WEBVTT -  The Girlfriends S2/Bonus 1 - The Girlfriends’ Guide to: Identifying a Doe

0:00:06.320 --> 0:00:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Novel.

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 2>Hello.

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm Annasinfield, the producer of The Girlfriends, and I'm here

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.160
<v Speaker 3>taking over the mic because I wanted to do something

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 3>that's very close to my heart and the philosophy of

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:24.920
<v Speaker 3>the show. When we set out to make The Girlfriends,

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 3>I insisted on providing concrete resources for any listeners who

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 3>may relate to the hard topics that we cover. It's

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 3>why we always partner with relevant charities, So if you're

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.880
<v Speaker 3>triggered or inspired by something we've mentioned, you've got somewhere

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.640
<v Speaker 3>legitimate to go for advice. But I've also done a

0:00:42.680 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 3>lot of behind the scenes work to make sure that

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 3>we actually know what we're talking about. You know, from

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 3>boots on the ground reporting, intensive investigations, and countless conversations

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:56.320
<v Speaker 3>with experts, you probably only hear about one percent of

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:58.440
<v Speaker 3>the things that I get to learn during the production

0:00:58.560 --> 0:00:59.639
<v Speaker 3>of the podcast, and.

0:00:59.640 --> 0:01:00.920
<v Speaker 2>I want to pass some of it on.

0:01:03.360 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 3>So let me introduce you to The Girlfriend's Guide, a

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.199
<v Speaker 3>mini series where I lay out how you can solve

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:14.559
<v Speaker 3>crimes and keep your girlfriends safe. We'll dive back into

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 3>our archive of never heard before interviews, break down real

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 3>life case studies, and give tangible tips on how you

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 3>can do it yourself. Oh and just a quick heads up,

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 3>we'll be discussing murder and acts of violence in this

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 3>episode from the teams at Novel and iHeart Podcasts. You're

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:37.680
<v Speaker 3>listening to The Girlfriend's Guide, Episode one, How to Identify

0:01:37.840 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 3>a dough. I feel like I need to say something

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 3>before we kick off. It's not normal for an everyday

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 3>person to attempt to identify a dough, but lately I've

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 3>noticed that more and more citizen sleuths are plugging the

0:02:04.960 --> 0:02:09.440
<v Speaker 3>gaps left behind by law enforcements, dwindling resources, or, let's

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 3>face it, lack of interest. It is estimated that four

0:02:17.160 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 3>hundred unidentified bodies are found each year in the United States,

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 3>and around one thousand of those people are still unidentified

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:30.440
<v Speaker 3>a year later, which means, sadly, cases build up and

0:02:30.480 --> 0:02:35.640
<v Speaker 3>get forgotten. Today, there are over fourteen thousand unidentified bodies

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 3>on NamUs, which is the US database for missing and

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:43.400
<v Speaker 3>unidentified people. Giving someone back their name is important. We

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 3>spoke about that a lot on the Girlfriends But before

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.080
<v Speaker 3>we get stuck in, I want to ask you to

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:52.040
<v Speaker 3>act with caution. Identifying someone who's been resigned to a

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 3>cold case is obviously a very caring and hard thing to.

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 2>Do when you don't know who they are.

0:02:57.800 --> 0:03:01.400
<v Speaker 3>But the fact is someone does at some point along

0:03:01.400 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 3>the way, you might be tempted to contact their family

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 3>and friends to help connect the dots for you. This

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 3>may have become a challenge to be solved, but every

0:03:10.040 --> 0:03:13.040
<v Speaker 3>new hope or reminder can be devastating for the people

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 3>on the other side, So tread lightly on people's lives.

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 3>Something you need to ask yourself is why am I

0:03:20.639 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 3>doing this? And that is a really complex ethical question. Ultimately,

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 3>you just have to be considerate, think about if it's

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:31.080
<v Speaker 3>appropriate to approach victims' families, and also then how you

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 3>would do it Instead, I'd recommend approaching the authorities first

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.520
<v Speaker 3>so they can help you prove the connection before the

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 3>family is informed. All Right, ethics briefly covered, let's get

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:50.840
<v Speaker 3>to it. So if you do find yourself interested in

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 3>a case involving an unidentified person, what do you do

0:03:55.040 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 3>and how do you identify them? Let's use an example

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 3>that I've come to know really well well, the case

0:04:01.000 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 3>of Heidie Bulch from season two of The Girlfriends. If

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 3>you listen to the series, then you know that Heidi

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:10.360
<v Speaker 3>was identified twenty four years after her remains were discovered,

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 3>but for a long time, the detectives really only had

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 3>the information from the initial police reports to go off,

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:18.480
<v Speaker 3>which reads like some.

