WEBVTT - Tech News: US Defense Contractors Flunk Basic Cybersecurity

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.880 --> 0:00:14.800
<v Speaker 1>He there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.960 --> 0:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio. And

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>how the tech are you. It's time for the tech

0:00:21.560 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>news for a Thursday, December one, two thousand twenty two.

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Where did the year go? Yet again? I at the

0:00:32.760 --> 0:00:35.400
<v Speaker 1>end of a year. I feel like the previous year

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>both lasted an eternity and was over in the blink

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>of an eye. I don't know how that is possible.

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>I guess it's cause Einstein found out time is relative. Man,

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>that guy was the worst. Okay, let's get to it.

0:00:52.120 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I am I'm kidding about Einstein. Let's get to the

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:59.880
<v Speaker 1>tech news so far this week, and um, it's getting

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>little quiet, which is fine. Usually we do see tech

0:01:03.440 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>news quiet down towards the end of the year, gearing

0:01:06.480 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>up to c e s and then things get back

0:01:09.240 --> 0:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>into crazy town. So, first up, we have a scary

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 1>situation here in the United States. I think it's pretty

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>well understood by just about everybody that cyber attacks and

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>cyber warfare are a constant threat. Really, they're constantly happening,

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.800
<v Speaker 1>whether it's from state sponsored hacking groups that are working

0:01:31.880 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of a government, or quote unquote independent groups

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that claim to merely be aligned with some nations goals

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 1>but not actually you know, sponsored by that nation, or

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's a cyber criminal organization. But we've seen tons

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>of attacks on various high profile targets all around the world. Well,

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>the scary thing I read is that, according to cybersecurity researchers,

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:04.840
<v Speaker 1>eighty seven per cent of US defense contractors failed to

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>meet basic cybersecurity regulations. Eighty seven per cent failed. That

0:02:11.880 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>is a sobering thought. Infosecurity Magazines James Coker explains that

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:21.160
<v Speaker 1>to get a passing grade, they must achieve a score

0:02:21.200 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of seventy on the Supplier Risk Performance System as designed

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>by the Pentagon. Only of defense contractors managed to do that.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.400
<v Speaker 1>By the way, to be considered fully compliant, you would

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>have to achieve a score of one ten. So yeah,

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a little like flunking your big math test,

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>except in this case, your math test describes how prepared

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you are for cyber attacks and security intrusions. And considering

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about key contractors in the supply chain for

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>the U. S Department of Defense, and that We've had

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 1>so much conversation of the last two years about importance

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and delicacy of supply chains. This is a huge problem now, y'all.

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>I have complained in the past about how the average

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:14.200
<v Speaker 1>person it's pretty bad at practicing basic infosecurity measures, but

0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:19.679
<v Speaker 1>this is unfathomable to me. You would think that these companies,

0:03:19.760 --> 0:03:23.760
<v Speaker 1>given the business that they are in, would be particularly careful,

0:03:24.240 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>as they would clearly be high profile targets for hackers.

0:03:27.880 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>But it appears the opposite is true now. In James

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Coker's article, which is called majority of US defense contractors

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>not meeting basic cybersecurity requirements, well, he explains part of

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that traditionally the US government hasn't been

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>super good at cracking down on these requirements. And you know,

0:03:49.400 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 1>you just have to look at kids to know if

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.480
<v Speaker 1>a rule is not being enforced, well, you might just

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>feel like there's no need to observe the rule in

0:03:56.520 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the first place, Like it's almost the same as no

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>rule being there at all. Coker also points out that

0:04:02.760 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 1>some of these contractors are, you know, smaller companies, They're

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>not like huge defense contractors, and not all of them

0:04:13.160 --> 0:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>have the assets or experience or knowledge base that you

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 1>find in some of the larger organizations, and that the

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:23.720
<v Speaker 1>learning curve to adopting proper security measures is a pretty

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>steep one. It can be tough to do, and that

0:04:26.520 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>may well be the case, but I maintain that when

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you consider the potential consequences of a security intrusion into

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain of national defense, having to buckle down

0:04:37.520 --> 0:04:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in order to meet regulations is a tiny price to pay.

