WEBVTT - Meta Connect and the FTC's Big Tech Fights

0:00:01.960 --> 0:00:06.279
<v Speaker 1>From Marhart where Innovation, Money and Power Collie in Silicon

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Vallet Nbon. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Ed lud Love.

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:28.639
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Heindel Bloomberg's World headquarters in New York, and

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm Ed Lovelo in San Francisco.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:31.640
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, we'll preview what to expect from Meta's connect

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>as analysts watch for the company's generator AI and v

0:00:37.720 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 2>ARE plans.

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 4>Plus, we'll have more reaction to the FTC's landmark antitrust

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 4>suit against Amazon, and hear from Chair Lena Kahan.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.280
<v Speaker 2>Herself and as Sir Altman's open AI seeks up to

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 2>a ninety billion dollar valuation. Will discuss the state of AI,

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 2>the regulation of it with the co chair of the

0:00:54.000 --> 0:00:57.360
<v Speaker 2>UK government's AI review. All that and so much more

0:00:57.400 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 2>coming up. First, we check in on these markets, which

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 2>are map dictated. We're flip flopping between gains and losses

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:04.759
<v Speaker 2>on the NASAC at the moment, currently underwater by two

0:01:04.760 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 2>tens percent. It seems to be being moved by this

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:08.199
<v Speaker 2>particular market.

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:08.759
<v Speaker 5>The bond market.

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 2>We're seeing yields back up four basis points. Look for

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 2>it sort of decade long highs at the moment four

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 2>point five to seven on the tenure. At the moment

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.440
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing above five percent on a two year We're.

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 5>Worried about the direction of travel for the Federal.

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Reserve and indeed a potential government start shut down here

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 2>in the United States. Interesting though, then we see the dollar,

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 2>of course still pushing higher. Is that as we expect

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the Fed to have to push back on currently where

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 2>some of the inflatory pressures have been, we're seeing the

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Dollar Index are for a six straight day, longest

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 2>winning street that we've seen since the beginning of the year.

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:39.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's move on and see that actually in the face

0:01:39.959 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 2>of a stronger dollar, Bitcoin higher up five ten percent,

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:46.440
<v Speaker 2>we saw a sudden bount of buying in European trading.

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 2>So actually managing to tread some water here, ed, But

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:50.919
<v Speaker 2>get back to the micro that's involved today.

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there's kind of some themes in the show from

0:01:53.360 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 4>sort of consumer electronics to augmented reality playing out in

0:01:56.640 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 4>the new cycle markets as well. So Snap up two

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:02.440
<v Speaker 4>point three percent. They're shuttering the unit of their business

0:02:02.440 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 4>that does augmented reality for enterprise one hundred and seventy

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:08.919
<v Speaker 4>jobs going with that job's being cut as well, it's

0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of a question about the long term commitment of

0:02:12.040 --> 0:02:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Snap two org maintor reality. Later in the show, we

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:17.120
<v Speaker 4>will talk to our Bloomberg Intelligence and list about that

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 4>consumer electronics hardware. Peloton now down nine ten to one percent.

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 4>Tom Cortes, the last remaining founder of Peloton, is leaving

0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 4>the company. So of the five that started the company,

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 4>he was the last DOMINODA four. He has left but

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 4>will remain on as an advisor. The stock kind of

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.280
<v Speaker 4>traded sideways for most of the session. It is now down.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 4>The big one, as you said, is Meta Connect. Meta

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 4>Connect is the company's annual developers conference. When we think

0:02:41.760 --> 0:02:44.400
<v Speaker 4>about developers conferences, we do think software, but there's going

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:46.799
<v Speaker 4>to be a big hardware component. We know that quest

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 4>the next generation of will be a topic of conversation.

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 4>Of course, alongside AI, we are treading water on Meta

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 4>the parent of Facebook. Upper tenth of one percent. How

0:02:55.520 --> 0:02:57.440
<v Speaker 4>much focus is going to be on the software side,

0:02:57.480 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 4>how much focus is going to be on the latest

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 4>generation of hardware metaverse versus artificial intelligence? What is the priority?

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 4>These are the great questions we have to ask.

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 2>And indeed the ones that we've been asking day in,

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:10.839
<v Speaker 2>day out, in fact with executives of Meta. Of course,

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 2>last week I got to sit down with the head

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:16.000
<v Speaker 2>of Global affairs to discuss how the company is utilizing

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:16.920
<v Speaker 2>generative AI.

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:17.680
<v Speaker 5>Just take a listen.

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 6>We're announcing next Wednesday on the twenty seven new applications

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:25.160
<v Speaker 6>of generative AI in our products. Things like you'll be

0:03:25.160 --> 0:03:28.600
<v Speaker 6>able to communicate with businesses on WhatsApp and Messenger, the

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:34.080
<v Speaker 6>sort of really really extraordinary aipowered bots that will transform

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 6>the way that all of us as consumers interact with businesses,

0:03:36.600 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 6>and many other things that will announce next Wednesday.

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 5>Let's weigh up what investors want to hear.

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.600
<v Speaker 2>Jeffrey's seen it Internet Analyst is with us Brinville ahead

0:03:44.680 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 2>of the all important Meta connect and Brent to that end,

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.560
<v Speaker 2>how much do you want to be hearing about generative AI?

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 2>How much do you want to be hearing about chatbots?

0:03:52.520 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 2>About therefore, the desire of people younger generation in particular

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 2>to remain committed to instagramed Messenger, to the other offerings.

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 7>I think AI is front center for every tech company, Google, Amazon,

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 7>the whole industry. This is this is the majority of

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 7>the topics that we're having with our investors, So I

0:04:12.560 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 7>think that's what investors want to hear. Obviously at software,

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 7>they don't love the hardware side of this, so they'd

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 7>like to hear more about this than the quest and

0:04:22.000 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 7>the hardware side, which again I think most investors are

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:29.560
<v Speaker 7>skeptical about obviously a more expensive endeavor, higher margin building

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 7>software and AI than hardware, So I think we want

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 7>to hear more around that. Mark Zuckerberg, you know, did

0:04:37.200 --> 0:04:40.800
<v Speaker 7>a story yesterday as Instagram about Jarvis.

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 8>Back in twenty sixteen.

0:04:42.000 --> 0:04:44.559
<v Speaker 7>He showed Jarvis was his AI bought at his house

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:48.160
<v Speaker 7>that could turn on the lights and do things like

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.480
<v Speaker 7>make his toast at home. Right, So that was back

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.240
<v Speaker 7>in twenty sixteen, and he kind of re posted that.

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 7>So we believe, you know, this concept of Jarvis for

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:01.159
<v Speaker 7>the home comes to the mass market in AI.

0:05:01.279 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 8>Obviously Microsoft and Google are.

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:07.520
<v Speaker 7>Doing this meta also as an incredible opportunity given given

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 7>what they have with What's App, Messenger and the global

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 7>platforms that they have that can help us, you know,

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:16.080
<v Speaker 7>find the right goods. We want help help surface ideas,

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 7>maybe pass along photos or other ideas or our friends.

