WEBVTT - Your Next Surgeon Might Be a Robot

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by Toyota. Let's go places. Welcome to

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Forward Thinking. Hey there, everyone, and welcome to Forward Thinking,

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the podcast that looks at the future and says, doctor, doctor,

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>give me the news. I'm Jonathan Strickland, I'm Lauren, and

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe McCormick. So, um, I heard you guys had

0:00:24.239 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 1>a movie scene that you wanted to talk about. But

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a movie. It's a movie I have not actually watched,

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:31.480
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know what you're talking about here. You're

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to tell everybody what you Jonathan. It's an

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>R rated film. That's why I wasn't able to get in.

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.720
<v Speaker 1>You're not allowed to go to those. It was the

0:00:40.720 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 1>movie Prometheus, which I, like a lot of people had

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>some questions about. It involved a lot of really shady

0:00:49.240 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>plot lining. I hear. It was a beautiful film. Oh,

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:55.840
<v Speaker 1>it was very pretty, and its vision of the relatively

0:00:55.880 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 1>near feature was really interesting in a number of ways,

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>some of which um are terrible and some of which

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 1>are are genuinely fascinating. There was one scene in particular

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>that I thought might be kind of relevant to this show,

0:01:09.120 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 1>and that scene is a horrifying, uh kind of body

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 1>violation scene featuring a dramatic surgery performed uh spur of

0:01:18.760 --> 0:01:22.039
<v Speaker 1>the moment, kind of entirely by a robot, right, not

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>by a human at all. It's automated, so one of

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>the surgery pod things I've heard about, right, right. Yeah,

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the character hops into a big glass coffin and then

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:34.840
<v Speaker 1>some knives pop out and start doing their thing. So

0:01:35.040 --> 0:01:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess this leads us into a discussion about robotic

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:42.280
<v Speaker 1>surgery and how that's uh, that's a real thing, but

0:01:42.720 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a real horror show thing like what you

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>have just briefly described, right, No one would hope that

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>in real life robotic surgery is not quite so scary

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and is in fact a good thing. Um though, I

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>guess we can debate that as it comes up. Sure, now,

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>this is not a new idea. It's not that robotic

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>surgery has debuted in the last year or two. It's

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>actually been around for a while. In fact, the first

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:10.080
<v Speaker 1>documented case I could find was a case back in

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>five and it was using a surgical arm called the

0:02:14.040 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Puma five sixty uh, used during a neurological biopsy. Now

0:02:18.560 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 1>this particular, in this particular case, the robot, as I

0:02:21.800 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>understand it was not performing the surgery, but was being

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:29.360
<v Speaker 1>used in conjunction with this biopsy. UH. As the years

0:02:29.360 --> 0:02:31.679
<v Speaker 1>went on, you started to see more and more use

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 1>of robots because people were like engineers and doctors were

0:02:35.840 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>saying there was a lot of potential there. Other doctors

0:02:38.440 --> 0:02:42.480
<v Speaker 1>were very hesitant because we're talking about very delicate procedures.

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>This is in many cases a life or death situation,

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>and you don't want to take any liberties with that

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:51.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing obviously, UM. But over the next couple

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:54.399
<v Speaker 1>of years they started using them in other procedures robotic arms.

0:02:54.400 --> 0:02:58.240
<v Speaker 1>That is, for laparoscopic procedures, for example, which usually means

0:02:58.280 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>there's some uh your sing a flexible optic camera as

0:03:02.200 --> 0:03:05.920
<v Speaker 1>well for minimally invasive surgery in order to UM to

0:03:06.360 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to handle things inside the body without having

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>to make a huge open cut, right and uh, laparoscopic

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>procedures can be performed by hand. Sure, I want to

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:19.240
<v Speaker 1>make clear that's not something that's necessarily unique to robots.

0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:21.480
<v Speaker 1>So there are a lot of surgeons who have trained

0:03:21.480 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in this art of trying to make small incisions in

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the body and stick in their instruments and sort of

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>do what they need to do in there without making

0:03:30.000 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>big open cuts. But of course there are limitations to

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>what you can do by hand in that sense, and

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about that more in a minuture. And

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 1>then we had other robots, and clearly one called robo Doc,

0:03:40.480 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>which is probably my favorite name, UH was the first

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>robot approved by the f d A, and they also

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:53.000
<v Speaker 1>approved the STOP robotic system for endoscopic surgeries back in UH.

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>These the SAP led into another development. There was another

0:03:56.480 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>robot called Zeus, which followed a SUP and after use UH,

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>the work that went into ESOP and Zeus later informed

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:07.680
<v Speaker 1>engineers who built the Da Vinci systems, which are probably

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the best known robotic surgery tools out there right now.

0:04:12.120 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 1>They're the ones that if you read a story about

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:17.120
<v Speaker 1>robotic surgery nine times off ten, it's a Da Vinci

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>system that we're talking about. Sure, they were finally approved

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>for FDA use in the year two thousand and UH.

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>We've even seen some transcontinental surgeries performed using robots because

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the other things we'll talk about is that

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 1>using a robot assistant essentially or a robot, you know,

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:37.520
<v Speaker 1>think of the robot as a replacement for the surgeon's

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:41.120
<v Speaker 1>actual hands means that the surgeon could potentially perform that

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>surgery while not even being present within the room. They

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 1>could be and that, like in this case, on the

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>other side of a continent. So that's kind of exciting. Um,

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:53.840
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna talk about all of that, but we

0:04:53.880 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>should also mention that it's not this using robots and

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>surgeries not something that was immediately embraced, and still to

0:05:01.560 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>this day, it is a controversial subject. It's one of

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>those that has there are a lot of both advantages

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and disadvantages, and you have to weigh them very heavily

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:13.280
<v Speaker 1>before you can say outright is it a good or

0:05:13.320 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>bad thing? Especially you know, it may be particular case

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.360
<v Speaker 1>to case basis. But a two thousand four report in

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>the Annals of Surgery urged caution and skepticism about robotic surgery,

0:05:22.800 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>saying that this is a direct quote, robotic surgery is

