WEBVTT - Mini Crush #32

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody, and welcome to Movie Crush. It's just another

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>mini Crush Monday. It's just another mini Monday. Why can't

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it be another day? Is that where we're going with that? No,

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>you are the sugar in my coffee man. Nice work.

0:00:46.640 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know if you would be hip to that.

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I had a cathartic experience last night, Chuck, and thank

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:53.639
<v Speaker 1>you for acknowledging my my hipster to my hip Tom.

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I saw the Muppet Movie for the first time, in

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>my original Muppet movie, and it was like pure joy.

0:00:59.520 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>It's just made me feel I've been whistling the Rainbow

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>connection all morning. Yeah. Great movie, really good. I mean

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>imagine seeing it that whatever age I was like nine,

0:01:11.280 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 1>What year did that come out? Seventy nine? Actually all right,

0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I was eight, and it was just like it opened

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.000
<v Speaker 1>And Josh and I talked about this on the I

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>believe the Muppet or the Henson episode of stuff you

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 1>should know. But if you had only seen like Sesame

0:01:28.000 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>Street and stuff like that, you had not seen the

0:01:30.319 --> 0:01:33.559
<v Speaker 1>world opened up like this. And then that very first

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:37.759
<v Speaker 1>bit with Kermit in the boat, uh, he like opens

0:01:37.800 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>up with him in a rowboat, right? Is that? Dom Deloise,

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 1>who was the guy that plays the agent. I swear

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>it looked like him, but I don't remember seeing his

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.199
<v Speaker 1>name in the credits. I don't remember the gold tooth.

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>He's the guy that's like, come to Hollywood. Yea, there's

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>an audition being had for Frogs. I don't remember it

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>very well. Might have been. It might have been, because

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:59.120
<v Speaker 1>that was certainly the peak Dom Deloise time. I met

0:01:59.200 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>him once when I was a little kid. Yep, he

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>was out at Stowe Mountain Park and we saw him

0:02:04.840 --> 0:02:08.639
<v Speaker 1>walking around and he was like, I believe no, I'm

0:02:08.639 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>positive he was the very first famous person I had

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 1>ever met, and he signed an envelope for us and

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>was really nice, and I just always thought that was

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:18.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of cool. Yes, I did confirm that he is

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Bernie the agent, the guy in the rowboat in thee

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that again it's been too long. Well, it's like the

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:25.840
<v Speaker 1>thing it was cool for me is I've never seen it,

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and so all these cameos were just pure surprises to me.

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>And it's like Steve Martin plays the rude waiter at

0:02:32.160 --> 0:02:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the Lodge and uh, I took my kid and we

0:02:35.080 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>just we we laughed and laughed. Did play in the theater, well,

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>the Midtown Arts Cinema, our local little kind of art

0:02:41.600 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>house theater does a series every summer, and this one

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>was Movies about mood making movies, and it was like

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.119
<v Speaker 1>stuff like eight and a half and The Day for Night,

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.079
<v Speaker 1>and then they tossed them up at movie and then

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>because it's totally a meta movie about making movies, and

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:57.519
<v Speaker 1>I really thought about that. It's it was a really

0:02:57.560 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>clever choice. And the guy that the guy did a

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>talk and it is just great. What guy. His name

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>is um Eddie von Mueller, and he is a history

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>um like animation historian at the Georgia State and he

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>was actually heavily featured on the Cartoon Network collaboration podcast

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>we did with Holly Fry uh Drawn the Story of Animation. Uh.

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 1>He was a big voice on that, just as it's

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>like kind of an expert opinion, full circle Noll, that's

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>what you call that, all right. So I think what

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do this week is just do a couple

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of segments because I always feel bad that we so

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>many people leave such great comments and questions and we

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>don't get to him. So we're gonna do some tropes

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and some questions because boy, the movie Crushers tropes thread

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>has exploded with close to three hundred tropes, and I

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.480
<v Speaker 1>would say easily two thirds of those are legitimate tropes,

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>which is not bad, you know, No, that's pretty damn good. Yeah,

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:01.360
<v Speaker 1>that's an I mean, I feel like we keep discovering

0:04:01.400 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>new ones or variations on when we've discussed. But there's like,

0:04:04.520 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the world of tropes is wide open, my friend, It

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>is wide open. Oh and you know, Josh and I

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>actually yesterday we recorded a stuff you Should Know episode

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>on police lineups and we were talking about all the

0:04:14.360 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>lineup tropes. Of course that that you see, it gets

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 1>parodied a lot, even you know, where there's just like

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>every person in the lineup is some stereotype of like

0:04:24.240 --> 0:04:28.600
<v Speaker 1>a particular overblown you know, caricature of the type of

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 1>criminal and that kind of stuff. Yeah, for sure. And

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>there's something also called a show up, which is easily

0:04:34.480 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 1>scientifically the worst. It's not even lineup, it's the it's

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.840
<v Speaker 1>but you've seen it in movies. It's when they bring

0:04:40.880 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>you to a if you're the victim of a crime,

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>they bring you to a place like where they have

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>just fingered the guy and they like pull him out

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of the police car handcuffed. Say, is is this the

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:54.680
<v Speaker 1>dirt bags the guy? Is this the guy? That's a

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>real thing. It's called a show up. And I'm like, man,

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>there is no science to that. It seems intense. You

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>are also like probably like freshly upset, you know, and

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>they and they pull someone out of it. So it's

0:05:04.240 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>heavily weighted in your mind because they pull someone out

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of a police car in handcuffs, so they don't appear

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>innocent in any way. They still do that, You think, yeah, wow,

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>I bet they do. Law enforcement. Man, it's got a

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:19.560
<v Speaker 1>long way to go, all right, So let's get down

0:05:19.600 --> 0:05:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to business on some of these submitted tropes. Uh all right,

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:29.719
<v Speaker 1>Chris uh Chris. Chris Wallzac says getting a vehicle or

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:33.280
<v Speaker 1>spaceship through a tight space by turning it on its side.