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>While we're on the subject of infosecurity, I have in

0:04:44.800 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the past recommended that people adopt password vault systems so

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.840
<v Speaker 1>that they can create and store strong passwords for all

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.479
<v Speaker 1>the online services they use, and I still think that's

0:04:55.520 --> 0:04:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a really good idea. I use one myself. You know

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you don't want to reu is the same password at all?

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.240
<v Speaker 1>You don't. I mean, you might want to for the

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.919
<v Speaker 1>sake of convenience, but you don't for the sake of security.

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>You also want each of your passwords to be difficult

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>to guess, and that means making each password really hard

0:05:12.960 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to remember. Because by difficult to guess, we're not just

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>talking about for humans. We're talking about for computers too.

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Now you can do something really clever like you can

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>pick say, three unrelated words for each service, and you

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>string these three words together and that makes your password.

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>This is actually a really good way to make a

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>strong password. But even then, as you add more passwords,

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.200
<v Speaker 1>like as you have more and more services that you're

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>doing this for, it can get a little tricky to

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>remember which string of words you used for which service.

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:47.880
<v Speaker 1>So password vaults help out in this case, right, Typically

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you use one master password in order to access the vault,

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>and then everything else is stored in the vault so

0:05:54.200 --> 0:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you don't have to remember it well. One such password

0:05:57.040 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>vault is last Pass, and unfortunately, hackers were able to

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:05.159
<v Speaker 1>access a cloud storage service used by last pass, and

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>they were able to access quote unquote certain elements of

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>last pass users information. Now, there hasn't really been any

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>clarification on what that means exactly, like what information was accessed,

0:06:18.839 --> 0:06:23.479
<v Speaker 1>and very little on if anything was even you know, taken.

0:06:24.080 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>But presumably any passwords accessed are heavily encrypted, which at

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the very least makes it unlikely that the hackers are

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>able to do anything with the information they stole, at

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>least not right away. Further, last Pass says it does

0:06:37.680 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>not store master passwords at all. That instead, when you

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.799
<v Speaker 1>put in your master password, it goes through what's called

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a one way salted hash. So this is an encryption

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>process that is not reversible, and it generates this jumble

0:06:54.080 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>of characters that can then be used as a key. Anyway,

0:06:57.600 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>if you use last Pass, you might want to look

0:06:59.800 --> 0:07:02.680
<v Speaker 1>in to see just you know what, if anything the

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>service is recommending you do. It might be to change

0:07:06.279 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>your master password, which you know you should be doing

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>on the rag anyway, and I still think password vaults

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>are a critical security tool for the average person. By

0:07:16.800 --> 0:07:19.840
<v Speaker 1>the way, I actually use one myself. I used to

0:07:19.960 --> 0:07:22.400
<v Speaker 1>use last Pass, but now I use a different one,

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:26.119
<v Speaker 1>So I mean I didn't have any issues with last Pass,

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I just kind of switched to a different service. But yeah,

0:07:29.400 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I still think that they're all, you know, important elements

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>to personal data security. A few weeks back, the Washington

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 1>Post published an article linking a software company to a

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>US military contractor that raised a lot of eyebrows. So

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:50.000
<v Speaker 1>this software company is called trust Core Systems. That's a

0:07:50.120 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>t R U S t c O R Systems, and

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it's in the business of issuing digital certificates, which is

0:07:57.360 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>an important part of making sure that the sites you

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:05.080
<v Speaker 1>visit are in fact legitimate. So certificates are what tell

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>browsers that a site is trustworthy, that there's been this

0:08:09.760 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>designated authority or hundreds of them actually that ends up

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>generating this certificate that says, yes, you can trust this website.

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.760
<v Speaker 1>So there are hundreds of these companies that you know,

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 1>issue these kinds of certificates, and trust Core is one

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:29.160
<v Speaker 1>of them. But according to the Washington Post, trust Core

0:08:29.640 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>has the same slate of officers, agents and partners as

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a company that's been known to make spywear and is

0:08:38.000 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>in turn connected to a defense company called Packet Forensics. Now,

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>when you hear the name packet Forensics, that suggests a

0:08:47.240 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>company that's in the business of analyzing data transmissions, possibly

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to intercept communications and pass intelligence along to US government agencies.

