WEBVTT - How to Win the Startup End Game

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:00:04.240 --> 0:00:08.119
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Well, I'm really

0:00:08.119 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>excited about our next guest. Tarage Parong has seen a lot.

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>He's been working in Silicon Valley since the late nineteen nineties.

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:17.919
<v Speaker 1>He's been involved in hundreds of M and A transactions

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.920
<v Speaker 1>and venture capital investments. Right now, he's the CEO at

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Server Robotics. You might recall this spun out of Uber.

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.680
<v Speaker 1>It focuses on sustainable self driving delivery. He's also got

0:00:28.680 --> 0:00:31.440
<v Speaker 1>a brand new book out. It's called Exit Path, How

0:00:31.480 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to Win the Startup Game. Tarage joins us this afternoon

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:40.080
<v Speaker 1>from Palo Alto, California. Tarage, how are you. It's good,

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>very good. Good to be on the show. Yeah, it's

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>good to have you with us. Hey, I want to

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>get to the book in just a second. But but

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>before we get to that, I want to just hear

0:00:48.159 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>what the environment in Silicon Valley is like right now.

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.640
<v Speaker 1>As I mentioned, you have experienced there through several economic cycles,

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>including the dot com crash of the late nineteen nineties.

0:00:56.520 --> 0:00:58.639
<v Speaker 1>What do you see when you look around the landscape

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>right now? Give us your your take, Yes, it's like

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>deja vu all over again. Rightly, So we've been through

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>this a couple of times, as you said, yes, late nineties. Uh,

0:01:10.680 --> 0:01:13.400
<v Speaker 1>this feels a bit more like the two thousand and

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>eight two thousand nine downturn. We're kind of venture capital

0:01:16.200 --> 0:01:20.360
<v Speaker 1>funding a bit dried up. There was no end in

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:23.160
<v Speaker 1>sight for the doom and gloom, and you know, there

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>were all sorts of memos issued by venture capital firms

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.520
<v Speaker 1>about you know, rest in peace, good times, right, So

0:01:31.280 --> 0:01:35.960
<v Speaker 1>it's very reminiscent of that and layoffs unfortunately, you know, uh,

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:39.320
<v Speaker 1>companies cutting costs or being advised by their boards to

0:01:39.480 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 1>cut costs so that they can extend their runway. So

0:01:42.480 --> 0:01:45.360
<v Speaker 1>bring this deja vu that you're feeling. And this landscape

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that we're in, we're funding is drying up. What does

0:01:48.680 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that mean for startups and the business of startups because

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean even in the public equity markets, you know,

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:58.360
<v Speaker 1>companies that are well established, feels like a very rocky time.

0:02:00.720 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 1>It is, it is at certain times. The thing about

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>startups is that a lot of them are in the

0:02:05.760 --> 0:02:08.840
<v Speaker 1>value creation business. There they kind of have a longer

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>term horizon, especially the earlier stage startups. I feel that

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:17.959
<v Speaker 1>earlier stage investors actually continue plug away and continue investing

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.000
<v Speaker 1>their activities. You know, we've seen in other downturns and

0:02:21.080 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of valuable companies were created are founded during

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:28.079
<v Speaker 1>the downturn, So there's no reason for early stage investors

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>to kind of pull back. The problem is with a

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of later stage investors who have invested a very

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:41.560
<v Speaker 1>healthy valuations and now they're facing down rounds or sort

0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.960
<v Speaker 1>of uh have there's a reckoning that has come to them,

0:02:45.000 --> 0:02:49.679
<v Speaker 1>and um that's impacting you know, the moral uh of

0:02:49.800 --> 0:02:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the teams, of their founders, of the investors. So in

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the later stage games, it's a bit of a hard time.

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:00.120
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting, though, Tarage, is what's happening right now now.

0:03:00.120 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean the Nazdak nearly in just a couple of months.

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering if the worst is behind us right now.

