WEBVTT - Microsoft Points to Chinese Hackers in SharePoint Breach

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast, with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and Eva Low in Sent Francisco.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up.

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft accuses Chinese hackers of exploiting vulnerabilities in its SharePoint

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 3>software that have led to breaches worldwide.

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 4>Plus Open Ai and Oracle deepen their Stargate Data Center

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 4>partnership to power AI work lanes, but no sign of

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 4>soft Bank to help finance the US infrastructure, and.

0:00:41.479 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 3>NXP gives a not so bullish third quarter forecast, suggesting

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 3>the chip makers still contending with a turbulent industry in

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:51.159
<v Speaker 3>the face of tariffs. Microsoft our top story in a

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:55.080
<v Speaker 3>blog post, saying that state sponsored Chinese hackers are behind

0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 3>what's happening, and in particular the stock reacting level to

0:00:58.960 --> 0:01:01.720
<v Speaker 3>the early in the session car a normalizing a little bit,

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 3>but we've got to get into it.

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 5>We do. Let's stick with that Microsoft story.

0:01:04.640 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 4>But in Magistrate dreiberg joins us for the latest and

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 4>these are known state actors, two of them and then

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:12.199
<v Speaker 4>one Chinese based actor.

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:13.120
<v Speaker 5>It would seem.

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Yes, that's exactly right.

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 6>Microsoft said this morning that two groups backed by the

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:25.560
<v Speaker 6>Chinese government, silk Linen Typhoon and another group have been

0:01:25.600 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 6>responsible for some of the exploitation of this vulnerability in

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:34.200
<v Speaker 6>its SharePoint software. We've also heard from other cybersecurity firms

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 6>that they're seeing multiple different organizations sort of hack into

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:41.840
<v Speaker 6>businesses and governments based on this vulnerability.

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 3>Jake, the top priority right now seems to be identifying

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 3>the victims. Do we know what the kind of net

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 3>result of this this hacking activity is? Who's been impacted?

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 6>We know that the impacted organizations are ones that hosted

0:01:57.240 --> 0:02:02.000
<v Speaker 6>SharePoint on their own servers. Seems to be a real

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 6>smattering of different groups, government, agencies, businesses, other organizations all

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.519
<v Speaker 6>over the globe. We know that governments have been hit

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 6>in the Middle East and in Europe and here in

0:02:14.440 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 6>the United States. We also know of businesses and state

0:02:18.280 --> 0:02:20.200
<v Speaker 6>level agencies that have also been hacked into.

0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft for its part, say investigations into other actors are

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 4>also ongoing. When it comes to the exploits, we could

0:02:26.160 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 4>currently see what they've put out in a blog post,

0:02:29.280 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 4>but more broadly, they acted swiftly to try and patch

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 4>the issue for once in a server.

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 5>That is the key concern exactly.

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 6>We've seen warnings from cybersecurity companies that you don't just

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.480
<v Speaker 6>need to patch, you need to sort of hunt for

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 6>whether your systems were penetrated and what they might have

0:02:47.880 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 6>been taken. And a source told Bloomberg yesterday that the hackers,

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 6>once getting in in some instances, are stealing log in credentials,

0:02:56.760 --> 0:03:00.640
<v Speaker 6>user names, passwords, tokens, and that suggests that they may

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 6>be trying to exploit that information to watch other attacks.

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.920
<v Speaker 3>Bloomboags Jake Bleiberg out of New York City, thank you

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 3>very much. Meanwhile, shares an NXP semiconductor or trading lower today,

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 3>the company posting third quarter forecasts that were less bullish

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 3>than invested in anticipated. Then they went on to talk

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 3>about the state of play in the automotive industry, which

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 3>is fifty percent or more of their revenue. Bloombozy and King,

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 3>who leads our chip coverages here, that'tually a pretty simple

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 3>story right away from all the AI stuff, there's been

0:03:28.960 --> 0:03:33.120
<v Speaker 3>a glut in inventory on automotive chips. NXP saying, look,

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 3>it takes time to work through them, but for that

0:03:36.000 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 3>industry and that key customer, the world's a bit uncertain

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 3>as well.

0:03:39.080 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 7>It absolutely is, and we'll hear from Texas Instruments in

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 7>a similar vein later today. The cross currents are everything's

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 7>supposed to be getting better. This kind of glow that

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 7>we've had over the last couple of years is supposed

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 7>to be going away. So we want you know, if

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 7>you're an investor, you want them to be more bullish,

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 7>you want them to be a bit more reassuring. That's

0:03:57.440 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 7>not what happened for man XP. They said things are

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 7>still had hanging around.

0:04:00.760 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 5>And ian almost bullish is the wrong word for it.

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 4>When revenue is down six percent for n XP and

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 4>actually revenues have been down quarter after quarter.

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 7>Right, Yeah, I mean what we'll have to look at.

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 7>And this is why I think it's going to be

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 7>useful to have Texas Instruments reporting today sort of back

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:21.919
<v Speaker 7>to back. Is this a customer related thing? Is NXP

0:04:22.400 --> 0:04:26.360
<v Speaker 7>basically supplying automotive companies that are struggling more than others.

