WEBVTT - Moody’s Cuts Bank Ratings

0:00:01.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Wait inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.880 --> 0:00:09.440
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Podcast with Carol Messer and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:22.760
<v Speaker 2>So we just talked with the team, right Tim, about

0:00:23.079 --> 0:00:26.000
<v Speaker 2>KBW Bank Index down almost four percent and it's lows

0:00:26.040 --> 0:00:28.040
<v Speaker 2>today still down about one point three percent, so we've

0:00:28.080 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>definitely bounced off the worst levels of the day. Same

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 2>thing for the SMP Regional Banking ETF. We're talking about

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:35.840
<v Speaker 2>the KRE, which was down about four and a half

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.199
<v Speaker 2>percent of its lows now down about one and a

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 2>quarter percent.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:39.959
<v Speaker 3>And of course this was.

0:00:39.920 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 2>All following Moody's lowering its ratings for ten small and

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 2>mid sized lenders and talking about downgrading maybe some other firms.

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 2>So a lot going on, reminding us that maybe wait

0:00:51.320 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 2>out of the woods yet when it comes to banking here.

0:00:53.440 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that's certainly fair to say the concerns

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:59.200
<v Speaker 4>are higher funding costs, potential regulatory capital weaknesses, rising risks

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 4>tied to commercial real estate. Those are among the strains

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 4>that are prompting the review. That's according to what Moody

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 4>said late yesterday with more very pleased to have with us.

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:10.119
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg Intelligence senior analyst for US Regional Banks, Herman Chan,

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:12.199
<v Speaker 4>who joins us in the Bloomberg Interactive broke.

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:14.119
<v Speaker 3>We actually call him King of Regional Banks. And didn't

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:18.319
<v Speaker 3>you know that was he anointed March happened?

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 4>Okay, king of regional Banks. I'm sorry, sir, I bowed down.

0:01:22.440 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 5>You gotta get the title, right.

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's good to have you. I it was nice

0:01:26.720 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 4>to uh to get to meet you a little earlier

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 4>too in person finally, because I was gone for the

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 4>regional bank crisis. But I guess I get my own

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 4>little mini crisis here to you.

0:01:35.880 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 5>That's the question of you're getting the after shocks.

0:01:38.440 --> 0:01:40.480
<v Speaker 4>So to what extent is this tied to what we

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:41.160
<v Speaker 4>saw in March?

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.840
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think it's. It's it's double barreled in terms

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:49.160
<v Speaker 5>of the failout, the fallout from the banking failures from

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 5>SBB Signature First Republic, and also it's the aftermath of

0:01:55.360 --> 0:01:58.800
<v Speaker 5>the higher rate environment that we're currently operating in the

0:01:58.880 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 5>Moody's rapport. It's noted in the higher counting funding costs

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 5>as you're articulated so that's really crimping the profitability of

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:11.360
<v Speaker 5>these banks. And also you're seeing a tougher regulatory environment.

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 5>The FED is already proposing tougher capital rules and tougher

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:18.680
<v Speaker 5>and expected to offer some tougher liquidity rules for the

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 5>regional banks. So these are all things the banking space

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 5>has to contend with, and the upshot is just weaker

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 5>earnings and weaker first line of defense against the expected

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.760
<v Speaker 5>potential higher charge offs from commercial real estate.

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 4>It's a little puzzling to me because and I mentioned

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.600
<v Speaker 4>this on with our TV colleagues a few minutes ago,

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 4>this shouldn't surprise anyone, right, So it shouldn't. So we've

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 4>been talking about the struggles in the commercial real estate

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:48.680
<v Speaker 4>market for months, and rates have been high for better

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:49.239
<v Speaker 4>part of a year.

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 5>Right, it shouldn't surprise folks. We've been writing about all

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 5>these issues ever since April and May, so it's been

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 5>on the radar screen of all the folks that cover

0:03:00.200 --> 0:03:02.880
<v Speaker 5>banks and write about them on a daily basis. I

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 5>guess it's just more of a of a recall that

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 5>the stocks have rallied a bits ever since the May

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.520
<v Speaker 5>time frame, and this is just a call that's saying

0:03:16.080 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 5>we're not totally out of the woodjet, but in my view,

0:03:19.240 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 5>it does seem like the issues facing the banks that

0:03:22.919 --> 0:03:25.359
<v Speaker 5>Moody's articulated it should be pretty manageable, all right, So.

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 2>March April, May June like, oh okay, so almost five

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:32.480
<v Speaker 2>months for five months later. So I don't know, how

0:03:32.520 --> 0:03:34.720
<v Speaker 2>do I I have mixed feelings coming if I go

0:03:34.760 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 2>back to the Great Financial Crisis and when finally the

0:03:36.800 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 2>ratings agencies kind of caught up to all that ailed us, right,

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 2>so how are we as investors supposed to kind of

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 2>be like, wait, is most of this still priced in run?

0:03:48.600 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 2>Or is it just again like you said, hey, we'll

0:03:50.680 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 2>slow down a little bit, Like how how do you

0:03:53.040 --> 0:03:54.520
<v Speaker 2>read a call like this?

0:03:55.800 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 5>I just go back to some of the clients that

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:03.200
<v Speaker 5>we've talked to today and they've mentioned that there isn't

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 5>really anything new in terms of the call, but it's

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 5>just reiterating the fact that there are a number of

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 5>issues in hurdles and headwinds that the banks need to

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:14.280
<v Speaker 5>contend with going forward for the next six months, a year,

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 5>two years.

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.919
<v Speaker 2>What are the banks that you most specifically keep on

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 2>your radar? I think about and you know, just to

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:22.040
<v Speaker 2>kind of give you some background, Tim, Like, I feel

0:04:22.040 --> 0:04:25.200
<v Speaker 2>like during we were leaning on Herman constantly during the

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>regional bank crisis. And what was interesting is I felt

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 2>like it was a few names that kept popping up.

