WEBVTT - Disney Shareholder Meeting, Tesla Deliveries Miss

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steina and Paul'sweenye.

0:00:14.520 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>The real app performance has been in US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough?

0:00:19.040 --> 0:00:20.280
<v Speaker 4>Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.159
<v Speaker 1>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.920
<v Speaker 3>The window between the peak and cut changing super fast.

0:00:37.080 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steinall and Paul's Wheenie on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>On Today's Bloomberg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.440
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:53.920 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Today, we'll look at why Tesla's first quarter deliveries missed

0:00:56.440 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street expectations.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:00:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Let's we'll look at why things are looking up for

0:00:59.280 --> 0:01:00.640
<v Speaker 4>the shipping company ups.

0:01:00.840 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>But first we begin with the Walt Disney Company. This

0:01:02.840 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 1>week's shareholders handed CEO Bob Biger, a big vote of

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:07.199
<v Speaker 1>confidence at the company's annual meeting.

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:10.760
<v Speaker 3>The shareholders rejected activist investor Nelson Peltz's bid for a

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:13.360
<v Speaker 3>board seat and elected all of Disney's choices for the board.

0:01:13.600 --> 0:01:16.280
<v Speaker 3>Peltz's Tree On Fund Management holds a Disney stake both

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 3>more than three and a half billion dollars and has

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 3>been pushing for seats to address lagging shareholder returns.

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Also, when the news, Paramount Global, the parent of CBS

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>and MTV, is getting closer to a deal to merge

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:30.040
<v Speaker 1>with independent producer David Ellison's Skydance Media. For more and

0:01:30.120 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 1>all of this, we were joined by Githa Rong and

0:01:31.640 --> 0:01:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Nathan Bloomberg, intelligence analyst on media. We first asked Githa

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>for her take on this week's news.

0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 5>Definitely a huge sigh of relief for both Bob Biger

0:01:41.200 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 5>and the management team. I mean, it would have been,

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 5>I think a very very publicly embarrassing thing for him

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:49.680
<v Speaker 5>if Pelts had had won. So this is definitely I

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 5>think gives them some something to cheer about, at least

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:55.400
<v Speaker 5>in the near term. So I think it's really business

0:01:55.400 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 5>as usual, right. They had their work cut out for them.

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 5>They know exactly what they need to do, whether it's

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 5>it's finding a proper good ESPN digital strategy, whether it's

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 5>getting the streaming business to profits, and more importantly for

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:10.200
<v Speaker 5>the board, whether it's chalking out a really bullet proof

0:02:10.320 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 5>succession plan this time around.

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>And on that succession plan, is the expectation getha that

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.359
<v Speaker 1>they will hire from within or will they try to

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.639
<v Speaker 1>make a big splash by hiring an outsider.

0:02:22.720 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 6>How do you think Disney would like to proceed?

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 5>Disney has always kind of looked within, Paul, and you

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 5>know this well. I mean the last time that they

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:33.040
<v Speaker 5>went external was back in nineteen eighty four. That's when

0:02:33.080 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 5>they hired you know, Michael Eisner, right, the Barry Diller protege.

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:39.799
<v Speaker 5>But after that, it's always been internal, right, whether it's

0:02:40.280 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 5>Bob Bieger, I mean it was Barb Biger after that

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:44.919
<v Speaker 5>for almost fifteen years, and then of course you had

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 5>Bob Japek for a couple of years, and then you know,

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 5>we have Bob Bieger two point zero back again. So

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 5>they've always kind of had, you know more, they've always

0:02:53.800 --> 0:02:57.520
<v Speaker 5>looked internal, and they do have four solid candidates, so

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:04.240
<v Speaker 5>all the division chiefs kind of emerge as potential successor candidates.

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 5>It's just going to be up to how they groomed them.

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 5>Is Barbiger going to do something very similar to what

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:11.560
<v Speaker 5>he did with you know, Tom's tags and Jay Rizzulo

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 5>kind of have that coo position for somebody whom he's

0:03:15.880 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 5>kind of looking to to elevate.

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.120
<v Speaker 4>What's the time frame here, KEITHA for this, it.

0:03:20.080 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 5>Has to happen pretty quickly, Alex. I mean barb Biger's term,

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 5>which was initially when he came back in November twenty

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 5>twenty two, was supposed to be two years. They extended

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 5>that out to four years, so we have until the

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:32.680
<v Speaker 5>end of twenty twenty six.

0:03:33.040 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and he's been known to extend extend extent. I mean,

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>he could do that because most shareholders are like Bob

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Biger's better than anybody else out there, will stick with that.

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, So things seem to be settling down a

0:03:42.400 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>little bit of stability. Returning to Mickey Mouse, how about

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a Paramount Global?

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:48.440
<v Speaker 6>It's almost the opposite. Are they going to sell the.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>Entire company parts of the company super voting stock?

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:52.880
<v Speaker 6>What's going on there?

0:03:53.120 --> 0:03:55.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So it looks like now they have or they've

0:03:55.960 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 5>entered this period of exclusive talks with Skydance Media, and

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.839
<v Speaker 5>Skydance Media has kind of been this on again, off

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 5>again interested party in the Paramount company, but of course

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:08.240
<v Speaker 5>they didn't want to come out with a bid for

0:04:08.280 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 5>the entire company at least up until this point. They

0:04:10.040 --> 0:04:12.120
<v Speaker 5>always kind of wanted to do it in a slightly

0:04:12.160 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 5>different way by kind of taking control of the voting

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 5>stock with through National Amusements and the red Stone family.

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.960
<v Speaker 5>Now it looks like they're kind of going to engineer

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 5>like a two step process where they first take control

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:26.960
<v Speaker 5>of National Amusements and then go about and merge sky

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:30.800
<v Speaker 5>Dance with the entire company with Paramount. So still, I mean,

0:04:30.839 --> 0:04:34.320
<v Speaker 5>there's just more unknowns than knowns at this point. There

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 5>seems to be some report out there suggesting that they

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 5>would need to do an equity deal raise of at

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:41.360
<v Speaker 5>least three billion dollars. That's going to be really dilutive

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 5>for the current shareholders. Again, we don't know exactly how

0:04:44.839 --> 0:04:48.200
<v Speaker 5>much Sherry Redstone is demanding for her voting stock. There

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 5>are rumors out there suggesting it's upwards of about two

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.119
<v Speaker 5>to two and a half billion dollars. She also owns

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 5>about close to almost a billion dollars in economic stake

0:04:56.360 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 5>in Paramount. So again, too many unknowns right now, Paul,

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 5>But you know, we do definitely have concrete talks. That

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 5>much is for sure.

