WEBVTT - Rookie 'Over/Unders'

0:00:01.440 --> 0:00:04.120
<v Speaker 1>High in. Hello football fan, your old pal Dave Damaschik here.

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you check out the Dave Damaschek Football Program.

0:00:07.200 --> 0:00:09.760
<v Speaker 1>You can watch it on YouTube, NFL dot com. You

0:00:09.760 --> 0:00:12.639
<v Speaker 1>can listen to it on iTunes or Stitcher or NFL

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash podcasts. We look at the world of

0:00:15.920 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>pro football and the game called life. Do you Around

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the NFL Podcast doesn't like other sports? Welcome back to

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>another edition to the Around the NFL Podcast. My name

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:35.720
<v Speaker 1>is Dan Janzas, and I am joined by a room

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:39.720
<v Speaker 1>filled with heroes, Mark Sessler, Chris Westling, and Greg Rosenthal.

0:00:39.760 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>What's up, boys? Hey dude, what is happening? What is

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>going on? Byway, that's not true that we don't like

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>other sports? West Monster, San Antonio Spurs fan. He's a

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>little nervous by the way to too now. I used

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>to be a softball fan until last Thursday night. Oh wow,

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh we're going there again. I was gonna say, Mark

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>is really the only one that doesn't like other sports.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm jumping back. I love tennis. We've got so much

0:01:06.440 --> 0:01:10.039
<v Speaker 1>available time, and you know, watching or latching onto another

0:01:10.080 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>sport does not crack my top fifty of things I

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 1>want to do during the NFL off season. It's about escapism.

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>When you're working in a cubicle at some law firm,

0:01:19.480 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>football as your escape. When you're covering football all day,

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:24.360
<v Speaker 1>sports are no longer what you want to escape to

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>when you get home. Softball is supposed to be your

0:01:26.360 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>guys escape. Well, it was an escape from fun before

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the team even started Thursday night, I was watching warmups

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and realized that my little uh diva act about the

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>starting lineup where I was batting meant absolutely nothing. I

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:44.680
<v Speaker 1>could have batted in this game and it wouldn't have mattered.

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why we're talking about softball again to

0:01:46.959 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>leave the show, but I will say it was on

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Sinko demyo. The game was played, and I got to

0:01:51.440 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>the field about a half hour before is a good

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>captain slash manager, Mr Manager, And when half my team

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>rolled in a little woozy for first pitch, that's when

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I knew the game was over. Had nothing to do

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>with the outcome they were west was with some of

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:06.200
<v Speaker 1>those people. I just want to say, that's that's my

0:02:06.280 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>number three hitter. No, I'm not your number three hitters.

0:02:09.480 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>So if you're not gonna put heard I might as

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.119
<v Speaker 1>well as well, wait and don't bury the lead here day,

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Reggie Jackson over here, the fearless, fearless leader on top

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>of the team is terrible. Let's start with there. But

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:21.400
<v Speaker 1>on top of it you you come out of the

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>game just a waste of three hours of your time

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.720
<v Speaker 1>with a torn hamstring. I tore my hamstring. Yeah, on

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:30.160
<v Speaker 1>the second to the last play of the game, of

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 1>all things, on the groundball in the second down one

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>six um. I had a tear in my hamstring, blood

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>under the skin. Very disgusting, very painful. I could not

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 1>bend down all weekend, which made Mother's Day on Sunday

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fun. When you're you're a big part

0:02:45.600 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of Mother's Day and west one day you will learn

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>the same thing is you're supposed to kind of pick

0:02:52.200 --> 0:02:55.880
<v Speaker 1>up the mantle of almost both parents. You're supposed to

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 1>be the one doing the heavy lifting the least and

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.799
<v Speaker 1>let and let mom enjoy her day. Is certainly does

0:03:00.880 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>deserve it. We have we're all very lucky to have

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 1>great wives. But that's very hard to do when you

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:07.800
<v Speaker 1>have a two almost a two year old and a

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:11.000
<v Speaker 1>torn hamstring trying to run around, bend over he's asking

0:03:11.040 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>for you to pick him up every like thirty one seconds. Uh,

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>just a total the total misery show for the old

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Zuser on Sunday, let the record show in a game

0:03:19.280 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>which we had no chance to win, down at least

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:25.400
<v Speaker 1>fifteen runs, the old Zuser was hustling down the first bason. Literally,

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>if I had to make a list of the ten

0:03:27.680 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>stupidest things I've ever done, it was busting it down

0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the first base line, down one six in the last inning.

0:03:33.880 --> 0:03:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Two spots up on that list, forming the softball team

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>to begin with, I saw the sniper up in the

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.400
<v Speaker 1>trees when you went down like a sack of potabo,

0:03:41.440 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I didn't go quite. I almost went collapse, which it

0:03:44.160 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>would been even more tragic. But two big signings by

0:03:46.880 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>the Way softball team. We have some issues on the

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>on the female side of the ball. Uh not pointing fingers,

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.600
<v Speaker 1>but we need to to juice up the roster on

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:57.920
<v Speaker 1>that side. Two big signings over the weekend. So we'll

0:03:57.920 --> 0:03:59.240
<v Speaker 1>see if it makes a difference. And we'll keep you

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>guys track, uh, you know, keep you guys up to date.

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I know a lot of people are interested. And before

0:04:04.760 --> 0:04:06.640
<v Speaker 1>you write it off, mark or only one in one.

0:04:07.240 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 1>I believe that's a ton of work this weekend in

0:04:10.360 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>a behind the scenes scouting project that someone else can

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 1>take credit for when it works. Your due diligence, Your

0:04:16.400 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 1>due diligence is something to behold. I would just say,

0:04:18.400 --> 0:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>anyone on the roster, male or female, that continues to

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>not perform, we've got other options. Absolutely, today's podcast, um

0:04:28.400 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is a solid one. I'm going to give it a

0:04:30.360 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>pre show grade of a B plus. That's like your

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.000
<v Speaker 1>default pre show, steady pre show. I mean, if it

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:38.839
<v Speaker 1>was less than a B plus, I'd be worried about

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the direction of the show in general. But I'm proud

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of the show, and I believe every show has the

0:04:43.839 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 1>potential to be a an A. But it's got to

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 1>start somewhere, and that's B plus. And what we're gonna

0:04:48.760 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>do today, I'm great. Yeah, I'm fantastic. You're watching some

0:04:54.920 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>tennis on Mother's Day. That's kind of cheating. What do

0:04:57.800 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you mean, not at all? You're watching the Spanish Open?

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I heard what are you talking about it? On Mother's Day?

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Is there a Spanish Open? Uh? Madrid? You know? Wrapped up?

0:05:06.520 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>I watched Saturday, some good some good actions Saturday. That

0:05:10.360 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>was not Mother's Day though. Yeah. Um, well, good to

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>see you. A good topic today, we're this segment. It's

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:24.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a segment called over under on rookies and

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>using one of those what are they called amber sands

0:05:28.480 --> 0:05:33.839
<v Speaker 1>ampersand amber sand emper amper sand old place old faces

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>slash new places. So we're gonna we're gonna take all

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>the rookies, all the guy veterans that are in new places,

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and I will throw out some over unders on their

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:48.720
<v Speaker 1>production in the twenty six season and we'll see where

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we all come down. And and you guys are always

0:05:50.960 --> 0:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>welcome to throw in some of your own. Uh. So

0:05:53.400 --> 0:05:57.800
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna be fun. News is fun too. There's always

0:05:57.880 --> 0:05:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a ton of stuff to talk about in the end

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of the even in this quiet time. So why don't

0:06:01.680 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 1>we get to it? Uh, the irishman behind the glass?

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>How you doing, buddy, I'm doing great? Great? Would you

0:06:06.440 --> 0:06:08.520
<v Speaker 1>mind if we started the news? Of course? You know

0:06:08.600 --> 0:06:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you're a line. I think you're great. You're my best friend.

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Anybody you've lost me on that one. It's usually the office, Yeah,

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:24.479
<v Speaker 1>that would be my guess, but I don't. Is it

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the office? Yeah, it's Michael the Toby is it late period?

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>Office season five? All right? So you're still leaning a

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 1>little on the late side, dude, I want five? Come on, man,

0:06:33.680 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>that the other one was like eight that I did.

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>So let's if we're gonna use all right, I'm gonna

0:06:37.160 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>make a rule here, and you know I love your

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>work behind the glass and I don't follow your rules.

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>But go on listen. You won't work here anymore. Um,

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I won't after October anyway. Well, I will shut you

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.880
<v Speaker 1>down completely, irishman. If you don't listen to me right now.

0:06:51.360 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>Season one through three of the Office is the only

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 1>drops you're allowed to use. I don't want to be

0:06:55.520 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>this guy, but I gotta be, because Mark, you know

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>anything past season four, it's a night. I agree with

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you on this whole, total case study in our nation's

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:07.680
<v Speaker 1>inability to cut a show off when they should. That's fair,

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>complete inability to do that like Friends after the first

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>four episodes, you know, West, you're showing your age there.

0:07:13.520 --> 0:07:23.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, it's not Mash. I don't even due all right, okay, Brandon,

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. Oh, it's just you know, it might be

0:07:25.920 --> 0:07:27.960
<v Speaker 1>a millennial thing, like they thought The Office was a

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 1>show that should be looked at as a as a whole.

