WEBVTT - Welcome to 2021 With Barry Ritholtz

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Well Care trillions. I'm Joel Weber and I'm Eric bel

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Tunis Eric. Now that is the beginning of the year.

0:00:15.840 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I need to speak with a financial advisor. Yeah. Yeah,

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:26.440
<v Speaker 1>there's so much going on, and what is going on?

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Bitcoin Tesla, what in the hell is happening

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>right now? There's a new political lance gap, so that

0:00:35.320 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>so so I figured, uh, we We've had a gentleman

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.400
<v Speaker 1>on before named Barry Ritt Holtz who's a Bloomberg opinion

0:00:42.440 --> 0:00:46.479
<v Speaker 1>columnist has a podcast with Bloomberg called Masters in Business,

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>and he's also the head of Holts Wealth Management. And

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 1>I was like, oh, yeah, Barry, we can solve this problem.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Let's dr Barry. Barry is great. You can throw anything

0:00:55.840 --> 0:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>at him and he's probably has three opinions on it um.

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>And that's exactly the kind of thing we want to do,

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:03.840
<v Speaker 1>is just bring up these things we're seeing and just

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.720
<v Speaker 1>get his take. And he does not have a shortage

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:08.960
<v Speaker 1>of takes, and they're usually good and they usually get

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>your thinking. And so you know, it's a good top

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:15.360
<v Speaker 1>of the year guest. And if you are interested in

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:20.720
<v Speaker 1>listening to prayer conversations with Barry, We've did a Use

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Your Disillusion Volume one and two episode a while back,

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and we basically just went really long on that one.

0:01:29.440 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll try to keep this one a little shorter though.

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>That was the first and only episode that was two episodes.

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>It was we could not contain Barry into one episode.

0:01:39.240 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>But this time we're gonna do it right. We're gonna

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>keep keep it to one, aren't we. Yes, we are, well,

0:01:44.680 --> 0:01:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna try our damnedest this time on Trillions. Welcome

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to the Jungle of with Barry rid holes Berry. Welcome

0:02:00.000 --> 0:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>actor Trillions. Well, thanks for having me again. Okay, we

0:02:03.200 --> 0:02:05.840
<v Speaker 1>got to talk about the fact that this is uh

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of a new year with a completely different

0:02:09.840 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>political landscape than we've had for a bit, which is,

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, a democratic uh sweep. Uh So, So, Barry,

0:02:17.919 --> 0:02:20.720
<v Speaker 1>what how are you talking to investors and to to

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.639
<v Speaker 1>prepare them for this new world? So first off, the

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>data about is so amazing and compelling that I think

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's going to, if not influence the incoming Biden administration

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.639
<v Speaker 1>at the very least, it will look it will confirm

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.520
<v Speaker 1>their priors. It will it will basically give them license

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.840
<v Speaker 1>to do what they wanted to do anyway, and the

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 1>data is this externality hits the market, the economy collapse

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that it's worst. GDP was probably cut in half. We

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>saw the single biggest drop in the markets, the single

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>biggest spike unemployment in the shortest period of time. And

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 1>then Congress that normally can't agree on renaming the library

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>past the first Cares Act. It was what two point

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:16.080
<v Speaker 1>one trillion dollars um versus you know, six or seven

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.519
<v Speaker 1>hundred eight hundred billion for the financial crisis that was

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 1>doled out over four months for years. This was eight months.

0:03:24.040 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>And what's amazing is you can really see it in

0:03:27.520 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 1>the economic data. So year of a year we saw

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>a one trillion plus increase in the after tax personal

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:41.280
<v Speaker 1>income of Americans compared to the previous year. That's an

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>eight percent gain over like eight or nine months from

0:03:44.720 --> 0:03:49.720
<v Speaker 1>like March to November, same period versus giant increase. How

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>does that manifest itself? Um savings rates go up. Not

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 1>only does retail sales go higher, they go above the

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>pre pandemic level. They spiked up, and credit card delinquencies

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>are now at you know, if not all time lows,

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>really close to it. And that's what you know the

0:04:09.360 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 1>old joke. I think it was Warren Buffett who said,

0:04:11.320 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 1>give me a trillion dollars, I'll throw you a hell

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>of a party. Um, hey, here's a trillion dollars and

0:04:16.240 --> 0:04:18.719
<v Speaker 1>they threw a hell of a party. What does that

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>mean going forward? Well, it means that the Biden administration

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:27.479
<v Speaker 1>now has carte blanche first for the Cares Act three. Right,

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:30.280
<v Speaker 1>we just had a you know, a mini Cares Act,

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.599
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollars. They're gonna do another two trillion dollars,

0:04:34.279 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>part of which is going to include four hundred billion

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars for the vaccine rollout for the States. Another part

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>of that is going to be a two thousand dollar

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>check for everybody. Um, they'll problem I'm guessing that there'll

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.760
<v Speaker 1>be a national mask mandate and a temporary lockdown while

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.840
<v Speaker 1>vaccines go out. And you can't fix the economy until

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>you fix the pandemic. A lot of my friends on

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>the right, um, completely couldn't wrap their head around that.

