1 00:00:08,880 --> 00:00:12,640 Speaker 1: Welcome to The Favorites, the podcast presented by BET three 2 00:00:12,720 --> 00:00:15,000 Speaker 1: six five. We are part of the Volume Podcast Network. 3 00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:18,680 Speaker 1: I am Chad Noman of the Action Network. I am 4 00:00:18,800 --> 00:00:23,120 Speaker 1: live from my Tommy John home studio. I'm joined as 5 00:00:23,160 --> 00:00:28,320 Speaker 1: always by my co host, my companion, my compadre, my bff, 6 00:00:28,440 --> 00:00:32,280 Speaker 1: professional better Simon Hunter, and os im In. 7 00:00:32,960 --> 00:00:34,520 Speaker 2: Hello, Chad, how are we doing? Brother? 8 00:00:35,040 --> 00:00:38,200 Speaker 1: You know I'm so excited for today. You know, it's 9 00:00:38,240 --> 00:00:42,360 Speaker 1: one of my favorite days. It's one of my favorite 10 00:00:42,440 --> 00:00:45,320 Speaker 1: days of the year. It's one of my favorite episodes 11 00:00:45,360 --> 00:00:47,960 Speaker 1: that we do every year. I get to talk to 12 00:00:48,640 --> 00:00:53,159 Speaker 1: my favorite and you will guess he's truly become my bff. 13 00:00:53,400 --> 00:00:54,600 Speaker 1: We talk even beyond the show. 14 00:00:54,680 --> 00:00:55,120 Speaker 3: It's true. 15 00:00:55,520 --> 00:01:00,280 Speaker 1: It's a true Hollywood insider, a top talent manager at 16 00:01:00,360 --> 00:01:03,400 Speaker 1: Mosaic in Los Angeles, a man named one of the 17 00:01:03,480 --> 00:01:08,840 Speaker 1: forty most powerful people in comedy by The Hollywood Reporter. 18 00:01:09,319 --> 00:01:15,000 Speaker 1: Most importantly, he's one of America's true Academy Awards savants 19 00:01:15,040 --> 00:01:20,520 Speaker 1: who can effortlessly rattle off every major category nominee across 20 00:01:20,680 --> 00:01:26,080 Speaker 1: every year. He's our favorite kind of Sickoh, He's Michael Lasker. 21 00:01:26,240 --> 00:01:28,160 Speaker 1: Welcome back to the show. Laskar. 22 00:01:28,640 --> 00:01:30,479 Speaker 3: Thank you. It's great to be back with you guys. 23 00:01:30,520 --> 00:01:32,920 Speaker 3: Thanks Chad, Thanks Simon. I want to point out that 24 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:36,200 Speaker 3: you're you're reporting on a Hollywood Reporter issue that is 25 00:01:36,240 --> 00:01:39,119 Speaker 3: like maybe seven or eight years old. Points. 26 00:01:39,440 --> 00:01:42,920 Speaker 1: I liked that it's in there. Every single year we 27 00:01:43,000 --> 00:01:45,119 Speaker 1: do it. And I remember when you first came on 28 00:01:45,920 --> 00:01:50,760 Speaker 1: and we mentioned it. You very humbly try to distract 29 00:01:51,200 --> 00:01:55,720 Speaker 1: from the mention because at that point it was like, 30 00:01:56,160 --> 00:01:58,960 Speaker 1: I don't know, a year or two old. So at 31 00:01:58,960 --> 00:02:02,200 Speaker 1: this point it is like five six years old. Matt 32 00:02:02,200 --> 00:02:04,240 Speaker 1: Mitchell continues to put it in there. He loves to 33 00:02:04,240 --> 00:02:05,880 Speaker 1: put it in there. He thinks it brings a lot 34 00:02:05,920 --> 00:02:07,040 Speaker 1: of credibility and grount no. 35 00:02:07,040 --> 00:02:09,920 Speaker 3: We should well Matt Mitchell, He's our guru. He knows 36 00:02:09,960 --> 00:02:12,560 Speaker 3: going on, guys, how are you? I mean, by the way, 37 00:02:13,040 --> 00:02:15,320 Speaker 3: I'm gonna just say not to not to immediately take 38 00:02:15,360 --> 00:02:17,320 Speaker 3: over the pod, but I'm going to say what I 39 00:02:17,320 --> 00:02:19,680 Speaker 3: think is very exciting and must be super exciting for 40 00:02:19,760 --> 00:02:22,280 Speaker 3: you guys. This is a great year for the Oscars. 41 00:02:22,440 --> 00:02:24,760 Speaker 3: This is a year with a lot of suspense. I mean, 42 00:02:24,840 --> 00:02:28,320 Speaker 3: last year, of course, Oppenheimer was like mowing everybody down. 43 00:02:28,400 --> 00:02:30,960 Speaker 3: The previous year, everything everywhere was like on its way 44 00:02:31,040 --> 00:02:33,799 Speaker 3: towards the end. They're like, I don't know if I'm 45 00:02:33,800 --> 00:02:36,520 Speaker 3: gonna be right today. There's a lot of good races still, 46 00:02:36,840 --> 00:02:38,839 Speaker 3: let's break him down. But I mean, I would think, 47 00:02:38,960 --> 00:02:40,800 Speaker 3: I mean, you guys are the experts, like there's a 48 00:02:40,800 --> 00:02:42,239 Speaker 3: way to actually make some money this year. 49 00:02:42,600 --> 00:02:45,040 Speaker 1: I think there is going to be. It's really interesting 50 00:02:45,040 --> 00:02:47,080 Speaker 1: that we're starting to see a lot of sort of 51 00:02:47,200 --> 00:02:50,239 Speaker 1: movement in the markets just because some of the awards 52 00:02:50,520 --> 00:02:54,040 Speaker 1: have been so inconsistent. There have been some controversies. We're 53 00:02:54,080 --> 00:02:56,360 Speaker 1: going to get into all of it as a reminder. 54 00:02:56,919 --> 00:02:59,160 Speaker 1: The Favorites podcast is presented by Bet three six y 55 00:02:59,200 --> 00:03:02,720 Speaker 1: five and now new Bet three six y five. Customers 56 00:03:02,720 --> 00:03:04,840 Speaker 1: get one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets when 57 00:03:04,840 --> 00:03:08,160 Speaker 1: you bet five dollars, sign up using promo code Favorites, 58 00:03:08,160 --> 00:03:10,480 Speaker 1: deposit ten dollars, place a bet for five dollars to 59 00:03:10,480 --> 00:03:13,200 Speaker 1: get one hundred and fifty dollars in bonus bets. Those 60 00:03:13,280 --> 00:03:16,120 Speaker 1: bonus bets can be used on spreads, totals, player props, futures, 61 00:03:16,120 --> 00:03:18,760 Speaker 1: and more. Whatever the moment, it's never ordinary. I Bet 62 00:03:18,800 --> 00:03:21,480 Speaker 1: three six y five must be twenty one or older 63 00:03:21,520 --> 00:03:25,760 Speaker 1: in present in Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, North Carolina, 64 00:03:25,800 --> 00:03:29,040 Speaker 1: New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, or eighteen and older in Kentucky. 65 00:03:29,440 --> 00:03:32,720 Speaker 1: Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler or one eight 66 00:03:32,840 --> 00:03:36,720 Speaker 1: hundred bets off in Iowa terms. Conditioned restrictions apply. And 67 00:03:37,440 --> 00:03:44,040 Speaker 1: before we dive in another reminder, you can officially RSVP 68 00:03:44,400 --> 00:03:49,680 Speaker 1: for our free Favorites live show event in Chicago. Let's 69 00:03:49,720 --> 00:03:53,440 Speaker 1: fill this room, folks. This will be for the Elite 70 00:03:53,640 --> 00:03:58,400 Speaker 1: eight March Madness Games Saturday, March twenty ninth. Joe's Bar 71 00:03:58,720 --> 00:04:03,640 Speaker 1: on Weed Street also better known as joe'son Weed nearest 72 00:04:03,720 --> 00:04:07,680 Speaker 1: Lincoln Park in Chicago. Free event, free drinks, free live show. 73 00:04:07,760 --> 00:04:10,440 Speaker 1: Me Simon plus some other folks going to be joined 74 00:04:10,480 --> 00:04:14,960 Speaker 1: and please RSVP to reserve your spot. Click the link 75 00:04:15,000 --> 00:04:21,960 Speaker 1: in this episode's description or just Google Favorites Live Event Chicago. Simon. 76 00:04:22,520 --> 00:04:26,200 Speaker 1: I'm already losing sleep over like people coming to this thing. 77 00:04:26,279 --> 00:04:27,279 Speaker 1: I just wanted to. 78 00:04:27,080 --> 00:04:30,599 Speaker 3: Know, like, how big is this place? What do we 79 00:04:30,640 --> 00:04:31,200 Speaker 3: have to fill here? 80 00:04:31,480 --> 00:04:33,760 Speaker 1: It's it's a decent size. We got it, we got it. 81 00:04:33,839 --> 00:04:35,840 Speaker 1: We gotta get some people in there. That's all I'm saying. 82 00:04:35,880 --> 00:04:40,240 Speaker 1: And I feel extra pressure being from Chicago. Like I've 83 00:04:40,279 --> 00:04:42,840 Speaker 1: already texted, like you know, you got different text chains 84 00:04:42,839 --> 00:04:44,880 Speaker 1: and stuff, and I got a text chain with all 85 00:04:44,960 --> 00:04:47,080 Speaker 1: my friends that I went to college with to Indiana 86 00:04:47,120 --> 00:04:50,320 Speaker 1: with who all live in Chicago. I'm like, please come, 87 00:04:50,440 --> 00:04:52,640 Speaker 1: let's make it a reunion. Tell all your kids and 88 00:04:52,760 --> 00:04:55,039 Speaker 1: tell all your friends, Like, let's just fill this room. 89 00:04:55,200 --> 00:04:56,720 Speaker 2: Heyay, you're gota fudge numbers. I try to bring in 90 00:04:56,760 --> 00:04:58,720 Speaker 2: twenty five relatives. That's what my move was in the 91 00:04:58,720 --> 00:04:59,560 Speaker 2: Philadelphia one. 92 00:04:59,600 --> 00:05:01,960 Speaker 1: So oh my god, I like every one of my 93 00:05:02,000 --> 00:05:04,360 Speaker 1: dad's eighty year old friends. They're going to be turning out, 94 00:05:04,440 --> 00:05:07,680 Speaker 1: that's all. We'll get them a special room. All right, 95 00:05:07,720 --> 00:05:09,560 Speaker 1: We're ready to dig in here where we're gonna get 96 00:05:09,680 --> 00:05:14,800 Speaker 1: We're going to focus on the eight major categories. Best Picture, Director, Actor, Actress, 97 00:05:14,839 --> 00:05:20,640 Speaker 1: Supporting Actor, actress, Screenplay, Original screenplay, Adapted screenplay. This will 98 00:05:20,680 --> 00:05:22,839 Speaker 1: be fun because Lasker, you and I we spoke in 99 00:05:22,839 --> 00:05:26,840 Speaker 1: December for a little while late in December, and we 100 00:05:26,880 --> 00:05:29,840 Speaker 1: went through the odds, like on prediction markets, and we 101 00:05:29,920 --> 00:05:32,840 Speaker 1: talked about sort of what the markets were saying and 102 00:05:32,880 --> 00:05:39,760 Speaker 1: you gave me your best instincts of what you were hearing, seeing, wondering, thinking, 103 00:05:39,880 --> 00:05:43,080 Speaker 1: based on your expertise through a bunch of categories. So 104 00:05:43,920 --> 00:05:47,080 Speaker 1: I tried to remember having not taken notes on that call, 105 00:05:47,120 --> 00:05:49,200 Speaker 1: because you're my bff, and I don't take notes on 106 00:05:49,240 --> 00:05:49,719 Speaker 1: those calls. 107 00:05:49,760 --> 00:05:51,600 Speaker 3: I know we just were just like staring at each 108 00:05:51,600 --> 00:05:54,159 Speaker 3: other's eyes, even though we're not even We weren't even facetiming. 109 00:05:54,240 --> 00:05:56,840 Speaker 1: No, no, I was just thinking about your face. So 110 00:05:56,880 --> 00:05:59,240 Speaker 1: the ones I remember specifically were Best Director and Best 111 00:05:59,240 --> 00:06:02,240 Speaker 1: Supporting Actress. I added context to those at least I'm 112 00:06:02,240 --> 00:06:06,960 Speaker 1: gonna try. But let's start with Best Actress. Okay, this 113 00:06:07,000 --> 00:06:14,599 Speaker 1: one has had so much controversy because Carla Sophia Guess Gohone, 114 00:06:14,720 --> 00:06:19,080 Speaker 1: the nominee from Amelia Perez, has basically tweeted herself out 115 00:06:19,120 --> 00:06:20,960 Speaker 1: of the running. Do you want to explain? Do you 116 00:06:21,000 --> 00:06:22,640 Speaker 1: want me to explain? Do you want to give your 117 00:06:22,640 --> 00:06:23,919 Speaker 1: take on so well. 118 00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:27,039 Speaker 3: The take that I would give, and you know not to, 119 00:06:27,200 --> 00:06:30,119 Speaker 3: you know, not to wade into politics. I think it's 120 00:06:30,160 --> 00:06:33,880 Speaker 3: actually weirdly irrelevant because I really liked Emilia Prez and 121 00:06:33,920 --> 00:06:36,599 Speaker 3: I thought she was excellent in the movie. I don't. 122 00:06:36,920 --> 00:06:39,040 Speaker 3: I never thought she was going to win. So yes, 123 00:06:39,240 --> 00:06:42,520 Speaker 3: it was a very weird classic Hollywood meltdown that the 124 00:06:42,680 --> 00:06:45,440 Speaker 3: entire town watched in real time. And I talked to 125 00:06:45,480 --> 00:06:48,840 Speaker 3: people associated with Netflix who were basically like, we've never 126 00:06:48,839 --> 00:06:51,760 Speaker 3: seen anything like it, Like, I mean, she really really 127 00:06:51,800 --> 00:06:56,800 Speaker 3: just went rogue and and so you know, but I 128 00:06:56,800 --> 00:06:59,440 Speaker 3: don't think she was ever gonna win. And so really 129 00:06:59,480 --> 00:07:01,560 Speaker 3: this race, as you know, is between to Me Moore 130 00:07:01,640 --> 00:07:05,240 Speaker 3: and Mikey Madison and it's a really really compelling race. 131 00:07:05,400 --> 00:07:07,800 Speaker 3: Now let's just go back, you know, two days, which 132 00:07:07,760 --> 00:07:08,240 Speaker 3: will we do that? 133 00:07:08,320 --> 00:07:09,920 Speaker 1: Let me just give the odds right now, we got 134 00:07:09,960 --> 00:07:10,560 Speaker 1: to me more. 135 00:07:10,840 --> 00:07:12,480 Speaker 3: You know, it's your show. 136 00:07:12,760 --> 00:07:16,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, thank you, thank you de Me Moore for the substance. 137 00:07:16,160 --> 00:07:20,560 Speaker 1: She's at minus three hundred, Mikey Madison for Honora plus 138 00:07:20,720 --> 00:07:23,800 Speaker 1: one sixty five. Uh, and then the rest of the 139 00:07:23,800 --> 00:07:26,840 Speaker 1: field is pretty far off. So it's really is between 140 00:07:26,880 --> 00:07:28,960 Speaker 1: those two. So yes, give us your take. 141 00:07:29,280 --> 00:07:32,720 Speaker 3: Well, so what's interesting is okay, So to me, one 142 00:07:32,960 --> 00:07:37,120 Speaker 3: Sag on Sunday, and the thing about Sag just as 143 00:07:37,200 --> 00:07:40,280 Speaker 3: one predictor and one thing I want to you know, 144 00:07:40,360 --> 00:07:42,560 Speaker 3: maintain and always sort of give the blanket statement is 145 00:07:42,560 --> 00:07:45,400 Speaker 3: that it's great that there's all these precursor awards, and 146 00:07:45,400 --> 00:07:47,320 Speaker 3: in a certain way, they do kind of start to 147 00:07:47,400 --> 00:07:51,120 Speaker 3: calcify a perception as to who's going to win. But 148 00:07:51,440 --> 00:07:54,480 Speaker 3: for everybody listening at home, there's no body in any 149 00:07:54,520 --> 00:07:58,040 Speaker 3: of these precursor awards, the PGA, the DJA, SAG, WGA 150 00:07:58,120 --> 00:08:02,480 Speaker 3: Golden Globes that truly truly correlates to the Academy as 151 00:08:02,480 --> 00:08:05,000 Speaker 3: of For instance, I think there's like ten thousand members 152 00:08:05,040 --> 00:08:07,200 Speaker 3: in the Academy. The Acting branch of the Academy is 153 00:08:07,240 --> 00:08:09,000 Speaker 3: the largest branch. I should have looked it up before 154 00:08:09,000 --> 00:08:11,440 Speaker 3: we got here, But let's say it's like three to 155 00:08:11,520 --> 00:08:14,240 Speaker 3: five thousand members are in the actors branch. There's one 156 00:08:14,360 --> 00:08:17,400 Speaker 3: hundred and fifty thousand people in SAG who were eligible 157 00:08:17,400 --> 00:08:19,800 Speaker 3: to vote, you know, in the last week for the 158 00:08:19,800 --> 00:08:23,320 Speaker 3: SAG Awards, which we're announced on Sunday. So ultimately, like 159 00:08:23,320 --> 00:08:25,080 Speaker 3: just because of something they did does not mean it's 160 00:08:25,080 --> 00:08:28,240 Speaker 3: going to completely correlate, because you've got people that are 161 00:08:28,240 --> 00:08:30,840 Speaker 3: doing day player parts on TV shows voting for who 162 00:08:30,880 --> 00:08:34,520 Speaker 3: they think should win, you know, best