0:05:26.640 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a new and exciting emerging technology that's taking the surgical

0:05:30.160 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>profession by storm. Up to this point, however, the race

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>to acquire and incorporate this emerging technology has primarily been

0:05:37.200 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>driven by the market. In addition, surgical robots have become

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the entry fee for centers wanting to be known for

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:47.039
<v Speaker 1>excellence and mentally invasive surgery despite the current lack of

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.920
<v Speaker 1>practical applications. Therefore, robotic devices seem to have more of

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a marketing role than a practical role. Whether or not

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>robotic devices will grow into a more practical role remains

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to be seen. Uh And in fact, the report went

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>on to suggect us that it's possible that by the

0:06:02.240 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 1>time robot surgery would be practical enough for it to

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>be universally adopted, something better would come along, which is,

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, another thing to consider. Yeah, well, one thing

0:06:13.560 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>this brings up. The first thing I would say to

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.599
<v Speaker 1>note is that that was from two thousand four and

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.000
<v Speaker 1>things have come a long way since then. But the

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 1>other thing to note, I think is that it's pretty

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:27.919
<v Speaker 1>much inarguable that in the future robotic surgery will offer

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.839
<v Speaker 1>big benefits. So the big questions are does it currently

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 1>offer big benefits now? And I think that's where most

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of the controversy lies. Well. And like I said, there

0:06:38.080 --> 0:06:42.359
<v Speaker 1>is also that possibility that by the time robotic surgery

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:46.600
<v Speaker 1>can demonstrably show that it is beneficial, that something else

0:06:46.720 --> 0:06:49.719
<v Speaker 1>comes along by that point. But I expect that they're

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.599
<v Speaker 1>going to be at least a few surgical procedures that

0:06:53.680 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 1>will still benefit from robotic surgery even if something else

0:06:56.640 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>comes along. I can't see, and granted this might be

0:07:00.560 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>uh short sightedness on my part, but I can't see

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:07.599
<v Speaker 1>some magical techniques sweep in and revolutionized surgery across the

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>board to the point where the robotic surgery progress we

0:07:11.160 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>see right now ends up being futile. Well, nanobots, rot

0:07:17.120 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>healing fog um. Well, that brings up a good point, actually,

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>which is something that I want to clarify before we

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>move on. We keep saying robotic surgery, and that's often

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:29.840
<v Speaker 1>the term people use when they're talking about these existing systems.

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.600
<v Speaker 1>But if you have in mind the definition of a robot,

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>one thing that should be pretty central to that is autonomy,

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:41.240
<v Speaker 1>something that that's often the case. Yeah, I think I

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>think for a lot of us, when we hear the

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.960
<v Speaker 1>word robot, we think of some form of autonomous being

0:07:46.600 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>that is capable of of following instructions from a human

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 1>but is able to do so on its own. It

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to necessarily have human oversight or control every

0:07:57.120 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>step of the way. Now that's not the case with

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>all robot but it's the ones like like when we

0:08:01.440 --> 0:08:04.679
<v Speaker 1>think of manufacturing robots, they're automated, right, It's not someone

0:08:04.760 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>who's actually moving levers so that a giant arm is

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 1>going to to weld a card door onto a frame.

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:13.440
<v Speaker 1>That's not how that works. It's all automated. That's not

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 1>necessarily a case with surgery. With surgery, what we're generally

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:20.680
<v Speaker 1>talking about is what should probably be called robot assisted surgery,

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>at least for today, meaning that what happens when you

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>go in for robot surgery is a surgeon sits down,

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>a human surgeon sits down at a terminal and controls

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.679
<v Speaker 1>a device that cuts you and does all kinds of

0:08:34.720 --> 0:08:39.840
<v Speaker 1>wonderful things inside your body. That was such a magical description.

0:08:40.559 --> 0:08:44.679
<v Speaker 1>Uh yeah, So usually you have a combination of things.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you you you really do need a combination

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:48.599
<v Speaker 1>of things, including you have to have some sort of

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:53.079
<v Speaker 1>camera view inside the patient, usually so you have a

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:56.320
<v Speaker 1>monitor that gives you a view of what you're doing.

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:00.680
<v Speaker 1>From what I understand, using these monitors is incredible challenging

0:09:00.800 --> 0:09:03.320
<v Speaker 1>for people, and the reason for that is that one

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:07.560
<v Speaker 1>your your actions maybe in reverse to what you're seeing

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:10.160
<v Speaker 1>on the monitor. Right, It's not like a mirror where

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>if you move right, the instrument moves right. Uh, if

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.319
<v Speaker 1>you're doing this by hand. So let's say that you

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.680
<v Speaker 1>have your you're using tools that are inside the patient.

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>There's a camera inside the patient, you're watching a monitor,

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and you are moving based upon what you see there.

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 1>So if you move the instrument right, you may see

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:31.599
<v Speaker 1>in the monitor that the instruments moving left, So that

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>could be very confusing. It can be difficult to coordinate

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 1>your hand eye coordination so that you don't cause any problems.

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.920
<v Speaker 1>It requires practice, like anyone who's had to change the

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>button configuration on on their Xbox. It's like that, but

0:09:44.000 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 1>times a million, and with a person. So and then

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.319
<v Speaker 1>you also have the issues of you might not have

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:51.959
<v Speaker 1>the right kind of haptic feedback while you're working within

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the patients, so it's harder for you to judge if

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>you are cutting into healthy tissue, or if you're cutting

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.240
<v Speaker 1>into anything at all, or especially if you don't want

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to be cutting into something. Um There's also the challenge

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of the fact that you're working within a three dimensional

0:10:06.600 --> 0:10:09.400
<v Speaker 1>environment a patient's body, and you're looking at it on

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a two dimensional screen. These are all challenges that we

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:14.760
<v Speaker 1>humans have to overcome in order to be able to

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>do this successfully. And and of course there are some

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.559
<v Speaker 1>surgeons out there who are really really good at it.

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>But the idea was that maybe with robots and UH

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and offloading some of that control over to an automated system.

