WEBVTT - Loss and Damage at COP 27

0:00:21.960 --> 0:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>The idea of loss and damages has been a real

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>focal point of the twenty seventh Conference of the Parties,

0:00:29.440 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>the annual UN Climate negotiations happening in Egypt last year

0:00:34.440 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>in Glasgow. Global North countries fought to keep the topic

0:00:37.960 --> 0:00:41.879
<v Speaker 1>off the agenda when it was made. This year's host country, Egypt,

0:00:41.960 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>vowed to put it on the agenda early and keep

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:49.600
<v Speaker 1>it there, and they've kept that promise. But I've been

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of big gaps in the media coverage

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>on this issue. Global South countries are often treated like

0:00:57.120 --> 0:01:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a monolith, and the discussion around how to handle countries

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>that are both on the front lines of the climate

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:08.520
<v Speaker 1>crisis and a major target for oil production is almost

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:12.279
<v Speaker 1>non existent. It's something I've been thinking about a lot

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>because we've been reporting a new season for the past

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>two years on Guyana and that country's emergence as an

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:24.080
<v Speaker 1>oil producing country, but also because I've spent so much

0:01:24.120 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>time looking at the history of climate policy and how

0:01:27.000 --> 0:01:31.759
<v Speaker 1>certain narratives have been shaped. The remarkable news out of

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>this year's cop is that negotiators, including those from the US,

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>which has historically been a big blocker to loss in damage,

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>agreed to officially establish a lost in Damage fund, but

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 1>there are still a lot of lingering questions around how

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the global North and the global South can move forward

0:01:52.000 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>on addressing climate together. There's the failure of negotiators to

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>agree to include any language in the final agreement around

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>phasing fossil fuels out, of course, but there are a

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>bunch of other conversations that need to happen to you,

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and those are all mostly informed by a history that

0:02:11.360 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 1>seems to be widely unknown or just ignored. Welcome back

0:02:17.200 --> 0:02:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to Drilled. I'm Amy Westervelt. In this episode, we're going

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to get into that history and unpack some of the

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:27.880
<v Speaker 1>messier details around cop and loss and damage that's coming

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>up after this quick break.

0:02:54.200 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 2>We have to ask ourselves, can we ever attain the

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 2>ultimate objective of the convention, which is to prevent dangerous

0:03:00.600 --> 0:03:06.040
<v Speaker 2>anthropogenic interference with a climate system. By failing to meet

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.359
<v Speaker 2>the objective of the convention, we may have rapified our

0:03:09.400 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 2>own doom. And if we have failed to meet the

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 2>objective of the convention, we have to confront the issue

0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 2>of loss and damage.

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 1>That's Yeb Sano, the Philippines chief negotiator in the United

0:03:21.639 --> 0:03:25.840
<v Speaker 1>Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, or UNF Triple C.

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>UNF Triple C is the basis for the annual Conference

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Parties. Those parties are the countries that have

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>signed on to the Framework Convention on Climate Change at SCHOOL. Initially,

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it was to bring the countries of the world together

0:03:40.640 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>to stop catastrophic climate change. During the twenty thirteen COP

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>in Warsaw, Sano's country was being devastated by super typhoon

0:03:49.760 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>High End, prompting Sauna to make the argument that the

0:03:53.160 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>UNF Triple C had failed to accomplish its original goal

0:03:57.720 --> 0:03:59.920
<v Speaker 1>and must now reassess.

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Loss and damage is a reality today across the world

0:04:06.080 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>and developed country emissions reduction targets are dangerously low and

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 2>must be raised immediately. But even if these were in

0:04:15.040 --> 0:04:18.239
<v Speaker 2>line with the demand of reducing forty to fifty percent

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.800
<v Speaker 2>below nineteen nine to levels, we will still have luck

0:04:20.960 --> 0:04:23.960
<v Speaker 2>in climate change, and we still would need to address

0:04:23.960 --> 0:04:25.320
<v Speaker 2>the issue of loss and damage.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:29.960
<v Speaker 1>After giving that speech, Sano went on a hunger strike,

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>saying he would not end it until global North countries

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:37.239
<v Speaker 1>committed to funding loss and damage. And here's fact number

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 1>one that I haven't seen in any news reports on COP.