0:04:58.960 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>And uh, I think the data absolutely shows that. But

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's not just the pandemic. You're gonna see a long

0:05:08.520 --> 0:05:13.159
<v Speaker 1>overdue infrastructure bill. I don't know, four billions, four trillion,

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>five trillion, six trillion over a decade. If they were smart,

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 1>they would fund this with fifty or a hundred year bonds.

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how smart these guys are, but that's

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:24.480
<v Speaker 1>what I would do. We we may have actually said

0:05:24.480 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that exact same thing last time I was on This time,

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna get an infrastructure bill. There's gonna be a

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>green new deal with extended UM tax credits for solar

0:05:34.839 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>and e vs, and maybe even smart roads with implanted

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>RF devices so self driving cars don't have to rely on,

0:05:41.880 --> 0:05:44.599
<v Speaker 1>you know, crappy little cameras to see where they're going.

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>They'll know exactly where they're going just a giant rollout.

0:05:48.040 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>Oh and ps, we're also going to see a massive

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>expansion of Obamacare. When we added thirty five to forty

0:05:56.600 --> 0:05:59.760
<v Speaker 1>million people to the role of to the roles of

0:06:00.080 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>sured the first Obamacare, it had a huge impact on

0:06:05.440 --> 0:06:09.920
<v Speaker 1>healthcare and hospital and pharmaceuticals and that entire sector, which

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:15.120
<v Speaker 1>is a huge chunk of UM retail sales. This time,

0:06:15.240 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe we had another twenty to twenty five million people

0:06:18.240 --> 0:06:23.280
<v Speaker 1>similarly going to impact UH, the economy and retail sales.

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.800
<v Speaker 1>All of those things cares at three. The infrastructure deal

0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>the Green New Deal. The expansion of Obamacare means that

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at a massive multi year stimulus, which, as

0:06:34.800 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we learned in twenty it turned out that John Maynard

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Keynes was right, and when demand falls off, it's very

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:47.040
<v Speaker 1>easy for the government to replace it by substituting their

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>own spending. For what you would normally see from households

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 1>and businesses, there's some offsetting costs. You're gonna see everybody

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>making more than four k is going to see their

0:06:56.520 --> 0:06:58.719
<v Speaker 1>tap top tax rate pick up a couple of percent.

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna the corporate tax rate probably go back towards

0:07:04.320 --> 0:07:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it'll get to tht I'm more

0:07:06.920 --> 0:07:10.920
<v Speaker 1>interested in the alternative minimum tax for corporations. So if

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>you're an Apple or a Facebook and you're making hundreds

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of billions or Microsoft, you can't pay like no taxes.

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>There'll be a twelve percent. Hey, you report your profits

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:25.080
<v Speaker 1>to the your shareholders. That's what we're gonna attack you on.

0:07:25.320 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So that's the that's gonna be the trade offs we'll see.

0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:30.480
<v Speaker 1>So you just laid out a lot of spending, a

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of stimulus. That's your vision of the future. It's

0:07:33.200 --> 0:07:36.280
<v Speaker 1>very it's very clear, How do you shift portfolios or

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>or do you not? You just know all this and

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.120
<v Speaker 1>know that that's why you're in you know, the Vanguard

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:46.840
<v Speaker 1>Total Market Fund and you know whatever else? Or do

0:07:46.880 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 1>you tweak things? Do you add an infrastructure e t

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>F onto it or a clean energy e t F.

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Those have been seeing some flows. No. So basically the

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>big philosophy we try and share with our clients and

0:08:01.600 --> 0:08:04.960
<v Speaker 1>investors is this, there's a lot of noise, there's a

0:08:05.000 --> 0:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of cross currents. You should leave I I wasn't

0:08:09.040 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>exaggerating when I said own a globally diversified portfolio of

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>low cost ETFs. Hey, maybe I'll add rebalance once a

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>year and then leave it the hell alone. But were

0:08:19.120 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the behavioral side. How do you train people

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to leave it the hell alone? Well, you give them

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:30.239
<v Speaker 1>a data based explanation of what's going on in the world,

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>so they're comfortable with leaving it alone. Because when things

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>don't make sense, they want to sell. When when there

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:44.840
<v Speaker 1>are cross currents and there's confusion and there's noise, hey

0:08:45.000 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't really understand this, Maybe I should sell. And

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the most popular pieces I wrote

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 1>for Bloomberg opinion this year was explaining why, hey, maybe

0:08:58.360 --> 0:09:02.439
<v Speaker 1>mr market isn't so rational after all. And we looked

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:06.000
<v Speaker 1>at all the components of the SMP five hundred index

0:09:06.720 --> 0:09:09.280
<v Speaker 1>to figure out to answer the question that we got

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:12.840
<v Speaker 1>over and over from clients. This market doesn't make sense.

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>I look around, the economy isn't going to hell? How

0:09:16.400 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>can the stock market keep going up? There's something wrong here.

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.600
<v Speaker 1>And when you look around at at why the economy

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>looks like how well your local dry cleaner is doing

0:09:25.400 --> 0:09:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a third of the business, they were all the little

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:31.720
<v Speaker 1>restaurants are closing, the bars are closing, the retailers. Even

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the gas station isn't doing well. Gases like a buck nineties,

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:39.520
<v Speaker 1>so everything is so cheap. Their personal experience is the

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>economy is terrible, but that's not what drives the market.