0:07:30.240 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>But let's you know, I'm gonna look. Greg wants us

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>to get into the news. I just well, because I'm

0:07:36.480 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>not allowed to share my opinions, which is like the

0:07:38.720 --> 0:07:42.840
<v Speaker 1>office in general. Well a, you just did well, I know,

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:46.600
<v Speaker 1>but you guys, I've made I've made that. No Martyr Rittie.

0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 1>No one wants to hear that. I just called the

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>back end of the show a waste of time. So

0:07:53.160 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>that's okay if you didn't like it that much. I

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 1>mean I watched it a couple of seasons and that

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was that was good. That was enough. I liked hearing

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:01.920
<v Speaker 1>your opinion on it. Greg. Wow, this is a new turn.

0:08:01.960 --> 0:08:05.000
<v Speaker 1>Greg's not allowed to give his apparently. Let's get going

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>with Sam Bradford, who uh you know, he sent his

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>his agent out to do a lot of dirty work

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>in the last few weeks, calling up any radio station

0:08:12.800 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>that would have him to uh, to spread the word

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that Sam Bradford did not want to be in Philadelphia anymore.

0:08:17.960 --> 0:08:19.680
<v Speaker 1>He wanted to be with the team that saw him

0:08:19.680 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>as a long term solution. But guess what, Mark Sellen,

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.600
<v Speaker 1>he didn't have any leverage Sam Bradford. So guess what

0:08:25.680 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>he has to get to work? So. NFL media insider

0:08:28.560 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Ian Rapp Report reported that Bradford officially returned to the

0:08:32.559 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Eagles facility Monday morning. Um we did. We then saw

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>some clips online and on Twitter of Bradford in action.

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So he is back. Uh. He released a statement, I'm

0:08:44.120 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 1>excited to be back on the field today with my

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>teammates and coaches. The business side of football is sometimes

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a necessary consideration. Blah blah blah blah blah blah blah.

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Greg your thoughts, None of this mattered. I didn't have

0:08:56.840 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that big of a problem with him doing it ahead

0:08:59.440 --> 0:09:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of time. He was trying to exercise the little leverage

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that he could to see if he could be the

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.040
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterback of the Broncos. That's basically what Ian Rapp

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Report reported today. I mean, they were hoping that something

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>could work out for Denver. It didn't work. He should

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>have just returned immediately after the draft when he realized

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work. He waits a week, He missed a

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of meaningless weeks, and he'll be their starter week one.

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm so sick of everybody trying to exercise whatever's can't

0:09:25.360 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>leverage they have, Yeah, instead of doing the common sense thing.

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.319
<v Speaker 1>The guy has been the most overpaid player in football

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 1>since he entered the league. He's about the best quarterback

0:09:34.440 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>in the NFL. Go compete. I'm sorry, I I agree

0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:40.000
<v Speaker 1>with that vantage point too. Like I totally understand everyone

0:09:40.040 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that has a big problem with it. I'm coming at

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it more that it's not gonna end up impacting the

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Eagles at all, that he's going to be their starter.

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I'd be really surprised if he was one of the

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>quicker he'll turns by the not a star player, but

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:55.719
<v Speaker 1>a well known quarterback that we've seen. Because even if

0:09:55.760 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>he was massively underwhelming with the Rams, there was a

0:09:59.559 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of optimism that he could have some sort of

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.760
<v Speaker 1>a comeback story and tell a nice tale last year,

0:10:04.800 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>at this time, last August. You know, so at this

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 1>point now, the minute that statement came out, all it

0:10:10.520 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>was was panned and snark and people just shooting it

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>down and seeing him as completely insincere. He was in

0:10:16.720 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a bad spot if he didn't battle this situation. But

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 1>he looks just like a bad teammate at this point

0:10:22.400 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>to a lot of people. All Right, he could not

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 1>have done more in in quicker time to get I mean,

0:10:28.240 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing happened, Nothing could have gone any worse in this scenario,

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 1>he basically just annoyed the entire city of Philadelphia and

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>got absolutely nothing out of it. Uh you know it's

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>uh the quiet time of the year when there's a

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>star player saying he can defy the odds and play

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>to an age that no one has ever thrived that before.

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.760
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson was that guy. An interview with Monday Morning Quarterback,

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.320
<v Speaker 1>he said that he he's thirty one years old now

0:10:52.360 --> 0:10:54.839
<v Speaker 1>coming off a rushing title, he believes he can play

0:10:54.880 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>at a high level until he's forty years old. Peterson

0:10:58.080 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>also had to say this about his team in the

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings, who of course won um double digit games

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.720
<v Speaker 1>and made the playoffs last year. We are going to

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.560
<v Speaker 1>have a good chance to win it this year. Win everything,

0:11:08.600 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>he told Peter King. Sit back and watch, Sit back

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and watch. You can be like I thought you guys

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.240
<v Speaker 1>were at least a couple of years away. Nope, you

0:11:15.280 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 1>sit back and watch this year, guys, West what is

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 1>more likely that Adrian Peterson is a productive running back

0:11:21.880 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 1>at age forty where the Vikings win the Super Bowl

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>this year. Vikings win the Super Bowl this year is

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>either likely no, Is it just me? Or does it?

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson tell this story to Peter King every year. Now, Well,

0:11:33.920 --> 0:11:36.000
<v Speaker 1>he always says he's gonna play the forty. He always

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>says he's gonna run, gonna break Emmitt Smith Vicker, this

0:11:39.080 --> 0:11:41.800
<v Speaker 1>is like the same story every offseason. I'm gonna play

0:11:41.840 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>forever the Vikings, I don't know. I'm just not sold

0:11:44.640 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>on their quarterback. And unless you have the Denver Broncos defense,

0:11:48.360 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you're not winning the Super Bowl without a high end quarterback.

0:11:51.400 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Big year for Teddy Bridgewater, obviously, Adrian Peterson thinks a

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:56.959
<v Speaker 1>lot of him uh to think that they have a

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>chance to really surprise people and go deep in the

0:11:58.920 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>playoffs and win it all. But he really needs to

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 1>take that next step. Maybe what they did by going

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and getting Treadwell on offense that will make a big difference.

0:12:06.840 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Adding Treadwell to Stefan Diggs and their white Out Corps.

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I think they'd be on the list of ten teams

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that could win a Super Bowl this year, at the

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.560
<v Speaker 1>back end of that list, but I put them on it.

0:12:16.720 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's been much more surprising Super Bowl champions

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:25.080
<v Speaker 1>than them. I think going into a season I don't

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:27.400
<v Speaker 1>like to coach a lot, they would be at the

0:12:27.520 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>very back end of that list for me. And when

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Peterson, I I'll believe that of all

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the running backs we've seen, he's the chance to play

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 1>deeper in his career and still be productive. But the

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>history is not on your side. The list of thirty

0:12:40.240 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>plus age running backs that have even had a thousand yards,

0:12:43.000 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it's very slim. I think the odds are he's gonna

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.120
<v Speaker 1>end up being the greatest old running back in NFL,

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:51.599
<v Speaker 1>the title which now is held by John Riggins Larry's on.

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think that guys that had big mid

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.200
<v Speaker 1>thirties didn't they use It's like Emmett Smith had some

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:59.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand John Henry Johnson, old Steelers running back, I believe great.

0:13:00.520 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I believe my boy Curtis Martin is the oldest player

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>to win a rushing title at age thirty two. So

0:13:05.320 --> 0:13:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's these guys fall off very This is a big

0:13:08.080 --> 0:13:10.079
<v Speaker 1>year for Adrian Peterson because you don't know how much

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:12.560
<v Speaker 1>longer he'll be a P, even if he thinks he

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>will be a P forever. Speaking of a player that

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.040
<v Speaker 1>fell off. Peyton Manning tough a year final year in

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the league. But you know, feel better with that Lombardi

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:23.520
<v Speaker 1>tro if you're in the Super Bowl ring. Now he's

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.360
<v Speaker 1>out of the league retired of course. Uh scheck O

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:28.640
<v Speaker 1>is a sandwiches. Has anybody heard a peep from Shack

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.640
<v Speaker 1>about because he said that uh Manning would have a

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>front office job by the draft cost himself three sandwiches?

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Have not heard anything from might be the biggest sandwich

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of sour that we know. So I would hope

0:13:41.000 --> 0:13:43.440
<v Speaker 1>we gotta truck. He's going to be high levels. Look,

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>I haven't even getten mind, I haven't even gotten mine

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>too that I won from him last year. All right, oh,

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>little debbut that might be ground to take away this. Yeah,

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:54.640
<v Speaker 1>we might have to get Scheck in here to talk

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>about this situation that's brewing. But anyway, so Peyton Manny

0:13:57.559 --> 0:13:59.480
<v Speaker 1>has time on his hands, is what I'm trying to say.

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>And Barry Jackson of the Miami Herald reports that Peyton

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>visited Dolphins headquarters earlier the earlier this spring to meet

0:14:07.559 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>with his former offensive coordinator Adam Gates, who now, of

0:14:11.000 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>course is the coach of the Dolphins and to help

0:14:13.240 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>instruct quarterback Ryan Tannehill. Here's a quote from Tannehill Mark Sessler.

