WEBVTT - Tech News: Coups and CES

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:15.040 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and I love all things tech and this is the

0:00:22.000 --> 0:00:28.560
<v Speaker 1>tech News episode for Tuesday, January twelve, twenty one. Before

0:00:28.600 --> 0:00:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I jump into it, I should also point out that

0:00:31.320 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 1>when I record these episodes, I record them the day

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>before they published. That gives my super producer TORII, enough

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:43.920
<v Speaker 1>time to edit and publish these episodes, which explains why

0:00:44.520 --> 0:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>when I recorded last Thursday's episode, I didn't have any

0:00:48.800 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>mention of the assault on the United States Capital at all,

0:00:54.120 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>because as I was recording that episode, that had not

0:00:57.160 --> 0:01:00.160
<v Speaker 1>yet happened. In fact, it was right after I had

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:03.160
<v Speaker 1>finished recording and I was starting to go back and

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:07.640
<v Speaker 1>listen to that recording that the news was starting to

0:01:07.680 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>break about that situation. And so today's episode has some

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:18.240
<v Speaker 1>of the fallout from that from the tech perspective. So

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.959
<v Speaker 1>since our last news episode, there's been a ton of

0:01:21.000 --> 0:01:25.240
<v Speaker 1>developments in the United States involving social media. The President

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:31.440
<v Speaker 1>of the United States and a platform called Parlor. Twitter, Twitch, Facebook,

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and Instagram have all banned Trump from posting to their platforms.

0:01:36.400 --> 0:01:40.759
<v Speaker 1>YouTube has been removing videos. Reddit shut down a subreddit

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>called our slash Donald Trump for violating policies that involve

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>the restrictions against promoting hate speech or encouraging violence. And

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>TikTok has been removing videos that relate to the riots

0:01:54.040 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on Capitol Hill, leading to some people joking that TikTok

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>band Donald Trump before Trump could ban TikTok. Each of

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.760
<v Speaker 1>these platforms have done this because of the content and

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>tone of the President's messaging leading up to and including

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the day of riots, saying that he is continuing to

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>encourage seditious acts. There are critics of the platforms on

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the ideological spectrum. You've got people arguing

0:02:22.600 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that the platforms are trampling on the First Amendment, which

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.160
<v Speaker 1>seems pretty simple to dismiss as these platforms are all

0:02:29.160 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>extensions of the private sector and the First Amendment protects

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:37.440
<v Speaker 1>citizens from government censorship. There have been multiple references to

0:02:37.840 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Orwell and Orwellian practices, which is particularly rich and suggests

0:02:43.600 --> 0:02:45.919
<v Speaker 1>to me that a lot of people invoking the name

0:02:46.160 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 1>or Well have never actually read or Well. There have

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:54.400
<v Speaker 1>also been many criticisms about the power that these tech

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>companies have, which interestingly is also a talking point on

0:02:58.320 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the opposite end of the ideal logical spectrum, though that

0:03:01.919 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 1>point extends to corporations as a whole, and how over

0:03:05.360 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of decades the United States government has

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>granted corporations more power year by year, enabling them to

0:03:12.919 --> 0:03:17.200
<v Speaker 1>have enormous political influence in the process. And then on

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the more liberal side of things, you've got critics saying

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>that these platforms are moving to ban Trump, but they've

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>proven that they could have done that if they had

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to at any point before now, which leads to

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>questions about why it took so long after there were

0:03:33.240 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>numerous examples of violations of policies over the last few years,

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:42.279
<v Speaker 1>in other words, that the president had clearly violated policies

0:03:42.320 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of these different platforms policies that if someone that was

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>not the president had done this, they would have found

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:53.800
<v Speaker 1>themselves facing consequences. So essentially, these critics are saying that

0:03:53.960 --> 0:03:57.480
<v Speaker 1>now that we're two weeks out from Biden's inauguration, sooner

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>than that, really one week out now, that's when the

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>platforms have finally deemed it possible to remove Trump from them.

0:04:06.440 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>So no one's really happy about how this was done.

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.800
<v Speaker 1>But some people view it as necessity to reduce the

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>chance for further chaos, and other people see it as

0:04:16.279 --> 0:04:18.720
<v Speaker 1>an attack on freedoms and a sign of too much

0:04:18.760 --> 0:04:22.640
<v Speaker 1>political power. And these two lines of thought don't necessarily

0:04:22.680 --> 0:04:26.640
<v Speaker 1>fall equally into the camps of democrat and republican. It

0:04:26.800 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>is a complicated and messy situation. Meanwhile, let's talk about Parlor,

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>which bills itself as a free speech social network. Now,

0:04:36.000 --> 0:04:40.039
<v Speaker 1>this social network receives a lot of funding from conservative

