WEBVTT - The Truth about Lie Detectors

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.080 --> 0:00:17.599
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello, everyone,

0:00:17.680 --> 0:00:19.959
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech Stuff. My name is Chris Polette, and

0:00:19.960 --> 0:00:21.759
<v Speaker 1>I am the tech editor here at how stuff works

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>dot Com, sitting across from me as usual as senior

0:00:24.640 --> 0:00:29.200
<v Speaker 1>writer Jonathan Strickland. Actually I am also Chris Polette. I'm

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.240
<v Speaker 1>sorry what I'm just seeing if I can get away

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:35.680
<v Speaker 1>with it. That's not true. No, it's not true. It

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:42.279
<v Speaker 1>leads to our listener mail. This listener mail comes from

0:00:42.320 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Boris or if you wish, Bobcat, and I do wish,

0:00:46.800 --> 0:00:51.240
<v Speaker 1>So this listener mail comes from Bobcat, who says, hello,

0:00:51.280 --> 0:00:53.720
<v Speaker 1>beloved tech eas First of all, I have to say

0:00:53.720 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>that I really appreciated the rant and other outbursts of

0:00:56.560 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>skepticism in your ghost Hunting Technology episode. That has been

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.760
<v Speaker 1>a profound absence of critical thinking and evidence based positions

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.600
<v Speaker 1>on various issues coming from the media lately, and your

0:01:06.600 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 1>show has definitely made me feel as if there's hope

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.640
<v Speaker 1>for rationality and non wackiness. So kudos you've made at

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>least one listener as happy as pie. If you're considering

0:01:17.400 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>doing more podcasts with related undertones of skepticism, I suggest

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that you guys consider taking on things like radiometric dating

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>technologies as well as lie detectors and the technology of spying.

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>That is, how some believe that the government may be

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>watching us and how they actually do. Also, during the

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:34.759
<v Speaker 1>sci Fi Movies podcast from before, you brought up doll

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:38.000
<v Speaker 1>House in passing still can't believe it's over. Why cover

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>movies for a podcast, not do TV shows and then

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.240
<v Speaker 1>rub it in our faces by mentioning Dollhouse. I expect

0:01:45.240 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>this gross malfie essence to be corrected as soon or malfeasance,

0:01:49.440 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess I should say my brain is not working.

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Should should be corrected soon. And with one of those

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 1>annoying listener mail announcements from Strickland, thanks for maintaining your

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>high standard of podcast. Yes, except for the fact that

0:02:01.160 --> 0:02:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I mispronounced malfeasance. Um well boris thanks a lot. We

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>actually decided from this email to take one specific UH suggestion,

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>which was the light detector suggestion. I thought that was

0:02:13.960 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>an excellent suggestion. We can talk about how they work

0:02:16.919 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>and how they do not work, because they do both

0:02:19.560 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. As it turns out, I'm sorry,

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:26.079
<v Speaker 1>I was still thinking about pie. Yeah, I was still

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking of Malfie, Yes, and so uh in suburbia. But

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know, once in a while I dropped

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a bomb like that and then I beat myself up

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:41.040
<v Speaker 1>over it for the next like three months apparently. So anyway, yeah,

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about let's talk about polygraphs. Light detectors. So

0:02:44.000 --> 0:02:48.480
<v Speaker 1>those those highly calibrated machines that it takes you know,

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>a train forensic psycho physiologist, uh, weeks to learn. Yeah,

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>yeah you could. It could take you up to fourteen

0:02:57.400 --> 0:02:59.679
<v Speaker 1>whole weeks to learn how to operate one of these things.

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, before we get too far, let's let's let's

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.360
<v Speaker 1>make some things very clear. First of all, light detectors do,

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in fact measure things. They're not just it's not just

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>a box with some little pens that scribble on a

0:03:12.080 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>paper randomly. It's not like it's it's um uh, you know,

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>just a fake tool. Um. What they do is they

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:24.800
<v Speaker 1>measure physiological responses over a set period of time, the

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:26.720
<v Speaker 1>set period being whenever you turn the machine on and

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:30.119
<v Speaker 1>whenever you turn the machine off. Um. But it does

0:03:30.200 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 1>this through three main methods. It measures your respiratory rate.

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>That would be uh, the respiratory Right there is Chris

0:03:37.840 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>breathing heavily into his mike getting it's just if any

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.640
<v Speaker 1>of you found that creepy right tech stuff at kustaphors

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 1>dot com. I know I will be. And then it

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>also measures your pulse rate. It has a pressure cup

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>on your arm. Oh my god, hey, you know I'm okay.

