WEBVTT - 4/12, Part 2: Thursday night recap, lineups, tiki drinks, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess dude Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. PA me

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>come best Friends, Fantasy best Friends Forever, our number two

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy b f as here at the Fantasy Sports Radio Network.

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>That's Frank Stan. I'm Greg's I's been joined as we

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>are each and every day in the second hour by

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>the closer, Chris Man shows up. Chris, Nope, nothing's hope,

0:01:07.760 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing's up? What's up? It's your boy. I'm gonna do it.

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>Even though you missed it the clothes, I missed my

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>opportunity today, you missed it. I'm sorry, man. Yeah, excited,

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:19.479
<v Speaker 1>excited for the weekend. Yeah, we've thrown you got Sunday, Yeah,

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night piped for that. Um, what else is there

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>anything else? Mass Mass I'm not interested in golf. Had

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:28.840
<v Speaker 1>someone asked me on Twitter who I think is gonna

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.000
<v Speaker 1>win the Masters? I said, I just can't even name

0:01:31.040 --> 0:01:33.560
<v Speaker 1>five golf. Why does you have they asked me. I've

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>been watching and follow it and just said, hey, pass

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>him over to Greg. Yeah, I will next time. Sorry,

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:43.679
<v Speaker 1>you follow golf? Yeah, like golf. I saw him watching

0:01:43.680 --> 0:01:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the Masters yesterday. Whole life. Feel like I don't even

0:01:45.640 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>know you anymore. I've watched the Masters in my whole life.

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>I like golf, You'll pull my friends? Do you like golf?

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Mostly because when I played it, it's so frustrating so far. Also,

0:01:59.320 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I can I can name quite a few golfers as well.

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Like golf, not like into it as like Mayo is

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>where Cam Steward is, Like I like watching casual. Those

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.440
<v Speaker 1>guys bet every single week, right, Yeah, they're into it.

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>When you bet, you like every sport pretty much pretty

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 1>much the game Reency theory on anything? Is Gabe still

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 1>down there with yes? Just making sure. Um, I gotta

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>talk to Gabe Okay after the show, I will bet.

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>What Regarding these Toronto raptors, man, I've noticed something about

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Gabe gave the number one rule of the Homer. Homer,

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>you can't bet with your heart, Gabe. Never bet against

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the Bills and never bet against the Raptors. He shouldn't

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 1>even touch the Raptors series. He shouldn't touch it because

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna bet with his heart. Don't touch a gab

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.359
<v Speaker 1>Gabe wants to grab him, Mike. You know, I'd give

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>him a chance to defend himself. I don't want to

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>kill the guy on air. Not let him defend himself.

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 1>He's on the air like six hours and true. Yeah,

0:02:53.040 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>like he's Gonnas game time. I mean, you could just

0:02:55.280 --> 0:02:57.800
<v Speaker 1>crush me. Then it's fine, all right, we gotta get

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.239
<v Speaker 1>back to baseball. We've been doodling too much. Sorry, man,

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>just being honest. Um should be the waiver wire is there?

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:06.440
<v Speaker 1>You want to do anything else you want to hit?

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean we can bounce around. I mean there were

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>still nothing else you want to talk about from yesterday.

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean most of us, like the afternoon, it was

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.800
<v Speaker 1>like kind of like whatever, Stephen Madi, Stephen Matts, is

0:03:17.800 --> 0:03:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that anyone hit on? That'd be cool? All right? Stephen

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 1>mates actually been solid. He had eight strikeouts. Interesting, how

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:29.280
<v Speaker 1>about strikeounts, but only seven swinging strikes that's crazy. That's

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.959
<v Speaker 1>an interesting stat for you. Huh. It's five pitches Stephen

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.480
<v Speaker 1>mat Like Mats, I don't own any shares of him

0:03:36.480 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>because last year he was all over the places. So

0:03:40.000 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>far has been pretty good. Whenever talk when we talk

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>about the Mets Martino, it just texts me facts about that,

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Like the second we mentioned I got playing. What do

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 1>you say that? Just Steven Matt's boom two point seven

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>e r A in Atlanta in his career. Wow? Alright,

0:03:53.880 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>look at Matins strike percentages up this year. The chase

0:03:58.800 --> 0:04:01.960
<v Speaker 1>rate is a rear high so far, so, but the

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.920
<v Speaker 1>swinging strikes do just haven't necessarily been there. Nine seven

0:04:05.400 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit below league average. So I think he's

0:04:08.120 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>he's been fine thus far. Looking at his pitch usage,

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>using the change up a little bit more this year,

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>curb boll less. So maybe you know his fastball change

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.679
<v Speaker 1>up combinations working out for him. He's creeping. He's creeping

0:04:18.720 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>up the ladder in terms of value. You know his

0:04:21.360 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>value in terms of his value. Alright, so he faced

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the braves last night? We ell does he faced? He's

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 1>faced Washington? Okay, that's you know, five shoutout and he's

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 1>against Washington with eight strike us. That's very good because

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you know we're using that as the argument for Zach

0:04:37.360 --> 0:04:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Wheeler is that he's been rocked by the Nationals twice

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:42.760
<v Speaker 1>because they're a really good lineup. So Matt has been

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 1>good there and then against the Marlins he allowed three

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.520
<v Speaker 1>runs but only one was earned. That was his worst start. Okay,

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>he's been pretty good and against three division foes. Alright,

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>So if he's like my SP five or six for

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>most people, he is, Yeah, you love it. I feel

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>right about that. I like the last year too. The

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>only thing with him is health. That's really what it is.

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:05.320
<v Speaker 1>It's health that's the only good because he's got the stuff,

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's not just health. He could be erratic,

0:05:08.400 --> 0:05:10.800
<v Speaker 1>to be iratic, that's the issue. I think mostly it

0:05:10.800 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>has been health, though gring Or lack their road, I agree,

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I agree, But he has been the numbers last year

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:19.479
<v Speaker 1>because I wanted to like Stephen Matts this year and

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.279
<v Speaker 1>I just couldn't bring myself to like like I wanted to,

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:24.920
<v Speaker 1>but I won't. But there was a time where I

0:05:24.960 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>looked into him and I thought it was gonna be

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.599
<v Speaker 1>one of my guys this year. You always want to

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.680
<v Speaker 1>like the Mets pictures like Callaway because we like and

0:05:31.680 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 1>this is part of the reason why we like the

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Indians too, right, because the Indians being able to develop pictures,

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>and part of them developing pictures was a lot of

0:05:38.240 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>it was Mickey Callaway. So now he's with the Mets

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and hopefully Zack Wheeler bounces back tonight. I guess we'll

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:47.160
<v Speaker 1>find out we're gonna lose our minds. We're gonna lose

0:05:47.160 --> 0:05:51.359
<v Speaker 1>our mind next week Wheeler sucks again. Um Dancey Sponsors

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>stole his first base of the season. Swanson also won

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.160
<v Speaker 1>one skys is doing it all everything. It's a good

0:05:56.200 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>bring upon. Is this a guy? Did he? Is? He

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>must add in twelve team? I'll tell you right now.

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:02.840
<v Speaker 1>He was the most picked up player on ESPAN leagues.

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Would you rather own Pantie Swanson or Jerks and Profile

0:06:06.080 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>that was coming pro far? I'd rather own Profar too,

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.400
<v Speaker 1>So I guess Andree Swanson is not a must owned

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>player because if you don't think Jerks and Profile and

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you can't think I do think. I don't think I'm

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.839
<v Speaker 1>saying I'm just saying logic. Yeah, I do think Mustard.

0:06:21.839 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I think to me, you like to ride

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 1>players while he's hot. I mean, there's might be the

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 1>only player hotter than him, Right, That's exactly what I

0:06:28.480 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to say. You want to pick up a

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:34.080
<v Speaker 1>hot batter wants his hot one man super hot. Yeah,

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and he's still a guy with upside. By the way,

0:06:36.800 --> 0:06:39.880
<v Speaker 1>we speculated about Kyle Kyle, he got hyoga being called

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>up for the Yankees because Gary Sanchez officially just hit

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the eye. Om man, Gary things always something looking at

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>was Sandro to Texas to Sandro, video producer editor downstairs,

0:06:50.720 --> 0:06:53.880
<v Speaker 1>the most optimistic Yankee fan. It's actually amazing every Yankee starters.

0:06:54.839 --> 0:06:57.920
<v Speaker 1>He loves Gary Sanchez, is that true? And Luke boit

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and am sorry angly and in this person and everyone

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>heard except I'm so happy. At least we have finally

0:07:08.360 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>caught Mets fever in terms of everyone heard on the team.

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Everybody Hicks d ned was coming into the year, but

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and new harror, Gary Sanchez, Severino's coming back. But it doesn't.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>But the most of them, it's not even like it's

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>like okay, it's not even like okay, you have five

0:07:29.000 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>guys on the aisle, yes, yeah, Hicks, right, so you

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>have six guys on the aisle, and you would hope

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that maybe three of them are guys that aren't really important,

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>but all six of them are vital to the team.

0:07:39.880 --> 0:07:43.320
<v Speaker 1>He's like, has been out crazy. All right, how about this, Greg,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I know we just spoke about how bad he is.

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:48.680
<v Speaker 1>If you need a second catcher, you pick up Austin Romine.

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Nice stinks, well, every second catcher stinks, Greg, we're dropping

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>our first catcher. Beef Castile would Josh Fegley, all right,

0:07:57.880 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. I agree with you on that. That's fine,

0:07:59.720 --> 0:08:02.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Why don't we like Fegley? He's been good,

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>he's been he's been good, absolutely hot man. Seriously, Josh

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Fegley's he's been good. I guess that catcher. No, he's

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:14.080
<v Speaker 1>been good. Second three homers, eight run scored, seven RBIs.

