WEBVTT - TechStuff Gets on a SOPA Box

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve Camray.

0:00:03.160 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology? With

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>tech stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hi kids,

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.480
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Poulette

0:00:20.480 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>and I'm an editor at how stuff works dot com.

0:00:22.360 --> 0:00:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me as always a senior writer, Jonathan Strickland,

0:00:25.520 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Oh better far to live and die under the brave

0:00:28.920 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>black flag. I fly then play a sanctimonious part with

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a pirate head and a pirate heart. Nicely done, Thank you.

0:00:37.200 --> 0:00:41.599
<v Speaker 1>So today we are going to talk about something that

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>has made the news recently as of the recording of

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>this podcast. Of course, we don't know exactly what it's

0:00:46.120 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>going to publish, so it might be old news by then.

0:00:48.680 --> 0:00:53.840
<v Speaker 1>But the uh, the Stop Online Piracy Act or SOAPA. Yes,

0:00:54.360 --> 0:00:56.480
<v Speaker 1>we had a few, quite a few people asking us

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>if we were going to talk about that, and as

0:00:58.920 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>a matter of fact, initially we were thinking that maybe not, because, um,

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>sometimes when Jonathan talks about these topics, he gets a

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>little in my head that threatens to explode every time

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:12.679
<v Speaker 1>I talk about this type of stuff. And and much

0:01:12.720 --> 0:01:15.000
<v Speaker 1>as much as I like pushing him, to the limit.

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:17.080
<v Speaker 1>In that regard, I don't want to see what happens

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>if it actually finally does. Yeah. And I've also given

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>up caffeine the week that we're recording this podcast, So

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that's a I'm already I'm predisposed to being cranky. But

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 1>soapa Stop Online Piracy Act. It's made a lot of

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:37.040
<v Speaker 1>news because, um, well because there are some potential consequences

0:01:37.080 --> 0:01:40.440
<v Speaker 1>that that may not be intended consequences, but people are

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 1>worried this act may go a long way to breaking

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. That's kind of like the extreme view, right. Yeah,

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to talk about what this act is,

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>what it's supposed to target and uh, and reasons why

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>some people are worried that it may be really bad

0:01:58.080 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>news for even for people who have no intention to

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>pirate content or to distribute pirated content. Uh and uh

0:02:07.280 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, that's that's its purpose essentially is to cut

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:17.639
<v Speaker 1>down on acts of intellectual property piracy over the Internet,

0:02:17.760 --> 0:02:23.920
<v Speaker 1>and it's specifically targeting piracy that's generated from from entities

0:02:23.960 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 1>outside the jurisdiction of the United States. That's the main

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>that's the main goal of this legislation. Uh. If you

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:35.520
<v Speaker 1>don't read the Act, you might not realize exactly how

0:02:35.560 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 1>it's targeting this. Uh, let me read the purpose of

0:02:38.480 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>this act. This is actually the purpose. And it was

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.640
<v Speaker 1>introduced by House Judiciary Committee Chairman Lamar Smith, who is

0:02:43.680 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a Texas Republican. Yeah, Republican from Texas. Well, I mean

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>he's from Texas. Of course he's Republican. Uh. That's a

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a joke. That's a joke. Uh. Texas is, however,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>thought of often as a conservative state. And he introduces

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:04.799
<v Speaker 1>and I should have had this has bipartisan support. Yes,

0:03:04.840 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>So even though I say Republican and I made some

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 1>jokes there, there are people on both sides of the

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>aisle supporting this legislation. So I don't mean to say

0:03:12.680 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>that this is a Republican cause versus a Democrat cause.

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:18.960
<v Speaker 1>In fact, there are several people who are on the

0:03:19.080 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>very conservative side of the aisle who are very much

0:03:22.240 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>opposed to this legislation. So I want to make that clear.

0:03:25.440 --> 0:03:27.119
<v Speaker 1>This is not I was. I was making a joke.

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to take sides here. Yeah. That That's

0:03:30.160 --> 0:03:33.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the funny things about this particular um proposed

0:03:34.000 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>legislation is that it has bipartisan support, and bipartisan opposition.

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>So the purpose of it is to promote prosperity, creativity, entrepreneurship,

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>and innovation by combating the theft of US property and

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:55.000
<v Speaker 1>for other purpose. Uh So here's the stick. The sticking

0:03:55.000 --> 0:03:58.000
<v Speaker 1>point here is that the the legislation is at least

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>supposed to promote prosperity, but the people who oppose it

0:04:01.680 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>say that it does exactly the opposite, that it's going

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>to stifle innovation and it's going to stifle entrepreneurship. And

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>it's really just a a love letter served up to

0:04:14.200 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>copyright holders and intellectual property owners. So organizations like the

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the Motion Picture Association of America um SO, that would

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.000
<v Speaker 1>be a big one, or the Recording Industry Association of

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 1>America that's another big one. So you've got these these

0:04:30.080 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>big organizations that have a very strong vested interest in

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>um in maintaining copyright and pursuing actions against copyright infringement

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 1>and there, and there's a limited amount that you can

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>do if the the person or entity that is violating

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:54.679
<v Speaker 1>your copyright is not within the jurisdiction of the United States.