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Those countries. At the twenty thirteen COP they agreed wealthy countries,

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:51.720
<v Speaker 1>including the United States, agreed that by twenty twenty they

0:04:51.760 --> 0:04:54.599
<v Speaker 1>would be putting one hundred billion dollars a year into

0:04:54.640 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>a loss in Damages fund, But so far only about

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty one billion dollars has ever been put in it,

0:05:02.320 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and most of what was supposed to be effectively grant

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:10.120
<v Speaker 1>money to global seuth countries in need of adaptation funding

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:15.800
<v Speaker 1>was turned into loans. More debt is not something the

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>majority of global sealth countries need. Last year, Barbados Prime

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Minister Mia Motley made history when she convinced the International

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Monetary Fund to help her hit pause on Barbados's debt

0:05:29.200 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 1>payments so that they could devote some of their GDP

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>to climate adaptation instead and hopefully get ahead of some

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.799
<v Speaker 1>of the climate impacts that they know are heading their way.

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.240
<v Speaker 1>This year, Motley is at COP with a proposal that

0:05:45.279 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>would help all Global South countries do the same. It's

0:05:49.040 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 1>called the Bridgetown Agenda. Here's Motley introducing it at COP.

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 3>Looks still too much like it did when it was

0:06:03.400 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 3>part of an imperialistic empire. The Global North borrows between

0:06:12.160 --> 0:06:16.000
<v Speaker 3>interest rates of between one to four percent, the global

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 3>south of fourteen percent, and then we wonder why they

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 3>just energy partnerships are not working. Similarly, we ask ourselves,

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 3>if countries that want to finance their way to NEET

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:33.680
<v Speaker 3>zero and want to do the right thing can't get

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 3>the critical supplies, will they not have to rely again

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:43.479
<v Speaker 3>on natural gases that clean bridge This is the ball reality,

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 3>and we have come here to ask us to open

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 3>our minds to different possibilities.

0:06:51.040 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Motley laid out the specifics of her plan in that

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>speech too, the establishment of a climate mitigation trust that

0:06:57.720 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>unlocks five trillion dollars of private sector savings, provided that

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the IMF will allow the use of its five hundred

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:10.160
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars special Drawing Rights reserve. That would require not

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>just a decision by the IMF but also its member states,

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>particularly the United States. As Motley made clear.

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 3>We believe that we have a plan. We believe that

0:07:21.640 --> 0:07:25.360
<v Speaker 3>there can be the establishment of a climate mitigation trust

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:30.560
<v Speaker 3>that unlocks five trillion dollars of private sector savings if

0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:34.880
<v Speaker 3>we can summon the will to use the SDRs five

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 3>hundred billion of SDRs special drawing rights in a way

0:07:39.840 --> 0:07:45.600
<v Speaker 3>that unlocks the private sector capital We believe that that

0:07:45.680 --> 0:07:53.080
<v Speaker 3>requires a change in the attitude of Congress, because the

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 3>agreement that establishes the International Monetary Fund requires eighty five

0:07:58.160 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 3>percent to change that agreement, and if the United States

0:08:01.840 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 3>government has seventeen percent of the quarter, then it can't

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 3>be done, mister Gore without your cognis.

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>She nodded to al Gore there because he spoke just

0:08:12.000 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>before her about the need to open up financing for

0:08:14.800 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>global self countries looking to adapt. But the bridget agenda

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 1>isn't just about debt, restructuring and the IMF.

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 3>We believe that it is critical that we address the

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 3>issue of loss and damage. The talk must come to

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:35.360
<v Speaker 3>an end, and I'd like to salute Denmark in Belgium

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.680
<v Speaker 3>and Scotland for their own modest ways of trying to

0:08:38.720 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 3>accept the precepts and principles of loss and damage as

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:49.319
<v Speaker 3>critical and as morally just. But for loss and damage

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:53.439
<v Speaker 3>to work, we believe that it can't only be an

0:08:53.440 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 3>issue of asking state parties to do the right things,

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.280
<v Speaker 3>although they must.

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Mat We also made a convincing argument for drawing fossil

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>fuel companies into the web of accountability at cop It

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:10.080
<v Speaker 1>was a particularly interesting proposal given that once again the

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:14.679
<v Speaker 1>industry has more delegates at COP than any one country.