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 2>Sort of murder mystery novel.

0:04:21.880 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 3>Here is my Canadian friend pretending to be an American

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 3>detective reading a summation of the police report.

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:32.760
<v Speaker 4>March nineteen eighty nine, two golfers discover a woman's head

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 4>on a golf course in Hopewell Township, New Jersey, sixty

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 4>five miles down from New York. A short while later,

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 4>her legs were discovered in a wooded area sixty five

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:47.599
<v Speaker 4>miles away. A post mortem confirms that she was white,

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 4>blond hair, blue eyes, and matching blue eyeshadow line. She

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:56.919
<v Speaker 4>has a couple of distinctive features, including a maul and scars.

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Her estimated age is around twenty to thirty. The legs

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 4>are officially linked to the head via DNA analysis. No

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:07.760
<v Speaker 4>arms or torso are found.

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 3>In the first few weeks of the investigation into what

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 3>would one day be known as Heidi's remains, the detectives

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:20.360
<v Speaker 3>tried everything. They put out nationwide requests asking for information

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:22.160
<v Speaker 3>on any missing person.

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 2>That would fit her description.

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 3>They made flyers, they held press conferences, interviewed families of

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 3>people who thought the remains could belong.

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:31.080
<v Speaker 2>To their loved one.

0:05:31.200 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 3>Those were the textbook things that detectives would do back

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:36.760
<v Speaker 3>in the eighties when working on a live case with

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 3>an unidentified body and an unknown killer. But none of

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 3>it worked and eventually the case went cold. By the

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 3>time the case was reopened in the twenty tens, there

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 3>were new options available, and that is when things really

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 3>started to heat up. An incredibly useful new resource available

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:03.159
<v Speaker 3>to the investigators the National Missing and Unidentified Person's System

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.400
<v Speaker 3>aka NamUs in the States.

0:06:06.000 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 2>Me and my.

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Assistant producer Maddie use this a lot on the Girlfriends,

0:06:10.960 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 3>and Maddie is brilliantly wonderfully here joining me to explain

0:06:15.839 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 3>how you can also use NAMOUS to help with the

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:18.679
<v Speaker 3>Doe case.

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 2>So, hey, Maddie, Hello Anna, Thanks.

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 3>For having me tell me about NamUs. What actually is it?

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 5>First of all, so NamUs is this amazingly vast database

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 5>in the US which includes the profiles of every currently

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:41.080
<v Speaker 5>reported missing person and also every unidentified body. What's great

0:06:41.120 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 5>about NamUs is that it's used by government agencies like

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 5>the police and detectives, but also.

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Anyone can access it.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:52.839
<v Speaker 5>So if you are looking to identify your own dough,

0:06:53.160 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 5>this is an incredibly useful resource for you too.

0:06:56.440 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 3>So what does it actually look like as a normal

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:02.039
<v Speaker 3>service and just accessing this online?

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 2>What do you see?

0:07:03.160 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 5>What you're going to see is thousands and thousands of

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:13.240
<v Speaker 5>profiles listed under missing people or on the unidentified body section.

0:07:13.840 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 5>It's basically a way of cataloging the profiles of every

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 5>single one of these people.

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 3>And so you kind of would search via location, age,

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:25.120
<v Speaker 3>that sort of thing.

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right.

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 5>There's actually lots of different things. You can search by

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 5>date that people went missing, date that body was found,

0:07:32.840 --> 0:07:38.720
<v Speaker 5>estimated age, race, gender, So any small details that you

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 5>do have about your dough is something that you can

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 5>enter on there.

0:07:42.040 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 3>And I think the idea is that every single unidentified case,

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 3>every single missing person's case, is meant to be listed.

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 3>Are there any instances when that doesn't happen? Theoretically No,

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 3>Every missing person who has been reported as missing will

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 3>be on there, and every unidentified dough will be on there.

0:08:03.440 --> 0:08:06.520
<v Speaker 3>An exception to this, and it's something that actually happened

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 3>in The Girlfriends Season two when we were looking for

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.920
<v Speaker 3>our dough. We couldn't find a matching profile on NAMOUS

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.520
<v Speaker 3>and this really confused us for a while, but it

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 3>was actually a massive clue. Basically, if someone's not listed

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 3>on there, it probably means that they have been identified.

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 2>Mmm, I know, I wish we knew that much much

0:08:27.000 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 2>earlier on.

