WEBVTT - Market Is Ripe For A Near-Term Pullback: Miller Tabak's Maley

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, along

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:06.200
<v Speaker 1>with my co host of Bonnie Quinn. Every business day

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts,

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>along with essential market moving news. Kind the Bloomberg Markets

0:00:13.600 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts,

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>and on Bloomberg dot com. We'll just in the last minute,

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at something that I haven't seen in a

0:00:22.680 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>long time, and that is all three major industries lower

0:00:25.720 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>than ASDAK has just turned lower now and is down

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a tenth represent of course, the S and P down

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a quarter represent and the DOAO has been down about

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>half a percent. But still we're talking very very small down.

0:00:36.159 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's bring in somebody who knows a lot about records

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and stock market action. Matt Melee is managing director in

0:00:41.720 --> 0:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>chief markets strologist add milleran tay Back, and he joins

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>us from Newton, Massachusetts. Today. Matt, we're down today, but

0:00:47.880 --> 0:00:50.520
<v Speaker 1>we're down very very small. Do we hold onto these

0:00:50.560 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>records even as we wait for another stimulus round? You know?

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's funny because this rally has been seems

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.240
<v Speaker 1>to be waning a little bit in the last a

0:01:02.280 --> 0:01:04.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of days. Even though you know, each day we

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>seem to try to test the all time high in

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the SMP and toil. This morning we got above the

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>inter day all time high. But even when we reached

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that inter day all time high and uh forty five

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>minutes ago, the the breath the advances versus decliners were

0:01:17.560 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>actually negative. And we've seen that kind of that breath uh,

0:01:22.240 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, pulling back recently, volume has dropped off considerably,

0:01:25.720 --> 0:01:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and so people, I think, are a little bit nervous

0:01:27.440 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>as we're making this new high. It's kind of a

0:01:29.840 --> 0:01:32.280
<v Speaker 1>point where people can step back and say, geez, you know,

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.039
<v Speaker 1>we're up fifty percent in just five months. We have,

0:01:35.480 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, evaluations, even though that's a lousy timing tool,

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>valuations above twenty times earnings. Uh, it's it gives people

0:01:42.040 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a reason to pause, and to

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>be honest with you, if we did pull back from here,

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be the worst thing in the world. I mean, pauses,

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>pull backs are and even corrections are normal and healthy

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 1>in any market. So, Matt, one of the the uh,

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the characteristics of this rally off the bottom is it's

0:01:57.200 --> 0:01:59.760
<v Speaker 1>total lack of breath. It's been driven by you know

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>or seven names, and if you pull those names out,

0:02:02.560 --> 0:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>we're actually down four percent year of her year. How

0:02:05.520 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>concerned are you about that lack of breath? Um just

0:02:08.360 --> 0:02:10.840
<v Speaker 1>from a market you know, maybe just the stability a

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:14.160
<v Speaker 1>technical perspective, Yeah, there's no question. I mean a lot

0:02:14.200 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of people are you know, each people are saying, well,

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 1>jeezy stocks deserve to be moving higher, and and that's

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 1>true to a certain degree, but it also tells us

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that the overall economy, the breadth of the economy is

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>not as strong as as some people would like to think.

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:31.320
<v Speaker 1>And therefore it's I guess my point is every time

0:02:31.360 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 1>we get a narrow rally, people come up with excuses

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>why it's it's it's actually nothing to worry about. But

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>each time it seems to be something that people should

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:41.360
<v Speaker 1>have worried about, and we do see a pullback of

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>some sort of substance. So not a lot of people

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>have been talking about cynicals and you know, a rotation

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:51.799
<v Speaker 1>into cyclicals, But are we really going to see a

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>rotation in this market action we talk about, you know,

0:02:54.680 --> 0:02:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the five stocks being the biggest part of the composition

0:02:59.720 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of a the s and it seems to me that

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:04.840
<v Speaker 1>even if we do have a rotation, it's going to

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>be so small that it's going to be barely noticeable. Yeah,

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I I agree, And of course one of the things

0:03:10.320 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>that that I worry about. Uh and again it's it's

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>funny because I've I've actually become more constructive on the

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>market on a longer term basis, but near term we

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely look like we're getting right for a pull back.

