WEBVTT - Windows 7 Overview

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:00:03.200 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>It's ready. Are you get in touch with technology with

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:17.880
<v Speaker 1>tech Stuff from how stuff works dot com. Hello again, everyone,

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>welcome to tech stuff. My name is Chris Poulette, and

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I am the tech editor at how stuff works dot com.

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Sitting across from me, as he always does on the

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 1>occasions on which I podcast, is senior writer Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:29.040 --> 0:00:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, so, um, the number seven, the number seven,

0:00:33.520 --> 0:00:35.920
<v Speaker 1>number seven. Don't jump ahead, We've got listener mail to

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:43.040
<v Speaker 1>deal with. Okay, let's do that. Then this listener mail

0:00:43.120 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>comes from Ted. Ted says, so when are we getting

0:00:46.760 --> 0:00:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the low down on Windows seven? As a user, I'm

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>loving the new OS is as better OS than XP

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.200
<v Speaker 1>and Vista, and finally starts to rub off the black

0:00:55.240 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>eye for MS. So when are you going to tackle

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the elephant in the room. M thanks and chat later, Ted, Well,

0:01:03.120 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 1>we don't tend to tackle elephants. They're very large. Yes,

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 1>they tend to charge. Yes, we can take away their

0:01:09.080 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>credit cards. We will. Someone left a footprint in the

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>butter we will. Um. We will, however, tackle Windows seven. Yeah.

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:20.559
<v Speaker 1>I should point out too that this is a little

0:01:20.560 --> 0:01:25.280
<v Speaker 1>difficult for us, simply because UM, as a group that

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.039
<v Speaker 1>typically does not do product reviews. UM, we don't have

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>a review copy of Windows seven in the house, although

0:01:32.480 --> 0:01:34.919
<v Speaker 1>both of us have had the chance to mess around

0:01:34.959 --> 0:01:38.480
<v Speaker 1>with the preview version that Microsoft released last year. We

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:40.760
<v Speaker 1>have a test machine that we use for stuff like

0:01:40.800 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>that and lenox um, so you know, in a way,

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 1>we have had the chance to mess with it some,

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>but we haven't had a chance to really mess with

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>the full version. Yeah, and part of that is because

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:55.639
<v Speaker 1>the office as a whole has not moved Windows seven,

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>so we don't have access to it on our work machines,

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and neither Chris nor I have purchased a computer since

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Windows seven went gold and uh, and I'm using a

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>Mac at home. So I mean, we just haven't had

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>a chance to use it in our personal lives really,

0:02:09.960 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>but there's been a lot out about it, so we

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>can talk about it. Uh. First of all, would you

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.440
<v Speaker 1>say that, when based upon what you've read and the

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>limited experience you've had, that Windows seven is a huge

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>jump over Windows Vista. Well, in doing some research for it,

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to see what other people were saying, because

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:35.079
<v Speaker 1>you know, even frankly even if it was we were

0:02:35.240 --> 0:02:37.079
<v Speaker 1>they were asking us just about our own experience. I

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>would still want to see UH sort of temper that

0:02:39.960 --> 0:02:42.160
<v Speaker 1>with some of the other reviews that I've read online

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and get a feel for what other bloggers and professionals

0:02:45.400 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>were saying about it too. Um. Based on based on that,

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I would say that people in general seem to agree

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that UH Windows seven is a very good interface. Yes, um.

0:02:56.680 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I even talked with with our I T professional who's

0:02:59.520 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>in the office. Um. He said in his opinion that

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Window seven is the second best OS that Microsoft has

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>ever released. You know, I didn't ask, I was afraid

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>to ask. But program Well, the problem is too that

0:03:19.000 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>people Vista still has a very you know, as to

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>point out, sort of a black eye, although you know

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>by now people don't complain about it nearly as often

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 1>as they used to. Well, it's because it's been some

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>time and upgrade it. Well yeah, but it's still not

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I think the bells and whistles, plus a lot of

0:03:35.800 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the machines on which people were trying to install it

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>at first, you know, may not have been able to

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.960
<v Speaker 1>handle it, whereas newer computers with it UH pre installed

0:03:44.400 --> 0:03:47.040
<v Speaker 1>are ready and you know, it wasn't such a big

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.800
<v Speaker 1>deal for people who were on Vista, But most people

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I've seen who have upgraded to Windows seven seemed to

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>really like it. I think for people who's stuck with

0:03:55.280 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>the Vista platform and who continued to patch it and

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>updated as they became available, probably have come around to

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to thinking that Vista is not really as bad as

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone was making it out to be. Now. When it launched,

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it certainly didn't have the support or the the versatility

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.680
<v Speaker 1>that people expected, particularly when it came to things like

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:20.200
<v Speaker 1>driver issues, drivers for things like video cards and sound cards,

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>and and just peripherals. Yeah, people were having problems with

0:04:23.040 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 1>their computers crashing. They would have all these peripherals that

0:04:25.839 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>worked perfectly when their machine was running Windows XP, but

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 1>when they upgrade Windows Vista, suddenly they would get all

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>these notifications that things weren't working correctly or the or

0:04:35.640 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>the computer would crash. Um. And as we said, you know, eventually,

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.039
<v Speaker 1>over time, Microsoft was able to address a lot of

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 1>these problems through patches, but the damage had already been done.

