WEBVTT - Musk's Pay Package Goes Through and Adobe Shares Surge

0:00:01.600 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>From the heart where innovation, money and power Collie in

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, Nbon. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:34.400
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.600
<v Speaker 2>And Karine Hyde at Bloomgg's Worlds headquarters in New York, Man.

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm Tim Stanevek in for Ed Ludlow. This is Bloomberg Technology.

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Coming up full reaction to Tesla's shareholder meeting as the

0:00:34.479 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 2>majority do back Musk's fifty six billion dollar pay package.

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's Adobe share surging on the company's sales out look,

0:00:40.640 --> 0:00:42.320
<v Speaker 3>how is AI driving demand?

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:44.880
<v Speaker 2>And we head to the G seven meeting in Italy

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:49.000
<v Speaker 2>as the Pope one's on artificial intelligence. But first let's

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 2>checking on these markets. And it's a day where some

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 2>lackluster economic data here in the US when it comes

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:57.120
<v Speaker 2>to consumer sentiment really dials in and wratchets up some

0:00:57.200 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 2>of the risk on risk off concerns that we've got

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 2>happening in Europe at the moment as we worry about

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:05.600
<v Speaker 2>the French political situation. Now as that flat we're holding

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 2>up relatively well, just down by some three points. The

0:01:08.319 --> 0:01:10.080
<v Speaker 2>S and P five hundred and fared a little bit worse,

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.720
<v Speaker 2>and we're seeing the cat forty absolutely slump at the moment.

0:01:12.760 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 2>I'm a shame there can't bring you a percentage number

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 2>on it. But in fact, we've wiped out about two

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:19.720
<v Speaker 2>hundred billion dollars worth of market capitalization throughout the week

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:23.400
<v Speaker 2>in France. That's basically the size of the Greek economy

0:01:23.560 --> 0:01:26.280
<v Speaker 2>all gone. Why because we are worrying about the political

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.639
<v Speaker 2>situation about Macron, about what that might mean for France

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:31.639
<v Speaker 2>even in the EU. A lot being dissected in Europe

0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.360
<v Speaker 2>at the moment, and indeed in the tic situation there too.

0:01:34.360 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm looking at euro just off by five tens of

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 2>percent almost. Let's move on and have a look what's

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:41.120
<v Speaker 2>happening in the cryptosphere though, because look, it's not risk

0:01:41.160 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 2>off everywhere, and actually we're seeing Bitcoin managing to steady

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.319
<v Speaker 2>at about four tens percent higher, small moves for a

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 2>relatively volatile asset class, but we're still only at sixty

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 2>nine hundred and thirty seven. Maybe a bit of a

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:54.880
<v Speaker 2>dial back in what has been never ending money moving

0:01:54.880 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 2>into some of these ETFs. But tim what are you watching.

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.320
<v Speaker 3>I'm watching shares of Adobe and there is no dial

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 3>back going on it there. Look at the shares having

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 3>their best day going all the way back to twenty twenty.

0:02:05.400 --> 0:02:08.640
<v Speaker 3>This after the company did report earnings after the belt

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 3>yesterday that said that they beat on the top line,

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 3>they beat on the bottom line. They raised their profit

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.520
<v Speaker 3>forecast for the fiscal year as well. But it's this

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 3>one metric that has everybody really excited. Digital Media net

0:02:20.440 --> 0:02:22.959
<v Speaker 3>new annual recurring revenue projections for that part of the

0:02:23.000 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 3>business did come in above estimates for their current quarter.

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.320
<v Speaker 3>We're going to have much more on Adobe coming up

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 3>a little later in the program, and I do also

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.240
<v Speaker 3>want to check in on what's going on with shares

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 3>of Tesla today because it is the day after that

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 3>shareholder meeting and it is official that fifty six billion

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 3>dollars pay package was approved by shareholders. We also saw

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 3>the company shareholders vote on approving in corporation to the

0:02:45.639 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 3>state of Texas from Delaware. That move actually already happening

0:02:48.639 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 3>according to paperwork filed after the meeting. Also some board

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 3>news coming out of the meeting. We saw Elon Musk's

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 3>little brother, Kimball Musk, get reelected to the board James

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.880
<v Speaker 3>Murdoch as well. Still shares of Tech lower on the

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:03.959
<v Speaker 3>day today and down about twenty eight percent so far

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 3>this year. Well, earlier today we heard from Ark invest

0:03:07.400 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 3>Tasha Kini on that pay package.

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.399
<v Speaker 4>You have to look at the Tesla results here, right,

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 4>I mean, when you're talking about the pay package, that

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 4>the stock has risen over one thousand percent over that

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:20.359
<v Speaker 4>time period. So he's really delivered shareholder value.

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 5>And I'm again so excited.

0:03:22.160 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 4>For the future because we're really on the cusp.

0:03:24.520 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 2>Of autonomous driving today.

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 3>For more, let's bring in at Bloomberg's mask Chaff guineas

0:03:29.960 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 3>here in our studios in New York. So Max, I

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 3>want to start with that pay package look largely symbolic.

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.400
<v Speaker 3>We've talked about this a lot over the last couple

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 3>of weeks, but seventy two percent approval, I mean, it's

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.240
<v Speaker 3>showing that Elon Musk has the support of shareholders absolutely.

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:47.640
<v Speaker 6>We know we've talked about all the challenges, all the

0:03:47.680 --> 0:03:49.839
<v Speaker 6>craziness around Elon Musk, and at the end of the day,

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 6>the difference in this vote versus the one that happened

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:55.160
<v Speaker 6>in twenty eighteen just one percentage point.

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:56.559
<v Speaker 5>So it doesn't.

0:03:56.240 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 6>Appear that Elon Musk has lost some huge constituency of support.

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 6>I do think the conditions have changed to some extent,

0:04:03.000 --> 0:04:06.760
<v Speaker 6>and there are the you know, the reasons for concern remain.

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 6>But certainly this was a victory lab for Elon Musk

0:04:09.640 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 6>and he acted like it.

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Hot down, I love you guys, is how he jumped

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:18.120
<v Speaker 2>onto stage, the krescendos of calling out his name. Over All,

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 2>he was being playful throughout the entire event as well.

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 2>He was very on Elon.

0:04:22.080 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 6>Look, this is a company that has a huge retail

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 6>shareholder base. Elon is a business celebrity, and the annual

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 6>meetings are always sort of rock star affairs. But it

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 6>was maybe a tiny bit looser, and you did feel

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 6>like maybe that there had been some stress building up

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.040
<v Speaker 6>within the company and that was suddenly released yesterday afternoon.

0:04:43.360 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 2>Okay, relieving of stress. But then he went back to

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:49.920
<v Speaker 2>the bread and butter that is autonomous, back to robotics.

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 2>I just want to go back to what Tasha Kini

0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 2>was saying over at Ark Invested a little bit earlier.

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Let's just listen to what she had to say about FSD.

0:04:56.080 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 2>I think this could have.

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.440
<v Speaker 4>A very attractive margins, higher margins than the the current

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 4>business model today which is mainly selling vehicles.

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so is it reality?

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:07.880
<v Speaker 6>Well, I mean we heard and we heard Elon Musk

0:05:07.920 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 6>echo this and in fact bring up Arc invest over

0:05:10.400 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 6>and over again in that presentation. They just put out

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.440
<v Speaker 6>a huge, you know, prediction for their valuation. Elon Musk

0:05:15.520 --> 0:05:16.160
<v Speaker 6>really likes it.

0:05:16.400 --> 0:05:18.440
<v Speaker 2>I think, yeah, I.

