WEBVTT - Iran Pledges ‘Decisive’ Reply to US Strikes as Israel War Rages

0:00:02.759 --> 0:00:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the

0:00:10.640 --> 0:00:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live weekdays at ten am

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android Auto with the Bloomberg

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Business App. Listen on demand wherever you get your podcasts,

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>or watch us live on YouTube.

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 2>Obviously, the overarching news and market themes of the day

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.840
<v Speaker 2>is Israel hitting nuclear sites as the world is now

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:35.040
<v Speaker 2>awaiting Iron's response to the US wrecking its nuclear sites

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:37.600
<v Speaker 2>in Iran over the weekend as well. All right, joining

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 2>us now is doctor Aeriel Cohen, Senior Fellow Atlantic Council,

0:00:41.159 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 2>joining us on the latest. How do we rank the

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:46.720
<v Speaker 2>probability of an Ironium response?

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 3>It will be a response they unless the Iranian regime collapses.

0:00:54.240 --> 0:00:57.960
<v Speaker 3>They will be trying to save face. The problem is

0:00:58.000 --> 0:01:02.680
<v Speaker 3>their options are not great. One, they could try and

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 3>attack tankers, and we see that the tanker rates, the

0:01:07.040 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 3>insurance rates are all going already. Two, they could try

0:01:12.240 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 3>to mine or close the Strait of Hormus.

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 4>That will piss off.

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 3>Their Chinese customers and endanger their political support from China.

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.760
<v Speaker 3>Three we see that Russia is talking but so far

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:34.199
<v Speaker 3>is not getting involved. Why because Russia benefits from high

0:01:34.440 --> 0:01:37.760
<v Speaker 3>oil prices. The higher the prices, the happier puts in

0:01:38.080 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 3>is so what else can they do? They could attack

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 3>their neighbors. They would be cautious not to attack American Basis.

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 3>It looks like because they could already could have attacked,

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:56.000
<v Speaker 3>they didn't. The regime is have broken because a lot

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 3>of generals were taken out, so the decision making chain

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 3>is WOBBLI. But if the attack American Basis, us will

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 3>deliver devastating blows against their on if they attack the neighbors,

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:14.840
<v Speaker 3>same thing. And here's a question that a lot of

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:19.320
<v Speaker 3>people did not ask about the alleged closure of the

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 3>Strait of Hormus. The pathway in the strait is through

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 3>the Omani waters, it's not the Iranian waters.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 4>So are they going.

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 3>To endanger their fragile relationships with other Gulf states a

0:02:37.440 --> 0:02:42.200
<v Speaker 3>big question mark. Also, they're normalized with Saudi Arabia under

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 3>the Chinese umbrella, the China broker that deal. Are they

0:02:45.880 --> 0:02:50.080
<v Speaker 3>going to endanger both Saudi and China connections? So the

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 3>option don't look good for the regime. And what I

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 3>am worried about, what keeps me up at night, is

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 3>all that highly enriched uranian. They enriched several hundred kilos

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 3>to sixty percent. If the ability to build a deliverable

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:13.959
<v Speaker 3>nuclear weapon is destroyed, now what about a dirty bomb?

0:03:14.000 --> 0:03:15.680
<v Speaker 4>And I think that should be on the table.

0:03:16.200 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 3>US and Israel do not put regime change on the

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 3>table yet. All the Trump had these musings about it.

0:03:23.600 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 3>But all the boxes need to be changed in terms

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:31.520
<v Speaker 3>of ballistic missiles, in terms of enriched uranium, in terms

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:35.200
<v Speaker 3>of proxies, and eventually if we move to an agreement,

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 3>that should be addressed in the future.

0:03:37.760 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 5>Great Aeriel, is it your opinion that some people are

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 5>talking about regime change but that seems far fetched? Is

0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 5>your sense that if there were to be regime change

0:03:46.680 --> 0:03:50.400
<v Speaker 5>in around it would have to come organically from the people?

0:03:52.160 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 4>Absolutely one percent.

0:03:54.440 --> 0:04:00.400
<v Speaker 3>It's a country with three plus thousand year history, ninety

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 3>plus million people.

