Speaker 1: Let's discuss the space Odyssey, the female Space Odyssey, because
Speaker 1: so many people are talking about it. I'm not sure
Speaker 1: if it's as mainstream as I think it is, because
Speaker 1: social media is on fuego about it, lit about it,
Speaker 1: and to me that is mainstream. But the mainstream media
Speaker 1: is just reporting the news like these women got off
Speaker 1: this spaceship and this is what happened. And also like
Speaker 1: that is a monumental thing, like going to space. You know,
Speaker 1: I think it's a big deal to go to Australia,
Speaker 1: So I'm going to say it's a big deal to
Speaker 1: go to space. Someone someone asks you if you want
Speaker 1: to go to space, you're considering it. Someone did mention
Speaker 1: the trip to me, and it was something in my
Speaker 1: mind as a concept I thought of, and it's certainly
Speaker 1: something you're thinking about. But like I do remember being
Speaker 1: like the why. You know, with everything I do, for
Speaker 1: I'm an experience, from a travel from an appearance standpoint,
Speaker 1: there's usually a why. And for me, for me personally
Speaker 1: doing something like that, I don't have the why. I'm
Speaker 1: a mother and my daughter really depends on me, and
Speaker 1: I have a normal rational amount of fear. But overall
Speaker 1: it's like what's the why that I'm going to do
Speaker 1: something When I get on a plane and sitting coach
Speaker 1: and go into Guatemala and it's like not safe, and
Speaker 1: I'm a little scared. I'm not bringing my daughter because
Speaker 1: it's not safe, and I'm going and there is a risk,
Speaker 1: even though I'm a mother. But there's such a reward
Speaker 1: in doing relief work and trying to help people, and
Speaker 1: so that is where I weigh it for me. I
Speaker 1: guess if I were taking a spaceship to save people's lives,
Speaker 1: would I do it? Probably? But not? I don't know.
Speaker 1: I mean, I got into some gnarly territory with the
Speaker 1: pandemic and with the PPE, and I almost ruined my
Speaker 1: career in the sense that, like, I was taking a
Speaker 1: lot of risks. I was sending thirteen million dollars of
Speaker 1: Haasmat suits to the government, and like it was scary
Speaker 1: because we were dealing with counterfeit people and just like
Speaker 1: I've dealt with some gnarly shit in my life. So
Speaker 1: I don't know the why of going to space. Now
Speaker 1: there's a battle going on online about was it really
Speaker 1: like a woman kind step or was it just an
Speaker 1: advertisement for space? Tourism, which is also like valid too,
Speaker 1: like space tourism, maybe a thing one day we would
Speaker 1: have never thought you could be on a plane to
Speaker 1: begin with. Or you know, everything is about evolution, so
Speaker 1: things that seem crazy now will one day make sense.
Speaker 1: But whatever it is, this did not land from a
Speaker 1: pr standpoint, and there are so many things about it,
Speaker 1: comical and otherwise to get into. So number one, it's
Speaker 1: a group of six women, strong, successful women that are
Speaker 1: wealthy and famous and privileged, and they went on a trip.
Speaker 1: Now they're entitled, not unlike going on a private jet
Speaker 1: or a yacht to go to the south of France, like,
Speaker 1: they can do what they want. They wanted to go,
Speaker 1: they were each invited. It was an experience. You know,
Speaker 1: people defended their own homes in Malibu with private firefighters.
Speaker 1: It wasn't looked highly upon by other people because it
Speaker 1: didn't seem that community. But nevertheless they protected their own
Speaker 1: homes and that's presumably why they made money to protect
Speaker 1: their own homes. So we can all sit in, you know,
Speaker 1: on the outside, looking into something. But six women decided
Speaker 1: collectively and individually to go to space, to have an experience,
Speaker 1: to do something innovative. I don't think they did it
Speaker 1: for the PR. I think they thought the PR would
Speaker 1: be good because it sounds really like, you know, intense
Speaker 1: and serious and like something groundbreaking, because it is they
Speaker 1: went to space, and they decided to go to space,
Speaker 1: so they went to space together. But here's where it
Speaker 1: took a turn. It took a turn because I don't
Speaker 1: know if this is true or fiction. Someone said Oscar
Speaker 1: to lorent to design the outfits, and they had these
Speaker 1: like tight outfits on, like I guess people were saying
Speaker 1: as like lycra or spandex. So like I get the
Speaker 1: idea of that. They were like where girl bosses and
Speaker 1: we're wearing these outfits. But that didn't land. And I
Speaker 1: get why that didn't land. It's like sort of focusing
Speaker 1: on the wrong thing and almost like making a joke
Speaker 1: out of it kind of. So there's that there were
Speaker 1: no actual real astronauts, so it's like this is going
Speaker 1: to be all this money spent and people going to
Speaker 1: get to go to space, and so people who spent
Speaker 1: their whole life studying or aspiring or dreaming to go
Speaker 1: to space that actually are professionals in that field aren't going.
