WEBVTT - Week 15 Injuries, TNF, Game Previews 0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.720 And listen to me. This is the Fantasy Football Best 0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:08.480 Friends Forever Show. To start listening to us or suffer 0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:40.720 the consequences. Listen matter didn't yees now as welcome bap 0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:53.440 your bye b frobe right except by your co host, 0:00:53.720 --> 0:01:00.360 Bye bye spake Bret Brick step Ball. Don't call at 0:01:00.480 --> 0:01:14.400 five eleven from nor Why ladies and gentlemen. And with 0:01:14.760 --> 0:01:18.479 that we want you inside of studio at thirty four. 0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.640 Miss is the b FFS. He is Frank Stanford, Here's 0:01:22.880 --> 0:01:27.880 Eric Young. I am Greg Friend. What's happening? Happy Thursday 0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:32.200 to you. A week fifteen begins tonight, Greg My j 0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:35.920 E t s Jets, Jets, Jets going up against Lamar 0:01:36.080 --> 0:01:39.960 Jackson and the Baltimore Reviews. Not really. I hope that 0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:42.840 I really sold that well because I'm trying here. I 0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:44.399 don't know what to expect in this game. We've got 0:01:44.440 --> 0:01:48.560 a huge spread. We'll see what happens. But e y 0:01:48.760 --> 0:01:51.400 back with us again. I'm assuming that you couldn't join 0:01:51.520 --> 0:01:54.600 us yesterday because you were so excited about Garrit Cole 0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.920 joining the Yankees. You were just at a loss of words. Yeah, 0:01:57.920 --> 0:01:59.760 I had to take the whole day off from that news. 0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.760 You know it's uh staggering Coal, one hell of a player. 0:02:03.880 --> 0:02:05.960 What to get for the Yankees. I have no idea 0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:10.519 what I'm talking about, and I'm happy about it. Grey 0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:16.079 Cold Mayby Freak Gardner. Maybe he's back. He's back. He's back. 0:02:16.120 --> 0:02:18.160 A lot of baseball going a lot baseball needs to 0:02:18.200 --> 0:02:20.800 take a week off. They had off for a month. 0:02:20.880 --> 0:02:24.720 It's been great, like free ages, old month. Go away. 0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.799 It's back, which is cool. It's a hot stove. Greg, No, 0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:32.799 but like there was a hot stove last year, there wasn't. 0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:35.760 It's back. It wasn't. There just wasn't. We didn't have 0:02:35.800 --> 0:02:37.480 any of these signings last year. But we've we've got 0:02:37.560 --> 0:02:41.000 some signings now, Greg, Yeah, we do, and thankfully it's 0:02:41.040 --> 0:02:45.720 with our team. Let's go tonight Thursday Night football. Ask 0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:49.360 Frank alluded to the Baltimore Ravens hosting the New York Jets. 0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:52.680 We have we'll have Virginia Zakis, who were by the way, 0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:56.200 e y. She is on IR herself. She tore her 0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:58.000 a c L, so we'll try to find out what 0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.400 her optimal recovery time is to day. She joins us, 0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.880 coming up at twenty pm Eastern time. If you're listening 0:03:06.000 --> 0:03:09.960 live or watching US on Pluto T the Live Frank, 0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:12.720 I just sleep, man, How did I sleep? I slept 0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:14.119 very well. I had to get in bed a little 0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.320 bit earlier. Schedule changing a little bit around here, so 0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:19.320 I had to had to get in a little bit earlier. 0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.080 Here today, you got some do you feel you feel refreshed? 0:03:22.280 --> 0:03:24.480 Some fun NBA content? No? Great, Just because you're getting 0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.080 bed earlier, it doesn't mean that you you fall asleep earlier. 0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.040 It's a lot of tossing and turning. It was all right, 0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:32.639 It is what it always is. I assume that you 0:03:32.720 --> 0:03:35.680 slept much better I got because I got off earlier. No, 0:03:35.840 --> 0:03:38.680 you just always sleep better than I. I just I 0:03:38.680 --> 0:03:42.320 don't sleep great typically. I'm sorry, man, I get in bed, 0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:44.480 my mind starts wandering all over the place. I have 0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.000 all these crazy thoughts and stuff. It's I don't know. 0:03:47.640 --> 0:03:53.720 I need help, all right, that's another story. Um. Anyway, 0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.200 So on today's show, I mentioned, well, Virginia will be 0:03:56.400 --> 0:03:59.160 here today and we want to do what we did 0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.240 last week. We hit all the waiverwidre a little bits, 0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:02.880 a little leftover guys that are out there, just a 0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.320 bit um. But we also mostly kind of start previewing 0:04:06.360 --> 0:04:09.040 the games for this weekend. They're sixteen games on the schedule. 0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:11.840 Of course that starts tonight, so we want to start 0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.440 previewing all of that, and we will do so on 0:04:14.680 --> 0:04:18.880 today's show. So Frank, let me start out with a 0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:20.960 bit of a Thursday night preview years the Ravens and 0:04:21.080 --> 0:04:23.680 the Jets. We've gotten some questions, including our own video 0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.080 producer Alex Passano is like, Hey, should I start Lamar 0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.840 Jackson tonight? Like are you freak kidding me? So he 0:04:28.839 --> 0:04:30.680 comes in, he talks about it in his update this 0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:35.080 morning with with Dane and like, what what are you doing? Dames? Like, oh, man, 0:04:35.120 --> 0:04:36.800 I agree, you got a tough decision. What is the 0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.480 tough decision you have? Lamar Jackson? He's your horse, ride him. 0:04:41.000 --> 0:04:43.239 But I got Jimmy j Jimmy, she's facing the falcons? 0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:44.920 Like what am I doing? Like, you've got a number 0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.360 one quarterback in the NFL, You've got the m v P, 0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.520 you got a leading Fantasy point score. You're gonna bench him? 0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:52.320 He's got this quad injury. What are they get up? 0:04:52.360 --> 0:04:54.560 Thirty seven seven? And like, how do you think they're 0:04:54.560 --> 0:04:58.159 getting thirty seven points? Marketing just gonna score six touchdown, said, 0:04:58.160 --> 0:05:00.440 he goes Marketing's gonna score touchdown. I go, all right, 0:05:00.720 --> 0:05:04.240 what about the other thirty points? Yeah? I mean, this 0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:05.880 is what we were talking about the other day. When 0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:07.920 when it when it comes down to this point in 0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:11.040 the season, the fantasy football playoffs, people start getting crazy, man, 0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:13.320 They start thinking all crazy kinds of things. And I 0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.560 get it. The Ravens are big favorites in this game, 0:05:15.800 --> 0:05:19.359 but for them to get up and potentially cover this spread, 0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:22.000 they're going to have to score points. And mark Ingram 0:05:22.080 --> 0:05:24.480 might score a touchdown or two. But the Jets have 0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.880 been good against running backs all season long. You can't 0:05:28.040 --> 0:05:30.160 bench Lamar Jackson because next thing you know, this guy 0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:32.839 throws for two or three touchdowns, he rushes for fifty 0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.080 sixty yards, and he does what he does every single week. 0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.680 He finishes on the top five fantasy quarterbacks. So I 0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:40.480 understand Jimmy Garoppolo has a good matchup. There's things that 0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.560 you could say about Jimmy g two. Who's to say 0:05:42.600 --> 0:05:44.320 that they don't just get up big and start running 0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.320 the football. There with Raheem Mostard, who has been great. 0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:50.320 So I understand that all these decisions are magnified, Greg, 0:05:50.680 --> 0:05:53.800 You know it's under a microscope. This is when things 0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:56.600 matter most. It's one and done. You either win or 0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.200 you go home. But don't overthink it. Man. You have 0:05:59.400 --> 0:06:01.920 the Fantasy MVP, you have the League MVP, and Lamar 0:06:02.080 --> 0:06:05.000 Jackson he's got the quad injury. You gotta keep him 0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:08.039 in your lineup. You gotta go down with not everybody 0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.120 who's gotten you here, Greg, but you've got to go 0:06:10.320 --> 0:06:12.440 down with the Lamar Jackson ship. You just have to. 0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.960 I don't care about the quad injury. He's going to 0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:18.559 be fine. What say you if you have Lamar Jackson 0:06:18.680 --> 0:06:21.039 and you know you have books, aren't worry about his quad? 0:06:21.120 --> 0:06:23.920 Is rushing prop and a half tonight they're seventeen and 0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.640 a half point favorites tonight. Uh e y. What do 0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:28.960 you say for those that have Lamar Jackson and you 0:06:29.080 --> 0:06:32.000 have a suitable option as you mean, g a Ryan Tannehill? Whoever? 0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:35.479 What do you say to those people? Do like Tannehill? Yeah? 0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.680 I mean, like Frank said, people get squarely at this 0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:39.640 time of year. There's you know, it seems like there's 0:06:39.640 --> 0:06:41.120 a lot more on the line, but this is just 0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:44.360 another fantasy game. And look at I mean, he's the 0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:49.440 number one point getter and fantasy you cannot bench this guy. Um, 0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:51.680 if you believe this is the only time that he's 0:06:51.720 --> 0:06:55.320 been hurt all year, then then you're insane, especially for 0:06:55.360 --> 0:06:58.279 a running quarterback. There's definitely been games when he's been store. 