0:04:03.280 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 4>It's fractured. You have the Shah, the former.

0:04:06.760 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 3>Shah supporters, the Crown Prince lived several miles from me

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 3>here in Potomac, Maryland.

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:18.560
<v Speaker 4>We have the far left, the mujahidin Hulk people.

0:04:19.640 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 3>We have the liberals in the regime, and of course

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.120
<v Speaker 3>we have IRGC and the Mullahs.

0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 4>So different components with diametrically.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 3>Opposed views of Iran society, the role of religion, the

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.919
<v Speaker 3>role of women. Don't forget this is a regime that

0:04:40.279 --> 0:04:43.920
<v Speaker 3>was executing more people per capita than any other country

0:04:43.920 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 3>in the world. This is a regime that a woman

0:04:46.839 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 3>could be beaten and killed for not wearing the hijab

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 3>in a proper way. So a lot of people inside

0:04:54.800 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 3>Iran are very unhappy. But this is a totalitarian regime

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:01.839
<v Speaker 3>or quasi talk to all their terror or rechi that

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:07.040
<v Speaker 3>picks up, picks out dissidents and publishes them and kills.

0:05:06.800 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 2>Them, which then makes an internal regime change enormously complicated.

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, doctor aiel Colemen, thank you very much, senior

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.720
<v Speaker 2>fellow Atlanta Council, for the latest in the Middle East

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.080
<v Speaker 2>or of what the actual options may be for Iran

0:05:20.240 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 2>and the rest of the world.

0:05:23.240 --> 0:05:26.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:05:27.000 --> 0:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:05:33.480 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's turn to the non market reaction. I mean,

0:05:39.760 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 2>when you see the kind of headlines that we saw

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend. The impact was estimated to be huge

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.840
<v Speaker 2>on financial assets, and that has not seemed to play out.

0:05:47.880 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 2>Emily lavell as Chief investment officer in New Mexico Climate

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.720
<v Speaker 2>Investment Center broadcase, Emily here, what do you make of

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 2>what many are saying are a subdued market reaction?

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.680
<v Speaker 6>Hi, good morning to be here. I would agree.

0:06:01.760 --> 0:06:04.240
<v Speaker 7>I mean, I'm pretty surprised that the markets haven't reacted

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:06.520
<v Speaker 7>a lot more forcefully. I think that, you know, this

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:11.239
<v Speaker 7>attack really expands the range of potential outcomes and creates

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 7>a lot more potential downside and a lot more risk

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 7>in markets. And I think it just underscores the need,

0:06:16.560 --> 0:06:19.919
<v Speaker 7>the strategic need in the United States to have, you know,

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 7>sources of energy coming from from all different sources, because

0:06:23.600 --> 0:06:26.599
<v Speaker 7>you know, if we get an escalation from Aron, then

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.160
<v Speaker 7>we could really see, you know, some some pretty big

0:06:29.240 --> 0:06:32.600
<v Speaker 7>energy shocks which could really impact inflation and prices all

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:34.400
<v Speaker 7>across the world, the US being no exception.

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:40.560
<v Speaker 5>What does the Trump administration mean for climate? Your Climate

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 5>Investment Center thinking about alternative sources of energy?

0:06:45.760 --> 0:06:46.800
<v Speaker 4>How are you guys.

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 5>Kind of positioning what you do in terms of addressing

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 5>the challenges of climate change with this new administration.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.200
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, well, that's a it's a good question, it's a

0:06:56.240 --> 0:07:00.119
<v Speaker 7>tough question. I mean, honestly, you know green Banks if

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:02.200
<v Speaker 7>if you're not familiar with with what they are, you know,

0:07:02.240 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 7>we know that we need an estimated three and a

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 7>half trillion dollars of investment into the energy sector in

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 7>order to transition away from fossil fuels by twenty fifty.

0:07:10.240 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 6>And green Banks stand in almost.

0:07:12.760 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 7>Every state to really support that acceleration of the energy transition.