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Obviously Silicon Valley, Blinton Bank, and you know, kind of

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 2>the ones that really were on everybody's radar, but there

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:38.159
<v Speaker 2>were others, whether it was pack West, and obviously we

0:04:38.200 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 2>know what happened there, you know, But right, what are

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.680
<v Speaker 2>the ones you now keep on your radar, either out

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 2>of concern as possible acquisition targets or what.

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.640
<v Speaker 5>Right, So, really, in terms of acquisition targets, the only

0:04:49.960 --> 0:04:53.239
<v Speaker 5>bank that really is a media on the radar screen

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:56.839
<v Speaker 5>after the Packwest announcement is Home Streets HMST is the

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 5>ticker Bloomberg wrote about them put to atually shopping themselves

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 5>a couple weeks back. So that's the one that's still

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 5>sort of floating out there. But the others that were

0:05:06.360 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 5>potentially you know, tougher hit a bit harder during that

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 5>banking turmoil earlier in the year, like a Western Alliance.

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 5>They've actually done a really solid job of shoring up

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 5>their balance sheet and improving their capital ratios, improving their

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:26.239
<v Speaker 5>deposit base, so not expecting anything they're going forward because

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:29.279
<v Speaker 5>I think they've they've laid out a very credible path

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:33.000
<v Speaker 5>of regaining that balance sheet strength that they lost a

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:33.919
<v Speaker 5>bit in March.

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 4>What's a little surprising to me, Hermann, is that in

0:05:37.360 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 4>the S and P five hundred, regional banks are down

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 4>one point two percent as a whole, but diversified banks,

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 4>the huge ones Jakie Morgan's, the Bank of Americas like

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 4>those are down one point one percent. This is it connected?

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:52.719
<v Speaker 4>Is it related? Why are they getting hit too?

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 5>I think it just shows the fact that there are

0:05:56.800 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 5>headwinds across the group going forward. The capital ratios issue

0:06:02.720 --> 0:06:05.919
<v Speaker 5>and the tougher regulatory environment is something that all of

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 5>the banks, the largest banks in the United States and

0:06:08.880 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 5>the regionals will have to convent tend with with varying degrees,

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:14.080
<v Speaker 5>And we're actually not sure.

0:06:14.400 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 2>The city's down one and a half percent. She put

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 2>Morgan down about two thirds. Yeah, and off their lows.

0:06:19.640 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>But nonetheless, right.

0:06:20.839 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 3>These are the ones we think, okay, we should be okay.

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's right, they should be fine. But we're just

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 5>in sort of some uncertainty and involved in what's going

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:31.960
<v Speaker 5>to happen. Next in terms of how these capital rules

0:06:32.000 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 5>really shake out.

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.800
<v Speaker 3>Is the real estate exposure still a big deal? Like,

0:06:34.839 --> 0:06:37.279
<v Speaker 3>what's the top of mind? Is it the interest rate exposure?

0:06:37.440 --> 0:06:40.280
<v Speaker 3>Is it real estate? Commercial real estate, office real estate?

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 3>What is it?

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.280
<v Speaker 5>Over the next couple quarters, it's it will continue to

0:06:43.320 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 5>be the deposit costs on how fast they arise and

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 5>the mix of deposits are. Will they continue the remix

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 5>into higher cost forms like CDs. So that's the the

0:06:55.000 --> 0:06:58.119
<v Speaker 5>earnings pressure that banks are facing. Over the next couple

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.840
<v Speaker 5>of years. You're going to see the commercial real estate

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 5>become more and more of an issue. Everybody's talking about

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 5>it now, but the actual repercussions of credit losses really

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 5>hasn't shown up yet at all. For the regional the

0:07:11.000 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 5>loans aren't due yet, because the loans aren't due yet,

0:07:13.600 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 5>and they can do a little bit of restructuring and

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 5>kick the can down the road, that sort of thing.

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.720
<v Speaker 5>So there's some maneuvering that's happening in some tough conversations

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.680
<v Speaker 5>that are going on today, but the actual losses just

0:07:25.720 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 5>haven't hit, So that's going to take some time to

0:07:27.720 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 5>really happen for the industry.

0:07:29.600 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 4>What do the data tell us and what do you

0:07:31.960 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 4>have at Bloomberg Intelligence that shows where people are keeping

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 4>their money right now? Because if they're keeping their money

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.080
<v Speaker 4>in their traditional quote unquote checking account, you know it's

0:07:39.080 --> 0:07:41.360
<v Speaker 4>paying nothing, right you can quickly move it to one

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 4>of these neo banks. And this was the problem during

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 4>the March banking crisis. Would was like, wait a second,

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 4>if I can get you know, four and a half

0:07:47.040 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 4>percent over at you know whatever American Express or Wealth

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 4>Front or whatever name the neo bank here, then I'll

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 4>just you know, take all my money from my checking account.

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 4>There is that still an issue for the banks that's happening.

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 5>So the longer we're in this higher rate environment, the

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 5>tougher it is for the regionals because ineviably your customer

0:08:04.920 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 5>base will start to erode from the traditional checking accounts,

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 5>and quarter by quarter, month after month, you're going to

0:08:11.000 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 5>see those zero cost deposits continue to move to a

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 5>higher cost rate like the CD or a high yield savings.

0:08:19.200 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 5>So that's something that frankly, the regional banks would love

0:08:23.360 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 5>to see rate cuts, you know, potential later this year

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:27.320
<v Speaker 5>or next year, just to stem that tide.

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.600
<v Speaker 2>We bout down to the King Herman Ted, thank you

0:08:29.680 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 2>so much, senior alas for US regional banks.

0:08:31.600 --> 0:08:35.959
<v Speaker 1>At Bloomberg Intelligence, you're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast.

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Catch us live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>Listen on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio app, and the

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:50.400
<v Speaker 3>In our Bloomberg Sledding segment today, we wanted to get

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:53.960
<v Speaker 3>into Tesla's new chief financial officer, who's actually kind of

0:08:54.200 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 3>old when it comes to Tesla.

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 4>Because it's like the chief accounting officer also, so.