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 3>So is the Apollo thing like off the table, right,

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:10.280
<v Speaker 3>because that would be more of a piecemeal approach to Paramount, right,

0:05:10.320 --> 0:05:12.159
<v Speaker 3>even though the cash deal was better.

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 5>So the Apollo thing was actually initially it was it

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 5>was piecemeals. So, but they only was really interested in

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 5>the film studio. They did not want the TV networks,

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.599
<v Speaker 5>They did not want the streaming asset. But it looks

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:26.600
<v Speaker 5>like when reports emerge about the Skydance deal, they said

0:05:26.600 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 5>that Apollo actually had made a twenty six billion offer,

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 5>an all cash deal for the entire company, which Sherry

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:36.279
<v Speaker 5>Redstone for some reason basically said note.

0:05:36.160 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 1>To So, what's the future. I mean, this is the

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.359
<v Speaker 1>Paramount studio, geeth that this is one of the prize

0:05:41.480 --> 0:05:44.880
<v Speaker 1>jewels in Hollywood. I mean, what happens to this company?

0:05:44.920 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is it can remain a publicly traded company?

0:05:47.800 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 6>Is it going to be taken private?

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 5>I think the most likely out come at this point, Paul,

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 5>is that it still very much remains a public company.

0:05:53.640 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 5>You know, we know that David Ellison is really only

0:05:56.160 --> 0:05:58.320
<v Speaker 5>interested in the studio portion of the business, and you're

0:05:58.320 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 5>absolutely right. It's an iconic studio, there's no doubt about it.

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 5>They have a very, very valuable studio lot right in

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.840
<v Speaker 5>the heart of la that's worth maybe upwards of one

0:06:07.880 --> 0:06:10.480
<v Speaker 5>point five two billion dollars. So obviously there's a lot

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.960
<v Speaker 5>of assets that he likes, but only with the studio business.

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 5>So again the question is, yes, he can keep it

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 5>a public company, but he might really kind of trim

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.919
<v Speaker 5>it down, try and find some buyers for the TV network,

0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:24.080
<v Speaker 5>for probably the streaming platform, and just make this like

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:28.080
<v Speaker 5>a pure play kind of a film studio with production

0:06:28.160 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 5>and licensing operations, very similar to what lions Gate is doing.

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to Githa Ranganath and Bloomberg Intelligence senior annals

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>covering media.

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 3>Back in January, Bloomberg Intelligence came up with a list

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 3>of fifty companies to watch in twenty twenty four, and

0:06:40.600 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 3>now they're back with a list of ten companies specifically

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:44.279
<v Speaker 3>for the second quarter.

0:06:44.680 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>This is based on scenarios from our bi analysts who

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 1>sort of threw the barrel to find the good apples

0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:51.160
<v Speaker 1>across sectors and regions.

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:51.840
<v Speaker 7>For more.

0:06:51.839 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>We were join by Tim craigkh Heat, Bloomberg Intelligence Research

0:06:54.560 --> 0:06:57.159
<v Speaker 1>Director for Content. We first asked him to talk about

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 1>the companies on this list.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 7>A couple of things to keep in mind. We are

0:07:00.320 --> 0:07:04.240
<v Speaker 7>top ten or two Q. These are part of a

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 7>broader set of focus ideas that we've got. There's roughly

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:09.720
<v Speaker 7>seventy five to eighty of them right now, across sectors,

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 7>across regions. These specifically have important catalysts coming up into

0:07:15.160 --> 0:07:18.120
<v Speaker 7>Q that we think can bring the market around to

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 7>our perspective. All of these focus ideas have really strong,

0:07:21.760 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 7>high conviction fundamental views that we think are different from

0:07:25.440 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 7>the market, and these catalysts should bring that awareness around.

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 7>It's a group of US companies. There's four of them,

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 7>there's three in Europe, three in Asia, and they span

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:44.080
<v Speaker 7>the gamut from healthcare, medtech products to big financials to tires.

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 7>So interesting group.

0:07:45.960 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>And Tim, one of the ones that you know, I've

0:07:48.400 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>been kind of thinking about. I just think these Olympics

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in Parish are going to be just huge, and I'm

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 1>thinking that ways to play it. You guys have one

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of them in the lodging space. Talk to us about

0:07:57.320 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity.

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:02.679
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, we do at Core. It's a big French hotel company.

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 7>You might not know Akor, but you probably know some

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 7>of their underlying brands. And you know, anybody who's made

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:14.600
<v Speaker 7>a hotel booking as of late knows that the prices

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 7>seem to be really high. Surprisingly, so that's feeding Akor's

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.400
<v Speaker 7>rev par they're pricing, which is playing through into profit margins.

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 7>And the catalyst for these guys is, in fact, Paris Olympics.

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 7>We should start to see early booking data over the

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 7>course of two Q heading into Summer Olympics. No, Paris

0:08:35.960 --> 0:08:38.560
<v Speaker 7>is only one part of their portfolio. They're across Europe

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 7>and Asia, and we're seeing a strong sustained travel recovery

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.480
<v Speaker 7>story that we think is better than consensus expects.

0:08:44.720 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 4>But apparently they have to like clean out the send.

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Did you read that that there's so much to you,

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Like can you imagine being Olympic swimmer and like those

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:53.200
<v Speaker 3>garbage hitting you in the end. I mean they're working

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 3>on it.

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:54.319
<v Speaker 6>They're definitely working on it.

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 4>Okay, you your second one is in retail chow Tai fuk.

0:08:58.000 --> 0:08:59.920
<v Speaker 3>No one's going to know this company here in the US,

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 3>So tell us about it and why this makes the outlook.

0:09:02.440 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 7>That and the next one on the list from an

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 7>alphabetical perspective are both sort of interesting twists on the

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 7>same underlying theme, and that's China. We all know that

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 7>there's problems in China from the standpoint of the property market,

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 7>and now that's playing through in terms of sentiment, the

0:09:19.160 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 7>wealth effect on spending plans, et cetera. Chautai Fuk is

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:28.040
<v Speaker 7>arguably the best known Chinese retailer when it comes to jewelry,

0:09:28.320 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 7>and it's a big market historically for tourists and travelers

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 7>coming into Hong Kong and to make those purchases. In fact,

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 7>what we're seeing right now is Hong kongers are going

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:42.120
<v Speaker 7>out of Hong Kong across the border in the mainland

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 7>China to shop for pretty much everything because it's cheaper.

