WEBVTT - Bill Gross on Institutional Bond Trading (Podcast)

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>M This is Mesters in Business with very Renaults on

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>Bluebird Radio. This week on the podcast, we have an

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>extra special guest. I'm trying to to maintain low tones

0:00:15.760 --> 0:00:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm trying to keep my insane enthusiasm down, but

0:00:20.760 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>holy cow, Bill Gross, the Bond King, spent three hours

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>talking with us literally about everything. Um, this is a

0:00:29.760 --> 0:00:34.559
<v Speaker 1>pretty amazing conversation. He does not hold anything back. He

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:38.479
<v Speaker 1>names names, he calls people out. He I don't even

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>want to say he has scores to settle because he

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>did that in his book. Uh. He explains what made

0:00:44.960 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>PIMCO such a unique place, how they accumulated a trillion dollars,

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>essentially creating the concept of institutional bond trading before Pimco,

0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>bond trading was by appointment only that this didn't exist before. Then,

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:06.240
<v Speaker 1>we cover everything from card counting to inflation, to the FED,

0:01:06.840 --> 0:01:09.759
<v Speaker 1>to his book, to Marry Child's book The Bond King

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>about him. Really there were no comments left unturned, and

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:19.880
<v Speaker 1>we also revealed what his thoughts were about when his

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>bonus was revealed by a certain podcast host about eight

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago, and and how that came about his and

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Muhammadalarian's multibillion dollar bonus pool, how that thing could even exist,

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:40.280
<v Speaker 1>how Alliance allowed them to do it, and and how,

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 1>after almost being a parlor game of speculation, how those

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars in who got what bonus pool was

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>finally revealed. This was an absolutely fascinating conversation and an

0:01:56.320 --> 0:02:01.080
<v Speaker 1>extra special guest. So, with no further ado, iye conversation

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>with PIMCO co founder Bill Gross. This is Mesters in

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Business with very renaults on Bluebird Radio. My extra special

0:02:15.360 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 1>guest this week is the bond King, Bill Gross, the

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>co founder of Pimco. At one time, Bill's total return

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>fund was nearly three hundred billion dollars. It was the

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:32.040
<v Speaker 1>world's largest mutual funds. Gross controlled more bond money than

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:35.160
<v Speaker 1>anybody else in the world. He advised the U. S.

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Treasury on the role of sub progme mortgage bonds in

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the O eight oh nine crisis. He was named morning

0:02:42.240 --> 0:02:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Stars Fund Manager of the Decade. They observed no other

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>fund manager made more money for more people than Bill Gross.

0:02:51.240 --> 0:02:55.480
<v Speaker 1>He is the author of several books, including Bill Gross

0:02:55.600 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on Investing and most recently his book I'm Still Standing

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gross and The Pimco Express. Bill Gross. Welcome back

0:03:06.560 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>to Masters in Business. Thank you, Barry. Actually I'm I'm

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>sitting talking to you, but I'm standing in life. So um,

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that's why the title applies, I think. But it's good

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to be here, it's good to have you back. And

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact, um, I owe you a debt of gratitude

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>because when you came on the show, you know it's

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:29.960
<v Speaker 1>got to be six seven years ago. You were really

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the first big name that said, all right, let's let's

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>try this podcast thing out, and you open the floodgates.

0:03:37.280 --> 0:03:41.800
<v Speaker 1>So if I'm lacking in any objectivity, let me disclose

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that right up front. But but let's talk about your career.

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Starting with Pacific Life. You're you're a junior guy there,

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>literally going into the vault taking bond certificates and clipping

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.760
<v Speaker 1>coupons off of that. How do you get from that

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>sort of junior intern menial labor to launching a standalone

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.760
<v Speaker 1>active bond shop. We'll let me add to that quickly.

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I could only clip coupons for half of the day,

0:04:12.920 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess the other half I was off making private

0:04:15.800 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>placements loans to fledgling companies such as Berkshire, Hathaway and Walmart.

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>I visited Sam Walton with his two kids as his

0:04:26.640 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>dog I struck. They had two walmarts in uh Bentonville, Arkansas,

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>and same thing with Buffett and Charlie Munger. So I

0:04:36.480 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>was doing some of that UM, but just to make

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:45.839
<v Speaker 1>the transition, I guess the managing money. I did a

0:04:45.880 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 1>master's thesis at u C. L A and I just graduated,

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>and it was about convertible bonds, but also about Warrens

0:04:54.120 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>and UM an option related vehicles. So I was interested

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in the bondmarket even though I want to get into

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>stocks and UM specific mutual in downtown l A had

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars worth of buns and m A broker

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>from Weeden and Company, Howard Rakoff, decided to visit and

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>tell me that somebody else in town was trading some

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 1>bonds from boxes. And in those days, as you know UM,

0:05:22.600 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>there weren't any computers or IBM three sixties, but we

0:05:25.920 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 1>only had one UM. You couldn't really buy and sell

0:05:30.760 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>on the wire, and so it was very difficult to trade.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>But I convinced him to let me use five million

0:05:39.240 --> 0:05:42.080
<v Speaker 1>of their bonds and set up an active trading account.

0:05:42.080 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>And that was the beginning of PIMCO, and before PIMCO.

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 1>I've heard bond trading described as by appointment only. Is

0:05:52.160 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it fair to say you and your team invented fixed

0:05:56.120 --> 0:06:00.720
<v Speaker 1>income trading? Am I am I overstating that? Um probably

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:03.119
<v Speaker 1>just a little. Uh. There was a gentleman I forget

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.480
<v Speaker 1>his name and Occidental life Insurance in l A there

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>was doing some of that. There was a Jim guy

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:13.920
<v Speaker 1>from Lehman who later died that was doing some of that.

0:06:14.000 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>But I was certainly one of the first who I

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:23.440
<v Speaker 1>was certainly one that pursued it and convinced at least

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the executives of specific mutual that this could be turned

0:06:26.520 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 1>into a business. So maybe I should say PIMCO helped

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:36.880
<v Speaker 1>to bring about institutional trading on a level that just

0:06:36.960 --> 0:06:40.919
<v Speaker 1>didn't exist before. You guys helped systematize it. Is that

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that more accurate? Yeah? I think that's true. But

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.280
<v Speaker 1>because back then, uh, you know, stocks were the vehicle

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>to trade, and even uh then, they weren't traded that actively.

0:06:54.040 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Hands were basically bought and ultimately matured. I guess the

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>big banks in the East and New York, in Boston

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 1>and Chicago, and so we have a bond trading was

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>was an active thought. No one thought that you could

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.120
<v Speaker 1>sell one bond by another and make some money. Um.

0:07:15.440 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And so it was innovative and I was glad to

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>be part of it. So in the book, you describe

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>how PIMCO grew in the nineteen eighties and nineteen nineties. Well,

0:07:27.240 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll talk about the latter years later, but that period, um,

0:07:32.160 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>following everything that Chairman Paul Vulker had done with the

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>bond market, that really was a perfect storm to to

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>plow into the fixed income space. Tell us about the

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:49.239
<v Speaker 1>growth of PIMCO in the nineteen eighties and nineteen nineties, okay,

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>And and so you're right, Uh, we started at a

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 1>great time, not in the seventies because the bear market

0:07:55.360 --> 0:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>didn't really end until eighties three, depending on you know,

0:08:01.640 --> 0:08:07.080
<v Speaker 1>the maturities of bond. But um, you know it's it's

0:08:07.080 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>set up the premise for total return in bonds where

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you could not only get a coupon, get an inters payment,

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>but get a capital gain. And when you're starting at

0:08:17.200 --> 0:08:21.720
<v Speaker 1>close to fifteen percent for a third year treasury, um,

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it was it was fairly easy ultimately to

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>get a capital gain, and so that helped us. We

0:08:30.600 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 1>were also helped by legislation from the Congress. Um A

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>built that legislated RISKA, which basically mandated that mentioned managers

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:49.840
<v Speaker 1>had to diversify UM and not just diversified between UM,

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:53.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the obvious, but also diversified between east coast

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:56.319
<v Speaker 1>and west coast. And so this little company called a

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>T and T, the biggest in the world, came according

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 1>UM Lady in the seventies and like what they saw,

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:07.240
<v Speaker 1>and they heard pim go, and that really was the

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:10.839
<v Speaker 1>beginning of it all. I mean, who who wouldn't open

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the door to a person or to a company that

0:09:14.040 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>had just been hired by A T and T. But

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.800
<v Speaker 1>this is more than just lucky timing for a couple

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>of reasons that I want to go into. We'll talk

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>a little later about some of the technical aspects that

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:30.600
<v Speaker 1>pim go really figured out to generate fixed income out alpha. Well,

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>we'll circle back to that. I want to talk a

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:38.359
<v Speaker 1>little bit about your investment outlooks. These were highly regarded.

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>People thought they were both insightful and well written. And

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.839
<v Speaker 1>this is at a time when you know, we kind

0:09:44.840 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>of take it for granted today that so many people

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:53.520
<v Speaker 1>write about financial investing and strategies. When you started doing

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the investment outlooks each month. That was somewhat unusual, wasn't

0:09:57.720 --> 0:10:01.640
<v Speaker 1>it tell us about that? Yeah, it was unusual. And

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I thought about it from a business context, and I said,

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I want to be successful at Pinco,

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>if we want to grow as a company, you've gotta

0:10:11.480 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 1>say hello. And the best way to say hello is

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to write these investment outlooks. I mean, I mean, there

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.719
<v Speaker 1>were a few. Um, there was a famous guy, you know,

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Barton Biggs from Morgan Stanley. There was a real good writer,

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think Jim Grant had started yet, but

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>he was a excellent writer in the time. So I

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the only one. But I I thought that if

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I can inject some personal uh then yettes into my

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>uh forecast for the bond market, the people would read

0:10:41.920 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it because they didn't really read these things that came

0:10:45.120 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>out of First Boston and Solomon Brothers and so on,

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and so I, uh, I decided to take a little risk. Um.

0:10:53.840 --> 0:10:56.839
<v Speaker 1>You know. One of the things that I wrote at

0:10:56.840 --> 0:11:00.199
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of my book a quote It said, the

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>talent is helpful in writing, but guts are absolutely necessary.

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>And so I decided to have a few guts and

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>opened myself up to people and something like that, and

0:11:13.360 --> 0:11:17.640
<v Speaker 1>some didn't, but you know, the reputation grew well. I

0:11:17.840 --> 0:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>want to point out first you were you the o

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>G the original gangster when it came to financial writing,

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:29.880
<v Speaker 1>because of course there were lots of professional writers and

0:11:30.000 --> 0:11:34.680
<v Speaker 1>journalists writing about it, but as far as I recall,

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:39.439
<v Speaker 1>you might be one of the earliest people who were

0:11:39.559 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 1>managing money. To describe what you were doing, I want

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to say it was Howard Marks and you pretty much

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:50.959
<v Speaker 1>you were the guys that were putting out regular commentary.

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Before you know, anybody could could go online and find

0:11:56.320 --> 0:11:59.720
<v Speaker 1>letters from Warren Buffett or or things that Ray Dalio wrote,

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:04.280
<v Speaker 1>or any one of thousands of other professional money managers.

0:12:04.280 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>When you began. I don't think there were many other

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>money managers putting out written commentary the way you guys were. You.

0:12:11.160 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Buffett and Marx are kind of the three that that

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>blazed this trial. I think so. And you know, one

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 1>of my positive attributes is that I I wasn't afraid

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to take risk and to take chances and so um.

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, there were those that PIMCO and Marketing and

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>so on that would suggest that you can't do that

0:12:35.080 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>because people would just jump on your ideas in front run.

0:12:38.480 --> 0:12:41.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I'm I'm tearing with in a lot

0:12:41.800 --> 0:12:43.959
<v Speaker 1>of things. But it wasn't paring Wood, not in terms

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>of um thinking that no one really cared and so

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>so why not why not tell people what I thought?

0:12:53.360 --> 0:12:57.240
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I think it worked. So it's no doubt

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it worked because the firm did well in the eighties

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and nineties. Is at what point did you come to

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the realization, Hey, this is kind of a one of

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.360
<v Speaker 1>a kind company and it's going to be special. Did

0:13:09.400 --> 0:13:12.000
<v Speaker 1>you ever imagine you would have a trillion dollars in

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:17.000
<v Speaker 1>assets under management? Well, of course not, UM at some

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:24.400
<v Speaker 1>point I did when we were but um no, My

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 1>my objective was was to grow the company two Um

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, have a fiduciary responsibility to clients in terms

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of products and not not charging them too much or

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.840
<v Speaker 1>inventing products that ripped them off. Um. But I also

0:13:43.960 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>want to uh or wanted to be famous. I mean

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that's that's in my book and in the other Child's

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 1>book as well. And um, you know, growing into a

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 1>trillion and ultimately into two trillion is uh was very

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:08.959
<v Speaker 1>productive in terms of being famous, and I guess ultimately infamous. So,

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.319
<v Speaker 1>now that you look back, which is more important in hindsight,

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:18.400
<v Speaker 1>money power of fame? Well, I never enjoyed my power,

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and I've enjoyed some of the money, but after a

0:14:22.040 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>certain point, it's not that productive unless you give it away.

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>And so I think, ultimately, if those are the three choices,

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and I did offer those to potential recruits, who, by

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the way, would never answer the questions because they were

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>afraid that any of the answers would be view negatively.

0:14:42.480 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>And I'm certain you know I would choose fame again,

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and I, um, I was. I was cognizant at the

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 1>time that fame can turn into infamy, that you could

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:02.720
<v Speaker 1>fly too close to the sun, etcetera, etcetera, from objective standpoints.

0:15:02.760 --> 0:15:05.120
<v Speaker 1>But I must say I didn't think it could happen

0:15:05.160 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>to me because I was always on the up and up,

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 1>always on us, always open and and why would anybody? Uh?

0:15:12.360 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think, ultimately, um, that was hige opening to me.

0:15:19.400 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But I do it again. Really interesting. Let's talk a

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the way PIMCO grew and generated profits

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:36.440
<v Speaker 1>for clients. You describe a lot of very technical aspects

0:15:36.480 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>to bond management and trading, which all contributed to fixed

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>income alpha, which I think a lot of people reading

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>your latest book might not have realized all the ways

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that you guys generated out performance. The question I asked is,

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 1>how is it possible with all this money laying around?

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Nobody he thought of this before? Why didn't anybody else

0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:09.560
<v Speaker 1>try and systematize total return of fixed income portfolios? Well,

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, Barry, I mean, a lot of bond managers

0:16:12.560 --> 0:16:16.440
<v Speaker 1>were and probably still are very conservative. That's their job

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to protect principle, and therefore on the sales side, on

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>the wall street side, they were facing the clientele that

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't really want to accept any of their suggestions whatever

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they were. Um, yeah, it was just the other way

0:16:34.520 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 1>for me and for PIMCO. And you know, we were

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>very innovative from the standpoint of new products. We were

0:16:42.200 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 1>one of the first to buy financial futures. Uh. We

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 1>were one of the first to to buy mortgages. A

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>fan amame mortgage. I mean, most most bond managers didn't

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 1>want to go through the problem of segregating principle and

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 1>interest in determining performance. That took along time and a

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>separate staff, and so we did that and then of

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:09.679
<v Speaker 1>course into later into global and UM tips and so on.

0:17:09.760 --> 0:17:14.639
<v Speaker 1>So the innovation was key. I think to Alpha generation,

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the biggest key was the thrust of what we called

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:27.160
<v Speaker 1>secular forecasting, secular outlooks. And I read a book early on,

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>just after a joint temco UM called Investing for the

0:17:33.640 --> 0:17:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Long Term. I forget who wrote it, but you know it.

