Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Shoulder to Shoulder Shields. I
Speaker 1: welcome to the Buck Sexton Show team. Welcome to the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hut Tuesday November fifteenth edition of the program. We
Speaker 1: have Republicans taking a House majority. Finally, it's not one
Speaker 1: hundred percent official, but it's pretty much official. They're doing it,
Speaker 1: so that's a good thing. Kerry Lake lost last night
Speaker 1: in Arizona, which is a bad thing. And we have
Speaker 1: more analysis of what happened in this election. Maybe California
Speaker 1: and its ballot harvesting techniques that Republicans have even used
Speaker 1: recently is a pathway forward. We'll discuss that, plus a
Speaker 1: word from a philosopher in the UK about what it
Speaker 1: means to be a conservative and o FTX Crypto is
Speaker 1: can ginuing to be a huge, huge story here with
Speaker 1: billions and billions at stake and now the founders saying
Speaker 1: he's gonna raise money now to bail out the bankruptcy.
Speaker 1: Who's gonna give this guy money? The second biggest donor
Speaker 1: to Democrats in the last election cycle, which I think
Speaker 1: needs to be said a lot. New York Times didn't
Speaker 1: say it at all, and a huge twenty two hundred
Speaker 1: word piece on him didn't talk about those Democrat donations. Gee,
Speaker 1: I wonder what that's all about. M isn't that special.
Speaker 1: We'll discuss it in just a moment, my friends. But
Speaker 1: you're going to be doing a lot of stuff online
Speaker 1: no matter who you are. A lot of stuff is
Speaker 1: going on online these days, right, There's no question about it,
Speaker 1: and so cyber criminals are trying to find all your information.
Speaker 1: They're combing the dark web for stolen data, and some
Speaker 1: of the things that they value most are your personal
Speaker 1: identify or information PII, your full name, social accurnity, member,
Speaker 1: driver's license, and that stuff is actually out there on
Speaker 1: the dark web and people buy it illegally and youth
Speaker 1: to take out loans in your name. It's important for
Speaker 1: us to understand how cybercrime and identity theft or affecting
Speaker 1: our lives. Your personal information gets exposed so often, makes
Speaker 1: it really easy for cybercriminals to steal your identity. It's
Speaker 1: happened to me before. Fortunately I have LifeLock in the background,
Speaker 1: so I got notified and I got help right away.
Speaker 1: LifeLock detects and alerts you to potential identity threats you
Speaker 1: may not spot on your own, like loans, take it
Speaker 1: out in your name you didn't know about, and if
Speaker 1: you do, become a victim of identity theft, like I
Speaker 1: had a cable company thought I owed them thousands of dollars.
Speaker 1: Somebody had used my social Security number, wasn't actually me.
Speaker 1: LifeLock work with me. Got the whole thing fixed, got
Speaker 1: the whole thing squared away. No one can prevent all
Speaker 1: identity theft or monitor all transactions at all businesses, but
Speaker 1: it's easy to help protect yourself with LifeLock. Join now
Speaker 1: and save up at twenty five percent off your first
Speaker 1: year with promo code buck. Call one eight hundred LifeLock
Speaker 1: or head tolifelock dot com and use promo code buck
Speaker 1: for twenty five percent off. All right, here's where we
Speaker 1: are in the election situation. For one thing, it didn't
Speaker 1: go as we wanted it to in Arizona. That much,
Speaker 1: I think is pretty obvious given where we are, given
Speaker 1: the circumstances, and I think everyone needs to do a
Speaker 1: bit more soul searching about what we do going forward.
Speaker 1: Here to win. I mean Ted Cruz. Here he is
Speaker 1: play Club nineteen. Here's Ted Cruise telling everybody. Look, we
Speaker 1: lost some races that we should have won, folks, that's
Speaker 1: the truth. So we need to look at what happened here.
Speaker 1: I am frustrated out of my mind that we did
Speaker 1: not have the kind of election we should have. The
Speaker 1: American people are really unhappy with the path we're on.