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 7>So I think this is going to be for us,

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 7>the most exciting part of it. I think the sideshow

0:05:26.880 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 7>will be, you know, Meta Quest three and the price point.

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:35.200
<v Speaker 8>Everyone's all below out of the vision prow at thirty

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 8>five hundred dollars.

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 7>So the differentiation there and what's going to happen in

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 7>the next generation of the Metaversese brand.

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:45.560
<v Speaker 4>Meta is building large language models, a heavy emphasis on

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:49.279
<v Speaker 4>open source when developing that technology, and it's kind of

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 4>hinted at how that translates to generative AI tools and

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 4>their existing properties. Right I think we're focusing on AI agents.

0:05:57.240 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 4>Do you see a clear path to Meta ever making

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.160
<v Speaker 4>any money from all of the things that they are

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 4>working on the R and D side?

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 8>We do.

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.279
<v Speaker 7>They've been very clear they're not making money now or

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 7>don't believe that this will be a big revenue initiative

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.839
<v Speaker 7>in the short term. Long term, we do believe that

0:06:14.920 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 7>they can make money on Lama, and they're obviously a

0:06:18.520 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 7>consumer focused company, not as much enterprise, and so this

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 7>is you know, going to take them time to figure

0:06:24.440 --> 0:06:24.760
<v Speaker 7>this out.

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:28.440
<v Speaker 8>But we think given the quality of the feedback.

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 7>From the channel about Lama and how they're using it,

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:34.799
<v Speaker 7>how they're the the open source community loving what they're doing.

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 7>There's no doubt there's an opportunity to monetize that this.

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 8>This isn't in the numbers. Uh, this isn't in the

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:43.080
<v Speaker 8>valuation today.

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 7>So two three, four years from now, could this could

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 7>we have a discussion around you know, is this going

0:06:48.360 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 7>to be a material revenue engine where they could they

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 7>could potentially license this model to companies to use and

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:57.719
<v Speaker 7>they would get a royalty for the answer is yes,

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 7>one hundred percent. What the details look like, they're still

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 7>trying to iron those out. Those aren't in our model,

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:05.839
<v Speaker 7>but certainly we do believe that they can monetize it

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 7>going forward.

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 4>Brent, quickly, it sounds to me like you're not that

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:14.160
<v Speaker 4>excited about augmented in virtual reality.

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Is that fair?

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 8>Yes, that's fair.

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Okay.

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 4>Here's the thing that it's either a metaverse story or

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 4>it's an AI story. Do you see a world in

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:28.760
<v Speaker 4>which meta can convince investors that we can have both.

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 7>I think we can have both, but I think that

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 7>is the lass they've talked about the metaverse. The higher

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 7>the stock is gone, so form an investor perspective, they

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:42.920
<v Speaker 7>if they keep talking about the software world and what's

0:07:42.960 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 7>going on the social networking side. That's great. This is

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 7>an advertising driven story, right. The majority of the revenue

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 7>is driven off for advertising. So at this point, I

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:54.240
<v Speaker 7>think everyone the jury is out whether the metaverse is

0:07:54.240 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 7>going to be exciting or not. I think most people

0:07:56.600 --> 0:07:59.520
<v Speaker 7>are saying it's not going to be as exciting and

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.320
<v Speaker 7>taking the height because there's real world productivity measures that

0:08:03.360 --> 0:08:06.040
<v Speaker 7>we can see and how it's impacting our lives, Like

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 7>putting a headset on and being claustrophobic and playing a

0:08:09.320 --> 0:08:11.160
<v Speaker 7>game with my kids for ten minutes is not going

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 7>to change my life, right, So I'm I think right

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 7>now we're not We're probably the biggest bear on the metaverse.

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 7>We're very foolish about the position and what they can

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:26.520
<v Speaker 7>do with the other side of their franchise, and so

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 7>we're very clear about what we like we don't like.

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 2>Interestingly, many an executive is trying to lean into what

0:08:33.800 --> 0:08:36.839
<v Speaker 2>investors and analysts such as yourself like, and look we

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 2>had and flipski on earlier in the week just talking

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 2>about how generative AI is becoming such a focus for AWS.

0:08:43.200 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 2>On the flip side of all of this is the

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 2>regulatory environment and look Amazon Meta all of them being

0:08:47.880 --> 0:08:51.000
<v Speaker 2>eyed from regulators in particularly the FTC.

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:51.840
<v Speaker 5>We just heard.

0:08:51.760 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 2>Yesterday of course Amazon under fire there. What are you

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.840
<v Speaker 2>making of this landscape? How do you expect the FTC

0:08:58.040 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 2>some of these legal wranglings to unfold for is In,

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 2>for example, brand.

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 7>The government has been trying to tackle big tech for

0:09:06.400 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 7>a long time, and we've said this that the government,

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 7>the government or oversight is the right thing to help

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 7>protect all of us as consumers. But the big tech

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:20.760
<v Speaker 7>is being big is not bad, right, Being bad is bad.

0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.439
<v Speaker 7>So as long as they find the middle ground. We've

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.720
<v Speaker 7>said this repeatedly, investors, anytime a regulatory scare comes in,

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:27.720
<v Speaker 7>you buy these stocks.

0:09:28.040 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 8>Just look at the charts of.

0:09:29.000 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 7>Meta, Google, Amazon or over the course of the last

0:09:32.400 --> 0:09:35.920
<v Speaker 7>five years, any any regulatory scare, these need these names

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 7>need to be bought.

0:09:37.360 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 8>Clearly.

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 7>Uh, there's been multiple attempts for the government to take

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 7>down tech.

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 8>It hasn't happened.

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:46.480
<v Speaker 7>They find a way out, stocks recover, Investors make money.

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 7>So I'm all for regulation and doing the right thing

0:09:50.000 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 7>to protect all of us. But I think what's happened

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 7>is they've overstepped their boundaries and they've gone after things

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:58.839
<v Speaker 7>that they don't necessarily have good footing or educate it

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 7>on and then that's caused the proms.

0:10:01.800 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 8>So I think ultimately these are comedies that have.

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 7>Both one and then end goal, and I think they

0:10:10.280 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 7>can meet in the middle. And we've said this repeatedly,

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:16.480
<v Speaker 7>like any regulatory scaring, Internet has not really done anything

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:18.400
<v Speaker 7>that he stocks. Just pull up the chart at Google

0:10:18.640 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 7>for the last five years and you can just see

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 7>it's an amazing up into the right chart.

0:10:23.559 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 8>So respected believe in it.

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:29.840
<v Speaker 7>Don't believe they're going to have a mass of consequence

0:10:30.320 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 7>or businesses.

0:10:31.760 --> 0:10:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Brent.