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.719
<v Speaker 6>Think there is a question of what is reality. I suppose,

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, on one hand, Elon Musk going to say,

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:26.480
<v Speaker 6>Tesla fans bulls are going to say, we have the

0:05:26.480 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 6>best driver assistance system on the market, and if you

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 6>just follow the straight line, Elon Musk said this, if

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:34.159
<v Speaker 6>you just look at the trends towards autonomy, we're going

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:36.159
<v Speaker 6>to get there. On the other hand, there is no

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:39.960
<v Speaker 6>robotaxi today and there really is no way to get

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 6>a robotaxi in the way that most people understand that

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:47.680
<v Speaker 6>word anytime soon. It's going to require massive regulatory overhaul

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.599
<v Speaker 6>and tons of technological breakthroughs that frankly are not there yet.

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:54.279
<v Speaker 6>And Elon Musk is counting on both of those things

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 6>happening now. You know, who knows he has achieved a

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:00.360
<v Speaker 6>lot in his career, but this is a huge jump.

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 5>He referred to.

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:03.560
<v Speaker 6>You know, we're not just writing a new chapter we're

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 6>starting a new book, and look, starting a new book

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:08.280
<v Speaker 6>that is a challenge, that is not a given, and

0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 6>it is going to be a real trial for Tesla

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 6>going forward.

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 3>I'm wondering about new vehicles. In that book, there was

0:06:14.200 --> 0:06:16.920
<v Speaker 3>this little tease where there were sort of silhouettes of

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:19.960
<v Speaker 3>vehicles under white sheets, and image of that appeared. I

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:22.680
<v Speaker 3>think one of those vehicles is in fact a very

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 3>cheap EV that could compete globally with those ten thousand

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 3>dollars Chinese evs.

0:06:27.440 --> 0:06:30.479
<v Speaker 6>I mean, that is certainly what Tesla's investors, at least

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.280
<v Speaker 6>some investors would like to hear. And we saw kind

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.400
<v Speaker 6>of a panic earlier in the year when it appeared

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:37.479
<v Speaker 6>that Elon Musk was backing away from that. I don't

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 6>think we should look at that slide and say that

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 6>Elon Musk has a you know, twenty five thousand dollars

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 6>EV in the near term. He brought this up in

0:06:44.600 --> 0:06:46.839
<v Speaker 6>all sorts of ways. He talked about how hard it

0:06:46.880 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 6>is to get to affordability, how difficult the car business is,

0:06:50.520 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 6>and you know, of course he talked on and on

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 6>and on about robotaxis. For him, I think at least

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:58.760
<v Speaker 6>right now, the affordable Tesla is the model three. He

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 6>talked about how cheap it is with all their incentives

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:03.359
<v Speaker 6>with the when you consider the cost of gas and

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 6>so on, and where they're really pushing towards is robotaxis

0:07:07.839 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 6>and of course Optimists, which if you think a robotaxi

0:07:10.960 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 6>is a fanciable product, you know optimis is you know.

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Sci fi or something sci fi? Well, he's pretty good

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 2>at sci fi. Overall, we thank you Max Trafckin, absolutely

0:07:20.440 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 2>brilliant to have you here to talk about some of

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 2>the light moments within what is, of course was that AGM,

0:07:26.520 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 2>but there were some serious moments and one of them

0:07:29.160 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 2>was being voiced by Kristin Hull, CEO of Near Impact Capital,

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:35.400
<v Speaker 2>who was a co fighter of Proposal eight. Regarding and

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 2>your reporting on anti harassment and discrimination efforts over at

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Tesla and Kristin, you're a renowned sort of activist investor.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 2>You go out there wanting to make impact. When you

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.640
<v Speaker 2>see this ultimate referendum endorsing Elon Musk and his board,

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:52.400
<v Speaker 2>do you feel you're having the impact?

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 7>Hello On, thanks for having me today. You know this

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 7>is a good question because we're here for the long game.

0:07:58.720 --> 0:08:01.240
<v Speaker 7>We had been long term investors in Tesla, and we

0:08:01.280 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 7>certainly see the promise both of the AI of the robotics,

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:09.960
<v Speaker 7>but certainly about revolutionary the entire automobile industry. And yet

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 7>being at the meeting yesterday had us concerned about where

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 7>investors are with this company.

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 3>That proposal AD that Caroline just mentioned was voted down

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 3>by shareholders yesterday. So I'm wondering where you go from here,

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 3>given that you were one of the sponsors, one of

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 3>the ones who brought that to the attention of shareholders.

0:08:30.640 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 3>What's your next move, Kristen.

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:35.200
<v Speaker 7>We know we don't have the numbers yet, and so

0:08:35.880 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 7>I'll be really curious to see how many of the

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 7>investors actually did support the board doing a report looking

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 7>into how much the company is spending on discrimination and

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 7>harassment issues. Of course, for this company, Elan said himself

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:55.640
<v Speaker 7>several times. You know, he is a pathological optimist. And

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 7>to be that optimist and to get to the dreams

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.560
<v Speaker 7>and the promises he made to shareholders, he's need to

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 7>have some really tough talent at that company. So to

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 7>be able to hire and retain that top talent, they're

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 7>going to need to spend some money and some time

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:10.600
<v Speaker 7>and attention on human capital management.

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:13.840
<v Speaker 2>You say within that speech that you gave yesterday, you

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 2>worry about the human capital management, the workforce management. Year

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 2>over year, you're saying more harassment and discrimination allegations have

0:09:19.960 --> 0:09:23.319
<v Speaker 2>emerged with few visible changes to Tesla's people management policies

0:09:23.400 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 2>or practices. And in fact, Kristin, I just want to

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 2>add to the fact that this comes in a context

0:09:28.240 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 2>where we're not just talking about this with one company

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:33.120
<v Speaker 2>of Elon Musks. We're talking about it with others, just

0:09:33.200 --> 0:09:37.840
<v Speaker 2>SpaceX and fired engineers there this week finding a lawsuit

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:42.240
<v Speaker 2>against Elon Musks for sexual harassment and for retaliation over

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 2>in California. Kristin, how much is this a worry? Do

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 2>you think?

0:09:46.600 --> 0:09:52.319
<v Speaker 7>More broadly, this is a significant concern. There are thousands

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:55.120
<v Speaker 7>of employees that are coming forward. And this is, as

0:09:55.200 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 7>you mentioned, this isn't across one company. You know, he

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:02.679
<v Speaker 7>is the leader of several companies. And he also said

0:10:02.720 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 7>that they're writing a new book. Writing a new book

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 7>is going to need a full time author, and when

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:13.120
<v Speaker 7>this author has so many cases of discrimination and harassment,

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 7>investors can be concerned.

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:19.599
<v Speaker 2>Can I just ask you to articulate you said thousands

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 2>of employees are coming forward. Where is that data for

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 2>all audience? Perhaps on seeing the thousands, but a hearing

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:26.839
<v Speaker 2>of the eight engineer here and the.

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:28.719
<v Speaker 8>Likes that's right.

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 7>So TESLA is still using for s arbitration, which does silence.

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 7>It's a concealment mechanism where many of the employees are

0:10:37.000 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 7>silenced and are not able to bring to suit. However,

0:10:40.320 --> 0:10:42.400
<v Speaker 7>many have gone to the State of California and now

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.400
<v Speaker 7>the State of California is suing Tesla for racial discrimination

0:10:45.840 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 7>based on thousands of reports coming to the state.

0:10:48.720 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 3>Some folks out there do argue that the idea of

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:55.000
<v Speaker 3>talent moving between companies is a benefit for Elon Musk.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 3>Check out what Tasha Kini said a little earlier on

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Bloomberg Surveillance.

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:02.200
<v Speaker 4>Kristen, it's great for talent acquisition. We've seen employees move

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:05.040
<v Speaker 4>in between his companies. You know, if you're the top

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:08.040
<v Speaker 4>AAI engineer in the world, you're not going to get

0:11:08.040 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 4>bored working for Elon Musk.

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Again, Tasha Kiney of ARC invest earlier on Bloomberg Surveillance, Kristin,

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 3>what do you make of what she said? Is there

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.080
<v Speaker 3>any indication to you that it's not beneficial for these

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 3>employees to move between companies. That the idea of employees

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 3>going from Neurolink to SpaceX to Tesla has not been

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 3>a boon for the companies.

