WEBVTT - Winning the Information War

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carole Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanibek. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the world of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all harnessing the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:20.000
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one twenty countries. You can download

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. I want to get to

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>our next guest. He's written about um, the US reaction

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>and watching what's going on in Russia and Ukraine. Specifically,

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he's written about why the US cannot allow Russia to

0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>create a sphere of influence. He's also talking about really basically,

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, managing to some extent the information that's going

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>out there, and how the US is learning to win

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 1>the information war. How brands is Bloomberg opinion columnist Henry

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>As entered Distinguished Professor at Johns Hopkins University School of

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Advanced International Studies. He's a sky all or two at

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the American Enterprise Institute, author of The Twilight Struggle What

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cold War teaches us about great power rivalry? Today

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>he is on the phone in Baltimore, Maryland. How it

0:01:10.280 --> 0:01:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is great to have you here with Katie and myself,

0:01:13.800 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So initially as you continue to see this situation in

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:23.280
<v Speaker 1>full present buying just making some comments about um, some sanctions, Um,

0:01:23.319 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 1>what's your initial thoughts here? So? I think that the

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration has tried to strike a balance between being

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>strong and its response to what we've seen from Russia

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:37.240
<v Speaker 1>so far, while also holding and reserve more severe sanctions

0:01:37.240 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that might be put in place if there's further Russian

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:42.680
<v Speaker 1>aggression in Ukraine. And so the first tranch has been

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>fairly impressive. I think the central measure is basically putting

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the nord Stream two on hold, and we'll see what

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>happens if putin goes further. And how I want to

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.040
<v Speaker 1>wrap this into this column that you had out on Friday,

0:01:54.080 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that the US can't let Russia get a sphere of influence.

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, just listening to President Biden speak, some of

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the headlines coming out saying that you know, Biden still

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:06.640
<v Speaker 1>believes Russia's poised to go much further, that this is

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of a Russia invasion. I mean, if you could,

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, look inside the President's mind right now, would

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you say that this is the fear, that that's what

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Russia wants to create a sphere of influence. I think

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:22.240
<v Speaker 1>that's certainly what the Biden administration fears, in part because

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Putin has mobilized a force that is far bigger than

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:29.000
<v Speaker 1>he need simply send some so called peacekeepers into the

0:02:29.040 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>done boss. If you'll take Putin's rhetoric seriously, He's talked

0:02:33.000 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>about rebuilding the influence of the Soviet Union used to have.

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>He's called the collapse of the Soviet Union the great

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical tragedy of the twentieth century. And so I think

0:02:42.880 --> 0:02:45.679
<v Speaker 1>at this point it's only prudent to expect that his

0:02:45.760 --> 0:02:48.800
<v Speaker 1>objectives are not limited to Eastern Ukraine. Isn't it kind

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of ironic? Though? The U s is okay about it

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>being involved in spheres of influence and being the great influencer,

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and yet it's very uncomfortable with others. There is a

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 1>certain irony to the out of of course, there's critics

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>might call it hypocrisy. But of course the big difference

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.680
<v Speaker 1>is that most countries want to be part of America's

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.360
<v Speaker 1>sphere of influence with the dynamic that's obviously absent from

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the Russian case. And so there are a very few

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 1>countries that are trying to leave America's system of alliances today.

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>There are many many more that would prefer to be

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:22.919
<v Speaker 1>part of that system. It's the opposite when you look

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:27.200
<v Speaker 1>at the countries around Russia's periphery. So just to follow then,

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>So what's really at stake here? And if Russia is

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.240
<v Speaker 1>allowed to have too much of its way and sway,

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>if you will, in the region, what are the implications

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the longer term implications, Well, there would be a sustained

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>crisis of security along NATO's eastern frontier as Russia gather

0:03:47.120 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>strength and postures its forces more menacingly in Ukraine and Belarus,

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>in addition to on its own territory. And I think

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:56.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the concerns and American policymakers have always had

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>is that when aggressive authoritarian regimes are able to carve

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>out a fear of influence, they don't necessarily stop there.

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>They might simply use it as a platform to push further.

0:04:06.560 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And so I think the fear in the in the

0:04:07.920 --> 0:04:10.800
<v Speaker 1>United States and in many European capitals would be that

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>Putin would use a strengthened position in Eastern Europe to

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>apply greater pressure to the Baltic States or Poland, for instance.