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I remember the old days. The big trick in the

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>seventies was they would do that with cars and and

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.560
<v Speaker 1>you would ride on two wheels, like they would go

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 1>off the ramp, you know, only sideways. But I'm thinking

0:05:47.720 --> 0:05:50.719
<v Speaker 1>like Millennium Falcon style, like flipping sideways, going through the

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>crevice and the Death Star and stuff like that, and

0:05:53.440 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I would argue that maybe that movie established that as

0:05:56.880 --> 0:05:58.720
<v Speaker 1>like a super cool thing that then everyone wanted to

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of do so sub to quin, space movies kind

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of started doing that. You gotta be the right shape, though,

0:06:03.279 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Willima and Falcons built for that. That's true. I mean

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the flatness of that ship made that possible. But then again,

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>like design of space movies started mimicking start. I mean,

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>you know it was. It was really like the Big

0:06:13.040 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the Big Space movie. Janet James Allman. This is a

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>good one, Janet. She says, someone is about to make

0:06:20.200 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>a confession when the door bursts open. That happens all

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the time, either a love confession or really any kind

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.360
<v Speaker 1>of confession, or you're about to kiss. I believe we

0:06:28.440 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that one. And you get interrupted every time, of course,

0:06:30.640 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>and they still do that because I guess it's a

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>valuable device because it builds romantic tension, but it doesn't

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.040
<v Speaker 1>give you the release that you so crave. It saves

0:06:39.080 --> 0:06:41.479
<v Speaker 1>that for a little later. Do you crave release, nol?

0:06:41.600 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I crave it daily growth. Uh let me see here,

0:06:47.040 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Clinton Barrett, this is a good one. Tapping a gauge

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in a desperate situation and then kicking the machine while

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:57.039
<v Speaker 1>saying work you infernal machine or something along those are

0:06:57.040 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>you damn thing? Yeah, tapping the gauge is fun because

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>it is usually like that starts to get the gauge

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to read correctly, right, Is that the deal? I'll just

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:08.560
<v Speaker 1>tap it. Man. Did you hear any of the audio

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>from that the guy in Seattle who took the plane?

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I did. We did a little segment about it on

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff that I want you to know. Actually fascinating that

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 1>whole bit. It's like twelve minutes or so. Yeah, he

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>says something like, um, he knew how to deploy the

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>landing gear just just for Anny wh who this guy

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in Seattle stole a plane. Um, he was a like

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.360
<v Speaker 1>a worker, I believe, like on the you know, the runways. Yeah,

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and he stole a plane. And it's not clear entirely

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>if it was with the intent to kill himself, but

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it was it was definitely clear was it was with

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the intent to fly a plane. And he knew how

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:44.640
<v Speaker 1>to do it well enough, just from having played fight

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 1>flight simulators and video games and stuff that thing for

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.360
<v Speaker 1>a while. And he did like barrel rolls and stuff.

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>And the guys on the ground that we're talking to him,

0:07:51.040 --> 0:07:52.920
<v Speaker 1>We're like, Wow, I didn't think you were gonna pull

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that one off. Man, It's so sad to listen to it.

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>It's very heartbreaking. It is. He seems like a nice kid,

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 1>he but he kind of says some self deprecating lee

0:08:00.960 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>suicidal things anyway, kind of painful side tracking their folks.

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>But it made me think of tapping gauges, because I

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>bet he tapped the gauges. Uh. Let me see here.

0:08:12.920 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Athena Black says, I'm sitting here watching a movie in

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a classic classic trope, just happened the whole dramatically brush

0:08:18.880 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>everything off the table trope. Uh, it's usually spontaneous sex

0:08:23.320 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>scene or a stressed out strategic explanation or some military

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>world saving maneuver. That's where they just need a clean

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>surface on which to accomplish some important task, like a

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:37.439
<v Speaker 1>sex scene. Have you ever strategic millet never raked everything

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>off of the table for a strategic military planning? Sash absolutely, yeah, yeah,

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>not not for sex. Don't I prefer, you know, a

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>cushion of some kind? Yeah? Who wants have six on

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:51.200
<v Speaker 1>the table? Crazy people in movies, chuck, Uh, let me

0:08:51.240 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 1>see here. Swimming for Harvey Anthony Hook. I like the

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>name Harvey. That's a good name. Yeah, it says if

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:00.640
<v Speaker 1>the imaginary bunny and that Jimmy Stuart. Yeah, you don't

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.160
<v Speaker 1>hear Harvey enough anymore. Uh. Swimming for ages underwater on

0:09:04.200 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a single breath, Oh boy, that's certainly the truth. Sometimes

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:12.680
<v Speaker 1>in movies like that, I will, uh, I'll try and

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 1>hold my breath as they're doing it, just to see, how,

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, long I can go? How long can you go? Chuck? Well,

0:09:18.120 --> 0:09:20.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm not very like I used to. They used to

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>be better a minute. Well, when I was a lifeguard,

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 1>I could swim full lap down and about a half

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a lap back on the water. And this was a

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>you know regulation like swim me it's about a minute