0:17:36.640 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>It focused me on the dangers of trading for the

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>short term because fear and greed on the other side

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.119
<v Speaker 1>get involved and you tend to make the decisions. And

0:17:48.160 --> 0:17:51.200
<v Speaker 1>so we approached it from the standpoint of three to

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 1>five years in terms of an outlook. We brought in

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>speakers that spoke to that, many of them you know,

0:17:58.440 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>feed officials or extra shoals, um, et cetera. And so

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.199
<v Speaker 1>I think that really helped us to avoid you know,

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.280
<v Speaker 1>the bad the bad months of the bad quarter by

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:14.200
<v Speaker 1>looking at three to five years. So those were several

0:18:14.240 --> 0:18:16.679
<v Speaker 1>of the keys. And when you say investing for the

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>long run, you're not talking about Jeremy Seagull's stocks for

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the long run. You're talking about something more specific. Yeah,

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>And it basically it involved forecasting interst rates, UM and

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:33.359
<v Speaker 1>and to be fair, UM you know throughout the period

0:18:33.400 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of time that the secular outlook for interest rates was down, down, down,

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know during our annual secular forms that

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>we had where we brought in outside speakers and basically

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:49.480
<v Speaker 1>set the tone for the next to all months. Um,

0:18:50.840 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, for the most part, it was a bullish forecast,

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:57.800
<v Speaker 1>which turned out to be true. If we uh had

0:18:57.840 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>a forecast that went the other way for the long

0:19:00.840 --> 0:19:04.320
<v Speaker 1>term for the next three to five years, and obviously

0:19:04.359 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the company would have disappeared. But by focusing on that

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>forgetting about the day or the week of the months,

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I think it became very successful in terms of positioning

0:19:16.119 --> 0:19:22.880
<v Speaker 1>a portfolio duration wise and volatility wise and credit wise. Huh.

0:19:23.040 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Really intriguing. So so let's talk a little bit about

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you as a investor and trader. I'm I'm

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:35.119
<v Speaker 1>kind of entranced by the way I've heard the Pimcote

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>trading floor described. Your desk was a horseshoe and the

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>traders and analysts were arranged in a really specific manner.

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>Tell us a little bit about about the thinking they're Well,

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was pretty simple and I don't really

0:19:51.520 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>remember the horseshoe. Um, but you know, I was positioned

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:00.640
<v Speaker 1>in the middle certainly, and the trade years of which

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>they eventually grew that were you know, basically positioned in pods.

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:14.240
<v Speaker 1>The mortgage people, how yelped people, global people, m etcetera.

0:20:14.520 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, they would work together and almost

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>independently day to day. But I would check and others

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.680
<v Speaker 1>would check in terms of what they were doing, make

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>suggestions and so on it as we walked around the floor. So, um,

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it made a lot of sense. It was a big

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>trading room with I don't know how many square feet,

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think functionally it really worked for so who

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.119
<v Speaker 1>got to sit close to you and who sat further away?

0:20:45.240 --> 0:20:49.119
<v Speaker 1>Was that a function of how accurate, how active those

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>markets were, or was it, you know, just a seniority

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:57.239
<v Speaker 1>basis you know, well it was both. Um. You know,

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I remember that Scott Simon uh sat to the left

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:06.360
<v Speaker 1>of me and and build powers, and I don't think

0:21:06.440 --> 0:21:08.800
<v Speaker 1>christ Allen has ever sat next to me. He was

0:21:09.000 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>he was content to be on the wing, so to speak,

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>and do his own thing. But but usually it would

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:19.679
<v Speaker 1>be determined as well by who would who would be

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:24.480
<v Speaker 1>quiet as supposed allowed. Um, you know, I liked quiet

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:27.720
<v Speaker 1>to be able to think myself and somebody would allowed

0:21:27.800 --> 0:21:31.800
<v Speaker 1>voice talking to brokers or calling up their spouse. Uh,

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, it just wasn't working for me in terms

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of trading to so um. You know, it's the quiet

0:21:38.680 --> 0:21:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and function and seniority all sort of fit in and

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 1>I I didn't pick, somebody else picked, and I just

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 1>went along with it until the noise got too loud,

0:21:49.400 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and then they were out and somebody else was in.

0:21:53.480 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>So So you mentioned the number of your colleagues in

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the book, which we'll talk about in a little bit.

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You're very general risk in giving lots of credit to

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.480
<v Speaker 1>your colleagues for being major drivers of of the firm's success.

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about some of these colleagues and how they contributed,

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:14.679
<v Speaker 1>uh to Pimco's growth. Well, they were, you know, we

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>hired some really smart pupil and really aggressive people, um,

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>obsessive people that really loved to do what they're doing.

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris Dialis was one of the first. He was my

0:22:28.600 --> 0:22:32.560
<v Speaker 1>co portfolio manager, so to speak, from the early eighties.

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:34.880
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to be a baseball player for the Angels,

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:40.080
<v Speaker 1>but decided to take our dollar offer and he came

0:22:40.200 --> 0:22:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and he had gone to the university of Chicago and

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, studied there about options and so on, and

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:57.879
<v Speaker 1>ultimately became instrumental in terms of bringing financial futures to

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>to the portfolios and suggesting some very creative ideas in

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of Jenny May futures, which you know, some say

0:23:07.160 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>we broke the market. But he was one. And then

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>there was another gentleman, Chang Hong Zoo um that came

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>to us from Wells Fargo in San Francisco. He ultimately

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>left after ten years to go back to China with

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>his family and head up you know, a key position

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:33.920
<v Speaker 1>in the Chinese Central Bank. I think, Um, but he um,

0:23:34.000 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>you would make lots of suggestions and investment committee in

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:43.680
<v Speaker 1>terms of convexity and yield curve strategies, Euro dollar futures, etcetera. Um.

0:23:43.720 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>He was perhaps the smartest guy on the floor, including me,

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:49.879
<v Speaker 1>and you know so I think a lot of his

0:23:49.920 --> 0:23:54.800
<v Speaker 1>strategies are due to his suggestions. Um. You know, there

0:23:54.840 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>was a high yield gentleman, Ben Trotsky who was really

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a master of that. All of our mortgage people, uh,

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Bill Powers and John Higg and Scott Simon that I

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:09.160
<v Speaker 1>mentioned were really smart and their performance and mortgages through

0:24:09.200 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the years in terms of their own portfolios just float

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 1>over into the total return funds. So all of these

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.159
<v Speaker 1>people and there are a lot other ones. Um, you know,

0:24:20.520 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>we were a team. And you know, the term bond

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:30.200
<v Speaker 1>king was I guess that's more of a pr acceptance

0:24:30.280 --> 0:24:32.960
<v Speaker 1>than anything else. I don't think there was a king.

0:24:33.040 --> 0:24:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I was a leader, um, and certainly a leader of

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the investment committee, and in terms of accepting a standard

0:24:40.600 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>portfolio for those to manage. But lots of smart people,

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and um, I think it theired acknowledgement in my book,

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So lots of these colleagues eventually became successful, they became

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>very wealthy, and they, you know, hit the eject button

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and retired. You stuck around for forty three years. That's

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a long time. What led to that longevity that's pretty

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:11.720
<v Speaker 1>unusual these days. I think it was because I loved it. Uh.

0:25:12.240 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the the standard, the standard idea that

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>you should do what you love is fine. It can't

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:25.719
<v Speaker 1>really apply to the billions of people. Uh. You know

0:25:25.760 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>throughout the world. They all can't find jobs that they love.

0:25:30.000 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 1>They can't all paint, they can't all write music. But

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:36.919
<v Speaker 1>this was an area that I loved in terms of

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>buying and selling and competing and making money and becoming famous,

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>of course. And so I think I stuck around for

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that long until I was seventy two at PEMCO or

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 1>seventy one, simply because I loved coming in. Um. It

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:58.960
<v Speaker 1>just it made my week. Um And you know, PEMCO,

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we would have them in from committee until from twelve

0:26:01.880 --> 0:26:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to three every day, but after three, and certainly in

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the summertime, I could just go across the street and

0:26:08.240 --> 0:26:10.720
<v Speaker 1>hit some balls and to play golf too. So I

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a one way uh horse writer. I guess I

0:26:16.280 --> 0:26:19.680
<v Speaker 1>could do a lot of things, but managing money and

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>investing and talking about it, writing about it was something

0:26:25.160 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I truly enjoy. So let's talk a little bit about

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the two thousands. You guys, really, because of what you

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:38.040
<v Speaker 1>were positioned, got a very early warning look at what

0:26:38.119 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>was going on in the bond market and the housing market.

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>You were pretty well positioned before, during, and after the

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis of O eight oh nine. How did you

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:55.199
<v Speaker 1>manage to to accomplish that well? I give most of

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the credit in this case to Paul McCulley, and Paul

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.080
<v Speaker 1>still around. He's on TV, he's got that long hair

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>in that southern drawl. Um, but at least the yes.

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:12.359
<v Speaker 1>But he was an economist at heart, and he was

0:27:12.400 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>a permanent member of the Investment Committee, and he would

0:27:16.320 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>speak about Himan Minsky and his theory about stability turning

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>into instability. And then as the housing market roared and peaked,

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:33.000
<v Speaker 1>we became sensitive to um the potential for instability. I

0:27:33.040 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>had a brother in law who was a mortgage banker

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>on a small scale, and we would have dinner sometimes

0:27:40.040 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>he would tell me about no docks and flyer loans

0:27:43.040 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>and so on, before anyone at the FED knew anything

0:27:47.480 --> 0:27:51.439
<v Speaker 1>about that. And so I decided to take ten of

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>our credit analyst and send them out throughout the country

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and pretend that they were buying houses and to see

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>what was going on. UH. They came to h and said, Hey,

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>this this stuff is danger these subprime mortgages, etcetera, etcetera.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:11.199
<v Speaker 1>And so we were wise to this. Early on. We

0:28:11.240 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>avoided portfolios of subprime mortgages and UH yields in general,

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>anticipating crisis at some point. So I I think our

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Investment Committee, and again Paul McCully was the leader in

0:28:27.320 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>this regard, really helped in terms of anticipating what might

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:36.600
<v Speaker 1>happen at some point that did happen. Huh, to say

0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the least full disclosure. I know McAuley really well. We've

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:41.960
<v Speaker 1>gone fishing together in Maine. I've had him on the

0:28:42.000 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>show before, and full credit to him for giving Minsky's

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>work a wider modern um audience. So, given that you

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:55.640
<v Speaker 1>were positioned so well during the financial crisis, how did

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the relationship with the U. S. Treasury developed? Tell us

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about that. Well, UM, I guess it's

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>this sounds delicate, but it shouldn't be. Um. You know,

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:11.760
<v Speaker 1>almost all of us don't. Weren't in touch with the Treasury.

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean I talked to um Timothy Geitner once over

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the phone on a Sunday evening when he called me

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:21.719
<v Speaker 1>up after he'd had a few beers and wanted to

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>know what was happening in the economy. But that's the

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>only time I can ever remember talking to the Treasury.

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.080
<v Speaker 1>We weren't like black Rock and Larry Fink put nothing

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:35.560
<v Speaker 1>wrong with that, but we were a company on the

0:29:35.600 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 1>West Coast that basically did our own research and weren't

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in touch with Treasury officials unless they were FED officials

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that had retired, like uh, you know Bernanke and Paul

0:29:52.320 --> 0:29:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Volker and h and others, And so I don't really

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>know how it developed. Uh it certainly wasn't a phone call.

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:04.080
<v Speaker 1>They called us and and said can we UM helped

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>manage a portfolio of mortgages for them? And we said

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>short and uh so that was basically yet. And you know,

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>there was a rumor that we badgered them into guaranteeing

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Fanny and Freddy mortgages. Nothing could be further from the truth.

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Nobody made a phone call to badge her or to

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.479
<v Speaker 1>to influence in any way. What we did see is

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that of all the mortgages, that Fannie and Freddie were

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the highest quality, and that they were yielding astronomical yields

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>relative to treasuries and much wider spreads and had ever occurred.

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:54.400
<v Speaker 1>And so that was the fascination with Fannie and Freddy.

0:30:54.520 --> 0:30:57.120
<v Speaker 1>We did well with mortgages, and we did well during

0:30:57.120 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the crisis and after the crisis to Pimpto went from

0:31:01.640 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>one trillion to two trillions because we had protected their money.

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So we mentioned earlier the new book by Married Child,

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>The Bond King is out Um and I know you

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:19.680
<v Speaker 1>participated in in responding to some questions about um at

0:31:19.720 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 1>least validating certain things or not factually. But it's pretty

0:31:23.880 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>easy to read that book and see that she's trying

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to make the case that PIMCO was the largest holder

0:31:31.440 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of Fannie and Freddie bonds and that you guys bully

0:31:34.920 --> 0:31:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the government into guaranteeing them. Make your case rebut that

0:31:39.320 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>premise was it simply, Hey, we never spoke to anyone

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>at Treasury about Fannie and Freddie exactly. I mean, how

0:31:46.040 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 1>could we relay our badger if um I or um

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess Mohammed didn't pick up the phone and and

0:31:57.480 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>and Badger and Billie. First of all, we were bullies

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.320
<v Speaker 1>in the trading room, but we weren't bullies from the

0:32:04.360 --> 0:32:11.680
<v Speaker 1>standpoint of uh, you know, Treasuries strategy. Were you bullies

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.080
<v Speaker 1>or were you really just the eight hundred pound guerrilla

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.040
<v Speaker 1>in the space? Yeah? I think so. You know, we

0:32:17.080 --> 0:32:18.920
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of money, we bought a lot of bonds,

0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and um you know that health our performance. But you know, bullies, No,

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you can't be a bully if you don't pick up

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a phone. So your counter to the book The Bond

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 1>King is no, we we didn't force the government to

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.800
<v Speaker 1>guarantee these. The government did that cause for their own reasons.

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Primarily they were desperate for liquidity, and they were desperate

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>for some degree of stability, and this is how they

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>achieved it. Is that a fair counter argument to our book? Um,

0:32:51.200 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>It certainly is. And one interesting sidelight. I mean, during

0:32:54.600 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the crisis, as Congress was voting UM, I guess for

0:32:58.960 --> 0:33:05.160
<v Speaker 1>their in the Ollar package bailout package, you know, Warren

0:33:05.200 --> 0:33:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Buffett called me up and uh and told me about

0:33:09.280 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a plan he had to contribute a hundred million in

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:23.720
<v Speaker 1>equity hundred millions, hundred hundred million and equity and to UM,

0:33:23.760 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, to basically buy subprime mortgages from the banks,

0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>in other words, to take a load off their shoulders obviously,

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>to buy them that are at the right price. And

0:33:34.840 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>within thirty minutes after checking with our executive committee, I said, fine,

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 1>we'll do it. UM. The next day, however, you know,

0:33:44.120 --> 0:33:47.479
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury Secretary decided to go the other way, and

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that's when they decided to to ask banks to to

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:57.960
<v Speaker 1>issue preferred stock and the bailout took another form. But

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that's about the only potential connection we had with um

0:34:04.440 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury, and as I say, it never came to fruition,

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and it was just like a forty eight hour idea,

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>really intriguing. Let's talk a little bit about this book,

0:34:14.280 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>which generated a little bit of controversy. People blamed you

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>for just seeking to settle scores. Tell us about the

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:27.359
<v Speaker 1>book and what motivated you to sit down and write it. Well,

0:34:27.400 --> 0:34:30.920
<v Speaker 1>had written a book twenty years ago, and I didn't

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:33.600
<v Speaker 1>really think at the time that I had another book

0:34:33.640 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in me, sort of like Wroting writing novels. I guess, um,

0:34:38.560 --> 0:34:43.440
<v Speaker 1>after the first one, it's all downhill. But I was

0:34:43.480 --> 0:34:46.520
<v Speaker 1>in touch with Mary Childs for five or six years,

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly after I left Tempt. We were not good friends,

0:34:54.200 --> 0:35:01.120
<v Speaker 1>but she would interview me occasionally, and so I was

0:35:02.440 --> 0:35:06.320
<v Speaker 1>alerted to the factor. I read something on Apple Books

0:35:06.320 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>that a book by Mary Childs was coming, you know,

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>twelve months in the future, and it had a prospective

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:19.600
<v Speaker 1>cover on it described me on the cover as ruthless

0:35:19.800 --> 0:35:25.279
<v Speaker 1>and you know, having lost everything. And I I said

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:29.319
<v Speaker 1>to myself, that's not who I am, as the look

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>in the mirror. And and so, you know, rather than

0:35:33.200 --> 0:35:36.200
<v Speaker 1>thinking about a lawsuit or any of that, I said, well,

0:35:36.239 --> 0:35:39.919
<v Speaker 1>the best way to count that and to give your

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>impression of pimpto and it's years and your part in it,

0:35:46.440 --> 0:35:49.320
<v Speaker 1>I was to wreat your own version. And I had time.

0:35:49.640 --> 0:35:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm not here in the desert. I played golf in

0:35:51.680 --> 0:35:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the afternoon. I uh get up at six in the morning,

0:35:55.960 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and I managed my portfolios for five or six hours.