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.800
<v Speaker 3>But we believe that the non state actors and the stakeholders,

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 3>the oil and gas companies and those who facilitate them,

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.600
<v Speaker 3>need to be brought into a special convocation between now

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 3>and COP twenty eight. How do companies make two hundred

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:36.920
<v Speaker 3>billion dollars in profits in the last three months and

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 3>not expect to contribute at least ten cents in every

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:46.120
<v Speaker 3>dollar of profit to a loss of damage fund. This

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 3>is what our people expect, and I ask us, as

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 3>we reflect on what a loss and damage fund can

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 3>look like and who should access it, that we convene

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.360
<v Speaker 3>a special convocation that doesn't only involve of state parties,

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 3>but non state actors such as the same companies.

0:10:06.080 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Motley has indicated that the G seven countries Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan,

0:10:11.800 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>the United Kingdom, and the United States seem generally supportive

0:10:16.160 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of her plan. None of them has officially signed on yet,

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but it would be a really big deal if the

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:28.120
<v Speaker 1>final COP agreement contains some version of the Bridgetown Agenda,

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.960
<v Speaker 1>particularly the requirement that fossil fuel companies contribute to loss

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and damages US Climate star John Carey has been talking

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:38.679
<v Speaker 1>about the need for the private sector to fund loss

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and damages, and his idea to make that happen is

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.880
<v Speaker 1>a carbon market. But if you're going to ask fossil

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:46.480
<v Speaker 1>fueld companies to pay for the carbon they're emitting today,

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:50.720
<v Speaker 1>what about their historic contributions to climate change? Where's the

0:10:50.880 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>private sector accountability on that front. Motley's proposal at least

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.960
<v Speaker 1>names that particular elephant, which brings me to the broader

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:04.760
<v Speaker 1>history of COP and the fossil fuel industry. As I've

0:11:04.800 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 1>talked about in previous episodes, the industry was at the

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>table from Jump. They were there influencing government officials when

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the UN Framework Conventional Climate Change was drafted. Way back

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:20.079
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen ninety two at the Real Earth Summit, the

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:22.079
<v Speaker 1>guy we've talked about a lot on this show, E.

0:11:22.200 --> 0:11:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Harrison, brought together the various industries and companies that

0:11:26.520 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>might be impacted by emissions regulations into a group called

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>the Global Climate Coalition. He also started working internationally in

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>advance of the Real Earth Summit because he saw this

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>whole cop situation coming a mile away. That's because back

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy two, Harrison had seen the impact of

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the first UN environmental summit, the United Nations Conference on

0:11:49.840 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>the Human Environment, which earthed the Stockholm Declaration. This groundbreaking

0:11:56.240 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>document made environmental issues global that emphasize is conservation, the

0:12:01.800 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>redistribution of resources, and state responsibility for environmental damage both

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>within and beyond their borders. It also had zero concern

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:15.679
<v Speaker 1>for business, to the extent that industry was included at

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>all in the UNCCH negotiations, it was as a culprit

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and a threat, not a partner. The first principle put

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:30.280
<v Speaker 1>forth in Stockholm Declaration reads quote man has the fundamental

0:12:30.400 --> 0:12:34.679
<v Speaker 1>right to freedom, equality and adequate conditions of life in

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:38.080
<v Speaker 1>an environment of equality that permits a life of dignity

0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and well being. And he bears a solemn responsibility to

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>protect and improve the environment for president and future generations.

0:12:47.440 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Later on, the Declaration reaffirms nation's sovereign right to extract

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:57.560
<v Speaker 1>their own resources, but notably balances that right with the

0:12:57.600 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>mandate that countries must quote ensure that activities within their

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>jurisdiction or control do not cause damage to the environment

0:13:05.840 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>of other states or of areas beyond the limits of

0:13:09.520 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>national jurisdiction. The Stockholm Declaration led to the creation of

0:13:14.440 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>new international laws, norms, and organizations focused on environmental protection,

0:13:20.040 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>including the United Nations Environmental Program, which was formed as

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:28.480
<v Speaker 1>a permanent agency to act as the environmental conscience of

0:13:28.559 --> 0:13:32.960
<v Speaker 1>the UN. The Stockholm Declaration, combined with the creation of

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the EPA and the passage of the Clean Air and

0:13:35.679 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Clean Water Acts in the US, was a massive pr

0:13:39.920 --> 0:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>crisis for American industry and a huge opportunity for a

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Harrison. Throughout the eighties, Harrison scored himself invitations and

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>speaking engagements at various UNIP events, where he pushed the

0:13:54.480 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>idea that the more companies participated in the creation of

0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:02.520
<v Speaker 1>environmental policies, the more effective those policies would be. To

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:05.240
<v Speaker 1>be clear, Harrison was not the only person getting that

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:09.079
<v Speaker 1>idea in the eighties, nor was his message a hard sell.