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>He's betting three thirteen. He's got like twenty times the

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>amount of hits that Yonder Alonzo has got. He's got

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.320
<v Speaker 1>a forty line driver. Rey is bad. Balls are line

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>drives and catcher. If you could grab a Hawkeye like that,

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it's big. That's yeah, like a two patch league. You

0:08:27.400 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>got exactly. Gotti Roman I would say, at least you

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>know Roman at least is gonna play the majority of

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the time in a really good lineup environment. So as

0:08:37.679 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 1>your second catcher, if you've got some scrub really sucks.

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I look at Roman. We speculated on this Braves line

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Roman or Carson Kelly, Gregson. Kelly's not even Roman because

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play one in Carson Kelly. Like that's something

0:08:50.840 --> 0:08:52.800
<v Speaker 1>I might do. Speak in the main eventure opportunity, I

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>have car Okay with that? Yeah, okay with that? Um yes,

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 1>especially yesterday on the Braves lineup. So enter c r

0:08:59.360 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>J didn't play yesterday. Azzi Albi's let off the game

0:09:02.559 --> 0:09:05.200
<v Speaker 1>still still ahead of which is what he's been doing.

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.480
<v Speaker 1>He hadn't doing it anyways, has been leading off against

0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:11.839
<v Speaker 1>his left alright, so he normally owns lefties. What do

0:09:11.880 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>you thinet that contract man? They're killing him as a

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 1>cons and his are they're getting. They're stealing that both,

0:09:18.880 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 1>they're stealing seven for thirty five? What are they thinking? Greg?

0:09:22.679 --> 0:09:25.440
<v Speaker 1>What it was Azzi Albi's team thinking? You're saying? Because

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, I understand when you to get a player

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 1>on a cheap contract while he's still under team control,

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>I understand, like from both sides because the team wants

0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>to lock up the player and you're worried about cheap

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.559
<v Speaker 1>and you know, the player wants some financial security. I

0:09:39.640 --> 0:09:41.440
<v Speaker 1>understand that it might be a strike in the future,

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 1>but Greg seven for thirty five. This is something that

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:47.840
<v Speaker 1>a player under team control was getting like five six

0:09:47.960 --> 0:09:51.439
<v Speaker 1>years ago. Like that was a contract that Starling Marte

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was signing when he was still under team control. Something

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:56.840
<v Speaker 1>like that. You know, I saw you. I saw it

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>yesterday called the second worst contract in the history of baseball?

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Were what was the worst Jason Worth, Kobe Elsbery? No,

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.839
<v Speaker 1>so the other side, right, like the other the worst

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>on the player. Okay, what was the worst team? Terrible? Yeah,

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Salvador Perez signed around the same time, even a little

0:10:15.080 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>bit older, signed like a five year, seven million dollar

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:23.959
<v Speaker 1>deal seven million hole before the season. That's why I

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>want to know what did Brandon lou get before the season,

0:10:25.840 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>because he got an extension for a second. But the

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Salvador Harris concert was so bad that after like they

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>won the World Series, he was so underpaid that the

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Royals just tore it up. Like listen, you have outplayed this, Like,

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>let me give you an I was thinking about this

0:10:37.360 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I just looked it up. Brandon Laud got six for

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty four million, six four three and Ozzy Albis gets

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>seven five. It's crazy. He has a whole season under

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:50.839
<v Speaker 1>his belt, where Azzi Albis does where he was pretty good.

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>I know, I know he fell off in the second half,

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 1>but overall his numbers were pretty good. He's a top

0:10:54.200 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>prospect and he had more prospect pedigree than a guy

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 1>with Brandon Laud. Not that I want to pooh pooh

0:10:59.080 --> 0:11:00.839
<v Speaker 1>loud because I like him as a player. I think

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 1>he's a good player, but more Yeah, and he got

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 1>more money, but like not significantly more money a seven

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>year contract, raig, he should at least got six yeah, yeah,

0:11:12.880 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Like the first number of my mind was like at

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:16.360
<v Speaker 1>least fifty six, Like give me at least eight million

0:11:16.400 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>a year, at least sixty he's worth six thread five?

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:23.559
<v Speaker 1>What is it? What is he wants to the agent

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:25.680
<v Speaker 1>doing here? I just saw something that said he doesn't

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.679
<v Speaker 1>care about the money. He wants his family secure one

0:11:28.720 --> 0:11:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and two. He wants to be He's worried about the team.

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.079
<v Speaker 1>More on yourself a little bit, I know, I know,

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and Akunya deserves more than ten million and he got

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>a ten for eighty right Southern Repara has later signed

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:43.600
<v Speaker 1>a sixty year, fifty two million dollar deal. Like after

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.400
<v Speaker 1>it was ripped up, it felt terrible of this guy

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like that sucked in. He signed a five year deal

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 1>for seven million awful, and they ripped it up into

0:11:59.920 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 1>a sixteen to give him a new deal after the world.

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 1>How much has he played to that the Royals? How

0:12:06.120 --> 0:12:09.079
<v Speaker 1>many years did he happens? Two solid years? Like good?

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>He played well. I don't want he played well. I'm

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 1>just telling you signed that deal. He was great defensively anyway,

0:12:13.280 --> 0:12:17.000
<v Speaker 1>so it didn't matter. He's mean, he was always pretty good. Yeah,

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's been one of the most consistent catchers

0:12:18.960 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>since he's been a starter. But I was wondering if

0:12:21.240 --> 0:12:23.079
<v Speaker 1>he was proven already or not at that point, you know,

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:26.599
<v Speaker 1>And I don't. I don't think he's like what he

0:12:26.720 --> 0:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>is now with that power, but he was still I mean,

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 1>he was an up and coming guy. And and you know,

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the Royal has given their contracts and given their ability

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 1>to you know, their budget constraints, they have to get

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>lock guys up. But five years, seven million dollars, that

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>come on, what are we doing what are you doing?

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Can at least right? I want to jump in. I

0:12:45.760 --> 0:12:47.800
<v Speaker 1>want to I want to jump into two. Lopez is

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>from yesterday. I want to ask you about Pablo Lopez

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.720
<v Speaker 1>because it's been three subpar starts, and before I dive

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>into anything, I want to ask you, guys, would you

0:12:56.200 --> 0:12:59.439
<v Speaker 1>drop Pablo Lopez just seeing what you've seen thus far? Yes, Yes,

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:02.319
<v Speaker 1>would drop Popo Lopez? Okay, well I'm here to tell

0:13:02.360 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>you that I would not. I would not because he's

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a six point one zero E array through three starts.

0:13:09.080 --> 0:13:11.599
<v Speaker 1>He has him good. I can't deny that. But he

0:13:11.640 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>has a three point three three x FIT So I

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>think told me that we don't play in an x

0:13:21.280 --> 0:13:25.319
<v Speaker 1>FIP league, but there are other there are other numbers

0:13:25.360 --> 0:13:27.600
<v Speaker 1>as well. And and that player that we were talking

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.440
<v Speaker 1>about was John Gray, who to this point in time

0:13:30.480 --> 0:13:33.319
<v Speaker 1>i'm still right about. He pitched a gem yesterday. Well, yeah,

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it was a giant. You could pitch a gem against him.

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>Probably the reason why the x FIP is more valuable

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:42.959
<v Speaker 1>here Greg is because he pitches in Marlin's Park, So

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>the x FIP is a little bit more valuable, Like

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>he's not going to give up home runs at the

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>rate that he has, or because he pitches in Marlin's Park,

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:50.439
<v Speaker 1>it's a much better location to pitch, and then a

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>place like Corus Field, and it's k minus walk percentage.

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 1>It's twenty four point five. So he's kane a bunch

0:13:55.800 --> 0:13:58.600
<v Speaker 1>of guys. He's not walking many and that would rank

0:13:58.640 --> 0:14:01.400
<v Speaker 1>top twelve months starting pitchers right now, So he's not

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not walking at anybody. He has two walks aloud

0:14:03.960 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>on the season total. He has struck out five guys

0:14:06.640 --> 0:14:09.040
<v Speaker 1>in each of his last two games, seven strikeouts an

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>opening day at home against the Colorado Rockies. He's allowed

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>three runs in the first start, and then the last

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.480
<v Speaker 1>two have been away one in Atlanta one since Natty Bolt,

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>known as hitter ballparks seven hits in each, four runs

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>allowed in each as well. He hasn't been good. I

0:14:21.240 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>can't defend that at all. And I own him in

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>a few locations, and I started him in the main event.

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I started him over whose Daktana, so clearly I was

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in and that one hurt. That one, that one sucks.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:34.320
<v Speaker 1>So I feel your pain if you've been starting Pablo Lopez.

0:14:34.360 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>But I'm here to tell you like the velocity is

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>up from last season, the whiffs are up, the strikeout

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>minus walkers there. I think there's still a lot to

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 1>like about Pablo Lopez in the deeper league, Like maybe

0:14:45.800 --> 0:14:47.120
<v Speaker 1>in the twelve team league you might be able to

0:14:47.120 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>find someone at this point who's better. But I think

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, if it's a deeper twelve team league, if

0:14:52.720 --> 0:14:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you have deep benches or overall, if it's just like

0:14:54.600 --> 0:14:57.520
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen team or mixed, I would hold onto Pablo Lopez.

0:14:57.520 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I think better days are coming. Oliver's next start hims

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:06.160
<v Speaker 1>at home on the sixteenth against the Chicago Cubs. That's

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>probably not a start for me. But you're not gonna

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 1>start him then he's at home, Like, you're not gonna

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Like he's in the analyst, but the clubs are one

0:15:11.720 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of the best lineups in the NL. But I understand.