0:10:32.080 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 4>When you outlined that ten minutes with an ar v

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 4>I headset playing with your kids at the weekend wouldn't

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 4>change your life, there were parents in the San Francisco

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 4>studio team here that tickled them a lot. I think

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 4>they probably share that view of you. Jeffrey, Senior Internet Analysts,

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 4>Brent Hill, thank you very much. Sticking with devices, Amazon

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.040
<v Speaker 4>has lured away longtime Microsoft executive Panos Pana to head

0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 4>the company's devices and services business after device's chief Dave

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:00.200
<v Speaker 4>limp announced his plans to retire. He most recently was

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.840
<v Speaker 4>Microsoft's chief product officer, overseeing Windows as well as the

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:07.079
<v Speaker 4>company's hardware teams, and of course Dave Limpoff to head

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:09.559
<v Speaker 4>up Blue Origin carr Lots.

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 5>Of Revolving Doors.

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.480
<v Speaker 4>FTC chair Lena Kahan is seeking to end what she

0:11:22.600 --> 0:11:26.080
<v Speaker 4>calls Amazon's illegal conduct, but didn't go as far as

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.360
<v Speaker 4>to call for a breakup of Amazon. We sat down

0:11:28.360 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 4>with her at our Bloomberg office in Washington, DC.

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 3>This is the conversation. Have listen.

0:11:33.880 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 9>This is a.

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 10>Case about a set of unlawful tactics that Amazon has

0:11:38.200 --> 0:11:42.520
<v Speaker 10>used to maintain its monopolies. We note in the complaint

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 10>both a set of anti discounting tactics that Amazon uses

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:50.679
<v Speaker 10>to punish any seller or retailer that dares to discount,

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 10>and ultimately these sets of tactics deter sellers and retailers

0:11:55.920 --> 0:11:59.400
<v Speaker 10>from lowering prices and closes off an entire dimension of

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:00.280
<v Speaker 10>price competition.

0:12:00.800 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 9>The other set of tactics.

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 10>We note, is a coercive scheme that Amazon uses to

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 10>effectively require sellers use its fulfillment service, and this in

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:14.359
<v Speaker 10>turn ends up stunting the development of independent fulfillment providers

0:12:14.600 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 10>and ultimately also deprives actual and potential rivals of scale.

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 9>And that's really the core theme here.

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:23.720
<v Speaker 10>These are a set of tactics, but ultimately Amazon has

0:12:23.760 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 10>pursued them to deprive actual and potential competitors of the

0:12:28.640 --> 0:12:32.400
<v Speaker 10>ability to gain the scale and momentum needed to effectively

0:12:32.480 --> 0:12:36.959
<v Speaker 10>compete online. And having achieved and protected its monopoly power,

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:40.800
<v Speaker 10>our complaint details how Amazon is now exploiting that monopoly

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 10>power in ways that harm customers, both the sellers, the

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.280
<v Speaker 10>tens of millions of American families that use Amazon to

0:12:48.320 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 10>do their shopping, but also the.

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 9>Sorry, both the shoppers, but also the sellers.

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 10>The hundreds of thousands and tens of thousands of sellers

0:12:57.040 --> 0:13:00.959
<v Speaker 10>use Amazon to access those shoppers, and it's done that

0:13:01.000 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 10>through actively raising prices. Amazon takes close to one out

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.240
<v Speaker 10>of every two dollars from sellers that they use its platform.

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 9>It's also degraded its.

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 10>Service by adding a whole set of pay to play

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.760
<v Speaker 10>ads that make it more difficult for consumers to find

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.000
<v Speaker 10>what they're looking for and steers them to higher price products.

0:13:20.000 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 10>So really encourage everybody to read the complaint. It details

0:13:23.800 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 10>all of this conduct in great detail, and we're really

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 10>looking forward to moving forward with it.

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.320
<v Speaker 9>So one of the things in the complaint is.

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 10>This phrase structural relief that you're seeking structural relief in

0:13:36.160 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 10>this case, which implies a breakup.

0:13:39.040 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 5>What would that look like.

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.520
<v Speaker 10>So at this stage the complaint is really focused on

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 10>the issue of liability. We lay out a scheme that

0:13:47.040 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 10>we believe violates the US antitrust laws.

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 9>What we note in.

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 10>The complaint is that these different aspects of Amazon's scheme have.

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 9>An aggregated effect.

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 10>So the harm is accumulating their feedback loops between the harms,

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:05.599
<v Speaker 10>and so the net exclusionary effect of Amazon's conduct is

0:14:05.679 --> 0:14:09.640
<v Speaker 10>quite significant. Ultimately, we'll want to make sure that any

0:14:09.679 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 10>remedy is halting the illegal conduct, preventing a recurrence, and

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 10>ensuring that Amazon is not able to profit and benefit

0:14:17.080 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 10>from its illegal behavior. So right now we're squarely focused

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 10>on the question of liability, But when we get to

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 10>the issue of remedy, those are going to be the

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 10>principles we'll be focused on.

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 2>FTC Chair Lena Calm there and look, Amazon has responded

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 2>to this lawsuit, with the company's Global Council writing that

0:14:34.400 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 2>if the FTC were to be successful, the result would

0:14:36.960 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 2>be actually anti competitive, anti consumer. Let's stick in to

0:14:40.840 --> 0:14:43.760
<v Speaker 2>all of this with Charlotte's lame and competition Policy Director

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 2>of Policy.

0:14:44.480 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 5>At public Knowledge.

0:14:45.640 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 2>And also you previously worked in the Anti competitive Practices

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 2>division of the FTZ investigating, litigating, and Charlotte, if you

0:14:52.680 --> 0:14:55.760
<v Speaker 2>were there now, how much confidence would you have that

0:14:55.840 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 2>this would be a winnable action.

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 11>I think there's a reason that the antitrust attorneys at

0:15:02.120 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 11>the FTC tried not to answer those kinds of questions.

0:15:05.080 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 11>It's really hard to say at this early stage, but

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:12.280
<v Speaker 11>I think they feel confident, right. I watched that interview

0:15:12.320 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 11>with Lena Khan yesterday, and it's so important to highlight

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 11>this problem for people. It seems clear, even though Amazon

0:15:20.640 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 11>has built their reputation on having the best prices, that

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 11>that didn't come from being a really efficient competitor. It

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 11>came from pushing those third party sellers to raise prices

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 11>everywhere else. That's not fair competition and if that's what's

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 11>going on, it needs to step Charlotte.

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting is sort of investor an analyst reaction to

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 2>all of this, and one particular analyst saying that this

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 2>is a benign scenario for Amazon over at BED, and

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 2>in fact they said that they were surprised the narrowness

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 2>of the overall case, saying that there isn't sort of

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 2>a reference to disallowing vertical integration. Do you think the

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 2>outcome should be some sort of breakup or has it

0:16:01.720 --> 0:16:02.880
<v Speaker 2>got to be something else?

0:16:04.880 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 11>So certainly I think stopping the conduct is not going

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 11>to be sufficient.

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 5>This has been.