0:09:32.360 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a half maybe pretty good, it's pretty good. Yeah, there's

0:09:34.920 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>no way I could now, well, I mean neither. But

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:38.720
<v Speaker 1>but then in these movies, though, they go not only

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:42.199
<v Speaker 1>do they not breathe, they're going crazy deep and then

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 1>by the time like they're running out of breath. And

0:09:43.840 --> 0:09:45.719
<v Speaker 1>there's another trope too, they're running out of breath and

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>they got a surface and they're like, you know, scrabbling

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to get to the surface, and then the giant breath

0:09:51.240 --> 0:09:55.240
<v Speaker 1>at the end relief. Yeah, that's that's a part of that,

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's a two part trope. All that stuff makes

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>me nervous. Me too, U Okay, Jake Hale says when

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>blood is needed for some reason and the character cut

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>the palm of their hand, there are many other places

0:10:09.320 --> 0:10:13.160
<v Speaker 1>to cut where it wouldn't be so debilitating. Oh. I

0:10:13.160 --> 0:10:16.679
<v Speaker 1>think he's talking about maybe like a vampire scenario. You know,

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>like an interview with a vampire, they often like cut

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>their hand or bite their wrist or something like that.

0:10:22.320 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>You know. Okay, when when has there ever been a

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>moment in a movie where someone gave a legit blood

0:10:26.800 --> 0:10:29.880
<v Speaker 1>transfusion using a cut on their own body. I don't

0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's what. I don't think that's how it works. No,

0:10:32.760 --> 0:10:34.440
<v Speaker 1>So when he says when blood is needed, what are

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>we talking about here? I don't know. I was. I

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.599
<v Speaker 1>was gonna think maybe Blood Brothers, but you've got to

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:44.839
<v Speaker 1>be the hand because shake hands. I know, Blood Brothers.

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't like cutting. I don't know if I've mentioned

0:10:46.520 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>this on the show. That's the thing I don't care

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>for in movies. I don't like watching like broats being

0:10:50.960 --> 0:10:53.600
<v Speaker 1>slit or that's I don't like it, which is funny

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because I have. I've never broken a bone, but I've

0:10:56.000 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>been stitched up probably one too, three four. I've been

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>stitched up like five times in my life, but never

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>broken the bone, including NL. Here's a little something. I

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if anyone has ever heard. I almost bit

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>my tongue off when I was like ten. What would

0:11:14.320 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>we just like surprised or something? No, I fell down

0:11:17.200 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>playing no bit you know. I think I got like

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>eight stitches across my tongue. Chez. Yeah, I've never had

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a stitch, never broken a bone either, really, never had

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>a stitch. No, no, not a stitch. Man. I cut

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>my foot open, I cut my shin open, I cut

0:11:32.760 --> 0:11:36.839
<v Speaker 1>my head open. I cut my tongue off rough rough

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:38.720
<v Speaker 1>childhood there and none of none of them were ever

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:43.320
<v Speaker 1>cuts though, like they were Fromino. None of the more

0:11:43.400 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>knife related. Yes, that's O good, but I'm okay with that.

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh let me see here, Melissa Cooney not Clooney, but

0:11:51.679 --> 0:11:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Cooney says character one finds out that character too hasn't

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.160
<v Speaker 1>had a certain food. Character too tries the food and

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:03.640
<v Speaker 1>is astounded because their life has been so blanned without

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>this wonder, is that a trope? I'm not sure has

0:12:07.200 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that happened once? Well, that's the problem with some of

0:12:10.040 --> 0:12:12.680
<v Speaker 1>these is like they seem so iconic, but then if

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you really look back through the fossil record that is movies,

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>you might only find one instance of it. But you know,

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:20.959
<v Speaker 1>we're we're not we're not forensically researching these, We're just

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of like rattling them off. So it's possible that

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 1>some of these quote unquote tropes may have only happened

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 1>once or twice. If it's twice, is it a trope?

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:32.760
<v Speaker 1>How many times does it take to make a trope? Oh? Five?

0:12:33.320 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Geez yeah, more at least at least Okay, Yeah, Like

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I think a trope has to be in five movies

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a year. I think, yeah, I think that's true. Yeah,

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Jamison Ousley, why can't anyone in a movie use a

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>blender without sending its contents all over the kitchen? Okay,

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm supposed that's happened a good sight gag uh. Bill

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>g says man or woman who works too much and

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>is first introduced while on his or her cell phone. Sure,

0:13:04.360 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>phone phones are overused in movies, I think for different things. Yeah,

0:13:07.880 --> 0:13:11.080
<v Speaker 1>for some reason, I'm picturing um Jim Carey and liar, liar.

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>You know he's he's like the overworked, aggressive lawyer dad

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know who gave us to get his come

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 1>up and and become a good guy. So he's always

0:13:18.960 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on the phone and ignoring, you know, his familial duties. Yeah,

0:13:22.080 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>for sure. Uh cement. She says when a character is

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:29.680
<v Speaker 1>shot and they think they're dead, but they have something

0:13:30.400 --> 0:13:33.880
<v Speaker 1>tucked away in their shirt pocket that has prevented the bullet.

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 1>That's a classic one. I think we talked about this. Wait, no,

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I know what it was. It was in an episode

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:45.400
<v Speaker 1>of Ridiculous History where we were talking about this guy

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:50.319
<v Speaker 1>who was a Korean soldier who ended up being conscripted

0:13:50.360 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>by like the Japanese army, the German army, and the

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>American Army. But in that story, there was a side

0:13:55.800 --> 0:14:00.480
<v Speaker 1>story about the guy who played Scottie on Star trek Um.

