WEBVTT - Target’s Plunge Shows Inflation’s Risk to Margins

0:00:01.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

0:00:04.440 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stanovk. We're here every day bringing

0:00:07.280 --> 0:00:09.799
<v Speaker 1>you the latest news from the worlds of business and finance,

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 1>plus technology, politics, economics, all purtnising the power of Business

0:00:13.640 --> 0:00:17.119
<v Speaker 1>Week reporters and editors, not to mention our journalists and

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>analyst in more than one and twenty countries. You can

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>download Bloomberg Business Week at iTunes, SoundCloud, or Bloomberg dot Com.

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>You can also listen to our radio show at two

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>pm Eastern Time on Bloomberg Radio or watch us on

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>YouTube search Bloomberg Global News. Shares of Target are having

0:00:32.640 --> 0:00:37.839
<v Speaker 1>their worst day since Monday, October nineteenth, nineteen seven. We

0:00:37.840 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>all know what happened on that day. That was Black Monday,

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.400
<v Speaker 1>where the Dow fell more than five hundred points at

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the time it was more than twenty percent of its

0:00:45.479 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>value was shed. Shares now down of Target. Uh. It's

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.440
<v Speaker 1>on pace for its worst stock drop since that time,

0:00:53.479 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>after becoming just the second big retailer in just two

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.800
<v Speaker 1>days the other one was Walmart to trim its at forecast.

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Justin Zach's writes all about it. He writes a column

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg Taking Stock. Sign up to read it on

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg and at Bloomberg dot com as well, justin

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>good to have you with us your Bloomberg New Equities Report.

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>In addition to writing the taking Stock column, I want

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to talk a little bit about the effect that targets

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>disastrous quarter and earnings report is having on on the

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 1>rest of the market. Here, margins of the concern. Inflation

0:01:24.160 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is the concern, and we're seeing it just ripple out

0:01:26.880 --> 0:01:31.039
<v Speaker 1>across Yeah. I think a lot of UH investors had

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>been positioned in companies like Walmart, who who also had

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a horrible earnings report yesterday and saw their largest stock

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>drop since n as well on the exact same issue

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>margin problems. There was this idea that you know, consume

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 1>went if inflation went up, then consumers in general may

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>look to lower priced UH retailers like Target and Walmart UH,

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and that really hasn't happened because inflation really is a

0:02:00.080 --> 0:02:03.200
<v Speaker 1>facting the lower income in the middle lower middle class

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the most. And so what has happened is those individuals

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:11.800
<v Speaker 1>end up shifting their spending UH to what they absolutely

0:02:11.800 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>have to have, like groceries. In a way from Uh,

0:02:14.560 --> 0:02:17.560
<v Speaker 1>their discretionary spending and some of their you know, big

0:02:17.600 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>box purchases, they may have made a target and that

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.919
<v Speaker 1>that caught everyone by surprise. And you highlight the fact

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that you know, this inflation risk we see really saw

0:02:27.000 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it in margins this this earning season. Uh. If I

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>look past over the past two years, it feels like

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>margins were sort of this shining star. I mean at

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:38.799
<v Speaker 1>the index level, it felt like there was a new

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 1>record hit every quarter in terms of profit margins. Uh,

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>it feels like we're starting to see the tides finally

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>start to turn on that. Yeah, it's at some point

0:02:46.960 --> 0:02:50.040
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be hard for these companies to pass along

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:54.519
<v Speaker 1>their costs every time, especially with uh, the wage inflation

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing and really low rates of unemployment. The workers

0:02:58.520 --> 0:03:02.080
<v Speaker 1>wages are now really catching up, and there's only so

0:03:02.160 --> 0:03:05.520
<v Speaker 1>much savings left from the COVID stimulus that people have

0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>to spend. Uh. The other interesting part about this whole

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:13.239
<v Speaker 1>thing is, you know, the FED has really committed themselves

0:03:13.600 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to fighting inflation. And Jerome pop Pal, the chairman of

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the Federal Reserve Bank, spoke yesterday and said, basically, they're

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna do whatever it takes to tame inflation, and that

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:28.799
<v Speaker 1>could mean uh going past the neutral rate uh and

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and quite quickly. And so I think that is something

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that market participants have in mind when they see again

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:38.840
<v Speaker 1>this type of inflation popping up. Well, justin you take

0:03:38.880 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a look at the S and P five hundred, and

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you see what's moving lower today. Target by far the

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>worst performer. That's followed by Dollar Tree, Tractor Supply, Costco, Wholesale, Uh,

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Dollar General. You got Best Buy in there. You got

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>companies like Auto Zone and their Walgreens in there as well.

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's pretty pretty ugly. These are companies though

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that people when they shop at these companies, when they

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>shop at these stores, they shop there because they have to.

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.880
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering, you know, if if they're not necessarily

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:10.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna stop shopping there. But can't these companies pass along

0:04:10.320 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>these higher costs to the consumers because well they have to? Well,

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and I think they have on food And so the

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>food inflation for these companies is up double digits year

0:04:21.279 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>on year, and so people are again shopping for the food.

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>But when you when you're going in to buy your

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>new furniture set or your new stereo, perhaps you're now

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 1>gonna wait, or perhaps you're gonna buy one level down.