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>When we look at we took apart to the SMP

0:09:46.720 --> 0:09:51.280
<v Speaker 1>five index and found top ten names are sent of

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:54.559
<v Speaker 1>the index. And these are companies that are a global

0:09:54.640 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>They get most of them get half of more of

0:09:56.520 --> 0:09:59.719
<v Speaker 1>their business from overseas, where they admittedly did a much

0:09:59.720 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>better job than we in America did managing the pandemic,

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:07.040
<v Speaker 1>and be they're perfectly set up for the work from

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:13.079
<v Speaker 1>home environment. So Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Netflix, go go down

0:10:13.120 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the list of all those giant companies that are doing great. Hey,

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic went for another ten years, they would be fine.

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 1>They don't care. But when you look at what's doing

0:10:21.520 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>really poorly, it's travel and hotels, and you know, your

0:10:27.440 --> 0:10:32.719
<v Speaker 1>most people's personal economic experience is not very well reflected

0:10:32.720 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>in the SMP five hundred, and in fact the number

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that blows people away. Take the thirty worst industrial sectors um,

0:10:40.840 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty words sectors in the SMP five, the little sub

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>industry groups and just throw them away, send them all

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:51.160
<v Speaker 1>to zero. It takes two off of the SMP five hundred.

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So it when you could explain to clients, hey, it

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>may seem that the market is irrational, but your personal

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>economic situation and what you're seeing around you is very

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>very um not publicly traded, it's very private, and so

0:11:10.440 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 1>therefore it's actually rational that the global, profitable, big cap

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>companies that are working um taking advantage of working from home,

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>are doing really well and therefore leave your damn portfolio alone. Okay,

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>so if I if I leave my portfolio alone, I'm

0:11:30.080 --> 0:11:35.520
<v Speaker 1>still living in a world that has gigantic infusions of cash. Yeah, stimulus,

0:11:35.600 --> 0:11:39.800
<v Speaker 1>stimulus coming fed doing what it's gonna do. How concerned

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:45.840
<v Speaker 1>about you know this bubblicious environment? Are you so? Having

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:51.520
<v Speaker 1>been a trader and lived through the nineties and two thousand, um,

0:11:51.559 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 1>this isn't this, this is this is still a fraction

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.160
<v Speaker 1>of that, right, I remember when you would buy something

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and that would go up there. Every sale was punished immediately.

0:12:04.240 --> 0:12:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It was it was just hey, from from I remember,

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it was from my birthday in October untill the top

0:12:11.320 --> 0:12:16.200
<v Speaker 1>in March from the nasdack doubled. Right, we had the

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>best year in in a decade. The Nasdaq was up

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>forty So it's still not not even anywhere close to that.

0:12:24.040 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, most of those companies that are

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.839
<v Speaker 1>doing really well have giant revenues and giant cash on

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the balance sheets and huge profits. That said, there are

0:12:34.559 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of pockets of speculation. UM Bitcoin probably the

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>poster child speculation. Uh, someone smarter than me can explain

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>what it's fundamental intrinsic value is. Um. I like to

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>tell people the intrinsic value of a dollar is that

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.199
<v Speaker 1>we it's are all. I'll admit it's a delusion it's

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:57.080
<v Speaker 1>a collective delusion that a dollar has value. Plus it's

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>with Uncle Sam demands you pay your taxes in and

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they have a standing army to enforce it. So it's

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>more than just an abstract thing. Bitcoin has become an

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>asset to speculate with um. The spacks clearly have gone,

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, berserk And what was the thing Elon Musk

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the other day? And the wrong company you know

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 1>went up fift These are all anecdotes, but you know

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:28.439
<v Speaker 1>you see enough of them. Oh and did I mention Tesla?

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Testlas looks a little bubblicious. I don't want to short

0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>it yet, but I'm interested in it. I mean, the

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>trader in me says there's a there's some money to

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 1>be made on the downside there. I've just watched too

0:13:43.520 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>many people carry down on their shields to want to

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>step into that fray just yet. I don't want to.

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go deep on bitcoin. But do

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you own any crypto? No? None. And by the way,

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:55.960
<v Speaker 1>when clients come to me and say I want to

0:13:55.960 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>buy some crypto, it's like, all right, go buy some crypto.

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. I'm not gonna tell you not to.

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Just don't mortgage the house and leverage up with crypto,

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:06.320
<v Speaker 1>because he'll knows I was. I was just gonna end

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I could tell you where equities will be a hundred

0:14:09.120 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 1>years from now, more or less. I have no idea

0:14:12.000 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>what crypto will be. Where will equities being in a

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 1>hundred years from now higher? That's not a hard bet

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to make, right And if it's not higher, we have

0:14:23.000 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>you have to worry about clean water and air at

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>that point, right right, Well, you know a lot of

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 1>advisors are talking about working in crypto to the portfolio.