Actress. So with 163 00:08:34,679 --> 00:08:36,400 Speaker 3: that said, you can still look at this stuff to 164 00:08:36,400 --> 00:08:39,160 Speaker 3: figure out if there's patterns. So what I decided to 165 00:08:39,200 --> 00:08:41,000 Speaker 3: do was for a lot of this was go back 166 00:08:41,040 --> 00:08:44,120 Speaker 3: to like twenty ten basically, like you know, start with 167 00:08:44,160 --> 00:08:46,920 Speaker 3: that decade and go forward. So from twenty ten to now, 168 00:08:47,600 --> 00:08:51,840 Speaker 3: ten of the fourteen winners for SAG Best Actress then 169 00:08:51,960 --> 00:08:56,760 Speaker 3: correlated to the Oscar winner. So that's you guys are numbers, 170 00:08:56,760 --> 00:08:59,440 Speaker 3: guys like ten to fourteen. That's pretty decent. With that said, 171 00:09:00,080 --> 00:09:01,960 Speaker 3: and this is my kind of hunch on this race, 172 00:09:01,960 --> 00:09:04,079 Speaker 3: which will lead into some of the other races I'm 173 00:09:04,120 --> 00:09:08,240 Speaker 3: thinking about last year. Last year Lily Gladstone beat Emma Stone, 174 00:09:08,760 --> 00:09:11,240 Speaker 3: and I thought Lily Gladstone was excellent in Killers of 175 00:09:11,240 --> 00:09:14,480 Speaker 3: the Flower Moon. And there were two narratives she had. 176 00:09:15,120 --> 00:09:17,680 Speaker 3: One was there was a question the entire year, which 177 00:09:17,760 --> 00:09:19,439 Speaker 3: was was she the lead actress or was she the 178 00:09:19,480 --> 00:09:22,000 Speaker 3: supporting actress because she's really kind of the supporting part 179 00:09:22,360 --> 00:09:25,240 Speaker 3: of that movie. But the other issue or not issue 180 00:09:25,240 --> 00:09:27,920 Speaker 3: that the narrative was she's a Native American woman playing 181 00:09:27,960 --> 00:09:30,520 Speaker 3: a Native American character in a movie that is about 182 00:09:30,520 --> 00:09:33,280 Speaker 3: the plight of Native American people. And you know, there's 183 00:09:33,280 --> 00:09:34,920 Speaker 3: a sense of like, well, we want to honor this 184 00:09:35,040 --> 00:09:39,200 Speaker 3: because this representation has not been around enough, and I 185 00:09:39,240 --> 00:09:42,080 Speaker 3: picked Loly Gladstone to win at the Oscars, and the 186 00:09:42,400 --> 00:09:46,320 Speaker 3: minute Michelle Yo announced Emma Stone winning, I was like, 187 00:09:46,840 --> 00:09:49,440 Speaker 3: I'm an idiot. Of course Emmastone was winning the whole time, 188 00:09:49,440 --> 00:09:53,040 Speaker 3: because if you had watched Poor Things, it was impossible 189 00:09:53,480 --> 00:09:56,480 Speaker 3: to not come away thinking Emma Stone was every single 190 00:09:56,559 --> 00:09:59,600 Speaker 3: inch of that movie. She was absolutely brilliant. Not to 191 00:09:59,640 --> 00:10:01,679 Speaker 3: mention she's kind of one of the most famous people 192 00:10:01,720 --> 00:10:04,160 Speaker 3: working in Hollywood. And when you go back to like 193 00:10:04,240 --> 00:10:07,880 Speaker 3: who's winning two Oscars for Best Actor or Actress before 194 00:10:07,880 --> 00:10:11,360 Speaker 3: they're forty, that is a very very rarefied list. My 195 00:10:11,440 --> 00:10:13,400 Speaker 3: point is, now you look at de Me versus Mikey, 196 00:10:14,280 --> 00:10:16,319 Speaker 3: I love to me Moore. I mean, I'm forty five 197 00:10:16,400 --> 00:10:19,720 Speaker 3: years old. Demi Moore was a huge part of my childhood. 198 00:10:20,040 --> 00:10:23,040 Speaker 3: A few good men, you know, like she was married 199 00:10:23,040 --> 00:10:25,280 Speaker 3: to Bruce willis my all time favorite actor. Like I 200 00:10:25,320 --> 00:10:27,640 Speaker 3: love Deme Moore. I'm rooting for Demi more just as 201 00:10:27,679 --> 00:10:30,240 Speaker 3: a human being, and she's run an amazing press to her. 202 00:10:30,760 --> 00:10:33,720 Speaker 3: If you watch The Substance, it is truly a fifty 203 00:10:33,720 --> 00:10:36,720 Speaker 3: to fifty movie. I mean, by design, she takes the 204 00:10:36,760 --> 00:10:40,000 Speaker 3: Substance and then Margaret Qally, you know, appears not to 205 00:10:40,000 --> 00:10:41,760 Speaker 3: give too much of it away, and then the rest 206 00:10:41,800 --> 00:10:43,760 Speaker 3: of the movie they're going back and forth sharing the 207 00:10:43,760 --> 00:10:46,760 Speaker 3: body and she's amazing in it, but it's like a 208 00:10:46,760 --> 00:10:50,240 Speaker 3: fifty to fifty split if you watch A Nora, not 209 00:10:50,440 --> 00:10:54,240 Speaker 3: unlike Poor Things. Every inch of that movie is Mikey Madison. 210 00:10:54,960 --> 00:10:57,520 Speaker 3: And not to get into the other categories, but obviously 211 00:10:57,559 --> 00:10:59,719 Speaker 3: A Noor is surging, and we'll come back to that 212 00:10:59,800 --> 00:11:01,720 Speaker 3: later and we get to like Best Picture and Director, 213 00:11:01,800 --> 00:11:05,480 Speaker 3: but I do feel like, frankly, if there's this much 214 00:11:05,520 --> 00:11:07,920 Speaker 3: love for Anora, well, how can you have that much 215 00:11:07,960 --> 00:11:09,880 Speaker 3: love for it and not have the love for Mikey Madison. 216 00:11:10,160 --> 00:11:12,000 Speaker 3: The thing going against her has been that she's twenty 217 00:11:12,000 --> 00:11:14,720 Speaker 3: five years old. The youngest actress to ever win the 218 00:11:14,720 --> 00:11:17,240 Speaker 3: Best Actress oscar is Marley Mattlin. She won in nineteen 219 00:11:17,240 --> 00:11:19,120 Speaker 3: eighty six for Children of a Lesser God. She was 220 00:11:19,160 --> 00:11:23,480 Speaker 3: twenty one. Now, there are young actresses that win relatively frequently. 221 00:11:23,559 --> 00:11:25,760 Speaker 3: Jennifer Lawrence won when she was really young for Silver 222 00:11:25,840 --> 00:11:30,160 Speaker 3: Lenning's Playbook. It's the best actor category where typically young 223 00:11:30,240 --> 00:11:33,240 Speaker 3: men do not win. Ironically, we'll get to this later, 224 00:11:33,320 --> 00:11:35,800 Speaker 3: but when Adrian Brody won in two thousand and two 225 00:11:35,840 --> 00:11:38,840 Speaker 3: for The Pianist. He was the youngest actress. Since he 226 00:11:38,920 --> 00:11:40,520 Speaker 3: might have beaten the record, I have to look it up, 227 00:11:40,720 --> 00:11:43,200 Speaker 3: but since Richard Dreyfus won in nineteen seventy seven for 228 00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:46,640 Speaker 3: The Goodbye Girl. So typically best actor goes to like 229 00:11:46,720 --> 00:11:49,959 Speaker 3: older men, and we'll get to that between Tim Shallmay 230 00:11:50,080 --> 00:11:53,000 Speaker 3: and Adrian. Now now Adrian's the older man. So but 231 00:11:53,040 --> 00:11:56,760 Speaker 3: this is an amazing race. I mean, Mikey Madison, you 232 00:11:56,800 --> 00:11:59,720 Speaker 3: know one Indie Spirit Award, she won the BAFTA, which 233 00:11:59,720 --> 00:12:02,280 Speaker 3: is not nothing. Demi won the Golden Globe to me 234 00:12:02,400 --> 00:12:07,320 Speaker 3: one sag. Demi has a huge following, obviously in Hollywood 235 00:12:07,360 --> 00:12:09,800 Speaker 3: for years. I think there's probably a sense that like, 236 00:12:09,880 --> 00:12:12,800 Speaker 3: will do me be nominated again? Who knows? Whereas Mikey's 237 00:12:12,840 --> 00:12:14,440 Speaker 3: at the beginning of her career and she can be 238 00:12:14,440 --> 00:12:17,800 Speaker 3: nominated five more times for all we know. This one 239 00:12:17,880 --> 00:12:19,400 Speaker 3: is such a toss up. But I am going to 240 00:12:19,440 --> 00:12:20,320 Speaker 3: go with Mikey Madison. 241 00:12:22,280 --> 00:12:28,600 Speaker 1: I'm shocked because I feel like you said two things 242 00:12:29,000 --> 00:12:34,000 Speaker 1: that actually contradict your theory about Emma Stone Demi Moore. 243 00:12:34,480 --> 00:12:40,680 Speaker 1: Demi Mour is the significantly more famous actor in this case. Yeah, 244 00:12:40,760 --> 00:12:43,960 Speaker 1: there is a history of wanting to give the award 245 00:12:44,559 --> 00:12:49,440 Speaker 1: as a career award for someone at this stage when 246 00:12:49,480 --> 00:12:52,800 Speaker 1: they haven't won before, haven't been appreciated, haven't been acknowledged. 247 00:12:53,320 --> 00:12:56,040 Speaker 1: And I love that your reference point for Demi Moore 248 00:12:56,480 --> 00:12:59,719 Speaker 1: is being married to Bruce Willis and if you have 249 00:12:59,800 --> 00:13:03,160 Speaker 1: read and like in the movie's Disclosure and a few 250 00:13:03,200 --> 00:13:07,679 Speaker 1: Good Men, and I'm thinking, like you know, seeing almost Fire, Yeah, 251 00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:12,600 Speaker 1: because because I'm because that's my reference point. But number one, 252 00:13:12,600 --> 00:13:17,000 Speaker 1: she's more famous. Number two, I do think in the 253 00:13:17,040 --> 00:13:21,839 Speaker 1: substance she had, I do feel like she carried that 254 00:13:21,920 --> 00:13:26,400 Speaker 1: movie and margaret quality was amazing in the movie, but 255 00:13:27,600 --> 00:13:31,319 Speaker 1: like her acting was much more muted to me, almost 256 00:13:31,400 --> 00:13:33,640 Speaker 1: literally like she just had didn't have a lot of lines, 257 00:13:33,679 --> 00:13:35,920 Speaker 1: like in the first thirty five to forty minutes of 258 00:13:35,920 --> 00:13:39,199 Speaker 1: the movie, whereas to me more was she felt like 259 00:13:39,240 --> 00:13:43,440 Speaker 1: a different person to me compared to her public persona Simon, 260 00:13:43,480 --> 00:13:45,960 Speaker 1: you're nodding back and forth. I think you're with me. 261 00:13:47,240 --> 00:13:48,800 Speaker 2: I think it is all part of the game. Like 262 00:13:48,840 --> 00:13:50,560 Speaker 2: there's a couple of things we'll talk about. He's coming up. 263 00:13:50,559 --> 00:13:54,240 Speaker 2: But it's like even if like you just said, it's career, right, 264 00:13:54,440 --> 00:13:56,760 Speaker 2: It's not just you know that, it's that part of 265 00:13:56,840 --> 00:13:59,319 Speaker 2: the game, right, it's not just for the one movie. 266 00:13:59,320 --> 00:14:02,040 Speaker 2: They've done it for their body of work. And like 267 00:14:02,120 --> 00:14:04,840 Speaker 2: you said, she knows a lot of these people in 268 00:14:04,880 --> 00:14:08,160 Speaker 2: this business better than you know, unfortunately for Mickey. But 269 00:14:09,480 --> 00:14:12,280 Speaker 2: I'm gonna be betting here on the dog. So I 270 00:14:12,320 --> 00:14:13,760 Speaker 2: already know where I'm going. I mean, I get it, 271 00:14:13,880 --> 00:14:17,400 Speaker 2: DEMI should be minus three hundred. But you know me, Chaed, 272 00:14:17,400 --> 00:14:18,760 Speaker 2: I like the dog. I like the upside of the 273 00:14:18,800 --> 00:14:21,520 Speaker 2: value here where what he's talking about, Like we've seen 274 00:14:21,600 --> 00:14:24,680 Speaker 2: last minute flips here in the oscars, right, they've gotten 275 00:14:24,680 --> 00:14:29,000 Speaker 2: the favorites wrong because it is kind of the human element, right, 276 00:14:29,080 --> 00:14:30,640 Speaker 2: they don't know how these people are going to vote. 277 00:14:30,680 --> 00:14:33,280 Speaker 2: All they can do is just project. So you know me, Jed, 278 00:14:33,280 --> 00:14:34,240 Speaker 2: I'm a sucker for the dog. 279 00:14:34,480 --> 00:14:36,960 Speaker 3: Well, the other thing too, keep in mind, like you 280 00:14:37,000 --> 00:14:38,400 Speaker 3: have to go back to, like, okay, what are the 281 00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:41,040 Speaker 3: narratives we have, like get you get a narrative on 282 00:14:41,080 --> 00:14:43,440 Speaker 3: the day of the nominations, and you get a narrative 283 00:14:43,480 --> 00:14:46,119 Speaker 3: now basically to this moment when we've had every precursor 284 00:14:46,160 --> 00:14:49,520 Speaker 3: award except obviously the Oscars. The narrative on the day 285 00:14:49,520 --> 00:14:52,600 Speaker 3: of the nominations were a couple of things. Over reformers 286 00:14:52,640 --> 00:14:57,400 Speaker 3: were a complete unknown substance actually, which helps to me more. 287 00:14:57,880 --> 00:15:01,680 Speaker 3: And I'm still here. The the Brazilian film that got 288 00:15:01,720 --> 00:15:04,240 Speaker 3: into the Best Picture race and Fernanda Taurus got you know, 289 00:15:04,280 --> 00:15:07,600 Speaker 3: Best Actress nomination. Those were the over performers, So that 290 00:15:07,640 --> 00:15:09,800 Speaker 3: would bode well for to me more. But then when 291 00:15:09,800 --> 00:15:12,680 Speaker 3: you look at the next two months, the massive overperformer 292 00:15:12,840 --> 00:15:15,840 Speaker 3: has been an Aura, which you know, Best Picture of 293 00:15:15,880 --> 00:15:18,760 Speaker 3: the PGA's Best Director of the DJA. We'll get to DGA. 294 00:15:18,880 --> 00:15:22,320 Speaker 3: That's a highly correlative, you know, one to one over 295 00:15:22,400 --> 00:15:28,040 Speaker 3: like ninety years, you know, winning Critics Choice Awards, did 296 00:15:28,040 --> 00:15:31,240 Speaker 3: not win baf TO or did not win BAFTA or SAG. 297 00:15:31,320 --> 00:15:33,880 Speaker 3: We'll come back to that. I have some stats, and 298 00:15:33,920 --> 00:15:36,640 Speaker 3: Golden Globes went to Brutalist. But and I'm very much 299 00:15:36,640 --> 00:15:38,320 Speaker 3: on the record here, like I don't think the Golden 300 00:15:38,360 --> 00:15:40,800 Speaker 3: Globes matter. I mean, the Golden Globes are not even 301 00:15:40,840 --> 00:15:43,520 Speaker 3: voted on people who even work in the business. Technically, 302 00:15:43,600 --> 00:15:46,120 Speaker 3: you know, you could at least make a correlation to say, 303 00:15:46,160 --> 00:15:48,720 Speaker 3: well the producers are you know, there's a certain body 304 00:15:48,720 --> 00:15:50,480 Speaker 3: of producers in the Oscar, you know, in the Academy 305 00:15:50,480 --> 00:15:53,760 Speaker 3: blah blah blah blah. So to me, I just feel 306 00:15:53,800 --> 00:15:56,840 Speaker 3: like you have to pay attention to Like it's been 307 00:15:56,880 --> 00:15:58,840 Speaker 3: a weird year of movies. I thought it was actually 308 00:15:58,880 --> 00:16:01,880 Speaker 3: a very good year, despite they're not being some massive heavyweight. 309 00:16:01,920 --> 00:16:04,720 Speaker 3: Everybody agreed was the Second Coming. But in talking to 310 00:16:04,760 --> 00:16:07,760 Speaker 3: a lot of Academy members and voters, one of the 311 00:16:07,760 --> 00:16:10,240 Speaker 3: movies people always come back to is Anora, And by 312 00:16:10,240 --> 00:16:11,840 Speaker 3: the way, a lot of the movies people come back 313 00:16:11,840 --> 00:16:14,040 Speaker 3: to his Brutalist. But it just seems like Brutalist is 314 00:16:14,120 --> 00:16:16,800 Speaker 3: like not dead on arrival, but like you know, is 315 00:16:16,840 --> 00:16:18,480 Speaker 3: not going to win Best Picture. I think feel like 316 00:16:18,520 --> 00:16:20,840 Speaker 3: it had its moment, it had its money. So we 317 00:16:21,240 --> 00:16:24,480 Speaker 3: like Mikey Madison here, well you guys do well, you listen. 