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 1>It was really cool a guy that had his career

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>the living legend that he is, coming off a Super

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Bowl winning season. It was really cool just to be

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>able to sit back and pick his brain about things

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>he's done in this offense and football in general. Uh,

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.520
<v Speaker 1>do you think this could make a difference? Do you

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 1>think Ryan Tannehill, a guy who's entering a if listen,

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater is entering a huge year. What does that

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>mean for Ryan Tannell's even begger? What would this help him?

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I think if he if it blooms into the situation

0:14:45.960 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 1>where Tannehill and and Manning could text back and forth

0:14:49.720 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>during the year and you can bound stuff off him.

0:14:51.800 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>It is a great situation. It also tells me that

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>anyone that thinks we're not gonna see Manning for the

0:14:56.680 --> 0:14:59.320
<v Speaker 1>next five ten years involved in some sort of football

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>scenari yo, nonsense. He can't stay away from the game.

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's a great start because under the

0:15:04.000 --> 0:15:07.120
<v Speaker 1>current cb A, these guys can't meet with their coaches,

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 1>and you can't Tanniel was just sitting there waiting to

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>get knowledge and to learn about the new scheme. This

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>was a perfect fill in the you know, the quiet

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>time of the year situation. Are you suggesting Adam Gaze uh,

0:15:19.040 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>surreptitiously used Peyton Manning as a sort of coaching trojan

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>horse and cheated. Look at you, Greg, I think you're

0:15:25.800 --> 0:15:28.840
<v Speaker 1>suggesting that. I think if God use a trojan horse

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>and thank you. But I'm a Dolphins fan. My favorite

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>part of this story is that Adam Gates carries that

0:15:33.240 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>much respect with Peyton Manning that he can just be Yeah,

0:15:35.560 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>those two were so tight though. I mean we about

0:15:38.120 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>reading between the lines as well. And Kevin Patra pointed

0:15:40.680 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>out and his right up on this, Uh, you know,

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>if we don't see Peyton Manning working with Paxton Lynch

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.040
<v Speaker 1>and the and the Broncos, but he's down in Miami

0:15:48.080 --> 0:15:50.440
<v Speaker 1>with his old boy, Adam Gaze, a little bad blood

0:15:50.480 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Denver side of things. I don't think it's

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 1>bad blood. It's awkward blood. I don't know awkward blood.

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know where it is, but I I would agree.

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Patra hit the nail on the head there.

0:16:02.240 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>He's not helping out, he's not helping out Kubiak and

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.200
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos. I don't remember those stories of Manning and

0:16:07.320 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Gaze like texting until two in the morning about just randomly.

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>It was almost inappropriate. But it's a good sign. It

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>it supports something I laed uh we did. I did

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a post collateral benefits who had a good draft for veterans,

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean Ryan Tannehill. For for a guy who struggled

0:16:27.280 --> 0:16:28.640
<v Speaker 1>last year and it's kind of in a key year

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:32.200
<v Speaker 1>of his career, they are doing everything possible to support him,

0:16:32.400 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>whether it's draft picks, whether it's you know, just saying

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he's our guy. There's no question not signing any backups,

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>getting a good coach that is a quarterback tutor getting

0:16:42.760 --> 0:16:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Now you get Peyton Manning in the mix, like they

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>are doing everything humanly possible for Ryan Tannehill to work.

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>So maybe I shouldn't give up on him. All right,

0:16:50.640 --> 0:16:53.240
<v Speaker 1>you're back up. I don't know, I I did. I

0:16:53.280 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 1>did drop number one in our making believe I'm not.

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not back on which one occupies the phou your

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 1>stable at Boys, Gino Smith or Ryan neither Uh. Speaking

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Dolphins, Cameron Wake has agreed to a contract

0:17:07.840 --> 0:17:13.199
<v Speaker 1>extension with the team UH. The deal UH is extends

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.679
<v Speaker 1>him through the seventeen season, so that's two years. The

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>deal includes ten million guaranteed, can make almost eighteen million

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 1>over the next two years. Rap Sheet reported UH same

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Cameron Wake sneaky old by the way, sneaky old Hall

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:29.119
<v Speaker 1>of Fame UH thirty four years old coming off a

0:17:29.200 --> 0:17:32.960
<v Speaker 1>torn achilles ended the season midway through UH last year,

0:17:33.320 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but has been one of the best pass rushers in

0:17:35.560 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the league when healthy UH since about two thousand ten

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>or so, I'd say, UM, and now he sticks around

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>with the Miami team that also, of course brought in

0:17:44.080 --> 0:17:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Mario Williams. What do you guys think about this move?

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an example of a team that hasn't

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>managed its cap well having to hold its nose and

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>do something that they don't want to do. I've I've

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about how cap problems are overrated. You can always

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:00.760
<v Speaker 1>figure ways around. Well, how you figure way around him

0:18:00.840 --> 0:18:04.480
<v Speaker 1>is giving ten million dollars guaranteed to a guy that's

0:18:04.560 --> 0:18:06.879
<v Speaker 1>in that's coming off a torn achilles and his thirty

0:18:06.880 --> 0:18:08.560
<v Speaker 1>four years old, and you and you have to put

0:18:08.640 --> 0:18:10.119
<v Speaker 1>him on the team the next two years. When you

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:12.320
<v Speaker 1>have no idea if he's going to be healthy or not,

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:14.560
<v Speaker 1>but it lowers his cap number for this year, and

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>that was what they were trying to do. Pretty damning

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>review hard to I'm just saying, these are these are

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the types of things you have to do because because otherwise,

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>like he seemed like a guy that might get cut,

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>they're saying he won't even start and he was gonna

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>get paid eight million dollars this year. So that's a

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.239
<v Speaker 1>weird it's a weird combination. We have a model for this.

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Robert manthis around the same age ruptures Achille ten and

0:18:36.359 --> 0:18:39.280
<v Speaker 1>came back had about seven sacks, but almost a non factor.

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Other pay cut news Danny Ammondola UH is staying with

0:18:45.840 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots, but it cost him. Rap Sheet reports that

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the Whiteout has agreed to a restructure two year deal

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.879
<v Speaker 1>that will pay him seven point three five million, with

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>another seven fifty k available and bonuses and incentives. Uh.

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:00.399
<v Speaker 1>He was initially slated to make twelve million over the

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>next two years. UH. So it's a big haircut industry

0:19:04.520 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>term for a guy that now was competing with UH

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>seven eleven always opened Chris Hogan, UH, Greg your thoughts

0:19:11.320 --> 0:19:15.119
<v Speaker 1>on this well, it's unheard. Well, I can't remember a

0:19:15.119 --> 0:19:18.240
<v Speaker 1>guy taking a page. Can I just say, when where

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:19.640
<v Speaker 1>did this come from? That we didn't want to hear

0:19:19.640 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Greg's a page. I don't know what was that about.

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I didn't mean it do anything. It wasn't that anything

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:27.919
<v Speaker 1>you wanted to hear. I didn't want to be the

0:19:28.000 --> 0:19:30.800
<v Speaker 1>third in the punch bowl telling you, guys, this show

0:19:30.960 --> 0:19:33.480
<v Speaker 1>that means so much to you, that's your favorite show

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of all time. You've said early in the season, and

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 1>then you don't want to be the guy who's like, yeah,

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not It was minutes before the episode when I

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:44.840
<v Speaker 1>had suggested a book for people to read, and Greg

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:48.120
<v Speaker 1>basically just said, NAT, don't waste your time, dumb book,

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and like I so that it was like in real time,

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:52.960
<v Speaker 1>like five minutes later he'd had to well and in

0:19:53.000 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>a show that you love, and suddenly he's playing, well, well,

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>we have a little bit of context. I didn't know

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>that had not forgot it my wrong. I grant Also,

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you said immediately after that, oh, no, don't don't worry.

0:20:05.000 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I feel, you know, I could care

0:20:07.000 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 1>less what you think about the book, but that when

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:11.040
<v Speaker 1>you start to piece together history. You're you're reigning on

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone's parade. Probably the problem part of the book problem,

0:20:16.080 --> 0:20:19.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, not to sidebar too far. Everyone gets

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>all excited, everyone gets on these group texts of oh

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.879
<v Speaker 1>we're starting a book club. Everyone read this book, like

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we're reading it right now. Is like, all right, I'm

0:20:25.920 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>not going to get left out of this book thing.

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:29.399
<v Speaker 1>I love books. So I drop a book i'm in

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:33.560
<v Speaker 1>love with to crank through Libra by DeLillo, which was

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:36.520
<v Speaker 1>a slog thinking I'm falling behind, and I'm like, you know,

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I see the text book. Oh it's like six months later,

0:20:38.920 --> 0:20:41.639
<v Speaker 1>no one's read the book except for Gonzo John Gonzalez,

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>at least for me, reality said, and I got the book,

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and then I realized that between work and trying to

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>maintain a marriage and a young child, that Don de

0:20:50.119 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Leo's book is not high up on the all understandable.