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 1>So if there's someone in China who has has a

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:03.039
<v Speaker 1>server arm that is just holding copies of various movies

0:05:03.120 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>on it for people to download, either for free or

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for a very low fee. Uh, there's not a whole

0:05:08.920 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>lot you can do as the copyright holder to stop

0:05:12.520 --> 0:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>that because it's over in China. What are you gonna

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can bring it up and try and

0:05:16.880 --> 0:05:22.600
<v Speaker 1>put some pressure on on the the whole situation, but

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>you don't have a whole you don't have a stick

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>to hold right, you don't have any threat. So this

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>is meant to be an act that gives copyright holders

0:05:32.400 --> 0:05:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of recourse when this sort of stuff

0:05:35.000 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>happens um and that it's similar to This is a

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 1>House bill, but it's similar to one that was introduced

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate UH earlier this year called the Protect

0:05:46.400 --> 0:05:52.479
<v Speaker 1>I P Bill, which was actually put on hold for

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>a while by Senator Ron Wyden who was concerned that

0:05:57.480 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>the bill in the Senate would intentionally muzzle people and

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that it would it would hamper free speech, and that

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>he felt that it was ultimately unconstitutional, and so he's

0:06:09.400 --> 0:06:11.479
<v Speaker 1>been he's been holding back on it so that it

0:06:11.600 --> 0:06:14.960
<v Speaker 1>hasn't it passed out of the committee, but it hasn't

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:18.520
<v Speaker 1>been voted on by the Senate itself. At least as

0:06:18.640 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the recording of this podcast. And just in case you're thinking, oh,

0:06:21.920 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>protect I P, that's simple. No. Protect IP is also

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:30.680
<v Speaker 1>an acronym. It's stands for preventing real online threats to

0:06:30.760 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>economic creativity and theft of intellectual property protect ip uh.

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:39.640
<v Speaker 1>And it's essentially a rewrite of an earlier piece of

0:06:39.720 --> 0:06:44.520
<v Speaker 1>legislation called Combating Online Infringement and Counterfeits Act or QUIKA,

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:49.480
<v Speaker 1>which failed to pass. Why is that because it didn't

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have a snazzy acronym that you can pronounce. All right,

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:55.040
<v Speaker 1>quakes just doesn't doesn't help. This was actually said. Here's

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:59.640
<v Speaker 1>what Widen had to say on about protect IP said.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I understand and agree with the goal of the legislation

0:07:02.800 --> 0:07:06.200
<v Speaker 1>to protect intellectual property and combat commerce and counterfeit goods.

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>But I am not willing to muzzle speech and stifle

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:11.920
<v Speaker 1>innovation and economic growth to achieve this objective at the

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:16.520
<v Speaker 1>expense of legitimate commerce. PIPE as prescription, takes an overreaching

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:19.080
<v Speaker 1>approach to policing the Internet when a more balanced and

0:07:19.120 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 1>targeted approach would be more effective. The collateral damage of

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>this approach is speech, innovation, and the very integrity of

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the Internet. So that's pretty interesting to hear. Uh A

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:33.080
<v Speaker 1>politicians say that. We hear that from people who are

0:07:33.960 --> 0:07:37.240
<v Speaker 1>big players in technology. We hear that from people like

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Eric Schmidt from Google has said similar things to this

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of legislation. And a lot of these companies have

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>also been involved in the forming of this legislation in

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>a in an attempt to head off any potential problems

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of these companies they recognize the problems

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that copyright holders face, and we should make that clear

0:07:57.880 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>to the complaint that the copyright holders have that their

0:08:02.120 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>work is being stolen and distributed freely with no way

0:08:05.920 --> 0:08:08.920
<v Speaker 1>for them to to make money from their the sale

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of their property or distribution of their property. That is

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate problem. Yes, piracy is a problem. How big

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a problem it is that is up for debate now.

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>The justification that various politicians and organizations have used to

0:08:26.280 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 1>formulate this legislation states that, uh, there's an estimate here

0:08:32.000 --> 0:08:34.560
<v Speaker 1>of how much money was lost per year due to

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:38.120
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property theft and counterfeiting, which is one and thirty

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollars in revenue. I don't know how they

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 1>came up with that number, because the government accounting office

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>just earlier this year released a report that said it's

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 1>essentially impossible to put a figure on the loss from

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>piracy because there's just not you don't have all the

0:08:57.679 --> 0:09:02.560
<v Speaker 1>facts straight. Well, Jonathan and I, I've had this discussion before, UM,

0:09:02.640 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 1>and this is one of the oldest I would say

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the oldest arguments in the software industry

0:09:08.920 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>because people talk about UM. The old standby in this

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:17.640
<v Speaker 1>conversation is, uh, well, it's Adobe Photoshop. That's an expensive

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>piece of software, and it's gotten more expensive over time

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and people are known. And then there are many pieces

0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of software like this UM, you know, where it is

0:09:27.880 --> 0:09:33.160
<v Speaker 1>an extremely useful tool, but the average person doesn't want

0:09:33.160 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>to go and spend you know, six hundred, eight hundred thousand,

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:42.319
<v Speaker 1>twelve hundred dollars for a piece of creativity software. They

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have that in their budget. It's expensive. In some

0:09:44.640 --> 0:09:48.000
<v Speaker 1>cases it's it's as expensive as a computer itself or

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>more expensive computer, depending on the machine you're using UM.

0:09:52.040 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is they say, well, you know what,

0:09:53.920 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>if it had been priced within my price range, I

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.600
<v Speaker 1>would have bought it, but instead they jacked up the

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>cost of the software so much that it was out

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of my price range. I couldn't afford it, So it

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.480
<v Speaker 1>serves them right that I downloaded in an illegal copy

0:10:07.480 --> 0:10:10.200
<v Speaker 1>of it and I'm and I'm using it. UM. On

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:14.720
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, the company that produces this software, UM

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:17.599
<v Speaker 1>will say, well, you know what, we wouldn't have to

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>jack up the price of the software so much if

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>people wouldn't stop stealing it. We're trying to make our revenue.

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>We're trying to provide value for our shareholders, and we

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:29.440
<v Speaker 1>can't do that if we're not selling copies of our software.

