WEBVTT - Hour 1 - Chris Mannix (06-05-20)

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:03.520
<v Speaker 1>You are listening to the Dan Patrick Show on Fox

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio. Oh, come on in, stay a while, spend

0:00:06.760 --> 0:00:09.880
<v Speaker 1>some time with John Smoltz, hall of fame pitcher working

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>for the MLB Network. Chris Mannocks from Sports Illustrated will

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:15.960
<v Speaker 1>stop by as well. Have a poll question, play of

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the day, a couple of stats of the day. Your

0:00:18.120 --> 0:00:21.240
<v Speaker 1>phone calls are welcome. Eight seven seven three DP Show

0:00:21.720 --> 0:00:24.439
<v Speaker 1>email address DPA, Dan Patrick dot com, Twitter, hand to

0:00:24.480 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>a DP show. Say good morning to our great radio affiliates,

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>including the Fox Sports Radio lineup, and you can watch

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube dot com slash the Dan Patrick Show. It's

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>been pretty good news this week for the sports leagues

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 1>coming back. The NBA is coming back, NHL is back,

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>MLS is back, NFL still on target to open his schedule.

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 1>There's one exception that's becoming even more glaring every single day.

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.400
<v Speaker 1>Where is baseball. It's gone from you know, maybe they're

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:57.840
<v Speaker 1>just negotiating. They'll work all of this out to players

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and owners really don't like each other. Maybe they salvage

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 1>something here. It's hard to believe that they would forego

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>an entire summer, but at least publicly, nothing positive is

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:12.319
<v Speaker 1>coming out both sides seem entrenched in their point of views,

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and they canceled the season back in nineteen ninety four

0:01:16.480 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>no World Series, when the sports suffered, and if not

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>for Cal Ripken's streak and Sammy Sosa Mark McGuire's home

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:26.679
<v Speaker 1>run record chase, I don't know where we would be

0:01:26.800 --> 0:01:30.320
<v Speaker 1>right now. I'm not sure that they ever really recovered

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:34.080
<v Speaker 1>from nineteen ninety four. Not coming back now would risk

0:01:34.080 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>falling even farther down the sports food chain. Hopefully it's

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:40.839
<v Speaker 1>all posting and baseball will come back soon, but as

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of today, hard to feel confident baseball knows what it's

0:01:45.120 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 1>doing or where it's going. Their proposals that went from

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the players won over one hundred games, the owners would

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>like to have fifty games, and then we thought, well,

0:01:55.240 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of course they'll meet in the middle. Now you're talking

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>about a forty eight game schedule, the owners, owners talking

0:02:01.720 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>about how much they lose every single game without having

0:02:04.720 --> 0:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>fans in the stands, still have revenue from local TV deals.

0:02:09.400 --> 0:02:12.680
<v Speaker 1>But if you're a player, specially a pitcher, and I

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>said there's going to be a forty eight game regular season,

0:02:16.639 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>are you going to risk that twenty five percent of

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a season for twenty five percent of your salary. And

0:02:23.120 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 1>if I'm a pitcher, a starting pitcher, I would really

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>have to question that. Now, you do have the safety

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 1>precautions you have to factor in, but let's just look

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 1>at the monetary aspect of this. If I'm a pitcher,

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>do I want to risk going out there rushing to

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.639
<v Speaker 1>get in shape? Now the fifty game schedule, forty eight

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 1>game schedule, how are you going to use me? If

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm an ace, are you going to use me even more?

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Because with fifty games, we might have a chance to

0:02:52.160 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>make the playoffs, we might have a chance to win

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.200
<v Speaker 1>our division. You might be using somebody a little bit

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>more than you normally would would. Pitching rotations going to

0:03:01.520 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>look like. If I'm a hitter, I'm okay with this,

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 1>But a pitcher, I really have to question this. Just

0:03:07.720 --> 0:03:11.359
<v Speaker 1>from that aspect. Now we can talk about COVID nineteen

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and safety precautions. I do believe that baseball will be

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:18.520
<v Speaker 1>able to do that. Being an outdoor sport, you're not

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 1>in contact with each other. I do believe baseball will

0:03:21.880 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 1>be able to provide some kind of safety precautions there.

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm a pitcher, I would really question, do

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to come back for this? This program is

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>brought to you by the great folks at legal Zoom.

0:03:35.520 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to leave your home. They will make

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>sure you can take care of your loved ones. That's

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 1>why legal Zoom has made it easy to set up

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the right estate plan without leaving your home. Take care

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of your family today the right estate Plan at legal

0:03:45.920 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>zoom dot com. Mclovity got a pull question for me today. Okay,

0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>so the NBA is coming back. They have afternoon games

0:03:53.080 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and night games apparently in the regular season. Which team

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.400
<v Speaker 1>will get the most primetime games? I'm only going to

0:03:59.440 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>give you actually two choices unless you can think of

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>anybody else. Is it gonna be the Lakers or the

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Pelican Lakers? I think I'll be the Pelicans because at

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the season it was Pelicans, Pelicans, Pelicans, Pelicans. Well,

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna get a lot more airtime than

0:04:12.480 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>they deserve. But you do have Zion and this is

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:18.640
<v Speaker 1>this is marketing, this is pr this is get our

0:04:18.640 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>product out there. We want you watching when once you

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>engaged and let's enjoy Zion why you can. But the

0:04:23.760 --> 0:04:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Lakers are going to get the most primetime games. I

0:04:26.279 --> 0:04:28.400
<v Speaker 1>would think they know they have the Lakers in the playoffs.

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>That's why maybe they pushed ion. But okay, who gets

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the least I can. Let me give you these choices.

0:04:34.600 --> 0:04:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I know you don't like to maybe, but let's be

0:04:36.920 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>honest here, Spurs, they're a strong contender there, the Magic,

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the Wizards, and I know you and Seton love the King.

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know if I could put them on

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the list. But I like the Kings. But it's it's

0:04:48.480 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>always a train wreck because I thought they were going

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to make the playoffs this year? Do I get credit

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:57.160
<v Speaker 1>for them? Almost? Like they're sort of almost in the playoffs?

0:04:57.200 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 1>They could make it. Yeah, Paulli, we're giving that to you.

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:03.000
<v Speaker 1>You are, Yeah, and it's time and yeah we're giving

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that ing ing ing ing Thank you. I needed that.

