WEBVTT - Netflix Crushes Subscriber Estimates: Reaction and Analysis

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio News.

0:00:07.040 --> 0:00:09.039
<v Speaker 2>This was a blowout number. I can feel like it

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 2>shocked all of us. First quarter streaming paid net change

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the subscribers up nine point three to

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:18.760
<v Speaker 2>three million. Timmy estimate was four point eight four million.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.400
<v Speaker 3>That's not the only beat. First quarter EPs coming at

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:23.639
<v Speaker 3>five dollars and twenty eight cents per share. Estimates were

0:00:23.680 --> 0:00:26.400
<v Speaker 3>for four dollars and fifty two cents. The company also

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.960
<v Speaker 3>out with second quarter EPs the guidance four sixty eight

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.240
<v Speaker 3>versus estimates of four to fifty four, and then another

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 3>big headline. We should note they're going to end reporting

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 3>quarterly membership numbers next year. We got a great group

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:39.920
<v Speaker 3>of folks with us right now to help us break

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:42.599
<v Speaker 3>down these numbers. Paul Sweeney is co host of Bloomberg Surveillance.

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:44.200
<v Speaker 3>He joins us on the phone from New Jersey. Paul

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 3>spent thirty years as a media analyst, also with US

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.760
<v Speaker 3>as Bloomberg News earnings reporter Red Brown. Hey, Paul, I

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 3>want to start with you, because I got to tell you,

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.760
<v Speaker 3>I'm pretty surprised by the reaction to these numbers, considering

0:00:54.800 --> 0:00:57.520
<v Speaker 3>they were it was such a blowout quarter Why do

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.640
<v Speaker 3>you think the stock is moving lower in the after hours.

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:02.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think it's a little bit by the rumor. Still,

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 4>the news people have been hyping up this quarter as

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 4>a really big quarter because you know, the paid subscription

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 4>was going to fuel subscriber growth. Yet again, you're that

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 4>a big beat on subs last quarter. Some the stock

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.959
<v Speaker 4>was up about twenty five percent since they reported in January,

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 4>so it's probably just taking back some of those games.

0:01:17.880 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 4>But you know, across the board, the subscriber numbers really

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:23.840
<v Speaker 4>really were impressive. One thing to note about that big

0:01:23.880 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 4>subscriber beat to the last couple of quarters. These are

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:29.400
<v Speaker 4>kind of short term phenomena, as you know, they the

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 4>people that were sharing accounts now are paying for their owns,

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 4>and that'll fade out over the next several quarters and

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:38.479
<v Speaker 4>then the focus will become, i think, on the advertising

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 4>side of the business as well.

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting. Do you care, Paul to hear that

0:01:42.840 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 2>they're going to end reporting quarterly membership numbers next year?

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:47.480
<v Speaker 2>It feels like it's something we focus on.

0:01:47.600 --> 0:01:50.680
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, it really is, and that quite frankly, that

0:01:50.720 --> 0:01:54.160
<v Speaker 4>had been the primary driver of this stock really since

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 4>it switched to this digital streaming format. That was the

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:00.600
<v Speaker 4>metric that moved this stock. The company really wants to

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 4>get away from that and get more towards Hey, guys,

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 4>just view us as you would any other company stock.

0:02:06.880 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 4>Look at revenue, look at cash flow, look at profitability,

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.320
<v Speaker 4>all those types of things, and let's focus less on

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.640
<v Speaker 4>subscriber growth because quite frankly, we pretty much got pretty

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:17.920
<v Speaker 4>much everybody that's out there, So it's really not so

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 4>much as a subscriber story. It's more how much money

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 4>can we make off each subscriber?

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 3>Paul one one more to you. And then I want

0:02:23.040 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 3>to bring in Red Brown, our earnings reporter, who's been

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 3>watching these numbers closely. Why would a company? Is there

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 3>any positive way to read into a company like Netflix?