Speaker 1: But like that's a touching story. A lot of archaeologists
Speaker 1: or ourn't historians want to go to Egypt, and rich
Speaker 1: people can go to Egypt, so like, okay, you know,
Speaker 1: like everybody wants to turn it everything, but this is
Speaker 1: not you know, this isn't a charity event they were doing.
Speaker 1: They were going to space, but it was highly publicized
Speaker 1: and they did marketing for it, so they are open
Speaker 1: to the scrutiny that they're getting. Because the one thing
Speaker 1: that I do understand and that I've talked about is
Speaker 1: I don't like girl boss quote unquote mentality. I don't
Speaker 1: like performative girl boss language act like we're bad bitches,
Speaker 1: we're a girl But like, I understand that there are
Speaker 1: people in the world, myself being one of them, that
Speaker 1: are bad bitch girl bosses, like Martha Stewart's a bad
Speaker 1: bitch girl boss, so is Oprah Winfrey, so is on
Speaker 1: a win tour. But the people that really are aren't
Speaker 1: putting forth the boss bitch mentality, the narrative, and so
Speaker 1: these women there was an essence to this whole thing
Speaker 1: that it's giving like forced girl boss, and it turned
Speaker 1: people off and it also really alienated the base of
Speaker 1: women and moms, because there was language which the women
Speaker 1: spoke with, which provided like a faux spirituality aspect, like,
Speaker 1: you know, we're connected and we're all together and it's
Speaker 1: the world. And I understand where they were coming from
Speaker 1: and saying that they're allowed to have a perspective. Just
Speaker 1: because you're rich doesn't mean you don't have a perspective.
Speaker 1: They were in a spaceship, they saw the earth, they
Speaker 1: felt something, they felt connected. This can all be real.
Speaker 1: It's all not the content, it's the delivery. It was
Speaker 1: the packaging, the wrapping, the messaging. It did not land
Speaker 1: no matter what. So the average American woman, who is
Speaker 1: the base, the purchasers of products, the loudest voice in
Speaker 1: the country, an important vote, a woman who really matters.
Speaker 1: I know this more than anyone. I understand these people. Okay,
Speaker 1: I love these people. I you know, have been broke
Speaker 1: and been rich, and so I feel like I kind
Speaker 1: of understand. I can't say that I'm not privileged. I
Speaker 1: can't say that I you know, I am not closer
Speaker 1: to the group that went on the spaceship than the
Speaker 1: woman in America who intimately understands the price of eggs.
Speaker 1: I'm not gonna costplay something I'm not just because I
Speaker 1: go to Tjmax and Dollar Store. I'm not going to
Speaker 1: costplay understanding the plight of a woman who is working
Speaker 1: two jobs and trying to make ends meet. But I
Speaker 1: understand the problem with this. I understand why that woman is, like,
Speaker 1: why are you publicly acting like this mission makes you
Speaker 1: connected to me and we're the same. You had to
Speaker 1: go to Space to realize something that isn't even true
Speaker 1: because we're not the same, because we're not dealing with
Speaker 1: the same issues. Because you went to Space in an
Speaker 1: oscar to lorent to outfit and you know, also the
Speaker 1: women were kind of in glam and I feel like
Speaker 1: that didn't totally land. It doesn't mean it's wrong. It
Speaker 1: was their Space trip, not unlike them going to Morocco
Speaker 1: or a housewives trip or the millions of bullshitarians on
Speaker 1: TikTok that are criticizing this, that also watch content of
Speaker 1: people that are billionaires at open air mes boxes like
Speaker 1: you can't pick and choose, but they are picking and
Speaker 1: choosing because this is the thing that they just didn't like.