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 7>Texas Instruments is a much broader supplier, has a bigger

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.840
<v Speaker 7>customer list and a bigger set of products, So that

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 7>will give us a sense of whether this is a

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 7>general automotive malaise, whether this is China related, whether this

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 7>is Europe related, and we'll have a much clearer picture

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:43.599
<v Speaker 7>later today.

0:04:43.720 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 3>I am going to dig into this a bit later

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 3>in the program, but the Philadelphia Semiconductor Industry Index, sorry,

0:04:49.480 --> 0:04:52.520
<v Speaker 3>is underperforming generally in NVIDEO and am D A big

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 3>drags on that. The read through between NXP and those

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.920
<v Speaker 3>two is difficult for me to see. But generally speaking,

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 3>away from those kind of ultra specialized and even analog chips,

0:05:04.360 --> 0:05:05.719
<v Speaker 3>things are quite robust still.

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean we've seen I mean you talk about

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 7>the index, the index has done pretty well this year.

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 7>There's a lot of money has been put to work.

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 7>Everything we've heard so far and we'll hear more on

0:05:15.400 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 7>on that vein as the inning season unfolds, is there's

0:05:18.080 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 7>a lot of spending still going on on these large

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:25.680
<v Speaker 7>AI infrastructure systems, and we've heard nothing that's telling us

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.560
<v Speaker 7>that that's not going to continue. And that's really what's

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 7>going to be the most important thing, and that's what's

0:05:30.440 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 7>driven the socks so far. Analog has been a slightly

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.200
<v Speaker 7>different story, but again analog benefits from the server build

0:05:36.200 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 7>out as well. You need these power related chips, you

0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:40.600
<v Speaker 7>need these micro controllers as well.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 4>In king always with all the context, so appreciate it.

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 4>Thank you. Let's dive deeper into the tech earnings, the

0:05:47.760 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 4>vibe in the market right now, Anna Rathens with us

0:05:50.320 --> 0:05:54.480
<v Speaker 4>founder and CEO of Grenna Dilla Advisory. Anna, your take

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 4>here is that, yes, we're perhaps pulling back on the

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:02.560
<v Speaker 4>day somewhat nxp not resounding vealing of optimism, but we're

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 4>still near all time highs and we've still got a

0:06:04.880 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 4>four trillion dollar in video in our hands.

0:06:07.400 --> 0:06:08.240
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, good morning.

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 8>Markets are definitely the valuations are high. There's no slicing

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 8>that in a different way. But I guess you know,

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:18.159
<v Speaker 8>you have to look at tech differently than we used to.

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:21.520
<v Speaker 8>So a lot of allocators and wealth advisors out there,

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 8>we've been taught to look at tech as a growth sector.

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 8>Perhaps it's more than that. So the AI component is

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 8>definitely tech, but maybe there's also a quality factor there

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 8>as well. Got healthy balance sheets, great cash flow, especially

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 8>those mega companies, megacap companies. It's also got a defensive

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 8>sector of characteristic as well. We learned that we cannot

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 8>operate this economy and our society without tech infrastructure as

0:06:49.000 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 8>well as software. So I think that when we're looking

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 8>at tech, we have to look at it from multiple

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 8>angles in order to perhaps try to explain some of

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 8>this valuation. It's not just about AI froup. It's much

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:02.159
<v Speaker 8>more than that.

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:05.920
<v Speaker 4>But what's been interesting is the AI winners have powered

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.280
<v Speaker 4>forward on the twenty twenty five, and those winners have

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 4>been deemed well the metas of this, Wells in videos

0:07:11.880 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 4>of this, Wells Apple left for dust. In some ways,

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 4>Alphabet has been a lagged too. How do we set

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:19.800
<v Speaker 4>up into Wednesday when we start to get a couple

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:21.240
<v Speaker 4>of those MACS seven names.

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think there's definitely a vifurcation in those MAC

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 8>seven names. And right now it looks like the people

0:07:28.960 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 8>who have really invested and gone forward with AIS are

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 8>definitely winning. Now Alphabet, for example, will have different challenges,

0:07:36.240 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 8>right Not only do they have some legal challenges, but

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:40.720
<v Speaker 8>you know, I don't know about you, but when I

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 8>talk to my friends, they stopped using Google as a

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 8>search engine. They're using chat, GPT. And I know that's

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 8>just a few people around me and perhaps you, but

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 8>those things can actually catch up. And I know Chetman

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.040
<v Speaker 8>and I is improving, but I think that's a real

0:07:55.720 --> 0:07:59.240
<v Speaker 8>competitor there, and so AI is going to be more

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 8>important going for work for some of these Max seven names,

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 8>and I wouldn't expect disappointing report from them, but certainly

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 8>I think investors can read between the lines.

0:08:10.640 --> 0:08:14.160
<v Speaker 3>And I what's curious about this week is that on Wednesday,

0:08:14.200 --> 0:08:20.280
<v Speaker 3>Alphabet and Tesla posts their earnings results right somewhat analogous companies,

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 3>some differences, and on the same day we'll hear from

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 3>the President about his vision for AI and American AI.

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 3>It's going to be a wild ride for investors this week,

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 3>isn't it.