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll understand. I'm powering through, trying to get it done

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in like ten days or so, because I could again

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>with the martyr scenario, you and I, poor Gregg has

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to read a book. You and I have total opposing

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.520
<v Speaker 1>views on books. My philosophy is life's too short to

0:21:07.560 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>stay with a bad book. You've got a hundred other

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:14.720
<v Speaker 1>books that could interest you. Think, by the way, not

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:18.679
<v Speaker 1>a book. It's not a bad vigorous intellectual discipline in

0:21:18.800 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 1>staying with a book, seeing it all the way through,

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>even if it doesn't move themselves. As a team player,

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:26.120
<v Speaker 1>it was part of the book club. I didn't want

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to let the team down. Me me, me, it's about me,

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>that's it. I didn't think it was that bad book.

0:21:35.200 --> 0:21:38.159
<v Speaker 1>It is widely as people is a master work. I mean,

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>if you don't like it, that's your opinion. Good for you.

0:21:42.720 --> 0:21:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh Amndola, who even cares about this guy? No, I'm

0:21:46.000 --> 0:21:50.000
<v Speaker 1>just it's a reminder of how bad the owners and

0:21:50.080 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>teams have players over a barrel in contracts. The Amundla,

0:21:54.200 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>who was a big part of them winning the Super

0:21:55.800 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Bowl two years ago, ended up taking pay cuts in

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.720
<v Speaker 1>back to back season, which is unheard of, and yet

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you never see them just offer Julian Edelman a nice

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>big bump after they get him signed to a wildly

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>underperforming contract. But if Amon Dola's worse than you thought

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 1>he was gonna be, take a pay cut or you're

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.480
<v Speaker 1>taking a hike. Well your point on Edelman as well said,

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:20.000
<v Speaker 1>but I think I I look at this like Am

0:22:20.040 --> 0:22:22.440
<v Speaker 1>and dol and the Patriots used common sense. Am and

0:22:22.480 --> 0:22:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Doula isn't good enough to make five or six million dollars.

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>He's a very good second, third receiver, fourth fiddle in

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>your offense. But he should be. He's a guy who

0:22:30.800 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>should be making two and a half to three million.

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 1>And they found common ground and everybody wins. And if

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 1>he stages some sort of you know scenario where doesn't

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>want to stay and he ends up on the open market,

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>he's not gonna make what he's making now with the Patriots.

0:22:45.080 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>UH to two more quick notes before we UH and

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>today's news segment. Congratulations to Antonio Crimarti and his wife

0:22:53.200 --> 0:22:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Tarika or Terraka probably a Terrika because that's too close

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to Terrible, So it'd be to Rica have welcomed twins,

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:08.200
<v Speaker 1>the Cornerbacks eleven and twelve children after, of course, uh

0:23:08.440 --> 0:23:12.239
<v Speaker 1>Terika got pregnant after Antonio's vast ectomy. Have you heard

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:15.479
<v Speaker 1>about this, Mark, Yes, I'd scare you at all, by

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the way, and that's you know, two kids, you're done.

0:23:19.240 --> 0:23:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I would think you're I would never have that procedure

0:23:21.800 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>done on my body to begin with, you wouldn't um

0:23:24.680 --> 0:23:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the name of the baby boys, a boy and a girl. Uh.

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>For the kid's name is Jinks. I don't know if

0:23:30.080 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that's tied into the vasectomy thing or no, is it?

0:23:34.119 --> 0:23:38.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even joking. I don't think it was kind

0:23:38.200 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of a jinx j y n X. I don't think so,

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and then that would be horrible. Little girl is j

0:23:44.800 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 1>j Adore. Now I'm struggling with these names Jayadore, not

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Navi Cremarti. So congratulations that one rolls off the tongue.

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:56.119
<v Speaker 1>He struggled to all his children during that one infamous

0:23:56.119 --> 0:23:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Hard Knocks segments. So maybe he's coming up with names

0:23:58.640 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>that are in any stay unforgettable. Twelve twelve children by

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>eight different women. Absolutely's elite when it comes to procreation.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Uh doesn't have a job either. By the way, I

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>wonder if that's gonna the other shoe will drop there,

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>because he still could play a little bit. Wouldn't be

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:18.400
<v Speaker 1>surprised if the Jets uh back. They've showed some willingness

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to not completely you know, we're there's some complaints circling

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>around the office that are you we had to handle

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:26.399
<v Speaker 1>one or two children during Mother's Day. Well, if you're

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Antonio Crimardi, you're gonna be tested. All your limits will

0:24:30.080 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>be tested, banged in a big spot. Uh. Mike Drico,

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>it's official, leaving ESPN for NBC, one of the great

0:24:37.359 --> 0:24:41.159
<v Speaker 1>play by play men of his generation. Uh. Here's the

0:24:41.240 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>quote from Sam Flood, executive producer of NBC Sports, and

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:48.119
<v Speaker 1>I agree with every damn word. Mike is an elite

0:24:48.160 --> 0:24:50.879
<v Speaker 1>talent who can contribute to all of our biggest events.

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>There you have it, Dreco, NBC look out, Al Michael's

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>love you, Al, love you baby, love your little Uh.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>You know there's subtle nods toward the gambling line at

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the end of each Sunday Night game sometimes of the

0:25:05.000 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>chemistry between you and Chris. But Mike Trico ain't signed

0:25:08.680 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>that contract to sit as somebody's backup for too long.

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:17.400
<v Speaker 1>You're absolutely this is the Packers drafting Aaron Rodgers. Well,

0:25:17.400 --> 0:25:20.160
<v Speaker 1>hopefully it's a cleaner transition than that. Oh, I'm sure

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 1>there would be some bad blood and your boy, a

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Boston product. Sean McDonough will replace Tariko and call games

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:30.000
<v Speaker 1>with Jon Gruden. Good to see him back on the

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 1>big stage. Sean mcdonne is great. I mean he does

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.680
<v Speaker 1>college football. That's a big stage. I guess used to

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>do the World series played by playman who Treka. Like

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>he's solid, he's great, I'm not. He doesn't excite me

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>like wow, like he excited. I think he's a unique talent.

0:25:45.520 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I agree with Dan even though he's not my of

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Like Greg's view of the office is how you view

0:25:50.000 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 1>Mike Treko. Yes, interesting, I think I'm more. I'm higher

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.840
<v Speaker 1>on Mike Treco, I'm high on the office. Fine. If

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 1>if Greg was sitting in a board room in two

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:02.960
<v Speaker 1>thousand five and seven out of ten, he was showing

0:26:03.000 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the pilot, he would have been like, nah, don't see.

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Did you know true fact? I worked at NBC Productions

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:12.080
<v Speaker 1>in their production office when the office was just stating

0:26:12.240 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>and when they were making the pilot. You've done a

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.720
<v Speaker 1>very indirect level, you could say, I even, you know,

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of, and your bad blood towards how that opportunity

0:26:20.640 --> 0:26:23.120
<v Speaker 1>ended led to how you felt about the office. It's

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 1>not true at all. Just trying we can agree on

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:31.080
<v Speaker 1>one thing. Greg Sean McDonough is a solid. We hear

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.840
<v Speaker 1>good buzz about him. Why think we've watched them? Have

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>we not? I mean, I don't remember anything that he's

0:26:35.880 --> 0:26:41.880
<v Speaker 1>ever done, really did the Joe Carter called then yes,

0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the Irishman And I'm just going to throw this out there.

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Season five of the Office had ten Emmy nominations. That

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>means nothing. Take it up with the Academy. I will

0:26:51.520 --> 0:26:53.880
<v Speaker 1>take a lot of things up with the Academy. Those

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:57.159
<v Speaker 1>awards are you could pick it up with the Academy

0:26:57.280 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have to put down the chisels. I'm sorry,

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and I want to pick up an Emmy for having

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>their back. Yeah, the same the same group of people

0:27:04.440 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that that believe Modern Family is forty five times better

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>show than The Wire. All right, that's what's happening in

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the news, all right, as promised. Oh, we love doing

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>over unders around here, some more than others. Greg loves

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.000
<v Speaker 1>doing over unders. I think we have to come up

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:20.960
<v Speaker 1>with another name for It's kind of like go get

0:27:21.000 --> 0:27:24.920
<v Speaker 1>my uh sandwich. It's offensive to women. No, Well, it

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just you know, gets to the the nature of the NFL.

0:27:28.880 --> 0:27:32.320
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, Okay, how Michael's has clever ways to

0:27:32.320 --> 0:27:33.919
<v Speaker 1>come up with things we might have to We might

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>have to come up with about high or lower? Yeah, higher, Bob,

0:27:39.240 --> 0:27:41.360
<v Speaker 1>How Michael's might be available for the podcast? How about

0:27:41.400 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>more or less for the same? Are about for now

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>we stick with over unders and then maybe we'll think

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>tank this over some coffee and Danish and get back

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to and anybody who's been asking, Yeah, spice Rack, the decision,

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:58.880
<v Speaker 1>No decision has been made. There's a tentative ban in place. Really.

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I got a fit teen hundred word email from the

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>spice Rack over the week words we're gonna read that

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.840
<v Speaker 1>on the separate spice Rack email podcast. Did he offer

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:14.200
<v Speaker 1>any sleeper rookie candidates and that waiting? He did offer them,

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and he explained, or at least he tried to explain

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 1>why he did not offer them on the podcast. Wow,

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>teasing the audience, he got inside his own head and

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:28.240
<v Speaker 1>started cooking dinner up there, couldn't finish. Wow. Are you

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.320
<v Speaker 1>saying that maybe we should, you know, have a little

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>leniency towards the appearance appearance given another shot? Is that

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.440
<v Speaker 1>where you're coming down on the l S. I believe

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we should, but I wouldn't want to speak for the

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 1>whole group on this issue. I believe in third and

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.280
<v Speaker 1>fourth chances, so I would can we can we post

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>this email somewhere we need offseason content. I feel like

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>there's I feel like there's part of it. We can

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>post him part of it I can't post. All right,

0:28:52.440 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>how about this. If Spice recks listening right now, and

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he might, you can come back on the

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>show if you allow us to publish your email in full.