0:04:33.720 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>You'll switch from your favorite uh, you know, brand name

0:04:38.120 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to something that is off label. Perhaps, so people are

0:04:41.600 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna make substitutions too, But you're right there going to

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>continue to go to those stores. And when we think about,

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, what we learned in the past several weeks

0:04:53.000 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 1>of earnings, I mean, clearly inflation, it's starting to bite

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:58.920
<v Speaker 1>for these companies, but it feels like we haven't necessarily

0:04:58.920 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>seen demand to struction from consumers yet. Yeah, that's that's

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that's very true. And I think what I said before

0:05:06.120 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>is we still have a pretty good savings from the

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.760
<v Speaker 1>consumer that they've saved up from from the stimulus. And

0:05:11.800 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>the other thing is now we're having this reopening and

0:05:14.400 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people have really been wanting

0:05:16.560 --> 0:05:19.599
<v Speaker 1>to get out and spend their money. And we have

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:24.960
<v Speaker 1>seen a little bit of demand destruction on the online side,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and we've seen Amazon get hit. But I think people

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.720
<v Speaker 1>are going to finally get out this summer and spend

0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that money, particularly on on on services. We're gonna see

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a shift from goods to services, which also is hurting

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.160
<v Speaker 1>UH companies like Walmart and Target. Because people will start

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>to shift some of their discretionary spent towards airfare and

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:46.599
<v Speaker 1>hotels and other types of travel because they haven't traveled

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>in two or three years. Yeah, we're talking to UH

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Hyatt Hotel CEO Mark Hoppolympzanian in a just a minute,

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:54.000
<v Speaker 1>so we'll definitely ask him about that. Justin just in

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the last thirty seconds that we have with you, I'm

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.960
<v Speaker 1>wondering how Target got this so wrong and how Anna

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Us got this so wrong. I think the analysts in

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 1>in perhaps Target everyone was so focused on UH supply

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:11.679
<v Speaker 1>chain problems being the only problem, and they didn't really

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 1>realize that the ultimate UH customer is the is there

0:06:18.200 --> 0:06:20.839
<v Speaker 1>is their customer. The ultimate demand comes from their customer,

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and how how that customer behaves and what they spend

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:26.440
<v Speaker 1>on is is going to be more important than any

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>smaller UH supply chain snaffood. Justin Zach is Bloomberg News

0:06:30.400 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Equities reporter. You can check out his column taking Stock,

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.719
<v Speaker 1>sign up to read it at the Bloomberg Terminal and

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com. This is Bloomberg Radio. You're listening

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:44.599
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg quick

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Hid Hotels reported results

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:51.479
<v Speaker 1>last week. The company beat on the top line and

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the bottom line loss was narrower than expected thanks to

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>strong demand for leisure travel. The company said that it's

0:06:57.360 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>our record levels of leisure demand and that it expects

0:06:59.880 --> 0:07:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the recovery abroaden and strengthen in the mots ahead. Joining

0:07:03.680 --> 0:07:06.560
<v Speaker 1>us now is Mark hoplamaze In the President and CEO

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>of Hyatt Hotels. Mark joins us via Zoom from Plaia

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>del Carmen in Mexico. Mark, really good to have you

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>with us. Uh, how are you well at the moment?

0:07:17.160 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't be better because I'm I'm sitting in the

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:24.679
<v Speaker 1>brand new Secrets Moche, which is just north of Plato Karmen.

0:07:24.720 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a magnificent new resort and it's a beautiful day.

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'm in good shape at the moment. Thank you.

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>How are you doing? Yeah, we're okay, I mean, and look,

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 1>usually when people are in Pla del Carmen, they're not

0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>working at least if they're you know, if they don't

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>live there, they're just traveling there to uh to have

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a good time. Um, we're good, but you know we're

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>focused on the volatility and the sell off and inflation

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and what we're seeing. And I know that you talked

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>about summer bookings being higher by fifty from one levels

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>for all inclusive results, a lot of good signs coming up.

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>But that was last week and that was last quarter.

0:07:59.440 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering what you're seeing right now on a day

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:04.400
<v Speaker 1>when the Nasdaq is down more than four point six percent,

0:08:04.480 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the S and P five hundred down three point seven percent.

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Does this volatility do the results from Target, the results

0:08:10.480 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>from Walmart? Does that concern you at all? Well? I

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 1>think the connection point UH over a longer period of

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>time to our consumer, which tends to be a higher

0:08:20.880 --> 0:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>end UH traveler at the higher end of each of

0:08:24.360 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the stegments that we serve UM is if there's a

0:08:28.840 --> 0:08:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I guess, very long and persistent sell off in UH

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in public equities, because many of the customers that we

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 1>serve are invested in the marketplace. But I don't think

0:08:39.120 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 1>day day in and day out volatility actually changes UM

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the booking behaviors on a real time basis. Right now,

0:08:46.960 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's a scarcity issue. People want to

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:52.839
<v Speaker 1>make sure that they've got their bookings for the holiday periods. Um,

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing booking levels across all of our hotels, not

0:08:56.200 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>just resorts now for the summer holidays up between twenty

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>for um Labor Day, fourth of July and Memorial Day,

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>and so I think that's one of the drivers. And

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the second thing is corporations and associations, which is a

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>significant part of our business, are coming back to meetings

0:09:15.520 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 1>in a meaningful way and the booking levels there are

0:09:18.559 --> 0:09:23.320
<v Speaker 1>also rising. So UM, we do see booking levels maintaining

0:09:23.320 --> 0:09:26.200
<v Speaker 1>at this point. And you know, I would say if

0:09:26.200 --> 0:09:29.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a very long and drawn out bear market or

0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:33.040
<v Speaker 1>or recession, then of course it's going to affect all businesses.

0:09:33.080 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>But I think our customer base, being relative at the

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>relatively higher end of of the you know, income scale,

0:09:41.840 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>are more resilient and less subject to volatility in terms

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>of their travel patterns, especially for leisure and mark. I

0:09:48.520 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>want to dig into that final point because obviously after

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the week of earnings that we've had, the consumer is

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>definitely in focus how they might be shifting their spending,

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:02.079
<v Speaker 1>spending more on staples, less on sort of discretionary purposes.

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And you mentioned that bookings obviously for the summer months

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:07.440
<v Speaker 1>up across the board. But I'm curious, have you seen

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>any indications that revenue spending on vacations could be slowing

0:10:11.920 --> 0:10:17.000
<v Speaker 1>down or shifting? No, Uh, not at all. On the contrary,

0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.559
<v Speaker 1>I would say we've had, Um, we've had a significant

0:10:21.080 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>increase in spend. Our rates are up significantly from twenty nine.