Speaker 1: The polling shows about seventy percent of Americans know that
Speaker 1: we're on the wrong path. And yet unfortunately the Democrats
Speaker 1: defied the odds they held onto the Senate. We lost
Speaker 1: some races we shouldn't have lost, and I think that means,
Speaker 1: at least in the United States Senate, we need to
Speaker 1: change what we're doing. We need strong principled conservatives in
Speaker 1: the Senate to stand and lead, to lead us happy warriors,
Speaker 1: to lead with a smile, but with a clear contrast.
Speaker 1: We need to not roll over and give in the
Speaker 1: disastrous policies from the Democrats, but rather give the voters
Speaker 1: a clear and meaningful alternative. Yeah about that. McCarthy in
Speaker 1: Congress already won the first vote to be the GOP
Speaker 1: majority leader in the House. So I don't know if
Speaker 1: we're getting a change in leadership. McConnell's holding those Senate elections.
Speaker 1: McConnell doesn't care. He just wants to be in charge.
Speaker 1: I think McConnell would prefer being in charge to being
Speaker 1: in the majority. And Ted Cruz has blamed him and
Speaker 1: said this exactly what I just said. This is a
Speaker 1: widespread sentiment. Blake clip twenty. If you look at this
Speaker 1: last cycle, Mitch McConnell pulled the money out of Arizona.
Speaker 1: We could have won Arizona. We nearly won Arizona, and
Speaker 1: abandoning Blake Masters was indefensible. Mitch, why did that happen?
Speaker 1: I gotta ask you, because everybody he's going to say
Speaker 1: the same thing I am right now. Explain to me, Senator,
Speaker 1: why in a race where the polling showed that we
Speaker 1: had a legitimate chance of winning there, why did he
Speaker 1: pull out that money from Masters who desperately needed it.
Speaker 1: Because Masters said he would vote against Mitch McConnell. And
Speaker 1: so Mitch would rather be leader than have a Republican majority.
Speaker 1: If there's a Republican who can win who's not going
Speaker 1: to support Mitch, the truth of the matter is he'd
Speaker 1: rather the Democrat win, so he pulled all the money
Speaker 1: out of Arizona. Apparently, if you come at the Mitch,
Speaker 1: you best not miss. I guess that's the lesson for
Speaker 1: people running in the Senate. If we're not going to
Speaker 1: get rid of him, which will probably not. He's going
Speaker 1: to be the Senate Minority leader. Again. I believe that
Speaker 1: was my friend Ben Ferguson there asking the question. So
Speaker 1: here we are trying to figure out what happened. And
Speaker 1: in Arizona specifically, Kerry Lake lost, who was probably the
Speaker 1: most closely associated with former President Trump, spent the most time,
Speaker 1: maybe with the exception of Mastriano and Pennsylvania who lost very,
Speaker 1: very big time to the Canto Shapiro for the governor's
Speaker 1: race there, carry Lake lost. And we can talk about
Speaker 1: how it's sketchy that the systems in place here keep
Speaker 1: bringing about these results, but we're also not playing the
Speaker 1: playing the game by the rules that are in place
Speaker 1: to the best possible advantage that we can. So we
Speaker 1: shouldn't be surprised when we have disappointing outcomes. And I
Speaker 1: know that's kind of hard for some people here. I'm
Speaker 1: just here telling you the truth. I give people that
Speaker 1: yell at me, just say, oh, but it's stolen. I say, okay,
Speaker 1: so what does that mean. Let's just assume it is?
Speaker 1: Where how if we don't know how, how do we
Speaker 1: fix it? So what is telling us that it's stolen? Actually?
Speaker 1: Do you say, oh, we're gonna look for how it
Speaker 1: was stolen? Okay, well, then let's find it. So then
Speaker 1: we agree, you have to find the way in which
Speaker 1: it was stolen. It's not if we just assert that
Speaker 1: we got to find proof of evans so we can
Speaker 1: fix it and we can hold people responsible or accountable.