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Will not maybe automated, but a robotic system could minimize

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:35.040
<v Speaker 1>some of those challenges or at least make them easier

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to overcome. Certainly, and some some code developing technologies are

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>making this easier. For for example, we have the ability

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to put stereoscopic cameras inside patients these days and create

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and on the spot three D model of what's going on.

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>So so that kind of thing can can vastly improve

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the experience of the doctor and the patient who are

0:10:54.400 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>going through this kind of surgery. Another thing that's developing

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>is the idea of the force feedback. Yeah, you can

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:04.120
<v Speaker 1>um with these robotic systems. The controls you have in

0:11:04.160 --> 0:11:07.120
<v Speaker 1>your hand have the potential to give you resistance so

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that you feel as if you're actually cutting right. So

0:11:10.880 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you and you can also up from some of these

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>systems having barriers so that once you reach a certain level,

0:11:18.160 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>like if you have if you have designated certain tissue

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:26.079
<v Speaker 1>as being healthy, and your your robotic UH instrument is

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:28.080
<v Speaker 1>getting closer and closer to cutting into that you start

0:11:28.280 --> 0:11:30.920
<v Speaker 1>encountering more resistance, which essentially tells you to back off

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>until the point at which I mean, like some some

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of these robots will actually stop if they hit one

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of these barriers that you have defined to make sure

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that they will not cut open something that they're not

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.319
<v Speaker 1>supposed to, right, So in this case, you know, it's

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it requires that you have to define these areas. It's

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>not that the robot automatically necessarily knows uh that something

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>is healthy tissue versus not healthy. Although we're seeing some

0:11:53.280 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>other technologies come out that are pretty cool that could

0:11:56.360 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>aid in that where if you were to pair those

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 1>technologies with the robotic systems, we could eventually get to

0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>a point where we have robotic tools that can on

0:12:06.480 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the fly determine whether or not the tissue you're working

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>with is healthier diseased. Are you talking about the vaporizing

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I knife. Absolutely, that's a cool thing, different technology, not robotic,

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but very cool for surgery. The ideas you're cutting on um,

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>say you're trying to exercise a tumor. This is a

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:27.679
<v Speaker 1>knife that. Uh, it burns the tissue as it's cutting

0:12:27.720 --> 0:12:30.599
<v Speaker 1>it and then sniffs the smoke to tell if the

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>place you're cutting is cancer us or not. And that

0:12:33.400 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 1>allows you to know almost instantly where the margins should be,

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>so you could understand, I mean you could you could

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.199
<v Speaker 1>easily imagine a robotic system that incorporates some sort of

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 1>technology similar to that and being able to aid a

0:12:47.600 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>doctor even if you're not able to ahead of time

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>determine exactly what zones are good zones versus bad zones.

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>So um, Yeah, we're talking a lot about what we'll

0:12:57.920 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>talk mostly about the Da Vinci line think because again

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.959
<v Speaker 1>that's probably the most popular I would imagine. UM. It's

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>it's built. Like I said, upon the success of previous

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:11.839
<v Speaker 1>UH projects like ESOP and Zeus, Um, it's one that

0:13:12.440 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>you can, you know, if you hear about robotic surgery, UH,

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>it tends to be the systems that pops up. I

0:13:19.400 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>mean occasionally you might run into some of the older ones,

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 1>but this is the one that I think is considered

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the state of the art these days. Yeah, I was wondering, well,

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>what kind of procedures are done with robot assisted surgeries

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 1>these days? I think a big one is prostate surgery. Yeah,

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.959
<v Speaker 1>that's that's the one. A lot of the studies have

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.480
<v Speaker 1>been around prostate surgeries in particular. In fact, I've read

0:13:40.760 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>several statements that it's basically becoming the norm in prostate surgery,

0:13:44.920 --> 0:13:47.760
<v Speaker 1>like these days, you're just likely to get a robot

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 1>assistant procedure if you go in for a prostate act

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:52.079
<v Speaker 1>to me, yeah, this is this is one of those

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 1>deals where uh, it's it's been shown to be an

0:13:56.280 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>effective means of of performing surgery. Uh. In fact, we'll

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit later about a study that specifically

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 1>looked at cases of people who underwent prostate surgery and

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>had a you know, the ones that had robotic assisted

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.559
<v Speaker 1>prostate surgery versus the ones that we're going to just

0:14:13.760 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>strictly human surgeons. And it's an interesting result, actually very

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>promising for the future of robotic surgery in general. But

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>beyond that, I've also seen that it's being used for

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>things like coronary uttery bypasses, gall bladder removal, hip replacement,

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>kidney removal or or transplants, hysterectomys, and more, although not

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>necessarily with the same success rate as prostate surgery. Right,

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>there are questions about all these, but I think before

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.360
<v Speaker 1>that we should talk about what at least are the

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 1>proposed advantages that a robotic system could provide over a

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:54.680
<v Speaker 1>standard open surgery or a handheld laper scopic surgery. Well,

0:14:54.720 --> 0:14:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it's finally tuned as surgeons hands are. As you were

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>saying before, think Joe, robots can can operate at a

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 1>much smaller and more delicate level than than even the

0:15:07.680 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>very best human surgeon. So you therefore have the opportunity

0:15:10.760 --> 0:15:14.720
<v Speaker 1>to make your surgeries minimally invasive. And that just basically

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>means having smaller incisions, um you know, in some cases

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:21.400
<v Speaker 1>for heart surgeries, not having to crack the breastbone, which

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is a terrific boon as you can imagine. Right. Well,

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:28.120
<v Speaker 1>there are actually two aspects to that. One, I guess

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>is the whole minimally invasive approach, and the other is

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 1>just the scaling down of movement in general, which no

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>matter what situation you're in, it does give you an

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.120
<v Speaker 1>advantage as a surgeon. To imagine, say you want to

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>move your hand one centimeter, but that translates to I

0:15:46.040 --> 0:15:48.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know much smaller measure of the actual tool moving

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe one millimeter. Oh sure, yeah, you can. You can design.