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.360
<v Speaker 1>A lot of this is really driven by pent up

0:10:29.440 --> 0:10:34.520
<v Speaker 1>demand and by a really really strong human desire to

0:10:34.600 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>reconnect with people. So um, I think it's you know,

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>people are making their decisions based on what they're going

0:10:40.800 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>to be most fulfilled by and what matters the most

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>to them, and that is reconnecting with with friends and family. Mark.

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that you do serve a higher and clientele,

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:54.280
<v Speaker 1>but everybody has their limits when it comes to spending.

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder about air fare prices. They are up

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:01.360
<v Speaker 1>double digits from last month, double digits from last year. Uh.

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you our listeners are familiar with this.

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>Checking the price of flights right now, it's kind of

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:08.360
<v Speaker 1>mind boggling to see how much it is to fly

0:11:08.400 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>a short distance thanks to you know, huge demand, lack

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of supply, and then of course oil prices as well.

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:17.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about that in the context of

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>what a consumer spends when they do visit one of

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.680
<v Speaker 1>your properties. Yeah. It. First of all, UM, I would

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 1>just note that we UH we now own the largest

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:32.760
<v Speaker 1>tour operations tour operator platform in the UH in North America,

0:11:32.960 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>so it's called a l G vacations UM. Back in

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>they handled over three million passengers and it's mostly doing

0:11:40.480 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>selling packaged UM travel, so airfare included UM and so

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>we tracked we're tracking this extremely closely UM. And I

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>would say that there's no question that we have seen

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a significant increase in airfares, and I think that will

0:11:56.440 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>persist for some period of time until supply demand starts

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to balance out a bit. And the supply demand I'm

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 1>talking about right now has to do with schedules, how

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 1>many planes are in service UM. I would note that

0:12:13.000 --> 0:12:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the air the air traffic, the total lift capacity into

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Cancoon and Punta Kana, which are too very large markets

0:12:21.880 --> 0:12:24.600
<v Speaker 1>for US UM in a l G dcations are up

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:31.360
<v Speaker 1>UM as compared to levels. So it's clear that the

0:12:31.400 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>airlines have have definitely clued in on where demand is

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>and they've added capacity. UM. It is also true that

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>air fares are up in that they're under some inflationary pressure.

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the dynamics for them have in

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.200
<v Speaker 1>part to do with energy prices or you know, get

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>gas for their their aircraft aviation guests. And for US,

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:58.880
<v Speaker 1>UM we look at how total unit value or total

0:12:58.920 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>package prices are increasing, and they are. But again I

0:13:02.559 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>think UM, I think as things start to stabilize in

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the oil and gas markets, and as we see supply

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:12.719
<v Speaker 1>being brought back with more schedules, more aircraft and more

0:13:12.760 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>pilots um UH back into the industry, we'll start to

0:13:16.520 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>see a rebalancing. And that may that may take a

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>number of months to do, but I think that that's

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the that's the inevitable outcome. And I want to talk

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>about all inclusive resorts because you acquired one all reclusive

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 1>result results can't talk today. UH. You acquired Apple Leisure

0:13:33.440 --> 0:13:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Group last year and UH seems to be very popular,

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 1>especially in UH the Caribbean. Do you have any plans

0:13:40.040 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to bring that model to your US hotels? Yeah? Actually

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 1>right now, I would say that the focus remains in

0:13:48.520 --> 0:13:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Mexico and the Caribbean. UM. We've and are some of

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>our key markets are Mexico first and foremost UM, the

0:13:56.840 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Dominican Republican Jamaica. We also have a large operation in

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Europe in the Balieric Islands and in the Canary Islands

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and in the southern coastal areas of Europe. UM we

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>just UM we're just now engaging with owners and developers

0:14:14.800 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in the Middle East and ultimately in Asia. We think

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:20.720
<v Speaker 1>that all inclusive is a great format and can be

0:14:20.760 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>extended across the globe. UM. The the particular arena that

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we're playing in is luxurial Inclusive UM, which a LG,

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the Apple Leisure Group actually really created from schooch about

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty years ago, and so we are now the largest

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:42.800
<v Speaker 1>player in the world in luxurial inclusive and the the

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 1>guest proposition is very very compelling because UM, you take

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the transactional elements that you might experience

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in a European plan hotel where everything is all a

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:58.160
<v Speaker 1>cart Um, You're you're taking a bunch of transactional friction

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>out of the equation and it's serves its purpose when

0:15:01.080 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>you're on holiday. I do think that there's a that

0:15:03.800 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>we can actually apply this format in the US. UM.

0:15:08.040 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>We are not. I can't tell you that we've got

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 1>a pipeline of such deals. But I think there are

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 1>probably specific markets that would be really well suited to

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it at certain markets in in Florida and and probably

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>in Hawaii as well. And UM so we're we will

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 1>investigate this, but right now we have a lot on

0:15:26.240 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 1>our plate with respect to just growing um fulfilling up

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the pipeline that we already have to build more hotels

0:15:33.080 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico, the Caribbean. Mark just ten seconds left. You

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:37.400
<v Speaker 1>have all the employees you need? Do you have all

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>the employees that you'll need this summer? You know that.

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you the American Hotel Lodging Association did a

0:15:43.480 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>great benefit to the entire industry by working and successfully

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>getting an increase in h two V visas UM these

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:54.880
<v Speaker 1>are temporary work visas for the summer that that is critical.

0:15:55.160 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to benefit from that, and we've we've

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>made some changes in our hiring practices and we're seeing

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>more success than being able to bring people back to

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>the hospitality industry. Mark Hoplmaze and President and CEO of

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Hiatt Hotels, joining us via zoom from Plaia del Carmen, Mexico.

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Not on vacation. I promise he's working. Well, he's there. Mark,

0:16:12.240 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much for taking the time and joining us.