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I want as as a as the person who is

0:03:58.360 --> 0:04:00.480
<v Speaker 1>sitting here in the studio with Chris at this time.

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to see what he has to do

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>about this one. I got nothing for this. Third. The

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>third thing it measures is galvanic response, which technically is

0:04:08.320 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>um sweating. And yeah, Chris is always sweating buckets, so

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of hard to tell from one moment to

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the next if he's actually, you know, trying to display something,

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>if he's trying to to illustrate a point. But that's

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>just as he's not really sweating. So they do this

0:04:29.400 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>through various methods. There's like a there's one that will

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.920
<v Speaker 1>be sensors that are placed around your chest to measure

0:04:34.960 --> 0:04:38.360
<v Speaker 1>your your chest expansion and contraction. Wise, your breathing would

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>be the respiratory rate. Part that would be the respiratory rate.

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 1>There's a pressure cuff placed along one arm that measures

0:04:43.160 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>the pulse the blood pressure right right, and then there

0:04:46.760 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>are electrodes attached to the fingers to measure the galvanic

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 1>response that the amount of sweat. Yes, okay, so they

0:04:54.080 --> 0:04:56.040
<v Speaker 1>have a bucket underneath the tables, you know, if it

0:04:56.160 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>gets out of hand. Yeah, when Muggsy comes in, they're like, okay,

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we got us weather, Let's let's put a bucket under there.

0:05:02.880 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>So these are always measuring these changes in the rates.

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:13.360
<v Speaker 1>They have to establish a baseline first, and any change

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in any of those three uh factors will result in

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:23.279
<v Speaker 1>a needle on the paper scribbling something um so that

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>you'll see you can actually see where the changes happen

0:05:27.160 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>along along the set time period. I think we've all

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:32.520
<v Speaker 1>seen a movie or TV show where the you know,

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>they've done that close up shot and little needle going right,

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the needles starts shaking back and forth really crazy. In

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:40.120
<v Speaker 1>case any of you can't hear that, you know what,

0:05:40.160 --> 0:05:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we should just leave it to Liz to put in

0:05:42.040 --> 0:05:44.320
<v Speaker 1>the little scratchy sounds, because I bet that picks up

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot better than you scratching on your laptop. I

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know. They can pick up footsteps outside the studio,

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that's true. We have her bigfoot lurking outside our studio

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>occasionally anyway, but at any rate. Okay, So so yeah,

0:05:55.520 --> 0:05:59.320
<v Speaker 1>these it's not just one line of data. It's actually

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>uh several lines of data because you get the you

0:06:01.720 --> 0:06:06.240
<v Speaker 1>get one essentially for each um uh factor. So uh,

0:06:06.320 --> 0:06:10.800
<v Speaker 1>there are three different needles measuring it, and ideally you

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>would be able to look at the three different lines

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>and be able to tell when there was a major

0:06:15.760 --> 0:06:20.920
<v Speaker 1>uh change in someone's physiological response. Well, there's there's sort

0:06:20.960 --> 0:06:24.720
<v Speaker 1>of a hypothetical basis on which you could say if

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:26.720
<v Speaker 1>somebody was lying, you would expect them to be more

0:06:26.760 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 1>stressed out than if they were telling the truth, preventing

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.000
<v Speaker 1>the truth from coming out. Right. That's that's what the whole,

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:36.919
<v Speaker 1>the whole basis of of polygraph is is. That's the

0:06:36.920 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>foundation for the polygraph test. The foundation for the polygraph

0:06:40.120 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>test is an assumption that if you lie about something,

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>you will your body will respond, will engage in the

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.800
<v Speaker 1>fight or flight response. Not to take something from our

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 1>sister podcast stuff, you should know, that's their favorite phrase

0:06:53.120 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>or it used to be anyway, but the fight or

0:06:55.160 --> 0:06:59.080
<v Speaker 1>flight response tends to pop into play whenever you are

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>trying to to conceal something. At least that's the theory. Now.

0:07:03.000 --> 0:07:05.799
<v Speaker 1>If this were to hold true, if every single person

0:07:05.839 --> 0:07:08.839
<v Speaker 1>in the world were to respond in a similar way

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>whenever they were trying to be elusive or lie about something,

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:15.800
<v Speaker 1>then the light detector test might actually work if everyone

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:19.120
<v Speaker 1>responded the same way. But we're human beings. Turns out

0:07:19.160 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we all have different responses to the same sort of

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>sensory input. Some of us, uh get very anxious at times,

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.960
<v Speaker 1>including myself. There are there are certain situations where I

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 1>get very very anxious, and um, I'm certain that if

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>I were ever brought in to be questioned about something,

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I would be very anxious about it. Not because necessarily

