WEBVTT - Week 18 NFL Best Bets (Ep. 149)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets. Let's talk to the pros.

0:00:16.120 --> 0:00:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Hey everybody, Welcome back to the Betting Bros. Podcast or

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.560
<v Speaker 2>Week eighteen of the NFL season, brought to you by

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.360
<v Speaker 2>bet MGM. I'm your host Dan Harris. With me, it's

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 2>Joe Pizza Pa. We are here to give our three

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:31.800
<v Speaker 2>best bets for Week eighteen of the NFL season. Joe,

0:00:32.360 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 2>how does this snowy Friday morning find you?

0:00:36.440 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>It finds me doing this show instead of going outside

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 1>and shoveling, that's for sure. I was like, Dan, do

0:00:41.400 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>you want to you want to do a few more

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:45.839
<v Speaker 1>podcasts today? Maybe stick around for a few hours, because

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>the longer we talk here, the longer I get to

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>stay inside and warm and not outside the freezing cold

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:52.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to shovel snow.

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:52.960
<v Speaker 3>So I'm all for this.

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:54.880
<v Speaker 1>In fact, this could be a three hour podcast for

0:00:54.960 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>all I care today.

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 2>Do you not have a snowblower? Joe?

0:00:57.800 --> 0:00:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I do here?

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 3>Okay, all right, you asked.

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's week eighteen, man, whatever.

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>So I have the longest driveway in creation, right, so

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.640
<v Speaker 1>I should have one of those ridiculous giant sized snowblows,

0:01:08.720 --> 0:01:11.479
<v Speaker 1>and I don't. I have like an electric one, which

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is annoying because it's got the cords and.

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:13.480
<v Speaker 3>It works fun.

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but the problem is my driveway so long that

0:01:16.560 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>I have more extension cords. It almost looks like clerker's

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.960
<v Speaker 1>while trying to light his Christmas tree or Christmas house.

0:01:22.000 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I should say, so, yeah, it's it's a weird situation.

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Last year there was so much snow that I had

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:28.640
<v Speaker 1>to borrow my neighbors who's got the big bad boy.

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll be okay, I'm gonna wait it out.

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Let the sun kind of take care of some stuff.

0:01:33.000 --> 0:01:35.320
<v Speaker 1>But overall, yes, I do. And it's of course called

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>a snow joe because a right.

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.920
<v Speaker 2>So, I think many people have driveway envy for us

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.040
<v Speaker 2>because our driveway is not particularly long, unlike a lot

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>of driveways in my neighborhood. And when we moved here,

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 2>my father in law, who's an incredibly handy individual. I'm

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 2>not handy, bought us a snowblower, and bought us a

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 2>snowblower that is basically like, if it snows four feet,

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 2>this will cut right through it. So's it's my favorite

0:02:00.880 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 2>thing in the world. I love it. I have to

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 2>go snowblowing a little bit, but I'm actually looking forward

0:02:05.840 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 2>to it because it's like the one thing that makes me,

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 2>look what I've done. I've heared this entire thing zen.

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:12.480
<v Speaker 1>About it right where it is like, you know, like

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>some people like to rake the sand, This snow blowing,

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like is the same thing, and you get

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 1>to choose which direction you're gonna blow it in.

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 3>It's a whole thing.

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>I like it.

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 2>I gotta say it, all right, I like it, So

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>we'll do that afterwards. All right, a couple of brief announcements.

0:02:24.720 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 2>First of all, this is my last podcast. Actually, this

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 2>is my last podcast total for if you follow us

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:32.080
<v Speaker 2>on Fantasy Pros, if you follow us on Betting Pros both,

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.520
<v Speaker 2>it's my last podcast. One last live stream for me

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday morning, week eighteen with Matt Parout like we

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:39.320
<v Speaker 2>do every single Sunday morning. But this is it my

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 2>last podcast. I love the company. I'm leaving for a

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:47.239
<v Speaker 2>completely unrelated opportunity outside of the field of sports betting

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 2>and fantasy. So this is the last time you're gonna

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 2>hear my voice, which I know for certain of you

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.679
<v Speaker 2>is very exciting because certain of you are desperate to

0:02:55.680 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 2>gear it to me and Joe is certainly one of

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 2>them as well. Terrible Terrible in the meantime to finish

0:03:02.639 --> 0:03:04.680
<v Speaker 2>stop in the playoffs and everything like that. Joe will

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:06.600
<v Speaker 2>be the host of the show and they'll have on guests,

0:03:06.600 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 2>and Joe's much better and more popular than I am.

0:03:09.080 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 2>So there you go. I've enjoyed I've enjoyed it. I've

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:16.799
<v Speaker 2>enjoyed doing the show very much this season. I love

0:03:16.840 --> 0:03:19.959
<v Speaker 2>all our listeners and I wish you the best of luck.

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:21.880
<v Speaker 2>I will try to send you out here on a

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:24.000
<v Speaker 2>high note. So we're gonna give our three best bets

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 2>here of the of the weekend for the NFL's week eighteen.

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 2>So it's crazy and a lot of this stuff will change,

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.119
<v Speaker 2>but let's recap last week what we did. We had

0:03:33.120 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 2>on our good friend Scott Bogman. Of course, he went

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.040
<v Speaker 2>one and two again. I think that's the second time

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Bogmin's gone one and two. He did hit on the

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.240
<v Speaker 2>over forty two and a half with Seattle in Detroit,

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.440
<v Speaker 2>but he missed on everything about the Rams Ravens game.

0:03:45.520 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 2>He missed on the Rams lank three and a half,

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 2>and he missed on over forty six and a half,

0:03:50.080 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 2>which I also liked. I went too and one I

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 2>hit on the Steelers getting three and a half from

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:56.760
<v Speaker 2>the Browns, which obviously closed that like the Steelers laying

0:03:56.760 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 2>three or whatever, and the Titans laying three and a

0:03:59.040 --> 0:04:01.800
<v Speaker 2>half to the Dolphins. Bogman also didn't like, so screw

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 2>that guy. I missed though, on the Chargers and the

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 2>Broncos under forty five and a half. They came in

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 2>at forty seven. So I'm now one game over five

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty six and twenty five on the year.

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 2>We will try to finish this off on a high note.

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:17.640
<v Speaker 2>But Joe, for the last time, you are the guest

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 2>of this show, not the host of this show. Therefore,

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 2>I will allow you to make the first selection. Please

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:27.680
<v Speaker 2>show give me your favorite bet for Week eighteen of

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the NFL season.

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I know sometimes when we see giant numbers it

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>scares people off, but it's Week eighteen. Defenses are quitting everywhere.

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Some teams are already quit. And I think one of

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.840
<v Speaker 1>the teams that's just completely done toast. I think they're

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>not gonna see Trevor Lawrence in the second half of

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this football game. It's the Jacksonville Jaguars and they're going

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>against Jonathan Taylor and the Colts, And I'm putting Jonathan

0:04:51.040 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Taylor ahead of the Colts because I don't think he's

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:55.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the two hundred and sixty six yards he needs.

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.600
<v Speaker 3>But I think he's gonna die trying. I really do.

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the more you have the to him,

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:02.719
<v Speaker 1>the more that eats up clock and the more difficult

0:05:02.720 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>it is for garbage time or any these other things

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>to catch up. I just feel like we're talking about

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:08.599
<v Speaker 1>a whole different class of football team, just kind of

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>like what you saw last week where the Patriots just

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:13.560
<v Speaker 1>to completely embarrass them. There's no self respect thing. It's

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:14.920
<v Speaker 1>not like they all go back go we got to

0:05:14.960 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>finish the season the highoue. No, all these guys already

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:20.840
<v Speaker 1>know the new regime is coming in and this was

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:22.960
<v Speaker 1>their chance to be evaluated the last couple of weeks.

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And let me tell you, I'm sure a lot of

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:27.719
<v Speaker 1>them are going to be jettisons when you have a

0:05:27.760 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>new staff coming in. Lawrence will be there a few

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:31.719
<v Speaker 1>other key pieces, but it's gonna be a big turnover

0:05:31.760 --> 0:05:34.359
<v Speaker 1>in this organization. So for these guys, it's about just

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>getting home, not getting hurt, and I don't see a

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 1>situation where there isn't a blowout here for the Indianapolis Colts.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And then again the.

0:05:43.000 --> 0:05:45.920
<v Speaker 3>Fact you add in all the time and all the rushing.

0:05:45.920 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like when they try to force the

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>ball to Jonathan Taylor, it's going to eat up a

0:05:50.240 --> 0:05:51.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of clock and I think it's gonna make it

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:55.039
<v Speaker 1>a really difficult situation for the Jaguars to score points

0:05:55.040 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>because they have to be very efficient, and efficiency has

0:05:57.080 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 1>not been the offensive strong suits. So at the end

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of the day, I think the fifty is actually a

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>safer number, and I don't think anybody in that Jacksonville

0:06:03.600 --> 0:06:05.640
<v Speaker 1>defense really cares at this point, and I can't blame them.

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I wouldn't want to get hurt either, But that,

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:09.800
<v Speaker 1>to me, I think is actually something that I would

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:12.120
<v Speaker 1>lock in there. I feel confident about it despite the

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>fact that it's a fifteen.

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, fifteen is a high number, Joe, So a couple

0:06:16.600 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 2>of things. Obviously, the consensus line is fifteen. There's fifteen

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 2>and a half's out there at bet MGM. You, as

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.040
<v Speaker 2>we were talking about before we get on, are fandueled

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 2>in Jersey? Is that your only book by.

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>The way, No, you got it one I like the

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:28.880
<v Speaker 1>most because I like the one you do.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 2>That's also they give you better lines like I'm I'm

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 2>at DraftKings. That's all we have here in New Hampshire.

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 2>The lines are always tougher. Man, It's always like a

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 2>little off from where I feel like the is in

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:44.839
<v Speaker 2>the wrong direction in my opinion, So you can actually

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 2>get this as we talked about at fourteen and a half,

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 2>that's like the only book I'm seeing out there at

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.479
<v Speaker 2>fourteen and a half. You lucky bastard. But that's fine.

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 2>Here's the thing, Joe, and I didn't tell you this

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 2>before we started recording. One of my picks was actually

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:02.920
<v Speaker 2>going to be the Jackar getting the points. And I'm

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 2>not going to make that one of my official picks,

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 2>mainly because if you are giving me an off route

0:07:08.400 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 2>or off ramp to not take the Jaguars and back,

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 2>then I'm going to take it. And this is my

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 2>off ramp. So I appreciate that. Here's my worry with it, though, Joe,

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 2>same situations last year, and the Jags were equally futured

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 2>last year, right. I think it was Mike Lennon as

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback going in, they were terrible. It was the

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.559
<v Speaker 2>last game of the season. The Colts wound up winning

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:28.520
<v Speaker 2>by fourteen, but only on like a last minute thing

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 2>did they get it up from one score to two score.