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 7>So you combine that with negative sentiment, we think Hong

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.720
<v Speaker 7>Kong retail sales are going to disappoint and Chautai Fuk

0:09:52.000 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 7>is a poster child. The other one, CSC Financial is

0:09:57.080 --> 0:10:00.559
<v Speaker 7>one of the largest Chinese brokerages you know good old fashion,

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 7>you know wealth management, and they are the investment banking business.

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 7>We think is set for disappointment because IPOs and other

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:12.920
<v Speaker 7>new stock listings are way underwater. You know, we think

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:16.240
<v Speaker 7>you're going to see investment banking revenue disappoint You.

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Know, I was looking through the list here, Tim, and

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:20.480
<v Speaker 1>I was looking for a name from Michael Dean and

0:10:20.520 --> 0:10:22.880
<v Speaker 1>the European Autos team, and I think I found one

0:10:22.920 --> 0:10:24.320
<v Speaker 1>in Perelli Tires.

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 7>Yes, indeed, I started to say, if you're an F

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.560
<v Speaker 7>one fan, but that's more from a European perspective than

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 7>NASCAR in the US. But Perelli is a well known

0:10:34.840 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 7>tire maker and what they're doing is twofold number one

0:10:39.520 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 7>upgrading their mix.

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 6>They're getting rid.

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 7>Of some of their lower end products. And number two,

0:10:44.320 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 7>they've taken on a pretty big initiative to shift production

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 7>from core Europe to places like Romania over here in

0:10:51.679 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 7>Mexico over there, all of which is driving better margins.

0:10:56.360 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 7>And we think that this is going to continue more

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 7>than what consensus currently he bakes in.

0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Plus, it's from one of my favorite analysts over in

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.240
<v Speaker 1>our London office, Gillian Davis, doing some good work there,

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:06.960
<v Speaker 1>so good stuff.

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 4>Home building Taylor Morrison made the list.

0:11:09.840 --> 0:11:11.520
<v Speaker 3>That's not normally the company you think of when you

0:11:11.559 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 3>think of like a homebuilder, right you're thinking lenar KB homes,

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. How does one make a list.

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 7>They're continuing to expand, specifically in some larger developments in

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 7>Florida and Texas, and it just seems to be a

0:11:24.800 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 7>case of good old fashioned running the numbers with those

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 7>expansion plans feeding through and their order book coming through

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 7>better than anticipated, where we think their positive surprises ad

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 7>but it is a classic story from the standpoint of

0:11:41.400 --> 0:11:43.840
<v Speaker 7>expanding order books, expanding volumes.

0:11:44.040 --> 0:11:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You know one name that's on here that surprising, but

0:11:46.640 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a potential rule opportunity is Tencent talks

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:52.720
<v Speaker 1>about that big Chinese e commerce because for a lot

0:11:52.760 --> 0:11:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of people, Tim as you well know, China's kind of

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>taboot right now.

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 6>From an investment perspective.

0:11:56.960 --> 0:11:59.880
<v Speaker 7>It is, especially when it comes to technology and regulat

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 7>where he concerns and you know, Beijing focusing in on

0:12:04.120 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 7>you know what the big tech companies are doing. You know,

0:12:07.080 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 7>historically these have ten cents driven by online gaming and

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 7>that growth rate is still somewhat muted, but there's more

0:12:18.200 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 7>video that's coming through. There's AI assisted advertising that is growing.

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 7>Both of those are drivers of their income statement that

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 7>we think are underappreciated. We think it's mid team's growth

0:12:30.320 --> 0:12:32.800
<v Speaker 7>going forward, but if you do the math, the market

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 7>seems to be discounting basically static to maybe low single

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 7>digit growth rates. And so there it's just a it's

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 7>just a case where we think the market doesn't realize

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 7>that they're back to having good, solid forward growth.

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to Tim Craik, he had Bloomberg Intelligence Research

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>director for content.

0:12:50.640 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 3>All right, coming up, we're going to discuss with Tesla's

0:12:52.480 --> 0:12:55.319
<v Speaker 3>first quarter delivery mis means for the EV space.

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.720
<v Speaker 1>Listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing end up

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 1>research and data on two thousand and companies and one.

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:01.880
<v Speaker 6>Hundred and thirty industries.

0:13:02.120 --> 0:13:05.080
<v Speaker 1>You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via big on the terminal.

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.079
<v Speaker 4>I'm Paul Sweeney and I'm Alex Steele, and.

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:08.079
<v Speaker 3>This is Bloomberg.

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.679
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple car Playing and

0:13:19.800 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 2>Broud Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:27.040
<v Speaker 2>wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 4>We look next at the EVS space.

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:32.760
<v Speaker 3>So this week Tesla reported first quarter vehicle deliveries it

0:13:32.800 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 3>felt fourteen percent short of analyst expectations, and this also

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:39.240
<v Speaker 3>represented Tesla's first year over year decline and delivery since

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:40.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty.

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:41.600
<v Speaker 6>This comes to us to EV maker.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Rivian reported that it delivered more EV's last quarter than

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street expected. For more on all of this, we

0:13:46.880 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>were joined by Steve Man, Global Autos and Industrials Research analysts.

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>We first asked Steve what Tesla's miss means for the

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>company going forward.

0:13:54.600 --> 0:13:56.200
<v Speaker 8>I mean, it's a bad time. You know, they just

0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 8>actually raise prices on their cars, puts in the question

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:03.000
<v Speaker 8>about that strategy. There's a lot of questions out there,

0:14:03.040 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 8>you know, with you know, the end market, the consumer

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 8>hesitating a bit on buying evs. So what's going to

0:14:10.120 --> 0:14:13.439
<v Speaker 8>be for Tesla going forward? Definitely their one point million

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:18.199
<v Speaker 8>target sales target for the year is definitely at risk.

0:14:18.559 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 4>Do we know why?

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:21.640
<v Speaker 3>Like, what's the why behind it? They're going to talk

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 3>about production misses in terms of supply chain issues, et cetera.

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 3>But then Ruvian kind of crushed it, So so what's

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 3>the real reason here?

0:14:30.280 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, they actually you know, TESTA attributed to the RESC hostilities,

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.240
<v Speaker 8>and you know that's that's partly right, because a lot

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.160
<v Speaker 8>of their Model three and Model why they're most the

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:43.520
<v Speaker 8>best selling vehicles actually come from China. And you know,

0:14:43.880 --> 0:14:45.840
<v Speaker 8>you know, you would assume a lot of these vehicles

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 8>are shipped through the Pacific Ocean, avoiding the Red Sea.