0:15:13.520 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>But like you're the analyst, right, so you're not startingh

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>he hits the Cubs, you certainly not gonna start against

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the Phillies. Don't you want to see a proven start

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>from him again? Though, But like if he bounces back

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:24.560
<v Speaker 1>in Mon's Park, then maybe you trust the matter kind

0:15:24.560 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of just you don't think you just have to necessarily

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:27.200
<v Speaker 1>get him in there, so I think I don't think

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to get him in there. I I we

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 1>always think a little bit different with than this, Like

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>when you're a weekly start lead. We were talking and arly, like,

0:15:33.560 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>which one of these guys do you start? Like that's

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:36.840
<v Speaker 1>I leave on the bench for some of our other options,

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:39.280
<v Speaker 1>probably depending on their matchups we haven't looked, but like

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I think, from a daily change league, are you going

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to start him or not? And maybe that will depend

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:47.040
<v Speaker 1>on where your matterpis during the little bit tougher, But

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Ja Dailey, that's how I think about it when we

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about it generally. I I would almost start anybody, okay,

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 1>in a in a daily transactionally, unless it's something really bad,

0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:58.320
<v Speaker 1>like if it's Pablo Lopez in Coors Field, like right

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>but at home in Chicago, Like you could talk me

0:16:01.400 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>into that in a daily trains actions league, but in

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 1>weekly I would imagine that I have someone with a

0:16:06.120 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>better matchup than to start there. And in the daily league,

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to think that's the thing. You want pictures on your

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.480
<v Speaker 1>roster that you can plug in at any time, because

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to try to plug them all in. So

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 1>if you have a guy you're on the fence about

0:16:18.880 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>like a Pablo Lopez. It almost comes to the point

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>that should I even own him, because now I gotta

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 1>worry about this in the daily league. Do I want

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:28.480
<v Speaker 1>to start him against the Cubs at all? Right? But

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>even even if it's a you know, a wait and see,

0:16:31.280 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>let's see what he does to start against the Cubs

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:35.400
<v Speaker 1>and then if he's all right, then maybe you trust

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>in the next one. If he gets bombed, then after

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that start, I get it. But I do think better

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>days are coming, Greg, And I want to bring up

0:16:41.280 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>poor Hee Lopez as well. Maybe we get into a

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit more after the break. Greg, but former top

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>pitching prospect for the Brewers, he's kind of bounced around.

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>He hasn't been good in the miners, haven't been good

0:16:50.080 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>in the majors either. Getting a chance to start now

0:16:52.200 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Kansas City Royals, he's been solid. And like

0:16:56.240 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the X fit and and and

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the strike of the hayes Per nine and the walk Brine,

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.800
<v Speaker 1>they don't look great regarding Jorgy Lopez, but the swinging

0:17:04.840 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>strikes are up. A guy throws an eighties seven mile

0:17:07.000 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 1>pur slider in deeper leagues, Jorge Lopez. That's my desertion

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>z break when we come back. More from Frankie Stanfeld

0:17:15.880 --> 0:17:19.160
<v Speaker 1>or from me work Chris Ventra labor Wire Friday. You're

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:31.160
<v Speaker 1>the fantasy best friends forrav. Maid Sailors is the leading

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>cleaning service in New York City and Boston. We service homes, offices,

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>corporate departments and Airbnb turnarounds. Give us a call or

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>text at two and two zero to book now. That's

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 1>two one two five one zero. Use the promo code

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 1>at n T s Y for off your first cleaning.

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>For more information, go to maid sailors dot com. That's

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:01.679
<v Speaker 1>made sailors dot com. What's your I R S problem?

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Do you owe back taxes? Is there a lean placed

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:08.880
<v Speaker 1>on your property? Have your bank accounts been frozen or seized?

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Have your wages been garnished? Are you being audited by

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>the I R S? Are they sending you letters that

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:19.800
<v Speaker 1>demand actions and have urgent due dates? Well. Solving your

0:18:19.840 --> 0:18:23.560
<v Speaker 1>tax problems is as easy as calling taxes three to one.

0:18:24.320 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>The I R S is the largest collection agency in

0:18:27.000 --> 0:18:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the world. You need the best representation to give you

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>peace of mind. You need experienced professionals that can cut

0:18:34.280 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>through the red tape and stop the collection process. If

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:39.680
<v Speaker 1>you have a serious problem with the I R S

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.360
<v Speaker 1>called the taxes three to one network today, we'll get

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>them off your back. Eight hundred nine six one thirty

0:18:47.640 --> 0:18:51.440
<v Speaker 1>six thirty one, eight hundred nine six one thirty six

0:18:51.560 --> 0:18:55.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, eight hundred nine six one thirty six thirty

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:59.360
<v Speaker 1>one eight hundred nine six one three six three one.

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Game time decisions like like you know he's been hit before, Calf,

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:07.960
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, you missed it, Like you can't like the

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.720
<v Speaker 1>show open, but like we're talking like food shot the

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.160
<v Speaker 1>first picture of the game, damn, And I came into

0:19:13.200 --> 0:19:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the game motivated today, like, oh we're gonna have a

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:18.600
<v Speaker 1>good of the game. Gone, he gone. I know he

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:21.440
<v Speaker 1>was typing you and Bold let his old cat gets

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to head back in the game, buddy. The past week

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 1>days four pm e Stern one be Pacific only on

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Dinner, Baby Shi, Dinner, Baby Shi,

0:19:38.240 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Dinner Baby Shake, Really baby sharks shark mommy shot? Is

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 1>this about Jeff some shark? What is it you like?

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Jeff the Martin? Come on ventu? Is this is this

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:01.400
<v Speaker 1>through a gym all over Gregg Sussman face Last night

0:20:02.280 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>what he talks smack about Jeff So, Marga, do you

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>believe in fantasy Karmen adventure. Yes, if you talk smack

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 1>about a player, they're gonna come back and own you.

0:20:11.359 --> 0:20:13.920
<v Speaker 1>That is real. It is a real thing. And I

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>believe if you got you know, kind of screwed in

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:18.280
<v Speaker 1>in fantasy, I feel like it will come back. You

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:21.640
<v Speaker 1>have a fable or vice versa. Because I was talking

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>about the smack about Tyler glass Now before the season

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and he owned me this week, he absolutely owned me.

0:20:27.920 --> 0:20:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's real. Wait did you tell did you

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>tell everyone about that trade? Yeah? I announced it in

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 1>the first hour. Have someone tweeting me that they traded

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>glass Now for Chris Sale. That's in and people don't

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I was insane for giving away glass Now for walking.

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:44.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know the Baby Sharks songs from. I

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know either. It's just a huge phenomenon. I think

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.159
<v Speaker 1>it's like a show or it actually might just be

0:20:50.240 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a song. I think it's just a song that like

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>toddlers sing along and it became huge, Like I think

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:56.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a show. I just think it's a song. I

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>randomly heard a kid playing it, like when I was

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.800
<v Speaker 1>playing fortnite. You know what it is. I was a

0:21:00.840 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>video of it playing in a club over the sandstorm beat.

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh drude, that's like the first house song ever you

0:21:12.600 --> 0:21:15.600
<v Speaker 1>can find that. But I saw there's a VIC song

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>out today? Is that? Yeah? That's it was possible because

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>he's not living well. I mean, they record a bunch

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of stuff that's just never released. There was a rumor

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>to that they probably had a bunch of like unreleased

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>mix tapes and stuff that he just did for the

0:21:29.640 --> 0:21:32.240
<v Speaker 1>fun of it and it was never released. Yeah, the

0:21:32.320 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>songs that, Yeah, I think it happened a decent amount.

0:21:34.280 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 1>With artists, they just record so much music, right, it's

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>just like whatever actually gets like pushed to like a

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.320
<v Speaker 1>label or whatever. This is a VG and Aloe block.

0:21:42.880 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Oh so he probably took his stuff that he never

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:47.680
<v Speaker 1>used before and mixed it into his own stuff, you

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:52.440
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean? Like, yeah, probably his family or something.

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>All Right, So I guess we'll give it a listen

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:59.239
<v Speaker 1>and see what happens. It was we were a big

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>house guy be venture. Definitely a lot of absolutely yeah

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>you all you all this stuff right? Vegas, Yeah, Vegas,

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Baby Vegas. It was amazing house. You have to like house.

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 1>If you're gonna go club, hate it. I went to

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>a club in Las Vegas. I'm burnt down, little John.

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Your head has been the same since. Yeah, I did

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:25.240
<v Speaker 1>too much from twenty like twenty to those were like

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:30.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy years for me. How much you how you in enhanced?

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Not as much as you think. But there was a

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>period of time where I was on like a streak

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:37.399
<v Speaker 1>for like almost a whole year, like nine months. It's

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot. That's a lot, like once a month, like

0:22:40.520 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>once a month for nine months. It's not I mean,

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 1>it's not that I would read a memory memoirs book

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>written by Christmas writing a book, yeah, please write a book.

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a horror book though, the closer men biography, it's

0:22:54.840 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that wars. I would read it. I would market it

0:22:57.800 --> 0:22:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for you. I would sell it. I'll sell it on

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 1>my patron all right. I'll try to come home todays

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:04.920
<v Speaker 1>take me forever, though, to write the memoirs of the

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.359
<v Speaker 1>close of some crazy stuff happened back in the day,

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>that's right. I wouldn't read about it. I wouldn't read

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.760
<v Speaker 1>about men's life. But you imagine more interesting than like

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.480
<v Speaker 1>me or you, Greg. I don't regret it. We don't

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>vanilla ice cream one scoop. You didn't part you were

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 1>like N twenty you know, I do you sure that?

0:23:27.680 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>But I like read different places basically like my friends

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>would my friends would go to the clubs and whatnot.

0:23:31.840 --> 0:23:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I hated it. I don't enjoy it. Yeah, personally, well,

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean you get drunk. Yeah, of course you don't

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.200
<v Speaker 1>even like it when you got drunk and stuff drinks

0:23:40.240 --> 0:23:41.680
<v Speaker 1>three I p a s on his couch and that

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>just the best. Now, that's for sure the best, the

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>best thing, the best club I ever went to. Yeah,

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>we're in Vegas for bachelor party that we're at a

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>pool party. I'll never forget this. We're at a pool party.

0:23:55.160 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 1>It's nighttime pool party. Rights, that's cool. So it's like

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>I love pools. I love being at and you're wasted.