0:07:16.480 --> 0:07:19.560
<v Speaker 7>And you know, New Mexico is really interesting because we're

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 7>the second largest producer of oil and gas in the country,

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 7>but we're also second in wind potential, is second in

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 7>solar potential, third and wind, and sixth and geothermal, and

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 7>so the potential for real diversification of our economy is

0:07:33.480 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 7>really significant. Unfortunately, what the Trump administration is doing through

0:07:38.000 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 7>a variety of policies enacted, the most significant of which

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 7>is the budget bill, the reconciliation bill that's currently going

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 7>back and forth between the Senate and the House, is

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 7>it really removes the majority of the incentives that have

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 7>been in place since two thousand and five to bring

0:07:54.520 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 7>cleaner electrons onto the grid, and so you know, unfortunately,

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:00.800
<v Speaker 7>I think what that means for the whole economy is

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:05.600
<v Speaker 7>going to be higher energy prices, less resilience, less manufacturing,

0:08:05.720 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 7>fewer jobs, you know, big multiplier effects for us Here

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 7>at the Green Bank, we continue to see a lot

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 7>of projects that are really interesting and benefit both you know,

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 7>the low income communities that we're trying to serve and

0:08:18.280 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 7>the broader economy.

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 6>But it's definitely going to be more challenging.

0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.680
<v Speaker 7>And there are estimates that fifty percent of the backlog

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 7>and that's in the interconnection queue right now on the

0:08:27.360 --> 0:08:30.240
<v Speaker 7>grid could be at risk if the bill passes in

0:08:30.280 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 7>its current.

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Form, and that's not even take into account how long

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:37.280
<v Speaker 2>that line is to actually get connected to AGRID. So,

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 2>if I was looking at individual stocks, is this like

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 2>a fossil fuel play then at the end of the day,

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:44.599
<v Speaker 2>or are there are more nuanced ways to play this?

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 7>You know, I sort of think of the way the

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 7>US has been in the last couple of months in

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:52.720
<v Speaker 7>the way that I'm used to looking.

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 6>At emerging markets.

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 7>I invested in emerging markets for almost ten years, and frankly,

0:08:57.160 --> 0:08:58.840
<v Speaker 7>I think you've got a skate where the puck is

0:08:58.880 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 7>going when it comes to Paul, it's it's really hard

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 7>to stick your neck out there. That being said, I

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 7>do think there is maybe some potential in the utility

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.840
<v Speaker 7>scale UH solar and wind market. And the reason for

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 7>that is, you know, at the same time that we're

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:17.800
<v Speaker 7>doing all these things to hurt this cheap, easy to

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 7>get on the grid energy, we're having this big national

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.880
<v Speaker 7>discussion about how we become AI leaders. And we heard

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.880
<v Speaker 7>next to our CEO, John Ketchum say last week, if

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 7>we kill solar and wind, we're going to lose the

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 7>AI race. And so I do think that there's the

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 7>potential for you know, lawmakers to come back to the

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 7>table to try to support some utility scale solar plus storage.

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.199
<v Speaker 7>In particular, the administration is still very focused on domestic manufacturers,

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:46.400
<v Speaker 7>so I think a name like First Solar my benefit.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:52.200
<v Speaker 7>You've got the you know, gas turbine manufacturers GeV and Siemens.

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:53.720
<v Speaker 6>But this is a cyclical industry.

0:09:53.760 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 7>They've got backlogs to twenty thirty two now, and I

0:09:56.800 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 7>just see more downside than upside at this point, with

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 7>the back clogs the way that they are.

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:03.959
<v Speaker 6>Then you've got clean firm power.

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.559
<v Speaker 7>Which is you know, nuclear geothermal, and that's all well

0:10:07.600 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 7>and good, and I think that that does need to

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.439
<v Speaker 7>be built out, but there aren't that many ways to

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 7>play it in the market. You know, you can look

0:10:13.960 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 7>at the Spraught Uranium Trust. There's a geothermal pure Play,

0:10:18.800 --> 0:10:23.120
<v Speaker 7>or Matt there's Constellation Energy Group, but it's you know,

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 7>it's it's tough out there. I think the reality is

0:10:25.880 --> 0:10:28.320
<v Speaker 7>that you're going to start to see some people have

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 7>to come back to the table because solar and storage

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 7>is the cheapest and fastest way to get new energy

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:34.600
<v Speaker 7>onto the grid.