318 00:16:24,560 --> 00:16:26,560 Speaker 3: I'm happy it's going to be to me, Yeah, but 319 00:16:26,600 --> 00:16:26,800 Speaker 3: I do. 320 00:16:26,960 --> 00:16:29,880 Speaker 1: I want to talk. I want to get to I 321 00:16:29,920 --> 00:16:32,440 Speaker 1: want to get to director, because Lasker, when you and 322 00:16:32,520 --> 00:16:37,480 Speaker 1: I spoke, Brady Corbett, I think was who directed The Brutalist. Yeah, 323 00:16:37,880 --> 00:16:41,680 Speaker 1: was the odds on favorite at the time, and I 324 00:16:41,720 --> 00:16:45,160 Speaker 1: had just seen a Noora. I freaking loved it. I 325 00:16:45,160 --> 00:16:48,400 Speaker 1: thought it was amazing. Sean Baker, the director of A 326 00:16:48,480 --> 00:16:54,880 Speaker 1: Noor He was I think the second shortest odds now 327 00:16:55,000 --> 00:16:58,360 Speaker 1: Sean Baker minus one eighty five Brady Corbett plus one 328 00:16:58,480 --> 00:17:03,520 Speaker 1: twenty five. I feel like, if Demi Moore has had 329 00:17:04,800 --> 00:17:11,840 Speaker 1: an incredible OSCARS campaign, Britty Corbett peaked and then has 330 00:17:11,880 --> 00:17:15,000 Speaker 1: gone downhill since he gave that speech, and now he 331 00:17:15,160 --> 00:17:22,720 Speaker 1: just continues to look like a very precious, unself aware director. 332 00:17:23,280 --> 00:17:28,119 Speaker 1: And that, along with the fact Anora has gotten so 333 00:17:28,200 --> 00:17:33,280 Speaker 1: much more heat the past few months, has catapulted Sean Baker. 334 00:17:33,800 --> 00:17:36,760 Speaker 3: Here's what I would say. I think, you know, I 335 00:17:36,840 --> 00:17:38,879 Speaker 3: always want to be politically correct because I work in 336 00:17:38,880 --> 00:17:43,159 Speaker 3: this business. I think that Seawan Baker's speeches at the 337 00:17:43,240 --> 00:17:47,280 Speaker 3: DGA and at the Indie Spirit Awards were like really 338 00:17:47,320 --> 00:17:51,240 Speaker 3: strong and really big rally cries, and look, they're both 339 00:17:51,320 --> 00:17:53,719 Speaker 3: incredible artists. They both have been very on the record, 340 00:17:53,880 --> 00:17:58,760 Speaker 3: like these guys. I a producer who produced some of 341 00:17:58,800 --> 00:18:01,080 Speaker 3: Sewan's movies, who produced a film for one of my clients, 342 00:18:01,119 --> 00:18:04,280 Speaker 3: was telling me, like, Sean Baker doesn't moonlight for the 343 00:18:04,320 --> 00:18:06,639 Speaker 3: studios and rewrite rom comms for them when he's not 344 00:18:06,680 --> 00:18:10,240 Speaker 3: making movies. He is an independent filmmaker. He goes from 345 00:18:10,280 --> 00:18:12,520 Speaker 3: one project to the next. He makes it every money 346 00:18:12,520 --> 00:18:14,520 Speaker 3: he can make. He literally said in his speech on 347 00:18:14,520 --> 00:18:17,119 Speaker 3: Saturday the Indian Spirit Awards. They doesn't have children, and 348 00:18:17,160 --> 00:18:18,960 Speaker 3: if he had children, he wasn't sure he'd be able 349 00:18:19,000 --> 00:18:21,679 Speaker 3: to survive because of the way him and his wife 350 00:18:21,800 --> 00:18:24,359 Speaker 3: you know live, you know, making these movies. And Brady 351 00:18:24,400 --> 00:18:26,800 Speaker 3: has been very open on many many interviews and on 352 00:18:26,840 --> 00:18:29,200 Speaker 3: many podcasts about you know, the life they're living. Hasn't 353 00:18:29,200 --> 00:18:31,520 Speaker 3: made anything off The Brutalist. I thought The Brutalist was 354 00:18:31,520 --> 00:18:35,000 Speaker 3: absolutely incredible. Definitely when it like really hit in December, 355 00:18:35,760 --> 00:18:37,680 Speaker 3: it was like, Okay, Brutalist is here to stay. He's 356 00:18:37,680 --> 00:18:39,919 Speaker 3: going to do it. I don't think the Golden Globe 357 00:18:39,920 --> 00:18:44,000 Speaker 3: speech helped, but I think on the bigger level, you know, 358 00:18:44,359 --> 00:18:46,960 Speaker 3: I loved the movie, but it's not a movie for everybody, 359 00:18:47,400 --> 00:18:50,840 Speaker 3: and it's not a movie where like it landed for everybody. 360 00:18:50,880 --> 00:18:52,960 Speaker 3: There's a lot of people that are like that first 361 00:18:52,960 --> 00:18:56,199 Speaker 3: half was incredible, second half less incredible. Wasn't sure that 362 00:18:56,280 --> 00:18:58,760 Speaker 3: the coda like totally landed, And there's a lot of 363 00:18:58,760 --> 00:19:01,120 Speaker 3: people think that it's an absolute masterpiece, but it does 364 00:19:01,160 --> 00:19:04,320 Speaker 3: feel like it's faded. I was very surprising didn't win 365 00:19:04,359 --> 00:19:09,000 Speaker 3: Best Director from the DGAs, and frankly very surprised they 366 00:19:09,000 --> 00:19:10,680 Speaker 3: didn't win to the PGAs because what a lot of 367 00:19:10,800 --> 00:19:13,399 Speaker 3: us thought was, we have a bunch of producers voting 368 00:19:13,400 --> 00:19:15,239 Speaker 3: on this and the whole story of the Brutalist. One 369 00:19:15,280 --> 00:19:17,119 Speaker 3: of the stories has been that they made it for 370 00:19:17,160 --> 00:19:19,359 Speaker 3: ten million bucks and it looks like fifty So like, 371 00:19:19,400 --> 00:19:22,120 Speaker 3: why would the producers vote for that? Because that's really 372 00:19:22,119 --> 00:19:25,399 Speaker 3: impressive and they didn't care. And by the way, Honora 373 00:19:25,560 --> 00:19:28,280 Speaker 3: was made for like, you know, a similar amount of money. 374 00:19:29,040 --> 00:19:31,760 Speaker 3: And also is it I mean, people love Anora, so 375 00:19:32,440 --> 00:19:34,359 Speaker 3: I think you know, yeah, I mean you can't. You 376 00:19:34,359 --> 00:19:36,159 Speaker 3: don't have really good odds on Sean Baker, but it 377 00:19:36,160 --> 00:19:38,160 Speaker 3: would be very hard to bet against him. The DGA 378 00:19:38,720 --> 00:19:42,920 Speaker 3: almost always correlates, and sometimes when it doesn't correlate, that's 379 00:19:43,000 --> 00:19:44,720 Speaker 3: because I have to look up the years. I mean, 380 00:19:44,720 --> 00:19:48,680 Speaker 3: one of them, notably was nineteen ninety five. In nineteen 381 00:19:48,760 --> 00:19:51,119 Speaker 3: ninety five, Ron Howard wins Best Director to the DGA 382 00:19:51,200 --> 00:19:53,960 Speaker 3: for Paul thirteen and then is not nominated for the 383 00:19:54,080 --> 00:19:56,560 Speaker 3: for the Oscars. And that's when Mel Gibson wins for Braveheart. 384 00:19:56,880 --> 00:19:59,480 Speaker 3: So there's years like that where the winner doesn't correlate. 385 00:19:59,520 --> 00:20:03,040 Speaker 3: But that's all so a very weird exception when the 386 00:20:03,080 --> 00:20:05,639 Speaker 3: winner of the DGA is also nominated for the Oscar. 387 00:20:05,880 --> 00:20:08,240 Speaker 3: I'd have to look it up, but like I think, 388 00:20:08,240 --> 00:20:11,320 Speaker 3: maybe the last time where it was in both fields 389 00:20:11,400 --> 00:20:14,080 Speaker 3: was I want to say, Sam Mendy's one for nineteen 390 00:20:14,119 --> 00:20:16,120 Speaker 3: seventeen of the DGAs and then of course Bank Juneo 391 00:20:16,280 --> 00:20:19,360 Speaker 3: won at the Oscars, which was a massive like surge 392 00:20:19,400 --> 00:20:21,760 Speaker 3: that night because he won so many Academy Awards. But 393 00:20:21,840 --> 00:20:24,800 Speaker 3: typically it does correlate, I mean almost always, So I 394 00:20:24,840 --> 00:20:26,760 Speaker 3: think you have to go over Sean Baker for director 395 00:20:26,840 --> 00:20:28,320 Speaker 3: right now, Well, you. 396 00:20:28,240 --> 00:20:31,600 Speaker 1: Could parlay Sean Baker at minus win eighty five and 397 00:20:31,640 --> 00:20:33,359 Speaker 1: to me more at minus three hundred and get a 398 00:20:33,359 --> 00:20:34,439 Speaker 1: little better, right, Simon. 399 00:20:35,119 --> 00:20:35,920 Speaker 3: That's it. 400 00:20:36,640 --> 00:20:37,439 Speaker 1: That's what we like to do. 401 00:20:37,680 --> 00:20:39,720 Speaker 3: Well, by the way, speaking of that, and this will 402 00:20:39,720 --> 00:20:42,560 Speaker 3: come to a non of the big eight categories, but 403 00:20:42,600 --> 00:20:44,040 Speaker 3: it's a category I want to bring up in a 404 00:20:44,040 --> 00:20:47,400 Speaker 3: second as it relates to Best Picture. Can you guys 405 00:20:47,480 --> 00:20:50,720 Speaker 3: actually bet in real time as the show's going on, 406 00:20:50,880 --> 00:20:52,920 Speaker 3: like can you place it? It has to be locked 407 00:20:52,920 --> 00:20:55,119 Speaker 3: in now they close it like an hour before. Usually 408 00:20:55,600 --> 00:20:55,960 Speaker 3: got it. 409 00:20:56,920 --> 00:20:59,919 Speaker 2: As soon as I hit the red carpet, they almost 410 00:21:00,040 --> 00:21:03,720 Speaker 2: all markets go off just because it's like that's where 411 00:21:03,800 --> 00:21:06,040 Speaker 2: the information is being shared, right, that's where the leaks 412 00:21:06,040 --> 00:21:06,600 Speaker 2: start happening. 413 00:21:06,600 --> 00:21:09,560 Speaker 3: Once into the building, Well once when we get the 414 00:21:09,560 --> 00:21:11,680 Speaker 3: best picture. I want to throw out a side category 415 00:21:11,680 --> 00:21:13,800 Speaker 3: that could connect to that, but we'll come back to 416 00:21:13,840 --> 00:21:14,560 Speaker 3: that in a second. 417 00:21:16,040 --> 00:21:21,080 Speaker 1: All right, So we're going with Anora and Sean Baker. 418 00:21:21,440 --> 00:21:22,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, we're best director. 419 00:21:22,920 --> 00:21:27,359 Speaker 1: Yeah, the Substance to me, we're going to go on 420 00:21:27,359 --> 00:21:32,080 Speaker 1: to Best Original Screenplay. And this is a race between 421 00:21:32,720 --> 00:21:36,359 Speaker 1: again a Noora, which is about minus I think two 422 00:21:36,440 --> 00:21:41,800 Speaker 1: thirty and Substance, which is plus two eighty and a 423 00:21:41,880 --> 00:21:44,320 Speaker 1: Real Pain is sort of drifting around on there plus 424 00:21:44,320 --> 00:21:49,840 Speaker 1: seven fifty. That's the Jesse Eisenberg movie that he did 425 00:21:49,840 --> 00:21:59,320 Speaker 1: with Kieran Culkin. So Anora and Substance both amazing, amazing movies. 426 00:22:00,359 --> 00:22:05,240 Speaker 1: I felt like the last twenty minutes of the Substance 427 00:22:06,560 --> 00:22:12,639 Speaker 1: kind of went from mind boggling horror slash big think 428 00:22:12,720 --> 00:22:20,000 Speaker 1: piece to kind of silly and lazy, whereas Anura like 429 00:22:20,119 --> 00:22:25,359 Speaker 1: went from this is a fun, cool, sexy romp with 430 00:22:25,480 --> 00:22:31,440 Speaker 1: a really smart lead and kind of a dopey supporting 431 00:22:31,480 --> 00:22:35,080 Speaker 1: actor and had a crazy pivot that just made it 432 00:22:35,119 --> 00:22:38,719 Speaker 1: more and more insane in a really good way. Simon, 433 00:22:38,760 --> 00:22:41,600 Speaker 1: you agree with me on this, you're shaking your head. 434 00:22:43,400 --> 00:22:45,320 Speaker 2: I thought it was good where it just felt like 435 00:22:46,160 --> 00:22:47,720 Speaker 2: I don't want to age myself here. But it feels 436 00:22:47,760 --> 00:22:50,520 Speaker 2: like so many movies nowadays are four forte and above, 437 00:22:51,160 --> 00:22:53,159 Speaker 2: and you don't really get too many twenties in like 438 00:22:53,200 --> 00:22:57,879 Speaker 2: twenties in below that's actually well done, right, like you 439 00:22:57,920 --> 00:23:00,479 Speaker 2: get kind of these romp comps or whatever. But this 440 00:23:00,560 --> 00:23:03,399 Speaker 2: felt like the actual thing of someone from this age, 441 00:23:03,480 --> 00:23:06,920 Speaker 2: from my generation, wrote a piece of their life into 442 00:23:06,920 --> 00:23:10,399 Speaker 2: a good, actual movie with actual good characters like not 443 00:23:10,440 --> 00:23:13,480 Speaker 2: the shit on female roles, but a lot of times 444 00:23:13,520 --> 00:23:17,000 Speaker 2: they don't keep them real, right. It's all about either 445 00:23:17,040 --> 00:23:20,119 Speaker 2: them chasing a boy or them going through heartbreak or 446 00:23:20,160 --> 00:23:22,600 Speaker 2: just something stupid in general, they don't really develop as 447 00:23:22,600 --> 00:23:25,240 Speaker 2: a character in this movie. I felt like they really 448 00:23:25,240 --> 00:23:27,960 Speaker 2: developed the female role in these characters, which is great 449 00:23:28,000 --> 00:23:30,840 Speaker 2: for this time period. Right, it's all about you know, 450 00:23:30,920 --> 00:23:33,520 Speaker 2: people my age wanting to get I want to see 451 00:23:33,520 --> 00:23:36,040 Speaker 2: things about the things they've gone through in their lives, 452 00:23:36,040 --> 00:23:38,040 Speaker 2: and it felt like we had a dead period, right 453 00:23:38,040 --> 00:23:39,479 Speaker 2: and the nineties we had a ton, the early two 454 00:23:39,480 --> 00:23:40,840 Speaker 2: thousands we had a ton. And then we've had a 455 00:23:40,920 --> 00:23:43,800 Speaker 2: run here of maybe one every two years of a 456 00:23:43,840 --> 00:23:46,040 Speaker 2: time piece of young people in my age living in 457 00:23:46,040 --> 00:23:48,800 Speaker 2: New York or Chicago, LA and showing what the life 458 00:23:48,840 --> 00:23:50,600 Speaker 2: is like there. So I'm right there with each other. 459 00:23:50,640 --> 00:23:53,119 Speaker 2: That's why I'm shocked to see it's picked up steam 460 00:23:53,119 --> 00:23:55,400 Speaker 2: here right Like every category we're going through right here, 461 00:23:56,080 --> 00:23:58,120 Speaker 2: they're kind of the favorite, right, So it's interesting they've 462 00:23:58,119 --> 00:23:59,960 Speaker 2: picked up so much steam such so late here. 463 00:24:00,240 --> 00:24:01,720 Speaker 3: Well, I think you make a good point. I mean, 464 00:24:01,880 --> 00:24:04,200 Speaker 3: you know, some people on other podcasts have talked about 465 00:24:04,240 --> 00:24:06,880 Speaker 3: like is Anora does have too much sex to win 466 00:24:07,119 --> 00:24:09,879 Speaker 3: like Best Picture, and people reference that, you know, the 467 00:24:09,920 --> 00:24:11,800 Speaker 3: only X rated film to ever win Best Picture was 468 00:24:11,800 --> 00:24:14,040 Speaker 3: Midnight Cowboy in nineteen sixty nine, and that movie would 469 00:24:14,040 --> 00:24:16,200 Speaker 3: not be rady to X sday. That was just because 470 00:24:16,200 --> 00:24:18,400 Speaker 3: of the time. There's not even that much sex in it. 471 00:24:18,720 --> 00:24:21,080 Speaker 3: I think the thing about Anora what connected to people 472 00:24:21,320 --> 00:24:23,480 Speaker 3: is that you just saw her as this real person. 