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 11>Going on for a long time and replacing the competition

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:16.920
<v Speaker 11>that has been lost is really difficult. So step one

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:18.920
<v Speaker 11>is going to be to stop the conduct, but more

0:16:19.000 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 11>will be needed. And I heard Chair con yesterday sort

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.600
<v Speaker 11>of demurring that this is going to be a decision

0:16:25.600 --> 0:16:28.040
<v Speaker 11>that happens far in the future, and that's absolutely right.

0:16:28.480 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 11>The remedy stage of litigation is later and separate. But

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 11>it may be that, you know, separating off the fulfilled

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 11>by Amazon part of the business is the only way

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 11>to address that lost competition, in which case the court

0:16:43.000 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 11>would have to take that seriously, Charlotte.

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 4>Some news in the last hour. The FTC has issued

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 4>an order saying that it will continue its internal case

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 4>against Activision and Microsoft steal that when that deal closes,

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 4>they could then after the fact, try to unwind it.

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:06.280
<v Speaker 4>This is what Activision had to say in response via

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 4>a spokesperson. We're focused on working with Microsoft toward closing

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:13.840
<v Speaker 4>how the FTC uses limited taxpayer dollars.

0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 3>Is its decision.

0:17:16.240 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 4>Given your CV that Caroline outline, What is your response

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 4>to this situation.

0:17:23.080 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 11>Well, they're drying on an important point, which is that

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.879
<v Speaker 11>the FTC has limited resources and there are so many

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:31.480
<v Speaker 11>important cases that we want them to bring with those

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:35.639
<v Speaker 11>limited resources. But this case against Microsoft and Activision is

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 11>a really important case. So if they think that that

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 11>has the opportunity to help so many consumers, as I

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 11>believe it would, that might be an important priority to

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 11>spend those limited resources. But they're absolutely right. We do

0:17:48.920 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 11>need to increase funding for these agencies so that they

0:17:51.880 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 11>can take on all of these important cases.

0:17:55.160 --> 0:17:58.680
<v Speaker 4>Charlotte quickly, it is Lena Khan picking too many fights.

0:18:01.240 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 11>No, we need to pick these fights. And she spoke

0:18:04.680 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 11>yesterday about the deterrence strategy which can make this more

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:14.520
<v Speaker 11>efficient use of resources. Right, if businesses out there can

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.399
<v Speaker 11>see this is not going to be an opportunity for

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 11>you to try something risky because there is a really

0:18:22.880 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 11>fierce enforcer here that can actually be a way of

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:29.480
<v Speaker 11>saving resources. So I think that's part of the strategy

0:18:29.560 --> 0:18:30.880
<v Speaker 11>and that can work over time.

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 4>Charlott's Lane and competition policy director at public knowledge. Thank

0:18:35.320 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 4>you so much for your time. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 2>Time now for work shifting when we look at the

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 2>changing landscape of the labor market amid advances in technology.

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 5>Big breakthrough for Hollywood.

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.399
<v Speaker 2>The Writers Guild of America approved a new contract with

0:19:03.480 --> 0:19:07.160
<v Speaker 2>the studios, ending it strike after months of intense negotiations.

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:09.400
<v Speaker 5>Now one of the biggest wins in the deal is.

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 2>Some assurance that artificial intelligence well won't replace their jobs.

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 2>Glomberg's Felix Jillet is here with us with more details

0:19:15.720 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 2>and before we move to what's next to occur in

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 2>all of this, Yeah, AI, how have they won any

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:23.160
<v Speaker 2>sort of protection here?

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 12>Well, they got what they wanted basically, which is that

0:19:26.119 --> 0:19:29.520
<v Speaker 12>the Hollywood studios agreed that they're not going to you know,

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 12>feed a bunch of scripts into the AI machine and

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.679
<v Speaker 12>come back and credit a movie to an AI that

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:38.679
<v Speaker 12>you know, the humans are still going to get the credit,

0:19:39.520 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 12>and that was what was really important. Now, the studios

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 12>did retain the right to experiment a little bit with AI,

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:49.000
<v Speaker 12>so you know, it remains to be seen a little

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:50.399
<v Speaker 12>bit how this is going to play out, But for

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 12>the time being, the writers are declaring victory.

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 2>And read across therefore to actors because they too, particularly

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 2>perhaps you know, the extras that are used, worried about

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 2>AI replacing them in some way.

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Is this an issue?

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.120
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I think they had similar concerns. And now there's

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 12>a template for these protections. So I think, you know,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.320
<v Speaker 12>there's optimism to believe that the writers, having made this pack,

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 12>well now the actors will make some real progress quickly.

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 4>Some of the numbers bind this felix are incredible, the

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 4>loss of the economy based on the strike. But the

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 4>whole point here is that the cost of contents getting higher.

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Did the studios feel good about this outcome?

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.800
<v Speaker 12>Their reaction has been notably more muted than the writers.

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 12>I mean, the writers have been very exuberant, very you know,

0:20:35.560 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 12>declaring victory.

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 3>The studios gave up a lot.

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 12>I think they gave up more than they thought they

0:20:40.240 --> 0:20:44.200
<v Speaker 12>would have to five months ago in terms of compensation,

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 12>in terms of minimum staff in on shows, and also

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:49.960
<v Speaker 12>in terms of the AI protections.

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so the other thing you're writing about is Lachlan Murdock.

0:20:53.720 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Daddy's gone metaphorically speaking, what's next?

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 12>Well, it's interesting, you know, at this announcement, last week's

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 12>stepping back as chairman of the two companies, you know,

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 12>talking to all the Murdoch kremlinologists about what this all means.

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.080
<v Speaker 12>Very unclear to everybody, Like does this change anything? What

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:14.959
<v Speaker 12>does this mean a lot of unanswered questions. I mean,

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 12>I think clearly it was framed as another vote of

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 12>confidence by Rupert In his chosen successor, Lachlan, his eldest son.

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 12>But at the same time, you know, the issues of

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.120
<v Speaker 12>what's going to happen to the company down the road

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:35.160
<v Speaker 12>remained fairly unresolved. And you know, they tried to recombine

0:21:35.760 --> 0:21:40.000
<v Speaker 12>Fox and News Corporation earlier this year. Investors balked at

0:21:40.000 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 12>that idea. So what comes next?

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:43.440
<v Speaker 3>You know, they have.

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 12>Been pretty quiet on the M and A front for

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 12>the past couple of years, really since acquiring it. To

0:21:48.400 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 12>be yeah, that looks like a successful deal for them,

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 12>but there's still basically a minno in this world of giants.

0:21:55.480 --> 0:21:58.239
<v Speaker 2>An extraett. It's a great wad go do it? This

0:21:58.280 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 2>has been the technology Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology.

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:13.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm Caroline Hyde, New York.

0:22:14.320 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 4>Now I med Lovelow in San Francisco. A quick check

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:18.640
<v Speaker 4>in on the markets. There's not a lot of kind

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 4>of big action at the macro level, at the index level,

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 4>and now's that one hundred down three tenths of one percent.