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:44.400
<v Speaker 1>hedge fund manager Robert Mercer and his daughter Rebecca. Mercer

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>was a big investor in Cambridge Analytica back in the

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>day and is a notable financial supporter of various right

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>wing organizations. Parlor itself is associated with conservatives in general,

0:04:57.440 --> 0:05:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and while the company says it is new role, the

0:05:00.839 --> 0:05:04.159
<v Speaker 1>fact is that the vast majority of activity on Parlor

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:08.400
<v Speaker 1>falls on the conservative and frequently the far right wing

0:05:08.560 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>side of the political spectrum. Parlor is also where a

0:05:12.279 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of the people involved in the riots on Capitol

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Hill have accounts, and it's a place that has been

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>used to organize activities like that. As such, people concerned

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:27.039
<v Speaker 1>with Parlor's role in facilitating violence and assaults on the

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>foundations of democracy began to pressure Google and Apple to

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 1>remove Parlor from their respective app stores. The two companies

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 1>ultimately complied, removing access to those apps, and then Amazon

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 1>announced it was booting Parlor from their web services platform

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>by eleven nine pm Pacific time on Sunday, January tent which,

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.520
<v Speaker 1>as I record, this was yesterday, So it is no

0:05:52.600 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>longer on those servers. A company representative route to Parlor,

0:05:56.960 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>stating quote, Recently, we've seen a steady increase in this

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.560
<v Speaker 1>violent content on your website, all of which violates our terms.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.000
<v Speaker 1>It's clear that Parlor does not have an effective process

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to comply with the a WS terms of service end quote.

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>That's an Amazon Web Services That's what aw S means.

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 1>So this means that the actual servers that Parlor used

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to host their network are now no longer available to Parlor,

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>effectively d platforming the platform. The admins of Parlor initially

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:33.919
<v Speaker 1>said that the plan was to relaunch Parlor on another

0:06:34.120 --> 0:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>web service, but that the platform might be down for

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 1>about a week as a result. They also said that

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>the plan was to rebuild Parlor from scratch, but that

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>seems unrealistic to me. Rebuilding would take a lot longer

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:51.040
<v Speaker 1>than just a week from a coding perspective. Moreover, subsequent

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>reports indicate that the founders aren't having much luck when

0:06:54.000 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>it comes to finding a new home for the platform,

0:06:56.760 --> 0:07:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and even the company's own legal team quit again. This

0:07:01.240 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>brought out First Amendment defenders, but opponents pointed out that

0:07:05.279 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>speech that incites violence or encourages sedition or treason are

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 1>not protected by the First Amendment, as the saying goes,

0:07:14.160 --> 0:07:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the right to swing your fist ends where the other

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 1>man's nose begins. These recent developments have elevated conversations that

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 1>have been going on for years about the role of

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>social networks and their responsibility to moderate. In the United States,

0:07:31.440 --> 0:07:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Section to thirty gives platforms an effective immunity against legal

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>action for the content that users post to those platforms.

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Some have said that it prevents those platforms from moderating discussions,

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>which is actually the opposite of the intent of that

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>piece of legislation. It was meant to encourage platforms to

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>moderate content on them, also without fear of legal action

0:07:57.920 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>for doing so so. If a platform were to, say,

0:08:00.480 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>remove all posts that referenced violence, the platform would not

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>be held legally liable if someone felt that the platform

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>was overstepping its bounds. However, rather than seeing these platforms

0:08:13.000 --> 0:08:17.360
<v Speaker 1>take a more active role in moderating content, the opposite

0:08:17.440 --> 0:08:20.720
<v Speaker 1>has largely been the case, and in fact, platforms have

0:08:20.840 --> 0:08:25.040
<v Speaker 1>found it profitable to do so because the inflammatory content

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>drives a lot of engagement, and that ultimately boils down

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to people spending more time on these platforms and thus

0:08:33.200 --> 0:08:37.319
<v Speaker 1>earning those platforms more money as a result thanks to advertising.

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:42.440
<v Speaker 1>And so there has been an incentive for platforms to

0:08:42.520 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of let things be until the situation boils over

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>because it was more profitable that way. Once things escalate

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:54.400
<v Speaker 1>beyond a certain point, the risks of housing the material

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>end up being greater than the reward of hosting it,

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's when we see platfor worms leap to action.

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Now that's not to say that all social network leaders

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 1>feel no responsibility for what happens on the platforms. It's

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>more of a commentary on how the whole business is

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a moral in nature, not immoral necessarily, but a moral

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and moving forward with Democrats in control of both Houses

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of Congress plus the White House, after January twenty. There's

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a growing expectation that the US government will be taking

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>a harder look at big tech with regulations and reform

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>in mind, which could include a renewed push to break

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>up some of those big companies that the government deems

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to be either a monopoly or at the very least

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>practice anti competitive strategies. That's one extreme we can see.

