WEBVTT - The Kavanaugh Confirmation.  Mollie Hemingway talks to Armstrong & Getty

0:00:01.560 --> 0:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>When you're ready to ride Metro, we want you to

0:00:03.960 --> 0:00:06.560
<v Speaker 1>know we're ready for you. Here are just a few

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:08.399
<v Speaker 1>of the people at Metro to tell you how we're

0:00:08.440 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 1>doing our part to keep riders safe. We're cleaning like

0:00:11.440 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>nevill before greatly. You've found half Santro, no mask, no

0:00:19.079 --> 0:00:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Metro need one. We have a few extras at Metro.

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>We're doing our part to keep the DC area moving.

0:00:25.320 --> 0:00:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Find out more at well Matta dot com slash doing

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>our part. Molly Hemingway is a senior editor at The Federalist.

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.240
<v Speaker 1>We enjoy her work on Brett Bears Show Special Report

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:39.800
<v Speaker 1>with Brett Bear. She is a thinker, she is a writer,

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and she's written a brand new book about the Kavanaugh confirmation.

0:00:43.640 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>And what a pleasure it is. Because four hours simply

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:52.800
<v Speaker 1>usn't enough. This is Armstrong and Getty extra large. So

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>we've been trying to get Molly Hemingway on the Armstrong

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:57.080
<v Speaker 1>and Getty Show for a very very long time. We

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>couldn't be bigger fans. For some reason, she's ducked us

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.920
<v Speaker 1>all these years. Me finally, Wow, Wow, that's a fine.

0:01:01.920 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>How do you do, Molly. I'd like to apologize for

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the belligerence and aile manners of my co host, How

0:01:06.360 --> 0:01:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are you great, and it's great to be here with you. Well,

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:12.559
<v Speaker 1>we are actually very big fans of you. Your intelligence,

0:01:12.560 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>your forcefulness in making your arguments. Also your occasional just

0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>barely perceptible eye roll when you're there on a special

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>report and a particularly numb skulled confident has made. Your

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:30.720
<v Speaker 1>lack of a poker face is more than appreciated. Yes,

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been told I need to work on that, but

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I do, I do, my bet. Yeah, Well it's it's

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely a respectful exchange of ideas and not a

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:44.639
<v Speaker 1>cable shouting match, which is why we like it so much.

0:01:44.720 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>But the occasional glance by Molly Hemingway is appreciated. So anyway,

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>So Molly Hemingway joined us today to talk about Justice

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 1>on Trial, the Kavanaugh confirmation, in the future of the

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. And Molly, I've seen you talk about this

0:01:57.280 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>book and a couple of different settings, though I haven't

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:03.880
<v Speaker 1>read it. But it's important that we soberly look at

0:02:04.040 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>that crazy couple of months that actually was a circus

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and a national disgrace, as Kavanaugh described it. Why did

0:02:11.480 --> 0:02:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you decide to write the book right. My co author

0:02:14.960 --> 0:02:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Carrie Savarino, and I lived through the hearings. She was

0:02:18.880 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>working on the nomination, I was covering it. We knew

0:02:21.680 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 1>it was an important story. We we believe strongly it

0:02:24.600 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>was the most important thing to happen to the country

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>last year. We wanted to just get an accurate description

0:02:30.400 --> 0:02:33.360
<v Speaker 1>of what happened, learn what was going on behind the scenes.

0:02:33.400 --> 0:02:36.040
<v Speaker 1>And we interviewed more than a hundred people, including the

0:02:36.080 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>President and vice president and members of the Supreme Court

0:02:39.760 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>and senators and people close to the Kavanaugh family and

0:02:43.160 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>the blasi Ford family, and just we're able to say

0:02:47.080 --> 0:02:49.800
<v Speaker 1>what happened and why it happened, and and get the

0:02:49.840 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>actual facts down before people forget them. Hey, I want

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>to get into the timeline and the various things and

0:02:54.880 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 1>when they happen in what order, and who knew what

0:02:56.600 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>when and what newspaper knew this but printed in anyway.

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>All that stuff is interesting to me. But how close

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>did it ever come to them actually pull in Kavanaugh?

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Did it ever get dicey? It definitely got dicey, but

0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>it got dicey on the Senate side. It didn't get

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.720
<v Speaker 1>dicey from the White House side. So the you know,

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:16.919
<v Speaker 1>whatever else you want to say about the Trump administration,

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.079
<v Speaker 1>they had kind of prepared for such a thing as

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>this type of confirmation battle. They had thoroughly vetted all

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:25.639
<v Speaker 1>candidates for any kind of problems that could arise. They

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>knew their history enough to know that sometimes there are

0:03:28.680 --> 0:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>last minute shenanigans where people try and pull you know,

0:03:31.560 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>dirty tricks to sideline nominees, and they anticipated it, and

0:03:35.400 --> 0:03:38.960
<v Speaker 1>they were prepared, and perhaps no other administration in history

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 1>this was going to withstand this type of pressure like

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 1>this one. Whatever. There's hardly been another human being on earth,

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>let alone a president that was so, you know, perfect

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>for being able to withstand the slings and arrows of

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>one of these scandals. He's been living in his whole

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:56.880
<v Speaker 1>adult life. He doesn't he doesn't go into a fetal

0:03:56.920 --> 0:03:58.880
<v Speaker 1>position when the media is on a roll with some

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:01.480
<v Speaker 1>sex scandal. He's been doing this his whole life. So

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:05.240
<v Speaker 1>that was perfect, exactly, and understanding the presumption of innocence

0:04:05.280 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and why that's important, why people need to actually prove

0:04:08.360 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>allegations without them just being believed. But the Senate was not.