0:14:09.640 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Plenty of people were happy to embrace a business friendly

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>approach that required no economic trade offs, but given his

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:23.840
<v Speaker 1>domestic and international influence, Harrison was a driving force. In

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the late nineteen eighties, he created two organizations, the Global

0:14:27.560 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Climate Coalition, which brought together manufacturers, oil companies, automotive, rail

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and various other industries into a group that could shape

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the global response to climate change, and envirocom an international

0:14:41.080 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>network of PR firms that would all use the same

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>corporate messaging on environmental issues. Their state admission was to

0:14:49.040 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>monitor emerging environmental policy all over the world for their

0:14:53.040 --> 0:15:00.280
<v Speaker 1>clients and to influence that policy through strategic lobbying. Was

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to fully integrate industry into the international approach to environmental issues,

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>and the strategy was enormously successful. At the nineteen ninety

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:12.680
<v Speaker 1>two Rio Summit. There was none of the urgency or

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>directness of the Stockholm Declaration. Gone was the emphasis on

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:22.000
<v Speaker 1>government regulation. It was replaced by a sort of big

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>tent approach that included business interests and prioritized compromise. Agenda

0:15:28.760 --> 0:15:31.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, one of the defining documents out of that

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ninety two summit, reads, in order to meet the

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>challenge of environment and development, states have decided to establish

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a new global partnership. It is recognized that for the

0:15:43.800 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>success of this new partnership, it is important to overcome

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:53.479
<v Speaker 1>confrontation and to foster a climate of genuine cooperation and solidarity.

0:15:54.760 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>It was at the many events run by a business

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:02.359
<v Speaker 1>surrounding that nineteen ninety two REO or summit that Harrison

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>presented his paper on the concept of sustainable communication, or

0:16:08.280 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>what we now call greenwashing. Here's Melissa Aronchick, a media

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>studies scholar at Rutgers University and author of the book

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 1>A Strategic Nature, which unpacks a lot of this history.

0:16:23.320 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 4>I think it would be unfair to say, you know,

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.360
<v Speaker 4>he invented the idea of corporate social responsibility. That would

0:16:28.360 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 4>be a little too much. But what we can say

0:16:30.200 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 4>is that he did invent the idea of sustainable communication,

0:16:35.440 --> 0:16:38.720
<v Speaker 4>which was so genius when you think about it, because

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 4>what is sustainable communication means? It means communicating in such

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 4>a way as to maintain sustainable relationships with the people

0:16:48.640 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 4>that matter, the people who are going to vote for you,

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 4>or the people who are going to support whatever it

0:16:53.000 --> 0:16:56.320
<v Speaker 4>is your clients are doing. It does not mean sustainable

0:16:56.360 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 4>practices or behaviors to protect the environment.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 1>Person wasn't exactly delivering his message to an unfriendly audience.

0:17:04.400 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Maurice Strong, the organizer of the Rio Earth Summit, was

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 1>a former oil man himself and often talked about the

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 1>need for industry to be part of any effective climate solution.

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:19.680
<v Speaker 4>It's also really important to remember that Maurice Strong, who

0:17:19.760 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 4>was the organizer of that United Nations conference, was committed

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 4>to having business participate in the conference. Maurice Strong was

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.879
<v Speaker 4>quite compelled or convinced by the idea that if you

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:36.240
<v Speaker 4>did not have business as a key stakeholder in these

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 4>conversations about sustainable development, that you would never be able

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 4>to enforce it. You needed to have business at the

0:17:43.119 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 4>table and in agreement.

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>In contrast to the nineteen seventy two convening, the un

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.880
<v Speaker 1>encouraged business community participation in Rio in nineteen ninety two

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and industry groups were ready to take advantage.

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 4>Because business communities had been invited to the conference, and

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 4>because they knew that their buying was so important, they

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:07.199
<v Speaker 4>planned extensively in the lead up to the conference to

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 4>be able to present what they called their own sustainable

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:15.719
<v Speaker 4>development Charter. And as you can imagine, this charter was,

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 4>you know, it did not contain anything that would have

0:18:18.280 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 4>really transformed how companies did business. It was a very

0:18:22.480 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 4>business as usual document, but it paid a lot of

0:18:26.400 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 4>lip service to the idea of going green, being sustainable,

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 4>being very concerned about the environment. And because they got

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 4>out in front of the actual conference and the other

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 4>types of events that were being designed. They were really

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 4>able to put that document forward and stave off other

0:18:44.520 --> 0:18:49.520
<v Speaker 4>kinds of more binding legislation or more draconian regulations that

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:51.600
<v Speaker 4>would have caused problems for these companies profits.