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:48.320
<v Speaker 1>That that the early perception was just that Vista was

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:53.080
<v Speaker 1>not a strong operating system and that it had too

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 1>much stuff stripped out of it during the development process,

0:04:56.880 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 1>which is true. There were quite a few features that

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>were supposed to be Windows Vista that ended up being

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:05.240
<v Speaker 1>pulled before it went gold, and so that has prompted

0:05:05.279 --> 0:05:08.120
<v Speaker 1>some folks to say that Windows seven is really what

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Vista should have been the whole time. Well, I will

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:17.360
<v Speaker 1>give you some more evidence that people like Windows seven. Um.

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Then Windows Vista took about a year to get ten

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.279
<v Speaker 1>percent of the market. Uh, Windows seven did that in

0:05:25.400 --> 0:05:30.640
<v Speaker 1>three months. Apparently so many people were waiting for uh

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>an upbring system that wasn't Vista, that they were very

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>willing to jump from XP directly to seven. Yeah. Well

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.279
<v Speaker 1>this this was this is based on an article I

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>read in All Things d by John Paskowski. And um,

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, basically, one in ten computers as of the

0:05:46.880 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>end of January, we're using uh Windows seven. Um. And

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.120
<v Speaker 1>as a matter of fact, another article I read and

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 1>seen it um said that Microsoft is, as a result

0:05:59.200 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of the success of Window seven, enjoying record profits. Um. However,

0:06:04.520 --> 0:06:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that's for people who are actually buying the operating system

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>from Microsoft. So people are upgrading to Windows seven, but

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>they're not necessarily buying new machines with Windows seven. On

0:06:13.680 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>it because PC manufacturers with Windows seven are not doing

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:20.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. Um. I think that's a result of the economy.

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, a PC, a brand new PC is much

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.560
<v Speaker 1>more expensive than a copy of an operating system, and

0:06:24.600 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people might be looking at netbooks, which

0:06:28.600 --> 0:06:31.240
<v Speaker 1>some netbooks do run Windows seven, kind of stripped down

0:06:31.320 --> 0:06:33.600
<v Speaker 1>version of Windows seven. It's not the same one that

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you're going to find on a fully fledged desktop. But

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:40.520
<v Speaker 1>you can also find netbooks on running the Linux operating system,

0:06:40.560 --> 0:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and um, pretty soon you will see some running the

0:06:43.080 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Google Chrome OS. But that that means that often the

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>Linux ones tend to be priced lower than the Windows ones.

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Not by a whole lot, but every little bit tends

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:56.960
<v Speaker 1>to help. So I think a lot of people just

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 1>and have have purchased Linux machines instead of Windows machines

0:07:01.880 --> 0:07:04.320
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the netbook market, although some of

0:07:04.360 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>those same people end up being dissatisfied when they realized

0:07:08.279 --> 0:07:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that the Linux machine doesn't do everything they expected it

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 1>to do. It's no fault of Linux, really, it's more

0:07:14.240 --> 0:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of not a lack of education on the part of

0:07:16.320 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the consumer where they just think, oh, this is a computer,

0:07:19.800 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>that means that this can do blah blah blah, And

0:07:22.680 --> 0:07:25.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not always the case. It is often very dependent

0:07:25.280 --> 0:07:29.040
<v Speaker 1>upon the operating system, the processor, the memory of the computer.

0:07:29.520 --> 0:07:32.160
<v Speaker 1>All that kind of stuff definitely takes a place apart

0:07:32.240 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and what the computer can and cannot do. But I

0:07:34.600 --> 0:07:37.080
<v Speaker 1>think in the average consumer's mind they just think computer.

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:40.000
<v Speaker 1>That means I can do this, um, and when they

0:07:40.040 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>get something that can't do that, they get frustrated and

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>then go and return it. But at anyway, yes, it's

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 1>true the Windows seven machines that are on the market

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>now just haven't been moving very quickly. But again, the

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the economy bright plays a very large factor in that,

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's generally if you're if you're interested in and purchasing.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:02.760
<v Speaker 1>So now I mean, I'm sorry, Window seven. Uh, there

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:06.240
<v Speaker 1>are there. It seems like there was some confusion at

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the very beginning of what versions we're going to come out. Well, yeah,

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>before before it launched, we had heard that there were

0:08:11.720 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be six versions. Yeah, and I think there

0:08:14.040 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I think there still are. It's just that o M,

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>which is original Equipment manufacturer. They you know, they come

0:08:20.200 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>pre installed on systems like netbooks and other computers. Right,

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that would be like like the netbook would be a

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>stripped down version, like I said, but you could get

0:08:29.240 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Windows seven Premium, or or Windows seven Ultimate or Windows

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:36.360
<v Speaker 1>seven Professional. I think are those those are the main

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>three for if you were if you're looking at upgrading

0:08:39.880 --> 0:08:42.880
<v Speaker 1>a desktop, and I think in most cases, Windows seven

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 1>Professional would be more than what most people would need.