0:08:33.600 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 8>Well. You know, anytime anyone from the government talks about

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 8>technology and AI and even bitcoin or blockchain, I get

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 8>a little nervous because I think we have to tread

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 8>very carefully here. We don't want to get in the

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 8>way of innovation, and yet we want to protect consumers, right,

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 8>So it's going to be a very It's going to

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 8>be a balancing act for anybody who from the government,

0:08:56.800 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 8>from the White House talking about AI and how America

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 8>is going to be involved in the development of AI.

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:06.680
<v Speaker 8>I would go in with a little bit of a

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 8>cautious view, and frankly, I'm expecting a lot of lofty statements,

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:14.680
<v Speaker 8>but the question always is how does this actually translate

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 8>down to the day to day and actual software and

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 8>make difference in our productivity.

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 2>Let's bring it back to today's news.

0:09:23.480 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 3>What did you learn about the near term and quantifileble

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:31.679
<v Speaker 3>impact of tariffs? You names like General Motors and NXP

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:34.600
<v Speaker 3>show us that actually something's happening here.

0:09:35.840 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean something is happening there. We're talking about

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 8>actual money, right. I mean, so for last week, if

0:09:41.520 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 8>you think about the CPI and consumer sentiment, you didn't

0:09:45.400 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 8>really see it, right, but you are seeing it in earnings.

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 8>This is actual cash flow impacts. So I think this

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.120
<v Speaker 8>is going to trickle in as the quarter goes and

0:09:54.120 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 8>give us a better view of exactly what areas of

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 8>the economy are being impacted by tariffs. Who is is

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 8>actually assuming some of those costs because GM actually came

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.040
<v Speaker 8>out and said we don't want to pass down all

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:08.719
<v Speaker 8>the costs to the consumers. So it'll be interesting to

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.199
<v Speaker 8>see how those things get I guess diversified into the

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 8>supply chain and how GM and other companies actually manage

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 8>those challenges.

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 4>And going back to taras tarvis is all about the

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.559
<v Speaker 4>geopolitics that is currently involved in technology investing. I think

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:25.880
<v Speaker 4>of the geopolitics between US and China. I think of

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 4>the latest news out of Microsoft blaming China for a hack.

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 4>How much do you factor that into your current investment thesis?

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 4>How much can you price that sort of geopolitics in?

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean I never thought that this trade talk

0:10:38.120 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 8>with China is going to be simple or smooth, right,

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 8>and this is yet another twist in the plot. I

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 8>would hold that August first deadline date really loosely in

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.200
<v Speaker 8>your hands, because you know, it was April first, and

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 8>then or July ninth, and then now it's August first.

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 8>I think that the Trump administration as well as China,

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 8>I mean, they have a lot at stake here, so

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 8>I don't think the deadline really matters. I think we're

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:08.400
<v Speaker 8>going to be negotiating until we actually get to a

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 8>good place for both countries, and August first might coming.

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:18.080
<v Speaker 3>Go Anna Rathban, founder and CEO of Grenadilla Advisory, thank

0:11:18.120 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 3>you very much for coming up. Oracle and open Ai

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 3>is set to expand their partnership, opening up more data

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.600
<v Speaker 3>centers to satiate AI demand.

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 2>We had the details next. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 4>Oracle along with open Ai have announced that they're set

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 4>to develop four and a half gigawatts of additional US

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 4>data center capacity. Let's bringing Bloomberg's Brodie Ford now on

0:11:52.000 --> 0:11:55.400
<v Speaker 4>how the evolution of stargate is going.

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.560
<v Speaker 5>And who's involved and who isn't, because we'll get.

0:11:57.480 --> 0:11:58.680
<v Speaker 4>To sort of bank in a moment the fact they

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 4>don't seem to be on the page, but this is

0:12:00.679 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 4>this component to what have ten giga?

0:12:03.400 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 5>What's by four years time?

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 4>They really seem to be building it out now, right, and.

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:08.560
<v Speaker 2>We can for get a giggle lot.

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.320
<v Speaker 9>I mean we're throwing these numbers around now, but you know,

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:13.240
<v Speaker 9>a couple of years ago you would never hear about

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 9>a giggle wat data center, and now we're talking about

0:12:15.160 --> 0:12:16.800
<v Speaker 9>four and a half. I mean each one of those

0:12:16.840 --> 0:12:19.640
<v Speaker 9>about equivalent to a nuclear reactor. And so a four

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 9>and a half gigawatt data center deal that's across the country.

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 9>This is an unprecedented cloud deal. I mean, this is

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.560
<v Speaker 9>likely the largest single cloud deal ever signed. And so right,

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:30.839
<v Speaker 9>if your oracle, if you've been trying to tell people

0:12:30.880 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 9>for many years, you're going to be a real cloud

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 9>infrastructure player.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:35.720
<v Speaker 2>This is a pretty.

0:12:35.400 --> 0:12:39.560
<v Speaker 9>Resounding sign of confidence from the most important AI company

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.440
<v Speaker 9>at the moment, Berdie.

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:44.120
<v Speaker 3>The way we look at this is it it's confirmation

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 3>of our prior reporting on the projects. But also, as

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 3>Cara alluded to, some clarity on the bits that SoftBank

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:55.079
<v Speaker 3>is and is not financing absolutely.

0:12:55.200 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 9>So it's very interesting because in January we saw you know,

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 9>Larry Ellison, Sam Altman, and soft Bank sitting at the

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.600
<v Speaker 9>White House. Today, SoftBank doesn't appear to be too involved.