473 00:24:23,520 --> 00:24:25,879 Speaker 3: You didn't see her she wasn't a prostitute. She was 474 00:24:25,920 --> 00:24:29,760 Speaker 3: a stripper who sometimes would you know, you know, do 475 00:24:29,880 --> 00:24:33,040 Speaker 3: other things, you know, as the movie sets up, and 476 00:24:33,640 --> 00:24:35,720 Speaker 3: it really I think tapped you into like this is 477 00:24:35,800 --> 00:24:38,000 Speaker 3: just a young person who's trying to live their life 478 00:24:38,000 --> 00:24:40,439 Speaker 3: and has dreams. And I think a lot of what 479 00:24:40,480 --> 00:24:43,840 Speaker 3: people enjoy about the movie is like it's this debate 480 00:24:43,880 --> 00:24:46,560 Speaker 3: of like is she dumb? Is she not dumb? Like 481 00:24:46,640 --> 00:24:48,200 Speaker 3: she really thinks this guy's in love with it, She 482 00:24:48,280 --> 00:24:50,160 Speaker 3: really thinks she's gonna she's gonna be married to this guy. 483 00:24:50,359 --> 00:24:53,119 Speaker 3: Like she's surprised that it turns out he's just a 484 00:24:53,200 --> 00:24:55,800 Speaker 3: video game loving you know, team you know, and all 485 00:24:55,840 --> 00:24:57,920 Speaker 3: that stuff. So what a lot of people thought going 486 00:24:57,960 --> 00:25:01,919 Speaker 3: into the nomination you know season, was that, oh, Honora 487 00:25:02,000 --> 00:25:04,040 Speaker 3: would be a lock to win Original Screenplay because that 488 00:25:04,040 --> 00:25:07,240 Speaker 3: would be the Constellation Prize for Anura. Other movies would 489 00:25:07,240 --> 00:25:09,000 Speaker 3: win the other big awards, and now turned out to 490 00:25:09,040 --> 00:25:11,639 Speaker 3: have all this momentum. The thing about the substance, And 491 00:25:11,680 --> 00:25:13,720 Speaker 3: I do think the screenplay, I mean, the movie is 492 00:25:13,720 --> 00:25:16,000 Speaker 3: way too long, but the screenplay is really good. And 493 00:25:16,080 --> 00:25:19,679 Speaker 3: what it's saying obviously about like modern beauty and societal standards, 494 00:25:19,720 --> 00:25:22,920 Speaker 3: you know, specifically for women, but not to compare one 495 00:25:22,920 --> 00:25:25,439 Speaker 3: French movie to another. But I do think back to 496 00:25:25,720 --> 00:25:27,800 Speaker 3: Anatomy of a Fall, you know, the movie that won 497 00:25:27,920 --> 00:25:31,639 Speaker 3: Best Original Screenplay last year. That movie, to me just 498 00:25:31,800 --> 00:25:34,720 Speaker 3: had so much more momentum in the way people talked 499 00:25:34,720 --> 00:25:37,080 Speaker 3: about it and what it was sort of analyzing about, 500 00:25:37,359 --> 00:25:40,399 Speaker 3: you know, marriage. I think CORALI you know, obviously getting 501 00:25:40,400 --> 00:25:43,800 Speaker 3: not director nomination, right a nomination producer nomination is huge. 502 00:25:43,840 --> 00:25:45,840 Speaker 3: I still don't think she's gonna win. What's interesting in 503 00:25:45,880 --> 00:25:47,480 Speaker 3: talking to a lot of people the last few days, 504 00:25:47,720 --> 00:25:49,720 Speaker 3: people do not want to count out a real pain. 505 00:25:49,840 --> 00:25:54,440 Speaker 3: Yet he won the Indie Spirit Award on Saturday. The 506 00:25:54,440 --> 00:25:59,440 Speaker 3: Town Loves when when actors also write. Emma Thompson adapted 507 00:25:59,440 --> 00:26:01,439 Speaker 3: Sentences of Ability in Night ten a five won the 508 00:26:01,480 --> 00:26:05,320 Speaker 3: Oscar for Best Adaptation. So I would not entirely be 509 00:26:05,480 --> 00:26:08,359 Speaker 3: surprised if he pulled an upset. I still think and 510 00:26:08,400 --> 00:26:10,960 Speaker 3: I'm and I'm going you know, as you'll see later, 511 00:26:11,000 --> 00:26:13,440 Speaker 3: with just the momentum of like you've got to think 512 00:26:13,440 --> 00:26:15,399 Speaker 3: about the end of the night and the next morning 513 00:26:15,400 --> 00:26:18,440 Speaker 3: of like what was the story and the only viable 514 00:26:18,480 --> 00:26:22,080 Speaker 3: story going into this Academy Awards is anura you know, 515 00:26:22,400 --> 00:26:25,040 Speaker 3: it's not going to be a year where something wins 516 00:26:25,080 --> 00:26:26,879 Speaker 3: seven eight nine Oscars. Will get back to some of 517 00:26:26,880 --> 00:26:29,560 Speaker 3: those stats when we get to Best Picture. But I 518 00:26:29,560 --> 00:26:31,720 Speaker 3: think you have to bet on Anora because it would 519 00:26:31,720 --> 00:26:34,440 Speaker 3: be surprising to me that like Substance or real Pain 520 00:26:34,560 --> 00:26:37,399 Speaker 3: is winning that, and then he's winning Director in Picture 521 00:26:37,440 --> 00:26:39,560 Speaker 3: and she's winning actress if we think she's winning actress. 522 00:26:39,760 --> 00:26:41,639 Speaker 3: But I don't know. I mean, it's it's another good 523 00:26:41,760 --> 00:26:44,439 Speaker 3: you know, up in the air category. I've talked to 524 00:26:44,440 --> 00:26:47,160 Speaker 3: Academy voters. They voted for September fifth. You know, that's 525 00:26:47,200 --> 00:26:49,719 Speaker 3: obviously not going to win, but you just never know. 526 00:26:49,760 --> 00:26:52,120 Speaker 3: That's the beauty. And to remind your listeners at home, 527 00:26:52,520 --> 00:26:55,400 Speaker 3: the way the Academy Awards work is that the individual 528 00:26:55,440 --> 00:26:59,359 Speaker 3: branches nominate their respective members. So all the writers nominate 529 00:26:59,400 --> 00:27:03,480 Speaker 3: the Writing comide. But for this Sunday, everybody who's voting 530 00:27:03,560 --> 00:27:07,440 Speaker 3: votes for the entire ballot. So a cinematographer is voting 531 00:27:07,440 --> 00:27:10,439 Speaker 3: for screenplay, an actor is voting for screenplay. You know, 532 00:27:10,520 --> 00:27:13,919 Speaker 3: somebody who's an at large member because they're in the 533 00:27:13,920 --> 00:27:15,920 Speaker 3: business as an agent or a manager or a lawyer, 534 00:27:15,960 --> 00:27:19,160 Speaker 3: they're voting for everything. So it's not all just writers 535 00:27:19,200 --> 00:27:22,000 Speaker 3: looking at the craft of writing. I do think also, 536 00:27:22,040 --> 00:27:25,399 Speaker 3: I mean Sean Baker, and same thing for Brady and 537 00:27:25,400 --> 00:27:27,639 Speaker 3: same thing for CORALI. But like Sean Baker has, so 538 00:27:28,080 --> 00:27:30,240 Speaker 3: you know, in a major way, been this kind of 539 00:27:30,280 --> 00:27:33,240 Speaker 3: outlier of like I'm not in the system, and he's 540 00:27:33,240 --> 00:27:35,560 Speaker 3: made other movies that have flirted with the Academy Awards. 541 00:27:35,560 --> 00:27:37,480 Speaker 3: I mean, he made The Florida Project, which a lot 542 00:27:37,480 --> 00:27:39,760 Speaker 3: of people thought I was going for Best Picture. It wasn't, 543 00:27:39,920 --> 00:27:42,560 Speaker 3: but Wilm Dafoe is nominated for Best Supporting Actor. So 544 00:27:42,720 --> 00:27:44,520 Speaker 3: like he's been kind of like knocking me on the 545 00:27:44,560 --> 00:27:47,879 Speaker 3: door of the Academy and people really really like him 546 00:27:47,880 --> 00:27:50,240 Speaker 3: and they really respect him. So I think it could 547 00:27:50,280 --> 00:27:53,280 Speaker 3: be a very big night for him. Sean Baker. People 548 00:27:53,400 --> 00:27:55,360 Speaker 3: really really like him and they really respect him. 549 00:27:55,560 --> 00:27:58,960 Speaker 1: What do you think happens to that guy's career if 550 00:27:59,000 --> 00:27:59,680 Speaker 1: he wins. 551 00:28:00,040 --> 00:28:03,439 Speaker 3: I've talked about this. I asked my friend who produced 552 00:28:03,440 --> 00:28:06,600 Speaker 3: a couple movies for him, and she was like, nothing, 553 00:28:06,800 --> 00:28:10,080 Speaker 3: he will just keep making movies. He's not gonna You know, 554 00:28:10,240 --> 00:28:14,960 Speaker 3: Edward Berger, who's a genius. Every two months you open 555 00:28:15,080 --> 00:28:16,760 Speaker 3: up the trades and it's like Edward Berger is doing 556 00:28:16,760 --> 00:28:21,320 Speaker 3: Ocean's fourteen. Edward Berger's rebooting The Boorn Supremacy. Like Edward Berger, 557 00:28:21,560 --> 00:28:24,119 Speaker 3: who I thought was amazing, we'll talk about Conclave. He 558 00:28:24,200 --> 00:28:26,560 Speaker 3: seems to like really be like I'm in Hollywood and like, 559 00:28:26,600 --> 00:28:28,199 Speaker 3: give me Hollywood stuff to do. I want to make 560 00:28:28,280 --> 00:28:31,879 Speaker 3: huge movies. Sean Baker is an artist. You know, he's 561 00:28:31,880 --> 00:28:34,280 Speaker 3: just going to go make his next story. I literally 562 00:28:34,359 --> 00:28:36,520 Speaker 3: asked a friend this and she was like, yeah, he's 563 00:28:37,240 --> 00:28:39,479 Speaker 3: He's not going to go do a weekly for Warner Brothers, 564 00:28:39,480 --> 00:28:41,520 Speaker 3: for Turner fifty grand to help him on a movie. 565 00:28:41,560 --> 00:28:42,520 Speaker 3: That's like not who he is. 566 00:28:43,080 --> 00:28:44,440 Speaker 1: Simon, You and I are artists. 567 00:28:44,680 --> 00:28:45,920 Speaker 3: Oh, you guys are total artists. 568 00:28:45,960 --> 00:28:49,120 Speaker 1: Yeah, we would never we would never ever. So I 569 00:28:49,200 --> 00:28:52,160 Speaker 1: like the idea. I like the idea of Jesse Eisenberg 570 00:28:52,320 --> 00:28:55,040 Speaker 1: getting a little bit of love at plus seven to fifty. 571 00:28:55,120 --> 00:28:56,760 Speaker 1: I liked the real pain. I didn't love it. 572 00:28:56,800 --> 00:28:58,480 Speaker 2: Did you watch his speech the other night? 573 00:28:58,720 --> 00:29:00,440 Speaker 1: I thought his speech was great. I think last year 574 00:29:00,440 --> 00:29:02,600 Speaker 1: that's maybe why you were thinking Emma Stone is because 575 00:29:03,440 --> 00:29:07,880 Speaker 1: he kept referring to Emma Stone in his speech. I thought, 576 00:29:08,000 --> 00:29:10,360 Speaker 1: and I thought the speech was great. I thought the 577 00:29:10,400 --> 00:29:14,640 Speaker 1: movie was to me okay, and we'll get to Kieran Culkin. 578 00:29:15,960 --> 00:29:17,800 Speaker 1: I didn't know you could, you know, be in a 579 00:29:17,920 --> 00:29:23,040 Speaker 1: lead for you know, supporting actor or actor. I forgot 580 00:29:23,080 --> 00:29:26,000 Speaker 1: what he is for playing yourself apparently that. 581 00:29:26,200 --> 00:29:28,320 Speaker 3: Playing character you already played on a TV show on HBO. 582 00:29:28,520 --> 00:29:32,080 Speaker 1: It's layers, that's basically what he's doing. And he's just, 583 00:29:32,160 --> 00:29:34,200 Speaker 1: you know, he seems to be very charming, and people 584 00:29:34,240 --> 00:29:36,120 Speaker 1: like to have him at award show, so they just 585 00:29:36,200 --> 00:29:39,800 Speaker 1: keep letting him win. All right, let's talk about Best 586 00:29:39,800 --> 00:29:42,200 Speaker 1: Picture here for a second, because we're just we're coming 587 00:29:42,240 --> 00:29:48,200 Speaker 1: out of original Screenplay. Okay, Honora minus three hundred Conclave 588 00:29:48,600 --> 00:29:53,600 Speaker 1: you just mentioned h plus two fifteen, then The Brutalist 589 00:29:53,920 --> 00:29:58,000 Speaker 1: plus six hundred, Complete Unknown plus twenty eight hundred. So 590 00:29:59,280 --> 00:30:04,760 Speaker 1: I thought Conclave was amazing, and Laskar, you and I 591 00:30:04,800 --> 00:30:08,959 Speaker 1: and Simon, I think it was two years ago. The 592 00:30:09,000 --> 00:30:11,960 Speaker 1: Menu to me was one of the best movies of 593 00:30:11,960 --> 00:30:12,240 Speaker 1: the year. 594 00:30:12,360 --> 00:30:15,080 Speaker 3: You do here on the record, and you love that movie. 595 00:30:15,120 --> 00:30:17,280 Speaker 1: I actually just watched it again. You can see it now. 596 00:30:17,280 --> 00:30:21,480 Speaker 1: I think it's on Netflix. It's so freaking good. It 597 00:30:21,600 --> 00:30:25,280 Speaker 1: is so good. Conclave obviously reminds me a little bit 598 00:30:25,920 --> 00:30:30,800 Speaker 1: of that movie, and because the actors and all that 599 00:30:30,880 --> 00:30:34,400 Speaker 1: kind of stuff. But give me your take on Conclave 600 00:30:34,640 --> 00:30:36,920 Speaker 1: or is this just anora? 601 00:30:37,920 --> 00:30:39,640 Speaker 3: This one is so up in the air. I mean, 602 00:30:39,760 --> 00:30:43,000 Speaker 3: first of all, I really really liked Conclave. I thought yea, 603 00:30:43,600 --> 00:30:45,960 Speaker 3: and I actually watched it twice, and the second time 604 00:30:45,960 --> 00:30:48,000 Speaker 3: I watched it with my seventy eight year old mother 605 00:30:48,120 --> 00:30:52,120 Speaker 3: and she gasped when it ended at the ending, which 606 00:30:52,160 --> 00:30:55,200 Speaker 3: was hilarious to watch in real time. I thought it 607 00:30:55,240 --> 00:30:57,640 Speaker 3: was great. I mean, I do think, and I want 608 00:30:57,640 --> 00:31:00,080 Speaker 3: to be careful not to spoil for people haven't seen it. 609 00:31:00,240 --> 00:31:03,080 Speaker 3: I still am not sure that the ending entirely works 610 00:31:03,120 --> 00:31:05,360 Speaker 3: of Conclave, like the you know, the kind of what 611 00:31:05,480 --> 00:31:08,280 Speaker 3: you find out at the very very end. And I 612 00:31:08,320 --> 00:31:10,280 Speaker 3: do think that a lot of these movies that tend 613 00:31:10,320 --> 00:31:13,240 Speaker 3: to win Best Picture sometimes they do come down to 614 00:31:13,320 --> 00:31:15,600 Speaker 3: like the ending. Like you know, I look back at 615 00:31:15,600 --> 00:31:20,080 Speaker 3: twenty eighteen when Green Book beat Roma, and you know, 616 00:31:20,080 --> 00:31:21,880 Speaker 3: if you just look at it from like a movie 617 00:31:21,920 --> 00:31:25,120 Speaker 3: going standpoint, you know, Roma was a piece of art. 618 00:31:25,520 --> 00:31:27,520 Speaker 3: Green Book was a movie that like made you feel 619 00:31:27,880 --> 00:31:30,320 Speaker 3: and you remember back to like when the door knocks 620 00:31:30,360 --> 00:31:33,600 Speaker 3: at the end of the movie and Marshal Ali is 621 00:31:33,640 --> 00:31:35,960 Speaker 3: standing there freezing and they hug each other, and that's 622 00:31:35,960 --> 00:31:38,360 Speaker 3: why that movie wins Best Picture. That's what people want 623 00:31:38,640 --> 00:31:42,520 Speaker 3: and no different than CODA. And you know twenty twenty 624 00:31:42,560 --> 00:31:44,560 Speaker 3: which is non by Land and twenty twenty one is CODA. 625 00:31:44,600 --> 00:31:46,960 Speaker 3: Those were weird years because of COVID. But like you 626 00:31:47,000 --> 00:31:48,840 Speaker 3: look at CODA when the dad says, I want to 627 00:31:48,840 --> 00:31:50,400 Speaker 3: hear you sing and he puts his hand on her 628 00:31:50,440 --> 00:31:53,600 Speaker 3: neck to feel her vocal chords. That's why these movies win. 629 00:31:54,200 --> 00:31:57,360 Speaker 3: And I kind of thought Conclave botched that a little 630 00:31:57,360 --> 00:32:01,360 Speaker 3: bit with you know the twist. I loved the movie 631 00:32:01,400 --> 00:32:03,640 Speaker 3: and I thought he was directed within an inch of 632 00:32:03,640 --> 00:32:06,680 Speaker 3: its life, and the editing and the photography and the acting, 633 00:32:06,720 --> 00:32:11,080 Speaker 3: and I could watch Ray Fines do literally anything. He's 634 00:32:11,080 --> 00:32:14,120 Speaker 3: never won an Oscar. He was nominated in ninety three 635 00:32:14,280 --> 00:32:16,480 Speaker 3: for Shindler's List for Sporting Actor, in ninety six for 636 00:32:16,520 --> 00:32:19,440 Speaker 3: Best Actor for The English Patient, and he's been overlooked 637 00:32:19,480 --> 00:32:21,840 Speaker 3: like seven times. Should have been nominated for the Grand 638 00:32:21,880 --> 00:32:25,880 Speaker 3: Buddapest Hotel, like another amazing, another movie. He's amazing and 639 00:32:25,920 --> 00:32:28,880 Speaker 3: an amazing film. So let's look at some of the 640 00:32:28,880 --> 00:32:32,800 Speaker 3: Best Picture of stats. So Honora won the PGA, the DGA, 641 00:32:33,040 --> 00:32:37,280 Speaker 3: the WGA, the CCA that's Critics' choice. Brutalist won Golden Globes. 642 00:32:37,360 --> 00:32:40,160 Speaker 3: That's like a distant memory. And now Conclave has won 643 00:32:40,240 --> 00:32:43,440 Speaker 3: BAFTA and SAG. Okay, all right, let's go to SAG. 644 00:32:43,480 --> 00:32:46,040 Speaker 3: They call it Best Ensemble. That's the version of Best Picture. 