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>In fact, these these robots systems are designed so that

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>they can translate human movements into much smaller like like

0:15:58.920 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a scales it down so much that you can

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>make very very precise movements that would be difficult for

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>even the most skilled surgeons. Going on with that minimally

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>invasive there are a lot of benefits to that, right,

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean apart from just the fact that you already

0:16:13.400 --> 0:16:15.280
<v Speaker 1>mentioned one with heart surgery, I mean, not having to

0:16:15.320 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>crack the breastbone is huge. Uh. The fact that any

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>time you're going to have minimally invasive, if that's the

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.160
<v Speaker 1>way it goes, you're gonna have smaller incisions, so you

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 1>heal faster. There's a much lower risk of infection. Uh,

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>it tends to be people people have reported having better

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 1>quality of life after that kind of surgery. It's less

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:35.840
<v Speaker 1>trauma to the body, and that overall, especially in the

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.520
<v Speaker 1>case of someone who needs surgery for anything, is probably

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be uh pretty important. Right. And again, like

0:16:41.800 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 1>we said, minimally invasive doesn't necessarily mean that it was

0:16:45.520 --> 0:16:48.920
<v Speaker 1>robotic surgery. A human can do these uh sort of

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 1>procedures too. But robots can do them and a degree

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that we just can't write. The idea is that you

0:16:54.960 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>can go further and further down that rabbit hole of

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of being minimally invasive, even to the point of perhaps

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>just having single incision surgeries. I saw a cool uh

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.159
<v Speaker 1>TED talk with a person named Katherine Moore, and she

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>was talking about a prototype of a surgical robot that

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:15.000
<v Speaker 1>would be a single incision surgical robot. So it just

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:20.199
<v Speaker 1>it inserts, say just a single tube into the patient

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>through a single incision, and out of that tube comes

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>your camera and several telescoping surgical instruments, so you don't

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>even have to come in from multiple directions. That would

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>be pretty incredible. Yeah, So the benefits there are pretty

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty easy to understand. The idea that you heal faster,

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>that you have much lower risk of infection. I mean,

0:17:40.520 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that's that's huge important news. The precision is also really

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.879
<v Speaker 1>important because again, you can end up having a surgical

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:53.000
<v Speaker 1>procedure where you get the specific UH outcome that you

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>desire with as few side effects as possible, right right.

0:17:58.119 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>And you can also with the precision factor in things

0:18:01.359 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>like a robotic control system for your hands. So imagine that. Well,

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to imagine. You probably know from experience

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.560
<v Speaker 1>that human hands are not perfectly steady. You know, even

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>somebody with the surgeon's hands might have slight tremors in

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.159
<v Speaker 1>their movement, especially after you've been doing a surgery for

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>some seven or eight hours. In these procedures are not

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:29.359
<v Speaker 1>necessarily quick, right, So, uh, what if you have a

0:18:29.520 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>machine that is able to detect unintended tremmors in your

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>movement and filter those out? Well, in fact, that's something

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.399
<v Speaker 1>that Da Vinci claims to do with their systems. So

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in other words, uh, the movements that the surgeon makes

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:44.439
<v Speaker 1>consciously are the only ones that get translated into actual

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:48.840
<v Speaker 1>surgical procedures. Anything that was an unconscious movement is filtered out,

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and thus you don't end up negatively impacting the patient. Right. Um, So,

0:18:54.720 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>there have been a lot of questions about whether robot

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 1>assisted surgery offers any like measurable bowl net benefit to

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the patient today. Right, Because, as it turns out, one

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>of the things we'll talk more about a little bit later,

0:19:07.119 --> 0:19:11.959
<v Speaker 1>these systems are really really expensive. So to justify the expense,

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you have to say, well, what's the actual benefit is there?

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:17.240
<v Speaker 1>A benefit. Well, we mentioned prostate cancer that that robotic

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:19.880
<v Speaker 1>surgery is kind of the norm for prostate cancer these days.

0:19:19.880 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's the only one that's been proven

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>by scientific study to to have an advantage. I don't

0:19:25.840 --> 0:19:27.320
<v Speaker 1>know if it's the only one, that's the only one

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:30.679
<v Speaker 1>I've seen. Okay, well, well, to to be fair, robotic

0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.680
<v Speaker 1>surgery is still even though it started back in it's

0:19:33.680 --> 0:19:37.680
<v Speaker 1>still relatively young, and it's hard to do, uh, studies

0:19:38.040 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>to show continued success because you don't have a lot

0:19:41.880 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 1>of you don't have a very large pool of patients

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.879
<v Speaker 1>to look at. It's a relatively small sample size, right,

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and very few of them have had robotic surgery long

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>enough ago for you to say, look, you know, and

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>at five years the success rate was blah blah blah,

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:58.680
<v Speaker 1>ten years. You know, we don't have enough of a

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 1>size there. But we have had some studies, right. Uh.

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>The one I wanted to talk about that you just mentioned, Lauren,

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.520
<v Speaker 1>was the one about prostate surgery. It was a U c.

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 1>L A study. It was published in February in the

0:20:10.160 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 1>journal European Urology, and it found that prostate cancer surgeries

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 1>performed by robotically assisted surgeons as opposed to the traditional

0:20:17.760 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>open procedures have a superior success rate, like measurably. Uh.

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>They measured the cancer margins in excised tissue from these

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 1>removed prostates, and the robotic surgery was quote associated with

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>five percent fewer positive margins. So that was thirteen point

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>six percent versus eighteen point three percent. And in a

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.920
<v Speaker 1>cancer surgery, you don't want positive margins, you want the

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>thing removed. Positive margins means that there was cancer at

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the edge of the thing they took out, which suggests

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:52.439
<v Speaker 1>that there could still be cancer cells left within the patient, right. Uh.