0:02:31.760 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 3>No longer reporting this? I mean, no question, the more

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 3>data for investors the better. Is this a negative? This

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 3>is a negative sign?

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:38.640
<v Speaker 2>No?

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Oh yeah, I think I think for an investor in

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:45.359
<v Speaker 4>an analyst, you always want more information, particularly when it's

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 4>critical information in terms of what drives the growth of

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 4>the business. And it's obviously just it's subscribers and how

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 4>much revenue you dandergenerate off each subscriber. It's pretty simple.

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 4>So I need take one of those data points away.

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.360
<v Speaker 4>But we've seen other companies in other industries do that,

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 4>subscriber based industries. They try to get you away from

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 4>that number and get you back to where are Look

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 4>how they are managing the business, and what they're telling

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 4>you is we're not managing the business to maximize subscriber

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 4>with We're managing the business to maximize revenue and profit

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.399
<v Speaker 4>per user. That's our management focus and that's how we

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 4>look at it, and that's how we think you should

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:21.360
<v Speaker 4>look at it.

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 2>Red Brown, come on in on it. We talk earnings

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 2>with you all the time. You know, I'm watching Netflix

0:03:25.840 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 2>shares that have been bouncing around in the aftermarket, a

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 2>lot of moves right now. The stocks still lower down

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 2>about three and a half percent.

0:03:33.200 --> 0:03:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I think what might be explaining a

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit of the negative movement too, is we saw

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>them actually boost their full year outlook for operating margin.

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>They beat EPs in the first quarter. They their guidance

0:03:44.880 --> 0:03:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to the second quarter was ahead of estimates as well.

0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like there's a little bit of a

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>disconnect between the full year number. If you know, those

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 1>two pretty healthy beats are not translating to the full year,

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:59.280
<v Speaker 1>analysts investors might start to question maybe where in the

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 1>back half of the year is are things starting to

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:03.720
<v Speaker 1>slow down as well? So I think that might also

0:04:03.760 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>be factoring in here a little bit to the to

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the negative price movement we're seeing.

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Let's speak a little bit to what Paul was saying,

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's a good point that we talked

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 2>about it earlier. Just you know, this stock has been

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 2>on fire this year, and you know, it looks like

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the numbers are are pretty upbeat, but it has been

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:22.960
<v Speaker 2>such an outperformer this year, and I just do wonder

0:04:22.960 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 2>how much of that is at play as well.

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, if you look at what analysts are

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:29.680
<v Speaker 1>rating for the stock, that it's kind of topped out

0:04:29.720 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>at the analyst ratings point at this point. So you know,

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 1>even with these really impressive numbers, maybe the it's just

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.719
<v Speaker 1>kind of a hit hit its ceiling for the time being.

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Red, it's so interesting, you know, I was saying

0:04:42.560 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 3>as we were going into our Beyond the Bell our

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 3>coverage with TV as we you know, waited for these

0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Netflix earnings, I was saying, you know, this could really

0:04:50.560 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 3>set the tone for the quarter for a lot of

0:04:52.839 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 3>the consumer tech companies that are set to report in

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:58.359
<v Speaker 3>the coming weeks, and yet yet we get a blowout

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.880
<v Speaker 3>number pretty much across the board, and we see a

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 3>negative reaction like this, and I'm wondering how we can

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 3>extrapolate this beyond Netflix.

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a good question. I mean, people have been

0:05:07.480 --> 0:05:09.880
<v Speaker 1>really focused on earnings this quarter, and a lot of

0:05:09.960 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 1>analysts are saying, you know, focus on the numbers, don't

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:15.320
<v Speaker 1>buy unto the hype and has really big implications for

0:05:15.480 --> 0:05:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the stock market at general at the moment. So I

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know if people kind of are on edge and

0:05:21.800 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>looking for any excuse to sell at the moment. Yeah,

0:05:25.000 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>it could paint a pessimistic picture for the remainder of

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the quarter here, probably for us.