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>So this starts to paint a pretty ugly picture. You've

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>got a company it's in charge of certifying trustworthiness that's

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:08.120
<v Speaker 1>tied to a company that is effectively spying on digital transmissions.

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.080
<v Speaker 1>The association has been enough for both Microsoft and Mozilla

0:09:12.200 --> 0:09:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to stop trusting certificates from trust Core, which kind of

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>seems to have an ironic name now doesn't it, and

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.839
<v Speaker 1>other browsers are likely to follow a suit anyway. Everybody's

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a spy, kind of like how in the john Wick

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.280
<v Speaker 1>movies everybody is an assassin. I mean, seriously, the entire

0:09:29.400 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>economy in the john Wick universe must be assassin based.

0:09:32.920 --> 0:09:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's a discussion for a different podcast. Across

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the pond, in the UK, more than one hundred thousand

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 1>small businesses have joined in a class action lawsuit against Google,

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:49.920
<v Speaker 1>and they are seeking more than thirteen point five billion

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:54.640
<v Speaker 1>British pounds and lost ad revenues. So these are mostly

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>publishers and related businesses, and they're saying that they cannot

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>come peat against Google when it comes to the online

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:06.760
<v Speaker 1>ad business, which is a business that Google definitively dominates.

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you just can't deny that claim. It is

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>obvious that Google dominates online advertising. But these companies also

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>say that Google, through this domination, can essentially dictate pricing

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>and other terms of ad deals, and that this affects

0:10:23.600 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the overall ad industry, that these other companies have no

0:10:27.840 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 1>choice but to follow Google's lead because Google is so

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.560
<v Speaker 1>powerful and has so much weight in the industry that

0:10:37.080 --> 0:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>all terms are defined by Google, and that Google is

0:10:40.920 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>acting more or less as a monopoly, at least as

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>far as settling these terms. So the lawsuit argues that

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 1>these smaller companies have had to sell ad space for

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.800
<v Speaker 1>much less than they should, losing out on up to

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of their AD revenue since January one, two thousand fourteen.

0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Now we'll have to keep an eye on this lawsuit

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to see where it goes, But in general, this falls

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.840
<v Speaker 1>in line with this larger trend we've been seeing in

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>tech as more regulators, politicians, and even smaller companies are

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:17.079
<v Speaker 1>pushing back against big text dominant position in various markets. Okay,

0:11:17.120 --> 0:11:19.360
<v Speaker 1>that's the first section of tech News. We're gonna take

0:11:19.360 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. When we come back, it's everybody's favorite

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.280
<v Speaker 1>guy to talk about in tech. Things are about to

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>get muskie, but first this break. Okay, we're back and

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>it's time for the Elon Must section of the show.

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>But this will be relatively short. We've only got a

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.440
<v Speaker 1>couple of stories. So first up, and this is a

0:11:45.480 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 1>tiny one, but over in China, Tesla has had to

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>issue a recall or recall, I guess that's how we

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>should say that on more than four five thousand Tesla

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:00.720
<v Speaker 1>vehicles in order to address a problem with side marker

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 1>lights on the cars, which were determined that you know,

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>under extreme circumstances, could potentially contribute to catastrophic car accidents.

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>But a recall ain't a recall, at least not like

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 1>it was in the old days, because in this case,

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.679
<v Speaker 1>the recall is actually an over the air firmware update,

0:12:20.320 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>So owners are not going to have to take their

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:25.520
<v Speaker 1>vehicles anywhere. They're not gonna have to go back to

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.880
<v Speaker 1>like the dealership or something and give up their car

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.800
<v Speaker 1>for any length of time. It'll actually be issued over

0:12:31.840 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the air, and it still qualifies as a recall legally,

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.960
<v Speaker 1>even though you know the drivers just it just means

0:12:39.960 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that their their lights will behave slightly differently from one

0:12:43.280 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>day to the next. Honestly, I do think it's super

0:12:46.240 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>cool that cars have reached a level of sophistication in

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>which at least some issues can be fixed just by

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.199
<v Speaker 1>sending out an update and you don't have to take

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>it back. It is kind of odd that we have