0:13:05.640 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 9>They're not saying we're out for good. But this four

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:10.560
<v Speaker 9>and a half gigle walks, which likely gets those to

0:13:10.600 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 9>around thirty billion a year, soft Bank is not involved

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 9>in financing. Where does the rest of that money come from?

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 9>That's going to be a big question in the following months,

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 9>right because open Ai makes a lot of money, they're

0:13:22.800 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 9>not making that much money to be able to just

0:13:24.720 --> 0:13:26.000
<v Speaker 9>spend all this themselves.

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:28.959
<v Speaker 4>We're going to dig into more news miracle in a minute,

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 4>but I just want to understand where we think these

0:13:31.520 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 4>data centers are going to be. Do we have much

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:35.959
<v Speaker 4>detail on the timescale here as well?

0:13:36.200 --> 0:13:38.440
<v Speaker 9>Every time I ask a source where the next data

0:13:38.480 --> 0:13:40.080
<v Speaker 9>center is going to be, they tell me a different state.

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 9>They're evaluating a lot of different states, a lot of

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 9>different sites. If you've read an article that says, hey,

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 9>they want to develop a multi giggle data center here,

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 9>odds are that starting. It has evaluated this site, so

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 9>I'm keeping my eyes out.

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:57.560
<v Speaker 3>Slightly smaller scale, but Oracle's also in talks around one

0:13:57.600 --> 0:14:01.320
<v Speaker 3>hundred million dollar a year paramoun Skydanceteel, What do we

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 3>need to know about that one?

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:04.280
<v Speaker 9>What you need to know is if your dad is

0:14:04.360 --> 0:14:06.880
<v Speaker 9>Larry Ellis said, and he helps you buy something, you're

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 9>going to have to kind of help buy some stuff

0:14:08.920 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 9>from him as well, right, I mean Larry Ellison's son,

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 9>David Ellison has been in the works to buy Paramount

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.280
<v Speaker 9>for a while and they're already having negotiations that assuming

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:23.160
<v Speaker 9>that deal goes through, Paramount will be a major OCI customer.

0:14:23.200 --> 0:14:25.680
<v Speaker 9>They're going to put all of their CBS, NTV, it's

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 9>a lot of assets, a lot of gigabytes, and they're

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.920
<v Speaker 9>going to be on Oracle servers doing best.

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 3>Brady Ford, thank you really on top of this story.

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:35.120
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much. Okay, we have another story. Some

0:14:35.240 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 3>updates in the four billion dollar fraud case against the

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 3>estate of deceased Autonomy founder Mike Lynch. A London judge

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 3>ruled that HPE lost close to one billion dollars after

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:50.320
<v Speaker 3>buying Autonomy. Lynch's estate will face a claim for much

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 3>of that sum after he lost a London fraud case

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 3>along with the former CFO of Autonomy. The ruling suggests

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 3>HPE will likely recain just a fraction of its total claim.

0:15:01.200 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 3>The ruling comes less than a year after Lynch drowned

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:06.600
<v Speaker 3>when his yacht sank in a storm off the coast

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:17.000
<v Speaker 3>of Sicily. Poseidon has announced its raised fifteen million dollars

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 3>in a seed round led by a sixteen Z crypto,

0:15:19.960 --> 0:15:23.520
<v Speaker 3>as the company looks to tackle bottlenecks in AI training data,

0:15:23.560 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 3>including IP safe resources. This particularly aimed at training data

0:15:28.240 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 3>for robotics, multimodal models, and physical AI. Here with more

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 3>is s y Le Poseidon President and CEO story The

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:40.000
<v Speaker 3>incubator behind Poseidon state of players really clear, right. AI

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 3>models have become commoditized, compute costs have come down. But

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:47.119
<v Speaker 3>the bottleneck, as you see it and many others see it,

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 3>is the data.

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.960
<v Speaker 10>You have a solution, yes, as you just wanted to

0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 10>put that into context again because now you know the

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:59.680
<v Speaker 10>previous generation of models. We're scraping the internets data, which

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 10>is you know, you know you can scrape it all.

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 10>But now AI is going to the physical world. It's

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:08.680
<v Speaker 10>the multimodel models, right, it's a robotics model, it's a

0:16:08.760 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 10>video model, audio model, and this really real bottleleg is

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 10>the data, as you said, because you know, you can't

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 10>ask rate it illegally on the Internet, and a lot

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 10>of times this data is very private. You know, there's

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.320
<v Speaker 10>a lot of IP safety concerns. And in that world,

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 10>how do you coordinate the collection, labeling, curating of the data.

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:35.520
<v Speaker 10>And we're using actually crypto incentives to actually coordinate that

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:37.080
<v Speaker 10>massively label coordinator.

0:16:37.080 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 3>So my next question was why is Andreson's crypto team

0:16:40.160 --> 0:16:43.880
<v Speaker 3>backing you and not an AI specialist.

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>Partner or a different firm.