0:05:05.560 --> 0:05:07.719
<v Speaker 1>But are there two less watchable teams in the Wizards

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and the Spurs. I'm sorry, this is me. You can

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:14.400
<v Speaker 1>throw the Magic in there as well. They got Aaron Gordon,

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah they do. He dunked off as got a couple

0:05:16.440 --> 0:05:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of years ago. I like how whenever anybody says saying

0:05:18.760 --> 0:05:21.440
<v Speaker 1>about Orlando, well they got that guy who lost the

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Slam dunk contest. Yeah, that guy Aaron Gordon, Hey, come

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>on down, let's watch Mo Bamba. Don't they have and

0:05:30.360 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Isaac think just keep collecting like top five picks.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they're all doing down there should

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 1>be Evan four and yeah, yeah see there. Yeah, no,

0:05:39.680 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>that's impressive. I had no idea where that came from. Yeah, yeah, Paully,

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I just saw like the five different field houses. That's

0:05:47.520 --> 0:05:49.280
<v Speaker 1>how I described more that the NBA's can be playing

0:05:49.279 --> 0:05:52.400
<v Speaker 1>down in Orlando. Do you ever watched Summer league basketball. Yeah,

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and there's a mishmash of people there and it's kind

0:05:54.600 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>of quiet, and it feels like a casual run. It

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel that serious because the setting or it's like

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Shamanad tournaments in college basketball. There's not that many people.

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:07.040
<v Speaker 1>These are gonna be empty gyms that are also small,

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>but the players are gonna be wearing their full uniforms,

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>like they're gonna look like they're in the middle of

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the NBA Finals, and but they'll be playing at like

0:06:13.480 --> 0:06:16.839
<v Speaker 1>junior college type facilities. Well, they've had this in Vegas,

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 1>but they had crowds there. They had summer league games

0:06:19.920 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>in Orlando and there's there's no depth to the arena.

0:06:24.320 --> 0:06:26.840
<v Speaker 1>There's no ambiance there. I don't know what they're gonna

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:29.920
<v Speaker 1>do with the cameras to dress it up a little bit.

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>The angles can help a little bit there, you know,

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:37.440
<v Speaker 1>can you get a different look to this? And I

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>think that that would be important with the NBA, they're

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>all there. I guess the players are going to be

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>housed in one hotel because there was talk that hey,

0:06:47.000 --> 0:06:50.680
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get to pick your hotel depending on your seed. Here.

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Now you got all of these NBA players in one hotel.

0:06:56.040 --> 0:06:59.039
<v Speaker 1>It's the NBA's real world here. That's a Brian Windhorse

0:06:59.120 --> 0:07:02.880
<v Speaker 1>report that they're all ding in one hotel. Yeah, because

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>it makes it easier to contain the safety precautions. And

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 1>I guess that you can get they're calling it in

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the bubble. You can get out of the bubble to

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 1>go play golf. I don't know how much socializing you're

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:14.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to have. This is going to

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 1>be a fascinating test. It really is like how do

0:07:19.240 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 1>how do we make this? Remember? You know, we see

0:07:21.440 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>these uh movies where somebody is living in a bubble

0:07:24.560 --> 0:07:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and and you know, hey, can you survive in a bubble?

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>How long can you survive in a bubble? Didn't they

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 1>have a show where it's like you were under glass

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>for Biodome Stephen Baldwin and Pauly Shore Classic One of

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>the great Man And there was a seventies movie about

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a bubble boy. Right, that's different, Okay, that was That

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>was John Travolta. He was he was one boy in

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>the bubble. Bubble Yeah boy bubble Yeah yeah, good movie.

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>The heartbreaking, heartbreaking. All right, So that's what's happening with

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>the NBA. They at least have a plan and they're

0:07:56.680 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be able to I guess roll this out

0:07:59.280 --> 0:08:01.960
<v Speaker 1>at the end of July. Home court advantage. There is

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>no home home court advantage. And I wonder, and I

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.360
<v Speaker 1>want to ask Chris Mannix about this. There are have

0:08:07.480 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 1>to be a couple of teams that you're looking at

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:15.000
<v Speaker 1>as spoilers here, because remember you had players. The Bucks

0:08:15.000 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 1>did this with the Greek Freak. They were load managing

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the Greek Freak this season he was playing thirty minutes

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a game, Kawhi Leonard load managing all of that. That's gone.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>That's not an advantage because everybody has been on everybody

0:08:29.360 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>has load managed thanks to the coronavirus. You don't have

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that advantage with Kawai. He's fresh coming back for the playoffs.

0:08:38.280 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>The Greek freak the same way. You know, James Harden

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>might benefit because normally he's run down by the time

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>we get to the postseason. Load management not going to

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.160
<v Speaker 1>factor in this year. Yeah, McLevin, I don't know if

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.319
<v Speaker 1>that's a pole question, but I feel this The empty

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>arena is so unfair to the number one seeds, both

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks and the lay. It's I know, I'm not

0:08:57.400 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 1>saying astric or anything, but it just feels like a

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:01.679
<v Speaker 1>real is justice that they work so hard to get

0:09:01.679 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the one season. I don't know what else you could

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:07.760
<v Speaker 1>give them, though, I mean the desperate times, desperate measures.

0:09:07.920 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 1>We just have to get through this season. Hopefully you

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 1>get true championship caliber basketball in the finals, the Eastern

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Western Conference finals, hopefully. But then there's part of you

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:22.480
<v Speaker 1>that's saying, you know, are the Celtics one of those

0:09:22.520 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>sneaky outlier teams where you go, man, they're one of

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the younger teams in the NBA, but they can win

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.640
<v Speaker 1>it all? Does Philadelphia? With Ben Simmons coming back are

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:33.440
<v Speaker 1>they going to be ready to go? Will they be

0:09:33.520 --> 0:09:37.320
<v Speaker 1>healthy enough? You know, is Toronto going to be a

0:09:37.320 --> 0:09:41.040
<v Speaker 1>sneaky team? You just you want to know who can

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>start in right away and be good because you have

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>eight regular season games and then the playoffs start. And

0:09:48.120 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>there were certain teams at the end of the year

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>where you started to see some progress, certainly with the Pelicans,

0:09:54.559 --> 0:09:56.959
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know if where they are to win

0:09:57.040 --> 0:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>that many games and then the matchups to try to

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>be a spoiler there, but I do think that you

0:10:02.400 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>have one or two teams that could be Wow. I

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:09.079
<v Speaker 1>didn't expect that. Yeah, McLean. One team shot up dramatically

0:10:09.120 --> 0:10:11.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Vegas odds yesterday. I saw this story the

0:10:12.080 --> 0:10:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Brooklyn Nets. They're afraid that they don't they don't want

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>to get caught flat foot if Katie does come back.

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 1>So it shot up crazy high. Would that be amazing?