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.640
<v Speaker 1>that I did something. I'm not saying I did, and

0:07:42.680 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that didn't. I'm just saying that, yeah,

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>But in either case, even if I were completely innocent

0:07:48.680 --> 0:07:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of it, I know that people asking me these questions

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 1>would make me nervous and my body would react in

0:07:54.200 --> 0:07:56.720
<v Speaker 1>such a way that, uh, it would be very difficult

0:07:56.760 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to say that a reading that you got for me

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:03.640
<v Speaker 1>would be, would would indicate a live versus truth just

0:08:03.680 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>because I would be anxious no matter if I had

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>done it or not. Uh. Conversely, there are people out

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>there who are consummate liars, and either they are delusional

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>and actually believe the things they're saying, they're sociopaths, they

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>don't care what they're saying, or they've trained themselves to

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>not give away these physiological responses so that it's very

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>difficult to tell whether or not they're telling the truth.

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Everything looks like the truth. It's kind of fascinating to

0:08:31.560 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>think that there are actually people that are you know,

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that actually believe that what they are saying is true,

0:08:38.040 --> 0:08:42.439
<v Speaker 1>even when it's you know, a patent lie. Yeah. Um.

0:08:42.480 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>But you know, if if somebody is delusional about that

0:08:45.760 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and believes that what they are saying is true, then

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to register any kind of response like that.

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 1>They believe it to be true. And as time passes,

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's easier and easier to believe a lie. Uh.

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:00.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean uh. And and in some case when I'm

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 1>saying lie, it may just be an exaggeration. For example,

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:05.240
<v Speaker 1>if you think about something that happened to you in

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>your childhood and you tell the story about it, and uh,

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 1>it can. It's one of those things that I've mentioned

0:09:10.480 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>this before. It can build over time, like you elaborate

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the story and you might exaggerate one fact over another,

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 1>or you might add in a little thing that that

0:09:19.520 --> 0:09:22.719
<v Speaker 1>didn't necessarily happen, but it makes the story better. And

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:25.959
<v Speaker 1>upon retellings and over the passage of time, you might

0:09:26.000 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>actually come to believe that that is actually exactly how

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>it happened. And then if you were to review, say

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>a film of it or a video of it, you

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.679
<v Speaker 1>might be shocked to see how different the real event

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>was from the way it was in your mind. If

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:40.640
<v Speaker 1>you've been given a polygraph test and you were asked

0:09:40.679 --> 0:09:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to relay that information under the polygraph system, uh, it

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.880
<v Speaker 1>would show that you're telling the truth because you're you're

0:09:47.920 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>saying what you believe. It's not it's not a there's

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.560
<v Speaker 1>no magic in the box that allows it to determine

0:09:53.559 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>what is really true and what isn't. So let's talk

0:09:57.520 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the process of a a graph

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:04.800
<v Speaker 1>examination and kind of explain, you know, how how these

0:10:04.840 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>examiners build a routine so that they can try and

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and track lies right now. Um. Actually, when I was

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:21.080
<v Speaker 1>commenting earlier, when we got started about the forensic psycho physiologist,

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:23.800
<v Speaker 1>I was hoping to say it without tripping that time. UM,

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>those are the people who who like to UH or

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>who are who like to be known that with that

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it is their professional UH title, I guess, but they

0:10:32.520 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>are the people who give the polygraph tests and really

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:40.040
<v Speaker 1>a professional forensic psycho physiologist. If I don't look at

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the words make them out easier. Um, they are. They

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 1>are generally going through some kind of professional training UM,

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 1>such as the ACCTRON International Academy UM, which is accredited

0:10:53.400 --> 0:10:57.079
<v Speaker 1>by the American polygraph Association and certified by the American

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>Association of Police Polygraphists Polygraphists. People who have polygraphs. Polygraphists

0:11:04.320 --> 0:11:08.679
<v Speaker 1>sound like people who have more than one graph. Um.

0:11:08.720 --> 0:11:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm on a monographists myself. So if you so, If

0:11:12.240 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 1>you were going to to become a forensic psycho physiologist US,

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you would need to UH to have a baccalaureate degree

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:25.960
<v Speaker 1>or at least five years of UM investigative experience and

0:11:26.000 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>an associates degree UM. You would need to go through

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a certified course which includes, among the different categories you

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:39.640
<v Speaker 1>would need to study or psychology, physiology, ethics, history, UM,

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:45.000
<v Speaker 1>question construction, UH, speech analysis, chart analysis, text and test

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:48.719
<v Speaker 1>data analysis. And you would also have to uh, you know,

0:11:49.120 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 1>go through a series of exams to you know, on