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 2>Paul Sweenie, come on back in here. I'm just thinking,

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:33.560
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're getting ready for the analyst calls, and

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:34.799
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there's going to be a fair amount

0:05:34.800 --> 0:05:37.359
<v Speaker 2>of questions, especially as you see the stock kind of

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:39.600
<v Speaker 2>bouncing around here. What's kind of the top one or

0:05:39.600 --> 0:05:41.520
<v Speaker 2>two questions that you would want to be putting up

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:42.480
<v Speaker 2>on that call.

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, one revenue and one cost question. The revenue side

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:50.119
<v Speaker 4>is talk to us about the advertising component how well

0:05:50.200 --> 0:05:53.240
<v Speaker 4>is that catching on with subscribers. How many subscribers are

0:05:53.320 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 4>going to the advertising tier and that's a big thing

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:58.200
<v Speaker 4>because that's gonna be one of the drivers going forward.

0:05:58.400 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 4>And then a second one on the call side is

0:06:00.279 --> 0:06:02.919
<v Speaker 4>where are we on our programming budget? You need to

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 4>spend more to drive more subscriber growth? Or or is

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 4>a company and a good level of spend because if

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 4>they are at a good level of spend, boy, the

0:06:10.400 --> 0:06:13.719
<v Speaker 4>profits just really start churning for this company and the

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:14.760
<v Speaker 4>free cash flow as well.

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 3>I do want to bring in some of the advertising

0:06:16.480 --> 0:06:19.240
<v Speaker 3>information that you mentioned, Paul in the letter. The company

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.720
<v Speaker 3>did come out and say that ADS membership grew sixty

0:06:21.720 --> 0:06:24.880
<v Speaker 3>five percent quarter on quarter after rising nearly seventy percent

0:06:24.920 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 3>sequentially in each of Q three twenty three and Q

0:06:27.880 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>four twenty three. They're also saying that over forty percent

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:33.360
<v Speaker 3>of all sign ups in our ads markets, remember it's

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 3>not fully rolled out, are coming from our ads plan

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.840
<v Speaker 3>for advertisers. The companies focusing on measurement solutions, including new

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 3>partnerships with Kantar and Lucid for brand awareness and recall,

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.480
<v Speaker 3>and then Nielsen Catalina solutions for sales lift Paul, I

0:06:47.520 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 3>don't have to tell you because you've been covering this

0:06:49.040 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 3>for years. How wild is it for us to talk

0:06:51.640 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 3>about Netflix and measurement because this is a company that

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.400
<v Speaker 3>for years was like, we don't care about ratings, We're

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 3>never going to share any numbers. We're never going to

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 3>do ads, never, never, never, And here they are talking

0:07:00.520 --> 0:07:03.880
<v Speaker 3>about yis Yeah, exactly, this is crazy.

0:07:04.560 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 4>It's a great point. They're going to have to start

0:07:07.279 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 4>the disclosing audience levels of some degree. But we already

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 4>know that the advertising video on demand model is a

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 4>very successful model. Advertisers are switching some linear TV broadcasting

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 4>cable to the more digital platforms, and they've been itching

0:07:22.600 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 4>to get to the streaming base of Netflix. So there

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 4>will be a lot of advertisers demand. And you know,

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 4>Netflix is going to have to provide the advertisers and

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 4>their agencies with some data the consistent they can just

0:07:35.040 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 4>get a sense of pricing and value.

0:07:37.240 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know.

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.080
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing is like I'm thinking about content, right,

0:07:40.160 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, original content versus licensing. And when we were

0:07:42.720 --> 0:07:44.680
<v Speaker 2>talking with Githa rang an ant On earlier, she said,

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of the upsides is that they are

0:07:47.440 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 2>you know, doing a lot of licensing deals.

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:49.480
<v Speaker 5>They had suits.

