WEBVTT - A Million Miles From the Memes

0:00:13.800 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to What Goes Up, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Mike Reagan, a senior editor at Bloomberg, and this

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:22.720
<v Speaker 1>week on the show, it was sort of a week

0:00:22.720 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>of deja vu. Meme. Stocks are back in the headline,

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>as shares of the movie theater chain a MC got

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>pumped to the moon, and the markets oriented geopolitical tensions

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 1>are making news again as the Biden administration looks to

0:00:34.800 --> 0:00:38.240
<v Speaker 1>potentially expand the number of Chinese companies that are blacklisted

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>for US investors. What should we make of all these flashbacks.

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>We'll get into it with the chief investment officer for

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a hedge fund firm that manages nine billion dollars. But first,

0:00:48.960 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Pellett Tallusue. This week's mystery co host is. This

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 1>week's mystery co host is Claire Ballantine. Claire as a

0:00:58.040 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>reporter for Bloomberg in New York, but gused on e

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>t f s. She hails from the same town in

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee as Dolly Parton. She's licensed to marry couples in

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:15.600
<v Speaker 1>New York, and she has a collection of alpaca paraphernalia. Claire,

0:01:15.640 --> 0:01:19.560
<v Speaker 1>there's lots unpacked in that introduction that Charlie Pellet introduction

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of you. Mainly I wanted to get Charlie Pellett to

0:01:22.120 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>say the words I'll pack up paraphernalia. I don't think

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I could say that five times best. But you gotta

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.600
<v Speaker 1>explain how does one collect Well, first of all, what

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the heck is alpaca paraphernalia? And how does one become

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a collector? And what's the market like? Is it? Is

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it a hot market right now? What are prices going

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:41.440
<v Speaker 1>for in the I'll pack a paraphernalia market? You know,

0:01:41.520 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been doing it for so long that I can't

0:01:43.560 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>even remember the origin of it. Um. It just sort

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:51.000
<v Speaker 1>of became a thing. And then what happens is when

0:01:51.000 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you have a thing, people always get you stuff like

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>that for your birthday or for Christmas. So even long

0:01:58.640 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>past when this would have died down, eventually it just

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>kept going because people kept giving me towels and mugs

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>and rugs. And suddenly my apartment is overtaken by alpacas.

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.440
<v Speaker 1>That's hilarious. That's hilarious. Is that? Have you ever owned

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.800
<v Speaker 1>an actual alpaca? Or no? No, I want to. I

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 1>want to get a standard poodle, the dog because I

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:23.200
<v Speaker 1>think it looks a bit like an alpaca, but you

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:25.480
<v Speaker 1>can walk it on the street without getting weird looks.

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:29.440
<v Speaker 1>All right. I don't know if you'd got a weird

0:02:29.480 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 1>luck with an alpaca. I don't know. There's only one

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.320
<v Speaker 1>way to find out. We'll have to test that thesis

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.200
<v Speaker 1>sometimes we should. I did one time see a guy

0:02:36.320 --> 0:02:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in the East village walking a pig. So anything in

0:02:40.680 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>New York goes, that's true, that's true. All right, Well

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 1>do you think goes? On this show? And we're very

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>lucky this week to have a really interesting guest someone

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I've read a lot about over the years. Uh. He

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 1>is the chief investment officer at UBS O'Connor, which is

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.399
<v Speaker 1>the hedge fund division at UBS Asset Management. His name

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>is Kevin, So Kevin, welcome to the show. Thank you,

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.080
<v Speaker 1>great to be here. Kevin. Let's start with this whole

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>revenge of the meme stocks that we're seeing in the

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:13.680
<v Speaker 1>market again, AMC, particularly just going doubling on one session

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:16.519
<v Speaker 1>during the week. I mean, for for a hedge fun

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:20.200
<v Speaker 1>guy like yourself with a lot of assets to sort

0:03:20.240 --> 0:03:23.079
<v Speaker 1>of puts work this see, these type of things seem

0:03:23.320 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>like kryptonite to me, especially obviously on the short side.

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've we've heard a lot of widow maker

0:03:27.840 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>trades on the short side. But I'm wondering for you,

0:03:30.440 --> 0:03:33.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, are there opportunities here for the I mean, obviously,

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>with the volatility and these eye popping moves we've seen,

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to ignore it for a guy like you.

0:03:38.440 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering if, if there are opportunities in the space,

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>is there anyway we're for you to put money to

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:46.960
<v Speaker 1>work in this type of environment? Yeah? Uh yeah, So,

0:03:47.000 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean I tried, We tried to be about as

0:03:50.400 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 1>far from these types of situations in the market as

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>we possibly can. I I talked to one of our

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>pms this morning and I said, I'd like to be

0:03:59.240 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 1>roughly a million and miles away from this, and he's like, well,

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you realize we're probably like thousand miles away because there's

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.880
<v Speaker 1>correlations with these stocks and other stocks that were evolved

0:04:09.880 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in so so I kind of I kind of acknowledge that.

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:18.200
<v Speaker 1>But you know, to me, anytime you have a stock

0:04:18.240 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>price moves that are divorced from economic reality or corporate

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:29.520
<v Speaker 1>finance changes, that's like a flashing warning side warning signed

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to us to really be cautious around it. And you know,

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you followed some of the stats

0:04:35.400 --> 0:04:39.599
<v Speaker 1>on AMC, I'm drawn to it not dissimilar to rubber

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:44.120
<v Speaker 1>necking an accident on the freeway. Um, but the numbers

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>I saw, we're just amazing. You know, we had more

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:53.160
<v Speaker 1>AMC volume on Wednesday than we had in Tesla, in Nvidia,

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Amazon combined. On one day, we had more

0:04:59.200 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 1>AMC op trading. Then we had this little index called

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the SP five hundred Index options trading. So you know,

0:05:07.200 --> 0:05:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the volume is is alarming. And listen, I think there's

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 1>this temptation to just completely dismiss this type of activity

0:05:16.640 --> 0:05:22.440
<v Speaker 1>as irrational and illogical and a casino or mm stock,

0:05:22.560 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's true at all, you know, I uh,

0:05:25.800 --> 0:05:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, to me, you really have to pay close

0:05:28.640 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>attention to some of these phenomenons. And for for a

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>long time, you know, we analyze companies, we analyze fundamental

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:39.359
<v Speaker 1>changes at companies, we analyze what's going on the economy.