0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:01.280 There's definitely been games where you been banged up. Um, 0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.160 maybe it wasn't reported or it wasn't said, but um, 0:07:04.400 --> 0:07:07.839 this one was. So they're talking about it quad injury. 0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.160 Anybody that's going to carry the ball and run the 0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:12.440 ball like that is going to be banged up at 0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:15.120 some point. But it hasn't mattered for this guy. You 0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:18.440 start Lamar Jackson, no, if sins are, but there's no 0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.240 quarterback better than him this year, So there's nobody that 0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:23.840 you should be starting in front of him. Well, the 0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.960 way Nick Arcolano says, do you stop asking should I 0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.440 start Lamar Jackson this week? Alex? Did you hear all 0:07:30.520 --> 0:07:34.800 of that? Buddy? Okay, he heard all that? Will you 0:07:34.920 --> 0:07:40.240 listen to us? Really that's interesting, Lamar Jackson Greig is 0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:42.840 averaging the most Fantasy points per game by a quarterback 0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.720 in NFL history. You should definitely guysure for Jimmy GJ 0:07:46.240 --> 0:07:48.640 definitely do it. I did give Alex from what are 0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.280 we doing? I did give Alex permission that if Lamar 0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.280 Jackson sucks tonight, he can come in tomorrow. Will tell 0:07:53.280 --> 0:07:58.720 me to ask myself. You're welcome. I want to be 0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.560 the next day Finn see millionaire. Dunk on your NBA 0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.000 DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot Com and dominate on 0:08:05.200 --> 0:08:08.200 fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with 0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:11.920 Daily Rodal dot Com optimizer and the most accurate projections 0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:15.440 in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake 0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.320 swap support, and much more. Save ten percent on winning 0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:22.000 NBA DFS advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily Rodal 0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:35.920 dot com backslash dunk to learn more. Back yere dffs. 0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.480 As I say going to break, I told Alex if 0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:43.560 he if Lamar Jackson is not foremasts we expect Lamar 0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:47.280 Jackson's you can tell me to f myself tomorrow. So 0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:49.800 now I'm kind of rooting against Lamar Jackson, right nice, 0:08:50.480 --> 0:08:53.000 Why are you running against our our friend? Well, I 0:08:53.080 --> 0:08:56.559 can't fully do it because I have Lamar Jackson going 0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:58.880 in one of my playoff matchups. Tonight. So actually in 0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:00.560 two of my playoff mats up, so I do need 0:09:00.679 --> 0:09:03.120 Lamar Jackson to have a big game, but being able 0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.000 to see one of our video producers tell you off 0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.000 it'd be pretty fun. All right, Well, let's see what 0:09:08.000 --> 0:09:10.040 happened live on the show tomorrow. I say that, Alex, 0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:16.200 you just do it anyway. It's where nation, No, yeah, 0:09:17.040 --> 0:09:19.360 all right, all right, if you say so. All right. 0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:22.200 Other than then Lamar and Jackson obviously starting mark Ingram 0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.160 tonight for Baltimore. What about the wide receivers and Ariel 0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:26.680 f Stein all in the morning after we was talking 0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:28.880 about how she likes Hollywood Brown in the prop tonight 0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:32.560 score touchdown, I actually like his yardage prop forty two 0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:34.160 and a half seems very low. You know, he can 0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:36.400 get that in one playff. I feel like that prop 0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.400 is kind of reactionary to him having just negative three 0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.920 yards last week against the Buffalo Bills. But that was 0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.880 against the Buffalo Bills, and the Jets are playing without 0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:47.719 Brian Pool, They're missing another starting cornerback tonight that will 0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.120 be without Jamal Adams. So I do kind of like 0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:52.880 Hollywood Brown in this spot as a solid wide receiver three. 0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.360 But I really do like that prop over forty two 0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.880 and a half receiving yards tonight. On the other side, Greg, 0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.240 I think Robby Anderson will see a lot volume, but again, 0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:04.920 the Ravens have been tough on wide receivers. Since Marcus 0:10:04.960 --> 0:10:07.480 Peters has joined this secondary, everyone else has gotten healthy. 0:10:07.559 --> 0:10:11.000 Jimmy Smith is healthy for the secondary as well. I 0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.120 like Robbie Anderson still as a low end wide receiver 0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:16.559 three just based on volume alone, because there's no Ryan 0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.480 Griffin tonight. To Marius Thomas is doubtful. That is twenty 0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:21.599 percent of the Jets targets that is out of this 0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:24.319 game tonight. Greig, you know, it's interesting because Ventro was 0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.240 talking a lot about Robbie Anderson and what you do 0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:29.520 about him, and it's really tough. Robbie Anderson's come on 0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.360 as of late e y with both jests roll receivers. 0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:35.160 As Frank mentioned, no Ryan Griffin, nod Marius Thomas expected 0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.600 Jimmy Jamison crowd has been brutal, but without those weapons, 0:10:39.640 --> 0:10:42.160 like maybe he sees more opportunity. What do you think 0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:44.680 about both wide receiver options for the New York Jets tonight, 0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:48.800 Robbie Anderson and Jamison Crowder. I mean he he hasn't 0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:50.679 been great as of late, but like you can think 0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.400 back to the game where he caught like a hundred 0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.719 passes with no Ryan Griffin and no Damerius Thomas there, 0:10:56.720 --> 0:11:01.000 I feel like they're going to rely on Crowder. Robbie 0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.760 Anderson is always a deep threat um, but like Frank said, 0:11:05.360 --> 0:11:08.439 the Baltimore secondary has been really good. This is a 0:11:08.559 --> 0:11:11.679 really strong defense. Donald is a smart quarterback and he's 0:11:11.679 --> 0:11:13.720 gonna want to get the ball out of his hands. Uh. 0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.520 And I think Crowder is going to have a bunch 0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.720 of catches. I don't know if he scores a touchdown. 0:11:18.760 --> 0:11:20.319 I don't know if he has a bunch of yards, 0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:22.440 but he's gonna catch a bunch of balls tonight. That's 0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.280 that's my belief. Jamison crowd or someone who has led 0:11:25.320 --> 0:11:27.719 us down big time recently, Greg he hasn't been over 0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.600 thirty yards in each of the past three weeks. Well, 0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.040 and again, the targets are going to be there for them. 0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:36.240 I've been there for you. Expect the Jets are gonna 0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:37.959 be trailing in this game. They're likely gonna have to 0:11:38.040 --> 0:11:40.679 throw once they get uh, you know, once they get behind. 0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:43.800 So I feel better about Robbie because this is like 0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:45.640 the time of year he always comes on. You know, 0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:48.000 he's had at least he scored a touchdown or has 0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.360 had a hundred receiving yards in four straight games. So 0:11:50.760 --> 0:11:52.959 this is the time of year where Robbie Anderson usually 0:11:53.120 --> 0:11:55.360 likes to come around. Greg. I'm gonna read you where 0:11:55.400 --> 0:11:58.400 I have Robbie Anderson and the players right around him, 0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:00.520 and you tell me if this is egregious or not. Ready, 0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:04.559 Let's have Robbie Anderson wide receiver thirty five just ahead 0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:07.600 of him. I have Terry McLaurin going up against the Eagles, 0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:11.760 Darius Slayton, and Zach Pascal just behind him. I have 0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.839 Curtis Samuel going up against the Seahawks, Chris Connley, who 0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.920 I'm really interested in at the Oakland Raiders, Sterling Shepherd 0:12:19.440 --> 0:12:22.160 at oh we'll not at but against the Miami Dolphins. 0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:24.000 So those are the three behind the three head. I 0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.719 actually like um Robby Anderson and three guys you have 0:12:26.800 --> 0:12:29.160 after him way more than the guys you have Adam 0:12:29.520 --> 0:12:32.959 way more. I think Zach Pascal. I know you like 0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.319 the t Y Hilton's coming back for Zach Pascal. I 0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.600 don't Um when TiO Hilton has been in the line 0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:40.520 of I know Marshall Latimar's on him. Zach Pascal's targets 0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.560 go way down. So I don't like that UM at all. 0:12:44.760 --> 0:12:48.240 Tim mcclarin, I still don't trust with um. Philly is 0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:49.839 just so bad man, you know, I know they're really bad. 0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:51.760 I just got torn up. Not torn up, but Eli 0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:56.720 Manning through too deep touchas is horrific. Anything Terry McLarin does. 0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.040 Just before last week, you would have said the same 0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.120 thing about Eli Manning. He is horrific and he's still 0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:05.319 threw two deep touchdowns to Darius lat I don't like 0:13:05.400 --> 0:13:09.199 McClaren this week. Who's the third guy? It was the 0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:11.800 one behind him? And then Slate we talked about off 0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:13.800 the air. Yes, Lain, I do like Slating against the Dolphins. 