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:51.520
<v Speaker 8>But we'll give them benefit of the doubt that it

0:14:51.680 --> 0:14:57.640
<v Speaker 8>had some impact. Maybe it's not necessarily the shipment of vehicles.

0:14:57.640 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 8>Maybe the shipment of parts right through the Red Sea

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:04.200
<v Speaker 8>that's impacted the production in China. And remember they actually

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.920
<v Speaker 8>cut some of the some production in China recently as well,

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 8>so you know that could be the reason. But like

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 8>you said, Rivian sales have gone up. You know, is

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 8>there anything specific to Tesla? I don't. I don't really

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 8>think so.

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 9>One.

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:21.320
<v Speaker 8>You know, one quarter is not gonna tell us the

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.720
<v Speaker 8>trend for the long term. I think Tesla vehicles are

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:27.880
<v Speaker 8>still you know, liked by a lot of consumer. We

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.960
<v Speaker 8>just did a survey actually recently, a buying intention survey.

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:35.800
<v Speaker 8>You know, Tesla has the greatest rand loyalty still amongst

0:15:35.840 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 8>all brands in the in the auto industry.

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Yes, the big question on investors' minds is what is

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 1>the real demand for evs in general?

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 6>And Tesla in particular.

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Look in I guess the near and intermediate term.

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 6>Do you have a view on that.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean I've always thought that not only Tesla,

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 8>but the entire eating market is going through a rough

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.160
<v Speaker 8>patch this year and likely into the next year. My

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.080
<v Speaker 8>long term view is still optimistic about EV's. I think

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:09.720
<v Speaker 8>there's enough policies out there to push greener vehicles, more

0:16:09.760 --> 0:16:13.640
<v Speaker 8>greener vehicles on the road. I think the issue today

0:16:13.760 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 8>is aboutffordability. There's actually not enough affordable EV's out there

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 8>for the masses currently. A lot of vehicles are expensive.

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 8>They're over fifty thousand dollars. A lot of people can

0:16:26.920 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 8>buy them, especially during high interest rate environments.

0:16:31.480 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 3>That has been the rhetoric really for a bit, and

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk seems to say, Okay, we're going to do

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 3>the lower cost, but give us a second.

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:41.400
<v Speaker 3>We had this wave of Model Y, Model three, et cetera,

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:43.600
<v Speaker 3>and now we're going to have another wave of.

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 4>More affordable EV's. Well, when does that wave happen.

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:48.360
<v Speaker 8>A lot of it actually comes online at the end

0:16:48.400 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 8>of twenty twenty five. Starts coming online at at the

0:16:50.960 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 8>end of twenty twenty five. That's when you have a

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 8>Model two. GM is also relaunching the more affordable Bolt.

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.840
<v Speaker 8>All of them are you know, thirty thousand or less.

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 8>And then you have you know, GM will continue to

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 8>roll out cheaper vehicles, and you have Rivian also launching

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 8>the R two and R three, you know, in twenty

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:14.720
<v Speaker 8>twenty six and twenty twenty seven.

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:16.760
<v Speaker 3>So it doesn't want a car Nambar two by the way,

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 3>total side note, I mean everyone, but go ahead.

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, but you know, a lot a lot of more

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 8>affordable EV's coming in and the hope is that, you know,

0:17:25.160 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 8>the addressable market for the EV, market for the EV

0:17:28.960 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 8>industry expands as the cheaper cars come on the road

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 8>and are available to consumers.

0:17:34.600 --> 0:17:37.040
<v Speaker 1>If I were an investor in this company, I'd be saying, Okay,

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.840
<v Speaker 1>you need to bring in a cheaper priced car for

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the mash market, but I'm not sure you can convince

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 1>me that you could do it at a profit.

0:17:45.560 --> 0:17:46.800
<v Speaker 6>What's the expectation of.

0:17:46.760 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Their ability to turn out lower price models on a

0:17:49.880 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>per unit profitable basis.

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 8>That That's a very good question. I think scale is

0:17:55.280 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 8>the most important thing. I mean, this is a scale

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 8>volume game in the auto industry has has been like

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 8>that for one hundred years. So the question is are

0:18:04.520 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 8>the cheaper vehicles going to resonate as you push more

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:11.119
<v Speaker 8>production through an assembly plant. In the auto industry, the

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 8>unicost does fall significantly in a logarithmic kind of trend,

0:18:17.080 --> 0:18:21.520
<v Speaker 8>so we're hoping that it will cut. But specifically to Tesla,

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 8>I would have also mention that they've done a really

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:29.520
<v Speaker 8>good job in vertically integrating their processes throughout the whole

0:18:29.600 --> 0:18:34.160
<v Speaker 8>value chain, right, and that actually does cut costs, especially

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 8>in newer tech like this. You know, if I look

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:41.639
<v Speaker 8>at over one hundred years ago, Henry Ford basically did

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:45.679
<v Speaker 8>the same thing. You know, switching everybody from horse carriages

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 8>to automobiles actually required vertical required Ford to be to

0:18:50.800 --> 0:18:55.400
<v Speaker 8>vertically integrate and able to manage costs and manage design

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.880
<v Speaker 8>and be nimble and flexible to react to consumers.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to Steve Man Global Autos and Industrial Research Jonalysts.

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:06.200
<v Speaker 3>Earlier in the week, we were joined by Matt Winkler,

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.159
<v Speaker 3>Editor in chief Emeritus at Bloomberg News. He's also been

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.280
<v Speaker 3>writing a series of opinion pieces on key swing states

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:13.280
<v Speaker 3>in the US.

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 1>And that's latest piece. His research focused on Georgia. His

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>economy has been booming over the last few decades. We

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.840
<v Speaker 1>began our conversation with Matt by asking him to discuss

0:19:21.840 --> 0:19:23.359
<v Speaker 1>his findings in Georgia.

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 10>Georgia population of more than eleven million makes it the

0:19:26.600 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 10>eighth largest state, and it's booming right now like it

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 10>never did before Joe Biden became the forty sixth president.

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:37.880
<v Speaker 10>And we know this because not since data was initially

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:40.480
<v Speaker 10>collected in nineteen ninety has there been a three year

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 10>period when growth in the Peach States manufacturing payrolls came

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 10>close to matching the eleven point nine percent increase in

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 10>jobs since twenty twenty one, or its rate of employment

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 10>gains compared with the US overall. And that's according to

0:19:56.880 --> 0:19:59.879
<v Speaker 10>data compiled by Bloomberg. So we are seeing a man

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 10>manufacturing boom, job boom in Georgia the likes of which

0:20:04.080 --> 0:20:07.960
<v Speaker 10>Georgia has never seen. And by the way, this is

0:20:08.520 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 10>counter to the trend in the twenty first century. Every

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 10>presidency in the New century except Biden's has seen a

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 10>decline in manufacturing jobs. So this is a departure.