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>But we're we're we're honest, and we're saying, you know,

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:47.479
<v Speaker 1>sometimes price performance securious performances a function of investors psychology

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>and position and positioning, and you know when you have

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 1>a situation like this, you know, you really cannot take

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>an aggressive stand one way or another. You can't dismiss uh,

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:01.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, the stock moves one way or another. You

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>just have to be cautious and realize this has become

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 1>a purely technical event. There's a whole bunch of investors

0:06:07.320 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>here with different perspectives and psychologies. There's investors who are

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 1>getting free popcorn at AMC theaters. By the way, Um,

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:18.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a motivation. So I wondered if that's subject to

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the dividend tax. I don't know. You gotta gotta give

0:06:21.200 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 1>a p for some of your popcorn back to the government.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Probably is probably a slight mark up at the at

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the counter. I agree with you. Well, and then while

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:32.640
<v Speaker 1>this is all happening, I mean, are there any opportunities

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that you see for you all? Or are there opportunities

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that maybe are getting overlooked because everyone is so focused on,

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, watching the meme stocks go up and down. Yeah,

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>so that's one of the that's my nine thousand mile analogy,

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>because you know, when stocks, whether it's an AMC or

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>bed bass in beyond, go up. Um, we see things

0:06:57.920 --> 0:07:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that go up in sympathy with that UM philosopher. For example,

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>if people think that A m C and Bed Bath

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 1>and Beyond are doing well, they get excited about mall

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>owners or strip mall operators. And the reality is the

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 1>dynamics of people going to malls and going to you know,

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.200
<v Speaker 1>strip centers is not changing. It's not changing based on

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:23.280
<v Speaker 1>overnight price action in bed Bathroom Beyond or a MC.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So we do see some of the stocks that are

0:07:26.480 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 1>related UM react and that's where we tend to look

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.840
<v Speaker 1>for opportunities to take advantage of the dislocation. So, you know,

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 1>one of our core disciplines and and and this has

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>been you know, for as long as I've been in

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the business. You have to be very mindful of how

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>big the short base is in any stock. I always

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>tell people stocks are a log normally distributed, which is,

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>you invest a hundred dollars UH and you can lose

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollars, but you can make ten x or

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>twenty extra your money. And and subsequently, you have to

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>be very mind full of the size and nature of

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>your short positions. UM and and so we're we're always

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>on top of that, but we're looking for things that

0:08:08.080 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>are one or two steps removed from these stories take

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>advantage of those dislocations. It always amazes me to you know,

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>if some stocks short interest, who's the one going in

0:08:20.400 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and turn it in a fifty one or fifty that

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>just seems like playing with fire. You know what I

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 1>gotta tell you, I I totally agree with that. And listen,

0:08:29.920 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I I learned this literally about two weeks

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:36.679
<v Speaker 1>into my job when I started twenty years ago, which is,

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>don't short too much of anything because it can be

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>very technical. And so I think it's just a matter

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.959
<v Speaker 1>of um of of hubrists. In a lot of cases,

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>people like well, listen, um, you know, the evaluation these

0:08:48.400 --> 0:08:50.719
<v Speaker 1>companies doesn't make sense. So I can be comfortable at

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>carrying a heat short and you know, when you have

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>something that can be so technical, evaluation just doesn't matter. Um.

0:08:57.120 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>And so we're always cautious with that. We we we

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 1>watch short interest ratios call used old fashioned. We look

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:05.719
<v Speaker 1>at the short based relative to daily volume. We look

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>at the short based relative to the free flowed, and

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>if he gets above these you know, sort of certain metrics,

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>we just try to avoid them. Kevin, to move on

0:09:22.080 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to something, I know you guys were involved with at

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>least earlier in the year, you were very bullish on China.

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the funds had was something like

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 1>exposure to China. I'm wondering, you know, do the sort

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of the sort of geopolitical sword rattling, the Biden blacklist

0:09:41.720 --> 0:09:48.479
<v Speaker 1>um possibly being expanded to to not just military linked firms. Um,

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you make of all that? Is it kind

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of is it kind of just that? Is it a

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of saber rattling? Do do you see any real

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>risk there of of sort of a worsening relationship with

0:09:58.360 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>China and an outright band of more stocks for US

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 1>investors in China. Yeah, so listen, I think big picture, Uh,

0:10:07.400 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a more constructive dialogue between the US and China happening,

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>happening now than under the prior administration. And even though

0:10:14.880 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>there's potentially a broader list of stocks that are going

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 1>to be banned, there's potentially a tightening of existing bands

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>and limiting bands to some of the specific subsidiaries. So,

0:10:26.559 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, big picture, I think relations between the two

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>countries from a trade and cooperation perspective are going to

0:10:34.400 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>be improving. Um. But you know, to the extent that

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:40.839
<v Speaker 1>that there are these bands. You know, I think this,

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think they create opportunity more than risk. You know,

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're sitting here, you're sitting in the US,

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.559
<v Speaker 1>you're sitting in Western Europe. You unfortunately tend to think

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>about this from a European or US perspective, like, you know,

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>the US government is going to discipline you know, the Chinese.

0:10:58.559 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But the reality is, uh, there's always a corollary a

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Chinese perspective on these stories that creates, you know, an

0:11:07.240 --> 0:11:09.920
<v Speaker 1>equally investable seamen. And I'll just give you an example.

0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, under the Trump administration, there was this

0:11:13.280 --> 0:11:21.000
<v Speaker 1>real aggressive pressure on reducing higher end semiconductor equipment materials

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and and telecom equipment in stocks to to to the Chinese.