0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.240 I like Starting Shepherd more. Yeah. So look he's right 0:13:17.320 --> 0:13:19.400 in that mix. Wide receiver three. Curtis Samuels just behind 0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:21.839 him against Charis Samuel more like. I like like Curtis 0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.439 Samuel more than Robbie Anderson. I think they're very similar, 0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:26.560 but I have the I have both of them above. 0:13:26.880 --> 0:13:28.440 Some of the guys that you mentioned would use Chris 0:13:28.520 --> 0:13:31.000 Connley ahead of Robby Anderson, like Chris Conley as well, 0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:32.520 for the same reason as that you were mentioned. I 0:13:32.520 --> 0:13:34.319 actually went to go see if he's a leftovers the 0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:36.040 leftovers a second caause, and then Chris Conny is the 0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:41.839 perfect guy. Um, it's a good matchup. It's very good. 0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:43.679 It doesn't get better than that. No, d J Chark, 0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.920 d D Westbrook dealing with the shoulder thing right now. 0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:50.559 I don't think is gonna be like because Robbie Anderson 0:13:50.559 --> 0:13:52.280 has been really hot as of late, and it's really 0:13:52.360 --> 0:13:54.120 hard to mentionment as you said, towards the end of 0:13:54.160 --> 0:13:56.839 every year, for whatever reason, he goes off. So my 0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:03.160 answer is no, Eric would say you, uh yeah, I 0:14:03.200 --> 0:14:05.400 mean that's a that's a mess. It's a mess. I 0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:10.360 think Haskins has improved and McLaren has been uh okay. 0:14:10.840 --> 0:14:13.280 I feel like there is a real connection there. We 0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:15.800 know they played together in college and and I think 0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:18.360 the connection will grow and Haskins will get better and 0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:21.560 Philly hasn't been able to stop anybody. But this is 0:14:21.800 --> 0:14:23.600 it's Robbie Anderson time at this time of year, and 0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:26.720 I don't know what it is about him. UM was 0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:29.800 dropped and almost non existent at the start of the year, 0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.280 but really starting to come on. Uh. And Connolly is 0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:34.400 a guy, I mean the guy can he can flat 0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:37.400 out fly? Uh? My question is the quarterback play there? 0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.440 So yeah, I mean, if I had to pick out 0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:43.520 of those guys, I think I probably lean McLaurin. At 0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.040 this point. Do we know for sure that t Why 0:14:46.120 --> 0:14:48.400 Hilton is gonna be backgreag because you're talking about it 0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.600 like it's a certainty, and I just don't know that 0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.200 that's gonna happen. Act just today, you practice today, But 0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:55.360 there's the first time they say. They always say will 0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.440 return to practice, right, and sometimes it gets updated later. 0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.480 But I know that today's their Wednesday practice because they 0:15:01.520 --> 0:15:04.600 play Monday night and he practiced on the Wednesday practice 0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:07.160 and he was talking about yesterday. How you know if 0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:09.160 he if he kind of play, he will be out there. 0:15:09.160 --> 0:15:11.680 He's signed up for sixteen games player all that stuff. 0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.680 He wants to play. I'm playing him and that means 0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:19.240 Zack basket drops a bit. Yeah. Look, personally, it's definitely 0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:21.760 gonna affect Zack Pascal if t Y Hilton plays. In 0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:24.280 regard to if you can actually put t Y Hilton 0:15:24.360 --> 0:15:26.840 back in your lineup, with your season on the line 0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:30.640 in Week fifteen. I understand that it's indoors inside the dome, 0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:32.760 but last time we saw t Y Hilton on the field, 0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:35.040 he was rusty, he dropped passes. There's a chance for 0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.040 re injury. Even if t Y Hilton plays, I don't 0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:39.640 know that he's a lot to get in your lineup 0:15:39.760 --> 0:15:42.080 in Week fifteen. Obviously depends who you have above him. 0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:45.440 We'll see where you ranked to Y Hilton tomorrow. Yeah, 0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:48.240 I mean I'm usually very I rank things according to 0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:50.960 what do I assume is going to happen. So as 0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:52.840 of now, I would still assume, even with t Y 0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.080 Hilton practicing, that he's not going to play this week. 0:15:55.480 --> 0:15:57.320 We'll see if that gets updated over the next couple 0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.960 of days. But if it's looking like he's going to play, 0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.000 he will probably be in a similar place to where 0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.200 I have Robbie Anderson right now, a lower end wide 0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:10.400 receiver three. There's just a lot of risk involved. Okay, Um, 0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.480 we mentioned Chris Connley, so let's get into some of 0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:15.960 these guys like Chris Conley that could be out there 0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:21.880 in the segment we like to call the leftovers. Didn't 0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.120 get your fill from the waiver wire. Now one more 0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:30.600 the BFFs has your leftovers watch this never mind, give 0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.040 me a whole lot of it, all right? Having the 0:16:34.080 --> 0:16:38.560 leftovers here on the BFFs. Chris Conley certainly part of 0:16:38.760 --> 0:16:40.880 that crew. Frankie, we talked a lot about Chris Conley, 0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:42.720 the reasons that you liked them. But he's not the 0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:45.680 only member of the leftovers that are out there on 0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.400 the waiver wire. This is we man. Dion Lewis fits 0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.360 the bill as well. Dion Lewis. It just came out 0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:54.840 earlier today that Derrick Henry said I am going to 0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.560 play this week. You know, there was some concern that 0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.360 he is dealing with this hamstring injury. He has really 0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.880 commended the Titan's medical staff for helping him through this process. 0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.800 Last week basically playing on one leg, still rush for 0:17:05.840 --> 0:17:08.640 a hundred yards, still rush for two touchdowns. I would say, 0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.040 like I have said this entire you know past month, Greg, 0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.440 if you own Derrick Henry, make sure you have Dean 0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.240 Lewis on your team, and if your opponent has Derrick Henry, 0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:19.560 then maybe that's where you also want to pick up 0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:21.760 Dean Lewis. But outside of that, just picking up Dean 0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:24.119 Lewis as a flex. I'm probably not gonna do that 0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.720 unless we get some scary news from from Derrick Henry. 0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:30.960 Are gonna go over to the Philadelphia Eagles, who god knows, 0:17:31.000 --> 0:17:33.800 it's already outside wide receiver for them. Nelson Aghalore still 0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:36.200 banging up j j R. Thing on white side is 0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.320 gonna play, but he's banging up any injest him A man? 0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:45.560 Greg Ward? Your man Greg Ward? A week ago? Did 0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:47.920 you have any idea that Greg Ward played for the 0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:50.360 Philadelphia Eagles. He was not my man a week ago. 0:17:50.560 --> 0:17:52.760 He's my man now he spelled his name with three G. 0:17:53.040 --> 0:17:57.399 He does not. Yeah, I don't. I'm not interested in 0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:02.479 Greg Ward. Move on. Actually I haven't ranked higher than 0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:07.600 the consensus. I have greg Ward rights. I don't know, 0:18:07.720 --> 0:18:11.720 somewhere like really crazy at wide receiver. Where he played 0:18:11.720 --> 0:18:13.560 in college? I do not know, but they were talking 0:18:13.600 --> 0:18:16.000 about him playing quarterback. He was the quarterback of the 0:18:16.080 --> 0:18:19.280 Houston Cougars. I will give you a legitimate leftover greg 0:18:19.400 --> 0:18:22.520 right now before the break, Danny Amandola against Tampa Bay. 0:18:22.600 --> 0:18:26.080 A legit left over wide receiver rate. Virginia Zakis joins 0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:31.400 us next. I want to be the next Daily Fantasy Millionaire. 