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. It's been nearly

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 1>fourteen years since Lehman Brothers collapsed and declared bankruptcy, marking

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the two thousand eight financial crisis. But

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:33.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not completely dead and just in a nod to

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the Princess Bride, just mostly dead. It's the cover story

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 1>for the upcoming edition of Bloomberg Business Week. Jeremy Hill

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>is the co author. He's bankruptcy and distress debt reporter

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg News, also with us as Joel Webber. Webber,

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>he's the editor of Bloomberg Business Week. Both of them

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>are with Katie Greifeld and me and the Bloomberg Interactive

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Broker's studio in New York. Joel, I gotta tell you

0:16:55.200 --> 0:16:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a little behind the scenes. Yesterday after our interview, you

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>showed me the cover story. You shall be the cover

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.919
<v Speaker 1>of this, you know. I think because we're in the

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>building it Joel can do anything he wants, and I

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.720
<v Speaker 1>saw that it was Lehman Brothers, and I'm thinking to myself, Joel,

0:17:13.400 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>We're we're done with a financial crisis. We're in a

0:17:16.080 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>different crisis right now. Why a cover story on Lehman Brothers. Well,

0:17:20.480 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you know you had that great Princess Brad reference to

0:17:22.960 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 1>something being mostly dead. Lehman is actually nearly dead, which

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:31.080
<v Speaker 1>is more than mostly I think. Uh. And and Jeremy

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>who is on the Jeremy Hill who's on the Code violence.

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>The story with Luca de Paula. Luca actually called me,

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, six months ago and he's like, hey,

0:17:39.840 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>I met this guy who's like caring for the state

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>of Lehman and he's basically like working himself out of

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a job. He's been there for like fourteen years, ever

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.560
<v Speaker 1>since the bank went down, and you know, he's basically

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:55.439
<v Speaker 1>been tasked with like eking every last pinion out of

0:17:55.480 --> 0:17:58.000
<v Speaker 1>this corpse. And I was like, you had me at Lehman,

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:01.640
<v Speaker 1>But okay, tell me the most of the story. Uh So, So, Jeremy,

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.320
<v Speaker 1>who are these people? And you know the great iron here,

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Tam that you mentioned is like, you know, we're we're

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 1>in some version of a of a sell off. Now,

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.919
<v Speaker 1>everyone's fearful that you know, the bottom could fall out

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>at any moment and things get much worse. And here

0:18:14.200 --> 0:18:16.480
<v Speaker 1>we are talking about, you know, the thing that kicked

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>off a financial crisis all those years ago. Um, Jeremy,

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:24.960
<v Speaker 1>how did how did you find a role in this story? Um? Yeah? So,

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>as a bankruptcy and distress debt reporter, I'm always pouring

0:18:28.640 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>through legal documents and looking for wonky court fights about

0:18:32.680 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 1>this and that, who is old one and why they

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.199
<v Speaker 1>are owded? And as you said, Luke actually got in

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>touch with me about this, this case going on in

0:18:40.359 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the UK over these weird subordinated notes called e caps,

0:18:46.640 --> 0:18:48.919
<v Speaker 1>and he's like sending me stories about how it's so

0:18:49.040 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting that you know, these guys they got these they

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>got these scraps of debt for almost free, and they

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:57.080
<v Speaker 1>might get a bunch of money. It's very complicated. But

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.240
<v Speaker 1>underneath all of this are these people that are ill

0:19:00.359 --> 0:19:03.960
<v Speaker 1>in what are now small offices in the US and

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:06.800
<v Speaker 1>in the UK that are kind of overseeing the corps

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of Lehman Brothers. They're they're pushing paper, they're looking for

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:14.360
<v Speaker 1>good times to sell their remaining assets and uh, as

0:19:14.359 --> 0:19:16.719
<v Speaker 1>you said, kind of eking out those those last pennies

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:18.919
<v Speaker 1>from the estate and Jeremy. You have a lot of

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 1>great characters in here. Let's start with Darryl Radigan. Who

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is he? Daryl Radigan? That was Luca spoke a lot

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>with him. He has been in charge of UM some

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:35.440
<v Speaker 1>property assets in the UK and has done a fantastic

0:19:35.520 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 1>job from what we can tell, because creditors there have

0:19:39.080 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>done much much better than anybody expected. UM. So he

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>was basically one of the people that was tasked with,

0:19:47.400 --> 0:19:50.840
<v Speaker 1>rather than dumping all of the bad property assets when

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.399
<v Speaker 1>we went bankrupt, kind of waiting, letting those mature like

0:19:54.440 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a fine wine and then finding a good time to

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.000
<v Speaker 1>sell them. So obviously there are a ton of bankrupts

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:03.879
<v Speaker 1>these every year, uh, none as big as Lehman. But

0:20:03.920 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>what what else has distinguished Lehman's long, slow death. The

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:14.360
<v Speaker 1>size is, of course important, The length is extremely notable,

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>because I mean we're talking about nearly fourteen years here.

0:20:18.040 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Bankruptcy is often you know, even when they fade away

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>from the headlines, there's a lot of clean up work

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to do UM But you know, mostly we're talking a

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>few years, five years something sears for example, still going

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:30.920
<v Speaker 1>on in the background. There's things to sort out there.

0:20:31.000 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>But I mean, this is more than a decade we're

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Everybody has not forgotten about Lehman. But I'm

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>sure I wasn't aware that they still have an office

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:42.240
<v Speaker 1>space in the Bowery Savings Bank building in Midtown. People

0:20:42.280 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 1>so so kicking. It's their their whole life. They're living

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>and breathing Lehman Brothers to this day. It is the

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>cover story of the upcoming issue of Bloomberg Business weeken.

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a great read when you're actually reading it in

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the magazine, but it's also a really good read if

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you're reading it online because it's an interactive presentation, and

0:20:58.520 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it gives a really good ex planation of

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of how creditors are repaid Jeremy, for people who aren't

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>familiar with it. Can you kind of sort of go

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>through that waterfall? Sure? Yes, when we talk about a

0:21:08.600 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>waterfall in bankruptcy, uh, you wanna sort of imagine a

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>stack of champagne flutes? Um that? By the way, Sorry

0:21:18.280 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>about that, jo Joel? Did you hold on, hold on,

0:21:20.600 --> 0:21:22.719
<v Speaker 1>hold on, Joel? Did you know that before you were

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.879
<v Speaker 1>ordering the art and doing the graphics. I like champagne,

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, and I like my champagne and more than yeah,

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, just so you're gonna drink it, drink it

0:21:33.119 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 1>right right? Sorry, go ahead, Well that's that's that's very okay. UM.