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And if we can't sell as many copies of our

0:10:31.160 --> 0:10:33.559
<v Speaker 1>software at that price, we're gonna have to raise the

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>price a hundred dollars. And and the thing is, Jonathan

0:10:38.160 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think, uh, you know, if we've talked about

0:10:40.480 --> 0:10:41.839
<v Speaker 1>it several times, but I think both of us sort

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of see, Um, this is a situation that you can't

0:10:45.280 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>really tell. I mean, the thing is, would the people

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>who are downloading illegal copies of the software really pay

0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>for it if it were seventy five dollars or where

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>they go? You know what, I really don't want to

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>pay the seventy five dollars either. Yeah. The way so

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>bad to finds the value of something is they say,

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the total retail value may be shown by evidence of

0:11:06.559 --> 0:11:10.840
<v Speaker 1>the total retail price that persons receiving the reproductions, distributions,

0:11:10.920 --> 0:11:15.720
<v Speaker 1>or public performances constitutent constituting, sorry, the offense would have

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>paid to receive such reproductions, distributions, or public performances lawfully.

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So in other words, this this applies to all sorts

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:25.520
<v Speaker 1>of stuff, not just software. So let's say that you

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>go to a site that has um lots of movies

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>on it, like movies that are available for you to

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>watch via streaming, and it's an illegal movie site and

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you watch it. Essentially, they would say that the total

0:11:41.040 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>retail value for that experience would be the cost of

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 1>a movie ticket multiplied by however many people streamed that film.

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:52.840
<v Speaker 1>So the the argument is that the the copyright holder

0:11:53.080 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>is is robbed of that much money. Now that's where

0:11:56.920 --> 0:12:00.319
<v Speaker 1>the problem comes in because there's a counter art that

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>states some of these people would never have paid to

0:12:04.480 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>see the movie period, They never would have bothered to

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 1>buy the tickets. So, in other words, the the copyright

0:12:11.360 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 1>holder would not have received that money, whether the people

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>pirted it or not, right, because that's that's not a

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:23.440
<v Speaker 1>ticket sale so that was an argument that came up

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot when m x Men's X Men Origins Wolverine

0:12:27.640 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>came out. I don't know if everyone on listening knows this,

0:12:31.280 --> 0:12:34.240
<v Speaker 1>but there was a big deal when X Men Origins

0:12:34.240 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Wolverine was getting closer and closer to distribution, that is,

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:40.959
<v Speaker 1>it was going to be in theaters. Before he got

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to theaters, there was an elaked release of the film

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that hit the Internet, and there were various pirate sites

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>that hosted the file so that people could access it

0:12:51.760 --> 0:12:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and watch the movie, and a lot of people did

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people did that, and there were not

0:12:58.080 --> 0:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>very many many ticket sales for the film, like the

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>essentially Wolverine bombed. Bombed might be a harsh term, but

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>did not perform as well as as the the company

0:13:09.800 --> 0:13:16.200
<v Speaker 1>had expected. And so there's a question and is the

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 1>is the pirated version to blame for the lack of

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 1>ticket sales or would the people who pirated that version,

0:13:24.000 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 1>would they have not bothered to go see the movie

0:13:26.240 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>in the first place, which means that the movie would

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>have bombed anyway. And you can't answer that question. And

0:13:31.440 --> 0:13:34.679
<v Speaker 1>that was the Government Accounting Offices point. When they release

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>the report, they said, there's no way to answer this question.

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So there is no way to give an actual monetary

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>value to the losses that a group or an industry

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>might encounter as a result of piracy. And if there's

0:13:48.920 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>no way that you can put a figure to that,

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:57.720
<v Speaker 1>then you can't justify. Uh. So you can't justify some

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.959
<v Speaker 1>of the punishments that are meeted out by the by

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>by the government against people who violate the copyright laws. Uh.

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:12.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't justify that the the intensity of those punishments

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:15.280
<v Speaker 1>based on these figures because the figures are based on nothing.

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>There's not there's no basis for it. So you end

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>up having people punished with ridiculous fines or potentially years

0:14:25.000 --> 0:14:28.800
<v Speaker 1>in jail for things that the whole justification for the

0:14:28.800 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>punishment is based on on voodoo numbers like these numbers

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that don't really mean anything. Yeah, the truth is probably

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.200
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in between all of these things. Like if the

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>if the company reduces the price of its product, you know,

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>by X number of dollars, and um, the the person

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>who uh is actually you know, going to purchase the product,

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.960
<v Speaker 1>you know they do actually have the money to do that,

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 1>then I think some of them will pony up the

0:14:59.640 --> 0:15:02.360
<v Speaker 1>money for or the software or the c D or

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the movie ticket. But and I think it's somewhere in between.

0:15:06.120 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Some of the people are still going to pirate and

0:15:08.480 --> 0:15:11.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the company's profits are still not going to

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>be realized. So some it would affect some, but it's

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>no there's really, as Jonathan said, no way to tell

0:15:17.440 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 1>exactly how many. It's not going to be. Yeah, there's

0:15:21.040 --> 0:15:25.800
<v Speaker 1>an issue of greed here that is affecting every player

0:15:26.040 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>in this in this scenario, right, So there's there's the

0:15:29.720 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>greed on the part of the consumer who feels that

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:36.160
<v Speaker 1>he or she has the right to access some content what,

0:15:36.400 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 1>no matter what its price point or it's or its

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>availability in that person's market. So you've got a sense

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:46.000
<v Speaker 1>of entitlement on the on the part of the consumer,

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>which is bad. You know, there's there's nothing that entitles

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>a consumer to someone else's intellectual property. I mean that

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you aren't entitled to that, but there's this perception of

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.520
<v Speaker 1>entitlement that if it's out there, I should have access

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>to it, and if h if the thing that's blocking

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>my access is that it's too expensive, then I should

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:08.000
<v Speaker 1>just be able to take it. Uh, there's a weird

0:16:08.040 --> 0:16:10.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of justification that goes on in a person's mind.