0:18:52.119 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>By the time the third cop in Kyoto rolled around,

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 1>industry was deeply entrenched in the process and absolutely determined

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:05.399
<v Speaker 1>to prevent a binding treaty from ever being ratified by

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>the US. The Global Climate Coalition was at its peak

0:19:10.000 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 1>at this point, fully funded and fighting the idea of

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Kyoto at every turn. Here's Brown University environmental sociologist doctor

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Robert Brule.

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:24.240
<v Speaker 5>The fossil fuel guys, they don't appeal to your head.

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 5>They appeal to your emotions. And then when it comes to,

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:34.679
<v Speaker 5>you know, the economic impact, they're gonna basically, you know,

0:19:34.680 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 5>you're gonna be cold and dark, eating you know, raw vegetables,

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 5>you know. And it's an emotive function. That what the

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 5>pr genius is. And you know, if you look at

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:53.199
<v Speaker 5>the commercial for the Global Climate, the gccs it's not

0:19:53.400 --> 0:19:57.560
<v Speaker 5>global and it won't work. They get a map of

0:19:57.600 --> 0:20:00.520
<v Speaker 5>the globe and they start cutting out the countries that

0:20:01.320 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 5>don't have to comply, you know, with the Kyoto Protocol

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:09.320
<v Speaker 5>and they're cutting out China, India, and all of Africa,

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 5>South America, and then they all that dispap all of

0:20:12.440 --> 0:20:15.360
<v Speaker 5>these holes in it. You know, they said, this isn't fair,

0:20:15.800 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 5>it won't work, and it's not fair. And that's what

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.920
<v Speaker 5>they ran on and guess what it worked.

0:20:22.280 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>They worked with Senators Chuck Hagel and Robert Byrd to

0:20:25.560 --> 0:20:28.919
<v Speaker 1>bake that idea into a resolution governing whether or not

0:20:29.000 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the United States could ratify Kyoto. Here's a Global Climate

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Coalition Chair Constance Holmes talking about it all back then.

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 6>In July nineteen ninety seven, the Senate passed the bird

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:45.760
<v Speaker 6>Hegel Resolution on a ninety five to nothing vote, almost

0:20:45.760 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 6>a nonprecedented vote. That resolution said, in essence, the Senate

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 6>would not ratify an agreement that is not global, or

0:20:55.240 --> 0:20:58.360
<v Speaker 6>would not ratify an agreement that caused the United States

0:20:58.400 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 6>economy harmed. The Kyoto Protocol does not meet either test

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 6>of the bird Hegel Resolution. The restrictions of the Kyoto

0:21:08.280 --> 0:21:12.679
<v Speaker 6>Agreement apply only to thirty eight countries of the developed world,

0:21:13.240 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 6>with no provision for participation of even the more developed

0:21:16.800 --> 0:21:19.960
<v Speaker 6>of the rest of the world. On the first day

0:21:19.960 --> 0:21:23.240
<v Speaker 6>of the Buenos Aires meeting the developing countries acting as

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:26.520
<v Speaker 6>a group, the Group of seventy seven in China refused

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 6>to let the subject of developing country voluntary participation remain

0:21:32.800 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 6>on the agenda.

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Fast forward thirty years and now it's the fossil fuel

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>industry arguing that those seventy seven countries really need to

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:49.160
<v Speaker 1>be able to delay emissions reductions. Why because international oil

0:21:49.200 --> 0:21:53.359
<v Speaker 1>companies need those countries oil to replace their reserves, and

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 1>they need their citizens to keep burning fossil fuels as

0:21:56.560 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>citizens in the Global North are reducing their usage. Without both,

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the industry is doomed. Here's Steve call, investigative journalist and

0:22:08.280 --> 0:22:11.720
<v Speaker 1>author of the book Private Empire, about Exonmobile.

0:22:12.400 --> 0:22:17.320
<v Speaker 7>They need the oil they have to replace what they

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:21.639
<v Speaker 7>pump every year, and they're just aren't that many places

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 7>left where an American oil company can own the oil

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 7>that they produce, And that's what Wall Street judges them by.