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 2>There's this whole thing, Joe, right where you've got a

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 2>team that's terrible and a team that gets blown out,

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 2>especially playing against the team that's playing for something. Right,

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 2>You've got all these situations right now, you've got one

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 2>team playing for something, but those situations, Joe number one.

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I think the lines are always a little inflated because

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 2>they know that people casual betters are going to look

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 2>at it and say, well, how are the I mean,

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 2>the Colts have to win to get into the playoffs,

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 2>and the Jaguars think, like, of course they'll go. So

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I think the lines are generally a little inflated. And second, historically,

0:07:59.920 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 2>like those teams that are limited, they play hard, and

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:06.360
<v Speaker 2>last week the Jaguars totally embarrassed, completely agree. I actually

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 2>think that that bodes a little bit better for them

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:10.480
<v Speaker 2>in this game because I think when you look historically,

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>teams that get absolutely drounced and lose by like twenty

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 2>five points, they usually are pretty good against the spread.

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:17.720
<v Speaker 2>The following week. They also had a lot of COVID

0:08:17.760 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 2>issues last week. This strikes me as a game Joe

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.120
<v Speaker 2>with the Colts, where the Colts do this every time.

0:08:22.160 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 2>They always struggle with Jacksonville for whatever reason, but where

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:26.760
<v Speaker 2>the Colts are gonna probably jump out to like a

0:08:26.800 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 2>big lead, and then because they're the Colts, they're not

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>gonna keep their foot on the gas and the Jags

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:33.280
<v Speaker 2>are gonna have a back yard cover here.

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not totally I think there's a lot of validity

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to what you're saying. But if you watched last week,

0:08:38.679 --> 0:08:42.199
<v Speaker 1>you saw how New England just manhandled them at the line,

0:08:42.240 --> 0:08:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you saw a few weeks ago how the

0:08:43.960 --> 0:08:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Colts man handled New England in the trenches.

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:48.600
<v Speaker 3>What I like the most about the Colts is.

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.839
<v Speaker 1>They went up front, and that's something that I find

0:08:51.840 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>that demoralizing. You know, Yeah, when you guys got like

0:08:56.600 --> 0:08:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Nelson and guys like that who just absolutely get that

0:08:58.840 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>push and things like that, once you're into that third quarter,

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.600
<v Speaker 1>it's just like, look, do I want to do this anymore?

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's where I think eventually it's going

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>to I think that real football in the trench of

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff is going to wear on the Jaguars in this game,

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:12.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the way they were on the Patriots

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 1>side of that game too, So to me, I think

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the one thing that I will throw out there.

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>But you make a lot of great arguments, and I

0:09:19.280 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>told you there's gonna be something wacky here. I kept

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>telling you I think it's going to be the Jets

0:09:22.920 --> 0:09:25.120
<v Speaker 1>this week, which I know would make you very happy

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to end.

0:09:25.880 --> 0:09:27.360
<v Speaker 2>Are you going to take the Jets as one of

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 2>your picks.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I'm going to take the Jets

0:09:29.160 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>as well, but I certainly wanted to. I mean, I

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>talked about a couple of days ago. I felt like

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the line was a little too big and the Jets

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:35.200
<v Speaker 1>are really.

0:09:35.160 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Chiming right now. Is Elijah More gonna come back? If so,

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:39.199
<v Speaker 3>then maybe.

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I do like, yeah, so what we'll do, by the ways,

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:43.280
<v Speaker 2>after all we do all our picks, we'll very quickly

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 2>run through the remaining spreads. We talked about it earlier

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:46.719
<v Speaker 2>in the week. We have a little more information now

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 2>obviously that we do, so all right, that's fair. And

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 2>the one thing I'll say, Joe also is like I

0:09:52.280 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 2>think the Jags are locked into either the one or

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 2>the two pick. And this does not strike me as

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 2>a year where it's like we have to make sure

0:09:58.920 --> 0:10:01.439
<v Speaker 2>we tank to get the umber one pick necessarily. Here

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 2>they've got Lawrence. And I think that even with teams

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 2>like this, the individual players, they're all being evaluated, they

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:09.000
<v Speaker 2>all need jobs next year, and so how they do

0:10:09.720 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of will motivate them to play at their very best. Nevertheless,

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.960
<v Speaker 2>I am thankful that you took the Cults so that

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I can have an excuse to not take the Jaguars.

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 2>So that is not going to be official thing. Now

0:10:20.040 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 2>here's a game, Joe, that I know we're on the

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 2>same side of, and I know you have a little

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 2>bit of a different way you want to go about it,

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 2>which I like it. I am rarely gonna jump on

0:10:27.960 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 2>the money line. I'm gonna instead take the spread and

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to take the forty nine ers getting four

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 2>and a half from the Rams for you. This is

0:10:35.120 --> 0:10:37.800
<v Speaker 2>one time where Fandel screws me out of a half point. Here, Joe,

0:10:37.800 --> 0:10:39.480
<v Speaker 2>it's only four for you, but it's four and a

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 2>half everywhere. I don't know why Fandel has to go

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 2>out on a limb and be cool, Joe. This is

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 2>just this is the Niners against you know, the Rams.

0:10:48.040 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Like we know how the story ends, right, we know

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 2>how it ends over the last several seasons. We know

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 2>what Kyle Shanahan does against the Rams. This is just

0:10:56.800 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 2>sort of how it works in that division. They have

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 2>their number straight against the Niners. They dominated them earlier

0:11:02.280 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 2>this year. Matt Stafford, Joe, and I forget if you

0:11:05.440 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 2>were the one who mentioned this on one of our podcasts.

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 2>He's not playing very well of late.

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>It was your right, sluggish and flat in a lot

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 1>of games, and then they end up kind of getting

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it together. But you can't keep doing that and think

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be a playoff team that matters.

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:21.160
<v Speaker 3>At the end of the day.

0:11:21.480 --> 0:11:24.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's battling through some injuries. I'm sure. I think

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 2>he has six interceptions over the last three games. All right, Joe,

0:11:28.160 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 2>here's here's a good stet I found Matthew Stafford in

0:11:31.559 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 2>his career. How often does he cover when he plays

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 2>a winning team, just not not wins, forget about if

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 2>he wins the game. How often does he cover the

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 2>spread when a Matt Stafford led team plays against the

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 2>team with a winning record. The time forty of the

0:11:49.760 --> 0:11:53.560
<v Speaker 2>time because he played a fantastic guess twenty eight percent

0:11:53.600 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 2>of the time, twenty eight He does not cover against

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 2>winning teams. It's terrible.

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:01.200
<v Speaker 1>A tough one though, he because I mean it's he's

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback.

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 3>But there's also a five Lions.

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 2>The team led by It's still a spread man. The

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:09.319
<v Speaker 2>spread takes into account that he's playing on the Lions.

0:12:09.640 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a Matthew Stafford the team. The forty nine ers

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:14.719
<v Speaker 2>fans are going to travel here against the Rams. They

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 2>need it more. The Rams need it, as we talked

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.040
<v Speaker 2>about last week, like they need to either win or

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 2>have Arizona lose to be able to take that division.

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:23.920
<v Speaker 2>So they need to win, but they don't absolutely need

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 2>to win. The forty nine Ers need to either win

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 2>or they need the Saints to lose to Atlanta to

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 2>get into the playoffs. They're ready to go. I don't

0:12:30.280 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 2>know if it's going to be Jimmy g or Trey Lance,

0:12:32.840 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 2>but I don't think it matters. I think Lance played

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.840
<v Speaker 2>well enough. You know, last week, forty nine Ers secondary

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:42.480
<v Speaker 2>is bad, but that Niners defense still playing pretty well.

0:12:42.559 --> 0:12:44.400
<v Speaker 2>I don't know whether or not Emmanuel Moseley is gonna

0:12:44.400 --> 0:12:45.959
<v Speaker 2>be able to come back. They designated him to return.

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 2>If so, it's a boon. But either way, ma'am, it's

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>just what happens with this game, right, the Rams and

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 2>the Niners. You back the Niners and you Backyle Shanahana

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 2>as a dog. I love it four and a half.

0:12:57.280 --> 0:12:58.679
<v Speaker 2>I'll take it, yeah, And.

0:12:58.679 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Of course I want to take it a step for

0:13:00.320 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>because safe is never good enough for me. And I

0:13:03.559 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>just want the forty nine ers outright. I mean, you're

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:09.640
<v Speaker 1>getting plus one seventy two. You're getting you know, plus

0:13:09.679 --> 0:13:13.439
<v Speaker 1>money across the board here on the bad boy here,

0:13:13.480 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>and I don't see why not. I mean, do we

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 1>need to be beat over the head with this.

0:13:17.640 --> 0:13:20.560
<v Speaker 3>When it comes to this team? I mean, this would

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 3>be six straight wins.

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:23.160
<v Speaker 1>And I know you say, well, eventually it's got even out,

0:13:23.200 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>does it?

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Does it? Is this a team that just owns them?

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned the key thing which I touched on

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>last time we were together, which is there's no home

0:13:30.160 --> 0:13:31.559
<v Speaker 1>field advantage for the press.

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:32.480
<v Speaker 3>It does not exist.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:35.560
<v Speaker 1>The LA crowd is the LA crowd anyway, and then

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get the bougie forty nine er crowd coming

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:39.880
<v Speaker 1>down for this game, and you know there's a lot

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of them in that area, and you know they're gonna.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 3>Travel for this game too, So.

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be like a almost fifty to fifty kind

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of feel in that stadium.

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 2>If not, I'm telling you, man, it's gonna be more

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 2>Niners than it's gonna feel like a Niner.

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>And because the Niners need this game, and because I

0:13:55.640 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>do think it's gonna be Trey Lance, I actually think

0:13:57.240 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Trey Lance is more equipped to win this game currently

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.839
<v Speaker 1>in the situation they're in. And the last thing I

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>heard at Garroppolo was it feels my my thumb is

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:08.960
<v Speaker 1>tearing off. That doesn't sound very good. I mean, I

0:14:09.000 --> 0:14:11.440
<v Speaker 1>can't I understand why he's trying to, because.

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Sure that's it for him here.

0:14:14.320 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Desroyd, it's coming to an end. But if to me,

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to be aggressive on this game that

0:14:19.040 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>is such a good plus number, that is really hard.

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's almost two to one money on a

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>team that's basically stuck it to the Rams five times

0:14:26.360 --> 0:14:28.680
<v Speaker 1>in a row. I think it's worth investing in. I

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:29.080
<v Speaker 1>really do.