0:16:47.880 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 10>First of all, micro founder is a you know, robotics

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 10>at UT Austin, and he's he's a big AI specialist

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 10>who's been kind of working on this data licensing and

0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 10>data collection for the last ten years and even he

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 10>thought about how do how do you incentivize data collection

0:17:02.680 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 10>with data dividends? So you know, he he he's an

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 10>AI expert in in this in this problem. But the

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 10>reason why we are kind of they we think this

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:14.520
<v Speaker 10>is so so timely, is you know forty days ago

0:17:14.640 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 10>actually meta semi a quiet actually as as you know, uh,

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:22.280
<v Speaker 10>scaling on as a data left a very huge vacuum

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.199
<v Speaker 10>in the space to actually for competitors and new players

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 10>to come in. And if you look at scaleing on

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 10>D I mean, I'm not trying to criticize, but they

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 10>have to you know, make a lot of shell companies,

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:34.800
<v Speaker 10>work with shell companies and developing countries to actually coordinate

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.719
<v Speaker 10>this kind of digital sweatshop to make that happen. But

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 10>the beauty of crypto is that it's still really good

0:17:40.320 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 10>at coordinating incentives in a at a global scale and

0:17:43.880 --> 0:17:46.000
<v Speaker 10>pay them instantaneously with stable coins or.

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:47.240
<v Speaker 5>Other type of cryptotokens.

0:17:47.320 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 10>Right, And that is a very very huge advantage number one, right,

0:17:51.160 --> 0:17:54.920
<v Speaker 10>And number two, not only that, what crypto and blockchain

0:17:54.960 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 10>does is it is good at you know, putting this

0:17:58.160 --> 0:18:00.959
<v Speaker 10>data and IP on an immedable ledger and track and

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:03.960
<v Speaker 10>attribute it and license it with small contracts. And that's

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 10>those two are very very important advantage of crypto. Even

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:12.879
<v Speaker 10>where my co founder, Ai Specialist wants to actually use thistagnomogy.

0:18:12.480 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 4>S ry, let's just go to the basics of the

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.600
<v Speaker 4>data that is needed. Here, I can see the crypto

0:18:17.640 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 4>read across. I think of Vaccineinfinity, the game that when

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.639
<v Speaker 4>bananas in the Philippines years ago, how people wanted to

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 4>play because they earned money in tokens via playing this

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 4>crypto native game. You're going to use people, incentivize people

0:18:31.320 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 4>to sort of video themselves in the real world, then

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:37.359
<v Speaker 4>ultimately helps Tesla build optimists in the real world.

0:18:38.440 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 10>Yes, actually you hit on the right comparable. Ex Infinity

0:18:43.760 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 10>was an example of coordinating this massive number of people

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 10>in the Philippines and other types of developing country, other

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 10>other developing countries to actually play games to ourn' tokens

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:53.320
<v Speaker 10>right in.

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 5>The same way.

0:18:54.560 --> 0:18:57.400
<v Speaker 10>Now, you know, when Tessa wants to train as human

0:18:57.440 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 10>aid robot, they you know, even if you script the

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.959
<v Speaker 10>entire Internet's data, you can't actually have a testa robot

0:19:04.480 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 10>holding a coffee cup, right because you know, you need

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 10>a million angles of data to ecocentric video footage and

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 10>a million different types of settings and that kind of data.

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 10>Instead of actually hiring a shell company and they're having

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 10>their share company hired, you know, tens of thousands of people.

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:24.520
<v Speaker 10>You can coordinate this at a mass skill and an

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 10>instantaneously with a with crypto incentive. That's what we're doing.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 4>And let's talk about the end demand here. How many companies?

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 4>Who is your ultimate provider? How do you then sell

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 4>this aip this ip safe AI training data.

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, the reason why it's IP safe is that everyone

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:47.399
<v Speaker 10>who are actually contributing data, anyone can contribute this data

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 10>anywhere around the world, right, and then actually set their

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 10>licensing usage terms on the blockchain. And we are at

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 10>the moment we're not completely centralized, and we are now

0:19:57.200 --> 0:20:00.119
<v Speaker 10>going to launch a decentralize a deep in app in

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 10>the center physical infrastructure app and fall that actually collects data,

0:20:04.760 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 10>you know, puts this on the blockchain with the licensing

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 10>terms in place. But at the moment, we're now actually

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 10>acting as an agent to actually secure these contracts, and

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:18.080
<v Speaker 10>we already have a you know, we've already signed a

0:20:18.119 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 10>contract and we cannot discuss.

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 2>It at the moment, right, you know.

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 10>And then I mean in the robotics relevant.

0:20:23.160 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, quickly, if scale AI, the scenario left a vacuum

0:20:27.800 --> 0:20:30.640
<v Speaker 3>and you look to occupy that vacuum, how many phone

0:20:30.680 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 3>calls have you had from the other frontier model makers

0:20:34.080 --> 0:20:36.440
<v Speaker 3>that you could fit into their organization in the same

0:20:36.480 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 3>way just thirty seconds.

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 10>You know, actually many many organizations, And I was really

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 10>surprised as C Stage company, they were willing to work

0:20:44.400 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 10>with us because a lot of them were telling us

0:20:46.640 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 10>that they were dropping contracts from SCALEI.

0:20:49.320 --> 0:20:51.520
<v Speaker 3>But I meant in terms of you being acquired or

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:52.680
<v Speaker 3>you joining a bigger group.

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 5>We don't have any plan.