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 1>But then you also have the the greed on the

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>part of the copyright owners where they want to see

0:16:18.040 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>every single penny come in from every instance that their

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>product is viewed or consumed or whatever. Uh, even if

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>there's no evidence to suggest that those that that, even

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:33.560
<v Speaker 1>if there was no piracy, that that money would be

0:16:33.600 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 1>pouring in. So they want dollars that just don't exist. Um, yeah,

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:41.280
<v Speaker 1>this is this is a complicated issue. Now let's talk

0:16:41.320 --> 0:16:44.520
<v Speaker 1>about what SOPA actually does. Yeah, I was gonna say,

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>because SOPA is not necessarily an act that is going

0:16:47.680 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to uh impose punitive monetary damages. These uh, the actions

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that are taken will actually be quite different for the

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:01.040
<v Speaker 1>most part the most there there are some some things

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>further in the act about streaming video or streaming streaming content,

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 1>are allowing content to be accessible that you know, you

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>don't own the copyright to. There are some elements that

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:14.960
<v Speaker 1>are added into the language towards the end of the

0:17:14.960 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>act and most of it has to do with things

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.320
<v Speaker 1>like housing motion pictures on a on a site, that

0:17:20.400 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff. But again, it's it's taking aim at

0:17:23.400 --> 0:17:26.520
<v Speaker 1>foreign sites, because of course, if it's a company that's overseas,

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>uh is outside of the jurisdiction of the United States government.

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>So how do you target these sites. Well, you do

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:37.480
<v Speaker 1>it by cutting off access and cutting off financial support.

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.560
<v Speaker 1>That's what this this act really does. And it gives

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of power and I mean a lot of

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.080
<v Speaker 1>power to the copyright holders, which is one of the

0:17:47.119 --> 0:17:50.320
<v Speaker 1>reasons why people are up in arms about this. So

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:54.120
<v Speaker 1>in general, what happens is, let's say that you are

0:17:54.680 --> 0:17:58.080
<v Speaker 1>the head of a corporation, a vast corporation, has lots

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and lots of intellectual property, and you discover that there

0:18:02.520 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>is some site hosted in China, let's say that is

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>uh AS that's got either duplicates of your product or

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.639
<v Speaker 1>is uh pirated copies of your product out and available

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>for people to download for a small fee. So they're

0:18:20.080 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 1>undercutting you illegally, and they're selling your content for less

0:18:23.800 --> 0:18:26.239
<v Speaker 1>than what you sell it for and yours, and you

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>feel your sales are suffering as a result. What you

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>could do is you could target I s p S

0:18:34.160 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Internet service providers in the United States and tell them, hey,

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>the site over there is they're they're violating my my

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:47.919
<v Speaker 1>intellectual property rights, and I need you to remove this

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:51.480
<v Speaker 1>site from your donate domain name service so that no

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>one can access it from the United States. And it's

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>very specific, it's for US directed sites, So in other words,

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you're cutting off the path way to get to that website.

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>It will you know, you if you were to type

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in the address in your browser, it wouldn't recognize it

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 1>as a valid address because of being removed from the

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 1>donain domain name service in the US, which some people

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>argue breaks the Internet because it means that the the

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 1>servers are not going to be identical across the globe.

0:19:20.760 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna have servers in some places that will have

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>uh those those domain names in them and will have

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the map to the proper ip address, but in the

0:19:30.040 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>United States they won't. Because some copyright holder has come

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>to the I s p s and said, we need

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you to take this down. Under SOPA, the I s

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:41.520
<v Speaker 1>P has five days to respond to that to that

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>request before the copyright owner can then pursue legal action

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I actually get the courts involved. So in other words,

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the copyright holder can threaten in a way threaten the

0:19:56.160 --> 0:19:58.439
<v Speaker 1>I s p S with legal action if they don't

0:19:59.000 --> 0:20:05.000
<v Speaker 1>remove access to that domain name. UM. And furthermore, the

0:20:05.040 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I s p s if they if they comply with

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:13.440
<v Speaker 1>the copyright holders actions or request or demand really uh,

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>they are immune from uh legal recourse. So in other words,

0:20:18.920 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>you as a user, if you rely on going to

0:20:21.600 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a certain site and that site is removed, like there's

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:27.280
<v Speaker 1>no way for you to access it from the United

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:31.960
<v Speaker 1>States without doing a song and dance routine. Um, there's

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>no easy way to access that. You have no legal recourse.

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>You can't sue the the I s P. You can't

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:43.600
<v Speaker 1>sue the copyright holder because uh, this act builds that

0:20:43.640 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>protection in for those entities. So that is also something

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.640
<v Speaker 1>that people who oppose the Act are very much up

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:55.240
<v Speaker 1>in arms about. They say, well, if a copyright holder

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>comes up to an I s P and makes this demand,

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:02.479
<v Speaker 1>and the demand doesn't have a whole lot of of

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.000
<v Speaker 1>real foundation in fact to it, but the I s

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:07.720
<v Speaker 1>P goes ahead and acts on it, there's no way

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:12.520
<v Speaker 1>to you know, easily reverse that. Yeah right now. Uh.

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>Sites like I s p s have what they call

0:21:16.160 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>safe harbor, which means that if you are using you know,

0:21:21.680 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>really fast DSL dot net services to get to a

0:21:26.560 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>site that has copyright infringement on it, or they're hosting

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 1>the servers there. You know, it's not the I S

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:37.920
<v Speaker 1>p S fault. They're not required to police the content

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet. It's kind of like can't be. They

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.080
<v Speaker 1>can't be held responsible for what somebody else has on

0:21:42.119 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>their servers. It's kind of like owning a building and

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>someone in that building commits a crime. It's not the

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>building owner's fault that the crime was committed in the building. Yeah,

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:54.679
<v Speaker 1>but this changes that, well, sort of changes that, and

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>that they they can come up to the building owner

0:21:57.600 --> 0:22:00.359
<v Speaker 1>and say you have to evict the tenant. Yeah, and

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 1>change all the locks, change lots and they can't come

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:05.760
<v Speaker 1>back in. And it doesn't matter if you like it

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>or not. And if that say no. And if changing

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>the lock means you change the lock on a hallway

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and anyone else who lives in that hallway also can't

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>get to their homes, that's another problem. And that we're

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:21.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about removing an entire domain name. It may affect

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.200
<v Speaker 1>other sites that or other web pages that have nothing

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.719
<v Speaker 1>to do with piracy, have nothing, no intellectual property as

0:22:27.760 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>being violated, no counterfeitings going on, and those those pages

0:22:31.640 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 1>will be affected too. So that's really that's another point

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:38.919
<v Speaker 1>that the people who oppose this act say, you know,

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:40.920
<v Speaker 1>if you do this, there are gonna be a lot

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of there's gonna be a lot of friendly fire, a

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of casualties in the internet landscape, and it breaks.