0:10:20.320 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I know I'm being fantasy. Here is Kyrie playing that

0:10:23.280 --> 0:10:26.360
<v Speaker 1>They say they don't Vegas. The story said Vegas doesn't

0:10:26.360 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>want to get caught if Kyrie and Katie come back.

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 1>They don't know anything that no one else does. That.

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard much about Kyrie. I've heard a lot

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>about kad In that he looks good, but we haven't

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:42.520
<v Speaker 1>seen him in game like situations here. I guess if

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you're thinking he's healthy, everybody signs off on it. He

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:50.400
<v Speaker 1>feels healthy. You got a chance to maybe steal the

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Conference. I guess you do. I mean, if Kyrie

0:10:55.240 --> 0:10:58.199
<v Speaker 1>and Durant come back, you have a chance to steal

0:10:58.240 --> 0:11:01.080
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern Conference. Yeah, Paul, You've been saying for months

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>that you would even consider having Durant back. But with

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>this new policy and the season being even a month

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>later than we expected a while ago, the Nets are

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a seventh seed, but now that seating has gone as

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>far as home court advantage, which I would not have

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 1>had at all in the playoffs. But you could steal something.

0:11:16.200 --> 0:11:19.200
<v Speaker 1>You could, like you said, you could steal a title maybe.

0:11:19.559 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>But the concern I have is you have you know,

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the games are not spread out now, and if you're

0:11:26.640 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>bringing back guys who have been injured, certainly with an achilles,

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>with Kevin Durant, he doesn't get a rest period of

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>two or three days in between games, You're going to

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>have a finite amount of time to get all of

0:11:39.480 --> 0:11:41.679
<v Speaker 1>these games in there. And that would be my biggest

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:44.520
<v Speaker 1>concern if you're bringing back somebody from that kind of injury.

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Durant might be ready to go, but can he play

0:11:48.600 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>back to back games? Can Kyrie play back to back games?

0:11:52.400 --> 0:11:55.560
<v Speaker 1>And is it worth the risk with this kind of

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>season under these circumstances, And that's why I would caution

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.480
<v Speaker 1>against it. Yeah, McLevin. You know how when the NFL

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>comes back, a lot of guys have soft what's called

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:07.280
<v Speaker 1>soft tissue injuries, Like don't you afraid they're going to

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 1>ramp up so fast and be at intense levels that

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.719
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be blown out knees and things. Can you

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>can you help somebody help themselves? Durant's gonna want to play,

0:12:17.559 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and then you have to say, no, you only get

0:12:19.160 --> 0:12:22.319
<v Speaker 1>to play twenty five minutes. Now there's a game, you know,

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:24.520
<v Speaker 1>hanging in the balance. Do I put him in because

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 1>all of these games mean so much. Now that would

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the risk that I would have the risk and the

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>reward is not great enough. Let's say something happens to

0:12:33.000 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Durant now I've lost him for another year, or something

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>happens to Kyrie. Brooklyn should just pace itself, Okay, you

0:12:42.280 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>have time, don't rush, And this is not the year

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>to try to do this. Sixty to one, I believe

0:12:50.600 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 1>is what now. They went from one fifty I believe

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>the Nets to sixty to one to win it all. Well,

0:12:59.280 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this quote him Caesar saying he didn't want to post

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>one fifty. I'll find out what they were before this, Okay, Yeah,

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Caesar's director of trading Jeff Davis. So I would rather

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>be cautious in deal sixty to one than get hurt

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>when we hear the news Durant and Irving are returning.

0:13:18.200 --> 0:13:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to post one fifty to one odds.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>And the problem is you take a bet of a

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>couple of thousand and it pays three hundred thousand, and

0:13:28.600 --> 0:13:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you're stuck if Durant is good. This according to Caesar's

0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>do you have the odds there? I haven't seen the

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.480
<v Speaker 1>uploaded as another part in the story. According to Doug

0:13:38.559 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Kazarian of ESPN, the NETS odds were his highest seven

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty to one when both Duran and Irving

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.440
<v Speaker 1>were ruled out for the season. I'll try to get

0:13:46.480 --> 0:13:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the whole odds, but that doesn't seem right, Yeah, Kevin Durant,

0:13:49.920 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>he injured his calf a year and a month ago

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.520
<v Speaker 1>May seventh, twenty nineteen. If he does not play in

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>this abbreviate NBA season and next season gets put pushed

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>back to use Christmas as starting date, he will have

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:03.719
<v Speaker 1>not played competitive basketball in one year, seven months, in

0:14:03.840 --> 0:14:08.040
<v Speaker 1>three weeks, closer to two years than one year, one year,

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 1>seven months and three weeks. And he knows this, like

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he's aware of this as he's sitting doing his rehab. Yeah,

0:14:14.000 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>but I'm okay given that Achilles injury and they talk

0:14:18.880 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 1>about nine to twelve months, but it's probably more like

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>twelve months and to be able to come back from that,

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and what's he going to be like when he comes back.

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I would love to ease him in more than just hey,

0:14:31.600 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>let's play eight games now, let's get ready for the

0:14:33.560 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>postseason and if Kyrie comes. But I haven't seen a

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:40.640
<v Speaker 1>timeframe for Kyrie. I I haven't seen any update on Kyrie. Yeah,

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm club By the way, they have the whole list

0:14:42.760 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of odds here from Caesar's Lakers one Bucks right behind them,

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>and then Clippers right behind them. So Lakers a plus

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:52.600
<v Speaker 1>two hundred, which two to one. I guess who would

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>surprise me in there? Is there anybody who's higher than

0:14:57.320 --> 0:15:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you would expect or lower than you'd expect with those odds. Wait,

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.160
<v Speaker 1>what are the Pelicans odds? Pelicans and this are plus

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>five thousand. Okay, yeah, here's a sneaky team. I like

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to look at point differential. The Dallas Mavericks are the

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 1>seventh seed in the West, traditionally seven seed. They're forty

0:15:14.120 --> 0:15:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and twenty seven, nothing special, but they beat their opponents

0:15:17.000 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>by an average of six point one points per game.

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>That's top three in the West. That's almost that's almost

0:15:22.360 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>the same as the Clippers. Their point defferential in their wins.

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 1>They're the highest scoring team in the league. And you

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>got an experienced coach, you know, Porzingis started to round

0:15:34.880 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>into shape, and then you've got you know, Lucas Sensation.

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:41.800
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know who Dallas would be matching up with,

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>and that that's always interesting to see. Yeah, that's where

0:15:46.440 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>it gets. You start to look at a team that

0:15:48.320 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 1>could surprise somebody. It's going to be because of a matchup.