645 00:32:46,600 --> 00:32:50,400 Speaker 3: SAG has been around for twenty nine years. Fifteen of 646 00:32:50,440 --> 00:32:53,760 Speaker 3: the twenty nine years of SAG, the winners that have 647 00:32:53,840 --> 00:32:58,160 Speaker 3: won Best Ensemble one Best Picture. You guys are numbers, guys, 648 00:32:58,320 --> 00:33:01,080 Speaker 3: not good. That's not good. That's fifty to fifty. That's 649 00:33:01,160 --> 00:33:04,840 Speaker 3: not good at all. So now there's all kinds of 650 00:33:04,880 --> 00:33:08,360 Speaker 3: like substats out there about, like, you know, get people 651 00:33:08,400 --> 00:33:10,320 Speaker 3: that are way smarter than me, that are like, you know, well, 652 00:33:10,360 --> 00:33:12,560 Speaker 3: the last time a movie only one X and Y 653 00:33:12,760 --> 00:33:14,800 Speaker 3: and one SAG one Best Picture, and like one of 654 00:33:14,840 --> 00:33:17,000 Speaker 3: those was Coda, you know what I mean. So this 655 00:33:17,040 --> 00:33:22,960 Speaker 3: has happened recently. The way I look at uh SAG ensemble, 656 00:33:23,000 --> 00:33:25,320 Speaker 3: to be quite honest, is sometimes I think people are 657 00:33:25,360 --> 00:33:28,400 Speaker 3: truly voting for an ensemble, you know, literally the word 658 00:33:28,800 --> 00:33:32,000 Speaker 3: and Conclave is an ensemble. You know, you've got like 659 00:33:32,160 --> 00:33:36,240 Speaker 3: nine people with major parts. Anora has four people in it, right, 660 00:33:36,720 --> 00:33:41,120 Speaker 3: it has you know, Mikey, it has the guy who's nominated, 661 00:33:41,160 --> 00:33:42,959 Speaker 3: you know, the Russian you know guy that she has 662 00:33:43,120 --> 00:33:46,760 Speaker 3: Russian Timothy right, then it has the Russian Timothy Schell 663 00:33:46,840 --> 00:33:48,600 Speaker 3: made the other guy, and then it has the older 664 00:33:48,640 --> 00:33:50,880 Speaker 3: guy who I loved. I need to write their names 665 00:33:50,880 --> 00:33:55,239 Speaker 3: down for a future podcast appearance. But it's it. It's 666 00:33:55,280 --> 00:33:57,640 Speaker 3: a four person movie. I don't think people see it 667 00:33:57,680 --> 00:34:01,280 Speaker 3: as an ensemble. So with all that said, there's only 668 00:34:01,320 --> 00:34:03,640 Speaker 3: two movies really now that feel like they could win, 669 00:34:04,080 --> 00:34:06,800 Speaker 3: and it's Anora. In Conclave, there was a feeling on 670 00:34:06,800 --> 00:34:10,040 Speaker 3: the day the nominations, a complete Unknown had a real chance. 671 00:34:10,120 --> 00:34:13,480 Speaker 3: People thought because of the preferential ballot that it could 672 00:34:13,480 --> 00:34:15,839 Speaker 3: be so many people's ones, twos, and threes it could 673 00:34:15,840 --> 00:34:18,959 Speaker 3: get there. I loved that movie, but I just don't 674 00:34:18,960 --> 00:34:21,680 Speaker 3: feel like it's shown any real momentum in any of 675 00:34:21,680 --> 00:34:24,440 Speaker 3: the other precursor awards. I never thought Wicked was going 676 00:34:24,520 --> 00:34:28,319 Speaker 3: to win. Brutalist is completely faded, so it's a nourra 677 00:34:28,400 --> 00:34:31,279 Speaker 3: in Conclave. Now. The funny thing about Conclave is that 678 00:34:31,320 --> 00:34:34,680 Speaker 3: it is the quintessential older Academy movie, you know. And 679 00:34:34,880 --> 00:34:38,040 Speaker 3: I talked to one Academy member that is in his seventies, 680 00:34:38,120 --> 00:34:40,279 Speaker 3: like a month ago, and he was like, it's a 681 00:34:40,320 --> 00:34:43,359 Speaker 3: process movie. And people in Hollywood love process movies because 682 00:34:43,360 --> 00:34:46,880 Speaker 3: it's kind of like making a movie, you know, so 683 00:34:47,560 --> 00:34:49,920 Speaker 3: it has a shot. Doesn't matter that it didn't get 684 00:34:49,920 --> 00:34:52,520 Speaker 3: a Best Director nomination. Coda did not have a Best 685 00:34:52,560 --> 00:34:56,919 Speaker 3: Director nomination and one Best Picture. Argo in twenty twelve 686 00:34:57,000 --> 00:34:59,800 Speaker 3: did not have a Best Director anomation nomination. One Best Picture. 687 00:35:00,360 --> 00:35:02,480 Speaker 3: Driving Miss Daisy in nineteen eighty nine did not have 688 00:35:02,520 --> 00:35:05,720 Speaker 3: a Best Director nomination one Best Picture happens all the time. 689 00:35:06,600 --> 00:35:09,640 Speaker 3: The Best Director race was unbelievably competitive this year. So 690 00:35:09,719 --> 00:35:11,120 Speaker 3: what I was going to talk about earlier, and this 691 00:35:11,160 --> 00:35:13,200 Speaker 3: is why I asked you, you know, Chad and Simon 692 00:35:13,200 --> 00:35:15,920 Speaker 3: about because you vote during the show. So let's talk 693 00:35:15,920 --> 00:35:20,600 Speaker 3: about Best Editing. Okay, pre nineteen ninety nine, usually the 694 00:35:20,600 --> 00:35:23,400 Speaker 3: movie that won Best Picture also won Best Editing because 695 00:35:23,400 --> 00:35:25,439 Speaker 3: there was a feeling that like, if it's the best 696 00:35:25,440 --> 00:35:27,360 Speaker 3: movie of the year, it was obviously the best edited 697 00:35:27,400 --> 00:35:29,400 Speaker 3: film of the year, because that means the movie is 698 00:35:29,400 --> 00:35:31,680 Speaker 3: put together in the best possible way. If you look 699 00:35:31,719 --> 00:35:35,400 Speaker 3: in the nineties, movies like Schindler's List, Dance with the Wolves, Unforgiven, 700 00:35:35,520 --> 00:35:38,680 Speaker 3: Forrest Gump, you know, on and on and on. From 701 00:35:38,800 --> 00:35:44,120 Speaker 3: nineteen ninety nine until now, only nine films that have 702 00:35:44,160 --> 00:35:48,160 Speaker 3: won Best Editing also won Best Picture, right, So it 703 00:35:48,160 --> 00:35:51,160 Speaker 3: doesn't correlate now at all. It did correlate the last 704 00:35:51,239 --> 00:35:54,600 Speaker 3: two years Obenheimer won Best Editing and everything everywhere all 705 00:35:54,760 --> 00:35:57,600 Speaker 3: once one Best Editing. But what happens now a lot 706 00:35:57,640 --> 00:36:00,520 Speaker 3: of times is Best Editing will go to maybe a 707 00:36:00,520 --> 00:36:02,680 Speaker 3: more unique film, like in nineteen Night nine it went 708 00:36:02,719 --> 00:36:04,600 Speaker 3: to the Matrix, you know, so it might go to 709 00:36:04,640 --> 00:36:07,160 Speaker 3: a movie that like really stood out for its editing. 710 00:36:07,280 --> 00:36:10,480 Speaker 3: One year, one of the Born movies, I think The Supremacy, 711 00:36:10,560 --> 00:36:13,239 Speaker 3: the second one one Best Editing. People remember those movies 712 00:36:13,239 --> 00:36:15,359 Speaker 3: were edited in really cool ways, like how they did 713 00:36:15,360 --> 00:36:18,640 Speaker 3: the fight scenes. So meanwhile, the five Best Picture, the 714 00:36:18,760 --> 00:36:24,760 Speaker 3: five Best Editing nominees are Amelia Prez, Conclave, Wicked, Anora, 715 00:36:24,800 --> 00:36:27,000 Speaker 3: and The Brutalist. Okay, well, we know Amelia Prez is 716 00:36:27,040 --> 00:36:29,600 Speaker 3: not winning Best Picture, and we don't think Wicked's winning 717 00:36:29,600 --> 00:36:31,399 Speaker 3: Best Picture, and we don't think The Brutal is winning 718 00:36:31,440 --> 00:36:35,200 Speaker 3: Best Picture. And what do you have left Conclave and Anora? 719 00:36:35,600 --> 00:36:38,360 Speaker 3: So here's my point. When you're watching the show on Sunday. 720 00:36:38,840 --> 00:36:42,560 Speaker 3: If Conclave wins Best Editing, assume it's probably winning Best Picture. 721 00:36:43,040 --> 00:36:44,720 Speaker 3: You know. And by the way, it's interesting that movie 722 00:36:44,760 --> 00:36:48,279 Speaker 3: was edited. The editing was incredible. Now I think the 723 00:36:48,360 --> 00:36:50,400 Speaker 3: editing of Anora was incredible too. I think the movie 724 00:36:50,440 --> 00:36:53,320 Speaker 3: was too long. I think most movies are too long today. 725 00:36:54,440 --> 00:36:57,040 Speaker 3: But you know, so you have to really that can 726 00:36:57,080 --> 00:37:00,640 Speaker 3: be a really strong precursor award going back up to 727 00:37:00,680 --> 00:37:02,800 Speaker 3: Best Picture. I mean, I still will go with Anura 728 00:37:02,920 --> 00:37:04,640 Speaker 3: because I'm just going to go with the momentum. And 729 00:37:04,640 --> 00:37:06,800 Speaker 3: I also think that if you are looking at the 730 00:37:06,800 --> 00:37:09,359 Speaker 3: proferential system of like what's in the top one, twos 731 00:37:09,360 --> 00:37:12,120 Speaker 3: and threes, you know, the movies I have heard anecdotally 732 00:37:12,200 --> 00:37:14,360 Speaker 3: about from the most people that I talked to that 733 00:37:14,400 --> 00:37:18,120 Speaker 3: are in the Academy are a nourra burillist and actually 734 00:37:18,120 --> 00:37:19,920 Speaker 3: a complete unknown. Because one of the things that a 735 00:37:19,960 --> 00:37:22,640 Speaker 3: complete unknown did, which you can imagine, I mean, you're 736 00:37:22,680 --> 00:37:25,120 Speaker 3: not a boomer, Chad, You're you're right after the boomers, 737 00:37:25,560 --> 00:37:29,040 Speaker 3: but the boomers right after. I would say, okay, twenty. 738 00:37:28,920 --> 00:37:32,839 Speaker 1: Years after, long long after, Okay, okay, very long after. 739 00:37:32,880 --> 00:37:35,880 Speaker 3: Okay, excuse me, but I'm telling you the people I 740 00:37:35,920 --> 00:37:38,279 Speaker 3: had two clients in New York who went to one 741 00:37:38,320 --> 00:37:41,239 Speaker 3: of the Complete Unknown Oscar screenings and they were like, 742 00:37:41,280 --> 00:37:43,600 Speaker 3: we were the youngest. These guys are both in their forties, 743 00:37:43,719 --> 00:37:46,080 Speaker 3: Like we were actually a client and a friend, and 744 00:37:47,000 --> 00:37:49,560 Speaker 3: they were like, we were twenty years younger than everybody 745 00:37:49,560 --> 00:37:52,239 Speaker 3: in the room. And people went nuts, and as you know, 746 00:37:52,719 --> 00:37:55,799 Speaker 3: and I felt this way. I felt this way about 747 00:37:55,800 --> 00:37:58,279 Speaker 3: Elvis a couple of years ago, which was that what 748 00:37:58,480 --> 00:38:00,399 Speaker 3: And I like the movie Elvis, but I think Elvis 749 00:38:00,440 --> 00:38:03,480 Speaker 3: resonated with the Academy is that a quarter of the 750 00:38:03,520 --> 00:38:06,160 Speaker 3: Academy was alive for Elvis Presley and they were like, 751 00:38:06,280 --> 00:38:08,560 Speaker 3: oh my god, like this is my childhood. This is 752 00:38:08,560 --> 00:38:10,080 Speaker 3: when I was twenty, this when I was thirty. I 753 00:38:10,120 --> 00:38:13,520 Speaker 3: remember Elvis Presley and I loved to Complete Unknown. I 754 00:38:13,600 --> 00:38:16,600 Speaker 3: was so happy Mangold was nominated and Monica Barbara. I 755 00:38:16,640 --> 00:38:18,920 Speaker 3: had them both on my nomination list that I made 756 00:38:18,920 --> 00:38:21,680 Speaker 3: the night before like a nerd. And I thought the 757 00:38:21,680 --> 00:38:23,880 Speaker 3: movie was great. I thought Mangold crushed it. And I 758 00:38:23,920 --> 00:38:26,160 Speaker 3: think there is that feeling of like he went out 759 00:38:26,160 --> 00:38:29,239 Speaker 3: and he recreated the Bob Dylan these four years that 760 00:38:29,360 --> 00:38:32,400 Speaker 3: a lot of us know. And when I talked to 761 00:38:32,400 --> 00:38:34,800 Speaker 3: a friend of mine whose mother is a retired producer 762 00:38:34,800 --> 00:38:37,120 Speaker 3: who's in the Academy, and she told me that her 763 00:38:37,120 --> 00:38:39,200 Speaker 3: mother and her dad literally got out all their Bob 764 00:38:39,280 --> 00:38:41,440 Speaker 3: Dylan albums like that week and like put them on 765 00:38:41,480 --> 00:38:44,680 Speaker 3: the mantle, like to kind of like pay respect, you know, 766 00:38:44,760 --> 00:38:47,400 Speaker 3: back to Bob Dylan. So I would say to me, 767 00:38:47,440 --> 00:38:49,480 Speaker 3: those are only three movies that really have a chance. 768 00:38:49,520 --> 00:38:51,480 Speaker 3: I think the Brutalis is out a lot of the 769 00:38:51,480 --> 00:38:56,320 Speaker 3: other movies in the top ten, you know, from you know, 770 00:38:56,440 --> 00:39:00,600 Speaker 3: Nickel Boys to you know, I'm Still here, you know, 771 00:39:00,800 --> 00:39:03,239 Speaker 3: to the Substance. I mean, they ever never going to win. 772 00:39:03,400 --> 00:39:06,560 Speaker 3: So I think you have to go with an Aura. 773 00:39:06,640 --> 00:39:08,960 Speaker 1: All right, then it's going to be anura. We're getting 774 00:39:09,239 --> 00:39:14,000 Speaker 1: into a noora like sweep category at this point. 775 00:39:14,160 --> 00:39:16,400 Speaker 3: Well that's where my head is at. I'm sorry to 776 00:39:16,480 --> 00:39:18,480 Speaker 3: rupt you. Is that is at the end of it, 777 00:39:18,520 --> 00:39:23,040 Speaker 3: you'll be like, okay, anor one picture director, screenplay actress, 778 00:39:23,320 --> 00:39:25,200 Speaker 3: maybe picked up another one, and then you'll be like okay, 779 00:39:25,360 --> 00:39:27,520 Speaker 3: one like four or five oscars, And that will make 780 00:39:27,520 --> 00:39:29,440 Speaker 3: sense because the other thing I was gonna mention earlier 781 00:39:30,200 --> 00:39:32,120 Speaker 3: is that which I touched on, is that you know, 782 00:39:32,200 --> 00:39:34,200 Speaker 3: a lot of these Best Picture winners now they win 783 00:39:34,280 --> 00:39:37,720 Speaker 3: less than five Oscars, so like Aubenheimer and everything everywhere, 784 00:39:37,719 --> 00:39:40,000 Speaker 3: each one seven. But then when you look back in 785 00:39:40,040 --> 00:39:43,560 Speaker 3: the previous you know, several years Code one three, no 786 00:39:43,640 --> 00:39:46,920 Speaker 3: Medland one three, Parasite one four, green Book one three, 787 00:39:46,960 --> 00:39:50,680 Speaker 3: Spotlight one two, are Go one three, So we're definitely 788 00:39:50,680 --> 00:39:53,920 Speaker 3: still out of this like huge epic, you know phase. 789 00:39:54,280 --> 00:39:57,120 Speaker 3: I mean, if The Brutalist ended up being the dominating movie, 790 00:39:57,160 --> 00:39:59,360 Speaker 3: that could have won like seven, eight or nine, but 791 00:39:59,760 --> 00:40:02,040 Speaker 3: just not meant to be. But I'm sorry I interrupted you. 792 00:40:02,080 --> 00:40:05,240 Speaker 1: Now, when you look back on history, green Book winning 793 00:40:05,840 --> 00:40:08,520 Speaker 1: three Oscars is gonna be one of those years where 794 00:40:08,520 --> 00:40:12,239 Speaker 1: you're like, what the fuck were people? Thank you? It's 795 00:40:12,239 --> 00:40:12,919 Speaker 1: a sweet movie. 796 00:40:12,960 --> 00:40:13,840 Speaker 3: I liked green Book. 797 00:40:14,120 --> 00:40:19,240 Speaker 1: It was fine, totally fine, Simon. The twenty seventeen Academy 798 00:40:19,280 --> 00:40:22,400 Speaker 1: Awards presentation featured one of the biggest live gaps in 799 00:40:22,400 --> 00:40:26,000 Speaker 1: the history of modern television. Many will remember that for 800 00:40:26,080 --> 00:40:28,880 Speaker 1: the final category of the night, the incorrect winner was 801 00:40:28,880 --> 00:40:32,800 Speaker 1: announced for Best Picture. This sent the entire broadcast into 802 00:40:32,880 --> 00:40:37,440 Speaker 1: complete chasts, tarnished the reputation of the Academy, and generally 803 00:40:37,520 --> 00:40:41,600 Speaker 1: embarrassed people on the biggest stage, and there's something else 804 00:40:42,760 --> 00:40:46,560 Speaker 1: that can send each of us into complete chaos, something 805 00:40:46,560 --> 00:40:50,279 Speaker 1: else that can tarnish our reputations. Signmon, something else they 806 00:40:50,520 --> 00:40:57,960 Speaker 1: can embarrass you on your biggest stage inferior, low quality underwear. 