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>It's also possible that we'll see the government create incentives

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 1>or find ways to pressure social networking companies to take

0:09:54.520 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>a more active and transparent approach to moderating content on

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:02.240
<v Speaker 1>the networks themselves. This is something that the platforms have

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:06.559
<v Speaker 1>said might be a necessity, including Mark Zuckerberg. There's also

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 1>the possibility that Section to thirty will come under fire again,

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.600
<v Speaker 1>which is interesting because it's a piece of legislation that

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 1>gets targeted both by conservatives and by certain Democrats, but

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>for very different reasons. Representatives from organizations like Tech Freedom

0:10:23.320 --> 0:10:27.440
<v Speaker 1>argue that removing or changing Section to thirty will not

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:30.640
<v Speaker 1>solve the problem, and that any approach will require a

0:10:30.720 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>great deal of thought and care behind it, or else

0:10:34.520 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it will be doomed to fail. Removing to thirty would

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>then be nothing more than a symbolic gesture, and further,

0:10:40.880 --> 0:10:43.800
<v Speaker 1>it could hurt smaller platforms and thus make the anti

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 1>competitive problem in tech even worse. So the message here

0:10:48.360 --> 0:10:51.640
<v Speaker 1>seems to be think carefully about the solution and don't

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>make it something that makes the problem even worse than

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.080
<v Speaker 1>it already is, or just doesn't even address the problem

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. While there are ongoing investigations into

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the security failures that allowed dozens of rioters to roam

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the halls of the US Capital, there's a parallel effort

0:11:10.160 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 1>to address the information security problems that arose as a

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:18.440
<v Speaker 1>result of unauthorized people having access to numerous computers and

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:22.800
<v Speaker 1>systems in the capital during the incident. The physical access

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to facilities and equipment means there's a possibility one or

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>more people not only accessed information they should not have,

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but potentially they could have bugged offices, copied data, stolen computers.

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:38.440
<v Speaker 1>In fact, we know for a fact that some computers

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.120
<v Speaker 1>have been stolen or at least have been reported as

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>being stolen, or maybe stolen other equipment. They could have

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:49.040
<v Speaker 1>injected malware into computer systems or more. With this sort

0:11:49.040 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>of intrusion, you have to move forward assuming the worst

0:11:52.720 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that is that everything has been compromised. Otherwise you leave

0:11:56.800 --> 0:12:01.360
<v Speaker 1>yourself vulnerable to the worst. It's pretty much the worst

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>case scenario for computer security. That being said, effectively, each

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:10.960
<v Speaker 1>member of Congress has their own information system, which means

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>there is some decentralization at play here. They're not all

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:19.400
<v Speaker 1>just automatically linked together. They're all kind of their own

0:12:19.640 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 1>little silos, but they are connected to so in other words,

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>if someone does gain access to one specific account, they

0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:31.439
<v Speaker 1>do not necessarily have access to all other accounts across Congress.

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:35.280
<v Speaker 1>That's a small comfort, but since we don't yet know

0:12:35.480 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the extent to which systems were compromised, it's also a

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:41.960
<v Speaker 1>bit of a moot point. And depending on the level

0:12:41.960 --> 0:12:44.720
<v Speaker 1>of access people were able to get, the damage they

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>could do could still be considerable. And there's the possibility

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that foreign agents could have played a part in the

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:55.640
<v Speaker 1>riots on January six as well, as has been widely

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 1>reported though far too late. The planning that led to

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>these riots was largely done on platforms like Parlor and Reddit,

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:07.719
<v Speaker 1>and while there appears to have been no centralized leadership,

0:13:08.120 --> 0:13:11.679
<v Speaker 1>the various smaller groups that made up the whole each

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>shared plans extensively within their respective groups. So any foreign

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>agency that was paying more attention than the media was

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:23.680
<v Speaker 1>could have followed along and played a part as well

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and taken the opportunity of access to compromise cybersecurity in

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the nation's capital. It will likely take many days to

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 1>assess the full level of damage, and even then we

0:13:36.559 --> 0:13:41.800
<v Speaker 1>likely won't know the whole story, and maybe we never will. Well,

0:13:42.559 --> 0:13:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that's enough doom and gloom from the rioting at the

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:49.679
<v Speaker 1>nation's capital. I think when we come back, we're going

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to take a look at a totally different topic what

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>c e S twenty twenty one is shaping up to

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>be this week. But first let's take a quick break.

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>So before the break, I mentioned it is c e

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>S week. Now I talked about this last week. It

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:16.319
<v Speaker 1>is a very different show than what we would normally see.