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:51.600
<v Speaker 2>They just did something with Sex and the City that's

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:53.720
<v Speaker 2>just coming out. I mean, when you think about it,

0:07:53.800 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 2>Paul as an analyst and somebody who understands the space,

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, cheaper to do a licensing deal versus creating

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 2>that original content.

0:08:01.160 --> 0:08:04.920
<v Speaker 4>It is generally speaking, it is much cheaper to license

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:07.480
<v Speaker 4>the show than to create it, particularly the shows that

0:08:07.600 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 4>they make, which are extraordinarily high quality, and they have

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.800
<v Speaker 4>very big budgets and other good and that's the that's

0:08:14.840 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 4>the investment part. The good is is it does drive

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.240
<v Speaker 4>subscriber growth. So I think most investors would say that's

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 4>a good investment to make in original programming. But you

0:08:23.080 --> 0:08:25.480
<v Speaker 4>got to find a balance here and so, and that's

0:08:25.440 --> 0:08:26.920
<v Speaker 4>the same. And that's true for the media companies. They

0:08:26.920 --> 0:08:29.680
<v Speaker 4>have to find a balance on what they licensed to

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 4>Netflix and what they keep on their own streaming services.

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 3>Red Let's say you had a chance to ask management

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:36.960
<v Speaker 3>a question today on the call that's coming up. What

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:37.720
<v Speaker 3>do you want to hear about.

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean we're talking about programming and what's going

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 1>to be driving growth in the future. I think there's

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>a big question around sports. Yeah, what what what level

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of investment are they planning on putting in that that area.

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>We know it's highly competitive, it's really crowded, it's very expensive.

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:53.920
<v Speaker 1>They are kind of stipping their toe in with some

0:08:53.960 --> 0:08:56.640
<v Speaker 1>of these combat sports. But yeah, it would be w

0:08:56.880 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>E WWE the Jake Paul and Mike Tyson fight later

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 1>this summer. We will want to hear kind of what

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is their strategy. They've been on the sidelines for a

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>while now, and you know, have they been able to

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>see the mess that sports streaming has been from, you know,

0:09:12.000 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>paying billions and millions of dollars? Do they have a

0:09:14.000 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>different strategy like they have in so many other cases

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in the market.

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder too, And I'm just looking at something

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 2>like a Walt Disney in the aftermarket, and obviously it's

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 2>not just about streaming. It's just down slightly down about

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 2>one tenth of one percent here, Warner Brothers, Discovery, same story.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Paul, is there anything that you kind of

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.040
<v Speaker 2>extrapolgalate when you look at something like a Netflix and

0:09:35.080 --> 0:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>then what it means for some of the other streaming

0:09:36.720 --> 0:09:37.839
<v Speaker 2>services that are out there.

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:41.320
<v Speaker 4>I think it's actually all net positive, which is it

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.920
<v Speaker 4>just shows you the strength of the streaming business model.

0:09:44.920 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 4>We now know when you look at Netflix's financials that

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 4>it can be extraordinarily profitable generate really high returns. So

0:09:52.440 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 4>now the question is who else can join Netflix with

0:09:55.800 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 4>those types of financial metrics Ken Disney do it, Warner Brothers, Discovery,

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Ken Powermount. That's kind of the question a lot of

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:06.680
<v Speaker 4>those investors are asking themselves, but they can be done

0:10:06.720 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 4>here if you look at Netflix.

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.479
<v Speaker 2>Listen, Paul Sweeney, thank you so much. We so appreciated

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 2>our own Paul Sweeney, who has covered the media industry

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 2>and did as a banker for many years, thirty years

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.480
<v Speaker 2>as a media analyst, so really great to get his insight.

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 2>We're going to continue with Red Brown. We're also going

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 2>to roll into it our Githa Ranganathan, who covers the

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 2>media space for our Bloomberg intelligence team. You know, getha

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>you called it on the subscriber number.

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.240
<v Speaker 3>She did, she really did. Can you remind everyone what

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 3>she told us a couple hours ago?

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 2>You said it was going to be a much higher number.