0:20:20.520 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 3>So how much of that do you attribute to the

0:20:22.880 --> 0:20:25.399
<v Speaker 3>Chips Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, Because something that

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 3>gets lost in all this messaging is with the IRA

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 3>for example, so much of that money is actually going

0:20:30.040 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 3>to Red States because they have the space to build stuff.

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 10>Well, there's no question that actually Red states are a

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.399
<v Speaker 10>big beneficiary. But it's not just the American Rescue Act

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 10>of twenty twenty one. It's also the Infrastructure Investment Jobs Act,

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:50.160
<v Speaker 10>the Chips and Science Act again, the Inflation Reduction Act,

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:56.159
<v Speaker 10>all of which have helped Biden make a legitimate claim,

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:00.000
<v Speaker 10>which is he created close to eight hundred thousand manufacturing

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 10>jobs since he took office. And we know this is

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 10>not an idle boast because those very careful fact checkers

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 10>called PolitiFact actually took a look at this claim and

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:15.680
<v Speaker 10>they showed that the nation's manufacturing rebound is the strongest

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 10>at this point after a recession since nineteen fifty one.

0:21:20.200 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 1>Is Georgia per se doing anything right versus I mean,

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.000
<v Speaker 1>is this all just the largest of the federal government

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 1>met or does Georgia have just better incentives better tax incentives?

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:33.080
<v Speaker 6>Are they doing something maybe some other states aren't doing well.

0:21:33.280 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 10>Well, there's no question that some of the credit has

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 10>to go to, as I said, these acts, because the

0:21:41.119 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 10>investments include, for example, South Korea's Hanwa Solutions Corp. Expansion

0:21:47.880 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 10>of solar panel and manufacturing. They were already there. They

0:21:51.200 --> 0:21:53.639
<v Speaker 10>got incentives to do a lot more than what they

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:58.680
<v Speaker 10>were doing. The same thing with Hyundai with EV vehicles,

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.640
<v Speaker 10>they're already there doing more. And then there's this battery

0:22:02.640 --> 0:22:06.240
<v Speaker 10>company from Norway, freyer Or Battery, which is going to

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 10>make clean battery manufacturing in Coueda County in Georgia. So

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 10>those things are definitely tied to the incentives that come

0:22:16.720 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 10>out of these acts. There's no question state and local

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:25.239
<v Speaker 10>officials have been supportive. But interestingly enough, the governor of

0:22:25.280 --> 0:22:28.920
<v Speaker 10>Georgia voted against or would have voted against, the Inflation

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 10>Reduction Act. All of the Republicans in Congress voted against

0:22:33.359 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 10>the Inflation Reduction Act, which is a big part of

0:22:36.400 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 10>why Georgia is doing well. But they're not ready to

0:22:39.480 --> 0:22:42.679
<v Speaker 10>give the money back. Of course, they're very happy that

0:22:42.720 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 10>it's all happening.

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:46.600
<v Speaker 3>We have seen with some of these acts that we

0:22:46.640 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 3>get all excited about the money that's being spent, but

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 3>then getting the shovel in the ground and actually doing

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 3>the hiring in the manufacturing gets delayed a little bit

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.680
<v Speaker 3>and gets pushed out or the plans get scaled back

0:22:58.720 --> 0:23:01.760
<v Speaker 3>a bit. Are we seeing any this in Georgia or

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.880
<v Speaker 3>is the outlook particularly rosy.

0:23:04.400 --> 0:23:06.639
<v Speaker 10>It's more of the latter, you know. And then again

0:23:06.680 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 10>the proof of that is that if you look at

0:23:10.040 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 10>the unemployment rate in Georgia, it actually declined most recently

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 10>and is several percentage points, you know, less than the

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 10>national average. So you know, unemployment in the US actually

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 10>has ticked up a bit. In Georgia, it's gone the

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 10>other way. And that's an example that the boom is

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.400
<v Speaker 10>very much underway and shows no signs of abating.

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have to remind yourself, I mean, how

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy in the South has really changed from you know,

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:46.199
<v Speaker 1>agricultural textiles, you know, very low technology touch types of

0:23:46.240 --> 0:23:49.199
<v Speaker 1>industries to now it seems like every new autoplant that

0:23:50.119 --> 0:23:53.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, international automakers, they want to build them in

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the movie studios. So much investments going to the Southeast.

0:23:57.320 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's again been a twenty third thirty year story.

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>What's next on your state?

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:24:03.480 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 6>What state is? Next year?

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:11.640
<v Speaker 10>We'll probably get to Nevada. So we've done Pennsylvania, Michigan,

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 10>now Georgia, and we're working through the list.

0:24:16.600 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>So if you were advising President Biden his campaign about

0:24:21.840 --> 0:24:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the messaging here, what would you say in terms of

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:27.320
<v Speaker 1>because I would argue that the messaging has not been effective,

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that this message of economic success has not been told.

0:24:31.040 --> 0:24:33.520
<v Speaker 10>Well, I'd say, actually, their messaging has been pretty good.

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.440
<v Speaker 10>A lot of this data that we've compiled at Bloomberg

0:24:37.200 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 10>is available in various announcements from either the White House

0:24:41.720 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 10>or the Treasury. But the saying is, you know, you

0:24:44.680 --> 0:24:47.160
<v Speaker 10>can lead a horse to water, but you can't get

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 10>the horse to drink. The horse in this case is

0:24:50.119 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 10>our profession, the media, and it's pretty much ignored what's

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 10>in front of its nose, which are the facts. So

0:24:57.080 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 10>unless reporters find this relevant, I do uh for it.

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 10>You know, they'd rather focus on polls, and so that's

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 10>perception not reality.

0:25:08.960 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Before we went on the area, you made a comment

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>about California. How big is that economy now? Because I

0:25:14.000 --> 0:25:15.280
<v Speaker 1>used to to me it was the seventh or y

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:16.600
<v Speaker 1>largest economy, it's number four.

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 10>It's now numbers and it's poised to overtake Germany. And

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 10>that's because you know, you keep talking about the Magnificent

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 10>seven on this show. Ye if you look at Corporate California.