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we definitely thought maybe we were going crazy and

0:08:30.400 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 5>not searching it well enough. But no, that's another clue

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.240
<v Speaker 5>that you can definitely include in your investigation.

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 3>And so you've got things like this government resource name US.

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 3>But there's also other databases for missing people and unidentified people,

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 3>aren't there?

0:08:44.679 --> 0:08:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there are.

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 5>There are a bunch of independent volunteer run projects like

0:08:50.640 --> 0:08:54.599
<v Speaker 5>the dough Network that we partnered with the Charlie Project.

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 5>There's also databases that focus on more specific groups of people,

0:09:00.080 --> 0:09:02.319
<v Speaker 5>like LGBTQ plus databases.

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>There's one for people of color.

0:09:04.360 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 5>And these have really been set up, I think in

0:09:07.000 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 5>response to some of the inaction that comes from government

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 5>agencies to serve a specific group which maybe hasn't got

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 5>the attention that they deserve from government resources.

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Also in some cases just not having the expertise from

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 3>the communities involved to identify things that could be clear clues. Yeah, totally,

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 3>like someone's sexual orientation might not be listed on their

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:38.200
<v Speaker 3>names missing profile, but that's something that could lead to

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 3>other clues about who they were. But what if you

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 3>can't find the doe's information on these databases just like us,

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:51.079
<v Speaker 3>or you think there might be more information out there,

0:09:51.679 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 3>or perhaps you think you know who it could be

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 3>and you want to request extra information on their case.

0:09:59.040 --> 0:10:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Well that's when you can deploy every journalist's favorite tool,

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.200
<v Speaker 3>the Freedom of Information Act request.

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:09.040
<v Speaker 2>After the break, we'll.

0:10:08.800 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 3>Tell you all about how to access information from the

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 3>authorities that just might solve your case.

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:36.719
<v Speaker 5>Fifth of December twenty twenty two. Hi, there, I'm a

0:10:36.800 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 5>journalist from the UK and I'm wondering if you might

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 5>be able to help me find out some information about

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 5>a body that was discovered.

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>In nineteen eight.

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 5>Fourth of January twenty twenty three, Hi, I hope you've

0:10:47.679 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 5>had a lovely holidays and a happy new year. I'm

0:10:50.240 --> 0:10:53.640
<v Speaker 5>just wondering if you've got anywhere with tracking down those records.

0:10:54.800 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 5>Ninth of January twenty twenty four did happy new year again.

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:03.080
<v Speaker 5>I'm writing to let you know that it has now

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 5>been over a year since my initial request was sent

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 5>to you on the fifth of December twenty twenty two,

0:11:09.160 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 5>and we are yet to receive any progress at all

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 5>on these records.

0:11:13.559 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Nothing's world.

0:11:15.920 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 3>So, Maddie, that was a clip of you from season

0:11:18.240 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 3>two getting really annoyed at the medical examiners for not

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 3>responding to your Freedom of Information Act request. It's fair

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 3>to say you've filed a lot and also you've had

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:31.080
<v Speaker 3>to deal with being disappointed a lot. How many times

0:11:31.080 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 3>do you think you've done a for a request for

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 3>the girlfriends alone?

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that really was.

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:40.040
<v Speaker 5>The tip of the iceberg, I think from my calculations.

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 5>In total, I filed about forty four freedom of information

0:11:44.360 --> 0:11:47.319
<v Speaker 5>requests and some of those were obviously the medical Examiner,

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 5>but then a lot of them were the NYPD, various courts,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:55.320
<v Speaker 5>the district attorney, basically anyone I could think of that

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 5>might have information.

0:11:57.160 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 3>It was amazing we got so much information based off

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 3>these for requests. I mean, I'd like, I don't think

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.960
<v Speaker 3>we would have solved this case if it wasn't for

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 3>all of your foyers.

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:09.320
<v Speaker 2>So you like really saved the day there. Oh, thanks, Nna.

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 5>That makes me feel better about the hours I've sunk

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:13.160
<v Speaker 5>into this.

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:14.520
<v Speaker 2>And the amount of moaning.

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh, yeah, yeah, yeahah.

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:20.600
<v Speaker 3>But I was thinking feoyer is something that's really standard

0:12:20.840 --> 0:12:22.920
<v Speaker 3>kind of bread and butter stuff for us, and it's

0:12:22.960 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 3>something that a lot of people probably have heard of,

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 3>but they maybe don't know what it actually is.

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 2>So could you break that down for the listeners.