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 2>What did you think of Lance last week, Joe in

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.239
<v Speaker 2>terms of just how he looked.

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 3>Better as the game went on. Yeah, I mean that.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:38.880
<v Speaker 2>That can happen much better than the first half.

0:14:38.960 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>This is this is the hard part is you know

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>when you are coming in here as a rookie quarterback,

0:14:43.320 --> 0:14:45.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's it's a very difficult situation to come

0:14:45.720 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in mid season where everybody's been playing and everybody's in

0:14:48.000 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the rhythm. I think it takes a lot and then

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just like as he plays, it got better. I think

0:14:53.160 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>had he been playing the whole year, we might have

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>a whole different story here. Garoppolo has been safe. Garoppolo

0:14:58.800 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>has been able to get the job done. Garoppolo still

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>makes mistakes that you shouldn't make this many years into

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the professional football league. I'm sorry, you just shouldn't make

0:15:06.080 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>them at this point. He also doesn't throw the deep ball,

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.160
<v Speaker 1>so it limits the offense. He does not throw a

0:15:10.160 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>good deep ball. He never has, didn't really in college either.

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think right now, you know, Lance kind of

0:15:15.400 --> 0:15:17.080
<v Speaker 1>gives them a little bit of energy too. I think

0:15:17.080 --> 0:15:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a different vibe and the Fortnitars offensive line is okay.

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 3>And I think his.

0:15:22.000 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Escapability, the escapability of Trey Lance is a good thing

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>because it extends plays. It creates that momentum thing also

0:15:29.440 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>where when you extend a play, the guy you know,

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>breaks free of a sack or breaks out of the

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:36.360
<v Speaker 1>pocket and runs for another fifteen yards or something like that.

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 3>That kind of stuff just crushes defenses.

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:40.400
<v Speaker 1>When you have a guy on third and long and

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a guy runs for fifteen that's tough. Or he extends

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a play and then finds an open guy. Those kind

0:15:46.680 --> 0:15:50.120
<v Speaker 1>of momentum swings in December January are everything in the NFL,

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 1>so to me, or just football in general, so to

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>me that I think that's something that Lance can bring

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that Garoppolo is kind of limited in.

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think you've got it right. And certainly in

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of that game first half, I was a

0:16:02.640 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 2>little worried about Lance what we were seeing from him.

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 2>But he really looked so much more comfortable in the

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 2>second half of that game, And I think that's kudos

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 2>to both him and the coaching staff for baking basically

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 2>making adjustments. All right, Joe, very good. Basically on the

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 2>same side, you are more bold than I am, which

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 2>is not a surprise given who we are. Why don't

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 2>you go ahead and give your second pick?

0:16:23.440 --> 0:16:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what a shock.

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>Dan Harris going out conservative boy talk about staying on brand.

0:16:31.520 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 1>I we shall have shirts for Dan at the Fantasy

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Pro shop that say give it more talk, or let's see.

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 2>Him think about it, let's think about this.

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I need some more time, all right. The next one

0:16:44.080 --> 0:16:46.560
<v Speaker 1>for me is the Buccaneers on the minus eight side.

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I want the buccaneer side of this game. I think

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Carolina is falling apart at the seams. I mean, the

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.960
<v Speaker 1>quarterback play has been atrocious. I think Matt Rule has

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>lost control.

0:16:57.400 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 3>And I can't think.

0:16:58.520 --> 0:17:00.160
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know if this is the podcast I

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>talked about with you or somebody else. I don't remember

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a time going into a season where I felt more

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:08.360
<v Speaker 1>confident about a head coach at his position, and then

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:11.680
<v Speaker 1>towards the end of the year the complete polar opposite.

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 1>I thought, Matt Rule, Joe Brady, they're building something here,

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, maybe this darnold thing is gonna work. And

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:17.840
<v Speaker 1>then September it kind of worked a little bit, and

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:19.720
<v Speaker 1>now I feel like Rule's gonna be out. I think

0:17:19.720 --> 0:17:21.159
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be back in college at one of these

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.480
<v Speaker 1>major programs. I think they're gonna completely, you know, revamp things.

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>And I can't believe it, And I think this game

0:17:26.760 --> 0:17:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is very important for a few reasons. Number One, you've

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>got some money on the line here for Rob Gronkowski.

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 1>And don't you think Tom Brady knows that the five

0:17:34.400 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand dollars has nothing to sneeze at if he

0:17:36.320 --> 0:17:38.440
<v Speaker 1>catches seven more balls, So they're.

0:17:38.240 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 3>Gonna push the ball a little bit.

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Defensively, I think you know when you've watched these teams

0:17:43.440 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>play Tom Brady, the Carolina Panthers still very good, young defense,

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>but still young, and Tom Brady tends to pick.

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:51.040
<v Speaker 3>Apart those young defenses.

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>He did all last year to them too, where he

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of embarrassed them in spots because he just does

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.320
<v Speaker 1>those little oaki dogs, those little pump fakes, those little things. Yeah,

0:17:59.320 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>it looks like he does that stuff. And because they're

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>young and athletic and aggressive, it leads to mistakes. And

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>I just think Tom Brady, despite all the Antonio Brown stuff,

0:18:09.359 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>despite all the injuries with Godwin, despite Evans hamstering all

0:18:12.400 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>these things, He's gonna find a way to win this game.

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:15.919
<v Speaker 1>I think this is kind of important because I think

0:18:15.920 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks want to have a little momentum going into

0:18:18.119 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs and Brady's not one to come out of

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.040
<v Speaker 1>games and rest, So if they're up by a lot

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth quarter, he'll come out. But Brady typically

0:18:23.640 --> 0:18:26.280
<v Speaker 1>does not like to come out of games. Brady typically

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>is somebody that's going to push and play hard. And

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:30.639
<v Speaker 1>I just don't see how Carolina keeps pace here with

0:18:30.680 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>the Buccaneers. That's the other thing too, And is there

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity for a defensive score? And I think the

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>answer is yes, in which case, whenever you see a

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>number that's greater than six or that you're struggling with,

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>if you think that there's opportunity for that, it's.

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:42.760
<v Speaker 3>That defensive turnover, that defensive score.

0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>And I think you're gonna see a couple turnovers in

0:18:44.720 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>this game for the Carolina Panthers. So to me, I actually

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:49.040
<v Speaker 1>like the Buccaneers despite the big number on.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 3>This one too.

0:18:50.160 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 2>You know, I want you to explain something to me, Joe.

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.880
<v Speaker 2>How is it that two weeks ago they go into

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:01.080
<v Speaker 2>Carolina and they win thirty two to six. Now at home,

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 2>this spread is eight, like and it's it by the way,

0:19:04.680 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 2>it was seven for a while, like it's moved up

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 2>a point. Are we here's my question, are we missing something.

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 2>Are they You're.

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 3>Missing wide receivers, you're missing weapons.

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 2>They were out last skin though, Joe that they got

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 2>hurt in the Saints skin. This is after that. After that.

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 2>They're actually in better shape right now because they have

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Mike Evans back. He's playing. So that's the thing I

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 2>I would have agreed to detail if Godwin and Evan's fine,

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:31.960
<v Speaker 2>the running backs Okay, fine, now.

0:19:31.920 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't even have pulling guys.

0:19:34.080 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 2>And but here's here's the thing. When when books set

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 2>the line, Okay, we have to be honest. They have

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:43.679
<v Speaker 2>more information than you and I do.

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:45.680
<v Speaker 3>Why they build giant hotels.

0:19:45.720 --> 0:19:47.720
<v Speaker 2>My friend, you are correct, which is why I'm saying,

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.560
<v Speaker 2>is it possible because everything you said is correct. Brady

0:19:51.600 --> 0:19:54.320
<v Speaker 2>doesn't like sit. They arians doesn't pull them. They played

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 2>their last game last year when they didn't really need to,

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 2>uh like they were and they need to by the

0:20:01.119 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 2>way here because now you're looking at a thing where

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 2>you've got a gimpy Mike Evans. You've got no God

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 2>when you've got no Brown like Brady needs time in

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:13.720
<v Speaker 2>game action to develop a rapport with Grayson. Right with

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 2>all these guys, everything suggests they're not gonna sit like,

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 2>and Vegas is begging you, the books are begging you,

0:20:21.119 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 2>saying good take the bucks. They seem to just be

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.280
<v Speaker 2>taking the stand here and that is the only thing

0:20:26.320 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 2>that makes me nervous about it, because other than that,

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 2>oh God, give me this. And what's worse, Joe is

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.639
<v Speaker 2>at eight how many teasers? Is this going to be

0:20:34.640 --> 0:20:36.280
<v Speaker 2>a part of where people are gonna tease it down

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 2>to too? I'm already like, where's my other teaser piece?

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 2>This is clearly my teaser piece here you can get

0:20:41.160 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 2>under a field goal. So to me, Joe, that's my

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 2>I think the pig is correct. I absolutely feel flumm

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 2>with it. My only worry is like, do they somehow

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 2>know something that we don't, because otherwise this line makes

0:20:54.480 --> 0:20:56.479
<v Speaker 2>absolutely no sense to me, you know what I mean? Like,

0:20:56.560 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 2>that's my only hesitation with it. Are we missing anything?

0:20:59.640 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 2>But everything you said seems correct, right, I don't think.

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we're missing anything on this one. I

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's just them covering themselves a little bit because

0:21:08.800 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of all the chaos that's also gone with.

0:21:10.240 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 3>The Buccaneers in the last seven days. Yeah, all right,

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 3>a lot of chaos.

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, sometimes teams get distracted now, yeah, that's led

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:18.640
<v Speaker 1>by Tom Brady and Bruce Arians. I don't think it's

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>going to correct. And I think that's also to the

0:21:21.920 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>point why it's really important that this team plays. It

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>gets on the field and goes past that distraction. Yeah,

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I think that's very important for them.

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So look, normally, you're right. Look, I completely agree with

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:35.679
<v Speaker 1>you in the sense that they are smarter than us,

0:21:35.720 --> 0:21:39.240
<v Speaker 1>which is why they build those casitos and hotels. However,

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.720
<v Speaker 1>in this instance, if I'm going to look for something

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>to invest in, and you look at this board, do

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>I want to invest in Bruce Arians and Tom Brady

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:49.200
<v Speaker 1>and the defending Super Bowl champions against Carolina.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I do.