807 00:40:58,680 --> 00:41:01,840 Speaker 1: That's why our beloved sponsor John is here providing the 808 00:41:01,880 --> 00:41:05,000 Speaker 1: red carpet treatment to every man and woman who wears 809 00:41:05,040 --> 00:41:09,280 Speaker 1: their best in class underwear and their flexible, breathable collection 810 00:41:09,480 --> 00:41:13,960 Speaker 1: of casual essentials. When I'm handed the envelope in the 811 00:41:13,960 --> 00:41:18,280 Speaker 1: best underwear category, there's only one nominee on my card. 812 00:41:18,520 --> 00:41:21,920 Speaker 1: It's Tommy John. Simon. Why will you be wearing more 813 00:41:21,920 --> 00:41:24,320 Speaker 1: of Tommy John in twenty twenty. 814 00:41:24,080 --> 00:41:26,360 Speaker 3: Five because comfort is gang. 815 00:41:26,920 --> 00:41:29,240 Speaker 1: Right now, you can shop Tommy John dot com slash 816 00:41:29,320 --> 00:41:32,080 Speaker 1: favorites and get twenty five percent off your first order. 817 00:41:32,160 --> 00:41:35,440 Speaker 1: Save twenty five percent of Tommy John dot com slash favorites. 818 00:41:35,560 --> 00:41:41,160 Speaker 1: That's Tommy John dot com slash favorites. Laskar chuckled at that, 819 00:41:41,320 --> 00:41:42,000 Speaker 1: which was fun. 820 00:41:42,280 --> 00:41:44,239 Speaker 3: Well, I actually thought you were going towards a piece 821 00:41:44,239 --> 00:41:45,680 Speaker 3: of trivia, and then the way you tied it into 822 00:41:45,680 --> 00:41:46,480 Speaker 3: the underwear at. 823 00:41:46,320 --> 00:41:49,160 Speaker 1: It, I can take no credit. It's all that, and 824 00:41:49,239 --> 00:41:52,440 Speaker 1: it's the first time I read these without having read 825 00:41:52,480 --> 00:41:56,080 Speaker 1: them before, and so I am I'm reading it. I'm 826 00:41:56,160 --> 00:41:58,120 Speaker 1: learning the story as I go. It's like reading. 827 00:41:58,520 --> 00:41:59,720 Speaker 3: That's why they feel so natural. 828 00:42:00,080 --> 00:42:01,799 Speaker 1: Yeah, as I go, And so it's so fun. I 829 00:42:01,800 --> 00:42:04,560 Speaker 1: can't wait to see how it ends. All right, best 830 00:42:04,600 --> 00:42:05,840 Speaker 1: actor Timothy Shallamy. 831 00:42:06,400 --> 00:42:09,239 Speaker 3: He just won SAG and then let's say, I looked 832 00:42:09,239 --> 00:42:10,800 Speaker 3: at my stats. Okay, so let me give you. 833 00:42:10,880 --> 00:42:12,359 Speaker 1: While you're looking at the stats, let me just give 834 00:42:12,400 --> 00:42:16,040 Speaker 1: the answer. Because while he won the SAG Adrianan Brody 835 00:42:16,040 --> 00:42:20,520 Speaker 1: at the Brutalist minus two twenty five Timothy Shallomey plus 836 00:42:20,560 --> 00:42:24,200 Speaker 1: one forty Ray Finds plus twelve hundred, and everything sort 837 00:42:24,239 --> 00:42:28,960 Speaker 1: of skyrockets from there. Appropriately. So, look, Shalome wants to 838 00:42:29,000 --> 00:42:31,440 Speaker 1: do what Brody did, which is win it as the 839 00:42:31,480 --> 00:42:35,279 Speaker 1: youngest person ever. As you mentioned, Brody did it. What 840 00:42:35,360 --> 00:42:36,759 Speaker 1: was it twenty five years ago or whatever? 841 00:42:36,840 --> 00:42:37,719 Speaker 3: Yeah, two thousand and two. 842 00:42:37,800 --> 00:42:40,960 Speaker 1: Yeah, give it to us, tell us what's well? 843 00:42:41,400 --> 00:42:43,759 Speaker 3: Look, I mean again, what's interesting is that you know, 844 00:42:43,800 --> 00:42:46,239 Speaker 3: Shalmy hadn't won anything until Sunday Night, and then he 845 00:42:46,280 --> 00:42:49,080 Speaker 3: won the SAG Award. Now SAG since twenty ten has 846 00:42:49,120 --> 00:42:53,120 Speaker 3: gone twelve or fourteen predicting Best Actor. The notable exceptions 847 00:42:53,120 --> 00:42:56,880 Speaker 3: were Denzel Washington won for Fences in twenty sixteen, as 848 00:42:56,920 --> 00:42:59,520 Speaker 3: opposed to Casey Affleck for Manchester by the Sea, and 849 00:42:59,560 --> 00:43:03,760 Speaker 3: then in twenty twenty, Chadick Boseman won for Ma Rainey's 850 00:43:03,760 --> 00:43:06,279 Speaker 3: Black Bottom instead of Anthony Hopkins for The Father. Now, 851 00:43:06,320 --> 00:43:09,320 Speaker 3: I had Anthony Hopkins winning that night at the Oscars 852 00:43:09,320 --> 00:43:12,680 Speaker 3: because if you watch Ma Raine's Black Bottom, he really 853 00:43:12,680 --> 00:43:14,760 Speaker 3: was a supporting person of that movie, and I actually thought, 854 00:43:14,960 --> 00:43:16,239 Speaker 3: I don't think people are going to vote for him, 855 00:43:16,239 --> 00:43:21,040 Speaker 3: just because unfortunately he tragically had passed away. So to me, 856 00:43:21,200 --> 00:43:23,560 Speaker 3: I feel like looking I mean, both of those from 857 00:43:23,600 --> 00:43:25,839 Speaker 3: SAG were just sort of like none of those made 858 00:43:25,840 --> 00:43:29,359 Speaker 3: sense because even Denzel and Fences wasn't really contending as 859 00:43:29,480 --> 00:43:32,400 Speaker 3: like maybe the runner up from Casey anyways, and a 860 00:43:32,400 --> 00:43:34,680 Speaker 3: lot of the other races that were being predicted that 861 00:43:34,760 --> 00:43:40,160 Speaker 3: year back in twenty sixteen, so it's pretty predictive. I mean, look, 862 00:43:40,360 --> 00:43:43,319 Speaker 3: it's it's so tricky because there's definitely this feeling of 863 00:43:43,440 --> 00:43:46,600 Speaker 3: like Challo May is our new Leo, and like, let's 864 00:43:46,600 --> 00:43:48,840 Speaker 3: make him work for it. Leo didn't win until he 865 00:43:48,880 --> 00:43:51,720 Speaker 3: was nominated, I think in his fifth time in twenty 866 00:43:51,719 --> 00:43:55,840 Speaker 3: fifteen for The Revenant. But shall may. I mean it's cool. 867 00:43:55,880 --> 00:43:58,279 Speaker 3: I mean he's a special, special actor. I think he's 868 00:43:58,400 --> 00:44:03,399 Speaker 3: unbelievable in the movie this. This is such a toss up. 869 00:44:03,520 --> 00:44:08,000 Speaker 3: I mean, I think I would still lean Adrian just 870 00:44:08,000 --> 00:44:10,040 Speaker 3: because he won so many of the early awards, and 871 00:44:10,040 --> 00:44:13,040 Speaker 3: I think people think he's just so amazing in that movie. 872 00:44:13,080 --> 00:44:15,160 Speaker 3: And I do think there's a little bit of a 873 00:44:15,200 --> 00:44:17,760 Speaker 3: sense of like Shalome will be back so many more times. 874 00:44:18,160 --> 00:44:21,360 Speaker 3: There was this weird narrative of like, you know, Adrian 875 00:44:21,360 --> 00:44:23,720 Speaker 3: Brody already won for this exact same role in The Pianist, 876 00:44:23,760 --> 00:44:25,799 Speaker 3: which that's a very reductive thing to say, just because 877 00:44:25,800 --> 00:44:30,080 Speaker 3: they're both, you know, Jewish Holocaust survivors. He's amazing in 878 00:44:30,120 --> 00:44:33,920 Speaker 3: The Brutalist. So I would still lean Brody. But it's 879 00:44:33,960 --> 00:44:34,759 Speaker 3: another toss up. 880 00:44:35,640 --> 00:44:39,719 Speaker 1: Snon loves to Mithew Shaname he's amazing. I did. 881 00:44:39,840 --> 00:44:43,360 Speaker 2: I think it's he's in a rare spot where, like 882 00:44:43,440 --> 00:44:46,160 Speaker 2: he talked about Leo, Leo probably would have won if 883 00:44:46,200 --> 00:44:48,319 Speaker 2: things were a little different in the nineties, where it 884 00:44:48,560 --> 00:44:50,960 Speaker 2: was really you got to earn it before you can 885 00:44:51,040 --> 00:44:52,560 Speaker 2: get it. Where I feel like there's been a shift 886 00:44:52,560 --> 00:44:55,840 Speaker 2: nowadays where you know, someone like him, I feel like 887 00:44:55,840 --> 00:44:59,319 Speaker 2: he has put in the work and movies do they 888 00:44:59,320 --> 00:45:02,239 Speaker 2: need a movie like we need young movie stars. We're 889 00:45:02,239 --> 00:45:04,560 Speaker 2: in this weird thing where, like I love Michael B. Jordan, 890 00:45:04,560 --> 00:45:05,719 Speaker 2: I thought he was gonna be the next one to 891 00:45:05,760 --> 00:45:08,800 Speaker 2: step up for people around my age. He kind of hasn't. 892 00:45:08,880 --> 00:45:11,799 Speaker 2: And there's been this void still of someone to fill 893 00:45:11,880 --> 00:45:15,719 Speaker 2: this void of the next Leo tom Cruise type, like 894 00:45:15,840 --> 00:45:19,160 Speaker 2: someone that you know like there was there's there's strutches 895 00:45:19,200 --> 00:45:21,200 Speaker 2: of different people, like even Brad Pitt. I put him 896 00:45:21,200 --> 00:45:23,920 Speaker 2: on the same pedestal where Matt Damon too. They make 897 00:45:23,960 --> 00:45:26,600 Speaker 2: a movie, I don't care what the movie is. I 898 00:45:26,680 --> 00:45:29,440 Speaker 2: go and see it, and they think they know they 899 00:45:29,480 --> 00:45:31,480 Speaker 2: need to start getting back to that with this younger 900 00:45:31,520 --> 00:45:34,600 Speaker 2: generation because we have had some dead like duds, Like 901 00:45:35,040 --> 00:45:37,439 Speaker 2: you know, I like Zach Effron, He's kind of a dud. 902 00:45:37,520 --> 00:45:38,759 Speaker 2: He didn't really turn out to be the guy like 903 00:45:38,800 --> 00:45:41,959 Speaker 2: I love Iron Claw, but I had to beg people 904 00:45:41,960 --> 00:45:43,600 Speaker 2: to go see that movie. They weren't going to see 905 00:45:43,640 --> 00:45:46,160 Speaker 2: it simply because Zach Effron's in it. Where you know, 906 00:45:46,160 --> 00:45:48,120 Speaker 2: if that was the nineties or eighties and it's Tom 907 00:45:48,200 --> 00:45:51,640 Speaker 2: Cruise in the Iron Claw. Everyone's seeing it, men and women. 908 00:45:51,760 --> 00:45:54,080 Speaker 2: So yeah, I think Timmy's in this cool spot of 909 00:45:54,600 --> 00:45:57,319 Speaker 2: his range of doom to then do a movie like 910 00:45:57,400 --> 00:46:00,359 Speaker 2: this right where he can be the action star guy. 911 00:46:01,040 --> 00:46:04,160 Speaker 2: And you know, I just think he could pull the 912 00:46:04,239 --> 00:46:05,839 Speaker 2: upsete off here, Like I love that he's a dog 913 00:46:05,880 --> 00:46:09,200 Speaker 2: in this number. And I do think it's like after 914 00:46:09,320 --> 00:46:11,719 Speaker 2: how he gave that speech at SAG where it's like 915 00:46:12,520 --> 00:46:14,440 Speaker 2: he's not backing away from it, He's lean into it. 916 00:46:14,560 --> 00:46:16,640 Speaker 2: Be like I want to be great. I want to 917 00:46:16,680 --> 00:46:19,040 Speaker 2: be the big guy. I do like that. I wonder 918 00:46:19,080 --> 00:46:21,080 Speaker 2: your percession of it is that gonna hurt him or 919 00:46:21,120 --> 00:46:21,680 Speaker 2: benefit him? 920 00:46:21,680 --> 00:46:23,480 Speaker 3: Well, the thing is the voting was the voting was 921 00:46:23,480 --> 00:46:26,800 Speaker 3: done on like February twenty ohr eighteenth, though the voting 922 00:46:26,840 --> 00:46:29,040 Speaker 3: closed like ten days ago, so it doesn't really matter. 923 00:46:29,280 --> 00:46:31,160 Speaker 3: I mean, look, I think honestly, for people that are 924 00:46:31,160 --> 00:46:34,399 Speaker 3: betting on this, it's like take Schalamey for Best Actor, 925 00:46:34,520 --> 00:46:36,239 Speaker 3: take to be More for Best actress, Like just head 926 00:46:36,320 --> 00:46:38,600 Speaker 3: your bets, you know what I mean? Like, look, I 927 00:46:39,040 --> 00:46:42,239 Speaker 3: thought Shallome was unreal in that movie. I would be 928 00:46:42,280 --> 00:46:44,759 Speaker 3: so happy if he wins. I don't know if this 929 00:46:44,800 --> 00:46:48,040 Speaker 3: one is just like a complete complete uh toss up. 930 00:46:48,080 --> 00:46:50,000 Speaker 3: But you're right, he definitely has been annoyed as like 931 00:46:50,000 --> 00:46:52,640 Speaker 3: he's going to be the next guy. But the SAG 932 00:46:52,680 --> 00:46:54,680 Speaker 3: Awards are always pretty late. Somebody said that they were 933 00:46:54,760 --> 00:46:57,719 Speaker 3: moved because of the LA fires, but yeah, I mean 934 00:46:57,719 --> 00:47:00,520 Speaker 3: they're you know, the voting has been done so and look, 935 00:47:00,560 --> 00:47:02,720 Speaker 3: I think shall May he was already doing so much press. 936 00:47:02,719 --> 00:47:05,600 Speaker 3: I mean, he played himself as Bob Dylan on SNL, 937 00:47:05,880 --> 00:47:08,600 Speaker 3: like you know, he was leaving it all out on 938 00:47:08,640 --> 00:47:13,640 Speaker 3: the on the floor these days exactly. 939 00:47:14,239 --> 00:47:16,920 Speaker 1: I want to take Shallo May here. 940 00:47:17,560 --> 00:47:18,160 Speaker 3: I love. 941 00:47:19,480 --> 00:47:22,520 Speaker 1: I thought the movie was amazing, just rush it. But again, 942 00:47:22,840 --> 00:47:26,640 Speaker 1: I'm close to Boomer so it's almost almost my music. 943 00:47:27,920 --> 00:47:32,160 Speaker 1: But I've never been a Bob Dylan guy. And I 944 00:47:32,320 --> 00:47:35,759 Speaker 1: watched that movie and then couldn't stop listening. You know, 945 00:47:35,920 --> 00:47:41,799 Speaker 1: I was your friend's parents like just streaming Dylan NonStop 946 00:47:42,200 --> 00:47:44,560 Speaker 1: because he was so so good in this movie. I 947 00:47:44,600 --> 00:47:46,960 Speaker 1: also found him to be and you know, I'm a sucker, 948 00:47:48,080 --> 00:47:51,880 Speaker 1: so incredibly charming on his press tour right yea in 949 00:47:52,000 --> 00:47:54,520 Speaker 1: college game day, he was amazing. And then the old 950 00:47:54,560 --> 00:47:57,319 Speaker 1: stuff surfaced about what a huge Knicks fan he was, 951 00:47:57,840 --> 00:48:01,360 Speaker 1: and his sports knowledge, I mean that connected with me. 952 00:48:01,600 --> 00:48:04,040 Speaker 1: And then so then it was just this guy who 953 00:48:04,600 --> 00:48:06,959 Speaker 1: I want to hang out with. Andy happens to be 954 00:48:07,000 --> 00:48:11,040 Speaker 1: a great actor and he's so freaking ambitious, which I loved. 955 00:48:11,160 --> 00:48:14,640 Speaker 1: Simon to your point, I love that speech, and I 956 00:48:14,680 --> 00:48:16,600 Speaker 1: like the way Adam Sandler says Timothy Shallowy. 957 00:48:17,000 --> 00:48:19,879 Speaker 3: Of course, no, he's he's amazing. It would be very 958 00:48:19,920 --> 00:48:22,040 Speaker 3: cool if he won. And I mean Adrian Birdie already 959 00:48:22,040 --> 00:48:24,520 Speaker 3: has an Oscar. But yeah, I think because Adrian Birdie 960 00:48:24,560 --> 00:48:28,000 Speaker 3: won in two thousand and two. You know, people I 961 00:48:28,080 --> 00:48:30,840 Speaker 3: saw amos at an Academy member yesterday, it's like, do 962 00:48:30,840 --> 00:48:33,200 Speaker 3: you want to put Adrian Brody in the two timer? Club? 963 00:48:33,320 --> 00:48:35,760 Speaker 3: Is winning two best after Oscars? But it's so far apart, 964 00:48:35,800 --> 00:48:37,560 Speaker 3: I don't think people really think about it. And by 965 00:48:37,560 --> 00:48:40,200 Speaker 3: the way, in this newer era, we've had a lot 966 00:48:40,280 --> 00:48:42,759 Speaker 3: of people win two Oscars relatively fast. I mean, Emma 967 00:48:42,800 --> 00:48:46,360 Speaker 3: Stone won two in twenty sixteen and twenty twenty three, 968 00:48:46,600 --> 00:48:49,760 Speaker 3: Christoph Waltz won two two thousand and nine twenty twelve, 969 00:48:50,120 --> 00:48:53,040 Speaker 3: Mershaw Alie won two twenty sixteen, twenty eighteen. I mean, 970 00:48:53,160 --> 00:48:55,880 Speaker 3: like it's happening kind of faster. I don't think people 971 00:48:55,880 --> 00:48:58,400 Speaker 3: care about that stuff as much anymore. It's a total 972 00:48:58,440 --> 00:49:00,680 Speaker 3: toss up. I mean, I literally might change my mind 973 00:49:00,680 --> 00:49:03,320 Speaker 3: at like four o'clock on Sunday when I like finished 974 00:49:03,320 --> 00:49:04,600 Speaker 3: doing my ballot at my house. 