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>And one of those reasons goes to what you just mentioned, Vonn,

0:03:23.880 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 1>is that we talk about how well can some of

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:29.919
<v Speaker 1>these um and you know, cyclicals do if we get

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>another round of another wave in the coronavirus. I mean,

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen these kind of whether it's a second wave

0:03:36.040 --> 0:03:39.480
<v Speaker 1>or a second half of the first wave. The weather

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>hasn't gotten cold yet, and what we've seen from Australia

0:03:41.920 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and New Zealand and other places in the southern Hemisphere

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 1>as the weather got colder, they did see a new wave.

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>In fact, in Australia it was worse than the first one.

0:03:49.120 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So if we get that kind of thing and and

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>we get some sort of a lockdown, I don't think

0:03:53.400 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 1>it'll be anywhere near as severe as the last one.

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>But if we get some kind of a semi lockdown,

0:03:57.840 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>we're already seeing that with the school, with some of

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the College is h that's going to make it tough

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:03.760
<v Speaker 1>for some of these cyclical stocks to rally in the

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 1>way that some people think they will. All right, so

0:04:05.640 --> 0:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>we still have the pandemic risk out there. Give us

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a sense of the political risk, big, big, big election

0:04:11.120 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 1>coming up in November. How are you factoring that in? Well,

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the in the market is not factoring it at all

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>right right now. And one of the things I mean

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 1>on two things. Number one, you know, long term uh

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of people will point out that the

0:04:23.600 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>Democrats have actually been better for for the stock market

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>or uh more more more more often than not, although

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.320
<v Speaker 1>certainly President Trump has been uh as a GOP president

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.600
<v Speaker 1>has been very positive for the stock market. But but

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:37.440
<v Speaker 1>on a on a near term basis, you look at it,

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.680
<v Speaker 1>where what's the starting point? The starting point right now

0:04:39.880 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>as we're moving towards the election, as we get past

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>these conventions and really move into the election season, the

0:04:45.160 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>market is an all time high. It's overbought on a

0:04:47.680 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>tentacle basis, it's expensive on a fundamental basis. So if

0:04:51.279 --> 0:04:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we start to see that the that the President Biden,

0:04:55.080 --> 0:04:57.839
<v Speaker 1>especially if we talk about you think about Elizabeth Warren

0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe being you know, in charge of the tragury Department

0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>or in charge of even the Justice Department, that will

0:05:02.839 --> 0:05:05.359
<v Speaker 1>have a negative impact on certain aspects of the marketplace.

0:05:05.440 --> 0:05:08.000
<v Speaker 1>So uh, and especially if it looks like the Democrats

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 1>are going to have a full sweep. I think that

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a longer term it may not be the worst thing

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>in the world, but near term, with the market the

0:05:13.960 --> 0:05:16.039
<v Speaker 1>way it is, people are gonna have to start to

0:05:16.040 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>factor that in. And that's another reason why I'm more

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 1>cautious on the near term prospects for the market. But

0:05:20.400 --> 0:05:22.720
<v Speaker 1>what would you do about banks right now? You've always

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 1>had such strong thoughts on the banks, but they're really

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>in the duldrums. Yeah, it's really a concern. And when

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you get somebody like Warren Buffett, who obviously he's been

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we've heard all the news about him

0:05:34.279 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>upping his position in Bank America, but then we find

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>out he's he's pulling him back in a lot of

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.080
<v Speaker 1>other areas. It's still a concern for me. And now,

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:43.360
<v Speaker 1>even though interest rates have moved up a little bit

0:05:43.760 --> 0:05:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in the last week or so. Uh, they're not going

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>to go up a lot higher even if they even

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.320
<v Speaker 1>if they stabilize up this this kind of slightly higher level.

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:52.760
<v Speaker 1>But the other thing that really concerns me is I

0:05:52.800 --> 0:05:55.400
<v Speaker 1>continue to watch these European banks. You look at the

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>European Bank Index, it's rolling back over again from a

0:05:58.560 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty low level already, and they've been in a performing

0:06:00.839 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 1>for quite some time now. It just shows that there's

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>some stress on the overall banking system, and I think

0:06:05.760 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 1>it shows, you know, concerns about you know, whether we're

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>going to have the situation with bankruptcies while they pick

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 1>up and get past the political questions. Matt Mally, thank

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.039
<v Speaker 1>you so much for joining us. We appreciate they appreciate that.