0:22:32.480 --> 0:22:34.840
<v Speaker 1>That's very different from the picture of the US fossil

0:22:34.880 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>fuel industry pains today when they talk about their projects

0:22:38.080 --> 0:22:40.680
<v Speaker 1>in the Global selth or about the benefits of quote

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 1>unquote cheap energy to those countries. Here's Mandy Gunnisakara a

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>spokesperson for the CO two coalition, sort of a modern

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:54.479
<v Speaker 1>day global climate coalition, testifying to Congress on this front.

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.159
<v Speaker 8>This country's ability to harness our vast energy resources and

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.399
<v Speaker 8>a responsible in an efficient manner has changed millions of

0:23:02.440 --> 0:23:05.560
<v Speaker 8>lives for the better. It is why life expectancy and

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 8>economic growth, both important indicators of human flourishing, have significantly improved.

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 8>Advancements in fossil based energy, and the development of modern

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:18.200
<v Speaker 8>economies has provided access to life saving technologies like heat

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 8>during winter, water treatment, medicine, and refrigeration. A stark contrast

0:23:24.000 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 8>exists today in countries that do not have sophisticated energy

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 8>systems or access to affordable, reliable electricity, and parts of

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:35.440
<v Speaker 8>the developing world, life expectancy today is ten to twenty

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:39.879
<v Speaker 8>years shorter, and children under five regularly succumbed to preventable diseases.

0:23:40.400 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 8>The reality is that we could change these outcomes by

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:47.120
<v Speaker 8>sharing our successful energy technologies, not by prohibiting their use

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:49.639
<v Speaker 8>as a result of misaligned environmental policies.

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>The conversation gets a little messier when oil producing countries

0:23:54.600 --> 0:23:57.640
<v Speaker 1>in the global South advocate for the ability to develop

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>and use the fossil fuels within their borders for longer.

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And it makes sense. How dare the global North, which

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>has amassed so much wealth thanks to abundant fossil fuels,

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>turn around and tell the global South that they can't

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.280
<v Speaker 1>do the same. I asked Melinda Jenki, an attorney who's

0:24:15.320 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>fighting to shut down oil drilling in her country, Guyana,

0:24:19.440 --> 0:24:23.240
<v Speaker 1>this question, especially because it's not just Exonmobile making this

0:24:23.480 --> 0:24:27.000
<v Speaker 1>argument about the benefit of oil to Guyana, but many

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>of her fellow citizens too.

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:36.360
<v Speaker 9>The global North has basically broken the global climate system

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.199
<v Speaker 9>as a result of greenhouse gas pollution, and I think

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 9>we should stop talking about emissions and call it what

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:49.680
<v Speaker 9>it is, which is pollution from fossil fuels. It is

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 9>incredibly stupid for anybody to say, well, because you did

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.800
<v Speaker 9>something bad and broke it, we now have a right

0:24:58.000 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 9>to do something bad and break it.

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Even further, Steve call notes that you need only look

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 1>at the last one hundred years or so to see

0:25:06.720 --> 0:25:10.560
<v Speaker 1>that when oil comes to town citizens are not in

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:13.720
<v Speaker 1>fact lifted out of poverty.

0:25:14.800 --> 0:25:17.240
<v Speaker 7>Does not pan out for anyone other than the elites

0:25:17.280 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 7>of those countries. That's what the record shows, and development economics,

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, it may not be a hard science like physics.

0:25:24.760 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 7>But it has pretty well established that the so called

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 7>resource curse in developing countries is a real thing, over

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.959
<v Speaker 7>and over again. And it's not only oil. Other resources

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 7>can produce the same cycle. But partly what happens is

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 7>that the elites that control the resource that produces sudden

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 7>wealth and sudden opportunity generally don't distribute the benefits equitably.

