WEBVTT - Value Investing Legend and Charlie Munger Disciple Seth Klarman 

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Masters in

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Business with Barry Ritholt on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:16.680 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 2>What can I tell you about this week's banger? Seth Klarman,

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 2>legendary value investor out of Boston at the bow Post Group.

0:00:26.520 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 2>What a fascinating discussion about risk, about the current environment,

0:00:31.680 --> 0:00:35.879
<v Speaker 2>about the Boston Red Sox, about just about anything that

0:00:35.960 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 2>affects portfolios, distress assets, stocks, bonds, real estate. I thought

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 2>this was fascinating and I know you will also with

0:00:45.320 --> 0:01:01.280
<v Speaker 2>no further ado, my conversation with Seth Klarman. Flarman, Welcome

0:01:01.360 --> 0:01:02.000
<v Speaker 2>to Bloomberg.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 3>So great to be here.

0:01:03.280 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 2>Thank you, Berry, Thank you so much. I've been looking

0:01:05.760 --> 0:01:10.120
<v Speaker 2>forward to this for forever. Before we get into your

0:01:10.160 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>investment philosophy and the development of baopost, I have to

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 2>roll back a little bit to your early days economics

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 2>from Cornell, an MBA from Harvard. What was the original

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 2>career plan?

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 4>So I was always drawn to investing, even when I

0:01:30.600 --> 0:01:34.000
<v Speaker 4>was a very young kid. I was interested in the

0:01:34.040 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 4>baseball statistics. I became aware that there were these other

0:01:37.520 --> 0:01:41.360
<v Speaker 4>columns of numbers in the newspaper and asked my neighbor

0:01:41.800 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 4>what those were and started to understand and follow the

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 4>stock market a little bit. So, of course I had

0:01:46.880 --> 0:01:48.960
<v Speaker 4>no idea what I was doing, but I was paying

0:01:49.000 --> 0:01:52.720
<v Speaker 4>attention from quite early age. I didn't really ever develop

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:55.640
<v Speaker 4>a career plan, but I was drawn to the stock market.

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 4>I think I'm drawn to puzzles.

0:01:58.280 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 3>Berry.

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:03.640
<v Speaker 4>I like doing word puzzles every day, like solving math puzzles.

0:02:03.840 --> 0:02:07.920
<v Speaker 4>I subscribed still to something called a math puzzle book

0:02:07.960 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 4>published by Dell. And stock market's a big puzzle. The

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:15.040
<v Speaker 4>financial markets are a big puzzle. How does it all work?

0:02:15.560 --> 0:02:18.880
<v Speaker 4>And how does the performance of the companies get reflected

0:02:18.919 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 4>in stock prices? And how can an investor outperform everybody else?

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 4>And so all of that is a piece of what

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:27.200
<v Speaker 4>drew me in.

0:02:27.680 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 2>So I'm interested in how you first found that beyond

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 2>the newspaper stock price pages. You grow up in Baltimore,

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>your parents divorce when you were relatively young. Mom was

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 2>an English teacher, later a psychiatric social worker. Dad was

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 2>a health economist at John Hopkins and NYU. Was it

0:02:49.000 --> 0:02:53.040
<v Speaker 2>just simply thumbing through the sports pages literally to the

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.480
<v Speaker 2>next set of pages were the stock pages.

0:02:56.800 --> 0:03:00.800
<v Speaker 4>That's literally the numbers on the page attract my attention.

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:04.640
<v Speaker 4>I would say, you know, I think my origin story

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 4>is a lot like other people in who ended up

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:11.079
<v Speaker 4>in the investing business, like Warren Buffett, like I think

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 4>Todd Combs, like many others drawn to small businesses wanted

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.640
<v Speaker 4>to make money. So I was delivering newspaper route for

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 4>the Baltimore Sun Papers. I had a snow cone stand

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 4>in my driveway. One summer. I mode lawns, I rake leaves,

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 4>I shoveled snow, I did little carnivals for the neighborhood

0:03:31.520 --> 0:03:37.600
<v Speaker 4>kids whatever. I sold candy at religious school on Tuesdays

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 4>and Thursdays because the kids were starving after school, and

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 4>I would buy it up over the weekend and bring

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:46.040
<v Speaker 4>it to school and sell it for an arbitrage profit.