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>They were not stalwarts. A lot of the senators were

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>ready to be ready to run throughout the process. You know,

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the story of Jeff Flake is well known about how

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:25.919
<v Speaker 1>he was back and forth about all the elevator, But

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>there were other Republicans too that were that, we're kind

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:31.279
<v Speaker 1>of wavering, and we'd tell the story of one senator

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 1>on the Senate Judiciary Committee who went to Susan Collins

0:04:35.279 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>and tried to get her to agree to go to

0:04:37.120 --> 0:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>the White House and get and get them to pull

0:04:39.240 --> 0:04:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the Kavanaugh nomination. And she said that he did this

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>after Christie Lassie Ford testified and she said, I'd like

0:04:45.440 --> 0:04:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to wait until we hear from Brett Kavanaugh. Of course,

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>so outrageous stalwart, but not everybody else was. Yeah. So listen, um,

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 1>if you were to just describe the entire Kavanaugh circus

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>briefly for folks, well, if I were going to i'd

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 1>probably working back to Joseph Welchi was the guy who

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 1>famously asked Joseph McCarthy at long last, have you no

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>sense of decency? Um? Was this just an abandonment completely

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of any sense of decency um in favor of just

0:05:13.920 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>achieving the end you want? I mean, it was so ugly,

0:05:17.760 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>it was, and it was it got ugly very soon.

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:23.679
<v Speaker 1>I think people forget what was happening early on. Within

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>moments of him being nominated, there was a big protests

0:05:26.440 --> 0:05:28.680
<v Speaker 1>that had been pre planned on the steps of the

0:05:28.680 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court. You had people announced that they were opposed

0:05:32.000 --> 0:05:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to his nomination before he before he had even been named.

0:05:36.400 --> 0:05:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they were saying they would oppose anyone who

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 1>was a nominee, and so there were problems early on.

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.640
<v Speaker 1>There were people getting arrested. In the first round of hearing.

0:05:44.960 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Two people got arrested, people who were flown in from

0:05:48.920 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>out of out of the area to do protests where

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.880
<v Speaker 1>they were um they had their bail paid for and

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>everything like that. So it was pretty chaotic from the beginning.

0:06:00.320 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to figure out where's the timeline on this

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:05.440
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, because there was the piece that came out

0:06:05.480 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>was at the New Yorker a couple of weeks ago

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.240
<v Speaker 1>about al frank and Stewart Smalley and how so many

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>people regret it. Regret that now it makes you understand

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.640
<v Speaker 1>the Kavanaugh thing and the al Franken thing, how the

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:18.760
<v Speaker 1>which trials happened, I mean, because we get into these fevers.

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Apparently now most Democrats look back on the al Franken

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>thing and think what were we doing? Why did we

0:06:23.920 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>run him out of office? And al Franken's thinking, why

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't I stand up to that? So but that was

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.080
<v Speaker 1>the that was the era and setting we were in

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>for this whole Kavanaugh thing, right, Oh well, it's even

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>more than that. And I actually found I'm very sympathetic

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>to the idea that al Franken got. Rail wrote it

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that people were just in a mob hysteria type moment

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and that he had to be the sacrificial lamb because

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of the way that politicians have been playing up the

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the me too moment. But the woman who

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.320
<v Speaker 1>wrote that piece in The New Yorker, Jane Mayor, was

0:06:53.400 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>one of the prime instigators of the Kavanaugh mob awesome,

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:59.839
<v Speaker 1>And she wrote the second piece you know, so first

0:07:00.000 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 1>of Christie blasi Ford come out. She writes this other

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 1>piece about a second accuser who spent six days alone

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>with her attorney to come up with an allegation. She

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>was very foggy on anything, She had nobody to corroborate

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>her story. And Jane Mayer published that story in the

0:07:16.080 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>pages of New Yorker and said that she did it

0:07:18.440 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>precisely to show a pattern of alleged misconduct, which is

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:25.800
<v Speaker 1>not a journalistic standard that I would encourage people to uphold.

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>So it's great that she has come late to the

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>notion that people should be innocent until proven guilty and

0:07:30.960 --> 0:07:34.160
<v Speaker 1>the due process matters. But she is the last person

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.880
<v Speaker 1>on earth I would have making that case, given how

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:39.360
<v Speaker 1>she was not just about Kavanaugh, but also she was,

0:07:39.400 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of course the author of one of the worst books

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:45.280
<v Speaker 1>about Justice Thomas uh from decades. Well, I'm glad you

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:49.800
<v Speaker 1>pointed that out, So would you? Was that your Is

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that what you'd say as the most immoral and disgusting

0:07:53.880 --> 0:07:57.000
<v Speaker 1>um the episode within the greater story? Or do you

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>have another that's a favorite? Well, there were lot of

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of media misbehavior in this story,

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and of course it's very important to take any allegations seriously,

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to investigate them and think about whether you are truly

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>about to nominate someone too. Are you're putting someone on

0:08:13.920 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court who is a serial rapist, which is

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.840
<v Speaker 1>where the allegations got by the end, regularly participates in

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:24.840
<v Speaker 1>gang rapes. That's where we were of a leader of

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a gang rape cartel that roamed the suburbs of Maryland.

0:08:27.720 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Was was the allegation made by Michael Abanati and his client,

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Julie sweat Nick. And yes, they were referred for criminal

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:36.959
<v Speaker 1>prosecution for making that false claim. Um, and so were

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a few other people who made false claims against Kavanaugh.

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's one thing to make the false claim. It's

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:45.280
<v Speaker 1>another thing that you had people who really should have

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:49.599
<v Speaker 1>been more sensible believing the claim or publishing it or

0:08:49.640 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>putting it out there. And NBC News knew at the time,

0:08:53.800 --> 0:08:56.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, before the confirmation. They knew that Michael Abanati's

0:08:56.840 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>supposed witness, second witness who would corrobor these crazy allegations.