0:10:35.400 --> 0:10:37.440
<v Speaker 5>Emily, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate it.

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 5>Emily Levelle, chief investment Officer for the New Mexico Climate

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Investment Center.

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:47.480
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Appleclocklay and Android Auto

0:10:51.040 --> 0:10:54.120
<v Speaker 1>with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 2>Taking a look at the market here, you're looking at

0:10:58.880 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Brent off by one point one percent and WTI crewed

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:03.760
<v Speaker 2>off one point two percent. The question I'm getting is

0:11:03.760 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 2>why why aren't we higher in prices? So I'm gonna

0:11:06.160 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 2>ask that question to Emri Descent. She is founder and

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 2>director of Market intelligence for Energy Aspects. All right, Amrito,

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 2>what's your answer?

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 8>Why are we lower in prices today? Yeah?

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:20.959
<v Speaker 9>Well, because again we haven't seen any actual supply disruptions.

0:11:21.840 --> 0:11:24.320
<v Speaker 9>You know, we've been saying that, Yes, while Iran is

0:11:24.360 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 9>threatening to close the straits or Foremos, that remains very

0:11:28.320 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 9>much the last resort for them, right because if they

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 9>did that, they are really going to get the US

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 9>involved in a much much bigger way than they have

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.079
<v Speaker 9>been so far. Any country that's even neutral towards it

0:11:40.120 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 9>will basically become far more kind of angry about the

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 9>whole situation. And I don't think Iran necessarily wants to

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 9>attract the hour of the whole world, given how weak

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 9>the regime is right now, So I think that's a

0:11:53.000 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 9>big part of it. The other one is a bit

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 9>more technical. We've seen most of the crude traders trade

0:11:59.640 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 9>this via the ouptions market, So when you are short

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 9>call options as prices are going up, you actually are

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:08.520
<v Speaker 9>taking profits all the way through, right because you're kind

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 9>of selling out of your position. So that's kind of

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 9>adding to it, I would say, generally speaking, unless Iran

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 9>actually escalates to the point of disrupting supplies, we are

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 9>probably not going.

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 8>To see any significant increase in prices.

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:27.240
<v Speaker 5>From here, Amrina. Is there a consensus about how much

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 5>geopolitical risk premium is in oil these days?

0:12:33.040 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 9>I don't know about consensus, but I think this one's

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 9>relatively easy, right because we were in the high sixties

0:12:38.640 --> 0:12:41.680
<v Speaker 9>for Brent, we were already moving higher, just based on

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 9>the fact that fundamental had been stronger than people expected.

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:46.959
<v Speaker 8>But I would say, given where.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 9>We are now versus where we start started when the

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:53.960
<v Speaker 9>conflicts kind of headline started coming in, it's about ten dollars.

0:12:54.840 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 6>What's your question then?

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 2>So if I'm assuming the question you're getting is why

0:12:58.160 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 2>aren't oil prices higher?

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:00.559
<v Speaker 6>But what's you question?

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 9>I mean, for me, the real question becomes the medium term, right,

0:13:06.840 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 9>Like I know the focus for the marketers in the

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.760
<v Speaker 9>Straits and Foremost, but we know this isn't over yet, right.

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 8>We know Israel while kind of.

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 9>You know, walking typrope around this, they are talking about

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 9>regime change and what does that mean? A political upheaval

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 9>has never been associated with a good outcome for oil production.

0:13:28.920 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 8>Be It Eerrah bit Kuwait, be It Iran in the past, be.

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 9>It Libya, and I do wonder for the medium term outlook,

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.599
<v Speaker 9>like do we actually see lower Iranian production over the

0:13:39.640 --> 0:13:42.400
<v Speaker 9>next couple of years at a time when OPEC plus

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 9>will also have less PEC capacity because they're bringing back

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 9>a lot of production. I know this is not the

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 9>time because of you know, the focus obviously has to

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:53.560
<v Speaker 9>be does Iran react and clos the straits? But for me,

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:55.959
<v Speaker 9>that's the more interesting thing that our long term ail

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:59.760
<v Speaker 9>price is undervalued given everything that was already going to happen,

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:01.240
<v Speaker 9>and now we added around to the mix.