0:14:16.720 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 1>C e S is the Consumer Electronics Show. It's an

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>enormous industry trade show that has had at least one

0:14:24.480 --> 0:14:28.160
<v Speaker 1>big event in a physical location every year since nineteen

0:14:28.200 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven until now. In fact, since it has been

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>held exclusively at Las Vegas in January, well, COVID has

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>forced c e S to go virtual like lots of

0:14:41.360 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 1>other events in the world, and The shift and venue

0:14:44.440 --> 0:14:47.080
<v Speaker 1>is just one of the changes that we're seeing this

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 1>week in c e S had more than four thousand

0:14:51.560 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>exhibitors officially at the event, and that doesn't count the

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>number of companies that set up shop in hotel suites

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>but are not in an official part of the show.

0:15:02.440 --> 0:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize that was a thing until I started

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>going to c e S. And now we get invites

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to go to different hotel suites to check out technology,

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and I realized, Oh, the reason you did this is

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>because renting out a hotel suite is cheaper than establishing

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:20.880
<v Speaker 1>show floor space at CEES. Plus you're not competing against

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>everybody else in the immediate area for attention. However, in

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>one the list of exhibitors is less than half of

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>what it was last year. It is one thousand, nine

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.800
<v Speaker 1>D sixty seven. Some big companies, including companies like Ford

0:15:36.920 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>and Toyota, aren't participating this year. And while ce S

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't exactly a car trade show, we usually see a

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>pretty big representation of car company technology on display during

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the event, and it shouldn't come as a big surprise

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of the technology we expect to see

0:15:54.120 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this week and beyond into the rest of one will

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:03.320
<v Speaker 1>play into how co it has affected our lives. Companies

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 1>will be introducing technologies designed to promote safety and wellness

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:11.760
<v Speaker 1>in office spaces. So we're anticipating a time when people

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.080
<v Speaker 1>will be able to work together in the same physical

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>location in relative safety across more of the world. And

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.440
<v Speaker 1>there's likely going to be a lot more technology that

0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:23.600
<v Speaker 1>supports those who will be working from home. As kind

0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of an ongoing arrangement, We've heard from a lot of

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 1>companies over the course of twenty twenty last year that

0:16:30.120 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>moving forward they are going to allow more of their

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>employees to work from home, you know, just as a

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>matter of course, even after we reach something like herd

0:16:40.840 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>immunity with COVID. One of the things that happens at

0:16:45.120 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>c S is that the Consumer Technology Association brings together

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a panel of judges to pour over thousands of products

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and select some that are standouts in their respective categories.

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:01.960
<v Speaker 1>The judges come from various sectors and include executives from

0:17:02.040 --> 0:17:09.280
<v Speaker 1>companies like Intel, Spotify, Comcast, Amazon, Apple, Google, and more.

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:14.239
<v Speaker 1>Oh and that more includes some really interesting outliers Like

0:17:14.480 --> 0:17:17.160
<v Speaker 1>this year, one of the judges is a representative from

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Cirque to Sola Entertainment Group, which famously had a financial

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 1>collapse last year. Somehow my invitation to be part of

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:29.240
<v Speaker 1>this must have been lost in the mail. But I'm

0:17:29.280 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 1>just joking because I'm neither qualified to really judge this

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:35.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of stuff, nor do I relish the thought of

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 1>having to examine countless examples of technology and then start

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>assigning scores to them. Anyway, we already know the winners

0:17:45.080 --> 0:17:49.000
<v Speaker 1>for this year's ce S Best of Innovation. Now. The

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:55.399
<v Speaker 1>honorees in total include two products from companies. Obviously, I

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.639
<v Speaker 1>am not going to list them all. That would be ludicrous,

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.119
<v Speaker 1>So I'm just gonna give you a a couple that

0:18:01.119 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>that stood out to me. A Canadian company called E

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:09.159
<v Speaker 1>two I p E twip, I don't know, anyway, they

0:18:09.160 --> 0:18:13.480
<v Speaker 1>submitted a product called Engineered electro Magnetic Surfaces that I

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>think is really cool. Now, these are sheets of plastic

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:20.840
<v Speaker 1>that are very very thin, and they're semi transparent, and

0:18:20.880 --> 0:18:26.880
<v Speaker 1>the sheets can reflect, redirect, or block specific radio frequency waves.