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>UM So with the Chinese government did is react uber

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 1>rationally and said, Okay, I get this. If there's some

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>risk that I'm not going to be able to buy

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>high quality intellectual property from the US, I'm going to

0:11:39.000 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>build my own technology supply chain. And so while most

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>people sat there in and said, wow, this is this

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty about US China trade and tech supply chain makes

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>me nervous, some of the best performing stocks in the

0:11:52.840 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>world were some of the domestically focused Chinese small and

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>MidCap technology and semiconductor stocks. So we always tell our

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 1>investors like, you know, don't use your don't look at

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>everything from your U S lens, uh, you know, put

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.200
<v Speaker 1>on your you know, your China hat and interpret what

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.600
<v Speaker 1>this local corollarya is going to be because it's going

0:12:13.679 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>to create an investable theme on the other side. And

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:18.600
<v Speaker 1>how do you go about gauging that or trying to

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 1>make predictions on what international relations are going to be

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:24.840
<v Speaker 1>like I mean, you know, talking about how this administration

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.480
<v Speaker 1>seems like it will be UM have a more amenable

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>relationship with China, how how do you go about sort

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of engauging that and then also the time horizon for

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>that well, and so there's a bunch of UM consultants,

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 1>there's UH political research firms, there's UH analysts, there's policy analysts.

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, we talked to government officials as well. We

0:12:51.240 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>can get you know, I think a really good sense

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.240
<v Speaker 1>for for the direction of travel and and and in

0:12:56.280 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 1>particular on on China where every our local presence. I mean,

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is why I would I would never

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>think about investing, you know in Asia from sitting here

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>in the US. We have a team that's local that's

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 1>very plugged into what's going on in the regulatory landscape

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>and economic policy landscape in China, and the teams in

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong and Singapore. There's resources in Shanghai as well.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 1>UM and you you you can get a really good

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>sense for what, um, what the policy agenda there is,

0:13:26.760 --> 0:13:29.240
<v Speaker 1>and and and likely that the changes that are coming.

0:13:29.280 --> 0:13:31.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's something you can you can get a pretty

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>good handle one, you know, Kevin. For years now, I

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.679
<v Speaker 1>guess the one of the main bullish teams for China

0:13:37.720 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 1>has been sort of this transition from a manufacturing dominated

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>economy to potentially a more consumer dominated economy. UM. And

0:13:46.920 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the interesting interesting developments in China this year

0:13:50.120 --> 0:13:54.359
<v Speaker 1>in late last year has been UM sort of an

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>attempt to tame the credit markets in China, you know,

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>corporate credits especially, and and prevent them from getting out

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.080
<v Speaker 1>of hand, getting a little too frothy. So I'm just going,

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, with those two things in mind and whatever

0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>else you're looking at in China, just what are sort

0:14:09.200 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>of the main themes, the main kind of sectors and

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is it is it equities and credit or a little both.

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>What kind of things are really drawing you into China.

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>And so one of the things that we're the makes

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 1>us the most excited about China, that that I'm you know,

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>puzzled because it feels like not enough people are talking

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>about is the aggressive market reform agenda passed by China

0:14:34.480 --> 0:14:36.640
<v Speaker 1>late last year. That's, you know, the q FE and

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>r q F reform. And you know, as you as

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you well know, historically when we want to access the

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 1>onshore market in China, we have to trade via the

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>connect system in Hong Kong. But what the QF and

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>r q F reforms are going to allow us allow

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:55.320
<v Speaker 1>us to do is to is to trade directly in

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:59.359
<v Speaker 1>the onshore market with Chinese banks and broker dealers. Additionally,

0:15:00.120 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a borrow market that develops in

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the onshore market that's going to allow us to short

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>stocks in the onshore market. So, you know, against all

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>this anxiety about China about essentially planned economy, about trade friction,

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>people are missing what we see as a watershed event

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 1>of the market opening up and becoming more efficient and

0:15:24.800 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>more accessible to international investors and all of the same

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>principles that we use to invest on a long short

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>basis fundamentally uh in the US or in Europe, well,

0:15:37.120 --> 0:15:42.240
<v Speaker 1>they hold also in China, it's just a lot less competitive,

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, Chinese. In the Chinese market, less than about

0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:48.960
<v Speaker 1>just about ten percent of the of the market cap

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>is is owned by hedge funds. The onshore market approximately

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of the volume, and the onshore market is

0:15:56.560 --> 0:16:00.000
<v Speaker 1>retail investors. Uh. And so we just have a market

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:01.760
<v Speaker 1>it that's you know, we think going to become a

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 1>lot more efficient, a lot more conducive to relative value

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:09.160
<v Speaker 1>investing in the market wheld. We don't think enough institutional

0:16:09.160 --> 0:16:12.960
<v Speaker 1>investors are paying close enough attention. So for us, we

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:16.040
<v Speaker 1>we like to think of it as China transitioning from

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a beta story to an alpha story, where it's gonna

0:16:19.840 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>matter the subsector as you pick, it's gonna matter the

0:16:23.920 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>management teams, the products, the sectors that you pick. It's

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>not just going to be China as a beta trade anymore.

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 1>And that just you know, for us, is superrational and

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a really healthy growth in that market from you know,

0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>from a subsector perspective, you know, where we um you know,

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>there's very clearly a tightening of the regulatory environment happening

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>in China. There's some tightening of regulation on fin techs.

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a tightening of regulation on some of the internet

0:16:55.360 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and larger media companies. Now that's having a pretty meaningful impact.

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>That's creating I think, big opportunities in the financial services sector. Uh.

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>You know, we see big opportunities and more of the

0:17:07.520 --> 0:17:13.639
<v Speaker 1>cyclical industrial and machinery and material spaces uh in China.