0:15:52.520 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, the team that they're facing might be a

0:15:54.720 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>better regular season team, but in a seven game series,

0:15:58.040 --> 0:16:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you might match up better with that team. Your strategy,

0:16:01.600 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>somebody you know, if you're facing the Rockets, Rockets in

0:16:04.560 --> 0:16:09.000
<v Speaker 1>a seven game series with Russell Westbrook and James Harden

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>going full tilt, and if they happen to capture some

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>magic there, then maybe, you know, Houston could be one

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:20.400
<v Speaker 1>of those teams that, given this format, could surprise people. Yeah. Mcleven, Yeah,

0:16:20.440 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you're right. The next year or two teams you mentioned

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:25.360
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics and the Rockets are at fifteen to one.

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>They're the next year after those big three teams. Yeah,

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the Celtics would be somebody that, like I would put

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:33.160
<v Speaker 1>money on the Rockets just because I think there's some

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 1>fascination there, curiosity, and that's not an easy matchup the

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Rockets either, you know, they either win or they beat themselves,

0:16:42.160 --> 0:16:44.800
<v Speaker 1>it feels like. And if they happen to get it

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 1>all together in a four game you know, for four

0:16:47.280 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 1>games to win. I think the Celtics are sneaky too.

0:16:51.360 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, I could see the Celtics winning the East. Yeah. Mcleven,

0:16:53.920 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 1>we're putting together. We're collecting my team back together. Let's

0:16:57.360 --> 0:16:59.600
<v Speaker 1>call our guy, let's let's get out on the playoffs.

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>We got it. You gotta go dark Horse, right, you

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.399
<v Speaker 1>can't go like what kind of would you take? I

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:06.159
<v Speaker 1>don't want you to get into this dand no, no no, no,

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't. Would you take a top ten team or

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:10.720
<v Speaker 1>like I would tend to fifteen team? I would go

0:17:10.840 --> 0:17:17.199
<v Speaker 1>Celtics Rockets if I was gonna do something interesting, and

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:19.920
<v Speaker 1>I would take Portland as a long shot. If you bet,

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>if I bet, do you want us to bet? And

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 1>you no, no, no, I'll no. I told you that

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>story of a friend of mine and we were having

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>beer and wings and it was a Monday night and

0:17:32.000 --> 0:17:35.800
<v Speaker 1>he said, who do you like? Now? That always triggers

0:17:35.800 --> 0:17:38.120
<v Speaker 1>something in me that I get nervous. Who do you like?

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>I go back to Pete Rose in the nineteen eighty

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 1>six playoffs between the Mets and the Astros, and he

0:17:45.600 --> 0:17:49.159
<v Speaker 1>says to Bob Costas and me at the top of

0:17:49.200 --> 0:17:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the dugout steps the Mets dugout, who do you like?

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:57.000
<v Speaker 1>And Bob and I looked at each other, going, I'm

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>not going to are you going to? And we didn't

0:17:59.840 --> 0:18:02.160
<v Speaker 1>say who we liked because we knew Pete was gonna

0:18:02.160 --> 0:18:05.560
<v Speaker 1>go bet. So fast forward to a couple of years ago,

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:07.680
<v Speaker 1>friend sits down, he goes who do you like? To me?

0:18:08.119 --> 0:18:13.520
<v Speaker 1>And I said, oh, gosh, I don't know Raiders. He goes,

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, he goes, order me a beer, he goes outside,

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:19.479
<v Speaker 1>he comes back, he goes, I go, where'd you go?

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:21.639
<v Speaker 1>He goes, oh, just on the phone. I had to

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.679
<v Speaker 1>put a dime on the Raiders. I go, no, no,

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>don't put no. Now, I have to sit and watch

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 1>this game. And he didn't give me any money when

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>he won. But I was gonna get blamed probably if

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:37.480
<v Speaker 1>he lost. Wait, dude, who won the game? The Raiders covered?

0:18:38.480 --> 0:18:40.639
<v Speaker 1>And I went, oh my god, he's gonna bug you

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>like a get it again. Well I get that. I

0:18:43.359 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>get that all the time, and I just say, no,

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>entertainment purposes only. Hey, I saw your Super Bowl pick.

0:18:49.000 --> 0:18:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Would you put money? No? I would not put I

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>do it because I have to do it. I don't

0:18:54.840 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>want to do it. Yeah, Paul, what if we bet

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.359
<v Speaker 1>on the team that you like as your dark course

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and not tell you, and if it wins, we tell you,

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and if it doesn't we never mentioned it again. That's

0:19:05.720 --> 0:19:08.639
<v Speaker 1>a good police. Whatever you do. I don't want to

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 1>know about it, super And that's not just gambling. Okay,

0:19:12.600 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever you do, I don't need to know anything. About it.

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.680
<v Speaker 1>So you like the Kings at two hundred one. No,

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 1>I do love the Kings. I don't know why, but

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:25.879
<v Speaker 1>that's a team that I do. I'll watch because I

0:19:25.920 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>don't think anybody else watches, and I'll go I gotta.

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you know, I'm watching my son play and

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.199
<v Speaker 1>the team's not very good, but but I feel like

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I have to. That's what I'm watching here. I'm watching

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.719
<v Speaker 1>the Kings, and I just I don't know, I'm just

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>rooting for him a little bit. There. Chris Mannox will

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>join us. We'll talk to him about well a few things.

0:19:46.680 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Give us that surprise team or teams that could create

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit of a run here in the

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>NBA Playoffs. Twenty one after the hour, just getting started

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>on this trigger Meat Friday. Back after this. Thanks for

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>listening to The Damn Patrick Show podcast. Be sure to

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>catch us live every weekday morning nine to noon Eastern

0:20:05.200 --> 0:20:08.120
<v Speaker 1>or six to nine Pacific on Fox Sports Radio. Find

0:20:08.160 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>your local station for The Dan Patrick Show at Fox

0:20:10.440 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio dot com, or stream us live every day

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>on the iHeartRadio app by searching f s R. We'll

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.400
<v Speaker 1>settle on a poll question. Phone calls are always welcome

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.479
<v Speaker 1>eight seven seven three DP show email addrestp at dan

0:20:23.560 --> 0:20:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Patrick dot com, Twitter handle a DP show. Kevin Durant

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.600
<v Speaker 1>had a long layoff earlier in his career. He missed

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>the last two months of the twenty fourteen fifteen season

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:37.200
<v Speaker 1>with Oklahoma City. He went over eight months without playing

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.959
<v Speaker 1>a game. In his first seven games of the next season,

0:20:40.000 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 1>he averaged thirty a game, shot better than fifty percent.