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:51.640
<v Speaker 1>If I'm going to go down account, I'm gonna invest

0:21:51.680 --> 0:21:53.280
<v Speaker 1>in those guys as opposed to some other things because

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there's some other lines that are inviting you

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>that I am think of traps and I'm staying away

0:21:57.400 --> 0:21:59.840
<v Speaker 1>from this one. I don't believe because I'm investing in

0:21:59.840 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the guys at the top, and the guys at the

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:02.959
<v Speaker 1>top at the end of the day are the ones

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>who usually get this done.

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:06.159
<v Speaker 2>It just makes no sense to me, Joe, Like, it

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 2>really doesn't I'm to the point where I really I

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.199
<v Speaker 2>don't know what to do with it. You're over crazy, Yeah,

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:14.960
<v Speaker 2>that's what. Oh, I'll bet it. Don't I'll walk into

0:22:15.000 --> 0:22:17.159
<v Speaker 2>a trap. I'm okay with it, so I'll buy with that,

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 2>all right. So that's a good one, Joe, I'm with you. Look, man,

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't have I have a bunch of crazy stats

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:28.800
<v Speaker 2>for this. This is me thinking that the Raiders are

0:22:28.960 --> 0:22:31.840
<v Speaker 2>just a vastly overrated team and that the Chargers are

0:22:31.920 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 2>a much better team. And I'm taking the Chargers on

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 2>the road in Vegas to beat the Raiders by three.

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.200
<v Speaker 2>So I'm taking them, laying the three points. Now, Matt

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Parralt has already taken the Raiders getting the three points.

0:22:44.960 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it might be one of our picks of

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the day over at Betting Pro. I don't really care.

0:22:50.600 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I just think the Raiders are not a good team.

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 2>They've played three games in overtime, Joe, Like, they they

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:58.240
<v Speaker 2>win these games, close games that they should lose, that

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.200
<v Speaker 2>they somehow managed to do. They won three games in

0:23:01.240 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 2>a row to put themselves in this position. Their turnover

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 2>margin in their three victories negative seven. Like, this is

0:23:09.400 --> 0:23:12.120
<v Speaker 2>not a team that deserves to be in the playoffs

0:23:12.160 --> 0:23:14.040
<v Speaker 2>or is good enough and to be as fair as possible.

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 2>They've dealt with an enormous amount of turmoil this entire year,

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 2>between the Gruden and the Rugs thing. They've had no

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Darren Waller. He may return here, which is certainly something

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 2>that affects it because he does open up the offense.

0:23:25.800 --> 0:23:28.400
<v Speaker 2>But the Chargers pass defense, which is really good when

0:23:28.400 --> 0:23:32.160
<v Speaker 2>they're healthy, is finally healthy. The Raiders pass defense, which

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:35.560
<v Speaker 2>at one point was good, has not been good. The

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 2>one real Achilles heel in this game is the Raiders

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 2>as the Chargers rush defense. But number one, they're getting

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:45.719
<v Speaker 2>healthier in the rush defense, and you can see how

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 2>they are able to sort of play when that happens

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:50.720
<v Speaker 2>at number two. Look, I like Josh Jacobs from a

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:54.399
<v Speaker 2>fantasy perspective, From a prop perspective, Josh Jacobs was very

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 2>good to me this year because I was always a

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:58.480
<v Speaker 2>little more bullish on him than the market was. But

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:00.919
<v Speaker 2>he's not a guy who go there and it's going

0:24:01.000 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 2>to basically dominate a game anymore. Like that's just not

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:05.879
<v Speaker 2>who he is to me. The Chargers are going to

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.440
<v Speaker 2>win this game. If it's a field goal, it's not moving.

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Joe, this is a field goal game.

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 2>That's it. I mean, you want something to worry about.

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 2>It's the fact that they could only need a tie

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 2>to win, and they could both lie down if everything

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 2>goes right. I think the Chargers win this game in Vegas,

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and I think they win by more than a field goal.

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:25.919
<v Speaker 2>So I'm taking the Chargers. I'm interested to know how

0:24:25.960 --> 0:24:27.919
<v Speaker 2>you feel about it, Joe, because again, I do know

0:24:27.920 --> 0:24:29.399
<v Speaker 2>people who are on the other side of this, and

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:30.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure I understand why.

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:33.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm on your side of this one, okay, which again

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 1>I hate saying those.

0:24:34.400 --> 0:24:35.159
<v Speaker 3>Words, but I am.

0:24:35.520 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm on your side of this one, and I think

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>this game goes a long way if indeed the Chargers

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>win this football game, of shedding that label of the

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:45.280
<v Speaker 1>same old Chargers who have a lot of talent but

0:24:45.320 --> 0:24:48.320
<v Speaker 1>always collapse in big spots. I think the difference is Herbert.

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the difference here. And Herbert tends to

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>show up in these big games too, which I like.

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.159
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the mark of a great quarterback. And

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:56.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, even in my early rankings so far on

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Pros and we turned over the year, like the

0:24:58.320 --> 0:24:59.959
<v Speaker 1>next day the season's over. Well, we turn over the

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:02.399
<v Speaker 1>we're starting to look ahead. Herbert to me is an

0:25:02.400 --> 0:25:03.200
<v Speaker 1>elite quarterback.

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 3>He really is.

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think Staley is a really good football coach.

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to give the Raiders credit, and I want

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 1>to give the coaching staff credit for keeping this thing together,

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.639
<v Speaker 1>just keeping it together as long as they have. That

0:25:14.680 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>they're ring into week eighteen is stunning, and I think

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.359
<v Speaker 1>there's something about that that they're home, and you know,

0:25:20.400 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the energy there and I get all of that.

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, I'm looking at

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the defense, and I think you're right. I think the

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:28.640
<v Speaker 1>defensive side of the football here on the charter side,

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is just much better. I also got the quarterback, and

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>those are the two things to me, when I'm making investments,

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:35.920
<v Speaker 1>whether it be fantasy or whether it be wagering, defense

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and quarterback play are the things you should be looking

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>at investing in. And I think the Chargers have that

0:25:40.359 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>more so than the Raiders, and that's why I think

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:43.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a smarter investment.

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 3>Now, if they lose this game, we'll go back.

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:48.240
<v Speaker 1>To that same narrative and it's going to haunt them

0:25:48.400 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>all off season of Why couldn't you get your business

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>done in that big spot when it mattered. You're the

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:55.639
<v Speaker 1>same charges we see every year. I think it's a

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>little different with Staley. But this game, I think is

0:25:57.880 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day going to either move

0:25:59.680 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>the needle forward or revert us right back to the

0:26:01.760 --> 0:26:02.280
<v Speaker 1>old thinking.

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:04.679
<v Speaker 2>And I understand the I mean, look that the loss

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:08.160
<v Speaker 2>of the Texans a couple of weeks ago was just horrible, right,

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 2>Like that's something we're like, come on, man, But you

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 2>look at the point score Joe over the last five

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:16.119
<v Speaker 2>games against Cincinnati, pretty solid defense forty one against the

0:26:16.160 --> 0:26:18.960
<v Speaker 2>Giants thirty seven. They lost that game to Kansas City

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:21.080
<v Speaker 2>and scored twenty eight points, and they had like three

0:26:21.440 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 2>times where they were down within like the three yard

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 2>line and they couldn't push it across. They obviously could

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.440
<v Speaker 2>have scored even more. Against Houston they scored twenty nine.

0:26:28.440 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 2>Against Denver they scored thirty four. They're gonna put up points.

0:26:32.280 --> 0:26:36.040
<v Speaker 2>I do not see the Raiders putting up a twenty

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:38.199
<v Speaker 2>eight spot in this game, Like, I just don't. And

0:26:38.240 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 2>I do think that the Chargers will against that Raiders

0:26:40.400 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 2>defense that just has not been nearly as good of late.

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.399
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, I'm taking the Chargers. I feel okay about it.

0:26:46.440 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I think they make it.

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:50.480
<v Speaker 1>The one other thing too, when Abram got hurt, Yeah,

0:26:50.480 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>I think that craps the secondary significantly. And this is

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and this is why when you play IDP right and

0:26:56.600 --> 0:26:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you are focused on all these kind of little things,

0:26:58.440 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>you see these things and you go, well, how that

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>gonn impact?

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Because Abram was a terrifying guy back there.

0:27:03.080 --> 0:27:05.440
<v Speaker 1>That guy hits hard on the few guys that still

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:08.159
<v Speaker 1>hits people back there, he hits him legally, he hits

0:27:08.600 --> 0:27:10.959
<v Speaker 1>and you take that guy out of that secondary, you

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:13.720
<v Speaker 1>take away the fear factor for the wide receivers. And

0:27:13.760 --> 0:27:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that's a bad concoction potentially for this game.

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:19.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and again just looking at the at the Raiders. Uh,

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, last several games, like they beat Dallas on Thanksgiving,

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 2>which is kind of a weird game that happened. They

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 2>lost to Washington seventeen fifteen, They got absolutely obliterated by

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:33.400
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs forty eight nine. They barely beat a Cleveland

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:36.719
<v Speaker 2>team that was just completely decimated at that point and

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.640
<v Speaker 2>was playing all backups and everything like that. Sixteen fourteen,

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 2>they barely got away with that game. They beat Denver

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 2>seventeen to thirteen when you had Drew Lock out there

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 2>and then they beat the Colts, who again, fine, the

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Colts also have a way of just sort of hanging

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 2>it stuff like that. This is not a good team man,

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 2>And kudos again, Joe, you said it. Kudos to that

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 2>coaching staff, Kudos to that whole team were holding it

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 2>together where they could have fallen apart forever ago. They're

0:28:01.080 --> 0:28:02.679
<v Speaker 2>not winning this game, I don't think, and I think

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 2>they lose a bit more film. Last pick, Joe, what

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:05.680
<v Speaker 2>do you got?

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:06.399
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:28:06.920 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I talked about defense as Quintin, and we're talking about

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:11.560
<v Speaker 1>trends and things like that. I think one of the

0:28:11.600 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>things I like the most is, you know, from a

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:16.000
<v Speaker 1>DFS standpoint, we were on this game yesterday on the

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 1>podcast over on Fantasy Pro Side and just loving this

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>forty eight number with Arizona and Seattle. I mean, Seattle

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:24.920
<v Speaker 1>another team. When you lose Jamal Adams at the secondary,

0:28:25.040 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a big loss. And you've been able to throw

0:28:27.040 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the ball aton on Seattle. So it helps Arizona because

0:28:29.560 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Arizona from an offensive standpoint, has been lackluster without their

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.359
<v Speaker 1>key pieces, without DeAndre Hopkins and Connor has been, you know,

0:28:37.440 --> 0:28:39.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of limping to the finish line here. We'll see

0:28:39.200 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>if he plays or not this week, but it's great.

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:42.080
<v Speaker 3>To get Edmonds back.