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 7>And I'm not even talking about some utopian socialist kind

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 7>of perfect distribution, but even just to reinvest it in

0:26:02.760 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 7>a sustainable strategy of private enterprise lad development just generally

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 7>doesn't happen. There are a few examples of rulers who

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:18.199
<v Speaker 7>lived for ten or fifteen years and who weren't so

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:21.880
<v Speaker 7>selfish as to keep it all for themselves and so on,

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.719
<v Speaker 7>but they are more the exception than the rule. And

0:26:24.760 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 7>it's not just about the greed of elites. It's also

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:37.920
<v Speaker 7>about the way sudden wealth distorts the patterns of investment

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:46.360
<v Speaker 7>in a country by essentially alleviating the pressure to educate

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:51.560
<v Speaker 7>a new generation of young scientists and tech entrepreneurs or

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 7>wealth creators, or people who are going to figure out

0:26:55.600 --> 0:26:59.040
<v Speaker 7>how to save and improve agriculture in an era of

0:26:59.080 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 7>climate Chain said all of these urgent problems that emerging

0:27:03.800 --> 0:27:07.920
<v Speaker 7>countries face in the global South, I mean, they get

0:27:07.960 --> 0:27:12.600
<v Speaker 7>displaced by the easy money that comes from a resource boom,

0:27:13.040 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 7>and so you end up not only running out of

0:27:18.680 --> 0:27:22.679
<v Speaker 7>the bounty when the oil is depleted, but you've missed

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:26.480
<v Speaker 7>the opportunity to pursue, you know, course of development, like

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:29.960
<v Speaker 7>the one easy example that is often cited I think

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 7>for good reason, and it can be distorted around, you know,

0:27:35.280 --> 0:27:41.000
<v Speaker 7>issues of culture or race and can be I think misstated.

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 7>But with that caveat, I mean, in the nineteen fifties,

0:27:46.640 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 7>Nigeria and South Korea had roughly the same per capita

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 7>income and they were both very poor countries. South Korea

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:59.920
<v Speaker 7>had just emerged from a terrible long experience of Warnaki

0:28:00.080 --> 0:28:06.480
<v Speaker 7>patient and Nigeria was blessed with this huge oil bounty,

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:10.959
<v Speaker 7>and South Korea chose to kind of industrialize on its

0:28:11.000 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 7>own without a lot of resources. And in you know,

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:18.000
<v Speaker 7>a single generation, one country got rich and the other one, uh,

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:22.720
<v Speaker 7>you know, cycled through the resource curse. And you know,

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 7>economists point to that and say, you know, statistically, Nigeria

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 7>may look like it had greater wealth, but in the

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 7>experience of its society, the wealth you know, ran off

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:43.120
<v Speaker 7>shore and often kind of displaced opportunities that Nigeria might

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 7>have had to build a more sustainable economy.

0:28:48.600 --> 0:28:51.880
<v Speaker 1>And the vast majority of cases, the big winners in

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.760
<v Speaker 1>these deals are not global self countries, but the global

0:28:55.800 --> 0:28:59.960
<v Speaker 1>north companies that profit from their oil, much of which

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.440
<v Speaker 1>is exported out of the country, and no matter where

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you are in the world, proximity to oil and gas

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:10.000
<v Speaker 1>development is more guarantee of cheap energy. In the US,

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, Gulf Coast residents have some of the highest

0:29:13.320 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>electricity bills in the country, which brings us back to

0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 1>where we began. Given the presence of fossil fuel influence

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 1>on COPS since its inception, and the rising number of

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>fossil fuel delegates every year, maybe it's time to include

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>them as official parties just as responsible for turning the

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 1>tide on climate and paying for damages as the governments

0:29:38.160 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>they have manipulated over the years. At a minimum, it's

0:29:41.520 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting to think about Motley's suggestion that a sort of

0:29:45.720 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>interim can meaning with fossil fuel company is held accountable,

0:29:50.440 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>could happen in between cops. Lots to think about and

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'll definitely be keeping tabs on how everything continues to unfold.

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening, and we'll see you next week. Don't

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 1>forget also to subscribe to our weekly newsletter. As the

0:30:10.440 --> 0:30:15.600
<v Speaker 1>future of Twitter remains a bit unpredictable, I am starting

0:30:15.720 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to do a lot of the things that I did

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>on there in this weekly roundup of climate coverage, So

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you'll get a list of five or six of the

0:30:24.200 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>stories or studies that I think are really important in

0:30:27.400 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the week and why, delivered to your inbox. You can

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>sign up for that at Drilled podcast dot com. Drilled

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:48.160
<v Speaker 1>is an original Critical Frequency production. Our producer is Sarah Ventry.

0:30:48.680 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Sound design, mixing and mastering are by Peter Duff, who

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>also wrote our original score. Our First Amendment attorney is

0:30:55.920 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>James Wheaton at the First Amendment Project, and the show

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>is reported, written and hosted by me Amy Westerbelt.