0:09:00.040 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Pretty big jobs now on his plate.

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:04.120
<v Speaker 4>Huh yeah, yeah, Well, you know, like I said before,

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:06.120
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk has more than one job. So it's like

0:09:06.200 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 4>if he you know, if he's the leader and says, okay,

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:10.319
<v Speaker 4>well I can be CEO of all these different companies.

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 3>Why can't you do a couple of few doings?

0:09:12.600 --> 0:09:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Right?

0:09:12.760 --> 0:09:14.120
<v Speaker 3>All right, So let's get let's.

0:09:13.920 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Get too because there was some news yesterday that Tesla

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:20.840
<v Speaker 2>was replacing its current CFO who was in the job

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.160
<v Speaker 2>for thirteen years. So tracking it all for us, making

0:09:23.200 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 2>sense of it is our own Bloomberg News senior technology

0:09:25.679 --> 0:09:26.439
<v Speaker 2>reporter downa Hall.

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 3>She is on the phone in San Francisco.

0:09:28.200 --> 0:09:30.679
<v Speaker 2>So, Dana, it does feel like, first of all, backdrop

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 2>a fair amount of movement in the executive suite at Tesla.

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Give us, give us a little bit of background here.

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 7>So when when you know, we say executive suite, there's

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 7>really only four people, there's only four named executives on

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:47.560
<v Speaker 7>Tesla's website and in their regulatory filings. And of the four,

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 7>the CFO is one of them. And Zach Kirkhorn had

0:09:50.280 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 7>been at Tesla for thirteen years. He'd been promoted several

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 7>times internally, and he became CFO four years ago. And

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.400
<v Speaker 7>Zach is really the person who kind of led Tesla

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:04.040
<v Speaker 7>to profit. He focused a lot on cost, on expanding margins,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 7>and it was under Zach that the company kind of

0:10:07.080 --> 0:10:10.520
<v Speaker 7>like steered through the pandemic, joined the s and P

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 7>five hundred SADS valuation sore. I mean, he is really

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 7>beloved by investors. So something happened and on Friday he

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 7>basically stepped down as CFO. His replacement is an internal candidate,

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 7>vab Pev viab Pev to today, I'm portraying that NATO policies.

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 2>Okay, we're all trying to figure it out to make sure,

0:10:32.920 --> 0:10:34.439
<v Speaker 2>we get it right, Yeah, fair.

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.760
<v Speaker 7>Enough, But then we didn't learn about this until Monday

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:42.319
<v Speaker 7>via regulatory filing. So, you know, I think broad strokes,

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 7>a lot of us are still trying to figure out

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:46.520
<v Speaker 7>what exactly happened with Zach and why he left. But

0:10:47.520 --> 0:10:49.920
<v Speaker 7>we do have a new CFO who's you know, in

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 7>the job now, but he's also still the chief accounting officer.

0:10:53.040 --> 0:10:56.960
<v Speaker 7>So to Tim's point earlier, you know, Musk doesn't really

0:10:56.960 --> 0:10:59.040
<v Speaker 7>think much of having more than one job. He has,

0:10:59.160 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 7>he's running six companies himself, But it is unusual for

0:11:02.360 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 7>a company of this size to have the CEO and

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 7>the CFO be the same person.

0:11:07.360 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 4>Is there any concern about a conflict of interest with

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 4>the person who sort of signs off on the you know,

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 4>accounting docs versus the financial docks. I mean, there is

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 4>a close relationship between accountants and you know, chief financial officers.

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:21.840
<v Speaker 4>But at the same time, isn't there good to have

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 4>some sort of independence there too, I would think.

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:28.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I haven't heard any like investors making a

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 7>huge cry of this. I mean, that would certainly be

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:37.719
<v Speaker 7>a concern that I would share, But but I think

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 7>the broader concern is that you know, CFOs typically have

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 7>like pretty broad operational experience in the business. Like Zach

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:48.240
<v Speaker 7>Kerkorn worked at McKenzie, he studied engineering at Penn. He

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 7>had been you know, always on the finance team at Teessel,

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 7>but was just like very much in the weeds about

0:11:53.520 --> 0:11:58.520
<v Speaker 7>how the company was running. And you know, the new

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 7>guy is more of like an account accounta who came

0:12:00.880 --> 0:12:04.080
<v Speaker 7>up through Price Waterhouse Coopers. And so it'll be interesting

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 7>to me to see how long he stays in the

0:12:07.520 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 7>CFO role.

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:11.120
<v Speaker 4>Jana, he just got We just learned about him yesterday.

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 4>I know, this is like flashbacks to twenty seventeen Tesla.

0:12:15.440 --> 0:12:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Remember that when all the it was like every day

0:12:17.200 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 4>there was an executive turning over.

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.280
<v Speaker 7>Mm hmm, yeah, I do remember, because you were.

0:12:21.160 --> 0:12:22.720
<v Speaker 4>The one breaking that news. That's how I remember.

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, And this was and this was a surprise to me.

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 7>I mean, you know, it really had had seemed like

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 7>Tesla's bench was pretty stable. Musk was focused on Twitter Slash.

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:36.080
<v Speaker 7>Now I guess now we call it X. You know,

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 7>the company has just had a quarter after quarter profitability,

0:12:38.840 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 7>so that the bench at Tesla actually seemed fairly stable.

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.080
<v Speaker 7>I was not expecting a Zech departure this summer at all.

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.319
<v Speaker 2>Is there something about the new CFO and his connection

0:12:49.480 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 2>to India that maybe makes it make more sense? I

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:53.560
<v Speaker 2>don't know.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 7>I mean, so, you know, Tesla obviously has a lot

0:12:56.800 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 7>of markets to expand into. India has always been top

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:05.240
<v Speaker 7>of the list all of South America. Another possibility, and

0:13:05.679 --> 0:13:07.800
<v Speaker 7>we've always been trying to figure out, you know, is

0:13:07.920 --> 0:13:11.200
<v Speaker 7>Tesla going to enter the India market. His name is

0:13:11.240 --> 0:13:14.480
<v Speaker 7>on like a filing in India around creating some kind

0:13:14.480 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 7>of office there, so he probably has been involved. But

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 7>I wouldn't read too much into that.