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:43.959
<v Speaker 1>I just think at the end of the day, historically,

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>when you look at these games too, and you look

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>at the way they played each other, these games tend

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to be high scoring between these two and the Arizona

0:28:50.880 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>defense as as good as they were in the beginning

0:28:53.520 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of the year, it's kind of flipped now. I don't

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>know if it's flip because the offense has been lackluster

0:28:57.880 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>and put them in bad spots too much or kept

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 1>them on the field too much. Fatigue fact injury though,

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:07.720
<v Speaker 1>injuries too, but everybody's had injuries. They've really fallen off

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>in terms of points, in terms of when you're looking

0:29:11.280 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at them, bigg giving up big plays and things like that.

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>So there's every opportunity here where the Seattle Seahawks, with

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>a very capable quarterback could want to say, hey, we'll

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:20.240
<v Speaker 1>got to stick it to you guys at the end

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:23.400
<v Speaker 1>in division game all that, I think that is certainly

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:25.880
<v Speaker 1>a very viable narrative, and forty eight is just a

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>very low number for these two teams.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 3>Anyway, let alone a week eighteen.

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>So, as far as I'm concerned, when you got two

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>stellar quarterbacks here, these are two QB one guys, and

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:37.280
<v Speaker 1>there's incentives on the line for certain guys. Aj Green's

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.080
<v Speaker 1>got incentives personally in this game. Yeah, I think you know,

0:29:40.120 --> 0:29:43.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy five yards is attainable for him. He's hit that

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a couple of times. It's a It's not an impossible number,

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:47.920
<v Speaker 1>although maybe a challenging one at times. I think you

0:29:48.000 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>look at that. I think you look at the way

0:29:49.160 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>where shot Penny's played. Wilson certainly looks healthier than he

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>did six seven weeks ago. So, as far as I'm concerned,

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the forty eight is too low. If I was setting this,

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 1>it will be a fifty one to begin with. Wow,

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's still in the forty eight's, I think, to

0:30:01.520 --> 0:30:03.400
<v Speaker 1>me personally, just far too low for this game.

0:30:03.680 --> 0:30:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's forty seven and a half at BETMGM. So

0:30:06.080 --> 0:30:08.239
<v Speaker 2>there you go. I am in agreement with you, Joe.

0:30:08.280 --> 0:30:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I hadn't really looked at this game very much, but

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 2>I think your points are right, and I think the

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 2>good part about it too, is like, because we are

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:18.000
<v Speaker 2>in week eighteen, I'm sure, the Seahawks want to win

0:30:18.040 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 2>this game, obviously. The Cardinals need to win this game

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:23.440
<v Speaker 2>if they have any shot of the division. I think

0:30:23.440 --> 0:30:25.680
<v Speaker 2>that you're going to see less of the let's run,

0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 2>Pete Carroll, let's run the ball, let's punt it on

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 2>fourth and one, and they'll probably take more chances and

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.320
<v Speaker 2>let Russ erit out a little bit more and try

0:30:34.360 --> 0:30:36.680
<v Speaker 2>to see what they can build on going into next year.

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 2>So I do think there are going to be points

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 2>in this game. And I like this call. I really

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 2>hadn't even thought about it before you brought it up,

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:44.520
<v Speaker 2>so I'm in agreement with you. I like it. I'm

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 2>mad at myself for not being on it earlier, but yeah,

0:30:48.280 --> 0:30:50.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm with you. So you know, Joe, there are times

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 2>when there are some really low over unders. This week's

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 2>some really low ones. You know what's fun when you

0:30:56.800 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 2>see a really really low over under and you go

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.600
<v Speaker 2>under it. And that is what I'm doing with the

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Bengals at the Browns at thirty eight thirty eight. I'm

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 2>still going on it. There are a couple of reasons.

0:31:08.400 --> 0:31:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Number One, the weather actually is going to right now,

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 2>at least as we record this on Friday, the weather

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 2>forecast is bad in Cleveland. It's like the wins, right.

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:20.080
<v Speaker 2>The wind Joe, for me, is really the one thing

0:31:20.120 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 2>that I think affects sort of right off of those.

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Two games last year where nobody could move the football.

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 2>I mean those two.

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Games were what like ten to seven field.

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and I'm not kidding, like I honestly think like

0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:34.479
<v Speaker 2>this is a game that ends at like twenty points,

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 2>like it really, I mean I wouldn't bet like an

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 2>overhudder there. But at thirty eight it's going to be

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 2>really windy. You're gonna have the Bengals not having anybody

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 2>in there because you know Burrow's not going to play.

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.560
<v Speaker 2>You know, Mixing's already out. They don't want anybody to

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 2>get hurt in this game. There's no reason for them

0:31:49.800 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 2>to risk anything. And the Browns obviously no Mayfield. Look,

0:31:55.840 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 2>no teams don't tank, Joe. Okay, teams don't tank. But

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the difference right now, because all those teams are bunched up,

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 2>the difference between getting the number four, see the finishing

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:14.280
<v Speaker 2>fourth in that division versus finishing third, it's actually going

0:32:14.360 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 2>to be pretty big in terms of schedule next year,

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 2>right Instead of getting the Dolphins. You're gonna get the

0:32:19.080 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Jets right instead of get you know, that sort of

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 2>type of thing. I think they play the I think

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 2>with the eighteen, I think they go against fourth place

0:32:27.880 --> 0:32:30.959
<v Speaker 2>in the division, in the NFC East. I believe if

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 2>memory serves, which means you get the Giants, like there's

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:38.000
<v Speaker 2>there's a good reason to come and last in that division.

0:32:38.360 --> 0:32:39.880
<v Speaker 2>And I just think I'm not saying that they're gonna

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 2>outright like Tank. I just think that they're not that

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 2>motivated to basically put everything out, you know, with Chub

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Joe again, what did we if Chubb either got banged

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 2>up last week or whether or not. They're just like,

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 2>who cares if we beat Pittsburgh. At this point, we're

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 2>not gonna take any chances. We're gonna rest them, maybe

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 2>put in our backups just to see like they're not

0:32:58.880 --> 0:33:00.680
<v Speaker 2>going to risk anybody within reason. They're not going to

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 2>do anything crazy. You've got backups, you've got bad weather,

0:33:03.760 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 2>You've got no incentive for either team to give a

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 2>crap about this game. Thirty eight points with the weather.

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 2>The weather is a big deal for me. If it

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 2>clears up, I'm gonna I may be regretting this but

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.280
<v Speaker 2>if it's I think you're just gonna see, you know,

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 2>samaj p Ryan and you know Dearanis Johnson run the

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:22.360
<v Speaker 2>ball forty times in this game and get the heck

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:25.480
<v Speaker 2>out of there. Low total, Joey, I'm still going under

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:28.120
<v Speaker 2>thirty eight points? Is that crazy? Is it crazy to

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:28.520
<v Speaker 2>go under?

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Especially the win factor because you know, I've been to

0:33:32.520 --> 0:33:37.479
<v Speaker 1>that stadium and it's I mean, yeah, oh it is.

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>The wind factor is is huge off that river at times,

0:33:41.080 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>and you saw it last year in those games were

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:45.080
<v Speaker 1>just completely destroyed the productivity.

0:33:45.120 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 3>You could not basically throw the football.

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's always funny to because people hyperventilate about rain

0:33:49.080 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. I'm like, well, like some guys can throw

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball in the rain. It's a fine, like this

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:56.680
<v Speaker 1>torrential downpour. And even then I've seen games where it's

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 1>it's odd because you can end up breaking a small

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.920
<v Speaker 1>pass for a very long run after, you know, because

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:03.719
<v Speaker 1>somebody slips and falls down and all that stuff. So

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>it's the wind factor that to me always always impacts

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>totals far more than the rain fact. People the rain

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and they freak out, but they should be looking at

0:34:14.960 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the wind more often, especially in places like Cleveland where

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:19.879
<v Speaker 1>you've seen it play out in games before. So if

0:34:19.880 --> 0:34:22.320
<v Speaker 1>it is up to those gusts where it was similar

0:34:22.360 --> 0:34:24.520
<v Speaker 1>to those games last season and there were two of them.

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:27.400
<v Speaker 1>If memory serves last year with Baker Mayfield.

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 3>That it was just it was almost like comical. You're like, well,

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 3>they're just gonna run the football million.

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Time, right, I mean think about the Bills and the

0:34:33.719 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 2>h and the Pats right this year, they maybe right

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 2>that game right, And I don't think it's supposed to

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 2>be that bad, but I do like when I checked

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 2>last night, Jobe was sustained twenty five sustained twenty five

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:47.839
<v Speaker 2>mile hour wins. That's field goes by the way out

0:34:47.840 --> 0:34:51.400
<v Speaker 2>the window right like to another thing, extra point like

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 2>it just everything to me screams to the under. So

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 2>I don't mind. I want to talk about the spread

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:58.279
<v Speaker 2>when we get to that game. So I'll recap all

0:34:58.320 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 2>of our six best bets of the weekend afterwards. I

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 2>do Joe very quickly want to hyper speed run through

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 2>the remaining spread. Is that quol with you? Yes, sir,

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:09.280
<v Speaker 2>Let's go Saturday. The Chiefs are laying eleven in Denver

0:35:09.840 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 2>to the Broncos. Obviously, the Chiefs still have a chance

0:35:13.080 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 2>at the number one seed if the Texans beat the Titans,

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 2>which they did earlier in the year, so they're motivated

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 2>to win. I think it's still gonna be Drew Lock

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:23.320
<v Speaker 2>in this game, although I haven't I haven't seen anything.

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:25.600
<v Speaker 2>Although it's Bridgewater on IR, I don't know. I think

0:35:25.640 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be Drew Lock regardless of what you got,

0:35:27.400 --> 0:35:28.200
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs slaying eleven.

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll take the Chiefs side of this one.

0:35:30.480 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 2>Do you think they're gonna win big?

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I think after last week, I think they need to

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 1>to be honest with you.

0:35:35.920 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean you want to get the you want

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 2>to end.

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.399
<v Speaker 1>Up going into this season for them because they they

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>had it up until last week, but now they I

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>mean it's kind of mentally important. I think it just

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:49.440
<v Speaker 1>like they're just a team that far out classes the

0:35:49.440 --> 0:35:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Denver Broncos right now in terms of quarterback played. And

0:35:52.040 --> 0:35:54.439
<v Speaker 1>once again, you can invest in quarterback and Andy Reid

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and Patrick Mahomes, or you can invest in Drew Lock.

0:35:56.800 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 3>And Vic Fangio.