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't seem I don't see a whole lot of

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:52.880
<v Speaker 1>value to Windows seven Ultimate for the average user. I mean,

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 1>for for real power users maybe, but for most people

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>myself included, I include myself in this group. I don't

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.760
<v Speaker 1>see any need to go beyond Windows seven Professional. Yeah. Yeah, Well,

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the Home Premium is the most stripped down of of

0:09:06.440 --> 0:09:11.079
<v Speaker 1>the three, and it's um and it lacks a lot

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of the features. It's basically just the rudimentary version, you know,

0:09:14.840 --> 0:09:17.600
<v Speaker 1>for the average computer. I guess um it doesn't have

0:09:17.640 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the XP mode, which that's that's uh, one of those

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>modes that a lot of businesses really essentially demanded. I think.

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason why that mode is in there

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:34.079
<v Speaker 1>is that's Microsoft's nod to corporate the corporate world. Because

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the XP is one of those proven platforms and a

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of businesses still use XP. I can think of

0:09:42.440 --> 0:09:45.000
<v Speaker 1>one that's very close to us right now that still

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.319
<v Speaker 1>uses the XP operating system run many of its computers,

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 1>all of them. We have a few, uh, we have

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>a few Mac based computers. There are a couple of

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:57.000
<v Speaker 1>people with the newer laptops who have Vista. Really. Oh

0:09:57.040 --> 0:09:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and then we also have a one Linux machine. Yeah

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that's true, probably more than more than one, but one

0:10:01.960 --> 0:10:05.560
<v Speaker 1>that went actually so um. But at any rate, yes,

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we we mainly depend upon Windows XP machines. And there

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of companies out there that have proprietary

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>software it was specifically designed with Windows XP in mind. Now,

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:20.839
<v Speaker 1>these are these are companies. Sometimes they have hundreds of employees,

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>each of whom has a computer. That's big business. So

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>if Microsoft had not built in some form of XP

0:10:27.000 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>compatibility where you could run in XP mode, uh, they

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 1>might have risked dis you completely counting out that whole

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.640
<v Speaker 1>section of the market. But by building in the XP capability,

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.080
<v Speaker 1>you allow these these companies to come in and say, well,

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:45.520
<v Speaker 1>we should get we should upgrade two Windows seven. Uh

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>that I'll make most of our processes go more smoothly.

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:51.240
<v Speaker 1>And for the stuff that is proprietary and legacy, that

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 1>has to run XP. We still have XP modes that

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 1>we can still run it now. Um. Yeah, that that's

0:10:57.600 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the case too, especially for out of large companies, at

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>least in my experience, that they get to supporting a

0:11:04.600 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>particular OS, they've got it, they've got it downpad. If

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:10.400
<v Speaker 1>they need to push out an update system, why they

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 1>can do that without having to worry about who's on what.

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Um And some you know, especially very very large companies,

0:11:16.600 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 1>are really slow to migrate. UM. I worked for one

0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.000
<v Speaker 1>company a few years ago where they were actually two

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>os is behind the current just because they had everything.

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:29.640
<v Speaker 1>It all worked, and I kind of uh, I mean

0:11:29.679 --> 0:11:31.760
<v Speaker 1>said said is that sort of seems in a way,

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.520
<v Speaker 1>especially if you love the you know, seeing what's on

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:37.079
<v Speaker 1>the cutting edge, you know, you have to appreciate that.

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Put your shoe feet in the shoes of you know,

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>the person you have to manage all that and go

0:11:41.600 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, if it just works right, why why

0:11:44.480 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>make the risk of moving to a new operating system

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.559
<v Speaker 1>that's both expensive and not guaranteed to work. Yeah, those

0:11:49.600 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>are two big risks there. And uh yeah, so it

0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 1>makes sense from a corporate perspective, But going back to consumers, UM,

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot easier because then you're just dealing with

0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 1>with one machine. You know, a handful of machines in

0:12:01.840 --> 0:12:04.439
<v Speaker 1>your house. Yeah, you're not having to convince some some

0:12:04.559 --> 0:12:08.320
<v Speaker 1>person in charge of the entire uh whatever you wanna

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>call it, I T department, whatever, whatever particular department oversees

0:12:12.040 --> 0:12:15.600
<v Speaker 1>the the computer purchases for your company. Uh, you don't

0:12:15.600 --> 0:12:17.200
<v Speaker 1>have to sit there and think about that. On a

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.840
<v Speaker 1>scale of this is gonna affect two machines or whatever,

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.199
<v Speaker 1>it's usually going to be two or three at most. Um.