0:20:52.560 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And so what's more, the patients who had the robotic

0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:59.400
<v Speaker 1>surgery in these uh in this study had a one

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:03.479
<v Speaker 1>third reduction in the likelihood of needing to get another

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>therapy for their cancer within the next two years. That's

0:21:06.880 --> 0:21:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and that you know, for cancer patients, that's a that's

0:21:09.840 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 1>huge news too. I mean, obviously, managing cancer is is

0:21:13.440 --> 0:21:17.639
<v Speaker 1>a life altering experience, and uh so any patient who

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:21.600
<v Speaker 1>would have that kind of um benefit, I mean, it's

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:23.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of hard to I don't know that you can

0:21:23.720 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>overstate how beneficial it is. So another potential advantage we

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>talked about briefly, or a little bit earlier, was the

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:35.680
<v Speaker 1>ability to perform surgery. A doctor could perform surgery even

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>if that doctor is nowhere near the patient using robotics,

0:21:39.520 --> 0:21:43.680
<v Speaker 1>using a telesurgery, right, the idea of telepresence, where the

0:21:43.880 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 1>doctor's presence is pretty much taken up by this this

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.479
<v Speaker 1>robot that's following the doctor's commands, right, And that can

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>be terrific for many different situations. If you've got an

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>expert in a certain kind of surgery, um, but he

0:21:55.560 --> 0:21:58.439
<v Speaker 1>or she cannot be in the physical location or cannot

0:21:58.480 --> 0:22:03.160
<v Speaker 1>be there quickly enough to perform surgery, then uh yeah, yeah.

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>This is one of those things I often hear about

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:08.240
<v Speaker 1>for cases where you have people, like say in a

0:22:08.400 --> 0:22:12.520
<v Speaker 1>scientific research center in a really remote location like I

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Antarctica, and you may or may not have

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>someone at that center who has the training and ability

0:22:19.560 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to perform particular medical procedures. But if you had one

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of these robots and the ability to connect with someone

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 1>who does have that expertise, you could still have that performed.

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you might be in a place and you know,

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.159
<v Speaker 1>Antarctica obviously is an extreme example, but it's also but

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it's also one that's realistic because there are scientific research

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 1>centers in Antarctica and it's not easy to get people

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in and out of them. Right. Well, you can't always

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>predict when you're going to need a complicated surgery. I mean,

0:22:45.440 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 1>what if you're down there and suddenly you need an

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>appendeck to me and if that has to happen fast

0:22:51.040 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and if you don't, you know, if you don't have

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:56.199
<v Speaker 1>the means of getting someone to come and grab them

0:22:56.280 --> 0:22:58.600
<v Speaker 1>by air and lift them out, and if you know

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:02.120
<v Speaker 1>that's just not an option, then you really are limited.

0:23:02.359 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>So these are there are definitely cases in extreme circumstances

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:09.879
<v Speaker 1>where this would be really really useful. Right And though

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 1>we have seen that tested before, telesurgery is more thought of,

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I think as a potential future benefit than as a

0:23:17.080 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>really current benefit. Yeah, there's some big challenges there too.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:24.159
<v Speaker 1>As of right now, the latency issue. Even though we

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.840
<v Speaker 1>are getting faster and faster computers and internet connections, um,

0:23:28.000 --> 0:23:30.800
<v Speaker 1>it's still not quite quickly enough that I would personally

0:23:30.960 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>want someone um performing robotic surgery from across the country

0:23:34.680 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and certainly not from like Antarctica. Right, So latency just

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>in case you guys don't know. That's essentially the delay

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:42.679
<v Speaker 1>between when you take an action and when that action

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 1>is carried out by whatever electronic device you're using, right,

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And so it's really frustrating when you're like playing a

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>shooter game online. It could be deadly if you're like

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>cutting somebody exactly. Yeah, So it's one of those things

0:23:55.560 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>that we have to get better and better at at

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>delivering high speed uh access. And that's we're starting to

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>see that happen. But yeah, like you said, Lauren, it's

0:24:05.400 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it's one of those things that is kind of delaying

0:24:07.600 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>tellusurgery from being a common practice in the present. Though.

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>One interesting way around that could be the development of

0:24:15.640 --> 0:24:20.160
<v Speaker 1>more autonomy in the surgical robots themselves, where you've got

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>robots that are well trained enough that they can do

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the precision activity on their own with merely kind of

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a supervising human surgeon on the other end, who doesn't

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:35.440
<v Speaker 1>have to do each individual cut with his or her hand. Well,

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk more about autonomy and the challenges there too. Uh.

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 1>And then we have one other benefit here that I

0:24:40.680 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>see the idea that a robots can take our jobs. Yeah, no,

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>that's a great thing. Um no, No, honestly it is.

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, surgery requires multiple staff members to be on hand.

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sometimes working, as I said before, for very long

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>hours under really high degrees of concentration, which can lead

0:24:56.320 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of fatigue and honestly medical problems for

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>those surgical staffers themselves. UM. Automation could could really allow

0:25:05.160 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>for needing you know, fewer surgeons and nurses on hand,

0:25:08.359 --> 0:25:12.560
<v Speaker 1>thus thus reducing their workload and reducing their personal fatigue. Um.

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>And could also increase the number of surgeons capable of

0:25:17.359 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>performing certain complex surgeries. Um. It could it could overall

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>potentially reduce the cost of surgeries due to you know,

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>needing fewer staffs that staff members on hand. Um. But hey,

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about that wacky cost thing, because that's kind

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of a big issue. Well, I was going to say,

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>because I agree that that is a potential benefit for

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the future, but as of now, these kinds of systems

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 1>are more labor intensive and cost more. Um. So yes,

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's it's no secret that robotic surgery is mega expensive,

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.840
<v Speaker 1>so of course you know they're going to negotiate prices.

0:25:54.920 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>But to get a ballpark idea, there was a two

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.600
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight New York Times article that reported DaVinci systems

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>we're selling for an average of one point three million

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a piece up front, that was And so you take

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that and then you add on hundreds of thousands more

0:26:09.640 --> 0:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>dollars in service upgrades and components that you have to

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:16.159
<v Speaker 1>replace after every surgery or at least very frequent right.

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 1>But but but they've got to be cheaper now, right,

0:26:18.359 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so today they have to be cheaper, right. Yeah.

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>A piece that was published from the Wall Street Journal

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.040
<v Speaker 1>just today. We are recording this, by the way, on

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 1>April first, so hopefully this is not an April Fools joke.