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna write yeah. On the other side, Bridgewater is

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:02.400
<v Speaker 2>out for the season, by the way. My poll and Locke,

0:36:02.400 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 2>by the way is banged up as well, so already

0:36:04.960 --> 0:36:08.760
<v Speaker 2>bad to worse. Yeah, it's eleven. I'm probably I'm probably

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 2>just gonna player prop this one. I'm not gonna I'm

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 2>not gonna get mountain the spread. Cowboys are laying four

0:36:13.239 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 2>and a half to the Eagles. Joe, when we looked

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:16.960
<v Speaker 2>at a Monday, I think it was seven, maybe we

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:19.440
<v Speaker 2>like we were like, WHOA what is this? Cowboys are

0:36:19.520 --> 0:36:22.279
<v Speaker 2>going to play to win reportedly, and again McCarthy has

0:36:22.280 --> 0:36:25.399
<v Speaker 2>a history of resting players and that not working out

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 2>for him very well going into the playoffs. Don't know

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:29.439
<v Speaker 2>exactly what the Eagles are going to do now, other

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:31.880
<v Speaker 2>than the fact that the entire team is on the

0:36:31.920 --> 0:36:33.359
<v Speaker 2>COVID list four and a half.

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Joe, what do you think I'm still tempted to on

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:37.839
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles side?

0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 3>Is hurt isn't on there? As long as Hurts isn't

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 3>on there?

0:36:41.080 --> 0:36:42.839
<v Speaker 2>You No, Hurts is not. But even if you were,

0:36:42.960 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 2>Joe going to kill you Like, no, he's not.

0:36:47.680 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Look, you know, my my faith in the Cowboys is tricky,

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Parsons is out for this game to correct

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Also Grave that's another piece where if you're taking somebody

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:57.960
<v Speaker 1>out of this game. You're taking the best defensive player

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.560
<v Speaker 1>right now in that conference arguably off.

0:37:02.239 --> 0:37:04.640
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's a big one too. So I'm still on

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:05.120
<v Speaker 3>the eagle side.

0:37:05.160 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But remember when we were here on Tuesday, we were

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about six and a half or something.

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I was like, it was it was seven in a

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 2>lot of books.

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Let's get the eagle side now before he did, it's

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:14.759
<v Speaker 1>a shrink and look, ye there is a four and

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a half.

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:16.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm not surprised at all.

0:37:16.440 --> 0:37:18.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, rare time. We made the right call on that

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 2>one on Monday. So yeah, I agree, that's exactly right.

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:23.760
<v Speaker 2>And if you know, I wouldn't mind making the Eagles

0:37:23.760 --> 0:37:25.319
<v Speaker 2>part of a teaser piece. Get him up to over

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 2>ten ten and a half. Steelers are visiting the Ravens.

0:37:28.200 --> 0:37:31.800
<v Speaker 2>They're plus five. I'm still not expecting Lamar Jackson to

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 2>play here. He's not practicing. I mean, for either one

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 2>of these teams, they both have something to play for

0:37:36.920 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 2>because they're not mathematically eliminated, but for either one to

0:37:39.239 --> 0:37:42.759
<v Speaker 2>make the playoffs requires a confluence of events that is

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:45.920
<v Speaker 2>just almost impossible to imagine at this point. So you

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 2>want to go with Mike Tomlin on the road as

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:51.160
<v Speaker 2>an underdog in games that are historically tight show or

0:37:51.239 --> 0:37:52.600
<v Speaker 2>you think the Ravens are going to finish on the

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 2>high note.

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a game I'm out on Tuesday

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:57.799
<v Speaker 1>and I'm out on Friday. Just all right, because these

0:37:57.800 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>are this is the rivalry game. They seems hate each

0:37:59.719 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>other in way, there's a respect factor. They don't care

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>about playoffs. It was like, look, you know, it's been

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>a disappointing season. Do we want to end it on

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:07.960
<v Speaker 1>a high note. I think both teams do so. This

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>is not like phoning it in. These teams are gonna

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 1>go at it and it's gonna be a close game,

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:13.600
<v Speaker 1>too close, if anything. I'll take the Steelers on the

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:15.200
<v Speaker 1>five side of that one, because I think that's actually

0:38:15.239 --> 0:38:16.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of a high number.

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:18.200
<v Speaker 2>I think if you had to go on one way,

0:38:18.239 --> 0:38:19.960
<v Speaker 2>I would go with the Steelers just because it's my

0:38:20.040 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 2>top five and that's pretty now to be for you,

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:24.879
<v Speaker 2>it's four and a half. For me, it's actually four.

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 2>It's five and a lot of other books.

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Well, on the consensus betting pros it's plus five.

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.799
<v Speaker 2>That's right exactly. I don't I don't really want it.

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 2>If I have to go one, well, I'll go to

0:38:33.960 --> 0:38:36.000
<v Speaker 2>the Steelers. Just because I do think that you get

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:37.759
<v Speaker 2>Mike Tom on the road. And again these games, like

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:40.800
<v Speaker 2>if these games fall outside of a three point window,

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:44.160
<v Speaker 2>it's weird because they've been playing like that basically historically,

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.799
<v Speaker 2>Titans visiting the Texans, Joe, they are laying ten. That

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:52.719
<v Speaker 2>sounds eerily familiar. Titans Texans. Titans laying ten didn't end

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:54.719
<v Speaker 2>well for the Titans last time. Obviously, the Titans are

0:38:54.760 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 2>playing for the number one seed. I guess no, I

0:38:57.040 --> 0:38:58.879
<v Speaker 2>don't even know. It's not possible. Actually, they can't wrap

0:38:58.880 --> 0:39:01.840
<v Speaker 2>it up before them, Titans laying ten? What do you think?

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 3>This is the trap one?

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>To me? This is the one that terrifies me. Remember before,

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 1>there's a trap one on here. That's a big number

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:08.799
<v Speaker 1>that I think is a huge trap. But like that's

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the one. I mean theoretically, yeah, the Titan should absolutely

0:39:11.800 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 1>handle their business.

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 3>The Titans may get Derrick Henry back, so we're still not.

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think for this game, right, I mean it's I.

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Don't think it's realistic. I don't think they should push him,

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>but this.

0:39:21.480 --> 0:39:23.319
<v Speaker 2>Is I think that's his ideal though, right, and they

0:39:23.320 --> 0:39:25.960
<v Speaker 2>get the buye. They practice him this week, they practice

0:39:26.040 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 2>him next week.

0:39:27.120 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Tan his game, but the ten is just not a

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:32.280
<v Speaker 1>number I'm comfortable with. With the Titans and Davis Mills

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>has played DCS down the stretch.

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:37.200
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I'm out so.

0:39:37.239 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 2>Much better than I expected. I'll be honest, like in

0:39:39.800 --> 0:39:43.120
<v Speaker 2>his rookie season. Uh yeah, I'm staying away from it.

0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.319
<v Speaker 2>I want to for the Titans, but I it's too

0:39:45.320 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 2>many points for me to back them. For sure. Bengals

0:39:47.719 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 2>are visiting the Browns. We just talked about, Joe. The

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:54.280
<v Speaker 2>Bengals are getting six, and I'm gonna be frank with you, Joe.

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:56.800
<v Speaker 2>I almost made this one of my picks, the Bengals

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 2>getting six, because I realize that they're playing all back up.

0:40:00.400 --> 0:40:03.360
<v Speaker 2>But again, I don't think the Browns are very motivated

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 2>to win this game, and you're gonna have crazy win,

0:40:05.600 --> 0:40:08.000
<v Speaker 2>which is like an equalizer and everything like that. So

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.759
<v Speaker 2>I would just take the team getting almost a touchdown

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 2>in this one if I have to go one way.

0:40:12.480 --> 0:40:14.640
<v Speaker 2>But it's also a game that I had absolutely no

0:40:14.760 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 2>interest in being in on other than rooting against scoring overall.

0:40:18.400 --> 0:40:19.080
<v Speaker 2>What do you think?

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Well? I think I have more faith in case Keenom

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:25.479
<v Speaker 1>than Brandon Allen for sure, and that's the hard part,

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:27.040
<v Speaker 1>and that's what makes it so tricky as you're dealing

0:40:27.040 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>with not one, but two backup quarterbacks. So I don't know, Man,

0:40:30.640 --> 0:40:32.440
<v Speaker 1>this is another game that I just I think you're right.

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're gonnapproach this game, it's the under

0:40:34.480 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 1>from the lot of the factors we talked about, and

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you stay away from the line.

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Personally, Vikings playing five and a half at home against

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 2>the bear sounds like it's gonna be fields returning for

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:45.840
<v Speaker 2>this game. So not sure what that does for you,

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:47.680
<v Speaker 2>Joe when you think about the team. But what do

0:40:47.680 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 2>you think five and a half kind of a dead

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 2>number just sitting there?

0:40:50.160 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Why wouldn't you take the Bear side? I mean, what

0:40:52.320 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>about the Vikings hasn't meant that they collapse and make

0:40:55.480 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>games close and have a lead and blow it every time?

0:40:57.680 --> 0:40:59.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's the thing that can And I almost

0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:01.439
<v Speaker 1>made this one of my picks because I was looking

0:41:01.480 --> 0:41:03.360
<v Speaker 1>at I was like, have I learned nothing from the

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:06.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one football season about the Minnesota Vikings. Yeah,

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:08.279
<v Speaker 1>the miniesulta Vikings should win this game handily, But do

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:10.279
<v Speaker 1>they ever win a game handily? They're supposed to do No,

0:41:10.760 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>do they end up in these games where they're winning

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:13.600
<v Speaker 1>by less than three?

0:41:13.719 --> 0:41:13.959
<v Speaker 3>Yes?

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Do they have a touchdown in every single game and

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 1>then somehow lose that lead? Pretty much up until week seventeen, Yeah,

0:41:20.560 --> 0:41:22.719
<v Speaker 1>that was the case. So I don't know. At a

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:25.080
<v Speaker 1>certain point when do we You don't have to get

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 1>beat over the head with it. I think if I'm

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>gonna be in on this game, it's gonna be on

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the Bear side, so I would lean towards the Bear side.

0:41:29.719 --> 0:41:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I st don't like betting it because I'm betting a quarterback,

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a rookie quarterback on the road, and two head coaches

0:41:35.120 --> 0:41:37.759
<v Speaker 1>that are basically I mean, I think both are probably

0:41:37.800 --> 0:41:38.440
<v Speaker 1>done at the end of the year.

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:40.000
<v Speaker 3>I think it matters what happens in this game.

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>But this one's gonna be fun, I think from a

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.000
<v Speaker 1>fantasy perspective, because I think everything's just gonna hang out

0:41:45.000 --> 0:41:45.359
<v Speaker 1>for this one.