0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:34.560 Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with Daily Rodal dot 0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:38.360 com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings this season. Compete 0:18:38.400 --> 0:18:41.000 with the pros with Daily Rodal dot Com Optimizer and 0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:45.080 the most accurate projections in NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, 0:18:45.200 --> 0:18:48.160 breaking news, lake swap support, and much more. Save ten 0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:51.640 percent on winning NBA DFS advice with promo code Dunk. 0:18:51.880 --> 0:18:55.040 Visit Daily Rodal dot com backslash dunk to learn more. 0:19:06.440 --> 0:19:11.680 I'm falling and I can get off Inside injuries with 0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:20.920 Virginia Zakis. Scratch a scratch the arms off. She's coming off. 0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:25.840 I are geez eligible on the return. It's our buddy, 0:19:25.880 --> 0:19:29.560 Reginia's eyes. What's going on, Virginia. It's good to be back. 0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.040 How are you feeling doing all right? This is a 0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:36.840 good distraction after a rough week or so. I'm gonna 0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.840 be very honest with everybody. So we uh when we 0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:42.120 found out Virginia, So those who don't know, she heard 0:19:42.160 --> 0:19:45.800 her knee playing soccer to her a c L. So 0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:49.680 immediately Frank and I responded into supparate emails to Virginia 0:19:50.200 --> 0:19:53.920 saying your optimal recovery time is six to nine months 0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.080 should be out there, you're at peak health. Um. We 0:19:57.320 --> 0:20:00.720 left internally. We also left extra only to each other. 0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:05.719 Virginia did uh not respond to those emails or provide 0:20:05.760 --> 0:20:08.000 an l O L of any sort. Uh, And we 0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:11.280 don't think we made her laugh? Rank Yeah, we hope 0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:14.880 that you don't. You don't hate as Virginia and y'all 0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:18.320 are spot on. We nailed it. We've learned a thing 0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.320 or too, Greg, we nailed it. Let's go all right, 0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.040 just staring. I mean that's uncomfortable. All right. There's a 0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:28.200 lot of players that we need your help with, Virginia, 0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:30.480 A lot of players that since you've been on I 0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:33.640 r uh, that are hurt and we need help desperately. 0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:36.000 So let me start in Oakland where Josh Jacobs. We 0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:38.800 know I was like a fractured shoulder, but he practiced today. 0:20:39.119 --> 0:20:41.320 He did not play this past week. John Green's like, 0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:43.360 I don't know if I'm gonna play him. What's going 0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:47.479 on with Josh Jacobs? Yea, so he actually has apparently 0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.280 been playing through a fractured shoulder blade since week seven. 0:20:50.760 --> 0:20:53.040 UM didn't miss any games until last week. It kind 0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:55.520 of came out of nowhere. UM, I think he had 0:20:55.600 --> 0:20:57.280 to have had some sort of an aggravation of his 0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:59.720 shoulder injury, because it doesn't really make sense that he 0:20:59.760 --> 0:21:02.080 could play through the injury for that long and then 0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.560 suddenly it's bothering him enough that you know he needs 0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:06.600 to take a week off. But he didn't undergo an 0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:09.480 m r I. UM, it showed relatively positive results. They 0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:13.120 didn't say that it was completely clean. Um. But there's 0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:15.600 a chance he could play this week. Now, the risk 0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.240 here is if he plays, which I'd give him, you know, 0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.040 a fifty chance, there's a very good chance he doesn't 0:21:21.119 --> 0:21:22.680 end up finishing the game. So he's going to be 0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:25.080 a really risky guy to play this week. Um. You 0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.240 know it's a painful injury. UM, any big hit hard 0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.399 fall on that side, Um, it's not gonna feel good. 0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:32.600 So he could be in and out of the game. 0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:35.520 They could manage his reps. UM. I just don't see 0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:37.280 his day going very well if he does suit up 0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:41.119 on Sunday, Greg, that is Uh, that makes us a 0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.639 very tough situation. I almost hope that John Gruden just 0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:46.960 rules Josh Jacobs out, protect him from himself, so that 0:21:47.040 --> 0:21:49.359 we can have DeAndre Washington all to himself in this 0:21:49.440 --> 0:21:52.600 backfield against the Jaguars, because if Josh Jacobs is active, 0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:54.920 you've got to use Josh Jacobs in your lineup. It's 0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:57.720 the best matchup for a running back right now going 0:21:57.840 --> 0:22:00.760 up against this Jaguars defense. So I almost hope that 0:22:00.800 --> 0:22:02.879 they just rule Josh Jacobs out so that we can 0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:06.280 have DeAndre Washington all by himself here Virginia, I want 0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:09.280 to talk about an injury going into tonight Thursday Night Football. 0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:12.520 That is Mark Andrews. He is dealing with a thi 0:22:12.880 --> 0:22:16.440 knee contusion. Uh, he's expected to give it a go 0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.879 going into tonight's Thursday Night Football. So you know, what 0:22:19.960 --> 0:22:23.760 does that mean exact? Like what what percentage do we 0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.080 give him? Like where is he rank right now in 0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.600 terms of his health like percentage wise, and what are 0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:30.959 his chances of him, you know, finishing out this game 0:22:31.000 --> 0:22:34.480 completely healthy. Yeah, So our algorithm is showing that this 0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.120 is a pretty minor, you know, soft tissue injury because 0:22:37.160 --> 0:22:39.920 it is a contusion. Um. But in this case, because 0:22:39.960 --> 0:22:41.800 he has the Thursday Night game, we're a lot more 0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.320 custimistic on him. Um. If he was gonna play Sunday, 0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.040 he would actually be in the elevated risk category. But 0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:49.640 because he has just four days to recover, UM, he's 0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.359 going to be a high injury risk entering tonight's game. UM, 0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:55.520 and his health performance factor is below average. So it 0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.800 doesn't sound like, you know, there's any ligament damage or 0:22:58.880 --> 0:23:01.560 real concern that this be um, that he could suffer 0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:04.560 a serious aggregation of this injury. But anytime you're dealing 0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.359 with sort of a knee quad contusion, you gotta keep 0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:10.040 it loose. UM. It might you know, sort of affect 0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:11.920 the way that you're running and jumping, which could lead 0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.960 to another injury. UM. You know, and it's one of 0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:16.359 those I think he could be sort of in and 0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:18.040 out of the game. UM. And a lot of it 0:23:18.160 --> 0:23:20.680 is just going to be about pain management. So it 0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.080 definitely hurts him that it's the Thursday night game, but 0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.240 it's not serious enough that he shouldn't give it a try. UM, 0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.680 it just might not go very well, right, I have 0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.000 market enters is my tight end ten? Is that too 0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:33.119 high or too low? It seems about right to me. 0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.560 Um As originally said that you keep him out or 0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.440 we know that that he snaps normally limited anyway, so 0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:39.760 that he mus to be out of what he needs 0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:41.439 to be out there for. I think you gotta put 0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.159 him in there. Ten seems about right. The Titans I 0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:46.639 have just ahead of him, Tyler Higby, Jack Doyle, Austin 0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:48.520 Hooper and Jared Cook for those ones. I'm good with 0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.160 all those. Jared Cook plays. He left this game early 0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.960 last week as well as concussion. I believe. Let me 0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.359 continue on for some other players that may return these week, Virginia. 