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 1>actual cases in which a LIE detector tests or I

0:11:55.920 --> 0:12:00.040
<v Speaker 1>should say polygraph is being used. Um and the th

0:12:00.160 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>are reviewed by professionals. So, uh, this internship can although

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the program is sort of short, that the internship can

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>take from eight months to a year. According to the

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>article we have on the website about how lie detectors work, Yeah,

0:12:13.600 --> 0:12:15.480
<v Speaker 1>it's actually a very good article. I do recommend that

0:12:15.520 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you read it. Um. So that all being kind of

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 1>beside the point really when you get down to to

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>what exactly is going on with lie detectors. But I

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:27.520
<v Speaker 1>just wanted to point out that that that there is

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.240
<v Speaker 1>some that the people who are actually doing this for

0:12:30.480 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>say a police department or another law enforcement agency, go

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 1>through training on how to interpret what they think is

0:12:37.280 --> 0:12:39.120
<v Speaker 1>coming out of the machine. Right. The problem is that

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>again the very foundation of what they do is faulty,

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>so built on a false premise. Ultimately it's built on

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a false premise. I just wanted to talk about how

0:12:47.720 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the process works. Okay, So let's talk about the test itself. Okay,

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>So during the test itself, what would happen is the

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>examiner would you know strap ian um. So let's let's

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>let's say that that I Jonathan Strickland. I'm the subject

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>of this polygraph examination. The first thing that would happen

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>is that we will Usually you get a few questions

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 1>at the beginning that are supposedly to form the baseline

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 1>so that the questionnaire can see what your level of

0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:21.599
<v Speaker 1>anxiety is, just based upon normal questions, nothing that necessarily

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.480
<v Speaker 1>has anything to do with what they brought you in for.

0:13:24.920 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>They want to see basically what's moving the needles when

0:13:27.080 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 1>they tell it, say or ask you versus what isn't

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:32.559
<v Speaker 1>moving the needles, and they can get an idea of

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:35.200
<v Speaker 1>how you're gonna behave right if you're If you're already anxious,

0:13:35.240 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 1>then this would theoretically at least let them know. Okay,

0:13:38.160 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>this guy's kind of a nervous nellie, so uh uh,

0:13:41.200 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 1>anything that hits this level doesn't necessarily mean it's a lie,

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>because this dude's just quivering in his boots, which is

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:50.719
<v Speaker 1>exactly how I would be. I'm not gonna lie I'm

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>about that anyway, So they would ask me a series

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of questions, supposedly to create a baseline. Now this is

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.360
<v Speaker 1>debatable whether or not this actually, you know, may any

0:14:00.440 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>real difference. Next, what they would probably do is ask

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:06.720
<v Speaker 1>a control question, and this would be a again a

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 1>simple question where it's just to uh, to measure your

0:14:10.679 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>your response. And then they would alternate that with a

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>question that actually relates back to what they're looking into, right,

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>and that would that would be why they ask the

0:14:22.280 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>people who are training to work with polygraphs to learn

0:14:25.840 --> 0:14:29.040
<v Speaker 1>about question construction, because they want to learn how to

0:14:29.080 --> 0:14:32.680
<v Speaker 1>phrase uh different topics in ways to see if they

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>can get a response from me. Yeah, so you get

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you get your design questions or what they're called, were

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the ones that have to do with your actual what

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>the purpose for the polygraph. So let's say, look, the

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>first question might be uh, um, is your name Jonathan

0:14:50.840 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Strickland And I would say yes, And then the next

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:57.800
<v Speaker 1>question might be I don't know, and then I'd pee myself.

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>But the next the next question, my be might be

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:04.000
<v Speaker 1>um more pertinent to whatever the matter is. For instance,

0:15:04.040 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 1>like like uh, were you in the Buckhead neighborhood? On

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Tuesday night, and then I would say either yes or no.

0:15:12.840 --> 0:15:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And then if they suspect that I was there and

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I said no, they would look at the chart to

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>see if the response on that question, UH was measurably

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 1>different from my response to the control questions, because if

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.160
<v Speaker 1>if I'm answering the control questions honestly, and they should

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>be able to to know that, because the control question

0:15:30.600 --> 0:15:33.280
<v Speaker 1>should be obvious, right, it should be very obvious questions

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>like are there two people in the room with us,

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:39.080
<v Speaker 1>and you'd say yes or no? UM. If you are

0:15:39.240 --> 0:15:42.440
<v Speaker 1>lying to an obvious question, then they can tell pretty

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:44.520
<v Speaker 1>quickly if you're going to be able to to fool

0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the polygraph UM, which by the way, is very possible.