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 10>Corporate California just dwarfs Corporate Anywhere, dwarfs Corporate Texas. It

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:39.360
<v Speaker 10>dwarfs Corporate Germany. Corporate California is still a juggernaut. And

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 10>you know who those companies are. But it's not just

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.879
<v Speaker 10>the big companies. It's big and small companies alike in

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.640
<v Speaker 10>the Russell three thousand that make California unique.

0:25:48.800 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Our thanks to Matt Winkler, editor in Chief Emeritus at

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg News.

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Coming up on the program, we're going to take a

0:25:53.280 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 3>look at the expanded partnership between UPS and the United

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 3>States Postal Service.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.440
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, aidding into

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>research and data. Are two thousand companies in one hundred

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and thirty industries. You can access Boomberg Intelligence b ab

0:26:05.960 --> 0:26:07.080
<v Speaker 1>I go on the terminal of.

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:10.800
<v Speaker 3>Paul Sweeney atamlex Deal and this is Bloomberg.

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:26:18.280 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 2>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android Auto

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.000
<v Speaker 2>with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen live

0:26:25.080 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 2>on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station. Just

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.960
<v Speaker 2>say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 4>We turn now to the logistics industry.

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 3>UPS announced this week that it had been awarded a

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 3>significant air cargo contract by the United States Postal Service.

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:44.760
<v Speaker 3>This comes after FedEx said its agreement to provide domestic

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.560
<v Speaker 3>transportation services for USPS we'll expire on September twenty ninth.

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>For more, we were joined by Lee Classical Bloomberg Intelligence

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:54.959
<v Speaker 1>senior Transport, Logistics and shipping analysts. We first asked Lee

0:26:55.000 --> 0:26:57.919
<v Speaker 1>for his reaction to UPS becoming the primary air cargo

0:26:57.960 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>provider for USPS.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:01.240
<v Speaker 11>This is somewhat of a surprise.

0:27:01.280 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 12>I think most people were expecting the FedEx would lose

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 12>maybe about half of that business, but they ended up

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 12>losing all of it. It's about one point seven to

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 12>one point nine billion dollars in revenue, makes up roughly

0:27:12.440 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 12>around four to five percent of their express business, maybe

0:27:15.160 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 12>two percent of their total business.

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 9>So it's a.

0:27:18.200 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 12>Big loss for fed X. And you know, while FedEx

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 12>is losing, UPS is gaining. What's great about this is

0:27:24.960 --> 0:27:27.639
<v Speaker 12>maybe not so much the revenue and the yields that

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:31.400
<v Speaker 12>it provides. It's the stability of the freight that it's

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 12>going to be getting into its network, And when you

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:37.159
<v Speaker 12>have any sort of freight network, you want equilibrium. You

0:27:37.200 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 12>want to be able to predict what you're going to

0:27:39.800 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 12>need in terms of resources, and this provides a good

0:27:42.960 --> 0:27:45.960
<v Speaker 12>level set of predictability for them and they can build

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 12>density onto these routes where the US Postal Service will

0:27:50.600 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 12>be leveraging.

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 6>Why is the Postal Service making the switch?

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:57.879
<v Speaker 11>That's a great question. They were negotiating with fed X.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 12>I guess the two parties couldn't come to a conclusion

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 12>in terms of an agreement, so therefore they just decided

0:28:05.920 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 12>to part ways. You know, one would guess that this

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 12>is maybe not the most high margin business for whether

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 12>it's UPS or FedEx. But again, I think there is

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 12>a benefit to having this because it does create a

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:19.439
<v Speaker 12>lot of density in their network.

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:20.760
<v Speaker 6>Let me ask a silly question.

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>When I'm looking to mail package, the United States Postal

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>Service does not even come into my mindset? Oh god, no, no,

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>who still uses the US Postal Service versus FedEx? Or

0:28:32.359 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 1>or you know a UPS store that's right next to

0:28:34.440 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>the Starbucks in town. I can go, you know, get

0:28:36.560 --> 0:28:37.800
<v Speaker 1>my cafe mocha there.

0:28:38.600 --> 0:28:40.320
<v Speaker 6>I'm not going to the post office. Who uses a

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 6>post office these days.

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 11>I mean I do. I guess I'm you do, but

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 11>I do sometimes. But but the reality is the postal service.

0:28:49.200 --> 0:28:52.400
<v Speaker 12>You know, obviously you were not sending letters to Grandma anymore.

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 11>But you know what we are doing is we're.

0:28:55.720 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 12>Ordering stuff online and the US Postal Service provides a

0:28:59.320 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 12>lot of the final mile delivery. So you might be

0:29:02.240 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 12>ordering from a department store or a dot com etailer,

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:10.080
<v Speaker 12>and you know, they might be using UPS and FedEx

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 12>for the line haul, but they might be leveraging the

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:17.040
<v Speaker 12>postal service for that final mile deliver because the postal

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 12>service at the end of the day has to go

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 12>to everyone's address, and it's a cheap way to do it.

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 12>And as more and more people are willing maybe don't

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 12>need that T shirt overnight, you can wait a couple

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 12>of days, you know, injecting that freight into the postal

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 12>service that makes sense. And Amazon's is a big user

0:29:32.160 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 12>of that final mile delivery as well.

0:29:34.520 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 4>My daughter does send letters to her grandmother. I'm just

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 4>putting that.

0:29:37.560 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 3>Out there on the flip side, and I should point

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 3>out they mentioned the margin part of it. So we

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 3>talked to the UPS CEO last week on television and

0:29:44.960 --> 0:29:47.640
<v Speaker 3>their whole pitch is that going forward, they want to

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:51.720
<v Speaker 3>focus on margin and pricing over volume. Does this fit

0:29:51.800 --> 0:29:52.720
<v Speaker 3>into that strategy?

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 12>Yes and no, so yes, because so what they're going

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.440
<v Speaker 12>to be focusing on are verticals like small to mid

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 12>size shippers, and those shippers come with very high margins

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 12>relative to you know, large enterprise companies that are out there,

0:30:08.680 --> 0:30:10.720
<v Speaker 12>so they're going to be really focused on that type

0:30:10.760 --> 0:30:13.760
<v Speaker 12>of business. But you know what the volumes from the

0:30:13.800 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 12>postal service brings is a level of density that you

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 12>can leverage because it's all about operational.

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 9>Leverage, right.