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course it's in the pool. And we saw Z

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>performing them perform to Greg so zs perforing and like

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>they played all these remixes that I know right because

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.359
<v Speaker 1>they had like a rude remix like the why you

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Gotta be Right? So they did a remix and that

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I was like, like, god, I love the song. It

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.080
<v Speaker 1>was awesome. I had having a blast drunk. I was

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.480
<v Speaker 1>like running around the water like splash and everybody was great.

0:24:21.080 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So one of my exactly that is not a party.

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>That's different times in the water, but I was in.

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 1>One of my buddies comes up to reas like like

0:24:35.400 --> 0:24:38.600
<v Speaker 1>yeah yo yo yo, t s Thos up there spinning

0:24:38.640 --> 0:24:45.480
<v Speaker 1>with Z and I'm like, okay, you didn't know. I

0:24:45.480 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>couldn't give less of a unit. One was the number

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>one DJ for a long time. I can imagine someone

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:53.399
<v Speaker 1>freaking out about Honestly, I was one of those guys.

0:24:54.400 --> 0:24:56.840
<v Speaker 1>It was like, oh, well, Dave Matthew's band is up there.

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Then you got my, my, my, my feeling on this.

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I know it's wrong. I know it's ignorant. You could

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.399
<v Speaker 1>go up there and there's the same effing button that's yes,

0:25:06.440 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>that's pressing no. But he makes his own sure, but

0:25:09.000 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it's all done already, he's made. It's in the studio,

0:25:10.840 --> 0:25:12.479
<v Speaker 1>it's all done. Oh yeah, it's all He goes into

0:25:12.520 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>pressing playlist. It's done. It's all he does. He could

0:25:14.520 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>do that, he does. It's the same. It's like someone

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>lip sinking at a concert. I hate that. It kills me,

0:25:19.080 --> 0:25:21.359
<v Speaker 1>but I hate that too. Exactly what they do actually

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.239
<v Speaker 1>make them. I get what you're saying. I get you're saying, like, oh,

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.040
<v Speaker 1>anyone could go up there and push button. Yeah you're

0:25:25.040 --> 0:25:27.080
<v Speaker 1>not wrong, But I think when you get to that point,

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of just like the experience, that's what you're

0:25:29.560 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 1>there for. Like, I don't think you care whether or

0:25:31.520 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 1>not the DJ is like doing his doing anything. But

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>if you just see him going like this, like growing

0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>a line here and exactly like this, that you can

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:47.240
<v Speaker 1>do it. You can do it. Yeah, it's exactly Marshall.

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>He can't even see you can't see any of the things.

0:25:51.480 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>That's it. And the scrilling sky's just going like this. Yeah,

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>but nobody kills because they're all you know, Yeah, they're

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>all messed up. And that is having a great experience.

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Big good when I have a good time, Greg, I understand.

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm just telling you. It doesn't I don't. It doesn't

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 1>do it for me. That's fine. Look, I was never

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a big I'm not in a house. You show you

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>know what I gotta do it. I got into it

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>when not house, but when like traffic, house kind of

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>got popularly when Marshmallow and Kigo got really popular and

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 1>they weren't nearly as hardcore as like Tiesto and when

0:26:23.880 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>they will underground more not underground like like now like

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the music that like Kigo come out with. Now he's

0:26:29.800 --> 0:26:32.600
<v Speaker 1>much less housy than all the music used to it.

0:26:32.960 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>So he's saying it's more it's more poppy. Yeah, yeah,

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it's more main stream. Correct, So like don't like that, no,

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:42.879
<v Speaker 1>no words of stuff like like trance, Like I love trance,

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:45.680
<v Speaker 1>like he played me this. I've gone to a few

0:26:45.800 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 1>like trance underground spots that have trance. It's just like

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:50.560
<v Speaker 1>the same beat or whatever. Actually I did it you

0:26:51.200 --> 0:26:54.439
<v Speaker 1>still like kind of like cripple reality and everyone's freaking out,

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>so right now, so right now, So there's this um

0:26:57.320 --> 0:27:00.680
<v Speaker 1>where's this sun? There's this Marshmallow song featuring Church. Yeah,

0:27:00.840 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>that's very popular right now in the radio, Like that's

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:04.840
<v Speaker 1>a how's the song? But I love them, it's great.

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's part would you go to a Dualipa concert?

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know as much about that

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 1>today because I don't party anymore like I used to

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>believe it's a party. It's just a pop singer. Yeah, yeah,

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:20.320
<v Speaker 1>like I I don't know about like you know. I

0:27:20.359 --> 0:27:23.520
<v Speaker 1>don't listen to radio that much anymore either, No, neither.

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:29.119
<v Speaker 1>My hey day was like Tiesto and UMCIVICI. I was

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a little before Dead Mouse. Um. I can't remember Mafia. Yes,

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 1>that era trancy, a little more trancy. You know. I

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>didn't do it never. My friends would get all my

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.199
<v Speaker 1>friends like saw Swedish House with the garden, like two

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>nights in a row. I wouldn't go to these guys.

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:48.919
<v Speaker 1>I would just go to a club to see them

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.639
<v Speaker 1>in Vegas. Yeah, and I went went this zen. It

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:54.640
<v Speaker 1>was awesome. They went and saw a lesso at Hokasan

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:57.399
<v Speaker 1>the next night. I'm not doing that. And then we

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.240
<v Speaker 1>went to the Light or last night in Vegas and

0:28:00.320 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 1>we got ye howkinsa sick actually because it's small. We

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:05.920
<v Speaker 1>had we had go to a pool party earlier in

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the day. I can't do both. You crazy? Yeah? The

0:28:08.880 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 1>post for are you crazy? I'm for hours an hour.

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>We started at noon. It was like five o'clock, Like

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't, I gotta go, I gotta go in five

0:28:17.840 --> 0:28:21.960
<v Speaker 1>hours crazy. I did them all key Pool party for

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:24.080
<v Speaker 1>like ten hours and we had to wear republic and

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I was just like I thought, three days had passed right.

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I was like, what's going on? We're still here? You

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>probably we really still here? Probably eat anything, no exactly,

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.200
<v Speaker 1>drank not enough water? Probably my friends were lost, Like

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>where are they? My favorites? When you're when you're in

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the pool and the girls just willingly just doing anything.

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:45.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. There's time, all right, it's good. Happy

0:28:45.840 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Greg is back. You don't want to happy. But you

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>know what, Frank, you don't want to go to the

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>pool part with girls, take other tops, doesn't do it.

0:28:53.960 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm engaged. Greg's okay, but you've never been to Vegas.

0:28:56.600 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Every one of us are engaged. Do you been to Vegas?

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was a family vacation, so I didn't

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 1>really do anything too crazy. I kind of guy. I

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>was like drunk every night, but you didn't got like

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a club or a pool to one club and I

0:29:09.920 --> 0:29:13.840
<v Speaker 1>saw a little John t J. That was fun. He's

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>always there. You want to talk about a guy who

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 1>basically did nothing on stage, he was just you know,

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:23.240
<v Speaker 1>doing fright with the Vegas and right there I did not.

0:29:26.040 --> 0:29:28.480
<v Speaker 1>And then I turned to Greg and we see like

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg's mom there. I love exactly Greg, Where do you

0:29:35.240 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>want to go. We gotta do something productive. There you

0:29:38.000 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>go to Greggy. That was this was Fiji. I was

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.840
<v Speaker 1>in Fiji. Drin we got to talk about. It was

0:29:46.880 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>like a good drink. I would have that right tap

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:50.520
<v Speaker 1>one of those right now, we can be one of those.

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I gotta make them around here. What are we to

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:57.920
<v Speaker 1>do on the screen. I'm gonna go with the tension. Hey,

0:29:58.000 --> 0:29:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to put that check on the screen, and

0:29:59.520 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go the Kathleen outside, who's great. Kathleen is awesome,

0:30:02.040 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and you may see if Kathleen can make me one

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>of those. All right, we'll do it. He has to

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>show a perfect opportunity for Gabe to go talk to

0:30:08.040 --> 0:30:10.400
<v Speaker 1>the hostess. He's been dying to talk. I wonder which

0:30:10.400 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know which hostess he was hash the manager,

0:30:14.080 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the black morning man, the morning manager of the morning hostess.

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Very different, the manager with the black hair, dark skin,

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:24.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty girls, dark skinned. But once she walked by, just recently,

0:30:25.120 --> 0:30:27.320
<v Speaker 1>some manager. You're saying, yeah, we're very hurt and I

0:30:27.360 --> 0:30:30.240
<v Speaker 1>are very friendly. Yeah. Absolutely, game wants me to introduced.

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Are you happy to Yeah? There you go, Gabe. I

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't know you were into a game all right, good

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:37.800
<v Speaker 1>for game. So there's Kathleen. All right, hold on, I'm

0:30:37.800 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna go see if you can do this. All right,

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll try and talk about baseball. Let's let's yeah, we'll

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>talk some baseball ventra. Freddy Galvis last night it was

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>four for four. Oh my god, what's happening here? Alright? Well,

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>solo solo shot? All right, Freddy Galvis last night goes

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>four for four. He's got four homers on the year,

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he's got nine ribbies, he's betting three, and he's got

0:30:59.640 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>a stole on base I think he's more of a

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>deep league ad. What do you think about Freddy Galvis?

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:09.160
<v Speaker 1>You're buying in I obviously like Dames be Swanson more.

0:31:09.920 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about Freddy Galvis? That's my thing,

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I'd rather have Swanson right and Galvis? You know

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.080
<v Speaker 1>what Galvis is. He's just a guy. You know, he's

0:31:19.120 --> 0:31:22.280
<v Speaker 1>getting high right now. So on the on the screen,

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna put up a drink. I drank in Fiji

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:26.920
<v Speaker 1>like ten years ago, and it looks amazing. What we

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 1>all want it? What is it? It's like a tiki

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 1>drink drink, a tequila sunrise or something like that. That's

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:40.120
<v Speaker 1>what it might be a frozen peanut Colada baby break.