0:14:31.760 --> 0:14:34.680
<v Speaker 1>You see institutions getting into it. Is there any thought

0:14:34.720 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that you might lose or upset clients if if it's

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>not part of the ritolds portfolio. You know, some of

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the basic rules of investing are know what you are own,

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 1>know what it's worth, and understand how it fits into

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:59.240
<v Speaker 1>a diversified portfolio. And if someone wants to take you know,

0:14:59.360 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>five percent two of their liquid net worth and by bitcoin,

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>um I would tell them two things. Write your password

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>down and put it in your bank vault. Because what

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>what is it? Something like twenty of bitcoin value has

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:19.960
<v Speaker 1>been lost? That stop and think about that just for

0:15:20.000 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a second. A fifth to a quarter of the value

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin is lost behind forgotten passwords or lost thumb drives,

0:15:30.080 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 1>So to me, that's not necessarily a Hopefully institutions will

0:15:34.800 --> 0:15:37.560
<v Speaker 1>be able to solve that. Maybe maybe Fidelity or somebody

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:40.640
<v Speaker 1>else that is moving into that space will do it.

0:15:40.720 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 1>But that's kind of a warning. The other thing is,

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, until you understand what it is, what it does,

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:51.280
<v Speaker 1>and what it's you know purpose. I like the explanation

0:15:51.280 --> 0:15:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that it's a solution in search of a problem, but

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>none of that matters. If someone says to me, hey,

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I want to own two or three percent of bitcoin, great,

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll set up a side pocket for you, you you know,

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a separate account. We won't charge you on it, and

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 1>it'll be here, and anytime you want to sell it

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 1>or buy more, you can do it. Just understand, assume

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:14.560
<v Speaker 1>it goes to zero. That's how much you should put

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.800
<v Speaker 1>into it, enough that it doesn't change your lifestyle. And

0:16:17.840 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>if it goes to a million, hey god bless Tesla. Okay,

0:16:27.800 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we were looking at some numbers in my team and

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 1>there's some mind blowing stuff. Besides the price jump. Obviously

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that's been parabolic. The volume in tesla um so for

0:16:38.120 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty years, not nothing traded more than Spy. I think

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Apple did on one days. Now, yeah, Tesla has now

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 1>traded more than Spy for twenty six out of less

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty days, and in the past month it's traded a

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars. UM, what's going on here? Have you have

0:16:55.600 --> 0:17:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you ever seen anything like this? Is this the retail investor? Um?

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>What do you think will happen to Tesla? If we

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>were to you know, timestamp now and look back and

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we're you know, we're five years down the road, what

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.000
<v Speaker 1>call would you make? Where will Tesla be? And just

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:14.640
<v Speaker 1>give me your general wide take on Tesla? So so

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 1>I have a hard time. UM. You know, you need

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>a certain distance from things to be objective. If you're

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 1>too far away, you don't understand anything about it, And

0:17:25.280 --> 0:17:28.200
<v Speaker 1>if you're too close, you know too much and it's

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>hard to see it. You guys know, I'm a car guy,

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:40.200
<v Speaker 1>and while I'm both fascinated and intrigued by Tesla, the automobile, Tesla,

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:44.399
<v Speaker 1>the company has not shown itself to be UM a

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>great automobile manufacturer. They are interesting cars with great technologies,

0:17:51.200 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>but terrible manufacturing. UM. And I understand why Tesla didn't

0:17:56.119 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 1>hook up with Ford or Toyota to manufacturer that the US,

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:06.560
<v Speaker 1>But I don't know how long their lead is going

0:18:06.600 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>to stay. Keep them in the lead. So, uh, the

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:14.679
<v Speaker 1>number of cars that are coming out of kind of fascinating,

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the the initial ones. Everybody is following here. First off,

0:18:18.920 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 1>before we go into the details, Tesla one like hold

0:18:23.200 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 1>hold aside the company the stock. Elon Musk changed the

0:18:26.800 --> 0:18:32.920
<v Speaker 1>paradigm of automobiles for the right reason. Hey, uh, internal

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>combustion engines and and carbon based transportation is destroying the

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>planet and just impacting the them the climate. And so

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>therefore I'm going to introduce this electric car and everybody

0:18:47.359 --> 0:18:49.840
<v Speaker 1>better come along. We're gonna You're gonna be left behind.

0:18:50.520 --> 0:18:55.359
<v Speaker 1>And the rest of the car industry said, we're not

0:18:55.400 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna let Musk do to us what Bezos did to retail,

0:19:00.040 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and Bezos did to cloud computing, and Bezos did to

0:19:03.560 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 1>go down the list. So the paradigm has shifted. Elon

0:19:08.040 --> 0:19:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Musk has won the internal combustion versus electric car debate.