0:41:45.400 --> 0:41:46.959
<v Speaker 3>But it's just gonna be All bets are off.

0:41:47.200 --> 0:41:49.279
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know. Man to me, the bear side

0:41:49.320 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 1>jumps out because of everything we've seen out of the

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Bengals stessh, I mean the Vikings. I don't think the

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Vikings are gonna lose, but I don't think that they're

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:57.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna win by running away either.

0:41:57.680 --> 0:41:59.359
<v Speaker 3>When has that been the Vikings? HEMO this year?

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 2>That's true, they do not run away with any victories.

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 2>I just want nothing to do with this game at all, Like, no,

0:42:05.600 --> 0:42:07.760
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea what I'm going to see. And again,

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:10.560
<v Speaker 2>a totally meaningless game though, right like this is the

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 2>spot where you can see the Vikings do really well. Right,

0:42:13.200 --> 0:42:15.879
<v Speaker 2>like a totally meaningless game. Nobody gives a crap about it.

0:42:16.280 --> 0:42:18.200
<v Speaker 2>They'll blow them out by you know, forty points. So

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I just I'm staying away from it and no idea

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:22.520
<v Speaker 2>what to expect. This one's an interesting one, Joe. The

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:25.120
<v Speaker 2>Lions are getting three and a half from the Packers.

0:42:25.200 --> 0:42:28.480
<v Speaker 2>This went from saying, Okay, the Packers are going to

0:42:28.560 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 2>rest everybody to you know, Lafour coming out and saying

0:42:32.360 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 2>we're not gonna rest. We've looked at it historically. That

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't do people well. But you have Aaron Rodgers, who

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:41.520
<v Speaker 2>what is the point of getting a buy and not

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:43.879
<v Speaker 2>giving the guy who's basically been dealing with the toe

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.759
<v Speaker 2>injury forever like an extra week of rest. So three

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 2>and a half points here, Joe, what do you think I.

0:42:49.520 --> 0:42:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Like the Lions side of this one. The plus three off,

0:42:51.640 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I see it's plus four at bet MGM. It's because

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:55.640
<v Speaker 1>of how much Jordan Love. I think we're gonna see

0:42:55.640 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna see Aaron Rodgers of this game, because I

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 1>don't think if you look historically, the comp layoff for

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 1>two plus weeks.

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.080
<v Speaker 3>Has been a good thing. Y hasn't it just happened me?

0:43:04.160 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>These guys come out flat, and there's a part of

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.840
<v Speaker 1>me they wouldn't mind seeing that necessarily. But at the

0:43:09.880 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>same time, I think you'll see Rogers for maybe a

0:43:12.719 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 1>quarter a couple series, and then it hands over to

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Love. And from what I've seen of Jordan Love

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and what I've seen of Dan Campbell getting his team

0:43:21.040 --> 0:43:24.439
<v Speaker 1>fired up to play football every week. Somehow despite all

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of the negga, I mean, we look up right now,

0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:27.640
<v Speaker 1>they're what four win team.

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 2>Right thirteen and one, so they have a chance.

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So I was thinking they could be a four win

0:43:35.480 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 1>team here, but I forgot about the tie. They're not.

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna show up as they always do

0:43:41.719 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>and play strong. And at the end of the day,

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:46.400
<v Speaker 1>is Jordan Love gonna make some mistakes? Yeah? And I

0:43:46.400 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 1>think that's enough for me to be on the Lion's

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:51.759
<v Speaker 1>side of this one. And it just really depends on

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is this is not a great investable game because you

0:43:55.600 --> 0:43:57.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know how long Aaron Rodgers is going to play.

0:43:57.800 --> 0:43:59.440
<v Speaker 1>If he plays one series and he's out all of

0:43:59.480 --> 0:44:01.319
<v Speaker 1>a sudden, that line line looks really good. You know

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>what this is? This is a game that if you

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:04.879
<v Speaker 1>like in game betting, this is a.

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:07.239
<v Speaker 2>Game boom that's right. Ready, This is.

0:44:07.160 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>The Roer betting line of the week, this.

0:44:09.120 --> 0:44:12.000
<v Speaker 2>One Rogers is in for the first series, they score

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:15.799
<v Speaker 2>a touchdown, the in game line jumps up. Bet the

0:44:15.840 --> 0:44:18.640
<v Speaker 2>line bet there. Then I think I think Rogers plays

0:44:18.640 --> 0:44:21.239
<v Speaker 2>the series. I think he plays one series with the

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.479
<v Speaker 2>starters and then is out because if.

0:44:23.360 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I'd be enough to get seven, and then when he

0:44:25.320 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 1>gets the seven, you turn around and go, okay, go

0:44:27.480 --> 0:44:29.560
<v Speaker 1>right to the Lions in game right by this freak in.

0:44:29.560 --> 0:44:31.560
<v Speaker 2>Game Yeah, but I would take it at three and

0:44:31.600 --> 0:44:33.600
<v Speaker 2>a half if I had to that. That is the

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:35.120
<v Speaker 2>spot that I like it as well. Again, not one

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 2>of my picks, but it is there. Joe the Washington

0:44:38.120 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 2>football team seven to the Giants. What do you think, girls?

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 3>Do I have to watch this game.

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Do you do you're contractually obligated?

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 3>Horrendous? I don't.

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I own nothing to do with this, Like I just

0:44:50.239 --> 0:44:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I love to say, yeah, it's just Washington and a

0:44:53.120 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>romp and things like that, but I don't know if

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:57.800
<v Speaker 1>they've got the goods to really, you know, just handle anybody.

0:44:57.840 --> 0:44:59.719
<v Speaker 1>And they make mistakes at the worst time. Every time

0:44:59.760 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 1>high he makes a bad mistake. So I know I'm

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:04.319
<v Speaker 1>out on this game. This is another trap one to

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:07.640
<v Speaker 1>me because it should be completely that and if the

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Giants not only covered but won this football game, like

0:45:10.560 --> 0:45:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you is that? Is that gonna shock anybody?

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Now?

0:45:14.600 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Seven points?

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Ugh?

0:45:16.440 --> 0:45:17.160
<v Speaker 2>Disgusting?

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, three and a half I'd go, okay, well look

0:45:20.480 --> 0:45:21.439
<v Speaker 1>give him a shot or four?

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because they pass over that touchdown. It's like they're

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 2>gonna be pissed at Joe Judge. For sure, they're gonna

0:45:26.000 --> 0:45:28.160
<v Speaker 2>want to win this game. But whatever, Yeah, it's too much.

0:45:28.400 --> 0:45:30.000
<v Speaker 2>I can't back the Giants for sure, but I can't

0:45:30.040 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 2>back anybody in this one. Pats are laying six to

0:45:32.960 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins. They historically struggle in Miami. What do you

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:38.000
<v Speaker 2>think here, Joe Tom.

0:45:37.840 --> 0:45:40.399
<v Speaker 1>Brady historically struggles in Miami, So I point that out

0:45:40.400 --> 0:45:43.279
<v Speaker 1>when you have weather typically that's been very hot and

0:45:43.320 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 1>things like that, especially in the beginning of the seasons.

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Those are the games that Brady had struggled in. I

0:45:46.840 --> 0:45:48.560
<v Speaker 1>think there was a stat out there. I remember seeing

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:51.040
<v Speaker 1>it last year or before he went to Florida. Somebody

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 1>put it out there. But it's like, do you really

0:45:52.440 --> 0:45:54.759
<v Speaker 1>want to be a buccaneer, Tom, you know, because they

0:45:54.760 --> 0:45:57.160
<v Speaker 1>showed you, you know, in games of eighty five degrees

0:45:57.280 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 1>or more or something like that, like Tom Brady's well

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:01.000
<v Speaker 1>they had one win or something crazy like that.

0:46:01.120 --> 0:46:01.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, career.

0:46:02.680 --> 0:46:04.680
<v Speaker 3>But I'm gonna say this. I think that.

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Last week the Dolphins got punched in the mouth a

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>little bit and they're staggering, and I feel like the

0:46:11.360 --> 0:46:13.360
<v Speaker 1>momentum right now is all on the Patriots side. I

0:46:13.360 --> 0:46:15.719
<v Speaker 1>feel like them the Patriots feel good about themselves there

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:16.840
<v Speaker 1>beating up of the Jaguars.

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:18.400
<v Speaker 3>They lost the two.

0:46:18.360 --> 0:46:21.239
<v Speaker 1>Competitive games that they had left on the schedule, right

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:22.200
<v Speaker 1>so they had the Colts.

0:46:22.320 --> 0:46:23.120
<v Speaker 3>They lost that one.

0:46:23.160 --> 0:46:25.319
<v Speaker 1>I think they got a little a little you know,

0:46:25.560 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of high falutint and then they competed with Buffalo.

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:32.320
<v Speaker 1>But really, at the end of the day, Buffalo handed

0:46:32.320 --> 0:46:35.120
<v Speaker 1>it to him. So this was a good bounce back

0:46:35.120 --> 0:46:36.759
<v Speaker 1>for them last week against the Jaguars where they get

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 1>back on track and all that. But the Dolphins game here,

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:41.759
<v Speaker 1>this is a very tricky one. If anything, I think

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots win, but I think the Dolphins of the

0:46:43.480 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 1>plus six is the smart way to go about this.

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's right, Joe. I think I'm probably

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:50.319
<v Speaker 2>gonna stay away from it. I haven't had a good

0:46:50.320 --> 0:46:52.840
<v Speaker 2>reado on the Pats all year at being transparent, like

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:56.400
<v Speaker 2>I just haven't. So it strikes me if that's correct.

0:46:56.560 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 2>But it's probably a game I'll stay away from as

0:46:58.200 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 2>I will. This one sounds like you may be in

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:03.560
<v Speaker 2>on it. Bill's playing sixteen to the Jets. J Ets,

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:07.560
<v Speaker 2>j Ets, What do you think, Joe, sixteen?

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:10.080
<v Speaker 3>It's a lot. And you know, here's what happened.

0:47:10.280 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 2>I look, you get sixteen and a half at fand

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:13.000
<v Speaker 2>old body.

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 3>I was looking around.

0:47:14.680 --> 0:47:15.719
<v Speaker 1>I was like, all right, let me look at the

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:17.360
<v Speaker 1>game log for the Bills and how many games are

0:47:17.360 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 1>they blowing out people? And there's enough blowouts for the

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Bills in the second half of the season where I go, no,

0:47:23.480 --> 0:47:26.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't really do this. But after watching the Jets

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.200
<v Speaker 1>last week, I kind of feel like the Jets few like, well,

0:47:29.239 --> 0:47:31.799
<v Speaker 1>we can at least kind of be competitive here, and I.