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:12:29.960 --> 0:12:34.880
<v Speaker 5>So, FEYER stands for Freedom of Information Act. Sometimes it's

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 5>called FOIL as well, and then its freedom of information

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 5>law has been in place since nineteen sixty seven, and

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 5>it means that the public have a right to request

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 5>access to records from any federal agency, and those federal

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 5>agencies have to disclose any information requested unless it falls

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 5>under one of the nine exemptions, which protect things like

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.880
<v Speaker 5>personal information or obviously national security.

0:13:04.200 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 2>That's fair enough, Yeah, it's fair enough.

0:13:06.520 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 5>It's described as a law that keeps citizens in the

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 5>know about their governments.

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:15.280
<v Speaker 3>In what context can that be useful in the identification

0:13:15.320 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 3>of a dough.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 5>To put it really simply, when you're trying to identify someone,

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.880
<v Speaker 5>the more information you have about them, the more likely

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 5>you are to figure out who they are. And FOIL

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 5>requests are really good way of accessing more information that

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 5>wouldn't be immediately available on the Internet or elsewhere. So specifically,

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 5>there are some very useful things you could look for,

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 5>like post mortem records or medical examiner records in general

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.040
<v Speaker 5>could tell you more about how someone died and give

0:13:45.120 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 5>other clues based on their estimated age or their medical records.

0:13:50.040 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Police reports can also be really interesting.

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 5>We managed to access a trove of police files from

0:13:56.880 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 5>the time that Heidi's body parts were found and she

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 5>was being treated as Jane Doe, and you just never

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:04.720
<v Speaker 5>know what kind of clues you might get with something

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:07.839
<v Speaker 5>like that. In those reports, we found out that Heidi

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 5>was wearing blue eyeshadow when she was found, and this

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 5>could be something that we could ask someone who knew

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:16.280
<v Speaker 5>her and they could confirm that that's something she always wore,

0:14:16.320 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 5>for example. And it also allows you to see what

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 5>investigating might have already been done by law enforcement, so

0:14:23.400 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 5>then you can pull together your information with theirs and

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 5>see which leads you could follow next.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:33.800
<v Speaker 3>This all sounds like obviously amazing in theory, but I

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.040
<v Speaker 3>think when I first started out as a journalist, the

0:14:36.160 --> 0:14:38.600
<v Speaker 3>idea of doing a foyer felt like a sort of

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 3>mystical beast, and I wasn't quite sure how I should

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 3>be approaching it. So how do you literally file a

0:14:48.200 --> 0:14:49.040
<v Speaker 3>foyer request.

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 5>It depends a lot on the department that you're requesting

0:14:52.920 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 5>information for, Okay, but there often are forms on a

0:14:56.760 --> 0:15:01.119
<v Speaker 5>website that are pretty straightforward and easy to follow an email.

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 5>If you're unsure, the best thing you can do is

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 5>call up a records department at the institution you're trying

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 5>to get information from and ask a nice person to

0:15:11.440 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 5>talk you through it slowly as if you're very stupid,

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 5>which is something that happened to me on multiple occasions,

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:21.600
<v Speaker 5>has probably led to the success of us getting this information.

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 3>I think like the big takeaway that I want to

0:15:23.760 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 3>make sure everyone has is that the point of foyers

0:15:26.680 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 3>is that they are so that normal people can, as

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 3>I think you said earlier, sort of like know what's

0:15:33.840 --> 0:15:37.880
<v Speaker 3>happening in government. And so I think what I'd really

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 3>like to instill in people is that it isn't some

0:15:40.240 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 3>sort of elitist exercise to file a foyer. It's something

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 3>that in theory, everybody should be able to do, and

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 3>it's your right to do. It's your right exactly.

0:15:50.160 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 5>Having said that, there are definitely some hurdles in getting

0:15:55.080 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 5>information from foyer requests.

0:15:58.200 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 2>A huge one is.

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:01.600
<v Speaker 1>The timeframe that they can take.

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 5>It definitely varies by location and institution, but it can

0:16:05.560 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 5>sometimes take six months just to get a response. And

0:16:09.040 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 5>also what you can access is obviously limited. Often with

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 5>medical examiners records. For example, the full post mortem can

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:20.200
<v Speaker 5>only be accessed by a relative of the deceased person,

0:16:20.760 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 5>which of course makes things really hard when you don't

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:28.160
<v Speaker 5>even know who the person is. And whilst it's frustrating

0:16:28.200 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 5>that there's a lot you can't access, it's for really

0:16:30.480 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 5>good reason. But you just never know what you're going

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 5>to get back once you send a request, so it's

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 5>always always worth filing them just to see. And the

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 5>feeling of waiting six months to hear if you've got

0:16:43.880 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 5>access to some records and then seeing something in your

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 5>inbox is truly the greatest thrill I can imagine.