0:12:58.040 --> 0:13:01.199
<v Speaker 1>this sort of antiquated system where we have to designate

0:13:01.240 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that as a recall. Because as much as I dog

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>on Elon Musk and on Tesla. Uh. I don't think

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really fair to just say, hey, almost half a

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>million Tesla's were recalled in China, because I feel like

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that paints a very inaccurate picture of what's actually happening.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 1>So I personally think we need to kind of update

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>our definitions of what a recall is and isn't, or

0:13:29.360 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>have some other term for these kinds of fixes where

0:13:34.320 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>recall does not bring up this idea that people had

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to surrender their vehicles or that Tesla had to take

0:13:41.600 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>them back or anything like that anyway. Next up is Neuralink,

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>which is the Elon Musk backed company that is developing

0:13:49.600 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>brain computer interfaces or BC eyes. Now, as Brain computer

0:13:54.920 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Interface suggests, this is a type of technology that would

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>allow a human to interact with a comp you directly

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>through thought through brain activity. And Elon Musk has been

0:14:05.559 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>known to get all futuristic with this vision and talk

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:10.600
<v Speaker 1>about how one day human intelligence is going to merge

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>with AI. To me, that sounds like he's kind of

0:14:14.040 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 1>falling into the philosophy of Ray Kurtzwil, a known futurist

0:14:19.520 --> 0:14:24.680
<v Speaker 1>who known famous futurist who has really pushed forward the

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.200
<v Speaker 1>idea of the singularity being on the horizon. I think

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:30.080
<v Speaker 1>he most recently said he thinks it will be here

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>by two thousand forty five. I just can't shake the

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.960
<v Speaker 1>feeling that these really rich people are just terrified at

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the thought that one day they are going to cease

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to exist, so they're kind of feverishly predicting and hoping

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>for a get out of death free card. Maybe I'm

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.760
<v Speaker 1>being totally unfair. I could just be so cynical and

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>skeptical that that's how I feel about it now. But

0:14:52.840 --> 0:14:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, they could be onto something, right. I mean,

0:14:54.840 --> 0:15:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to dismiss the concept, but we are definitive, far,

0:15:00.520 --> 0:15:02.760
<v Speaker 1>far far away from being able to merge AI with

0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>human intelligence. Musk did say he hopes that the neuralink

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>interface will be implanted in a real human brain within

0:15:10.320 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>six months or so, because so far the company has

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.840
<v Speaker 1>been testing this tech out on animals like monkeys and pigs.

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>And to be clear, there are other bc I devices

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:22.800
<v Speaker 1>out there, including some that are, you know, attached to

0:15:22.840 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>real human brains. People are really using these kind of

0:15:27.000 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>interfaces to interact with computers for very specific use cases,

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and neural links design is particularly sophisticated. It's a really

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.440
<v Speaker 1>cool design and it has benefits over other implementations of

0:15:39.480 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>this technology, including a smaller surgical footprint, which is obviously important.

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>You want to reduce or ideally eliminate the risk of

0:15:49.040 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>things like infection or surgery complications because you have to

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>implant these things into brains, which means you've got to

0:15:56.280 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>get to the brain, and that means going through either

0:15:59.840 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the skull or I saw one suggestion that had going

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>through the jugular to feed a chip up into the brain.

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>That way. Either way seems pretty extreme to me, right,

0:16:12.640 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it also is going to allow for

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.280
<v Speaker 1>wireless transmission of data because a lot of the BCIs

0:16:20.320 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that exist right now, you have to be tethered to

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a machine. Now in the case of b C I

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:27.720
<v Speaker 1>S the way we're seeing it used in a lot

0:16:27.760 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 1>of cases are for people who have limited or no mobility,

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 1>right So being tethered to a machine, while not ideal,

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 1>also does not have a huge impact on quality of

0:16:40.600 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 1>life in the sense that these are people who otherwise

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:46.800
<v Speaker 1>aren't capable of moving anyway. But what there are able

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to do now is to use thought to control electronics

0:16:50.280 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in some way, either by moving a cursor and typing

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>things out, or some other form of communication where they're

0:16:56.680 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>able to interact with their environments and with other people

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:05.360
<v Speaker 1>when previously they were not capable of doing that. And honestly,

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:09.320
<v Speaker 1>that is the use that I can get behind, and

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>that's in fact what the Neuralalink teams are working toward. Really.