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 1>And how I want to turn to another piece you

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>had out for Bloomberg opinion that the US is learning

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to win the information more and you highlight that the

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Biden administration they've been willing to publicly release sensitive intelligence

0:04:30.960 --> 0:04:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on Russia. I was telling Carroll earlier that I was

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.560
<v Speaker 1>listening to Biden speak on Friday, and I was kind

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 1>of shocked to hear him say that he expects invasion

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:41.080
<v Speaker 1>within the next few days, within the next week, you know,

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:44.559
<v Speaker 1>to hear that from the President, it's not not something

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>we've gotten used to. And I'm curious what you think

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:51.760
<v Speaker 1>is behind that strategy shift. Well, part of it is

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:54.799
<v Speaker 1>about forcing Putin to pay as higher price as possible

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.360
<v Speaker 1>for what he's doing in Ukraine, and part by depriving

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>him of the ambiguity and s rise in which he

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 1>likes to cloak his actions. And so the United States

0:05:03.760 --> 0:05:05.840
<v Speaker 1>is trying to get out ahead of Russian moves is

0:05:05.880 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a way of rallying the broadest possible coalition to to

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>punish those moves when they occur. I think the other

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.560
<v Speaker 1>thing that's happening those United States has learned that it

0:05:14.600 --> 0:05:17.160
<v Speaker 1>simply has to be faster when it comes to responding

0:05:17.200 --> 0:05:21.000
<v Speaker 1>to disinformation, whether in this or other context. That we've

0:05:21.000 --> 0:05:23.839
<v Speaker 1>seen that the Russians are certainly going to try to

0:05:23.880 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 1>create a variety of of lies and this truth around

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>their role in Ukraine, perhaps inventing Ukrainian provocations. And the

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.159
<v Speaker 1>only way the United States is going to be able

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>to push back against that disinformation is by getting its

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>own story out more quickly, right. And it also is

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:41.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of uh, I guess how you could say is hey, guys,

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:45.040
<v Speaker 1>we know what you're doing even before it is publicly known,

0:05:45.120 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 1>like we're on it. That's right. I mean, there's certainly

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>some messaging going on here that the U. S Intelligence

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.520
<v Speaker 1>has very good information not simply on Russian troop movements

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and military preparations, but on the innermost decision making of

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the regime. And I would imagine that some of these

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:04.559
<v Speaker 1>releases are meant to create a certain sense of doubt

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>or even dissension within the regime by advertising the fact

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>that it's intermost communications are presumably compromised. What's the risk

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of doing this though on the part of present vine,

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>especially if you get something wrong, well, you you could

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>look foolish. If you get something wrong, you could promote

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 1>crisis fatigue. If you're constantly warning about an imminent invasion,

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you can also blow sources and methods, and so of

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States too aggressively publicized information that it has

0:06:31.000 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 1>obtained through sensitive sources, it could make it easier for

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>the Kremlin to figure out what the conduit for that

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.400
<v Speaker 1>information is in the first place. And so there's certainly

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a balancing of risks that that that has to be

0:06:41.320 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>involved here. All right, we're gonna leave it on that note. Listen,

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>we really appreciate your insight, uh and taking some time

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.360
<v Speaker 1>to chat with us. How brands Henry A. Kiss Into

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>a distinguished professor at Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:56.680
<v Speaker 1>International Studies. He is a Bloomberg opinion columnist, and as

0:06:56.680 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>we mentioned, he's got a book that's very timely right now.

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>It is entitled The Twilight Struggle. What the Cold War

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>teaches us about great power rivalry today? Joining us on

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the phone from Baltimore. The pandemic really taught us big

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>time the importance of connectivity, and for many of us,

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I think Katie, it's saved to say, were kind of

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:15.480
<v Speaker 1>shocked at how well it worked thanks to advancements and technology, Like,

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing what everybody was able to get done. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean it felt like life as we know. It

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:26.120
<v Speaker 1>moved online for everyone, for workers, for students, for everyone.

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>We did okay, we did okay, We're doing okay, not perfect,

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>not equal, but still impressive. Back with us and working

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>on creating the connected campus is Transact Campus ces Nancy Linger.

0:07:36.920 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>She joins us once again on the phone in Phoenix, Arizona. Nancy,

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>nice to have you here with Katie and myself. How

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>are you. I'm good, How are you kill doing okay?

0:07:45.400 --> 0:07:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Doing okay? Managing through and just trying to, you know,

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:52.640
<v Speaker 1>take take in everything that keeps continually being continuously being

0:07:52.640 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 1>thrown at us. So remind our audience about what you

0:07:55.960 --> 0:08:00.160
<v Speaker 1>are up to and specifically how you're doing it. Yeah. So,

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Transit Campus, we're we're really in two different business lines.

0:08:04.320 --> 0:08:08.120
<v Speaker 1>One is payments, both tuition payments as well as non

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>tuition payments on higher ED generally higher ED campuses. So

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>we have the software that UH handles really parents are

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>students going into to make all of their tuition, room

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and board type payments integrated deeply into the to the

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>university systems. And then we have on campus things like

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>point of sales software, mobile ordering KIOSK especially important right

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.080
<v Speaker 1>with kind of where the world's gone with contact lists.