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:50.480
<v Speaker 4>So it was just a pattern of being drawn to

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 4>small business and make money, and over time that led

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.360
<v Speaker 4>to an interest in stock market. About my first stock

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 4>with some barmuts for money when I was around ten years.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:02.119
<v Speaker 2>Well, it couldn't have been bar Mitz for money.

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.320
<v Speaker 4>If it wasn't bar Mitz money, then it was a present.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:06.440
<v Speaker 4>But then bar Mitz money continued to be.

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 2>So really well then ten years old and.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 3>I bought a shriff Johnson and Johnson.

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 2>Uh huh, still have it?

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:13.839
<v Speaker 3>Do not still have it?

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 4>It split three for one, but ultimately I presumably have

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:19.880
<v Speaker 4>traded that in for something else that I that I

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:20.360
<v Speaker 4>like better.

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:24.039
<v Speaker 2>So let's fast forward a little bit to the bow

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.919
<v Speaker 2>Post origin story, which isn't that far ahead. You're only

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 2>twenty five. The urban legends you co found bow Post,

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:36.599
<v Speaker 2>but reality you were brought in to manage money for

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 2>the four founding families. Still at twenty five, that's a

0:04:41.760 --> 0:04:45.159
<v Speaker 2>kind of shocking thing. Oh, we have all this wealth,

0:04:45.240 --> 0:04:47.800
<v Speaker 2>let's bring in this kid to run our portfolio.

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:48.360
<v Speaker 3>Right?

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:50.760
<v Speaker 4>And I would say the same thing if I were,

0:04:50.880 --> 0:04:53.039
<v Speaker 4>if I were in their seats, I would wonder, how

0:04:53.040 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 4>does this kid know how to do that? So I

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 4>don't think people should generally be starting investment firms at

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.479
<v Speaker 4>age twenty five. And of course I really didn't start

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 4>the firm. The firm was in the process of being created.

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.919
<v Speaker 4>The four clients of the firm that came together. The

0:05:08.960 --> 0:05:12.880
<v Speaker 4>founders had the idea that they would build a firm

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:16.960
<v Speaker 4>that might go and make investments itself, might hand money

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:20.240
<v Speaker 4>to others who were in the business already of making investments.

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 4>So I think they wanted to build kind of an

0:05:23.080 --> 0:05:26.839
<v Speaker 4>institutional structure or framework for how to make sure the

0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 4>money got managed well given what was then back in

0:05:30.120 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 4>the early eighties a highly fraught time as you know

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 4>from history, the volatile markets, long history of underperformance of

0:05:38.520 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 4>the stock market, and real economic uncertainty, stagflation at some

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.840
<v Speaker 4>point and getting worse. Treasury bond yields were getting higher

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 4>and higher. So it was a really fraught moment, and

0:05:49.680 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 4>I think they wanted to make sure that the money

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:56.520
<v Speaker 4>they had not only was kept intact, but was accounted

0:05:56.560 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 4>for clip the coupons and collected ends and all of that.

0:06:01.839 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 4>The founders were all selling businesses around that time, So

0:06:05.960 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 4>the serendipity was I was a student at business school.

0:06:09.440 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 4>Bill Porvu, the PO of Bowpost, was my real estate professor,

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:18.320
<v Speaker 4>and he and some friends were selling Channel five. He

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 4>was a big investor in that the Metromedia largest sale

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:24.919
<v Speaker 4>at the time of a TV station to Metromedia. It

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 4>was the ABC affiliate in Boston. A third friend had

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 4>a computer publishing and consulting business. All that was getting sold,

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 4>so they had this pile of twenty seven million dollars

0:06:35.960 --> 0:06:38.280
<v Speaker 4>and the basic job offer I got wasn't come run

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 4>a fund. It was come join us, and let's figure

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 4>out smart things to do with the money.