0:31:40.200 --> 0:31:44.440
<v Speaker 1>Definitely would drink. But look at this, Kathleen. You have

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>all different colors in this thing. You got a red

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and yellow, little green, blue down there, pineapple? We got here? Sure? Okay, yeah,

0:32:00.800 --> 0:32:05.640
<v Speaker 1>can you make it? That's the question. Yeah, do you

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:10.000
<v Speaker 1>have I'll take it. They have glasses close to that though,

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>similar You guys don't want that? Sure? Are you all right?

0:32:12.960 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll get out three. I will buy the best. I'll

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>buy the collos. Buying coos very much to say you

0:32:23.560 --> 0:32:25.680
<v Speaker 1>have to expense this, like I'm not paying for it

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>because that drinks, because that is for sure, like sears. Yeah,

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>Christmas party? Dude, Greg, are you picking up Freddy Gavis? What? Greg?

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>He's hitting three four home? Freddy Gavis one of just

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a few players play every game last year, that is correct,

0:32:50.480 --> 0:32:54.640
<v Speaker 1>one of I believe two games. Mad Olsen was one

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.680
<v Speaker 1>of them. Guess not playing every game this year. Freddy

0:32:57.720 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Freeman was also one of them. And he's playing you're

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>not picking up? No, you can't? All right? Will we

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:07.200
<v Speaker 1>play in a fifteen team league? Middle infielder? And what

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>if he's already taken long? Definitely taken Preddy Galvis. You

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 1>have Warmer Floras as your middle infielder right now? Are

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you picking up Freddy Galvits as a short stop or

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.360
<v Speaker 1>as a middle infielder? I would I would rather take

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Jeff McNeil. He's not available in a fifteen team. I

0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:26.400
<v Speaker 1>would rather Chad Pinder. All right, well that's fair. Would

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>you take the Pender? Would you take Pinder over Preddy

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 1>Galvis at least Galvet's place? Yes? Yeah. Elvis is just

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a guy that's been around forever and all of a

0:33:36.760 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>sudden he's good. Now. No, I'm sorry, it's not true.

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>What if I told you that told you three years

0:33:42.560 --> 0:33:48.560
<v Speaker 1>ago he hit twenty home runs with seventeen stolen bases?

0:33:49.240 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Was his batting average to forty? But whatever? So that's

0:33:53.040 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 1>his that's his top potential. Twelve homers with fourteen stolen bases.

0:33:58.240 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 1>This guy could go fifteen, fifteen. But you're not holding

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:02.000
<v Speaker 1>him for the APRISTI. If you're picking up now, you're

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 1>picking up for now because because he's AT's gonna take

0:34:04.800 --> 0:34:07.680
<v Speaker 1>over theory, she's gonna take over in July. I don't care.

0:34:07.680 --> 0:34:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't care about July. That's what I'm saying. Freddy,

0:34:10.560 --> 0:34:12.359
<v Speaker 1>you're not keeping up for the year subscribing to your theory.

0:34:12.400 --> 0:34:17.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at you should be picking him up. He's

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.359
<v Speaker 1>hitting more flyballs this year. Too many hits. He leads

0:34:20.400 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 1>off right or hits one person. A better question is

0:34:24.400 --> 0:34:27.160
<v Speaker 1>he's hot? Listen, there's no discuting this. He's hot right now.

0:34:27.560 --> 0:34:30.880
<v Speaker 1>The better yesterday hit second in the Blue Day's lineup,

0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:35.040
<v Speaker 1>right ahead of Justin Smoke. He's hit first second each

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the last four games. He's got to lead off for

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 1>hit second all of them. Wait. The better question is

0:34:39.560 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>is there a guy you're there? A guy who would

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.000
<v Speaker 1>pick up like I asked you about him? Dude, just

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 1>look into it. I was getting drinks for us. I

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it. It let me a great drink. You know,

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen vent Or drinks since he got wat

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>on the train, so I'm looking forward to this. Do

0:34:55.680 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 1>you put that in his hand? How did he say? No? Yeah, no,

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:00.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm drinking that. That's good. I need, you know, I

0:35:00.960 --> 0:35:03.360
<v Speaker 1>need a refreshment. You know what I'm saying. Um, but

0:35:03.440 --> 0:35:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna saying. The better question is there a

0:35:05.280 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>guy that you wouldn't pick up over? Freddy Galvis, that's

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a better, queen. He does't be the best of the drinks.

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>But she hasn't been any alcohol on it. It's just

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>like orange juice by Yeah, please don't do that. We

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't tell her how much she's filling it off. I

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:22.000
<v Speaker 1>just I just saw a bottle upside down. I don't

0:35:22.040 --> 0:35:25.960
<v Speaker 1>want to pay for that drinks. You didn't say house vodka.

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Just put Tito's inside that too. Oh yeah, is gonna

0:35:31.520 --> 0:35:34.879
<v Speaker 1>be a good day happening. This is gonna be fifty

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:38.600
<v Speaker 1>dollars of drink. It's seventeen dollars of drinking. Pinder making

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of contact this year cut down the strikeout

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:44.280
<v Speaker 1>rates significantly twenty six percent strikeout rate last year, thirteen

0:35:44.320 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>point seven percent strikeout rate this year. Line drives. He's

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>hitting the ball hard, hard hit rate. I like Pinder two.

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But to me, Freddy Galvis's playing time is a lot safer.

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 1>Pinder's only playing it's left handed pitching. He played yesterday

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>because they wanted to give happen in a day off.

0:36:01.520 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>Matt Chapman. But I think Pinder, this guy Galvin, this

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:09.759
<v Speaker 1>guy Galus to do way too good right now. Like

0:36:09.880 --> 0:36:12.759
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are crazy. I don't disagree but you come

0:36:12.840 --> 0:36:14.920
<v Speaker 1>up all he's hot. No, he's not gonna do this,

0:36:15.120 --> 0:36:17.560
<v Speaker 1>even this week. I don't think I'm gonna think up

0:36:17.560 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 1>any other hot wilver Floora has been awful. When not when,

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:23.399
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you what, I'll put his zero dollar. Don't

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>want it bidding anything for you, but I will drop

0:36:26.000 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>when we're floor is the fifteen team league, Freddy. I

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>just got a question on Twitter waiver wire question, would

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:37.640
<v Speaker 1>you drop Matt Strong for Frank Thornton? No? Good question?

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Um M, well I got his good questions for you, Greg,

0:36:41.840 --> 0:36:46.440
<v Speaker 1>that's not usually terrible. Um should I start Jordan'simmerman? Who

0:36:47.120 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 1>give me the right answer? Who did they face this week?

0:36:51.400 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, you're probably just gonna ride the match up

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 1>for both of these. It's been a lot better. But

0:36:57.320 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay is a scrappy d you're really gonna get

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 1>in the way. It's Thornton starts tonight against Tappa and

0:37:01.840 --> 0:37:05.680
<v Speaker 1>then next week in Minnesota. I don't like either of those.

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't love that. And then strom is facing Arizona

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>tomorrow and then I'm not sure, probably not the hold

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 1>on a strump. Yeah that I'll tell you this. If

0:37:18.239 --> 0:37:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Trent Thorn has another good start tonight, but I'd rather

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:22.799
<v Speaker 1>own him. We'll wait too much. We haven't wait too

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:24.760
<v Speaker 1>much on a Friday. We'll give use some more waivers

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>and some more Shenatigan Next. Lose weight now go to

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:36.200
<v Speaker 1>fat dot com. Lose that unwanted belly fat today and

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 1>get free information at fat one dot com. Fit in

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the dress or pets or bathing suits you've always wanted

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>to Go to fat one dot com. Lose ten, twenty

0:37:47.080 --> 0:37:50.480
<v Speaker 1>or more pounds immediately go to fat one hundred dot

0:37:50.560 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>com for free information on how you can lose weight.

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Go to fat dot com, fat one dot com. That's

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 1>fat dot com, Brain Dads, Naked Rain. If you look

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:06.720
<v Speaker 1>at the Jets, their skill positions are pretty much set. Obviously,

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Donald is their quarterback. They like Robby Anderson. They just

0:38:09.560 --> 0:38:11.640
<v Speaker 1>signed Quincy and noon Walk to an extension. They got

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Crowder for the slot. They have their running back room intact.

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:16.880
<v Speaker 1>That how we talk about time. Monk realized McGuire as well.

0:38:16.920 --> 0:38:18.600
<v Speaker 1>These are all guys who can do work out of

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the backfield. We're starting to see what the Jets are

0:38:20.719 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 1>putting together here as far as the pieces around Sam Donald,

0:38:23.800 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and it's actually looking pretty good. Week days six and

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>nine am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports networking on your

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>popular podcast Providers. Maurice Allan two thousand and fifteen, two

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 1>thousands and sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion two thousand

0:38:36.719 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>seventeen World number one. Me personally, I keep my game

0:38:44.560 --> 0:38:49.920
<v Speaker 1>face on me all the time, especially coming out with

0:38:49.960 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the bucker leaving the range or you're leaving the boys.