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's kind of a rotation, not dissimilar to

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the rotation we're seeing everywhere else in the world where

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you're going from, you know, from tech and growth to

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:25.480
<v Speaker 1>more value and cyclical sectors. But that's happening against a

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:28.040
<v Speaker 1>backdrop of a market getting more efficient. You know, for us,

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:31.199
<v Speaker 1>we see China as the biggest alpha opportunity in the

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:34.159
<v Speaker 1>world over the next really five to seven years, and

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.399
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly to do with the fact that the markets

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>are becoming more efficient. Is there anything that's um that's

0:17:39.760 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>surprised you in terms of your stance on China and

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:47.479
<v Speaker 1>um sort of these these positions that either um this

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 1>year or even more recently that you maybe didn't expect. Yeah, well,

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean it just uh, you know, so the feedback

0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that we that we get out talked to investors, UM

0:17:56.800 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot, We talked to UM you know, obviously our

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.560
<v Speaker 1>counterparties a lot. Yeah, I think people's eyes are just

0:18:04.600 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 1>off the ball here. I mean again, I think they

0:18:06.960 --> 0:18:10.399
<v Speaker 1>just have it in there head that you know, China

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>is highly you know, highly regulated, closed economy. There's a

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 1>very standoff dynamic between between the US and China from

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a political or trade perspective. But again, it's it's not

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>what's happening in reality. The market is undergoing this massive

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>opening up, and it's to meet people are just kind

0:18:30.880 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of ignoring it, and they're they're getting caught in these

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>headlines and they're not they're not paying close enough attention

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to the reality of what's happening. And I'll, i'll, I'll

0:18:40.080 --> 0:18:41.760
<v Speaker 1>give you a stat that I think it's pretty interesting.

0:18:41.840 --> 0:18:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Right now, we estimate that you can short approximately fifty

0:18:47.600 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in aggregate of Chinese equities right now through

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:58.919
<v Speaker 1>current inventory and the connect mechanism. If this onshore borrow

0:18:58.960 --> 0:19:02.000
<v Speaker 1>market develops as we expect, that number is going to

0:19:02.080 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>go up by a factor of you know, at least

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>five x, maybe ten x. And what that means is,

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, China's already outstanding from a liquidity perspective. If

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.919
<v Speaker 1>you get if you get that borrow market developing and

0:19:13.960 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it gets more efficient, it is just going to be

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a terrific place for dynamic relative value investers to deploy capital.

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:23.640
<v Speaker 1>And and and we think we're there sooner than most,

0:19:23.720 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think we're gonna see a lot of people

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:28.840
<v Speaker 1>go in that direction. Yeah, it's interesting. You often read

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>about these sort of valuation discrepancies caused by the ontore connect.

0:19:33.359 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's there's a lot of money flowing in

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:39.119
<v Speaker 1>South and north, and you know, it causes you know,

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 1>stocks to be trading it wildly different valuations depending on

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, where they're listed. I imagine that's a pretty

0:19:45.760 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>fleeting opportunity, but a big one when it happens for

0:19:49.240 --> 0:19:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for like you said, the people that are there, they're

0:19:51.280 --> 0:19:53.960
<v Speaker 1>in place ready to take advantage of it. Yeah, listen,

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's a huge opportunity. Uh. You know, and

0:19:57.160 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to again resist the temptation of

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of professional investors, you know, dismiss retail flows

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.320
<v Speaker 1>at your own peril, you know. Um, we say, and

0:20:08.480 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not just similar to the to the MEM's talks.

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:15.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Chinese retail investors have a heavy momentum

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>quality um and you will see things overreact both directions.

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>You need to follow it, you need to respect it.

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.840
<v Speaker 1>But it also creates a lot of dislocation and relative

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>value investment opportunities for for funds like US to to

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>capitalize on. Yeah, I have a colleague you she at Bloomberg,

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:37.400
<v Speaker 1>who you know, follows the Chinese social media very carefully.

0:20:37.400 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>He said. One of the jokes going around when all

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.479
<v Speaker 1>Game stop and now AMC, when all that was going on,

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>is that, well, here, America, you've turned into the Chinese

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:51.440
<v Speaker 1>market now with this heavy dominance of retail participation. So

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be interesting. I think when all of a

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.160
<v Speaker 1>sudden there is an opportunity to borrow a lot more

0:20:56.200 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>of these names. Um well, I don't know, I don't

0:20:58.680 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 1>know if Reddit is uh published in Mandarin yet or not,

0:21:02.040 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>but an interesting dynamic. There's undoubtedly a you know exactly,

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>there's undoubtedly that that sort of same chat room mentality.

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess, just just sort of relating to that, I mean,

0:21:30.840 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 1>do you think that there are any any lessons from

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>that that you know can be applicable to the US

0:21:35.640 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>market just in terms of the of the retail presence,

0:21:38.720 --> 0:21:41.840
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing either in the two markets or um

0:21:41.880 --> 0:21:45.639
<v Speaker 1>a need similarities or differences. You know. I mean, maybe

0:21:45.960 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you can call me a little bit old fashioned, but

0:21:48.760 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, we believe in being in being a little

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>bit paranoid, paranoid about you know, making sure we know

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:59.200
<v Speaker 1>what we know, paranoid about what we don't know. UM.

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>And anytime you see stock prices or moves that look irrational, um,

0:22:06.600 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's just something to draw your interest in.

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, you've got to do a lot more work

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>again on the on the technicals, on the positioning, on

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the expectation before you can become you be prepared to

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>come in and fade some of these moves and listen.

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:26.040
<v Speaker 1>If I had one recommendation, you know for people, it's

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to not dismiss these flows, uh, to understand what that's

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>telling you about MARKETR participants. What's that telling you about psychology?

0:22:35.400 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>And then just be humble about it and say like, Okay,

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>when I'm on the other side of these trades, where

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to take the other side of these trades

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>because I don't think you know, a m C h

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.000
<v Speaker 1>is worth its current market cap, Well, I guess what,

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the people buying AMC have no opinion on its market cap.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>So my assessment of coming in and looking at the

0:22:53.880 --> 0:22:58.040
<v Speaker 1>value of AMC on a market cap relative to earnings power,

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>which maybe is how we think it should be valued,

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>it's just not relevant. So you just have to have

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:08.320
<v Speaker 1>this inherent paranoia or skepticism that there could be something

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:11.439
<v Speaker 1>else driving stock rights performance, and then you should be

0:23:11.440 --> 0:23:15.720
<v Speaker 1>cautious about it. Kevin I was reading about I guess

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:18.359
<v Speaker 1>it was the first half of last year. You guys

0:23:18.359 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>had a really strong run than during the pandemic. And

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:23.719
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I thought was really interesting was

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:27.440
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like he did some pear trades where you

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:31.000
<v Speaker 1>would short the stocks of some of the companies getting

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 1>really hit hard by the pandemic, but then go along

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:37.679
<v Speaker 1>the credit of the same companies UM. And it to me,

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it makes total So I don't think I granted,

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I ever would have thought of that

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:44.680
<v Speaker 1>at the time, but it makes total sense given the

0:23:44.760 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>dynamics at play at the time, with the FED basically

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>saying it was going to backstop the credit markets. UM.