0:09:01.600 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>They knew she was saying that he what he claimed

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 1>about her was not true. But they sat on that

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 1>for weeks. They knew it before the confirmation vote, and

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.560
<v Speaker 1>then they kind of like put it out quietly a

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.360
<v Speaker 1>few weeks after he was confirmed. And again, that's just

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.520
<v Speaker 1>really bad behavior that decreases people's trust in the media

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to accurately. Oh my god, that's beyond bad behavior. You've

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:21.439
<v Speaker 1>got to get out of the business. If you're willing

0:09:21.440 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to do something that's not biased, that's that's that's crime.

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>It's from It's astounding, yeah, that that should be criminally

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:32.240
<v Speaker 1>prosecutable for ruining a person's life and image and reputation

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and everything like that. Um what I remember this story barely,

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>and this one was so amazing to me that a letter,

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it was in a just in an envelope to a

0:09:42.880 --> 0:09:45.600
<v Speaker 1>newspaper and that was pretty much all the information, you know,

0:09:45.679 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>scrawled on their Kavanaugh raped me and that was about it,

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and newspapers were willing to run with it. Was that

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:53.160
<v Speaker 1>what was that whole story? I wouldn't say it was

0:09:53.280 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>quite that bad. But what was interesting is Christine Blossi

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Ford sends a letter to her representative. She claimed she's

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 1>unclear on how to reach a U. S. Senator. She's

0:10:03.000 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a weird claim to make, given

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>that she's a PhD uh, you know, she's a professor

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:09.800
<v Speaker 1>at a university. It's kind of odd to claim that

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:11.880
<v Speaker 1>you don't know how to reach your own U. S. Senator.

0:10:12.480 --> 0:10:16.839
<v Speaker 1>Her representative and as she puts her in contact with

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:20.360
<v Speaker 1>Senator Diane Feinstein, the ranking member on the Senate Judiciary Committee.

0:10:20.480 --> 0:10:23.400
<v Speaker 1>And that's where things get really weird because she writes

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 1>this letter to find Stein at the end of July,

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>she says she doesn't want her name to be out publicly.

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>I while the Senate has a process for how to

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:34.719
<v Speaker 1>handle allegations against nominees, it's completely confidential, and it is

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>actually it goes through the FBI. Um, but everyone's kept

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:42.000
<v Speaker 1>all the information is kept confidential. It protects the accuser

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>and the accused, and you can actually investiga into claim.

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 1>And Diane Feinstein, for some reason, circumvents that process. Instead,

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:52.319
<v Speaker 1>she connects the accuser with a high profile attorney who's

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:56.320
<v Speaker 1>known for rolling out um like pr campaigns against against

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>high profile men who are accused her sexual misconduct. They

0:11:00.640 --> 0:11:03.200
<v Speaker 1>circumment the process that would have kept it confidential, and

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:05.560
<v Speaker 1>then they arranged for a big PIA rollout, which was

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.280
<v Speaker 1>against the stated interests of the accuser. Now, it is

0:11:09.320 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>also true that the accuser are saying that she didn't

0:11:12.120 --> 0:11:14.280
<v Speaker 1>want her name to be public or anything to be public.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.959
<v Speaker 1>The first call she made was to the Washington Post

0:11:17.000 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in early July. So there, you know, there's reason to

0:11:19.800 --> 0:11:22.400
<v Speaker 1>think that maybe what she claimed she wanted was a

0:11:22.440 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 1>bit at odds with her behavior. But um but either way,

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>her stated her stated preference was did not have her

0:11:27.800 --> 0:11:30.760
<v Speaker 1>name be public and everybody who had the information set

0:11:30.760 --> 0:11:33.600
<v Speaker 1>about to make it public, and that was unfortunate. It's

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.240
<v Speaker 1>probably a minor point, but do you have an idea

0:11:36.280 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>an opinion on whether di fi herself was the engine

0:11:39.360 --> 0:11:41.840
<v Speaker 1>for that or was it activist staffers that are going

0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>behind the old gal's back. Oh so, we you know,

0:11:44.600 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>we interviewed a lot of people involved in the process,

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:51.120
<v Speaker 1>senators and their staff. They all actually speak extremely well

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:54.839
<v Speaker 1>of Diane Feinstein and extremely poorly about her staff. But

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.319
<v Speaker 1>they feel that her staff was taking advantage of her

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that um, that she's older, she her she throughout the day,

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe it gets more tired and whatnot, and they felt

0:12:05.320 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>that the staff was taking advantage of that situation to

0:12:08.559 --> 0:12:11.000
<v Speaker 1>do things in her name that were not what she

0:12:11.040 --> 0:12:13.400
<v Speaker 1>would want. And we had many examples that's how she

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:17.079
<v Speaker 1>would negotiate things that were actually favorable to Democrats throughout

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.240
<v Speaker 1>the process, and her staff would then renegotiate it in

0:12:20.240 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a way that was so absurd that the Republicans just

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of stopped working with them. Um. And they really

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people had a higher regard for her

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>than they did her staff, and they really felt that

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.760
<v Speaker 1>that in fact they get so upset about this. At

0:12:33.760 --> 0:12:36.200
<v Speaker 1>one point, we tell the story of a bunch of

0:12:36.240 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>senators who literally almost physically fight each other. They're so

0:12:40.600 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>frustrated about what's happening and that disconnect between the minority

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>staff and the majority staff. You know, I expect politicians

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>to behave badly and uh, maybe I should hold them

0:12:52.440 --> 0:12:54.439
<v Speaker 1>to higher standards and expect more, but I expect them

0:12:54.440 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>to But maybe it's because I'm in media. I expect

0:12:57.200 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 1>the media to be better. And I was speaking of

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the particular letter that went to the San Diego Union

0:13:02.400 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>Tribune that showed up. It was to Kamala Harris's office,

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 1>then got forward to the San Diego Union Tribune. There

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:11.160
<v Speaker 1>was just an accusation that Kavanaugh and a buddy of

0:13:11.200 --> 0:13:14.119
<v Speaker 1>his raped me, and it just it had no information,

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>was unsigned, I think it was. I was unsigned. It

0:13:18.160 --> 0:13:20.080
<v Speaker 1>had no return just so it had nothing and it

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:22.600
<v Speaker 1>actually made it into the into the into the media

0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and got talked about that. I mean, that's just disgraceful.