0:06:20.080 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>Matt Mally, managing director in chief market strategist for Miller Tabek,

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>joining us on the phone from Massachusetts. Uh, yeah, Vonnie's

0:06:27.240 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you brought up the banks because they just

0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 1>can't seem to get out of their way here, and

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>yet they have a whole myriad of issues you have

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.320
<v Speaker 1>to deal with. As Matt suggested, those low rates and

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>the potential right offs. It's amazing because they're one of

0:06:38.160 --> 0:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the areas that didn't rally ever, even when people were saying, look,

0:06:41.880 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they're they're way under valued here. Yeah, exactly, so the

0:06:45.920 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>whole host of issues that they have to deal with.

0:06:47.760 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So we'll look forward to those earnings the next quarter.

0:06:52.480 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>It is time for Bloomberg Opinion. We're joined today by

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion calumnist Sarah Haws actually covers retail for Bloomer.

0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>She's based in Washington, d C. Sarah, A busy day

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.320
<v Speaker 1>today for you, Thanks for joining us. We had Walmart,

0:07:06.400 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Home Depot, Coals all reporting earnings today. It seems like

0:07:10.840 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Walmart Home Depot they're kind of seeing some benefit here

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>from changing buying habits, but Coals not so much. What

0:07:17.560 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>are your key takeaways? Yeah, I think that's exactly right.

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:23.320
<v Speaker 1>All of us are spending so much more time in

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:25.840
<v Speaker 1>our homes, and that clearly has been a benefit to

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Home Depot. People have taken on renovation projects they wouldn't

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:31.880
<v Speaker 1>have otherwise if they didn't suddenly have to have a

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>home office, for example, or they're pulling forward renovation projects

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that maybe they were planning to do a year or

0:07:37.080 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>two down the road, and so comparable sales growth. They're

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a booming twenty UM and Walmart also benefited from all

0:07:43.800 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 1>these traumatic changes to our lifestyle. Not only are people

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>cooking more at home, but again trying to trick out

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 1>their backyards to make spending climate at home more valuable

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>UM and enjoyable sporting goods, that kind of thing. And

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 1>so those two held up fairly well in the quarter.

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>But old, you know, consistent with what we saw in

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the commerce department retail sales numbers last week, clothing just

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:09.680
<v Speaker 1>continues to be a real weak spot. People are just

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>not spending money in that product category, and that showed

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:14.440
<v Speaker 1>up in the weak results for coals in the quarter.

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Now that's something that you might anticipate because there are

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:21.520
<v Speaker 1>no events to go to, this very little entertaining at

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 1>home and so on. So clothes you can understand. But

0:08:24.640 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>can Walmart UM Home Depot keep up these figures even

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:32.839
<v Speaker 1>as stimulus recedes, because you know, there was that check

0:08:32.880 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and then there were extra unemployment insurance payments, But they've

0:08:36.080 --> 0:08:39.440
<v Speaker 1>gone away for the moment, Yes, And I think that's

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 1>a real risk, and I think that's why you're not

0:08:41.520 --> 0:08:44.640
<v Speaker 1>seeing their stocks really pop on these results this morning,

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:48.840
<v Speaker 1>even though they beat expectations. Walmart cited repeatedly in its

0:08:48.880 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>earnings materials that the government stimulus was a real boon

0:08:52.240 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>for it in the quarter, that when you saw those

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>checks in early May and June, that that was clearly

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>propping up spending in general merchant NAE categories, And as

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we got deeper into July, they said, spending basically normalized,

0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>sales normalized. And so I think UH investors are looking

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:10.679
<v Speaker 1>at these results and seeing a real risk that the

0:09:10.760 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Congress doesn't do more to support consumers, that this strength

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.719
<v Speaker 1>is simply not going to be replicated. And Sarah, you

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>wrote a fantastic column today just on this issue that

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 1>you really hope that the folks in Congress are taking

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:28.679
<v Speaker 1>a look at some of these numbers that are being

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 1>released it and more importantly, listen to some of the

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>commentary by the c e O s about what they're

0:09:33.880 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing in terms of future demand. It would suggest that

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe they better get moving. Yes, exactly. I think if

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>we don't see uh, you know, any progress out of

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Washington soon, it could be really destructive. You had some

0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of them executives offering color about how the back to

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>school shopping season is going so so far, and it's

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.520
<v Speaker 1>not going great. I think choppy was the word used

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>on the Walmart call, uh, and understandably so. Right, So

0:09:58.440 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 1>many parents don't even know if they're trying all that's

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:03.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be going back to school in person or virtually,

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and don't even know exactly what supplies to buy, you know,

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>do you need a laptop or do you need a backpack? Um?