0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 7>You know, I don't mind the cross pollination. Certainly, we

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 7>want talent and we want well rounded employees. And yet

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.960
<v Speaker 7>what we're talking about here are sexual harassment and racial discrimination,

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 7>and those employees are not moving from one company to another.

0:11:43.040 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 7>Those are actually being boxed out and so their talent

0:11:45.400 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 7>isn't rising to the top and they're not able to

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 7>bring their full selves to the workforce. And that's where

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.800
<v Speaker 7>we're having issues because as we know, Tesla's been out

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 7>in front for quite some time. However, much of the

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 7>industry is poised to catch up and they this talent

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 7>is moving to other other companies within the industry.

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Christ And when you were on the program back in

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 3>November with that in Caroline, you said you wanted to

0:12:06.200 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 3>see Elon Musk step down. Do you still at least

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 3>at Tesla, do you still want to see that?

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 7>So where we're going with this is that we are

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 7>looking for the board to put in management that really works.

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 7>And so we saw yesterday at the shareholder meeting there's

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 7>a lot of shareholders that really do love the CEO

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.840
<v Speaker 7>despite his shortcomings, So if we could manage around that.

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 7>You know, there's no perfect CEO, and yet we do

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:35.240
<v Speaker 7>know that leadership comes from the top, and so we

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 7>would like to see him either really recognize where the

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:42.280
<v Speaker 7>human capital management is missing and put that in place,

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 7>or possibly go on to other projects.

0:12:45.120 --> 0:12:48.959
<v Speaker 2>And Christen for those that yes voice that there's been

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 2>a capital market capitalization erosion in the last six months,

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 2>but ultimately back elon because he has contributed so much

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.720
<v Speaker 2>value to this business and ultimately to the US economy.

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Where do you go with the articulation of talent and

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 2>money here?

0:13:04.160 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 7>So he's a clear leader, right and in fact, some

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:11.120
<v Speaker 7>would say, given yesterday's following, that he's a guru, and

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:16.680
<v Speaker 7>many were attesting their love for this CEO. So no

0:13:16.760 --> 0:13:20.640
<v Speaker 7>one can argue that Tesla has completely disrupted the automobile

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 7>industry as we know it, particularly with the battery play

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 7>and then really moving things off great as far as

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 7>electrifying our economy. We want to give him that credit.

0:13:28.880 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 7>And there's so much potential at this company that can

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:34.800
<v Speaker 7>be realized when we know that they are hiring top

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 7>talent employees and that they can keep them, so we

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 7>really are mindful that we want to see them working

0:13:40.880 --> 0:13:44.120
<v Speaker 7>toward a place where discrimination, harassment don't happen at Tesla.

0:13:44.800 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Kristin really appreciate you coming on and joining us post

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 3>shareholder meeting. Kristin Hole of NIA Impact Capital, thanks so much.

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:02.440
<v Speaker 3>Was posting their biggest gain in more than four years

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 3>after the company projected strong future sales for its creative products,

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 3>suggesting customers are adopting the company's new AI based tools.

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Joining us now for more is Bloomberg's Brody Ford Brody?

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 3>Is that a sigh of relief? I hear from investors saying, Okay,

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.320
<v Speaker 3>we're not as concerned as we thought we should be

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 3>about competition from these upstarts and established organizations. Adobe is

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:26.240
<v Speaker 3>doing okay.

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:27.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:28.720
<v Speaker 5>The question for.

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 9>Our software in recent weeks has been are you an

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 9>AI winner or an AI loser? And investors have whipsad

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 9>on Adobe. I mean, I think they were down like

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 9>twenty five percent on the year before the results, but

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 9>yesterday evening they pretty much showed that, hey, people are

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 9>sticking with our platform and they are beginning to pay

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:50.400
<v Speaker 9>for these AI tools. I mean, they introduce their family

0:14:50.400 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 9>of models that have now been used nine billion times, right,

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 9>I mean, it's not a ton of money from AI yet,

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.520
<v Speaker 9>but the indicators here are looking much better thanpated.

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 2>Still notable, though Adobe is still off by more than

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>twelve percent year today. As you said, they've been under

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 2>pressure coming into this. I'm looking at alyst recommendations thirty

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:11.240
<v Speaker 2>five say by, and in fact the price target is

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:13.560
<v Speaker 2>still well above where we're currently training. They see going

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 2>out to about six hundred and thirteen by in the

0:15:16.120 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 2>next twelve months. What gets us hed, Crody? What more

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 2>proof do we need that they're able to generate revenue?

0:15:24.080 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 9>Well, So much investment in AI right now, as you

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 9>all have reported, is in the hardware, in the infrastructure.

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 9>At some point there have to be application uses for

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.760
<v Speaker 9>all this AI investment or it's you know, why were

0:15:36.760 --> 0:15:39.840
<v Speaker 9>we doing it? The hope is that Adobe is one

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 9>of those companies that has Photoshop, Illustrator, these applications used

0:15:44.400 --> 0:15:47.760
<v Speaker 9>by millions of people, and that once folks are ready

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 9>to start paying for AI, it's going to go to

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 9>a company like a Dome. Of course, it could also

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 9>go to a company like Canba, and that's where the

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.280
<v Speaker 9>barecase is Brody.

0:15:57.320 --> 0:16:01.359
<v Speaker 3>How important are these safeguards when it comes to copyright

0:16:01.680 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 3>to Adobe's business. Is this the moat that Adobe has

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 3>the idea that if you use its tools to generate images,

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 3>those are quote unquote commercially safe.

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 9>It certainly helps so, right, I mean that's a big

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 9>part of their argument that hey, if you go use

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 9>mid Journey, if you go use DOLLI, you might get

0:16:19.320 --> 0:16:21.440
<v Speaker 9>sued and your SISO is going to be mad at you.

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.400
<v Speaker 9>I think that whether or not folks are going to

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 9>only stick with Adobe for this copyright concept, it's yet

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 9>to be seen. I think what's a more compelling argument

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 9>is that Adobe already has the applications we all know

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:38.880
<v Speaker 9>how to use. I mean, am I going to go

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 9>learn a whole new program based on AI or am

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 9>I going to click the new button in Photoshop that's

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 9>going to help me generate something and it's not really

0:16:46.760 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 9>disruptive to how I already did my work. To me

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 9>and to many investors, that's the really compelling argument.

0:16:52.640 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 2>They have laziness love it ready for also.

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 3>Precipses that I know how to use Photoshop with.

0:17:00.000 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 2>A I'm sure you could dust off some of those.

0:17:05.600 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Brody Ford will show us we.

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:07.359
<v Speaker 3>Ban c you.

0:17:07.640 --> 0:17:10.359
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile, coming up we head out to the G seven

0:17:10.400 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 2>in Italy that the Pope has been urging world leaders

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 2>to be cautious on artificial intelligence over there, Tim.

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:19.880
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and you're certainly watching shares of Vodaphone this morning, Caroline,

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:21.400
<v Speaker 3>because there's some news coming out of the UK.

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, keep keen eye on photophone. Telecom company look at

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:28.800
<v Speaker 2>selling off stakes in companies and stakes around the world

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 2>that haven't been particularly optimal for them. This time, they're

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 2>looking to sell an entire stake in an Indian tower

0:17:34.720 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 2>company in block trades. We think it's going to happen

0:17:37.240 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 2>as soon as next week. Could fetch up to two

0:17:38.880 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars Apple quarter percent for the UK Listic company

0:17:42.320 --> 0:18:00.960
<v Speaker 2>is a bilybod technology time now for tech first Up,

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 2>open ai has appointed retired US Army General Paul Lakasoni

0:18:05.920 --> 0:18:08.320
<v Speaker 2>to hiss Bard of Directors now. Makasoni formerly led the

0:18:08.400 --> 0:18:11.600
<v Speaker 2>National Security Agency and will join open AI's Safety and

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 2>Security committee. That's as the company is looking to bolster

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 2>at cybersecurity efforts to protect its technology. Meanwhile, recent documents

0:18:18.160 --> 0:18:21.400
<v Speaker 2>reveal that London hospitals, well, they've known for years about

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 2>a weakness that left them vulnerable to a recent cyber hack.