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.599
<v Speaker 2>It is a much higher number. Walk us through the

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:40.199
<v Speaker 2>quarter and why is it that?

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 5>Though?

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 2>First of all, are you I'm assuming you're watching the

0:10:43.200 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 2>stock in the aftermarket, it's down about two point six percent.

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:48.560
<v Speaker 2>It just has been bouncing around a lot. Walk us

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 2>through the quarter, maybe why you think, I mean, should

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:52.240
<v Speaker 2>investors be disappointed here?

0:10:53.600 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 6>So absolutely, right, Carol, it was a blowout quarter. I mean,

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 6>I think it came in much higher than expected. We

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 6>were kind of thinking maybe six seven million dollar seven

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 6>million subscriber ads net ads range. This was of course

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 6>way above that. But I think what is really kind

0:11:08.520 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 6>of causing a little bit of concern here is that

0:11:11.440 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 6>they are going to stop reporting subscriber metrics altogether, and

0:11:16.240 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 6>that I think is coming as a little bit of

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.640
<v Speaker 6>a disappointment. I mean, Netflix is out and out a

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:25.720
<v Speaker 6>subscriber story, or at least it always has been, and

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 6>so this is kind of going to require a complete

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 6>change in the mindset of investors, right. You know, this

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 6>is this was always such an easy model to follow.

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.200
<v Speaker 6>You know, you just multiply subscribers by the monthly price

0:11:37.240 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 6>that you pay, and you you, you know, you kind

0:11:39.040 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 6>of have your whole model. But now they're going to

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.600
<v Speaker 6>stop reporting subscriber numbers. They're going to stop reporting the

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 6>average revenue per user. So it's kind of going to

0:11:47.760 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 6>it's it's definitely becoming. It's I would say, it's gone

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.440
<v Speaker 6>from kind of high growth to now more you know, uh,

0:11:56.880 --> 0:12:00.480
<v Speaker 6>definitely a very profitable company. But obviously they do seem

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.520
<v Speaker 6>to be kind of signaling that subscriber growth that the

0:12:03.559 --> 0:12:05.160
<v Speaker 6>party is going to be over at some point.

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 3>Correct me if I'm wrong, getha. But did Netflix used

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 3>to report churn and then they stopped reporting churn and

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 3>that was a really big deal to investors when that happened.

0:12:15.640 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 6>That was a very very long time ago. Yes, they did,

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 6>they would, they would mention it, and yeah, they did

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 6>stop reporting it. But subscribers, again, this is the bread

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 6>and butter of this whole streaming business. So I think

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:31.080
<v Speaker 6>it's it's definitely going to require people are going to

0:12:31.080 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 6>take some time to kind of digest that.

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:35.480
<v Speaker 1>Getha. We've seen them, they have started to give us

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more viewership on information over the past

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>year or so. Do you think that that is part

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of or them kind of trying to signal that, you know,

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>ads are going to become a bigger part of our business,

0:12:46.880 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know how big of a part of their business.

0:12:49.400 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that will be in the next couple

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of years.

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, so right now, they haven't really given us any

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:58.400
<v Speaker 6>concrete metrics around advertising, I mean, other than the first

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 6>number that they gave us in January, which was roughly

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 6>about twenty five million active users. They did report something

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 6>today by saying, you know that they've seen like forty

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:08.840
<v Speaker 6>percent of their new signups are actually on the ad tyear,

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 6>but we don't actually have a concrete number.

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 5>That said.

0:13:12.360 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 6>I think what they're doing, they're they're they're still kind

0:13:14.800 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 6>of taking pretty a pretty measured approach, but there are

0:13:19.080 --> 0:13:22.400
<v Speaker 6>signals that they really are looking to get or to

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:24.880
<v Speaker 6>scale up their advertising business, and I think sports is

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 6>obviously a big way that they're going to do that.