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>So you can engineer this stuff to allow certain radio

0:18:30.560 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>frequency waves to pass through and to block other ones

0:18:33.320 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>and so on. The applications for such material are numerous,

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>so you could use it to help focus signals like

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>five G radio frequency signals to a particular location. So

0:18:44.440 --> 0:18:47.119
<v Speaker 1>let's say that you wanted to have a five G

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 1>wireless connection to your home. You want to set up

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 1>an antenna pick up five G transmission signals and use

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:56.919
<v Speaker 1>that for your home network. You've got a router and

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 1>the five G signals come in to the router and

0:19:00.440 --> 0:19:03.919
<v Speaker 1>then you can connect your local network that way. Well,

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we know that the ultra fast version of five G

0:19:07.040 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>has a very limited range, so you need to be

0:19:09.480 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>close to these antenna and it also has a limited

0:19:12.800 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 1>ability to penetrate walls. So even if you are close,

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.159
<v Speaker 1>you wouldn't be able to pick this up with a

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>router antenna inside your home because the signals themselves wouldn't

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>get into your home in the first place. So you

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.639
<v Speaker 1>might need something akin to a satellite dish that uses

0:19:28.720 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>this engineered material to help direct signals to the antenna.

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.520
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, it's capturing and redirecting more of

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>those five G signals to get a nice strong connection,

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and that way you could end up having a five

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>G connectivity to the outside world, and then your local

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:50.880
<v Speaker 1>network connects by a five G that'd be super cool.

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Or imagine using this material to help shield a location

0:19:54.840 --> 0:19:59.440
<v Speaker 1>from outside signals, to make sure that external signals can't

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:02.160
<v Speaker 1>get into to a facility. If you need to create

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>a cyber secure location. Let's say you've got an air gap,

0:20:05.800 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 1>so you don't want to connect to the internet at large,

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>but you still want to have an internal network complete

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:14.840
<v Speaker 1>with wireless components. So inside the building you're able to

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.520
<v Speaker 1>connect to WiFi, but it's only for the internal network.

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>You would want to have something like this to block

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>external signals from potentially interfering or snooping on you. There

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.200
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of other potential uses for this material

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.040
<v Speaker 1>as well. I just thought it was super cool. Another

0:20:31.160 --> 0:20:34.719
<v Speaker 1>product that One and Innovation award is the bio Button.

0:20:35.080 --> 0:20:37.720
<v Speaker 1>It is a wearable device about the size of a

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:43.119
<v Speaker 1>half dollar coin US half dollar. It monitors various bio

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:47.280
<v Speaker 1>markers like respiratory rate, heart rate, and body temperature, with

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:51.639
<v Speaker 1>a specific purpose for screening for COVID nineteen. I don't

0:20:51.680 --> 0:20:55.400
<v Speaker 1>know how you wear it. I looked at pictures of this,

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't see any description of how it's actually warrnt.

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I imagine it has to be worn against the skin.

0:21:01.920 --> 0:21:05.679
<v Speaker 1>If it's monitoring your temperature. Otherwise how would it know.

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But you pair it with a smartphone app and you

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:13.400
<v Speaker 1>receive notifications based on those bio markers, such as a

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.919
<v Speaker 1>clear or no clear notification before you start your day.

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe this is just something that you use to do

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:22.879
<v Speaker 1>a quick scan as opposed to consistent monitoring, But that

0:21:23.000 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 1>wasn't the implication I got when I was reading over

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the material. Anyway, this sort of approach could be critical

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to preventing further spread of the illness, with some big

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:38.760
<v Speaker 1>qualifiers there, because this approach is dependent upon detecting symptomatic

0:21:38.880 --> 0:21:42.240
<v Speaker 1>cases of COVID nineteen. But we also know it's possible

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to be asymptomatic as well as contagious, and this device

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:48.720
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be much help for those cases. I mean, it

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>is looking for symptoms of COVID. If you're asymptomatic by definition,

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you don't have those, so it's not like it's a

0:21:55.960 --> 0:22:02.680
<v Speaker 1>failsafe device that is completely dependable. Is one more measure

0:22:02.720 --> 0:22:06.359
<v Speaker 1>to use in the efforts to prevent the transmission of

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteam, but shouldn't be seen as the big solution.

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>And the last one I want to highlight for This

0:22:14.600 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>episode comes out of IBM. They received a Best of

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Innovation award for the Mayflower Autonomous Ship or m AS design.

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:27.400
<v Speaker 1>This ship will be fully autonomous. It will be guided

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 1>by artificial intelligence from start to finish whenever it takes

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:35.080
<v Speaker 1>its trip. It's supposed to go on its maiden voyage

0:22:35.200 --> 0:22:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in the spring of this year, where it will set

0:22:38.200 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>forth from Plymouth, England and travel to Plymouth, Massachusetts, under

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.920
<v Speaker 1>its own power, under its own guidance, and thus echoing

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 1>the famous Pilgrim's journey. It is meant to self navigate

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:54.480
<v Speaker 1>and self operate, and it could be a very valuable

0:22:54.480 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>technology in the future to allow for stuff like cargo

0:22:57.840 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>transportation without putting crews and risk of various hazards like