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:27.800
<v Speaker 2>Now Guy and St Thomas's NHS Foundation failed to meet

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 2>UK Health Service data security standards, and it even acknowledged

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:34.680
<v Speaker 2>as recently as April that quote cybersecurity remained a high

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.159
<v Speaker 2>risk and Microsoft will it faced a public grilling on

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 2>Capitol Hill because President Bradsmith was facing questions from the

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 2>House Homeland Security Committee related to two reports that Microsoft

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:47.680
<v Speaker 2>failed to protect government emails when getting into the hands

0:18:47.720 --> 0:18:50.200
<v Speaker 2>of Chinese hackers. Now, the tech giant pledged that it

0:18:50.240 --> 0:18:54.280
<v Speaker 2>would overhaul its cyber defenses in response to the recent lapses.

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.959
<v Speaker 3>Teim Now talking of political discussions around technology, one has

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.560
<v Speaker 3>been underway at the G seven summit, with Proud a

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 3>surprising voice to many. The Pope arrived at the conference

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 3>today and expressed his concerns about AI. Bloomberg's Ari Hordern

0:19:08.200 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 3>joins us with more from Italy. Right now, Henri Pope

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:15.159
<v Speaker 3>Francis becomes the first Pope to address the Group of Seven.

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 3>What can you tell us about what he warned when

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:18.679
<v Speaker 3>it comes to AI?

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.480
<v Speaker 11>Well, a lot of fanfare around the Pope given the

0:19:21.480 --> 0:19:24.359
<v Speaker 11>fact he's the first pontiff to ever address the G seven.

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:27.360
<v Speaker 11>Here in the southern Italy, in the region of Pulia,

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 11>and it comes on the heels of the Pope calling

0:19:29.400 --> 0:19:33.200
<v Speaker 11>for a treaty to regulate AI. He himself has been

0:19:33.320 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 11>victim of AI generated imagers. So this is what he

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.439
<v Speaker 11>had to say to the leaders around the table.

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 2>He said, AI is fascinating and terrible.

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:43.479
<v Speaker 11>He talked about the fact that his first and foremost

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 11>an instrument, but the benefits or negative consequences will depend

0:19:48.480 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 11>on how it is used and how it is deployed.

0:19:51.119 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 11>So we really wanted to make this case to G

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 11>seven world leaders and what we know given the draft

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 11>communicate that only Bloomberg has seen eyes on right now

0:19:59.600 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 11>and the leader we'll release it later this evening. Is

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 11>this they are going to say, they recognize the impact

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:07.399
<v Speaker 11>of AI and the military domain and the need for

0:20:07.480 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 11>a framework for responsible development and use. We encourage more

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:13.399
<v Speaker 11>states to do so to ensure that military use of

0:20:13.440 --> 0:20:17.760
<v Speaker 11>AI is responsibly responsible, complies with applicable international law, and

0:20:17.840 --> 0:20:23.159
<v Speaker 11>enhances intentional security. The only real deliverable though we are getting,

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 11>even though there's lots of talk about AI today at

0:20:25.720 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 11>the second day of the G seventh summit, is really

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 11>that they're just going to coordinate more together. But potentially

0:20:31.800 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 11>this sets up potentially more work and what the Pope

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 11>is calling for and has called for in the past,

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 11>a global treaty.

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 2>They're good at talking, and the policymaking sometimes a little slower, unless,

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:44.879
<v Speaker 2>of course, you're in the EU. I'm really talking of

0:20:44.920 --> 0:20:49.440
<v Speaker 2>the EU. Much anxiety around France. I mean the markets

0:20:49.440 --> 0:20:53.399
<v Speaker 2>selling off hard today and Macron was there anything regarding

0:20:53.440 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 2>the French economy. I mean for us it's important from technology,

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 2>but for everywhere else it's political.

0:20:59.280 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 11>If you think Manuel MalCon had a bad day yesterday,

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.719
<v Speaker 11>he had a worse day waking up today after the

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 11>news last night that these left wing parties are going

0:21:07.440 --> 0:21:09.919
<v Speaker 11>to form a coalition in a block and they're coming

0:21:09.920 --> 0:21:12.440
<v Speaker 11>out and talking about a manifesto and what they would

0:21:12.440 --> 0:21:15.240
<v Speaker 11>do in terms of some of the reforms Emmanuel Macon

0:21:15.280 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 11>has wanted to put in place and has been working

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 11>on with the French economy. They're talking about lifting wages,

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 11>they're talking about going back to a lower retirement age.

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:27.480
<v Speaker 11>You heard from the French finance minister today talking to

0:21:27.560 --> 0:21:30.960
<v Speaker 11>local radio stations and friends. Really they're talking about how

0:21:31.040 --> 0:21:33.119
<v Speaker 11>this is going to be very challenging, not just for

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 11>the French economy. But this is going to be challenging

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:38.440
<v Speaker 11>for Emmanuel Macon. He's really going to be hit now

0:21:38.600 --> 0:21:41.200
<v Speaker 11>when it comes from the left and the right squeezing

0:21:41.240 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 11>him and he might have to pick someone from this

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:46.600
<v Speaker 11>left coalition to be his prime minister. And he came

0:21:46.640 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 11>into this G seven really a weekend leader.

0:21:49.480 --> 0:21:52.640
<v Speaker 2>Amri Hoden, We thank you so much for coming live

0:21:52.720 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 2>to us from Italy. Welcome back to bluemod Technology.

0:22:03.160 --> 0:22:05.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm Caroline Hyde and I'm Tim standerbeck in for a

0:22:05.760 --> 0:22:06.160
<v Speaker 3>lad though.

0:22:06.800 --> 0:22:09.119
<v Speaker 2>Meanwhile there you are on cam. Oh, let's just do

0:22:09.160 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 2>a quick check on these markets, tens, because we're actually

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 2>managing to bounce off of our lows, and it's that

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.280
<v Speaker 2>one hundred now gaining about a tenth of percent high.

0:22:16.359 --> 0:22:19.000
<v Speaker 2>That the broader NAZAC index is still underwater by a

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.800
<v Speaker 2>tenth per percent. We're trying to digest and consumer sentiment

0:22:21.880 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 2>that well falls again rather surprising the market inflation pressure

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 2>store there for a consumer woes. Politically speaking, over in France,

0:22:29.400 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 2>the market's just shut. We're down by two point seven

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 2>percent on the CAC forty look not as low as

0:22:33.560 --> 0:22:35.479
<v Speaker 2>it had been earlier in the training day. But this

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:38.879
<v Speaker 2>is an index that's wiped out tens of billions of dollars,

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:40.959
<v Speaker 2>the same a size as the economy of Greece over

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 2>the course of the week because the political instability. Bitcoin

0:22:43.520 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 2>though on a little bit by three ten percent, it's

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.119
<v Speaker 2>six eight hundred and ninety nine.

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 5>Move on.

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:51.000
<v Speaker 2>See how we're training on individual names this morning. And Adobe,

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:52.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean you've called it out time and time again.

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 2>Tim absolute phenomenal move fourteen percent higher, best day since

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty. We liked the adoption of Adobe AI products

0:23:00.520 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 2>in the earnings. Tesla though perhaps rallies into the AGM

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 2>and then falls after it after the relief that is

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:09.240
<v Speaker 2>Elon Musk getting the backing of shareholders. More broadly, maybe

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 2>he won't be jumping ship and doing AI elsewhere anytime soon.

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:14.879
<v Speaker 2>We're down by one point seven percent, though after we

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 2>digest also the Tesla moving to Texas for its corporate headquarters.

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 2>We understand on semi interesting, off by more than four percent.