0:20:44.040 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Soon after that, he strained a hamstring and missed six games. Yeah,

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.439
<v Speaker 1>the rush to have him come back. I get it

0:20:50.880 --> 0:20:53.840
<v Speaker 1>that you feel like the Eastern Conference is maybe there

0:20:53.920 --> 0:20:56.760
<v Speaker 1>for the taking. I don't know about Kyrie. Did you

0:20:56.760 --> 0:20:59.320
<v Speaker 1>get an update on Kyrie's health at all? Did anybody

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>see anything on this? I mean, he is a man

0:21:01.600 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>of mystery. But yeah, we were talking about if Durant

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:07.719
<v Speaker 1>comes back. Vegas is already lowering their odds just in

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>case Durant and Kyrie coming back. Chris Mannox covers the

0:21:12.880 --> 0:21:17.240
<v Speaker 1>NBA senior NBA writer from Sports, illustrating his most recent column,

0:21:17.320 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 1>sa I finally the NBA has a format. Now the

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:24.920
<v Speaker 1>real work begins. Chris, good morning, How are you What's

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:28.160
<v Speaker 1>going on? Then? Well, I'm trying to figure this NET

0:21:28.280 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>situation out, I've always felt everything I've read is that

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Durant would not be coming back. We'll start there. Do

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>you think Durant is going to be coming back? I don't,

0:21:41.760 --> 0:21:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think it would. It would take an incredible

0:21:45.280 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>reversal of direction for Durant to come back. You know

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:52.919
<v Speaker 1>how to talk to people about this within the NETS organization.

0:21:53.000 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I've talked to Rich Kleiman, Durant's manager, and every conversation

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I've had has not left left me feeling like the

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:04.720
<v Speaker 1>door was even open for something like this to happen.

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if it was a shoulder injury or a

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Steph Curry like broken hand, you can have a different conversation.

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:16.359
<v Speaker 1>But you're talking about the most significant injury an NBA

0:22:16.480 --> 0:22:20.880
<v Speaker 1>player could have, and then taking that player and dropping

0:22:20.960 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>him after seven eight regular season games in a three

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 1>week training camp into the most intense atmosphere an NBA

0:22:28.200 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>player can go through. And you know, all I think

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 1>about when you're thinking of that scenario was didn't we

0:22:34.000 --> 0:22:37.000
<v Speaker 1>just do that with Kevin Durant, Like, didn't each us

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:41.280
<v Speaker 1>with a major injury to his cap, come back and

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>then in one game pop his achilles? I mean the

0:22:44.280 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>Nets have a four year investment in Kevin Durant. Even

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>if he came back, I wouldn't make the Nets a favorite.

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.400
<v Speaker 1>You don't come back from an achilles injury and look

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.240
<v Speaker 1>like the same player you once were. So what is

0:22:57.280 --> 0:23:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the point in rolling him back out there truncated season postseason,

0:23:02.920 --> 0:23:05.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, just to roll the dice and hope you

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>catch lightning in a bottle. No, I, it's gonna be

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:11.040
<v Speaker 1>an incredibly long layout for Kevin Durant once the next

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>season starts. But the risk to meet Dan and I

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 1>think that the Nets and Kevin Durant is not worth

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the reward given the fact that we have, you know,

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:26.640
<v Speaker 1>a smaller postseason, eight games regular season going in. Give

0:23:26.720 --> 0:23:28.919
<v Speaker 1>me one or two teams that you think and with

0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>no home court advantage, that this team might play the

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.600
<v Speaker 1>role as spoiler either in the East or the West. Well,

0:23:35.600 --> 0:23:38.639
<v Speaker 1>to me, it's Philadelphia in the East. And you know,

0:23:38.680 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the Sixers had plenty of problems this year, even before

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, Ben Simmons went down with that injury. But

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Ben Simmons is coming back, and you know that, you know,

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:51.479
<v Speaker 1>we always thought when it came to the Sixers that

0:23:51.680 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>a defensive minded team that doesn't rely on the three

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>point shot might have a shot in the postseasons on

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:04.199
<v Speaker 1>UPPO necessarily high volume prepoint shooting team, Like these playoffs

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>almost are built for a team like Philadelphia, Like when

0:24:08.640 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>you have teams coming back, you're just not going to

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to you're still sharp enough to be the

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of perimeter shooting team that you were prior to this.

0:24:18.000 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>A lot of these players have not been even doing

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:23.439
<v Speaker 1>much in the way of one on one work. Some

0:24:23.520 --> 0:24:25.639
<v Speaker 1>of them have even shooting to the better part the

0:24:25.680 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>last couple of months. So you're gonna see a lot

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>of college basketball like shooting numbers. I think in the

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 1>regular season in the postseason, if you're Philadelphia, you don't

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:38.880
<v Speaker 1>shoot threes. If you don't care you are a defensive team.

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>You want to you want to play nineties style basketball

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>where games are in the eighties and nineties. So I

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.679
<v Speaker 1>look at the Sixers. You know their chemistry is always issue,

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:51.680
<v Speaker 1>but but talent perspective, if this play be perfect for them,

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:54.000
<v Speaker 1>like if they could wind up being a team that

0:24:54.080 --> 0:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>not only win the first round series, but they could

0:24:57.280 --> 0:24:58.760
<v Speaker 1>make a run all the way to the finals. Like

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that this is just one of those weird

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.120
<v Speaker 1>scenarios that sets up really well for Philadelphia. Wait are

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you doing this because you know mclovin is so excited

0:25:07.400 --> 0:25:10.120
<v Speaker 1>what mclovin I told you and I take a Barr said,

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>don't don't book Maddocks today, you know, and now I

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:16.640
<v Speaker 1>think it's totally paid off. Thank you for a lof

0:25:16.680 --> 0:25:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate that. M Is it fair? Is it fair

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>to the Lakers in Bucks that there is no home

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>court advantage for these two teams considering what they did

0:25:26.359 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 1>during the regular season? There was no way to give

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:33.919
<v Speaker 1>them something for what they did during the regular season. No,

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:37.199
<v Speaker 1>it's not fair, But life's not fair. I mean, it's

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.919
<v Speaker 1>it's the way it goes in the current climate. And

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, there are all these suggestions you read about

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:44.720
<v Speaker 1>some of them, and they're even more from the people

0:25:44.720 --> 0:25:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I talk to you about finding ways to uh, you'll

0:25:48.560 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>give teams that had home court advantage, whether it's an

0:25:51.240 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>extra possession or little things like that. But once you

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>heard Adam silver State last night lines up with some

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff up and writing the last couple of weeks,

0:26:00.880 --> 0:26:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the NBA that athlete wants to protect the integrity of

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs and Michael Jordan said this to Adam Silver,

0:26:08.040 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 1>and Adam Silver has believed this all along. You don't

0:26:10.840 --> 0:26:13.040
<v Speaker 1>want to screw around with gimmicky stuff once you get

0:26:13.040 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to the playoffs because that threatens the credibility of the champion.