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 5>How has OPEC been behaving OPEK plus Has it been

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.120
<v Speaker 5>rational over the last I don't know, just since maybe

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:10.760
<v Speaker 5>you know October seventh of last year when things got

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 5>really really ratcheted up in the Mid East.

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I mean it's a great quitiontive. They're rational.

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.600
<v Speaker 9>I mean you have to understand kind of their logic

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 9>to this, and I think they have.

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 8>Been consistent, is what I would say.

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 9>Saudi Arabia has been saying, Look, it needs to be

0:14:25.680 --> 0:14:27.960
<v Speaker 9>equitable cuts, everybody needs to be a part of.

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.600
<v Speaker 8>This, and I think that's what they have been doing.

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:34.960
<v Speaker 9>But at the same time they have also been kind

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:40.120
<v Speaker 9>of obviously there's been disagreements between OPEC members, with Kazakhstan

0:14:40.200 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 9>cheating clearly and some of the others as well with

0:14:42.880 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 9>regards to, you know, what that kind of policy should be.

0:14:47.200 --> 0:14:49.120
<v Speaker 9>I think that in terms of what's going on with

0:14:49.160 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 9>the Middle Eastern conflict, one thing they're very very clear

0:14:51.840 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 9>is they don't want to get drawn into it.

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:55.680
<v Speaker 8>They want to make sure that their.

0:14:56.880 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 9>Genuine infrastructure, not just energy, it's protected, and I think

0:15:00.040 --> 0:15:00.440
<v Speaker 9>they're going.

0:15:00.360 --> 0:15:02.280
<v Speaker 8>To try and be as neutral as possible.

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 9>And again, this is one of the reasons why I

0:15:04.560 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 9>don't think they're going to be surging production if there

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:09.720
<v Speaker 9>were to be an Iranian outage, because the last thing

0:15:09.760 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 9>they want is to then get attacked because Iran's going

0:15:12.880 --> 0:15:14.880
<v Speaker 9>to be like, you're taking advantage of our situation.

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:15.400
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:15:15.840 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 2>Well, speaking of here's an extremely unfair question. When President

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Trump tweeted earlier, I want lower oil prices. Drill baby drill,

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 2>Come on you, guys, I'm watching who's the you. I mean,

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.040
<v Speaker 2>who is he talking to specifically?

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 9>I mean drill baby drill refers to the US producers, right,

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:35.080
<v Speaker 9>and I mean it's I did smile when I saw

0:15:35.120 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 9>that because I was like, yes, you say that, but

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 9>at the same time, you know, thanks to tariffs, thanks

0:15:42.320 --> 0:15:46.080
<v Speaker 9>to just kind of broader his economic policies, oil prices

0:15:46.160 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 9>are a lot lower. Again, if you take away the

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 9>ten dollars geopolitical risk premium, then it has been in

0:15:52.240 --> 0:15:54.680
<v Speaker 9>the in the last you know, couple of years, so

0:15:55.040 --> 0:15:58.040
<v Speaker 9>there is no incentive for their producers to drill.

0:15:58.440 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 8>We know we've talked.

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 9>About this, Alex, you and I about how Gassi are

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 9>the acreage is getting all of these reasons right. So

0:16:05.480 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 9>Drew baby drul remains a five dream. I think that

0:16:08.800 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 9>it's regardless of why the prices are simply because you

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:14.880
<v Speaker 9>are you know, you are in a situation, at least

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 9>for the crude oil side of things, is geology is playing.

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 8>It's pot we're going to get nngs, We're going to

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 8>get gas.

0:16:19.600 --> 0:16:21.960
<v Speaker 9>But I don't think that's going to necessarily translate into

0:16:22.040 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 9>oil production.

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:24.640
<v Speaker 4>All right, I'm Rita.

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:26.680
<v Speaker 5>Thank you so much for we appreciate that. I'm Rita

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:30.840
<v Speaker 5>send founder and research director of Market Intelligence joining us.