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Now that he's won that, he has created a massive

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>amount of future competition for himself. So the Porsche take

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Can Turbo comes out and it's spectacular. It's much better

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 1>than anything out of Tesla, except it's a hundred and

0:19:30.160 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 1>eighty six thousand dollars. It's it's a high end luxury,

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>very fast forward four seat e V. The question is,

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:44.199
<v Speaker 1>can somebody come out and make a product that's competitive

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>with the Tesla UM with either the Model three UM

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>or or them the model uh at? Why? Or go

0:19:54.680 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>down the list? And we now have an answer. The

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 1>new Ford Mustang Maki is every bit as good as

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:07.240
<v Speaker 1>anything from Tesla. It the reviews are spectacular. Everybody seems

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>to love it. The one thing people don't like is

0:20:09.400 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the name Mustang. But you know, get over yourself. And

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 1>the argument now is, and I have this argument with

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>some mutual friends, Dave not Agan. I argue about this

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>all the time. You seem to think Tesla is a

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>car company. Their genius is the network of super fast

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:30.680
<v Speaker 1>charging stations. Dave range anxiety was has always been nonsense

0:20:31.560 --> 0:20:35.119
<v Speaker 1>of all trips in a car are within you know,

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty miles of the home. And if you're gonna take

0:20:38.600 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>any electric car and along the trip, well you may

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>have to do a little more planning in the Mustang

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:47.240
<v Speaker 1>than the Tesla. But you know, so what and PS,

0:20:47.280 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>there's still a bajillion gasoline cars around, so this isn't

0:20:50.840 --> 0:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a problem. By the time the gasoline cars

0:20:54.119 --> 0:20:56.520
<v Speaker 1>go away. I don't know if it will be some

0:20:56.560 --> 0:21:00.080
<v Speaker 1>consortium a ford in Toyota and Volkswagen will have the

0:21:00.600 --> 0:21:04.880
<v Speaker 1>charging network equal to Tesla's. Maybe the government rolls went out.

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Maybe a bunch of manufacturers agree in a standard and

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 1>they all use it interoperably. But I don't think that's

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>worth the massive premium that Tesla is getting. And PS,

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>there are startups like the Lucid Air is a spectacular car.

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Um uh, the I'm gonna get the name wrong, the

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Bolinger Bodinger, the suv and the pickup truck really interesting. PS.

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:32.400
<v Speaker 1>The the GM Electric Hummer, Oh my god, that that's

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a spectacular vehicle. So elon Muskwaden. We're all going electric.

0:21:38.080 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's a matter of time before it becomes clear

0:21:42.240 --> 0:21:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that Tesla is not going to have a market share

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>of the electric market. Um and so at a certain point,

0:21:50.680 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>and and this is the difference between a company and

0:21:53.119 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 1>a stock. And this is why I have no interest

0:21:55.640 --> 0:22:00.160
<v Speaker 1>in shorting Tesla yet um the stock looks fantastic. Think

0:22:00.240 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>the companies on fire. It's just going higher and higher.

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a great story. The narrative behind it is just

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:12.640
<v Speaker 1>kicking everything else's ass. Eventually that'll probably come to an end,

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and at a certain point the downside in Tesla is

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:18.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be a great trade. But I don't think

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>we're there yet. We're maybe we're closer than further. I

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know, but you know the three bullet points elon

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:30.639
<v Speaker 1>musk one. Everybody's going e V. Tesla stock is on fire.

0:22:30.960 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Anybody who shorts this is killing themselves. But one day

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>they'll say, oh, I wish I had a few pennies

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:38.920
<v Speaker 1>left to still short this. It's a shame I went

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:43.280
<v Speaker 1>broke in. Can I give you a fourth bullet point?

0:22:44.480 --> 0:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Cathy Wood might be even hotter than Tesla. So I

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 1>don't want to disc Cathy because I think she built

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>something spectacular. I um, I watched from a distance that

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:03.679
<v Speaker 1>entire arc of her minority shareholder exercising the right to

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:09.800
<v Speaker 1>buy that forced her to buy him out. Now, I

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:11.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know if she goes on to be a hundred

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:15.760
<v Speaker 1>billion or a trillion dollar company. I kind of think

0:23:15.800 --> 0:23:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that she may have top picked herself. When so, when

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>you see someone who's had just an amazing ride. I mean,

0:23:22.800 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 1>what was it six years ago? They were a hundred million,

0:23:26.560 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 1>two hundred million. That's when they went to Reliance as

0:23:30.359 --> 0:23:33.760
<v Speaker 1>their marketer. And there, this and that, and nobody expected

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:37.080
<v Speaker 1>her to blow up to be a fifty billion dollar company.

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:42.400
<v Speaker 1>But she just bought them out with a note at

0:23:42.520 --> 0:23:45.359
<v Speaker 1>some ungodly price. It's undisclosed. I don't know if it's

0:23:45.400 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>fifty million, a hundred million. It's kind of weird. It

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>reminds me so God bless her for kicking ass. I

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 1>hope the farm goes to a hundred billion dollars. But

0:23:56.800 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 1>when we look back in hindsight and say, hey, Cathy

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.200
<v Speaker 1>would financed a hundred million dollar buy out of her

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>firm after they raised fifty billion dollars and after a

0:24:07.840 --> 0:24:10.719
<v Speaker 1>hundred and sixty percent raise, we may look back at

0:24:10.720 --> 0:24:14.240
<v Speaker 1>that and say she is like the mutual fund buyers

0:24:14.280 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>that managed to top tick the hot funds, she may

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>have top ticked herself. I hope that doesn't happen. I

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>hope the fund does great. Um. I find her research

0:24:23.640 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and her approach fascinating, but it would really make for

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>an ironic ending to that story. And like as an advisor.

0:24:32.320 --> 0:24:36.160
<v Speaker 1>You guys don't touch anything like that, anything that's highly concentrated,

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:38.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, because we do talk about this idea of

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>a Barbell portfolio very low cost passive and then you

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, put some hot sauce on top. And you know,

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>because the middle those middle closet indexing active managers seem

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 1>like it's just they're not nobody's interested in that anymore.

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>They want either cheap beta or shiny objects, right right, Well, well,

0:24:57.359 --> 0:25:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the closet indexers, what's the point. Come

0:25:00.960 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>for the high fees, stay for the under performance. It

0:25:03.200 --> 0:25:06.800
<v Speaker 1>does nothing for you. So so if you're gonna be

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>pretty um, if you're gonna be pretty beta, and maybe

0:25:10.920 --> 0:25:14.159
<v Speaker 1>you have a lean towards value or small cap or whatever.

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 1>To me, the more interesting aspect of the concentrated positions

0:25:20.359 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is not us putting clients into a concentrated position, but

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a client coming to us and saying, hey, I'm a

0:25:28.080 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 1>sea level executive at fill in the blank Exo, Mobile, Amazon, Google, Apple,

0:25:33.560 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter, and while I love your concept of

0:25:36.720 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a diversified portfolio, I don't want any more exposure to

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:44.840
<v Speaker 1>fill in the blank, technology, energy, whatever it is. And

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>so That's one of the reasons we've been embracing UM

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:51.919
<v Speaker 1>for those sort of clients. Direct indexing. We work with

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:55.840
<v Speaker 1>O'Shaughnessy's product called Canvas, and we have about two million

0:25:55.880 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars in that product and basically what and we with

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:02.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the beta testers with them and and just

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>really blown away with how good the technology is. Basically,

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 1>we could take our core portfolios of you know, fifteen

0:26:09.480 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>mutual funds and give it to them and say replicate

0:26:13.280 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>these with all individual stocks and they run the holdings

0:26:17.359 --> 0:26:21.479
<v Speaker 1>through their their software and they say, here's stocks that

0:26:21.560 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>look exactly like your seventy thirty portfolio UM. And then

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we get to say, okay, separate from this five million dollars.

0:26:31.200 --> 0:26:35.880
<v Speaker 1>This client has ten million dollars in Apple UM employee

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.720
<v Speaker 1>stock options and another two million dollars in Apple stock

0:26:39.160 --> 0:26:43.200
<v Speaker 1>that he can't sell. So a, let's tune out Apple

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:47.640
<v Speaker 1>from his holdings and be what else trades very much

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>like Apple that he doesn't need more exposure to, And

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 1>then we tune that out and so they get a

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>diversified portfolio without all of the hyper concentration that they

0:26:59.760 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 1>come to us. There's a couple of other things This

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>software does. The E s G aspect of it is

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>mind blowing. How specifically you can tune out different things,

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>whether it's gun manufacturers, or reduce the exposure to companies

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that never have had a woman on their board of directors,

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>like you can really fine tune this. The software really

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is just amazing and it's it's one of the better

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 1>E s G projects products I've I've ever seen. Okay,

0:27:32.480 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>a couple of questions on this, So customer dexting and

0:27:35.080 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>director next to get something we've been tracking UM Parametric

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>custom Core is the big one. It didn't really see

0:27:42.560 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>much in flows last year. You guys are definitely tip

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>of the spear type advisors. But it's I the E

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.119
<v Speaker 1>T F and Vanguard and a couple. You can get

0:27:53.160 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a whole portfolio for four basis points and you're not

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.640
<v Speaker 1>making active bets, so there's no chance you're gonna underperform

0:27:59.720 --> 0:28:03.000
<v Speaker 1>because as you are the market, you're gonna take active

0:28:03.000 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>bets and pay up. Isn't that against where where it

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 1>all went? It all went from complex to simple. Isn't

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:13.240
<v Speaker 1>this going the other under direction? Yes and no. So

0:28:13.240 --> 0:28:18.119
<v Speaker 1>so first I'm not of the camp that things direct

0:28:18.200 --> 0:28:23.359
<v Speaker 1>indexing eats passive. I think it's a very specific niche

0:28:23.600 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>with a very specific audience. UM, and the three key

0:28:29.040 --> 0:28:33.439
<v Speaker 1>audiences are a the concentrated equity position that you have

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:36.560
<v Speaker 1>to work around. That's one be the E S G.

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.600
<v Speaker 1>Um investor who really wants the ability to fine tune

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it in a lot of ways and see the high

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.920
<v Speaker 1>income as opposed to high asset investor who has a

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>giant tax bill. The tax lost harvesting ability when you

0:28:54.280 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>have two thousand stocks as opposed to twelve mutual funds,

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.400
<v Speaker 1>it's world's apart. It's it's you know, hundreds and hundreds

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of basis points versus I could squeeze twenty or thirty

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:11.360
<v Speaker 1>basis points swapping this total market funds for that total

0:29:11.440 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>market funds. This is just a huge, huge um source

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of tax alpha. If I could use a horrific cliche

0:29:20.440 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and so I agree the tax alpha and it makes

0:29:23.000 --> 0:29:25.000
<v Speaker 1>so much sense. The E S G is hard to

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.200
<v Speaker 1>argue with because E S G. E T s aren't

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:29.200
<v Speaker 1>going to cut it if you have specific views, because

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a copy cutter approach. So subjectivity is great. UM,

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>that's I get that the tax alpha. At first, you're

0:29:37.200 --> 0:29:40.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna run out of losses to use at some point

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and if a bear market hits, what the e t

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.200
<v Speaker 1>s and the mutual funds that can that advantage should

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>go away, and then your left giving all your money

0:29:49.320 --> 0:29:52.040
<v Speaker 1>to one company? Does that? Is that a little concerning?

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Like whereas when I go food shopping, I like to

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>get different brands, so I don't want to give my

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:00.080
<v Speaker 1>whole I don't know, there's something about having choy some

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.160
<v Speaker 1>different brands and sure, um, well that's why I said,

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't see us with one eight billion

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:08.719
<v Speaker 1>and I have two million in this. I don't see

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing rotating over to that anytime soon. That said,

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the complexity is certainly an aspect there. The software covers it.

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>The cost and credit O'Shaughnessy with something very very clever

0:30:24.960 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that they did. They said, if you set this up

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>as pure beta, there's no cost to it. We're only

0:30:29.760 --> 0:30:33.080
<v Speaker 1>going to charge you for the active share. So our

0:30:33.120 --> 0:30:38.640
<v Speaker 1>portfolios are about a twenty lean towards value and small cap,

0:30:39.080 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>and so you're only paying a fee on that um

0:30:44.000 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and you're you're basically getting it no charge because the

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>transactions are free, the holding is free, and so yes,

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>you're adding a level of complexity, but surprisingly you are

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:01.600
<v Speaker 1>not increasing the fees, so it's not six BIPs, but

0:31:01.800 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>it'll end up being you know, twenty or thirty BIPs,

0:31:04.400 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>which is pretty reasonable. And that's before you know the

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.440
<v Speaker 1>tax advantage. So I don't see a cost penalty with

0:31:11.520 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>this if you're that type of client who's got a

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.040
<v Speaker 1>bigger income and a lot of tax um issues they're

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 1>dealing with. So Barry, I just want to get your

0:31:22.680 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>take on this too, which is that obviously Vanguard is

0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.600
<v Speaker 1>getting bigger and black Rock to do oppoly. They now

0:31:27.680 --> 0:31:32.360
<v Speaker 1>want about of most stocks with a concern. I think

0:31:32.360 --> 0:31:34.920
<v Speaker 1>that distortion concerns have died down a little bit, like

0:31:35.040 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, because they're seeing stocks go up and down.

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:40.040
<v Speaker 1>So clearly Active is in control. But what is bubbling

0:31:40.120 --> 0:31:43.400
<v Speaker 1>up is how are they voting? And should two companies

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>have that much power in their voting? And I guess,

0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.280
<v Speaker 1>as somebody who owns Vanguard and just watches this stuff,

0:31:49.920 --> 0:31:52.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you do? You think they have too much power?

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:54.520
<v Speaker 1>And if they do, what should be done? So we

0:31:54.600 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>own Van Garden black Rock also, and I just saw

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the other day the crossed I think the Financial Times

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:05.400
<v Speaker 1>reported um Vanguard crossed seven trillion, which is a pretty

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:11.080
<v Speaker 1>big milestone. Um, do they have too much power? Well, well,

0:32:11.120 --> 0:32:14.400
<v Speaker 1>first of all, any investor who wants to vote their

0:32:14.440 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 1>own you know, um individual proxies can we just know

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:25.240
<v Speaker 1>from experience, nobody does that. Nobody really cares so um

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:29.520
<v Speaker 1>or or or they don't care enough to vote the proxy.

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:31.920
<v Speaker 1>And so when you look at black Rock and you

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:37.200
<v Speaker 1>look at Vanguard as fiduciaries for their clients, the you

0:32:37.240 --> 0:32:40.640
<v Speaker 1>know the I want to reframe the question. The better

0:32:40.680 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>way to my response to that question is another question,

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>which is do you think that black Rock and Vanguard

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>with six of the outstanding equities seven trillion for Vanguard,

0:32:55.360 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 1>what what is black Rock? Eight points something trillion? Does

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>anybody believe for a moment they want to get into

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the business of voting proxies against the interest of their investors. No,

0:33:12.360 --> 0:33:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this isn't the arguments the Milton Friedman argument that no,

0:33:17.440 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>banks and brokers would never behave ridiculously and blow themselves

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:25.080
<v Speaker 1>up by using leverage um, and therefore they don't need

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to be they don't need to be regulated. That argument

0:33:28.560 --> 0:33:31.920
<v Speaker 1>is very, very different, because they're engaging in a risky

0:33:31.960 --> 0:33:37.600
<v Speaker 1>behavior for further profit. This is hey, maybe there, This

0:33:37.680 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is what the legal law the law review community, in

0:33:44.560 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>desperate need of topics to write about, has been, you

0:33:48.560 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>know about and and it's kind of silly stuff. I mean,