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.320
<v Speaker 4>There's still a lot of focus right on economic data,

0:22:27.359 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 4>what the Federal Reserve will do, and before you know it,

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.760
<v Speaker 4>Caroline Earning season will be back and we will get

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 4>for I know, I just cannot believe it. There are

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 4>two names that we're looking at specifically right now, and

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 4>this has been a theme of the show, right Artificial

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 4>intelligence and hardware. It is Metaconnect today the developers conference.

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:46.639
<v Speaker 4>We're up three tens of one percent. We will go

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 4>even further later in the show on what we expect,

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.320
<v Speaker 4>why we do or don't care about the hardware side,

0:22:52.320 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 4>and we will focus on the AI side. Microsoft softer

0:22:55.160 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 4>four tens of one percent. You're about to bring us

0:22:57.040 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 4>a story that makes this move surprising to me because

0:23:00.880 --> 0:23:04.359
<v Speaker 4>you think about the news flow. Would Microsoft be higher

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 4>on what you were about to bring our audience.

0:23:06.400 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 2>You would have thought so, because on paper they have

0:23:09.119 --> 0:23:12.440
<v Speaker 2>made a pretty penny on a thirteen billion dollar investment

0:23:12.520 --> 0:23:15.680
<v Speaker 2>in one company, ed Open AI. We are talking about,

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:18.399
<v Speaker 2>of course, the fact that company, the AI company, is

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 2>in talking to its investors about a potential share sale

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 2>that would value it up to eighty to ninety billion dollars. Now,

0:23:25.080 --> 0:23:26.399
<v Speaker 2>this at the moment ed is all according to the

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 2>Wall Street Journal reporting sources, But the deal would allow employees,

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 2>most crucially, to look sell some of their existing shares

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 2>to be able to access some of the monetary value

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:38.840
<v Speaker 2>of the work that they've been doing without.

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.640
<v Speaker 5>The company actually having to issue or raise fresh capital.

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 2>This exact valuation extraordinary when you think that actually open

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:47.879
<v Speaker 2>Ai was only just starting in our lexicon at the

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 2>beginning of this year.

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, and when they did issue shares in April that

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 4>was at a twenty nine billion dollar valuation. It's a

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:56.720
<v Speaker 4>hell of a jump. A big part of the story

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:00.520
<v Speaker 4>is employee liquidity, right, it's a big frustration when you're

0:24:00.520 --> 0:24:03.440
<v Speaker 4>in a private startup for decade and you can't sell

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 4>that your RSUs or your stock. And then did you

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 4>see the revenue numbers that the journal reported and weird

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:09.919
<v Speaker 4>that might be it?

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean the fact that Bloomberg knows that they're

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be bringing in about a billion in a year.

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.199
<v Speaker 2>I mean everyone's been questioning, how do you monetize the

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 2>generative AI opportunity?

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 5>Well, clearly open ai is already doing that solely with enterprise.

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 2>They're still evolving in terms of multimodal ways in which

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 2>we can interact with generative AI. It's also notable though,

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 2>what I thought was interesting is the fact that what

0:24:29.000 --> 0:24:32.440
<v Speaker 2>they're number three now behind TikTok, but also behind SpaceX

0:24:32.440 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 2>and who was a co founder of open ai.

0:24:35.280 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, very interesting the wrap around with mister Elon Musk,

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.640
<v Speaker 4>who's doing his own thing now and a lot of AI.

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Let's dive into all of this look in authority in

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the space, particularly when it comes to the impact of

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 2>generative AI, maybe regulation of it. Dame Wendy Halls with US,

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Professor of Computer Science at the University of Southampton, also

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 2>as a co chair of the UK Government's AI Review

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 2>published back in twenty seventeen. And boy has the narrative

0:24:56.320 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 2>kind of changed accelerated, Wendy since twenty seventeen. And we've

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:01.479
<v Speaker 2>had you on the show for just talk about the

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 2>exuberance that you still see around the space and ultimately

0:25:04.520 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 2>whether we're wringing our hands about the opportunity but also

0:25:07.080 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 2>the risks.

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:10.359
<v Speaker 13>Enough, well we should have ring our hands about the opportunities.

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 13>The opportunities are there. There's a hype wave at the moment,

0:25:13.720 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 13>and I remember the web dot com crash. I'm just

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 13>saying that putting it out there when everyone piled into

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:24.760
<v Speaker 13>web companies and the technology wasn't mature enough and we

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 13>had a crash. The generative AI people may be buying

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 13>into it, but it's not proven yet as a thing

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 13>that business can use. Is it really I'm not saying

0:25:34.920 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 13>it won't be, but at the moment, is it reliable enough?

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:44.399
<v Speaker 13>And there's a lot of competition. We don't really know

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 13>what the business models are. There's still to be explored,

0:25:47.400 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 13>and so there's a terrible I personally wouldn't be buying

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.680
<v Speaker 13>shares in AI companies at the member. Then I'm not

0:25:52.720 --> 0:25:55.120
<v Speaker 13>a stocks and shares person, so I'm not in the.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:57.399
<v Speaker 3>Contrad style, Wendy.

0:25:57.440 --> 0:26:01.200
<v Speaker 4>We appreciate the perspective that will go commercialization. A second

0:26:01.240 --> 0:26:04.639
<v Speaker 4>today is Meta connect and we will hear from the

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 4>parent company of Facebook what they are doing in the

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 4>world of artificial intelligence. But broadly they have stuck to

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 4>the doctrine of open source development. What is your position

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 4>on open source development?

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 14>Well, I'm a circular academic.

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 13>I love it for the innovation it provides, but I

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 13>worry about the risks and who's responsible is the world

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 13>of responsible AI if you get you know who's responsible

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:34.359
<v Speaker 13>for the use of that open source and who's responsible

0:26:34.440 --> 0:26:38.320
<v Speaker 13>for whether it goes to the bad actors or the good.

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 14>Actors down the line.

0:26:39.840 --> 0:26:41.960
<v Speaker 13>As we talk about regulation, we have to talk about

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:44.960
<v Speaker 13>regulation of open source as well as the regulation of

0:26:45.040 --> 0:26:47.080
<v Speaker 13>the core generators of the technology.

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 2>I've seem to recall when Meta first announced Lama Too

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 2>and Nick Kleagg was out there discussing about the why

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 2>they're focused on open sourcing.

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 5>You said, and I think it was you saying, look, this.

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:04.920
<v Speaker 2>Is potentially like giving people the instructions for a nuclear

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:07.720
<v Speaker 2>bomb here. Do you still stand by that that it

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:10.919
<v Speaker 2>could be as impactful? And you think Meta and the

0:27:10.920 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 2>rest of the regulatory community are reacting to that.

0:27:15.440 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 13>Well, I yes, I stand by what I said in

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 13>these sense, and it makes people think about what we're

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 13>doing right if the say are the AI companies are

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 13>saying we can't explain how this stuff works, but we're

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 13>putting it out there anyway, you know, we've I'm not

0:27:29.320 --> 0:27:30.199
<v Speaker 13>a doom sir about this.