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:57.719
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? You go to game face grooming dot

0:38:57.800 --> 0:39:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Com from all your athletic facial wipes and body clap needs,

0:39:02.760 --> 0:39:06.680
<v Speaker 1>good morning after. I've always found the relationships worked better

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the less you see each other. But eventually that if

0:39:09.640 --> 0:39:11.480
<v Speaker 1>like you never see each other, and then it won't

0:39:11.520 --> 0:39:13.520
<v Speaker 1>work out either. There's gotta be that fine line. Maybe

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:15.440
<v Speaker 1>on a Monday, there's not as much action and you know,

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:17.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe he'll get me for a half power cab his

0:39:17.239 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>girlfriend like she while she was yelling at the TV

0:39:19.120 --> 0:39:22.200
<v Speaker 1>about about the poems. The relationship that is hashed and

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:24.839
<v Speaker 1>such a fashion, there is a relationship that is built

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:27.880
<v Speaker 1>to last. Sweet Day's nine Ammister on F and T

0:39:28.040 --> 0:39:35.520
<v Speaker 1>s Y Radio and on your popular podcast Providers. Yeah,

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:42.560
<v Speaker 1>is that Churches take show Man? If it'll take me

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 1>to the other side? Can you do you? Can you

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:50.480
<v Speaker 1>like me in the change sort of create a show

0:39:50.520 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>in the movie. Yeah, taken fund, I'll take me to

0:39:55.440 --> 0:40:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the other sad job. And this is I'm watching you

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube right now. This is exactly why you don't

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:07.960
<v Speaker 1>go to clubs. You gonna move. I don't like someone

0:40:08.000 --> 0:40:12.240
<v Speaker 1>in the chat last night they traded there. It's actually Undertaker,

0:40:12.280 --> 0:40:14.960
<v Speaker 1>So thank you for watching Undertaker. They traded away there

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:19.279
<v Speaker 1>Byron Buckston to get Hayes Wu's are And I don't

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>know if buckst I like is a blog, but I

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 1>would imagine you could buy me even lower than that.

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>I like what I've seen from bucks and so far

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:33.480
<v Speaker 1>very good. And I like R two like I think

0:40:33.480 --> 0:40:35.480
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna bounce back. Do you guys want to play

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Jason Stark trivia? Sure you don't. Frank seen with Maryfield

0:40:42.560 --> 0:40:45.480
<v Speaker 1>missed a two hundred hit forty Steel season. Just missed it.

0:40:46.440 --> 0:40:49.399
<v Speaker 1>There are three active players who have made it into

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the two hundred hit forty Steel season active active reactive

0:40:54.920 --> 0:40:58.279
<v Speaker 1>place who two and forty steals? Is this is each

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:02.040
<v Speaker 1>row still technically active or no one is alt? Do

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.319
<v Speaker 1>you want to say the answers, Well, I'm gonna tell

0:41:04.400 --> 0:41:06.840
<v Speaker 1>us if a right or not correct two is one

0:41:06.880 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of them. Um, one person has done it twice, Gordon,

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that's person didn't nice? Nice? What did we get all

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the answers? There three players? The third one, I'll tell

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:20.920
<v Speaker 1>you what it's not Billy Hamilton's you know you know

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:25.920
<v Speaker 1>who it is. Hands got you shook, Handley Ramire, it's correct.

0:41:26.239 --> 0:41:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Good one. Look at Rice venture I had when he

0:41:31.440 --> 0:41:34.520
<v Speaker 1>was young. He was a totally different player. Start off

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that way right, He's started off stealing bases early on

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in his career, Rod Griffi bonds even Manny right, hands

0:41:44.840 --> 0:41:48.680
<v Speaker 1>got you shook. That's who he used to poem when

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:57.000
<v Speaker 1>he first came up. Word up, say word yeah, Manny

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:59.319
<v Speaker 1>never stop. Man wasn't He was a lot leaner though

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:02.480
<v Speaker 1>early on that slid job you had three for three,

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:06.239
<v Speaker 1>I am pressed, Well that you know why? That's that's uh,

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:09.200
<v Speaker 1>there's not a lot of guys who hit hits. And

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 1>also steal Ford was Hanley is a good job by you.

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't superb job, thank you. Um. All right, one

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:21.760
<v Speaker 1>day that we had through about yesterday, still amazed exactly

0:42:21.920 --> 0:42:23.919
<v Speaker 1>when day we threw out yesterday joking around a little

0:42:23.920 --> 0:42:25.879
<v Speaker 1>bit was Terrence Gore, who you heard in the probo

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 1>before the shar started that he's a rookie despite being

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the majors for like seven years, because he doesn't have bats.

0:42:31.560 --> 0:42:34.400
<v Speaker 1>She just pinched runs. Billy Hamilton's got carded off the

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:37.120
<v Speaker 1>field yesterday, which looked that was so bad. I don't

0:42:37.120 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 1>know how he ran into the wall like that bowls

0:42:39.600 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 1>right there. He only has a spring knee, so it's

0:42:41.640 --> 0:42:44.200
<v Speaker 1>nothing super significant. I expected to go on the i

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:47.160
<v Speaker 1>L but he didn't like tear anything, thankfully, didn't breaking anything.

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Thankfully bring name. So there's a chance that Terence Gore

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.719
<v Speaker 1>because the everyday center fielder batting ninth like Hamilton's not

0:42:54.800 --> 0:42:56.719
<v Speaker 1>every much of the season for a sure period of time,

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:59.279
<v Speaker 1>a very shure period of time. If you're looking for

0:42:59.400 --> 0:43:03.040
<v Speaker 1>speed and legitim really nothing else but speed, Tarren score

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is an option for you. Yeah. Yeah, this is strictly

0:43:06.440 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a RHADO play fifteen team or ale only, um like

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>fifteen team mix or ale only. Anything shallower than that,

0:43:12.880 --> 0:43:14.879
<v Speaker 1>like maybe in a twelve team league if you really

0:43:14.920 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 1>need speed. But this guy is fast. He makes fast

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:21.719
<v Speaker 1>people look not so fast. He's in the ninety percentile

0:43:21.760 --> 0:43:24.919
<v Speaker 1>of sprint speed on the season so far, he has

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, minor league seasons where he's stolen you know,

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 1>forty four bases. I'm looking at this, he had one

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:33.560
<v Speaker 1>with sixty eight stolen basis. Terrence scores are really really

0:43:33.600 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 1>fast to stuff, and he he hasn't really played a

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:36.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of feel like I'm looking. I was looking at

0:43:36.680 --> 0:43:38.719
<v Speaker 1>his mind as he play like eighties something games or

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 1>so for the past like three or four years, because

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 1>all he does, they just used him as a pitch runner.

0:43:42.560 --> 0:43:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Like he's just really not league kind of like Billy

0:43:45.840 --> 0:43:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Hamilton's might even be faster. It's just crazy to imagine

0:43:49.520 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 1>because Billy Hamilton's already is a better hitter. So this

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is just a deeper you know, if you need speed,

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you need stolen basis, even if it's for the short term.

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Taran score extremely fast. Yeah, he's He's one of the

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:03.520
<v Speaker 1>vastest players in the league. That's why he's a perfect

0:44:03.560 --> 0:44:06.680
<v Speaker 1>really replacement um for Billy Hamilton. If Billy Hamilton's owner,

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:08.560
<v Speaker 1>I go, I go right up and pick pick up

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:12.359
<v Speaker 1>Terrence Coore. If wherever you own Billy Hamilton's I don't

0:44:12.360 --> 0:44:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think I don't. He's real owned daily. But whatever you

0:44:14.120 --> 0:44:15.600
<v Speaker 1>wherever you think he should be owned, that's what I

0:44:15.640 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 1>would do. Um what else do we have for guys?

0:44:19.440 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>So Florida And we asked him he must add this

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 1>week and he gave it the name like Bogelo Box.

0:44:24.320 --> 0:44:26.480
<v Speaker 1>He talked about Swanson. We talked a lot about Jason

0:44:26.520 --> 0:44:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Heyward a couple days ago, and Max Freed was the

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:33.080
<v Speaker 1>top pitcher that he named. The more I look into

0:44:33.160 --> 0:44:34.560
<v Speaker 1>this and the more you think about it, and I

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:36.320
<v Speaker 1>was on, I don't want to keep saying this. I

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:39.440
<v Speaker 1>was on free to at the beginning. The more you

0:44:39.480 --> 0:44:40.960
<v Speaker 1>think about it, the more I think he's gonna do that.

0:44:41.360 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Keep this opportunity in the rotation because the big problems

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that when guys get back, he's going to lose it.

0:44:47.080 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 1>And Mike Fulton Eviage is coming back. Kevin Galsman came back.

0:44:50.840 --> 0:44:54.760
<v Speaker 1>He stinks, that's it, vent what you just said. He stinks.

0:44:55.239 --> 0:44:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And the Braves are trying to win this year and

0:44:56.920 --> 0:44:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they have no allegiance to Kevin Galsman. They don't care

0:44:58.960 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>about Kevin Gosman. When Faulty comes back, if he continues,

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:05.399
<v Speaker 1>if Goalsman stinks in his next start, and that streak continues,

0:45:05.480 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>pitch like he's going to Gosman's out. Gosman's out. Look,

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>look at this, look go pretty good. I'm just give

0:45:14.200 --> 0:45:16.319
<v Speaker 1>me the mic, you can talk. Oh my god, you're

0:45:16.320 --> 0:45:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the best man. We even want to do we even

0:45:19.040 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 1>want to reveal with in here nor I don't know,

0:45:22.920 --> 0:45:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't want to know. Actually I wanted to be

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:26.399
<v Speaker 1>all right, we don't want to reveal it. I wanted

0:45:26.400 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to be a surprised. This is amazing much, Thank you

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 1>very much. We appreciate it the best. This is amazing service.

0:45:35.200 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 1>Look at this. How gorgeous does this look? This is

0:45:38.840 --> 0:45:41.160
<v Speaker 1>looks like this pretty close. This looks like a fruity

0:45:41.200 --> 0:45:43.640
<v Speaker 1>pebble in a drink. This is as close as possibly

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:45.200
<v Speaker 1>come to that. What is the green Martino? Can you

0:45:45.239 --> 0:45:47.400
<v Speaker 1>put it up? This sale looks want to put it

0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:50.040
<v Speaker 1>on the space. Let's look at all different kind of cars.

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:52.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's a little bit. Are any more arms and pink?

0:45:52.080 --> 0:45:54.359
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, I mean it's all over the place.

0:45:54.400 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm pebble. Um. This is impressive. How good does this look?

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:03.319
<v Speaker 1>M hm m all right? He take a sip now right, well,

0:46:03.480 --> 0:46:10.719
<v Speaker 1>salute here we go. Oh that's great. This is this

0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:16.239
<v Speaker 1>is great, this is great thee Oh my god, just

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>need to be on a beach. Oh my god, is

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 1>this good? Go take it away? Oh man, I see

0:46:23.560 --> 0:46:24.879
<v Speaker 1>wee we'll get a flag and they want to see

0:46:24.880 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 1>the light of the day. Oh this is spectacular. I

0:46:30.520 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 1>wanted to go out there and like screaming to the mask.