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:35.920
<v Speaker 1>But but yeah, they reported that the current range for

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>da Vinci systems is some one point eight five million

0:26:38.800 --> 0:26:42.399
<v Speaker 1>dollars to two point three million dollars. I don't know

0:26:42.520 --> 0:26:45.240
<v Speaker 1>if those numbers may include some of those other extra

0:26:45.359 --> 0:26:48.080
<v Speaker 1>costs I was talking about rolled in. That's the possibility.

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I I it did not give me specific details it down.

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.479
<v Speaker 1>But so robotic procedures in general are more costly than

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>traditional surgeries. Just one example, there's a study published in

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>jama in uh and it tried to compare costs for

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.159
<v Speaker 1>US one specific procedure. So it was just looking at

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>robotically assisted hysterectomys versus laparoscopic hysterectomies that traditionally you know,

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:17.080
<v Speaker 1>laparoscopic done by hand among women with benign gynecologic disease.

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 1>That was the title. Uh. And the study found that

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>the robotically assisted surgeries and the laparoscopic history ectomies had

0:27:23.960 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 1>similar morbidity rates, but the robots were more costly. So

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the outcomes were comparable, but the robot procedures were just

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 1>more expensive. On average, the total costs of a robotically

0:27:35.680 --> 0:27:39.639
<v Speaker 1>assisted procedure were two thousand, one and eighty nine dollars

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:43.840
<v Speaker 1>more than for a laparoscopic procedure. Right, So we're starting

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>to see kind of those those criticisms that were brought

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>up in that two thousand four report are still, at

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>least in some cases, uh, possibly valid. I mean, the

0:27:54.000 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>idea that a robotic assisted procedure may come across as

0:27:58.119 --> 0:28:00.680
<v Speaker 1>more of a marketing tool than a practical will in

0:28:00.800 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>the in the current state of the way the technology

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>fairs right now. Right, there's this idea among some surgeons

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that there's this possible illusion of advantage caused by the

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:16.120
<v Speaker 1>dazzling technology of a robotic surgeon. Um. So, some surgeons

0:28:16.160 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 1>have alleged that patients seem to want robotic procedures even

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.440
<v Speaker 1>if the patients are told that they cost more, and

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no evidence in this particular case that they're better

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:30.040
<v Speaker 1>than the old surgery. Uh, it's just like they seem

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>to see the option of a robot and think, wow,

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that looks really high tech. It must be the best,

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and so they want to go with it, even if

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:40.800
<v Speaker 1>it's not necessarily the best. If it's just as good

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>but costs a lot more, um so that that would

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>be a problem. On top of that, The other issue

0:28:47.840 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 1>or ain't another issue I should say, is that these

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>these systems are not small. We're not talking about a

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>robotic arm that fits on a little side table and

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>you just lay it down next to the patients. It's

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>not like inspector gat backpack. No, we haven't reached that

0:29:02.480 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>level yet either. Yeah, these are big, big systems, which

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>means they take up a lot of rooms, so you

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>have to have the space to to house them and

0:29:09.680 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>be able to move them around. And when you add

0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>that to the cost, so we're talking about the cost

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of purchasing, maintaining housing this thing, being able to move

0:29:18.680 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it around the facility. UH, you know those. This means

0:29:22.400 --> 0:29:24.960
<v Speaker 1>that it creates a really big barrier for a lot

0:29:25.040 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of medical centers to uh, And they have to make

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>a tough decision. Do they go and invest in getting

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>one of these things and making sure that their facility

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>can handle it? Uh? Spending all that money knowing that,

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 1>at least for some procedures, there is not a scientifically

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>measurable benefit to having that versus the traditional procedures. Do

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>they go ahead and do that anyway? Uh? And and

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>by doing that, they know that they're not going to

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to use that same money for something else.

0:29:56.600 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>And this is a big issue. A lot of medical

0:29:58.440 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>centers feel pressured to go into getting these robotic surgery

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 1>systems because again, there's this perception that the newest is

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the best, and therefore if they don't have it in

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>order to be considered a good center, then they're going

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>to need this exactly right. If they don't have it,

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>then they're not obviously not a cutting edge medical center.

0:30:18.480 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of this this rough place right now. Now.

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.240
<v Speaker 1>That's not to say that robotic surgery isn't going to

0:30:25.280 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 1>continue to improve. I fully believe that we're going to

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>see it. Sure. I mean robotics overall as a field

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>is is improving probably every day and every year. It's

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty incredible. I got worse yesterday, but I got twice

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 1>as better today, so it's averaging out. Yeah, we just

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:44.720
<v Speaker 1>say that the line is on a constant incline. I mean,

0:30:44.800 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>you see some dips here and there, but you know

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the trend is there. Well, you know, speaking of that,

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not like these machines are are insusceptible to things

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:57.680
<v Speaker 1>like recalls, like any other bit of machinery. There was

0:30:57.680 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 1>a class to recall of Da Vinci models see robots

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in because a friction issue was causing some robots to

0:31:05.560 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>freeze up during surgeries. UM. It was it was determined

0:31:08.760 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>that that probably these machines weren't being tested entirely properly

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.680
<v Speaker 1>before leaving the factory UM, which was causing these small malfunctions.

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>It is a it is a small recall in a class.

0:31:19.880 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 1>To recall a product could cause temporary or medically reversible

0:31:23.640 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>problems in a patient. So it's a voluntary thing and

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>the device doesn't need to be taken off the market.

0:31:28.360 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 1>But you know it's I just wanted to say like

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff does happen, right, Well, there have

0:31:32.800 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 1>been people who have actually criticized robotic surgical procedures for

0:31:36.720 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 1>being they think dangerous or there there are legitimate safety questions,

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 1>right right. They may be, they may not always be reliable, right. Uh. Yeah.