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I had time, and so I just started

0:36:03.880 --> 0:36:08.839
<v Speaker 1>writing in order to say that I'm still standing. I

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:15.000
<v Speaker 1>haven't lost everything. And the ruthless part, I'm not sure

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:18.840
<v Speaker 1>what she was referring to. I called her up and

0:36:18.840 --> 0:36:21.399
<v Speaker 1>I said, Mary, Uh, you know, I kind of get

0:36:21.400 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the ruthless part. And I think she decided to take

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:27.399
<v Speaker 1>it off the cover, right. I haven't read the book,

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:31.799
<v Speaker 1>of course, because I'm too sensitive criticism, and I know

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:35.200
<v Speaker 1>there's criticism in it. But the ruthless part, I I

0:36:35.239 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>just went overboard, and that's what set me off. And said,

0:36:38.400 --> 0:36:41.239
<v Speaker 1>write your own book, tell your own story, and hopefully

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 1>after five or six years, um. You know, the the

0:36:47.280 --> 0:36:52.400
<v Speaker 1>wounds as in time heals all wounds. UM had healed

0:36:53.760 --> 0:36:57.759
<v Speaker 1>pretty much and the scars, said, turned from red to white. Um.

0:36:58.480 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And so I thought I could write in active book

0:37:01.680 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>about the pluses and the minuses each argument, Tempo's argument,

0:37:06.760 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 1>my argument why I left, and um why I wasn't

0:37:11.920 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the bond kings. The company was full of bond

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>kings and bond queens for a long long time. Huh.

0:37:19.880 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>And and the book title does not have ruthless in it.

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Um And for those people who may not be familiar

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>with Mary Child's um, she covered Pimco and the bond

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:34.560
<v Speaker 1>market at Bloomberg News for a while. Before that, she

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.680
<v Speaker 1>worked at the Financial Times, and now she's a co

0:37:37.880 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 1>host of Planet Money podcast at NPR. And we'll talk

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:46.000
<v Speaker 1>a little later about a project she and I did together,

0:37:46.520 --> 0:37:50.399
<v Speaker 1>but let's talk about the book. You do not and

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I think ruthless may not be the right word, but

0:37:54.480 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 1>you don't hold anything back in the book. I mean,

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>you are completely blunt and worthcoming an example, I want

0:38:02.280 --> 0:38:06.000
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about. You said your partner who negotiated

0:38:06.120 --> 0:38:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the Alliance purchase of Pimco skinned them alive. So so

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:17.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a serious um line. Tell us about the Alliance

0:38:17.320 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 1>takeover of Pimco and how you guys managed to get

0:38:22.280 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 1>such a one sided deal that worked to the benefit

0:38:25.920 --> 0:38:30.439
<v Speaker 1>of the Pimco owners. And the company oh so much

0:38:30.480 --> 0:38:34.399
<v Speaker 1>so UM and Ken Covies no longer will this. But

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.839
<v Speaker 1>he was brilliant. He was He was a leader in

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:43.279
<v Speaker 1>terms of negotiating with Alliance. And by the way, all

0:38:43.320 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 1>ants when they bought Pimco, they um, they only bought

0:38:49.719 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 1>it specific mutual held onto it for you know, a

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:59.120
<v Speaker 1>year or two, and they left with us the people

0:38:59.239 --> 0:39:04.280
<v Speaker 1>the partners UH of the profits going forward which still

0:39:04.320 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 1>exists and UM. And so that basically meant that what

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>they were paying for was was about a sixth of

0:39:13.080 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>PIMCO in terms of the ongoing revenue stream. But to

0:39:20.120 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>talk about proving what he did, he basically suggested to

0:39:24.120 --> 0:39:26.640
<v Speaker 1>them and we would suggest to him. And yes, we

0:39:26.640 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>were very ruthless from the standpoint of, UM, you know,

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:36.359
<v Speaker 1>trying to strike a very good deal if we're ever

0:39:36.400 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 1>going to sell part of the company and UM, Poopy

0:39:41.360 --> 0:39:44.680
<v Speaker 1>would will always tell them and I would participate in

0:39:44.719 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the discussions that these people needed to be incentivized. UM.

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Not that of the profit pool wasn't incentive enough. But

0:39:54.120 --> 0:39:58.279
<v Speaker 1>Poopy would say, UM, you know, these partners will be

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:03.080
<v Speaker 1>there twenty five now that we fifties WI, this won't

0:40:03.080 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>be enough to keep incentivizing the existing partners and to

0:40:08.760 --> 0:40:12.399
<v Speaker 1>bring a new partners. So he devised what he called

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:16.399
<v Speaker 1>a B share UM sort of a fake equity UH

0:40:16.760 --> 0:40:20.359
<v Speaker 1>type of plan where partners would be given a certain

0:40:20.400 --> 0:40:22.759
<v Speaker 1>amount of B shares and and that the value of

0:40:22.760 --> 0:40:26.920
<v Speaker 1>those shares ten five, ten years forward when they could

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 1>be cashed in, would be based upon multiples ten twelve, fourteen,

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:40.759
<v Speaker 1>sixteen time multiples of existing earnings. And basically, when I

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:44.680
<v Speaker 1>say he skinned them, Alliance had no idea that what

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:48.000
<v Speaker 1>they would be pain in terms of those multiples and

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:51.720
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the performance of that we're anywhere close

0:40:51.800 --> 0:40:56.080
<v Speaker 1>to would eventually occurred. And um, it was a brilliant idea.

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:59.920
<v Speaker 1>He uh pulled the wool over their eyes. They were

0:41:00.800 --> 0:41:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I guess star struck with you know, buying Pempco and

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to um wonderful publicity. But it was really

0:41:11.800 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 1>that B share plan that made made me more money

0:41:14.880 --> 0:41:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and made partners more money than the existing thirties represent

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>profit pool. It was a total billions and billions of

0:41:22.920 --> 0:41:27.440
<v Speaker 1>dollars in terms of B share payoffs. And you you

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:30.279
<v Speaker 1>don't again, you don't hold back, you say in the

0:41:30.320 --> 0:41:33.960
<v Speaker 1>book quote none of us were worth what we were paid.

0:41:34.239 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Unquote explain if if you're generating billions and dollars of profits,

0:41:40.080 --> 0:41:44.680
<v Speaker 1>what should you have been paid. Well, there's a certain

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:47.160
<v Speaker 1>logic of that. I mean, our our fees weren't excessive.

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 1>We were charging thirty five basis points on average. We

0:41:50.400 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>just grew and grew and grew and grew and grew.

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>And one of the beauties of working at PEMCO was

0:41:57.040 --> 0:41:59.640
<v Speaker 1>that it was small. We kept our expenses down and

0:41:59.760 --> 0:42:03.560
<v Speaker 1>our people low. You know, companies like Bank of America

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:06.880
<v Speaker 1>had two hundred and fifty thousand people. We had two thousand,

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 1>five hundred or a hundreds of their size, with profits

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:14.640
<v Speaker 1>about the same size, and so um. You know, that

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 1>was part of our strategic brilliance as well. I guess

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:24.839
<v Speaker 1>Jim Muzzy and early on Bill Pondlock, the original partners,

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:28.279
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, simply thought that we should keep expenses

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and people low. With that we could manage without a

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, and so you know, that generated huge

0:42:34.960 --> 0:42:39.760
<v Speaker 1>bonuses where we're worth it. Uh you know, I simply

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:43.479
<v Speaker 1>said that I don't think anybody's worth uh that type

0:42:43.520 --> 0:42:49.720
<v Speaker 1>of money. Um, yeah, maybe maybe Bezos and Elon Musk

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of their creativity but it's just it was

0:42:53.239 --> 0:42:55.759
<v Speaker 1>too much money. You know, as as I left him go,

0:42:56.200 --> 0:43:01.280
<v Speaker 1>our executive secretaries were making five hundred million dollars um um.

0:43:01.600 --> 0:43:05.120
<v Speaker 1>Our our our head corporate lawyer, you know that the

0:43:05.200 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 1>ge lawyer uh was making one or two million dollars.

0:43:08.960 --> 0:43:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Our our lawyer was making ten to twelve million dollars.

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like we didn't know we had so much money.

0:43:14.120 --> 0:43:15.919
<v Speaker 1>We didn't know how to get rid of it, um

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and um. We had this egalitarian type of attitude that

0:43:20.120 --> 0:43:22.319
<v Speaker 1>we should spread it out as much as possible. But

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anybody there to deserve to make what

0:43:27.520 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they were making. So we're gonna circle back to the

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:35.720
<v Speaker 1>bonus structure. But unfortunately, at this point I have to

0:43:35.760 --> 0:43:42.040
<v Speaker 1>insert myself into our conversation. So you get fired from

0:43:42.040 --> 0:43:48.239
<v Speaker 1>pimco in and I save a bunch of UM your

0:43:48.320 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I O s from previous dates, and in the train

0:43:51.640 --> 0:43:55.000
<v Speaker 1>home from work, I just read a bunch just you know,

0:43:55.040 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>across a couple of years. By the time I get

0:43:58.360 --> 0:44:01.760
<v Speaker 1>home that night, your voice is in my head. And

0:44:01.920 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, whenever they arrest a painting forger, they always

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.200
<v Speaker 1>say the same thing. Once I had his stroke down,

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:13.319
<v Speaker 1>everything I painted looked like Picasso. Well, once I had

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>your voice in my head, whatever I wrote sounded like you,

0:44:17.120 --> 0:44:20.640
<v Speaker 1>and so for it was then called Bloomberg View. I

0:44:20.680 --> 0:44:26.879
<v Speaker 1>wrote your final investment outlook in your voice, Um, purposefully

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:29.800
<v Speaker 1>making it outrageous. But you know, by the time it

0:44:29.880 --> 0:44:34.000
<v Speaker 1>got through the editing process, it was smoothed out enough

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that it very much sounded like your voice, so much

0:44:38.239 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>so that PIMCO called Mary Child's asking her, Hey, how

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:46.160
<v Speaker 1>the hell did you guys get bills last? I? Oh,

0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 1>this is wrong, and it's in Bloomberg View. It's an

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.960
<v Speaker 1>opinion piece. It's a satire, it's a parody. Um. And

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:57.400
<v Speaker 1>so you and I began speaking about that. But before

0:44:57.480 --> 0:45:00.600
<v Speaker 1>we get into the bonus discussion, how us a little

0:45:00.600 --> 0:45:04.480
<v Speaker 1>bit about that day. What was it like after forty

0:45:04.520 --> 0:45:07.759
<v Speaker 1>three years to be sent to the principal's office and

0:45:08.200 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>sent home? Well, I was traumatic. I mean I was

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the one of the founders. I was one of the

0:45:16.200 --> 0:45:22.120
<v Speaker 1>leaders of the Chief Investment Officer. The performance was flat

0:45:22.239 --> 0:45:27.799
<v Speaker 1>for twelve months, but you know, nothing tragic. And you

0:45:27.840 --> 0:45:32.880
<v Speaker 1>know the executive committee which was going to fire me

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:39.359
<v Speaker 1>on Friday afternoon because they thought I was unsettling in

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:44.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of my pursuit of insiders talking to the press

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:49.560
<v Speaker 1>in any case, UM, you know, I I decided I'm

0:45:49.600 --> 0:45:52.719
<v Speaker 1>not walking that plank that I deserved better than this.

0:45:53.080 --> 0:45:56.439
<v Speaker 1>I even asked in the last a week or two

0:45:56.480 --> 0:46:00.799
<v Speaker 1>when when I knew that, you know, the inevitable was

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:04.200
<v Speaker 1>coming up that Friday afternoon, I said, why don't you

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:07.960
<v Speaker 1>just let me manage you know, a small portfolio closed

0:46:07.960 --> 0:46:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in fund, just so I can stay in it. Um.

0:46:12.200 --> 0:46:14.319
<v Speaker 1>They said, I don't even work in another building if

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:18.080
<v Speaker 1>you want, UM, and they looked at me. They said,

0:46:18.120 --> 0:46:21.799
<v Speaker 1>it's not going to happen. And so I at the

0:46:21.840 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 1>time I couldn't understand that. Now, I sort of do

0:46:24.920 --> 0:46:27.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, when you when you kill the king, you

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:31.120
<v Speaker 1>better make sure he's dead. And uh, they didn't want

0:46:31.160 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>any presence of Bill grows in the ongoing PEMCO. I

0:46:35.440 --> 0:46:40.120
<v Speaker 1>objectively understand that, but UH, to turn down uh an

0:46:40.200 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 1>offer to let me manage a few small portfolios and

0:46:44.040 --> 0:46:47.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe write some investment out looks, I couldn't believe it. Um.

0:46:47.920 --> 0:46:53.440
<v Speaker 1>I made a quick call to the Janice with Dick Wile,

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 1>who was heading that up and um ce at PIMCO

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:01.879
<v Speaker 1>a few years before, and UH, he said sure, come

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:05.920
<v Speaker 1>over And so I I didn't want to walk the plank.

0:47:05.960 --> 0:47:08.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to go into that committee and be fired.

0:47:08.120 --> 0:47:14.880
<v Speaker 1>And so I left that night, walked down the floor

0:47:14.920 --> 0:47:19.120
<v Speaker 1>stairs for the last time, and uh, and the next

0:47:19.120 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>morning I was off to Denver. Um. I just I

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:26.480
<v Speaker 1>didn't think it was the way you should treat somebody

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that was a founder and responsible for much of their success.

0:47:32.120 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>And there was at the time a lot of sniping

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:38.520
<v Speaker 1>in the news. They had said you had become disruptive

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:41.799
<v Speaker 1>and we're a problem on the training floor and was

0:47:41.840 --> 0:47:45.040
<v Speaker 1>affecting morale, and there was a lot of personal stuff.

0:47:45.280 --> 0:47:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Hey Bill is a little unstable, And they trotted out

0:47:48.520 --> 0:47:51.239
<v Speaker 1>that picture from you at the morning Star conference with

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the glasses, which I think we're or two I was

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:58.560
<v Speaker 1>years before. You know, what was your reaction when this

0:47:58.760 --> 0:48:03.280
<v Speaker 1>became so you know, personal and to be blunt, so petty,

0:48:03.360 --> 0:48:11.000
<v Speaker 1>on on all around. Well, it wasn't good. Um, you know,

0:48:11.480 --> 0:48:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I guess like in a divorce, and this was a divorce.

0:48:15.440 --> 0:48:18.759
<v Speaker 1>Both sides started picking at each other, you know, wore

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the roses type of thing. Um. So of you know,

0:48:23.960 --> 0:48:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't enjoy what they were leaking to the press.

0:48:27.880 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I never talked to the press, by the way, but

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I didn't enjoy that. They said the performance was bad,

0:48:34.280 --> 0:48:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that I was erratic, etceteratera etera. I was always somewhat

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:45.520
<v Speaker 1>not erratic, but always uh quirky, somewhat of a quirky character.

0:48:45.719 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think that had changed. But but there

0:48:49.160 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 1>had been you know, two or three people that our

0:48:52.600 --> 0:48:57.560
<v Speaker 1>lawyers eventually discovered that we're leaking, leaking information to the

0:48:57.600 --> 0:49:01.680
<v Speaker 1>press and favoring Muhammad supposed to me in terms of

0:49:01.680 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 1>why he left, and I I didn't think that was nice,

0:49:05.400 --> 0:49:11.879
<v Speaker 1>and so uh that ultimately, and to be fair, as

0:49:11.960 --> 0:49:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I wrote in my book, you know, one of the

0:49:15.200 --> 0:49:19.560
<v Speaker 1>main reasons I think that they fired me, what was

0:49:19.760 --> 0:49:22.839
<v Speaker 1>I was in favor of low fees and they were

0:49:22.840 --> 0:49:26.759
<v Speaker 1>in favor of high fees. You know, Dan Iverson and

0:49:26.840 --> 0:49:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the mortgage department had created, uh, you know, products that

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:35.880
<v Speaker 1>had two and twenty hedge fund types of types of

0:49:35.920 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 1>seas and we're making a lot of money. I was

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:40.719
<v Speaker 1>making some of it. But it just seemed to me

0:49:40.760 --> 0:49:46.240
<v Speaker 1>in terms of buduciary responsibility that low fees were something

0:49:46.320 --> 0:49:49.799
<v Speaker 1>we owed to clients and we weren't hedge fund managers.

0:49:49.880 --> 0:49:54.959
<v Speaker 1>And so UM. Ultimately, I think the executive committee which

0:49:55.040 --> 0:50:00.520
<v Speaker 1>was formed with eight people, uh three of which were

0:50:00.840 --> 0:50:06.040
<v Speaker 1>portfolio managers, one uh Iverson who eventually led the the

0:50:06.200 --> 0:50:11.359
<v Speaker 1>coup as I called it. UM. You know, they went

0:50:11.680 --> 0:50:14.640
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of high seas as opposed to low

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 1>fees E T f s and UM and so on.

0:50:18.400 --> 0:50:22.000
<v Speaker 1>So UM there was a fundamental reason, but there there

0:50:22.080 --> 0:50:25.759
<v Speaker 1>was also other personal reasons. Um. I was seventy two

0:50:25.920 --> 0:50:28.959
<v Speaker 1>was the time to go. Um, not in my mind,

0:50:29.000 --> 0:50:33.040
<v Speaker 1>but in their mind because at seventy two, as I

0:50:33.120 --> 0:50:35.919
<v Speaker 1>wrote in my book, if you're not as sharp as

0:50:35.920 --> 0:50:39.279
<v Speaker 1>you are fifty two, and certainly not as sharp as

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:43.200
<v Speaker 1>you you at seventy seven as you as you were

0:50:43.200 --> 0:50:47.120
<v Speaker 1>at seventy two. So so maybe there was some of that,

0:50:47.200 --> 0:50:50.760
<v Speaker 1>and I understand some of that. I just still don't

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>understand the exit and why they had to do it

0:50:55.280 --> 0:50:58.399
<v Speaker 1>that way. So let's talk a little bit about that.

0:50:58.480 --> 0:51:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Wore the roses so I got I don't remembered as

0:51:02.160 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>the facts or an email, but a spreadsheet that was

0:51:06.360 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, the long debated and wondered about bonus pool

0:51:11.640 --> 0:51:15.960
<v Speaker 1>at PIMCO, and it had you earning about three hundred

0:51:15.960 --> 0:51:19.960
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year in bonus. Um. Muhammad Alarian about

0:51:20.000 --> 0:51:23.799
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and forty million dollars in bonus uh, and

0:51:23.920 --> 0:51:28.080
<v Speaker 1>down the run a whole run of of literally billions

0:51:28.120 --> 0:51:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in excess compensation. So tell us about why

0:51:33.080 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that was released and and did that have the intended

0:51:38.280 --> 0:51:43.439
<v Speaker 1>effect of really rattling the senior management at PIMCO and

0:51:43.440 --> 0:51:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and causing turmoil uh in the C suite. Well, I

0:51:48.840 --> 0:51:51.160
<v Speaker 1>think it might have had an effect. That was the intense.

0:51:51.560 --> 0:51:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't have anybody in the company that could tell me, um,

0:51:56.640 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 1>whether or not their esteem coming uh, you know, out

0:52:00.200 --> 0:52:04.799
<v Speaker 1>of the years of many of the partners. But I,

0:52:05.400 --> 0:52:09.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, like I say, I had been fired. Uh.

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:12.600
<v Speaker 1>They were talking in the press negatively about me, and

0:52:12.640 --> 0:52:15.439
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to call up the press and talking

0:52:15.480 --> 0:52:20.799
<v Speaker 1>negatively about them. And so what I did was, I said, uh, well,

0:52:20.840 --> 0:52:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I know how I can get back at them, um.

0:52:24.480 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>And it was childish in a way, but it was

0:52:27.560 --> 0:52:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a way to you know, to stop taking

0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:33.200
<v Speaker 1>bunches and maybe throw one of them out. And so

0:52:33.320 --> 0:52:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I I took last year's bonus pool and I mailed

0:52:38.160 --> 0:52:43.160
<v Speaker 1>into eight random of partners UH in an envelope and

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:47.520
<v Speaker 1>sent it as a package to PIMCO and I as

0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:51.759
<v Speaker 1>soon they ultimately distributed it. Um. You know, for the

0:52:51.800 --> 0:52:55.080
<v Speaker 1>most part, I assumed anyway the partners knew what other

0:52:55.160 --> 0:52:58.120
<v Speaker 1>partners were making. You know, that happens over drinks and

0:52:58.840 --> 0:53:01.520
<v Speaker 1>over the water cooler. But UM, it just made me

0:53:01.560 --> 0:53:04.880
<v Speaker 1>feel better that I could do something to counder what

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:07.759
<v Speaker 1>they were doing. So in the book you said you

0:53:07.800 --> 0:53:10.400
<v Speaker 1>could hear the screams from the top floor all the

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:14.360
<v Speaker 1>way uh your house. But let me just shed a

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:19.080
<v Speaker 1>little color about what took place when when I got

0:53:19.120 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the document, I walked it over um to some senior

0:53:23.280 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 1>editors at Bloomberg who walked it through legal and we

0:53:27.040 --> 0:53:30.640
<v Speaker 1>brought in, of all people, married Childs, who was covering PIMCO,

0:53:31.040 --> 0:53:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and UM. The plan was I would write the opinion

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:38.359
<v Speaker 1>piece about how outrageous this was, and Mary would cover

0:53:38.440 --> 0:53:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it as straight news. Uh, and that after we had

0:53:43.239 --> 0:53:46.879
<v Speaker 1>vetted everything. And they, you know, to Bloomberg's credit, their

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 1>process is just absolutely fastidious and top notch. I was

0:53:51.640 --> 0:53:56.120
<v Speaker 1>very comfortable that we checked every box, both from a

0:53:56.280 --> 0:54:01.040
<v Speaker 1>journalistic side and the legal side. And UM, what they

0:54:01.080 --> 0:54:03.920
<v Speaker 1>did is they waited till eight p M East Coast

0:54:03.920 --> 0:54:07.120
<v Speaker 1>time after the Wall Street Journal and the New York

0:54:07.160 --> 0:54:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Times print editions had gone to bed, and they called

0:54:11.440 --> 0:54:15.840
<v Speaker 1>up Pimco to get a comment on it, and um,

0:54:16.120 --> 0:54:19.560
<v Speaker 1>they seem to not really believe that we had what

0:54:19.600 --> 0:54:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we had And so the next day both pieces ran

0:54:23.680 --> 0:54:26.640
<v Speaker 1>and all hell broke loose. That was the most read

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:30.279
<v Speaker 1>pieces on the Bloomberg terminal for like six months. I

0:54:30.280 --> 0:54:34.239
<v Speaker 1>don't remember the exact date, but it absolutely blew up.

0:54:34.600 --> 0:54:36.920
<v Speaker 1>And I know it was a parlor game. People were

0:54:36.960 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 1>trying to guess what Pimco's bonus pool was. So now

0:54:41.600 --> 0:54:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that you look back at it, did did this accomplish

0:54:44.880 --> 0:54:46.799
<v Speaker 1>what you hoped? And you know, do you have any

0:54:46.840 --> 0:54:52.879
<v Speaker 1>regrets about that? You know? Were the roses era? Oh god,

0:54:53.280 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 1>God no, I mean I thought then I still think

0:54:58.719 --> 0:55:03.640
<v Speaker 1>now that it was just a little job to counter

0:55:03.800 --> 0:55:09.760
<v Speaker 1>their uppercuts and so, um, they really do any damage

0:55:09.840 --> 0:55:13.279
<v Speaker 1>to the structure of the company in terms of compensation,

0:55:13.600 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, um, but since they were all very

0:55:18.760 --> 0:55:21.719
<v Speaker 1>good in terms of the executive committee in terms of

0:55:21.719 --> 0:55:25.960
<v Speaker 1>smoothing things, and I assume internally that you know, they

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:28.799
<v Speaker 1>gave it an after that, but not not for a

0:55:28.840 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>six month. I'll tell you a funny story that I

0:55:31.920 --> 0:55:35.239
<v Speaker 1>never shared with you, but I might as well as

0:55:35.280 --> 0:55:39.080
<v Speaker 1>long as we're coming clean. Um. So, in order to

0:55:39.200 --> 0:55:43.879
<v Speaker 1>protect our source, spreadsheet was to the penny. I mean

0:55:43.920 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it was really precise. It wasn't two hundred forty million dollars.

0:55:48.719 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 1>It was two hundred million, eight hundred and seventy seven thousand,

0:55:52.760 --> 0:55:56.520
<v Speaker 1>six hundred, you know, in forty three and fifty two cents.

0:55:56.920 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 1>But all right, let's make it to forty and it'll

0:55:59.719 --> 0:56:03.000
<v Speaker 1>pre text the source a little bit. And I don't

0:56:03.000 --> 0:56:05.880
<v Speaker 1>remember the gentleman's name who was the head of pr

0:56:06.120 --> 0:56:09.320
<v Speaker 1>at Pimco at the time, but I was very annoyed

0:56:09.360 --> 0:56:11.880
<v Speaker 1>that he would come out and say, oh, those numbers

0:56:11.880 --> 0:56:16.480
<v Speaker 1>are wrong and um, and he accused me of getting it,

0:56:16.880 --> 0:56:19.920
<v Speaker 1>not just that they weren't precise. Oh this is wrong.

0:56:19.960 --> 0:56:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Results doesn't know what he's talking about. It's all wrong.

0:56:22.840 --> 0:56:26.440
<v Speaker 1>So I recall sending an email to him with his

0:56:26.560 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 1>exact salary and bonus to the penny and said, next

0:56:30.640 --> 0:56:33.719
<v Speaker 1>time you say something wrong, I will release the salary

0:56:33.760 --> 0:56:36.279
<v Speaker 1>of every person of Pimco down to the penny. So

0:56:36.440 --> 0:56:40.400
<v Speaker 1>your career, most of us have followed your career for decades,

0:56:40.960 --> 0:56:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and there's a sense that you grew up kind of hard, scrabbled,

0:56:44.760 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>you didn't come from money. I'm I'm curious do you

0:56:48.239 --> 0:56:50.879
<v Speaker 1>today do you think of yourself as rich? Have you

0:56:51.400 --> 0:56:54.960
<v Speaker 1>wrapped your head around the fact that you're a billionaire,

0:56:54.960 --> 0:56:57.759
<v Speaker 1>because sometimes we we see some of the things you

0:56:57.920 --> 0:57:00.600
<v Speaker 1>write and say and do, and it's like he still

0:57:00.640 --> 0:57:04.200
<v Speaker 1>thinks he's that kid from you know, fifty sixty years ago.

0:57:04.680 --> 0:57:09.759
<v Speaker 1>I do, Um, you know, objectively, I know I'm a billionaire.

0:57:09.800 --> 0:57:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I see it every morning with my uh you know,

0:57:13.480 --> 0:57:19.040
<v Speaker 1>financial statement and my portfolios. But um, you know, I

0:57:19.080 --> 0:57:22.760
<v Speaker 1>think that comes from a certain insecurity. I and and

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:25.800
<v Speaker 1>to be fair, you know, I've got a plane, I've

0:57:25.840 --> 0:57:29.840
<v Speaker 1>got several homes, and so that's typical of billionaires. But

0:57:31.200 --> 0:57:37.200
<v Speaker 1>all throughout my life, in my marriages and so on,

0:57:37.360 --> 0:57:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I would bring home take up dinners

0:57:41.840 --> 0:57:45.560
<v Speaker 1>from the local Taco bell um three times a week.

0:57:47.720 --> 0:57:50.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, we we never lived and still don't live

0:57:51.400 --> 0:57:54.200
<v Speaker 1>high off the hog. We eat very simply. We go

0:57:54.320 --> 0:57:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to sleep but eight o'clock and and watch Netflix and

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:00.720
<v Speaker 1>so on and so on. We don't out of parties,

0:58:00.840 --> 0:58:07.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't uh dress up a lot and and and so. Um.

0:58:07.440 --> 0:58:12.240
<v Speaker 1>You know my idea of living well is, yes, certainly

0:58:12.480 --> 0:58:16.000
<v Speaker 1>have enough money to live well, but then to to

0:58:16.120 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 1>live simply and to ultimately give give back. Uh not

0:58:21.440 --> 0:58:25.040
<v Speaker 1>in terms of time. I don't give back time like

0:58:25.320 --> 0:58:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Bill Gates, and we'll INDI Gates do. That's not my strength.

0:58:30.120 --> 0:58:34.320
<v Speaker 1>But you know I give back a lot of money. Um,

0:58:34.400 --> 0:58:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I've done the giving pledge. I've already given a billion

0:58:37.040 --> 0:58:40.520
<v Speaker 1>or so in in terms of money, I have a

0:58:40.520 --> 0:58:46.120
<v Speaker 1>five million dollar foundation, etcetera, etcetera, and so so you know,

0:58:46.160 --> 0:58:48.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a simple life, but not so simple in terms

0:58:48.920 --> 0:58:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of all the money that I have to to give back,

0:58:53.200 --> 0:58:58.680
<v Speaker 1>not just two people and um organizations. But you know,

0:58:58.840 --> 0:59:02.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly to the government want to check the bucket, they'll

0:59:02.680 --> 0:59:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll take it unless you give it all the way.

0:59:05.600 --> 0:59:08.919
<v Speaker 1>That's a good enough reason to a having a state

0:59:08.960 --> 0:59:12.640
<v Speaker 1>tax and B give the money away. So I have

0:59:12.760 --> 0:59:16.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask this question, what's the deal with Gilligan's Island.

0:59:17.000 --> 0:59:22.400
<v Speaker 1>You have to explain and ps. I always understood that

0:59:22.560 --> 0:59:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you could put whatever you want in your backyard. Nobody

0:59:24.920 --> 0:59:29.760
<v Speaker 1>has the right to a view across the neighbor's property. Um,

0:59:29.800 --> 0:59:33.600
<v Speaker 1>but tell us about Gilligan's Island. Well, our our house

0:59:33.720 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is right across from the the bay or the entrance.

0:59:39.880 --> 0:59:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Um that the opening segment of Gilligan's Island takes place

0:59:46.400 --> 0:59:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in him a few years ago. And this is in

0:59:51.200 --> 0:59:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Newport Beach or in Laguna. It's a Newport Beach. It's

0:59:55.360 --> 0:59:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a home in Newport Beach. And um, so we watched

0:59:59.160 --> 1:00:01.800
<v Speaker 1>it and we said, hey, that's where this house is.

1:00:02.080 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 1>And so we we learned to love Gilligan Islands. That

1:00:06.480 --> 1:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the skipper and the movie star, and we would sing

1:00:10.360 --> 1:00:13.360
<v Speaker 1>it to each other. And so when we would go

1:00:13.480 --> 1:00:18.280
<v Speaker 1>down to the hole in South Vaginas, we'd just seen

1:00:18.400 --> 1:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Gilligan's Island, and and the whole neighbor things started with

1:00:22.600 --> 1:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a sculpture in the backyard that the neighbor didn't disapprove

1:00:27.040 --> 1:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of at a fact, he had said he liked it.

1:00:30.920 --> 1:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>But one day there was a one storm the palm

1:00:34.440 --> 1:00:39.200
<v Speaker 1>tree fronts um broke down and broke some of the

1:00:39.200 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the glass, and so we put up the net um,

1:00:42.440 --> 1:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, during inclement, whether to protect it. He didn't

1:00:45.360 --> 1:00:49.240
<v Speaker 1>like that any sued and that was the start of

1:00:49.280 --> 1:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing, uh, which resultimately ridiculous that that Um,

1:00:56.280 --> 1:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know I spent five and a million or five

1:00:58.320 --> 1:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>five or a million. Um you know, I spent five

1:01:01.520 --> 1:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>and a thousand. Lawyer's face. I think he did too. Um.

1:01:05.160 --> 1:01:08.120
<v Speaker 1>I suggested we just give it all to local charities.

1:01:08.160 --> 1:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>He didn't want to do that. I think he. I

1:01:11.480 --> 1:01:14.400
<v Speaker 1>think being a personage. Um, you know, like the bon

1:01:14.560 --> 1:01:18.320
<v Speaker 1>King was part of the problem. He wanted to take

1:01:18.360 --> 1:01:22.040
<v Speaker 1>it to the Bond King, and he did. And you

1:01:22.080 --> 1:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>mentioned in the book he was always sort of watching

1:01:25.560 --> 1:01:29.320
<v Speaker 1>you guys, had cameras trained on your house. How much

1:01:29.360 --> 1:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>of this is just? Gee, you know, I don't care

1:01:33.040 --> 1:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>if I'm a billionaire Bond King. I'm entitled to have

1:01:36.760 --> 1:01:39.920
<v Speaker 1>some degree of privacy in my own backyard. Where's the

1:01:39.960 --> 1:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>line there? Well, that's true, and that's our argument that

1:01:44.600 --> 1:01:47.400
<v Speaker 1>it didn't fly with the judge. But you know, the

1:01:47.440 --> 1:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>city ordinance has said that the sixty decibels was as

1:01:51.000 --> 1:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>loud as you could play the music. We had a

1:01:53.840 --> 1:01:56.440
<v Speaker 1>decibel meter that kept it at sixty year under. But

1:01:56.520 --> 1:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>it didn't please the neighbor, especially at eight or nine

1:02:00.760 --> 1:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>o'clock when we were in the pool, and so, um,

1:02:03.600 --> 1:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, he kept seeing and kept calling the cops.

1:02:05.720 --> 1:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Etcetera to tour and ultimately we wound up in court

1:02:08.600 --> 1:02:14.000
<v Speaker 1>for playing loud music. And it is sort of disheartening. Um,

1:02:14.920 --> 1:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>not that it diminishes my career, but it's certainly what

1:02:19.360 --> 1:02:23.080
<v Speaker 1>people talk about. And you know, I guess my epitaph

1:02:23.080 --> 1:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>will be half on King and half you know, loud music,

1:02:27.360 --> 1:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>which is a little disturbing, but that I was part

1:02:30.520 --> 1:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>of it. Bill, I wish you would have called me

1:02:33.040 --> 1:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>for advice. I would have given you a very simple solution.

1:02:36.440 --> 1:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Asked him when he wants for the house, by it

1:02:38.360 --> 1:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and knock it down, and him solved he didn't have

1:02:43.080 --> 1:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>as much money as I did. I'm going to tell

1:02:45.600 --> 1:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you I someone I worked for at a neighbor that

1:02:47.680 --> 1:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>was problematic and that was their solution, Hey, what do

1:02:50.360 --> 1:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>you want for your house? And the guy threw out

1:02:51.760 --> 1:02:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a ridiculous numberies like done. Have your lawyer called my

1:02:54.800 --> 1:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>lawyer and we'll we'll be bulldozing this in a month. Um. So,

1:02:58.680 --> 1:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>so you know, Harry's book is out. Your book is out.

1:03:02.480 --> 1:03:05.120
<v Speaker 1>There's been reviews of both. Your book actually got some

1:03:05.160 --> 1:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty good reviews. Also, you really let a lot of

1:03:08.440 --> 1:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff out there that most people don't any regrets about

1:03:13.280 --> 1:03:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the book. Is there anything you feel like, well, maybe

1:03:15.760 --> 1:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I shouldn't have gone that far here or hey, this

1:03:20.960 --> 1:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>is who I am and you gotta take the good

1:03:23.600 --> 1:03:27.400
<v Speaker 1>with the bad. No, no regrets about the book. I

1:03:27.400 --> 1:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>mean I read it myself about a hundred times over

1:03:30.960 --> 1:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and over and over again and and cut some stuff

1:03:33.200 --> 1:03:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and not um what I wanted to do. What was

1:03:36.160 --> 1:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to present subjectively of course from my uh classes, but uh,

1:03:44.240 --> 1:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>what I thought was a fair arguments on either side

1:03:47.760 --> 1:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>from pim Pill and myself and tend to explain to

1:03:50.720 --> 1:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>what I called the you know, the Pimpco magic um

1:03:54.640 --> 1:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>why we were so successful? And I I think that's

1:03:58.360 --> 1:04:01.120
<v Speaker 1>the heart of the book. Um, you know why it

1:04:01.200 --> 1:04:06.360
<v Speaker 1>was spent Pimco successful? What what were the people like? Um?

1:04:07.320 --> 1:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So it um. I think it was a good book.

1:04:10.000 --> 1:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It was I think it. I shouldn't say this. I

1:04:13.240 --> 1:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>think that a great book and I think people should

1:04:17.400 --> 1:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>read it. Not not thoroughly. You can't spend three or

1:04:21.800 --> 1:04:25.320
<v Speaker 1>four hours reading it. But there's some very interesting parts

1:04:25.320 --> 1:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and there's some interesting investment outlooks in the appendix h

1:04:30.520 --> 1:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know, I think are pretty humorous. Since some

1:04:34.240 --> 1:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of the best and so I, uh, it's only four

1:04:37.200 --> 1:04:41.640
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine, So I'd recommend, you know, going to where

1:04:41.680 --> 1:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>you need to go, Amazon or wherever it is, and

1:04:45.240 --> 1:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>and all the proceeds are donated to charity. Yeah, to

1:04:48.640 --> 1:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the to the extent that that matter as much, But

1:04:52.480 --> 1:04:55.760
<v Speaker 1>that's where where it goes. Let's talk a little bit

1:04:55.760 --> 1:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>about the state of the market today and what's going on.

1:05:00.560 --> 1:05:04.200
<v Speaker 1>When you wrote the book, inflation was looking like it

1:05:04.240 --> 1:05:07.959
<v Speaker 1>was gonna tick all the way up to five. We're

1:05:07.960 --> 1:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>recording this towards the end of March. The last print

1:05:10.640 --> 1:05:14.040
<v Speaker 1>we got was just about eight percent. What's your view

1:05:14.680 --> 1:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of inflation here? Is this transitory or is this a

1:05:18.400 --> 1:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>kin to the nineties seventies or is this something completely different? Well,

1:05:23.120 --> 1:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's transitory. Uh. In other words, going

1:05:26.960 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>back to two or less. Um, I think it's a result, yes,

1:05:34.440 --> 1:05:41.880
<v Speaker 1>of supply shocks, of oil prices, of the war in Ukraine. Um,

1:05:42.560 --> 1:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of global considerations, but it's also, um,

1:05:47.800 --> 1:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, a Freedman Milton Freedman type of thing in

1:05:50.760 --> 1:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>which you know, basically money supply matters. And I'll take

1:05:54.920 --> 1:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it back very and uh, I don't think he started then,

1:05:58.720 --> 1:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>but you're certainly aware of Nikon went off the gold standard,

1:06:04.080 --> 1:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and credit was free to be created as opposed to

1:06:07.560 --> 1:06:10.480
<v Speaker 1>be tied to the gold and and back the inn

1:06:10.920 --> 1:06:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Total credit in the United States and I'm talking about mortgages,

1:06:14.440 --> 1:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about government that, I'm talking about credit cards,

1:06:17.360 --> 1:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about everything was one trillion dollars um. Today

1:06:23.080 --> 1:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that number is eighties seven trillion. And so talk about

1:06:27.080 --> 1:06:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a growth industry um one to eight seven over what

1:06:32.200 --> 1:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty one years UM. And so it's been this tremendous

1:06:36.920 --> 1:06:41.520
<v Speaker 1>creation of credit in the last few years, certainly based

1:06:41.600 --> 1:06:45.240
<v Speaker 1>upon the COVID bill out and as well as the

1:06:45.280 --> 1:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>fiscal uh stimulation of four trillion dollars. Uh. You know,

1:06:50.680 --> 1:06:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to study the economy. So when you combine a huge

1:06:54.320 --> 1:06:59.040
<v Speaker 1>discal push with monetary creation and the FED increasing its

1:06:59.080 --> 1:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>balanchie date brillion and like I say, credit credit credit um,

1:07:03.720 --> 1:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>inflation is inevitable. And so if they continue to do this,

1:07:07.520 --> 1:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and I know the Fed's talked about reducing its balance

1:07:10.200 --> 1:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>sheet UM, and the government isn't issuing a four trillion

1:07:15.120 --> 1:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>dollar deficit, perhaps there's one trillion now um. Yeah, this

1:07:20.640 --> 1:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>is certainly excessive in terms of the possibility of exceeding

1:07:24.320 --> 1:07:27.680
<v Speaker 1>too pers and inflation. So yeah, we're coming back down. Yes,

1:07:27.800 --> 1:07:31.920
<v Speaker 1>oil prices and gasoline prices will uh steady at some

1:07:31.960 --> 1:07:34.040
<v Speaker 1>point and come back down. The same thing with food

1:07:34.080 --> 1:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>and wheat and um, all of the commodities. Um. But um.

1:07:41.080 --> 1:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And this is a guess, um, you know, forty five

1:07:44.240 --> 1:07:47.480
<v Speaker 1>inflation for the next several years I think is baked

1:07:47.520 --> 1:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>in the cake. And the question becomes, now that the

1:07:50.640 --> 1:07:56.040
<v Speaker 1>FED isn't buying bonds, who wants to buy them? At

1:07:56.920 --> 1:07:59.720
<v Speaker 1>you to thirty five of the tenure and and two

1:08:00.240 --> 1:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>for the third year, and and perhaps a flight to safety,

1:08:05.040 --> 1:08:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I can see that. But but you're certainly being out inflated.

1:08:12.240 --> 1:08:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I guess by um, you know, the the existing in

1:08:16.120 --> 1:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the future trail of inflation going forward, bonds are definitely

1:08:22.200 --> 1:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>something to avoid. Huh. That's really interesting. The FED. Are

1:08:26.160 --> 1:08:29.559
<v Speaker 1>they behind the curve? And if so, by how much? Yeah,

1:08:29.560 --> 1:08:32.960
<v Speaker 1>they're way behind the curve. And I can see, uh,

1:08:33.160 --> 1:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the COVID crisis of a year two years

1:08:36.400 --> 1:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>back now or getting onto two years. I can see

1:08:40.080 --> 1:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>how that would be a reason to not raise interest rates,

1:08:44.439 --> 1:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>to not stop buying bonds. But you know, I think

1:08:48.200 --> 1:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Powell should have figured it out that you know, a

1:08:51.640 --> 1:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>four trillion dollar budget deficit. In the stimulation in the

1:08:55.720 --> 1:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>economy that that creates, as well as the credit that

1:09:00.040 --> 1:09:05.080
<v Speaker 1>is being created by his policies at near zero posent industry,

1:09:05.080 --> 1:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>it's was was ultimately going to be very inflationary, and

1:09:08.400 --> 1:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>that to think that he could stop it, um, And

1:09:12.479 --> 1:09:15.040
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't speak to stop in it at a time.

1:09:15.160 --> 1:09:18.200
<v Speaker 1>He says it will take time. But once you get

1:09:18.200 --> 1:09:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the momentum going like in the seventies, um, you know,

1:09:22.040 --> 1:09:24.599
<v Speaker 1>in the in the rays is you know, based upon

1:09:25.720 --> 1:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>prices at the stores and grocery stores. Uh, you know,

1:09:28.960 --> 1:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it's pretty hard to stop. And in order to keep

1:09:32.280 --> 1:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>the economy above the line, that's the important thing. To

1:09:35.200 --> 1:09:38.439
<v Speaker 1>keep it above the line in terms of fortified percent

1:09:39.040 --> 1:09:44.080
<v Speaker 1>nominal GDP, which was the standard before. Uh, you have

1:09:44.240 --> 1:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to keep on printing money. And ultimately that becomes destructive,

1:09:51.479 --> 1:09:54.200
<v Speaker 1>not just in terms of inflation, but in terms of savings,

1:09:54.240 --> 1:09:58.559
<v Speaker 1>and it distorts the U. S economy, and it's distorts

1:09:58.560 --> 1:10:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the global economy. So I'm going to assume you don't

1:10:02.160 --> 1:10:07.679
<v Speaker 1>think bonds are buy anytime soon. No, I don't, But

1:10:07.680 --> 1:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>but I don't see here, you know, I think there's

1:10:09.840 --> 1:10:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a limit to the tenure. I've talked about in my

1:10:13.080 --> 1:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>tweets in the last few weeks about you know, breaking

1:10:16.560 --> 1:10:20.599
<v Speaker 1>a long term down trendline at two fifteen for the tenure,

1:10:20.600 --> 1:10:23.200
<v Speaker 1>and now it's at two thirty five, so theoretically it's

1:10:23.280 --> 1:10:29.040
<v Speaker 1>broken the line. Um, I don't don't think the economy

1:10:29.080 --> 1:10:33.200
<v Speaker 1>can stand much more in terms of higher yields. I mean,

1:10:33.560 --> 1:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>we have a flat Yielker, what does that mean ultimately

1:10:37.120 --> 1:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in terms of forward interest rates? It it basically means

1:10:40.160 --> 1:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>that the tenure at two thirty five five years forward

1:10:44.200 --> 1:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>is estimated to be two forty or two forty five.

1:10:47.400 --> 1:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So all of all of the curve going forward basically

1:10:53.520 --> 1:10:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in terms of current pricing, is suggesting that interest rates

1:10:58.120 --> 1:11:01.240
<v Speaker 1>don't go up much. And so why that be if

1:11:01.360 --> 1:11:07.840
<v Speaker 1>inflation is four it would be simply because if it

1:11:08.560 --> 1:11:11.839
<v Speaker 1>ten year goes to three or three and a half

1:11:11.920 --> 1:11:17.080
<v Speaker 1>or four um, then it'll break the economy, much like

1:11:17.479 --> 1:11:20.320
<v Speaker 1>when the said went to five and a quarter in

1:11:20.400 --> 1:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and six, it broke the mortgage market. You

1:11:24.720 --> 1:11:27.240
<v Speaker 1>know now are at much lower levels, but there's been

1:11:27.280 --> 1:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot more debt created. And I simply think that

1:11:32.640 --> 1:11:36.800
<v Speaker 1>uh fifty basis points higher is about as much as

1:11:37.080 --> 1:11:40.920
<v Speaker 1>as the economy can take. Otherwise we see recession. And

1:11:41.280 --> 1:11:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that's basically what the flat you care You'll curve is

1:11:43.880 --> 1:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>telling you that that you've got to be careful. And

1:11:46.920 --> 1:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>that's why the thirty year bond with um, you know,

1:11:50.360 --> 1:11:54.599
<v Speaker 1>a duration of of you know, close to twenty is

1:11:54.760 --> 1:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>trading at two and a half percent. It's simply because

1:11:58.200 --> 1:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>there are those that think, um, that it interest rates

1:12:02.320 --> 1:12:07.200
<v Speaker 1>go much higher, the economy will enter a recession. UM.

1:12:07.240 --> 1:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>So I don't like bonds. Obviously, if you buy a

1:12:10.760 --> 1:12:13.320
<v Speaker 1>tenure at two thirty five, you're not getting paid your

1:12:13.320 --> 1:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>money's worth relative to inflation. You should go elsewhere. But

1:12:18.040 --> 1:12:23.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't think there's the nineteen eighty one

1:12:23.960 --> 1:12:29.360
<v Speaker 1>risk anytime soon of interest rates moving much more than

1:12:29.400 --> 1:12:34.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred risk spots higher. Huh, that's really interesting. Let

1:12:34.400 --> 1:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>me give you a counterfactual to the issue of a

1:12:38.720 --> 1:12:44.599
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in credit. Fifty years ago. Hypothetically, there wasn't

1:12:44.640 --> 1:12:49.240
<v Speaker 1>this massive credit creation, uh Fanny Freddie, the government, the

1:12:49.280 --> 1:12:54.760
<v Speaker 1>private sector, of the household sector. Let's say the outstanding

1:12:54.760 --> 1:12:59.040
<v Speaker 1>credit was a couple of trillion dollars. What would that

1:12:59.160 --> 1:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>lack of credit creation have meant for the economy. Asked differently,

1:13:04.960 --> 1:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>how much of our wealth and success and GDP expansion

1:13:10.320 --> 1:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>and rising in corporate profits is related to all of

1:13:15.240 --> 1:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>this credit that's been issued. Oh, it is um and

1:13:20.360 --> 1:13:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and certainly you need to create credit, ongoing credit relative

1:13:25.280 --> 1:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>till last year and the year before, in order to

1:13:29.600 --> 1:13:35.800
<v Speaker 1>to keep the economy going. Um. The question becomes how

1:13:35.880 --> 1:13:39.240
<v Speaker 1>much how much credit? And uh, certainly in the last

1:13:39.400 --> 1:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>several years, it's accelerated dramatically because of the physical and

1:13:44.040 --> 1:13:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the monetary stance at zero pers and interest rates. And

1:13:47.439 --> 1:13:49.839
<v Speaker 1>no one can really judge, no one. No one can

1:13:49.880 --> 1:13:53.080
<v Speaker 1>tell you or any no one can tell me that

1:13:53.200 --> 1:13:57.920
<v Speaker 1>they know what the number is. It's just that the

1:13:58.000 --> 1:14:03.680
<v Speaker 1>global economy, than most part is hooked on more and

1:14:03.680 --> 1:14:07.519
<v Speaker 1>more credit, more and more money. And that's what you know,

1:14:07.600 --> 1:14:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the cryptos, that's what bitcoin and ethereum and so and

1:14:13.120 --> 1:14:18.120
<v Speaker 1>represent in terms of people that are fearful that the

1:14:18.240 --> 1:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>government keeps on printing. So, so let's talk about that.

1:14:22.320 --> 1:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna suggest it's not a huge coincidence that all

1:14:27.400 --> 1:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the credit created during the financial crisis in a eight

1:14:31.320 --> 1:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and oh nine and beyond coincided with the creation of

1:14:36.360 --> 1:14:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different cryptocurrencies and their rise in price.

1:14:40.760 --> 1:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned your own bitcoin, You're optimistic about etherorium. This

1:14:45.200 --> 1:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>is not the typical safe bond experience. This is a

1:14:48.320 --> 1:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>bit of a long shot. So tell us why you've

1:14:51.960 --> 1:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>jumped aboard the cryptocurrency train. Well, it it's not a

1:15:00.200 --> 1:15:05.880
<v Speaker 1>because of its volatility and compared to the dollar. You know,

1:15:06.120 --> 1:15:10.639
<v Speaker 1>it's certainly ten times as volatile as the dollar, uh

1:15:10.800 --> 1:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>during any particular period of time. So to use it

1:15:14.720 --> 1:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>as a medium of exchange, which ultimately I think it

1:15:19.960 --> 1:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>will be um and is becoming. Uh, you know, it

1:15:23.960 --> 1:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>does a very risky proposition that depends on on the

1:15:28.320 --> 1:15:31.920
<v Speaker 1>level of bitcoing on any particular day, any particular moment.

1:15:32.040 --> 1:15:37.559
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fascinating on Saturday and Sunday at at midnight,

1:15:37.640 --> 1:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I can I can see trading in in bitcoin. Um.

1:15:42.000 --> 1:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, limited though it is, but UM, I think

1:15:45.400 --> 1:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>ultimately you know the global financial system which is dollar

1:15:49.280 --> 1:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>dependent and dollars supported. Um. You know, much like in

1:15:53.400 --> 1:15:58.520
<v Speaker 1>the seventies in which Nixon broke the code from gold. Um,

1:15:58.600 --> 1:16:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, things happen, and now that there is a

1:16:03.920 --> 1:16:08.920
<v Speaker 1>potential alternative in terms of bitcoin and some of the

1:16:08.920 --> 1:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>other cryptos UM. You know, I think it offers the

1:16:14.880 --> 1:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to UM to avoid, to avoid a currency that

1:16:21.840 --> 1:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>goes down, down, down, in terms of its value. UM.

1:16:25.479 --> 1:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, the bitcoin ultimately is capped, at least they

1:16:29.720 --> 1:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>say it's kepped, you know, at a certain level, most

1:16:33.000 --> 1:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>of which has already been mined or or supplied, and

1:16:36.200 --> 1:16:40.160
<v Speaker 1>so UM to the extent that future supply is limited,

1:16:40.240 --> 1:16:42.559
<v Speaker 1>and to the extent, and this is important, to the

1:16:42.600 --> 1:16:47.639
<v Speaker 1>extent that it becomes a medium of exchange and it's

1:16:47.680 --> 1:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>not really a medium of exchange yet. You can't buy

1:16:50.280 --> 1:16:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a donut with bitcoin, but you can buy other things.

1:16:53.439 --> 1:16:56.519
<v Speaker 1>And there are countries that UM are are using it.

1:16:57.680 --> 1:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>So UM, you know, it's it's up in the air.

1:17:01.280 --> 1:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>And you know, did I get in at a good price? No,

1:17:05.800 --> 1:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I think I got in it through a mutual under fifty.

1:17:09.720 --> 1:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>But I just it's just a small, it's up, small piece.

1:17:14.120 --> 1:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>I use it mainly for observation and to remind me

1:17:17.680 --> 1:17:24.120
<v Speaker 1>that that even the dollar has a global standard, UM

1:17:24.640 --> 1:17:30.479
<v Speaker 1>is subject to future volatility and certainly to appreciation in

1:17:30.560 --> 1:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of its value relative to what it can buy.

1:17:35.160 --> 1:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>Really interesting, let's let's talk growth stocks and technology UM.

1:17:40.040 --> 1:17:43.479
<v Speaker 1>They had a great couple of years until I don't know,

1:17:43.520 --> 1:17:46.519
<v Speaker 1>about four or five months ago, we've seen that the

1:17:46.640 --> 1:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>complex really takes some some hits. What what are you

1:17:49.479 --> 1:17:53.240
<v Speaker 1>thought about the various tech stocks that are out there

1:17:53.320 --> 1:17:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and and some of the managers who kind of rose

1:17:57.400 --> 1:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to fame on on the rallying technolog ology. Well, I

1:18:02.479 --> 1:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>think two months ago at the Pig there was a

1:18:06.880 --> 1:18:10.160
<v Speaker 1>bubble in most of these talks. Um. You know, many

1:18:10.200 --> 1:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>of them had no earnings and really no prospect for

1:18:14.960 --> 1:18:18.559
<v Speaker 1>earnings two three or four or five years in the future. Um.

1:18:19.080 --> 1:18:21.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, they were based on hope and and yes,

1:18:21.880 --> 1:18:28.519
<v Speaker 1>on objective and subjective estimations of a changing world in

1:18:28.600 --> 1:18:33.840
<v Speaker 1>terms of technology, um, and a consumer use of that technology.

1:18:33.920 --> 1:18:36.839
<v Speaker 1>Sylum that you've pointed out in the past that quote

1:18:36.880 --> 1:18:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the new stock Queen Cathy would seems to be a

1:18:40.160 --> 1:18:43.599
<v Speaker 1>two year wonder and since then the art complex has

1:18:43.600 --> 1:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>had some pretty serious draw downs. What are your thoughts

1:18:47.080 --> 1:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>on managers like Woods who have you know, put together

1:18:50.680 --> 1:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>a great track record when the big cap profitable companies

1:18:55.040 --> 1:18:59.880
<v Speaker 1>the Google's, Amazon's Apples, Tesla's Netflix and Video, when when

1:19:00.000 --> 1:19:03.760
<v Speaker 1>those have been screaming higher, Well, you know, I give

1:19:03.760 --> 1:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>her credit. I watched she's got fifteen billion under management,

1:19:08.040 --> 1:19:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and and that's that's just how you break into this market.

1:19:13.439 --> 1:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't break in by being a junior clerk like

1:19:16.680 --> 1:19:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I was it at Pacific Mutual. You break in with

1:19:20.040 --> 1:19:25.200
<v Speaker 1>an innovative, innovative idea, and hers was that these companies

1:19:25.240 --> 1:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that she was buying, um, you know, we're a significant

1:19:28.960 --> 1:19:33.400
<v Speaker 1>part of our future economic future. And I think that's true.

1:19:33.439 --> 1:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, I listened to her on CNBC all

1:19:35.960 --> 1:19:39.880
<v Speaker 1>the time, and it seems like she doesn't have an

1:19:39.960 --> 1:19:44.519
<v Speaker 1>excellent sense of value and when to buy and what

1:19:44.720 --> 1:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to pay. Um. She she simply thinks that at some

1:19:48.360 --> 1:19:52.320
<v Speaker 1>point down the road, on the long term road, that

1:19:53.560 --> 1:19:58.320
<v Speaker 1>her her judgment in terms of owning these securities will

1:19:58.360 --> 1:20:02.559
<v Speaker 1>be validated. And perhaps I will. But in the meantime, um,

1:20:02.600 --> 1:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, subject to the huge veil of volatility. And

1:20:07.360 --> 1:20:10.479
<v Speaker 1>I I also think, you know, much like Peter Lynch

1:20:10.560 --> 1:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>back and not to knock Peter Lynch because uh, you know,

1:20:14.000 --> 1:20:19.280
<v Speaker 1>he was a significant part of the late eighties and

1:20:19.439 --> 1:20:23.360
<v Speaker 1>early nineties UM in terms of Magellan, but you know,

1:20:23.400 --> 1:20:26.280
<v Speaker 1>once more money started to come into was fun because

1:20:26.280 --> 1:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>he was doing well, that money went straight into the

1:20:28.840 --> 1:20:31.880
<v Speaker 1>same stock that he was owning and buying, and uh,

1:20:32.000 --> 1:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, I went up, up, up, because the cash

1:20:34.040 --> 1:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>flow was going straight into that. And I think the

1:20:37.280 --> 1:20:40.120
<v Speaker 1>same thing for the last several years with arc Um

1:20:40.280 --> 1:20:43.759
<v Speaker 1>and uh some of the other funds that she manages,

1:20:43.880 --> 1:20:47.479
<v Speaker 1>huge inflows would lead to more and more and more buying,

1:20:47.560 --> 1:20:52.280
<v Speaker 1>and now, uh, some of the outflows lead to lower

1:20:52.280 --> 1:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>and lower prices. And so I think you just have

1:20:55.160 --> 1:20:59.519
<v Speaker 1>to be careful in terms of anointing someone that has

1:20:59.560 --> 1:21:01.880
<v Speaker 1>a had a good record for two years. Now it's

1:21:02.400 --> 1:21:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the last year, it's not so good. Um, you know,

1:21:05.280 --> 1:21:07.360
<v Speaker 1>let's let's see what happens five years from now. I

1:21:07.520 --> 1:21:10.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's a little early fit fair enough. And to

1:21:10.200 --> 1:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>clarify the assets under management, I want to say that

1:21:14.520 --> 1:21:18.519
<v Speaker 1>it was about coming up on sixty billion at its peak,

1:21:19.120 --> 1:21:22.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's since fallen at least as of the beginning

1:21:22.720 --> 1:21:25.559
<v Speaker 1>of this year, to about twenty three or twenty five

1:21:25.640 --> 1:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. I'm not looking at her releases, but more

1:21:30.160 --> 1:21:33.599
<v Speaker 1>or less that seems to be a ballpark number when

1:21:33.600 --> 1:21:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at their website. So let's talk about someone

1:21:37.840 --> 1:21:41.800
<v Speaker 1>else you actually mentioned in the book. Who's another fund

1:21:41.840 --> 1:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>manager you you talk about Jeff Gunlock, who many anointed

1:21:46.280 --> 1:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>as the heir apparents or placed you. I don't know

1:21:48.800 --> 1:21:51.880
<v Speaker 1>if that worked out that way. What are your thoughts

1:21:51.920 --> 1:21:58.160
<v Speaker 1>about gunlocks approach to managing fixed income? Well, he's sort

1:21:58.160 --> 1:22:01.840
<v Speaker 1>of anointed himself. I mean, one of the commentators on

1:22:01.960 --> 1:22:06.439
<v Speaker 1>CNBC throughout the term once and and he ran with him.

1:22:06.479 --> 1:22:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess, I guess I did too. But you know,

1:22:10.080 --> 1:22:12.839
<v Speaker 1>to be a bond king, you've got to have a kingdom.

1:22:13.080 --> 1:22:18.439
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Pemco's kingdom, although ultimately grew to one

1:22:18.479 --> 1:22:22.639
<v Speaker 1>to two trillion dollars a gun Lex kingdom, in terms

1:22:22.680 --> 1:22:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of his mutual funders around fifty billion dollars and not growing,

1:22:26.880 --> 1:22:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and and his performance has been like sixtieth percentile for

1:22:33.040 --> 1:22:36.880
<v Speaker 1>three years, five years or whatever. I think he's a

1:22:36.920 --> 1:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>smart guy. You know, when I listened to him on

1:22:39.200 --> 1:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>c NBC, I O, yes. And he he follows markets,

1:22:45.040 --> 1:22:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, very assiduously. He's he's really into it. So

1:22:50.120 --> 1:22:53.799
<v Speaker 1>I respect that. But you got to put up the numbers,

1:22:53.800 --> 1:22:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and you've got to build your kingdom in order to

1:22:57.000 --> 1:23:00.040
<v Speaker 1>be the bond king or the new bond king. And

1:23:01.280 --> 1:23:03.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think anybody can be the future

1:23:03.640 --> 1:23:08.120
<v Speaker 1>bond king because central banks basically are the kings and

1:23:08.160 --> 1:23:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the queens of the market. They rule, They determine where

1:23:11.920 --> 1:23:15.880
<v Speaker 1>interest rates are going, not um you know von managers

1:23:15.920 --> 1:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>like him too or uh you know Double Line, etcetera, etcetera.

1:23:21.040 --> 1:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I think the term is sort of

1:23:23.880 --> 1:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>passe and certainly unlock doesn't tip uh you know, the

1:23:28.520 --> 1:23:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the past definition of what a bond king should be. Right,

1:23:32.040 --> 1:23:36.080
<v Speaker 1>And and as of December thirty one, Double Line had

1:23:36.640 --> 1:23:40.640
<v Speaker 1>add thirty four billion in assets under management. Totally, I

1:23:40.680 --> 1:23:44.280
<v Speaker 1>don't I'm not seeing the breakdown by fund, but you

1:23:44.320 --> 1:23:48.559
<v Speaker 1>know it's definitely a substantial amount of money, but you know,

1:23:48.680 --> 1:23:51.439
<v Speaker 1>not a trillion dollars worth. Let's you know, one of

1:23:51.479 --> 1:23:55.919
<v Speaker 1>the things we should talk about is risks to financial markets.

1:23:55.960 --> 1:23:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And you have pointed out that climate change is an

1:24:00.000 --> 1:24:04.400
<v Speaker 1>actual risk factor. Tell us what you see, um as

1:24:04.400 --> 1:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that risk from rising temperatures and and how do you

1:24:08.400 --> 1:24:13.479
<v Speaker 1>think about E S G investment? Well, I think the

1:24:13.600 --> 1:24:17.040
<v Speaker 1>risk is is it's sort of like the broken window syndrome.

1:24:17.080 --> 1:24:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so that sends a baseball through a window

1:24:23.040 --> 1:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>on their brakes and you've got to replace it. Um,

1:24:26.439 --> 1:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>that increases G D p the replacement of a window,

1:24:29.760 --> 1:24:32.160
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't make the window any better than it

1:24:32.280 --> 1:24:35.519
<v Speaker 1>was before. And it's it's really the same thing. I

1:24:35.840 --> 1:24:41.960
<v Speaker 1>think in terms of global warming, UM does um, you know,

1:24:42.000 --> 1:24:45.559
<v Speaker 1>because it requires a huge amount of investment in order

1:24:45.560 --> 1:24:49.360
<v Speaker 1>to to stop it from going forward, and a huge

1:24:49.479 --> 1:24:55.559
<v Speaker 1>change in terms of societal behavior and and so that

1:24:55.680 --> 1:25:01.880
<v Speaker 1>investment that goes into capping carbon creation at a certain level.

1:25:02.920 --> 1:25:08.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, if if global warming wasn't taking place, then um,

1:25:08.439 --> 1:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>then you could use that money for something more productive.

1:25:12.240 --> 1:25:16.439
<v Speaker 1>But it's it's you can't really call it productive. If

1:25:16.920 --> 1:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you simply stop a negative trend from happening, it it

1:25:21.960 --> 1:25:25.960
<v Speaker 1>makes things better than they would be. But it's sort

1:25:26.000 --> 1:25:29.599
<v Speaker 1>of like the broken window. And so UM, I think

1:25:29.720 --> 1:25:35.400
<v Speaker 1>in the future enormously countries and companies will be moving

1:25:35.600 --> 1:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>in the direction of of creating a better future environment

1:25:42.280 --> 1:25:48.120
<v Speaker 1>for us and for our kids and grandkids. But but ultimately, UM,

1:25:48.439 --> 1:25:50.519
<v Speaker 1>it won't make it any better and then it is now.

1:25:50.680 --> 1:25:54.800
<v Speaker 1>It will simply not make it worse. And uh, that

1:25:54.920 --> 1:25:57.360
<v Speaker 1>costal lot of money, and I don't don't make it

1:25:57.400 --> 1:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>worse that that's the advice at this point. Huh. Interesting,

1:26:01.600 --> 1:26:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you know we've gone this far into the conversation, and

1:26:04.640 --> 1:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>I just haven't gotten around to ask you about your

1:26:08.160 --> 1:26:12.960
<v Speaker 1>days as a card counter playing blackjack. Tell us a

1:26:13.040 --> 1:26:15.599
<v Speaker 1>little bit, which also you mentioned in the book. Tell

1:26:15.680 --> 1:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about Ed Thorpe and his books

1:26:19.720 --> 1:26:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and what led you to to head to Sin City. Well,

1:26:24.960 --> 1:26:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll go through it quickly. Uh. You know that the

1:26:27.479 --> 1:26:32.200
<v Speaker 1>year before I graduated from Duke in sixty I had

1:26:32.200 --> 1:26:34.599
<v Speaker 1>gone to Bahamas on the spring break and I lost

1:26:35.520 --> 1:26:40.839
<v Speaker 1>fifty on the black jack table um. And I remembered

1:26:40.880 --> 1:26:45.600
<v Speaker 1>that after I uh nearly cut off the top of

1:26:45.640 --> 1:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>my head in a car accident and was in a

1:26:48.000 --> 1:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>hospital for a long time, and somebody introduced me to

1:26:52.160 --> 1:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>this new book called Beat the Dealer. Until I had

1:26:54.200 --> 1:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>all the time in the world to sit there and

1:26:56.800 --> 1:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and to discover whether or not his theory about car

1:27:01.280 --> 1:27:03.840
<v Speaker 1>counting worked. I didn't have a computer, but I would

1:27:03.840 --> 1:27:07.040
<v Speaker 1>play thousands of hands of black jack back and forth,

1:27:07.080 --> 1:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>back and forth, and I discovered it worked. And so

1:27:10.880 --> 1:27:14.920
<v Speaker 1>when I graduated from Duke in May of sixty six,

1:27:14.920 --> 1:27:18.759
<v Speaker 1>and before I was going into the Navy and ultimately

1:27:18.800 --> 1:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to Vietnam. Four months later, I went to Las Vegas.

1:27:23.200 --> 1:27:25.439
<v Speaker 1>I hopped on a freight train. I had two hundred

1:27:25.439 --> 1:27:30.759
<v Speaker 1>dollars that's all I could afford to put on the tables,

1:27:30.880 --> 1:27:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and took a freight chain, took seven days to Vegas,

1:27:34.240 --> 1:27:37.960
<v Speaker 1>got off at the Golden Nugget right in downtown and

1:27:36.920 --> 1:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>U and rented a six dollar a day motel that

1:27:41.080 --> 1:27:44.519
<v Speaker 1>n cents of free nickels and a free breakfast. And

1:27:45.360 --> 1:27:50.880
<v Speaker 1>so I started playing black jack. That that basically taught me.

1:27:50.920 --> 1:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>I ultimately turned it into ten thousand and it paid

1:27:54.000 --> 1:27:57.360
<v Speaker 1>for my graduate school. But it taught me about money management.

1:27:57.360 --> 1:28:01.720
<v Speaker 1>It basically it worked off what they all the Kelly system, UM,

1:28:01.920 --> 1:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the system where you can't bet more than two of

1:28:04.840 --> 1:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>your um your your stake, even if the odds were

1:28:09.920 --> 1:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>tremendously in your favor, because things can go wrong. And

1:28:12.840 --> 1:28:18.440
<v Speaker 1>so when I ultimately went to Pacific Mutual and Independo,

1:28:18.680 --> 1:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>it became an instrumental part of risk management for me

1:28:23.560 --> 1:28:26.200
<v Speaker 1>because it made a lot of sense and uh and

1:28:27.400 --> 1:28:32.120
<v Speaker 1>it still does. Um but um yeah, Vegas for me

1:28:32.320 --> 1:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>was was was the heart of my career ultimately as

1:28:38.720 --> 1:28:43.200
<v Speaker 1>as it came to pass it it it taught me

1:28:43.280 --> 1:28:46.839
<v Speaker 1>what I like to do it just to bet against

1:28:46.840 --> 1:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the house and to make money it um it provided

1:28:50.400 --> 1:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a system of money management, and ultimately I would all

1:28:56.439 --> 1:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>to at Thorpe who eventually I met he ups out

1:29:00.439 --> 1:29:04.240
<v Speaker 1>here and yeah in Newport Beach Irvine, who was a

1:29:04.280 --> 1:29:09.040
<v Speaker 1>mathematics professor, and we came together to to fund a

1:29:09.400 --> 1:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>stem cell research center at ten million dollars. Um you

1:29:13.680 --> 1:29:16.639
<v Speaker 1>know what you see, Irvine, And so we contact each

1:29:16.640 --> 1:29:21.240
<v Speaker 1>other once in a while. Um. Uh. He's a very

1:29:21.280 --> 1:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>smart guy, smarter than me, but um you know, very

1:29:25.760 --> 1:29:28.880
<v Speaker 1>fun to talk to and uh and to talk about

1:29:28.920 --> 1:29:32.559
<v Speaker 1>his times in Las Vegas, which were much much larger

1:29:32.600 --> 1:29:38.160
<v Speaker 1>than my ultimate ten dollars. Did you ever run into

1:29:38.240 --> 1:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>any of the trouble he did? The Vegas is not

1:29:41.600 --> 1:29:45.080
<v Speaker 1>fond of either people who win money from them, and

1:29:45.320 --> 1:29:50.479
<v Speaker 1>especially not fond of card counters as they're known. Did

1:29:50.520 --> 1:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you have the same sort of problems of getting chase

1:29:54.120 --> 1:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>from casino to casino like he did. Yeah, I get

1:29:58.080 --> 1:30:00.120
<v Speaker 1>chased from a few and I was very proud of it.

1:30:00.200 --> 1:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Was like a badge of honor to be to be

1:30:05.600 --> 1:30:08.519
<v Speaker 1>kicked out. I would wear different disguises, I would wear

1:30:08.560 --> 1:30:11.599
<v Speaker 1>a hat, I would wear different clothes to the extent

1:30:11.720 --> 1:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of that had them, but that they could eventually track

1:30:16.040 --> 1:30:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a card counters simply by watching the size of their bets.

1:30:21.280 --> 1:30:23.559
<v Speaker 1>You know, I would bet two dollars and then ten,

1:30:23.800 --> 1:30:26.920
<v Speaker 1>and then three dollars and then fifteen, back and forth,

1:30:26.920 --> 1:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>back and forth, and they could ultimately watch my eyes

1:30:31.160 --> 1:30:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and see me covering the table in three or four

1:30:34.040 --> 1:30:37.680
<v Speaker 1>seconds in terms of counting the cards. So, um, was

1:30:37.720 --> 1:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>I killing the casinos with my UH ten dollar winning

1:30:42.000 --> 1:30:45.519
<v Speaker 1>to no? But they simply didn't like the trend, and

1:30:47.080 --> 1:30:51.599
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, I got booted a few times. So last

1:30:51.680 --> 1:30:54.360
<v Speaker 1>question before I get to my favorite questions that we

1:30:54.400 --> 1:30:58.240
<v Speaker 1>ask all our guests. In the book, you talk about

1:30:58.240 --> 1:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>having a mild case of Asperger syndrome. Tell us about that.

1:31:03.720 --> 1:31:07.600
<v Speaker 1>How has this affected your life? How is it manifested?

1:31:08.240 --> 1:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>A number of other great investors UM have either discussed

1:31:13.960 --> 1:31:17.120
<v Speaker 1>being on the spectrum or wondered if they're on the spectrum.

1:31:17.520 --> 1:31:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about your experience with Asperger syndrome. Well, I

1:31:23.120 --> 1:31:26.320
<v Speaker 1>was never aware of it until I read Michael Lewis's

1:31:26.320 --> 1:31:29.599
<v Speaker 1>book The Big Short and in one of the chapters

1:31:29.600 --> 1:31:35.439
<v Speaker 1>he talks about an individual called Michael Drury who has

1:31:35.760 --> 1:31:39.679
<v Speaker 1>still as prominent in the press. I guess with shorting

1:31:39.760 --> 1:31:44.720
<v Speaker 1>and managing money. But he um, he was either he

1:31:44.800 --> 1:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>or his son. I forget, it's probably him, um that

1:31:48.800 --> 1:31:53.280
<v Speaker 1>had Aspergers. And he listed like ten things that alert

1:31:53.360 --> 1:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you to the fact that he had it and and

1:31:56.560 --> 1:31:59.120
<v Speaker 1>therefore I might have it. And and one of them

1:31:59.200 --> 1:32:04.719
<v Speaker 1>was not people in the eye or never observing the

1:32:04.760 --> 1:32:09.639
<v Speaker 1>color of their eyes. And to tell you the truth,

1:32:09.720 --> 1:32:12.800
<v Speaker 1>I am my ex wife. I didn't know she had

1:32:12.840 --> 1:32:17.800
<v Speaker 1>brown eyes until seven years into the marriage. Um. And

1:32:17.800 --> 1:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and so there were other things too about the characteristics.

1:32:21.000 --> 1:32:24.639
<v Speaker 1>And I I took this page out to the kitchen

1:32:24.680 --> 1:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to my ex wife and I said, look at this,

1:32:26.600 --> 1:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Look at this. I said, I think I have asked

1:32:28.960 --> 1:32:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Berger's And she goes, you do it was certainty? And

1:32:33.600 --> 1:32:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I said, how do you know? She said, well, we

1:32:37.080 --> 1:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>were up at Bill Gates house in Seattle on an

1:32:40.160 --> 1:32:44.439
<v Speaker 1>open house about four years ago. And I was watching Gates,

1:32:44.520 --> 1:32:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and I was watching you. You're at the same table, um,

1:32:47.280 --> 1:32:49.479
<v Speaker 1>and you were doing the same thing he was doing.

1:32:49.560 --> 1:32:51.599
<v Speaker 1>He was doing the same thing. You were going looking

1:32:51.600 --> 1:32:54.479
<v Speaker 1>down at the table, not being engaging that type of thing.

1:32:55.240 --> 1:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>And I'd heard that Gates had a mild case of Aspergers,

1:32:58.560 --> 1:33:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and and so I I went to a psychologist on

1:33:03.000 --> 1:33:06.840
<v Speaker 1>my own and described the symptoms that she said, he does,

1:33:07.120 --> 1:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>he's an asperger. And so that's how I discovered it.

1:33:11.160 --> 1:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I ultimately, after my divorce, I went to a psychologist

1:33:15.520 --> 1:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and after the first meeting, I as my closing question,

1:33:19.360 --> 1:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>I said, do you think I have asked Burgers? And

1:33:22.080 --> 1:33:27.719
<v Speaker 1>she said most definitely. And so that's how I became

1:33:28.160 --> 1:33:35.080
<v Speaker 1>aware of it. And what are the symptoms of characteristics

1:33:35.160 --> 1:33:37.559
<v Speaker 1>or how has it affected my life? I think what

1:33:37.600 --> 1:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>it does is it allows me to to screen out

1:33:41.320 --> 1:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>of you know, minuan and everything that's going on. Um

1:33:46.800 --> 1:33:50.719
<v Speaker 1>For instance, example, when I played golf with Tiger Woods

1:33:50.720 --> 1:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>and Phil Nicholson at the A T and C. You know,

1:33:52.960 --> 1:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>people would say, how do you do it? You know,

1:33:54.680 --> 1:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm afraid of getting my drive into the crowd. I go,

1:33:58.120 --> 1:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I never seen the crowd. I know they're there, but

1:34:00.840 --> 1:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I never see them. And and so, um, you know,

1:34:04.080 --> 1:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>in terms of uh PIMCO, in terms of managing money,

1:34:08.760 --> 1:34:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I rarely see the minusha. I see the big picture

1:34:12.800 --> 1:34:17.479
<v Speaker 1>because of my Aspergers. That's just what aspergers that the

1:34:17.520 --> 1:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>spectrum do. And um, so I think it's been very helpful.

1:34:22.600 --> 1:34:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I owe a lot to ask Murgers. That's interesting, and

1:34:26.160 --> 1:34:29.559
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought up Tiger Woods because that could

1:34:29.560 --> 1:34:33.599
<v Speaker 1>be my favorite story in the entire book. You talk

1:34:33.720 --> 1:34:39.800
<v Speaker 1>about almost missing a golf pro am game with him.

1:34:39.800 --> 1:34:43.559
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about that story. Okay, this wasn't a setup.

1:34:43.600 --> 1:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't a question of paying ten tho dollars to

1:34:46.080 --> 1:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>play with Tiger Woods. This was the A T and

1:34:48.000 --> 1:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>T pro am. This was big time. You gotta qualify, right,

1:34:51.080 --> 1:34:55.680
<v Speaker 1>You gotta hit your way into the actual game, right.

1:34:55.720 --> 1:34:57.960
<v Speaker 1>The first three days you qualify and if you have

1:34:58.000 --> 1:35:01.720
<v Speaker 1>a certain score, you make it into Sunday. And so. Um.

1:35:02.320 --> 1:35:05.080
<v Speaker 1>When Bill Thompson and I the CEO, went up there

1:35:06.000 --> 1:35:11.360
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and two, um, you know, the rumor

1:35:11.479 --> 1:35:13.760
<v Speaker 1>was that you needed to be nineteen under as a

1:35:13.840 --> 1:35:17.720
<v Speaker 1>team in order to qualify for Sunday. And so I

1:35:17.720 --> 1:35:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I finished my round on Saturday and Thompson came up

1:35:20.280 --> 1:35:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and he had been fourteen under and he said, what

1:35:23.200 --> 1:35:26.120
<v Speaker 1>are you? I said, sixteen under. He said, well, let's

1:35:26.120 --> 1:35:28.439
<v Speaker 1>go home because nineteen under makes the cut. And I said,

1:35:28.560 --> 1:35:30.599
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, LABI should stay and he goes, now,

1:35:30.680 --> 1:35:34.320
<v Speaker 1>let's go. So I went to the airport and we're

1:35:34.360 --> 1:35:38.519
<v Speaker 1>waiting in line, and um, this guy from my local

1:35:38.920 --> 1:35:42.400
<v Speaker 1>country club had a cell phone, and cellphones weren't said

1:35:42.600 --> 1:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>popular back then. I certainly didn't have one. And he said, Bill,

1:35:46.080 --> 1:35:48.559
<v Speaker 1>how did you do? I said, sixteen under probably miss

1:35:48.600 --> 1:35:51.960
<v Speaker 1>a cut by two, and he goes, no, I said,

1:35:52.040 --> 1:35:54.800
<v Speaker 1>he said, I just checked. He said, sixteen under is

1:35:54.960 --> 1:35:59.720
<v Speaker 1>in a card off. I go, oh, okay, And so

1:35:59.840 --> 1:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I told Thompson, you better go home, and I'd better

1:36:02.040 --> 1:36:03.680
<v Speaker 1>go back to the hotel. So I went back to

1:36:03.720 --> 1:36:07.559
<v Speaker 1>the hotel and at nine o'clock my Caddy calls up

1:36:07.720 --> 1:36:11.840
<v Speaker 1>and he says, Mr Gross, we made the cut, the

1:36:11.880 --> 1:36:14.320
<v Speaker 1>card off. We made the cut. I guess who we're

1:36:14.320 --> 1:36:16.519
<v Speaker 1>playing with? At eight thirty in the morning, I go,

1:36:16.600 --> 1:36:23.280
<v Speaker 1>who because and I almost saying it. And of course

1:36:23.320 --> 1:36:28.639
<v Speaker 1>I never slept, But um, if that gentleman hadn't seen

1:36:28.720 --> 1:36:31.800
<v Speaker 1>me at the airport check in line and told me

1:36:32.160 --> 1:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>I had a chance, I would have been sleeping Sunday

1:36:35.120 --> 1:36:39.720
<v Speaker 1>morning in Newport Beach while Tiger was waiting for me

1:36:40.720 --> 1:36:43.800
<v Speaker 1>to meet him on the first day it was. It

1:36:43.920 --> 1:36:51.040
<v Speaker 1>was incredible luck, incredible luck. That's just an amazing story.

1:36:51.120 --> 1:36:55.200
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes right place, right time is all that matters.

1:36:55.439 --> 1:36:58.439
<v Speaker 1>All right, so I've kept you for two hours, far

1:36:58.479 --> 1:37:02.400
<v Speaker 1>longer than I usual. Let me jump to my favorite

1:37:02.479 --> 1:37:05.960
<v Speaker 1>questions we ask all our guests, starting with something that

1:37:06.000 --> 1:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you actually mentioned earlier. Tell us what you're streaming these days?

1:37:10.200 --> 1:37:13.760
<v Speaker 1>What kept you busy during uh the lockdown on either

1:37:13.840 --> 1:37:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Amazon Prime or Netflix or or whatever you were entertained with. Well,

1:37:19.880 --> 1:37:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I get up at five thirty. I've got a bloomberg here,

1:37:23.000 --> 1:37:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and I've got a bloomberg at my other homes, and

1:37:26.680 --> 1:37:29.679
<v Speaker 1>so I get up in uh, you know, the markets here.

1:37:29.680 --> 1:37:32.799
<v Speaker 1>I've been up at six thirty, and so I've start

1:37:33.479 --> 1:37:38.960
<v Speaker 1>managing my portfolio, doing trading, mostly in stocks these days,

1:37:39.040 --> 1:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>and stock options. But it occupies my time till market

1:37:44.400 --> 1:37:47.360
<v Speaker 1>closed at twelve thirty. Sometimes I take a nap because

1:37:47.360 --> 1:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I had gotten up so early. In my lovely wife

1:37:52.720 --> 1:37:57.719
<v Speaker 1>keeps me up till eleven o'clock to watch uh serial

1:37:57.880 --> 1:38:00.679
<v Speaker 1>programs and so on, so I don't get that much sleep.

1:38:01.880 --> 1:38:05.360
<v Speaker 1>But in any case, I manage money, and then here

1:38:05.400 --> 1:38:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I am out for eight months of the year. Out

1:38:07.920 --> 1:38:10.599
<v Speaker 1>at the vintage in Indian who else it's eighty five degrees.

1:38:10.680 --> 1:38:15.439
<v Speaker 1>It's almost always seventy five degrees. It's like Hawaii, and

1:38:15.479 --> 1:38:19.519
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking out at the golf course and I have

1:38:19.600 --> 1:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>a little lunch, I top in my cart with Amy

1:38:22.840 --> 1:38:26.400
<v Speaker 1>and we go play golf in the afternoon. That's like,

1:38:26.720 --> 1:38:30.320
<v Speaker 1>what you know, this this is uh, this is paradise.

1:38:30.640 --> 1:38:34.439
<v Speaker 1>You know. Our family comes out into visit and it's

1:38:34.479 --> 1:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>just the all around best time I could ever imagine,

1:38:37.600 --> 1:38:40.599
<v Speaker 1>doing something I love in terms of investing, and doing

1:38:40.680 --> 1:38:43.599
<v Speaker 1>something I love in terms of golf, which I do

1:38:43.720 --> 1:38:48.439
<v Speaker 1>every day. And so um, that's that's basically my day.

1:38:48.680 --> 1:38:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Tell us about some of your early mentors who helped

1:38:51.960 --> 1:38:56.280
<v Speaker 1>to shape your career. Well, to be honest and say,

1:38:56.400 --> 1:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I only had one UM, and that was well for Girkin,

1:39:00.880 --> 1:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>who was the CEO and chairman of the board of

1:39:04.920 --> 1:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Pacific Mutual. And it was Kirkin that basically who was

1:39:09.000 --> 1:39:13.640
<v Speaker 1>a risk taker for an insurance executive. UM. It was

1:39:13.680 --> 1:39:17.479
<v Speaker 1>Girkin who basically gave the go ahead and they all

1:39:17.520 --> 1:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>clear to to start the five million dollar bond fund.

1:39:26.800 --> 1:39:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And and and the man would take me to New

1:39:30.120 --> 1:39:33.320
<v Speaker 1>York for conferences and so on and so on, and

1:39:33.760 --> 1:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>clearly he was supporting me for some future role. I

1:39:38.080 --> 1:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>don't think he unnecessarily knew that Tempco was going to

1:39:44.040 --> 1:39:46.519
<v Speaker 1>be a raging success. But he was willing to take

1:39:46.600 --> 1:39:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the chance and to give me his moral and I

1:39:51.640 --> 1:39:55.040
<v Speaker 1>guess financial support, because there was a time in the

1:39:55.080 --> 1:39:57.800
<v Speaker 1>first few years of TEMPKO where we weren't making any

1:39:57.880 --> 1:40:01.600
<v Speaker 1>money and not getting very many clients. And you know,

1:40:01.960 --> 1:40:07.920
<v Speaker 1>they could have canceled us, um straight away, but he didn't.

1:40:07.920 --> 1:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>They supported me, you know, throughout the but in fifteen

1:40:12.560 --> 1:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty years that that he was active within the industry.

1:40:16.960 --> 1:40:21.599
<v Speaker 1>And so as I say, it was Mr Gherkin who's

1:40:21.680 --> 1:40:25.320
<v Speaker 1>no longer with us. Let's talk about books. What are

1:40:25.400 --> 1:40:27.800
<v Speaker 1>some of your all time favorites and what are you

1:40:27.840 --> 1:40:33.719
<v Speaker 1>reading right now? Well, um, you know, all time favorites

1:40:33.760 --> 1:40:41.519
<v Speaker 1>is one thing, um, I guess. Um. One of my

1:40:41.560 --> 1:40:45.920
<v Speaker 1>favorite books was by a brilliant author who won the

1:40:46.000 --> 1:40:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Pulitzer Prize, Annie Dillard, who wrote a an incredible book

1:40:51.840 --> 1:40:57.280
<v Speaker 1>called Bilgrament Thinker Creek, which was about observations of life,

1:40:57.479 --> 1:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>nature and and personal reflections on on both. And I

1:41:03.160 --> 1:41:07.080
<v Speaker 1>would encourage any of your listeners to pick up any

1:41:07.120 --> 1:41:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Dilert's Pilgrim at Tinker Creek. She also wrote a book

1:41:10.360 --> 1:41:15.000
<v Speaker 1>called American Childhood, which was much like mine. Um, she's

1:41:15.000 --> 1:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the same age, grew up in Pittsburgh, and her childhood

1:41:18.600 --> 1:41:23.720
<v Speaker 1>memories are quite similar to how I was, um, how

1:41:23.800 --> 1:41:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I was growing up. I also, I'm recently uh, I

1:41:30.320 --> 1:41:35.000
<v Speaker 1>recently bought recently reading a book called The Age of AI,

1:41:35.080 --> 1:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>which is a book co authored by Henry Kissinger and

1:41:40.760 --> 1:41:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Eric Smith from Google and a third party who probably

1:41:44.800 --> 1:41:48.800
<v Speaker 1>wrote most of it. But it's very interesting about artificial

1:41:48.840 --> 1:41:53.320
<v Speaker 1>intelligence in the future that has for for all of

1:41:53.400 --> 1:41:56.920
<v Speaker 1>us going forward. And then there's another book. There's an

1:41:56.920 --> 1:42:02.080
<v Speaker 1>author called Julian Barnes who has written fifteen books. He's

1:42:02.120 --> 1:42:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a wonderful writer, very introspective, and it's called Done Nothing

1:42:07.880 --> 1:42:10.599
<v Speaker 1>to be Afraid Of It, and it's it's about death

1:42:10.640 --> 1:42:14.920
<v Speaker 1>and dying and his thoughts going forward, which is sort

1:42:14.920 --> 1:42:22.200
<v Speaker 1>of apropost I sort of say, I'm in uh, in

1:42:22.280 --> 1:42:28.679
<v Speaker 1>the death zone at because that's when people uh find

1:42:28.680 --> 1:42:31.240
<v Speaker 1>out they have prostate cancer or breast cancer or whatever.

1:42:31.880 --> 1:42:34.439
<v Speaker 1>It's it's not a good time going forward. And so

1:42:34.560 --> 1:42:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it you know, it's very introspective, and the man has

1:42:38.240 --> 1:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>written other books that I think other people would enjoy,

1:42:41.080 --> 1:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Julian Barnes and Nothing to be Afraid Of So uh,

1:42:46.320 --> 1:42:50.280
<v Speaker 1>those are some of them really interesting stuff. Our final

1:42:50.360 --> 1:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>two questions, what sort of advice would you give to

1:42:53.960 --> 1:42:57.320
<v Speaker 1>a recent college grad who was interested in a career

1:42:57.960 --> 1:43:04.880
<v Speaker 1>in either investing or fixed income? O. Um, well, I

1:43:04.920 --> 1:43:07.639
<v Speaker 1>would say this. I mean, the market is much different

1:43:07.640 --> 1:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>now than it was then, and I had an opening

1:43:10.120 --> 1:43:14.599
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the little line that you know, even

1:43:14.600 --> 1:43:18.240
<v Speaker 1>a ten year old could have run through. I guess, um,

1:43:18.400 --> 1:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>now it's a different story. But that I think finance

1:43:22.439 --> 1:43:26.559
<v Speaker 1>um will always be with us, whether stocks, bonds, real estate.

1:43:26.800 --> 1:43:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Um uh, you know, money is something that's always been

1:43:31.760 --> 1:43:34.320
<v Speaker 1>with us, and the making of money with money has

1:43:34.439 --> 1:43:38.400
<v Speaker 1>always been with us. I don't see that. Um, I

1:43:38.439 --> 1:43:40.280
<v Speaker 1>see it changing, but I don't. I don't see it

1:43:41.080 --> 1:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>declining in any form or fashion. And so I would

1:43:45.240 --> 1:43:49.280
<v Speaker 1>advise those that are thinking about the industry they do

1:43:49.280 --> 1:43:51.920
<v Speaker 1>do something like yeah, like Cathy Wood did. I mean

1:43:52.000 --> 1:43:56.280
<v Speaker 1>she she innovated in terms of her ideas and there

1:43:56.280 --> 1:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of her portfolio construction. She did take a

1:43:59.520 --> 1:44:02.720
<v Speaker 1>risk in terms of her ideas. I mentioned before that

1:44:02.840 --> 1:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>she didn't be too much attention to price, but obviously

1:44:07.080 --> 1:44:12.639
<v Speaker 1>she created this huge wedge and opening for herself. What's

1:44:12.720 --> 1:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a product that no one else was thinking of, and

1:44:16.800 --> 1:44:20.840
<v Speaker 1>so one of those products I don't know. Um, I'm

1:44:20.920 --> 1:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>past the stage of innovation, but yeah, I would say

1:44:26.400 --> 1:44:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in addition to spending your one or two years of

1:44:29.800 --> 1:44:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Goldman or whatever in terms of the background, that you know,

1:44:35.320 --> 1:44:38.679
<v Speaker 1>you kind of go out on your own and innovate

1:44:39.240 --> 1:44:42.160
<v Speaker 1>with some type of product that will it will get

1:44:42.200 --> 1:44:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you going and make you a a star and make

1:44:46.320 --> 1:44:50.760
<v Speaker 1>you some money and and lead you to hopefully to

1:44:52.240 --> 1:44:55.919
<v Speaker 1>obsessive enjoyment of of what you're doing. You you can't succeed,

1:44:56.000 --> 1:44:59.240
<v Speaker 1>I would tell them, you can't succeed unless you love

1:44:59.479 --> 1:45:04.120
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing. Really really interesting. And our final question,

1:45:04.680 --> 1:45:07.839
<v Speaker 1>what do you know about the world of finance today

1:45:07.880 --> 1:45:11.599
<v Speaker 1>that you wish you knew fifty years or so ago

1:45:11.840 --> 1:45:19.080
<v Speaker 1>when you were first getting started out. Oh? Um, you

1:45:19.120 --> 1:45:22.800
<v Speaker 1>know when I think it is Barry, I think. Um.

1:45:22.840 --> 1:45:24.919
<v Speaker 1>You know. There was an old soft from Will Rogers,

1:45:24.920 --> 1:45:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the old journalists in the thirties, and he said a

1:45:28.120 --> 1:45:30.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of funny things, sort of like Yogi berra. Um.

1:45:31.280 --> 1:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>He was known for, um, you know, funny equips and

1:45:34.640 --> 1:45:38.760
<v Speaker 1>funny comments. And uh I remember him saying about the

1:45:38.760 --> 1:45:42.840
<v Speaker 1>stock market. He said, if you if you have a

1:45:42.880 --> 1:45:46.760
<v Speaker 1>stock that goes up, buy it and it goes If

1:45:46.760 --> 1:45:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't go up, don't buy it. Um. And I

1:45:50.439 --> 1:45:53.479
<v Speaker 1>thought that was really funny, and I didn't and I

1:45:53.520 --> 1:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>think he thought it was funny too. I don't think

1:45:55.240 --> 1:45:57.679
<v Speaker 1>he knew what he was talking about. But it really

1:45:57.760 --> 1:46:02.439
<v Speaker 1>refers to a momentum. If you find this stoctor goes

1:46:02.520 --> 1:46:06.599
<v Speaker 1>up by it, and if it goes down, and don't

1:46:06.640 --> 1:46:10.559
<v Speaker 1>buy it. Because momentum is a very powerful force that

1:46:10.600 --> 1:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I learned, you know, sort of in the last ten

1:46:14.080 --> 1:46:18.480
<v Speaker 1>or fifteen years of managing money. Um. It's an alpha generator.

1:46:18.520 --> 1:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>It's statistically proven to be an alpha generator. You can

1:46:22.000 --> 1:46:24.120
<v Speaker 1>turn against you, like in the last few months when

1:46:24.200 --> 1:46:28.759
<v Speaker 1>momentum upward momentum turns negative and it uh, it turns

1:46:28.760 --> 1:46:34.520
<v Speaker 1>into downward momentum. But momentum is something that really predocated

1:46:34.600 --> 1:46:39.519
<v Speaker 1>upon human nature. They do what has been successful before

1:46:39.680 --> 1:46:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and it continues until a dozen't And so I think

1:46:44.439 --> 1:46:48.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what I That's what I was always skeptical, skeptic, skeptical.

1:46:49.040 --> 1:46:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I was all skeptical of people that UH followed momentum

1:46:53.640 --> 1:46:56.240
<v Speaker 1>because I thought that was just joining the crowd. Well,

1:46:56.720 --> 1:47:02.080
<v Speaker 1>joining the crowd works for while until a dozens and

1:47:02.080 --> 1:47:04.719
<v Speaker 1>and how do you measure it? Well, you can measure

1:47:04.720 --> 1:47:07.599
<v Speaker 1>it with two hundred moving day averages with owns or bands,

1:47:07.680 --> 1:47:12.880
<v Speaker 1>with lots of different things. But it's it's statistically an

1:47:12.880 --> 1:47:16.519
<v Speaker 1>alpha generator in addition to several of the things that

1:47:17.240 --> 1:47:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I discovered before that. So I say I should have

1:47:21.160 --> 1:47:25.240
<v Speaker 1>been more appreciative of momentum, not that the Tempco with

1:47:25.320 --> 1:47:29.840
<v Speaker 1>its secular forecast wasn't really doing the same thing, and

1:47:29.840 --> 1:47:33.680
<v Speaker 1>and following momentum downward in terms of interest rates and

1:47:33.760 --> 1:47:37.759
<v Speaker 1>upward in terms of bond prices. But I I follow

1:47:37.840 --> 1:47:43.760
<v Speaker 1>momentum today. It's important, really really great stuff. Bill, Thank

1:47:43.800 --> 1:47:47.679
<v Speaker 1>you for being so so generous with your time. We've

1:47:47.720 --> 1:47:51.479
<v Speaker 1>been speaking with the bond king, Bill Gross, co founder

1:47:51.479 --> 1:47:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of PIMCO, the man who managed more bond money than

1:47:55.280 --> 1:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>literally anybody else UH in the private sector has ever done.

1:48:00.600 --> 1:48:03.439
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy this conversation, check out any of our

1:48:03.479 --> 1:48:07.000
<v Speaker 1>previous four hundred plus discussions we've held over the past

1:48:07.040 --> 1:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>eight years. iTunes, Spotify, wherever you get your podcast from,

1:48:12.240 --> 1:48:15.559
<v Speaker 1>you'll find Masters in Business. We love your comments, feedback

1:48:15.600 --> 1:48:19.880
<v Speaker 1>and suggestions right to us at m IB podcast at

1:48:19.880 --> 1:48:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot net. You can sign up from my daily

1:48:24.160 --> 1:48:28.120
<v Speaker 1>reading list at dhults dot com. Follow me on Twitter

1:48:28.160 --> 1:48:31.120
<v Speaker 1>at rit Halts. I would be remiss if I did

1:48:31.120 --> 1:48:33.920
<v Speaker 1>not thank the crack team that helps me put these

1:48:33.960 --> 1:48:39.200
<v Speaker 1>conversations together each week. Katherine Silva is my audio engineer.

1:48:39.560 --> 1:48:43.360
<v Speaker 1>Sean Russo is my head of research. Paris Wald is

1:48:43.439 --> 1:48:48.480
<v Speaker 1>my producer. I'm Barry Hults. You've been listening to Masters

1:48:48.479 --> 1:48:50.880
<v Speaker 1>in Business on Bloomberg Radio.