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Well, oh sorry, Carol, go ahead. I was gonna

0:13:21.800 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 4>ask against about the backdrop here if we if we

0:13:24.200 --> 0:13:26.439
<v Speaker 4>zoom out and look at Tesla as a company and

0:13:26.920 --> 0:13:30.960
<v Speaker 4>where it is right now. Obviously it's it's come a

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:33.480
<v Speaker 4>long way, Dana, in the years that you've been covering it,

0:13:33.600 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 4>But at the same time, despite all of its successes,

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:42.000
<v Speaker 4>it's still kind of clying its way to being really sustainable.

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, look at the way that the company has

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 4>still dealt with recalls, production delays, and that old cyber

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 4>truck that still isn't on the streets.

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I mean, I think I think it depends on

0:13:51.840 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 7>what you mean by sustainable. Like they have plenty of

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:58.240
<v Speaker 7>cash on their balance sheet, and you know, they continue

0:13:58.280 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 7>to be profitable, but they certainly have like cut prices

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:05.040
<v Speaker 7>in order to move metal, and they are not in

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 7>They don't have a truck, and I mean Americans really

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:09.520
<v Speaker 7>like trucks, and so the longer it takes to get

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 7>the cyber truck out, the more competitors like Rivian have

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 7>time to kind of really own that market. And you know,

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:20.360
<v Speaker 7>I mean Elon is sort of famous for introducing products

0:14:20.400 --> 0:14:23.200
<v Speaker 7>that then take years to bring out. You know, we

0:14:23.240 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 7>all thought we'd see the cyber truck this year. Now

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 7>we kind of learned during the last earnings round that

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:31.640
<v Speaker 7>the only ones that they've made or released candidates. So

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 7>I mean, we're still pretty far away from anything like

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 7>high volume production.

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Forgive me if if we already talked, I don't think

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 2>we did talk about this, But I mean, Kirk corn

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to him for a second.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 2>What he walked away with about almost six hundred million

0:14:42.920 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 2>dollars and so as CFO.

0:14:47.920 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 4>But did you not get that out of your first job, Carol, No.

0:14:51.280 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 3>Not even close. But that's okay different different worlds.

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 2>But I mean, could it possibly be Dana that he

0:14:59.120 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 2>walked away from the Sea job just because I'm set,

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:03.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm good, like I'm going to do something else, or

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 2>could he be ticked off that Meanwhile, what is Elon worth?

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 2>Because the stock has just taken off in the last decade.

0:15:10.800 --> 0:15:12.720
<v Speaker 7>You know, there's always this, there's this sort of joke

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:16.720
<v Speaker 7>among Tesla executives and employees that we're working at Tesla's

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 7>like dog lears, right, So like one year at Tesla

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 7>is like seven years in a normal company. So Zach

0:15:25.480 --> 0:15:28.520
<v Speaker 7>put in thirteen years, which is this magnificently long run.

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:31.200
<v Speaker 7>And you know, I think he's about to turn forty.

0:15:31.240 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 7>I don't know his exact birth date, but he's like Lea,

0:15:33.760 --> 0:15:35.640
<v Speaker 7>you know, he's like thirty eight or thirty nine. On

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 7>the cusp of being forty, I think that. I mean,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:39.880
<v Speaker 7>I don't know how old you guys are, but when

0:15:39.920 --> 0:15:41.640
<v Speaker 7>I turned forty, that was a big moment for me

0:15:41.720 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 7>to kind of take the stock of my life. And

0:15:43.320 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 7>to your point, he has done a lot for Tesla.

0:15:46.760 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 7>The company is in a good place financially. He's still

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 7>very young, and I could see him taking on another

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.400
<v Speaker 7>job at some point as a CEO, I think he's

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 7>got the chops to do it. And so there's a

0:15:57.880 --> 0:16:00.920
<v Speaker 7>lot of theories as to why he left, but you know,

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 7>I don't have anything solid to share at the moment.

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure those are things you're you're still chasing at

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 4>this point, Dana, so so always chasing, always chasing. And

0:16:10.240 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 4>you know what, if you know why he left, you

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 4>know how to get in touch with Dana. She's on

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.200
<v Speaker 4>she's on the platform formally known as X as well.

0:16:17.240 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 4>But I don't know not much Dana anymore.

0:16:20.400 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 2>I'm not well. One thing I wanted to ask you

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 2>we just got about a minute left here, Dana, is

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:25.560
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder, like you just said, you know, you

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:28.400
<v Speaker 2>turn as individuals, we turn a certain age and we

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 2>like do sometimes take stock of our of our lives

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 2>and is there somewhere where Tesla, which is really you know,

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 2>had the field to itself for a long time and

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 2>now there's a lot more competition. We were talking earlier

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 2>with Rivian earnings. You know, I saw two Rivians this

0:16:41.640 --> 0:16:44.360
<v Speaker 2>past weekend. I have not ever, i think, seen them

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 2>on the road. So it's like I feel like, all

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:48.600
<v Speaker 2>of a sudden, they're out there there's more competition for Tesla.

0:16:48.800 --> 0:16:52.000
<v Speaker 2>Is Tesla kind of maybe taking stock a little bit

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 2>of kind of where its world is now, kind of

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 2>where it needs to go in a very different environment

0:16:56.480 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 2>from where it's been the last decade or so. Yeah.

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 7>Probably, I mean it's pret you know, I think I

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 7>think for so long Tesla Tesla is all about proving

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:08.440
<v Speaker 7>to the world that it could make a profitable electric

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.880
<v Speaker 7>car that consumers really wanted. And they have done that.