0:29:03.120 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>We really can't do that. Maybe you haven't reddit page. Yeah,

0:29:06.320 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>we can do it on the reddit page. All right,

0:29:08.240 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>So here's the game over unders on rookies, am person,

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>old faces, slash new places to use that second and

0:29:18.960 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>between old faces new places. At don't want to do it.

0:29:22.800 --> 0:29:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't don't think it looks as good, So I'll

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 1>throw out a bunch of um, you know, um really

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>projections if you really want to get down to it

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 1>on the rookie class, and also any players veteran players

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that have changed addresses in this offseason. Um, if I

0:29:39.120 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>could just find my paperwork on this, and I have,

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and we will start with one of the more sexy

0:29:47.120 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>names out of the draft class, Cowboys running back Ezekiel Elliott. Okay, guys,

0:29:52.800 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>we're kind of gonna blow through these sometimes. Maybe if

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>for something we want to talk about on about a

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>player or team. Feel free to dig in a little bit.

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>But here we go, Ezekiel Elliott four hundred all purpose yards,

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>eight total touchdowns, three thirty touches. I'll go over on

0:30:13.840 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the yards and touchdowns over an immediate Pro Bowl type style. Well,

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 1>when rookie running backs don't play, it's usually because they're

0:30:23.760 --> 0:30:27.960
<v Speaker 1>lacking the fundamentals, especially pass blocking, and from all accounts,

0:30:27.960 --> 0:30:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that's his specialty. Yeah. Everything we keep hearing is that

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:36.040
<v Speaker 1>he's the almost the ultimate plug in play, uh, offensive player.

0:30:36.080 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>It's easier to transition at running back than in his

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:40.960
<v Speaker 1>other positions. And even beyond that, he is such a

0:30:40.960 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>well polished player. Yeah, I think that's conservative. Touches is

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the only one that is close. I did. I did

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 1>a piece trying to project that. I said three fifty

0:30:48.960 --> 0:30:51.920
<v Speaker 1>something like to you know, three hundred carries fifty catches

0:30:51.960 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 1>something like that. Uh, I mean, Geo Bernard's gotten twelve

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:57.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards from scrimmage and two of his three years.

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Four hundred yards from scrimmage is not a huge number. Uh.

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>If you're getting a lot of carries and you're active

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>in the receiving game. I'll throw it out there that

0:31:06.080 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>they do have a guy. It was a weird year

0:31:08.040 --> 0:31:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for running backs. I get it, but I think Darren

0:31:09.560 --> 0:31:11.280
<v Speaker 1>mc fadden was like third in the NFL and rushing

0:31:11.360 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 1>last year, third or fourth. And they have Alfred Morris

0:31:14.000 --> 0:31:16.479
<v Speaker 1>who they didn't sign for no reason. So there's some

0:31:16.600 --> 0:31:19.360
<v Speaker 1>there's some cooks back there, and they might want to

0:31:19.360 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>not burn out a rookie early in his career, a

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>guy they probably see is a ten year talent. Potentially

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go under across the board just because a

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>why not and be you know, weird things happen in

0:31:30.160 --> 0:31:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. They're not all good things, alright, predicting injuries

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:41.600
<v Speaker 1>out right now. He just didn't say injury. There's you know,

0:31:41.760 --> 0:31:46.680
<v Speaker 1>who knows what could happen to the entire world. Um, alright,

0:31:46.840 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of UH, I didn't say I

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:53.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm just saying I'm not It's like new Star. No,

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna I'm gonna slow down on that. Let's

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.360
<v Speaker 1>see what happens. I've been wrong of the time, so

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 1>this is good news for the three of you. I

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't say anything. Um, all right, here we go. Uh.

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.560
<v Speaker 1>In Denver, they have some interesting things going on at

0:32:06.600 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback position. Mark Sanchez and Paxton Lynch both new

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:14.120
<v Speaker 1>to the Broncos, so they're both tied into this and

0:32:14.160 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>it's a simple one. Paxton Lynch Lynch seven and a

0:32:18.080 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 1>half starts over under seven and a half. I'll take

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the over because I think it's probably closer to sixteen.

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the over for two words. Mark Sanchez, Okay,

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you put the number right at the right

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 1>spot there. Danny, Oh. Thanks. That means a lot coming

0:32:34.480 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>from you too, Do you know what I'm saying? Yeah,

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>because I like I like these numbers. I would have

0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>said I think he'll come in around week seven, weeks

0:32:44.960 --> 0:32:46.480
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight, so I guess that would be eight

0:32:46.520 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>or nine starts, assuming he stays healthy. I guess I'll

0:32:49.160 --> 0:32:52.160
<v Speaker 1>go slightly over. I think I think they will give

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a chance to Sanchez. When I was looking for when

0:32:54.200 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>will Lynch start a game, they they have a Thursday

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to Monday night transition with ten days in between after

0:32:59.280 --> 0:33:03.240
<v Speaker 1>six weeks, and that would set up Old Paxton for

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>his first art to be against the Houston Oilers and

0:33:06.080 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 1>brack Aswaler. Wouldn't that be something the Oilers Houston Texas.

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>I will I will use your own logic the east

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:14.120
<v Speaker 1>torn out which I which I grew with from the past,

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>which is week seven is a really, really long time

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>if things are not going well in Denver, right, And

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it could be by the end of week two that

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>people have had enough of Mark Sanchez and Elway has

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>already talked about Lynch is someone that could start a

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:29.440
<v Speaker 1>lot earlier than people think. I just think it's gonna

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.640
<v Speaker 1>be way before weeks seven. Your logic is sound on

0:33:32.640 --> 0:33:36.280
<v Speaker 1>one level and unsound on another. It's sound on multiple levels.

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.280
<v Speaker 1>But I will hear what you have the flannel felines

0:33:39.360 --> 0:33:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to my left here less and say that's a nice shirt.

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.800
<v Speaker 1>I like it. H you both stepping up the clothes

0:33:46.840 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>game in general. This plays well on an audio podcast,

0:33:49.960 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>stepping up my game for everything? Um, alright, West down

0:33:54.360 --> 0:33:57.400
<v Speaker 1>to seven Paxton Lynch, you guys think he's going to

0:33:57.440 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>be a starter at the gate or close to it,

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I will say, great marks your point. Mark Sanchez could

0:34:02.880 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>be a big problem after two or three weeks, but

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that to me he was the whole problem with banking

0:34:07.840 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 1>on Mark Sanchez in the first place. He might be

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>forced to go to a guy that's not ready because

0:34:12.239 --> 0:34:14.319
<v Speaker 1>the guy that he brought in Mark Sanchez isn't good.

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.520
<v Speaker 1>It could be a messy situation. But you're you're agreeing

0:34:17.560 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>with me, I am, but I'm saying it's because John

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Elway's gonna box himself in. He still has his anti

0:34:22.560 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>Elway point and ride that, ride that one and see

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.800
<v Speaker 1>where that's no way was John l Way ever banking

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:31.400
<v Speaker 1>on Mark Sanchez he was starting quarterback. I have not

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.640
<v Speaker 1>ruled out a case Keenum or someone like him, but

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>especially case Keenum introduction to the Broncos, whether it's in

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:40.520
<v Speaker 1>the next couple of months or it's early in training camp,

0:34:40.560 --> 0:34:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I could just can't you see that happening. It doesn't

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:44.279
<v Speaker 1>mean he's gonna be starting, but maybe he'll be an

0:34:44.280 --> 0:34:45.839
<v Speaker 1>option to start in the middle of I don't see

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:48.400
<v Speaker 1>it happening. For the reason why they didn't sign Horrier,

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:49.800
<v Speaker 1>because they want to give all these reps to the

0:34:49.840 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>two quarterbacks they have. All Right, let's move down. We

0:34:53.080 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 1>love talking about the a f C South now West,

0:34:54.880 --> 0:34:57.560
<v Speaker 1>what do you like to call it? That the area

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of the football world that doesn't get enough angle of

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the NFL, and Nashville is in that triangle, but maybe

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>not anymore, depending on how the season shapes up. But

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:12.880
<v Speaker 1>their new backfield um nucleus of DeMarco Murray and percent

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry. Here, we got start with DeMarco four point

0:35:18.680 --> 0:35:22.040
<v Speaker 1>zero yards per carry over under. I'm not saying anything

0:35:22.080 --> 0:35:25.760
<v Speaker 1>about it. His workload, no, just his yards per carry

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the season. DeMarco Murray. Okay, just Murray four point oh

0:35:30.080 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna average four yards to carry in Tennessee. It's

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:36.399
<v Speaker 1>a tough one. What was he last year? Three point

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 1>six and I think he was around five the year before.