0:17:12.400 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk is talking about AI and human intelligence merging,

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:18.640
<v Speaker 1>but these teams are looking at a more pragmatic approach

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and one that could have a transformative effect on a

0:17:21.600 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>person's life who otherwise would be facing incredible challenges that

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>most of us can't even imagine going through. To me,

0:17:30.480 --> 0:17:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that is the inspiring thing about this technology, way way

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:40.240
<v Speaker 1>more energizing and and inspiring than thinking that one day

0:17:40.240 --> 0:17:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll be able to complete the New York Times crossword

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>puzzle and pen in just five minutes. I don't see

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>that as being the huge benefit. And lastly, in our

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>Muskie section, Terry Breton, and I don't know if I'm

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>pronouncing that name correctly anyway, This is an EU official

0:17:57.960 --> 0:18:01.359
<v Speaker 1>in charge of implementing the upcoming Digital Services Act or

0:18:01.440 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>d s A in the EU once that Act has

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>been finished and approved. That is it's still not complete anyway.

0:18:10.280 --> 0:18:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Bretton has indicated that Twitter is going to have a

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of work to do in order to comply with

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>EU laws to operate in the EU, the implication being

0:18:20.359 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>that if Twitter fails to do that, it could potentially

0:18:23.280 --> 0:18:27.400
<v Speaker 1>be banned from the EU. However, I should add that

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:33.200
<v Speaker 1>the EU really focuses on very large operating platforms or

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 1>v lops, and as of now, Twitter has not yet

0:18:38.359 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>been designated a v LAP, so it's possible that Twitter

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 1>won't be won't be subject to the most restrictive rules

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:49.320
<v Speaker 1>in the EU. It still will have to follow some,

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>but not maybe all, of the super tight restrictions. I'm

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>sure that Musk would much prefer not having to follow

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 1>every single restriction that will be coming up from the

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>d s A. Elon Musk actually had a meeting with

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>Breton and it seemed to go pretty well. Musk said

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.159
<v Speaker 1>that he thought that the rules were all very reasonable.

0:19:11.840 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>But this puzzles me a bit simply because of what

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Musk says and what he's been doing appear to be

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 1>at odds of each other. Because, like the d s A,

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.480
<v Speaker 1>is going to require transparent and thoughtful sets of policies

0:19:25.480 --> 0:19:30.480
<v Speaker 1>on things, for example, like banning and unbanning accounts. But

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.600
<v Speaker 1>must just recently announced that, you know, thousands of banded

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>accounts would be allowed back on Twitter, and there's nothing

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>transparent or thoughtful about that approach it. It seems, at

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 1>least on the outside, that Musk is ruling Twitter mostly

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:51.280
<v Speaker 1>by whim, which is antithetical to the requirements of the EU.

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>But Musk also has said that he plans to hand

0:19:54.520 --> 0:19:57.480
<v Speaker 1>control of Twitter over to some other CEO at some

0:19:57.560 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>point in the future, So may be by the time

0:20:00.680 --> 0:20:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the d s A is actually in full effect, it

0:20:03.040 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>will be a moot point because Musk won't be the

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.280
<v Speaker 1>one calling the shots. I don't know. I just feel

0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:13.239
<v Speaker 1>like the narratives here are are at cross purposes with

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:17.399
<v Speaker 1>one another. The two things cannot be an alignment based

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>upon what we have seen so far with Musk's version

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter. But yeah, confusing stuff, and that is it.

0:20:23.640 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>That's it for the Elon Musk section this week. Thank goodness.