0:14:00.559 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>He was in World War Two and he got shot

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>and a cigarette case saved his life. So that really

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a real life thing that that certainly is

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>is all over the movies. Yeah, you've definitely seen cigarette cases, Yeah,

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>or a zippo or or some special keepsake that someone

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>has just recently given you two. That's that's a good one.

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.040
<v Speaker 1>That's a good one. Oh, that that always happens, like

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:25.360
<v Speaker 1>if someone it's sort of like if you see the

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>gun in the first act has to go off in

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the third. If someone gives you a hard metal case

0:14:29.600 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>in the first act will save your life in the third.

0:14:32.080 --> 0:14:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Chekov's case is what they call that. Really, Chekhov's gun

0:14:35.840 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is the gun thing. Okay, it's like, if you know

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the gun that's displayed on the mantel, it's eventually going

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to be used in some scene. Chekov's gun, Audrey Brotzman, Oh,

0:14:47.080 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this is a good one. When someone when a few

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>people are having a discussion and two of them step

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:57.240
<v Speaker 1>away to have the private discussion, it's always like five

0:14:57.280 --> 0:14:59.720
<v Speaker 1>ft from the other person totally. It was like, dude,

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>they can totally here you absolutely well, it always it

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 1>all goes back to the Shakespearean aside. You know, Oh,

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>it probably right. I think maybe it's just like the

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>idea that it's it's suspending disbelief. You know. Oh, you

0:15:10.560 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 1>were bringing tremendous insight today, So do my best, because

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>we didn't do bong hits uh Peter Griffin. Peter Griffin. Hey,

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:23.320
<v Speaker 1>it's me Peter Griffin from Hawk knocking a rider uh

0:15:23.480 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>off a motorcycle to steal it, pick up the bike,

0:15:26.520 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>then proceeds to immediately to a wheelie as he drives away. Yeah,

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that was pretty bad. Peter was fine, man, Peter Griffin

0:15:36.120 --> 0:15:40.120
<v Speaker 1>is already like a bad impression of a guy from

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Where are they from? I think it's like Rhode Island,

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.160
<v Speaker 1>Rhode Island. Yeah, it's like that chap aquittic kind of

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy accent. You know, maybe I should have done Cleveland.

0:15:51.720 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>That wasn't bad Cleveland. Cleveland's good. I like that voice.

0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I just I saw that movie chap Aquittic. By the way,

0:15:56.480 --> 0:15:58.280
<v Speaker 1>on the plane the other day. We interviewed the director

0:15:58.320 --> 0:15:59.920
<v Speaker 1>on stuff they don't want you to know. Yeah, I was,

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and I wasn't there that day. But did you get

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to see the movie? I did. Yeah, we saw a

0:16:02.920 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>screener of But I thought it was really good. It

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.440
<v Speaker 1>was good. Yeah, it had a I mean it had

0:16:06.440 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a movie of the Week quality, but

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>h a really good movie of the week. Absolutely, No,

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I thought the same thing, but like it definitely like

0:16:13.360 --> 0:16:16.160
<v Speaker 1>what Ed Helms is in it, and he's play the

0:16:16.200 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>guy that plays Kennedy is is fantastic And yeah, no

0:16:20.640 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>it's if anyone hasn't seen that one. It didn't really

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>make the rounds in a big way. I know, it

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>was kind of under the radar. I thought it was

0:16:26.360 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>quite good though. Yeah, I agreed. Boy, I'd love to

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>seeing Ed Helms to a a drama like that. He

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>was great. John Taylor Wesley, Yeah, this is a good one, boy,

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>And this isn't almost every Western ever guy goes to

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>a bar and just waves at the bartender and the

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 1>bartender just serves a drink some whatever drink. Well, I

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.760
<v Speaker 1>mean it's kind of like saying beer, that's true, Like

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>who does that? I will say this though, I I

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>have a two neighborhood bars at which I am a regular,

0:16:54.880 --> 0:16:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and they definitely know my drink and they don't have

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to ask me. All Right, I'm gonna guess this is

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a game called guests knowles bar huh um. I know

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>where you live? You still live in the same place. Well,

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I will give you a clue. They are more in

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>relation to here where we are now than than my

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:15.239
<v Speaker 1>than my home. Okay, I should make it even easier. Uh, well,

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with one right in this very building then,

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and say the Mercury. No, that's too fancy for me.

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I would go there if someone else is paying. Um geez,

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>what bars around here? The Righteous Room? Yeah, the Righteous Room. Really,

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:29.479
<v Speaker 1>that's my spot and the Local is my spot. Okay,

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>So shout out to Righteous Room and local Local. I

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 1>remember had good French fries. They have really good chicken wings,

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:39.280
<v Speaker 1>really good smoked wings. Really. Yeah, well, let me let

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>me take you to the local sometime, Chuck. You know, no,

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.879
<v Speaker 1>you're I know you're a family man, and I know

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you've got stuff going on. But one day, let's do

0:17:46.119 --> 0:17:48.760
<v Speaker 1>around after work. I still like to drink. Well, I

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:50.399
<v Speaker 1>know that shock, But I'm just saying we keep different

0:17:50.400 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>slightly different hours in terms of our office comings and goings. Yeah, yeah,

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>I would. I would do that for a lot of times. I'll,

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'll go with Ben from stuff they don't

0:17:57.280 --> 0:17:59.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, and other folks are on the office and

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:02.080
<v Speaker 1>won't go Taiwan on after work. So well, I'll tell

0:18:02.119 --> 0:18:07.679
<v Speaker 1>you what. If Ben stays at home, I'll go with you. Um.

