1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:03,720
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Law with June Grosso and Michael Best on demand

2
00:00:03,800 --> 00:00:06,800
Speaker 1: via our Bloomberg Radio Plus app free for iPhone and

3
00:00:06,800 --> 00:00:10,080
Speaker 1: Android devices. Well, now it's time for our daily Bloomberg

4
00:00:10,160 --> 00:00:13,200
Speaker 1: Law Brief, exploring legal issues in the news. Today, Bloomberg

5
00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:15,920
Speaker 1: Law host June Grosso and Greg Stewart discussed as a

6
00:00:16,040 --> 00:00:20,960
Speaker 1: Rereme Court case which concerns the constitutionality of immigrant detention.

7
00:00:21,320 --> 00:00:24,200
Speaker 1: They speak with Niel's friends In, director of the Immigration

8
00:00:24,239 --> 00:00:28,160
Speaker 1: Clinic at USC School of Law, and John Fear, legal

9
00:00:28,200 --> 00:00:32,239
Speaker 1: policy analyst at the Center for Immigration Studies. John, if

10
00:00:32,280 --> 00:00:34,400
Speaker 1: I can start with you just can you just give

11
00:00:34,479 --> 00:00:38,159
Speaker 1: us a brief summary of what the Appeals Court decided

12
00:00:38,200 --> 00:00:41,680
Speaker 1: in this case. Yeah, Basically, what the a CLU was asking.

13
00:00:41,760 --> 00:00:44,800
Speaker 1: What the Ninth Circuit decided was that the government must

14
00:00:44,840 --> 00:00:49,840
Speaker 1: provide individualized bond hearings to assess the danger and flight

15
00:00:49,960 --> 00:00:53,840
Speaker 1: risk for individual who has in detention when that comes

16
00:00:53,920 --> 00:00:56,920
Speaker 1: up to six months, and then every six months thereafter.

17
00:00:57,080 --> 00:01:01,400
Speaker 1: The argument is that a person would be detained for

18
00:01:01,480 --> 00:01:05,120
Speaker 1: a lengthy period of time. Nails tell us about the

19
00:01:05,160 --> 00:01:09,160
Speaker 1: government's argument this case, Well, I mean, the government's argument

20
00:01:09,240 --> 00:01:14,640
Speaker 1: is based upon a Congressional statute um and there are

21
00:01:14,680 --> 00:01:19,520
Speaker 1: several statutes that issue that provide in certain circumstances for

22
00:01:19,680 --> 00:01:23,880
Speaker 1: mandatory detention without the ability of an immigration judge to

23
00:01:23,920 --> 00:01:28,720
Speaker 1: make an individualized determination regarding potential public safety risk or

24
00:01:28,880 --> 00:01:33,039
Speaker 1: or or flight risk. And the Ninth Circuit has said

25
00:01:33,120 --> 00:01:36,800
Speaker 1: that the governments the congressional statutes that issue could not

26
00:01:36,920 --> 00:01:41,400
Speaker 1: have intended to provide for indefinite detention without an individualized

27
00:01:41,440 --> 00:01:45,399
Speaker 1: hearing before a judge. John, there's a lot of statutory

28
00:01:45,440 --> 00:01:48,520
Speaker 1: complexity here, and there are different groups of people involved

29
00:01:48,520 --> 00:01:51,080
Speaker 1: in the case. Can you just lay out who they are?

30
00:01:51,120 --> 00:01:53,920
Speaker 1: There are legal permanent residents, there are people who are

31
00:01:54,600 --> 00:01:59,320
Speaker 1: in the country illegally, uh, and and describe whether those

32
00:01:59,360 --> 00:02:02,280
Speaker 1: should be treating differently under the law, and people seeking

33
00:02:02,280 --> 00:02:05,080
Speaker 1: asylum as well. I think there's probably a stronger case

34
00:02:05,200 --> 00:02:09,119
Speaker 1: for individuals who are here legally as LPRs a legal

35
00:02:09,160 --> 00:02:12,760
Speaker 1: permanent residence. Um. But a stronger case you mean for

36
00:02:12,760 --> 00:02:15,240
Speaker 1: for for a bond hearing for a bond hearing, Yes,

37
00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:18,320
Speaker 1: But once you open that door, the problem is that

38
00:02:18,320 --> 00:02:21,200
Speaker 1: it starts to expand to every other category of of

39
00:02:21,320 --> 00:02:25,280
Speaker 1: non citizen. And that's really what this is about. UM.