0:23:50.440 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Another big story this week obviously, is is the FED

0:23:53.080 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>saying it's gonna sort of unwind? Uh, it's credit holdings. Um.

0:23:57.800 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And it was really I think more of a psych

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>logical effect on the credit markets that a sort of

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>dollar for dollar impact from from what the FED did.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.439
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just curious, you know how you're thinking is

0:24:09.600 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was that was that sort of a a a fleeting

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 1>once in a lifetime opportunity to do that type of

0:24:16.200 --> 0:24:20.320
<v Speaker 1>thing amid the pandemic we're you know, are credit markets

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.520
<v Speaker 1>such that you would you would still think of doing

0:24:22.560 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>that type of trade? Uh in this environment a year later? Yeah,

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:33.960
<v Speaker 1>So the opportunity in March and April of in the

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.639
<v Speaker 1>U s CR credit markets was historic. Uh you know

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 1>really the only good analogy I think is the global

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis. UM. And in particular, when the FED came

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>out and went the extra mile to say they were

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>going to support the high yield market, we were staring

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.320
<v Speaker 1>at each other like, can you believe they just said that?

0:24:54.560 --> 0:24:56.679
<v Speaker 1>They really just say that the other world it does

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly and and there was a time where the market

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't react right away, and we were staring at each

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>other like this is a really unbelievable historic and special opportunity,

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>and the and the most unique thing about it is

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>that you know, normally you see that sort of news

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and then the market squeezes squeezes up and you have

0:25:23.119 --> 0:25:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a hard time buying anything, and you're like, okay, well

0:25:25.320 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>I just missed it. But what happened for really the

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 1>entirety of the summer because of this economic conditions associated

0:25:32.960 --> 0:25:35.560
<v Speaker 1>with COVID were so severe. We actually had a bunch

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of companies who had to come out an issue high

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:42.320
<v Speaker 1>yield investment grade or convertible debts. So not only did

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.480
<v Speaker 1>you have this dynamic where the FED was supporting the

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 1>credit markets, and listen, I was always hell people like

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:52.159
<v Speaker 1>if you had a a wish list of things you

0:25:52.200 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 1>wanted for the holidays and you asked for their FED

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they gave you all those things, and it's like, oh,

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:58.720
<v Speaker 1>by the way, we got a new car for you

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>out in the driveways. So so you had everything you

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>could possibly have wanted. But then there was a ton

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:08.800
<v Speaker 1>of issuance, so we could go out and buy a

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of high yield investment grade in convertible bonds. So

0:26:11.680 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>not only were we able to benefit from the from

0:26:15.160 --> 0:26:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the FED, policy action, but we were able to benefit

0:26:17.560 --> 0:26:22.000
<v Speaker 1>from corporates issuing in what retrospect was incredibly cheap paper

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>to shore up their liquidity to operate over the COVID crisis.

0:26:25.440 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I'm trying to imagine how that particular

0:26:28.960 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>fact pattern repeats, and I really can't, let's hope. Yeah,

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And I feel a little I feel a little bad

0:26:38.320 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>because it was it was, without a doubt, probably the

0:26:40.520 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>most compelling investing environment that I've seen in uh you know,

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 1>really it's it really only compares to the global financial

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>crisis in terms of the opportunity. So it's it's hard

0:26:50.640 --> 0:26:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to imagine, you know, it's it's ever like that again.

0:26:53.240 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>But but listen, there are and this is part of

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 1>the reason why investors like ourselves, who we invest in

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:04.200
<v Speaker 1>equity market and credit credit markets globally all day, every day.

0:27:04.680 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Uh not everybody does that, and so you can have

0:27:07.040 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 1>situations where people are looking laser focused on the equity

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:16.040
<v Speaker 1>market or the credit market and they're missing the dynamic

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>um and you know, probably one of the you know,

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we had some some credit positions that that really benefited

0:27:23.680 --> 0:27:28.160
<v Speaker 1>from from some of this retail participation because as these

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:31.800
<v Speaker 1>company stocks rallied. They were able to issue equity there

0:27:31.960 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>to shore up their balance sheets improve their credit. So

0:27:34.600 --> 0:27:37.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just a really a perfect dynamic to be long

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:41.200
<v Speaker 1>credit and short equity. Yeah, and I wonder you gotta

0:27:41.600 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of be in the right position to take advantage

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:45.440
<v Speaker 1>of it. You know, if you're if you're getting margin

0:27:45.520 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>calls and you're getting outflows and all that, it's some

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>opportunities for a lot of people. Just had to have

0:27:51.840 --> 0:27:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to skip on my imagine. Yeah, you just I mean,

0:27:54.480 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 1>our philosophy is we just, uh, we're never that confident.

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>So we're just ever going to go into a situation

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:06.560
<v Speaker 1>over levered um. We're always going to keep dry powder um,

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and we're always gonna we always manage our our betas

0:28:09.680 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 1>very tightly. Again, we're a relative value funds, so you know,

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 1>when there's a market draw down, we're going to be

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:22.520
<v Speaker 1>massively outperforming you know, beta indices, and generally our investors

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>are going to focus on their their beta investments, so

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:27.359
<v Speaker 1>they're they're confident that we're going to be able to

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:30.679
<v Speaker 1>ride through those sort of events and capitalize on some

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>of those dislocations. So you know, when you have a

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 1>long term, stable capital base and you're prudent from maintaining

0:28:37.200 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>some excess margin, you can come in and take advantage

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of these opportunities. So we were fortunate to do that well.