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.800
<v Speaker 1>storms or even pirates. Really. In addition, scientists will be

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.439
<v Speaker 1>able to learn more about the oceans by looking at

0:23:09.560 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>data that the ship gathers as it navigates through environments

0:23:13.040 --> 0:23:16.160
<v Speaker 1>that would be too dangerous for humans. The m AS

0:23:16.240 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>itself is more of a prototype ship. It looks fairly

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.840
<v Speaker 1>futuristic and nifty, with lots of solar panels on it

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. It does not look like a cargo vessel

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>in other words, and it's not meant to be. Should

0:23:29.320 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>this technology prove viable, I expect we would see more

0:23:33.240 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>industrial versions that would look a lot less science fiction

0:23:36.880 --> 0:23:39.560
<v Speaker 1>in a lot more functional. But I will be following

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:43.760
<v Speaker 1>this story with interest to see how it develops. I

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:49.040
<v Speaker 1>think that autonomous shipping is definitely a big area of

0:23:49.480 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>development that will see over the next few years. Uh.

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>Kind of along the same lines that we've heard about

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>how autonomous driving is really going to make an enormous

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>impact in the truck industry. There are a lot of

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>other products that received awards. These were just a few

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:07.199
<v Speaker 1>I found interesting. Let's close out with a couple of

0:24:07.200 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>other brief c e S notes, but we'll cover more

0:24:10.560 --> 0:24:13.879
<v Speaker 1>of c e S in Thursday's episode. So another c

0:24:14.000 --> 0:24:17.120
<v Speaker 1>E S news, l G showed off it's TV lineup

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>at its press conference. The smart TV line uses the

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.680
<v Speaker 1>web OS operating system, and the new smart TVs will

0:24:25.720 --> 0:24:29.679
<v Speaker 1>have Google Stadia and in video g force now built

0:24:29.760 --> 0:24:34.120
<v Speaker 1>into them. Both of these are cloud gaming services. They're

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>very different. In Video g force Now is all about

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:41.720
<v Speaker 1>being able to access games that exist in your libraries

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:45.840
<v Speaker 1>with other services like Steam, whereas Google Stadia is more

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:49.439
<v Speaker 1>of a walled Garden, where you own the access to

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:53.080
<v Speaker 1>games within Stadia itself. To learn more about Google Stadia,

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 1>make sure you check out tomorrow's episode of Tech Stuff

0:24:56.400 --> 0:24:58.960
<v Speaker 1>because that's when I'll do a deep dive on that

0:24:59.040 --> 0:25:04.440
<v Speaker 1>cloud gaming service. Also, Samsung showed off some new robots

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:08.680
<v Speaker 1>designed to help around the house. The butt Handy is

0:25:08.720 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 1>a robot that looks like a pedestal on top of

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:15.880
<v Speaker 1>a robotic vacuum and has an articulated arm attached that pedestal,

0:25:16.359 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>and Samsung showed off a video of it doing stuff

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>like pouring a glass of wine from a bottle and

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>loading a dishwasher, which come on, I mean a dishwasher

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is already a labor saving device, but loading a dishwasher anyway.

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Samsung showed all these off, along with a three other

0:25:33.680 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>types of robots as press conference, so once again we

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:40.919
<v Speaker 1>see another push for consumer robots. I haven't seen a

0:25:40.960 --> 0:25:46.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of adoption of consumer robots outside of robotic vacuums

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and then a few other specialized robots like gutter cleaners

0:25:50.680 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>and pool cleaning robots. Beyond that, I haven't seen a

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 1>whole lot of movement in the industry to actually go

0:25:57.800 --> 0:26:03.000
<v Speaker 1>that consumer route. But maybe maybe we'll see a change.

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. And to close out this section, Phillips

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.440
<v Speaker 1>showed off a smart toothbrush. Now, we've seen a lot

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>of different advanced toothbrushes over the last few years, including

0:26:14.119 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>some that track how you're brushing and giving you tips

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>on what you should do in order to get a

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:22.040
<v Speaker 1>better coverage of your mouth. This one is supposed to

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>use artificial intelligence to monitor your oral hygiene and automatically

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 1>adjust its vibration frequency based on how you brush your teeth.

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 1>So you know, if you're brushing your teeth extra hard

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>or very gently, then the vibration should kind of, you know,

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.720
<v Speaker 1>pick up where you left off or adjust based on

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>how you are brushing your teeth. So the idea is

0:26:44.359 --> 0:26:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that your teeth are always getting the cleaning action that

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 1>they need. I don't know how much it will cost.

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:52.840
<v Speaker 1>It as part of the Sonic Care line of toothbrushes.

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Full disclosure, I have a Sonic Care toothbrush. Bought it myself.