0:13:26.480 --> 0:13:29.920
<v Speaker 1>It's really that all standards were thrown out the window

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.199
<v Speaker 1>for how to handle something just because I guess people

0:13:32.200 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 1>thought that reputational harm was not a big deal or

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that it was justified because of political reasons, like political opposition.

0:13:39.280 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>But there were all sorts of allegations. You had people

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:45.760
<v Speaker 1>making claims. I think I just heard when you mentioned

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the claim that there was a rape on a boat

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:50.559
<v Speaker 1>in a in a state that, like Kavanaugh, had never

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:54.480
<v Speaker 1>even been rod And the senator takes it to the

0:13:55.400 --> 0:13:57.880
<v Speaker 1>to Chuck Grassley, but he also releases it to the

0:13:57.920 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 1>media who run with it. And and these are the

0:14:00.920 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>types of things. You know. Anyone can make an allegation,

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's important for people who are gatekeepers like the

0:14:05.440 --> 0:14:08.679
<v Speaker 1>media to investigate the claim and decide whether it is

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>it meets the standard of should this be published? And

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:14.760
<v Speaker 1>there was not a lot of that going on. And

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that's very unfortunate because there is real harm caused by

0:14:17.960 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>reputational damage. You said, there was no buckling of out

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of the White House. They didn't get close to pulling Kavanaugh.

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.440
<v Speaker 1>How close did Kavanaugh come to us saying and I

0:14:28.440 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>don't need this is his wife or friends or whoever

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:34.200
<v Speaker 1>egging him on saying just get out. We report that

0:14:34.280 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 1>when he was being considered for the nomination, his wife

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>actually prayed that he wouldn't get the nomination. They had

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:44.680
<v Speaker 1>gone through two very different difficult confirmation battles years prior

0:14:45.040 --> 0:14:47.920
<v Speaker 1>he had a lifetime appointment on a federal court. Their

0:14:47.960 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 1>life was really good. She just didn't want to go

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>through it again, and that was before she had any

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:54.960
<v Speaker 1>idea how bad it would get. But he always had

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this idea that he would give it his best for everything,

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:58.960
<v Speaker 1>so he just, you know, if he was upsloord, he

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>was going to try and get it. If he doesn't

0:15:00.240 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>get it, that's fine. And then once he gets the nomination,

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:04.760
<v Speaker 1>he's going to try and actually make it through the process.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>And if he doesn't, that's fine. Um, there is a change.

0:15:07.920 --> 0:15:10.240
<v Speaker 1>So he he was never going to back out, and

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 1>he had the support of his family, but there was

0:15:12.640 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>this change you saw in the reopened hearing where it's

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>not even about getting to sit on the Supreme Court,

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>but really about whether he's going to be able to

0:15:21.280 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 1>be around children anymore. You know, at that point you

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>have the media saying that he shouldn't be around children,

0:15:25.600 --> 0:15:27.360
<v Speaker 1>like I don't even know where they were coming up

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.160
<v Speaker 1>with some of these things. He shouldn't be coaching his

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>daughter's basketball team and that sort of thing with with

0:15:31.480 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>his background, what a terrible thing to say about a

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, Um did you did? You got more

0:15:38.600 --> 0:15:41.840
<v Speaker 1>emotional about it at that point? Yeah, yeah, I would too.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.200
<v Speaker 1>I he was pretty emotional, as we all remember in

0:15:44.200 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that hearing, But I would have been I might have

0:15:46.720 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>physically attacked somebody. You start telling me I can't be

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 1>around my kid's friends because I'm so dangerous, such a

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:56.440
<v Speaker 1>sexual predator. That'd make you insane? Did you do you

0:15:56.520 --> 0:15:59.480
<v Speaker 1>ever talk to anybody in journalism say I gotta ask you,

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:01.880
<v Speaker 1>how did you sit on that story or you knew

0:16:01.920 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that probably wasn't true? How did how did you? How

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.480
<v Speaker 1>do you live with yourself? Well, that's one of the

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>things that does bother us that we look at, is

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:13.240
<v Speaker 1>how prior to the confirmation you have this feeding frenzy

0:16:13.320 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of stories, all alleging really serious wrongdoing. The moment he's confirmed,

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it all just goes away. And you have to wonder

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>there if it were bad that someone were being considered

0:16:22.920 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>for the Supreme Court who had these allegations, so much

0:16:25.480 --> 0:16:27.880
<v Speaker 1>worse if they actually are on the court. So there's

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>no reason why the story should have stopped if they

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>believed them to be true and that they didn't pursue

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the stories and it just kind of disappeared. And even

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, we we wrote this book. It's a number

0:16:38.080 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>one best seller, and the New York Times in Washington

0:16:41.480 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Posts have admitted that in their best seller lists, but

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>they haven't covered the news that we break about, um

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>about what happened behind the scenes. You know normally when

0:16:50.000 --> 0:16:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you interview Supreme Court justices and key players. When you're

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>ready to ride Metro, we want you to know we're

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.160
<v Speaker 1>ready for you. Here are just a few of the

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 1>people at Metro to tell you how we're doing our

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>part to keep righters safe. We're cleaning like Noble before

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>half builded greatly. You've found hand sign of stations Metro,

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:13.440
<v Speaker 1>no mask, no Metro need one. We have a few

0:17:13.480 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>extras at Metro. We're doing our part to keep the

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>DC area moving. Find out more at well mata dot

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:25.240
<v Speaker 1>com slash doing our part. For all your foodies out there,

0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm unwrapping a McDonald's steak, egg and cheese bagel. Look

0:17:29.480 --> 0:17:32.320
<v Speaker 1>at this steak and the juice running down the side.