0:35:39.200 --> 0:35:41.480
<v Speaker 1>That offense didn't really fit his skill set and his

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:43.840
<v Speaker 1>legs were tired from the year before. I mean, if

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:45.879
<v Speaker 1>you're buying the Titans at all, you gotta go over.

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I am buying the Titans. You gotta go over, and

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm going over. Then I'll go over to. I'm gonna

0:35:53.400 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 1>go under. I'm not really buying the Titans or Murray necessarily.

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.239
<v Speaker 1>The odds are guys like Murray don't really bounce back

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:03.279
<v Speaker 1>that hard. Maybe he bounces back to four oh four

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:08.400
<v Speaker 1>one and he's solid since entering the league. DeMarco um

0:36:08.400 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 1>five point five, four point one, five point to four

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>point seven and then led the league that year and

0:36:13.040 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 1>then a crash down to three point six last year,

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>so he's over five for his career. His career is

0:36:18.560 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>at four point six last year. I really dragged them down.

0:36:20.920 --> 0:36:23.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, can we view last years in everything that

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 1>could go wrong? Did situation or you could look at

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like it's coming back off of a five hundred

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:33.399
<v Speaker 1>touch season and he'll never quite be the same again. Yeah,

0:36:33.640 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>all right, but I'll play two games and have four

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>yards per carry. You often the guys with huge workloads

0:36:38.719 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>have a horrible next season and bounce back a little bit. Yeah,

0:36:42.920 --> 0:36:47.600
<v Speaker 1>and now this will play into the usage Derrick Henry

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>over under two hundred carries as a rookie under under.

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:55.319
<v Speaker 1>But if you said touches, I'd probably go I'd still

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:57.120
<v Speaker 1>go under. He wouldn't. He's not gonna have a lot

0:36:57.120 --> 0:36:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of catches, is he? In general, this guy depends who

0:36:59.600 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 1>you listened to. Like, the book on him from a

0:37:01.400 --> 0:37:03.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of people was he's not a great receiver, and

0:37:03.040 --> 0:37:05.239
<v Speaker 1>then when teams worked him out, they thought he looked

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:07.359
<v Speaker 1>like a really natural pass kid. Right, he never had

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>a chance in college. He has almost no production in

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the passing game. I had him around a hundred and

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 1>fifty touches. I think this is DeMarco Murray's offense, and

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.960
<v Speaker 1>unless it goes horribly wrong, Henry is gonna have games

0:37:20.000 --> 0:37:22.600
<v Speaker 1>where he gets six carries or something like that. I

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.560
<v Speaker 1>mean you said two hundred rushes. I mean there was

0:37:25.640 --> 0:37:28.879
<v Speaker 1>only one. Only Girly had among rookie running backs had

0:37:28.880 --> 0:37:31.520
<v Speaker 1>over two hundred last year. That's safely going to be

0:37:31.560 --> 0:37:33.839
<v Speaker 1>under I mean, this is the scenario where demarc Murray

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:36.600
<v Speaker 1>is the same player as he was last season. He stinks,

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:39.279
<v Speaker 1>and then the rookie shows something and starts taking over.

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:41.319
<v Speaker 1>The offense will be screaming for well. I think they'll

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 1>be trying to make it work with DeMarco Murray for

0:37:43.560 --> 0:37:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a large enough part of the season where it would

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>be late in the year that he gets close. If

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you're Henry, I had a I had a Henry one

0:37:49.200 --> 0:37:51.840
<v Speaker 1>while we're here. Oh yeah, let her might as well

0:37:52.239 --> 0:37:58.440
<v Speaker 1>over under Derrick Henry's carries over under DeVante Booker of

0:37:58.480 --> 0:38:01.960
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos carries. You are in love with Devontae Booker.

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:04.480
<v Speaker 1>It's a good situation. Now, I'll take I'll take Henry

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:08.000
<v Speaker 1>over Booker. Booker in Denver has a good chance to

0:38:08.120 --> 0:38:11.960
<v Speaker 1>supplant c J. Anderson, according to UH, according to a

0:38:12.000 --> 0:38:14.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of draft knicks. According to Daniel Deremiah thinks he's

0:38:14.680 --> 0:38:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the best. Thinks he is too. But they're not running

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the Denver Broncos. They didn't just hand C. J. Anderson

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:25.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty million dollars. He's making five million this year. I

0:38:25.080 --> 0:38:26.880
<v Speaker 1>think it would be a one in a one B

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 1>where he's playing the Ronnie Hillman and or he's playing

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:32.759
<v Speaker 1>what C. J. Anderson was last year. Anderson's no sure

0:38:32.800 --> 0:38:35.239
<v Speaker 1>bet to roll in top shape either. We've seen this

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:38.239
<v Speaker 1>multiple there. He was also the FCS best running back

0:38:38.280 --> 0:38:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and multiple teams. You know we're trying to hire DJs

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:43.960
<v Speaker 1>because he knows people were trying to hire C. J. Anderson.

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Two fair alright. I have a bit of this next one.

0:38:47.120 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I have a bit of a um Sessler. I think

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>Joey Bosa is gonna be a star in this league,

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:04.000
<v Speaker 1>guys and UH. I think he's gonna make an immediate

0:39:04.000 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>impact in San Diego. So I'm gonna put his over

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:10.840
<v Speaker 1>under sacks as a rookie nine and a half. Who's

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>coming with me? We're going out, Bob and beyond who

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 1>Joey Bosa, I'm going under on sacks. I don't know

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:19.960
<v Speaker 1>if that's the position he's gonna and I don't think

0:39:20.000 --> 0:39:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna rule he's gonna play. You don't think he's

0:39:22.120 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna I don't think he's gonna be like some terror

0:39:25.040 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>off the edge rusher. Well, I take him the third.

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they're kind of hoping he is on thumb level.

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go under because I think over time, if

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:36.400
<v Speaker 1>this actually was a thing that paid, you know, real money,

0:39:36.520 --> 0:39:39.359
<v Speaker 1>you'd probably do well betting unders on rookies having lots

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of sacks. That's hard. A lot of rookies have a

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:44.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of sacks. That's all I'm saying. I'll go with you.

0:39:45.000 --> 0:39:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm riding with the hands. I love it. And because

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I rode with you with p nin d X, I

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:51.279
<v Speaker 1>knew you could do it, and you really are doing

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:53.520
<v Speaker 1>a great job with it. And now you're riding with me.

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I will not prove you wrong. Carson Wentz and Jared

0:39:56.400 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>goth the one and to pick UH the number one

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and number two overall pick in this draft golf Number

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:06.799
<v Speaker 1>one UH. They will combine for sixteen and a half

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 1>starts over under sixteen and a half starts. Goff and Wentz.

0:40:11.840 --> 0:40:14.399
<v Speaker 1>This is the easiest one. Over Yeah, over, way over,

0:40:14.680 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>because golf is the over under onund golf might be

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:25.359
<v Speaker 1>sixteen injury probably about you're right? Uh, didn't you right?

0:40:25.640 --> 0:40:27.719
<v Speaker 1>Didn't you right? Greg? In a piece that I read

0:40:27.760 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and quite enjoyed that there was a real path to

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Carson Wentz just staying on the bench all year because

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:36.719
<v Speaker 1>the amount of money the Eagles have invested in their

0:40:36.760 --> 0:40:40.719
<v Speaker 1>quarterbacks this season. Yes, and now that Bradford is back

0:40:40.760 --> 0:40:43.399
<v Speaker 1>in the mix, that seems even more possible. But that

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:45.919
<v Speaker 1>felt like a position of mind that was a little

0:40:45.960 --> 0:40:49.319
<v Speaker 1>out on a limb. Probably not not everyone's expecting him

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:52.799
<v Speaker 1>to sit all year. So that's why I think it's

0:40:52.840 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 1>an easy one. I think it's safe that it's over.

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>It's I mean, you don't take these players one and

0:40:56.680 --> 0:40:59.040
<v Speaker 1>two if they're not gonna play much sooner than anyone's

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 1>saying I'm gonna sit for an entire year. My name

0:41:01.160 --> 0:41:03.799
<v Speaker 1>is Carson Wentz. Whatever. How about a tough week? Though

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:08.520
<v Speaker 1>for Chase Montana with Sam showing back up man, it

0:41:08.560 --> 0:41:11.719
<v Speaker 1>continues to make millions of dollars without actually exerting any

0:41:11.760 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 1>physical effort practice. I like him a lot, but his

0:41:18.560 --> 0:41:20.839
<v Speaker 1>career is beginning to look like one where he'll sit

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:22.880
<v Speaker 1>for nine and a half years. You have to go,

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to go to training camp and in practice

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and do all those sort of things. Well, you're right

0:41:27.920 --> 0:41:30.120
<v Speaker 1>about that, Les, you got one. I have an overund

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>over under three games before Devonte Booker becomes the greatest

0:41:35.680 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>fourth round pick in the history of football. Wow, you

0:41:38.680 --> 0:41:42.160
<v Speaker 1>just hate total shot at Greg. I don't. I don't

0:41:42.239 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 1>have any great belief. If he's so great, why did

0:41:45.719 --> 0:41:48.279
<v Speaker 1>he last to the fourth round. Everybody's convinced that this

0:41:48.320 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 1>guy is an awesome running back and he's a fairth

0:41:50.640 --> 0:41:54.120
<v Speaker 1>round pick. That's fair. Sometimes fourth round picks are good

0:41:55.920 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>out in private, I don't. It's just it's one hyped

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>rain West is not. I have one for you. I'm

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:04.160
<v Speaker 1>open minded too, but I just don't think, all right,

0:42:04.160 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>ce J Anderson's the best running back in then FC

0:42:06.280 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>down the stretch and a Super Bowl. You're a big

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Anderson fan, that's super Bowl hero. You're just gonna bench

0:42:10.840 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 1>him for some rookie that got drafted in like picks

0:42:14.600 --> 0:42:16.920
<v Speaker 1>in or whatever. I would think in a in a

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:20.560
<v Speaker 1>perfect world, if if you're believing in Booker, then Anderson

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:23.800
<v Speaker 1>gets two hundred and fifty touches and Booker gets two hundred,

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:26.759
<v Speaker 1>and it's a nice little group, that's all. It's nice

0:42:26.800 --> 0:42:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to share the wealth. Or Booker is Ronnie Humman. Yeah

0:42:30.480 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 1>he was drafted who really was drafted considerably higher and

0:42:33.239 --> 0:42:36.440
<v Speaker 1>came with just as much pub and didn't do one thing.