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch us live

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:39.440
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever

0:16:42.800 --> 0:16:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:16:46.640 --> 0:16:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Terry Hayes, founder of Pangea Policy, joining us in the

0:16:49.920 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 2>middle of all of this. Terry, and let's just start

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 2>with what we're seeing overseas. Are we too complacent about

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 2>further action between the US around and is real? Or

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:02.240
<v Speaker 2>do you feel like one and done? Moving on?

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 10>Good morning, Alex, I apparently am the uh am, the

0:17:07.400 --> 0:17:09.960
<v Speaker 10>person urging humility and a sea of certainty. You know,

0:17:10.000 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 10>I've heard, he written, heard and and read a lot

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.440
<v Speaker 10>of people saying this morning, well I can dandalists so saying, oh,

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 10>I know exactly how this is going to go. Iran's

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:21.960
<v Speaker 10>going to super peace and this will happen, and that happened,

0:17:21.960 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 10>and the other happened, and here's the you know, here

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.639
<v Speaker 10>the the the knock on effects from China and Russia

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 10>and elsewhere. We're in the phase of this conflict where

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 10>downside economic risk is heightened, much more heightened than people think,

0:17:35.359 --> 0:17:40.400
<v Speaker 10>because the possibility for irrational action is much greater at route.

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 10>So Terry, I could go on, I will know.

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.800
<v Speaker 5>It was just it seems like President Trump's policy seemed

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 5>to change a little. There's the outlook seemed to change

0:17:52.640 --> 0:17:55.760
<v Speaker 5>a little bit from you know, America first to now,

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.480
<v Speaker 5>you know, really ratcheting up the stakes in Iran. You

0:17:59.520 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 5>how do you think has outlook changed.

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:04.360
<v Speaker 10>I've never looked. I got to tell you, Paul, I've

0:18:04.359 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 10>never been the guy that thought, I think I said

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:08.640
<v Speaker 10>this to you yesterday too. I've never been the guy

0:18:08.680 --> 0:18:11.240
<v Speaker 10>that thought that that this is some sort of a

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 10>U turn or anywhere close to it. I think Trump

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.520
<v Speaker 10>is absolutely right to come in and put a fresh take,

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:19.560
<v Speaker 10>a fresh eye on the nature of the United States

0:18:19.560 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 10>commitments and how and what's most important for America certainly,

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:27.840
<v Speaker 10>But you know, this got taken as withdrawal all over

0:18:27.880 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 10>the world, and that was never going to happen.

0:18:30.000 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 10>You know, we are. We're in it to our teeth

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:38.000
<v Speaker 10>in Taiwan, our interests in the Middle East are are

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 10>are very very important to the national interest in the

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 10>United States. And even in a situation like Ukraine, you know,

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 10>we haven't left. They're not crazy about where we are,

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 10>but we've given him more weapons, We've signed a minerals deal.

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.000
<v Speaker 10>We're not gone, and and we're not going to be

0:18:54.080 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 10>gone either. And now it's very apparent to those for

0:18:58.040 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 10>whom it wasn't obvious already that we're going to be

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.680
<v Speaker 10>in it to to stay. And you know, this is

0:19:03.960 --> 0:19:07.280
<v Speaker 10>a clear situation I think where the uh, the duties

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 10>of the president O weigh the preferences of the candidate.

0:19:10.480 --> 0:19:12.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, what is in it to stay?

0:19:13.040 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 6>In it to stay?

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:15.440
<v Speaker 2>I mean, like what what does that really entail?

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 10>Well, you know, it's you know, we have we have

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:24.560
<v Speaker 10>continued to defend Taiwan and UH and you know, to

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:29.840
<v Speaker 10>work our work our military and economic interests there Middle East. UH.

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:32.240
<v Speaker 10>You know, it's not for nothing that the President made

0:19:32.640 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 10>a centerpiece of his early second term a week long

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 10>trip to the Middle East with the idea that we're

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:44.639
<v Speaker 10>going to be using interconnected economic alliances in part to

0:19:44.800 --> 0:19:47.879
<v Speaker 10>ring fence the Iranians and the Ring then the Iranians

0:19:47.960 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 10>or client state of China, so in essence ring fence

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:54.359
<v Speaker 10>China and Russia as well. So that's not uh, that's

0:19:54.400 --> 0:19:57.680
<v Speaker 10>not new. And it's clear now that you know, the

0:19:57.960 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 10>President would like the Europeans to stay up up to

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 10>the plate on defense. UH, and you see that from

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 10>from the NATO resolutions that they're finally getting serious about that.