0:06:43.360 --> 0:06:48.400
<v Speaker 2>So eventually you become the lead partner there. I don't

0:06:48.400 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 2>know if CEO is the right term.

0:06:50.760 --> 0:06:53.120
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't CEO for the first seven or so years,

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:56.919
<v Speaker 4>and then it became CEO and effectively got control of

0:06:56.960 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 4>the firm as sort of a handshake deal where we

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 4>agreed that if I worked hard and did well for

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 4>the clients, that they would recognize that with a stake

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 4>in the business. So I had no stake the day

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 4>it was formed, and ended up with over half.

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:16.880
<v Speaker 2>Ended up with over half. That's amazing forty something years later.

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 4>And now much less because I'm a big believer in

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:21.400
<v Speaker 4>sharing the pie with my team.

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 2>Makes a lot of sense. Let's talk a little bit

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>about the timing you mentioned. There was a lot of

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 2>turmoil and stagflation the previous sixteen years. I want to

0:07:32.000 --> 0:07:36.320
<v Speaker 2>say the inflation adjusted returns for something like down seventy

0:07:36.320 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 2>five percent, sixty six to eighty two, something along those lines.

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Eighty two was the beginning of a historic bull market.

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 2>How did that affect how you thought about risk, how

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 2>you thought about opportunities, what were you. What did the

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 2>markets look and feel like in eighty two, when I

0:07:56.080 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 2>imagine most people were still pretty bearish.

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I think Malcolm Gladwell would look and say,

0:08:02.480 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 4>nineteen eighty two, what an interesting time to start an

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:07.760
<v Speaker 4>investment firm. That certainly was a wind at your back

0:08:07.800 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 4>in terms of being successful the challenges. And you know

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 4>this how it works in the markets is you had

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 4>no idea that you were at the beginning of a

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 4>long bowl market. What you felt was the market hasn't

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 4>done that well, you know, for a long period of time,

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 4>and people were very skeptical about it, and you could

0:08:24.280 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 4>always point to I think this is probably valuable insight

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:30.360
<v Speaker 4>is you could always point to things at any moment

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 4>that don't add up, that seem overvalued, that seemed risky,

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 4>and yet we get through most of those things. So

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 4>at the time it didn't feel like a gimme, It

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 4>didn't feel like a lay up hand. But what ended

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 4>up happening was, you know, we tried to make money

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 4>apart from the market. We weren't buying an index. Indexes

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 4>weren't big then anyway, we weren't buying the market. We

0:08:52.360 --> 0:08:56.480
<v Speaker 4>were buying idiosyncratic situations, looking for situation bottom up by

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 4>bottom up miss pricings and that led to us build

0:09:00.200 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 4>a record. So while it looks just okay compared to

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 4>the market over that period of time, I think we

0:09:06.520 --> 0:09:08.960
<v Speaker 4>would have done okay whether the market had been up

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 4>down our.

0:09:09.360 --> 0:09:14.959
<v Speaker 2>Sideways really interesting. So given you coming off of what

0:09:15.080 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 2>was an epic bear market and just a whole lot

0:09:17.960 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 2>of cross current stagflation, super high rates under Vulker, you're

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 2>not that far away in eighty two from the end

0:09:27.440 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 2>of Vietnam, Watergate, all that malaise. How did that environment

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:36.320
<v Speaker 2>affect you as a professional investor? How did that change

0:09:36.360 --> 0:09:40.280
<v Speaker 2>how you looked at the world, and what lessons did

0:09:40.320 --> 0:09:40.960
<v Speaker 2>you take from it?