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>So imagine a waiter pouring the champagne um into the glasses.

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:44.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even going to try to pronounce the correct

0:21:44.320 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>word um. The people with the most senior debt we're

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>talking about like secured loans, like a mortgage. UM on

0:21:52.080 --> 0:21:54.840
<v Speaker 1>the house is secured by the house itself. People who

0:21:54.880 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 1>actually have claims to the assets, they get their cups

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>filled up first, and then below the those their cups

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.119
<v Speaker 1>that have weaker claims to the estate or none at all,

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.720
<v Speaker 1>so they just get whatever is overflowing um. In the UK,

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>there was way more champagne than anybody anticipated, so people

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.560
<v Speaker 1>at the very bottom ended up getting their fill um.

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:18.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's very unusual. I don't know. I'm still stuck on, Darryl.

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:21.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how many people are You're still stuck on champagne?

0:22:21.520 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, thank you. I hate I hate coop glasses.

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>I have to say, they're so hard to drink out

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:27.920
<v Speaker 1>of it. But anyway, Darryl Radigan, how many just makes

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you drink it? Quicker. I don't know, just to get

0:22:31.119 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>it at a level where you can actually use the glass.

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Then you guys are where it's my birthday tempt Yeah,

0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm surprised, Champagne, thank you. Um later after five, Jeremy,

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>how many people are there, like Darryl Radigan that are

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.920
<v Speaker 1>just sort of helping to put Lehman finally in his

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>final resting place. Sure, so let's talk about the US. UM.

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Not so long ago, a few years ago, there were

0:22:55.560 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple of hundred people that were still sort of

0:22:58.040 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 1>acting as portfolio managers for this like used financial assets, sales,

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>lot um. And now we're down to about twenty as

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>best as we can tell. UM. Not a lot of

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>going into the office these days, as with many of us.

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:18.240
<v Speaker 1>But so we're all here. We are all here today, Jeremy,

0:23:18.680 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Is there any sense about how much money has been

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:24.840
<v Speaker 1>eaked out of this thing? Because one of the one

0:23:24.840 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of the things that surprises me is like it just

0:23:26.800 --> 0:23:30.040
<v Speaker 1>seems like there were they were gyms in this thing, right,

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>and everyone just assumes, oh, it's Lehman brothers, it's gone.

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But it's like part of the reason this has taken

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.359
<v Speaker 1>so long is because there was so much value locked

0:23:38.440 --> 0:23:40.840
<v Speaker 1>up in it, right, how much any sense of what

0:23:40.960 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>was actually hidden in there? That's right. Yeah, So it's

0:23:43.359 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, it's hard to uh paying a complete picture

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of how much money has been paid out because there's

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>so many different slices of of the estate. As part

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 1>of why it has taken so long to sort out

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 1>all over the world, many different classes of creditors. One

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly important class has so far recruped about half of

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>their money. And for that, for that class of creditors,

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.640
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at like forty billion dollars. That's double what

0:24:06.040 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>Lehman itself estimated it will be able to pay out

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>back in UM. But some people even did better. Those

0:24:12.840 --> 0:24:15.480
<v Speaker 1>decaps notes that Luca was telling me about, the very

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>wonky pieces of financial engineering UM. Some of these notes

0:24:20.240 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>were actually given away for free in recent years because

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.480
<v Speaker 1>they were so worthless. Thought to be so worthless, those

0:24:25.480 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>free scraps of paper could end up being worth millions

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>of dollars depending on how some court cases in the

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>UK play out. I gotta go ahead. Well. One of

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the curiosity is so much of the story and Luca

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 1>being based in London, a lot of the story takes

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.480
<v Speaker 1>place there. You did mention the U S element? How

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:43.600
<v Speaker 1>do how do the UK and US elements relate to

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>one another? Right? So, in the U S you've got

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the big parent company, like the ultimate uh yeah, the

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate parent of Lehman. But overseas in the UK

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>they actually had their own deal that it's a subsidiary.

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:58.680
<v Speaker 1>But they're not run by the same people. In some

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>cases they don't like each other because they each have

0:25:01.560 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>their own creditor bodies that they're representing and that they

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:09.679
<v Speaker 1>are trying to maximize value for. I do love the

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>idea of how you measured the length of this bankruptcy

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>for presidential administrations, I mean literally lifetimes ago and this

0:25:18.840 --> 0:25:21.720
<v Speaker 1>thing is still going on, Jeremy, just in the last

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>forty seconds that we have with you. What is the

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>legacy of the bankruptcy and the aftermath? My big takeaway

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>from this reporting process, Um, things worked out a lot

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:38.240
<v Speaker 1>better for Lehman creditors than almost anybody would have predicted,

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>except for the shrewd investors that as soon as Lehman

0:25:41.040 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 1>went bust, when everybody else was freaking out and panicking,

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>said this seems really interesting. It's a very complicated structure.

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's sharpen our pencils, figure out what this stuff is

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 1>really worth. Because we have an edge the people they

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>were able to do that. Big asset managers specialize in

0:25:56.720 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>distress vulture investors. Although they might not like to be

0:25:59.320 --> 0:26:02.760
<v Speaker 1>called that, they did very very well to summon up

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in the word inconceivable. There we go. It all goes

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>back to the Princess bride. Joe Weber, editor of Bloomberg

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Business Week, Jeremy Hill, Bankruptcy and Distress Debt reporter, both

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:14.000
<v Speaker 1>with us in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. Check out

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Jeremy's story. It's the cover of the upcoming issue of

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week magazine. Read it now in the Bloomberg

0:26:19.000 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>and at Bloomberg dot Com. You're listening to Bloomberg Business

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:27.359
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Masser and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. Well, the Tiger Couds, their audience is

0:26:31.000 --> 0:26:33.960
<v Speaker 1>very familiar with them. They're so named because their founders

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.880
<v Speaker 1>all worked under the legendary investor Julian Robertson. Over at

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Tiger Management. We're talking about comes companies like Tyler Global,

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Tiger Global Management, Co. To Management Loan Pine Capital, Maverick Capital,

0:26:45.520 --> 0:26:49.199
<v Speaker 1>d One Capital, and more. It's something that Hamma Harmer

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:52.280
<v Speaker 1>writes about whose hedge fund reporter for Bloomberg near she's

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>with us now in the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio. I

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:57.600
<v Speaker 1>mean on a day like today, Emma, where we're seeing

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, multi level multi year lows for the SMP

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>five hundred and multi month lows for the NASTAC one hundred. Uh.