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 10>We don't have any plan. And we think the advantage

0:20:58.440 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 10>of this open system is that we can work with

0:21:00.000 --> 0:21:00.520
<v Speaker 10>any AI.

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 5>Farmers, s y Lee, a Poseidon and Story. Great to

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 5>have you on today.

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Now, let's just turn back a minute for what's going

0:21:08.200 --> 0:21:11.840
<v Speaker 4>viral because Tesma's futuristic diner in la is complete with

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 4>a drive in charging experience. Now, the sleek retro Vibe

0:21:15.160 --> 0:21:19.199
<v Speaker 4>diner is also replete with two sixty six foot megascreens

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.600
<v Speaker 4>and a rooftop skypad and a prototype of Optimist.

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.120
<v Speaker 5>The robot is serving popcorn.

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 4>Apparently that was at the pre launch event for the

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 4>Hollywood venue. Tesa claims it's the largest urban supercharger in

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 4>the world.

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 5>Let's just talk.

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 4>About another key player that's got earnings later this week. Alphabet, Well, Google,

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 4>we understand is seeking to recruit news organizations for a

0:21:45.680 --> 0:21:47.440
<v Speaker 4>new licensing project related to AI.

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 5>It's all, according to sources, which could be a big

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.080
<v Speaker 5>win for the struggling media companies.

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Hannah Miller joins us, now, is this some sort

0:21:54.920 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 4>of Google capitulation here, because we've seen some deals done

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:00.880
<v Speaker 4>by other AI players, but Google's always set on the side.

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:03.159
<v Speaker 11>I think Google is playing catch up here. You know,

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 11>we've seen big companies like open ai and Microsoft strike

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:12.280
<v Speaker 11>these massive licensing deals with news organizations, and Google, yeah,

0:22:12.280 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 11>they've been sitting on the sidelines.

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:14.880
<v Speaker 5>They haven't been doing that as much.

0:22:14.960 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 11>So this could be them, you know, testing the waters,

0:22:17.560 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 11>you know, trying to build better relationships with media companies

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:22.600
<v Speaker 11>as the AI race heats up.

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Kind of.

0:22:23.960 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 3>One of our sources said that in one case, Google

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 3>launched this kind of pilot with twenty different news orgs.

0:22:29.320 --> 0:22:33.520
<v Speaker 3>You cover TMT right from the news perspective, So it's

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:36.479
<v Speaker 3>like a cash cow, a great gold mine just to

0:22:36.520 --> 0:22:39.840
<v Speaker 3>sell data and bring in some money through a new mechanism.

0:22:40.600 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 5>A lot of people in.

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.119
<v Speaker 11>The industry are saying this is a temporary band aid,

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 11>you know, yes, we can get some money from these

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 11>big companies at the start, but looking long term, of

0:22:51.200 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 11>many journalists feel like AI is a threat to their business.

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:57.199
<v Speaker 11>You have people in the arts, you have people at

0:22:57.200 --> 0:23:00.639
<v Speaker 11>major media companies concerned about the effect AI will have

0:23:01.000 --> 0:23:01.800
<v Speaker 11>on their jobs.

0:23:02.960 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 3>Bloombog's Hannah Miller out in New York, thank you very much. Now,

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Netflix and Disney are both taking steps into the somewhat

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 3>controversial world of AI video creation with software from Runway

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 3>AI Blueboks. Rachel Mets brings us the story. Interesting one

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:20.600
<v Speaker 3>about this is that in the earnings context, this has

0:23:20.640 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 3>already come up, particularly for Netflix right in recent weeks.

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:28.439
<v Speaker 3>But what's the controversy and what is the actual tool here? Like,

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:31.440
<v Speaker 3>what is it that a Netflix would need AI to do?

0:23:33.040 --> 0:23:36.640
<v Speaker 12>So as you as you mentioned, Netflix said on their

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 12>earnings call just last week that they're using AI, and

0:23:41.880 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 12>they also mentioned a production that they'd used it in.

0:23:44.320 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 12>So companies like Netflix, what they could do with this

0:23:46.440 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 12>software in theory is they could maybe lower some of

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 12>the costs for special effects, so they'd use a model

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:56.000
<v Speaker 12>like Runway. Runways top line model is JEN four. They

0:23:56.040 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 12>also have some models that aim to reproduce motion capture

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 12>software and without using all the fancy and clunky hardware

0:24:05.359 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 12>that comes with it. So the idea would be to

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 12>save costs here and to do some shots that perhaps

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 12>it would have been impossible previously without using AI software.

0:24:16.040 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 4>I think we learned from Ted surroundos over Netflix that

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:23.639
<v Speaker 4>it was previously using to sort of simulate a building collapse,

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 4>and I think it was an Argentinian particular visual effects company,

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 4>but it wasn't Runway usually we understand according to people

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:35.320
<v Speaker 4>familiar who are Runway, have they worked with and what

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:37.840
<v Speaker 4>have they been able to produce thus far? Because they're

0:24:37.880 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 4>actually out competing Hollywood or West Coast based visual effects companies.

0:24:44.080 --> 0:24:48.400
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so Runway works with a number of different companies.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 12>We also know that Disney has been testing out those software.