0:22:47.400 --> 0:22:50.160
<v Speaker 1>That's where the breaking the Internet thing comes in. Many

0:22:50.160 --> 0:22:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of the companies that have spoken out, and there are

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:58.720
<v Speaker 1>quite a few of them who have expressed, um, more

0:22:58.760 --> 0:23:02.840
<v Speaker 1>than a little discomfort with the idea of SOPA going through.

0:23:03.560 --> 0:23:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Many of them have said, look, you know, we're we're

0:23:05.760 --> 0:23:10.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be uh affected by this in an extremely negative way.

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're talking we're talking about large companies like Google, Facebook, Um,

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>you know all sorts of places. Well, you think about it.

0:23:18.880 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 1>You have something like how how many people, uh we

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:24.000
<v Speaker 1>when we did the episode on YouTube? You said, how

0:23:24.119 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>much video was uploaded every minute? Forty eight hours of

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>video every minute. Can you imagine the number of people

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 1>that would have to examine all that video to make

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:40.560
<v Speaker 1>sure it doesn't have any kind of copyright violation? Now now,

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:47.560
<v Speaker 1>YouTube is known for complying with copyright infringement requests from

0:23:47.640 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 1>companies that own the property, and they'll say hey, you're

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.439
<v Speaker 1>using this this person posted a video with our music

0:23:53.480 --> 0:23:56.879
<v Speaker 1>in it. Please remove the music and there and people

0:23:56.880 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>will wonder why this video has no sound. It's because,

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:02.280
<v Speaker 1>as YouTube has gone in, strip the sound out and

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 1>let the video up right and and under the d

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>m c A. That's where YouTube has safe harbor. Just

0:24:08.119 --> 0:24:09.960
<v Speaker 1>like you were saying before with the I s P s,

0:24:10.040 --> 0:24:13.760
<v Speaker 1>YouTube also has safe harbor for user generated content. And

0:24:13.800 --> 0:24:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I should add, uh, well, two things really. First of all,

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.919
<v Speaker 1>when a copyright holder issues such an order to an

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I s P or other entity, I'll talk about the

0:24:22.080 --> 0:24:24.879
<v Speaker 1>other entities in a second, but when it does, it

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>has to do so with proof. You can't just send

0:24:28.800 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a message to an I s P and say, hey,

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 1>you gotta take down access to this site because it

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>violates our intellectual property rights. Now you have to actually

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 1>submit proof evidence of of the violation. And according to

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.399
<v Speaker 1>the Act and the and the language is a little vague,

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>but according to the Act, it's supposed to target uh

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:55.480
<v Speaker 1>sites that are the main purpose of the site is

0:24:55.520 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to distribute piratic content or counterfeit goods. Uh. So it's

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>so it's not supposed to target sites like YouTube or

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:07.560
<v Speaker 1>even a message board where the primary purpose of the

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>site is for something else, but just so happens that

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:14.720
<v Speaker 1>some people use it to distribute it pirated content. Supposedly,

0:25:15.480 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>this act does not target those sites. It's supposed to

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:21.560
<v Speaker 1>aim at sites like, uh, like the Pirate Bay. Let's

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:23.359
<v Speaker 1>say it would be a good example. And so you

0:25:23.400 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>talk about, you know, aiming taking aim at sites that

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>have by their very name come out and said, hey,

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we're about distributing content freely and uh despite any copyright

0:25:37.240 --> 0:25:43.200
<v Speaker 1>UH concerns, So that that's also something to keep in mind. UM. So,

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in other words, I don't want I don't want to

0:25:45.119 --> 0:25:49.400
<v Speaker 1>spread too much fear, uncertainty, and doubt the good old

0:25:49.400 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 1>fud out there, because the Act does have language built

0:25:53.760 --> 0:25:57.439
<v Speaker 1>into it so that it doesn't it's not blanketing the

0:25:57.640 --> 0:26:01.640
<v Speaker 1>entire Internet landscape in the same it's it's trying at

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>least to focus on sites that are known entities for violations.

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not that's how it gets applied is a

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>totally different matter. And of course, through the process of

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:17.960
<v Speaker 1>debating this legislation there may be more UM amendments added

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>to it that change it dramatically. UH. Moving on though,

0:26:21.960 --> 0:26:25.920
<v Speaker 1>besides I S P. S. The Act also gives copyright

0:26:25.960 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>owners the the recourse to go after search engines and

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:37.320
<v Speaker 1>financial institutions and advertising agencies UH search engines. The deal

0:26:37.400 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is that if you're the copyright holder, you can contact

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>Google and Bing and Yahoo and all these other search

0:26:45.160 --> 0:26:49.720
<v Speaker 1>engines and say, I want you to take down links

0:26:49.760 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to this site because it violates my UM copyright, my copyrights,

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:57.640
<v Speaker 1>so I want you to go in and remove any

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:01.360
<v Speaker 1>links you have to this. Whenever anyone searching for whatever

0:27:01.440 --> 0:27:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the topic might be, this site cannot appear in search engines. However,

0:27:08.800 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>with the blacklist, from what I understand, there are ways

0:27:11.720 --> 0:27:15.000
<v Speaker 1>around it. UM. Jonathan and I talked a long time

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 1>ago about domain names and how they work and I

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:22.000
<v Speaker 1>P addresses. So the thing is you can UH, let's

0:27:22.000 --> 0:27:26.120
<v Speaker 1>say YouTube dot com is blocked because of copyright violations,

0:27:26.160 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>but if you know the IP address UM, the series

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:33.280
<v Speaker 1>of of numbers separated by dots that actually tell you

0:27:33.280 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>where the site is, you should be able to type

0:27:35.160 --> 0:27:37.360
<v Speaker 1>in that i P address and still get through, according

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to UH. To one source, I I checked partially because

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>they were talking about another security measure that people have

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.520
<v Speaker 1>been working on called d n S sec UM, which

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.120
<v Speaker 1>is UH. The d n s are the domain name

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>servers and UH these basically are the system of addressing

0:27:57.640 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 1>UH sites that go on on the Internet, so that

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the the addresses have a general location you can find them.