0:17:10.960 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 7>They have proven that, and now they're you know, they're expanding,

0:17:14.240 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 7>They're building a new factory in Mexico, They're going to

0:17:17.000 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 7>come out with the cyber truck and the next generation

0:17:19.160 --> 0:17:22.960
<v Speaker 7>vehicle platform, and they've kind of like they're they're done

0:17:23.119 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 7>being this kind of like scrappy startup. They're part of

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 7>the S and P five hundred. Now they need to

0:17:27.400 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 7>sort of mature as a as an organization. And you know,

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 7>I think Zach has a lot of institutional knowledge that's

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:36.199
<v Speaker 7>kind of going out the door. But you know, his

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 7>successor also has a lot of inside knowledge. So it's

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.159
<v Speaker 7>it's not a dramatic change, but the CFO is a

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 7>big deal. It's a big deal for a company like Tesla.

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and as you said, the executive suite really only

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 2>for people.

0:17:48.640 --> 0:17:51.399
<v Speaker 3>So it's again some perspective. Hey Dana, thank you.

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 2>As always, Bloomberg News Senior Technology put her down a

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:55.920
<v Speaker 2>hall on the phone in San Francisco. Shere's a Tesla

0:17:55.960 --> 0:17:58.159
<v Speaker 2>by the way, app one hundred and two percent so

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:00.520
<v Speaker 2>far here in twenty twenty three.

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.479
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:09.560
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on Bloomberg Radio,

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App, and YouTube. You can also listen

0:18:13.119 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station,

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 3>You guys talked about Zoom yesterday, right, Yeah.

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.399
<v Speaker 4>I mean if you think about perhaps the company that

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 4>most epitomizes working from home, yeah, it's Zoom. I mean

0:18:30.200 --> 0:18:32.600
<v Speaker 4>it was not just a you know, a COVID stock,

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 4>but it was also what we were all learning how

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 4>to use in the early days of the pandemic.

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.760
<v Speaker 4>We talked about it yesterday because even they're telling employees

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 4>to get back to the office. Carol, Yeah, I know, Zoom.

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.199
<v Speaker 4>If you live near a of Zoom office, you got

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 4>to come in a couple days a week. So we've

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 4>seen Amazon, Chipotle, black Rock, companies as varied as those

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 4>telling hey, workers, workers, Hey, you got to come back

0:18:51.040 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 4>to the office.

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting, right, we're seeing that post COVID several

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 2>years out and how that is kind of yep, they're

0:18:57.080 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 2>coming back to the office. The other thing at play,

0:18:59.280 --> 0:19:01.119
<v Speaker 2>right we see when it comes to how we are

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 2>working going forward.

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:06.719
<v Speaker 3>Is just the explosion of what the think about AI

0:19:07.200 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 3>around artificial intelligence generative AI and what does it mean

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:12.400
<v Speaker 3>eventually for work.

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, fortunately McKenzie is out with a new report that

0:19:14.880 --> 0:19:17.080
<v Speaker 4>says twelve million workers are going to move into new

0:19:17.080 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 4>lines of work by twenty thirty. I guess I'm not

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 4>saying fortunately that's fortunately there's a report. You know, we'll

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 4>see if it's fortunately unfortunately that AI is forcing people

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 4>to move to new lines of work. Very pleased to

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:31.000
<v Speaker 4>have with us this afternoon, Quaylon Ellen, Grude, partner at

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 4>McKinsey Global Institute, joins us via zoom from Minneapolis. A

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:38.280
<v Speaker 4>director and senior partner at the McKinsey Global Institute. Quailan,

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:40.240
<v Speaker 4>how are you great?

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 8>Great to be with you today.

0:19:41.400 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's great to have you join us on this.

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:46.560
<v Speaker 4>So you know, when did you guys start thinking about

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 4>the impact of AI on workers? Because I think for

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 4>a lot of people this is relatively new phenomenon with

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.640
<v Speaker 4>the explosion of chat GBT last fall.

0:19:54.640 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely, we've been thinking about the future of work now

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:00.920
<v Speaker 8>for about a decade and modeling what does automation due

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 8>to jobs which are biggest gaining jobs, losing occupational categories.

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:08.480
<v Speaker 8>And then to your point, just about six months ago,

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:12.640
<v Speaker 8>start a delayer on to automation and COVID nineteen impact

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 8>the impact of GENAI. So now we've put all of

0:20:15.119 --> 0:20:17.879
<v Speaker 8>those three things together to say, what do the future

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 8>of jobs look like in the United States?

0:20:19.760 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 3>All right, so play it out for us, what do

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 3>they look like? I am a robot, absolutely, yeah, I

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 3>am a robots indeed.

0:20:27.000 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 8>I think the bottom line is about thirty percent of

0:20:29.400 --> 0:20:34.080
<v Speaker 8>the activities that US workers do today could be automated

0:20:34.160 --> 0:20:36.159
<v Speaker 8>away by the end of twenty thirty, so over the

0:20:36.200 --> 0:20:39.960
<v Speaker 8>next seven years. And that again is through automation, COVID

0:20:40.040 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 8>nineteen impact, mostly affecting interpersonal interactions, and THENI GENAI alone,

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:49.359
<v Speaker 8>if you just isolate that piece, increase that percentage by

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 8>about nine or state or nine percent, so up until

0:20:52.320 --> 0:20:56.040
<v Speaker 8>about thirty percent of overall activities. There are a lot

0:20:56.080 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 8>of jobs that will be fewer, and there will be

0:21:00.720 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 8>quite a few more overall. I think it's good news

0:21:04.440 --> 0:21:07.080
<v Speaker 8>to your point earlier. We will have more jobs in

0:21:07.080 --> 0:21:08.960
<v Speaker 8>the future, I think is the great news, and those

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 8>jobs will be higher paying jobs. They will be also

0:21:12.000 --> 0:21:15.640
<v Speaker 8>higher skilled jobs that on average require higher average education.