0:46:33.760 --> 0:46:36.960
<v Speaker 1>There's your pineapple juice in here. Oh my god, this

0:46:37.080 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>is good. This is good at orange on top. I

0:46:39.400 --> 0:46:40.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want to I don't want to work the rest

0:46:40.600 --> 0:46:42.759
<v Speaker 1>of the day now, thankfully you don't have to. Yeah,

0:46:43.719 --> 0:46:47.360
<v Speaker 1>just taken off after this. Oh my god, this is incredible,

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:51.640
<v Speaker 1>this is amazing, like all of you. Did you get this? Yeah,

0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:55.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever this is called. Oh my god, Rudy pebble, Rudy pebble.

0:46:57.120 --> 0:46:59.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a good job. I don't even know what to say. Now.

0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 1>What we need is a pool. It's tasty. Holy I'm

0:47:02.160 --> 0:47:03.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna get this all summer. I think she put a

0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:06.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of alcohol. I guarantee you. It's one of those things.

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's nothing in here? You know? Oh

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>my god, I'm getting the chills as much. I'm enjoying

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:23.800
<v Speaker 1>this great chug. Oh my god, this is this is

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:29.759
<v Speaker 1>the best Greg I do regard regarding Max Freed, I

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:31.879
<v Speaker 1>think that was always the case for they're gonna give

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 1>a shock to Freed, to Kyle Wright, to Bryce Wilson.

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Whoever pitch the best was going to get an opportunity

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:39.960
<v Speaker 1>to stay in the rotation. Max Freed has done that.

0:47:40.320 --> 0:47:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Gausman, he was alright in his first start, wasn't

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:46.080
<v Speaker 1>great yesterday. Overall, I don't think he's very good. He's

0:47:46.080 --> 0:47:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a two pitch pitcher, relies heavily on his splitter, but

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:52.160
<v Speaker 1>he's been prone to getting blown up at times, and

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I just overall, I don't think he's that great. And

0:47:55.640 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 1>saw Nukem in that mix too. John nukemb got off

0:47:58.480 --> 0:48:00.759
<v Speaker 1>to a hot start last year, but too many guys

0:48:00.880 --> 0:48:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and he doesn't miss enough bats to mitigate his walks.

0:48:04.160 --> 0:48:06.839
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't strike out enough guys to mitigate the fact

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that he walks the world. At least with guys like

0:48:09.160 --> 0:48:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Robbie Ray and Chris Archer and Glass. Now they'll walk everyone,

0:48:13.040 --> 0:48:15.000
<v Speaker 1>but they get out of trouble because they strike out

0:48:15.040 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of dudes. I mean, Newcomb doesn't, he hasn't

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 1>unless she he struck out a lot of guys he

0:48:19.080 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 1>had over a k per inning. But you know, tell

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:25.680
<v Speaker 1>that to big Billy. That's his guy. Tell that the

0:48:25.719 --> 0:48:29.120
<v Speaker 1>big Billy. Oh yeah, I got that. QUI I got

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:31.080
<v Speaker 1>ripped for not like I got a Twitter quest. A

0:48:31.080 --> 0:48:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Twitter question just now from Johnny Sacks. Sean Nucombe walks

0:48:34.360 --> 0:48:36.399
<v Speaker 1>for nine this season, higher than his case for nine.

0:48:36.480 --> 0:48:40.160
<v Speaker 1>Jesus Christ, that's so, that's why I'm a Max Free.

0:48:40.200 --> 0:48:41.719
<v Speaker 1>How much you're spending on Max Freed? How much do

0:48:41.760 --> 0:48:44.279
<v Speaker 1>you budget? I'm not gonna be super aggressive on him.

0:48:44.719 --> 0:48:48.759
<v Speaker 1>I can see like six seven What do you think? Yep?

0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:51.600
<v Speaker 1>So my initial instinct that's always I want to give

0:48:52.239 --> 0:48:55.719
<v Speaker 1>is probably slightly more than that. And I think I

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:58.239
<v Speaker 1>think you're probably right him and I am so that

0:48:58.440 --> 0:49:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. Men? For what about you? Six to

0:49:01.600 --> 0:49:04.520
<v Speaker 1>seven percent? Five? Just too busy and join the lovely drinking?

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:09.960
<v Speaker 1>How good is that? M all right? How much you

0:49:10.000 --> 0:49:12.960
<v Speaker 1>spending on Max Freed? Um? Not much? No, but I

0:49:13.000 --> 0:49:16.520
<v Speaker 1>don't think anybody realizes about this guy. He's and he

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:19.160
<v Speaker 1>has pan links. If they listen to us than they are, Um,

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I'll pay five. I got a question from Johnny Sax

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:27.759
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter. Not not the Johnny Saxon was in the

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:31.919
<v Speaker 1>surpremise's offering Jameson tie On for Chris Sale an insulting offer.

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so at all. Would you do that

0:49:35.239 --> 0:49:37.359
<v Speaker 1>if you're him? Would you trade Jameson tie On away

0:49:37.360 --> 0:49:39.920
<v Speaker 1>for Christal? Would you would? Would you trade away? And

0:49:39.960 --> 0:49:41.359
<v Speaker 1>the the other one I asked, would you trade away

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Louise Castillo for Christal? This is a good question too,

0:49:46.360 --> 0:49:49.120
<v Speaker 1>if this gentleman listens to uh again, I was listening

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:51.400
<v Speaker 1>to the sleeper in the bus heading into today with

0:49:51.560 --> 0:49:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Justin Mason and Paul Spoor and they question what was again?

0:49:56.160 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Was Castillo for Chris Sale? And you're giving away Castile?

0:49:59.480 --> 0:50:00.960
<v Speaker 1>And I would ride have Chris Sale? I don't have

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:04.799
<v Speaker 1>Chris Sale? Then tie own? And yeah, I think I'm

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>on that side. This is the I mean, this is

0:50:06.600 --> 0:50:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the perfect by cell high opportunity, right, Chris Salingu. The

0:50:10.520 --> 0:50:13.040
<v Speaker 1>thing is it might not necessarily be a cell high

0:50:13.080 --> 0:50:15.520
<v Speaker 1>for Castio if buying in, but he's the thing. You know,

0:50:15.520 --> 0:50:17.200
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna keep a zero point nine two e

0:50:17.320 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>r A. But but here's the thing that would be

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:22.160
<v Speaker 1>very good. Buying low we say it all the time,

0:50:23.200 --> 0:50:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and selling high. It's the hardest thing in the world

0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to do, because you don't want to sell, Louise Castio,

0:50:27.520 --> 0:50:29.799
<v Speaker 1>if you think that it's real, we're never going You're

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:31.520
<v Speaker 1>never going to know, of course, if it's real, until

0:50:31.680 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 1>after the fact. So what about buying low what's you're worried?

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:38.359
<v Speaker 1>You're worried that he doesn't turn it around? Of course.

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's the hardest proposition. It's always going to be

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:43.799
<v Speaker 1>a risky propositions when we say it like, it's much

0:50:43.840 --> 0:50:47.600
<v Speaker 1>easier than done. But to me, Louise Castillo for Chris

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:50.439
<v Speaker 1>Sale is the epitome of this by low so high

0:50:51.400 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 1>doing it's like Tyler go down for Walker Bueler absolutely

0:50:54.440 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 1>lesser extent, absolutely, and I'm gonna do it. I agree,

0:50:58.160 --> 0:51:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna do what I would right away Castido to

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:02.960
<v Speaker 1>get Chris Sale. And I would trade away glass now

0:51:03.040 --> 0:51:04.680
<v Speaker 1>to get Walker Peeler. I know you don't agree with that,

0:51:04.719 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but I would do that. Yeah, I would do the

0:51:07.719 --> 0:51:10.640
<v Speaker 1>sale one. I don't know about the glass now for

0:51:11.160 --> 0:51:13.440
<v Speaker 1>for beula thing, I think Walker people owners are freaking

0:51:13.440 --> 0:51:17.280
<v Speaker 1>out right now, Greg, what else you as Walker Peeler

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>my home, I'm say me, I would think that they're

0:51:19.560 --> 0:51:21.319
<v Speaker 1>freaking out the least that we play in trade leads.

0:51:21.560 --> 0:51:23.200
<v Speaker 1>The GDD is right because you paid a lot for

0:51:23.719 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 1>So should we go take a look? Sure? Should we

0:51:26.320 --> 0:51:29.120
<v Speaker 1>don't paid a premium for him? You know, probably my

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:32.839
<v Speaker 1>league's a keeper. What beelers the keeper? My home leagues

0:51:32.880 --> 0:51:34.600
<v Speaker 1>are as well. Guys, I want to jump into two

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:36.759
<v Speaker 1>star pitchers just real quick, just kind of run down

0:51:36.800 --> 0:51:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the list and tell me if you guys trust trust

0:51:38.719 --> 0:51:41.440
<v Speaker 1>him or not. So Max Freed, we've been talking about him.

0:51:41.480 --> 0:51:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Everyone wants to pick him up. He's got two starts

0:51:43.920 --> 0:51:46.920
<v Speaker 1>against Arizona at home and at Cleveland. I love that.