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember when the Righteous Room opened, By the way,

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>that's how long. That's how long I've been around. It

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>was to me. I still think of it as one

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>of the new bars. I think it says I'm the Sign,

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but it's established or something like that. Yeah, but that

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:23.439
<v Speaker 1>was a new bar. Like when I first started going there,

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I was like, whoa, the Righteous Room, Like all the

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:26.800
<v Speaker 1>other bars have been here for forty years and this

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:29.360
<v Speaker 1>one is brand new. Yeah, I like it. It's my cheers. Well,

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's right For those of you don't know Atlanta,

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.840
<v Speaker 1>we have a very classic movie theater from the nineteen

0:18:35.320 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 1>geez one was the Plaza built. It had to be

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>the I'm Bad Time math um. But there's also a

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:46.400
<v Speaker 1>really cool old diner right next to it called the Majestic,

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and they clearly are of the same era. Yeah, it's

0:18:48.800 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>a very kind of throwback part of Atlanta. And the

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Plaza Theater is owned, to believe by a couple who

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.200
<v Speaker 1>lovingly sort of restored it to a classic movie house

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:00.119
<v Speaker 1>and they show some really good films there and and

0:19:00.480 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that's where you're gonna see like your Rocky Horrors in

0:19:03.040 --> 0:19:05.960
<v Speaker 1>the Room and stuff like that late night. Um, but

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:08.360
<v Speaker 1>they programmed great movies and the Righteous Room is right

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:10.959
<v Speaker 1>next door in this little shopping center. So you can

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>go have a beer at the Righteous Room or whatever

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you please, and then uh saunter right next door and

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:18.359
<v Speaker 1>go to see a movie. They sort of booze at

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.359
<v Speaker 1>the movie theater too, they do, so you can just

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>keep boozing it up all night long, all night long,

0:19:22.440 --> 0:19:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and then call a lift because you shouldn't drive drunk.

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Also true. Alright, a couple of more tropes here, Uh,

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.480
<v Speaker 1>David Carroll, he has a couple of them. I'll go

0:19:38.480 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>ahead and read. Both high school jocks are all violent bullies,

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Uh who would never respect women or be friends with

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>non jocks. Sure, that's a jock trope. And then step

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>dad's are evil. Yeah, I mean stepdads are so evil

0:19:51.240 --> 0:19:54.480
<v Speaker 1>in movies. They They had a horror movie called The Stepfather,

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and I believe they even remade that horror movie. Oh

0:19:58.080 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>I remember the Stepfather. Yeah, the guy from Lost was

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>the stuff. He totally was lock. John Locke from Lost

0:20:06.200 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>was the Stepfather. That's right. Yeah, I bet it doesn't

0:20:08.720 --> 0:20:11.399
<v Speaker 1>hold up if we watch it now. Probably not. But

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.680
<v Speaker 1>there was a golden time for those kind of family

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>drama type horror movies. Remember The good Son with the

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>McAuley culkin where he was he was like the evil

0:20:20.440 --> 0:20:23.600
<v Speaker 1>step son or no, that's not true. Elijah Wood was

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 1>the stepson. He was the son and he was he

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 1>was a bad, bad dude. So who was the good son? Well,

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the good son was Elijah Would. But I think it

0:20:31.760 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 1>was sort of meant to be ironic because the mother

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:36.240
<v Speaker 1>thought that McCauley Culkin was the good son and he

0:20:36.280 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of blamed everything on Elijah Would. But in fact

0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:42.280
<v Speaker 1>McAuley Culkin was a little devil spawn. And speaking of Culkin,

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>have you seen him succession yet on HBO? It is

0:20:46.440 --> 0:20:49.159
<v Speaker 1>awesome really, Oh yeah, it's like a it's about like

0:20:49.200 --> 0:20:52.119
<v Speaker 1>a Rupert Murdoch esque family and like of the idea

0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>of like who's going to inherit, who's gonna run the company?

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And Brian Cox is in and who played Hannibal in

0:20:57.359 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the original Man Man Hunter and Culkin is in it,

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's written by the guy who wrote Um,

0:21:04.520 --> 0:21:07.880
<v Speaker 1>He's got something to do with that director in Nucci

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>who did Um Death of Stalin and Heap and all

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 1>that stuff, and this got man, it's so good. I

0:21:13.680 --> 0:21:15.280
<v Speaker 1>watched two episodes last night and now I was just

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:17.560
<v Speaker 1>like hooked. It's all right, big check it out, big

0:21:17.560 --> 0:21:22.679
<v Speaker 1>reck see. Look, we're doing recommendations to everybody. Uh. Speaking

0:21:22.680 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of recommendations, we also have merged. Now, by the way,

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 1>get a couple of movie crush shirts if you want. Yeah,

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a t public dot com slash movie crush,

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>you know why not? Right? All right, We're gonna finish

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>here with some questions. Uh these are you know, always

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>asked for movie questions or just questions for Nolan, I

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh for me and Nol and how you say it?