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but also, you know, we're talking about kind of

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 3>sloothing around online if you think that something's a live

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 3>case or whatever. I think there's a lot of slothing

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 3>around online and in kind of archival resources that we

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 3>do things that kind of don't require foroyers. You know.

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 3>The very specific example bringing it back to Heidi is

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:14.160
<v Speaker 3>that her case was actually eventually solved in part because

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 3>the serial killer, Joel Rifkin, confessed to the murder in

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 3>a book years later. And so you never know when

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 3>that stuff's going to appear or if it's already out there,

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:25.120
<v Speaker 3>and you just need to kind of look for it.

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:27.800
<v Speaker 3>And so we did a lot of that, didn't we we'

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:31.439
<v Speaker 3>gleaned lots of information from articles and forums. Maddie, do

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.920
<v Speaker 3>you have any tips for how people can use the web.

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 5>It definitely involves a lot of lurking around on random websites.

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 5>The first thing is, if it's a contemporary case, there'll

0:17:42.760 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 5>probably be some articles about it online and those will

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 5>be easy to access.

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>If it's a bit.

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 5>Older, you might want to search on an online newspaper database.

0:17:52.520 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 5>These are quite often behind payballs, but most libraries tend

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 5>to let you use theirs for free. And then we

0:18:00.040 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 5>looked in some really random places and found some quite

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:07.959
<v Speaker 5>useful information. Forums can be good. I remember we found

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 5>a message on a forum from years ago of someone

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 5>who said that they knew Heidi and were friends with her,

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 5>and that gave us some information about where we think

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:21.440
<v Speaker 5>Heidi lived. But also Reddit is amazing. I love readit

0:18:21.560 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 5>so much. And once we finished season one, we actually

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 5>found a group of people on Reddit discussing who they

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 5>thought the torso might be. So it's a great way

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 5>to pull your information with other people. If you are

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.680
<v Speaker 5>looking into this case, there is a really good chance

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:45.159
<v Speaker 5>that someone else's and teaming together is only going to

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:47.640
<v Speaker 5>give you more information and make your case stronger.

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 3>As you know if you listen to our second season,

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 3>when Joel Rifkin admitted to Heidie's murder, he named the

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:58.400
<v Speaker 3>dough as Susie, and that meant that suddenly the detectives

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 3>had something to cling onto, so they started searching for

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 3>missing persons reports and arrest reports for somebody called Susie. Ultimately,

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.760
<v Speaker 3>this led them to finding a mugshot for a woman

0:19:09.880 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 3>called Susan Spencer that looked very similar to their.

0:19:12.760 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 2>Dough, Maddie.

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:17.880
<v Speaker 3>That's a very convoluted way of going about this, but

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 3>that's often the way when it comes to unidentified cases.

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 3>Are there any similar techniques that we could use to

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 3>help identify a dough?

0:19:25.760 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, definitely. I think NamUs again is really useful for this.

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 5>If you have an unidentified person, there's a quite high

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 5>likelihood that that person is missing from someone else and

0:19:41.080 --> 0:19:44.160
<v Speaker 5>hopefully they will have reported them as missing, so there

0:19:44.160 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 5>should be a profile on NamUs for that missing person.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 5>And what you can do is take the information you

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 5>have about your dough, like when they were suspected to

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:59.200
<v Speaker 5>have died, how old they are, their gender, their race,

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.719
<v Speaker 5>and put those into a search of missing people and

0:20:03.760 --> 0:20:06.400
<v Speaker 5>see if anyone matches or it could be a possible

0:20:06.440 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 5>candidate for your dough. And you might not find just

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 5>one person who's an exact match, but it might come

0:20:11.840 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 5>up with a list of names that you can then

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 5>work to rule out.

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.119
<v Speaker 3>But you've got to be flexible as well, don't you,

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 3>in a bit like creative about it, because you know,

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:25.600
<v Speaker 3>sometimes people will have really changed since they were registered

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 3>as a missing person, or they might have traveled to

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 3>a state that the person who filed that missing person's

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:34.240
<v Speaker 3>report had no idea of and stuff like that.

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:37.960
<v Speaker 5>So with all these searches, it could get you closer

0:20:38.000 --> 0:20:40.360
<v Speaker 5>and it could give you ideas of who it could be,

0:20:40.880 --> 0:20:43.200
<v Speaker 5>but definitely take.

0:20:43.000 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It with a pinch of salt and keep a very

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>open mind.