0:27:05.720 --> 0:27:08.520
<v Speaker 1>It's easy to say that, you know, nobody's really doing

0:27:08.520 --> 0:27:11.119
<v Speaker 1>well right now, but how much more are the Tiger

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>cubs hurting than the industries represent Yeah, the Tiger Cubs

0:27:14.960 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>have been having a very difficult year. These are funds

0:27:17.520 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that typically focus on tech stocks or consumer stocks. Um.

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>They were all trained un into julian Um and they

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>have been known to sort of travel similarly travel impacts.

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.960
<v Speaker 1>We are seeing a little bit more dispersion more recently,

0:27:31.320 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>but some of the funds that have been hit the

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>worst is Tiger Global. They're down, you know, in the year,

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>which is putting them on track for their worst year ever. UM.

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I seeing d one who is a Tiger Grand Cub

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.520
<v Speaker 1>became from Viking, which itself as a Tiger cub and

0:27:45.720 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>UM they're down you know, about twenty UM, so you're

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:51.760
<v Speaker 1>seeing double digit losses. Other funds are down, but maybe

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 1>not down quite as much in the tiger cubs. But generally,

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>if you've got exposure to like tech giants, if you've

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>got UM exposure to some of these consumer companies, UM,

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.400
<v Speaker 1>it's it's very it's been very, very painful. I feel

0:28:05.400 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 1>like it's hard to feel bad for them because I

0:28:06.880 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>mean the adage that I always here is that you

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:12.280
<v Speaker 1>know you have voluer markets, you have you know, blood

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:14.440
<v Speaker 1>on the streets if you will. That's when active managers,

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:18.840
<v Speaker 1>when hedge funds should shine. So for years, if you remember,

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds were complaining about their not being in a

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>volatility and then the past few years we've definitely seen

0:28:24.400 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>volatility UM. So when they were complaining about them not

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>being enough, you know, macro funds, we're really struggling then,

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and now macro funds are actually doing a lot better

0:28:32.480 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 1>because UM they've been able to capitalize on this volatility. UM.

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 1>There's also good vall and bad vall, and so bad

0:28:39.120 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 1>vall is when you just like you don't know what's happening,

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't see it coming. It comes up and down

0:28:42.520 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>in spurts versus good volatile is a little bit more consistent,

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.320
<v Speaker 1>and so you're able to make more money from it. Gosh,

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.239
<v Speaker 1>what really surprised me about reading this hemma was how

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:54.120
<v Speaker 1>much concentration there was, or maybe not concentration, but overlap

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 1>there was between the stocks that these different hedge funds,

0:28:58.240 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>these different Tiger cubs held. You know, companies like Door, Dash, Bar, Fetch, Netflix,

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>see Shopify, Block the company formerly known as Square, all

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.120
<v Speaker 1>held by multiple of these firms. Well, how do you

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>explain that? So, because they were all trained under Julian Robertson,

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:21.440
<v Speaker 1>they take a similar approach. They focus on stocks versus

0:29:21.640 --> 0:29:23.959
<v Speaker 1>more diversified stuff. They do some privates as well too.

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>They've all been increasingly investing in privates. They focused on

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>tech and consumer stocks um and so they tend to

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>travel around these sames like Caravanna and Netflix. These are

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>companies that you know, all the fangs for a long time,

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>you saw them like going in and out of them.

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:41.240
<v Speaker 1>What's interesting from the thirteen filings that we saw on

0:29:41.240 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>Monday was Maverick and Co. To both increase their steak

0:29:44.800 --> 0:29:48.840
<v Speaker 1>in Cavana, which, as you see now that is incredibly

0:29:48.840 --> 0:29:51.880
<v Speaker 1>whisky and it clearly has not worked out well. Um,

0:29:52.040 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 1>we saw Code to increase a steak in Netflix. We

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>saw D One, Maverick, and Viking all increase their steak

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>in Ribvian. So these are you know, companies that have

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>had a very very difficult one. Um. On the flip side,

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.479
<v Speaker 1>they've you know, while Coachy increased steak and Netflix, Maverick

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and Tiger Tiger Global decreased. So it's not like everyone's

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing, and we are seeing more dispersion.

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Our story has shows some overlapping stocks and while you know,

0:30:16.360 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>previous dus you might have seen more people in and

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:20.920
<v Speaker 1>out of the same you are seeing some splits, you

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>know about even I think it was Microsoft three people,

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:26.400
<v Speaker 1>three of the funds sold those steak and three added.

0:30:26.560 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's but yes, it's generally the same type of

0:30:30.240 --> 0:30:32.600
<v Speaker 1>names that we're talking about here. And it's interesting you

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 1>point out in your story that you know, for a

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:36.960
<v Speaker 1>long time the Tiger clubs, they really kind of went

0:30:37.040 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 1>into the same names, but breaking apart a little bit. Now. Yeah,

0:30:41.080 --> 0:30:45.600
<v Speaker 1>so um, other popular names like JD dot com that

0:30:45.760 --> 0:30:48.440
<v Speaker 1>was one where we saw some selling. About four of

0:30:48.480 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the six cubs sold in those UM meta platforms, So Facebook,

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 1>about three funds sold while two added so UM and

0:30:59.440 --> 0:31:01.400
<v Speaker 1>what was actually really interesting, So if you look at

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:03.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the tables in our story, we picked up

0:31:04.040 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>on what were the two biggest new purchases like brand

0:31:07.760 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 1>new steaks that these guys were investing in, and how

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:13.840
<v Speaker 1>do they do? And across the board, all of them

0:31:13.840 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 1>are down. So that's Dave for Tiger Global, that's Docu

0:31:17.760 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>signed for co to UM, that's Atlasias Atlasian for d

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>one Tea. Yeah, and so they're down like double digits.