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:31.720
<v Speaker 14>I think generative AI is going to.

0:27:31.640 --> 0:27:35.200
<v Speaker 13>Be a profoundly positive technology if used well and responsibly.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 13>But lots of people are pulling Jeffrey Hinton and people

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 13>have pulled out of it. They're also it's dangerous, it's dangerous,

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 13>We've got to be careful. But then they're giving away

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 13>the open source versions. It just seems so contradictory in

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.440
<v Speaker 13>my mind. If you think something is so dangerous, shouldn't

0:27:49.480 --> 0:27:52.440
<v Speaker 13>you be making sure very sure about who the people

0:27:52.480 --> 0:27:54.040
<v Speaker 13>you're giving it to and what they're.

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 14>Going to do with it.

0:27:55.720 --> 0:27:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Also what's interesting is an inn Video executive has since

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 2>left the business and as it's two thousand and one,

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 2>claiming that their biggest concern is the fact that it

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 2>is being dominated by big tech players and then there

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:08.959
<v Speaker 2>isn't enough of the startups being able to come in

0:28:09.000 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 2>and other players being able to be at the table.

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:12.320
<v Speaker 5>Do you agree with that narrative?

0:28:12.320 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're about to have yet another summit occurring

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 2>where you are in the UK.

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 13>Well, I won't be at the summit right the people

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 13>at the It's at Bletchley Park, which is tiny. There's

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.000
<v Speaker 13>about one hundred and twenty seats you can get into

0:28:24.040 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 13>the conference room and a number of country if I

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.120
<v Speaker 13>had that by the number of countries attending, there won't

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 13>be many reps from every country. We mainly diplomats people

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 13>from the intelligence agencies because it's all about.

0:28:34.880 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 14>Cybersecurity and national security.

0:28:36.880 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 13>And it'll be the tech grows, the people running the

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:41.600
<v Speaker 13>tech companies that will be there.

0:28:41.600 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 14>There won't be a diversity of thought of any.

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:49.960
<v Speaker 13>Type there, and so I really worry that this whole

0:28:49.960 --> 0:28:53.880
<v Speaker 13>conversation is being run by the tech companies and they're

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:59.680
<v Speaker 13>being effectively asked to regulate themselves and they're giving away

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.520
<v Speaker 13>stuff to you know, here's the open source guys. You

0:29:02.640 --> 0:29:05.960
<v Speaker 13>do do this is who's responsible in this food chain?

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 14>Where is the responsibility? That's what wiries me.

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:11.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, Wendy, let's talk about the nation.

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.240
<v Speaker 4>That's why I want to ask you, though, Wendy, about

0:29:14.240 --> 0:29:16.000
<v Speaker 4>the nation state level action.

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 4>We had Joe White on the show last week, the

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:22.160
<v Speaker 4>UK Technology Ambassador, and he was telling Caroline and I

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 4>about all the meetings he's having with the tech companies

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:30.440
<v Speaker 4>to secure the compute, the chip makers, the hyperscale cloud providers.

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 4>So I understand your concerns, but do you at least

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 4>see the UK trying to get itself at a national

0:29:37.640 --> 0:29:40.000
<v Speaker 4>level in a position of leadership in what is a

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 4>nascent technology.

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 13>Yes, of course I do, and a lot of the

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:47.760
<v Speaker 13>things they're doing is totally applaud We have to put

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 13>more money into this the UK does.

0:29:49.560 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 14>I mean we don't.

0:29:50.640 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 13>We are never going to be able to put the

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 13>amount of money the US and China puts in. The

0:29:54.360 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 13>EU's bigger than us, it could put more in. We

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:58.920
<v Speaker 13>don't have the companies in Europe, of course, they're all

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.360
<v Speaker 13>in Washington, in Washington or in shen Zen in China,

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 13>and so we can only lead by regulating, governing. And

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 13>I've always said that that's the right thing for us

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:11.760
<v Speaker 13>to do, because we're good at that sort of stuff.

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.920
<v Speaker 13>But just at the moment, since chat GPT came out,

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:18.920
<v Speaker 13>everything has flipped in the UK. It's really turned so

0:30:19.000 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 13>that it is all about the technology at the moment

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:26.520
<v Speaker 13>and the safety risks, and it's not about very little

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 13>about how you you know.

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.400
<v Speaker 14>The good things that this can be used for and.

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 13>How it's going to be used by society evolving the

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:35.520
<v Speaker 13>wider community in those debates.

0:30:36.680 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 3>Day Mighty Hall.

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 4>On that note, then, let me ask you then in

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:45.160
<v Speaker 4>your research, what are you most excited about about artificial

0:30:45.200 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 4>intelligence bringing to society.

0:30:47.840 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 13>Well, I'm excited about the things that the day I

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 13>can do that will give us answers to questions we

0:30:53.920 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 13>couldn't possibly.

0:30:55.040 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 14>Work out without it. So example, in health.

0:30:57.040 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 13>Everyone talks about health, but the breakthroughs are already. It

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 13>will relieve people in the judgeries of some of the

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 13>boring jobs, create new jobs. It will help us with

0:31:06.600 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 13>solving the big ground challenges of the world like the

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 13>climate change and energy and food security. And you know,

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.760
<v Speaker 13>we'll be able to do things with AI and data

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:20.640
<v Speaker 13>we couldn't possibly have done without without it, and that's

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 13>you know, it's just and it's going to change. Generative

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 13>AI is going to change how we do everything. It

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 13>will change how you work, how I work, how students work.

0:31:28.720 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 14>You know it will.

0:31:29.440 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 13>It will be as profound as the introduction of the

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 13>calculator and the computer back in the seventies. We will

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:38.479
<v Speaker 13>all approach the creation of things differently. But it doesn't

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:40.880
<v Speaker 13>mean that generative AI is going to wipe us out

0:31:40.880 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 13>of existence as it is now. So that there's such

0:31:43.800 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 13>a hype around the existential threat and that we've got

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 13>to of course talk about that and global but it's

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 13>not the immediate threats are you know, more about misinformation

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 13>and threats to the democratic process.

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.200
<v Speaker 14>How AI might be used in the.

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.760
<v Speaker 13>Campaign's next year and that and that's those are the

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 13>things that worry me.

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 4>Dame Wendy Hall, Professor of computer science at the University

0:32:11.080 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 4>of Southampton. Robust conversation as always, Thank you.

0:32:14.960 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 14>Okay.

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Now coming up here from Bloomberg Technology the future of

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 4>marine transportation? Can the marine transportation industry go electric? We'll

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 4>talk all about that more with ARC co founder Ryan

0:32:26.600 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 4>Cook and Eclipse Sventure's founder Lee or Susan.

0:32:29.000 --> 0:32:29.840
<v Speaker 3>That's coming up next.

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:49.640
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology. Okay, time for talking tech. First

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:52.320
<v Speaker 4>stop can How's planned IPO will be Keith for gauging

0:32:52.360 --> 0:32:56.200
<v Speaker 4>demand in Hong Kong's sluggish deals market, companies have raised

0:32:56.240 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 4>just under three billion dollars so far in twenty twenty three.