0:13:27.520 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 6>You know, you obviously saw that the WWE deal. There

0:13:29.960 --> 0:13:31.560
<v Speaker 6>are a few more things that are out there on

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.920
<v Speaker 6>the horizon, obviously the NBA being a big one, and

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 6>if they if they make an aggressive bid for that,

0:13:37.160 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 6>then that really tells us how serious they are about advertising.

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 6>And I think potentially what they're what we're looking at

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 6>in terms of advertising dollars, if they get everything right.

0:13:45.200 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 6>It has been a little bit underwhelming so far, but

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 6>if they you know, if they're able to execute with

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 6>the sports and the other live events expected to be

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 6>at least ten to fifteen percent of their revenue by

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:01.120
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty five. So you know, you're looking at a

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.840
<v Speaker 6>forty forty five billion dollar business. I think you're going

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 6>to see four to five billion at least in advertising.

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 2>It is kind of interesting, you know, Githa, We all

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:10.800
<v Speaker 2>kind of kid. It's like, I only have so many

0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 2>hours to watch all this stuff, and so we're picking

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 2>and choosing, and it seems like there's so much out there.

0:14:14.840 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the company said in their letter to shareholders,

0:14:17.400 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 2>with more than two people per household on average, we

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 2>have an audience of over half a billion. And then

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.280
<v Speaker 2>they go on to say no entertainment companies ever programmed

0:14:25.280 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 2>at this scale and with this ambition before. But it

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>does feel like, you know, and listening to you talk about,

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, them not reporting their quarterly membership numbers in

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 2>the future, that they are conceding that there is just

0:14:38.280 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 2>a point that we're going to max out. We can

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:43.400
<v Speaker 2>just only sign up so many people. And that means

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 2>even on a global scale, right.

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 6>Yes, on a global scale. So back in the day,

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 6>you know, maybe even about three four years ago, they

0:14:50.800 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 6>would always talk about this one billion number as their

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 6>total addressable market about two years ago. That's when the

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 6>great Netflix reset and the Great Correction happened.

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 5>They kind of toned that down.

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 6>They said, you know, it's probably closer to about four

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 6>hundred five hundred million as the total addressable market looks

0:15:06.360 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 6>like it's you know, probably even slightly smaller than that.

0:15:09.240 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 6>You know, so they definitely are conceding that there is

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 6>an upper limit, There is a ceiling to kind of

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:17.200
<v Speaker 6>the growth here.

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:19.640
<v Speaker 2>But is there something like I always laugh about this

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 2>sometimes when we talk about some of these big tech names.

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 2>We used to talk about this a lot. By Apple,

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.520
<v Speaker 2>We'd be like, Oh, it's a disappointing number. Yet they

0:15:25.560 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 2>still sell a lot of stuff, And I understand it's

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 2>growth trends and trajectory. Can we still, though, can see

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.240
<v Speaker 2>that Netflix still is kind of the big behemoth in

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 2>this space.

0:15:34.600 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 5>They absolutely are.

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 6>They They have completely cemented their dominance when it comes

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 6>to this whole streaming wars. I mean, I think the

0:15:41.120 --> 0:15:44.320
<v Speaker 6>streaming wars are pretty much over. They are the winner,

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 6>there's no.

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 5>Doubt about that.

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 6>And now it's just about them kind of you know,

0:15:48.160 --> 0:15:52.320
<v Speaker 6>getting into different verticals, kind of becoming that you know

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 6>that one service they probably will you know, kind of

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 6>absorb absorb a lot of the other smaller streaming services,

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 6>I think just because they're licensing so much of content

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.640
<v Speaker 6>from them and they you know, it's just but at

0:16:04.640 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 6>this point, it's definitely going to become you know, how

0:16:06.880 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 6>much pricing power do they have? So right now we

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:11.400
<v Speaker 6>are at about fifteen and a half dollars for a

0:16:11.400 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 6>standard plan in the US. How much upside is there?

0:16:15.200 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 6>Can that go to twenty twenty five dollars? That is

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 6>kind of the big question.