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:19.160
<v Speaker 8>The tough news, or the tough transition to get there,

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.439
<v Speaker 8>is we don't necessarily have the workforce today that is

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:25.120
<v Speaker 8>best suited for those jobs of the future. So first,

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 8>where are we gaining Where are we losing? We are

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 8>gaining jobs in healthcare, in STEM categories, and in transportation delivery,

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:35.600
<v Speaker 8>all of those other areas. We are losing jobs in

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:39.880
<v Speaker 8>primarily four big occupations, and those four occupations make up

0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.800
<v Speaker 8>about eighty percent of the job losses between now and

0:21:42.840 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 8>twenty thirty. That is customer service, food service, and sales

0:21:48.960 --> 0:21:53.560
<v Speaker 8>production or manufacturing and office services or assistants. And you've

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 8>all seen kind of food chiosks, that fast food restaurants, right,

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:58.399
<v Speaker 8>We've seen all of these different elements. But when you

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 8>add them together, those four our occupations make up eighty

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 8>percent of the occupational switches, which is about twelve million

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 8>of them between now and twenty thirty.

0:22:06.960 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 2>So before we get into that, it's a lot. But

0:22:09.560 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 2>I've also seen it. I've done it right. I'm at

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:15.720
<v Speaker 2>an airport, I order on an iPad and then stuff

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>just gets delivered. I've gone to a retailer here.

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 3>Sorry, but I'm what you and I've done this before

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 3>and sometimes it works.

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:26.680
<v Speaker 4>It's sometimes it's also just terrible, not all the time.

0:22:27.040 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 4>Maybe I'm just thinking of Newark Airport. I don't know,

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 4>no offense.

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh, come on, I know, pick on the New Jersey.

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 4>We've had some fun times there, we have.

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 3>But kind of works. O.

0:22:35.920 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 4>God, I don't know.

0:22:36.760 --> 0:22:37.760
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't always work.

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:39.360
<v Speaker 4>It's like, no, it doesn't always work.

0:22:39.600 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 3>But I'm amazed at that.

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I think how many times I check out at a supermarket,

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I just and I go there a target, a retailer,

0:22:48.760 --> 0:22:50.520
<v Speaker 2>tzar you good, Azara, you drop it.

0:22:50.480 --> 0:22:50.920
<v Speaker 1>In a bin.

0:22:51.320 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 4>That's amazing.

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 3>It shows up. That blows my mind.

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:58.399
<v Speaker 4>It shows up on like unicloide does that too, It's amazing. Yeah,

0:22:58.840 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 4>And you.

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.960
<v Speaker 2>Check out and you take off the safety you know

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:04.880
<v Speaker 2>whatever they what do they call them?

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 8>That?

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 2>You know what I mean, yeah, the anti theft things,

0:23:07.560 --> 0:23:09.959
<v Speaker 2>the anti theft things, like I do it all and

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 2>like somebody's watching you, but it's like WHOA.

0:23:13.160 --> 0:23:14.360
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know.

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 4>Is the experience better though? That's the thing, like, you know,

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 4>if speaking of airports, we've done this, you know, we've

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:22.280
<v Speaker 4>gone airports together where there's nobody to actually check us in, right,

0:23:22.320 --> 0:23:23.879
<v Speaker 4>and we're like, you know, we know it's because of

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:24.720
<v Speaker 4>cost cuts.

0:23:24.480 --> 0:23:28.080
<v Speaker 3>And we're flying business, thank you Blue Berk. We do everything.

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:31.360
<v Speaker 4>But what's the balance here, Quaylon that of actually having

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 4>like an experience it's better because who cares? If not,

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:35.920
<v Speaker 4>who cares? But it's like it's one thing to replace people,

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.920
<v Speaker 4>it's another thing to replace them with, you know, an

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:39.920
<v Speaker 4>inferior product.

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 3>And I thought all the companies are about customer service

0:23:42.080 --> 0:23:43.240
<v Speaker 3>customers first.

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:47.000
<v Speaker 8>Not apparently, And there is absolutely a balance, and there's

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.600
<v Speaker 8>also a bit of a transition pain point to get there.

0:23:49.880 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 8>But I think the alternative is not always great customer

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.600
<v Speaker 8>service in person. It could be they're understaff, they don't

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:58.879
<v Speaker 8>actually have the people, and so the alternative is do

0:23:58.920 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 8>you want to wait for ten fifteen minutes to flag

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.200
<v Speaker 8>somebody down to get your order or do you want

0:24:03.200 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 8>to enter it into the iPad or do you want

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 8>to pay two dollars more for that sandwich or not?

0:24:07.920 --> 0:24:09.879
<v Speaker 8>And so I think those are the trade offs that

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 8>we're really wrestling.

0:24:11.040 --> 0:24:12.640
<v Speaker 3>Well, when does the cost come to us?

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Because I've go to the supermarket and man, I'm doing

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.520
<v Speaker 2>all the work, and or I go to the airport and.

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 3>They're like, you want an extra bag?

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:19.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:24:19.119 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 3>You know, So when does that cost come back to

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 3>the customer?

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.159
<v Speaker 8>I think we've already started to see it right on

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.840
<v Speaker 8>so many different products. Some of that has been passed along,

0:24:29.280 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 8>some of the costs have been kind of captured and

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 8>improved better efficiency and effectiveness, part which has not then

0:24:35.359 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 8>been passed on in higher prices, even though supply chains

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 8>have been challenged and prices across many categories have gone up,

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 8>most notably in service and gas areas. I think some

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.240
<v Speaker 8>of that will flow through over the next few years.

0:24:49.280 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 8>We'll see where it all settles out. But I do

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 8>think there are automation improvements that are being made and

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 8>then consumers do stand to benefit from some of that.

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Hey, really quickly, thirty seconds, because we've got to story

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.600
<v Speaker 2>coming up about the lack of workers in the healthcare area.

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 2>You said we are seeing gains in health healthcare thirty

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 2>seconds what specifically.

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, frankly across the board, given consumer spending aging in

0:25:14.640 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 8>the United States and frankly in many developed countries around

0:25:17.720 --> 0:25:23.880
<v Speaker 8>the world. So nursing tech in healthcare as well. Overall,

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:25.840
<v Speaker 8>I think we'll need quite a few more jobs in

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:26.639
<v Speaker 8>those areas well.