Speaker 1: Now you had Chris and Chloe on the tarmac, the
Speaker 1: Space tarmac or whatever you call the launching pad and Oprah,
Speaker 1: and it's just adding to the privilege that people just
Speaker 1: don't want to see but they know exist. It just
Speaker 1: is one of these things that was like spoon fed,
Speaker 1: force fed to them and it's not landing. They didn't
Speaker 1: like it, and I again understand why it's not landing.
Speaker 1: And then you have celebrities on the ground. Amy Schumer
Speaker 1: made fun of it. Em Rada, a gorgeous, wealthy supermodel
Speaker 1: in a Mercedes Sprinter full disclosure of car that I
Speaker 1: had guilty as charged in a Mercedes Sprinter, discussing the
Speaker 1: privilege and waste of resources. Now it's twenty eight million dollars,
Speaker 1: that's a lot of money, but that is wasted every
Speaker 1: day by different rich people everywhere. Okay, people adore and
Speaker 1: love Taylor Swift, but you know people have called her
Speaker 1: out for her private jet usage, and Kylie's up on
Speaker 1: that list, like and Leonardo DiCaprio is flying private but
Speaker 1: then talking about the earth, like, you know, unless you're
Speaker 1: gonna be Fred and Wilma Flintstone billionaires that are gonna
Speaker 1: start the car at the bottom of your feet, you're
Speaker 1: gonna contribute. I'm not the best recycler. I'm trying to
Speaker 1: eliminate plastic. I just went through my entire attic to
Speaker 1: get rid of a bunch of shit, and there's all
Speaker 1: this wasted fucking Halloween costumes in Eastern It's like, get
Speaker 1: rid of it, you can buy it again. Right then,
Speaker 1: I'm gonna buy this crap again and contribute more to
Speaker 1: the landfill, garbage, crap, fast fashion. So like, we all
Speaker 1: do our part, and you can't decide to cherry pick
Speaker 1: what's right and what's wrong. It's twenty eight million dollars.
Speaker 1: That's a lot of money, but there are ten people
Speaker 1: at the top of my head I can think of,
Speaker 1: you know, flying private planes to Coachella that literally added
Speaker 1: up to twenty eight million dollars or twenty five people.
Speaker 1: And so people aren you know, spending ten thousand dollars
Speaker 1: on tenths to listen to music and play like their
Speaker 1: bohem and fly in on Gulf Streams, which you know
Speaker 1: cost one hundred and fifty thousand dollars each flight, and
Speaker 1: then the fuel. So I'm just saying Devil's advocate Emorda
Speaker 1: is in a Mercedes Sprinter talking about privilege and waste
Speaker 1: of resources, and I can't fucking wait for Saturday Night Live,
Speaker 1: like I need to play Amorda in the car. It's
Speaker 1: just and I like Amorta, and she made a point,
Speaker 1: but it's just funny also when it's like, these people
Speaker 1: don't live the life of the woman who you know
Speaker 1: intimately understands the price of eggs and milk. So the
Speaker 1: whole thing, as I said in a TikTok, it's a
Speaker 1: circular reference of satire. The whole Space Odyssey is a
Speaker 1: complete bag of bullshit from head to toe, and everyone
Speaker 1: commenting on it, like you just have to say, people
Speaker 1: did what the fuck they want and that's why they
Speaker 1: went to space, and you wanted to go or you
Speaker 1: didn't want to go, And it's being publicized because it
Speaker 1: doesn't feel like something that happens every day. And now
Speaker 1: people aren't having it. They just don't like the way
Speaker 1: it's been fed to them. So sorry, you're welcome. I've
Speaker 1: been thinking about the Space Odyssey and Oprah and Chris
Speaker 1: Jenner and Chloe Kardashian being on this Space tarmac, and
Speaker 1: it's reminding me of something that I've thought for a while,
Speaker 1: which is that in many cases, the sum is greater
Speaker 1: than its parts, meaning boats rise with the tide. So
Speaker 1: like you get Kim Kardashian and Kanye together as celebrities,
Speaker 1: but together they were stratospheric George Clooney and Amal, Victoria
Speaker 1: Beckham and David Beckham, Like there are situations where two
Speaker 1: people get together Jay Z and Beyonce and the combination
Speaker 1: is explosive, And then there are examples of combinations that
Speaker 1: trigger people. So when you get together a certain type
Speaker 1: and level of privilege, it triggers people. So when you
Speaker 1: get Megan Markle and Oprah and Ellen together in Montecito,
Speaker 1: while they're all smart, successful, strong, beautiful women, it bothers
Speaker 1: people because it's sort of like a rich person's club.