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.640
<v Speaker 1>And then we have UM what we call campus i

0:08:37.760 --> 0:08:41.679
<v Speaker 1>D so those ideas that students used to navigate in

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:46.120
<v Speaker 1>buildings but also contains UH stored value where they can

0:08:46.160 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 1>load funds to actually transact on campus and also to

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>some extent off campus leveraging those funds. And most of

0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that we've really moved to a mobile credentials. So we've

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:02.679
<v Speaker 1>got about we've got about the universities twelve million plus

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>students that we service in some capacity in those in

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:09.680
<v Speaker 1>those solutions. So twelve million students that you have some

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 1>insight onto. I'm curious, you know this stop and start

0:09:13.360 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>emerging from the pandemic. I mean, one of my in

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>laws is still in college and it feels like, I

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know, trying to come back from winter break was

0:09:21.960 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>definitely a difficult thing. To do as we as colleges

0:09:26.280 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>try to emerge from the pandemic. What have you noticed

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in how that's affected students spending habits? Yeah, I mean

0:09:35.040 --> 0:09:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think in you tracked the spending habits, you know,

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>tuition is always the largest obviously it's about forty thousand

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:43.200
<v Speaker 1>over four years, and then comes renting room and board,

0:09:43.240 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>which is about seventeen thousand, and you get into the

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.559
<v Speaker 1>personal spending and I can't tell we have a a

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, deep deep knowledge, but I would say we've

0:09:52.679 --> 0:09:56.200
<v Speaker 1>seen most of that trending pretty typical, you know, in

0:09:56.280 --> 0:09:59.679
<v Speaker 1>terms of dining, you know, food being next probably for

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>an dollars a month or so that they spend either

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>on a meal plan. But you do see definitely an

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>up to take no surprise in you know the grub

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>hub or eats, you know, kind of restaurant delivery, meal,

0:10:11.960 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>field delivery, kind of expenses that have kind of uh,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:22.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, eclipsed what generally students have been been spending on. So, Nancy,

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I always wonder about, like, in terms of college spending,

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>what kids are spending on. What does it tell you,

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>if anything, about what's going on more broadly in terms

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 1>of consumer spending or the you know kind of economic

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:35.320
<v Speaker 1>outlook or or sometimes I feel like colleges are just

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>some extent insulated maybe from what's more broadly going on economy,

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>but but maybe not so. So I'm curious how you

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>see it. Yeah, I mean I would say, like I said,

0:10:46.679 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you see the trend in really convenience space

0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.200
<v Speaker 1>spending right where where you know, they're spending a little

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:57.640
<v Speaker 1>more to have kind of contact lists, uh, kind of

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>um delivery, whether it's it's food or other items. UM.

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that you know that they clearly are spending

0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>less on you know, kind of academic curriculum stuff, mostly

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>because that's fun digital light that used to be a

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>fairly high item for them, but that's lower. But they

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 1>are spending more on you know, kind of personal expenses,

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of that goes to convenience

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.480
<v Speaker 1>based and some of that just kind of a trend

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>with millennial but some of that I think is tied

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>to kind of COVID and just what's gone on with

0:11:30.040 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, how we want to engage and make purchases

0:11:32.640 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's I want to talk a little bit about

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:37.120
<v Speaker 1>transact campus and uh, some of the deals that you've

0:11:37.120 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 1>made recently because you've announced some new partnerships with Apple, Google,

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:45.559
<v Speaker 1>grub Hub. Really the list goes on. Yeah. So so

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>when you think about our mobile credential, which today again

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>it it holds the stored value that a student would

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>use to make purchases, but it's also what they used

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to kind of navigate securely through campus, and it was

0:11:57.720 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>critical that we embedded that and integrated that first into

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.679
<v Speaker 1>both the Apple and Google wallet. So that's that's, that's

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, just um kind of table stakes in terms

0:12:07.920 --> 0:12:10.880
<v Speaker 1>of having those kind of partners with you know, with

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the population that that we serve. And then you look

0:12:14.559 --> 0:12:16.680
<v Speaker 1>at you know, we have point of sales software on

0:12:16.760 --> 0:12:20.200
<v Speaker 1>campus and we have mobile ordering, you know, which which

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is in kind of a closed campus environment, but wanting

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to extend that out to where they can leverage that

0:12:26.640 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>outside of campus um at at merchants, but also through

0:12:31.000 --> 0:12:34.120
<v Speaker 1>a grub hub or we're speaking with Uber eat store Dash,

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>all of those, Uh, just makes sense in terms of

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>how students really want to make perstances and transact right

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a broad array of offerings and the more you can

0:12:44.320 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of load it becomes kind of a full service. Hey, Nancy,

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:49.559
<v Speaker 1>thanks for the update. Nancy Langer, she's CEO a TRANSAC

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>campus on the phone from Phoenix, Arizona. So one of

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the stories that definitely is a must read today. It's

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>also among our most righte on the Bloomberg Today. It

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.559
<v Speaker 1>has a line. It's starts with US business is getting

0:13:01.559 --> 0:13:04.319
<v Speaker 1>ready for long inflation. So let's get to it. Sean

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>donnin Is Bloomberg New Senior writer for Economics on the

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>phone in Maryland. Inflation. Inflation, inflation, Sean, your story is

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.040
<v Speaker 1>so relevant, especially when it comes to our discussions about

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>what's going on in the economy and what we might

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:19.160
<v Speaker 1>get from the Fed. Next. What are you guys hearing?