0:15:48.280 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>So they alternate these questions. They will ask a control

0:15:53.520 --> 0:15:56.640
<v Speaker 1>question now and again just to make sure that that

0:15:56.760 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>they're reading the results correctly, and then they will ask

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>one of the design questions to see if you are

0:16:04.240 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>telling the truth or not. UH. You can get through

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>an entire polygraph lying your butt off the whole way through,

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>and if you are able to control your responses or

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>you're able to boost your responses to control questions to

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 1>show that you are a nervous, nelly. Either of those

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to make the results unreliable. They're not gonna

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>be able to say this guy for sure was lying

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:31.200
<v Speaker 1>or or was telling the truth. So for instance, that

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>they asked me, is your name Jonathan Strickland and I

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>said yes, but I was able to, uh, to provoke

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:42.920
<v Speaker 1>myself into reacting in a more um well heightened way,

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:45.840
<v Speaker 1>it would indicate that I had lied on that even

0:16:45.880 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 1>though I told the truth. Um, and this could all

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.160
<v Speaker 1>be very I can manage to do this on my own.

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, I could fabricate it as if

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.400
<v Speaker 1>it looks like it looks like it's a lie. And

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 1>then the next question they asked me, where you win

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 1>Buckhead on Tuesday night? And I say no, Um, I

0:17:00.960 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>could just relax a little bit and then it will

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>come up as not being a lie, and then they'll

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:07.640
<v Speaker 1>they'll look at the results and say, well, according to this,

0:17:07.760 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we asked him this control question. He told

0:17:09.680 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the truth, but his response was off the charts. Then

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:14.400
<v Speaker 1>we asked him this question and he said no, and

0:17:14.560 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 1>his response was calm, clearly, he's just nervous. We can't

0:17:17.880 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 1>we can't rely on this as as information to establish

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>whether or not he's guilty, or or if he's telling

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the truth or not. Um So, really, when you get

0:17:27.840 --> 0:17:29.800
<v Speaker 1>down to it, once you understand that, you realize the

0:17:29.800 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>polygraph is not a reliable tool for telling truth versus lies.

0:17:34.640 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 1>That doesn't mean that the polygraph isn't useful if you

0:17:37.320 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>are willing to use some psychological bullying to try and

0:17:41.840 --> 0:17:45.080
<v Speaker 1>get a confession out of someone. In fact, it's incredibly

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>useful if you want to try and get a confession

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 1>out of someone, and as long as that person believes

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:52.679
<v Speaker 1>that the lie detector is doing its job and is

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>working properly, it's it can be incredibly effective at getting

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.720
<v Speaker 1>a confession. It's but it's almost like a confession under

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:02.680
<v Speaker 1>dure us if you think about it, because the person

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:04.920
<v Speaker 1>is being fooled into thinking this device is doing more

0:18:04.960 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>than it really is. Well, how are you How are

0:18:07.280 --> 0:18:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you going to fool somebody into believing that it actually works?

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>All right? What could they do? Here's here's a good example.

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 1>This is not necessarily how everyone does it, but there

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 1>are police, state law enforcement officials who have done this

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.680
<v Speaker 1>or examiners who have done this. Um you do a

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>very simple card trick, but you don't present it as

0:18:24.640 --> 0:18:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a card trick. What you do is you you present

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the person who's being questioned. You present that person with

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a deck of cards and say, pick a card, look

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:36.600
<v Speaker 1>at it, memorize it, put it back in the deck,

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:39.040
<v Speaker 1>you know however you want to do it. And then

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you deal the cards out face up, and you just

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>tell the person, uh, just say that it's not your card,

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's your card or not, say it's not your card. Okay.

0:18:48.960 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So each card that comes up, you're saying, no, that's

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 1>not it, No, that's not it, till you go through

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>the whole deck. Then the person goes back to supposedly

0:18:55.440 --> 0:18:59.040
<v Speaker 1>look at the results on the polygraph, comes back and

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>then says, our core into the polygraph, this is your card.

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And they hold up the card that you picked. And

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 1>then you're convinced, oh my gosh, not only does this

0:19:06.760 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>thing work, it can actually work to the point where

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>it can it can tell the difference of one response

0:19:12.359 --> 0:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>out of fifty two questions. Now, in reality, the examiner

0:19:17.160 --> 0:19:19.919
<v Speaker 1>has just used a very very basic card trick, and

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it's a it's there are many different ways of doing

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.679
<v Speaker 1>a card force where you forced someone to pick the

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>card you want them to pick, or you don't force them.