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 1>There's some some nice elements to Windows seven that make

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it attractive to consumers, one of which is that Windows

0:12:32.280 --> 0:12:37.199
<v Speaker 1>seven was optimized for machines that have multi core processors. Yes,

0:12:37.520 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>now that's something that Windows XP does not have. You

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 1>don't it's not, Um, it's not optimized in that way.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>So that means that if you have a machine with

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 1>a multi core processor, uh, the Windows seven operating system

0:12:48.440 --> 0:12:50.800
<v Speaker 1>is built in such a way that it will use

0:12:50.880 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>that to the best of its ability. And that uh,

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 1>just because you have a multi core processor doesn't mean

0:12:55.880 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna run a particular program better than another computer.

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>It has to be the program has to be designed

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to run on a multi court processor. Yes, it does,

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.120
<v Speaker 1>and in this case with Window seven, that means that

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 1>you get things like faster load time. It shuts down

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:14.360
<v Speaker 1>faster than Vista. Um, and it does have a really

0:13:14.840 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>pretty snappy booting and shutting down sequence compared to uh

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 1>TO specifically compared to Vista. Also compared to my Windows

0:13:23.920 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>X being machine which now approximately takes four days to

0:13:27.280 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>shut down. Yeah. Yeah, I find that the longer you

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:35.120
<v Speaker 1>use a machine, the more digital crud accumulates, and it's

0:13:36.040 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>bits and bites. Yes. Um, So there are all other

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:45.319
<v Speaker 1>things that are added into Windows seven. They're the home

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:48.959
<v Speaker 1>Groups Oh yes, which is a home Groups is a

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a product from from Microsoft that's supposed to make it

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>easier to set up a home network. Um. Home networks

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>are really not that difficult to set up, but it

0:13:59.000 --> 0:14:02.199
<v Speaker 1>can be a little intimidating for someone who is not

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:06.120
<v Speaker 1>used to working with computer networks. Well, home Groups takes

0:14:06.160 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of that out of the equation. It does

0:14:08.800 --> 0:14:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the thinking for you. There is one

0:14:10.720 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>major downside to home Groups. Yeah, it works with Windows

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 1>seven machines and yeah, so if you are running multiple

0:14:20.440 --> 0:14:24.920
<v Speaker 1>computers on different operating systems, the home Groups option isn't necessary,

0:14:24.960 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>isn't gonna necessarily work for every machine in your house.

0:14:27.880 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>It'll work for anything that's running the Windows seven and

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>you can still network the computers. It's not like it

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>prevents you from networking. It's just that the the tool

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:42.160
<v Speaker 1>itself won't be applicable in that case. Um. It's uh. Also,

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it's also better designed with as to work with direct

0:14:46.480 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>x ten UM standards, which is that's mostly used in gaming,

0:14:52.200 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>it's used for video cards and sound cards and uh. Again,

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>one of the problems with Vista was that whole driver issue.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:01.320
<v Speaker 1>The Microsoft really took a good look at that when

0:15:01.360 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>they were designing Windows seven to try and avoid as

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.360
<v Speaker 1>much of that as possible. Sometimes it's impossible to avoid

0:15:06.400 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>that because you know, unlike Apple, Microsoft is not in

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the business of designing computers from scratch. They don't they

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>don't build every single element that goes into a computer.

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>They're designing an operating system. That's it. It's it's the

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>platform that exists between the hardware and all the applications

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you want to run. Um. They're not the ones building

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 1>the video cards, sound cards, all that kind of stuff,

0:15:32.200 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and they don't dictate what goes into a computer they

0:15:34.520 --> 0:15:38.040
<v Speaker 1>have you know, they might work with developers to make

0:15:38.040 --> 0:15:42.320
<v Speaker 1>sure it works properly, but they don't. They don't demand

0:15:42.520 --> 0:15:44.880
<v Speaker 1>that you use a specific video card or sound card,

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>whereas a different there's another company that's taking a very

0:15:49.440 --> 0:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>different approach. Yes, you're you're thinking of Apple Cane, And

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that one approach is better or worse

0:15:57.560 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>than the other, by the way. No, Actually they both

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.720
<v Speaker 1>have their good points and their bad points. Um. You

0:16:02.760 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>know there's that diversity that the diversity of uh, you know,

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the PC, the traditional you know, Windows Slash Linux, not

0:16:10.800 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a Mac PC that has you know, you can you

0:16:13.520 --> 0:16:16.000
<v Speaker 1>can build your own you know, put your own case together,

0:16:16.400 --> 0:16:18.440
<v Speaker 1>throw whatever graphics card you want to in there with

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a motherboard and you know, put it, put all the

0:16:20.880 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>guts together. The thing is, you know, while that it

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 1>can be inexpensive, very inexpensive. You have to get all

0:16:28.840 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the drivers for that. Sometimes they don't support it. For example,

0:16:32.600 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>actually on our test machine here's an example. Um I

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.960
<v Speaker 1>install installed the newest version of a Buntu Linux and

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Windows seven the test release we got last year, neither

0:16:42.280 --> 0:16:44.160
<v Speaker 1>of which had a driver for the sound card on

0:16:44.160 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that um sound does not work on that machine gradually updating.