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>What were you reporting on? Yeah? Look, I mean we've

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 1>all been hearing about higher inflation for some time now,

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>and I guess when you start calling around to US

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 1>businesses and asking what they're expecting, their answer is you

0:13:32.360 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>should expect to hear about it for a little bit longer.

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh maybe longer than a lot of people expect right now.

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:42.679
<v Speaker 1>And that's you know, this is a big question confronting

0:13:42.679 --> 0:13:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve at its meeting in March. It's going

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.320
<v Speaker 1>to get to work, and we're expecting it to raise

0:13:48.400 --> 0:13:51.800
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. They really telegraphed that that's the beginning of

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.360
<v Speaker 1>a fight against the inflation. But that's going to take

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:59.000
<v Speaker 1>some time, economists say, And businesses are still looking at

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.800
<v Speaker 1>this year and think they're gonna have to deal with

0:14:01.960 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>elevated inflation for some time. And sean, where do wage increases,

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the cost of labor factor into this, because

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:15.360
<v Speaker 1>that's where inflation ticket really sticky, right exactly. And look,

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:17.760
<v Speaker 1>so already we've seen, uh, you know, a lot of

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.760
<v Speaker 1>people calling last year the you know, the return of

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the power of labor. We saw those strikes of places

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>like John Deere that yielded some big wage increases for

0:14:28.240 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 1>for workers there. But that's not over, if anything, that's

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 1>building speed. And that's a big worry for the FED

0:14:34.600 --> 0:14:38.240
<v Speaker 1>who worry about the kind of wage price spiral in

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:41.240
<v Speaker 1>other words, that as higher prices cause workers to add

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>ask for higher wages, that leads to higher prices as

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>companies try to pass on the cost of those higher

0:14:49.080 --> 0:14:53.040
<v Speaker 1>wages and and so on. M you talked to, you know,

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>I was talking to a guy called Brian Nelson who

0:14:55.440 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>is works for an agricultural equipment parts maker called hcc UH.

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 1>They're based in Illinois. Uh. They are a big supplier

0:15:04.240 --> 0:15:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to John Deere. Uh, and you know what it's going

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to hurt him this year, he says, is he's going

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>into wage negotiations with the U a W who just

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 1>negotiated a new contract with John Deere, and he's expecting

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the same there. You talked to other folks,

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of small manufacturers, and they're expecting UH to

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 1>have to raise wages again pretty aggressively, just to keep

0:15:26.880 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>up with the competition and to get out ahead of inflation.

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, Sean, I can't help but feel, especially coming

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 1>off the financial crisis, we were in such a period

0:15:35.800 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of low inflation for so long that we were all

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of shocked by it, right, And then I wonder

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>would we still be in that period of low inflation

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>had we not gone through the pandemic, or were we

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>starting to see signs that something was changing in our

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:56.840
<v Speaker 1>inflationary environment that was just different fundamentally. Well, look, I

0:15:56.880 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 1>mean the big irony is that before the pandemic, the

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>FED was really hoping to get a little bit more

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>inflation in the economy, right. Uh. We we there was

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 1>a hope that you get running the economy that they

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:10.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted to run the economy a little bit hotter. And

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:13.480
<v Speaker 1>President Trump certainly made that point over and over again.

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't necessarily after higher prices, but he wanted faster growth.

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen that this time around with the response

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>to the to the pandemic, the economic crisis side of

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, that everyone has has done their work to

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:30.920
<v Speaker 1>get the faster growth and it's gotten this higher inflation

0:16:31.560 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 1>that's there, and the big question now is how long

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 1>that sticks around. One of the really interesting things right

0:16:37.320 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>now is a really interesting note doubt from JP Morgan's

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>chief economist UH last week making a point that we

0:16:44.920 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>all of the models that we have now for inflation

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:52.600
<v Speaker 1>don't really explain what's going on now with inflation. And

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that raises a big question, and that is are we

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>entering a new era of higher inflation or are we

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.080
<v Speaker 1>going to go back to what we saw pre pandemic?

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of economists are are betting that we're

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have higher inflation for longer and that's gonna

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>have consequences for businesses and consumers and the economy as

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>a whole for some time. And if we are heading

0:17:12.880 --> 0:17:15.160
<v Speaker 1>into that environment, I mean you highlight in the piece

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>that for some companies actually persistently high inflation, it's not

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>so bad, right. I mean, if you're a Walmart and

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:27.879
<v Speaker 1>competitors are charging higher prices, there's an argument that and

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>an argument that executives there make that that's actually good

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.240
<v Speaker 1>for business. It draws more customers uh their way. We

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>also talked to the CEO of the price comparison site Trivago.

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 1>He said, look, if people are are spooped by higher

0:17:42.640 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 1>prices out there, they're going to spend more time on

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>price comparison shot fights looking for for bargains. So there's

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:52.280
<v Speaker 1>always a little bit of an outside, but you know,

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>it becomes a grind for for for a lot of families,

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and and that's something that we're going to have to

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:00.879
<v Speaker 1>get used to thinking to a little bit more about

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the purchases. I think we felt a lot of people

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 1>felt flush through the pandemic. They weren't spending as much

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.639
<v Speaker 1>on commuting. They weren't they were getting the government stimulus

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>checks and so on, and they were spending that on

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:15.879
<v Speaker 1>goods or home renovations, right, and so on. We may

0:18:15.960 --> 0:18:17.480
<v Speaker 1>be entering a period where we have to think a

0:18:17.480 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about what we buy. Yeah, gosh, that's

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 1>no no joke. Hey. I do also love in your

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>story where you talk about this h c C president

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Brian Nelson and how because of higher inflation he had

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to put off his retirement because the board wanted this

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>seven years seventy year old to stay on. Somebody who

0:18:33.760 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>understood an inflationary environment just got twenty seconds. I mean,

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.720
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing this right. We want executives will understand this

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>cycle just quickly. Absolutely, And Brian makes the point, Look,

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:45.639
<v Speaker 1>I went through this in the nineties, and I'm not

0:18:45.640 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>freaking out this time because that's been through it before.

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:50.199
<v Speaker 1>He also does business in Brazil, and you know what

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>he's doing. He's getting his people in Brazil to treating

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 1>these people in the US and how to deal with inflation,

0:18:55.240 --> 0:18:58.000
<v Speaker 1>how to ask customers for higher prices. Alright, good stuff.

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:00.479
<v Speaker 1>Shawn Donna and senior economics writer up bloom News on

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:02.920
<v Speaker 1>the phone in Maryland. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Weeek

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Carl Master, Katie Greifeld, and this is Bloomberg Radio. Well,

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the future is schmir so, says our next guest website,

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>who founded Better Brand. It's a company that's attracted investments

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>from Reddit co founder Alexis o'hanian, also the grandson of

0:19:17.600 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Wendy's founder excuse me, Dave Thomas, also actress Emmy Rossum

0:19:22.480 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 1>and more. Here with what she is doing to create

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the Better Bagel is Amy Yang. She's founder of the

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Better Brand and she's on the phone in l A. Amy.

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Nice to have you here with Katie and myself here

0:19:31.840 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. So tell us about your company and

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 1>what you're up to. Hey guys, thanks so much for

0:19:37.800 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>having me and thrilled to be here. Um so yeah,

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to share a little bit more about Better Brand. We are,

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, a food tech company and leading innovation in

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:50.119
<v Speaker 1>the refined carb space. Right. So our mission is really

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>creates a world where you know, we can eat freely

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>without worrying about and weight gain or negative health consequences

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.199
<v Speaker 1>and and without having to compromise is on you know

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:05.680
<v Speaker 1>what in paste, text, or flavor or basically in any way.

0:20:05.880 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 1>And you know what better way to showcase that innovation

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>and start them by turning the most car heavy food, um,

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, a bagel into the carb equivalent of let's say,

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:22.320
<v Speaker 1>two slices of banana. Sounds sounds really good. Sounds really good. Yeah,

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.879
<v Speaker 1>how exactly do you do that? Walk us through that process, because,

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.960
<v Speaker 1>like you said, to the same net carbs as two

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>banana slices seem amount of protein as four eggs. That's

0:20:32.600 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 1>what really caught my eye. Yeah. Yeah, you know, it

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:38.919
<v Speaker 1>was a long innovation journey and um, you know a

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:42.119
<v Speaker 1>lot of people referred to better brand as you know,

0:20:42.160 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the beyond need of cards, right, And I think that's

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.360
<v Speaker 1>a really great way of thinking about it and understanding

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>you know exactly, you know, what we had to do

0:20:49.960 --> 0:20:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to get where we are in terms of you know,

0:20:52.640 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 1>on the focus on R and D there and so,

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 1>but you know, to dive a little bit deeper, it

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>really comes down to you know, um, preparatory ingredient formulation

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and in process. Okay, so I'm going to jump in

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:09.440
<v Speaker 1>when you say a proprietary ingredient formulation. It's a little

0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>bit of a red flag for me because I like

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.720
<v Speaker 1>to know what I'm eating and increasingly we're in a

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>consumer space. We want to know how are the things

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we wear, who produces it, where it's made, who's manufactured,

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is it fair labor, is it sustainable? When it comes

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to food, we're equally increasingly looking at that. So tell

0:21:26.440 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>me what you can tell us about Yeah, I agree,

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and I would actually think that with food it's even

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:37.280
<v Speaker 1>more important to be transparent, right because it's something that

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 1>that we consume and expects you know us you know, physically,

0:21:40.520 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 1>physiologically and everything between. So so when we were focused

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>on development of better brand, um, you know, we were