0:26:57.200 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>This is not a ad. I wasn't paid to do it.

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.400
<v Speaker 1>They didn't send me one. Um, so I've definitely used

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 1>their products before. I do not know, like the standard

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Sonic here was already fairly expensive. I don't know how

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:13.800
<v Speaker 1>expensive this is gonna be or whether that will be

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:18.439
<v Speaker 1>a barrier to entry. We'll see. But some people just

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 1>love having smart everything. I don't think that's necessarily smart, ironically,

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>but you know, for some people, that's just the way

0:27:27.040 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 1>they go. We have some more stories to wrap up

0:27:30.400 --> 0:27:32.719
<v Speaker 1>this episode, but before we get to that, we're going

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 1>to take another break. Like I said in the last section,

0:27:42.840 --> 0:27:45.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll talk more about c e S on Thursday's episode.

0:27:45.680 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure once we have more things that have been

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>released by then. As I mentioned before, on recording this

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:55.960
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, January eleven, the day before it publishes, so

0:27:56.240 --> 0:27:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I only have a limited amount of information I can

0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 1>cover at the moment. Last week, however, I talked about

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>how employees at Google are moving to unionize. Well. According

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 1>to the Telegraph, some staffers at Google have been told

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 1>by executives that they need to take training in how

0:28:13.680 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>to moderate internal email discussions, including flagging those discussions whenever

0:28:19.080 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>they might contain sensitive material. Now there's no smoking gun here,

0:28:24.160 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>but the fear is that Google is attempting to head

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:31.400
<v Speaker 1>off the efforts to unionize, that they're keeping an eye

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:38.800
<v Speaker 1>on things with a goal of counteracting the unionization of Google,

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:43.680
<v Speaker 1>which you know, it's kind of a bad look. I

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>also mentioned last week that Facebook changed the terms of

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>service of WhatsApp, the messaging service that Facebook owns, and

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>that is going to facilitate the sharing of information from

0:28:54.880 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the messaging platform to Facebook as a whole. In other words,

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Facebook would be able to mind WhatsApp for data that

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:08.240
<v Speaker 1>could be used mostly in advertising. Well now an antitrust

0:29:08.320 --> 0:29:12.479
<v Speaker 1>board in Turkey has launched an investigation into Facebook because

0:29:12.560 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of those new terms, and just a reminder, anyone who

0:29:15.880 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 1>uses WhatsApp has no choice but to agree to those

0:29:19.040 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>terms or stop using the service. There's no opt in feature.

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>The antitrust board also said it was ordering that Facebook

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:31.479
<v Speaker 1>stopped from implementing those terms. This is a complicated issue

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:35.520
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of privacy advocates have expressed concerns about

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Facebook's changes. However, Turkey also has a history of suppressing

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>social networks as a way of stifling voices that are

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>not in alignment with the Turkish government. So it's not

0:29:48.320 --> 0:29:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a simple black and white matter here. It's it's pretty complicated.

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Tim berners Lee, who developed the first web page and

0:29:57.040 --> 0:29:59.680
<v Speaker 1>thus is seen as the father of the Worldwide Web,

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:03.920
<v Speaker 1>advocates for a fundamental change in how the online world

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>handles personal information rather than personal data accumulating and what

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.920
<v Speaker 1>he calls silos, which are essentially, you know, databases owned

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>by some of the tech world's largest companies like Google, Amazon, Facebook, etcetera.

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>He advocates for pods p o ds that stands for

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>personal Online Data stores. These would be individualized stores of

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.680
<v Speaker 1>data unique to each person and owned by that person.

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:35.880
<v Speaker 1>So you would own the collection of data about you,

0:30:36.480 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and that would include information about stuff like your online purchases,

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:44.240
<v Speaker 1>which websites you visit, the social networking platforms you belong to.

0:30:44.440 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>All of that kind of stuff, the stuff that gets

0:30:46.680 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>bought and sold today, All of that would actually belong

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 1>to you, And if a company wanted to access that information,

0:30:53.680 --> 0:30:57.000
<v Speaker 1>the company would first need to get your consent to

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>get that particular bit of data, and they would also

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>be restricted to access only the data relevant to whatever

0:31:04.160 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the request is. Kind of similar to the way that

0:31:07.400 --> 0:31:10.360
<v Speaker 1>app permissions are supposed to work on smartphones. You know,

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:14.120
<v Speaker 1>a smartphone. When you activate an app, if it needs

0:31:14.120 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to access something like your camera or microphone, it asks

0:31:16.760 --> 0:31:20.000
<v Speaker 1>you for permission for that, but it can't also then

0:31:20.040 --> 0:31:23.280
<v Speaker 1>get permission to access other stuff that it does not

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>expressly tell you about. It's restricted to just the things