0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.360
<v Speaker 2>This seminar conductor company. I mean a few woes. They're

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:26.720
<v Speaker 2>consolidating in terms of whether fabs are going to be

0:23:27.080 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 2>but they're notably having to let go of some people

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 2>about one thousand people overall, we're off by four percentage points.

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:34.959
<v Speaker 2>But we want to talk about another key corporate company,

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:37.720
<v Speaker 2>still private, but one that you might know and use well.

0:23:37.840 --> 0:23:41.320
<v Speaker 2>All Eyes on Health, fun Tech and Apple's latest watch

0:23:41.359 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 2>announcements of course came earlier in the week, but here's

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.080
<v Speaker 2>another company in the space that's seeing real momentum or

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 2>a ring. We want to bring in the CEO, Tom Hale,

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.560
<v Speaker 2>because well, you've got some really strong numbers for us.

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.239
<v Speaker 2>How many people have been buying these rings? Who are

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:57.000
<v Speaker 2>buying these rings?

0:23:57.040 --> 0:24:02.320
<v Speaker 8>Tom, We're very proud today to announce that we've reached

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 8>two point five million rings sold. We just hit that

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.800
<v Speaker 8>milestone a couple days ago. And the impact that we're

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.919
<v Speaker 8>having on millions of people's lives is I think just

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:12.080
<v Speaker 8>so inspiring for us.

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.040
<v Speaker 5>It's not just the high end.

0:24:14.119 --> 0:24:16.879
<v Speaker 8>It's the CEOs and the people who are just getting

0:24:16.920 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 8>their first job. It's men, it's women, it's old and young.

0:24:19.800 --> 0:24:21.840
<v Speaker 8>It's people who are training for marathons, and people who

0:24:21.880 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 8>are just trying to get out of bed today or

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.479
<v Speaker 8>managing a chronic illness. It's really amazing to see this

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:27.440
<v Speaker 8>movement taking off.

0:24:27.720 --> 0:24:29.639
<v Speaker 5>Dig a little is important.

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Tom dig A little deeper into the demographics here and

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 3>help us understand in terms of men and women, the

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.600
<v Speaker 3>shift that you've seen who's buying the ring right now.

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 8>What's been most impressive to us over the last twelve

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:44.640
<v Speaker 8>months is this shift towards women. Women's health I think

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 8>has been really a hot topic. I think there's a

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.119
<v Speaker 8>lot of history where women haven't been paid as much

0:24:49.160 --> 0:24:52.600
<v Speaker 8>attention to by technology or the medical industry, and right

0:24:52.640 --> 0:24:55.159
<v Speaker 8>now we're sort of hitting this sweet spot. In the

0:24:55.240 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 8>last twelve months, we've seen our demographic shift dramatically towards women.

0:25:00.000 --> 0:25:02.720
<v Speaker 8>Months ago, we were fifty five forty five male to female.

0:25:02.720 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 8>Now we are almost sixty forty female to male. I

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:07.600
<v Speaker 8>think part of it it's a ring, but part of

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:09.640
<v Speaker 8>it is that women, I think, really have a real

0:25:09.680 --> 0:25:11.800
<v Speaker 8>desire to take control of their health and we help

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 8>them do that.

0:25:12.560 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 2>And Tom, actually the ring's working better for women now

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 2>than when I originally purchased it. Like I was originally

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.680
<v Speaker 2>bored a ring by my husband because I wanted to

0:25:20.720 --> 0:25:22.960
<v Speaker 2>be more aware of my own cycles, and initially it

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:26.480
<v Speaker 2>wasn't that great, But now it's actually really being incredibly predictive,

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:29.800
<v Speaker 2>and I'm interested from your perspective as to what you've

0:25:29.840 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 2>done on the back end here, what DATAI using, How

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.480
<v Speaker 2>you able to interpret women's health that much better at

0:25:35.520 --> 0:25:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the moment.

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, so much of what's important to women is one

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:41.680
<v Speaker 8>where they are in their life. Are they at the

0:25:41.720 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 8>beginning where they're worried about contraception or conception. Are they

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 8>getting pregnant, are they in post post birth? Are they

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:53.880
<v Speaker 8>in perimenopause or menopause, that whole cycle. Actually, we've been

0:25:54.000 --> 0:25:57.879
<v Speaker 8>investing in each one of those areas, most recently. The

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 8>dynamic around temperature, which is one of the metrics that

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.280
<v Speaker 8>the or ring tracks, is really powerful for being predictive

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:06.520
<v Speaker 8>about a lot of things in a woman's life. It

0:26:06.560 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 8>can predict when your cycle is going to come, what

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 8>phase of your cycle in when you're maybe most fertile

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 8>or maybe not fertile. It's a really powerful tool, and

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 8>I think women really have welcomed the idea that they

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 8>can have a lot of information, knowledge and education founded

0:26:19.400 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 8>in the data of their own body.

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Tom, I think one thing that members have noticed

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 3>is that you're able to add different measurements to the

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:29.919
<v Speaker 3>ring even after you buy it, without buying a new

0:26:29.920 --> 0:26:33.399
<v Speaker 3>piece of hardware. For example, cardiovascular age was something I

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:35.600
<v Speaker 3>saw recently when I opened up the app as a

0:26:35.640 --> 0:26:37.600
<v Speaker 3>new feature. There, what can you tell us about the

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:40.800
<v Speaker 3>product roadmap right now in terms of what new sensors

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 3>will be turned on and what we can expect in

0:26:42.760 --> 0:26:44.280
<v Speaker 3>the coming months and perhaps even year.

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 8>We've made a really lot of progress by investing in

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 8>the software and activating the sensors that are already on

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:53.920
<v Speaker 8>your body. What's powerful about it is that it's collecting

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 8>your data over a long period of time and looking

0:26:56.480 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 8>for deviations in those data. So here's one example that's

0:26:59.280 --> 0:27:02.280
<v Speaker 8>really interesting. We have a new feature. It's in beta.

0:27:02.520 --> 0:27:03.959
<v Speaker 5>It's called symptom radar.

0:27:04.280 --> 0:27:06.679
<v Speaker 8>And what symptom radar does is two or three days

0:27:06.720 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 8>before you actually get sick, it gives you signals that

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 8>you might be getting sick and you might want to

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 8>change your behavior, maybe you know, drink more fluids or

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 8>take some rest, or try and avoid stress. And these

0:27:17.400 --> 0:27:19.960
<v Speaker 8>kinds of features that are really more strictly speaking, health

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 8>features as opposed to fitness features, are the kinds of

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 8>things that people really find a ton of value. In

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:29.680
<v Speaker 8>cardiovascular age, honestly, it's motivated people dramatically if you learn

0:27:29.720 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 8>that your cardiovascular system is older than it should be,

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:35.119
<v Speaker 8>older than you are with your chronological age. It really

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:36.640
<v Speaker 8>makes you get out of bed and work a little

0:27:36.680 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 8>bit harder because you can see that metric move over time.

0:27:39.680 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 5>So, broadening the software.

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 8>Solutions that we provide to people using the RING, we

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 8>think is going to take us down the path of

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:49.399
<v Speaker 8>women's health, cardiovascular health, and I think ultimately when we

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 8>want to look at all the things that are shortening

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 8>people's lives, whether it's cardio, metabolic disease or other disease

0:27:55.040 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 8>states that people are worried about or might cause some

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:58.440
<v Speaker 8>illness or death.

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 3>Well, your software company, and you're a hard way company,

0:28:00.480 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 3>and you charge for both of them, what is the

0:28:02.800 --> 0:28:05.520
<v Speaker 3>revenue breakdown right now between the software side and the

0:28:05.520 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 3>hardware side? What portions of your overall yearly revenue comes

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:09.359
<v Speaker 3>from software now?

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 8>So we're pushing up on north to twenty percent is

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 8>software revenue. And this is a pretty significant milestone for us.

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:20.480
<v Speaker 8>We introduce a subscription business model in twenty twenty one,

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.240
<v Speaker 8>and we have more than tripled our active subscription base

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:26.400
<v Speaker 8>since then. The reason for this is that people are

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 8>so engaged. I mean, of course it's your own data.

0:28:28.600 --> 0:28:30.399
<v Speaker 8>It's your own body, it's your own health. People are

0:28:30.400 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 8>really invested in this, but the reality is it's an

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 8>incredibly sticky application. People consult it three times a day

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:40.840
<v Speaker 8>on average. Out of any seven day period, eighty percent

0:28:40.840 --> 0:28:42.760
<v Speaker 8>of our customers are looking at it five of those

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 8>seven days. The ratio of daily active users over monthly

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 8>active users is on par with social media. It's just

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 8>a lot healthier than social media. So this engagement has

0:28:53.240 --> 0:28:55.840
<v Speaker 8>really driven the software side of our business and it's increasing.

0:28:56.520 --> 0:28:58.640
<v Speaker 2>I just want to talk about engagement with your patents

0:28:58.680 --> 0:29:02.440
<v Speaker 2>and IP and actually engagement with the courts a little bit, Tom,

0:29:02.760 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 2>because we are seeing that actually you're pretty active when

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:08.840
<v Speaker 2>it comes to fighting for your own IP, and some

0:29:08.880 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 2>companies feel that maybe they need you to make a

0:29:11.200 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 2>preemptive strike. We've seen Samsung talking about launching a ring

0:29:15.200 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 2>and ahead of it coming ready to the market, they've

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:21.480
<v Speaker 2>preemptively sued you because they're worried that you'd say that

0:29:21.480 --> 0:29:23.280
<v Speaker 2>they've run a foul of some of your patents in

0:29:23.320 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 2>some way, Tom, can you respond to the Samsung claims

0:29:25.640 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 2>and indeed what you feel about trying to protect your IP?

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, I can't really comment broadly on active litigation. But

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 8>here's what I can say.

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:38.760
<v Speaker 5>The law does not support.

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 8>Samsung's position here, and quite frankly, we've already filed our

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 8>motion to dismiss and I believe we're going.

0:29:45.280 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 3>To prevail for a CEO. Tom, Hell, Tom, thanks for

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 3>joining us. Really good to see you, and I just

0:29:50.320 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 3>say I really.

0:29:50.920 --> 0:29:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Loved the way. Also, when I have a glass of

0:29:53.120 --> 0:29:55.480
<v Speaker 2>wine on a Friday or Saturday the next day, it says,

0:29:55.480 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 2>don't worry about it. Everyone feels like these on a Saturday. Meanwhile,

0:29:59.360 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 2>we've got you some break news and I just want

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 2>to bring what's happening in Apple and the EU set

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 2>for It's well, the first big tech company really to

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:10.560
<v Speaker 2>feel the ire of Europe under the new EU Digital law.

0:30:11.120 --> 0:30:13.680
<v Speaker 2>We understand Brussels is set to charge Apple over allegedly

0:30:13.680 --> 0:30:16.960
<v Speaker 2>stifling competition in its mobile app store. It's the first

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.719
<v Speaker 2>time that you regulators are really using these new digital

0:30:19.760 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 2>rules the Digital Markets Act in particular to target a

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 2>big tech company. Look not being factored in much the

0:30:25.400 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 2>share price right now, but we're still off by some

0:30:27.680 --> 0:30:28.720
<v Speaker 2>three tenths of a sentence.

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 3>And well, of course, continue to bring you any developments

0:30:30.800 --> 0:30:33.920
<v Speaker 3>or updates. Throughout the day on Bloomberg regarding this breaking news.

0:30:33.920 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Coming up, we are going to be joined by Carolyn Childers,

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 3>the co founder and CEO of Chief, to talk about

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 3>the state of women in leadership. This is Bloomberg.

0:30:58.800 --> 0:31:01.479
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about the c suite and diversity there. Women's

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.400
<v Speaker 2>representation in the C suite is actually fallen the first

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.160
<v Speaker 2>time in two decades, so latest from report, I have

0:31:07.160 --> 0:31:09.800
<v Speaker 2>a non for profit fifty to fifty women on boards.

0:31:10.200 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 2>Let's dive into why and actually a tech enabled solution

0:31:12.960 --> 0:31:15.520
<v Speaker 2>as to how things might change a little. Karen Childers

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 2>is with us, co founder and CEO of Chief. It's

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.400
<v Speaker 2>a network of senior women executives, in fact, the biggest

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 2>network there is out there. And what's interesting is you're

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 2>trying to shine a light on even if there is

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 2>this DEI pushback audibly so coming from companies and boards.

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Maybe we're still seeing the work being done. But why

0:31:33.280 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 2>are we seeing fewer women's on boards? For example?

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:39.960
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, we just recently published a study that talked about

0:31:40.560 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 12>companies are still making the investment into diversity. Eighty percent

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 12>of companies are still having the same, if not more

0:31:48.840 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 12>investment into ensuring that they have great representation at all

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 12>levels of leadership, but as you said, the numbers are

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.160
<v Speaker 12>not moving. So for the first time in over a decade,

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:03.040
<v Speaker 12>the number of women in the C suite has actually declined.

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:07.360
<v Speaker 12>And it's a number of factors which makes it so

0:32:07.680 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 12>hard to find one silver bullet to actually change some

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 12>of these representation numbers. It's everything from the glass cliff

0:32:15.760 --> 0:32:18.680
<v Speaker 12>where women are so often put into positions where they're

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 12>needing to do a turnaround of a business. It's everything

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 12>from the real push to bring everybody back into the office,

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 12>which we know has greater impact on women. And it's

0:32:30.520 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 12>why something like Chief which is really focused on how

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 12>do we give support and network in community to senior

0:32:36.960 --> 0:32:40.160
<v Speaker 12>executive women to It's still going to be hard to

0:32:40.240 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 12>be a senior executive, but at least it will be

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:44.360
<v Speaker 12>less lonely and be able to come together to really

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 12>give each other support.

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:47.400
<v Speaker 2>And let's talk about the support. You're offering sort of

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:50.080
<v Speaker 2>more customized membership packages here to ease some of the

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 2>anxieties that each woman might have. Whether it's about executive coaching,

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.240
<v Speaker 2>maybe it's a little bit more about advisory, maybe it's

0:32:55.240 --> 0:32:57.920
<v Speaker 2>about education once you're there in leadership, how do you

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 2>it tune your to be the best leader you can be?

0:33:02.040 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 2>How much you could be charging for this? How winning

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:05.200
<v Speaker 2>are women to spend on this?

0:33:05.600 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 12>Yes, so we are largely sponsored by the companies, so

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 12>the women go back into their organizations and get them

0:33:12.640 --> 0:33:15.560
<v Speaker 12>to sponsor their membership into chief And if you think

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 12>about what it costs to get a six month engagement

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:22.120
<v Speaker 12>with an executive coach, that can often be thirty thousand

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 12>dollars for a senior executive. So our price points are

0:33:25.440 --> 0:33:29.200
<v Speaker 12>anywhere from fifty nine hundred to up to eleven nine

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 12>hundred for executive coaching. We started five years ago here

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 12>in New York with just one hundred members. We've now

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 12>grown to thousands of members across the US. And throughout

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 12>that entire journey, we've been adapting as an organization to

0:33:44.440 --> 0:33:49.160
<v Speaker 12>really understand what leaders need in this moment, and that

0:33:49.320 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 12>changes every year from when we started to the pandemic,

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 12>to all of the financial crises that we have seen,

0:33:58.080 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 12>to the socioeconomic issues people are navigating. And so we

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 12>recently just pivoted as a company to really give a

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 12>number of different membership packages to our members that can

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:12.560
<v Speaker 12>really meet you where you are. So whether that is

0:34:12.760 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 12>executive advisory where you meet with a peer group, your

0:34:16.000 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 12>true peers that are going through everything that you're going through,

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 12>to meet on a monthly basis, whether that be one

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.040
<v Speaker 12>on one coaching because there are times where you just

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.959
<v Speaker 12>need a little very focused time on you, or whether

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 12>that be executive education specific things that you're looking to

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 12>dive into.

0:34:30.840 --> 0:34:33.279
<v Speaker 3>I'm wondering about the company sponsorship now, I'm in here.

0:34:33.440 --> 0:34:36.040
<v Speaker 3>We're Bloomberg. We love numbers, we love the data. What

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:38.880
<v Speaker 3>happens if an individual who wants to join comes to

0:34:38.880 --> 0:34:40.880
<v Speaker 3>you and says, you know, my company will not sponsor this.

0:34:41.000 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 3>I need to go back to them with proof that

0:34:43.760 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 3>this is a worthwhile investment, that it works. What data

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 3>do you give them?

0:34:48.360 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, there's a number of things that we look at.

0:34:50.280 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 12>I think success metrics in something like this is hard

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 12>because success is very different for every individual, and so

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:59.919
<v Speaker 12>we really look at how much does this really help

0:35:00.200 --> 0:35:03.080
<v Speaker 12>change your leadership impact? How much do you believe you

0:35:03.120 --> 0:35:06.200
<v Speaker 12>are a stronger, better leader because of your participation in chief?

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 12>How much do you feel like you have built the

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 12>connections that help you really navigate new areas that you

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:15.160
<v Speaker 12>need to look into. And those are the numbers that

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:17.359
<v Speaker 12>we give back to the organizations on top of the

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 12>broader numbers of how important it is to drive diversity

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 12>into your companies and what that does for you as

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 12>an organization.

0:35:25.920 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so talk numbers here in terms of companies that

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:31.000
<v Speaker 3>have not yet signed on, how will you get to

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:33.640
<v Speaker 3>one hundred percent participation within the Fortune one hundred, within

0:35:33.640 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 3>the Fortune five hundred.

0:35:34.920 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 12>We actually have members in ten thousand different companies, So

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:45.280
<v Speaker 12>we actually have amazing sponsorship across all of these different organizations,

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 12>and we continue to build those relationships again and again,

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:54.040
<v Speaker 12>but have already made a pretty significant impact into all

0:35:54.040 --> 0:35:56.240
<v Speaker 12>of the different companies to be able to sponsor their members.

0:35:56.320 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 2>Have any companies pulled away as the pendulum on DEI

0:35:59.320 --> 0:35:59.800
<v Speaker 2>is shifted.

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 12>I think what we're seeing is that people are talking

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 12>about the investment in DEI a lot less than they

0:36:04.600 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 12>are actually pulling back on the investment.

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:08.799
<v Speaker 2>That's something that we noted. We did a whole show

0:36:08.800 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 2>on it yesterday. I want to ask about your own capital.

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:15.640
<v Speaker 2>You raised a ton of money back in the heady

0:36:15.680 --> 0:36:18.440
<v Speaker 2>days of twenty twenty two, and I wonder whether you

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 2>need more. You have some big commitments from some very

0:36:20.960 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 2>well known bench capitalists. But this is expensing opening club houses.

0:36:25.480 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 2>You have a lot of them New York, Washington and

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:30.400
<v Speaker 2>the like, and indeed satisfying the needs of your membership.

0:36:30.560 --> 0:36:30.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 12>I think we are always wanting to continue to invest

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:35.760
<v Speaker 12>in our members and make sure that they are having

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:39.040
<v Speaker 12>the best experience in continuing to grow as leaders for Russell,

0:36:39.080 --> 0:36:41.040
<v Speaker 12>a really strong business that doesn't need to go and

0:36:41.120 --> 0:36:41.600
<v Speaker 12>raise capital.

0:36:41.719 --> 0:36:42.320
<v Speaker 2>You're profitable.

0:36:42.840 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 5>We are profitable.

0:36:44.680 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 12>Yeah.

0:36:45.760 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, to hear that, VCS very very cool.

0:36:48.480 --> 0:36:51.640
<v Speaker 3>Maybe breaking a little news here tech Carolyn Childers, co

0:36:51.680 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 3>founder and CEO of Chief, thanks so much for joining

0:36:54.640 --> 0:37:04.800
<v Speaker 3>us today. Well, the highly anticipated launch of Ether ETFs

0:37:04.840 --> 0:37:07.319
<v Speaker 3>could be coming as early as this summer, according to

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:10.920
<v Speaker 3>SEC chair Gary Gensler. Bloomberg's James Seyffert it joins us

0:37:11.000 --> 0:37:14.320
<v Speaker 3>now with more James, how do you take Gensler's recent

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:18.040
<v Speaker 3>comments in terms of your own thinking when it comes

0:37:18.080 --> 0:37:20.280
<v Speaker 3>to an actual launch date for these when will investors

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.000
<v Speaker 3>do you think have access to this at least according

0:37:22.000 --> 0:37:23.680
<v Speaker 3>to Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:27.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean when these things were approved there was

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 5>the end of May.

0:37:27.920 --> 0:37:30.400
<v Speaker 10>We basically said they'll be out probably by the end

0:37:30.440 --> 0:37:34.240
<v Speaker 10>of the summer, possibly earlier, so our overall take has been.

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 5>For a long time.

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 10>These things are likely to begin trading sometime this summer.

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:39.720
<v Speaker 10>We put the over under around the July fourth number.

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.880
<v Speaker 10>We thought it could happen by early July. There's a

0:37:42.880 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 10>lot of overlap you can take from the launching of

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:48.960
<v Speaker 10>spot bitcoin ETFs and the launching of ethery and Futures ETFs.

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 10>They had to go through like similar processes with these

0:37:51.320 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 10>divisions at the SEC, so there is some new stuff here,

0:37:54.160 --> 0:37:56.439
<v Speaker 10>specifically with spot Etheroryum. But we didn't think it would

0:37:56.440 --> 0:37:58.520
<v Speaker 10>take as long as it took for spot Bitcoin, so

0:37:59.000 --> 0:38:01.680
<v Speaker 10>just to put some number on it, Spot Bitcoin started

0:38:01.680 --> 0:38:04.719
<v Speaker 10>in early October. They launched on January tenth, so that's

0:38:04.719 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 10>a three month process, so we think it should take

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:08.760
<v Speaker 10>less than that. We think a lot of it is done,

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:11.200
<v Speaker 10>but based on what we're seeing right now, all these

0:38:11.200 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 10>issuers submitted their documents for registration, this last step of

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:17.240
<v Speaker 10>the process to get these things approved by the SEC

0:38:17.360 --> 0:38:20.919
<v Speaker 10>fully on May thirty first, and there hasn't been any

0:38:20.960 --> 0:38:22.640
<v Speaker 10>movement as far as we can tell from the SEC.

0:38:22.719 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 5>So the SEC is also in no rush at this point.

0:38:26.080 --> 0:38:28.720
<v Speaker 10>But I think it's unlikely that it would take anything

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:30.680
<v Speaker 10>beyond the summer, and we were saying that weeks ago.

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:33.200
<v Speaker 10>So I feel like Gensler is saying that in front

0:38:33.200 --> 0:38:35.360
<v Speaker 10>of Congress. Didn't really like give us any more insight

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:37.080
<v Speaker 10>than we already had.

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:37.919
<v Speaker 5>But time will tell.

0:38:38.239 --> 0:38:41.760
<v Speaker 2>The players vanek, Arc, black Rock, Fidelity the same names

0:38:41.800 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 2>as we saw with a Bitcoin spot ETF. Is there

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:47.239
<v Speaker 2>the same desire to be offering these ETFs this time

0:38:47.320 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 2>round to match what might be slightly less demand.

0:38:51.160 --> 0:38:53.640
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so we do think the demand will be slightly less,

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:56.080
<v Speaker 10>but we still think. I mean, you're talking about slightly

0:38:56.160 --> 0:38:59.360
<v Speaker 10>less demand versus the most successful launches in ETF history

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:02.240
<v Speaker 10>across the world, some of the most successful fun launches.