0:30:19.800 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 12>You know, no matter what you are in transportation, operational

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.120
<v Speaker 12>leverage is pretty high. Because you add like one more

0:30:26.360 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 12>piece of freight, that piece of freight tends to have

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 12>higher margins than the first twenty pieces of freight. And

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.480
<v Speaker 12>so what this will do is this will probably help

0:30:34.520 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 12>them provide a base level of cost coverage and you

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:40.640
<v Speaker 12>know what a profitable cost coverage at that and then

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.040
<v Speaker 12>all these additional volumes that they're getting from higher margin

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 12>might even carry higher incremental margins for ups. So long term,

0:30:49.200 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 12>it could have a very positive impact on margins. Near term,

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 12>it might have a negative mixshift, if you will, but

0:30:56.040 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 12>you know, we think that it.

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.719
<v Speaker 11>Does make sense for them to take this volume.

0:31:00.120 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 12>Other verticals also that they talked about during their analyst day,

0:31:03.320 --> 0:31:06.360
<v Speaker 12>or the healthcare vertical, which tends to be highly profitable

0:31:06.480 --> 0:31:08.960
<v Speaker 12>just because of the high touch nature and the high

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 12>service level of that freight that goes through their network.

0:31:12.120 --> 0:31:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So Lee looking at the air freight companies to the

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:17.000
<v Speaker 1>FedEx toups, how is business?

0:31:17.000 --> 0:31:18.800
<v Speaker 6>How are volumes these days?

0:31:18.800 --> 0:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Are they kind of peeled off from the pandemic or

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>how is volume?

0:31:22.480 --> 0:31:24.640
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so you know, we're coming off those highs that

0:31:24.680 --> 0:31:27.120
<v Speaker 12>we reached during the pandemic when everyone was sitting at

0:31:27.120 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 12>home and ordering toilet paper online or at least trying

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:31.720
<v Speaker 12>to get some toilet paper online.

0:31:32.200 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 11>You know, we're back to a more normalized level.

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:38.440
<v Speaker 12>You know, the reality is what the pandemic has done,

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:41.880
<v Speaker 12>is it really increased that e commerce penetration. Kind of

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:45.240
<v Speaker 12>brought the penetration forward by three to five years, which is.

0:31:45.160 --> 0:31:46.120
<v Speaker 11>A net positive.

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:47.840
<v Speaker 12>But you know, we have to go back to this

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:51.760
<v Speaker 12>quote unquote normalization process, which feels like a negative, but

0:31:51.800 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 12>it's really not. Because once we get this space, which

0:31:55.040 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 12>I think we're building right now, you know, we should

0:31:57.200 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 12>see positive growth from.

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.480
<v Speaker 3>Here on out O thanks to Lee Klaska, a Bloomberg

0:32:01.520 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 3>Intelligence senior Transport, Logistics and shipping analysts.

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This week we took a look at the Big Take

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>story Huber's at Hurts doomed its massive bet on one

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:12.920
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand Teslas. It's about how two finance veterans bought

0:32:13.000 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Hertz out of bankruptcy to save it.

0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 3>The Big Take piece takes an inside look at how

0:32:17.120 --> 0:32:19.320
<v Speaker 3>their big idea to go all in on EV's and

0:32:19.360 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 3>Tesla went wrong in almost every way. We were joined

0:32:22.440 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 3>by Eric Shasker, Bloomberg New Economy editorial director, who co

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:27.600
<v Speaker 3>wrote the Big Take piece, and we first asked Eric

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 3>for some context.

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:34.320
<v Speaker 13>The experience of a Tesla owner is very different from

0:32:34.360 --> 0:32:38.239
<v Speaker 13>the experience of a Tesla renter, and going into this

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.240
<v Speaker 13>big bet on one hundred thousand Tesla's they placed in

0:32:41.360 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 13>order for one hundred thousand Teslas. In fact, back in

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 13>twenty twenty one, the new owners at Hurtz didn't appreciate

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 13>that there were no data to be fair on what

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 13>it was like for our rental car company to have

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 13>evs in the fleet, because none did. Hertz was going

0:32:57.920 --> 0:33:00.479
<v Speaker 13>to be the first, and so they did look at

0:33:00.480 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 13>the data how to Tesla's perform when they're owned by individuals,

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 13>And generally speaking, Tesla's perform well. They don't require a

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 13>lot of maintenance. Obviously, refueling the car, so to speak,

0:33:13.080 --> 0:33:14.960
<v Speaker 13>is a matter of plugging it in. But if it's

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:17.480
<v Speaker 13>your Tesla, it probably sits in your garage, or it

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 13>sits in your driveway, or maybe if you live in

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 13>a city like New York, it's at a parking garage

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 13>and you've had a charger put in. That's all fine,

0:33:25.560 --> 0:33:27.360
<v Speaker 13>and these people tend not to get into a lot

0:33:27.400 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 13>of accidents, and they don't have range anxiety because they

0:33:30.760 --> 0:33:33.800
<v Speaker 13>own the car, they made the decision to buy it.

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 13>It's a totally different story when you get off of

0:33:38.760 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 13>a Red Eye flight and stroll up to the Hertz

0:33:44.040 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 13>counter and are told that no, I'm sorry, the car

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 13>you reserved is not available, but we're giving you a Tesla.

0:33:51.720 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 13>If you've never been behind the wheel of an EV

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 13>it can be a terrifying experience.

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 9>You don't know.

0:33:57.000 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 13>You don't want to have to find a charger in

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 13>the wild. You don't know what this instantaneous breaking is like.

0:34:02.600 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 4>Turn the car.

0:34:03.840 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 13>You don't realize that it has rocket like acceleration, and

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:10.600
<v Speaker 13>as a result, Hurts with its Tesla fleet, started running

0:34:10.640 --> 0:34:14.160
<v Speaker 13>into all kinds of problems. They were crashing and it's

0:34:14.239 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 13>very expensive to repair a Tesla. In many cases they

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 13>have to be junked because insurance companies are worried about

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 13>the damage that might have.

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:24.000
<v Speaker 9>Occurred to the battery.

0:34:24.080 --> 0:34:27.240
<v Speaker 13>People didn't want to rent them, so the demand wasn't there,

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 13>And then of course Elon Musk cut Tesla prices by

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 13>thirty percent and kind of blew a hole into Hurts's

0:34:33.600 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 13>balance sheet.

0:34:34.320 --> 0:34:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Economic mod How did Hurts get into this position, It's

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a good question.

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.720
<v Speaker 13>This was a rental car company, the only major rental

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 13>car company that went bankrupt in the early days of

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:46.320
<v Speaker 13>the pandemic.

0:34:46.360 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 6>I'm a gold circle member of Hurts. By the way,

0:34:48.920 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 6>I just strolled right up to my car, John.