Speaker 1: You know, if you use the term rigged, which I
Speaker 1: greatly prefer because I think it's a well, first of all,
Speaker 1: it's definitely true, right. Stolen, I think is for a
Speaker 1: lot of people an emotional gut feeling about this election
Speaker 1: in some places and say oh we're stolen. You say, well, okay, yes,
Speaker 1: Democrats are shifty and dishonest, and would they cheat if
Speaker 1: they could get away with it? Sure, But the cheating
Speaker 1: pattern here is very strange because you have states like
Speaker 1: Nevada where we win the governor's race but we lose
Speaker 1: a senate race. You're gonna say they set it up
Speaker 1: so that there were fake ballots that elected a Republican one.
Speaker 1: I mean, being governor is not a small thing in Nevada, right,
Speaker 1: So that's kind of a big deal. So if that's
Speaker 1: a big deal, what's going on here? And then I
Speaker 1: bring you to just just hear me out on this one.
Speaker 1: And because I'm getting all the emails, Oh they cheated,
Speaker 1: they cheated, they cheated. I got the same emails in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty I don't want to get the same emails
Speaker 1: in twenty twenty four. So whether they cheated or not,
Speaker 1: whether you believe that or not, we have to figure
Speaker 1: out how, where in what ways? Right, we have to
Speaker 1: figure that out. It's not enough to just say, oh,
Speaker 1: they cheated, well how and really what does that mean?
Speaker 1: If you want to say rigged as in they pretend
Speaker 1: that it doesn't open the system to all kinds of
Speaker 1: manipulation with ballot harvesting and early voting, and expanding early
Speaker 1: voting to be like a month before actual election day
Speaker 1: or even more than that in some places. Yeah, all
Speaker 1: that is a big problem. I think it's disingenuous, I
Speaker 1: think it's dishonest. I think it makes it much easier
Speaker 1: for fraud to be committed. But if we keep losing
Speaker 1: in these states. The states are on their own elections,
Speaker 1: so we see the problem doesn't get better by saying,
Speaker 1: look what they're doing, they shouldn't do that. We gotta win.
Speaker 1: How do we figure out a way to win? We
Speaker 1: were close to winning in these places, and I mean
Speaker 1: to believe, I honestly just think people are giving the
Speaker 1: Democrats in some areas here too much credit to think
Speaker 1: that they'd be able to pull off very specific, not
Speaker 1: even across the board, ballot wide cheating, but only in
Speaker 1: certain races in certain times, and not have anybody be
Speaker 1: able to pick up on it or figure it out.
Speaker 1: We had, we had poll watchers. I spoke to people
Speaker 1: legal team out there, paying attention to everything they can. So, okay,
Speaker 1: if there's cheating, shown me the cheating, and if we
Speaker 1: can't show it, then talking about it doesn't really help
Speaker 1: us very much. It is rigged. Can we talk about
Speaker 1: how we make it not rigged anymore? Wouldn't that be
Speaker 1: a better way to go? Wouldn't that make more sense,
Speaker 1: at least in the immediate future, until we can actually
Speaker 1: get some changes made, meaning we fight fire or fire
Speaker 1: until we can change the rules. Right, if we don't
Speaker 1: keep losing. By the way, California, we do have some
Speaker 1: races Lauren Boebert and Colorado came from behind, came from
Speaker 1: behind even though there were delays in the vote count
Speaker 1: there in Colorado. So it's not the case people keep
Speaker 1: saying this, Oh, but we lose every race that gets
Speaker 1: delayed beyond election. That's not true. So we have we're
Speaker 1: the reality team, right, We're honesty, we're fact based. It's
Speaker 1: not true that they lose every that we lose every
Speaker 1: election after as so people can get mad at me
Speaker 1: for saying that, but it's just not true. And in
Speaker 1: California right now, I think I can remember the name
Speaker 1: of the woman who's running in a race that's still
Speaker 1: going their Democrat, but she is losing ground as the
Speaker 1: votes are tallied up. You know why because in California
Speaker 1: they have Republicans there that make an effort to do
Speaker 1: early voting, and they do ballot harvesting too, and they
Speaker 1: tell people to use the drop boxes. They're using the
Speaker 1: rules as they are to their benefit. California Republicans got
Speaker 1: crushed in twenty eighteen. This year, we're gonna win a
Speaker 1: bunch of very important congressional seats in California. Why because
Speaker 1: the GOP in that state, it really was actually just
Speaker 1: more Republican organizations in that state decided we got to
Speaker 1: fight fire with fire. I'm just telling you what I'm
Speaker 1: seeing here. You know, we're trying to be honest about
Speaker 1: what's happening so that we can win the next time around.