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:50.000
<v Speaker 1>In a small anonymous survey of a hundred and seventy

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>six doctors, some fifty seven percent of surgeons who had

0:31:53.520 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>used a da Vinci machine for prostate surgery UM said

0:31:56.160 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that they had experienced and irrecoverable intraoperative malfunction either before

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 1>or during a surgery, which I'm not positive about the

0:32:03.920 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 1>definition of that, but I'm pretty sure it's like a

0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.400
<v Speaker 1>surgical blue screen of death. Yeah, yeah, that's that's a

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 1>phrase you don't want to hear during any kind of

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>medical procedures. Blue screen of death. Absolutely not. And okay, so,

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 1>so surgery has always come with a certain amount of risk.

0:32:17.840 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>You are you are never going to be completely safe

0:32:20.360 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>when people are cutting you open and doing stuff to

0:32:22.760 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 1>your inside, sure, or just undergoing general anesthesia. Oh absolutely,

0:32:27.080 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 1>there There are any number of wacky things that can

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>go wrong with our bodies at any given moment, let

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>alone when we're when we're in a hospital. Um, which

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>was probably the cheeriest thing I've ever said on this show.

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>But sorry, guys, them's the facts were weird meat machines. Um. Furthermore,

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the under reporting of things going wrong during surgeries to

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the f d A is widely accepted to be an issue. Um,

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean not not just in robotic surgery, and in

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>any kind of surgery across the medical industry in general. However,

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>researchers at Johns Hopkins did a study of the Da

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Vinci surgeries that had taken place between the year two

0:33:03.440 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>thousand and twenty twelve and found evidence that adverse events

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>related to these devices maybe and I quote vastly under

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:17.080
<v Speaker 1>reported and in fact, in question was officially raised by

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists about the usefulness

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>of robotic his direct Me procedures. Um. So some one

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in nine women will undergo his direct Me at some

0:33:28.800 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 1>point in her life. Um. And it's also the type

0:33:32.560 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>of robotic surgery that's apparently the most likely to cause

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>a patient harm. Some fort of patient injuries that have

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>been reported. Um, we're during this type of surgery in fact, um,

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:47.800
<v Speaker 1>so you know, they also went into everything else that

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:49.800
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about with with cost and all of that.

0:33:50.080 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>But but this surgical procedure in particular might have been

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>one that was adopted too widely, too soon. Yeah, you

0:33:57.040 --> 0:33:59.600
<v Speaker 1>see that over and over the idea from the critics

0:33:59.760 --> 0:34:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of robotic surgery. They're they're criticizing not so much the

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:08.200
<v Speaker 1>idea in UH in theory, but just as it's practice,

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.320
<v Speaker 1>were rolling it out too fast. Yeah, and the marketing

0:34:12.480 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>is too aggressive with with the prostate removal surgeries. I

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 1>would say that using robotic surgery in general has been

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>rolled up pretty quickly across a lot of different surgical procedures.

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>With the prostate removal surgery, as that study from U

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.759
<v Speaker 1>c l A found out, it actually looks like there's

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:34.359
<v Speaker 1>a demonstrable benefit there and that that's that's fantastic. Whether

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.320
<v Speaker 1>or not that was rolled out too quickly in that surgery,

0:34:36.440 --> 0:34:39.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, but it does look like they're uh,

0:34:39.760 --> 0:34:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it is definitely beneficial to have the robotic assisted surgery,

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>But in other cases we may not be there yet.

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't mean we won't get there. It just means

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that the implementation we have right now may not be ideal.

0:34:51.600 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it may not even be anything wrong with

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:57.240
<v Speaker 1>the technology. It may be that surgeons are still learning

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:00.400
<v Speaker 1>how to use it at its most effective way. So

0:35:00.640 --> 0:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>there may be some cases where it's I wouldn't call

0:35:03.400 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>it human failures so much as we haven't figured out

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>how to leverage the technology in the way that's most beneficial. Right. Well,

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:13.880
<v Speaker 1>one thing that would obviously be a big benefit in

0:35:13.920 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the future would be the idea of autonomous surgery, like

0:35:16.760 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>truly autonomous robotic surgery, unless you tick off your autonomous

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:24.240
<v Speaker 1>robotic surgeon, in which case you know you've got terminator

0:35:24.239 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>all over the place. That actually kind of also comes

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 1>into play in Prometheus because it occurred to incurred to

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:31.840
<v Speaker 1>me that the ship's doctor is the android character. So

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:34.920
<v Speaker 1>so you're technically dealing with all robot surgery all the

0:35:34.960 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 1>time on that ship, and not all of it goes well. Okay.

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>So well, here's the thing about autonomous autonomous robotic surgery

0:35:41.640 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is I think it's a really interesting idea. I think

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be one of the most challenging applications

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:52.239
<v Speaker 1>for any sort of autonomous robot. First of all, we're

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:56.279
<v Speaker 1>really far out from having autonomous robots that could do

0:35:56.440 --> 0:36:00.279
<v Speaker 1>something as delicate as a surgical procedure delicate and important. Yeah,

0:36:00.360 --> 0:36:05.120
<v Speaker 1>without without human uh interaction, without without a human controlling it.

0:36:05.280 --> 0:36:07.400
<v Speaker 1>And the reason why I say that is because not

0:36:07.520 --> 0:36:10.800
<v Speaker 1>only are we talking about life or death procedures, but

0:36:10.880 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 1>we're also talking about the human body, which does not

0:36:13.520 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>come in one shape and size. Right, There's a lot

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>of variation there. Even with a simple, quote unquote simple

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.360
<v Speaker 1>surgical procedure, you can have a lot of complications that

0:36:24.480 --> 0:36:29.480
<v Speaker 1>can crop up, and robots have to be able to adapt,

0:36:29.800 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to recognize a detective adapt exactly just the way a

0:36:33.280 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>human would, and that's hard to do. But that does

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>raise the question of how would you do this? How

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 1>would you program a robot to autonomously performer a surgical procedure?

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:47.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think one of the things that would be

0:36:47.440 --> 0:36:50.320
<v Speaker 1>really crucial to this would be a learning robot. So

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>perhaps a robot that would be connected to the to

0:36:53.960 --> 0:36:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the human controlled system, so it studies what the human

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>surgeons do. Maybe you give it ten thou zen surgeries

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:04.719
<v Speaker 1>to analyze, You select your ten thousand best variations of

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the same surgery, and say learn from these. Honestly, I

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 1>would imagine that it would have to involve a lot

0:37:10.760 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>of work with human cadavers too, you would have to.