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:35.679
<v Speaker 1>Get a little bit on a wrapper here, m and

0:17:35.680 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>then the fluffy egg and real cheese folded over the side,

0:17:38.840 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>looking just so good. Mmm mmm grilled onions on a

0:17:43.160 --> 0:17:45.960
<v Speaker 1>butt of bagel too thumbs off a McDonald steak, egg

0:17:46.040 --> 0:17:51.159
<v Speaker 1>and cheese bagel for breakfast. Love It, m boup. I

0:17:51.280 --> 0:17:54.400
<v Speaker 1>participate in McDonald's. It's a major news story. You would

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:57.399
<v Speaker 1>get some media coverage, and they're not even covering the book,

0:17:57.480 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 1>which is a big, big thing with a lot of

0:17:59.720 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>news that is broken in it that has never been

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>reported before, about Kennedy's retirement, or about Christine blasi Ford's

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:07.879
<v Speaker 1>friends not believing her. I mean, these are things that

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>are just reported that should be covered and they're not

0:18:12.080 --> 0:18:15.360
<v Speaker 1>even acknowledging them. Well, that would open up, That would

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>open up, Yeah, exactly, that would open up a can

0:18:17.520 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>of worms that they'd have to account for. Well, I'd say,

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>given the seriousness of what you're writing about in the

0:18:22.920 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 1>the impact that it's had to ignore it is well,

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:31.000
<v Speaker 1>it speaks louder than words. Honestly, Um, you're you're a

0:18:31.040 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>serious journalist, so you might not be willing to go here.

0:18:33.960 --> 0:18:36.320
<v Speaker 1>How nutty is blasi Ford? I mean, as you looked

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>into her life and her friends, my my personal take

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>was she believed what she was saying. That doesn't mean

0:18:42.680 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it happened. I think she believed it though I don't know.

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:48.639
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, and we definitely don't get into into

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:51.800
<v Speaker 1>pretending like we can know what was going on inside

0:18:51.800 --> 0:18:54.040
<v Speaker 1>someone's brain or whatnot. But we did talk to a

0:18:54.040 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>lot of people who are friends with her, and they

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:59.000
<v Speaker 1>painted a really mixed picture. They all actually really like her,

0:18:59.040 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and they thought she was a nice person. They did

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that she was very political, very motivated by her

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>support of abortion, that she scrubbed her Facebook page before

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>she went public, um that her behavior, her description of herself,

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for her characterization of herself in high school was at

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>odds with what they remembered. But you know, there are

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>people who are lifelong friends, and they painted a pretty

0:19:20.480 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>complicated picture. She had no evidence to support her allegations,

0:19:25.200 --> 0:19:29.359
<v Speaker 1>and she named four people, including a lifelong friend who said,

0:19:29.440 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>not only did she not remember such an occasion, she

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:34.359
<v Speaker 1>remembered the summer quite well, and for her not to

0:19:34.400 --> 0:19:38.680
<v Speaker 1>remember anything matching this description was notable. That friend also

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 1>reported that she had been pressured to change her story

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.600
<v Speaker 1>by mutual acquaintances of the two that she didn't appreciate

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that pressure. So these were you know, these are all

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>things that we cover in the book and it's um,

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it's important and noteworthy. Well and and Ms Blasi Ford

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and I do not know what happened. I was not there.

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:00.680
<v Speaker 1>And crazy people get raped and sluts it raped, and

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>and whoever perpetrates that sort of thing ought to be

0:20:03.000 --> 0:20:07.480
<v Speaker 1>punished severely. But she had some pretty severe emotional problems too. Um,

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:10.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean just credibility. Why she's a little nutty, as

0:20:10.960 --> 0:20:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Jack said, but I know you you don't want to

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 1>go there. Just no, it's it's not I don't know

0:20:15.200 --> 0:20:17.840
<v Speaker 1>if it's emotional. I would just say that Rachel Mitchell,

0:20:17.920 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the sex crimes prosecutor who does the forensic interview of

0:20:22.119 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>her very difficult circumstances of live national television, impossible to

0:20:26.520 --> 0:20:30.240
<v Speaker 1>explore some of the inconsistencies. For instance, we were told

0:20:30.280 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that the hearing had to be delayed because of a

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of a terrifying, crippling fear of flying. Right, And she

0:20:35.600 --> 0:20:37.199
<v Speaker 1>points out that not only did she fly all the

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:40.199
<v Speaker 1>time for professional reasons, she does it for personal reasons,

0:20:40.200 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and lists her primary hobby as international surf travel, which

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 1>involves not just flying, but like flying over large expanses

0:20:47.760 --> 0:20:50.399
<v Speaker 1>of the Pacific Ocean and island hopping and so the

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.160
<v Speaker 1>claims that were made were at odds with the reality

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 1>um that she herself testified to. It's a very generous

0:20:56.320 --> 0:20:58.200
<v Speaker 1>way to put it. So this is just an opinion

0:20:58.320 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 1>question to you, as an acute observer of the political scene,

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:07.160
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me that this trend can't continue much further.

0:21:07.359 --> 0:21:10.119
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god, unless you accuse somebody of being Hitler

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 1>reincarnate or the anti Christ. You can't go much further

0:21:13.840 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>than that. Yet, where does it go from here? Well,

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and this has happened before. You saw this in the

0:21:19.560 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>Bork hearings, the Thomas hearings. Uh, there were other other

0:21:24.000 --> 0:21:28.760
<v Speaker 1>hearings where you've seen some pretty outlandish claims that are made. Um,

0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>it happened here. I think people would be naive to

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.399
<v Speaker 1>think it won't happen in the future. One of the

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:36.200
<v Speaker 1>things we show is that it tends to happen not

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:39.159
<v Speaker 1>because of particular nominees so much as when there's an

0:21:39.200 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 1>ideological shifts in play for the for the court. So

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 1>Neil gors Wich was replacing Anton and Scalia. That's not

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>a big shift, So nobody freaks out about it. When

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a Trump nominee is replacing Anthony Kennedy who's a swing vote, Well,

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a bigger issue. And if one of the liberal

0:21:55.920 --> 0:21:58.880
<v Speaker 1>block justices were to retire or have a seat open

0:21:59.000 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>up and then to be replaced by a Trump nominee,

0:22:02.480 --> 0:22:05.919
<v Speaker 1>I think you would expect it come like an apocalyptic

0:22:06.080 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>type battle. And it's not going to be about whether,

0:22:09.320 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the nominee really has a problem in their past.

0:22:13.240 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So much is whether people feel threatened by a change

0:22:16.520 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>on the court. Right. So if the notorious RBG actually

0:22:19.359 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, can't do it anymore, and Trump gets to

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:26.159
<v Speaker 1>appoint another Supreme Court justice the way he's appointed so

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:29.200
<v Speaker 1>many justices at various levels across the country, that would

0:22:29.240 --> 0:22:32.200
<v Speaker 1>be Are there people out there that would be willing

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:34.879
<v Speaker 1>to to stick their neck out and even even try

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.199
<v Speaker 1>to make it through that gauntlet. It's certainly, and there

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:38.959
<v Speaker 1>might be people who are willing to stick their neck out,

0:22:39.000 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>but aren't willing to have their family go through it.

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 1>It's there are all sorts of people who just cannot

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:48.760
<v Speaker 1>imagine putting their loved ones through this type of battle,

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>which is why it's important to hold people accountable for

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>making false allegations for circumventing processes that are designed to

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:59.359
<v Speaker 1>protect nominees and people who accuse them, and there hasn't

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of the on ability at this point,

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's important that people know the history and know

0:23:03.440 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it well and tell people that you know, it's understandable

0:23:06.800 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that political battles will be politically waged, but there should

0:23:10.000 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>be limits to what you're willing to do or able

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>to do as you go after people. It just occurs

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>to me the three examples we just gave here, so

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:20.640
<v Speaker 1>you got Kavanaugh, Bork, and Clarence Thomas O's are all

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:24.119
<v Speaker 1>Republicans that Democrats went off when after in a in

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a very ugly way. Do we have any examples where

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 1>the parties are flipped? No, I mean Republicans play hardball

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.280
<v Speaker 1>on this too. You might remember that when President Obama

0:23:34.359 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>nominated Merrick Garland to fill Scalia's seat, they just said,

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we're not even going to have hearings, and that was

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:43.919
<v Speaker 1>that was something that bothered a lot of people. Now

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.000
<v Speaker 1>they didn't go after Garland. It bothered me. It was

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.399
<v Speaker 1>a clever move and it worked, but it wasn't fair

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>they made that. They made the claim before Garland was

0:23:53.720 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 1>even named, which is a big difference and important difference.

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.600
<v Speaker 1>So they didn't go after him personally. They went after saying,

0:23:59.600 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we're just even getna hold hearings. We're not going to

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>consider anyone that you put forth. So Republicans play hardball,

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:07.520
<v Speaker 1>but less personally. And of course the big issue here

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is the court has become this way that people accomplish

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:14.119
<v Speaker 1>things when legislatures fail to accomplish what they want, so

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.159
<v Speaker 1>they use the court to push through their progressive ideology

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and and so the court is kind of responsible for

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>this itself. The more political they are, the more political

0:24:22.440 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>people will be about nomination battles. The better course of

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:27.639
<v Speaker 1>action would be simply to do their job, which is

0:24:27.680 --> 0:24:30.840
<v Speaker 1>determined whether a law is constitutional or not um and

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 1>that can be a law written by Democrats or Republicans.

0:24:33.520 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 1>You just determine is it constitutional or not. And when

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't do that and you make it more political,

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:40.400
<v Speaker 1>well you're gonna have a lot of political battles. What

0:24:40.440 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>was it was it Ben sass Or who was talking

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>about quite persuasively not long ago, about the fact that

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Courts been elevated to such astounding heights because

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Congress won't do its damn job, and so you almost

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.200
<v Speaker 1>have to have a nine person legislative body figuring out

0:24:58.240 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>what the hell Congress means. Well, I do think that

0:25:01.880 --> 0:25:05.159
<v Speaker 1>the Congress has passed a lot of its responsibility to

0:25:05.359 --> 0:25:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the administrative state executive branch agencies, and then that does

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:12.480
<v Speaker 1>create a huge branch of administrative law where the courts

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>have to decide whether something's constitutional or not. So Congress

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 1>has been part of the problem. But really, even so,

0:25:20.280 --> 0:25:24.200
<v Speaker 1>even when that's their job, rather than um, make political decisions,

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>as the Court has done too many times. You know,

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's like redefining marriage or inventing rights to to abortion,

0:25:31.119 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you know these are things better handled through the legislative

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>process and uh, and that people should litigate them through

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>the court of public opinion rather than the actual Supreme Court.

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>So you and Carrie Savorino have digested this ugly episode

0:25:49.080 --> 0:25:53.199
<v Speaker 1>as thoroughly as absolutely anybody. Uh. Looking to the future,

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and of course the subtitle includes the future of the

0:25:55.280 --> 0:25:57.959
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court, but looking to the future of Supreme Court hearings.