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:49.639
<v Speaker 3>And then I guess the next thing is that sometimes

0:20:49.680 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 3>none of this works right, And that's something that happened

0:20:53.119 --> 0:20:55.680
<v Speaker 3>to us when we were trying to identify the Jane

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 3>Doe who ended up being Heidi from season one. We

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 3>kept reaching these dead and so at one point I

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:06.760
<v Speaker 3>went full obsessive journalists and I started looking into killers

0:21:06.800 --> 0:21:09.840
<v Speaker 3>from the time to see if I could match the

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.840
<v Speaker 3>case of our Jane Doe, you know how she was killed,

0:21:12.920 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 3>her age, and see if it matched up with a

0:21:15.840 --> 0:21:18.919
<v Speaker 3>killer's m o at points. In order to do this,

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:21.680
<v Speaker 3>I even had a phone call with the criminal profiler.

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 3>And actually, what was kind of neat is I had

0:21:25.480 --> 0:21:28.000
<v Speaker 3>that phone call with a criminal profiler. They told me

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:30.360
<v Speaker 3>a bunch of stuff, and then we received the Hope

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 3>Well police report where they also had got the FBI

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 3>to create a profile of the killer back in nineteen

0:21:36.720 --> 0:21:40.480
<v Speaker 3>eighty nine. And you got particularly into this, didn't you.

0:21:41.280 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I found this fascinating. Yeah, they asked.

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.320
<v Speaker 5>The FBI Behavioral Science Unit to create a profile of

0:21:48.359 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 5>the killer very early on in their investigation, where they

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:55.480
<v Speaker 5>had so little to go on other than Heidi and

0:21:55.520 --> 0:21:58.840
<v Speaker 5>the state that she was found in. And what's really

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 5>really crazy about this now knowing about Joel Rifkin and

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:07.160
<v Speaker 5>who he is, the details are a really close. So

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.679
<v Speaker 5>some of the characteristics that they predicted this person would have.

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 5>They'd be a white male in their twenties or thirties, single,

0:22:15.880 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 5>living alone. They may have an occupation which involves travel,

0:22:20.160 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 5>like sales, a truck driver, or construction. They're educated, and

0:22:25.560 --> 0:22:28.000
<v Speaker 5>this is the one that actually gives me chills. They

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 5>may not have killed before, but they will kill again.

0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:35.679
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and I mean, obviously we now know that Heidi

0:22:35.880 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 3>was the first of what is predicted to have been

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 3>seventeen victims.

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.879
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, it's true, but it's also a really interesting and

0:22:46.000 --> 0:22:49.360
<v Speaker 5>useful way of looking at a case like this to

0:22:49.400 --> 0:22:52.360
<v Speaker 5>turn your attention to when you've reached a dead end

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 5>trying to look at information about the victim, to try

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.159
<v Speaker 5>and think if you can find the person who did it,

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 5>and if that would help you identify this person.

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 3>Do you have kind of any other tips when it

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.360
<v Speaker 3>comes to foyers and getting that sort of information from

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 3>authorities or I guess even the web.

0:23:07.640 --> 0:23:11.679
<v Speaker 5>I would say my biggest tip is persistence. It's not

0:23:11.880 --> 0:23:15.080
<v Speaker 5>an easy and it's not a quick process, and you

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 5>will reach a lot of dead ends and rejections, but

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.679
<v Speaker 5>it is so worth it for the small glimmers of

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 5>information that you do get.

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I would also say, befriend people.

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 5>What you're coming up against is often a lot of

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 5>bureaucracy and a lot of people who, even though your

0:23:32.040 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 5>interest in this case is huge and finding out details

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 5>is really important to you, is just one of a

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.120
<v Speaker 5>million other things they're doing. So if you can get

0:23:40.160 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 5>a friend on the inside or someone who recognizes who

0:23:43.840 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 5>you are and will help you, that's also going to

0:23:46.200 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 5>be really useful.

0:23:47.600 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and just always send that extra email to the

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 3>medical examiners. Okay, so we're at the point in the

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.680
<v Speaker 3>investigation where you hopefully have a hunch as to who

0:24:02.720 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 3>your dough might be, like the Hopeworld detectives when they

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 3>discovered Susie Spencer's arrest report. When you make that connection,

0:24:10.240 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 3>like Maddie said, it is honestly one of the best

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 3>and most exciting feelings in the world. But what do

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 3>you do now and how do you prove it? That's

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:42.239
<v Speaker 3>after the break, so you think you know who your

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 3>dough is, but proving it is an entirely different ballgame.

0:24:46.760 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 3>The first port of call is to contact the agency

0:24:49.600 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 3>like the police department who's handling the doe case and

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 3>the missing person's case if there is one. Maddie, how

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:57.560
<v Speaker 3>do you go about doing that.