40
00:02:25,400 --> 00:02:28,600
Speaker 1: The government, the administration, the abom administration is concerned about

41
00:02:28,639 --> 00:02:32,360
Speaker 1: the fact that if this were to move forward in

42
00:02:32,480 --> 00:02:34,840
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court work to come out with the ruling,

43
00:02:35,280 --> 00:02:39,720
Speaker 1: it would effectively be rewriting immigration law and removing a

44
00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:44,680
Speaker 1: lot of the UH political branches plantary power over immigration

45
00:02:44,760 --> 00:02:47,119
Speaker 1: away from them, away from the executive branch, away from

46
00:02:47,160 --> 00:02:51,520
Speaker 1: the legislative branch. And that's John Fear, a legal policy

47
00:02:51,520 --> 00:02:54,680
Speaker 1: analyst at the Center for Immigration Studies and Neil's Friends

48
00:02:54,720 --> 00:02:58,160
Speaker 1: and director of the Immigration Clinic at USC School of Law,

49
00:02:58,400 --> 00:03:01,120
Speaker 1: speaking with Bloomberg Law how student Rasso and Greg's store.

50
00:03:01,360 --> 00:03:03,600
Speaker 1: You can listen to Bloomberg Law weekdays at one pm

51
00:03:03,600 --> 00:03:07,160
Speaker 1: Wall Street Time here on Bloomberg Radio and now among

52
00:03:07,160 --> 00:03:10,280
Speaker 1: the top legal stories from Bloomberg Law. Billionaire Steve Cohen

53
00:03:10,360 --> 00:03:13,320
Speaker 1: has acted to close the book on the last insider

54
00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:16,920
Speaker 1: trading claim facing his old firm, S A C. Capital Advisors.

55
00:03:17,240 --> 00:03:19,359
Speaker 1: Cohen and the firm will pay a hundred thirty five

56
00:03:19,360 --> 00:03:23,320
Speaker 1: million dollars to a group of Elon Corporation investors. Shareholders

57
00:03:23,360 --> 00:03:26,320
Speaker 1: had claimed they lost money because of insider trading in

58
00:03:26,480 --> 00:03:29,720
Speaker 1: Elan shares. A federal judge still has to sign off

59
00:03:30,000 --> 00:03:33,400
Speaker 1: on the settlement, and that's this morning's Bloomberg lawn Reef.

60
00:03:33,480 --> 00:03:35,880
Speaker 1: You can find more legal news at Bloomberg Law dot

61
00:03:35,880 --> 00:03:39,280
Speaker 1: com and Bloomberg BNA dot com. Attorneys will find exceptional

62
00:03:39,360 --> 00:03:42,560
Speaker 1: legal research and business development tools there as well. Visit

63
00:03:42,560 --> 00:03:45,560
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Law dot com and Bloomberg b NA dot com

64
00:03:45,680 --> 00:03:49,560
Speaker 1: for more information. You can listen to Bloomberg Law weekday

65
00:03:49,560 --> 00:03:52,320
Speaker 1: afternoons at four thirty pm Eastern in New York on

66
00:03:52,360 --> 00:03:55,760
Speaker 1: Bloomberg eleventh three oh in Boston on A M and

67
00:03:55,840 --> 00:03:58,440
Speaker 1: ninety four point five F m HD two in San

68
00:03:58,480 --> 00:04:01,480
Speaker 1: Francisco on a m and one or three point seven

69
00:04:01,520 --> 00:04:04,640
Speaker 1: F m h D two and Sirius XM satellite radio

70
00:04:04,720 --> 00:04:05,680
Speaker 1: Channel one nineteen