0:25:58.000 --> 0:26:01.719
<v Speaker 1>If you were to have advised, say, an administration on

0:26:01.840 --> 0:26:06.120
<v Speaker 1>how to counter the battle roar administration for oh lord, um,

0:26:06.800 --> 0:26:09.840
<v Speaker 1>how to counter the fever pitch, the wild allegations, the

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 1>utter journalistic irresponsibility, Uh, what would your council be? Well,

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I actually think the Trump administration handled it really well.

0:26:17.600 --> 0:26:21.680
<v Speaker 1>They started their vetting during the primary campaign, not even

0:26:21.920 --> 0:26:24.760
<v Speaker 1>not even in not waiting until they had the actual

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Republican nomination, but they started going through candidates figuring out

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:32.000
<v Speaker 1>who had the right approach to the law, this originalist

0:26:32.160 --> 0:26:35.879
<v Speaker 1>approach to whether something is constitutional or not. They looked

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to see had they shown that they have the right

0:26:39.240 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>approach through multiple opinions and a track record that shows

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they're willing to make unpopular decisions that are correct under pressure.

0:26:46.760 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 1>And they really did look for courage. Do they have

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the courage of their convictions? That's what you're going to

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.320
<v Speaker 1>need to get through this type of process. One of

0:26:54.359 --> 0:26:56.639
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court justices we talked to was kind of

0:26:56.680 --> 0:26:58.880
<v Speaker 1>pointing out, if you can't make it through this brutal process,

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of brutal for everyone to one degree

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:03.560
<v Speaker 1>or another, and then maybe you shouldn't be serving on

0:27:03.600 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>the court. You know, it requires a lot of courage

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:10.199
<v Speaker 1>to make the proper decision, and if you don't have

0:27:10.320 --> 0:27:11.720
<v Speaker 1>if you don't if you can't make it through a

0:27:11.760 --> 0:27:14.560
<v Speaker 1>tough process, then you might not have what it takes

0:27:14.600 --> 0:27:16.399
<v Speaker 1>to withstand all the pressure that will be coming your

0:27:16.400 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 1>way once you do sit on the court. You know,

0:27:18.640 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Molly Hemingway, we are fanboys here on the Armstrong and

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>getting show for the term, and we're on all across

0:27:23.840 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the country, including in Washington, D C. And and uh,

0:27:27.000 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 1>just hoping that we can get you on on a

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:30.880
<v Speaker 1>regular basis to talk about that. We play clips from

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:32.760
<v Speaker 1>you and then pretend you're here. That's what we do.

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I love it, said Molly Hemingway. Hey, what a pleasure,

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:39.959
<v Speaker 1>terrific book. Can't wait to read it. And uh, and

0:27:40.119 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate the conversations. Why we got you on the line,

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>I got to ask, I mean, we just finished when

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:46.000
<v Speaker 1>we're taping this two nights of Democratic debates. Who's going

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to be the nominee? Who do you think? I'm really

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 1>not sure. I think I'm really not sure. And until

0:27:52.600 --> 0:27:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I am sure, I don't like to speculate too much.

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I think Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren are strong. I

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:01.880
<v Speaker 1>think there's something about Mary Ann Williamson that I wouldn't

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:04.480
<v Speaker 1>which I know it sounds absurd and crazy, but she's

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the only one that says anything actually interesting. Usually, how

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>about my boy Yang, He's pretty fun, He's pretty interesting.

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if his his what his platform is

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:18.160
<v Speaker 1>universal basic income and no circumcision, which I'm not sure

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 1>how palatable that it's not my top five. Well well, well,

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>but speaking of palatable, I mean, if any of the

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:30.520
<v Speaker 1>candidates run on health care for illegals, free healthcare for illegals,

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a chance of beating Trump, do they.

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>It was so interesting to watch these debates where you

0:28:36.200 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>have the people desperately trying to plead with the more

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>radical candidates to moderate their positions somewhat, and then the

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.720
<v Speaker 1>radical people getting very angry at being told that their

0:28:46.760 --> 0:28:49.560
<v Speaker 1>ideas are too extreme for the general populus. So just

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>watching that back and forth with people just think, can

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you please not be so crazy if we're gonna have

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>if we're gonna have a shot of beating Trump, and

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:59.320
<v Speaker 1>then the people saying nope, we're going to be crazier. Yeah,

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a stay right now, and it's amazing.

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:03.080
<v Speaker 1>You certainly wouldn't have guessed this a couple of years ago.

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump's gonna get reelected and win like forty eight states

0:29:06.160 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>against some just crazy out there AOC green new deal

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.520
<v Speaker 1>healthcare for a legals candidate. Wow, what a historic moment

0:29:13.560 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that will be. Um, it'll be interesting to watch. But

0:29:16.720 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 1>I certainly think he has a lot of advantages right

0:29:19.080 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>now that are under noted by people in the media.

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And of course, like the more crazy the people in

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>the media get where they're just they're just becoming almost

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>rabid in their dislike of Trump. Not almost that, they're

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 1>totally rabbid, and it just makes it hard to take

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 1>them seriously when they try to levy critiques. It just

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 1>comes off as absurd, all right, just an indulgence if

0:29:40.240 --> 0:29:42.360
<v Speaker 1>you don't mind a few words on a couple of

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:48.960
<v Speaker 1>different people. Let's start with Brett Bear. What's Brett like? Oh,

0:29:48.960 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>he's great. He's wonderful. So one of the two major

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 1>shows that he comes on our show fairly regularly. We've

0:29:53.280 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>had him on before. What are you doing? I've tried

0:29:56.880 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 1>flatter and I'm gonna try shaming. I'm gonna see what works. Um,

0:30:01.320 --> 0:30:04.040
<v Speaker 1>But he's great. I really enjoyed. That's my favorite hour

0:30:04.160 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of television on each day. And I like the cow

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>he handles the news and very thankful that he UM

0:30:12.000 --> 0:30:15.400
<v Speaker 1>puts people on his panel who represent the viewpoints of

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of Americans. Yeah, it's the best news show

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>on television. Absolutely. He seems like a thoroughly distant human being.