0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.160 And that brings us to Adam Feeling, who's been out 0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:02.520 for seemingly forever with his hamstring. He's been nagging him 0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:05.199 and nagging him. Your practice today, and he feels better 0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:09.440 than ever. You wouldn't guarantee he plays Sunday. He's feeling good, 0:24:09.920 --> 0:24:13.480 say you, Adam Feeling. Yeah. So he originally was hurt 0:24:13.520 --> 0:24:17.240 in Week seven, missed week, returned two weeks after his injury, 0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.080 which we thought was too soon, and then of course 0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.520 he hasn't played since then, and he did have another 0:24:21.600 --> 0:24:24.560 aggravation at practice along the way. Obviously, good to see 0:24:24.640 --> 0:24:26.560 him out there today. He said he went through some 0:24:26.640 --> 0:24:30.200 individual drills and was moving a lot closer to game speed. Um. 0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:32.480 I would really like to see him get in a 0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:35.080 full practice though, and uh, you know, make it through 0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:37.440 the practice without any sort of a setback, because there's 0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.000 really no other way to fully test out your hamstring 0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.320 unless you're going full speed, and doing that for the 0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.879 first time in a game, especially when you've missed this 0:24:45.000 --> 0:24:48.840 much time, is incredibly risky. So he actually has reached 0:24:48.880 --> 0:24:52.000 his optimal recovery time, but his injury risk remains very, 0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:56.120 very high UM, hovering right around thirty eight percent UM, 0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.919 just because you know he's already aggravated it a few 0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:00.760 times and this is just such a tough injury to 0:25:00.800 --> 0:25:04.520 fully recover from. His health performance factor just slipped back 0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.240 into the above average category. So if he plays I 0:25:07.240 --> 0:25:09.840 actually think he could play fairly well, um, but this 0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.439 hamstring string could affect his explosiveness. UM. Ideally that keep 0:25:13.520 --> 0:25:15.360 him out one more week, get him a few full 0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:18.280 practices next week, slowly bring him back, UM, then hopefully 0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:20.680 he's good to go. I told Greg during the break 0:25:20.760 --> 0:25:22.680 that ranking Adam Feeland has been one of the hardest 0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:24.920 things to do this week, just because a he's coming 0:25:24.960 --> 0:25:27.440 back from an injury, so obviously there's always a risk 0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:29.600 involved with that, especially with a hamstring, and he's going 0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:31.399 up against the Chargers the charges have been a really 0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.320 good defense against wide receivers. So I do have Adam 0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.680 feeling as my wide receiver twenty four. I think that 0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:38.720 that's the range he should be viewed a low and 0:25:38.800 --> 0:25:41.879 wide receiver to high end wide receiver. Three Virginia, I 0:25:41.920 --> 0:25:44.320 want to ask you about t Y Hilton. We brought 0:25:44.359 --> 0:25:46.359 him up earlier in the show, and obviously if he plays, 0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.280 he affects the target share of Jack Doyle and Zach Pascal. 0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:51.520 So we've got to hear you know, what's the latest 0:25:51.680 --> 0:25:54.919 on t Y Hilton. He's still dealing with that caffe injury. UH. 0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:58.440 Supposedly returned to practice today on Thursday. Is this a 0:25:58.520 --> 0:26:01.800 week where he will be rested up enough good to go. 0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:05.399 Is this where his optimal recovery time kind of lines 0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:10.000 up with everything? Um? So, because he returned in week twelve, 0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:13.160 which we thought was too soon and aggravated his cap string, 0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.360 his optimal recovery time got pushed back, um And we're 0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:19.600 actually showing a healthier return date around week seventeen. Um. 0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.200 And given the Colts position right now, they really should 0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:24.200 just shut him down for the season. It's such a 0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:28.520 tough injury to fully recover from. Similar to Filin's hamstring strain. UM, 0:26:28.600 --> 0:26:31.080 these muscular injuries, once you hurt them and then aggravate 0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.680 them again and they get worse, it's just really tough 0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.879 to get back to within a few weeks. So I 0:26:37.000 --> 0:26:39.800 really don't think he should play. Um, he shouldn't play 0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.280 next week. Very very high injury risk right now. UM. 0:26:43.440 --> 0:26:45.480 And also when you're dealing with a calf strain, not 0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:48.480 only are you risking aggravating the calf, but the rest 0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:51.280 of your lower bodies compromised. UM. You know, anything from 0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:55.360 a hamstring strain, ankle sprain. UM entering the achilles, he's 0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.600 just putting himself at a very high risk of suffering 0:26:57.760 --> 0:26:59.920 a more serious injury that would then affect him in 0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:02.200 the off season if he does try to play this 0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:04.280 week er next. It kind of reminds me of Kevin 0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:06.120 Durant too, right, as he was dealing with the calf 0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:08.840 injury throughout the playoffs, ends up coming back too soon 0:27:09.000 --> 0:27:11.320 and he ruptures his achilles. You know, obviously we would 0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.160 never want something like that to happen to t Y Hilton, 0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.720 but if he does return too early, it, you know, 0:27:15.800 --> 0:27:18.400 he does put himself at risk for that. Greig absolutely. 0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:20.640 We've seen this a lot with t Y Hilton trying 0:27:20.640 --> 0:27:22.320 to push himself back in other players. Even if he 0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:23.879 plays in it and they say he's good to go, 0:27:24.320 --> 0:27:25.879 I don't think I can use him. I think it's 0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.480 way too risky. We'll see what happens. E Y, I 0:27:28.560 --> 0:27:31.240 know you have a question in regards see your boy 0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:35.480 Derrick Henry. What's going on with him? For Virginia, Yeah, 0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:37.920 I mean banged up the hamstring thing. It's a it's 0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:42.000 a scary thing. Um. He's been unbelievable all year. Uh 0:27:42.080 --> 0:27:44.160 and when you need him most, this is the most 0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.760 worried that Derrick Henry owners have been all year. What 0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:51.280 do you think, Virginia. Yeah, So I'm actually not too 0:27:51.400 --> 0:27:54.560 concerned about his hamstring injury. Um. You know, he's had 0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.040 I think around two fifty cars this year, which is 0:27:57.080 --> 0:27:58.800 by far the most he's ever had in his career. 0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:02.560 And there's still three games averaging almost twenty carries a game. Um, 0:28:02.760 --> 0:28:04.680 that's a lot for a guy like Henry who hasn't 0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.920 had this kind of workload in season's past. So my 0:28:08.200 --> 0:28:10.600 my guess is that his hamstring is a little tight. Um. 0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:12.960 You know, it's been cold sometimes, which can leave you 0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.840 a little more susceptible to suffering a strain. So I'm 0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.120 hopeful that they're just you know, being very cautious with him. 0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:21.399 I'm dealing with some streness and some tightness, but that 0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:25.680 this isn't, you know, truly a strain yet. UM. You know, 0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:27.879 if you continue, if you miss his practice today and 0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.399 again tomorrow, I'll definitely be concerned. But the last few 0:28:31.440 --> 0:28:33.800 weeks he's been limited throughout the week um and has 0:28:33.960 --> 0:28:36.560 gone out there on Sunday and played well. So he's 0:28:36.600 --> 0:28:38.760 an elevated injury risk right now, so a slight bit 0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:41.280 of concern, but his health performance factor is in the 0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.760 peak category, so expects him to go out there and 0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.480 continue to play very well. Right, So, Derrick Henry should 0:28:46.480 --> 0:28:48.760 be a right this weekend. For those that are playing 0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:55.080 against Derrick Henry. Dam I'm sorry, yes man, Damie Williams, 0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:57.400 someone I'm also playing against this week, and he was 0:28:57.480 --> 0:29:01.200 heard to practice yesterday with these real injuries. Damie Williams 0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:05.080 ready to go, Virginia. Um, yep, our algorithm is saying 0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.720 that he has reached his optimal recovery time. UM. I 0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.080 think we've mentioned this before that I believe his injuries. 0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.520 A rib cartilage fracture not the same as a rib 0:29:12.720 --> 0:29:15.920 rib fracture, UM, but very painful to cartilage in between 0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:18.720 the ribs gets damaged. UM. It can take you know, 0:29:19.240 --> 0:29:21.640 five six weeks for a player to become pain free 0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:23.800 after this injury if it's on the more serious side. 0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:25.880 But he should be healthy enough to go out there 0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:28.760 and play. Might get an injection before the game. He 0:29:28.880 --> 0:29:30.880 might also have to wear some extra padding just to 0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:34.520 protect that area. UM. Elevated injury risk, but his health 0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:37.160 performance factors back at peak, So as long as he 0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:39.240 gets enough touches, I think he actually should have a 0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:42.440 pretty good day. Virginia. I want to ask you about 0:29:42.480 --> 0:29:46.000 Gerald Everett, more so for affecting the value of Tyler 0:29:46.080 --> 0:29:49.880 Higbee back to back one yard receiving games for Tyler Higbye. 