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.000
<v Speaker 1>We do have a couple more stories Before we get

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to those. We're gonna take another quick break and we'll

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>be right back. Okay, got a few more to wrap up.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Andy Jase, this CEO of Amazon has indicated that the

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Prime video streaming unit of Amazon could potentially spin off

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to become its own company. This really confused me at first, because,

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:00.720
<v Speaker 1>like the headlines were saying Prime to become standalone owned company,

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>and Prime refers not just to the streaming video service

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 1>but to the Amazon Prime program, which is one that

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>gets you like free shipping and all that kind of

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff for a yearly subscription. But yeah, anyway, he said

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:18.520
<v Speaker 1>this during an interview during the deal Book Summit, which

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 1>just concluded. A lot of stuff happened there, including some

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>stuff about f t X and its implosion, but I

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get into all that. Maybe I'll talk

0:21:28.720 --> 0:21:32.040
<v Speaker 1>about that and into the year episode. So it would

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.040
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see Prime Video kind of spinoff and

0:21:35.080 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>become its own standalone company. But I've got a lot

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>of questions. For example, if the video streaming division becomes

0:21:41.440 --> 0:21:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a standalone company, would that mean an Amazon Prime membership

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:50.400
<v Speaker 1>would no longer serve as access to the streaming content

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:54.159
<v Speaker 1>on the standalone company the separate company, or would Prime

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:58.400
<v Speaker 1>members be able to use their membership both on Amazon

0:21:58.800 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and the standalone video a service. If not, would that

0:22:01.840 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>mean they'd have to subscribe to yet another streaming service.

0:22:05.680 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the answer to this. These are all

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.600
<v Speaker 1>just hypothetical questions. Anyway, Jesse did not outright say that

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>this is definitely going to happen. He just said that

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:18.560
<v Speaker 1>over time the company has looked at opportunities to follow

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:22.119
<v Speaker 1>this kind of approach, so I wouldn't be surprised to

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.560
<v Speaker 1>see it happen. I am very curious about the implementation

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and whether or not that would affect how you access

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:33.800
<v Speaker 1>either the Amazon Prime features that have become very popular

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>at Amazon or the streaming video, because if they split

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>that out, then they're gonna be people asking questions like, well,

0:22:42.680 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>are you going to reduce the cost of Amazon Prime them?

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Because if I'm not getting the streaming video, then you're

0:22:48.680 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>taking stuff away from the subscription, So why would I

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>pay as much when you're taking things away? These are

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 1>all questions that I just don't have answers to. Now.

0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure most of y'all are familiar with the concept

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:05.240
<v Speaker 1>of focus groups and entertainment. These groups, which usually consist

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of you know, just average people, are gathered together by

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 1>market analysts, end up watching early cuts of shows or films,

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>and then they give feedback to studio representatives, who might

0:23:19.040 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>then take that feedback and send it to producers, who

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.880
<v Speaker 1>might then phone up directors and demand that the directors

0:23:24.880 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>make the movie less sad or whatever, you know, like, hey,

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>what if Old Yeller just gets better by the end.

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.960
<v Speaker 1>That kind of thing. Now, in some cases, focus groups

0:23:35.960 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>can really help set a project on the right path,

0:23:38.640 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe it turns out that motives are muddled and

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:46.040
<v Speaker 1>people don't understand why characters are doing things, and it

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.600
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the intent of the director for that to happen,

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it's just how it came out in the edit. Well,

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:53.479
<v Speaker 1>if people are confused, it may not be a very

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 1>satisfying experience. Maybe it's something the director can fix even

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>by having an alternative edit, or maybe they have to

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>go and do reshoots. Those can all be good things,

0:24:02.280 --> 0:24:05.480
<v Speaker 1>but it also could lead to a director's vision being

0:24:05.520 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>totally compromised. We've heard stories of that to where a

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>director essentially loses all control of a film or an editor,

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:15.159
<v Speaker 1>and because really, when you get down to it, the

0:24:15.160 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>finished film, the editor's touch is at least as important

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 1>as the directors, sometimes more important. Anyway, all that aside,

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Netflix is actually going to expand its focus group program

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.320
<v Speaker 1>right now that consists of around two thousand subscribers who

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.360
<v Speaker 1>are allowed to watch Netflix original content early and give

0:24:35.440 --> 0:24:38.320
<v Speaker 1>feedback on it. So the company plans to expand this

0:24:38.400 --> 0:24:42.479
<v Speaker 1>to quote tens of thousands of users around the world

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>end quote, and that's going to happen starting early next year.

0:24:46.280 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So if you're a Netflix subscriber, maybe you'll become a tastemaker.