0:25:26.640 --> 0:25:28.240
<v Speaker 2>That certainly fits into the story that we're going to

0:25:28.280 --> 0:25:31.480
<v Speaker 2>talk about. Quailan, thank you so much. Quaylan and Ellen Gruge.

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:34.119
<v Speaker 2>She is director and senior partner at mckensey Global Institute

0:25:34.119 --> 0:25:37.159
<v Speaker 2>on Zoom for Minneapolis. Their latest report, Generative AI in

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the Future of Work in America. It wasn't so bad

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:39.560
<v Speaker 2>in new work.

0:25:39.680 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 4>Please please enter your symptoms on this iPad.

0:25:42.480 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Exactly Who do I complain to? That's the thing that

0:25:45.080 --> 0:25:47.440
<v Speaker 2>bothers me. There's no one ever to complain you.

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 4>Please to meet Carol.

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 3>All right, I will. This is Blomberg.

0:25:52.560 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 2>Muckle a journal now about you.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:25:57.720
<v Speaker 5>Let me drive?

0:25:58.240 --> 0:26:04.600
<v Speaker 3>No, no, no, honry please, I'll do the gravel wat I

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 3>want to try.

0:26:05.200 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 2>It's a good question.

0:26:12.200 --> 0:26:17.000
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the globe. Well, ja don

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 1>on Bluebird Radio.

0:26:18.760 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody's safe to say we thought the closes

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:23.240
<v Speaker 2>is going to be a little bit different, certainly earlier today.

0:26:23.280 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 2>We're well off our lows of the session on the

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.640
<v Speaker 2>equity trade, still down across the board, tim, but yeah,

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:31.680
<v Speaker 2>like I said, not as bad as it looked earlier today.

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.560
<v Speaker 2>And yields have definitely bounced a little bit off their low,

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.919
<v Speaker 2>especially the two year. But we're still looking at a

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:39.879
<v Speaker 2>ten year at about four point zero one two year

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:41.320
<v Speaker 2>note with the other four seventy five.

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:43.399
<v Speaker 4>Okay, a lot on the agenda, Carol. We got with

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:45.600
<v Speaker 4>today's trade, right, We got the banks, we talked about

0:26:45.600 --> 0:26:49.439
<v Speaker 4>the move and yields ups. Earnings not so great. Some

0:26:49.440 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 4>pharmaceutical company earnings those were pretty good. A couple FED

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:56.400
<v Speaker 4>We heard from a couple FED presidents, one voting, one

0:26:56.480 --> 0:27:00.520
<v Speaker 4>non voting. The big question, what does it mean for tomorrow?

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:01.680
<v Speaker 4>What does it mean for the rest of the year,

0:27:01.680 --> 0:27:02.440
<v Speaker 4>What does it mean for the FED?

0:27:02.600 --> 0:27:04.480
<v Speaker 2>I am curious about clarity, and we've got a perfect

0:27:04.520 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 2>voice to do it. Understands market cycles has seen several

0:27:07.480 --> 0:27:12.399
<v Speaker 2>many like like us. Sam Stovel is cfre's chief investment

0:27:12.480 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 2>strategist on zoom on this Tuesday in Allentown, Pennsylvania. Sam

0:27:16.480 --> 0:27:17.919
<v Speaker 2>It is good to have you back. And I do

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.840
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate the way you analyze the market. We all do,

0:27:21.080 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 2>and you know, relate it to different cycles. So when

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.919
<v Speaker 2>you look at this cycles, this cycle, excuse me, you

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:29.800
<v Speaker 2>know what matters in a day where we feel like

0:27:29.800 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 2>we had a dump of news on China and Italy,

0:27:32.800 --> 0:27:34.360
<v Speaker 2>US banks, a lot of stuff going on.

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:35.080
<v Speaker 3>What matters?

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:38.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think a lot of that stuff matters, Carol,

0:27:38.280 --> 0:27:40.959
<v Speaker 6>But good to talk to you and Tim today. I

0:27:41.000 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 6>think investors have been getting the feeling that maybe we've

0:27:44.480 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 6>gone a little bit too far with the market advance.

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 6>The SMP is up twenty eight percent since the October

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:54.080
<v Speaker 6>twelfth low. The Nasdaq was up forty six percent through

0:27:54.080 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 6>the end of July, and being a reader of this

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 6>Stock Trader's Almanac and doing my own research, realize that

0:28:01.280 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 6>August is the third worst month of the year, second

0:28:04.359 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 6>worst for the NASDAK. But then we have September, which

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 6>is the worst of the year for both indices. Just

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 6>from a seasonal perspective, maybe we are entering into a

0:28:14.960 --> 0:28:18.879
<v Speaker 6>digestion phase, because, let's face it, the Nasdaq was trading

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 6>at twenty six percent above it's two hundred day moving average,

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:24.960
<v Speaker 6>which is a statistical extreme.

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 4>So you're saying this is more about seasonality and technicals

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 4>than actual fundamentals.

0:28:30.359 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 6>I wouldn't go that far, because when you look to

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.400
<v Speaker 6>the fundamentals, you're seeing, yes, the second quarter earnings did

0:28:36.440 --> 0:28:39.080
<v Speaker 6>come in a little bit better than expected, meaning they

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:42.520
<v Speaker 6>fell a little less than was anticipated. Nine of the

0:28:42.560 --> 0:28:46.360
<v Speaker 6>eleven sectors are actually showing an improvement in what will

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 6>probably end up being the conclusion for the second quarter

0:28:49.720 --> 0:28:53.080
<v Speaker 6>versus their June thirtieth estimates. And when you look to

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 6>twenty twenty four, we're still focusing on about a twelve

0:28:56.800 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 6>percent year on year rise for the S and P

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 6>five hundreds. So should we finally get the last rate hike,

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:08.160
<v Speaker 6>I think investors will be feeling good because we tend

0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.200
<v Speaker 6>to see a hike, skip, and a jump that takes

0:29:11.240 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 6>place after the FED is finally finished.