0:29:50.040 --> 0:29:51.880 Jerald Everett dealing with this knee injury. What do we 0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:55.960 expect heading its week fifteen, So he hyper extended his 0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:59.080 knee in week twelve. They haven't said exactly UM what 0:29:59.240 --> 0:30:02.160 his injury is, but more than likely he's dealing with 0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.440 a bit of a nie sprain and possibly also a 0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:07.320 bone bruise. UM. Given that we're considering this a grade 0:30:07.400 --> 0:30:10.400 to knee injury and his optimal recovery time is around 0:30:10.480 --> 0:30:13.480 three to four weeks. Um, it's not looking like he's 0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:15.600 going to play this weekend, but I would give him 0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:19.000 a pretty good shot at returning next week. Um. His 0:30:19.200 --> 0:30:21.720 injury risk right now is in the elevated category and 0:30:21.800 --> 0:30:23.760 will be again next week as well, as long as 0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:25.800 you know there's no sort of a setback between now 0:30:25.840 --> 0:30:29.080 and then. Um, but best I'm hoping he misses this 0:30:29.200 --> 0:30:31.000 week and then returns next week. And it is, you know, 0:30:31.080 --> 0:30:35.080 pretty close to a fire up. Tyler Higby over Mark 0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:38.520 Andrews tonight, Frank with a Monster fish Pump where you 0:30:38.560 --> 0:30:41.000 didn't give out that news about Jerrold Everett Virginia. We 0:30:41.040 --> 0:30:43.160 appreciate the time you look in your recovery and we'll 0:30:43.200 --> 0:30:47.640 talk to you next week. All right, when we come back, 0:30:47.720 --> 0:30:50.400 we looked two weeks, we've seen you, begin our reviews 0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.560 and we start going over everything you need to know 0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:58.840 for this weekend. In fantasy, I want to be the 0:30:58.920 --> 0:31:02.120 next Daily fin see Millionaire dunk on your NBA DFS. 0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.680 Competition with Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on fandel 0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:08.560 and DraftKings this season. Compete with the pros with Daily 0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.040 Rodal dot com optimizer and the most accurate projections in 0:31:12.320 --> 0:31:16.240 NBA DFS, plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, 0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.360 and much more. Save ten percent on winning NBA DFS 0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:22.560 advice with promo code dunk. Visit Daily Rodal dot com 0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:38.280 backslash dunk to learn more. How will you you're on 0:31:38.680 --> 0:31:41.160 the bf F that's that's time to tell you. That's 0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.360 you gotta put your money in your mouth. Leakes, you've 0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:45.800 been a shot. Opening a sports waging account over on 0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.160 Fandel in New Jersey's largest sports book and Fandel dot 0:31:48.200 --> 0:31:50.040 com slash grade, will you receive a free bed up 0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.000 to five hundred bucks. It's a free bed up your 0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:55.040 five dollars. Open a sports wadjering account at Fandel dot 0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:57.840 com slash grades, points, breads, game tales, prop parlays and 0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.240 in game wagering in college and pro sports. You're in 0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.560 control of the vandal dot com slash grid. Open your 0:32:02.560 --> 0:32:04.320 new account and claiming a free wager of up to 0:32:04.400 --> 0:32:06.920 five hundred dollars. Today, you have a gambling problem when 0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:08.960 a hundred gamblets where one over in New Jersey only 0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:13.920 eligibility restrictions applied. We have site for details, Greg, I'm 0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:17.200 hijacking the show. I just want to tell you where 0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:19.040 I have Levian Bell ranked, and you tell me if 0:32:19.040 --> 0:32:20.880 it's crazy or not, because we didn't get into it 0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:24.960 when we preview the Jets RB. Is that too high? 0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:29.400 Who's random? I have mark Ingram, Philip Lindsay, Alvin Kamar 0:32:29.560 --> 0:32:33.480 just ahead, Joe Mixon, Austin Eckler, David Montgomery just behind. 0:32:34.200 --> 0:32:36.520 The reason I asked, is someone in the chat legitimately 0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:41.080 asked Levian Bell or Patrick Laird, l On Bell or 0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.400 Patrick Laird, But there are other people in the chat 0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.880 actually saying Patrick Laird. That's why I wanted to bring 0:32:46.000 --> 0:32:48.520 it wrong. Well, we don't know for certain that it's wrong. 0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:51.560 We do know we knew it. It's a wrong call. 0:32:51.800 --> 0:32:53.640 You have been processed of a results. I could see 0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.160 why you would have pause though over Levian Bell. You 0:32:56.200 --> 0:32:58.400 don't know where his head at, where his motivation is 0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:01.000 at his heads he was all the two fifties, so 0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:04.479 I'm sure rocked. He's locked in. He should be good 0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:05.800 to go if he can. If he can do that 0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:07.800 on the lanes, you should be able to do that 0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.880 on the field. Right. But the way the Jets should 0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.520 attack the Ravens tonight is actually on the ground. It's 0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:15.320 easier to run against him than it is to throw. 0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:17.600 I mean, since they've gotten all these corners back and 0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.080 they traded for Marcus Peters and everyone's healthy, it's harder 0:33:20.120 --> 0:33:22.920 to throw against him. And teams have had success running 0:33:23.040 --> 0:33:25.720 against the Ravens recently. Uh wh he Moser had a 0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:28.080 big game against him. Devin Singletary ran for like eight 0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:31.960 yards last week against him, So me personally, Baal Powell 0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.040 is not going to play in this game tonight. Levian 0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.640 Bell and Time Montgomery are might be the only two 0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:38.680 running backs actively. I guess we'll see if like Josh 0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.760 Adams is active or something like that, but I expect 0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:44.360 a big workload for Levian Bell once again tonight. I agree, man, 0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:46.479 I totally agree. I like lady on Bell way more 0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:48.440 than like I like Patrick laird Um, but An the 0:33:48.520 --> 0:33:51.360 way you haven't certainly seems fair. While we were looking 0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:53.280 at them, I guess it was a straight sex time 0:33:53.360 --> 0:33:57.280 celebrity league yesterday is dominating in that league. I believe 0:33:57.640 --> 0:34:01.480 Seth Seth Rawlins is going up against delln Batant. It's hilarious. 0:34:01.520 --> 0:34:03.560 And then the miss is going answering to somebody too. Yeah, 0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:06.440 I forgot who the miss is going up just showing 0:34:06.480 --> 0:34:09.680 up fantasy football, man, very good fantasy It's a big thing. 0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:13.000 It's definitely a huge thing. Um, both of those guys 0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:15.560 are eliminated in in the real league that all w 0:34:15.680 --> 0:34:18.160 W guys play in. A'm still in that in the playoffs. 0:34:18.880 --> 0:34:21.879 Uh but yeah, I mean Miss and Seth both die 0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:26.120 hard football guys. Know they're fantasy. Love fantasy football. Um 0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.719 when I run into them, you know, I run into 0:34:28.719 --> 0:34:31.000 Seth weekly, and that's what we talk about. We talk 0:34:31.000 --> 0:34:34.360 about fantasy football. Yeah, that's that's what matters around here, right, 0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:36.040 Like I come to work talking about fantasy football, you 0:34:36.080 --> 0:34:38.280 go to work talking about It's all that matters. Literally, 0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:40.919 all that managed What was we're talking about here? All right, Greig, 0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:43.440 you can have the show back now the same breakdowns. 0:34:43.440 --> 0:34:44.839 I don't know, I don't really want the show back. 0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.120 Come on, he's doing a great job. The Bears at 0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:50.200 the Packers, Greg, the Green Bay Packers five point favorites 0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.440 a forty one point total in this game. Greg, I 0:34:53.640 --> 0:34:58.879 have Aaron Rodgers ranked as my QB twelve on the week. 0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:00.440 He is at home where he is aid better in 0:35:00.480 --> 0:35:03.319 his career. He's been very inconsistent this year. He's got 0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:06.399 five games over nineteen Fantasy points this year. The other 0:35:06.520 --> 0:35:10.280 eight games he has been held under fifteen Fantasy points. 0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:12.799 So he's had some big games when he's really had 0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.000 some clunkers because they've been running the ball more. What 0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:17.800 say you? Yeah? So for me, if I had another 0:35:17.880 --> 0:35:21.719 option Ryan Tannehills of the world, have Ryan Tannehills my 0:35:21.800 --> 0:35:27.960 QB four? What can go wrong? In Week fifteen? I 0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:31.000 haven't ranked the head of Patrick Mahomes. That seems dangerous. 0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:33.600 I like to live on the edge here, Greg, clearly 0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.560 do um starting him in the pit league? Boys, I'm 0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:41.359 the only BFF left. Let's let's get behind this. Too soon? 0:35:41.520 --> 0:35:44.200 You want too soon? Man? Do come? I do have 0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:48.080 Baker and Ryan Fitzpatrick. Fitzpatrick ranked ahead of Aaron Rodgers. Um, 0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:51.719 where do you? Where's Baker and Ryan fits Patrick? Right? 0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:54.600 Acres my QB nine against the Cardinals Fitzpatrick QB eleven, 0:35:54.640 --> 0:35:57.480 one spot. So I agree with that, Um, I I'm 0:35:57.520 --> 0:36:00.239 looking at Aaron Rodgers. Gaelog Into somebody that has not 0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:02.480 really had Aaron Rodgers this year. I had him in 0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:06.800 one spot, but it's been very annoying. He has not 0:36:07.040 --> 0:36:09.920 thrown for three hundred yards in like six weeks. That's 0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.759 a really long time not throw three hundred yards if 0:36:12.760 --> 0:36:15.759 you're Aaron Rodgers. Um previously this year against Chicago that 0:36:15.840 --> 0:36:19.879 was the opening day Georgia yards one touchdown, and that's 0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:21.840 like kind of what I expect on a weekly basis 0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:24.759 from Aaron Rodgers, right about two hundred yards one to 0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:27.640 do touchdowns. In fact, he hasn't thrown more. He's thrown 0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:31.239 more than one touchdown just once in the last six weeks. 