0:39:02.040 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 5>In history across the world.

0:39:03.280 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 10>Right, So, even if you get twenty five percent of

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:07.239
<v Speaker 10>the a of the flows, which is kind of the

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:10.239
<v Speaker 10>range that we're thinking twenty twenty five percent maybe more,

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:12.480
<v Speaker 10>part of that goes back to the fact that ethereum

0:39:12.520 --> 0:39:15.200
<v Speaker 10>is about thirty percent of the size of bitcoin, so

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 10>there is going to be a little bit less demand.

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:18.760
<v Speaker 10>But again, there is a lot of issuers that stepped

0:39:18.760 --> 0:39:21.360
<v Speaker 10>out of this. Technically speaking, three and a half issuers

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:24.120
<v Speaker 10>jumped out of this. So wisdom Tree Valkyrie and hash

0:39:24.160 --> 0:39:27.440
<v Speaker 10>Decks fully are not launching ETFs ark in twenty one

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:29.960
<v Speaker 10>Shares partnered with on their bitcoin ETF and ARC is

0:39:29.960 --> 0:39:31.879
<v Speaker 10>now backed out, but we do have one new issue

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:34.160
<v Speaker 10>in pro Shares for this Ethereum race, so most of

0:39:34.200 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 10>the same players are still in this.

0:39:35.800 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 2>James lift the lid on the gossip a little bit

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:40.839
<v Speaker 2>as to why people might get out and ultimately what

0:39:40.880 --> 0:39:44.480
<v Speaker 2>people feel about the SEC process, because I'm hearing behind

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 2>the scenes a lot of the time, you know, this

0:39:47.320 --> 0:39:50.799
<v Speaker 2>stop start, this sudden desire to have all your documentation

0:39:50.920 --> 0:39:53.239
<v Speaker 2>and then go quiet. I mean, it's exhausting, and many

0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 2>feel that there's more challenges and more hopes to jump

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 2>than is necessary.

0:39:57.400 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean's what's really happened here. From our point

0:39:59.800 --> 0:40:01.279
<v Speaker 10>of view and from what we're seeing and hearing, a

0:40:01.320 --> 0:40:03.319
<v Speaker 10>lot of this has become political. It's not like just

0:40:03.400 --> 0:40:06.120
<v Speaker 10>normal going through the processes of doing these things.

0:40:06.120 --> 0:40:06.960
<v Speaker 5>It seems like this.

0:40:07.000 --> 0:40:10.200
<v Speaker 10>Approval actually happened on the back of political wind shifting,

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 10>which is part of the reason why we don't know

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:14.000
<v Speaker 10>when this is going to launch, why there's such a

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:17.000
<v Speaker 10>large gap between the nineteen before approval and the S

0:40:17.080 --> 0:40:18.360
<v Speaker 10>one registration approval.

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:20.000
<v Speaker 5>So a lot of it has.

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:21.440
<v Speaker 10>To do with the fact that this has become so

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:24.680
<v Speaker 10>political in nature. But another reason why people have backed

0:40:24.719 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 10>out is the fact these things are not going to

0:40:26.160 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 10>allow staking right now. If you can stake ethereum, that's

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 10>a three ish three to four percent yield, so that's

0:40:31.640 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 10>almost like a fee that you're missing out on. So

0:40:34.160 --> 0:40:37.080
<v Speaker 10>there's a lot of inefficiencies potentially here. But the main

0:40:37.120 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 10>reason that I think this is some of these issues

0:40:39.719 --> 0:40:42.560
<v Speaker 10>have backed out is just one, fees got so competitive,

0:40:42.640 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 10>Like we saw a massive fee war launch before the

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.880
<v Speaker 10>biccoin ETFs even launched themselves, so price is compressed to

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 10>the point where issuers aren't really making that much money.

0:40:51.239 --> 0:40:53.000
<v Speaker 10>And throw in the fact that if you're a smaller issuer,

0:40:53.080 --> 0:40:56.120
<v Speaker 10>you have to compete with the behemoths of Blackrock, Fidelity,

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:58.879
<v Speaker 10>in Vesco. So some of these issuers have done well

0:40:58.880 --> 0:41:01.520
<v Speaker 10>to compete with them, right, but it's very hard to

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.200
<v Speaker 10>basically start from day one against those guys. A lot

0:41:04.239 --> 0:41:07.080
<v Speaker 10>of these smaller issuers benefit from launching before them, coming

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:10.280
<v Speaker 10>out with new products right here, when the bitcoin ETFs

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:12.160
<v Speaker 10>launch and when the etherey and mets launch, they're all

0:41:12.200 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 10>starting out of the same gate, and it's really hard

0:41:14.200 --> 0:41:16.640
<v Speaker 10>to compete with somebody with that much distribution in size.

0:41:16.920 --> 0:41:19.239
<v Speaker 3>James, I know you do not do price targets over

0:41:19.239 --> 0:41:22.520
<v Speaker 3>at Bloomberg Intelligence, but I am curious about the price

0:41:22.560 --> 0:41:25.520
<v Speaker 3>of ether because we're still not back to those twenty

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 3>twenty one all time highs, whereas Bitcoin did hit an

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 3>all time high just a few months ago in the

0:41:30.360 --> 0:41:33.480
<v Speaker 3>wake of these spot bitcoin ETFs. Well, what can you

0:41:33.520 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 3>tell us about the way that you're thinking about price

0:41:36.520 --> 0:41:40.880
<v Speaker 3>movement when these ETFs do become available for investors.

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:43.919
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean the consensus for bitcoin from the market

0:41:44.080 --> 0:41:45.520
<v Speaker 10>was like it's going to be a buy the rumor

0:41:45.560 --> 0:41:47.399
<v Speaker 10>sell the news, and it ended up kind of being

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:50.720
<v Speaker 10>like that initially. But once money started pouring into the funds,

0:41:50.840 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 10>obviously Bitcoin's price ran and there the ETFs are a

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 10>large reason why we've seen those all time highs in bitcoin.

0:41:56.960 --> 0:41:59.120
<v Speaker 10>I guess it will depend what happens on the flows

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:01.240
<v Speaker 10>on the back of a theory. So if the etherem

0:42:01.280 --> 0:42:03.640
<v Speaker 10>metfs launch and they do not see as much interest

0:42:03.640 --> 0:42:05.400
<v Speaker 10>as people are expecting, or they see more interest than

0:42:05.400 --> 0:42:07.640
<v Speaker 10>people are expecting, we'll see that run and we could

0:42:07.640 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 10>see all time eyes, But I think Ethereum is kind

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:11.800
<v Speaker 10>of caught in the middle here.

0:42:11.640 --> 0:42:13.080
<v Speaker 5>There's a little bit more going on.

0:42:13.120 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 10>Bitcoin has this narrative, it's digital goal, it is what

0:42:16.200 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 10>it is, right. Ethereum is like more of the Internet

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 10>of money and app store, what have you.

0:42:20.800 --> 0:42:22.239
<v Speaker 5>And there's a lot of competitors.

0:42:22.560 --> 0:42:24.520
<v Speaker 10>So I think part of the reason that Ethereum hasn't

0:42:24.560 --> 0:42:26.960
<v Speaker 10>caught and run alongside Bitcoin is the fact that it's

0:42:26.960 --> 0:42:29.160
<v Speaker 10>competing with the likes of Solana and these other coins.

0:42:29.719 --> 0:42:32.759
<v Speaker 2>James always such great inside track. We thank you, James

0:42:32.760 --> 0:42:35.759
<v Speaker 2>Siefert of Bluemeg Intelligence. Meanwhile, that does it for this

0:42:35.880 --> 0:42:38.919
<v Speaker 2>edition of BlueBag Technology. Happy Friday. Great to have Tim

0:42:38.960 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 2>here in the spotlight with me. To check out our

0:42:42.040 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 2>podcast you can find on the terminal as well as

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:51.319
<v Speaker 2>online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart this is Blue Meg Technology.