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:09.159
<v Speaker 1>UM and UH the idea of being that there is

0:28:09.280 --> 0:28:13.840
<v Speaker 1>as an authoritative UH security baked into the d n

0:28:14.000 --> 0:28:19.399
<v Speaker 1>s with a public key. So if somebody tried and this, this, UH,

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:22.680
<v Speaker 1>from what I understand, would cut down on things like fishing,

0:28:22.800 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>because you could UM use the secure site to know

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.840
<v Speaker 1>for in fact, you are at the site that you

0:28:30.920 --> 0:28:35.040
<v Speaker 1>are trying to get to and not some ingeniously designed

0:28:35.080 --> 0:28:38.440
<v Speaker 1>copy of that. And d N s SEC would be

0:28:38.880 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>UH somewhat hamstrung by SOPA if it were to go

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.080
<v Speaker 1>through and UH and d N s SEX is actually

0:28:46.120 --> 0:28:47.959
<v Speaker 1>something that people have been working on for quite some

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.520
<v Speaker 1>time and would be a more effective security solution. UM.

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:54.080
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the people who have been working on

0:28:54.120 --> 0:28:57.600
<v Speaker 1>SOPA are are trying to get this done more quickly,

0:28:57.680 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's probably part of the reason that,

0:29:00.680 --> 0:29:03.479
<v Speaker 1>um there are so many holes in it. Yeah. And

0:29:03.480 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>as for the financial institutions and advertising as you probably

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 1>have guests based upon the I s p S and

0:29:09.640 --> 0:29:13.280
<v Speaker 1>search engines same sort of thing. Copyright holder can go

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to a things organizations like PayPal or the credit card

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>companies and say this site, this foreign sight is violating

0:29:23.560 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>our intellectual property rights, so you need to cut off

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.800
<v Speaker 1>any payments from the United States to those sites. And

0:29:31.920 --> 0:29:36.200
<v Speaker 1>again those organizations will have five days to respond before

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the courts get involved. UH. And same thing with the

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.080
<v Speaker 1>web advertising, where you'd say, you know you're you're serving

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:44.760
<v Speaker 1>up ads on this site, which is giving the site

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 1>its owner income. Uh, cut it out and again five

0:29:50.360 --> 0:29:54.960
<v Speaker 1>days to respond reasonably anyway and then um and then

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>cut off again. So it's a very very short time

0:29:57.440 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>to deal with from giving with getting the getting the information,

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 1>getting the order, and then having to turn around and

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and figure out your response. I mean, especially if you

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>want to truly have due diligence and make sure that

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the site that's being targeted does indeed UM violate intellectual

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>property rights and that that is the intent of the site.

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Because one of the concerns that I've seen repeatedly around

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the Internet is that that I s p s might

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>even take this as an opportunity to shut down sites

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:37.760
<v Speaker 1>that have competing UH content on them from because this

0:30:37.840 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>is the complication we have where certain in an Internet

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.800
<v Speaker 1>service providers are also content providers. Now when you when

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you have both in one entity, there's a conflict of

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:50.160
<v Speaker 1>interest there, and I don't think you can get around that.

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're the person who owns all the pipes

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're the person who owns some of the stuff

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that goes in the pipes. That's complicated because it means

0:30:58.880 --> 0:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>your content is competing with other companies content. Some people

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>are worried that I s p S might be able

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to use this to cut off access to competitor content

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:16.000
<v Speaker 1>so that they lock in users to one specific umbrella

0:31:16.080 --> 0:31:19.400
<v Speaker 1>of content, and they do so with immunity because it's

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 1>built into the act. As long as they can somehow

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.040
<v Speaker 1>show that this stems from an order they received from

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:28.440
<v Speaker 1>an intellectual property rights holder, they're they're in the clear.

0:31:28.840 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>So that's scary because it means that if you have

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I s P A and the content you really want

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to access was not made by I s P A,

0:31:39.560 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>but was made by I s P B, you might

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>not have access to that content because of this. This

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:53.080
<v Speaker 1>this legal safety net that the that SOPA provides. Now

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:57.760
<v Speaker 1>that's again not the purpose of the legislation, and it

0:31:57.880 --> 0:32:00.720
<v Speaker 1>may come to pass. If this legislation and is actually

0:32:01.160 --> 0:32:05.720
<v Speaker 1>approved and passes and turns into law, it may turn

0:32:05.760 --> 0:32:08.680
<v Speaker 1>out that no one ever abuses in such a way,

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 1>but there are people who are worried, very much worried

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:16.560
<v Speaker 1>about the potential for it to be abused like that. Now, this,

0:32:16.560 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>this legislation was um announced on October I believe of

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven, shortly before well three or four weeks

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:28.800
<v Speaker 1>before we recorded this. UM, and UH at first, people

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 1>weren't really picking up on it, um until uh some

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>outlets started uh publicizing drawing attention to this legislation. Now, um,

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:42.720
<v Speaker 1>just recently again right before we recorded this, Uh, many

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:46.440
<v Speaker 1>American sites had what they were calling American Censorship Day,

0:32:46.600 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>So you would you would show up on the website

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and there would be a message about how the site

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>was blocked, um and then essentially a dialogue on hey,

0:32:54.560 --> 0:32:58.840
<v Speaker 1>this is what could happen if this, uh this goes through.