0:51:47.000 --> 0:51:49.759
<v Speaker 1>At Cleveland start, I'm willing to swallow whatever happened in

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the Arizona start. I mean, he's been good like he

0:51:51.719 --> 0:51:53.319
<v Speaker 1>did it. At least it's not in corse Field. At

0:51:53.360 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 1>least it's not in Arizona. So I like that. I

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:58.759
<v Speaker 1>like against Arizona and at Cleveland. What do you think

0:51:58.840 --> 0:52:01.239
<v Speaker 1>venture like those matchups? You Freed, you start him? I

0:52:01.239 --> 0:52:03.120
<v Speaker 1>would start him for two if you need him. Yeah,

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Domingo Hermon just below him, and CBS going up against

0:52:06.920 --> 0:52:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Boston and Casey. Again, this is a case where and

0:52:10.160 --> 0:52:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they're both at home, so doxon Yankee Stadium. I know

0:52:16.200 --> 0:52:17.919
<v Speaker 1>that you've been the Domingo Hermon guy. You're gonna trust

0:52:18.000 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 1>him at home for two Boston and Casey. Yeah, because

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that second start is I tend to agree. I think

0:52:24.040 --> 0:52:26.840
<v Speaker 1>the problem with Boston. I have this vision of deming

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Herman like basically playing a littere. He goes like four in.

0:52:30.800 --> 0:52:32.919
<v Speaker 1>He's not just three runs like something like, he keeps

0:52:33.000 --> 0:52:35.239
<v Speaker 1>them in the game because Boston not gonna make him

0:52:35.560 --> 0:52:37.600
<v Speaker 1>fantasy purpose correct, boss is gonna make him with throw

0:52:37.600 --> 0:52:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pitches against Casey. That could be really exactly.

0:52:39.960 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 1>That's why I agree with Chris. I'm just starting him.

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Maybe he'll get you ten twelve points hopefully against Boston,

0:52:45.280 --> 0:52:47.040
<v Speaker 1>and then it pays for it, because it would be

0:52:47.040 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 1>awesome if you get at least double digits from Boston

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:53.480
<v Speaker 1>would be great. This is a really interesting one. You

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Darvish at Miami and at home against Arizona. I think

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to right if you owned him in the

0:53:01.600 --> 0:53:03.240
<v Speaker 1>league too. But here's the thing. If you're not starting

0:53:03.280 --> 0:53:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you darst to start week one of which is in Miami,

0:53:06.000 --> 0:53:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you should own him. Wait what is it again? Kind

0:53:08.040 --> 0:53:10.960
<v Speaker 1>of agree with you that at Miami and at home

0:53:11.040 --> 0:53:14.440
<v Speaker 1>and Wrigley against the Diamondbacks. Yeah, I guess if you

0:53:14.480 --> 0:53:16.000
<v Speaker 1>own him, you gotta start him. When are you going

0:53:16.080 --> 0:53:18.200
<v Speaker 1>to start him? Then? When are you going to start him?

0:53:18.920 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 1>It's just so tough man. Not if you don't start

0:53:22.600 --> 0:53:24.560
<v Speaker 1>him now you're not you should drop him, trade him.

0:53:24.640 --> 0:53:27.120
<v Speaker 1>But it's that's that's why I called it interesting regarding

0:53:27.120 --> 0:53:29.160
<v Speaker 1>you Darks, because he's one of these guys where I

0:53:29.200 --> 0:53:31.160
<v Speaker 1>would want to take away and see approached. Like, I

0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:33.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think you should cut him, you should continue to

0:53:33.160 --> 0:53:36.399
<v Speaker 1>own him. But he hasn't done anything to warrant starting him,

0:53:37.000 --> 0:53:38.359
<v Speaker 1>aside from the fact that he has a two star

0:53:38.440 --> 0:53:40.480
<v Speaker 1>week and one of them is against Miami. But his

0:53:40.640 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 1>performance has not warranted him being started. So that's why

0:53:44.800 --> 0:53:47.320
<v Speaker 1>me personally, I would want to take away and see approached.

0:53:48.200 --> 0:53:50.600
<v Speaker 1>M hmm. This is tough. The first start is against

0:53:50.640 --> 0:53:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Miami at Miami. I think that's because that could be

0:53:53.680 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>his turnaround game potentially. I mean, look his second starts

0:53:59.000 --> 0:54:00.840
<v Speaker 1>against Robbie Ray and to how many walks are in

0:54:00.880 --> 0:54:06.320
<v Speaker 1>that star creak. What's the problem prop for walks combined

0:54:06.400 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>between you, Darvish and then Robbie Ray. What are you

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:12.000
<v Speaker 1>setting it that? Probably like six and a half the

0:54:12.120 --> 0:54:15.600
<v Speaker 1>over take the over, easy to take the over all? Right, Greg,

0:54:15.640 --> 0:54:19.279
<v Speaker 1>your boy? Why trade it to you? Big nicky p

0:54:19.840 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Nick Pavetta has been trash a nine point five four

0:54:23.640 --> 0:54:25.840
<v Speaker 1>or five year ad to start the season, going up

0:54:25.840 --> 0:54:29.359
<v Speaker 1>against the Mets and in Colorado. How the hell can

0:54:29.400 --> 0:54:32.960
<v Speaker 1>you start this guy? I would against the Mets in

0:54:33.239 --> 0:54:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Citizens Bank and at Corsefield. Honestly, I can't think of

0:54:36.680 --> 0:54:41.040
<v Speaker 1>two worst matchups. It's terrible, But I'm starting in Philly

0:54:41.160 --> 0:54:44.200
<v Speaker 1>in Citizens Bank against the Mets lineup and at Colorado.

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:46.399
<v Speaker 1>You can't say so, Greg? If you if you can't

0:54:46.400 --> 0:54:47.880
<v Speaker 1>start him in a two star week, why do you

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:50.720
<v Speaker 1>own Nick Pavetta? Well? Does she start weeks? Not nearly?

0:54:50.760 --> 0:54:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Didn't the other two start a week? We just talked

0:54:53.520 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 1>about it is a bit too star Wars. But I'm

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:59.719
<v Speaker 1>not starting. I'm doing it. How about this? Whoever, Pa,

0:55:00.080 --> 0:55:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I will buy him right now from you? All right,

0:55:01.920 --> 0:55:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll train him right now. Let's make another trade right now,

0:55:04.920 --> 0:55:08.319
<v Speaker 1>another traded for him. But I'll do it. You train

0:55:08.400 --> 0:55:11.480
<v Speaker 1>him and a studio for somebody. Let's set up a

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:14.279
<v Speaker 1>trade right now. I'm training with Chris I'm getting I

0:55:14.280 --> 0:55:16.239
<v Speaker 1>want to step in a trade between YouTube right now?

0:55:16.280 --> 0:55:19.719
<v Speaker 1>Do you give me? Um? I don't know whatever you want?

0:55:19.800 --> 0:55:23.239
<v Speaker 1>What do you want? Your team closes stable a lot

0:55:23.280 --> 0:55:27.000
<v Speaker 1>of players, all right, So his current catcher is Frankie Savelli,

0:55:27.080 --> 0:55:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Greg Francisco. I shall take him. I'll take him back

0:55:29.640 --> 0:55:32.640
<v Speaker 1>if you getting okay? Okay, right, um, which means I

0:55:32.719 --> 0:55:34.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta give you a really good pick. How about this,

0:55:34.960 --> 0:55:38.680
<v Speaker 1>how Marco Gonzalez? That might be fair. What do you think, Greig?

0:55:40.440 --> 0:55:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll do that hot second. Oh, here's the one, Charlie Morton. No,

0:55:47.640 --> 0:55:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I would have done. I would have done it from Morton.

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:53.520
<v Speaker 1>What about Steven Matt Steven Matt's Greig mm hmm. Now

0:55:53.760 --> 0:55:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that's somewhere Vetta and that's studio for Savelli and Matt's.

0:56:00.640 --> 0:56:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I feel like Mac Greggy better the same. Should take

0:56:04.080 --> 0:56:06.839
<v Speaker 1>Marco Gonzalez instead? Is not an option? You could see.

0:56:06.840 --> 0:56:08.920
<v Speaker 1>He's been a hot second. He said, yeah, I didn't

0:56:08.960 --> 0:56:11.560
<v Speaker 1>like Marco. He's trying to get rid of like Marco,

0:56:11.719 --> 0:56:13.360
<v Speaker 1>I just like I love. I don't think this is

0:56:13.440 --> 0:56:14.879
<v Speaker 1>his point in this deal, though, I don't. I don't

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:17.759
<v Speaker 1>see why I'm doing this. What do you find is

0:56:17.760 --> 0:56:19.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna be crap all year. That's the only reason why

0:56:19.360 --> 0:56:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you're doing the trade. Greg, Yeah, Marcos better. You know,

0:56:21.719 --> 0:56:23.439
<v Speaker 1>it's up to you. You know who does Marco face?

0:56:23.480 --> 0:56:25.680
<v Speaker 1>What's what's this funny? Yeah? I gets Houston next week.

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:31.520
<v Speaker 1>He's been good the whole year. Next week Phillies, right, Phillies. Yeah,

0:56:31.560 --> 0:56:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in Philly, in Philly for Steve Matt's Jesus Christ brace.

0:56:34.680 --> 0:56:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Harvey is at home er seven times left? Should I

0:56:38.400 --> 0:56:42.200
<v Speaker 1>trade for Domingo Harman? Hi, guys, I mean you can?

0:56:42.600 --> 0:56:44.800
<v Speaker 1>You can? I know I can. It's kind of like

0:56:44.880 --> 0:56:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the American League version of can I get? Can I

0:56:47.960 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 1>get two of them? With two pictures? What about Stual?

0:56:52.600 --> 0:56:54.839
<v Speaker 1>And asked deal? I'm getting you, asked the deal? Yeah?

0:56:56.440 --> 0:57:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And Pavetta Yes for her mom and Mark Gogin dogs.

0:57:00.920 --> 0:57:03.399
<v Speaker 1>I ut your belly back and catch you and I'll

0:57:03.440 --> 0:57:09.560
<v Speaker 1>throw sabll I'll give you I'm interested in. Now, let's

0:57:09.840 --> 0:57:11.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. It's been a great week. We're gonna

0:57:11.640 --> 0:57:14.480
<v Speaker 1>finish our drinks, have a great weekend. We'll see you

0:57:14.560 --> 0:57:16.400
<v Speaker 1>back here on one day, we hope.