975 00:49:04,760 --> 00:49:07,560 Speaker 1: You know, oscars are practically a participation trophy now, the 976 00:49:07,560 --> 00:49:10,120 Speaker 1: way they're just giving away. They don't even have standards anymore. 977 00:49:10,880 --> 00:49:16,240 Speaker 1: Best Adapted Screenplay Conclave runaway here has. 978 00:49:16,080 --> 00:49:19,160 Speaker 3: To be relatively weak category. The other thing too, going 979 00:49:19,200 --> 00:49:21,800 Speaker 3: back to Best after for one second, just again thinking 980 00:49:21,800 --> 00:49:24,960 Speaker 3: about what happens the next day. One thing that's happened 981 00:49:24,960 --> 00:49:28,160 Speaker 3: recently with the Academy Awards is every year there have 982 00:49:28,280 --> 00:49:31,040 Speaker 3: been some major major movies with like ten or eleven 983 00:49:31,080 --> 00:49:35,759 Speaker 3: nominations to get nothing. Notably Killers of Flower Moon, Irishmen 984 00:49:35,960 --> 00:49:39,920 Speaker 3: Banshees of an Asheron Tar like Tarn Banshees each had 985 00:49:40,000 --> 00:49:44,359 Speaker 3: nine nominations, got zero, so completely unknown as eight nominations, like, 986 00:49:44,600 --> 00:49:47,479 Speaker 3: don't be surprised if it wins zero oscars, Like that's 987 00:49:47,600 --> 00:49:52,279 Speaker 3: just how it shakes out sometimes now. But back to adapted, Yeah, 988 00:49:52,360 --> 00:49:55,480 Speaker 3: Conclave has been the runaway you know favorite for this 989 00:49:55,840 --> 00:49:58,160 Speaker 3: you know, non stock you know the entire narrative, the 990 00:49:58,280 --> 00:50:01,799 Speaker 3: entire year, and I don't see why wouldn't win. You 991 00:50:01,840 --> 00:50:04,359 Speaker 3: can't go off the WGA's. It's very confusing because thinking 992 00:50:04,360 --> 00:50:08,080 Speaker 3: about the WGA's, they only nominate WGA scripts, and a 993 00:50:08,120 --> 00:50:10,480 Speaker 3: lot of these movies you get nominated for oscars are 994 00:50:10,520 --> 00:50:14,520 Speaker 3: written by foreign, non American writers who are not in 995 00:50:14,560 --> 00:50:17,400 Speaker 3: the WGA. So I don't think Conclave was even eligible 996 00:50:17,400 --> 00:50:20,400 Speaker 3: at the w's. The Brutalist wasn't eligible, blah blah blah blah. 997 00:50:20,400 --> 00:50:22,760 Speaker 3: So the Conclave is gonna win. I don't see anything 998 00:50:22,840 --> 00:50:24,759 Speaker 3: upsetting it. I can't ever. I mean, I know, like 999 00:50:24,800 --> 00:50:28,759 Speaker 3: Complete Unknown was nominated. I'm forgetting Oh Nickel Boys, that's 1000 00:50:28,760 --> 00:50:31,000 Speaker 3: not going to win. Yeah, I'm forgetting the other two 1001 00:50:31,000 --> 00:50:34,399 Speaker 3: nomination Amelia Perez not gonna win and Sing Sing, Yeah, 1002 00:50:34,440 --> 00:50:37,160 Speaker 3: not gonna win. The Sing Sing nomination. I loved Sing Sing. 1003 00:50:37,200 --> 00:50:39,560 Speaker 3: I was bummed it was nominated for Best Picture. That 1004 00:50:39,840 --> 00:50:42,279 Speaker 3: was definitely a way of nominating the guys behind that 1005 00:50:42,320 --> 00:50:44,160 Speaker 3: movie to like show them some love. But it's not 1006 00:50:44,200 --> 00:50:44,640 Speaker 3: gonna win. 1007 00:50:45,120 --> 00:50:50,359 Speaker 1: This does feel like the award that is Conclave's consolation, right, 1008 00:50:50,560 --> 00:50:53,000 Speaker 1: Like it's sort of second place in a lot of 1009 00:50:53,000 --> 00:50:56,239 Speaker 1: different categories and this is the one. Everyone can be like, oh. 1010 00:50:56,280 --> 00:50:59,640 Speaker 3: Yeah, but but how about this. What if Conclave wins 1011 00:51:00,120 --> 00:51:04,080 Speaker 3: Best Editing, Best at After Screenplay, and Best Picture with 1012 00:51:04,239 --> 00:51:06,680 Speaker 3: no director nomination. You know, that would be tantamount too 1013 00:51:06,920 --> 00:51:08,040 Speaker 3: a little movie called Argo. 1014 00:51:08,320 --> 00:51:10,640 Speaker 1: I was just going to say, that feels Argo at. 1015 00:51:10,640 --> 00:51:16,360 Speaker 3: Argo, you know. So it's possible. It's completely, completely possible, 1016 00:51:16,520 --> 00:51:19,759 Speaker 3: and it's that's why it's fun, and that's you know, 1017 00:51:20,080 --> 00:51:23,279 Speaker 3: the new proferential balloting they do is really interesting, and 1018 00:51:23,760 --> 00:51:27,279 Speaker 3: Conclave could win. You know, the BAFTAs are are to 1019 00:51:27,280 --> 00:51:29,840 Speaker 3: be taken seriously because the Academy has gotten very international, 1020 00:51:29,880 --> 00:51:34,080 Speaker 3: has a much more international voting body. Although I think 1021 00:51:34,120 --> 00:51:37,680 Speaker 3: the producers of Conclave were British and so you could 1022 00:51:37,760 --> 00:51:40,040 Speaker 3: argue because it won Best British Film and it won 1023 00:51:40,200 --> 00:51:43,040 Speaker 3: Best Film at BAFTA, so you know, maybe a one 1024 00:51:43,080 --> 00:51:45,239 Speaker 3: because it was kind of the hometown favorite a little bit. 1025 00:51:45,440 --> 00:51:48,120 Speaker 3: You know, I don't know, I really liked it. If 1026 00:51:48,120 --> 00:51:50,160 Speaker 3: it wins, I'll be okay with that. I think there's 1027 00:51:50,200 --> 00:51:51,759 Speaker 3: parts of Conclave that are incredible. 1028 00:51:52,480 --> 00:51:54,200 Speaker 1: Yeah, she's an inter sharing by the way, you. 1029 00:51:54,200 --> 00:51:56,800 Speaker 3: Know, you're you're on the record you loved inter Sharing. 1030 00:51:57,280 --> 00:52:02,480 Speaker 1: I thought that was as good a examination of the 1031 00:52:02,520 --> 00:52:06,399 Speaker 1: price of success, the price of a life like that was. 1032 00:52:06,600 --> 00:52:08,560 Speaker 3: Well, it was about you and Simon. It was I mean, 1033 00:52:08,600 --> 00:52:12,120 Speaker 3: you saw you and Simon's relationship reflected between Branglemon has 1034 00:52:12,120 --> 00:52:12,480 Speaker 3: told me. 1035 00:52:12,480 --> 00:52:14,239 Speaker 1: So many times, if I keep talking to him, he 1036 00:52:14,320 --> 00:52:16,680 Speaker 1: is just going to start cutting off the body. 1037 00:52:16,719 --> 00:52:17,359 Speaker 3: Exactly. 1038 00:52:17,520 --> 00:52:21,840 Speaker 1: You can't babom wasting any more time when there is 1039 00:52:21,960 --> 00:52:25,680 Speaker 1: real stuff to be done. Correct, best supporting actress. 1040 00:52:26,960 --> 00:52:29,200 Speaker 3: Both of these are locked. I mean not to you know, 1041 00:52:29,440 --> 00:52:29,919 Speaker 3: they're locked. 1042 00:52:30,640 --> 00:52:32,719 Speaker 1: She was the pick when you and I spoke like, 1043 00:52:32,840 --> 00:52:33,719 Speaker 1: she was the odds on. 1044 00:52:33,760 --> 00:52:36,440 Speaker 3: She and the Amelia press controversy did not affect her 1045 00:52:36,440 --> 00:52:39,560 Speaker 3: on any level for the obvious reasons of she's great 1046 00:52:39,600 --> 00:52:42,279 Speaker 3: in the movie, She's beloved in the business. It's kind 1047 00:52:42,280 --> 00:52:44,719 Speaker 3: of a weak category this year, and people are not 1048 00:52:45,000 --> 00:52:47,440 Speaker 3: that you know, uh mean, they're not going to like 1049 00:52:47,480 --> 00:52:49,879 Speaker 3: hold that against her. She's she's getting up there, and 1050 00:52:49,920 --> 00:52:54,280 Speaker 3: she has played her press and speeches post the controversy perfectly. 1051 00:52:54,480 --> 00:52:55,560 Speaker 3: She's she's winning. 1052 00:52:56,200 --> 00:53:00,920 Speaker 1: She was so good in that movie. Yeah, she danced 1053 00:53:01,160 --> 00:53:06,719 Speaker 1: that scene when they're at that dinner. You know, there's 1054 00:53:06,800 --> 00:53:09,520 Speaker 1: thousands of people there and she is dancing in the 1055 00:53:09,520 --> 00:53:13,080 Speaker 1: middle of the tables, Like her movement is great, her 1056 00:53:13,200 --> 00:53:16,960 Speaker 1: voice is amazing, she speaks Spanish so much in the movie, 1057 00:53:17,120 --> 00:53:22,000 Speaker 1: Like she was tremendous. This is a no brainer. Lock 1058 00:53:22,080 --> 00:53:27,600 Speaker 1: it in. She's minus three thousand, no discussion. Ye's so, 1059 00:53:27,640 --> 00:53:31,760 Speaker 1: then the question is, as you just said, best Supporting Actor, 1060 00:53:32,480 --> 00:53:36,280 Speaker 1: Kieran Culkin in a real pain. He's minus five thousand. 1061 00:53:36,320 --> 00:53:37,400 Speaker 1: He's been winning everything. 1062 00:53:37,640 --> 00:53:39,960 Speaker 3: He's a log as well. Look, I think in both 1063 00:53:40,000 --> 00:53:42,600 Speaker 3: categories you could do fun upsets if you want to 1064 00:53:42,600 --> 00:53:44,600 Speaker 3: try to make some money. Going back to supporting actress, 1065 00:53:44,680 --> 00:53:47,399 Speaker 3: I did talk to her Academy member last week who 1066 00:53:47,480 --> 00:53:49,719 Speaker 3: not only told me they were voting for Isabelle Rossellini, 1067 00:53:49,920 --> 00:53:52,000 Speaker 3: but also we're like, oh, yeah, she's winning. It's kind 1068 00:53:52,000 --> 00:53:53,440 Speaker 3: of the same thing as to me. More it's like 1069 00:53:53,480 --> 00:53:55,920 Speaker 3: a career oscar. I do not think she's going to win, 1070 00:53:56,280 --> 00:53:58,600 Speaker 3: but maybe if you wanted to find like a fun upset. 1071 00:53:58,960 --> 00:54:02,920 Speaker 3: And I think in supporting actor there's two upsets to 1072 00:54:02,960 --> 00:54:05,320 Speaker 3: be at, because because Kieran obviously seems to be winning, 1073 00:54:05,800 --> 00:54:09,440 Speaker 3: one would be Yuri Borisov from Anora if you want 1074 00:54:09,440 --> 00:54:13,359 Speaker 3: to go the full Honora like sweep. But the other 1075 00:54:13,400 --> 00:54:17,160 Speaker 3: one the performance that everybody talks about in Hollywood is 1076 00:54:17,239 --> 00:54:20,120 Speaker 3: Jeremy Strong. Yeah, and when you think about the fact 1077 00:54:20,160 --> 00:54:23,480 Speaker 3: that Sebastian Stan was also nominated, shows you some real 1078 00:54:23,560 --> 00:54:26,359 Speaker 3: love for that movie. And Jeremy Strong is just having 1079 00:54:26,360 --> 00:54:29,040 Speaker 3: one of those moments where people are like, no one 1080 00:54:29,120 --> 00:54:31,320 Speaker 3: quite knows what to make of him. He seems really weird, 1081 00:54:31,480 --> 00:54:35,120 Speaker 3: but he's a hell of an actor. And don't be surprised, 1082 00:54:35,120 --> 00:54:37,560 Speaker 3: I mean be hysterical because him and Kieran obviously were 1083 00:54:37,600 --> 00:54:40,520 Speaker 3: on a show together for four years, and you know 1084 00:54:41,239 --> 00:54:44,160 Speaker 3: how whatever relationship they have, I don't know. They both 1085 00:54:44,239 --> 00:54:49,279 Speaker 3: seem odd frankly, but but Kieran probably is gonna win. 1086 00:54:49,920 --> 00:54:52,360 Speaker 3: In the last ten to fifteen years, we're better or worse. 1087 00:54:53,120 --> 00:54:57,400 Speaker 3: The supporting categories calcify really early, and I can barely 1088 00:54:57,440 --> 00:55:00,319 Speaker 3: remember upsets. You know, I'd have to think about, but 1089 00:55:00,360 --> 00:55:02,720 Speaker 3: there's very, very, very few upsets that come to mind. 1090 00:55:03,239 --> 00:55:08,000 Speaker 1: Isabella Rosselini in Conclave plus two thousand. I feel like 1091 00:55:08,080 --> 00:55:11,160 Speaker 1: she had five lines in the movie. I agree that 1092 00:55:11,280 --> 00:55:16,920 Speaker 1: wasn't a supporting actor in any sense. She was like, 1093 00:55:17,680 --> 00:55:18,520 Speaker 1: you know, a cameo. 1094 00:55:20,960 --> 00:55:23,680 Speaker 3: Yeah, I completely completely agree with you, and I was 1095 00:55:23,719 --> 00:55:25,880 Speaker 3: I actually didn't even have her on my nomination ballot, 1096 00:55:27,040 --> 00:55:29,879 Speaker 3: you know, but like Felicity, you know, Jones never really 1097 00:55:29,880 --> 00:55:33,120 Speaker 3: took flight, Ariana Grande never took flight. And who the 1098 00:55:33,160 --> 00:55:35,200 Speaker 3: fifth one would have? Who's the fifth one of that category? 1099 00:55:35,360 --> 00:55:35,600 Speaker 1: Blank? 1100 00:55:35,680 --> 00:55:41,880 Speaker 3: And was Monica Barbaro, who I love, but again not 1101 00:55:42,000 --> 00:55:43,960 Speaker 3: I mean her nomination is the win. 1102 00:55:45,200 --> 00:55:49,840 Speaker 1: Yes, I feel like I feel like she was great, 1103 00:55:50,000 --> 00:55:53,560 Speaker 1: but you know, it's not like maybe a lot of 1104 00:55:53,600 --> 00:55:56,040 Speaker 1: people could have done that part and she just hadn't 1105 00:55:56,080 --> 00:55:58,680 Speaker 1: be really good at that part. It's always al Donna. 1106 00:55:58,719 --> 00:56:00,960 Speaker 1: I don't know anyone else who could have on this 1107 00:56:01,120 --> 00:56:03,840 Speaker 1: part like she was. She put her stamp on it. 1108 00:56:03,920 --> 00:56:05,640 Speaker 1: She was brilliant. It was her. 1109 00:56:06,040 --> 00:56:08,480 Speaker 3: She was. The interesting thing about Monica Barbarro. I was 1110 00:56:08,520 --> 00:56:13,360 Speaker 3: talking to Fred Berger, the nominated producer of A Complete Unknown, 1111 00:56:13,360 --> 00:56:16,479 Speaker 3: who's a really good friend of mine, and I was saying, 1112 00:56:16,480 --> 00:56:19,160 Speaker 3: next time at a wedding at the end of the 1113 00:56:19,239 --> 00:56:21,760 Speaker 3: Christmas break and right is the movie is kind of surging, 1114 00:56:21,800 --> 00:56:24,840 Speaker 3: and I was just peppering him with a gazillion questions 1115 00:56:24,960 --> 00:56:27,000 Speaker 3: and a lot of this has been in the press now. 1116 00:56:27,040 --> 00:56:30,480 Speaker 3: I mean Monica, I don't think she actually could sing 1117 00:56:30,520 --> 00:56:32,920 Speaker 3: when they cast her they I mean, she could carry 1118 00:56:32,920 --> 00:56:35,280 Speaker 3: a tune. They must have been able to suggest that somehow, 1119 00:56:35,560 --> 00:56:37,000 Speaker 3: but they had to teach her to be able to 1120 00:56:37,000 --> 00:56:39,279 Speaker 3: sing like that, and they ended up, you know, had 1121 00:56:39,440 --> 00:56:41,960 Speaker 3: they all these shutdowns with COVID and so forth. And 1122 00:56:42,280 --> 00:56:44,120 Speaker 3: I mean, she's amazing in the movie. I thought she 1123 00:56:44,160 --> 00:56:44,920 Speaker 3: was just incredible. 1124 00:56:45,560 --> 00:56:48,040 Speaker 1: Also great in Top Gun Maverick, she's amazing. 1125 00:56:48,120 --> 00:56:51,719 Speaker 3: I was flying bat them buying flying back from New 1126 00:56:51,800 --> 00:56:54,920 Speaker 3: York last weekend. I rewatched the final scene of Top 1127 00:56:54,920 --> 00:56:58,680 Speaker 3: Gun Maverick about four times in a row. Failed tears 1128 00:56:58,920 --> 00:57:02,480 Speaker 3: every time when he says, thank you for saving my life, 1129 00:57:03,040 --> 00:57:05,319 Speaker 3: and then Miles Teller says, is what my father would 1130 00:57:05,320 --> 00:57:08,600 Speaker 3: have done. And it's so brilliant because he saved his 1131 00:57:08,640 --> 00:57:11,040 Speaker 3: life technically by rescuing him, but he saved his life 1132 00:57:11,040 --> 00:57:14,160 Speaker 3: by giving him purpose. It's an incredible movie. 