Speaker 1: When you get Elon Musk and Mark Zuckerberg and Trump together,
Speaker 1: it bothers people, like it turns people off about the
Speaker 1: individuals where it's not a sum is greater than its parts. Okay,
Speaker 1: you got Lauren Sanchez and Jeff Bezos together and that
Speaker 1: was a sum is greater than its parts. Like he
Speaker 1: seemed like a nerdy Amazon guy married to like a
Speaker 1: normal intellectual a woman and she was not really known
Speaker 1: at all, but the combination was like Bam and she's
Speaker 1: lying helicopters, and it's like, okay, they're on the map.
Speaker 1: But when you put Lauren Sanchez together with the Kardashians,
Speaker 1: it reaches a point of diminishing return. Now it feels
Speaker 1: like the Kardashians are hanging out with Lauren Sanchez because
Speaker 1: she's marrying a billionaire. And now it seems like Lauren
Speaker 1: Sanchez is hanging out with the Kardashians because it's like,
Speaker 1: now we're all rich and famous together and we hang
Speaker 1: out on the back of boats. So Lauren Sanchez and
Speaker 1: Jeff Bezos elevates both of them, Lauren Sanchez and the
Speaker 1: Kardashians takes it all down. And I know you agree
Speaker 1: because I know it's true because I hear people like
Speaker 1: ugh and it's like why, uh, you may like them individually, like,
Speaker 1: you can't disrespect what the Kardashians have built as entrepreneurs,
Speaker 1: as business people, as you know, influencers. You can like them,
Speaker 1: you can hate them, but you can't knock it. Megan
Speaker 1: Markle moves product has influence. Is a beautiful woman bagged
Speaker 1: and landed a prince in her own right as a
Speaker 1: successful actress, and he feels lucky to be with two
Speaker 1: of them in ways elevated each other, like he was
Speaker 1: sort of the other son. She was an unknown actress
Speaker 1: by most people, and together they became relevant and they
Speaker 1: became a unit. So it's just an interesting concept how
Speaker 1: we are the company we keep and people judge it differently.
Speaker 1: Sometimes you get with someone and it's like a power
Speaker 1: couple or a power combat. Okay, Gigi Hadid and Taylor Swift,
Speaker 1: that's like elevated. It used to be Blake Lively in
Speaker 1: that group sort of, but and now Blake Lively is
Speaker 1: a drag on the ticket. But like you get these
Speaker 1: like young supermodels together, you're like, oh my god, we
Speaker 1: caught Gig and Bella and this one out to dinner
Speaker 1: like bam, we like it. But then you have other
Speaker 1: ones added to the mixture, like, eh, drag on the ticket.
Speaker 1: So I just find it to be an interesting concept,
Speaker 1: Like people do judge us by who we associate with,
Speaker 1: and sometimes we think it's good for us. I've thought
Speaker 1: it was Wow, I can't believe I'm invited to this,
Speaker 1: And then people around me and like, eh, I don't
Speaker 1: know if I like that. Look for you. Now I
Speaker 1: choose who I'm hanging out with. And sometimes I think
Speaker 1: someone's more elevated than people around me think like they're like, ugh,
Speaker 1: that is not the best look for you right now.
Speaker 1: Even if it's someone who's well known that looks trashy
Speaker 1: for you, I don't think that's the right look for
Speaker 1: you, you know. Like, so, if you are trying to build
Speaker 1: an image, this has nothing to do with who you're
Speaker 1: actually good friends with. Okay, I don't count brand new
Speaker 1: friends in the entertainment industry as friends like my friends
Speaker 1: I've had since high school. Those are the people that
Speaker 1: if there was a body in a dumpster or in
Speaker 1: the trunk of my car, they wouldn't I wouldn't even
Speaker 1: have to say, don't say anything, Okay, where's the shovel?
Speaker 1: But like anybody new in the land of Hollywood, you know,
Speaker 1: that's all fair game. And basically, people need to understand
Speaker 1: that there is an association and a connotation to people
Speaker 1: that we associate with the most, to the consort, to
Speaker 1: the conser