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 3>So it's funny as you're saying this, I'm thinking to myself, Okay, well,

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 3>you know, twenty years ago, all we wanted was it

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 3>all the card options for TV, and we kind of

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 3>got that now. And I think a lot of us

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 3>are spending more on all a combination of all these

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 3>services given that you know, it's Paramount, it's Hulu, It's Max,

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 3>it's Disney Plus, it's Netflix, just to name a few.

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 3>I do wonder, Githa, where the growth is for Netflix

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:40.480
<v Speaker 3>at this point. Is it is it in the ad

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 3>supported model, is it outside of the United States? Where

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 3>where is that growth coming from? As the company matures?

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 3>Is it raising prices?

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's actually Jim, it's all of the above, and

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:53.840
<v Speaker 6>it's just you know, it's going to be a very

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 6>it's a very tough balancing act for them because they

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 6>don't want to do anything too quickly and too rashly,

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:01.440
<v Speaker 6>which is why when they were kind of implementing their

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 6>whole password sharing crackdown, they were very careful not to

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:07.159
<v Speaker 6>raise prices because you know, they didn't want to anger

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, existing customers. So again, it's going to be

0:17:10.800 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 6>it's going to be tricky. They're kind of walking a

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 6>tight trope here, but yeah, they are going to use

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 6>all the different levers that they have to kind of

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.919
<v Speaker 6>keep profitability, which is their main metric right now, profitability

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:23.920
<v Speaker 6>and margins kind of climbing up.

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Githa. Before the report and the analyst I was speaking

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of them made a big deal about

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the T Mobile partnership that they were working on. How

0:17:33.560 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>do you see that factoring into the future. Do you

0:17:35.840 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>think that that has been a successful program and do

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 1>you can you expect to see them maybe do some

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>some more types of those partnerships.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.240
<v Speaker 6>Absolutely, I think that is going to become a critical

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.359
<v Speaker 6>critical factor for Netflix if it really kind of wants

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 6>to grow its subscribers. So what they did with T

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 6>Mobile was kind of they're offering their ad supported plan,

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.679
<v Speaker 6>which is a seven dollars monthly plan to you know,

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 6>select T Mobile members for free, and they're going to

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.080
<v Speaker 6>do a lot more of that. The having a low

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 6>priced plan kind of really gives them a lot of

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:10.040
<v Speaker 6>flexibility because they can add subscribers. But then again, they're

0:18:10.040 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 6>not necessarily losing our poop because remember they're the greater

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 6>the subscribers they have, they can always kind of appeal

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:19.680
<v Speaker 6>to advertise the advertising community, so and kind of makeup

0:18:19.960 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 6>or offset for any of that ar foo differential from

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 6>from their advertising dollars. So I think that's going to definitely,

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 6>uh play a much bigger role, not just in the US,

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 6>but of course across the world as well. They're going

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 6>to have lots of those kinds of telecom partnerships.

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.560
<v Speaker 2>Keetha, what do we you know, kind of pull from

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 2>this when it means to like Disney Streaming and Warner

0:18:37.480 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 2>Brothers Discovery and some of the other services that are

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 2>out there.

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 6>So for all of those other services, I think subscriber

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.439
<v Speaker 6>growth is not the primary focus anymore.

0:18:46.480 --> 0:18:48.160
<v Speaker 5>It's kind of moved now.

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 6>Carol to profitability, where obviously, again Netflix leads the back.

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:57.520
<v Speaker 6>A lot of these other services have made good progress,

0:18:57.520 --> 0:18:59.439
<v Speaker 6>I would say really good progress when it comes to

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 6>at least they're not profitable yet, but they're you know,

0:19:03.240 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 6>moderating their losses. Disney obviously is the big one to

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 6>watch for there, and now they have the model in place.

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 6>You know, you've seen exactly what Netflix has accomplished. They

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.439
<v Speaker 6>all know exactly what they have to do. It's just

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 6>going to be a question of how well they do

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:17.440
<v Speaker 6>it and can they get there quick enough.