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:29.600
<v Speaker 1>that asks you for. That's sort of the same kind

0:31:29.600 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of concept. Berners Lee has co founded a company called

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>interrupt I n R U p T meant to promote

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 1>adoption of this idea, but it faces an enormous challenge

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:44.800
<v Speaker 1>in that huge companies have already developed these silos and

0:31:44.840 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>they depend heavily on them. I may need to do

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>a full episode on this idea and the technology behind

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it if you want to learn more. However, I recommend

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times article titled he created the Web,

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Now He's out to remake the digital world. It blushed

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:06.360
<v Speaker 1>on January t one. And remember quimby, the short form

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:10.920
<v Speaker 1>video platform optimized for mobile devices that launched in April

0:32:10.920 --> 0:32:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of and shut down just last December. Well, Roku, the

0:32:16.440 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 1>company that's behind various streaming set top devices and smart

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>TV interfaces, has arranged to acquire all of Quimby's content library.

0:32:26.680 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Roku will host the content, which includes more than seventy shows,

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 1>on its own ad supported channel, which is otherwise free. Personally,

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm thankful that the content is going to live on

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.040
<v Speaker 1>and have a chance to find an audience even after

0:32:42.160 --> 0:32:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Quimby's collapse. While I never thought Quimby really had a

0:32:46.120 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 1>strong business case even before the pandemic, I didn't want

0:32:50.200 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to see content creators have the rug pulled out from

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 1>under them. So it will be interesting to see if

0:32:55.760 --> 0:32:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Roku not just supports these shows but then extends them,

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:01.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, whether or not some of these shows get

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 1>further seasons in the future, picking up where Quimby left off,

0:33:05.080 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>perhaps with some restructuring to bring the content closer in

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>alignment to the running time that people are more used to,

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:14.240
<v Speaker 1>because the average Quimby video was between eight and ten

0:33:14.280 --> 0:33:17.920
<v Speaker 1>minutes long, and longer form stuff was divided up into

0:33:18.080 --> 0:33:22.000
<v Speaker 1>lots of eight to ten minute chapters, you could say,

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.240
<v Speaker 1>so glad to see that that content is back in

0:33:25.360 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>some form. A lot of very talented people were working

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on Quimby content, and then it wasn't their fault that

0:33:33.480 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the platform failed. In fact, I would say that really

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the the selling point of the platform itself was a

0:33:40.920 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 1>little questionable. Again, uh, you understand it. The idea was

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 1>that people are spending a lot more time looking at

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, entertainment on their phones, at least when the

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:55.640
<v Speaker 1>world's not having them all locked at home, and thus

0:33:56.160 --> 0:34:00.560
<v Speaker 1>creating a short form, high production, value service kind of

0:34:00.600 --> 0:34:03.720
<v Speaker 1>made sense. But in a pandemic world where nobody leaves

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>their house, uh, and everyone's able to watch stuff on

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:11.160
<v Speaker 1>entertainment systems, it's a lot harder to sell Quimby. So

0:34:11.440 --> 0:34:13.920
<v Speaker 1>glad that the content sticking around, curious to see if

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:20.560
<v Speaker 1>it will have a life beyond that initial outburst of creativity.

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, that's where Quimby is now. It's found a

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:29.160
<v Speaker 1>home on Roku. And that wraps up this news episode

0:34:29.360 --> 0:34:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of Tech Stuff. We will continue covering the stories on Thursday.

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:38.080
<v Speaker 1>That will include an update on what's going on at CES,

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 1>as well as I'm sure updates on the unfolding political

0:34:41.880 --> 0:34:47.360
<v Speaker 1>situation with technologies role. Uh. There's already ongoing stories that

0:34:47.400 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't include here that we're breaking as I was recording,

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:56.280
<v Speaker 1>about various big tech companies deciding to halt political spending

0:34:56.360 --> 0:35:01.080
<v Speaker 1>at least in the short term, and specifically toward politicians

0:35:01.120 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>who were seen to undermine the democratic process. So that's

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>something that is unfolding as I record this, and of

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 1>course by the time you hear it on Tuesday, that

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>will have progressed further, so I'll give an update on

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Thursday about those stories. But we'll also cover other stuff,

0:35:20.600 --> 0:35:24.000
<v Speaker 1>so I look forward to chatting with you. Tomorrow's episode

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of tech Stuff is all about Google Stadius, so I

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>hope you enjoy that. If you want to reach out

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:30.960
<v Speaker 1>to me, the best place to do it is on Twitter.

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 1>The handle for the show is text Stuff H s

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:42.600
<v Speaker 1>W and I'll talk to you again really soon. Text

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Stuff is an I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:48.840
<v Speaker 1>from my Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app,

0:35:49.000 --> 0:35:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows