Speaker 1: Center is always nice to be sitting with you in studio,
Speaker 1: and for people that are listening audio only, you can
Speaker 1: watch this episode on YouTube as well. Let's start with
Speaker 1: this idea, and I think it's time to have a
Speaker 1: real discussion about it, the possibility that Joe Biden may
Speaker 1: actually not be the nominee for the Democratic Party. They
Speaker 1: seem to be turning on him. Your initial reaction to this.
Speaker 2: Well, I think the odds that Joe Biden is not
Speaker 2: the Democrats nominee in twenty twenty four have risen significantly,
Speaker 2: maybe by as much as twenty or thirty percent, And
Speaker 2: I think they're all sorts of inditia that suggests that
Speaker 2: Democrats are getting nervous. They're getting nervous about his age.
Speaker 2: They're looking at polling numbers that show two thirds of
Speaker 2: Americans think he's too old to be president. They're getting
Speaker 2: nervous about all of the evidence of Biden corruption. You've
Speaker 2: got Hunter being indicted, You've got all the connections to Joe.
Speaker 2: And then what we've seen in recent weeks is the
Speaker 2: media's turning on them. And remember the role of the media. Sadly,
Speaker 2: they're no longer journalists, they no longer report news. They
Speaker 2: are the left wing of the Democrat Party. And when
Speaker 2: the media turns on the presumed Democrat nominee, I think
Speaker 2: that is the cutting edge of the Democrat intelligentsia saying
Speaker 2: we may have to cut bait and find someone new. So,
Speaker 2: for example, David Ignatius, Yeah, columnists in the Washington Post.
Speaker 1: Say that again in the Washington Post, saying this, this
Speaker 1: is something that doesn't happen.
Speaker 3: Well, he wrote, tell us what he wrote.
Speaker 1: Then he wrote something interesting and basically was saying it's
Speaker 1: time to get rid of Joe Biden or maybe Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: or maybe both. And one of the things he talked
Speaker 1: about in here he said he was concerned about Harris
Speaker 1: that even with Biden, because he says that, well, one
Speaker 1: way that Biden could help himself is by encouraging quote
Speaker 1: a more open vice presidential selection process that can produce
Speaker 1: a stronger running mate. So he's even saying, hey, Joe Biden,
Speaker 1: you're in deep trouble. Democrats need to pay attention to this.
Speaker 1: But if you're not going to stop, if you're not
Speaker 1: gonna say I'm not going to run, you might want
Speaker 1: to look at replace your vice presidential candidate. Because maybe
Speaker 1: that will at least make you'll go, all right, well,
Speaker 1: we like you a little bit more because we know
Speaker 1: we're going to replace you with someone that we like.
Speaker 1: Because her poll numbers are worse than Joe Biden's, well,
Speaker 1: well they are.
Speaker 2: And the fact that the Washington Post is throwing that
Speaker 2: marker out there, and let's come back to that, because
Speaker 2: I want to talk about the likelihood of Joe not
Speaker 2: being the nominee. I want to talk about the likelihood
Speaker 2: of Kamala not being the vice presidentdential nominee. But first,
Speaker 2: the fact that the Washington Post puts that out there
Speaker 2: in a very prominent column. It's like the starter's pistol
Speaker 2: and the media, they all listen to the same things.
Speaker 2: And so when you have the Washington Post start saying that,
Speaker 2: when you have the New York Times starts saying that,
Speaker 2: you start having others. So, for example, here's CNN this
Speaker 2: past week. Give a listen he has done I don't
Speaker 2: know if it's similar things, but he's sort of told
Speaker 2: some stories that don't line up quite like this before.
Speaker 4: Yeah, this president has a pattern at this point of
Speaker 4: either in venting or embellishing stories about his own past,
Speaker 4: his biography. He did it three times in one speech
Speaker 4: last month alone. He claimed he had witnessed bridge collapse
Speaker 4: in Pittsburgh when he actually showed up about six hours later.
Speaker 4: He claimed that his grandfather had died just days before
Speaker 4: he was born himself at the same hospital. In fact,
Speaker 4: his grandpa died more than a year before in a
Speaker 4: different state, not the same hospital. And he also repeated
Speaker 4: a favorite fallse story that I and others had debunked
Speaker 4: over and over again about a supposed conversation with an
Speaker 4: Amtrak train conductor he was friends with who was actually
Speaker 4: deceased at the time the conversation would have had to
Speaker 4: take place. And that's not all. There are some more
Speaker 4: serious ones, in my view. Previously in his presidency, he
Speaker 4: claimed at one point he'd been arrested during a civil
Speaker 4: rights protest, when in other versions of the story he
Speaker 4: just said an officer had taken him home from a protest.
Speaker 4: He said he had visited the Pittsburgh synagogue where warshippers
Speaker 4: were killed in a twenty eighteen match shooting. In fact,
Speaker 4: he had actually spoken to the rabbi, but but never went.
Speaker 4: And he's made a whole bunch of others too, he
Speaker 4: said At one point Republicans like to bring this up.
Speaker 4: He said that he used to drive a tractor trailer
Speaker 4: and he used to drive an eighteen wheeler. Never happened.
Speaker 4: The White House later clarified he used to drive a
Speaker 4: school bus at one point for as a job briefly
Speaker 4: school bus, of course, not an eighteen wheeler. So whatever
Speaker 4: his intentions, whether it's you know, foggy memory about stuff
Speaker 4: that's going on decades ago, or deliberate embellishment, this is
Speaker 4: unfortunate pattern that keeps coming up again and again with
Speaker 4: Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: You go back to the starter gun analogy that used
Speaker 1: a moment ago, Senator. It's like everyone was holding back.
Speaker 1: Then all of a sudden, the op ed comes out
Speaker 1: in the Washington Post, and it's like, oh, we can
Speaker 1: now say this, we can now do this well.
Speaker 2: And I got to say that clip on CNN I
Speaker 2: think is funny on like nineteen different levels. Number one,
Speaker 2: the most important thing is they're finally reporting on the
Speaker 2: fact that Joe Biden is a pathological serial liar. He
Speaker 2: has been his entire career. He says things that are false,
Speaker 2: he says the things that they're false. Again, he does
Speaker 2: it over and over and over and over again. The
Speaker 2: reporters all know that. Yeah, us CNN didn't used to
Speaker 2: talk about it. They didn't used to be willing to
Speaker 2: say it, because, hey, their job is to protect the
Speaker 2: Democrat president, not actually to report on what he says
Speaker 2: and does, even though it's a lie.
Speaker 3: That's point number one. On that point number.
Speaker 2: Two, the examples they use are deliberately minor examples. They're
Speaker 2: deliberately not that consequential. They didn't include the lie that
Speaker 2: Joe Biden just did last week where he said he
Speaker 2: was at ground zero the day after nine to eleven
Speaker 2: and he saw it right there. That's a flat out lie.
Speaker 3: No, he wasn't.
Speaker 2: He was on the floor of the Senate on September twelfth,
Speaker 2: two thousand and one. He did not go the day
Speaker 2: after nine to eleven. It's just at an absolute lie.
Speaker 2: But they didn't include that one because that is well.
Speaker 1: I laugh, because they put at the bottom of the
Speaker 1: screen on the ticker, but they didn't mention it in
Speaker 1: their comments. They're like, well, it was like the pretext
Speaker 1: was like, let's not mention that one, because I think
Speaker 1: that makes too many Americans angry that you would place
Speaker 1: yourself at the ground zero the day after nine to eleven,
Speaker 1: So we'll just put at the bottom of the screen,
Speaker 1: but we won't even talk about it. Where our work words.
Speaker 2: And most significantly, they do not include his repeated lies
Speaker 2: about his corruption with his son, Hunter Biden. They don't
Speaker 2: include the lie I've never spoken with my son about
Speaker 2: his overseas business dealings. That's now demonstrably false. Even the
Speaker 2: White House is backed away from it. But far be
Speaker 2: it from CNN to admit that that's a lie, because
Speaker 2: that actually that goes to their conceit no evidence, no evidence,
Speaker 2: no evidence, there's no evidence, no direct evidence. We obviously
Speaker 2: had an entire podcast explaining what they mean when they
Speaker 2: say no no direct evidence and why they're lying. So
Speaker 2: they don't include the most consequential and significant ones. And
Speaker 2: I got to say, for those of you that are
Speaker 2: watching this on YouTube, this is one of our three
Speaker 2: pods a week that is both on YouTube and on audio.
Speaker 2: You can see the images they put up, and they
Speaker 2: have a whole series of clips of Joe Biden, every
Speaker 2: one of them.
Speaker 3: He's smiling.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they're all good. He looks like a genial grandfather.
Speaker 3: So he's a.
Speaker 1: Liar, but he's just like it old he just haven't fine,
Speaker 1: he's just you.
Speaker 2: I mean, who else hasn't claimed they were at ground
Speaker 2: zero after nine to eleven when they weren't. That's just
Speaker 2: what really old genial uncle Joe's do. So CNN is
Speaker 2: starting to criticize them, but they're so bad at it,
Speaker 2: They're so used to being the praetorian guard protecting him
Speaker 2: that they can't really bring themselves to do it. That
Speaker 2: being said, look this the Washington Post flipping on him,
Speaker 2: CNN flipping on him. This is significant, and I think
Speaker 2: the Democrat intelligentsia is getting nervous and Ben. I believe
Speaker 2: there is now a real possibility Joe Biden is not
Speaker 2: the Democrat nominee in twenty twenty four. And I think
Speaker 2: there are two ways this potentially plays out. One way
Speaker 2: is the pressure ratchets up internally within the Democrat Party
Speaker 2: significantly enough that Biden ends up back out. I think
Speaker 2: there's some chance of that. He didn't want to, but
Speaker 2: I got to say. The weird thing about Democrats their
Speaker 2: command and control.
Speaker 3: They are collectivists.
Speaker 2: And if enough of the power brokers go to Biden
Speaker 2: and say enough is enough is enough, I think there
Speaker 2: is some possibility, says I'm out.
Speaker 3: I did what I came to do.
Speaker 2: I stopped Donald Trump from getting in office in twenty
Speaker 2: twenty one.
Speaker 3: I'm done.
Speaker 2: I'm riding off into the sunset. That's actually what David
Speaker 2: Igdasias says. Look, you can victory lap. You did what
Speaker 2: you wanted to do. And by the way, one of
Speaker 2: the things fueling that is the unease about Kamala Harris.
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris's numbers, her pole support is terrible, her unfavorables
Speaker 2: are terrible.
Speaker 1: Worse than his, and his poll numbers, to be clear,
Speaker 1: are at Jimmy Carter.
Speaker 2: Levels or thirty nine percent approval ratings, and hers are
Speaker 2: worse in the twenties. It makes you wonder if she
Speaker 2: wears mint flavored shoes, because daily she seems to stick
Speaker 2: her foot in her mouth and Democrats are nervous. Look,
Speaker 2: Joe Biden is eighty years old. If Biden is elected
Speaker 2: in twenty twenty four, the actuarial tables are very significant.
Speaker 2: The odds are high that he does not live out
Speaker 2: a second term, that he dies sometime in the White House.
Speaker 2: That's just the realities of the age he's at, which
Speaker 2: means in this next election, if the Democrat ticket is
Speaker 2: Biden Harris, A huge part of it is going to
Speaker 2: be you pull that lever for Joe Biden. You are
Speaker 2: voting for President Kamala Harris, and that number one scares
Speaker 2: the heck I think out of a lot of voters.
Speaker 2: But number two makes Democrat Democrats nervous because they recognize
Speaker 2: it scares the heck out of a lot of voters.
Speaker 2: Now you asked, Okay, might they dump Kamala Harris as VP?
Speaker 3: I think the chances of that are zero?
Speaker 1: Is it for the same reason that I think it's
Speaker 1: probably zero, and that is if it was a white male,
Speaker 1: they'd have a much easier time. I'm getting rid of
Speaker 1: that person. But this is an African American female. How
Speaker 1: do you offload an African American female without having to
Speaker 1: worry that women are going to turn against you? Yeah,
Speaker 1: and minorities would turn against you, saying how dare you
Speaker 1: get rid of our woman? Who could be the first
Speaker 1: female president in the history of the United States of
Speaker 1: America could be Kamala Harris, not because anyone elects her,
Speaker 1: just because of age and him having to resign or
Speaker 1: based on age that he could die in office.
Speaker 2: So yes, And especially because the Democrats are such hyper
Speaker 2: bean counting, they put everyone into categories, so they don't
Speaker 2: think of you as a human being. They think of
Speaker 2: you you are a man, you were a white man,
Speaker 2: you were a black woman, like whatever your race, whatever
Speaker 2: your category. Ideally you're a transgender, you know, vegetarian, pantheist
Speaker 2: or whatever. But whatever your category, they put you into it.
Speaker 2: If it were some poor slub white guy, if the
Speaker 2: VP were Joe Biden, see ya, they'd put him out
Speaker 2: on a boat with a guy saying Hail Mary as
Speaker 2: he puts around in his forehead as they do, and
Speaker 2: Godfather too. That's what they do. And I mean that figuratively.
Speaker 2: I can just see the fact checkers now. Cruz says
Speaker 2: they're going to murder him, though that's not what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: I'm saying they'd get rid of him, and get rid
Speaker 2: of him really quickly. I don't think the Democrats would
Speaker 2: be willing to dump Kamala Harris because they view African
Speaker 2: American women as such an essential part of their political
Speaker 2: coalition to victory that I think they'd be terrified of
Speaker 2: pissing off black women.
Speaker 3: And if African American women stayed home.
Speaker 2: Democrats lose, so I don't think they can dump Kamala
Speaker 2: Harris as much as as the Washington Post columnists might
Speaker 2: want them to. So they're two scenarios in which Joe
Speaker 2: Biden is not the nominee. I believe number one, the
Speaker 2: powers that be in the Democrat Party convinced Joe Biden
Speaker 2: to pull out. If that happens, I think it's a
Speaker 2: free for all. I think a bunch of people get in.
Speaker 2: I think the top four Democrats who get in are
Speaker 2: Kamala Harris, Pete Bootage, Edge, Gavin Newsom, and Elizabeth Warren.
Speaker 2: And I think all four of them get in. I
Speaker 2: think Gretchen Whitmer probably gets in as well. I think
Speaker 2: there are some others that get in. I think you
Speaker 2: probably get five to ten candidates who jump in the
Speaker 2: instant Biden is out now, in my view, the top
Speaker 2: tier of the first four I listed, and I think
Speaker 2: in that primary, I believe Elizabeth Warren wins that primary. Really,
Speaker 2: and when I say that that shocks people, I get
Speaker 2: a lot of gasps.
Speaker 1: But I'd be to that group right now because that
Speaker 1: was not what I thought you were gonna say. Why
Speaker 1: Elizabeth Warren out of all them. I mean, she has
Speaker 1: Pokehontas for a reason.
Speaker 2: Because I think Elizabeth Warren is the ID of today's
Speaker 2: Democrat Party. She is the hard left, angry Marxist and
Speaker 2: that is where the heart is. Look, it's Elizabeth Warren
Speaker 2: and Bernie Sanders and AOC that drive the Democrat policy
Speaker 2: agenda right now because the entire party is terrified of her.
Speaker 2: In twenty twenty, Elizabeth Warren was splitting the crazy moon
Speaker 2: bat Marxist left with Bernie Sanders. Yeah, and the two
Speaker 2: of them were dividing that vote, which is what let
Speaker 2: Joe Biden win that primary. I don't think Bernie runs
Speaker 2: this time. I think he will recognize he's too old
Speaker 2: to run this time. And so I think Elizabeth has
Speaker 2: the crazy left winger lane all to herself, and I
Speaker 2: think that beats the rest of that field. That scenario one,
Speaker 2: Elizabeth Warren comes out of a wide open, real Democrat primary. Now,
Speaker 2: the thing about it is you're running out of time,
Speaker 2: So I'll give you some deadlines. October sixteenth is the
Speaker 2: filing deadline for major party candidates in Nevada. November tenth
Speaker 2: is the filing deadline for major major party candidates at Alabama.
Speaker 2: November fourteenth is the filing deadline for major party candidates
Speaker 2: in Arkansas. So we're starting to get to filing deadlines
Speaker 2: where it becomes exceedingly difficult to get on the ballot.
Speaker 2: And so if this scenario happens, it has to happen fast.
Speaker 1: That was my question at the timeline. If Joe Biden's
Speaker 1: gonna if he's gonna be pushed out, forced out, because
Speaker 1: it's not gonna be on his own accord.
Speaker 3: Next sixty days, next sixty days, Yeah, I mean it's
Speaker 3: we've got it.
Speaker 1: So then here's my question. Do we see the media
Speaker 1: change the way they're covering the Biden crime family over
Speaker 1: the next sixty days is part of the final push
Speaker 1: to get him to realize he can't run.
Speaker 3: I think that is entirely possible.
Speaker 2: I think Washington Post and CNN are sort of the
Speaker 2: opening shots. And if we see in the next couple
Speaker 2: of weeks, if we see the media actually covering all
Speaker 2: of Biden's enormous problems, that's the pressure mounting. There's a
Speaker 2: second scenario, and this scenario I think is more likely
Speaker 2: and a heck of a lot more dangerous, which is
Speaker 2: fast forward to next year. Fast forward to the Democrat
Speaker 2: National Convention. It's going to be in Chicago, Illinois, and
Speaker 2: it is August nineteenth through twenty second. If we get
Speaker 2: to August of next year and number one, Biden's mental
Speaker 2: diminishment has gotten even worse and it becomes obvious to
Speaker 2: anyone that he can't find his shoes, and Democrats decide, okay,
Speaker 2: all of this downside is really worrying us. Then the
Speaker 2: convention is the opportunity to parachute someone in. You parachute
Speaker 2: someone in by having some story that for health reasons,
Speaker 2: Biden's not able to continue. How the Democrats execute that exactly,
Speaker 2: I don't know. But the Democrats are very big on
Speaker 2: smoke filled rooms and forcing through the outcome they want
Speaker 2: and they obey orders. Now, if you're a Democrat, pubah.
Speaker 2: And by the way, the Democrats also have what are
Speaker 2: called super delegates. Republicans don't have super delegates. Super delegates
Speaker 2: are typically elected officials that have disproportionate power at their convention.
Speaker 2: They have the ability to really move the votes. If
Speaker 2: you get to the August convention for Democrats and they've
Speaker 2: collectively lost their nerve on Biden said, it's time to
Speaker 2: put Joe out to pasture. What do they do then, Well,
Speaker 2: the natural thing to say would be, okay, it'll be
Speaker 2: one of those top four. And here's the problem. Whoever
Speaker 2: they pick is a problem. They pick Kamala Harris, She's
Speaker 2: the vice president in some ways the natural choice. All
Speaker 2: of the downsides of Kamala Harris make that a really
Speaker 2: dangerous choice. If they pick Gavin Newsom, that makes some
Speaker 2: California Democrats happy. The problem is you're replacing an African
Speaker 2: American woman in the Democrat Party with a white guy.
Speaker 2: That a rich white guy, a very rich white guy.
Speaker 2: You want to talk about a recipe for discontent. That's
Speaker 2: a big problem. They could go with Pete Boudhajeedge, another
Speaker 2: white guy, but Buddha Jedge is gay. That's at least
Speaker 2: the gay lesbian community is a big chunk of the
Speaker 2: Democrat coalition. So rich liberals would really like Pete bootaj Edge,
Speaker 2: and a lot of the Democrat donors are gay and lesbian.
Speaker 2: That's a major chunk of the funding stream for a
Speaker 2: Democrat candidate. But you have the same problem if you
Speaker 2: jettison an African American woman who's vice president for a
Speaker 2: white guy in the Democrat primary, you're really asking for trouble.
Speaker 2: An option for is Elizabeth Warren. Well, Elizabeth Warren makes
Speaker 2: the crazy moon bat leftists happy, but you have the
Speaker 2: same everyone else who doesn't get it. I think anyone
Speaker 2: they go with as a coronation. It's different than an
Speaker 2: open primary where Warren wins, because primary voters vote for
Speaker 2: that gives an element of legitimacy that the people who
Speaker 2: don't win can live with. If it's just the king
Speaker 2: maker saying nope, we pick you, whoever doesn't get picked,
Speaker 2: everyone else's pissed. So here's the scenario that I think
Speaker 2: is perhaps most likely and most dangerous. In August of
Speaker 2: twenty twenty four, the Democrat kingmakers jettison Joe Biden and
Speaker 2: parachute in Michelle Obama, and I want you to pause
Speaker 2: and reflect on it.
Speaker 1: Oh, I'm pausing, and I'm reflecting, as we said, and
Speaker 1: so is everybody else listening right now.
Speaker 3: I view this as a very serious danger.
Speaker 1: I'm smiling right now because it terrifies me. And I
Speaker 1: also could totally see this happening.
Speaker 2: So, Michelle Obama, number one, you don't infuriate African American women,
Speaker 2: which is a critical part of the constituency that Democrats
Speaker 2: are relying on to win. But number two, you so
Speaker 2: avoid the problem if you pick from any of the four.
Speaker 2: The other three are pissed because they're all, to some
Speaker 2: extent peers, they're rivals, they're all jabbin knives at each other.
Speaker 2: Michelle Obama, because she was first lady, has the ability
Speaker 2: to kind of parachute in above all four and say, hey,
Speaker 2: we're not picking among any of you. You guys can
Speaker 2: all fight it out. Next time. You're all going to
Speaker 2: be on the same level. We're coming. This is the
Speaker 2: Obamas saving the day. And I think in terms of
Speaker 2: a solution that unifies Democrats, there ain't nothing like that.
Speaker 2: I also think Michelle is not all that eager to
Speaker 2: run for president, but to parachute in in August of
Speaker 2: twenty four a couple of months before the presidency and
Speaker 2: suddenly wake up and be president not a bad gig.
Speaker 2: It's not a bad gig at all. Now would she
Speaker 2: do it? I don't know. I've met Michelle, but I
Speaker 2: don't know her personally in any meaningful way. I don't
Speaker 2: know if she would do it. I do think Barack
Speaker 2: Obama is already running the Biden administration. I think he
Speaker 2: is already the puppet master behind this Biden White House.
Speaker 2: I don't think Joe Biden is the decision maker. And
Speaker 2: so when I see the media turning on Joe Biden
Speaker 2: right now, I think the odds of Michelle Obama parachuting
Speaker 2: in in August of twenty twenty four have risen dramatically,
Speaker 2: and that ought to scare the hell out anyone who
Speaker 2: who is unhappy about the direction this country is going
Speaker 2: and doesn't want us to go even crazier in an
Speaker 2: even worse direction.
Speaker 1: I want to tell you about our friends at Patriot Mobile.
Speaker 1: If you are tired of giving your money to woke
Speaker 1: corporations that are actually fighting against what you believe in.
Speaker 1: There's one bill every month that you pay they can
Speaker 1: actually now make a difference standing up for what you
Speaker 1: believe in, and that's for your cell phone. Patriot Mobile
Speaker 1: has been around now for over a decade and they're
Speaker 1: the only conservative Christian cell phone provider in the country.
Speaker 1: And when you pay your bill every month, they are
Speaker 1: actually fighting for the causes that you believe in. We're
Speaker 1: talking about standing with the First and Second Amendment issues,
Speaker 1: protecting the rights of unborn children, helping with adoptions, and
Speaker 1: they help with our first responders, our American veterans, those
Speaker 1: that serve this country. I love Patriot Mobile because they
Speaker 1: actually stand up for what I believe in. Now, the
Speaker 1: coverage you get is amazed, amazing because they give you
Speaker 1: coverage on all three major networks and you usually save
Speaker 1: money over what you're paying right now. So whether you
Speaker 1: have a business or a small business or just a
Speaker 1: family plan, call them one hundred percent USA based call center,
Speaker 1: so you're talking to people right here in this country.
Speaker 1: Eight seven eight Patriots the number that's eight seven eight
Speaker 1: Patriot or Patriotmobile dot com slash verdict. Now use the
Speaker 1: promo code verdict and you're gonna get free activation the
Speaker 1: best deals of the year. Keep your same cell phone
Speaker 1: number you have right now, your same cell phone, or
Speaker 1: upgrade to a new one seven eight Patriot or Patriot
Speaker 1: Mobile dot com slash verdict. I gotta ask you one
Speaker 1: more question about this scenario with Michelle. If that was
Speaker 1: to happen at the conventions you just described it and
Speaker 1: Joe Biden walks off the stage, does he turned himself
Speaker 1: into the biggest hero of the Democratic Party in history.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, yeah, I know that they immediately start carving
Speaker 2: him on Rushmore figuratively speaking, the rushmore of socialists. Joe
Speaker 2: Biden would permanently look. He aspires to be the next FDR,
Speaker 2: and part of how Democrats would get him to step
Speaker 2: down as saying, by doing this, your FDR. By doing this,
Speaker 2: you're George Washington stepping down after two terms. You're demonstrating
Speaker 2: the ultimate statesman principle. Now look, I think Joe Biden
Speaker 2: loves the trappings of being president. This guy's wanted to
Speaker 2: be president forevers he was two. And to be clear,
Speaker 2: I understand that in particular sickness, my hands are not cleaned.
Speaker 3: Yeah, in that.
Speaker 2: Discussion, but so I get it. But I do think
Speaker 2: the Democrats appeal to his vanity that you will be
Speaker 2: legendary and immortal if you do this, and that may
Speaker 2: be an element of making it happen. And I don't
Speaker 2: think it is more likely than not. I don't think
Speaker 2: it's greater than fifty percent that Biden is not the nominee,
Speaker 2: but I think it's probably twenty five or thirty percent
Speaker 2: right now.
Speaker 1: It's interesting that you said that about Michelle because I
Speaker 1: was doing my podcast the night after Michelle Obama was
Speaker 1: talking with Billy Jing King about equal pay, and she
Speaker 1: did this speech the US open in prime time And
Speaker 1: I said the next day, not thinking about the connection
Speaker 1: you're talking about here, I said it like it was
Speaker 1: almost like a coming out political speech. It was the
Speaker 1: first time I saw Michelle Obama in a political way.
Speaker 1: It wasn't a first lady's speech. It was a political
Speaker 1: ass speech. It was her in her own words, not
Speaker 1: under my husband. First lady ask and if you think
Speaker 1: about that now, with what you just said, that's scary
Speaker 1: as hell.
Speaker 2: And by the way, this is not a new thought
Speaker 2: for Democrats. Had Bill Clinton who served two terms, and
Speaker 2: then obviously Hillary was presumed to be the heir apparent,
Speaker 2: and so the dynamic from Barack to Michelle. Listen, the
Speaker 2: Democrats are dynastic. The Democrats are top down. The Democrats
Speaker 2: are command and control. And it's because Michelle has a
Speaker 2: claim to already being at a higher level in the
Speaker 2: Democrat pecking order than any of the other contenders. It's
Speaker 2: the only solution for Democrat power brokers that doesn't cause
Speaker 2: a civil war.
Speaker 1: Yeah, and it comes with the best political campaigner in
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party, her husband.
Speaker 2: Plus, look, Michelle spent eight years as first lady. First
Speaker 2: lady is a position that by design keeps you out
Speaker 2: of the political fray. And so Michelle Obama has really
Speaker 2: high positives and relatively low negatives. Now she starts getting
Speaker 2: into policy, I think she is further left than Barack.
Speaker 2: I think she is further left than Joe Biden. I
Speaker 2: think as a president she would be disastrous. But the
Speaker 2: American people think not only of her because she's first Lady.
Speaker 2: The role of first lady insulates someone. And if she
Speaker 2: parachutes in in August with big positives and relatively low negatives,
Speaker 2: and she can also say, hey, all the things Joe
Speaker 2: Biden screwed up on that wasn't me. Yeah, that is
Speaker 2: really potent politically. If I were a Democrat, I'd be
Speaker 2: excited about that.
Speaker 1: There's also something else to happened this week with a
Speaker 1: Democratic primary that was shocking to me. You've had people
Speaker 1: that made threats against you, You've run for president of
Speaker 1: United States of America. I've experienced having people threatened against
Speaker 1: me as well. It's not a good feeling. You look
Speaker 1: at the Kennedy family and the fact that they've had
Speaker 1: assassinations and targeting, and RFK has made it clear he
Speaker 1: wants protection. There was something shocking that had this week
Speaker 1: with a man that was dressed liked law enforcement. Thank goodness,
Speaker 1: they saw him, they figured it out. There were certain
Speaker 1: things he was wearing in his outfit, the way where
Speaker 1: his gun was being held on his person that didn't
Speaker 1: fit law enforcement, and he was arrested. But you were
Speaker 1: upset about this, I think as you should be, because
Speaker 1: why have they still not decided to protect RFK and
Speaker 1: what's taking them so long, especially when see things like
Speaker 1: this happened.
Speaker 2: Yeah, this was a really disturbing security incident. You had
Speaker 2: someone show up at an event for RFK Junior. He
Speaker 2: had two firearms and two shoulder holsters that he was wearing.
Speaker 2: He was dressed as law enforcement, and it was fraudulent.
Speaker 2: He was dressed with a lanyard that indicated he was
Speaker 2: a US marshal. He was trying to camouflage. He told
Speaker 2: people he was part of rfk's security detail. Thankfully, the
Speaker 2: private security that RFK hired recognized that he wasn't and
Speaker 2: they detained and arrested him. But someone coming in with
Speaker 2: two loaded firearms and extra magazines impersonating law enforcement is
Speaker 2: on its face, exceptionally dangerous. Now, RFK put out the
Speaker 2: following statement, We're gonna put it up on the screen.
Speaker 2: Here's what RFK said. I'm very grateful that alert and
Speaker 2: fast acting protectors from Gavin de Becker and associates his
Speaker 2: private security firm spotted and detained an armed man who
Speaker 2: attempted to approach me at my Hispanic Heritage speech at
Speaker 2: the Wilshire Ebel Theatre in Los Angeles tonight. The man,
Speaker 2: wearing two shoulder hosters with loaded pistols and spare ammunition magazines,
Speaker 2: was carrying a US Marshal badge on a lanyard and
Speaker 2: at belt clip federal ID. He identified himself as a
Speaker 2: member of my security detail. Armed GDBA team members moved
Speaker 2: quickly to isolate and detain the man until LAPD arrived
Speaker 2: to make the arrest. I'm also grateful to LAPD for
Speaker 2: its rapid response. And then this is in bold in
Speaker 2: his tweet. I'm still entertaining a hope that President Biden
Speaker 2: will allow me Secret Service protection, the first presidential candidate
Speaker 2: history to whom the White House has denied a request
Speaker 2: for protection.
Speaker 1: Now, can you explain the politics of that real quick.
Speaker 1: So people don't understand how this works.
Speaker 3: Yeah, let me do that in the way I'm going
Speaker 3: to do that.
Speaker 2: I want to put up I retweeted this, and I
Speaker 2: retweeted it with my own comment. So let's put up
Speaker 2: what I tweeted. I retweeted RFK statement, and here's what
Speaker 2: I said. This isn't a left or right issue. The
Speaker 2: Biden administration should give Robert Kennedy Junior a security detail now.
Speaker 2: Given his tragic family history. Both his father and uncle
Speaker 2: were horrifically assassinated and this latest serious security incident, Biden
Speaker 2: shouldn't mess around. Under law, quote, major candidates are entitled
Speaker 2: a secret service protection. Is Mayorcus's deceivision not to grant
Speaker 2: protection political Surely this administration wouldn't put a man's life
Speaker 2: at risk Rather than concede that RFK Junior is a
Speaker 2: major candidate. The Trump DHS gave Biden protection in March
Speaker 2: of twenty twenty after a security incident. MAJORCA should follow
Speaker 2: that precedent and expeditiously approve protection for RFK Junior. Now,
Speaker 2: the way it works under law is that a candidate
Speaker 2: for president is entitled to secret Service protection if they
Speaker 2: are a quote major candidate, and being a major candidate,
Speaker 2: there are a series of criteria that are used to
Speaker 2: ascertain major candidate, including poll numbers. It is the Secretary
Speaker 2: of the Department of Homeland Security that makes that determination.