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:13.719
<v Speaker 10>But you know, even then, we haven't completely withdrawn from Ukraine,

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 10>as was widely assumed in the United States six months ago.

0:20:17.160 --> 0:20:17.400
<v Speaker 4>Uh.

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:20.600
<v Speaker 10>So you know, we're we are not melting away from

0:20:20.600 --> 0:20:23.639
<v Speaker 10>our from our global responsibilities here by any stretch.

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:28.680
<v Speaker 5>Terry you mentioned Ukraine. Does a calculus there for mister

0:20:28.720 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 5>Putin change given the actions of the US in the

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 5>in the Middle East over the weekend.

0:20:35.160 --> 0:20:37.399
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, and well, you know, good news bad news. The

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 10>increased price of oil helps him. Uh, and and and

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 10>around does something that that sparks a significant increase in

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 10>the price of oil. Obviously Putin has helped. So uh,

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:51.840
<v Speaker 10>that's not good news for Ukraine. But but on the

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 10>other hand, what you have is increased not only increased resolution, uh,

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 10>demonstrated by the European allies, wells, the United States and you,

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 10>you and my estimation could do an awful lot more

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:07.600
<v Speaker 10>than they than they already are, which is the precious

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:12.640
<v Speaker 10>little but the U. But not only that, but you've

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.760
<v Speaker 10>got a situation here where there's a clear commitment by

0:21:15.760 --> 0:21:19.119
<v Speaker 10>the president with a clear follow through. And that's that

0:21:19.200 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 10>alone is bad news for Putin. So uh, you know,

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.800
<v Speaker 10>kind of a mixed a mixed bag overall. But I'd

0:21:24.840 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 10>say for Russia. It's overall negative.

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.119
<v Speaker 2>And before you let you go, Dave palat test to

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:33.199
<v Speaker 2>find to the House tomorrow and the Senate on Wednesday,

0:21:33.440 --> 0:21:35.000
<v Speaker 2>what do you think the biggest talking point is going

0:21:35.040 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 2>to be?

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 10>Well, you know, here's the thing. It's uh. I think

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.399
<v Speaker 10>we all know this. Pal's not going to say anything

0:21:42.400 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 10>new personally. Secondly, you know, as Mike McKee just reminded

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 10>the audience, Uh, you know, the the key here with

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:52.000
<v Speaker 10>the Fed is read every word, and he pointed out

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 10>a number of words uh in Mickey Bowman's statements that

0:21:55.040 --> 0:21:59.320
<v Speaker 10>the market isn't reading, for example. But Paul can't say

0:21:59.359 --> 0:22:03.880
<v Speaker 10>anything new in this testimony, in this twice year testimony.

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.920
<v Speaker 10>While Mickey Bowman may talk about the possibility of July

0:22:08.040 --> 0:22:11.480
<v Speaker 10>doesn't mean July. Pali is certainly not going to to

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.399
<v Speaker 10>endorse that or anything else. He's speaking for the entire bed.

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:17.760
<v Speaker 10>What's going to happen on Tuesday and Wednesday really is

0:22:17.800 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 10>that Congress is going to talk over Pal's head. They

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 10>know that. Then none of that's going to happen. What

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 10>markets get out of this is is a look forward

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 10>on the meaning of the tax bill and promises for

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 10>growth and also for fiscal and why that situation is

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.480
<v Speaker 10>not going to clear get cleared up anytime soon, you know,

0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:40.640
<v Speaker 10>with the actors taking their usual stances and their usual marks.

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 5>Terry, thanks as always for joining us. Always appreciate getting

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 5>your perspective there. Terry Haynes, founder of Pangaea Policy, joining

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 5>us from Rhington d C. Via that zoom thing.

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:55.199
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:22:59.560 --> 0:23:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Tenay to neon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio

0:23:03.720 --> 0:23:07.000
<v Speaker 1>app tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You can

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.800
<v Speaker 1>also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and always

0:23:10.880 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg terminal