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I'm still not sure. Um, let me see here,

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 1>all right. Ralph Spradley has this question for us Nol

0:21:56.119 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit of a thought experiment. Pick the war film

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that you, if you were fighting in a war and

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 1>living it out, you would like or dislike the least

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to be in. Well, I just saw a Platoon for

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>this very show again for the gazillion time, and that

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:20.440
<v Speaker 1>movie does a great, great job of h really driving

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.080
<v Speaker 1>home how little you would have wanted to be in

0:22:23.119 --> 0:22:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the Vietnam War. Wet insect written uh, utterly frightening chaotic,

0:22:32.200 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 1>uh V I mean obviously like the d D Invasion

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and Private Ryan like war as war. But I would

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>say the Vietnam War probably for me. Are we talking

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.680
<v Speaker 1>about particular movie or yeah, Like pick a war film

0:22:47.720 --> 0:22:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and like what what war in that film? Like as portrayed?

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 1>Would you be like Nope, well yeah, I mean like

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.720
<v Speaker 1>with the World War two and World you know, the

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:57.680
<v Speaker 1>first two World wars is a lot of that trench warfare.

0:22:57.720 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>It was a lot more um kind of what's sort

0:23:02.680 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of for like kind of blunt instrument warfare where it

0:23:05.280 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>was a lot more like scrapping in the trenches and

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. You know, you might get bayonetted. You

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>might get bayoneted, and that's terrifying in its own right.

0:23:11.960 --> 0:23:15.160
<v Speaker 1>But the thing about Vietnam, I think is at least

0:23:15.200 --> 0:23:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that's depicted in movies like The Deer Hunter and um

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Apocalypse Now is sort of the psychological toll of it

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and the idea of it being kind of like a hopeless,

0:23:23.800 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>pointless war where you're literally burning villages and women and children,

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.239
<v Speaker 1>and the way you see people that are like your

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>former buddies kind of losing their minds and you know,

0:23:34.400 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>becoming like the thing that they you most kind of

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>hate and fear. You know that that's the thing that

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is interesting to me about Vietnam. Interesting And yeah, Bruce

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Olsen says this, and I kind of agree with Bruce here,

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 1>how come there are no more quotable lines for movies anymore?

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>It feels like when I grew up in the seventies

0:23:51.800 --> 0:23:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and eighties, almost every hit film had at least one line.

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 1>You would hear people saying all the time. Well, I

0:23:57.000 --> 0:24:00.159
<v Speaker 1>don't have an answer for that, Bruce, um, but I

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>think I kind of agree. Um, I'm sure there are

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 1>some quotable lines. But even like a movie like I know,

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we we talked about The Hangover, not a lot, but

0:24:12.080 --> 0:24:14.320
<v Speaker 1>a few times in here, and that's a good example

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.399
<v Speaker 1>of just a huge, big, monster comedy hit. And I

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>don't I can't think of a line from The Hangover

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>that's super quotable. Hey, it's the Hangover, you know, can you?

0:24:25.800 --> 0:24:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there any big iconic line. Absolutely not. I

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.119
<v Speaker 1>mean often I will say the funny line for me,

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:33.240
<v Speaker 1>I will say this A lot around the house is

0:24:34.080 --> 0:24:36.680
<v Speaker 1>with me and Emily and Ruby is We're the three

0:24:36.800 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>best friends that anyone could have. That's good, that's good,

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>but that's not some icon did not invade the mind

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of of the zeitgeist. Not not like a Show Me

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the Money or something like that. Yeah, or even like

0:24:49.080 --> 0:24:51.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, Big Lebowski, you know, which which just was

0:24:51.880 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 1>more of a sleeper hit. Uh, that's probably more quotable

0:24:55.840 --> 0:25:01.440
<v Speaker 1>divides if we believe in Nothing Lebowski. It cuts off Johnson.

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.359
<v Speaker 1>That's it's fairly Maybe maybe I'm just into it. Sometimes

0:25:05.400 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 1>you eat the bar, sometimes the bar eats you. That

0:25:08.440 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>counts is a quotable movie. But they're on, They're on

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a ton of those anymore. I am. I am super

0:25:15.080 --> 0:25:18.440
<v Speaker 1>on board with that notion. Uh. Duncan Creamer says, do

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>you ever watch a movie in bits and spurts? Uh? Yeah,

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>there are there are movies where I feel like I

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have seen almost all of the movie, but only in

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>bits and spurts. And it's a it's a movie you know,

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 1>always that I don't truly truly care about seeing. You know,

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:40.119
<v Speaker 1>for me, it's too it's the Goonies and a Christmas Story,

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'll tell you why. It's because they get played

0:25:43.040 --> 0:25:46.400
<v Speaker 1>on TV so much that over, especially at Christmas stories.

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:48.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, every Christmas they play a Christmas Story or

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:51.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe for years at least on TBS here around Atlanta,

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I guess around the world. They used to play Christmas

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Story for twenty four hours. They probably still do, but

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that's how I saw The Christmas Story, so you tune

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in and I'd see it in reverse order. I'm still

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 1>not quite sure the chronology of events in that movie,

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:07.919
<v Speaker 1>and similar with the Goonies, although I did watch it

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 1>in one sitting with my kid recently and I enjoyed

0:26:09.760 --> 0:26:11.200
<v Speaker 1>it very much. But for a long time, I've never

0:26:11.240 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>seen it from front to back. I just seen little

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>snippets of it on TV. Yeah, and you know what,

0:26:15.560 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>going back to the quotable lines thing, I wonder if

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 1>there's anything too lines being more quotable when you're younger,

0:26:24.480 --> 0:26:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Like I wonder if we were to ask a uh,

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty year old today about quotable lines for movies and

0:26:33.119 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 1>they would be able to fire off ten of them

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:37.520
<v Speaker 1>from the past five years. I wonder if that's a

0:26:37.560 --> 0:26:39.920
<v Speaker 1>young young man's game. I guess so, but I don't

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 1>really think so, because it's just like you say, it's

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>just not I don't Maybe it's maybe it's a different

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>intent that goes into making the movies. Maybe that's more

0:26:47.400 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>of an old fashioned kind of way of making movies.