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I had an opportunity to talk with some robotics experts recently,

0:37:19.360 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and uh, then they were showing me robots that do learn,

0:37:22.760 --> 0:37:25.799
<v Speaker 1>and they learned by you showing them that you want

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:28.960
<v Speaker 1>them to do certain tasks in a certain order, and

0:37:29.040 --> 0:37:31.200
<v Speaker 1>if they make a mistake, you can correct them, so

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that they learned that. All right, that was an exception

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to what I'm supposed to do. I won't do that again.

0:37:36.600 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>And then once they learned the procedure, they'll repeat it

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:42.520
<v Speaker 1>exactly over and over and over again. However, that's also

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a procedure that involves uniform material that doesn't change from

0:37:47.200 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>case to case. So it's different from surgery. Yeah, so

0:37:50.600 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 1>so you're going to need to, I mean a just

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:54.640
<v Speaker 1>like I, like a human surgeon, have a lot of

0:37:54.760 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>practice on things what can't be hurt. Be those be

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>those models or cadavers, um and and be incorporate a

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of sensory technology, like like the most advanced

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:07.840
<v Speaker 1>room bow you have ever met in your life, that

0:38:07.960 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>that is able to tell from from the inside of

0:38:10.719 --> 0:38:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you what you what its surroundings are. There is a

0:38:12.920 --> 0:38:16.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of potential there for it to really revolutionize the

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>way we think about medicine. I mean, right now, medicine

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.360
<v Speaker 1>is a thing you go to, right, you go to

0:38:22.480 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the hospital, you go to the doctor. But if you

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>could have, say a really versatile general robotic surgeon that's

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>small enough to fit in a backpack, I mean that

0:38:33.320 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>what a bizarre world that would be that you could

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>carry around a limitless supply of medical treatment with you

0:38:41.680 --> 0:38:43.479
<v Speaker 1>where you go. But I would I would let myself

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>get critically injured all the time. I mean, as opposed

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to just happening accidentally, and I just you're inviting it. Well,

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>you can see how that would make a big difference

0:38:54.280 --> 0:38:57.560
<v Speaker 1>for say, people who are in any kind of exploring capacity,

0:38:57.719 --> 0:39:01.800
<v Speaker 1>so you're exploring space, or you're exploring remote wilderness, or

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:05.920
<v Speaker 1>a military capacity on things like a triage on the battlefield.

0:39:06.160 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 1>So now I'm thinking that the quote I should have

0:39:08.080 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>used should have been a movie quota show said pain

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:14.480
<v Speaker 1>don't hurt, because I didn't realize that that was Lauren's philosophy. Um,

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 1>but you hadn't, this would be this would be pretty phenomenal.

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:23.919
<v Speaker 1>And these are advances that we do think are quite

0:39:23.960 --> 0:39:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a ways down the road. We don't want We don't

0:39:25.719 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>want anyone to go away from this episode thinking, oh,

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, within like a year or two, we're going

0:39:30.280 --> 0:39:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to have these incredible robots. These are these are enormous challenges,

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and not that they are challenges that will never overcome.

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:42.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just gonna take a lot of work. I expect

0:39:42.800 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 1>that there will be such a thing. Whether I see

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 1>it in my lifetime or not, I don't know, um,

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>but I I certainly hope to see extreme advances in

0:39:51.200 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 1>this field. I think it's could be incredibly beneficial. One

0:39:54.880 --> 0:39:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of the other interesting things, and we didn't really cover

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:00.759
<v Speaker 1>this earlier on, is a robotic surg tree is one

0:40:00.800 --> 0:40:04.040
<v Speaker 1>of those fields where there seems to be another issue

0:40:04.080 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>with cost, and that generally speaking with electronics, we think

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the longer something has been around, the less expensive it

0:40:10.200 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 1>tends to be because we improve on manufacturing processes, materials

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:17.799
<v Speaker 1>become cheaper, we streamline everything, and so therefore you end

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:21.840
<v Speaker 1>up saving money down the road. Uh. The one criticism

0:40:21.880 --> 0:40:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I've seen about robotic surgery says that at least in

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>these stages, that's probably not going to be true because

0:40:27.640 --> 0:40:33.319
<v Speaker 1>while we perfect means of creating robotic surgery tools, from

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for that we're state of the art like three years ago.

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.799
<v Speaker 1>We're continuously improving all the other technologies that you would

0:40:39.800 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>want to include with the current generation of robotic surgeons,

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:46.759
<v Speaker 1>thus keeping that price either steady or climbing. Uh for

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.440
<v Speaker 1>the for the near future, Oh, share in medical research alone.

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean the capacity to test all of

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:55.640
<v Speaker 1>this is very expensive, and that's not going to get

0:40:55.760 --> 0:40:59.880
<v Speaker 1>cheaper ever, right right, unless we can suddenly start cloning

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 1>beings and have absolutely no ethical issues with it. It's

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:07.720
<v Speaker 1>uh that probably will come after we have robotic surgeons. Jonathan,

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>why do you have to end every podcast with the

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>idea of cutting up clones? I everybody needs a hobby.

0:41:15.320 --> 0:41:18.040
<v Speaker 1>And on that note, if you guys have any suggestions

0:41:18.120 --> 0:41:21.600
<v Speaker 1>for future episodes of Forward Thinking, let us know. Send

0:41:21.680 --> 0:41:25.160
<v Speaker 1>us an email our addresses f W Thinking at Discovery

0:41:25.320 --> 0:41:28.799
<v Speaker 1>dot com, or drop us a line on Twitter, Facebook,

0:41:28.840 --> 0:41:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Google Plus. We are at all three of those with

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the handle f W Thinking and we will talk to

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. For more on this topic in

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the future of technology, visit forward thinking dot Com, brought

0:41:55.680 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to you by Toyota. Let's go places