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:15.880
<v Speaker 2>What about sam about the impact of potentially it seems

0:29:15.920 --> 0:29:19.880
<v Speaker 2>like the one narrative that feels fairly consistent is higher

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 2>for longer from the FED, so that even if they

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:25.840
<v Speaker 2>stop raising rates, they're going to keep them there for

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 2>a while. What's the longer term impact of that on

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the equity trade?

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think You're absolutely right that normally there is

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 6>a nine month differential between the last rate hike and

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:41.840
<v Speaker 6>the first rate cut, and the market traditionally has risen

0:29:41.880 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 6>about thirteen percent, along with all sizes, styles, sectors, and

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 6>ninety nine percent of the sub industries. But if the

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:53.480
<v Speaker 6>FED decides to keep rates elevated for longer, I think

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 6>they will be doing so if we do not end

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:59.000
<v Speaker 6>up falling into recession, and if we do end up

0:29:59.040 --> 0:30:01.640
<v Speaker 6>with a soft land, which is exactly what they would

0:30:01.640 --> 0:30:05.480
<v Speaker 6>be hoping for, because the higher rates would ensure that

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 6>we would end up with a decline in the core

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:14.200
<v Speaker 6>PCEE that will likely stick around rather than simply touch

0:30:14.280 --> 0:30:16.880
<v Speaker 6>the low point and then bounce once again. So I

0:30:16.880 --> 0:30:18.960
<v Speaker 6>would tend to say that the FED would be very

0:30:18.960 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 6>happy to keep rates higher for longer. But if we

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 6>don't end up getting thrown into recession, that would be

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:28.240
<v Speaker 6>icing on the cake, because if we did fall into recession,

0:30:28.520 --> 0:30:30.800
<v Speaker 6>the FED would have to reverse course and start to cut.

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 2>But is it more likely that we fall into recession

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:36.560
<v Speaker 2>if we keep higher for longer, or we'll investors see

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 2>that like, okay, we're done. We're just kind of marking

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.840
<v Speaker 2>time until the FED feels comfortable enough to start cutting rates.

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:45.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think actually you can say yes to both

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 6>of those partial questions. First off, if the FED does

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 6>raise rates for longer, then it increases the likelihood of recession.

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.440
<v Speaker 6>But at the same time, if the investors realize that

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:59.400
<v Speaker 6>the FED will be cutting interest rates, then that could

0:30:59.400 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 6>be a reason that the recession might end up being

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 6>shallower than anticipated. I mean, when we look to all

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 6>of the other historical reference points, we should be in

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 6>recession by now. Whenever inflation has been above six percent,

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 6>we've fallen into recession. Year on year declines and leading

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:22.440
<v Speaker 6>economic indicators have signaled recession earnings, recessions have signaled economic recessions,

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.640
<v Speaker 6>and so forth. So basically, this would be a one

0:31:26.680 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 6>of the few times in which a majority of the

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 6>fairly reliable indicators did not work.

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.240
<v Speaker 4>So it raises the question, Well, actually, I want to

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:36.760
<v Speaker 4>go back to something that you said that I've been

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.440
<v Speaker 4>thinking about a hike, skip and a jump. That's what

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.840
<v Speaker 4>you said, right, Yes, so we've had the hike, we've

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:48.480
<v Speaker 4>had a skip, but we had another hike were you anticipating?

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 4>So where does the h Where does this end? In

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 4>your opinion, we think.

0:31:52.720 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 6>It ends in September, they will hike rates one more time,

0:31:56.800 --> 0:31:59.960
<v Speaker 6>and then they will be on hold until twenty twenty four.

0:32:00.720 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 6>Our expectation right now is that they probably will start

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.200
<v Speaker 6>to cut rates by the end of the first quarter

0:32:07.320 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 6>or into the second quarter, and then gradually do so

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 6>maybe two or three times next year, But that certainly

0:32:14.560 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 6>is dependent upon the data. Maybe we do end up

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 6>staying higher for longer. But even when we have had

0:32:22.160 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 6>a hike a skip, we've had had the jump in

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:28.360
<v Speaker 6>the markets, Even with a subsequent hike in interest rates,

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 6>the market continues to rise, primarily because they realize that

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 6>the end is year, the end of the hiking process

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:37.160
<v Speaker 6>is almost over.

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 3>So, Sam, I'm going to go back to what you said.

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>You know, you talked about earnings of recession usually precedes

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.440
<v Speaker 2>an economic recession. There are other indicators out there that

0:32:43.480 --> 0:32:45.760
<v Speaker 2>all point to that we're going to get into a recession.

0:32:46.720 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 2>And then you kind of said, but this could be

0:32:48.400 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 2>potentially one of those times when the regular signals.

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Don't bear out.

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 2>Do you actually believe it could be different this time around?

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.320
<v Speaker 2>And forgive me, I've only got about thirty five seconds.

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Left, Okay, I hate to say say this time is different.

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:03.640
<v Speaker 6>I do think that maybe we do end up a recession,

0:33:03.680 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 6>but it ends up materializing in twenty twenty four rather

0:33:07.480 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 6>than when most people had been anticipating it to occur

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 6>in the second half of this year.

0:33:12.080 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so in case we get there, but just different

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 3>in terms of timing, I think.

0:33:16.160 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 6>So I'll add to that all of the plethora of

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:23.240
<v Speaker 6>inverted Buel curves and the weight of the potential recession

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 6>is over one.

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 8>All right, cool?

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 2>Great, Oh my god, so glad we got some time

0:33:26.960 --> 0:33:29.920
<v Speaker 2>with you, Sam b Wile Sam Stowell, Chief Investment Strategers

0:33:29.920 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 2>over at CFRA. Joining us on zoom in Allentown, Pennsylvania.

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast of a little

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, Spotify, and anywhere else you get your podcasts.

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Listen live weekday afternoons from three to six Eastern on

0:33:44.640 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business App. You can also watch us live every

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:54.600
<v Speaker 1>weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Journal alone.