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess there is a risk that a big private

0:33:56.520 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 1>company like Vanguard or a big publicly traded company like

0:34:01.000 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>black Rock, maybe they might in a given instance abuse

0:34:06.440 --> 0:34:11.319
<v Speaker 1>their seven percent market share and vote a proxy in

0:34:11.360 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a way on a given company that is against their

0:34:15.280 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>interests but against the investor's interest. But why why are

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:24.719
<v Speaker 1>they going to go down that rabbit hole? They own

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:33.120
<v Speaker 1>some percentage of twenty companies like Now, that's why you

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 1>get these letters as to why from Larry Fink as

0:34:36.160 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 1>to why you should be more green and you should

0:34:37.920 --> 0:34:41.960
<v Speaker 1>have a diverse portfolio board of directors, And he's doing

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:47.279
<v Speaker 1>it by letters because he can't do it by proxy. Otherwise,

0:34:48.520 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>as our colleague Matt Levin would say, that would be

0:34:51.680 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the basis of securities litigation. You're giving an

0:34:55.120 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 1>excuse for lawyers to sue you because you're not operating

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:01.319
<v Speaker 1>in your in your client's best interest. So that's a

0:35:01.360 --> 0:35:04.520
<v Speaker 1>long answer to I don't really see that as as

0:35:04.560 --> 0:35:08.839
<v Speaker 1>a realistic um thing that's going to happen, and the

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:12.239
<v Speaker 1>first time it were to happen, the outcry would be

0:35:12.320 --> 0:35:15.920
<v Speaker 1>so you know loud, it would never happen again. There

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>would be new restrictions put in place internally. But you

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:22.839
<v Speaker 1>have a really nice business. Why mess with it for

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>something as stupid as a proxy vote? Who cares? Okay,

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 1>here's my question. When we get back two normal times,

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:37.320
<v Speaker 1>whatever that looks like, what's the thing from this time

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that you want to make sure that you retain. So

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of things we we've talked about this,

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>my wife and I, my partners and I. First, UM,

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I've lived in New York my whole life, and the

0:35:55.960 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 1>winters here are less than desirable. And while I'm not

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a giant fan of Florida, I've always fantasized of just

0:36:04.480 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 1>going someplace warm and sunny for a month or two

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and working remote. And I always wondered if that was doable,

0:36:12.120 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>and and now we all know it's completely doable. Um.

0:36:16.120 --> 0:36:20.240
<v Speaker 1>The more r I A related aspect to that, UM

0:36:21.239 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>we've discussed internally. My partner JESSH. Brown wrote a long

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:29.320
<v Speaker 1>blog post about this. You now know as an r

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I A that local doesn't mean anything. You have a

0:36:33.760 --> 0:36:38.920
<v Speaker 1>national potential client base because nobody saw anybody for the

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>past nine months and everything worked fine, and so whatever

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 1>hesitancy there was about I need a local advisor, that's gone.

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Because if we're doing this over Zoom or Google Hangout

0:36:51.480 --> 0:36:57.040
<v Speaker 1>or whatever your preferred technology is, if I'm down the

0:36:57.080 --> 0:36:59.480
<v Speaker 1>block or across the country, it's meaningless. And I think

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna potentially change the industry to some degree. Um,

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:08.600
<v Speaker 1>the the ability to hire people remotely that I don't

0:37:08.600 --> 0:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>have to come into the office every day, So I think,

0:37:11.360 --> 0:37:15.359
<v Speaker 1>I think that's going to be a change. And then

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:17.799
<v Speaker 1>the other thing you kind of come to realize is

0:37:17.840 --> 0:37:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the advantage of just a clean sheet of paper and

0:37:21.560 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>just saying to yourself, Hey, I have to drop all

0:37:24.680 --> 0:37:28.319
<v Speaker 1>my assumptions. I can't assume that I have to be

0:37:28.360 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in the office five days a week. I can't assume

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:33.840
<v Speaker 1>that clients want to meet us all the time. I

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:36.239
<v Speaker 1>can't assume that we have to have, you know, a

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:38.839
<v Speaker 1>big office in the city. That I think a lot

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:45.080
<v Speaker 1>of fundamental assumptions that had inertia and a general rational

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:50.600
<v Speaker 1>for their existence. Um, get get a clean um review

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's clear that a lot of our assumptions about

0:37:54.480 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 1>everything turn out to be wrong. Very ahole. Thanks joining

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>us on Trillians. As always, Thanks guys, thanks for listening

0:38:09.760 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 1>to Trillions. Until next time. You can find us on

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Terminal, Bloomberg dot com, Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and

0:38:17.200 --> 0:38:19.480
<v Speaker 1>wherever else you like to listen. We'd love to hear

0:38:19.520 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>from you. We're on Twitter, I'm at Joel Webber Show,

0:38:22.920 --> 0:38:26.520
<v Speaker 1>He's at Eric Baltunas, and you can find Barry at

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:30.560
<v Speaker 1>rid Holes. This episode of Trillions was produced by Magnus Hendrickson.

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:34.480
<v Speaker 1>Francesca Levy is the head of Bloomberg Podcast. Bye.