0:10:08.760 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>All of those spending decisions are kind of on ice

0:10:10.960 --> 0:10:14.680
<v Speaker 1>right now. Um. And so against that backdrop, and with

0:10:14.760 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the unemployment rate as high as it is, Uh, it's

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:19.840
<v Speaker 1>just really hard to see how the back to school

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>season and the really crucial holiday season set up well

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.439
<v Speaker 1>for these retailers. If Congress doesn't take some action, are

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>retailer is changing the mix of what's available in their stores. So,

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 1>for example, is Walmarts, you know, getting rid of the

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>backpacks just in case there won't be as much demand.

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Is it putting in more leisure where Yeah, Cole talked

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:40.840
<v Speaker 1>about this a bit on its earnings call this morning

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that it definitely is going to shift its assortment to

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:47.400
<v Speaker 1>focus more on comfy clothes, on home products because people

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>are still spending a lot on pitching appliances and that

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing um really shifting its assortment to those

0:10:52.600 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 1>product categories where people are still spending money. Cools also

0:10:57.280 --> 0:11:01.160
<v Speaker 1>talked about cutting the total number of items that it offers,

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>so it said by the holiday season, it expects that

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.679
<v Speaker 1>skew count or the number of individual items that itself

0:11:06.880 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 1>to be on um and instead to really focus on

0:11:11.000 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a few key items that it thinks can sell really

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>well and buying really deep into those particular items. So

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a change you can expect to see

0:11:19.200 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>when you're in stores in fall and winter. Sarah, do

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you have the sense that retailers in general, whether it's

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:30.680
<v Speaker 1>a coals or home depot um, can continue to invest

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in their digital businesses, Because it just seems like the

0:11:33.480 --> 0:11:38.840
<v Speaker 1>money that Amazon continues to invest in its e commerce business,

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:42.199
<v Speaker 1>whether it's fulfillment and distribution centers or just tech technology

0:11:42.200 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 1>in general, is just just outstanding and it's almost hard

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to replicate. How about these other retailers, what are they

0:11:48.240 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>doing in terms of investing in in their e commerce businesses?

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.120
<v Speaker 1>So well, all three of these retailers are trying to

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:58.400
<v Speaker 1>do is leverage their store footprint, kind of turn it

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>into not an Alba trouss, but a help in this

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:04.959
<v Speaker 1>digital era, and one key approach to doing that is

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:08.800
<v Speaker 1>to invest in curbside pick up um. Particularly since the pandemic,

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>this has become a really popular format, especially in the

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>suburbs where these stores tend to have, you know, big

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>sprawling parking lots and it's easy to kind of pull

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>up in your car and never get out, have someone

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.600
<v Speaker 1>drop your items in your trunk or your back feet. Um.

0:12:22.720 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 1>So they're really investing in making those services work well.

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:28.439
<v Speaker 1>And that's more complicated than you might think, because they

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.079
<v Speaker 1>have to think about how to allocate in store labor

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>just pick those orders for you quickly, and they have

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to think about the technological experience of how you can

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>safely let them know, hey, I'm outside and I want

0:12:39.120 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you to bring those items to my car now. And

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>so I think that's where you're going to see a

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of investment from all of these retailers. Pick Up

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>for home depot has always view to be quite a

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 1>large percentage of their digital sales overall, and so I

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>think you'll continue to see all of them lean into

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 1>making that a good experience in a way to differentiate

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 1>themselves from Amazon, which simply doesn't have a lot of

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:03.200
<v Speaker 1>can order outposts from which to do that. So, Sarah,

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:06.679
<v Speaker 1>how do the peers of those retailers that have been

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>successful differentiate themselves to also be successful? So, for example, Lows,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>how does Lows get some market share from Home Depot?