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:29.640
<v Speaker 1>You just you manipulate the cards in such a way

0:19:29.680 --> 0:19:33.159
<v Speaker 1>that you know what card they picked. Easiest ways just

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.399
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to what card is on the bottom of

0:19:35.440 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the deck, and then you cut the cards. You put

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you put the person's card they chose on the top

0:19:41.720 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of the cut. You cover that up. Well, the card

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that was on the bottom of the deck is gonna

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 1>come immediately before the card that person picked, So you

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>just look for that, like if it were the three

0:19:51.840 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 1>of Hearts, you look for the three your Hearts. Next

0:19:53.600 --> 0:19:55.560
<v Speaker 1>card that's gonna be the one that the person picked.

0:19:56.280 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I just I just did a big reveal on magic tricks.

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>But that's a very basic one. So lots of YouTube

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>videos out there that show how that's done. But anyway,

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you in this case, the examiner is gaming the system.

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:09.560
<v Speaker 1>The examiner already knows what the card is, does not

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 1>need to look at the light detector at all. In fact,

0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the light detector probably wouldn't even help at all and

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.719
<v Speaker 1>figuring out which card this was unless someone was just

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:22.399
<v Speaker 1>that hyped up about, oh my god, that's my card. No,

0:20:22.640 --> 0:20:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that's not it. I mean, unless that were to happen.

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:28.560
<v Speaker 1>The light detector wouldn't help you. But by establishing that

0:20:28.640 --> 0:20:31.199
<v Speaker 1>the light detector is so sensitive and accurate, you have

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>now built into the person's mind that this thing is

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna catch you if you lie. And then you start

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the questioning, and since the person now believes that if

0:20:41.119 --> 0:20:45.120
<v Speaker 1>he or she lies, it's gonna be instantly recognizable, they

0:20:45.200 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>might actually move ahead and just confess. So you've skipped

0:20:49.720 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the whole process of having to do a light detector

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:54.800
<v Speaker 1>test in the first place. You've scared the person into

0:20:54.840 --> 0:20:57.520
<v Speaker 1>confessing a crime. Now, of course, if the person is innocent,

0:20:57.560 --> 0:21:00.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not gonna help at all. You know, you're still

0:21:00.200 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to go through the whole thing. Um, it's

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>only if the person is guilty and willing to confess,

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>if they if they don't realize that it was all

0:21:06.280 --> 0:21:09.399
<v Speaker 1>a trick to try and gain their confidence. That's just

0:21:09.520 --> 0:21:11.480
<v Speaker 1>one method. There are other ways of doing the same

0:21:11.520 --> 0:21:14.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing, where you tell a person to lie

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>and then you show them the results on the lie

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 1>detector and say, see, here's where I asked you to lie,

0:21:21.400 --> 0:21:24.359
<v Speaker 1>and you see where your response is, and that could

0:21:24.359 --> 0:21:29.119
<v Speaker 1>either be a legitimate test that they're showing them, or

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it could be a pregenerated test where you're just showing

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>them some lines and saying, see, see where I asked

0:21:36.080 --> 0:21:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you to lie, and you see these squiggles here. Those

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:41.879
<v Speaker 1>may or may not be your squiggles. I'm just saying

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:46.160
<v Speaker 1>those aiggs right. Yeah, if you're like, no, obviously Jane

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:50.359
<v Speaker 1>wasn't here lying. She's a terrible liar. I'm much better,

0:21:51.000 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, they're It's it's essentially deception, is what it

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.560
<v Speaker 1>boils down to. And that's not to say that every

0:21:57.560 --> 0:22:01.120
<v Speaker 1>examiner feels that this is necessary, or that every examiner

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:03.479
<v Speaker 1>even thinks that what they're doing has no merit. I'm

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:06.119
<v Speaker 1>sure most of them think that it is. Uh, it

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:10.800
<v Speaker 1>is a completely legitimate practice, but the fact remains that

0:22:11.680 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 1>it's it's really it's just measuring your physiological response, which

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.440
<v Speaker 1>is different for everybody. Yeah. Yeah, there are there some

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>things that people try to do to avoid giving themselves away,

0:22:23.720 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>So just taking sedatives or biting their tongue or sticking

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.560
<v Speaker 1>attack in their shoe. There there's lots of other very

0:22:29.600 --> 0:22:33.639
<v Speaker 1>simple ones. Just simple breathing exercises can help you stay calm.

0:22:33.680 --> 0:22:36.520
<v Speaker 1>And like I said again, if you if you take

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.720
<v Speaker 1>it so that you maybe you tense your muscles a

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.840
<v Speaker 1>bit when you are when you're truthfully answering a control question.