0:42:36.480 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 1>I found doing that running back piece. I mean, all

0:42:38.800 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of these fourth round, fifth round running backs were drafted

0:42:42.200 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>into perfect situations to get touches early. So if they're good,

0:42:46.800 --> 0:42:49.560
<v Speaker 1>there'll be some fourth or third rounders playing, whether it's

0:42:49.560 --> 0:42:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Seattle or Kenneth Dixon in Baltimore. Uh, you mentioned the Bears.

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a lot of open spots. You had one, Mark, Sure,

0:42:57.760 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>let's let's try it out. How many times during the

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 1>regular season, well, chip Kelly sneer with comprehensive disdain at

0:43:04.960 --> 0:43:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a reporter responding to a fair question with a mumbled

0:43:08.239 --> 0:43:12.640
<v Speaker 1>non answer. The borders psychologically on antisocial paranoia mixed with

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:15.879
<v Speaker 1>a raging sense of megalomania. I'm putting the over under

0:43:15.880 --> 0:43:19.000
<v Speaker 1>its sixty seven times during the regular season that Chip

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Kelly refuses to treat journalists like living, breathing human being

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:26.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven times. What say you, Well, I need to

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:28.320
<v Speaker 1>get a little history over, and well, who was it

0:43:28.400 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 1>last year? Who is keeping track of this like that?

0:43:31.520 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>Because that's important? Well, now I will I wasn't he

0:43:35.200 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't have the official year, but I mean we

0:43:38.400 --> 0:43:40.399
<v Speaker 1>have a sense. So you're saying that that's like every

0:43:40.440 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>time he speaks. So you're saying that the person who

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.120
<v Speaker 1>sets up the rules of the game also gets to

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 1>decide if it well, all right, we'll put a third

0:43:47.840 --> 0:43:50.760
<v Speaker 1>party who has stakes at it? Put a third party

0:43:50.760 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 1>at it. I don't are you talking about the Irish

0:43:52.320 --> 0:43:54.040
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like would take up a lot of time anyway,

0:43:54.080 --> 0:43:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So I'm happy to have someone else irishman's influence earlier today,

0:43:58.320 --> 0:44:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm going over. I am own way over because he meets.

0:44:02.520 --> 0:44:04.239
<v Speaker 1>He has to meet with the media four times a

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:07.720
<v Speaker 1>week at least during the season. Plus he got training camp.

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Ad that up. That's gotta be a hundred fifty times.

0:44:12.040 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>You don't think he can resist taking shots at journalists.

0:44:14.600 --> 0:44:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I think just being in the room he probably you

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 1>can ring the bell from I need a little perspective.

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:21.000
<v Speaker 1>I need to know, like, what's the average amount of

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:24.160
<v Speaker 1>sneers for a coach what's considered high, what's considered low.

0:44:24.200 --> 0:44:26.000
<v Speaker 1>It's got to be at the high end of this question.

0:44:26.080 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Seems like the smart money's on the over according to

0:44:28.000 --> 0:44:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Greg's math. I have to I'm gonna hold out on

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:33.320
<v Speaker 1>this one. This feels like a trap you can't vanish.

0:44:33.440 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Like Howard Hughes, he's got it. He said, he's got

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to be out there four or five times a week.

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:40.280
<v Speaker 1>It's probably on the higher end. What basically you're saying.

0:44:40.760 --> 0:44:43.799
<v Speaker 1>If you're saying under, you're saying, I believe that he

0:44:43.880 --> 0:44:46.839
<v Speaker 1>comes with a different attitude because I think his his

0:44:46.840 --> 0:44:51.280
<v Speaker 1>historical stats would would have gone over here and safely. Alright,

0:44:51.320 --> 0:44:54.080
<v Speaker 1>A couple more from me here. The top ten guys

0:44:54.080 --> 0:44:58.640
<v Speaker 1>in the draft real quick, Goff Wentz Bosa, Elliott Ramsey, Stanley,

0:44:59.040 --> 0:45:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Jack Conklin, my favorite name in the draft, DeForrest Buckner,

0:45:02.680 --> 0:45:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Leonard Floyd, and Eli Apple. Last year, guys, there were

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 1>three top ten players that went to the Pro Bowl,

0:45:10.600 --> 0:45:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Jameis Winston to Mary Cooper and Todd Gurley over under

0:45:14.760 --> 0:45:17.880
<v Speaker 1>for Pro Bowl selections. And keep in mind, sometimes it's

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this guy called in sick, this guy lost his homework,

0:45:20.520 --> 0:45:23.879
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah. That counts go to the Pro Bowl,

0:45:23.880 --> 0:45:25.160
<v Speaker 1>you go to the Pro Bowl two and a half.

0:45:25.160 --> 0:45:29.319
<v Speaker 1>Pro Bowl selections under two and a half, I would

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:31.440
<v Speaker 1>out of all I've gone on under at one. I

0:45:31.480 --> 0:45:33.239
<v Speaker 1>have no idea, but I don't even know how you

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:35.520
<v Speaker 1>figure it out when guy like Jamis Winston goes because

0:45:35.560 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven other people decided, you gotta figure Ezekiel Elliott

0:45:39.239 --> 0:45:41.279
<v Speaker 1>has the best chance of the rest of the top ten.

0:45:41.400 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 1>And then for everyone else that is an uphill battle

0:45:44.040 --> 0:45:45.799
<v Speaker 1>to try to make the Pro Bowl. I mean it's

0:45:45.840 --> 0:45:48.600
<v Speaker 1>an upbill battle for Elliott. Jalen Ramsey, I think he

0:45:48.640 --> 0:45:51.399
<v Speaker 1>would be uh to me, somebody who jumps out. I've

0:45:51.400 --> 0:45:54.560
<v Speaker 1>already stated that Joey Bosa could have an early breakout season.

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 1>You can. This is gonna sound like I'm being sarcastic,

0:45:58.280 --> 0:46:00.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'm a little surprised Brian Hoyer was not in

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the Pro Bowl. Issue by the time everyone tell if

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:06.319
<v Speaker 1>everyone takes vacations and says, no, I'm not going. I

0:46:06.320 --> 0:46:09.479
<v Speaker 1>mean they're down to the eight best quarterback I'll go under.

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Good question though, and one more here we go this

0:46:14.400 --> 0:46:18.120
<v Speaker 1>one should this should inspire some opinions on both sides.

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:22.719
<v Speaker 1>To Lollis the last one for me. Uh. Mario Williams

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and Jason Pierre Paul, two veteran pass rushers that inspire

0:46:27.719 --> 0:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of opinion. We have a sandwich prop based

0:46:33.480 --> 0:46:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on the only, the first ever sandwich prop that included

0:46:36.160 --> 0:46:40.560
<v Speaker 1>a named judges panel. Do you remember this? Someone asked

0:46:40.560 --> 0:46:43.759
<v Speaker 1>to decide who had a better season right between these two?

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Those two, and I didn't remember that. Yeah, I have

0:46:45.840 --> 0:46:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a west, says Mario, and a three man football panel

0:46:50.440 --> 0:46:53.719
<v Speaker 1>will decide. Uh. The over under is thirteen and a

0:46:53.760 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>half sacks combined. Vegas obviously doesn't not see this that

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>Williams will have to get at least a dozen for

0:47:04.239 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>either player. JP the you know the glove fits. He's

0:47:08.480 --> 0:47:13.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna get some sat past the quarterback. According to football

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 1>the club is off. JPP is gonna be great. Mario Williams,

0:47:17.960 --> 0:47:20.000
<v Speaker 1>even in a bad year, can get seven. So I'm

0:47:20.000 --> 0:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna go over. I'll go over because Williams will get

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>twelve and JPP will get as usual one, I'll go under.

0:47:26.760 --> 0:47:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I think, Williams says, the chance to be a total

0:47:28.680 --> 0:47:31.239
<v Speaker 1>headache if things go south. Mary Williams is playing for

0:47:31.239 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Dolphins on his third contract that's gonna go great.