Speaker 2: They do so in consultation with a bipartisan advisory committee
Speaker 2: that concludes both with Republicans and Democrats at the easy level,
Speaker 2: the major party nominees both are entitled to coverage, and
Speaker 2: they both get it, but historically they get it earlier
Speaker 2: than becoming the nominees. If you look at twenty sixteen,
Speaker 2: so I've got some real and personal experience with dealing
Speaker 2: with this. In twenty sixteen, in the Republican presidential primary,
Speaker 2: Donald Trump was given Secret Service protection relatively early on,
Speaker 2: and Ben Carson was given Secret Service protection relatively early on. Now,
Speaker 2: Ben Carson did not win a single state. Ben Carson
Speaker 2: was given Secret Service protection because the level of death
Speaker 2: threats that were directed at him was deemed sufficient that
Speaker 2: it merited Secret Service protection. I don't know exactly how
Speaker 2: many death threats were talking about, but the Department of
Speaker 2: Homeland Security made the determination given this threat level, given
Speaker 2: the risk that some lunatic would try to kill an
Speaker 2: after Kann American Republican running for president, We're going to
Speaker 2: provide Secret Service protection now. As the primary went on,
Speaker 2: I won twelve states. For months, the race was essentially
Speaker 2: a two man race between me and Donald Trump. No
Speaker 2: other Republican other than Trump and I won more than
Speaker 2: a single state. So John Kasik won Ohio, Marco Rubio
Speaker 2: won Minnesota, and Trump and I won the other forty
Speaker 2: eight states. And at the time that I dropped out,
Speaker 2: I had won twelve and he had won something like
Speaker 2: twenty two to twenty three states, so he'd won about
Speaker 2: twice as many states.
Speaker 3: That's when I dropped out.
Speaker 2: So for months earlier, I easily met the standard for
Speaker 2: a major candidate, and had I requested Secret Service protection,
Speaker 2: I almost certainly would have received it, because under any
Speaker 2: objective measure, I met it. In twenty sixteen, I made
Speaker 2: the decision not to ask for it. We talked about
Speaker 2: it in our campaign because when Secret Service comes into
Speaker 2: the campaign, they slow everything down. They come in, they
Speaker 2: take over all the security, They set up magnetometers, they
Speaker 2: set up metal detectors in the front of the events.
Speaker 2: That means people coming to your events often I'll have
Speaker 2: to wait one two three hours in line.
Speaker 3: It slows the operation down.
Speaker 2: Once you bring Secret Service in, typically a candidate will
Speaker 2: do maybe two or three events a day because it
Speaker 2: just slows the entire operation down. In twenty sixteen, we
Speaker 2: were running fast and hard. I was doing in days,
Speaker 2: six seven, eight, nine events a day.
Speaker 3: I mean, we were going fast.
Speaker 2: And I didn't want pump the brakes to pump the brakes,
Speaker 2: I didn't want to slow it down. So we took
Speaker 2: security very seriously. So I hired private security, and we
Speaker 2: had significant private security. But I would do something at
Speaker 2: the end of most events. I'd jump off the front
Speaker 2: of the stage and I'd plow into the crowd and
Speaker 2: I'd be hugging people, I'd be taking pictures, I'd be
Speaker 2: talk to kids. I remember, Secret Service would never let
Speaker 2: you do that.
Speaker 3: They would.
Speaker 1: You stay on the other side.
Speaker 2: And so we made the decision that we wanted to
Speaker 2: be faster and more nimble, and that bringing Secret Service
Speaker 2: in would slow that down. And we also made the
Speaker 2: decision that we had a pretty significant investment in security,
Speaker 2: and that we thought we could use private security to
Speaker 2: ensure safety while at the same time maintaining speed. In
Speaker 2: this instance, you've got RFK Junior Number one, You've got
Speaker 2: his unique personal story. His father was murdered while running
Speaker 2: for president of the United States, Bobby Kennedy murdered as
Speaker 2: a candidate for the Democratic nominee for president, and before that,
Speaker 2: his uncle John F. Kennedy was murdered while being President of.
Speaker 3: The United States. Given that history and.
Speaker 2: Given people are just not look at this guy, Coppy
Speaker 2: Katz and create look, I think it is a no
Speaker 2: brainer that if RFK Junior wants Secret Service protection given
Speaker 2: his circumstances, he deserves it. And the reason I believe
Speaker 2: the Biden administration hasn't granted it is because if they did,
Speaker 2: under it genmizes him, they would have to say he's
Speaker 2: a major candidate. And the approach of the Biden White
Speaker 2: House is RFK who we never heard of him? Nope, Nope,
Speaker 2: nobody running, nobody in the Democrat primary doesn't exist.
Speaker 3: This is a corrodation.
Speaker 2: Joe's down in the basement, and I think it is
Speaker 2: purely political. And I ask everyone listening to this, imagine
Speaker 2: your reaction if you turned on the TV tomorrow and
Speaker 2: saw that RFK Junior, like his father, was murdered while
Speaker 2: being a candidate for the Democrat nomination for president.
Speaker 3: Imagine the horror.
Speaker 2: How do you justify the Biden administration saying nope, politics
Speaker 2: matters more to us, So good luck you. Hope nothing happens.
Speaker 2: This should not be Look, I'm not voting for our
Speaker 2: FK junior.
Speaker 3: Yeah, but you should.
Speaker 1: If you're running for president, you should be safe while doing.
Speaker 2: This is the right thing to do. And whether you're
Speaker 2: a Democrat or a Republican, this ought to be an
Speaker 2: easy choice. And the Biden Whitehouse ought to get their
Speaker 2: political heads out of their rear ends and do the
Speaker 2: right thing. Listen, they feel confident they can beat OURFK junior,
Speaker 2: You're fine. If they're confident, then do the right thing
Speaker 2: and ensure that he's got Secret Service protection so we
Speaker 2: don't have a national tragedy on her hands.
Speaker 1: I want to tell you about a gusta precious medals.
Speaker 1: If you are worried about your retirement, if you've seen
Speaker 1: what's happened with interest rates hitting at twenty one year high,
Speaker 1: for example on houses, you've seen some of the bank
Speaker 1: failures that we had earlier this year, and you lost
Speaker 1: money maybe last year in your retirement account, you should
Speaker 1: take a look at our friends in Augusta Precious Medals
Speaker 1: and Augusta Precious Medals. They have one goal and that
Speaker 1: is to protect your assets by diversifying your funds using
Speaker 1: gold as part of that plan. Now they do something
Speaker 1: that's really different. Not only will they send you their
Speaker 1: free investor Guide on gold, but they do a one
Speaker 1: on one web conference web conference that I've actually done
Speaker 1: with them, where they answer all of your questions. They
Speaker 1: take a look at what your strategy is. Now, they
Speaker 1: take a look at what you've saved. They take a
Speaker 1: look at your earning potential if you're still working or
Speaker 1: in retirement, how much money you need when in that retirement,
Speaker 1: and how to protect it. Then they'll talk to you
Speaker 1: about if gold is right for you or not. That's
Speaker 1: why I love them. If you've never checked out a
Speaker 1: gust the Precious Metals, do it, call them eight seven
Speaker 1: seven the number four gold IRA. Get the free Investor's
Speaker 1: goide on gold, but then do the web conference for
Speaker 1: free and get the peace of mind of knowing that
Speaker 1: you're protecting.
Speaker 3: Your hard earned dollars.
Speaker 1: Remember, if you're in retirement a close retirement, there's no
Speaker 1: time to make up losses. That's why you want to
Speaker 1: preserve what you already have. Eight seven seven gold ira.
Speaker 1: That's eight seven seven the number four gold ira are online.
Speaker 1: Augusta Precious Medals. That's Augusta Precious Medals dot com. Use
Speaker 1: the promo code verdict, Senator. I also want to move
Speaker 1: on to something else that happened this week, and this
Speaker 1: one actually makes me really angry. It's judges getting involved
Speaker 1: in a way that I think is pretty clear it
Speaker 1: to election interference. We've seen court dates that have come
Speaker 1: out now for Donald Trump, with all these different indictments
Speaker 1: in different states, that could be like the days before
Speaker 1: Super Tuesday, when any normal candate would be on the
Speaker 1: campaign trail. You just mentioned why you guys didn't do
Speaker 1: secret service. That's how important is to be to be
Speaker 1: fast and right to be campaigning. We're seeing two things
Speaker 1: now that seem to be marking the calendar. One, you
Speaker 1: could throw this guy into courtroom during dates when he
Speaker 1: descerately needs to be out campaigning, taking away his ability
Speaker 1: to have a fair election against Joe Biden or whoever
Speaker 1: it may be. And two, now you may take away
Speaker 1: the president form president. It's America and the leading can
Speaker 1: it for the Republican party's voice to talk about the
Speaker 1: accusations against him from these the leftists and these people,
Speaker 1: these DA's are trying to lock him up by putting
Speaker 1: a gag order on what he can say. This seems
Speaker 1: un American, it seems Banana Republic. Ask. I think it's
Speaker 1: disgusting political poy here. Yet that's what we're really talking
Speaker 1: about now, is that real possibility?
Speaker 3: Look, you're exactly right.
Speaker 2: We have talked at length on this podcast about how
Speaker 2: the multiple indictments against Donald Trump are election interference. Democrats
Speaker 2: have convinced themselves that Donald Trump is Adolf Hitler, and
Speaker 2: because they believe he's Hitler, anything, anything, anything is justified
Speaker 2: to stop him. The ends justify the means, and they're
Speaker 2: willing to corrupt the legal process to turn the Department
Speaker 2: of Justice into a political weapon. They're willing to do
Speaker 2: everything they can to stop the voters from daring to
Speaker 2: make a decision to vote in the way these angry
Speaker 2: partisan Democrats don't want the voters to vote. We've gone
Speaker 2: over two hundred years of our nation's history. We've never
Speaker 2: indicted a president or a former president, or a major
Speaker 2: candidate for president. In the last six months, Democrats have
Speaker 2: done so four separate times. The US Department of Justice
Speaker 2: under Biden is the most partisan and political we've ever seen.
Speaker 2: And Jack Smith, the special prosecutor, we've talked at length.
Speaker 2: He is a partisan. He has a history of abusing power,
Speaker 2: including this is not the first presidential candidate or potential
Speaker 2: presidential candidate he's gone after he went after Bob McDonald,
Speaker 2: the governor of Virginia, was considered a credible presidential candidate.
Speaker 2: Jack Smith indicted him, destroyed his political career, destroyed his life,
Speaker 2: and then on appeal, the Supreme Court unanimously throughout the
Speaker 2: conviction as not being consistent with law. But he'd already
Speaker 2: done its job, which here out he took him out.
Speaker 2: In this instance, the case in the District of Columbia
Speaker 2: is profoundly dangerous. It's profoundly dangerous because number one, the
Speaker 2: jury pool in the District Columbia is over ninety percent
Speaker 2: about ninety four percent Democrat. So you're going to get
Speaker 2: a jury that in all likelihood hates Donald Trump and
Speaker 2: believes he's Adolf Hitler. Now, if you believe someone's ad
Speaker 2: Off Hitler, he's a victim. That's not a hard guilty
Speaker 2: for whatever the crime is Yeah, it's just you hate
Speaker 2: if it's Adolf Hitler. Yes, we also have a district
Speaker 2: judge who has demonstrated and earned a reputation as being
Speaker 2: one of the furthest left Democrat district judges on the
Speaker 2: federal bench in d C. Who is presiding this trial
Speaker 2: is designed to directly interfere with the election. But Jacksmith
Speaker 2: said this is not enough, and so he filed a motion,
Speaker 2: a motion for a gag order. So he's gone to
Speaker 2: this left wing district judge and he's asked for a
Speaker 2: gag order. He says, defendant has repeatedly and widely disseminated
Speaker 2: public statements attacking the citizens of the district Columbia. That's
Speaker 2: by daring to point out that ninety four percent of
Speaker 2: DC voters vote Democrat, and that's going to be the
Speaker 2: jury pool the court. That's by pointing out that the
Speaker 2: judge has a record of being one of the most
Speaker 2: left wing Democrats on the entire federal bench.
Speaker 3: Prosecutors.