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Actually the one who did recognize the sound card and

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:55.000
<v Speaker 1>I'd given up trying. I had, as of this podcast,

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>tried the Windows seven to see if they've actually uh

0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>done this is this is an old Dell machine actually

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>probably a couple of years old now, um, and uh,

0:17:03.760 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you figure it was recent enough where they

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.000
<v Speaker 1>would do it, but they had, you know, they just

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.359
<v Speaker 1>hadn't gotten around to releasing the driver as part of

0:17:09.359 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the main software. And of course they're a third party

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>people who will write, especially with the Linux community. They

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.280
<v Speaker 1>are all sorts of developers who are working with that UM,

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:23.320
<v Speaker 1>who may or may not be interested in putting something together. UM,

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:25.800
<v Speaker 1>but from Microsoft. In a lot of cases, you know,

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it's either from them or one of the major like

0:17:27.800 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the sound card manufacturer, who's interested in in writing those drivers. Right.

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And And to get back to the argument of of

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:39.920
<v Speaker 1>controlling everything versus versus just taking a hands off approach. UM.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:43.160
<v Speaker 1>One of the pros of the hands off approaches that

0:17:43.320 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>you get machines in a variety of price ranges, so

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:52.680
<v Speaker 1>you could buy a computer running the same operating system.

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:54.600
<v Speaker 1>You can look at a selection of them, all running

0:17:54.640 --> 0:17:57.639
<v Speaker 1>Windows seven the same version of Windows seven at different

0:17:57.720 --> 0:18:00.399
<v Speaker 1>price points and different capabilities, and you're gonna see that,

0:18:00.480 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a very wide range. You might see something

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>that around the four dollar level, and there may be

0:18:05.160 --> 0:18:09.280
<v Speaker 1>others that are two thousand or more depending upon the specs. Uh.

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 1>The other approach, the Apple approach, you're going to have

0:18:13.280 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>fewer choices. You're gonna it's usually a tiered choice and

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you may have three or four options, but it's uh,

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 1>you're not going to find a cheaper version of the

0:18:22.720 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>same kind of machine from someone else. It's all through

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>one company. But on the flip side of that, it's

0:18:28.320 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 1>pretty much guaranteed to all work together because it was

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 1>designed that way. Yeah. So because the developer of the

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 1>operating system is also the manufacturer of Hartwell their contract

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the manufacturer of the hardware. So it's one of these

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.879
<v Speaker 1>five chips, it's one of these seven hard drives. You know,

0:18:44.920 --> 0:18:46.760
<v Speaker 1>we're pretty much sure that we have a driver for that.

0:18:47.320 --> 0:18:50.080
<v Speaker 1>So back to Windows seven. Yeah, one of the cool

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 1>features is the home media stuff, which it incorporates very well.

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:57.960
<v Speaker 1>So if you wanted to use your computer as a

0:18:58.000 --> 0:19:01.520
<v Speaker 1>media PC, um whether or that means to you just

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:04.920
<v Speaker 1>watching media on your PC directly or even networking it

0:19:05.000 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>with your television. UH so hooking your your PC up

0:19:08.440 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>to your TV so that your PC becomes kind of

0:19:10.359 --> 0:19:14.119
<v Speaker 1>a a media server. Really, the Window seven comes with

0:19:14.160 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>that capability built in. UM, if you I think it's

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if Premium has it. I know the

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:24.200
<v Speaker 1>professional does. But if you if you just run the software,

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you can do things like connect kind of like a DVR.