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to Walmart, obviously this this Well,

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.439
<v Speaker 1>there's there's no one like Walmart, but there's a petrea

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of dollar generals and so on. Sure, I think Walmart,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, its advantage is always that everyday low price focus. Um,

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Target is clearly a close competitor, and I

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:35.280
<v Speaker 1>think Walmart needs to focus on leveraging its muscle with

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:39.360
<v Speaker 1>UH suppliers and vendors right now to keep making sure

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 1>it offers the lowest prices and that it continues to

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 1>win on that metric. Particularly as we are heading or

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 1>as we're in a recession that doesn't look to be

0:13:47.720 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>letting up any time soon, shoppers will become more value

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>focus and so price will be an important point of differentiation.

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I think Loads the focus in winning relative to Home Depot.

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 1>There It's interesting, typically Lows UH store footprint is thought

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of as a disadvantage because it's not Its stores tend

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to be located in more suburban and rural areas as

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>opposed to in dense urban areas where home depot tends

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to be more concentrated. UM, But that might not be

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>such a disadvantage right now if folks in uh, those

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in rural and suburban areas are more willing to visit

0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a physical store compared to those in urban areas, so

0:14:25.240 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of leveraging that could be a lover for lowest

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>of pole and I expect we'll kind of see that

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in its results. It's two key results when they come

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>out tomorrow. Sarah Holzac with all of the answer is

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:38.200
<v Speaker 1>no one. If she's in Washington, d C. I hope

0:14:38.240 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>they listened to her down there. So Holza is columnist

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 1>with Bloomberg opinion on retail primarily, but it turns her

0:14:44.800 --> 0:14:50.760
<v Speaker 1>home to a lot of topics. Well, the housing market

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>is the one area of this economy that continues to

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>show real strength across the board. Just last month, home

0:14:57.960 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>sales jump erect UH. So obviously low interest, low mortgage

0:15:02.280 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>rates are key driver. Let's see what else it's driving

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>this market. We welcome Sherry Chris, president and CEO of

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>Realology Expansion, brand's portfolio that includes better Homes and Gardens,

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Real Estate and e r A based in Madison, New Jersey. Sherry,

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:18.200
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us here. So again, the

0:15:18.280 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 1>residential housing market very very strong. What are the key

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 1>drivers that you think are pushing that market, Well, Paul's

0:15:27.520 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because, first of all, there's a pent up

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:35.160
<v Speaker 1>demand from April and May due to COVID, and people

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>that would normally be moving couldn't move during that time

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>or couldn't look during that time, so that two months

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>of inactivity has has caused a demand. But there are

0:15:45.960 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>other things as well. There's a lot of migration patterns

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that are happening across the country where people are consumers

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>are exiting large cities for outlying areas, um consumers want

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>to buy a different type of home, things like that.

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:06.160
<v Speaker 1>So it's not really driven by people having to move,

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>which is typical of the past. It's more people want

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to move now. So I am absolutely fascinated by this data.

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 1>The chows that suburban areas are seeing, you know, anything

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that comes to markets snapped up. Do people really have

0:16:21.440 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>that much savings set aside, you know too, to put

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:28.680
<v Speaker 1>together a mortgage? Are they getting what they thought they

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>would get for their houses or their condos or their apartments.

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>In the city's sherry Well, Bonnie, some people are buying

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>without selling their existing home. They're renting out their property.

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>And when we think about the mortgage rates being at

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>such a low, historical low, and the fact that you know,

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 1>with the average sale price hovering around three hundred thousand, now,

0:16:53.240 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't take much for people to you know, put

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:01.760
<v Speaker 1>that down or less and by a home. So we're

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 1>not talking millions of dollars. And uh, you know, I

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 1>don't know this for a fact, and you may know better,

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:13.480
<v Speaker 1>but I think at the beginning of COVID, people started

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:17.359
<v Speaker 1>liquidating certain assets. Cash was something that they wanted to have,

0:17:17.520 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and now they're looking for a home and the housing

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 1>market has, you know, it's really exploded over the last

0:17:23.800 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of months. So is this how much of this

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>is being driven? Do you think by the exodus from

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>maybe more densely populated areas like like Manhattan for example, Um,

0:17:36.680 --> 0:17:39.600
<v Speaker 1>and people really do just looking to get out of