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:03.080
<v Speaker 1>And some companies had put a censored bar over their logo.

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah yeah, UM, I was reading on on the next

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Web that, um, one of the sites affected by this

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:14.560
<v Speaker 1>was the blogging site Tumbler. Yes, that's actually a major

0:33:14.680 --> 0:33:17.840
<v Speaker 1>site that is that people are very concerned would be

0:33:17.880 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 1>affected by things like protect IP and SOPA. Yeah, well,

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:25.880
<v Speaker 1>anything anything like UM, a blogging site, UH, photo sharing

0:33:25.920 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>sites like like Flicker, UM, video sharing sites Vimeo or YouTube,

0:33:32.320 --> 0:33:34.960
<v Speaker 1>or anything at the even which is a place where

0:33:34.960 --> 0:33:38.520
<v Speaker 1>people make crafts, but a lot of times people will

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:43.920
<v Speaker 1>knit things or make things that include logos or designs

0:33:43.960 --> 0:33:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. UM. Anything like this where there

0:33:46.640 --> 0:33:50.600
<v Speaker 1>are thousands, hundreds of thousands, even millions of people submitting

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 1>content that could infringe a copyright is is you know

0:33:54.840 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a likely target? Facebook, any any kind of social sites. UM.

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>So Tumbler was one of them, and they actually asked

0:34:04.400 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>people who are visiting their site to call their United

0:34:07.600 --> 0:34:11.520
<v Speaker 1>States representatives to let them know what they thought about SOPA.

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And according to the next Web, UM, seven thousand, eight

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:19.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty four calls were generated as the results of that effort.

0:34:21.360 --> 0:34:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Mm hmm. So that's a particularly large number of people

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>that they were able to drive to the representatives. And

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I think UM generally, what I heard was that people

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:37.760
<v Speaker 1>were really concerned because SOPA seemed to have an overwhelming

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:42.840
<v Speaker 1>level of support UM in the House of Representatives. But

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 1>at this point, I think they have gotten a lot

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.719
<v Speaker 1>of feedback and are starting to have second thoughts about it.

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:52.359
<v Speaker 1>So it seemed like a go at the very first

0:34:52.400 --> 0:34:54.720
<v Speaker 1>when I first heard about it, and now it seems

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:59.240
<v Speaker 1>like the enthusiasm is maybe not uh, it's not over

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:03.239
<v Speaker 1>with completely, but it is it's flagging somewhat due to

0:35:03.280 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the response from uh, you know now that people are

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 1>aware of it, um and calling their representatives to let

0:35:09.600 --> 0:35:12.520
<v Speaker 1>them know. Sure. And and part of this was due

0:35:12.520 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>to the fact that, I mean, you can't get around it,

0:35:15.200 --> 0:35:17.040
<v Speaker 1>due to the fact you've got to follow the money, right.

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:20.719
<v Speaker 1>So it turns out that these organizations like the m

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.359
<v Speaker 1>p A and the r I double A and other

0:35:23.440 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 1>similar organizations of the the pharmaceutical industries another one because they're

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:29.680
<v Speaker 1>very much concerned with counterfeit drugs, which you know, again

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:34.000
<v Speaker 1>legitimate concern, but they pour a lot of money into

0:35:34.040 --> 0:35:38.239
<v Speaker 1>political campaigns um. And so there is also this perception

0:35:38.320 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>of perhaps politicians are acting on behalf of the interests

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of these parties, partly because it gets so much campaign

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 1>money from these sources. So you get you know, people

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>some people just come out right out and say, you know,

0:35:55.920 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 1>they'll accuse the government of cow towing to these these

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.960
<v Speaker 1>organizations because they're getting paid essentially that the politicians are

0:36:04.000 --> 0:36:07.799
<v Speaker 1>for sale. Other people don't take quite such an extreme

0:36:08.080 --> 0:36:11.920
<v Speaker 1>stand and say this is problematic. If you are getting

0:36:12.000 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>massive campaign contributions from these sources and your legislation is

0:36:16.360 --> 0:36:19.120
<v Speaker 1>acting on behalf of these sources. At the very least,

0:36:19.160 --> 0:36:22.319
<v Speaker 1>there is the appearance that you are doing this in

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.680
<v Speaker 1>return for money, even if that's not what you are doing.

0:36:25.840 --> 0:36:28.160
<v Speaker 1>You have to keep that in mind, that it looks

0:36:28.200 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>like that, and you have to behave accordingly. And of

0:36:32.400 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 1>course there are other people just say no, no, no no, no,

0:36:34.320 --> 0:36:36.719
<v Speaker 1>it has nothing to do with it. Total separation. I think.

0:36:36.960 --> 0:36:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I think both extremes are kind of a little they

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.600
<v Speaker 1>have blinders on. But I think I do think that

0:36:44.600 --> 0:36:48.080
<v Speaker 1>there's definitely a problematic issue here. And so you've got

0:36:48.120 --> 0:36:51.359
<v Speaker 1>other companies like the like Google and Yahoo and Microsoft

0:36:51.640 --> 0:36:55.280
<v Speaker 1>that also contribute money to campaign funds, but that money

0:36:55.719 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>is a fraction of what the entertainment industry pours into

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:03.480
<v Speaker 1>campaign funds. So it may have been that the early

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:06.800
<v Speaker 1>days of SOPA, the movement on it was very rapid

0:37:06.920 --> 0:37:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and very enthusiastic because it was in response to campaign

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>contributors who have a lot of sway, and then other

0:37:14.160 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>campaign contributors that have a good deal of sway but

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:20.760
<v Speaker 1>not as much, but also have a massive public following

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:25.760
<v Speaker 1>started to protest, and that is what has caused everyone

0:37:25.800 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to slow down and say, we do need to think