0:19:28.080 --> 0:19:31.080
<v Speaker 1>You can pull content from the web and uh and

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:34.800
<v Speaker 1>stream it to your television. UM. It does require that

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you hook your computer up to your TV, which is

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a step that some people find intimidating. It's getting easier

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 1>and easier, especially when you find a machine that has

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>h d M I boorts and all you really need

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:47.239
<v Speaker 1>is an HDMI cable and the right software and then

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you're ready to go. UM it's getting so easy now

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that I think that the average consumer could very easily

0:19:53.800 --> 0:19:55.920
<v Speaker 1>set up a media PC and his or her own

0:19:55.920 --> 0:19:58.840
<v Speaker 1>home with uh, you know, just just by buying the

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.719
<v Speaker 1>right machine. Back in the day, it meant that you

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>had to know your way around different codex and uh,

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:11.840
<v Speaker 1>different networking solutions. UM it's much easier now. So that's

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 1>one I mean that and that we we started to

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:16.639
<v Speaker 1>see that in Windows Vista. They incorporate a lot of

0:20:16.680 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>the home media stuff and Windows Vista. But again it

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:23.119
<v Speaker 1>just when upon launch was not the most stable or

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>reliable service. Yeah. Yeah, um, and the interface has changed

0:20:28.240 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>pretty substantially too. I mean there are there are a

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>lot of benefits to using Windows seven over some of

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the earlier versions. One of the things, as a person

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>who's probably been using a lot of guests, Yeah, I've

0:20:40.960 --> 0:20:43.880
<v Speaker 1>been using a Mac longer than I have Windows, although

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>I've used both for many many years now. Um, I

0:20:46.760 --> 0:20:49.679
<v Speaker 1>really like the fact that UH, as opposed to the

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>XP machine that I use every day, Windows seven basically

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>has one instance of a particular program in the task bar. Now,

0:20:56.080 --> 0:20:58.119
<v Speaker 1>when you mouse over that, you can see a preview

0:20:58.160 --> 0:21:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of all the different UH windows that you have open

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:05.400
<v Speaker 1>in that. So if you have for for word documents open,

0:21:05.480 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it's basically one instance of word and you can you know,

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>easily find it just by mousing over that. And which

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I think, Uh, you know, I've had I've had laptops

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 1>with small screens and when you have multiple documents open

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and they're they're all you can you can barely tell

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>what it is at the bottom that always frustrates. Yeah,

0:21:22.800 --> 0:21:25.359
<v Speaker 1>but this is far more elegant and a lot more streamlined,

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:28.119
<v Speaker 1>although you know, there is that trade off when you

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 1>can see which what is in you know the name

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:32.840
<v Speaker 1>of whatever it is that you have opened, and you

0:21:32.840 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>can go, okay, well that's the one I want to

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>click on, just when it gets so out of hand

0:21:37.640 --> 0:21:39.520
<v Speaker 1>on some of the earlier versions. But I really, I

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.600
<v Speaker 1>really like that. That's one of those things that I

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 1>just found easy and it's um, you know, just using

0:21:45.560 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the operating system on a day to day basis, you know,

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:51.560
<v Speaker 1>editing articles, doing research podcasts and things like that. UM,

0:21:51.600 --> 0:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I've noticed that, you know, it's easier to find preferences. UH,

0:21:56.480 --> 0:21:59.879
<v Speaker 1>different menus are make make a lot more sense to

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 1>me than they did in earlier versions. So it's obvious

0:22:02.840 --> 0:22:07.080
<v Speaker 1>that they've taken a lot of user interface UM information

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 1>research into uh, into the design process of trying to

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:13.880
<v Speaker 1>come up with this. And I also should point out

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>too that on the test machine that we've tried Office

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>which is UM, actually there I think a final release

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:22.880
<v Speaker 1>candidate as of the recording of this, so that it's

0:22:22.880 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>probably going to hit the shelves before too awfully long, um,

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 1>but it also shows a lot of maturity since the

0:22:30.480 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>previous version of Office. I know this was the Windows

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:35.280
<v Speaker 1>seven thing, but the two of them worked together very

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 1>very well. And uh, I'm impressed by the new Office

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. And the less said about Office two thousand seven,

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>the better. Yeah, I kind of um might have wanted

0:22:45.119 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to skip that, although the uh, there are some things

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>they changed. That little bubble in the upper left window.

0:22:50.240 --> 0:22:52.040
<v Speaker 1>If You've used Office two thousand seven, you know what

0:22:52.040 --> 0:22:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about, that's gone away. They have a file

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 1>menu over there now in Office, which makes it it's

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it actually makes a little sense. It's actually more intuitive,

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, builds on what was before. I don't get

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the the nest the feeling of necessity to when you,

0:23:07.040 --> 0:23:10.000
<v Speaker 1>whenever you come out with a new version to totally

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>change the user interface that you have built up over

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:15.879
<v Speaker 1>the past versions, unless it was just so unwieldy that

0:23:15.920 --> 0:23:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it just didn't make sense to keep on building on

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>that and just you want to start over. Uh. So

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:23.680
<v Speaker 1>many programs do that, where they'll the next version will

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>be a complete change, and it means that you have

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to take the time to learn the system that you

0:23:29.440 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>theoretically should already know. Um, I hate that this is

0:23:32.680 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a personal pet peeve, but I was gonna also mention

0:23:36.200 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Radar or tech Radar, which is a UK site, did

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a test running Windows seven. Actually they had this was