0:36:31.280 --> 0:36:33.759 It was four touchdowns against Giants, which doesn't really count. 0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:38.000 So to me, I don't love Aaron Rodgers. I think 0:36:38.000 --> 0:36:42.239 the other guys that you could choose from Tannehill, Fitzpatrick, Mayfield, 0:36:42.880 --> 0:36:45.600 I'm much more interested. I have no problem bending Aaron Rodgers. 0:36:45.880 --> 0:36:48.440 Why do you agree? Are you starting Baker Mayfield at 0:36:48.520 --> 0:36:50.880 the Cardinals who have allowed the most fantasy points and 0:36:50.920 --> 0:36:54.040 most passing touchdowns this year? Ryan Fitzpatrick going up against 0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:56.279 the Giants, even through Kyler Murray. And this makes because 0:36:56.280 --> 0:36:59.120 I haven't ranked one spot behind Aaron Rodgers. Kyler Murray 0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:01.840 going up against Ker Mayfield. Here, we've got the clash 0:37:01.920 --> 0:37:04.839 of the past two Heisman Trophy winners. Would you use 0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:09.759 Kyler Murray over Aaron Rodgers this week? Eway, I think 0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:12.839 I would seriously think about it. That that offense has 0:37:12.880 --> 0:37:14.799 kind of got it down. It doesn't really matter. They're 0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:19.720 playing at home, uh indoors Cleveland. Um hasn't been the defense. 0:37:19.840 --> 0:37:21.359 I think a lot of people thought they were going 0:37:21.440 --> 0:37:23.279 to be. And I think that Baker is gonna be 0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.200 able to move the ball. I've got an interesting decision. 0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:29.040 I've got Mayfield and went so I'm not sure what 0:37:29.200 --> 0:37:33.360 to do there, but out of out of Murray and Mayfield, 0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:37.799 I think I probably probably lean Baker. I think, yeah, 0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:39.560 I had Baker ranked the high outset of all of them. Greig, 0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:43.719 would you use Kyler Murray over Aaron Rodgers? That one's closer, Um, 0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:47.040 because Murray's floor is also not He hasn't been playing well, 0:37:47.520 --> 0:37:49.640 but he did have two tough matchups against the Steelers 0:37:49.680 --> 0:37:54.040 and rams Murray just for Kirk Cousins at Los Angeles Chargers. No, 0:37:54.239 --> 0:37:57.520 So I think Aaron Rodgers is I think Aaron Rodgers 0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:02.320 is ranked well. But I think that I think that 0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:04.320 really for the first time because I didn't do it 0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:06.759 last Remember we had it was the Tom Brady versus 0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:09.960 Nick Foles debbe? Was that what it was? Tom Brady? 0:38:10.600 --> 0:38:13.000 It was? It was not Nick Foles women Nick Foles 0:38:13.680 --> 0:38:16.560 in terms of we start one week. It was either 0:38:16.719 --> 0:38:18.440 that or I know we had Jared Golf like two 0:38:18.520 --> 0:38:20.000 years ago or something like that. Sure, I think it 0:38:20.080 --> 0:38:24.359 was Nick Foles last year. And I always was saying, dude, 0:38:24.480 --> 0:38:30.640 it's Brady or it's Rogers. Strip the name off the jersey. 0:38:30.880 --> 0:38:33.840 I just don't feel that way anymore. And it just 0:38:33.920 --> 0:38:36.360 shouldn't feel that way about Rogers. I've watched enough of 0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:38.160 the Packers this year, and even enough of the Patriots, Like, 0:38:38.160 --> 0:38:40.919 where's Tom Brady on your list this week? Um? QB 0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:45.239 there you go, Right, that's Brady and Rogers not in. 0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:49.400 Rogers barely as a QB one this week, Brady barely 0:38:49.640 --> 0:38:52.080 as a QB two this week. I think both of 0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:56.920 those guys this season not really consistent fantasy starting quarterbacks. 0:38:57.400 --> 0:38:59.200 I think that's I think that's fair to say. Look, 0:38:59.200 --> 0:39:01.800 I think Aaron Rodgers has that upside game in his 0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:05.400 back pocket, but predicting when it's going to come, like 0:39:05.640 --> 0:39:07.759 Aaron Rodgers has been the perfect best ball quarterback this 0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:10.200 year because you don't really know when he's going off. 0:39:10.280 --> 0:39:12.239 I actually had a league where I benched him in 0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:14.040 that monster game against the Raiders where he had like 0:39:14.120 --> 0:39:16.600 six touchdowns, So that was not fun. Greg. On the 0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:20.120 other side, Mittel Trobiski coming around. He's the QB five 0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:22.520 and fantasy points per game over the last five weeks. 0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:27.880 Just rush for sixty three yards against the Dallas Cowboys 0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:30.600 last week. I love David Montgomery. You've been able to 0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:32.680 run on the Packers all year. I think Montgomery is 0:39:32.719 --> 0:39:35.800 a very solid RB two this week, Alan Robinson, I 0:39:35.840 --> 0:39:37.400 don't see how you can get away from even in 0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:39.480 a tougher match up against the Packers. Greg, I think 0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:40.880 the ones that I really want to ask you about 0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:46.080 here are Trabisky as a super flex and Anthony Miller. 0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.080 I don't know that that Taylor Gabriel is gonna be back. 0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:51.400 He hasn't practiced yet this week. Are you going back 0:39:51.440 --> 0:39:53.880 to Anthony Miller? And would you trust Trabisky as a 0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:57.279 super flex quarterback? The reason that I do trust your 0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.720 Whisky as a super flex quarterback because he's just runs 0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:01.440 some much more in the pastoral of the weeks. That 0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:05.040 part of his game has come back. And when you 0:40:05.160 --> 0:40:07.400 do that, as we've seen with Josh Allen throughout the season, 0:40:07.800 --> 0:40:10.680 when you do that, the floor is just so much higher. 0:40:11.080 --> 0:40:13.640 And because of that, I'm okay in the super Flex 0:40:13.760 --> 0:40:17.000 only starting true whisky. When it comes to Anthony Miller, Listen, 0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:19.399 I'm not an Anthony Miller truth. I drafted him before 0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:21.400 the season started. It didn't work out. E Y did 0:40:21.440 --> 0:40:23.399 the same thing. It didn't work out. Whenever, since Taylor 0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:25.160 Gabriel has gone down over the past couple of weeks, 0:40:25.920 --> 0:40:28.560 he's been pretty good. You haven't touchdown last week and 0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:31.960 save this day. Thirteen targets the week before, targets over 0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:33.759 his last four weeks. Great, Yeah, I mean last year 0:40:33.800 --> 0:40:35.360 the touchdown and say this day. Let's let's be very 0:40:35.400 --> 0:40:39.000 fair about that. Um against Green Bay the first time 0:40:39.040 --> 0:40:42.240 when I started him in the league, he had one target. 0:40:43.640 --> 0:40:45.480 That was it. They were still figuring out the offense. 0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:49.040 I think you can start Anthony Miller. I think the question, 0:40:49.080 --> 0:40:51.960 like the perfect question I have is Anthony Miller Zach Pascal, 0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:54.320 Like that's a question that I think it's legitimate. I 0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:57.480 have Pascal ranked higher personally. I have Anthony Miller wide 0:40:57.520 --> 0:41:00.279 receiver forty three. I'm not as excited about him this 0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:02.000 week as I have in the past couple of weeks. 0:41:02.160 --> 0:41:04.440 I would use Alan Hearns over him, Danny Amon Dola. 0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:09.760 I don't know what Alan. This is assuming that DeVante 0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:11.880 Parker is not that because he didn't practice again today. 0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:14.479 Well he was in stage four. He actually did practice today. 0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:16.880 Well if he did, then it's like a limited but 0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:19.040 he's still in concussion party. Yes he is. Well, him 0:41:19.080 --> 0:41:21.160 and Albert Wilson or anything that I say about the 0:41:21.200 --> 0:41:24.200 Dolphins receivers not named Devanta Parker is assuming that DeVante 0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:27.600 Parker would be out e y. You were the Anthony 0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:29.600 Miller guy, I mean, are you going back to him 0:41:29.640 --> 0:41:32.160 this week? Would you use him over someone like Robby 0:41:32.239 --> 0:41:36.000 Anderson tonight? People might have that decision. I don't think 0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:38.399 i'd start him over Robby Anderson, but but I think 0:41:38.480 --> 0:41:42.560 this is what what people that were drafting Miller early. Um, 0:41:43.000 --> 0:41:44.960 he's one of my biggest boss. I had him way 0:41:45.080 --> 0:41:47.600 up my board, especially because of what he did with 0:41:47.719 --> 0:41:51.319 basically one arm last year. I think he had seven touchdowns. Uh, 0:41:51.480 --> 0:41:53.320 he's starting to show up. He's starting to look like 0:41:54.000 --> 0:41:56.200 the wide receiver that I thought he was going to 0:41:56.280 --> 0:41:58.560 be uh, and I don't know why it took Taylor 0:41:58.600 --> 0:42:01.239 Gabriel being out for this to happen. I mean a 0:42:01.320 --> 0:42:04.560 lot of this coincides with Mr Risky not being an 0:42:04.640 --> 0:42:08.000 absolute tire fire, you know. I believe that's a big thing. Um, 0:42:08.200 --> 0:42:11.759 he's making some plays. Uh, he's using his feet, making 0:42:11.800 --> 0:42:14.160 the defense guess what he's going to do, and the 0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:17.560 wide receivers are reaping the benefit. Alan Robinson has been 0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:20.680 good no matter who is that quarterback all year. He's 0:42:20.680 --> 0:42:24.239 been really really good. But Miller his starting to step up. 0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:25.920 So he's a guy. I mean, I think you can 0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:27.960 stream him this week. I don't think I put him 0:42:28.040 --> 0:42:32.200 over Robby Anderson, but I would think about it. Allen 0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:34.640 Robinson has four touchdowns in his last three games. He's 0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:36.200 a low end wide receiver. One for me, I think 0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:38.880 that he has matchup proof at this point. The Broncos 0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:40.640 at the Kansas City Chiefs. Let's see if we get 0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:43.240 one more game in here before tomorrow, greg The Chiefs 0:42:43.280 --> 0:42:45.360 are laying ten points in this game forty six and 0:42:45.360 --> 0:42:48.040 a half total divisional matchup. Big point spread for a 0:42:48.080 --> 0:42:50.480 game that is a divisional matchup. Here I've got to 0:42:50.480 --> 0:42:52.839 ask the question because if people are having questions about 0:42:52.920 --> 0:42:55.080 Lamar Jackson, and of course they're gonna have questions about 0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:58.319 Patrick Mahomes, which is still crazy. But he posted ten 0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:02.040 touchdown passes in his three games. Since then, he has 0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:04.960 ten touchdown passes in his next seven games that he 0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:08.520 has started and finished. So he's clearly playing hurt right now. 0:43:08.640 --> 0:43:12.680 He's banged up. Greg As of now, I have Ryan 0:43:12.760 --> 0:43:15.480 Tannehill ranked ahead of Patrick Mahomes. I have Drew Brees 0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:18.120 ranked ahead of Patrick Mahomes. I have Patrick Mahomes as 0:43:18.200 --> 0:43:22.640 my QB five on the week. Would you dare play 0:43:22.760 --> 0:43:25.920 Ryan Tannehill over Patrick Mahomes? Now, all right, how about you? 0:43:25.960 --> 0:43:29.960 Euy No, No, I don't think I'd be doing that, um, 0:43:30.400 --> 0:43:32.840 but but I do have you you mean, I have 0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:35.320 them high. I think Ryan Tannehill is going to have 0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:38.080 a big game. This is do or die, and when 0:43:38.200 --> 0:43:40.400 he's been leaned on and he's been, I mean, the 0:43:40.480 --> 0:43:43.200 Titans needed this guy and he's showing up. He's been, 0:43:43.560 --> 0:43:46.640 you know, arguably other than Derrick Henry, their best player 0:43:47.040 --> 0:43:51.040 and the recipe for this offensive success. So I like 0:43:51.239 --> 0:43:53.560 Dan Hill this week. I think it's a big game. Uh, 0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:55.359 they want to win it. They want to beat they 0:43:55.440 --> 0:43:57.960 want to beat Houston and take that number one spot. 0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:01.080 And I think they're gonna do it. Yeah. So I mean, 0:44:01.080 --> 0:44:02.960 if anyone's out there asking, oh well, Frank, would do 0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:05.400 you actually do it? Would you actually start Ryan Tannehill 0:44:05.440 --> 0:44:07.719 over Patrick Mahomes? I really would, Greg, I really would. 0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:09.560 I don't think that Patrick Mahomes is a percent. I 0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:12.920 still think that's lucky. You're lucky to wear out, and 0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:14.759 I would not let you do that. We don't. We 0:44:14.760 --> 0:44:16.560 didn't have Tannehill as their back, and we had Sam Donald, 0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:19.479 we wouldn't have had that question. But I actually legitimately would. 0:44:19.600 --> 0:44:21.560 I think Patrick Mahomes is playing through some stuff right now. 0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:23.680 I think you could still have a solid game, something 0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:26.600 like you know, to S and two, which will put 0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:28.680 him in that you know, QB five QB six discussion. 0:44:28.840 --> 0:44:33.040 But I think Tannehill's upside is much higher. Greg, You've 0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:34.480 got something I do. I want to just ask you, 0:44:34.560 --> 0:44:36.120 how high do you have a J? Brown? This week? 0:44:36.520 --> 0:44:42.600 I have a J. Brown. I'm pulling it up right now. 0:44:42.719 --> 0:44:46.120 I have him as my wide receiver, twenty receiver too. Yeah, 0:44:46.160 --> 0:44:48.040 he is a wide receiver too. So yeah, if I 0:44:48.080 --> 0:44:49.640 like Tannehill, I got to like the people that he's 0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:52.440 story him throwing the ball to Greg on the other 0:44:52.600 --> 0:44:55.640 side here if No one fan is healthy, The Kansas 0:44:55.640 --> 0:44:57.640 City Chiefs have been a team to target all shore 0:44:57.719 --> 0:44:59.200 long with tight ends. So would you start in No 0:44:59.280 --> 0:45:03.040 A Fan or more, Andrews says e Y. I would 0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:04.600 start Mark Andrews because I don't know if No A 0:45:04.640 --> 0:45:06.800 Fans gonna play. I don't know if is gonna be 0:45:06.800 --> 0:45:09.480 effective tonight. I still do like Courtland Sutton. I think 0:45:09.480 --> 0:45:11.759 a bounce back game here this week. I think he's 0:45:11.760 --> 0:45:14.000 a wide receiver too. I do like Lindsay as an 0:45:14.080 --> 0:45:17.480 RB two as well, Royce Freeman. Nothing but a desperation 0:45:17.560 --> 0:45:20.280 flex for Eric Young and Frank Danville. My name is gregs. 0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:22.160 Going to join the game tonight. We'll see you back 0:45:22.160 --> 0:45:28.359 here tomorrow. We hope. I want to be the next 0:45:28.560 --> 0:45:32.120 Daily Fantasy Millionaire. Dunk on your NBA DFS competition with 0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:35.799 Daily Rodal dot com and dominate on fandel and DraftKings 0:45:35.960 --> 0:45:38.359 this season. Compete with the pros with Daily Rodal dot 0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:42.400 com optimizer and the most accurate projections in NBA DFS 0:45:42.520 --> 0:45:45.600 plus line up alerts, breaking news, lake swap support, and 0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:48.960 much more. Save ten percent on winning NBA DFS advice 0:45:49.040 --> 0:45:52.560 with promo code dunk. Visit Daily Rodo dot com backslash 0:45:52.640 --> 0:46:07.279 dunk to learn more. Here's what you missed on the BFFs. 0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:09.560 Let me start out with the bit of a Thursday 0:46:09.600 --> 0:46:12.040 night preview years the Ravens and the Jets. We've gotten 0:46:12.080 --> 0:46:14.680 some questions, including our own video producer Alex Fasano was like, Hey, 0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:17.320 should I start Lamar Jackson tonight? Like? Are you kidding me? 0:46:17.960 --> 0:46:19.320 So he comes in, he talks about it in his 0:46:19.480 --> 0:46:22.920 update this morning with Dane and like what what do 0:46:22.960 --> 0:46:24.279 you do? And Dames like, oh, man, I agree, you 0:46:24.320 --> 0:46:26.640 got a tough decision. What is the tough decision you have? 0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.520 Lamar Jackson? He's your horse? Ride him? Like, but I 0:46:29.560 --> 0:46:31.600 got Jimmy, j Jimmy, he's facing the falcons? Like what 0:46:31.760 --> 0:46:33.680 am I doing? Like, you've got a number one quarterback 0:46:33.880 --> 0:46:35.680 in the NFL, You've got the m v P, you 0:46:35.760 --> 0:46:38.239 got the leading Fantasy point score, You're gonna bench him. 0:46:38.360 --> 0:46:40.160 He's got this squad injury. What are they up? Thirty 0:46:40.160 --> 0:46:42.160 seven seven? And like, how do you think they're getting 0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:44.600 thirty seven points. Yeah, Market, you're just gonna score six 0:46:44.600 --> 0:46:46.640 touchs down, he said, he goes More's gonna score touchdown. 0:46:46.640 --> 0:46:50.520 I go, all right, what about the other thirty points? Yeah? 0:46:50.560 --> 0:46:51.800 I mean, this is what we were talking about the 0:46:51.840 --> 0:46:53.880 other day. When when it when it comes down to 0:46:53.960 --> 0:46:56.120 this point in the season, the fantasy football playoffs, people 0:46:56.160 --> 0:46:58.480 start getting crazy. Man, They start thinking all crazy kinds 0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:00.520 of things. And I get it. They evens are big 0:47:00.560 --> 0:47:03.480 favorites in this game. But for them to get up 0:47:03.520 --> 0:47:05.719 and potentially covered this spread, they're going to have to 0:47:05.880 --> 0:47:08.560 score points. And mark Ingram might score a touchdown or two. 0:47:08.680 --> 0:47:10.880 But the Jets have been good against running backs all 0:47:10.920 --> 0:47:14.360 season long. You can't bench Lamar Jackson because next thing 0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:16.120 you know, this guy throws for two or three touchdowns, 0:47:16.160 --> 0:47:18.279 he rushes for fifty sixty yards, and he does what 0:47:18.360 --> 0:47:20.520 he does every single week. He finishes the top five 0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:23.880 fantasy quarterbacks. So I understand Jimmy Garoppolo has a good matchup. 0:47:23.920 --> 0:47:25.560 There's things that you could say about Jimmy G two. 0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:27.319 Who's to say that they don't just get up big 0:47:27.360 --> 0:47:29.279 and start running the football. There with Raheem Mostard, who 0:47:29.280 --> 0:47:32.360 has been great. So I understand that all these decisions 0:47:32.400 --> 0:47:36.080 are magnified, Greg, you know it's under a microscope. This 0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:38.560 is when things matter most. It's one and done. You 0:47:38.680 --> 0:47:41.440 either win or you go home. But don't overthink it. Man. 0:47:41.560 --> 0:47:43.080 You have the fantasy m v P, you have the 0:47:43.160 --> 0:47:46.240 league MVP, and Lamar Jackson. He's got the quad injury. 0:47:46.360 --> 0:47:48.120 You gotta keep him in your lineup. You gotta go 0:47:48.200 --> 0:47:51.040 down with not everybody who's gotten you here, Greg, but 0:47:51.160 --> 0:47:53.359 you've got to go down with the Lamar Jackson ship. 0:47:53.440 --> 0:47:56.720 You just have to. I don't care about the quad injury. 0:47:56.760 --> 0:47:58.800 He's going to be fine. What say you if you 0:47:58.840 --> 0:48:01.160 have Lamar Jackson and you you have like books, don't 0:48:01.160 --> 0:48:03.839 worry about his quad is rushing and a half tonight 0:48:03.880 --> 0:48:06.680 there's seventeen and a half point favorite tonight, U e y. 0:48:06.880 --> 0:48:08.680 What do you say for those who have la Moore 0:48:08.760 --> 0:48:10.799 Jackson and you have a suitable option at Jimmy Gia, 0:48:10.920 --> 0:48:13.560 Ryan Tanney Hill, whoever, what do you say to those people? 0:48:13.640 --> 0:48:16.560 Do like Tannehill? Yeah, I mean, like Frank said, people 0:48:16.600 --> 0:48:18.279 get squarely at this time of year. There's you know, 0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:19.919 it seems like there's a lot more on the line, 0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:22.799 But this is just another fantasy game and look at 0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:25.840 I mean, he's the number one point getter and fantasy 0:48:25.960 --> 0:48:28.880 you cannot bench this guy. Um, if you believe this 0:48:28.960 --> 0:48:31.439 is the only time that he's been hurt all year, 0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:34.879 than then you're insane, especially for a running quarterback. There's 0:48:34.920 --> 0:48:37.080 definitely been games when he's been stored. There's definitely been 0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:39.799 games where he's been banged up. Um, maybe it wasn't 0:48:39.840 --> 0:48:42.560 reported or it wasn't said, but um, this one was. 0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:46.040 So they're talking about it quad injury. Anybody that's going 0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:47.800 to carry the ball and run the ball like that 0:48:48.239 --> 0:48:50.120 is going to be banged up at some point, but 0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:53.600 it hasn't mattered for this guy. You start, Lamar Jackson, No, 0:48:53.760 --> 0:48:56.000 I have sins are, but there's no quarterback better than 0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:58.800 him this year. So there's nobody that you should be 0:48:58.840 --> 0:48:59.680 starting in front of him.