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:44.040
<v Speaker 1>a city type environment gets a more suburban area. Part

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:46.560
<v Speaker 1>of it is, but not not all of it. I mean,

0:17:46.560 --> 0:17:49.440
<v Speaker 1>if we think about the two cities that are h

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, having that problem right now. Manhattan obviously one

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco is another one where there are a

0:17:55.880 --> 0:18:00.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of very popular outlying areas that people could move too.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:04.720
<v Speaker 1>And now that many of the large companies, including ours,

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're not opening our headquarters anytime soon. But

0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:13.240
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the West Coast with Facebook, Google, Twitter,

0:18:13.680 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>et cetera, and all of those employees are working from home,

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:19.360
<v Speaker 1>they don't need to live in the Bay Area anymore.

0:18:19.640 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>And the same is true with Manhattan, yeah, exactly. And Sherry,

0:18:24.200 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>the fact that housing starts throughout twenty two points per

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>month over a month, and obviously they were up seventeen

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent the month previously. I know that's

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>partially because everything got shut down so much back in

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>March or April. But where are these starts? Are builders

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>now sort of changing their ideas on what to build,

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>where to build and what's the bare minimum necessary? Like

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>are people demanding, for example, at least a bit of

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:52.080
<v Speaker 1>a garden. Well, people are demanding and through better homes

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>and gardens. The magazine, which were affiliated with we did

0:18:56.560 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a number of consumer surveys during COVID and one of

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the things that came out loud and clear that people

0:19:02.960 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>are looking for properties that have, you know, the possibility

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 1>even extended outdoor space, UM, a front porch, a different

0:19:10.880 --> 0:19:14.479
<v Speaker 1>type of living area, places where their children can study,

0:19:15.160 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>where you know, both spouses can work in offices, and

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:21.920
<v Speaker 1>so the configuration is different. But when you think about

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 1>the builders, I think the builders are taking more of

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>a calculated risk right now because they're seeing, you know,

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>what definitely is a pent up demand in the housing industry,

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.639
<v Speaker 1>and they are they're moving forward. We only have a

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 1>four month supply of listings, so that's causing a backlog

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 1>right now where people who would like to move and

0:19:42.320 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>buy a new home are hesitant to put their existing

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>home in the market because there's nothing to buy. Sherry,

0:19:49.000 --> 0:19:51.959
<v Speaker 1>just an indulgence for me, given that you're affiliated with

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that magazine that Homes and Gardens real estate. Obviously, what

0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>is the one thing that people are most buying? Is

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>it flowers? Is a part your furniture? And if it is,

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>what kind of party of furniture. Oh, that's a great question, Bonnie. Um.

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:10.199
<v Speaker 1>What people want to do is extend their living area

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>into an outdoor space. So it's patio furniture to dine outside. Um,

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>it's outdoor kitchens are very popular, and so if you

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:23.239
<v Speaker 1>think about moving your kitchen and dining room outdoors, UM,

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it just extends your space. Particularly as we're continuing to

0:20:28.440 --> 0:20:33.159
<v Speaker 1>somewhat isolate at home, you want to enjoy where you're living.

0:20:33.280 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>And one of the things that we found anecdotally, UM,

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in talking to you know, our many brokers and agency

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and consumers across the country is that when people were

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 1>inside for an extended period of time, you know, you

0:20:46.080 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 1>start looking at the faults of your home and that

0:20:49.520 --> 0:20:53.359
<v Speaker 1>causes you to want to either make changes or get outside. Sherry,

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:55.560
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for joining us today. Sherry Chris

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>as president and CEO of Real g Expansion brand's portfolio,

0:20:58.960 --> 0:21:03.920
<v Speaker 1>which includes Better Homes and Gardens real estate. Josh joins

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 1>us the senior portfolio manager at Aberdeen Standard Investments. And Josh,

0:21:09.320 --> 0:21:11.120
<v Speaker 1>we've been talking about the market and how we're at,

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, all time highs, which really boggles the mind,

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:17.359
<v Speaker 1>giving that people are just suffering out there except for

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the top of the top one per cent.

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of it? Why is the market

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:27.040
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally making highs? I think the real reason for that

0:21:27.200 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 1>is because there's no other place really to invest when

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.520
<v Speaker 1>you look at interest rates and how low they are,

0:21:31.680 --> 0:21:35.200
<v Speaker 1>nteniare you get left in one percent for investment there?

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>So I think people are viewing this as the only

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:42.199
<v Speaker 1>alternatives right now. In addition, we've just seem massive stimulus

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.440
<v Speaker 1>by government on the US and in Europe and then

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>said in ECB s so much money at this problem.

0:21:49.240 --> 0:21:52.439
<v Speaker 1>So um, there's so much liquidity in the system and

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>it's I believe it's been driving up the stock market.

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So Josh, talk to us about the infrastructure space. Here

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>are give us the sense of what the pandemic has

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:05.160
<v Speaker 1>meant to infrastructure investing, and people just kind of pulled

0:22:05.160 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>back the reins, pulled back the money to see what

0:22:07.119 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>happens or is it still moving forward? So it depends

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:15.040
<v Speaker 1>on which subsector with an infrastructure and certainly governments and

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:19.119
<v Speaker 1>local governments of space and budget deficits and issues. But

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>we actually believe there's a lot of opportunities within the

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure space, both on the public and private side, and

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>part of that is from stimulus packages um for because

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>of COVID. In addition to the fact that you just

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.199
<v Speaker 1>see certain sectors a prime for growth. And I'll give

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you one example, to start on the communications sector, right,

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:42.199
<v Speaker 1>we all know because of the pandemic, how important it

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is to have that broadband connection to it um because

0:22:46.600 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>people are working from home, kids are in zoom school

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 1>from home, and that's just spotlights how important it is.

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 1>It's basically the come as essentially utility to that. So

0:22:55.000 --> 0:22:58.639
<v Speaker 1>we were excited about the communication sector prior to because

0:22:58.680 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of the transition to five G, and now COVID has

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 1>just put a stoplight on it. You know, you think

0:23:03.600 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 1>about what's happened over the past twenty years, how we've

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>all transitions from landlines to cell phones to smartphones and

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>the next wave of technology it's five G and we

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:16.200
<v Speaker 1>believe that invested in cellular tavere or so those are

0:23:16.200 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 1>those large steel structures that least based on the steel,

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:24.199
<v Speaker 1>powers and essential component infrastructure component that will allow the

0:23:24.280 --> 0:23:27.600
<v Speaker 1>five G to actually happen and grow. Huh. So that's

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.480
<v Speaker 1>one area. And then there's also of course, you know

0:23:30.840 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>energy and green energy. Well, how much time do you

0:23:33.600 --> 0:23:37.480
<v Speaker 1>spend wondering what will happen if President Trump wins for

0:23:37.520 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 1>a second term, given particularly that we saw yesterday for example,

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 1>that he's going to allow Arctic drilling going go ahead.

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:47.400
<v Speaker 1>So he's been president for about three and a half

0:23:47.480 --> 0:23:50.919
<v Speaker 1>years now and we still see a tremendous growth in

0:23:50.920 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>the renewable sector. And that's not only happening in the US,

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.720
<v Speaker 1>is happening throughout the globe. You know, the EU passed

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the largest stimulus package into Martiall Plan with the focus

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>on climate change. So there are great opportunities to invest

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in renewables and that's going to continue to happen because

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 1>not only it's good for the environment, but it now

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:14.840
<v Speaker 1>also makes economics sense as the cost of solar and

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:19.320
<v Speaker 1>wind on part with carbon emitting alternatives and some geography,

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:23.280
<v Speaker 1>So we believe it's gonna The next catalyst for renewable

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>energy is storage, and storage costs have come down about

0:24:27.400 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>over the last decade. It's expected to come down over

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the next five years. But if you think about how

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>important that is if you have a solar farm and

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the sun is shining during the day and now you

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>could store that energy and use it at night and

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>make that infrastructure as that even more valuable. So we believe,

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>regardless of who wins the election, renewables are a great

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>place to invest over the next ten years or so.

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:52.679
<v Speaker 1>How about if President Trump is successful in opening up

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the Arctic, would you be investing in some of those

0:24:54.600 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 1>projects up there? Um, we probably would not be invested generally,

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 1>don't for an infrastructure investment. We're not looking to take

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 1>specultive views on commodity prices or the e MP side

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of it, So we're really looking for the more stable,

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:15.920
<v Speaker 1>predictable cash flows in our infrastructure investments. Do you look

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>outside the US as well, Josh? I mean Europe is

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty much ahead of us in many ways, particularly when

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:24.879
<v Speaker 1>it comes to broadband and five G and towers and

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>so on. Well, so it's interesting. I wouldn't. Um, we

0:25:28.680 --> 0:25:31.800
<v Speaker 1>do invest globally, and Europe's important part of it. In

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:33.920
<v Speaker 1>some ways, we're actually ahead of them. So if you

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:38.480
<v Speaker 1>think about the tower sector in the United States, of

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the towers are owned by independent tower companies. In Europe

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it's only about twenty, so there are great opportunities. We

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>like a company called seal Next, which is consolidated that

0:25:48.720 --> 0:25:51.280
<v Speaker 1>right now, so you'll get there or get natural organic

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>growth as data is growing thirty UM, as we're all

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>using more than with intensive applications on the phones. Plus

0:25:58.480 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>you'll get the inorganic growth as a cell phone companies

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to sell off their tower assets, as we've

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:06.240
<v Speaker 1>seen here in the United States, and that's beginning to

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>happen in Europe. So here in the States it seems

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:16.240
<v Speaker 1>like infrastructure spending is fairly bipartisan. What do you expect

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to see out of Washington, no matter who's which administration

0:26:19.920 --> 0:26:22.280
<v Speaker 1>is in the White House over the next couple of years.

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>As you know, we try to get this economy on

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>the other side of this pandemic, try to get this

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>economy development growing again. And I think that's an important

0:26:31.320 --> 0:26:33.679
<v Speaker 1>point you make. I believe that's the only issue that

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 1>both the Democrats and Republicans agree on that we need

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>to spend more on infrastructure. So I think regardless of

0:26:40.200 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 1>who wins, we could see infrastructure spending. But what I

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>will say is when we look to invest at Aberdeen specifically,

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for currently right now, with the opportunities and

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>once and if there is an excellent infrastructure stimulus package,

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to me, that's a free call option for our investments.

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:02.080
<v Speaker 1>So we believe in that when and if that will happen,

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.359
<v Speaker 1>it will just enhance the value of investments will currently

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 1>make it. So Josh never did get the infrastructure week,

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>So what makes you so convinced that there will be

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>something like that next time around, no matter who the

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>president is, and that there will be money left Because

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury is issuing so much right now just to

0:27:18.760 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>keep the economy from going too far underwater, why would

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>they issue more money for an infrastructure sort of spend.

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>Totally agree, and that's a great point, and that's why

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 1>I said initially, any investment we make is based on

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the environment we see right now, and if something does

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>happen to free call options. But the point you make

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is that the governments don't have enough money, the local

0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>and federal government to spend on infrastructure, so we believe

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>they will use more private capital to invest on infrastructure.

0:27:49.080 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>We saw that in Europe during the last financial crisis,

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and we believe that could happen in the United States.

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 1>And we have seen some more privatezations PPP public private

0:27:58.760 --> 0:28:01.600
<v Speaker 1>partnership and actually to increase about ten x over the

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>last decade. So we think there's a great opportunity if

0:28:04.800 --> 0:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you're investing in both public and private infrastructure. Josh Deats,

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We certainly appreciated Josh

0:28:12.640 --> 0:28:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Deet's Senior portfolio manager Aberdeen Asset Management. They have six

0:28:16.440 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty five billion dollars in assets under management. Vannie,

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:23.640
<v Speaker 1>you may not know this, but the real infrastructure play,

0:28:23.680 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>the only one I'm focused on, is this gateway project

0:28:26.000 --> 0:28:30.760
<v Speaker 1>that kind of upgrade the Northeast Transit UH railroad so

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:32.400
<v Speaker 1>we can get more trains in and out of the city.

0:28:32.400 --> 0:28:34.959
<v Speaker 1>That was a crucial thing before the pandemic, but maybe

0:28:35.600 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>not so much after it. Fair boys working from home,

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe

0:28:42.480 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm Bonnie Quinn. I'm on Twitter at

0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 1>Bonnie Quinn, and I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at

0:28:51.680 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>pt Sweeney. Before the podcast, you can always catch us

0:28:54.560 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>worldwide at Bloomberg Radio m