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>If you tense your muscles that and you just increase

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.760
<v Speaker 1>your breathing rate a little bit, that's gonna be enough

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>to boost your your pulse and to change the respiratory

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:57.360
<v Speaker 1>reading to uh, to start fouling up the um the results.

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.680
<v Speaker 1>It is not hard to learn how to fate, how

0:23:00.720 --> 0:23:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to how to fool a polygraph, or at least fooling

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 1>is probably the wrong word. How to make the results unreadable, essentially,

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 1>because if you make it so that it looks like

0:23:10.920 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you're lying to answers that are obviously the truth, they

0:23:13.560 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>can't rely on the test as a whole. Yeah, And

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why, uh, it's so controversial even now

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 1>after decades of being in use, and why so many

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:27.680
<v Speaker 1>jurisdictions won't allow polygraphs to be submitted, and there's still

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 1>some that will, and some of them will only do

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it upon the order of a judge. Like in some jurisdictions,

0:23:34.240 --> 0:23:37.919
<v Speaker 1>a judge can say can allow, has has discretion to

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>allow or not allow lie detective results. Um, I I

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:46.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's it's I think that using them in any

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>case in a in that sense like as evidence, is terrible.

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just a horrible idea because it's already been proven

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to be unreliable. You can beat it if you know how,

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and even if you don't know how, but you are anxious,

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>can be falsely you can give off false positives. Um.

0:24:04.480 --> 0:24:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And here's another good example. I meant to mention this

0:24:07.520 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>with the whole control question versus the the real questions.

0:24:12.040 --> 0:24:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So part of the problem is that you can never

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:18.840
<v Speaker 1>really establish a good control versus real question because the

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>control questions aren't going to have the same emotional impact

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:25.000
<v Speaker 1>as the real questions. Okay, so, like a control question

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>might be do you live at such and such address? Well,

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no emotional attachment there, there's no sense of risk,

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing like that, and you you could just say yes.

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>But if they say did you kill Mr so and

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.359
<v Speaker 1>so blah blah blah, well that that's definitely got an

0:24:42.400 --> 0:24:44.639
<v Speaker 1>emotional attachment to it, whether you did it or not.

0:24:46.000 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Just the accusation alone is enough to provoke the fight

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:51.520
<v Speaker 1>or flight response in most people. Maybe not even most,

0:24:51.520 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but in lots of people. Most is probably too too

0:24:55.160 --> 0:24:57.679
<v Speaker 1>vague word but I would I would think that a

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:00.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of people would respond very strongly to that question

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.920
<v Speaker 1>whether they had done anything or not, because it's an

0:25:04.920 --> 0:25:08.400
<v Speaker 1>emotionally charged question unless you were able to create control

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:11.880
<v Speaker 1>questions that were also emotionally charged. Uh, you can't really

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:14.240
<v Speaker 1>say that's a baseline. You know, it's like how was

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:17.440
<v Speaker 1>your day? Oh it is good? Good? Did you skin

0:25:17.800 --> 0:25:20.760
<v Speaker 1>this person alive? And then wear that as address that?

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Two different questions, two different levels. For some of us

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we can casually answer yes to those, but others, you know,

0:25:28.520 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 1>would have a bit of a reaction to that. Sometimes

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.440
<v Speaker 1>you frighten me. I just wanted you to to do that. Well, hell,

0:25:35.480 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what springs right around the corner, and fashion

0:25:37.720 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>time is coming up great at any rate. So polygraph tests, uh,

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:50.840
<v Speaker 1>I think you can safely say are great for measuring

0:25:50.880 --> 0:25:55.280
<v Speaker 1>a physiological response, not great at at ascertaining truth versus lies.

0:25:55.680 --> 0:25:59.679
<v Speaker 1>So there, it's a misnomer. Really, it's more of like

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>Tyler was saying, our our guest producer for the day. Uh,

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>it's more of a stress test than a than a

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>lie test. Um. Do you have anything to add to that? No?

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Not really. The fact that some some pretty major cases

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of came down to lie detector evidence making a

0:26:17.040 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>big difference. Yeah, it's a little hard to imagine that,

0:26:21.400 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 1>but um, it's true. But in in several of the cases,

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.600
<v Speaker 1>just because someone passes a lie detector test doesn't mean

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>they're innocent, And just because someone fails it doesn't mean

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.760
<v Speaker 1>they're guilty. Well, it also if they fail it, they

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:36.560
<v Speaker 1>might be guilty. If they pass it, they might be innocence.