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And then just seeing what happened last year, I mean,

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, like we said, knock on wood, we're not

0:28:47.480 --> 0:28:50.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have a repeat of that. But were there

0:28:50.040 --> 0:28:52.880
<v Speaker 1>any sort of lessons from that trade or from kind

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of being able to identify that early that you're going

0:28:56.320 --> 0:28:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to take into the future or even the next time

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>there is any market memorial or anything like that. Yeah,

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:06.080
<v Speaker 1>So I think that one of the enduring lessons for

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 1>for us is that, um, you know, let's get our

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:15.280
<v Speaker 1>capital to the spots that are the most attractive. You know,

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I think there's one of the you know, i'll call

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 1>it a mistake, but may maybe that's an overstatement. You know,

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 1>people say, hey, I need to have some invested in

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:26.040
<v Speaker 1>this area of the market, in that area of the market,

0:29:26.160 --> 0:29:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and and the reality is they were like, you know, yeah,

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the the credit markets in the US were an enormous opportunity,

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 1>but that was just you know, frankly, one of three

0:29:35.480 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 1>enormous opportunities in um, you know, most people don't really

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:44.600
<v Speaker 1>don't remember or or forgetting the fact that well, China

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>was approximately three to four months ahead of every other

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>economy in the world in terms of getting the covid

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:57.440
<v Speaker 1>um you know, virus, but emerging from it. And so

0:29:57.680 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>in our view, one of the biggest opera tunities that

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:03.840
<v Speaker 1>we were able to capitalize on was moving into equities

0:30:03.840 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in China. In the summer of we were in remember

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the summer here, we were in the throes of anxiety

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>in Western Europe and the US, but we were seeing

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>very clear indications based on travel and commerce that the

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Chinese economy is starting to accelerate out of that. So

0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we were able to rotate and really gross up our

0:30:24.640 --> 0:30:28.520
<v Speaker 1>exposures in China and take care of that. And then

0:30:28.560 --> 0:30:32.240
<v Speaker 1>and then finally, you know, we had that election back

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in November. Uh, and you know, maybe it seems obvious now,

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the democratic agenda by administration democratic Congress

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 1>was going to lead to two things, uh, stimulus and

0:30:47.360 --> 0:30:53.200
<v Speaker 1>um environmentally oriented policy, right, and so that accelerated, in

0:30:53.200 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 1>our opinion, a massive opportunity to rotate and move our

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>capital into some of the cyclical sectors that had been

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 1>ignored a really you know a long time. I mean,

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>we we'd spent almost twenty years when we thought about, Hey,

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are low, growth is low, We're supposed to

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:12.920
<v Speaker 1>go buy you know, high quality growth stocks and quality stocks.

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.720
<v Speaker 1>And now it's the opposite in a lot of ways.

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>We're starting a new economic cycle. We're supposed to own

0:31:17.880 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 1>cyclical stocks, you're supposed to own value stocks. And it

0:31:22.400 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>was a very clear and obvious rotation that people should

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:28.600
<v Speaker 1>have been doing pretty much right into and after the election,

0:31:28.680 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>but people people lagged in that rotation. Frankly, Uh continues

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to go on even even in the markets. Um, you

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:39.120
<v Speaker 1>know here today on Thursday, Uh, Kevin. Before we get

0:31:39.160 --> 0:31:41.640
<v Speaker 1>into the crazy things, I think someone passed a law

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:44.680
<v Speaker 1>somewhere where every interview like this has to include a

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:49.720
<v Speaker 1>question about inflation. It's it's mandatory. I think I get

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I get locked up if I don't, if I don't

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>touch about it. But one thing I noticed, Um, you know,

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:56.800
<v Speaker 1>everyone and not everyone, but a lot of people keep

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.680
<v Speaker 1>an eye on that city Economic Surprise Index or there's

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>there's other you know, firms that have ECO surprise index.

0:32:03.080 --> 0:32:06.440
<v Speaker 1>C He also has an inflation surprise index that unfortunately

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:08.160
<v Speaker 1>it only prices once a month at the end of

0:32:08.200 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the month, and I looked at it on the first

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.640
<v Speaker 1>stay of June and noticed May. I mean, we all

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.560
<v Speaker 1>knew inflation was hot in May, and we all knew

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>it was hotter than everyone expected, but that inflation Surprise

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Index jumped it like doubled in May and it hit

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the highest level ever, which to me I find interesting

0:32:26.560 --> 0:32:30.840
<v Speaker 1>because the ripple effects of all the CPI and pc

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>whatever reports we saw in May. Yeah, the market didn't

0:32:34.320 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 1>freak out too much about it, um, which to me

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 1>leads me to believe that kind of the consensus out

0:32:40.360 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 1>there is to agree with the fit that this is

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 1>all transitory, whether it be base effects or or the

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>supply bottlenecks we're seeing, and that we don't really have

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to worry about inflation. Um. I'm just curious what your

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>take on it is. I mean, is there I don't

0:32:54.920 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 1>know what a single digit chance that they're wrong that

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 1>we are looking at sort of a structurally high higher

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>inflation rate going forward because of all the all the stimulus.

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:05.720
<v Speaker 1>How are you thinking about it? Yeah? So, so I

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>think when one of the things that a lot of people, uh,

0:33:08.280 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, forget is you know, we're getting this rush

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of economic activity after several years of really lower capex

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and investment on expectations that you know, growth was going

0:33:21.800 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 1>to be low forever. And so you know, whether it's

0:33:26.200 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>it's UM, it's industrial metals, or oil and gas, there

0:33:29.560 --> 0:33:33.280
<v Speaker 1>has been a massive you know, under investment in capex

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>really the past several years. And so now is the

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>global economy starting to restore, starting to restart. The commodity

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 1>markets are just really tight, and you know, the the

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 1>amount of of of price inflation happening just on the

0:33:48.400 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>raw material side is massive. UM and now there's a

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:58.080
<v Speaker 1>ton of there's no shortage of resources in the world. Uh,

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>there's just a shortage of resources I can get put

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.880
<v Speaker 1>into production right away. And so you know, we're definitely

0:34:03.920 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in the camp that we're going to see a supply reaction.