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:45.560
<v Speaker 1>back in the beta days, so it was a Windows

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>seven beta versus Windows Vista versus XP okay benchmark, Yeah,

0:23:50.040 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 1>bitchmarking test between the three and discovered that Windows seven

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.719
<v Speaker 1>was the best whenever you were copying several files up

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.720
<v Speaker 1>to a megabyton size or up to a gigabye, it's

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:05.240
<v Speaker 1>faster than then both XP and Windows Vista. It was

0:24:05.280 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>also faster for network copying files of up to a

0:24:08.280 --> 0:24:13.240
<v Speaker 1>gigabyt and size, it was faster than than together to However, um, interestingly, uh,

0:24:13.280 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 1>the the if you were to network copy one megabyte files,

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>XP was actually faster. That happens. I mean they found

0:24:22.480 --> 0:24:26.359
<v Speaker 1>that with macOS ten snow Leopard as well. Um, there

0:24:26.359 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 1>are certain things that it does better, and there are

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>certain things the previous virsion of the Osterich I think

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of funny. Well, what's interesting is in their

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>benchmark tests, under all the benchmarks that they did, Windows

0:24:35.640 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Vista performed, Uh didn't. It was never first ever in

0:24:39.760 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>any of the benchmarks. Uh. That didn't mean they came

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:44.760
<v Speaker 1>in last every time, but they were never first. It

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>was either XP or Windows seven, which means that Vista

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:52.200
<v Speaker 1>just wasn't the best at anything. That's kind of sad. Um.

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>And granted this was the beta, so it wasn't the

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.880
<v Speaker 1>same as the necessarily the same program that that came

0:24:57.880 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 1>out available to everybody. Uh. I actually have a word

0:25:02.200 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>to say about that if you're somebody like if you're

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:08.440
<v Speaker 1>somebody like us who downloaded uh, the free version of

0:25:08.520 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the operating system, which I gotta say, Uh, excellent move

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on Microsoft's part to give people an opportunity. It's for

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 1>marketing reasons and for um, for consumers to actually have

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to get their hands on an early version

0:25:22.920 --> 0:25:25.120
<v Speaker 1>of the operating system. It was the best move Microsoft

0:25:25.160 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 1>could make considering the pr they had to be dealing

0:25:28.119 --> 0:25:31.120
<v Speaker 1>with with. But you can also you can also upgrade

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>uh your operating system online too, which is an also

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.160
<v Speaker 1>a good move where you want to necessarily buy the disc.

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 1>But if you did, excuse me, download a a copy

0:25:42.240 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>of that early preview release, there's something you need to know,

0:25:45.680 --> 0:25:48.440
<v Speaker 1>at least depending on when you listen to this. Otherwise,

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 1>if it's afterwards, you're gonna go, why is my computer

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:55.360
<v Speaker 1>shutting down? Well, Microsoft is going to shut your computer down. Um,

0:25:55.440 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 1>let's see I misplaced the date on that. It's gonna

0:25:59.280 --> 0:26:02.880
<v Speaker 1>be like this is gonna be like a inspector gadget

0:26:02.880 --> 0:26:07.680
<v Speaker 1>thing where after thirty seconds the message explodes. Okay, so yeah,

0:26:07.720 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 1>if you're using the Windows seven preview, uh, you have

0:26:10.800 --> 0:26:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to upgrade to the full version. A full version. I

0:26:13.440 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>assume it doesn't necessarily matter which one for March one,

0:26:17.480 --> 0:26:20.800
<v Speaker 1>because at that point Microsoft is going to let you

0:26:20.880 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>use the operating system for two hours, and then your

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>computer will shut down and it will not save your work.

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:28.879
<v Speaker 1>And if you try to open it up again, Microsoft

0:26:28.920 --> 0:26:32.440
<v Speaker 1>will send Clippy out after you, and then Clippy will

0:26:32.480 --> 0:26:35.040
<v Speaker 1>ask you over and over, I see you're trying to

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:39.479
<v Speaker 1>operate a defunct operating system. Can I help? Well, actually,

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it's uh, it's a little bit more serious than that.

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:43.239
<v Speaker 1>They're going to change. You won't be able to have

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:45.879
<v Speaker 1>custom wallpaper anymore. It will be a solid black background

0:26:46.240 --> 0:26:49.040
<v Speaker 1>with a persistent message I'm actually quoting from the Microsoft side,

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:51.480
<v Speaker 1>with a persistent message on your desktop. You'll also get

0:26:51.480 --> 0:26:55.720
<v Speaker 1>periodic notifications that Windows isn't genuine. That means your PC

0:26:55.840 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>may no longer be able to obtain optional updates or

0:26:59.040 --> 0:27:02.720
<v Speaker 1>downloads require in genuine Windows validation. I think if they

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.360
<v Speaker 1>have I think if they have Clippy deliver that message,