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:25.479
<v Speaker 1>Do you deny that? He's absolutely wonderful. That's good. And

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:27.800
<v Speaker 1>what was it like knowing, at least to some extent,

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Charles Krahammer, who also came on our show regular nay,

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>oh stop it. I adored Charles and he was someone

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 1>who at first, you know, we would just fight a lot,

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>but then we would continue fighting off air because we

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>enjoyed it so much. And he was also very encouraging.

0:30:46.360 --> 0:30:48.520
<v Speaker 1>You know a lot of people take things so personally

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in DC right now, where if you disagree with them,

0:30:51.200 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>then they decide that you're evil and you're horrible and

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:56.840
<v Speaker 1>you're beneath contempt. And he had this idea that when

0:30:56.880 --> 0:31:00.360
<v Speaker 1>people disagreed, they should explore that disagreement and talk about

0:31:00.360 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>it and you know, figure out where that disagreement led.

0:31:03.480 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>And he didn't take it personally, So he really was

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>encouraging in terms of um. You know, he and I

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:12.640
<v Speaker 1>definitely disagreed on a lot, you know, whether it's about

0:31:12.680 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Trump or foreign policy or whatnot, but we had fun

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>in that disagreement. Yeah, you know, it's funny you should

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.160
<v Speaker 1>say that, because my dominant memories of Charles or number one,

0:31:23.160 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>how funny he was um and number two, whenever I

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>disagreed with him, I would think about it and think

0:31:28.400 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 1>about it and think about it because I thought I needed,

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.400
<v Speaker 1>I need to have a really good case to disagree

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>with this guy. And you know, we need more people

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 1>like that. You know, he comes from that group of

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>people that were very anti Trump, but unlike so many

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of them, he wanted to understand why people like Trump

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and what they found appealing about him, and he was

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:49.719
<v Speaker 1>more humble about it than a lot of people are

0:31:49.760 --> 0:31:52.840
<v Speaker 1>who just can't even understand how anybody could possibly vote

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 1>for him. Well, that's doing it wrong. And Brett Show,

0:31:54.960 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>you gotta do it like they do on CNN. So

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>you've got nine people on a panel and hey, guess

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>what all nine of them agree, no disagreement. Yeah. Molly

0:32:05.680 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Hemingway Justice on Trial with Kavanaugh confirmation in the Future

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:11.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Supreme Court, which she wrote with Kerry Savarino, Molly,

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:12.200
<v Speaker 1>great to talk to you. I hope we can do

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it against soon. Thanks a milions, great, thank you, Thanks

0:32:15.920 --> 0:32:17.600
<v Speaker 1>so you think I was successful on any level. I

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>don't feel like I was. Were you trying to humiliate

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.680
<v Speaker 1>yourself and me by extension? Well, then yes, you were successful.

0:32:23.960 --> 0:32:28.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought, absolutely successful. I realized flattering was getting nowhere, right,

0:32:29.080 --> 0:32:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So then I thought, these people that you like in respect,

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>who are also big deals. They've come on the show

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:38.520
<v Speaker 1>multiple times. It was the what's the term transparency of

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the strategy that bothered me. Really, she's she's a serious woman. Yeah,

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>no doubt, which is great. I cannot wait to read

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>this book because watching it unfold was so disgusting, and

0:32:55.160 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>part of it is, you know, I sort of got

0:32:57.400 --> 0:33:01.120
<v Speaker 1>My biggest fault is naivete. I can't believe people act

0:33:01.400 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>so badly in such a big way, and and you

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 1>can still suck air and sleep at night in the

0:33:09.120 --> 0:33:12.960
<v Speaker 1>rest of it. It's astounding. You can't shock politicians can't

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 1>shock me at this point. But I do expect journalists

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:19.680
<v Speaker 1>to not sit on something that would could clear a

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 1>guy of being a gang rapist, right, but that would

0:33:22.840 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>interrupt the narrative. That's print Wait a minute, a piece

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of notebook paper unsigned arrived at add newspaper office. Let's

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>go ahead and print that allegation. I mean, that's an

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:41.280
<v Speaker 1>abandonment of journalistic principles so astounding and egregious. If it

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>hadn't happened, I wouldn't believe it. And you know, if if, um,

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:50.760
<v Speaker 1>if the Weekly World News did that, I chuckle and think, well,

0:33:50.840 --> 0:33:53.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows what they are. But for n NBC to

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>do that, well, you know, let's screw him. That's I

0:33:55.920 --> 0:33:58.400
<v Speaker 1>think of NBC about like I think about the Weekly

0:33:58.440 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 1>World News. At this point, they have made their bed.

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:04.840
<v Speaker 1>By God, they wouldn't lie in it. I don't remember

0:34:04.840 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>how we end these extra long podcasts. I think we

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:17.360
<v Speaker 1>just stopped talking mark extra large. When you're ready to

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>ride Metro, we want you to know we're ready for you.

0:34:20.520 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>Here are just a few of the people at Metro

0:34:22.600 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to tell you how we're doing our part to keep

0:34:24.640 --> 0:34:28.640
<v Speaker 1>riders safe. We're cleaning like nevill before, half builded greatly.

0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:35.279
<v Speaker 1>You've found half sanitizing, no mask, no Metro need one.

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 1>We have a few extras at Metro. We're doing our

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 1>part to keep the DC area moving. Find out more

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>at well mata dot com slash doing our part