Speaker 1: I want to talk to you though, in a second
Speaker 1: about what's going on with the Democrats and the psychology
Speaker 1: of the Democrat Party right now and what it means
Speaker 1: to be a conservative today, and then also a little
Speaker 1: more on FTX crypto. But if you ever thought about
Speaker 1: being a real estate investor, listen up. Okay, it's a
Speaker 1: process that if you don't know what you're doing, it
Speaker 1: can be overwhelming. You're buying a house as an investment.
Speaker 1: It's not a small thing. So you want to make
Speaker 1: sure you're making the right decision, that you've had all
Speaker 1: the numbers crunch, that you have real expertise in that area,
Speaker 1: in that neighborhood, in that state, somebody who knows the
Speaker 1: market cold, and therefore you're making a smart, sound, long
Speaker 1: term investment that's going to give you free cash flow
Speaker 1: every month, and you're going to build up equity in
Speaker 1: the house over time does not sound great. That's what
Speaker 1: my friends had Done for your real Estate can do
Speaker 1: for you. Just go to Done for You Buck dot
Speaker 1: Com Again, that's done for you, Buck dot com. I'm
Speaker 1: just telling you to do what I've done. I'm a
Speaker 1: done for You client. I own multiple houses that I
Speaker 1: bought through Done for Your real Estate. They act as
Speaker 1: as my advisory as my experts, and they've done this
Speaker 1: for thousands of people across the country. The houses I
Speaker 1: bought with Done for You real Estate are doing so well.
Speaker 1: All of them have a tenant in place. I've never
Speaker 1: had even a full month of vacancy in any of
Speaker 1: the houses that I've bought. I mean, it's worked out
Speaker 1: really well. And that's because they know what they're doing.
Speaker 1: And now I'm a real estate investor and I'm building
Speaker 1: up a portfolio. You can join me on this journey.
Speaker 1: Gooda done for you Buck dot Com Again, that's done
Speaker 1: for you Buck dot Com. To begin your real estate
Speaker 1: investment journey today. Done for you, Buck dot Com. So
Speaker 1: you may have noticed that there's a story in Vice
Speaker 1: magazine or Vice the website about people who want non
Speaker 1: binary bottom surgery and this is this is real. This
Speaker 1: was in Vice, which is a very left wing website,
Speaker 1: and it's where somebody who is trans wants to either
Speaker 1: have both a penis and a vagina. So if they
Speaker 1: have a vagina, they want a penis to be built,
Speaker 1: but they leave the vagina, or if they have a
Speaker 1: you know, you get it right, they want both pairs,
Speaker 1: or if they are there are even some people who
Speaker 1: are claiming they want to be gender neutral downstairs, if
Speaker 1: you catch my drift, they want all of the genitalia
Speaker 1: surgically removed and just have essentially a urinary tract with
Speaker 1: an exit so they can urinate. That's it. I know
Speaker 1: this is pretty intense stuff, but this is where this
Speaker 1: is now a part of the trans movement. And when
Speaker 1: Weiss wrote about this, they were bemoaning the fact that
Speaker 1: the people that want this are having a hard time
Speaker 1: getting access, as in having doctors who will do the
Speaker 1: surgery and I assume having insurance and taxpayers pay for it.
Speaker 1: So that's where we are now. Remove all the genitals
Speaker 1: or I want two pairs of genitals. And if you
Speaker 1: don't believe that, you are are refusing someone's truth or
Speaker 1: something like that. I was reminded earlier day of something
Speaker 1: that Roger Scrutin. I believe that's how you say his name.