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 3>Githa, do you think there's any consumer confusion? I mean, okay,

0:19:20.840 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 3>I know the answer to this is yes, and I

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 3>just don't know how to solve it. The consumer confusion

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:26.840
<v Speaker 3>about where to watch something. Yeah, I mentioned Sex and

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:28.199
<v Speaker 3>the City and I was shocked to hear that that's

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:31.639
<v Speaker 3>on Netflix. It's an HBO show. Somebody in our simulcast

0:19:31.720 --> 0:19:33.600
<v Speaker 3>chat mentioned in the office, Well, I think that's now

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 3>on Peacock, but it was on Netflix. Friends, a former

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 3>NBC show or No Seinfeld is now on Netflix. I

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 3>believe it's confusing, is that right? I don't know, like

0:19:43.200 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 3>you know it is.

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 6>How Discovery is the biggest's not content anymore. It's really

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 6>just discovery is the biggest problem right now in the

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 6>whole of you know, the streaming space. And at the

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 6>end of the day, we're kind of looking for that

0:19:55.080 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 6>one or what we're waiting for is that one aggregator

0:20:00.160 --> 0:20:03.240
<v Speaker 6>or reaggregator that can kind of take all the shows

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:04.719
<v Speaker 6>that you really want to watch and do it.

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:06.040
<v Speaker 5>I don't know who it's going to be. Is it

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 5>going to be YouTube? Maybe it is.

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 6>It could be Amazon, it could be Apple, but but

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 6>we're all waiting for that. Again, I'm not sure when

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 6>exactly it's going to happen.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.520
<v Speaker 3>Roku doesn't Okay, Roku does a really good job of that,

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.040
<v Speaker 3>but you've got to have be signed into everything on

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 3>your Roku and plus that means you're only watching on TV.

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:23.800
<v Speaker 3>You're not watching it on the iPad or on like

0:20:23.840 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 3>your phone, and.

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 5>It's there's still is friction.

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:27.399
<v Speaker 3>Yeheah, there is still a lot of friction.

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 2>Final thought, Githa, I'm just thinking of our investor audience

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.639
<v Speaker 2>as we work through this. Netflix share is still down

0:20:33.640 --> 0:20:35.040
<v Speaker 2>about three and a quarter percent here.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, So I think the big question is really going

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 6>to be, you know, on the call of you know

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.840
<v Speaker 6>what how many subscribers do or how many you know

0:20:44.840 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 6>subscribers you think you've captured from the whole password sharing initiative.

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 6>I think the numbers that they're originally identified was one

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 6>hundred million households. I think people will definitely want to

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 6>know what percentage of that has already been kind of captured,

0:20:57.520 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 6>just given the strong subscriber metrics, and then they'll kind

0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 6>of try to figure out how much more runway is

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:03.000
<v Speaker 6>left Rockstar.

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.200
<v Speaker 2>As always, Githa Ringing Athen thank you so much. Tech

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 2>and media analyst a Bloomberg Intelligence Red Brown, final thoughts

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 2>for you just twenty seconds here. I mean stocks down

0:21:09.600 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 2>in the aftermarket, but we'll see what happens tomorrow.

0:21:11.680 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we'll see what happens tomorrow. And for the remainder

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 1>of the year. I think, you know, they put up

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 1>strong financials and that could easily bounce back. You know,

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.360
<v Speaker 1>this quick reaction, but the investors love the short term.

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 3>It depends on what they say.

0:21:22.760 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 2>On the call exactly, and it'll be interesting to do

0:21:25.240 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 2>if some investors may say, well, wait, it's a little

0:21:27.080 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 2>bit cheaper than it was and I want the exposure.

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:32.720
<v Speaker 2>Red Brown, thank you so Also a rock Star, Yes, yes,

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 2>rock Crease here right now.

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we had a great group.