0:09:41.559 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 4>I would tell you I think every investor needs to

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 4>be a student of history. That it may not repeat exactly,

0:09:48.880 --> 0:09:52.640
<v Speaker 4>but it certainly rhymes and it is very valuable to understand,

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 4>and I think especially financial history for an investor. So

0:09:56.400 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 4>what are the worst moments? How did we go through

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:03.560
<v Speaker 4>a market crash in nineteen twenty nine to nineteen thirty

0:10:03.600 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 4>three and a great depression that lasted close to a decade.

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 4>What must that have been like for the people at

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:14.080
<v Speaker 4>the time? How would one handle oneself. If you're going

0:10:14.080 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 4>into a period like that that we know that even

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 4>the greatest acclaim value investor of all time, Benjamin Graham,

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:24.920
<v Speaker 4>nearly went broke twice during that era. So it's I

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 4>think incumbent on all investors to be thinking and maybe

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.440
<v Speaker 4>holding multiple inconsistent thoughts in their head at the same

0:10:33.480 --> 0:10:37.679
<v Speaker 4>time that I found this interesting opportunity today, this bargain

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:41.600
<v Speaker 4>price stock for whatever reason, it's out of favor. They

0:10:41.640 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 4>cut their dividend, it's a spin off, it's a bankrupt

0:10:45.200 --> 0:10:49.080
<v Speaker 4>security that's converting into a new equity. These things tend

0:10:49.080 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 4>to get mispriced, but you've got a backdrop of from

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 4>time to time, as today, we have a backdrop of

0:10:56.400 --> 0:10:59.000
<v Speaker 4>very expensive market and a bit of you for a

0:10:59.120 --> 0:11:02.760
<v Speaker 4>conditions is that dangerous? It's dangerous, But we're also at

0:11:02.760 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 4>the cusp of maybe a groundbreaking new technology. So I

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 4>think over the forty years, it's always been some of

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 4>both that you've got a backdrop of something sometimes very depressed,

0:11:13.440 --> 0:11:17.320
<v Speaker 4>sometimes very optimistic, but you've also got individual securities that

0:11:17.360 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 4>are fluctuating around, maybe creating bottom up opportunity. What I

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:25.120
<v Speaker 4>deeply believe is that value investors make money staying in

0:11:25.160 --> 0:11:27.680
<v Speaker 4>the bottom up that you might have a top down view,

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 4>you might say, yeah, it could be a bubble, it

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.440
<v Speaker 4>could be a problem. But bottom up is where you're

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:35.360
<v Speaker 4>going to devote your time. It keeps you anchored that

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.880
<v Speaker 4>if you have a portfolio of bargains, you're probably going to.

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 3>Do okay if you've stress tested.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Them and if you've been intellectually honest about them and

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:43.400
<v Speaker 4>they really are bargains.

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned Ben Graham, I'm curious as to who

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 2>else were important influences on the development of your investment philosophy.

0:11:52.600 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 2>I've read about Michael Price and Max Hein, Who affected

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:01.880
<v Speaker 2>you the most over the years? Who still affects you right?

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:07.400
<v Speaker 4>So I think reading Ben Graham was certainly a major

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 4>influence on me. I think as he has been on

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 4>essentially everybody in the value investing community. And then Warren Buffett,

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.839
<v Speaker 4>the real life practitioner of Graham as well, And it

0:12:17.920 --> 0:12:22.520
<v Speaker 4>was always heartening to know that somebody like Buffett, who

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 4>seemed to think similarly to how I thought, thought about

0:12:26.080 --> 0:12:29.719
<v Speaker 4>downside risk, thought about the need to stay focused in

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 4>individual companies and not worry so much about the overall market.

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:38.079
<v Speaker 4>The willingness to hold cash and concurrently like the willingness

0:12:38.120 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 4>to not have an opinion on everything. I have a

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:43.640
<v Speaker 4>lot of ideas and I end up with no opinion,

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:46.520
<v Speaker 4>no position. But once in a while we find something

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 4>that seems way off the beaten path that's really interesting.

0:12:49.440 --> 0:12:53.520
<v Speaker 4>So to watch Warren Buffett do that, I've realized now

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 4>that Warren probably had a certainty of the idea that

0:12:58.679 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 4>he would compound capital over a long period of time,

0:13:02.280 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 4>and I think that that is something that Graham probably gave.