0:24:50.840 --> 0:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Then you can be the one to tell Tim Burton, hey,

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>please stop messing with the Adams family's interpersonal dynamics so much.

0:24:59.880 --> 0:25:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Or Tega is doing a phenomenal job, but you're messing

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:08.119
<v Speaker 1>with one of the greatest families and American fiction. Stop it.

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>I might be projecting. Rolls Royce, the aviation company, not

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the luxury car, recently demonstrated a jet engine using hydrogen

0:25:20.560 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>as fuel. So the engine was a Rolls Royce A

0:25:23.960 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty one A and it was modified to accept hydrogen

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:32.520
<v Speaker 1>as combustion fuel. And you know, hydrogen can be used

0:25:32.520 --> 0:25:35.240
<v Speaker 1>as combustible fuel, but it can also be used in

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.119
<v Speaker 1>stuff like fuel cells. Fuel cells use a totally different

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>physical process from combustion, and Garzia Vitadini, the CTO of

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 1>Rolls Royce, said, quote we are pushing the boundaries to

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>discover the zero carbon possibilities of hydrogen, which could help

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 1>reshape the future of flight. End quote. Now, it is

0:25:54.720 --> 0:25:59.080
<v Speaker 1>true that burning hydrogen does not produce carbon dioxide, so

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 1>that's great, But I will have more to say about

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:08.040
<v Speaker 1>combusting in a little second. Further rolls. Royce said that

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>they got the hydrogen by relying on renewable energy. This

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:16.000
<v Speaker 1>is also critically important. So hydrogen is the most abundant

0:26:16.080 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>element in our galaxy, but hydrogen also bonds with other

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>elements very very readily, and it forms compounds. Uh it.

0:26:24.800 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>We typically do not encounter hydrogen in its pure form.

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>If we did, and we could just harness it, things

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:34.240
<v Speaker 1>would be way easier. Instead, we have to harvest hydrogen

0:26:34.400 --> 0:26:37.640
<v Speaker 1>from some other source. Now, one way to do this

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:40.359
<v Speaker 1>is to add kind of a secondary process to something

0:26:40.440 --> 0:26:44.600
<v Speaker 1>like natural gas mining operations, because that produces a lot

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of hydrogen in the process. However, if we do that,

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:54.680
<v Speaker 1>then we tie our source of hydrogen to ongoing fossil

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>fuels operations. That really just extends our reliance on fossil fuels, right,

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and said of it, saying like, let's let's move away

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>from relying on fossil fuels and depend more on sources

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:10.960
<v Speaker 1>like hydrogen. It says, oh, well, while we're depending on

0:27:11.000 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuels, let's also get hydrogen. That means that we

0:27:13.680 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>become less less likely to just move off of fossil

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:24.840
<v Speaker 1>fuels entirely. So really, any solution quote unquote that just

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.200
<v Speaker 1>assumes that fossil fuels are still going to be part

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:31.119
<v Speaker 1>of the picture is not great, generally speaking from an

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>environmental perspective. But that's not the only way to get hydrogen.

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Another source of hydrogen is water. You know, good old

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:42.439
<v Speaker 1>h that's the hydrogen to oh two hydrogen atoms to

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:46.200
<v Speaker 1>every oxygen atom. If you run an electric current through water,

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you can break those molecular bonds and you release oxygen

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and you release hydrogen. But in order to do that,

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you have to generate an electrical current, right, you have

0:27:55.680 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>to use energy to do this to break these molecular bonds.

0:28:00.400 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>So Rolls Royce was looking at renewable energy systems like

0:28:03.880 --> 0:28:09.200
<v Speaker 1>wind turbines and uh and and tidal turbines to generate

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the electricity needed to harvest the hydrogen. So that way

0:28:11.800 --> 0:28:15.480
<v Speaker 1>they're not relying on like a coal powered power plant. Right,

0:28:15.960 --> 0:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>So that's good. That's a pretty good ecosystem to get

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>your hydrogen through means that are not carbon emission systems.

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But here's where we start to encounter a problem because, yeah,

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:31.600
<v Speaker 1>burning hydrogen doesn't create carbon dioxide. However, burning hydrogen in

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>our atmosphere, specifically at higher temperatures, does create other byproducts. Now,

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the main byproduct is water, and people say, oh, well water,

0:28:40.880 --> 0:28:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that's that's fine, right, It's just water, and that's true.