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 1>And I know we're talking private versus public, but there

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>is some connection here. There is a connection. Especially you know,

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:15.880
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, you know, companies either

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>want to get public or be acquired, right, Yeah, the

0:03:19.480 --> 0:03:25.120
<v Speaker 1>public market definitely has an impact private markets as well. Um,

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's hard to tell, but my hope is

0:03:30.360 --> 0:03:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that the worce is behind us for sure. Okay, well,

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>let's get into the book a little bit and talk

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.720
<v Speaker 1>about exit path. Because you have personal experience with trying

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>to sell a startup of yours that didn't end up

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>working out the I p O route or the sales route,

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>why do you argue that founders should be less focused

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>on I p O s and more focused on being acquired. Yes? Absolutely,

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>um So you know, if you look at the stats alone,

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>most startups don't make it. You know, over seventy actually

0:03:58.400 --> 0:04:01.040
<v Speaker 1>venture back startups who have rates more than a million

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>don't end up returning the money to their investors. So

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the chances of success are very slim. Now, those who

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:14.640
<v Speaker 1>do manage to make it through are either acquired or public.

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:19.000
<v Speaker 1>For every I p O there's dirty acquisitions. So odds

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 1>are your chances of uh actually making it and surviving

0:04:25.320 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>is through a strategic sale. Um. I experienced that with

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:34.040
<v Speaker 1>my first startup because we were single, singularly focused on

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:38.240
<v Speaker 1>just that I p O. We ignored really any strategic

0:04:38.279 --> 0:04:42.160
<v Speaker 1>conversations building relationships with potential acquires. At What ended up

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:44.599
<v Speaker 1>is that in two thousand and two tho nine, during

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>a time very similar to now. Um, we had to

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>sell because we couldn't raise any more money and we

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't have those relationships to fall back on, and um

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>it was a failure because of that, right, And I

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>mean it's a really interesting point that odds are you're

0:05:01.040 --> 0:05:03.880
<v Speaker 1>probably going to get acquired, You're more likely to do

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that then go public. But it still feels like going

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>public a lot of people sort of regarded as sort

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>of the holy grail for a lot of these startups.

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>But if the case is that you know your company

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:17.440
<v Speaker 1>is much more likely to go bought, I mean, should

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:22.159
<v Speaker 1>founders be sort of preparing for that possibility and trying

0:05:22.160 --> 0:05:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to line up chips for that possibility. That's what I've

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>seen workouts really well for founders. UM, you know, in

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>my next startup after that failure, I actually the first

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.279
<v Speaker 1>thing we did, we we created our eggit strategy and

0:05:37.720 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we did an outside and by doing so, just that

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:44.479
<v Speaker 1>act alone set in motion a series of events that

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>led to a very successful exit. UM you know, web

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff Come was the name of the company we sold

0:05:49.920 --> 0:05:53.480
<v Speaker 1>to visit the print and more than tenets, multiple revenues. Um,

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>it was a very good outcome, and I credited because

0:05:58.240 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>we did take those steps. Now it had to be

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 1>even gone forward. We decided not to sell and had

0:06:04.680 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 1>gone uh you know, with another round of financing and

0:06:08.480 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>gone all the way to IP. Having had acquirers would

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>make our IP a lot more successful because now we

0:06:14.760 --> 0:06:19.719
<v Speaker 1>have actually leveraged in those conversations with investment banks. Turage,

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we only have about forty five seconds left. But how

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.400
<v Speaker 1>do you know when to walk away from an offer

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>when you know that you can get a better offer

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>because you just don't know. Yes, that's why you know.

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:32.559
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot of upsites optionality. So the only

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>way you can walk out from an offer is if

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>you have Bible strategic alternatives. And what I advocate in

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>my book at great length is how to create those

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>strategic optionality for yourself so you can walk out all right.

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Turage Parong, chief operating officer at Serve Robotics, author of

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the brand new book Exit Path, How to Win the

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 1>Startup end Game. Joining us this afternoon on the phone

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>from Palo Alto, California. Tarage, thank you so much for

0:06:58.320 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>taking the time and joining us.