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 12>They also Runway has a deal with Lionsgate. They're working

0:24:58.000 --> 0:25:00.439
<v Speaker 12>in a field that's increasingly crowded and there are so

0:25:00.480 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 12>much larger players. Open Ai has its own video software.

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.040
<v Speaker 12>Google does as well, And what I would expect to

0:25:07.040 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 12>see is companies like Netflix. Probably they said they did

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:13.240
<v Speaker 12>not create that scene with Runway, Well that implies there's

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 12>at least one other company that they're working with the

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 12>software from, right, so I would expect to see that

0:25:18.400 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 12>actually As these companies dip their toes into the water

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 12>of AI video software more and more, you'll probably see

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:25.760
<v Speaker 12>them try out a bunch of different ones, and maybe

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 12>they will end up using a bunch of different tools

0:25:28.200 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 12>for different things. I think it really just depends on

0:25:31.280 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 12>what they find most useful and what their production teams do.

0:25:34.240 --> 0:25:36.359
<v Speaker 12>Is it live action, is an animation, and what tools

0:25:36.600 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 12>work the best for those sorts of things.

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Let's try and get the big picture vision.

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 3>This is what Ted Sarandos actually said on Netflix's earning score.

0:25:44.440 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 13>We remain convinced that AI represents an incredible opportunity to

0:25:48.240 --> 0:25:52.040
<v Speaker 13>help creators make films and series better, not just cheaper.

0:25:53.240 --> 0:25:56.480
<v Speaker 13>There are AI powered creator tools, so this is real

0:25:56.520 --> 0:25:59.960
<v Speaker 13>people doing real work with better tools. Our creators are

0:25:59.880 --> 0:26:04.119
<v Speaker 13>already seeing the benefits and production through pre visualization and

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.160
<v Speaker 13>shot planning work and certainly visual effects.

0:26:08.760 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 2>So Rachel, that's how Netflix sees it.

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:14.640
<v Speaker 3>If you are a Runway or another AI company that's

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 3>working on text to video tools, right is the movie

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 3>industry or television. What they're working toward is that who

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 3>they want to serve.

0:26:24.920 --> 0:26:28.360
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely, I mean they want to work with professionals who

0:26:28.400 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 12>are working in these fields, and they want to work

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 12>with the studios. I think what's also important to keep

0:26:34.000 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 12>in mind is this technology is really controversial because there

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:43.320
<v Speaker 12>are a lot of people people that perhaps would or

0:26:43.359 --> 0:26:46.720
<v Speaker 12>would not be wanting to use this software, that are

0:26:46.920 --> 0:26:49.080
<v Speaker 12>concerned that this is going to cut into their livelihos,

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 12>and I think that's a really real concern. So that's

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:55.280
<v Speaker 12>part of why the studios are being I think they're

0:26:55.320 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 12>a little bit hesitant to be public right now about

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.639
<v Speaker 12>how and if they're using this software because the stakes

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 12>are really high.

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Rachel Metz, thank you very much, Cara, what you.

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 4>Got as time now for Talking Tech and first stop

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:13.360
<v Speaker 4>ed in video. The chip challenger Furiosa AI has finalized

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 4>a deal with LGAI Research. Now the South Korean chip

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.640
<v Speaker 4>designer one final approval for its AI chip Renegade after

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 4>seven months of evaluations. Now in March, remember, the company

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:26.359
<v Speaker 4>rejected an eight hundred million dollar takeover from Meta, choosing

0:27:26.400 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 4>instead to grow the business as.

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 5>An independent company.

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:31.919
<v Speaker 4>Plast black Rock has told staff not to bring company

0:27:31.920 --> 0:27:34.959
<v Speaker 4>devices to China, including iPhones and iPads. That's all according

0:27:34.960 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 4>to a memo seen by bluembg News, and then move underscools,

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:40.880
<v Speaker 4>growing concern among some global firms about employees working there

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 4>and data security and glade Brook Capital Partners has raised

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 4>five hundred and fifty million dollars for investors for its

0:27:47.240 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 4>full fund. The firm has Stakes and SpaceX Perplexity Stripe,

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 4>among other startups, and it prows to continue backing fintech, AI,

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 4>E commerce, space and defense companies.

0:27:56.680 --> 0:28:00.000
<v Speaker 3>Ed okay, coming up, tech and energy leaders head to

0:28:00.240 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 3>Washington to discuss how the US can win in the

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 3>AI race. Or take a look at where global AI

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 3>competition stands now, Caroline, you pointed this one out earlier today.

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 2>It's a name what I've not looked at in a while.

0:28:12.880 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Open Door.

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, the stock's down one point six percent in the

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 3>hearing now, but look at some of the swings in

0:28:17.600 --> 0:28:21.199
<v Speaker 3>the session. Bloomberg writing about some of the activity, some

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.439
<v Speaker 3>of the halts. Open Door is the latest memes stock.

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 3>This says it on the Bloomberg terminal. No, seriously, go

0:28:27.920 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 3>check it out.

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 2>We'll be right back. This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 4>President Trump in a bilateral meeting with President of the

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:45.120
<v Speaker 4>Republic of the Philippines. I want to go straight out

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 4>to Mike Shepard there was a lot discussed there DOJ

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 4>investigations being queried, and some referring to potential as Trump

0:28:53.880 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 4>continues to see it of an election rigging, as he said,

0:28:57.880 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 4>but we've also had so much more when it comes

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 4>to the trade, when we think about China, when we

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 4>think about magnets, as it says, flowing out succinctly from

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:08.720
<v Speaker 4>the country. Can you just wrap up what we were

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:09.440
<v Speaker 4>hearing from there?