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to find don't know if it's possible,

0:26:19.280 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to find a way of shipping

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Blaker floor to Orlando and playing games on it, great

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 1>like to that. But that is as far as it

0:26:27.920 --> 0:26:31.239
<v Speaker 1>goes when it comes to giving them an advantage. I

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.119
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's the floor as much as it

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is the fans that you need to ship to give

0:26:36.119 --> 0:26:38.679
<v Speaker 1>these teams their home court advantage. How about you just

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>send Jack Nicholson and a fan to be name later.

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I'm all for sending like the super fan

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>of every team down there, like Clipper Darryl, you know

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>in the stands. Can I mean match out his voice

0:26:51.880 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>with echo in an empty arena, like, send somebody for

0:26:55.720 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>for each team. But this is just I mean, you

0:26:58.000 --> 0:26:59.560
<v Speaker 1>know this then this is just the way it goes.

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, this is the best of a bad situation.

0:27:03.280 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 1>There's no way to fix it or make it any

0:27:05.600 --> 0:27:07.960
<v Speaker 1>more palatable. So teams are gonna have to deal with

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the consequences. Talking to Chris Mannix from Sports Illustrated, senior

0:27:12.040 --> 0:27:17.320
<v Speaker 1>NBA writer, how is the NBA going to issue press credentials?

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>How do people get in to cover? And do we

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:23.119
<v Speaker 1>have broadcast teams who are going to be able to

0:27:23.119 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>cover this? You know, it's I know for a fact,

0:27:26.600 --> 0:27:30.439
<v Speaker 1>it's still being negotiated right now. As far as what

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of a press access there's going to be. I mean,

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine that if you want to cover the

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.560
<v Speaker 1>playoffs in its entirety, you've got to put yourself in

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that bubble and you have got to agree to effectively

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:47.920
<v Speaker 1>quarantine yourself for three months. And that's you know, difficult

0:27:47.920 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of people to do. I mean, maybe

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 1>not so much for me, I have feel life whatsoever.

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>But you you know, for a lot of people, you know,

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you have families, you have reasons to be in and

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>out of there. So I think that is that is

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:01.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be a challenge. There's a lot of interest

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 1>in from a print media perspective, in being part of

0:28:06.080 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>covering it, but the NBA is understandably leary about letting

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>people come in and out the question of broadcasting. I

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know if that's been fully resolved yet, but people

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought to have been under the impression that many

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>of these broadcasts will take place remotely, whether it's from

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Bristol or you know, Atlanta for Turner. You know, I

0:28:25.240 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's that's certainly is a fluid situation right now.

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:29.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the last couple of weeks, that was

0:28:29.800 --> 0:28:31.920
<v Speaker 1>what I was hearing when it came to how games

0:28:31.960 --> 0:28:34.800
<v Speaker 1>we broadcast during all this. Yeah, I think it'll be

0:28:34.920 --> 0:28:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a via remote for the national broadcast and even local broadcast.

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:42.200
<v Speaker 1>The NBA season if there's a game seven would end

0:28:42.280 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>on that Monday night in mid October. And then there's

0:28:45.040 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>a quick turnaround and the commissioner talking about starting the

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:55.880
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty one season on December first, seems aggressive. Why

0:28:56.000 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>start December first with games? Why not wait till Christmas? Well,

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:05.720
<v Speaker 1>starting December first is all about finishing like the end

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>of June, you know, it's all about trying to recalibrate

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the schedule in one season, like they don't they as

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>of now, they don't want to play into the next summer.

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:20.680
<v Speaker 1>So if you start December first, you might have to

0:29:20.760 --> 0:29:23.720
<v Speaker 1>sandwich some games closer you know, do some things you

0:29:23.720 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily want to do with spacing, but you can

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:31.120
<v Speaker 1>get back on a regular calendar. I think it's I

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's a mistake, and I think it's one that,

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:36.880
<v Speaker 1>as you saw, Michelle Roberts has already commented on this,

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.880
<v Speaker 1>like you're gonna have a union problem with negotiating that

0:29:40.920 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>type of quick turnaround. But I think the NBA has

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>got an opportunity here, Dan to start the season on Christmas,

0:29:46.960 --> 0:29:50.440
<v Speaker 1>when most people start caring about basketball anyway, to use

0:29:50.520 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>that as your launching point, and then play into the

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>summer on a regular schedule. Try to get some valuable

0:29:56.760 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 1>data to see if summer basketball actually work, if the

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>ratings go up, if getting away from the NFL actually

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>makes some sense. If it doesn't, and you're ratings plummet

0:30:08.320 --> 0:30:11.400
<v Speaker 1>for one year, okay, end of August, which is when

0:30:11.440 --> 0:30:14.480
<v Speaker 1>that December start would probably put you, you can find

0:30:14.520 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a way to get back on track in the twenty

0:30:17.320 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty one twenty twenty two season. But right now, I

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:23.760
<v Speaker 1>think it's a golden opportunity for the league to do

0:30:24.240 --> 0:30:26.720
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of people internally already want to do,

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and something they can shock up to the pandemic. And

0:30:29.520 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't even include the fact that it's good business

0:30:32.800 --> 0:30:35.719
<v Speaker 1>to push even further down the line to get fans

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:43.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially back in the stands for next season. Who's your prediction. Well,

0:30:43.120 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I started this whole year saying the Lakers wouldn't make

0:30:46.720 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, or at least would be more likely than

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>not to not make the playoffs. So I'm going to

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 1>take the Lakers to win the whole thing. Let's just

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>do a complete, complete, one eighty. But I'll tell you then,

0:30:57.360 --> 0:30:58.800
<v Speaker 1>I am going to go out on the limb and

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna say, Lakers, there's sixers in the finals. Okay,

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>you're not picking your Celtics, huh, they like I look

0:31:08.240 --> 0:31:10.760
<v Speaker 1>at the Celtics, and I look at the Bucks, and

0:31:10.800 --> 0:31:12.880
<v Speaker 1>I look at how reliant they are on the three

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:15.560
<v Speaker 1>point shot, Like that, to me is a big variable

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 1>in all this, Like how are these guys, What kind

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of skills are these guys gonna have when this game

0:31:21.600 --> 0:31:24.000
<v Speaker 1>comes back? Like the Bucks Giannas doesn't shoot threes, but

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.520
<v Speaker 1>everybody else does, Like that's a five out team, Like

0:31:26.560 --> 0:31:29.480
<v Speaker 1>they want everybody else but Yanna's behind the three point

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:31.840
<v Speaker 1>line launching. And if you're missing a lot, and that

0:31:31.920 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>leads to, like, what does the Sixers do well? They

0:31:34.080 --> 0:31:36.560
<v Speaker 1>force misses, and they play up and down in transition.