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:10.200
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna get a reaction out of out of OPEC,

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:11.919
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get a reaction on some of the metal

0:34:11.960 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and mining companies, and you're going to offset some of

0:34:14.800 --> 0:34:17.840
<v Speaker 1>those short term price squeezes. But it's unclear to me

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 1>whether that's happening in the in the end second quarter,

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:24.480
<v Speaker 1>third quarter, or fourth quarter. And so I think there's

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:29.600
<v Speaker 1>a pretty significant probability that there's an inflation surprise, and

0:34:29.600 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 1>that it's difficult for the market on a on a

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:34.000
<v Speaker 1>short term basis that's over the sort of the three

0:34:34.000 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>month horizon. But I think longer term, I think there's

0:34:37.280 --> 0:34:40.160
<v Speaker 1>generally consensus that that there's going to be a supply

0:34:40.520 --> 0:34:44.759
<v Speaker 1>response and offset some of these transitory pressures. So you know,

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>what we're seeing though, is uh And I agree with you,

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:50.960
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, you have to talk about inflation every

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>every discussion, otherwise it's a problem. You know, there's a

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:59.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a really I think a rational transition, transition happening

0:34:59.880 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in the market right now as investors are starting to

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 1>distinguish between who is more tightly managing their cost a

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:13.359
<v Speaker 1>good sold their inventory requirements, and so we're seeing who

0:35:13.400 --> 0:35:17.720
<v Speaker 1>has pricing power, We're seeing, you know, who's managing their

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:23.360
<v Speaker 1>cost infrastructure better, and the market is actually distinguishing companies

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:27.439
<v Speaker 1>and subsectors based on how they're managing the cost side

0:35:27.440 --> 0:35:30.200
<v Speaker 1>of their equations. So I actually, to us, it looks

0:35:30.239 --> 0:35:33.520
<v Speaker 1>like we've transitioned from you know, if you were ten

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:39.799
<v Speaker 1>out of ten frenetic anxiety about inflation in March, you're

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>probably down to like a seven out of ten now

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:45.759
<v Speaker 1>because people you know, I could once once people are

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:47.839
<v Speaker 1>talking about it for a good rule of them. If

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:49.640
<v Speaker 1>you've been hearing people talk about it for two weeks,

0:35:50.080 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>it's discounted um. And so for all of the handwringing

0:35:54.160 --> 0:35:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that's happened. If you guys are watching the tenure right

0:35:56.920 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>ten years, been at one sixty for I don't know,

0:35:59.280 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 1>three weeks now four weeks. So I think increasingly the

0:36:04.680 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>markets are are are discounting these short term inflationary pressures

0:36:08.480 --> 0:36:11.239
<v Speaker 1>in and are more relaxed about it. There's still going

0:36:11.280 --> 0:36:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to be some rotations and volatility, but you know, clearly

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the it's the negative event in the market.

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:20.520
<v Speaker 1>It's it's the black spawn event. There's a there's an

0:36:20.520 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>inflation surprise, it's the FED is behind the curve, the

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>e c B is behind the curve, and you know

0:36:28.760 --> 0:36:31.600
<v Speaker 1>it ends up being counterproductive to economic activity in the

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>back half of the year. That's that's a probability. We

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.560
<v Speaker 1>think it's pretty low, but that's clearly the thing to

0:36:36.600 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>worry about, you know. And I keep thinking, as you

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that supply side response, I just can't help but

0:36:42.800 --> 0:36:45.720
<v Speaker 1>wonder if that's going to overreact and we're talking about

0:36:45.800 --> 0:36:49.239
<v Speaker 1>transitory deflation next year, and who's prepared for that? You know,

0:36:49.600 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, hope hopefully I'll be able

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 1>to come back and uh and uh and uh and

0:36:55.560 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 1>talk about that. I mean, listen, I think that there's again,

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no shortager resources out there. It's just a function

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of you know, really structurally lower capex for the past

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:08.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of years. Their corporate boardrooms around the world, they're

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.879
<v Speaker 1>seeing this, they're seeing the opportunity. They're looking for new

0:37:10.920 --> 0:37:15.240
<v Speaker 1>supply projects, they're bringing supply online, and it's going to offset.

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.439
<v Speaker 1>It's just a question of whether it gets here soon

0:37:17.560 --> 0:37:21.720
<v Speaker 1>enough for for some people in the market. Stand clear

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:25.280
<v Speaker 1>of the craziest things we saw in markets this week.

0:37:26.000 --> 0:37:28.799
<v Speaker 1>You know, Claire, as Kevin said, there's no shortage of

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 1>supply of resources in the world. You know, there's also

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 1>not a shortage of crazy things. I believe. I totally agree,

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:38.840
<v Speaker 1>well supplied in that arena. So I want you to

0:37:38.920 --> 0:37:41.279
<v Speaker 1>kick us off with the craziest thing you saw this week.

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:44.799
<v Speaker 1>So the craziest thing that I saw. We actually had

0:37:44.800 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a story out this morning. It was my colleague Katie

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Greifeld wrote it um and she's fantastic, But it of

0:37:52.280 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>course is about AMC and UM. We saw that UM

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:05.880
<v Speaker 1>with AMC UM. It recently had a regulatory filing UM

0:38:05.920 --> 0:38:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that landed this morning, and it talked about its intention

0:38:08.760 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to UM sell more than eleven million shares UM. But

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>it had this acknowledgement in the language UM and it

0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>said that the stock is at the mercy of the

0:38:21.320 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 1>retail mania UM with fundamentals playing little role in determining

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>its valuation. UM. So just the fact that that made

0:38:29.120 --> 0:38:33.640
<v Speaker 1>its way into an official regulatory filing I thought was

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:38.080
<v Speaker 1>was pretty crazy. Proceeds from the sale will be deposited

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>with Libroll Reddenbacker to pay for all that presentably it is.

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.319
<v Speaker 1>I I don't think we've had any of us have seen.

0:38:46.400 --> 0:38:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know. The bar for crazy things

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:50.719
<v Speaker 1>keeps getting raised higher and higher. This this one though,

0:38:50.840 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 1>was it's pretty good. I don't know. I don't want

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to knock on wood people listening with headphones at home.

0:38:56.640 --> 0:38:58.720
<v Speaker 1>That might get a pop in here, but knock on wood.