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Now I should mention some of these could be private

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>stakes that have turned public post and I p O

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>and so they can't get out of them for several months.

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 1>So they're stuck regardless. But um, you know it's clear

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:38.719
<v Speaker 1>it's not great. So the thirteen that we get their

0:31:38.760 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>backward looking. So we don't know necessarily what these hedge

0:31:41.640 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 1>funds are doing right now. But what does your reporting

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>tell you about their strategy moving forward for the rest

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of the year. How do they salvage this? So UM, yes,

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's they file these documents because they have to,

0:31:53.000 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants to, and they follow them forty five days

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>after the end of each quarter. So this gives us

0:31:58.240 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 1>some insight as to how they would navigate those first

0:32:00.520 --> 0:32:04.280
<v Speaker 1>three months. Um, we're definitely keeping a lookout to see

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:06.960
<v Speaker 1>what are they doing now? Are they increasing these stakes?

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Are they decreasing them? Um, it's tough because you can't

0:32:11.000 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>ditch it all right away. UM. I mean, I guess

0:32:14.120 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you could, but you're also losing on that side too.

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 1>And then um, and did you look at their valuations

0:32:19.320 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 1>on the private stuff? Um, you know, there's a lot

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:25.160
<v Speaker 1>of speculation over like how are those things gonna be

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>marked down? As private markets are also a little bit complicated.

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Ham A Parmer is hedge fund reporter for Bloomberg News.

0:32:31.400 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>She joins us from the Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios. Check

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>out her story. It's written along with Tom Maloney, hedge

0:32:37.920 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>Fund of Hell, how the tech crashes, clabbering the Tiger

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Cubs broad Journal. Yeah but you let me drive? Oh no, no, no, no, oh,

0:32:56.440 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to drive the Drive to the Clothes thing.

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>Well up on Bloomberg Radio, it is the Drive to

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the clothes. Right now, the SMP five hundred having its

0:33:14.920 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>worst day since June of it's down more than four percent.

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>The nastac Can posit down four point seven percent, the

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.479
<v Speaker 1>Down down three point six percent. Let's get into it

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and drive to the close with David Deet's managing principal

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and senior portfolio strategist at Pepack Private Wealth Management. He

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 1>joins us on the phone from Summit, New Jersey. Peapack

0:33:33.840 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>Private Wealth Management has got about ten point seven billion

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:40.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars in assets under management. David, how are you very good? Tim?

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you? You are very good on a daylight today.

0:33:42.960 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's pretty rough out there were you know,

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly the phones have not been ringing off the hook

0:33:50.240 --> 0:33:54.239
<v Speaker 1>certainly all year UM investors have been very nervous and

0:33:54.280 --> 0:33:56.719
<v Speaker 1>we've been holding a lot of hands. The problem for

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:59.240
<v Speaker 1>this year, Tim has been where do you go? Because

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:02.440
<v Speaker 1>people are all still looking at those bond holdings dropping

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:06.239
<v Speaker 1>close to ten percent as well UM the alternatives like

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin have crashed, So, uh, there's only cash. But you know,

0:34:10.600 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>with inflation close to eight percent, cash doesn't look very

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>good at the long for the long haul either. So

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>it's it's there real hand reading time for investors. So

0:34:18.520 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>where should they go right now? Well, so you go

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 1>back to your your your time frame. I think the

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.760
<v Speaker 1>first thing is you need to have a longer time

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>frame than just next month or even year end. The

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:34.960
<v Speaker 1>time for the day trading and for the for the

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>rapid swipe right and make a lot of money, that's

0:34:37.680 --> 0:34:41.759
<v Speaker 1>all gone. Um. Second, you need to be diversified. You

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 1>know before of course, up until just this week, people

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 1>said dismissed a lot of losses. Those crazy tech investors,

0:34:48.440 --> 0:34:52.240
<v Speaker 1>those crazy crypto guys, um, those crazy new economy people.

0:34:52.360 --> 0:34:54.600
<v Speaker 1>They're the ones that you know are losing big and

0:34:54.640 --> 0:34:57.279
<v Speaker 1>they deserve it because in potential to valuations. Now, of

0:34:57.320 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>course you're seeing it's creeping into mainstream Dow stocks, you know,

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Walmart of course, Target disaster, so it's spreading out. See,

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you really need to be spread out. You can't hide

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in one area and say I'm safe. That's what I

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:12.879
<v Speaker 1>want to get into Walmart, Target. But I do want

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to say it is my birthday. I was born twenty

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:17.239
<v Speaker 1>nine years ago in Summit, New Jersey. So cool to

0:35:17.280 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 1>talk to you. But overlook overlook, right overlook hospital overlook. Yeah, absolutely,

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.479
<v Speaker 1>up on the hill overlooking. It's the name Summit, New Jersey. Yeah, yeah,

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:29.520
<v Speaker 1>you got it, you got it. But let's talk about

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.719
<v Speaker 1>Walmart and Target. And I mean you mentioned that investors

0:35:32.760 --> 0:35:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in some of those more speculative names they're getting crushed.

0:35:35.320 --> 0:35:37.160
<v Speaker 1>But I mean you just look at the declines that

0:35:37.200 --> 0:35:40.080
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing in Target losing what a quarter of its

0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>value just Walmart also really falling by the move, just

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:48.839
<v Speaker 1>some pretty amazing size and scopes. It's not an overreaction.