0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:10.160
<v Speaker 4>Warren gave me as well, the idea that if you

0:13:10.200 --> 0:13:13.400
<v Speaker 4>protect on the downside, if you don't find yourself getting

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 4>margin calls, frozen in place because you're too exposed, or

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.560
<v Speaker 4>getting massive redemptions because you're down so much, if you

0:13:23.559 --> 0:13:26.240
<v Speaker 4>can position yourself that way, it can leave in a

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:29.439
<v Speaker 4>position to play offense when even your best competitors might

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.439
<v Speaker 4>be not on the playing field. And that's a huge advantage.

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 4>So I think that Graham a dot is kind of

0:13:37.120 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 4>a north star. It kind of is a place where

0:13:39.880 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 4>you can stay focused on what's something worth. You can

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:46.839
<v Speaker 4>ignore the herd, you can ignore the siren song of

0:13:47.559 --> 0:13:52.360
<v Speaker 4>growth at any price, and of exciting new technologies and

0:13:52.400 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 4>exciting IPOs and you could ignore all that because you

0:13:55.880 --> 0:13:58.199
<v Speaker 4>have a confidence that I own something that's going to

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 4>be worth more a year or two from now than

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 4>it is today. And that's I think the that's an

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 4>underpinning that lets you follow a value investment strategy.

0:14:07.720 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 2>So you mentioned downside risk and that we referred to

0:14:12.760 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 2>before you began in nineteen eighty two. Less than a

0:14:16.480 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 2>decade later, you publish Margin of Safety nineteen ninety one.

0:14:21.280 --> 0:14:23.920
<v Speaker 2>What led to you, at the ripe old age of

0:14:23.920 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 2>thirty four to write a book on risk management? What

0:14:28.160 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 2>was the motivation? How was it initially received, because it's

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 2>become so sought after these days, what was the initial reception? Like?

0:14:38.800 --> 0:14:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, so I think in retrospect that looks pretty darn presumptuous.

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 4>I got asked to write it by a classmate from

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 4>business school who worked at Harper Collins at the time

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 4>or Harper and Roe, maybe before Harper Collins, and she

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 4>had seen some of my client letters. She said, you know,

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 4>you seem like you'd be a good writer, and you're

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 4>a smart guy. Maybe you'll have something to tell the audience.

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 4>What I really thought was, I'm just updating intelligent investor

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 4>for modern examples and contemporary market. That's decades since that

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 4>book was written, and I thought maybe i'd make it

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:24.320
<v Speaker 4>a little bit more accessible for the average Joe. I

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 4>don't know whether it accomplished that, but that's what I

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 4>was trying to do. I had no idea if I

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 4>didn't think I would make money from writing the book.

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 4>I mean, as you as an author, you know, we

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.920
<v Speaker 4>get like a buck fifty an hour. But it's a

0:15:37.960 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 4>great feeling and it's a ton of work, but I

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:44.240
<v Speaker 4>think ultimately worth it, and you get smarter from the

0:15:44.280 --> 0:15:45.240
<v Speaker 4>act of writing.

0:15:44.960 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 3>About what you do.

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:48.240
<v Speaker 4>You can do what you do all day long without

0:15:48.920 --> 0:15:51.320
<v Speaker 4>maybe fully forming the philosophy, but if you want to

0:15:51.320 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 4>share it with anybody else, it makes you think more

0:15:53.880 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 4>clearly about what you do.

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. The former Librarian of Congress, Daniel Borston used to say,

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 2>I write to figure out what I think, And there's

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 2>a lot of truth to that. What was the initial reception, like,

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 2>did people respond or did it kind of land in

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 2>a handful of value? Geeks bought it, but no one else, so.

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 3>It's somewhere in between.

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 4>What happened first was I think my editor got fired

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 4>three different times, so I kept getting new editors. They

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 4>had promised to back the book with advertising, and they didn't,

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.160
<v Speaker 4>so the book landed with a bit of a thud.