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 1>We don't get any crazier than that. But Kevin, how

0:39:01.680 --> 0:39:04.319
<v Speaker 1>about you? You see anything crazy this week? Well? I mean,

0:39:04.360 --> 0:39:06.240
<v Speaker 1>am I going to get in trouble if I kind

0:39:06.239 --> 0:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of copy Claire on this one, not at all, not

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:13.920
<v Speaker 1>at all, So so I, um, I saw something and

0:39:13.960 --> 0:39:16.360
<v Speaker 1>it was a MC, but it was an AMC nuance

0:39:16.600 --> 0:39:19.879
<v Speaker 1>that I think is interesting here. I I came in

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>after the long weekend stupor that we all were in

0:39:23.280 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday morning and saw that AMC had issued stock

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 1>to a single investor. Um. And call me old fashioned,

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm used to company's issuing stock at a discount until

0:39:38.280 --> 0:39:43.399
<v Speaker 1>last sale, and I saw that they issued stock at

0:39:43.520 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 1>a premium to last sale to a single investor about

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:49.279
<v Speaker 1>h I think it was about a four or five

0:39:49.320 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>percent premium um, which and then I saw the stock

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:58.879
<v Speaker 1>promptly rally um massively past that. And then that same

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>investor came out in the afternoon and said he thought

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>the stock was wildly overvalued. So we had this weird

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 1>dynamic where a company issue stock at a premium to

0:40:10.840 --> 0:40:15.759
<v Speaker 1>a single investor, that investor obviously sells it in the

0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 1>market that day, presumably, and then and then tells people

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>who thinks it's overvalued before it promptly doubles again the

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>next day. And you know, I think I've seen company's

0:40:30.560 --> 0:40:35.359
<v Speaker 1>issue stock at a premium. Uh, maybe once in my

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 1>in my career, and it's just again one of those

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>things where you know something's different is happening. If someone

0:40:43.680 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>can find the page and Graham and Dodd where this

0:40:46.200 --> 0:40:48.680
<v Speaker 1>this is all explained, I'd love to see it. But well,

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and also I believe that investor was a distress debt investor,

0:40:51.640 --> 0:40:54.320
<v Speaker 1>so in a way of brilliant trade, kind of the

0:40:54.360 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 1>opposite of of your trade last year. You know, it's

0:40:56.360 --> 0:40:58.960
<v Speaker 1>go along the stock so that they can you know,

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:02.400
<v Speaker 1>bolster the credit. I we I don't know, but I's

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:04.920
<v Speaker 1>such a risky thing because you really didn't know. I mean,

0:41:05.239 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 1>who knows how the market would react to a secondary

0:41:07.920 --> 0:41:09.719
<v Speaker 1>like that, I guess. But they all worked out in

0:41:09.719 --> 0:41:12.280
<v Speaker 1>their favor. Yeah, well I think, I mean, he obviously

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>figured out. We worked out well for it. We worked

0:41:15.000 --> 0:41:19.279
<v Speaker 1>out well for him. Uh, pretty good, pretty good. The

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>tip of the hat to to that. Um, I'm copying

0:41:22.880 --> 0:41:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to him. I and I guess we're all in the

0:41:24.440 --> 0:41:26.759
<v Speaker 1>A m C. We're all in the theater together on this.

0:41:27.000 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say I did. I did go back to

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 1>an AMC theater last weekend, Uh, and saw a movie.

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:35.480
<v Speaker 1>We've got it. They have the big cushy leather recliners

0:41:35.520 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 1>and they bring you the food. It's it's I don't know.

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there's there's a good bookcase to be made. But

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to me, the the promotions that Claire, you and I

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.640
<v Speaker 1>worked on this story a little bit together, the promotions

0:41:47.680 --> 0:41:51.960
<v Speaker 1>going on of AMC are our borderlining on the absurd.

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:55.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're seeing people on the street corner holding

0:41:56.040 --> 0:41:59.799
<v Speaker 1>poster boards saying, you know by AMC stock. You're you're

0:41:59.800 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>seeing someone tweeted a video of some pool party looked

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:09.880
<v Speaker 1>at some hotel that these these models and bikinis danced

0:42:09.920 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 1>around waiving signs that say a MC to the moon.

0:42:13.560 --> 0:42:16.719
<v Speaker 1>I can't wrap my head around this, Kevin, I don't know.

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I I uh, it's all fun while last I guess

0:42:19.600 --> 0:42:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, uh, sort of a game of musical

0:42:22.360 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 1>chairs to some degree, to see who's gonna be left

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.239
<v Speaker 1>holding that back. You know, by the end of this,

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:31.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll they'll be, they'll be it'll end very badly for

0:42:31.520 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 1>people on the long and short side of there, like,

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>so the people are going to have issues with it,

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 1>for sure. I presumably those models got paid for their

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>day's work, though, so they're they're happy it's so some

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:46.880
<v Speaker 1>some stimulats in to the economy from all this anyway,

0:42:47.120 --> 0:42:51.040
<v Speaker 1>But Claire Balantine, Kevin Russell really great to catch up

0:42:51.040 --> 0:42:52.879
<v Speaker 1>with both of you. I hope we can have you back,

0:42:53.280 --> 0:42:55.080
<v Speaker 1>both of you back on this show someday. But I

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:58.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's all the time we have. Thanks for having me, guys,

0:42:58.719 --> 0:43:09.839
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed it. Thank you What Goes Up. We'll

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:11.799
<v Speaker 1>be back next week. That's something. You can find us

0:43:11.840 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg Terminal website and app, or wherever you

0:43:14.680 --> 0:43:17.160
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts. We'd love it if you took the

0:43:17.160 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>time to rate and review the show on Apple Podcasts

0:43:19.840 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>so more listeners can find us. And you can find

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:26.880
<v Speaker 1>us on Twitter, follow me at Reaganonymous. Claire Valentine is

0:43:27.040 --> 0:43:32.279
<v Speaker 1>at CFP Underscore eighteen. You can also follow Bloomberg Podcasts

0:43:32.480 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>at Podcasts and Thank you to Charlie Pelletto, Bloomberg Radio

0:43:36.160 --> 0:43:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and the voice of the New York City Subway System.

0:43:38.600 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 1>What Goes Up is produced by tofur Forez. The head

0:43:41.320 --> 0:43:44.680
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Podcast is Francesco Leviy. Thanks for listening. See

0:43:44.680 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you next time.