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:50.759
<v Speaker 1>I know it's bad out there, but man, those are

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:54.319
<v Speaker 1>some big numbers, you know, I'm not sure it is

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.960
<v Speaker 1>an overreaction. When you look at the magnitude of the

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>miss by Target today, it was pretty um stunning. Uh well,

0:36:03.440 --> 0:36:06.720
<v Speaker 1>so what did we learn? I think that um, although

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 1>consumer demands seems reasonable, there was just the complete unwillingness

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>or inability by Target to pass along the higher prices

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:19.239
<v Speaker 1>at seeing UM. And so that's disturbing for a number

0:36:19.239 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of reasons. One is that a lot of bulls out

0:36:22.560 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>there said, gee, you know, there's inflation, but inflation tends

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to favor stocks in um, companies can just increase prices

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.880
<v Speaker 1>with inflation not so much to worry about. Well, that

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:36.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of that story has been uh dismissed today. UM.

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You know. The second, of course, is the the idea

0:36:40.160 --> 0:36:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that um that that the consumer was going to stay strong,

0:36:46.040 --> 0:36:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that they still had big bank accounts from government transfer payments.

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:52.959
<v Speaker 1>You know, we had this such strong employment wages going

0:36:53.040 --> 0:36:56.360
<v Speaker 1>up that they could continue to spend. Well, that seems

0:36:56.400 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to have been dissipated today. The only thing people can

0:36:59.560 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>hide behind is that the idea that consumers are now

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 1>going to the experiential things, you know, they want to

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:10.880
<v Speaker 1>travel airbnbs, airlines and so forth, and they're moving away

0:37:11.040 --> 0:37:14.560
<v Speaker 1>from uh, the just the goods. Uh that Target and

0:37:14.600 --> 0:37:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Walmart are selling. But I'm not sure that's so satisfying. Yeah,

0:37:18.160 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, look, you sound like the CEO of Hyatt

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.880
<v Speaker 1>who we spoke too earlier in the program today, who

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>did tell us that experiences and look talking you know,

0:37:26.400 --> 0:37:28.520
<v Speaker 1>he's of course talking his book a little bit or

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot. But we are still seeing people, you know,

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:33.000
<v Speaker 1>buy those plane tickets, and we're hearing that from airlines

0:37:33.040 --> 0:37:35.760
<v Speaker 1>as well. The question is demand destruction, David Hey. Before

0:37:35.800 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>we get to that, though, I want to talk about

0:37:37.120 --> 0:37:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the bottom here because I'm curious if you are seeing

0:37:41.320 --> 0:37:44.240
<v Speaker 1>signs that we're at the market bottom. Well, we're definitely

0:37:44.280 --> 0:37:48.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing signs. The question is are all the boxes checked off.

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:49.839
<v Speaker 1>So some of the signs where we may be at

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the bottom is we're seeing extraordinarily low levels of sentiment

0:37:53.440 --> 0:37:58.600
<v Speaker 1>among retail investors. Indeed, we're seeing huge cash pile ups

0:37:58.600 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 1>by institutional investors. By some measures, the biggest amount of

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:04.919
<v Speaker 1>cash is now being hoarded by fund managers since two

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:08.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand one of America survey that came out yesterday. Yeah,

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:11.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the flip side is someone said that they're

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 1>also buying a lot of calls just to hedge themselves

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in case there's a big rapid brought up in the

0:38:16.320 --> 0:38:19.000
<v Speaker 1>in the triple QUS and aztecs, so maybe they're not

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:22.560
<v Speaker 1>so uh cautious as as that one METROC group suggests.

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:27.040
<v Speaker 1>We're seeing a number of days of course with sucks

0:38:27.080 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>down on heavy volume. Um, you know, so those are

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 1>metrics that are suggesting that when your bottom. But the

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 1>flip side is we saw the VIX, which is that

0:38:36.480 --> 0:38:40.560
<v Speaker 1>fear indicator, sore to eighty five in the pandemic month

0:38:40.640 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 1>of March two thousand twenty. Today it's below thirty. It

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:46.440
<v Speaker 1>hasn't gotten above thirty five for a long time, so

0:38:46.520 --> 0:38:51.800
<v Speaker 1>that would suggest we haven't had that one huge panic waterfall, Uh, sale.

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the other thing is bottoms maybe tougher here

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:56.200
<v Speaker 1>because in the past, and we had kind of a

0:38:56.239 --> 0:38:59.839
<v Speaker 1>quick bottom, the FED was always coming to the rescue here,

0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, just just yesterday. Basically, um Jerome Pile suggested

0:39:05.480 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that if the if the price of stomping out inflation

0:39:08.560 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>was pain for consumers, so be it. But how can

0:39:12.200 --> 0:39:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the consumers experience pain and there'd be no pain for investors?

0:39:16.560 --> 0:39:18.520
<v Speaker 1>And David, I mean, do you think the FED does

0:39:18.600 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>step in at any point? I know that you know

0:39:20.880 --> 0:39:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the FED puto has been written a bunch of times,

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:25.759
<v Speaker 1>but at what point do you think they would step in?

0:39:25.800 --> 0:39:30.279
<v Speaker 1>And really have about forty seconds left? You know right now,

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to be cautious about predicting there being any

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>FED put any time soon. In fact, I think some

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the strategy is to squash some of the

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:44.279
<v Speaker 1>demand that the Marriott CEO is talking about. And how

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>do you do that Because of the large bank accounts,

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you get them where it really hurts, which is their

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.840
<v Speaker 1>stock account. So they may want to see this market

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:54.479
<v Speaker 1>taken down a few more notches so that that will

0:39:54.480 --> 0:39:56.560
<v Speaker 1>help cool some of the demand to high end in

0:39:56.640 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>order to really get inflation out, so I don't think

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 1>the FED what is anytime soon? All right? David Deed's

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>managing principal and senior portfolio strategist at Peapack Private Wealth Management,

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:12.200
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from Summit, New Jersey. Thanks

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>for listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Download the podcast on iTunes, SoundCloud,

0:40:16.200 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 1>or Bloomberg dot com, and you can also listen to

0:40:18.360 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>our radio show at two pm Eastern on Bloomberg Radio

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.840
<v Speaker 1>or watch us on YouTube. Search to Bloomberg Global News