0:26:36.600 --> 0:26:40.200
<v Speaker 1>So even in cases where lie detector tests were entered

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>into evidence, usually there was other evidence that really contributed

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 1>to a person's sentence of guilty. Um, that doesn't necessarily

0:26:49.800 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>mean that no one has ever been falsely imprisoned because

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:54.479
<v Speaker 1>of a lie detector test. I haven't done the research

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>on that. I would imagine that it's probably happened, which

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is unfortunate, but uh, it probably doesn't happen A lot

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:06.440
<v Speaker 1>still shouldn't happen at all, I know. But anyway, Yeah,

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:08.719
<v Speaker 1>but I'm glad we tackle this one because it's, uh,

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it's fascinating to think about it, and it's some The

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that makes this so different from the ghost Hunter

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Tech episode is that you know, it actually does more

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>or less what it's supposed to, but it's just so

0:27:20.440 --> 0:27:23.160
<v Speaker 1>unreliable that you can't count on it. Yeah. Yeah, like

0:27:23.200 --> 0:27:25.639
<v Speaker 1>I said, there is you know, a legitimate reason for

0:27:25.720 --> 0:27:28.120
<v Speaker 1>wanting to use it, right. It it does measure things.

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>It's just like I said, the premise that it's based

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>upon it itself is faulty. And that's the problem is

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:35.280
<v Speaker 1>when you when you're when you have a faulty premise,

0:27:35.560 --> 0:27:39.159
<v Speaker 1>everything else that follows can't be relied upon. And again

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about critical thinking, so that's another great um example.

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, if you guys have other critical thinking kind

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 1>of of topics you would like us to tackle, let

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>us know. Now we should also point out some people

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:54.159
<v Speaker 1>have been suggesting things that really don't fall into the

0:27:54.200 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>tech field. Uh. And this, since this is tech stuff

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and not skeptic stuff, we can't just tackle anything, as

0:28:01.920 --> 0:28:03.480
<v Speaker 1>much as I would love to do that. But we

0:28:03.520 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 1>do have a sister podcast called Stuff from the Science

0:28:06.240 --> 0:28:09.479
<v Speaker 1>Lab that just went live not that long ago. And um,

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:13.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure they'd talk about scientific Yeah. I don't know

0:28:13.320 --> 0:28:15.040
<v Speaker 1>what their email addresses off the top of my head,

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 1>but as soon as this, by the time this goes live, um,

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I will I be sure to make a blog post

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that points people in the right direction, because I think

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that that podcast would probably be the best place to

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>tackle skeptical matters that are non technology oriented. I mean,

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm still going to take the tech ones. I will

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:34.920
<v Speaker 1>find them tooth and nail, but if it's not tech

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>related and you still want to hear about it, it

0:28:36.760 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>would be a good choice. So but that brings us

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:44.160
<v Speaker 1>to our second round of listening along. This listening mail

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>comes from Jason from Maryland, and he says, Hey, guys,

0:28:46.920 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I read this and it reminded me of your podcast

0:28:48.960 --> 0:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a bit ago about easter eggs. I hope all is well.

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>A crazy easter egg popped up on airfare search site

0:28:55.120 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>kayak today. If you try searching for one way flight

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 1>from Sydney to Los Angeles to place on September twenty two,

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>two ten, you'll get the fictitious flight featured on a

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:08.920
<v Speaker 1>mysterious TV show called Lost, which is true. You'll do

0:29:09.040 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>get the Oceanic Airways flight. Um. I've never actually seen

0:29:13.520 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 1>an episode of Lost, but I went ahead and tried

0:29:15.440 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>this anyway and it did work. Yeah. Cool. I then

0:29:19.440 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>was mauled by a polar bear. I have no idea

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>what that's about. Yeah, I don't either. I haven't watched

0:29:25.520 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the show either. We're lane if you want to write

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:30.959
<v Speaker 1>and tell us how lame we are tech stuff at

0:29:30.960 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>how stuff works dot com. Remember when we get the blogs,

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we get the live show every Tuesday one pm. Uh.

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I hope you guys are are tuning into that. It's

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.040
<v Speaker 1>been a really fun experience so far. We've we've managed

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:45.680
<v Speaker 1>to to to alienate Apple fans and when does fans alike?

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:48.880
<v Speaker 1>All right? I hope we can continue. I think Lennox

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>is next. Just you know, it all depends on what's

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in the news. We'll see, so tune into that. Read

0:29:54.640 --> 0:29:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the blogs, check out the website. Check out this article

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>on how light detectors work. It's a, like we said,

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a very good article, and we will talk to you

0:30:01.200 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 1>again really soon for more on this and thousands of

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>other topics. Does it how stuff works dot com and

0:30:09.440 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>be sure to check out the new tech stuff blog

0:30:11.560 --> 0:30:18.520
<v Speaker 1>now on the house stuff Works homepage. Brought to you

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you