0:37:29.080 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 1>about this a little more and make sure that if

0:37:31.800 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>we pass this legislation it really does target what we

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 1>want to target. And again, I mean, I'm known as

0:37:38.680 --> 0:37:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the person who comes out and just starts screaming about

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:45.759
<v Speaker 1>free speech and I go bonkers, But I understand completely

0:37:45.920 --> 0:37:49.200
<v Speaker 1>the intent of this legislation and I don't even disagree

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:52.680
<v Speaker 1>with it, because it does piracy is a problem. It

0:37:52.719 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>needs to have some sort of solution. I just think

0:37:55.239 --> 0:37:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this is the wrong way to do it. Yeah, you're

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>to clarify, you're not disagreeing that people's intellectual property needs

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>some protection. It's that you're disagreeing with this particular legislation

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:09.319
<v Speaker 1>exactly exactly. Yeah, I think I think the people who

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>own an intellectual property have a reasonable right, uh to

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.839
<v Speaker 1>expect to be able to profit from that that they

0:38:16.840 --> 0:38:19.320
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't feel like, oh well, you know, it's just the

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:21.960
<v Speaker 1>nature of intellectual property. People are gonna steal it. Oh well,

0:38:22.239 --> 0:38:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's not fair either, because if you take

0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that perspective, then you suddenly remove a huge incentive to

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 1>generate intellectual property. So so that can hurt innovation too.

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>If if you tell someone who is an innovative person, hey,

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a great idea, You're never gonna see a dime

0:38:39.280 --> 0:38:40.960
<v Speaker 1>for it, because we're all gonna steal it, but thank

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you for thinking it up. That then people are gonna like, well,

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna stop thinking and start watching reality television.

0:38:47.560 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>But but if you know, at the same time, if

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you turn around and use the draconian measures to shut

0:38:54.320 --> 0:38:58.440
<v Speaker 1>down pirates that end up affecting other people in unintended ways,

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you also shut down innovation because then everyone's scared to

0:39:01.600 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 1>do anything. Yeah, that that is the The original intended

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:08.800
<v Speaker 1>purpose of copyright was to protect the creator for a

0:39:08.920 --> 0:39:14.279
<v Speaker 1>certain period, so that twenty eight years originally less than that.

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:18.920
<v Speaker 1>Oh the first copyright, yes, I I always was it fourteen.

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:20.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought that when it could be and it could

0:39:20.640 --> 0:39:23.720
<v Speaker 1>be extended once. Oh, that's right, that's right up to yes.

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is that the thing is it's intended

0:39:27.320 --> 0:39:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to protect people at the beginning, and it expires on

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>purpose so that it can be used to serve the

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>greater good and you know, expanded on and and and

0:39:36.160 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 1>embellished and enhanced later by other people. I think it's

0:39:39.360 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 1>and I think it's otherwise it would be in perpetuity

0:39:41.800 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and we wouldn't even having this discussion. The question is

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>how long is a fair period of time? That fair

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>period of time has changed dramatically since it was introduced

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and emotionally in the twentieth century. Yes, because of of

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:59.960
<v Speaker 1>lobbying by intellectual property rights holders, you had had come

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:03.040
<v Speaker 1>panies that held the rights to certain intellectual properties saying

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 1>this is not a fair length of time because it

0:40:05.400 --> 0:40:08.680
<v Speaker 1>affects our corporation. Corporations are the same as people, uh

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the eyes of the law. So therefore, by that estimation,

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:16.200
<v Speaker 1>we have to have greater terms for the copyright to

0:40:16.360 --> 0:40:19.120
<v Speaker 1>stay valid. So now it's seventy five years from the

0:40:19.160 --> 0:40:23.880
<v Speaker 1>creation of the work, and expect that to be pushed

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.080
<v Speaker 1>again before too long because a certain mouse is getting

0:40:27.080 --> 0:40:30.200
<v Speaker 1>older every day. Yes, that's true. So um, well, it'll

0:40:30.239 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 1>be interesting to see with time, as people feedback to

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>their representatives whether they will go ahead with this legislation

0:40:38.239 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 1>or if they have SOPA on the Ropes. Nice, thanks

0:40:43.280 --> 0:40:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Sopa on the Ropes. Okay, so we're just gonna we're

0:40:47.520 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 1>just gonna end it now the podcast, I mean, and uh,

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:55.440
<v Speaker 1>just to set me just this episode now, we'll see.

0:40:55.640 --> 0:40:58.040
<v Speaker 1>We still have a couple more recordings we need to do,

0:40:58.120 --> 0:41:00.439
<v Speaker 1>so I can't lose you just yet of a couple

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>of day of episodes to redeem yourself. But you, guys,

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.560
<v Speaker 1>if you have any requests for topics that you would

0:41:06.560 --> 0:41:08.720
<v Speaker 1>like us to cover, or you have any questions about

0:41:08.800 --> 0:41:12.200
<v Speaker 1>protect IP or sofa, let us know. You can send

0:41:12.239 --> 0:41:15.160
<v Speaker 1>us an email that addresses tech stuff as how Stuff

0:41:15.160 --> 0:41:18.680
<v Speaker 1>Works dot Com or let's know on Facebook or Twitter

0:41:18.920 --> 0:41:22.359
<v Speaker 1>are handled there as text stuff hs W and Chris

0:41:22.400 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 1>and I will talk to you again, assuming we're not

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:29.319
<v Speaker 1>censored really soon. Be sure to check out our new

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 1>video podcast, Stuff from the Future. Join How Stuff Work

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:36.360
<v Speaker 1>staff as we explore the most promising and perplexing possibilities

0:41:36.400 --> 0:41:40.280
<v Speaker 1>of tomorrow. The House Stuff Works iPhone app has arrived.

0:41:40.400 --> 0:41:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Download it today on iTunes, brought to you by the

0:41:47.560 --> 0:41:50.959
<v Speaker 1>reinvented two thousand twelve camera. It's ready, are you