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 14>Well, First, the very first question the President took, of course,

0:29:13.200 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 14>was on the FED, something very close interest to our audience,

0:29:16.880 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 14>and the President stopped short of calling for Jerome Powell

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 14>to resign as FED chair. He did keep up his

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:26.600
<v Speaker 14>criticism of Powell's handling of interest rate policy, saying that

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:29.720
<v Speaker 14>he's been too late and too slow to lower interest rates.

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.720
<v Speaker 14>And this is a theme he has returned to again

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 14>and again in these moments when visiting foreign leaders join

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 14>him in the Oval Office. Just last week we saw

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 14>him hit these notes with the visiting Crown Prince at Bahrain.

0:29:44.120 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 14>We heard it again today with the President of the Philippines,

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 14>Ferdinand Marcos. We also heard the President talk about China,

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 14>which of course is a crucial topic between the US

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:58.200
<v Speaker 14>and the Philippines. China's one of China's closest neighbors. The

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:01.600
<v Speaker 14>Philippines has to balance this relatelationship, and we heard Marcos

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:04.320
<v Speaker 14>and Trump both talk about this, and Trump also indicated

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:09.000
<v Speaker 14>he had accepted taken an invitation from President's Shushin Ping

0:30:09.040 --> 0:30:11.280
<v Speaker 14>of China and was looking at possibly accepting it and

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.400
<v Speaker 14>would make a decision on that in the near future.

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 3>Carol Okay, Bloombergs, Mike Shephard, thank you very much. We

0:30:17.080 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 3>also expect to hear from the President later this week

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 3>in a speech on AI. Let's get from DC to

0:30:21.680 --> 0:30:25.000
<v Speaker 3>the global perspective of how the AI race is unfolding.

0:30:25.080 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 3>Nicolaus Lang is with us for that, managing director, senior

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.680
<v Speaker 3>partner Boston Consulting Group and the global leader of BCG's

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 3>think tank, the BCG Henderson Institute. We've covered a lot

0:30:35.880 --> 0:30:40.840
<v Speaker 3>in this program, how codified Europe's framework is around AI.

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:45.080
<v Speaker 3>We're waiting on America to follow suit in many respects.

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 3>The President will outline a vision on Wednesday. How would

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 3>you summarize the differences of approach between those two jurisdictions.

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, well, thank you for having me, and I think

0:30:56.000 --> 0:31:00.080
<v Speaker 15>when we look at the global geopolitic SOFII. What we

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 15>have seen here in our research is that we see

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 15>two superpowers, Yeah, on one side, the US. On the

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 15>other side, China, I think, leading in talent, compute, power,

0:31:11.640 --> 0:31:14.760
<v Speaker 15>foundation models. And then you have Europe and the Middle East,

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 15>which are these middle powers challenging the superpowers. And I

0:31:19.280 --> 0:31:22.239
<v Speaker 15>think that's where we will see the dynamic unfold in

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 15>the years to come. You just mentioned the approach to regulation.

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:29.800
<v Speaker 15>I think this is different. I think in the US,

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:32.479
<v Speaker 15>it's different in Europe, it's different in China. And the

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 15>realities that we need to adapt to these three constituencies

0:31:36.840 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 15>and these three approaches to regulation.

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 4>Very briefly, Niklaus, the companies you advise, where are they

0:31:43.080 --> 0:31:45.840
<v Speaker 4>trying to navigate? They're looking at expanding data centers within

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 4>the Middle East, within the US. Where are people tending

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 4>to default right now for their expertise?

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, Well, I think what we see in AI is

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.360
<v Speaker 15>a fragmented world as we see it also in other

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 15>parts of geopolitics, and I think companies realize that they

0:31:58.800 --> 0:32:01.040
<v Speaker 15>need to be present in the different regions, both with

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.880
<v Speaker 15>data centers, with AI talent, and also with capital and investment.

0:32:05.280 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 15>And I think that what makes this jubiled pigs of

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 15>AI space so interesting because I think we have a

0:32:10.480 --> 0:32:13.800
<v Speaker 15>huge dynamic, a regional dynamic which is very different from

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:14.959
<v Speaker 15>what we see in other areas.

0:32:15.520 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 4>We're going to be hearing much more about that regional

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 4>dynamic and an event later this week, of course, over

0:32:20.480 --> 0:32:23.840
<v Speaker 4>in DC Nicolaus Lang fascinating from the Boston Consulting Group.

0:32:23.880 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 4>We wish we had had more time. Meanwhile, though, that

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 4>does it for this edition of Bloomberg Tech Ed.

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, don't forget check out the podcast where we can

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:33.520
<v Speaker 3>retap all of today's Bloomberg stories and a lot more

0:32:33.560 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 3>that was going on.

0:32:34.400 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 2>You know where to find it.

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 3>It's on all the Bloomberg platforms, the Bloomberg terminal and

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.880
<v Speaker 3>online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart this is Bloomberg Tech