Speaker 1: I've seen this quote this clip before. Yeah, Roger Scrutin,
Speaker 1: or maybe it's Scruton. I'm just kidding, it's Scrutin. He
Speaker 1: said this in twenty eighteen about what does it mean
Speaker 1: to be a conservative? And I thought you should hear
Speaker 1: this because it really struck a chord with me. Play four.
Speaker 1: The typical conservative, in my reading of events, is someone
Speaker 1: who looks around himself and he finds things that he loves,
Speaker 1: you know, and he thinks, well, those things are threatened,
Speaker 1: they're vulnerable, I've got to protect. And it's not often
Speaker 1: that you find on the left somebody who looks around
Speaker 1: and finds things that he loves. It's always something that's
Speaker 1: gone wrong, something that's even hateful, and who got to
Speaker 1: mobilize against it. If you've lost any sense that actually
Speaker 1: the world is lovable and that there are things therefore
Speaker 1: to be rescued in it, you have actually lost the
Speaker 1: sense of why there is such a thing as a
Speaker 1: community in the first place. And that I think is
Speaker 1: one of the things that I've felt very strongly throughout
Speaker 1: my life that there really are wonderful things that we've inherited. Yes,
Speaker 1: to be a conservative in the truest sense is to
Speaker 1: want to defend what is true and beautiful and kind
Speaker 1: and righteous in our society, in our world. And unfortunately,
Speaker 1: so much of the progressive and woke left is angry
Speaker 1: and hateful and seeks to undermine, destroy and annihilate in
Speaker 1: the service of a revolution of some sort that will
Speaker 1: bring about the perfect future. If only we destroy everything
Speaker 1: around us, will build something perfect in its place. You
Speaker 1: can say this is the root fallacy of leftism, which
Speaker 1: fortunately is now the dominant ideology of the Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: And you see this all over, and you see this
Speaker 1: with the gender identity debate. How far will they take this.
Speaker 1: It's not enough merely to make accommodations for people who
Speaker 1: have who have gender issues or no, no, no, They
Speaker 1: want to eradicate the notion of gender entirely, destroy it
Speaker 1: all and then maybe build something new. What will our
Speaker 1: categorizations be? Whatever someone says, that's not an organizing principle
Speaker 1: for society doesn't matter. Destruction creates its own power, and
Speaker 1: they know that that's why they're trying to do so
Speaker 1: many of these things speaking of unfortunately destruction. You'll notice
Speaker 1: that in a lot of states they're getting very extreme
Speaker 1: about abortion, even more extreme in some ways since they
Speaker 1: were before Rovwade was overturned. The left has mobilized on
Speaker 1: this issue and they are more aggressive in some ways
Speaker 1: than I've seen them in years, pushing apaganda about oh,
Speaker 1: it's not really a heartbeat, or oh, it's just about
Speaker 1: a woman's health freedom. No, it's about a baby in
Speaker 1: the womb. Look, we're changing laws as quickly as we can,
Speaker 1: but we're going to lose in some places, and that
Speaker 1: means there's going to be a lot of abortions taking place.
Speaker 1: You need to do what you can as a member
Speaker 1: of the pro life community today to help save lives.
Speaker 1: The Preborn Pregnancy Clinics began their mission over sixteen years
Speaker 1: ago to love and help women with unplanned pregnancies. The
Speaker 1: first step in that is offering them a free ultrasound,
Speaker 1: because when an expectant mother hears her baby's heartbeat and
Speaker 1: sees the image of her baby on ultrasound, it is
Speaker 1: a divine moment, a connection between that mother, the baby,
Speaker 1: and God. But preborn's response here providing that ultrasound and
Speaker 1: then additional help if the mother needs it, if she
Speaker 1: chooses life. It's entirely dependent upon you, the pro life community,
Speaker 1: and your generosity, your donations, your help is needed now
Speaker 1: more than ever. For just twenty eight dollars, you can
Speaker 1: give an old trasound to an expectant mother. One hundred
Speaker 1: and forty dollars helps to rescue five babies lives through
Speaker 1: these ultrasounds. All you have to do to donate is
Speaker 1: dial pound two fifty, say the keyword baby, that's pound
Speaker 1: two five zero on your cell phone and say the
Speaker 1: word baby. That will connect you with someone at Preborn
Speaker 1: who can tell you more and receive your donation. Their
Speaker 1: website is preborn dot com slash buck that's preborn dot
Speaker 1: com slash buc k. Let's help us organization save as
Speaker 1: many as forty thousand lives. Preborn dot com slash buck.