0:24:58.160 --> 0:24:59.880
<v Speaker 5>The first thing to do would be look at name

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 5>and see if there is a detective or an agency

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 5>attached to the case, and there should also hopefully be

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:10.320
<v Speaker 5>contact details, or you can just look at what jurisdiction

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.440
<v Speaker 5>your case should probably come under, and then contact someone

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 5>at the police station there. A big tip for this

0:25:16.520 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 5>is when you do it, try and get someone's name

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.679
<v Speaker 5>or someone that will check back in with you if

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 5>there are any new developments. Having a contact like that

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 5>means that you'll probably be able to stay updated on

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 5>the case, and that.

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Was just more likely to help you.

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 3>So once you've spoken to the detectives in charge of

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 3>the case, you do kind of need to leave it

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 3>with them and hope that they look into it. Detectives

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 3>will then investigate it further and if they think it's viable,

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 3>they can compare the DNA of the dough with a

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.919
<v Speaker 3>family member of the missing person. This is actually what

0:25:49.960 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 3>the Hopeworld detectives did after they figured out that the

0:25:52.800 --> 0:25:56.080
<v Speaker 3>arrest record they found of Susan Spencer was actually listed

0:25:56.160 --> 0:25:59.920
<v Speaker 3>under a false name. They instead matched up the mugshot

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:03.400
<v Speaker 3>with a missing person's photo of Heidi Bulch and then

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:06.919
<v Speaker 3>they track down Heidie's family and compare the family's DNA

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.760
<v Speaker 3>with the remains they found on the Hope Well golf

0:26:09.800 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 3>course in nineteen eighty nine. But there is another similar

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:16.920
<v Speaker 3>route that deploys the use of DNA, and that's called

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 3>complicatedly genetic genealogy. Maddie, What does that actually mean and

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 3>how can you use it to identify a dough?

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 5>Put simply, genetic genealogy is the combination of genetic analysis,

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 5>so looking at DNA and the study of family trees,

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 5>and then using pretty standard historical investigation to find out

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:41.160
<v Speaker 5>more about that.

0:26:41.960 --> 0:26:45.399
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So if you were to kind of apply that

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 3>to an actual situation, So say you've found a dough,

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 3>what would people then do to try and study that

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:54.879
<v Speaker 3>in a genetic genealogy sort of context.

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 5>So what you could do is take the DNA data

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 5>from the dough and then enter it into a website

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 5>like twenty three in meters or another one of those

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 5>big genetic databases, and then you can see if there's

0:27:09.960 --> 0:27:14.360
<v Speaker 5>any matches. Obviously, in a dream world, a perfect match

0:27:14.359 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 5>with a parent would immediately appear and then you could

0:27:17.359 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 5>contact that person maybe and you have identified them, but

0:27:21.040 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 5>it could be a sibling.

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:24.120
<v Speaker 1>It could be a very distant relative.

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:26.920
<v Speaker 5>But what it might do is start to build out

0:27:26.920 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 5>a family tree, which you can then investigate through other

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 5>resources and get closer and closer to identifying who this

0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 5>person is.

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean that sounds amazing, the idea that you can

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 3>just put some DNA data in and then, you know,

0:27:40.920 --> 0:27:44.199
<v Speaker 3>pop outcomes a bunch of relatives and you whittle your

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:48.359
<v Speaker 3>way down into identifying the person. Other benefits outside of that,

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 3>you must get a lot of information from DNA.

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 5>I think it can really help with narrowing down locations

0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 5>that they're from. Further, might help you identify their ancestral homeland.

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 5>I mean the dream is that there are living relatives

0:28:02.160 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 5>and that they're people happy to speak to you, or

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 5>their people who you could find out more about and

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.040
<v Speaker 5>then find out the identity of your dough.

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 3>I guess one of the big downsides is that you

0:28:10.880 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 3>can only work with what's in the system, can't you.

0:28:13.960 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 3>It really relies on people having put their DNA data

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 3>into the system in the first place, so that there

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 3>can be connections.

0:28:22.160 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's right.

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 5>I think, like so much of this research, it relies

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 5>on community participation. But there are a couple of other

0:28:29.920 --> 0:28:34.040
<v Speaker 5>drawbacks too. Another big one is concerns over privacy. Not

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:38.560
<v Speaker 5>everyone feels comfortable uploading their DNA and for that information

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 5>to be owned by another website. Understandably, there's also the

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 5>testing isn't perfect, the results can sometimes be a little misleading.