Speaker 2: That's by pointing out that jack Smith is a hard
Speaker 2: core partisan Democrat, has already abused his power repeatedly and
Speaker 2: prospective witnesses. The government therefore requests that the court quote
Speaker 2: enter a narrowly tailored order pursue into local criminal Rule
Speaker 2: fifty seven C that restricts certain prejudicial extra judicial statements,
Speaker 2: And in particular, what they ask for the government seeks
Speaker 2: this is a quote A narrow, well defined restriction that
Speaker 2: is targeted at extra judicial statements that present a serious
Speaker 2: and substantial danger of materially prejudicing the case. The government's
Speaker 2: proposed order specifies that such statements would include A statements
Speaker 2: regarding the identity, testimony, or credibility of prospective witnesses, and
Speaker 2: b statements about any party witness, attorney, court personnel, or
Speaker 2: potential jurors that are disparaging and inflamma territory or intimidating.
Speaker 2: Now let's be clear who do they mean by potential witnesses.
Speaker 2: They mean people like Bill Barr yep, and they mean
Speaker 2: people like Mike Pence. So Mike Pence is literally running
Speaker 2: against Donald Trump right now for the Republican nomination for president.
Speaker 2: And you have the Biden Department of Justice asking a
Speaker 2: federal judge issue an order that Donald Trump cannot say
Speaker 2: a critical word of Mike Pence about one of his
Speaker 2: opponents in the primary, Like, holy crap, if this doesn't
Speaker 2: piss you off, You're not paying attention. I mean, it
Speaker 2: is truly breathtaking. You want to understand why this is
Speaker 2: election interference? Jay believes the federal court can order one
Speaker 2: political candidate you're not allowed to criticize your opponent. Just
Speaker 2: don't say a word. Don't say a word at all,
Speaker 2: despite the fact that you're facing a political persecution designed
Speaker 2: to interfere with the election, You're not.
Speaker 3: Allowed to say it.
Speaker 2: And if you do, by the way, look, a gag
Speaker 2: order is typically enforced by contempt and by jail. So
Speaker 2: what the Biden doj is proposing is if Donald Trump
Speaker 2: says a negative word about Mike Pence, that the US
Speaker 2: Department of Justice will show up and arrest him and
Speaker 2: put him in jail for saying a negative word about
Speaker 2: one of his opponents running for president.
Speaker 1: And by the way, they would do that. Let's be clear,
Speaker 1: they would love to arrest him again.
Speaker 2: That's what they want, and to keep him in jail.
Speaker 2: This is election interference. It is wildly unconstitutional. It is
Speaker 2: a direct violation of the First Amendment. It is also
Speaker 2: a direct violation of the right to vote of our
Speaker 2: democratic process in this country. Now, the Democrat talking heads
Speaker 2: will say, look, sometimes you have gag orders. If you're
Speaker 2: going against the mafia, bosh, you're going up against al Capone.
Speaker 2: Courts will enter orders saying, Okay, you can't intimidate witnesses,
Speaker 2: you can't say things that will prejudice the jury. You're right,
Speaker 2: in an ordinary criminal trial. Those things can happen. In
Speaker 2: an ordinary criminal trial. The defendant is not a leading
Speaker 2: candidate for president of the United States actively running for
Speaker 2: president of the United States. And my guess, I don't
Speaker 2: think the district court will grant this. I don't know that.
Speaker 2: I don't know this judge at all. I've never met her.
Speaker 2: Her record demonstrates she's left wing. But I think if
Speaker 2: the district court granted this order, it would be exceptionally foolish.
Speaker 2: Why because the order would be appealed and it would
Speaker 2: be overturned on appeal. I do not believe there's any
Speaker 2: way the Supreme Court of the United States would allow
Speaker 2: a leading candidate for president to be enjoined. To be
Speaker 2: ordered from a court, you are not allowed to criticize
Speaker 2: your political opponents. I mean, if you can envision, imagine debate,
Speaker 2: let's we have a subsequent Republican debate. Trump shows up
Speaker 2: and Mike Pence blasts him, and Trump turns and says,
Speaker 2: I'm sorry, I'm prevented by court order from.
Speaker 1: Respond, yeah, from defending myself.
Speaker 2: That is not free speech, that is not democracy, that
Speaker 2: is not how our system operates.
Speaker 1: And that's election interference.
Speaker 2: Exactly, perfect example of what capsulates. And by the way,
Speaker 2: that's what they want, actually what they want. Look, they
Speaker 2: know in that circumstance, Donald Trump could not restrain himself, sure,
Speaker 2: and then they would arrest him.
Speaker 3: And then they would arrest him.
Speaker 2: I mean, I mean, you can almost envision the jack
Speaker 2: booted thugs sitting by the side of the debate and
Speaker 2: as Trump blasts his opponents, and he'll blast all his
Speaker 2: opponents because that's what he does. You can almost envision
Speaker 2: them walking out in the middle of the debate and saying, sir,
Speaker 2: you're under arrest. If that is not election interference, holy cow,
Speaker 2: it really shows just how extreme the Democrats have gotten.
Speaker 2: This is horrific. By the way, let's be clear, I
Speaker 2: would be every bit as opposed to an order preventing
Speaker 2: Joe Biden from criticizing his opponents from criticizing RFK Junior
Speaker 2: from criticizing Donald Trump. Not to be clear, Joe Biden
Speaker 2: couldn't get up in the morning and speak without criticizing
Speaker 2: Donald Trump. He says, good morning. Trump is the devil.
Speaker 2: That's just how he addresses it. And he also demonizes
Speaker 2: every other Republican because he's in his mental and feeblement,
Speaker 2: he's also become an even more vicious partisan. But I
Speaker 2: would be equally and animately opposed to any court trying
Speaker 2: to prevent Joe Biden from attacking me or Trump or
Speaker 2: anybody else, because that's what free speech and elections are
Speaker 2: all about. But today's Democrats, they don't believe in democracy,
Speaker 2: which is why these indictments are happening. They want to
Speaker 2: stop the voters from voting in a way they don't like.
Speaker 2: And they don't believe in free speech, which is why
Speaker 2: they want to muzzle their leading opponent for president. It
Speaker 2: is it's a brave new world.
Speaker 3: We're living here.
Speaker 1: It certainly is. Don't forget. We do the show three
Speaker 1: days a week Monday, Wednesdays and Fridays. Make sure that
Speaker 1: subscribe follow our auto download button depending on where you're
Speaker 1: listening to this podcast. And also we have a new
Speaker 1: podcast on Saturdays. That is some of the segments you
Speaker 1: may have missed during the week that we put together
Speaker 1: in a weekend review, so make sure you listen to that,
Speaker 1: and on the days in between, join me on my podcast,
Speaker 1: The Ben Ferguson Podcasts, and I'll keep you up to
Speaker 1: down the biggest breaking news. On those days in between,
Speaker 1: We'll see you back here again real soon.