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:51.359
<v Speaker 1>focused on completely clean label, non GMO ingredients. And what

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean by preparatory blend is um. You know, all

0:21:54.480 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>the ingredients are you know, wide listed on the label,

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 1>but just in terms of the specialty ingredients we've really

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>been able to develop and use. UM. But you know,

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>again completely clean label and non GMO and and transparent

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>in every way. UM. So to just kind of dive

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.040
<v Speaker 1>into that a little bit more in terms of specialty ingredients,

0:22:13.400 --> 0:22:16.320
<v Speaker 1>so you know, UM, the first ingredient on on our

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>ingredient list is is a modified wheat starch, right, So

0:22:19.240 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>so what is that wheat start? Okay, and so so

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.959
<v Speaker 1>you know what does that really mean? Right? So, so

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a Nephew actually approved source of fiber um and

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you know it's classified as an RS for Type of

0:22:33.840 --> 0:22:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Existance search, which means that's actually indigestible in the upper

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:41.359
<v Speaker 1>gastro intestinal tract um. So so if you think about that,

0:22:41.400 --> 0:22:44.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, in the terms of consumption, right, and so,

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>typically you have wheat search that's starggested by you know,

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.639
<v Speaker 1>an enzyme in the body called um alpha amblaise. And

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:55.159
<v Speaker 1>what that does is then you know, the refined carbs

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>and sugars released throughout your body and drives up insulin levels,

0:22:58.920 --> 0:23:03.120
<v Speaker 1>which you know causes the body tostore access calories and

0:23:03.119 --> 0:23:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and so what we've been able to do is actually

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:10.959
<v Speaker 1>modify that wheat to where that and it's not penetrable

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:16.040
<v Speaker 1>from the emilyse so and and it's not um, so

0:23:16.080 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>it's not able to be absorbed by the body, is

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>indigestible in your gas row intestinal tract and therefore functions

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 1>as a dietary fiber um while retaining all the distal

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>laptic properties of the wheat. So you know, it still

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>allows us to make all the foods that we crave

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:35.679
<v Speaker 1>um and the way that we crave them, but you know,

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>without any of the negative health side effects or um

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>or guilt and so, I mean, you've been compared to

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the beyond meat of grains, but some of the pushback

0:23:46.560 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>that I hear about the Beyond Meat products is that

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the texture is totally off that you know, it's not

0:23:52.200 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>quite like eating real meat. And you know, when you're

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.160
<v Speaker 1>designing the Better Bagel, I mean, are you going for

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, something that's if you bite into it, it's

0:24:01.680 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 1>indistinguishable from a bagel, or are you trying for you know,

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe just a different unique taste. We're going for. Um.

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, when a consumer bites into that bagel, they

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:19.040
<v Speaker 1>feel the entire joyous experience of what it's like to

0:24:19.080 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 1>eat a traditional bagel. You know, there's never that feel

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:25.560
<v Speaker 1>of oh, I have to compromise, um, but whereas you know,

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>rather it's it's kind of that feel of oh wow,

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:31.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, how is it possible that this entire bagel

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>is the carb equivalent of two slices of banana? Um?

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>And I can you know, have three bagels and in

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the morning if if I want without ever having to

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>worry or feel guilty or feel like I'm doing something

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:46.760
<v Speaker 1>you know that's that's not great for my body. UM.

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And so that's how that was kind of our goal.

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And we're really really excited about, you know, kind of

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>sharing the better bagel with you know the world, um,

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and and kind of stemming forward from from there. You mean,

0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you do a Google start. Guys have

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.200
<v Speaker 1>been raising a bunch of money from certainly some high

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:05.679
<v Speaker 1>profile individuals. Um, where are you guys in terms of

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>product to market? I'm just curious about what's the consumer

0:25:08.800 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>side of this and the consumer ramp up side of this. Yeah.

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I fundamentally believe as a founder that

0:25:15.359 --> 0:25:17.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you believe in your product, in your mission,

0:25:17.560 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>then you should get the product out in the markets

0:25:19.760 --> 0:25:22.520
<v Speaker 1>as soon as you can, right because one that's the

0:25:22.560 --> 0:25:25.119
<v Speaker 1>only way you're able to learn and collect data and

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>really run an efficient company. To UM, you know, it's

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>important to to take the consumer on on the journey

0:25:31.320 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>with you right as you put your story forgiving because

0:25:34.880 --> 0:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>we're running out of time. But in thirty seconds, like

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:40.520
<v Speaker 1>are you placing our who's placing orders with you? What's

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>what are we seeing in terms of kind of the

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>balance sheet, in terms of top and bottom line? Just

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:48.400
<v Speaker 1>very quickly. Yeah, so we actually hit a million dollar

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>run rate within three months of launch. And I've really

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>d to see at eat better dot com um, you know,

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's really about this, this transformative vision of creating

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that world where you know, we can eat freely without

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.879
<v Speaker 1>compromise in any way. We'll stay in touch and let

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>us know how things are ramping up. Amy Yang, she's

0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:10.080
<v Speaker 1>found her better brand. On the phone from l A. Yeah,

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>but you let me drive. No, no, no, I'll do gravels.