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:02.640
<v Speaker 4>That's on track for the least since the nineteen nineties.

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 3>What a stat can now.

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:06.840
<v Speaker 4>The logistics unit of Aali Barber is expected to raise

0:33:06.880 --> 0:33:10.000
<v Speaker 4>at least one billion dollars, and Binance says it's doing

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.800
<v Speaker 4>business in Russia as it recognizes that quote operating in

0:33:13.880 --> 0:33:17.240
<v Speaker 4>Russia is not compatible with its compliance strategy. The crypto

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 4>exchange platform is selling its units to comes a service

0:33:21.200 --> 0:33:24.360
<v Speaker 4>launch just one day before the deal was announced. Binance

0:33:24.400 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 4>and its founder Chang Peng Jao have been the subjects

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:31.080
<v Speaker 4>of regulatory reviews this year in the US, plus TikTok

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 4>Shop is dealing with a major setback to its growth

0:33:34.080 --> 0:33:37.720
<v Speaker 4>in ambitions. In Indonesia, officials implemented a ban that prohibits

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 4>social commerce companies from facilitating direct e commerce payments on

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.960
<v Speaker 4>their platforms. The new policies aimed at ensuring local e

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 4>commerce services such as Tokopedia won't be squeezed out.

0:33:48.920 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 3>Caroline.

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, now you've got a real focus today in

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 2>the VC spotlight right where we're going to be talking

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 2>electric boat snow less take it away.

0:33:58.400 --> 0:34:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Yes, So two interesting people coming up on the program. First,

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:05.840
<v Speaker 4>ARC's co founder and CTO joins us Ryan Cook alongside

0:34:05.920 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 4>Lee or Susan, one of the partners over it at clips.

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 4>Electric Boat Companies raised seventy million dollars to expand its

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.880
<v Speaker 4>operations electrify more of the marine industry. This is like

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:20.600
<v Speaker 4>the Tesla playbook to go mass market in boats. So

0:34:20.680 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 4>let's bring this conversation in and Ryan I want to

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 4>start with you. You had a limited number, fewer than

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 4>twenty of these three hundred thousand dollars battery electric boats.

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 4>The next gen model is going to come next year,

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty four, but we don't know anything about it.

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 4>So tell us where do these funds go to develop

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:39.040
<v Speaker 4>this next gen model?

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:43.719
<v Speaker 15>Thanks, Ed, Yeah, I mean these funds really go to

0:34:43.800 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 15>us expanding production into a more mass market vehicle. The

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:52.239
<v Speaker 15>ARC one was limited edition, we completely sold out, but

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 15>we really want to focus our attention now on electrifying

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:58.400
<v Speaker 15>everything else on the water, everything up in the marine industry.

0:35:00.040 --> 0:35:02.560
<v Speaker 15>A lot of gas boats out there, and ourxsmission is

0:35:02.600 --> 0:35:05.920
<v Speaker 15>to convert all of them to electric. These funds really

0:35:05.960 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 15>help us accelerate that mission. We're going to be using

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 15>it to expand our footprint here in Los Angeles, and

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:13.640
<v Speaker 15>we're going to be using it too, as you mentioned,

0:35:13.960 --> 0:35:17.719
<v Speaker 15>work on our next more mass market product, which we

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 15>will unveil more details in the next couple of months.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you leave us hanging, but or on that respect,

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 2>what is the ultimate total addressable market here?

0:35:27.640 --> 0:35:28.600
<v Speaker 5>From your mind's eye?

0:35:28.640 --> 0:35:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Why are you so excited to commit more capital here?

0:35:32.600 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's great to be here again.

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 16>Caroline, and I think you know, like many other physical industries,

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 16>the marinetime industries is being here for I don't know,

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 16>five thousand years.

0:35:43.560 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 1>It's a gay game.

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:47.160
<v Speaker 16>Think industry of multi hundreds of billions of dollars that's

0:35:47.200 --> 0:35:52.600
<v Speaker 16>still being run by generally gas, a combustant engine. That's

0:35:52.600 --> 0:35:57.280
<v Speaker 16>all going to change by electlification, with batteries, with electronics.

0:35:57.480 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>You guys mentioned in the previous section AI.

0:36:00.320 --> 0:36:02.719
<v Speaker 16>We love seeing AI in a physical industries and the

0:36:02.800 --> 0:36:06.640
<v Speaker 16>impact in society and climate, and of course building what

0:36:06.719 --> 0:36:08.240
<v Speaker 16>we believe will be the next Testla.

0:36:08.320 --> 0:36:09.080
<v Speaker 1>Here with dog.

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:14.040
<v Speaker 4>Ryan, we talked about your CV. You had seven years

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 4>of engineering at SpaceX, some of your investors at Tesla alum,

0:36:18.520 --> 0:36:21.040
<v Speaker 4>some of your staff a Tesla alum. And you seem

0:36:21.080 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 4>to be replicating this idea like Tesla started with the Roadster,

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:26.640
<v Speaker 4>then the Model Less than the Model three. Is it

0:36:26.680 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 4>fair to say that you're kind of replicating that path forward.

0:36:30.719 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think that's fair to say.

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.840
<v Speaker 15>I mean, we really think that's the smartest way to

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 15>go about doing this. The hardest part about working on

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 15>a hardware startup is really scaling that production. Starting with

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 15>something that's a smaller batch field kind of like the

0:36:44.640 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 15>ARC one. It allows you to learn a lot where

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 15>the risks are minimized because you have fewer products out there.

0:36:51.920 --> 0:36:55.000
<v Speaker 15>We can take all of those learnings and honestly move

0:36:55.080 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 15>faster as we move into the next product, rather than

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 15>trying to jump straight to something else mass market. And

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 15>the other point here that we're only two and a

0:37:04.880 --> 0:37:08.680
<v Speaker 15>half years old, we've already sold and delivered orc ones

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 15>to customers. That's incredible speed for a hardware company, and

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 15>it really speaks to the engineering team that we have

0:37:15.040 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 15>and this kind of first principles approach that you know

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 15>we bring from space accent as well to be able

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:21.400
<v Speaker 15>to execute that quickly.

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Leo, You've put a lot of dollars into real world startups,

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.840
<v Speaker 4>companies that actually make stuff. But it was interesting to

0:37:28.920 --> 0:37:32.680
<v Speaker 4>note the expansion of US manufacturing here and not going overseas.

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 3>What do you make of that, Leo?

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:40.640
<v Speaker 16>I think there is a new industrial renaissance in this country.

0:37:41.160 --> 0:37:43.719
<v Speaker 1>I just came back from Washington, d C. Two weeks ago.

0:37:44.239 --> 0:37:48.360
<v Speaker 16>The government is very serious to help this country build again.