0:31:36.600 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>They don't shoot threes, they don't even shoot long two

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>as well, but they can up and down in transition

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and create opportunities. And that's why I think Philadelphia, if

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>they're if Simmons as well, and they're act together, I

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.240
<v Speaker 1>think they could have a pick a run. Did you

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:52.680
<v Speaker 1>care about this CBS poll about the greater Shooters of

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>All Time? I mean, not really you It's obviously subjective,

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:00.600
<v Speaker 1>so I mean I even though it was on the

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>list at this point, well it was, let's see Clay Thompson,

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Steph was number one. Clay Thompson I think was two.

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Bird was in there, Reggie Miller in there, Ray Allen

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>was in there, and probably Kevin Durant was in there.

0:32:18.280 --> 0:32:21.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's again it's like types of shooters though right,

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, Steph Curry like greatest off the triple

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:26.360
<v Speaker 1>three point shooter I've ever seen, Ray Allen maybe the

0:32:26.360 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>best standalone three point shooter I've ever seen. What Reggie

0:32:30.000 --> 0:32:33.600
<v Speaker 1>could do, can clutch moments and you know, the best

0:32:33.600 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>of both worlds in that way. It's just you almost

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 1>have to break it down to silos and say, here's

0:32:38.920 --> 0:32:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the best, just type of three point shooter. Yeah, I

0:32:42.000 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>know it's meant to have us get riled up and argue,

0:32:45.440 --> 0:32:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and nobody's arguing with Steph Curry. Clay Thompson might be

0:32:49.480 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>a little recency biased. He's a wonderful shooter. How did

0:32:53.440 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>everybody miss on Clay Thompson when he was at Washington State.

0:32:58.200 --> 0:33:01.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question. I don't think they saw him

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>as being like he was a very good defender, a

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:08.120
<v Speaker 1>very good three point shooter. But I think if I

0:33:08.160 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>think back to what was going on back then, I

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>think they saw more as one dimensional. I don't think

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>they saw him being and becoming a complete player that

0:33:17.280 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 1>he was. Mean, he was still a lottery pick, like,

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 1>he was still a well regarded player, But I don't

0:33:22.320 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>think they saw the diversity of the skills that Clay

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Comfin has shown in his time as a pro. I

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.760
<v Speaker 1>remember Mark Jackson, the former Golden State head coach, was

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:32.840
<v Speaker 1>we had a private conversation and this is when they

0:33:32.840 --> 0:33:36.320
<v Speaker 1>were thinking about Kevin love for Clay Thompson straight up yeah,

0:33:36.360 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 1>And I said, man, that gives you a whole different look.

0:33:39.480 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, he can shoot threes, he can rebound, he goes,

0:33:42.160 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Clay Thompson is the best two way guard in the NBA,

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>And I went, really, he goes, In my opinion, he goes,

0:33:51.000 --> 0:33:55.240
<v Speaker 1>we would never even consider that trade. Yeah, they really

0:33:55.280 --> 0:33:57.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't either on Golden State side. That. I mean, it's

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:01.560
<v Speaker 1>been documented well over the years, but they didn't really

0:34:01.960 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>give that more than enough funk. But I mean, again,

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you see guys be great defensive players in college. I

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:10.799
<v Speaker 1>don't think anyone saw Clay becoming the stopper that he

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>became in the pros. But we can, like there's so

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.479
<v Speaker 1>many like almost how about Kevin Love for OJ Mayo

0:34:15.520 --> 0:34:20.760
<v Speaker 1>happened to stand one most lopsided deals in draft history. Yeah,

0:34:20.800 --> 0:34:22.960
<v Speaker 1>I was right there, Paulie and I were arguing, and

0:34:23.040 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I said, Kevin Love sealing fifteen eight, you know, OJ

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Mayo might be a guy who can get you twenty

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:34.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, you know, play some defense, and that didn't go.

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:37.399
<v Speaker 1>I hate to say that, damn, but I was kind

0:34:37.400 --> 0:34:39.839
<v Speaker 1>of having the same argument you were at the time,

0:34:39.880 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>like more towards Mail. You have to remember too, that

0:34:41.960 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Love back then was like Joey Like, he just

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't look like he had he didn't have an NBA body,

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And there were people at the time that, you know,

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I had one team like expressed to me. They thought

0:34:53.760 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Love might have an eating disorder like that he'd

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>never be able to develop the kind of body that

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:01.640
<v Speaker 1>he adds a ELP that made him a great NBA player.

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>So grace to Kevin Love for for turning his entire

0:35:05.200 --> 0:35:08.800
<v Speaker 1>physique around in the NBA and OLJ Mayo average nineteen

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 1>his rookie year, he was first team All Rookie. But

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Love improved himself, he got got better, you know,

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he put in a thirty thirty night

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Like man, you just you just never know, Dan, like

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>what you can tell, Like, it's so hard to tell

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>work ethics on eighteen year olds, right, Like you you

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>can see them doing stuff, you know, in high school

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:34.719
<v Speaker 1>and in college. You can talk to their coaches, but

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.439
<v Speaker 1>until you get them in the gym for like year one,

0:35:37.560 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't know what their dedication is going to be.

0:35:40.520 --> 0:35:42.640
<v Speaker 1>And that's that's one of the the most difficult parts of

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:45.440
<v Speaker 1>scouting players. You can see the talent then try to

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>project out the talent But did you know that Kevin

0:35:48.200 --> 0:35:50.719
<v Speaker 1>Love was going to become this workaholic that would you know,

0:35:50.800 --> 0:35:53.040
<v Speaker 1>turn him his body into one of the better NBA

0:35:53.120 --> 0:35:56.680
<v Speaker 1>physiques and turn himself into one of the better front

0:35:56.680 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 1>court three point shooters. I mean, he just he put

0:35:59.640 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the time and you can't really project that when a

0:36:02.000 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>guy's a young Thank you, Chris, enjoy the weekend. We

0:36:05.239 --> 0:36:10.200
<v Speaker 1>appreciate your time. As always. That's Chris Mannix, Sports Illustrated

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 1>NBA Senior Writer. No other show in America. It's talking

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:17.759
<v Speaker 1>about OJ Mayo today, but this one we'll take a

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 1>break play of the days up next year on The

0:36:19.600 --> 0:36:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Dan Patrick Show. Thanks for listening to The Dan Patrick

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Show podcast. Be sure to catch us live every weekday

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:27.480
<v Speaker 1>morning nine until noon eastern six to nine Pacific on

0:36:27.560 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Fox Sports Radio, and you can find us on the

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app at FSR or stream us live every day

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:38.040
<v Speaker 1>at YouTube dot com slash The Dan Patrick Show. Mclovin,

0:36:38.080 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 1>what's the pull question we're going with? Let me just

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:43.200
<v Speaker 1>first date that I was excited about Mannix picking the sixers.