0:47:34.320 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Does anybody know the history of the sport? And then

0:47:37.440 --> 0:47:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the guy with the finger problem, you know, got all

0:47:40.360 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the tools, couldn't bring guys down. I got a feeling

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be way under But getting the club off

0:47:46.640 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>is a huge thing though. That by president, I don't know,

0:47:50.560 --> 0:47:56.000
<v Speaker 1>because it seems impossible to tackle someone with the club. Well,

0:47:56.520 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I've never I can't wait. I'm on

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 1>this panel. Who also thought it was a me marking

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:02.799
<v Speaker 1>somebody else? Is that what it was? Yeah? I don't

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:05.040
<v Speaker 1>remember being named to a panel. Maybe you weren't here,

0:48:05.080 --> 0:48:08.200
<v Speaker 1>but there there was. It's on go get my lunch

0:48:08.280 --> 0:48:10.680
<v Speaker 1>dot org. So I'll find it while while we're talking.

0:48:10.760 --> 0:48:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking forward to this panel. Can't just name someone

0:48:13.400 --> 0:48:16.160
<v Speaker 1>to a panel when they're not here? Well, you don't

0:48:16.160 --> 0:48:18.400
<v Speaker 1>want to be on the panel. I just want to

0:48:18.400 --> 0:48:22.879
<v Speaker 1>be asked, Mark, will you be on the panel? Please? Wow?

0:48:23.120 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 1>This is it's a bad It's a bad thing. When

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:30.839
<v Speaker 1>Mario Williams has already been quoted saying he's much more

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:33.760
<v Speaker 1>focused this year and he's trying like that. Those quotes

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:36.279
<v Speaker 1>always bother you because you're just calling yourself out for

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:39.759
<v Speaker 1>not being focused at off. Enough of this guy come

0:48:39.760 --> 0:48:44.160
<v Speaker 1>back to us, Mario. Alright, one more from the Sizzler. Alright,

0:48:44.280 --> 0:48:46.319
<v Speaker 1>I had to, but I will just use one. Here

0:48:46.320 --> 0:48:49.719
<v Speaker 1>we go. How many posts? All right? The first one

0:48:49.800 --> 0:48:53.719
<v Speaker 1>is quick game losing flubbed field goals by hyper controversial

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:57.240
<v Speaker 1>rookie Bucks kicker Robert Guy Guyo. I put the number

0:48:57.280 --> 0:49:01.399
<v Speaker 1>at two game losing flubbed field goals. I'm giving them too.

0:49:01.480 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be under the microscope, so they're gonna be

0:49:03.640 --> 0:49:06.040
<v Speaker 1>two kicks that either they have a chance to tie

0:49:06.120 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>or win the game, and he'll miss them. Bingo, I'll

0:49:08.040 --> 0:49:11.120
<v Speaker 1>go under. You know what, I'm gonna say. The Bucks

0:49:11.160 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 1>brain trust nailed this, and he's gonna be a sensation,

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:17.640
<v Speaker 1>so I'll say under. I don't think he's gonna be

0:49:17.640 --> 0:49:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a sensation, but I also don't think he's gonna be

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:22.160
<v Speaker 1>flooding all these games, so I'll go still go under.

0:49:22.280 --> 0:49:25.720
<v Speaker 1>He'll he'll be the most entertaining Bucks kicker since Martin

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Grammatica injured himself. So Donald, I'm hoping you're right. I'm hoping,

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:33.800
<v Speaker 1>but you if you have a feeling it's gonna be

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>over now. No, I just think he's going to be

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on the radar any a lot of pressure on the

0:49:36.960 --> 0:49:39.320
<v Speaker 1>young kid, exactly. All right, here we go. How many

0:49:39.400 --> 0:49:43.160
<v Speaker 1>posts will the combine six A t N writers ultimately

0:49:43.920 --> 0:49:46.960
<v Speaker 1>pen on any Apple between today and the end of

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:49.920
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl fifty one. I'm putting the number at five.

0:49:51.880 --> 0:49:53.759
<v Speaker 1>Take the under I think this this is like her

0:49:53.800 --> 0:49:56.680
<v Speaker 1>fifteen minutes of fame. And I don't think she's gonna

0:49:56.760 --> 0:49:59.399
<v Speaker 1>She's not gonna have a state. Who is writing them? Well,

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:02.560
<v Speaker 1>all six combined, all of four of us in Connor

0:50:02.680 --> 0:50:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Or and Kevin Patra. I'll break this down a little

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:09.200
<v Speaker 1>bit too beyond um the that type of post would

0:50:09.280 --> 0:50:12.920
<v Speaker 1>usually fall under the old zeuser's domain. But I have

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 1>not been gripped by Antie apple fever. I think it's

0:50:16.160 --> 0:50:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a nice little story. She's outspoken, we've done as and

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:23.200
<v Speaker 1>she's funny on Twitter and and she's had some positive

0:50:23.560 --> 0:50:26.799
<v Speaker 1>network television appearances. But I have not written about her

0:50:26.880 --> 0:50:29.040
<v Speaker 1>yet for a reason. I'm just not as like an

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:31.799
<v Speaker 1>amored buyer. So then somebody else has to step up

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:34.399
<v Speaker 1>to do like kind of the pop culture NFL beat

0:50:34.440 --> 0:50:38.440
<v Speaker 1>on this, maybe maybe counter or I don't think Wes

0:50:38.560 --> 0:50:40.680
<v Speaker 1>is writing an Apple piece. I know Market's kind of

0:50:40.719 --> 0:50:42.720
<v Speaker 1>like I kind of like her. I would have written

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:45.439
<v Speaker 1>one last week interesting. We know Mark, Mark won't say

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 1>it on the pod, but there's been a lot of

0:50:47.000 --> 0:50:51.520
<v Speaker 1>anti Annie sentiment. Help me out. I'll stick up for Market.

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:54.960
<v Speaker 1>It has nothing to do with anti Apple. It's the reaction.

0:50:55.040 --> 0:50:58.360
<v Speaker 1>It's the I would say, going overboard reaction. Well, to

0:50:58.440 --> 0:51:00.400
<v Speaker 1>my point, you're not going to feed into it with

0:51:00.480 --> 0:51:02.840
<v Speaker 1>more media as you know, you're probably not going to

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>be involved. I would be hypocritical if I'm you know,

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:09.200
<v Speaker 1>antagonizing the media for too much attention than adding to it.

0:51:09.280 --> 0:51:11.359
<v Speaker 1>And then it's the Boss Patrick. I've done right now.

0:51:11.600 --> 0:51:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Patrick Patrick is not doing anything like that. He Patricks

0:51:15.200 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>a wild card. Yeah, he's not a bit of a

0:51:16.680 --> 0:51:18.440
<v Speaker 1>wild card. But I could also see him, you know,

0:51:18.480 --> 0:51:22.960
<v Speaker 1>doing the Patrick Oh, I'm not doing this. And then

0:51:23.000 --> 0:51:27.960
<v Speaker 1>there's Greg Patrick also just cranks out stories. You never know. Mark,

0:51:28.080 --> 0:51:31.160
<v Speaker 1>just to update you, you are on a five person panel.

0:51:32.440 --> 0:51:34.920
<v Speaker 1>You were not asked, you were assigned to the panel.

0:51:35.120 --> 0:51:37.879
<v Speaker 1>Would officially like to ask you, can you evaluate whether

0:51:38.000 --> 0:51:40.600
<v Speaker 1>JPP will have a better season or had a better

0:51:40.680 --> 0:51:42.399
<v Speaker 1>season than Mario Williams. At the end of the year,

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:46.439
<v Speaker 1>it's you Dan conn Or, Kevin Patrick and David Eally

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:49.680
<v Speaker 1>somehow Yeah, five person panel, A lot less work attached

0:51:49.719 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 1>to that. That was my main concern. I'll join that, pel.

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I think we needed an odd number. Yes, that's exactly

0:51:55.640 --> 0:51:58.200
<v Speaker 1>what it was. And I remember that now. Well, welcome aboard.

0:51:58.719 --> 0:52:02.000
<v Speaker 1>All right. So what are the anti Apple one? I'm

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:05.960
<v Speaker 1>going with? Under good for you? Yeah, under good one, Mark,

0:52:06.040 --> 0:52:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I can control that, all right. That's it. Taking the

0:52:09.360 --> 0:52:13.960
<v Speaker 1>desk rate it good pod guys, Solida minus um. We

0:52:14.040 --> 0:52:18.120
<v Speaker 1>will be back on Wednesday with another show. Three shows

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:20.719
<v Speaker 1>this week, everybody, um, so make sure you check it out.

0:52:20.760 --> 0:52:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday will have more great football talk, uh, which is

0:52:25.280 --> 0:52:28.239
<v Speaker 1>what we do on the show. Keep on leaving comments

0:52:28.760 --> 0:52:31.560
<v Speaker 1>over on iTunes, so make sure you check us out

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>on Wednesday. Is Dan hands a signing off for You're

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:41.160
<v Speaker 1>quiet Storm. They're busy on the research project, Mark, the mailman,

0:52:41.840 --> 0:52:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the boss and the irishman behind the glass. So Wednesday,

0:53:00.080 --> 0:53:11.360
<v Speaker 1>m where are you the way that you are? Honestly,

0:53:11.400 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 1>every time I try to do something fun or exciting,

0:53:15.120 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you make it not that way. I hate so much

0:53:22.200 --> 0:53:26.640
<v Speaker 1>about the things that you choose to be h