1133 00:57:14,600 --> 00:57:18,720 Speaker 1: It's a dude. I've seen it so many times. I've 1134 00:57:18,760 --> 00:57:22,160 Speaker 1: made my kid watch it probably four times, and I've 1135 00:57:22,160 --> 00:57:28,000 Speaker 1: made him watch the original Top Gun, which I still love. 1136 00:57:28,120 --> 00:57:32,439 Speaker 1: It's much slower than it's interesting. You watch movies now, 1137 00:57:32,480 --> 00:57:35,920 Speaker 1: Like my kid was sick last week and so we 1138 00:57:36,040 --> 00:57:39,800 Speaker 1: ended up watching a bunch of movies together. We did 1139 00:57:39,880 --> 00:57:42,880 Speaker 1: like we did Meet the Parents and then we did 1140 00:57:43,120 --> 00:57:46,960 Speaker 1: we did Wedding Crashers, and like, even the difference between 1141 00:57:46,960 --> 00:57:50,240 Speaker 1: those two movies as comedies with just a few years 1142 00:57:50,280 --> 00:57:54,720 Speaker 1: between them, the pacing is different, right, And so one 1143 00:57:54,720 --> 00:57:57,520 Speaker 1: of the nights I just happened to watch All the 1144 00:57:57,600 --> 00:58:00,800 Speaker 1: Right Moves with Tom Cruise from nineteen eighty three, Tom 1145 00:58:00,800 --> 00:58:03,600 Speaker 1: Cruising Lea Thompson, Right. My wife was out of town 1146 00:58:03,600 --> 00:58:05,600 Speaker 1: this weekend, so like, and I don't have any friends, 1147 00:58:05,600 --> 00:58:08,439 Speaker 1: so I was just watching a lot of movies, and 1148 00:58:09,880 --> 00:58:12,520 Speaker 1: All the Right Moves was on you know, Amazon Prime 1149 00:58:12,800 --> 00:58:16,040 Speaker 1: in the first row. So I watched it. It's so 1150 00:58:17,040 --> 00:58:18,560 Speaker 1: and I was gonna call my kid up from the 1151 00:58:18,560 --> 00:58:20,280 Speaker 1: basement and play in two k to come watch it 1152 00:58:20,280 --> 00:58:23,480 Speaker 1: with me. And it's so slow. I'm like, he'll walk 1153 00:58:23,520 --> 00:58:25,960 Speaker 1: out in two seconds. It's a great I loved it, 1154 00:58:26,000 --> 00:58:27,320 Speaker 1: but it is so slow. 1155 00:58:27,600 --> 00:58:29,800 Speaker 3: Well, there's all these movies from that era where like 1156 00:58:29,840 --> 00:58:32,360 Speaker 3: the first acts are forty minutes long, and like, yeah, 1157 00:58:32,360 --> 00:58:35,520 Speaker 3: I mean people today, granted we're making really long movies 1158 00:58:35,600 --> 00:58:38,000 Speaker 3: right now, but people just would not They just wouldn't 1159 00:58:38,040 --> 00:58:39,800 Speaker 3: get how much time. But then you know, there are 1160 00:58:39,920 --> 00:58:43,840 Speaker 3: actual there's funny examples. I have to clock it but 1161 00:58:43,840 --> 00:58:46,120 Speaker 3: if you go back and watch Tutsie, I think it's 1162 00:58:46,160 --> 00:58:49,640 Speaker 3: like minute nine when he's the woman he goes to 1163 00:58:49,680 --> 00:58:52,760 Speaker 3: lunch with Sidney Pollock, and Sydney Pollock is like, you're busted. 1164 00:58:52,840 --> 00:58:54,800 Speaker 3: Nobody likes working with you. You got to like shake it 1165 00:58:54,920 --> 00:58:58,360 Speaker 3: up hard. Cut to him walking down the street of 1166 00:58:58,360 --> 00:59:01,439 Speaker 3: New York dressed as Dorothy Michael and you just buy 1167 00:59:01,480 --> 00:59:02,920 Speaker 3: it because you know he's an actor. You know he 1168 00:59:02,960 --> 00:59:05,760 Speaker 3: has access to makeup, bright hair and that and that's 1169 00:59:05,800 --> 00:59:07,840 Speaker 3: it and they and it's one of the fastest buy 1170 00:59:07,880 --> 00:59:10,760 Speaker 3: ins for a movie ever, you know. But uh yeah, 1171 00:59:10,800 --> 00:59:13,840 Speaker 3: a lot of those movies they take their time. So anyways, 1172 00:59:13,840 --> 00:59:16,240 Speaker 3: I mean, look, as you guys know, it's a it's 1173 00:59:16,280 --> 00:59:17,720 Speaker 3: a great year. I mean, I thought it was a 1174 00:59:17,720 --> 00:59:19,520 Speaker 3: great year for movies there. It's going to be really 1175 00:59:19,560 --> 00:59:23,520 Speaker 3: spread around on Sunday and there's still like a lot 1176 00:59:23,520 --> 00:59:24,960 Speaker 3: of surprises to come. It's exciting. 1177 00:59:25,520 --> 00:59:29,600 Speaker 1: It is exciting. Michael Laskar, you are a super powerful 1178 00:59:29,880 --> 00:59:33,840 Speaker 1: manager at Mosaic, and so we appreciate you coming on 1179 00:59:33,880 --> 00:59:36,960 Speaker 1: the favorite podcast to waste your time with us. Simon 1180 00:59:39,240 --> 00:59:42,960 Speaker 1: is going to chop off all those fingers after probably 1181 00:59:42,960 --> 00:59:44,680 Speaker 1: the next few episodes, of talking to me. So this 1182 00:59:44,800 --> 00:59:45,880 Speaker 1: was a good rest bite for him. 1183 00:59:45,920 --> 00:59:47,680 Speaker 3: You guys didn't You didn't even give any trivia this. 1184 00:59:47,680 --> 00:59:52,120 Speaker 1: Time, Matt Mitchell, do we have any trivia? I mean, Michael, 1185 00:59:52,200 --> 00:59:55,760 Speaker 1: you're we know you're a savant. Our listeners know your savant. 1186 00:59:56,160 --> 01:00:00,960 Speaker 2: The Hollywood reporter knows you're a powerful and so powerful. 1187 01:00:01,000 --> 01:00:03,640 Speaker 1: I didn't make you. Uh, we didn't need to wheel 1188 01:00:03,640 --> 01:00:04,600 Speaker 1: out that parlor trick. 1189 01:00:04,920 --> 01:00:06,880 Speaker 3: Okay, Okay, I'll ask you one thing. 1190 01:00:06,880 --> 01:00:07,640 Speaker 1: I'll ask you one thing. 1191 01:00:07,680 --> 01:00:08,560 Speaker 3: Oh, I hope I get it right. 1192 01:00:08,600 --> 01:00:10,960 Speaker 1: And this is this is more of an opinion to 1193 01:00:10,960 --> 01:00:15,560 Speaker 1: see if you can match sort of my perspective on 1194 01:00:15,640 --> 01:00:21,000 Speaker 1: pop culture. Yes, earlier in the show we mentioned Green 1195 01:00:21,000 --> 01:00:25,080 Speaker 1: Book as a movie. I think it's should not have 1196 01:00:25,120 --> 01:00:27,600 Speaker 1: won three Oscars, should not have won. I think it 1197 01:00:27,680 --> 01:00:32,160 Speaker 1: won Best Picture that year, should not have won. Can 1198 01:00:32,200 --> 01:00:35,320 Speaker 1: you name What's in My Head as the other movie 1199 01:00:35,840 --> 01:00:39,200 Speaker 1: that looking back is on the wrong side of history 1200 01:00:39,560 --> 01:00:42,280 Speaker 1: and given the competition and how those movies have played 1201 01:00:42,320 --> 01:00:46,120 Speaker 1: out historically over the past, say twenty five years, should 1202 01:00:46,160 --> 01:00:50,200 Speaker 1: not have won Best Picture but did win because of 1203 01:00:50,240 --> 01:00:52,960 Speaker 1: the marketing, might have a certain studio. 1204 01:00:53,840 --> 01:00:55,600 Speaker 3: Well, you have to be referring to Shakespeare in Love. 1205 01:00:56,480 --> 01:01:00,640 Speaker 3: Michael Asker, you have won again. I mean, it's funny. 1206 01:01:00,640 --> 01:01:04,440 Speaker 3: People talk about it all the time. Harvey, who's in 1207 01:01:04,520 --> 01:01:07,920 Speaker 3: prison for life where he should be, he changed it forever. 1208 01:01:07,960 --> 01:01:11,240 Speaker 3: I was talking to an exec who worked at Miramax 1209 01:01:11,240 --> 01:01:14,120 Speaker 3: in the mid nineties, and she was telling me, she 1210 01:01:14,200 --> 01:01:16,760 Speaker 3: was like an assistant. This was the year of Ill Postina, 1211 01:01:16,800 --> 01:01:19,600 Speaker 3: which is a very beautiful Italian film that Miramax got 1212 01:01:19,600 --> 01:01:23,320 Speaker 3: a Best Picture and Director and actor nomination, that the 1213 01:01:23,400 --> 01:01:26,480 Speaker 3: actor had died, Masimo Treesi, and he was nominated possionously 1214 01:01:26,560 --> 01:01:31,160 Speaker 3: for Best Actor. And she was like, it was like basically, 1215 01:01:31,200 --> 01:01:35,000 Speaker 3: Harvey ran the campaigns like political campaigns, and they would 1216 01:01:35,000 --> 01:01:37,040 Speaker 3: get the numbers of all the Academy members, and all 1217 01:01:37,040 --> 01:01:39,200 Speaker 3: these assistants would sit in a room and they would 1218 01:01:39,280 --> 01:01:41,400 Speaker 3: dial up. There was no cell phones. They would dial 1219 01:01:41,440 --> 01:01:43,400 Speaker 3: people up at home. They'd say, have you watched Ill Postino? 1220 01:01:43,440 --> 01:01:44,919 Speaker 3: Can I tell you all about it? Blah blah blah 1221 01:01:44,920 --> 01:01:48,680 Speaker 3: blah blah. And he just completely changed the face of campaigning. 1222 01:01:49,880 --> 01:01:53,000 Speaker 3: I don't think I don't really think that people like 1223 01:01:53,040 --> 01:01:55,720 Speaker 3: I don't think there's like, you know, people are actually 1224 01:01:55,720 --> 01:01:58,400 Speaker 3: trying to hurt people, like when that AI thing came 1225 01:01:58,440 --> 01:02:00,760 Speaker 3: out about, like how they altered Adrian Rody's voice for 1226 01:02:00,880 --> 01:02:03,880 Speaker 3: some of the foreign language and brutalists. I don't think 1227 01:02:03,920 --> 01:02:06,560 Speaker 3: that's like a plant. I don't think you know, people 1228 01:02:06,600 --> 01:02:08,400 Speaker 3: have been wondering, like was it a rival movie that 1229 01:02:08,480 --> 01:02:12,280 Speaker 3: dug up that the tweets from the Starving lay Prez No, 1230 01:02:12,800 --> 01:02:15,600 Speaker 3: I don't believe any of that. But everything just obviously 1231 01:02:15,760 --> 01:02:19,480 Speaker 3: is more amplified than it's ever been now. And yeah, 1232 01:02:19,520 --> 01:02:21,400 Speaker 3: I mean people look back at Shakespeare Love, but the 1233 01:02:21,480 --> 01:02:25,680 Speaker 3: thing is, and I love Sam Briar Ryan, but when 1234 01:02:25,720 --> 01:02:29,080 Speaker 3: it lost, even in that moment, I reconciled that, like, well, 1235 01:02:30,080 --> 01:02:33,000 Speaker 3: let's break the movie down, like it's the greatest first 1236 01:02:33,000 --> 01:02:36,320 Speaker 3: act in the history of movies basically, and then it 1237 01:02:36,360 --> 01:02:40,520 Speaker 3: is really strong. But like, I don't remember actually feeling that, Like, 1238 01:02:40,640 --> 01:02:42,760 Speaker 3: I mean, I like the third act a lot, you know, 1239 01:02:42,800 --> 01:02:44,480 Speaker 3: when they have to like defend you know, the bridge 1240 01:02:44,480 --> 01:02:47,080 Speaker 3: and everything, But I don't remember actually thinking in the 1241 01:02:47,160 --> 01:02:50,200 Speaker 3: end the movie was like perfect Shakespeare in Love and 1242 01:02:50,320 --> 01:02:51,920 Speaker 3: Chad and I year old enough as am I I 1243 01:02:51,960 --> 01:02:55,000 Speaker 3: was in college. That movie really knocked people. That took 1244 01:02:55,000 --> 01:02:59,240 Speaker 3: people by storm. It was so clever and the acting 1245 01:02:59,280 --> 01:03:01,480 Speaker 3: was incredible in the writing was incredible and the way 1246 01:03:01,520 --> 01:03:03,560 Speaker 3: it kind of created this amalgamation of where all his 1247 01:03:03,640 --> 01:03:07,320 Speaker 3: stories came from. So like, I don't personally think I 1248 01:03:07,320 --> 01:03:09,520 Speaker 3: thought you were gonna say Crash because people talk about 1249 01:03:09,560 --> 01:03:10,479 Speaker 3: Crash beating broke By. 1250 01:03:10,640 --> 01:03:11,360 Speaker 1: That's another one. 1251 01:03:11,440 --> 01:03:14,080 Speaker 3: I don't think Shakespeare Love is that bad. There are 1252 01:03:14,160 --> 01:03:17,080 Speaker 3: worse Oscar winners than Shakespeare in Love. I mean, in 1253 01:03:17,080 --> 01:03:18,880 Speaker 3: that movie, it ended up winning the most Oscars of 1254 01:03:18,920 --> 01:03:23,120 Speaker 3: the night because it won Actress, Supporting Actress, Best Picture, 1255 01:03:23,400 --> 01:03:26,320 Speaker 3: Best Original Screenplay, and it won some like below the 1256 01:03:26,360 --> 01:03:28,760 Speaker 3: line stuff. So I think Sampire won four and they 1257 01:03:28,800 --> 01:03:31,160 Speaker 3: won five or something like that. So I don't think 1258 01:03:31,160 --> 01:03:33,840 Speaker 3: it was so controversial. What's controversial is it was the 1259 01:03:33,840 --> 01:03:37,640 Speaker 3: beginning of Harvey being a terrorist and kind of willing 1260 01:03:37,760 --> 01:03:40,600 Speaker 3: his might on people. And you know, you want to 1261 01:03:40,600 --> 01:03:44,960 Speaker 3: talk about controversial. The artist. Another Harvey Weinstein special wins 1262 01:03:45,000 --> 01:03:48,280 Speaker 3: Best Picture in twenty eleven, right over movies like The 1263 01:03:48,280 --> 01:03:51,760 Speaker 3: Descendants and other good movies that year, and like, have 1264 01:03:51,800 --> 01:03:54,240 Speaker 3: you has anybody ever talked about the artist ever again? 1265 01:03:54,920 --> 01:03:59,240 Speaker 3: Picture Director, Actor, Like that was a Harvey Weinstein special. 1266 01:04:00,040 --> 01:04:03,240 Speaker 1: I had just had my first grandkid when Shakespeare in 1267 01:04:03,280 --> 01:04:09,200 Speaker 1: love now you know you have a baby face because 1268 01:04:09,240 --> 01:04:12,440 Speaker 1: I'm old. I'm old, Simon. That was the joke. Laster, 1269 01:04:12,920 --> 01:04:14,880 Speaker 1: You're the best brother. Thanks for coming on. 1270 01:04:14,960 --> 01:04:17,960 Speaker 3: So wonderful seeing you guys. Let's compare notes on Sunday 1271 01:04:17,960 --> 01:04:21,240 Speaker 3: and Monday, and you know, happy heavy betting to your audience. 1272 01:04:21,560 --> 01:04:24,480 Speaker 1: We will as a reminder, the Favorite podcast is presented 1273 01:04:24,480 --> 01:04:26,480 Speaker 1: by Bet three six five and now new Bet three 1274 01:04:26,480 --> 01:04:28,600 Speaker 1: six five. Customers get one hundred and fifty dollars and 1275 01:04:28,640 --> 01:04:31,120 Speaker 1: bonus bets when you bet five dollars, sign up using 1276 01:04:31,160 --> 01:04:33,560 Speaker 1: promo code Favorites, deposit ten dollars, place a bet for 1277 01:04:33,600 --> 01:04:35,480 Speaker 1: five dollars to get one hundred and fifty dollars in 1278 01:04:35,520 --> 01:04:39,200 Speaker 1: bonus bets. Those bonus bets can be used on spreads, totals, 1279 01:04:39,200 --> 01:04:41,840 Speaker 1: player props, futures, and more whatever the moment. It's never 1280 01:04:41,960 --> 01:04:44,320 Speaker 1: ordinated at Bet three sixty five. Must be twenty one 1281 01:04:44,480 --> 01:04:48,120 Speaker 1: or older in present in Arizona, Colorado, Indiana, Iowa, Louisiana, 1282 01:04:48,160 --> 01:04:51,360 Speaker 1: North Carolina, New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Virginia, or eighteen and 1283 01:04:51,440 --> 01:04:54,240 Speaker 1: older in Kentucky. Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler 1284 01:04:54,560 --> 01:04:56,800 Speaker 1: or one eight hundred bets off an iowaere terms. Conditioned 1285 01:04:56,880 --> 01:05:00,240 Speaker 1: restrictions apply. Simon and I will return with their next 1286 01:05:00,240 --> 01:05:02,440 Speaker 1: episode of The Favorites in the Action Network You two 1287 01:05:02,480 --> 01:05:06,400 Speaker 1: page Tuesday, one thirty pm Eastern Download from Spotify, Apple Pods, 1288 01:05:06,400 --> 01:05:08,600 Speaker 1: wherever you get your pods, Rate review, subscribe, leave us 1289 01:05:08,600 --> 01:05:10,760 Speaker 1: five stars, state whatever you want. Feedback is a gift. 1290 01:05:11,240 --> 01:05:24,840 Speaker 1: Until next time, Love you. Action Network reminds you please 1291 01:05:24,920 --> 01:05:28,320 Speaker 1: gamble responsibly. If you or someone you care about has 1292 01:05:28,320 --> 01:05:31,440 Speaker 1: a gambling problem, help is available twenty four to seven 1293 01:05:31,600 --> 01:05:33,040 Speaker 1: at one eight hundred gambler