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:33.759
<v Speaker 3>Think it's a big.

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:35.359
<v Speaker 1>Boost for you when you can compete for a few

0:47:35.400 --> 0:47:38.279
<v Speaker 1>quarters with the raigning champions. And I think Wilson's looking

0:47:38.320 --> 0:47:40.400
<v Speaker 1>more confident if they get Elijah Moore back for this

0:47:40.440 --> 0:47:44.320
<v Speaker 1>game and Barrios has played well, why can't you compete?

0:47:44.360 --> 0:47:47.439
<v Speaker 1>Why can't you and garbage time get some point. There's

0:47:47.560 --> 0:47:50.200
<v Speaker 1>variables here that make it very tempting, but it's said,

0:47:50.200 --> 0:47:51.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to stay away from it because it

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is the Jets at the end of the day, and

0:47:53.719 --> 0:47:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Goodness knows, I just can't trust them.

0:47:55.480 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 3>But I want to, Dan, I really want to.

0:47:57.719 --> 0:48:01.240
<v Speaker 2>So do I. But I'm staying away well just because

0:48:01.280 --> 0:48:04.000
<v Speaker 2>I think that we've seen enough where you see the

0:48:04.080 --> 0:48:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Jets kind of randomly look borderline competent on offense and

0:48:07.600 --> 0:48:10.000
<v Speaker 2>Wilson look okay, and then he lays the dud. I'm

0:48:10.040 --> 0:48:12.040
<v Speaker 2>hoping that you see him build on last week, in

0:48:12.080 --> 0:48:16.640
<v Speaker 2>which case, from a completely personal fan standpoint, that you

0:48:16.680 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 2>can feel because I do think that Wilson has played

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:22.879
<v Speaker 2>better of late in recent weeks, and certainly this last game.

0:48:22.960 --> 0:48:25.200
<v Speaker 2>If he does again here you can feel confident in him.

0:48:25.440 --> 0:48:28.760
<v Speaker 2>For me, I'm not there yet, so I'm just gonna

0:48:28.800 --> 0:48:30.800
<v Speaker 2>take a step back. Hope they play this one close.

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:32.759
<v Speaker 2>If I had to take a side, it would be

0:48:32.760 --> 0:48:35.279
<v Speaker 2>the Jets. We talked about the total in this game, though,

0:48:35.840 --> 0:48:38.600
<v Speaker 2>how do you see the spreadshoe with the Seahawks and

0:48:38.640 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 2>the cards. It's six and a half right now across

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:41.240
<v Speaker 2>the board everywhere.

0:48:41.400 --> 0:48:42.839
<v Speaker 1>Give me the Seahawks with the six and a half

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:45.560
<v Speaker 1>because the Arizona Cardinals don't put teams away, they just don't.

0:48:45.600 --> 0:48:48.279
<v Speaker 2>I think that's right. I think that's right. I think

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:51.560
<v Speaker 2>that this game will be closer than sort of people expect,

0:48:51.640 --> 0:48:53.160
<v Speaker 2>and I think that's why the books are kind of

0:48:53.239 --> 0:48:55.000
<v Speaker 2>laying it. I think the books are begging you to

0:48:55.040 --> 0:48:57.600
<v Speaker 2>basically tease the cards down, like they're saying, God, teasing

0:48:57.680 --> 0:48:59.799
<v Speaker 2>down to half point, see what happens. Like, well, now,

0:49:00.000 --> 0:49:01.839
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't be surprised to Seahawks on this game. Again,

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:04.880
<v Speaker 2>Second divisional games are always tricky anyway, so who knows about.

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:05.399
<v Speaker 3>That this one?

0:49:05.480 --> 0:49:07.919
<v Speaker 2>Joe, I had very mixed feelings about these Saints are

0:49:08.000 --> 0:49:10.319
<v Speaker 2>visiting the Falcons. They're laying three and a half. You

0:49:10.360 --> 0:49:12.400
<v Speaker 2>saw the Falcons have a big game against them. The

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:16.160
<v Speaker 2>Saints do not score points. They just don't score points. So,

0:49:17.120 --> 0:49:19.279
<v Speaker 2>you know, I don't know, Joe, what do you think here?

0:49:19.320 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 2>Three and a half Falcons at home?

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:22.919
<v Speaker 3>Gross? I want nothing to do with this game either.

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't have a beat on it, especially

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>after the last week with the Falcons were competitive for

0:49:26.960 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>half a football against the Bills in the snow. Who

0:49:29.560 --> 0:49:34.319
<v Speaker 1>the hell saw that coming? Like, I just, I know,

0:49:34.360 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm Jostradamus. But at the same time, I mean, I

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:39.200
<v Speaker 1>was watching the Falcons there and I'm watching them in

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the snow, and I'm watching it was like a fifteen

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:43.000
<v Speaker 1>to twelve game. At one point, I go, what in

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:45.120
<v Speaker 1>God's name am I watching right now? How are the

0:49:45.120 --> 0:49:47.719
<v Speaker 1>Falcons even in this? And then you add in the

0:49:47.800 --> 0:49:50.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that Kyp has been doing with that hamstring injury,

0:49:50.160 --> 0:49:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like he's that weapon they have left.

0:49:52.200 --> 0:49:52.680
<v Speaker 3>I don't know.

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:54.719
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's tough too, because he's got that that.

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:57.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, milestone obviously can be that, I know, but

0:49:58.160 --> 0:49:59.359
<v Speaker 2>but he's banged up, I.

0:49:59.280 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 3>Know, push him for a milestone.

0:50:01.600 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 2>It strikes me, Joe. As he plays, he runs a

0:50:04.600 --> 0:50:07.880
<v Speaker 2>couple of routes he catches a pass and then he's like,

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:10.759
<v Speaker 2>I can't, I can't go right, Like that's that's really

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:12.640
<v Speaker 2>what it seems like. Yeah, I'm with you if I'm

0:50:12.680 --> 0:50:14.160
<v Speaker 2>forced to go though one way, Joe, I'm going to

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 2>take overfield goal at this point because how many points

0:50:17.160 --> 0:50:20.720
<v Speaker 2>are the Saints put up, like seventeen, Maybe the Falcons

0:50:20.719 --> 0:50:22.719
<v Speaker 2>can fide their way to that. Obviously, the Saints are

0:50:22.719 --> 0:50:24.600
<v Speaker 2>playing for something. If they win the Niner sues, they're

0:50:24.640 --> 0:50:26.919
<v Speaker 2>in the playoffs, so they're motivated, but again, I don't

0:50:26.960 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 2>really think that matters necessarily. All Right, that's it. This

0:50:30.080 --> 0:50:33.480
<v Speaker 2>is my final podcast. As we said, Joe, it was enjoyable.

0:50:33.600 --> 0:50:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much for making my final podcast fun.

0:50:36.239 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Let's recap very quickly the bets. Let me see if

0:50:38.920 --> 0:50:40.200
<v Speaker 2>I have it right, Joe, you correct me. If I

0:50:40.239 --> 0:50:42.879
<v Speaker 2>have your bets in correct, you're taking the Colts. We'll

0:50:42.880 --> 0:50:45.080
<v Speaker 2>give minus fifteen. You can get it fourteen and a half.

0:50:45.080 --> 0:50:48.600
<v Speaker 2>Though the Bucks are laying eight, and the Cards and

0:50:48.760 --> 0:50:52.160
<v Speaker 2>the Seahawks over forty eight. You're also sprinkling on the

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:55.759
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco money line at plus one seventy two. I'm

0:50:55.800 --> 0:50:57.680
<v Speaker 2>going to be a coward and just take the points

0:50:57.880 --> 0:50:59.520
<v Speaker 2>with the forty nine Ers getting four and a half

0:50:59.560 --> 0:51:01.480
<v Speaker 2>from the Ram the jack No, I'm not taking the

0:51:01.560 --> 0:51:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Jags actually because I know you can't. Chargers, Charger, Jaguars,

0:51:08.480 --> 0:51:11.279
<v Speaker 2>you got it right. The Chargers though, laying three to

0:51:11.360 --> 0:51:13.920
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders and the Bengals and the Browns and the

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Wind Bowl and the Backup Bowl under thirty eight points.

0:51:17.360 --> 0:51:21.080
<v Speaker 2>It has been a pleasure hosting this podcast. Joe has

0:51:21.120 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 2>been hosting the College Football podcast and the non NFL

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:27.520
<v Speaker 2>podcast for the whole year. He's going to take you

0:51:27.719 --> 0:51:30.799
<v Speaker 2>to the finish line to the super Bowl with this podcast. Joe,

0:51:30.840 --> 0:51:34.040
<v Speaker 2>it's been a pleasure. I appreciate you joining me today,

0:51:34.560 --> 0:51:37.279
<v Speaker 2>and please don't screw up the NFL side of the

0:51:37.320 --> 0:51:39.239
<v Speaker 2>podcast into the future. Can you do that for me?

0:51:40.280 --> 0:51:43.080
<v Speaker 3>No promises, Dan, but I will try. I will try

0:51:43.120 --> 0:51:44.239
<v Speaker 3>my best to keep it going.

0:51:44.320 --> 0:51:47.640
<v Speaker 1>But again, thanks for having me on today, and I

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:49.840
<v Speaker 1>hope at least for you, there's nobody else that you

0:51:49.880 --> 0:51:52.279
<v Speaker 1>wanted to finish your last podcast here Fantasy Pros with,

0:51:52.320 --> 0:51:54.799
<v Speaker 1>because I know I wanted to be on the show with.

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:57.479
<v Speaker 3>You today, so it was fun as usual. My friend.

0:51:57.480 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 3>I'll miss year.

0:51:58.360 --> 0:52:01.279
<v Speaker 2>You were definitely my top eighteen of people to have

0:52:01.400 --> 0:52:05.920
<v Speaker 2>on this. The first was twenty first, seventeen declined, but

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:07.880
<v Speaker 2>you were here anyway. I appreciate everybody. Good luck with

0:52:07.880 --> 0:52:11.759
<v Speaker 2>your bets again Sunday Morning Betting prosy Livestream, YouTube, dot Com,

0:52:11.760 --> 0:52:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Slash betting pros Matt Pearl and I bringing down, giving

0:52:14.160 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 2>out some player props, all that good stuff. That will

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 2>be my final public appearance on as a part of

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:22.759
<v Speaker 2>fans Rosa Betting Pro. So I'll talk to you that

0:52:22.800 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 2>in the meantime, enjoy the snow, Joe, go go shovel

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:28.000
<v Speaker 2>some snow. I'm gonna go snowblowing my driveway and I'll

0:52:28.000 --> 0:52:28.759
<v Speaker 2>talk to again on Tip