Speaker 1: It is so important the work that they're doing. Now,
Speaker 1: I told you about FTX trading and how this guy
Speaker 1: who's the second biggest donor to Democrats. Now they're saying, oh,
Speaker 1: but the co CEO donated some to Republicans. Who's the
Speaker 1: co CEO? Like, no one's heard of that guy. Was
Speaker 1: he really running this show? Was he really the co CEO?
Speaker 1: And by the way he gave even by the reports,
Speaker 1: I've seen about half if that of what was given
Speaker 1: by Sam Bankman freed to the Democrat Party. And I'm
Speaker 1: not the only one who's notice this. Want to be clear,
Speaker 1: a lot of people are noticing. New York Times has
Speaker 1: given very gentle treatment of this guy because he donated
Speaker 1: forty million dollars to Democrats in the midterm cycle. Here is,
Speaker 1: for example, Ken Griffin of Citadel, which is a huge
Speaker 1: financial firm, talking about FTX and Trump Lose and aligned
Speaker 1: item that they had over at the FTX crypto trading
Speaker 1: platform that is imploded and now risks up to a
Speaker 1: fifty billion dollar bankruptcy play three. You know, I'm the
Speaker 1: balance to ftx's line called Trump Loose, and Sam was
Speaker 1: the second biggest donor to Democratic candidates. I'm gonna leave
Speaker 1: it to everybody else to draw their own conclusions about
Speaker 1: what you're saying here, right are those are really really
Speaker 1: ugly facts. When you see a fraud of this bang
Speaker 1: too having played out and you find no regulators were
Speaker 1: there to prevent it, that's a really, really tough story.
Speaker 1: Fraud of this notice the word that he uses. Ken Griffin,
Speaker 1: Citadel Securities, the CEO. It's a massive financial firm. He
Speaker 1: knows what's up. It's a fraud, he says. And the
Speaker 1: regulators want to know part of it. Why this guy
Speaker 1: was getting invites to the Biden White House to hang
Speaker 1: out with Joe Biden talked to all of his people.
Speaker 1: It was close to them. He was funding the preferred
Speaker 1: Democrat candidates, and he was funding their agenda through climate
Speaker 1: change and equity and all this other do good want
Speaker 1: to be do good or nons This actually doesn't do good.
Speaker 1: This stuff, this is all just part of the apparatus,
Speaker 1: all just part of the left in their system. We'll
Speaker 1: talk more about this obviously. I'm on this store. I
Speaker 1: think it's really important. I want to thank you, especially
Speaker 1: those of you who are joining the Rumble Channel go
Speaker 1: to Rumble dot com, slash Buck Sexton, and also all
Speaker 1: of our podcast listeners. As I say, we're building out
Speaker 1: the studio here the Freedom Hunt. We're gonna have more
Speaker 1: stuff up, more things going on, so please spread the word.
Speaker 1: Like I say, we're going to start having guests and
Speaker 1: all these things are happening, probably going to be really
Speaker 1: a twenty twenty three version of it, meaning that we're
Speaker 1: gonna have the two point o start in twenty twenty three,
Speaker 1: so about another month and change here of this version
Speaker 1: of the show, but we're going to build it out,
Speaker 1: be doing more. And so all of my subscribers, some
Speaker 1: of you have been with me since original Saturday Squad meeting.
Speaker 1: You were OSS back in twenty twelve, so you've been
Speaker 1: with me for over a decade. We're gonna go in
Speaker 1: our eleventh year here and thank you so much for that.
Speaker 1: But more on that tomorrow and the days after. Shields
Speaker 1: High