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Then I had the guys in the back pull Mannix

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:48.279
<v Speaker 1>prediction record on the show. I am putting a huge

0:36:48.280 --> 0:36:50.920
<v Speaker 1>bet on the Milwaukee Bucks right now. No, I'm just kidding.

0:36:51.160 --> 0:36:53.359
<v Speaker 1>What is the second tier team that you think has

0:36:53.360 --> 0:36:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the best chance based on what you were saying earlier?

0:36:55.840 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Second tier being out of the top five teams. The Celtics,

0:36:59.760 --> 0:37:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the Rockets, the thunder Dallas, Mavericks for Sixers. Those are

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:09.080
<v Speaker 1>teams like not in the top five of the Sandys.

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if Dallas is good enough to make

0:37:11.840 --> 0:37:17.359
<v Speaker 1>a consistent run, but I do think that they they

0:37:17.360 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>would be a tough out just because of Luca and

0:37:21.080 --> 0:37:26.040
<v Speaker 1>poor Zingis. The Rockets could either be really good or

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:31.359
<v Speaker 1>really bad. Oklahoma City is quietly, they quietly played some

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>pretty good basketball. That's one of the younger teams in

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:37.560
<v Speaker 1>the league. And they have Chris Paul, so you throw

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>in his age, that's a young team. Celtics, I like

0:37:42.719 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to I know Mannic says, oh, you can't rely on

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the three? Well, all right, so the Sixers can't shoot

0:37:49.560 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>the three. What if they need to shoot the three?

0:37:51.760 --> 0:37:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Because let's say they're down by double digits. Are they

0:37:55.560 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a good enough shooting team to be able to come back?

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:00.759
<v Speaker 1>That would be my big concern. They get a lead,

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>they play defense, Okay, maybe, but those are fun teams

0:38:05.160 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>on the outside there. Those are all interesting teams. But

0:38:09.040 --> 0:38:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia has the talent to make a longer run, and

0:38:11.680 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 1>it's the Eastern Conference. Celtics would be able to do

0:38:14.920 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that as well. Houston and Dallas could be in a

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:21.759
<v Speaker 1>similar boat. Maybe a tough out, but can they be

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:23.920
<v Speaker 1>consistent enough to make a run where you're gonna win

0:38:24.040 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>sixteen games? Yeah, mclub. Maybe it'll be like the NCAA

0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>tournament where a team like Virginia who only plays defense

0:38:29.960 --> 0:38:32.600
<v Speaker 1>like a defense team can win. Like the Sixers are

0:38:32.640 --> 0:38:35.760
<v Speaker 1>great defensive. Maybe that's the key that we're not talking about.

0:38:35.880 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that means. Is there anyone's defense

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:45.239
<v Speaker 1>that you love? Do you have the defensive analytics? I

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:48.520
<v Speaker 1>don't have my analytics yet, but I'll get them. Yes, boy.

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Scoring wise, the best defenses in the East are the

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Raptors in the Celtics, and in the West it's the

0:38:54.680 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>Lakers and the Nuggets. Okay, I like the Pacers. Healthy

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 1>rocked him back, he was had some injury issues. Sneaky team,

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 1>don't get they get no coverage. No they don't, No,

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>they don't. I mentioned why did Klay Thompson? You know

0:39:11.719 --> 0:39:13.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of fly under the radar, and then I looked

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:17.680
<v Speaker 1>at some numbers. Here. Washington State played at very slow pace.

0:39:18.480 --> 0:39:21.560
<v Speaker 1>His last year, he averaged they averaged seventy two points

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a game that was sixty fifth in the nation. He

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>averaged twenty one a game for a team that scored

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>only seventy two points. But even if it's a slow pace,

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 1>even if you have a guy getting twenty one points

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.200
<v Speaker 1>a game, if I'm looking at a great shooter, one

0:39:36.200 --> 0:39:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of the great shooters of all time, Ray Allen, when

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:40.879
<v Speaker 1>you saw him in college, you knew he was great.

0:39:40.920 --> 0:39:42.319
<v Speaker 1>When you saw him in the pros, you knew he

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>was great. Larry Bird, you knew he was great. Steve Nash,

0:39:46.760 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>you didn't know because you didn't know if he was

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 1>able to physically play in the NBA. Steve Kerr was

0:39:53.840 --> 0:39:56.800
<v Speaker 1>a good shooter at Arizona. I'm just looking at the

0:39:56.840 --> 0:40:03.200
<v Speaker 1>guys who were on this list, so Nash, who else

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:05.440
<v Speaker 1>is on that list of great shooters of all Trek

0:40:06.960 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Dirk we didn't know because he was coming over from Europe,

0:40:10.160 --> 0:40:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and it didn't take long before we realized that he

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>was at that size as good a shooter as we've

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>ever seen. But JJ Reddick, did you know that that

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:19.680
<v Speaker 1>would trans I knew, we knew he could shoot, that

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:22.560
<v Speaker 1>he'd be effective at NBA player. I knew that he

0:40:22.600 --> 0:40:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was a great shooter in college, but I got to

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:28.720
<v Speaker 1>see all of those games. JJ Reddick had as pure

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of a shot as I've ever seen in college basketball,

0:40:31.400 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>because when he made shots, there were times when the

0:40:34.280 --> 0:40:38.640
<v Speaker 1>net didn't move. Rick Mount, who played at per Due,

0:40:38.760 --> 0:40:41.240
<v Speaker 1>is one of the great pure shooters I ever saw.

0:40:42.480 --> 0:40:47.520
<v Speaker 1>But Rick Mount wasn't a good ABA player. JJ Reddick

0:40:47.560 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 1>has made himself into He's not a Hall of Famer,

0:40:52.520 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>but this is a guy who's made the playoffs every

0:40:54.960 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>single year, I believe of his NBA career, pretty storied career.

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>John Smoltz will tell us, are we going to have

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:04.359
<v Speaker 1>baseball this year?