0:26:17.800 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>I want to drive. It's a good question, but drive.

0:26:25.480 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the clothes on Bloomberg Radio.

0:26:31.880 --> 0:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, just coming up on ten minutes away from

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.520
<v Speaker 1>that closing bell on this Tuesday, as to shortened holiday

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>trading week. But nonetheless, it's been kind of a wacky

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday to say the least, and of course driven by

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.000
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical up concerns. Our next guest notes that the SMP

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:48.119
<v Speaker 1>is down ten percent. Maybe I think we thought earlier

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>wasn't about little We're definitely through. It seems like we've

0:26:53.200 --> 0:26:55.439
<v Speaker 1>bounced back a little bit. Yeah, definitely. And but the

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 1>average stock, he noted, is down or more. So. Let's

0:26:58.800 --> 0:27:01.200
<v Speaker 1>get to it with Walter A. Todd, President and Chief

0:27:01.240 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>investment Officer Greenwood Capital Associates, on the phone from Greenwood,

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina. Walter, so nice to have you here with

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Kitty Greifeld and myself. So all right, let's just talk

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 1>about the day. First of all, A lot of volatility,

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>it seems we know where it's coming from. Uh, I

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:17.840
<v Speaker 1>don't know, how do you factor in a day like

0:27:17.920 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>today into your longer term thinking about the financial markets? Yeah, well,

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:25.800
<v Speaker 1>good afternoon, Thanks for having me on. Yeah, you know

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be an interesting day. When you pull

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>up the old G I P on the Bloomberg terminology,

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:32.959
<v Speaker 1>hundred s and P points on the right hand scale.

0:27:33.480 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Um so, yeah, it has been very volatile, is very

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>fluid situation. UM. I think it's important in times like

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>these for us is just to kind of, you know,

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:43.120
<v Speaker 1>try to step back and look at you know, try

0:27:43.160 --> 0:27:46.359
<v Speaker 1>to maybe dig in on some individual names and you know,

0:27:46.400 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 1>earning stories that we're still getting despite all these headlines

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of whipping things around. And I think, you know,

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>it can present opportunities for companies maybe that have just

0:27:54.280 --> 0:27:57.320
<v Speaker 1>reported that maybe don't have that much exposure to this

0:27:57.520 --> 0:28:00.199
<v Speaker 1>situation directly that you are getting caught up in this

0:28:00.440 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 1>this macro trade. Yeah, and I mean it's interesting to

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 1>hear you say, you know you want to dig in

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 1>on specific companies. I mean Home depot comes to mind,

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.400
<v Speaker 1>because man, their gross margins really didn't look too great

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 1>compared to a year ago. I mean zooming out and

0:28:15.359 --> 0:28:17.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at that at a macro level, I mean, what

0:28:17.680 --> 0:28:20.600
<v Speaker 1>does that tell you in terms of how companies are

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>dealing with inflation? What the read through into markets is. Yeah,

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think that's you know, the quarters being reported. Of

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>course we're looking back are great, right, And to your point,

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:33.679
<v Speaker 1>they're looking forward. It's the guidance and the issues around

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain and what that means for margins in

0:28:36.680 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of the input costs, et cetera. I don't know.

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not surprised that time depots down on the guidance.

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit surprised at the magnitude of the move. Um.

0:28:44.480 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why. I was a surprise that growth

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>is gonna slow after EPs years. But no, I understand

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>you know the dynamic there, and I do think it

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>speaks to a bigger issue. It's it's a combination of

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>the input costs, but also you know, the demand side

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is good, but it's it's moderating. I mean, let's face

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the consumers are having to deal with a lot of

0:29:04.200 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>other you know, input costs, themselves a little the gasoline, food,

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. That are going to kind of cramp their

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>ability to spend on what they've been spending on for

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the past you know, two years or so. So how

0:29:13.920 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>do it make sense though, of the economic data? Is

0:29:16.160 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>that fundamentally something that you think is important? Um? US

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>consumer confidence dropping to a five month low on inflation concerns. Um.

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:28.080
<v Speaker 1>So we see that playing out. Meantime, some decent strong

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 1>pm I data on the manufacturing and servants sector. So,

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, when we kind of get rid of all

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>of the chaos and the static out there, I mean, fundamentally,

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>what kind of backdrop is there for the US economy. Yeah,

0:29:42.880 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it's very I would say confusing at this point. I mean,

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>aside from the geopolitical headlines, like you said, when you

0:29:48.920 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>look at these various inputs, you know, like you said,

0:29:51.680 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the p m I is the market numbers this morning,

0:29:53.360 --> 0:29:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty good, actually pretty strong. But then you look

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.760
<v Speaker 1>at consumer competence conference boards. Okay, but the Michigan number

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you know last week, as you know in recession territory,

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>and you know, some of these Federal Reserve surveys or

0:30:04.440 --> 0:30:06.600
<v Speaker 1>week as well. So it's a very mixed, and again

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's important to go back to see what

0:30:08.520 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>companies are telling you, and I would say that the

0:30:11.160 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 1>message from management teams is not as dire as some

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of the macro headlines or data points that we're getting.