0:28:44.720 --> 0:28:49.280
<v Speaker 1>But it also at high temperatures can create nitrogen oxides.

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, because there's a lot of nitrogen in our atmosphere,

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>nitrogen and oxygen, So burning at these high temperatures can,

0:28:57.240 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>as a byproduct, produced nitrogen oxides that is also a pollutant.

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 1>It can cause respiratory problems. It's a big contributor to

0:29:06.400 --> 0:29:11.080
<v Speaker 1>stuff like smog. So while you could convincingly argue that

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>using hydrogen and jet engines is cleaner than typical jet fuel,

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:19.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd have to look at all the analysis to make

0:29:19.520 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 1>that conclusion. But it seems, you know, sensible, It's still

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:28.040
<v Speaker 1>not totally free of pollutants, and I think it's a

0:29:28.080 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>heck of an engineering achievement. Don't get me wrong. I

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's a great engineering achievement, and I don't want

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to to diminish that or dismiss it or anything like that.

0:29:38.640 --> 0:29:41.959
<v Speaker 1>But I also don't want to ignore one pollutant just

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>because this new approach could eliminate emissions of some other pollutant. Right,

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>we have to keep the whole picture in mind. Otherwise

0:29:52.360 --> 0:29:56.160
<v Speaker 1>we just trade one problem for a different problem. If

0:29:56.200 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>we're able to reconcile all of at and to determine, okay, well,

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>does this approach make sense? Um is the pollutant significant?

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:11.000
<v Speaker 1>If it's not significant, then maybe it makes perfect sense

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to go this way. But if it is significant, if

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.920
<v Speaker 1>all we're doing is trading carbon emissions for nitrogen oxide emissions,

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:22.400
<v Speaker 1>then we still have some tough questions we have to answer. Still,

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Anything that is pushing us away from fossil fuels and

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>toward an approach that is less environmentally dangerous, I think

0:30:33.080 --> 0:30:36.360
<v Speaker 1>is ultimately a good thing. And that's it. That's it

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.600
<v Speaker 1>for this news episode of tech Stuff. Hope you are

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>all well. As I said earlier this week, I am

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>working on an end of the year kind of wrap

0:30:46.280 --> 0:30:49.200
<v Speaker 1>up of the big news stories that unfolded in tech

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.920
<v Speaker 1>in two, if you have any favorites that you would

0:30:52.960 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>like me to cover, let me know. Uh, some of

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the major stuff I'm obviously going to tackle, like Elon Musk,

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter obviously is going to have to play a part

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>in that. Meta's crisis is gonna play a part in

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>that um But you know, if there are specific stories

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:12.720
<v Speaker 1>that happened within tech that you think are really important,

0:31:12.760 --> 0:31:15.840
<v Speaker 1>even if they weren't necessarily huge, but you think they

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:20.200
<v Speaker 1>have important implementations for tech or consumers or anything like that,

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>feel free to let me know. You can get in

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>touch in a couple of different ways. One way is

0:31:25.160 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you can download the I Heart radio app and you

0:31:27.760 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>can navigate over to the tech Stuff page. You just

0:31:30.200 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>put that in the search field and there you will

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>see a little microphone icon. If you click on the

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>microphone icon, you can leave a voice message up to

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:40.720
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds in length. Let me know what you think.

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>If you would like me to play the message in

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a future episode of Tech Stuff, just let me know

0:31:44.680 --> 0:31:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that as well. I will only do it if you

0:31:46.880 --> 0:31:48.760
<v Speaker 1>tell me it's okay. The other way, if you don't

0:31:48.760 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>want to talk into a microphone, and I understand if

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that's how you feel, You can leave me a message

0:31:53.720 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter to handle for the show is tech Stuff

0:31:57.040 --> 0:32:01.120
<v Speaker 1>hs W and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:32:07.000 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Text Stuff is an I heart Radio production. For more

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.520
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from I heart Radio, visit the i heart Radio app,

0:32:13.640 --> 0:32:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.