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 5>But one of the biggest drawbacks is the costs. Actually,

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:56.120
<v Speaker 5>at one point on Series two, we considered extracting some

0:28:56.280 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 5>DNA from Heidie's grave in Heart Island when thought she

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 5>was there, and not only did the thought that just

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 5>seem kind of prohibitively gruesome, but also it's incredibly expensive.

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 5>And this is something I would say isn't necessarily accessible

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:15.480
<v Speaker 5>to just the average person trying to look into a case.

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and it's also just something that's quite hard to

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:21.600
<v Speaker 3>do on your own, isn't it. And so I guess

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 3>like the one thing I would say there is, if

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 3>that is a route that you're wanting to go down,

0:29:26.520 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 3>there are volunteers at charities that specialize in this that

0:29:30.440 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 3>will genuinely be happy to help you out. They can't

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 3>take on every case, but people like DNA Doe do

0:29:37.320 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 3>this every single day. They're the charity that we partnered with,

0:29:40.560 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 3>and they're really great at responding to inquiries or just

0:29:43.440 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 3>like perhaps giving you some advice, so do reach out

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 3>to them. I hope our tips have been useful, But

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.360
<v Speaker 3>the truth is there is no one way to identify

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 3>a dough. Each new clue will open up a new

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 3>rabbit hole to fall down, and you've just got to

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:05.640
<v Speaker 3>dive in Alice in Wonderland style. Get obsessed with the

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 3>necklace and finding out where it's from. Fixate on the

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:13.840
<v Speaker 3>location the dough was discovered, spend weeks pouring over small turns.

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 2>Of phrases in news reports from the time.

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:19.840
<v Speaker 3>When I was trying to solve our dough case from

0:30:19.920 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 3>seasons one and two. I was deep in those kinds

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 3>of rabbit holes for a year and a half. At

0:30:26.080 --> 0:30:28.920
<v Speaker 3>points I had to accept for my own sanity that

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 3>maybe I'd never know who she was, or perhaps I would,

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:34.680
<v Speaker 3>but I'd never be able to prove it and share

0:30:34.680 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 3>her story.

0:30:35.280 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 2>With listeners like you.

0:30:37.680 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 3>It felt like it was only at the last moment,

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 3>when budgets were dwindling Faith was in crisis about to

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.719
<v Speaker 3>put out a show with no resolution, that we actually

0:30:46.760 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 3>found the definitive proof that we needed. So my final

0:30:51.080 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 3>piece of advice to you is to just have some faith.

0:30:54.680 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Sometimes new evidence can emerge and change everything, like that

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 3>confession from Joelrih. Sometimes one new contact will give you

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 3>access to materials that you've been trying to get for years.

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 3>That's what happened for us, So good luck until next time.

0:31:12.920 --> 0:31:28.480
<v Speaker 3>Hold your Girlfriend's Tight. The Girlfriend's Guide is produced by

0:31:28.560 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 3>Novel for iHeart Podcasts. For more from Novel, visit novel

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:36.720
<v Speaker 3>dot Audio. This episode is produced and hosted by me

0:31:37.000 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 3>Anna Sinfield. Our assistant producer is Madeline Parr and we've

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 3>had some fantastic additional production by Lee Meyer, Leona Hamid,

0:31:44.920 --> 0:31:49.840
<v Speaker 3>and Zaiana Yusuf. Max O'Brien is our executive producer. Production

0:31:49.960 --> 0:31:54.760
<v Speaker 3>management from Shrie Houston and Charlotte Wolf. Sound design, mixing

0:31:54.840 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 3>and scoring by Daniel Kempson and Nicholas Alexander. Music supervision

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 3>by me Anna Sinfield and Nicholas Alexander. Original music composed

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 3>and performed by Louisa Gerstein and produced by Louisa Gerstein

0:32:07.840 --> 0:32:11.280
<v Speaker 3>and you guessed it Nicholas Alexander. The series artwork was

0:32:11.320 --> 0:32:15.480
<v Speaker 3>designed by Christina Limcool. Story development by me Ana Sinfield.

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Willard Foxton is creative director our executive producers at iHeart

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 3>are Katrina Norvell.

0:32:22.120 --> 0:32:23.040
<v Speaker 2>And Nicki Etour.

0:32:23.640 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 3>Special thanks to Ali Cantor, Carrie Lieberman, and Will Pearson

0:32:27.200 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 3>at iHeart Podcasts, as well as Carl Frankel and the

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 3>whole team at WME. And special thanks to Daniel Laskrin

0:32:34.480 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 3>for putting on your best detective voice