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.560
<v Speaker 16>I think we understanding what that means from a geopolitics

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:55.839
<v Speaker 16>point of view and the needs to secure and resilience,

0:37:55.880 --> 0:37:59.280
<v Speaker 16>our supply chain and manufacturing, and that's mean building companies

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:02.799
<v Speaker 16>like RC locally when you're putting on top of it,

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 16>automation and software the other two biggest move that we

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 16>are seeing in physical industries. You now can build the

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:13.080
<v Speaker 16>most sophisticated boat in Los Angeles.

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Uh, that would be just not something you could do before.

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:20.960
<v Speaker 16>And it's very exciting because I think we are seeing

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:23.800
<v Speaker 16>companies like Tesla and s Basics and ARC and others

0:38:24.960 --> 0:38:27.920
<v Speaker 16>building a new industrial regime here in this country.

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Ron Therefore, what is the headache for you as you

0:38:31.800 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 2>want to take on this money to accelerate in a

0:38:34.560 --> 0:38:36.960
<v Speaker 2>big way. Is it supply chain that remains a concern?

0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Is it talent pool? What is it that hinders you

0:38:39.200 --> 0:38:39.719
<v Speaker 2>if at all?

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, it's it's probably a combination of both of those.

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:51.480
<v Speaker 15>You know, talent is really the most important. Talent is

0:38:51.520 --> 0:38:54.760
<v Speaker 15>what lets you, you know, accelerate move quickly. We invest

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:56.960
<v Speaker 15>a lot in our people. We have a great engineering

0:38:57.040 --> 0:39:00.160
<v Speaker 15>team with a great background from you know Tueslee be

0:39:00.200 --> 0:39:05.720
<v Speaker 15>in SpaceX, all those companies. The supply chain is definitely

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:07.800
<v Speaker 15>the top of mind as well. That's actually where CLIPS

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:10.680
<v Speaker 15>is incredibly helpful. They have a great portfolio of companies.

0:39:10.680 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 15>They have a lot of experience operating in the hardware space.

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 15>Our main focus though, is really just execution.

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>On production ramp.

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:23.240
<v Speaker 15>Anyone who's started a hardware company knows trying to scale

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 15>production is the hardest possible thing. Building one of something

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 15>is easy, Building hundreds thousands of something is incredibly difficult.

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's really you know, the next.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 15>Year, two years being our entire focus is building the

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:38.360
<v Speaker 15>production line itself.

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 2>Well here, so hope you don't have to sleep there

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:44.280
<v Speaker 2>too much as well, Elan did arc CTO co founder

0:39:44.360 --> 0:39:46.399
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Cook, great has some time you an Eclipse founder

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 2>and managing partner ner Sisan, Thank you very much. Now, look,

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:58.479
<v Speaker 2>all eyes are going to be trained on the Meta

0:39:58.520 --> 0:40:01.359
<v Speaker 2>Connect event, which is slee to start relatively shortly about

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:03.440
<v Speaker 2>half a last time, but we've got to touch on

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:05.800
<v Speaker 2>the news out of Snap, the company closing a division

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:09.560
<v Speaker 2>focused on making augmented reality services for businesses, putting the

0:40:09.560 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 2>plug on its latest attempt just try and diversify this

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 2>business mandate. Seeing a place to say cover both of

0:40:15.040 --> 0:40:17.880
<v Speaker 2>these key companies, Bloombag Intelligence and you already wrote to

0:40:17.920 --> 0:40:19.800
<v Speaker 2>react to what was a great piece coming out of

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:22.640
<v Speaker 2>our own Alex Bernka, what do you make of really

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:24.839
<v Speaker 2>the decision quite hard nose decision here to just pull

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:25.240
<v Speaker 2>the plug.

0:40:25.960 --> 0:40:28.879
<v Speaker 17>I think in case of all these companies that are

0:40:28.920 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 17>relying on hyperscalers to give them the cloud capacity. I mean, look,

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:38.240
<v Speaker 17>investing in generative AI isn't cheap, and that's what every

0:40:38.360 --> 0:40:41.400
<v Speaker 17>small company is realizing. It's hitting their growth margin. In

0:40:41.400 --> 0:40:44.200
<v Speaker 17>the case of Snap, clearly they have a problem with

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:47.799
<v Speaker 17>top line growth. And I think AR, even though it

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:49.920
<v Speaker 17>was touted as the next big thing a couple of

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:53.640
<v Speaker 17>years back, clearly isn't the thing that investors are focused on.

0:40:53.680 --> 0:40:57.080
<v Speaker 17>They're more focused on generative AI, and that's why they're

0:40:57.120 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 17>trying to cut their costs here. And look, Snap, compared

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 17>to their peers has a very high R and D intensity,

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 17>it's about forty percent, So compare that to all their peers,

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 17>it's more twenty to twenty five percent is more than

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:13.400
<v Speaker 17>norm So I'm not surprised they're cutting that line.

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:17.320
<v Speaker 4>Mandy, Meta connect and the keynote from Zark coming up shortly.

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 4>What's the AI story that you want to hear from Meta?

0:41:22.239 --> 0:41:25.600
<v Speaker 17>Yeah, Look, I think we've seen a clear strategy from

0:41:25.719 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 17>Microsoft using copilots to monetize GENI as well as the

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:33.720
<v Speaker 17>cloud capacity. Same thing with Google, you know, monetizing cloud

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 17>and then they're launching copilots do it, and also they're

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.399
<v Speaker 17>integrating it in search. In the case of Meta, yes,

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.799
<v Speaker 17>they have a large anguage model, they have open source it. Well,

0:41:44.800 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 17>we still don't know how they are going to monetize it,

0:41:47.320 --> 0:41:50.080
<v Speaker 17>and a lot of the GPU capacity that they're buying

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:53.040
<v Speaker 17>it's more for internal use. Yes, it will help with

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 17>at targeting, but I think investors are more focused on

0:41:56.840 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 17>external forms of monetization, and that's fair. They can integrate

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 17>their large ANGLID model and build an ecosystem that's tied

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 17>to the API. I think that would be huge in

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:11.120
<v Speaker 17>terms of monetization.

0:42:12.000 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 2>We'll see how that all unfolds, and also those agent bots,

0:42:15.280 --> 0:42:19.239
<v Speaker 2>chatbots and how all the different variations are discussed. Man

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:21.360
<v Speaker 2>keep saying Bloomberg technology will let him get back to

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 2>get ready for the meta connective and meanwhile, now that

0:42:23.640 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 2>does it for this addition of Bloomberg technology today.

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:27.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so much to recap.

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:30.040
<v Speaker 4>There will be people out there that are excited about

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 4>ARVR headsets.

0:42:31.280 --> 0:42:32.720
<v Speaker 3>Recap our discussion.

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:35.839
<v Speaker 4>On that on the podcast Apples, Spotify, n iHeart. Of course,

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:38.279
<v Speaker 4>it's on all the Bloomberg platforms as well. Big show

0:42:38.280 --> 0:42:40.640
<v Speaker 4>coming up in twenty four hours time from SFA New York.

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:43.760
<v Speaker 4>This is Bloomberg Technology.