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 13>Some people have very good experiences with Hertz, including Paul Sweeney. Evidently,

0:34:56.680 --> 0:34:59.400
<v Speaker 13>so Hurts went bankrupt. It was bought at a bankruptcy

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.839
<v Speaker 13>in June one by two professional investors.

0:35:02.880 --> 0:35:05.760
<v Speaker 9>Tom Wagner runs Nighthead Capital and.

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 13>Greg O'Hara is the founding partner at Satari's Management. They

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:12.800
<v Speaker 13>raised a billion and a half dollar fund. They wanted

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 13>to find travel and leisure companies that had been crushed

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 13>by the pandemic, but of course which in theory would

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.600
<v Speaker 13>soar once the economy reopened, and Hurts seemed like a

0:35:22.600 --> 0:35:26.480
<v Speaker 13>great candidate. And actually that part of the thesis played

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 13>out perfectly once the economy reopened. In fact, before the

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 13>economy reopened, when people realized getting into a car and

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:36.280
<v Speaker 13>driving somewhere doesn't put me at risk of COVID at all,

0:35:36.760 --> 0:35:41.160
<v Speaker 13>demand for rentals went sky high, and so coming out

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 13>of this acquisition from bankruptcy, Hurts was crushing it. But

0:35:44.880 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 13>they had a transformational plan to turn it into a

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:53.479
<v Speaker 13>largely electrified rental car company, and that's where everything went

0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 13>pear shaped. I talked about it, the demand, the damage,

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 13>the price cuts, and we say it's a tale of hubris,

0:36:02.160 --> 0:36:04.920
<v Speaker 13>because in many respects it is.

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 9>Of course, everything looks clear.

0:36:06.320 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 13>In hindsight, it did sound like an incredibly good idea

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 13>of the time, and I think for the sake of

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 13>the planet, it would be nice if you could electrify

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:20.320
<v Speaker 13>a rental car company and save you know, the environment

0:36:20.400 --> 0:36:23.320
<v Speaker 13>from all the gasoline that gets poured into rental cars.

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:29.000
<v Speaker 13>But it just doesn't work in practice, and whether it's arrogance,

0:36:29.080 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 13>whether it's hubris, whether it's blind optimism, it could be

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 13>a combination of all those three. These new owners, these

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:37.719
<v Speaker 13>professional investors, one who runs a hedge fund, the other

0:36:37.760 --> 0:36:40.799
<v Speaker 13>who runs a private equity firm, thought that they had

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 13>an answer for this industry that the industry itself had

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:45.080
<v Speaker 13>ignored for years.

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.960
<v Speaker 9>And the truth of the matter is running any company in.

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:54.279
<v Speaker 13>The industry is tough, right, requires some experience maybe, And.

0:36:54.239 --> 0:36:56.080
<v Speaker 3>The funny thing is, well, not for them, but is

0:36:56.120 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 3>that they could be right just either a little earlier,

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 3>a little late, depending on how you look at it.

0:37:00.760 --> 0:37:03.080
<v Speaker 13>Like you know, whenever we talk about it early right,

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.000
<v Speaker 13>it's the broken clock thing, right, broken clock is right

0:37:06.080 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 13>two times a day.

0:37:07.080 --> 0:37:08.799
<v Speaker 9>And the case of being early.

0:37:10.640 --> 0:37:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a great strategy when I first

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 1>heard it. Just sound to hit so many buttons there.

0:37:16.200 --> 0:37:17.600
<v Speaker 1>But I guess it kind of goes to the bigger

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:20.359
<v Speaker 1>question which we asked the auto industry have we seen

0:37:20.440 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 1>peak interest in evs?

0:37:21.960 --> 0:37:23.640
<v Speaker 3>But this is why I found the article so interesting,

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 3>because there were things that I didn't think about, in

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.360
<v Speaker 3>that they don't have dealerships, right, they don't have a

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:31.040
<v Speaker 3>relationship with dealerships. So like when my super retire gets,

0:37:31.160 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 3>you know, messed up, I did just drive it in

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 3>and then they fix it and then we drive out.

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 3>Kind of thing.

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 4>You can't do that with a Tesla.

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 3>I never thought of that. For example, I never thought

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:41.440
<v Speaker 3>of how difficult it would be to all of a

0:37:41.440 --> 0:37:43.360
<v Speaker 3>sudden get off a plane and go sit in a Tesla.

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 3>It's weird enough getting in the morning to a Tesla

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:47.799
<v Speaker 3>and getting in the back seat. I can't imagine just

0:37:47.800 --> 0:37:49.759
<v Speaker 3>being shoved into the front seat and having to drive

0:37:49.800 --> 0:37:51.920
<v Speaker 3>it at the same time. And these little details I

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:53.400
<v Speaker 3>found to be very provocative.

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 13>Well, they are, as you say, something of an indication

0:37:57.360 --> 0:38:00.360
<v Speaker 13>as to why demand for EV's right now is slowing.

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:00.880
<v Speaker 9>Hurts.

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 13>You know, we can play on the fact that it

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.480
<v Speaker 13>even has yellows. Part of its logo was the canary

0:38:07.480 --> 0:38:10.759
<v Speaker 13>in the coal mine for the EV industry. True what

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.279
<v Speaker 13>began to happen it hurts is what the rest of

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 13>the industry is beginning to wake up to that all

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:18.000
<v Speaker 13>of the evs that are being cranked out right now

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:22.399
<v Speaker 13>may not have a natural buyer because people aren't enough

0:38:22.520 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 13>chargers out there. People haven't gotten over this idea that

0:38:26.200 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 13>it's a different driving experience.

0:38:28.120 --> 0:38:29.399
<v Speaker 9>People, as we all know.

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:34.239
<v Speaker 13>Are very personal about their cars. Right, It's an extension

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:39.360
<v Speaker 13>of themselves. And you don't want your arm to feel

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:41.480
<v Speaker 13>like it doesn't belong on your body, and that's in

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:44.760
<v Speaker 13>some respects how people feel about getting behind the wheel

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 13>of an.

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 9>EV all Right.

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.800
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Eric Shasker, Bloomberg New Economy Editorial Director.

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 2>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:56.880
<v Speaker 2>and anywhere else you will get your podcasts. Listen live

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.920
<v Speaker 2>each weekday, ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg Dot,

0:39:00.680 --> 0:39:04.080
<v Speaker 2>the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app.

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 2>You can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:09.280
<v Speaker 2>and always on the Bloomberg terminal.