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>It still seems pretty healthy. I would point to Walmart's

0:30:21.200 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>quarter um last week, which was pretty upbeat on their

0:30:24.320 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 1>on their outlook, which is a little bit surprising, quite honestly,

0:30:26.920 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>so I think, man, it speaks to the broader right,

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>a wider swath of the US economy. Is that fair

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 1>to say? I would say so definitely, you know, lower

0:30:36.720 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>income kind of dynamic there. But still again the pretty

0:30:40.600 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>upbeat message from the CEO about what they're seeing from

0:30:43.040 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the consumer. But again it's just a lot of different

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:49.680
<v Speaker 1>cross currents here flying um from from a macro standpoint,

0:30:49.720 --> 0:30:52.440
<v Speaker 1>that are that are moving individual stocks in the markets

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>around pretty ugg resting, and those cross currents from a

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>macro perspective, let's just walk through of them. I mean,

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>we have the earning season. I mean, again, it was

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong, but you did start to see, uh, maybe

0:31:03.520 --> 0:31:06.120
<v Speaker 1>some not so great news coming out from companies such

0:31:06.120 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>as Home Depot. You have geopolitical tensions, you also have

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:11.360
<v Speaker 1>the FED to worry about, and I would love to

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>hear your perspective on how you think FED officials are

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>looking across the balance of risks right now. And I

0:31:17.440 --> 0:31:20.240
<v Speaker 1>do want to point out the yield curve looks very

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:22.760
<v Speaker 1>very flat right now through forty basis points on that

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>very key two's tense curve. Yeah. Absolutely, Okay, it's a

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:29.280
<v Speaker 1>great point. And you know, it's funny, we're basically the

0:31:29.320 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>same face on the SMP that we were in the

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.280
<v Speaker 1>first week of October last year from a level standpoint,

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 1>but you look at kind of the changes on the

0:31:36.320 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>FED outlook back then there was one hike estimated today

0:31:40.400 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 1>six um. You know, the two years at twenty eight

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>basis points today as at three UM. So very different

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>backdrop from the FEDS. And I don't en be their

0:31:50.960 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>position right now because their growth is clearly slowing. It's

0:31:55.120 --> 0:31:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the question of how much is more permanent versus I'm

0:31:57.960 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a crime related etcetera. But then at the same time,

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you've got this inflationary event going on geo politically politically,

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>spiking energy prices, et cetera. So I don't I don't

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>envy their position, but I think they're going to probably

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>go slow at first and then speed up if they

0:32:13.040 --> 0:32:15.960
<v Speaker 1>have to, based on the balance of what we've heard

0:32:16.000 --> 0:32:18.640
<v Speaker 1>from from all the individuals, which are which is quite

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit of commentary unfortunately from the FED presidents themselves

0:32:22.880 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and create even more confusion. Walter just quickly just got

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.320
<v Speaker 1>about thirty seconds you you know, shared with us some

0:32:28.400 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>notes about the S and P down from its highs

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 1>average stockdown or more. Does that mean there's some buying

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>opportunities in your view? And just quickly yeah, I do.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it's across sectors. There's a lot

0:32:40.280 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 1>of focus on on technology have been hit the hardest,

0:32:42.600 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think you can dive into individual sectors across

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the board and look at the opportunities in healthcare and industrials, uh,

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 1>in financials and even you know energy pulling back here

0:32:52.960 --> 0:32:55.560
<v Speaker 1>off of the oil movie. So I think I think

0:32:55.600 --> 0:32:58.560
<v Speaker 1>there are some significant opportunities, particularly on the cap scale,

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 1>smaller cap stocks. If you have some bit harder than

0:33:01.160 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>somebody gives you some new money just twenty seconds, where

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.560
<v Speaker 1>would you put it to work? Right now? Yeah, So

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 1>just some individual names that we hold that we've found

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>very trying to have already reported drop Box Cisco qualcom

0:33:12.560 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in fell J M J. Biogen. All right, that's pretty

0:33:15.640 --> 0:33:19.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting for our client. Okay, good to know. Love specificity.

0:33:19.640 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>'m Walter Todd, Thank you, Thank you. He is President

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>and chief investment Officer at Greenwood Capital Associates. On the

0:33:25.240 --> 0:33:28.720
<v Speaker 1>phone from Greenwood, South Carolina. Thanks for listening to Bloomberg

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 1>dot com. And you can also listen to our radio

0:33:34.400 --> 0:33:37.000
<v Speaker 1>show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio or watch

0:33:37.040 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>us on YouTube search Bloomberg Global News