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>But it's like you think of Jurassic Park, even like

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, Clever Girl, and they do move in herts

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and even things like that, which seems kind of a

0:26:59.560 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>knock you us that those those were pretty pretty quotable.

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.159
<v Speaker 1>You gotta wonder if the filmmakers like, I want this

0:27:05.240 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to be super quotable, yeah, or like when the screenwriter

0:27:09.480 --> 0:27:12.119
<v Speaker 1>writes a line, they're like, oh, yeah, this, this is

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:15.919
<v Speaker 1>going to be one of those lines. Maybe you shouldn't

0:27:15.920 --> 0:27:17.639
<v Speaker 1>try to write that way, though it doesn't seem like

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you should now. It seems like that would be very forced.

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Harris says, you know how George Lucas went back

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and changed Star Wars movies, including new scenes. I'm not

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:29.280
<v Speaker 1>a fan of what he did, but I do like

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>the idea for less popular movies instead of remakes, I

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.440
<v Speaker 1>think studios should commission a different director to go back

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>and fix movies that flopped. Well, Kevin, I do not

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:44.440
<v Speaker 1>agree at all with that statement. Uh. I see where

0:27:44.440 --> 0:27:49.119
<v Speaker 1>you're going, and I respect your opinions, sir, but I

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>don't like the idea of going back and trying to

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:56.399
<v Speaker 1>fix a movie. I don't see the point you release

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.879
<v Speaker 1>it out there in the world. That's your best effort.

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:02.320
<v Speaker 1>Just let it be. That's what I say. Let's do

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of more here. Joe Smith says, what is

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the movie you enjoy that really isn't very good, but

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you enjoy it because you love the source material so much?

0:28:10.119 --> 0:28:13.719
<v Speaker 1>For me, it was constantine as Joe Smith, you know

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>what comes to mind is, uh the Watchmen movie. Yeah.

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking about that too, even though I the

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.439
<v Speaker 1>source material just is so much greater than the than

0:28:22.480 --> 0:28:23.679
<v Speaker 1>the movie, and that i'd be but I think we

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:27.159
<v Speaker 1>were maybe on slightly different sides of that argument. You

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:30.159
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed that you enjoyed the movie quite a lot, right, Well, no,

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:32.959
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it was that great. I kind of

0:28:33.000 --> 0:28:36.159
<v Speaker 1>liked it, But I think I think it qualifies for

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>his question because I loved the graphic novel so much.

0:28:39.920 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying you think it made made you give

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a move of the movie a past a little bit,

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more of a pass. I was so

0:28:45.120 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>ready to love the Watchman movie, and I think they

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 1>did a good job in a lot of ways. Um,

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but in the end, it just, I don't know, it's tough.

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>They didn't have the giant squid attacking the City, you know. Yeah,

0:28:58.040 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that's right. You know it just got green light for

0:28:59.720 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>a series on HBO. Yeah, they just shot that here

0:29:02.120 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in Atlanta. I didn't know that. So you've been known

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:06.600
<v Speaker 1>about this for a minute and you were holding out

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on me, Chuck, I haven't known about this for mead

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 1>friends that worked on it. I think the thing with

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>me and Watchman is the book is so good that

0:29:12.320 --> 0:29:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I was prepared for the movie to not

0:29:14.840 --> 0:29:16.719
<v Speaker 1>be good, and it was actually a little better than

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>I expected it to be, but still not as good

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>as as as the book. Yeah, I hear you. It's

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.600
<v Speaker 1>such a good graphic novel, and I don't read graphic novels.

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:27.480
<v Speaker 1>That's one of the few ever. Guess that's it's the one.

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you're going to read one, that's definitely

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:38.640
<v Speaker 1>one of them. And all right, let's finish up with this.

0:29:41.000 --> 0:29:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Tim van den Hook says Chuck on your other show,

0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I suppose he's talking about stuff you should know. You

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>mentioned you have a list, a club, a selection of

0:29:49.960 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>directors who have never made a bad movie. Yeah, thecent Club.

0:29:54.280 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>I've talked about it before, Uh, he said, I remember

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Sophia Coppola on the list. I think that I had

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:03.120
<v Speaker 1>made that state before I saw her most recent one,

0:30:03.440 --> 0:30:07.360
<v Speaker 1>The Oh, it was the one. It was. It was

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a remake of the movie that had Clint Eastwood in

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it as the the the wounded Civil War soldier who

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>was taken in by a by a house fuld of women. Uh.

0:30:19.400 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 1>And it was okay, the Guild, Yeah, the Beguild. It

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:29.000
<v Speaker 1>was all right, but that definitely dinged her armor a

0:30:29.000 --> 0:30:32.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit for me. Otherwise, I think Sophia Couple has

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>made pretty much great movies. I think Wes Anderson is

0:30:35.320 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>in that group. I talked about the Coen Brothers um

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:46.560
<v Speaker 1>with a slight ding on the Tom Hanks movie that

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think was great, The Lady Killers. Yeah, did

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you like that? I mean, it's fun if you watch

0:30:51.120 --> 0:30:53.479
<v Speaker 1>it again and don't like try to hold it up

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to the Coen Brothers canon. It's a fine little movie. Yeah. So,

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.520
<v Speaker 1>like their worst movie is probably that movie, and it's

0:30:58.560 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>not that bad. They're there in that group. And of

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:04.960
<v Speaker 1>course Alexander pained to me absolutely club p t Anderson

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>um and he says, how would you rate David Fincher?