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>it would be more effective. Yes, exactly, I guarantee it

0:27:10.000 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>would be more effective. I mean, granted, if your operating

0:27:12.560 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>system is no longer working and it's telling you why

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>it's no longer working, that should be effective enough. If

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Clippy is doing it, Yeah, it just adds a little

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.199
<v Speaker 1>expediency to the matter in my opinion. Well, I am

0:27:22.280 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that there are people working on ways to keep

0:27:24.560 --> 0:27:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the preview release going. Um, those are are probably who

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I say probably, I mean most definitely not legal. Um,

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>not that I'm sure that they're gonna necessarily know that

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:41.359
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it, but I wouldn't recommend it anyway. Um, Yeah,

0:27:40.600 --> 0:27:45.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's ah and I guess in somemation, since

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:47.120
<v Speaker 1>we're sort of winding down at this point, I think

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a good release. Um, I've been very impressed with it.

0:27:49.760 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>It has been you know, I haven't done any scientific

0:27:51.920 --> 0:27:54.360
<v Speaker 1>benchmarking or anything like that, but it's been uh, it's

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 1>been faster, it's been smoother, um, and I do like

0:27:58.240 --> 0:28:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it better than next pum on four sly as of

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:03.360
<v Speaker 1>March one, I will probably not be able to trust it,

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, get a whole blog post written and then

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 1>suddenly it will shut down without saving my work, and

0:28:08.440 --> 0:28:10.239
<v Speaker 1>that would be kind of a bummer. Yeah, but I do,

0:28:10.400 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>but I do like it quite. It's nice. Um, it'll

0:28:14.640 --> 0:28:16.920
<v Speaker 1>be um and of course before we we sign off

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>and we should wrap up here. But currently there are

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 1>now rumors that Windows eight is already in the uh

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:27.200
<v Speaker 1>not not just in development, because that's not a surprise

0:28:27.240 --> 0:28:29.199
<v Speaker 1>when a when an operating system hits the market, you

0:28:29.200 --> 0:28:31.720
<v Speaker 1>can get you can bet that the company has been

0:28:31.720 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>working on the successor to that operating system already before

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it even hits the store shelves. But the rumor now

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:41.200
<v Speaker 1>is that we may see Windows eight before the end

0:28:41.240 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand eleven. Just not really that shocking. I mean,

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.760
<v Speaker 1>all Bring systems used to come out every couple of years.

0:28:46.800 --> 0:28:50.440
<v Speaker 1>It's just it feels like for something as Major's not

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.720
<v Speaker 1>Brings system, it just feels kind of weird, like, wow,

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>you don't even get two years out of it. But

0:28:54.520 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's because everyone's been using XP for so long

0:28:57.040 --> 0:28:58.960
<v Speaker 1>and they just skipped this to and now they're thinking,

0:28:58.960 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>oh and not brings system is supposed to last X

0:29:01.520 --> 0:29:04.360
<v Speaker 1>number of years. Yeah, well I think uh, I think too.

0:29:04.400 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>It sort of benefits tech companies to continue that go

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>go go cycle because you know, if they could keep

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>people buying a hundred and release for their operating system

0:29:14.560 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>every two to three years, you know that that keeps

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the cycle up, It makes them seem like they're more innovative.

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Got to pay those shareholders. Yeah, and that I mean,

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's it's like people buying you know, new phones or

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 1>new MP three players or whatever. You know, it's less

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>than two years stocks. Yeah, I'm not touching that, but

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>why that's why I replace them, right, Okay, then all right,

0:29:38.680 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>well that wraps up this discussion on Windows seven. Keep

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.560
<v Speaker 1>keep your ears tuned to tech stuff. We are doing

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.040
<v Speaker 1>lots of different spotlights on on various programs over the

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>next couple of weeks, probably um no fourmal reviews, but

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah just over there right right stuff so

0:29:56.560 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 1>that you guys can kind of get a little more

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>information about these these different uh products that are out

0:30:02.320 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>there on the market and Ted, I hope that uh,

0:30:04.760 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that suffices for our elephant in the room discussion. If

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:12.520
<v Speaker 1>any of you have any questions, suggestions, criticisms, things like that,

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>write us our email addresses tex stuff at how stuff

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:17.959
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. Remember, check out our blogs, check out

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 1>our live show every Tuesday at one pm. Check out

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 1>the articles on that wacky website we call how stuff

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.280
<v Speaker 1>works dot com because it's awesome and Chris and I

0:30:26.280 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 1>will talk to you again really soon for more on

0:30:30.480 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this and thousands of other topics, because it how stuff

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>works dot com. Let us know what you think. Send

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 1>an email to podcast at how stuff works dot com.

0:30:43.080 --> 0:30:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Brought to you by the reinvented two thousand twelve camera.

0:30:45.960 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>It's ready, are you