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>He said, aside from Alien three, which is probably beyond

0:31:13.240 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>his control of his worst film is probably Panic Room,

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:20.120
<v Speaker 1>which is still pretty good. Uh, you know what, I'm

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna put Fincher up there for sure. As I look

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:28.080
<v Speaker 1>through his repertoire, Gone Girl I thought was really good.

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Girl with the Dragon Tattoo was great, Social Network was great.

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh you know what, Benjamin Button I didn't. I didn't

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:37.720
<v Speaker 1>really like that movie that much. That was so he's

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 1>not a hundred percent club. We talked about this the

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>other day because that was one of those movies that

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:43.240
<v Speaker 1>got passed around to a bunch of different directors, I think,

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh, really yeah, I remember that segmented a couple

0:31:46.920 --> 0:31:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago about movies that were there. Would know

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.800
<v Speaker 1>that that just they were offered to people and then passed,

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you know. And I think Benjamin Button was one that,

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>like almost all of the big directors on the list,

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>had been offered at some point, and ultimately Fincher got it,

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:05.520
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was an odd choice considering that it

0:32:05.520 --> 0:32:08.280
<v Speaker 1>wasn't really like anything else he'd done, and it also

0:32:08.320 --> 0:32:12.080
<v Speaker 1>wasn't particularly good. Yeah, that's my only ding in his armor, though,

0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:15.680
<v Speaker 1>because Zodiac is a masterpiece. To me. I did like

0:32:15.720 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Panic Room. I thought it was pretty good. Fight Club

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of course, is great. The game very very good movie. Yeah, people, people,

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I think we talk about this. People rag on Fight

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Club that it does doesn't hold up, and I I

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:27.960
<v Speaker 1>would beg to differ. I think it's uh. I think

0:32:28.720 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I think it was a movie for its time, and

0:32:30.280 --> 0:32:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it certainly showcases a lot of toxic masculinity that's very

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.440
<v Speaker 1>much not in vogue right now. But I think that

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it knows if that's what it's doing. Um So I

0:32:40.880 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Yeah, seven great movie. Alien three again not great,

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but our our our listener here gives that when a pass.

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And then boy, he did a lot of Paulo Abdual videos.

0:32:55.920 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Looking at his list, he's a lot of Madonna videos too.

0:32:58.040 --> 0:33:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah he I didn't realize this he did. I mean,

0:33:00.880 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 1>he goes back to the eighties with Rick Springfield videos

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:10.960
<v Speaker 1>for Christ's sake. But yeah, venture overall, I give him

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And I enjoyed the mind Hunter TV series. Did not

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 1>watch House of Cards? Do you watch that? No? I didn't.

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know what, I really liked mind Hunter, and

0:33:19.080 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I watched at least the first three episodes, but for

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>some reason I did not continue. And that happens to

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:26.080
<v Speaker 1>me from time to time. Mind Hunter. And it's not

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:28.760
<v Speaker 1>a ding on the show necessarily. I think it's just

0:33:28.880 --> 0:33:31.480
<v Speaker 1>like a testament to the clutter that is my mind

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes I just kind of like fall off of

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 1>things placed, you know. But I really did like mind Hunter.

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was more understated than I was expecting

0:33:39.880 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>it to be. It kind of was like a TV

0:33:41.400 --> 0:33:43.719
<v Speaker 1>show version of Zodiac in some ways in terms of

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 1>like the tone, and they totally set it up to

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>where you think, like, oh man, this is a serial

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:52.719
<v Speaker 1>killer show and it is not as thrilling as that.

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a much more cerebral, uh show about this this dude,

0:33:59.240 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>this this mind Hunter Detective. I like it. I can't

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>wait for season to finish. Yeah, alright, we're gonna finish

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>up with that, everybody, Thanks for listening your homework. For

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 1>this week, we continue with the friends and family editions

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>with my very good pal that you heard on the

0:34:14.080 --> 0:34:18.239
<v Speaker 1>pre Oscar special. I think it was the pre with

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:21.320
<v Speaker 1>my friend Scott A. Polito. He is a director of

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>photography and a camera operator and he also writes on

0:34:25.040 --> 0:34:28.359
<v Speaker 1>the side. Scotty and I've written things together as as

0:34:28.400 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 1>screenwriting partners, and he has an old old friend and

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 1>one of my uh, one of my bestias, one of

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:39.759
<v Speaker 1>my brothers, and he chose Close Encounters of the Third

0:34:39.840 --> 0:34:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Kind as his favorite film. He tossed around some really

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>good ideas from et to Chinatown, which was nabbed by

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 1>our mutual buddy from last week, Chad Crowley, so he

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.880
<v Speaker 1>went Close Encounters. I can't wait. I'm gonna watch it

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.040
<v Speaker 1>this weekend, and Scott and I are gonna sit down

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 1>and talk next week, and uh, we're gonna keep doing

0:34:58.880 --> 0:35:00.760
<v Speaker 1>some more friends and family, gonna at Noel and Emily

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in here and maybe even my brother if he agrees,

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and uh so look forward to those. We're gonna intersperse

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>those along with the regular guests that we're going to book.

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I hope that's okay with you guys. I

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's kind of fun. So thanks for listening. And

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:18.879
<v Speaker 1>until next week, Noel, do you want to say good

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 1>night man? I guess I'll do it. It's not really

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 1>night time though, it's pretty early still, but good day,