0:16:27.240 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 4>I think it had maybe a very tiny second printing,

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 4>so I think they printed maybe seven thousand copies. I

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:37.280
<v Speaker 4>ended up buying a bunch of them back from HarperCollins

0:16:37.960 --> 0:16:40.160
<v Speaker 4>by the time they took it off the market and

0:16:40.200 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 4>the rights somehow reverted back to me.

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:43.920
<v Speaker 3>What it did do.

0:16:44.040 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Though, it was bought I think significantly by competitors who

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 4>used it to train their teams. And that was also like,

0:16:52.400 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 4>is that what I wrote it for? Because I don't mind,

0:16:55.640 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 4>but it wasn't maybe the starting goal. The starting goal was,

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 4>if you go back to the book, the first half

0:17:01.920 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 4>of it was about the street and about how they

0:17:05.320 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 4>treat the average investor and maybe the challenge of whether

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 4>the investor is getting a good deal. And the second

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:15.360
<v Speaker 4>half is maybe an investment approach, a value oriented approach,

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:18.320
<v Speaker 4>and how an investor might think about doing that, even

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:23.560
<v Speaker 4>if they're not a professional investor. So it was successful

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 4>in a weird way. It's sort of because it didn't

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.000
<v Speaker 4>get republished, it developed a bit of a cult following,

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:34.320
<v Speaker 4>and that's kind of amusing and interesting to me, and

0:17:34.520 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 4>of course we've reprinted some on our own, so we've

0:17:37.520 --> 0:17:40.639
<v Speaker 4>made it available to our clients and to summer interns

0:17:40.680 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 4>and to anybody that's connected to the firm.

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:49.360
<v Speaker 2>So in twenty twenty three, the seventh edition of Security Analysis,

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:54.719
<v Speaker 2>Ben Graham's Framework for Investing was edited by you and

0:17:54.760 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of ways substantially rejiggered. How different is

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:04.960
<v Speaker 2>this version then Ben Graham's, I mean, obviously the markets changed,

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 2>the economy is so much is different than when he

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 2>was writing. How did you approach this?

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 4>So the earlier edition, the sixth edition, I was co

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 4>editor with Jim Grant and Bruce Greenwald, and the seventh

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:22.639
<v Speaker 4>edition they asked me to just edit that one. As editor,

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:27.440
<v Speaker 4>we didn't follow the process that you might follow, because

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 4>we kind of thought of Security Analysis as the Bible

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:32.800
<v Speaker 4>and we thought we should leave it alone, and what

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 4>we should do is have modern day expert investors right

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 4>commentary about the different chapters, different sections of the book.

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:41.640
<v Speaker 3>So that's what we did.

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:45.000
<v Speaker 4>So I think the sixth edition and the seventh both

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.520
<v Speaker 4>have some really great selections by investors. Some of them

0:18:48.560 --> 0:18:51.040
<v Speaker 4>are well known, but some of whom aren't known at all.

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.480
<v Speaker 4>And you know, my former colleague David Abrams is one

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 4>of them. David's contribution in the sixth edition is one

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:02.040
<v Speaker 4>of the most brilliant things I've ever read, and so

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:06.840
<v Speaker 4>I felt like we were making we're moving Gramma DoD

0:19:06.960 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 4>into a different era. The thing that's beautiful about Gramma

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.120
<v Speaker 4>DoD it was written a hundred years ago, give or take,

0:19:13.520 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 4>and it was written during the depression, and things that

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 4>made sense in a depression haven't made sense every day

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 4>since then because we haven't been a depression most of

0:19:21.320 --> 0:19:22.400
<v Speaker 4>the time since then.

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:23.879
<v Speaker 3>If at all.

0:19:24.080 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 4>So it was an update, taking what's valuable why people

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 4>revere the book as a bible, but also making it

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:36.800
<v Speaker 4>more accessible at more relevant modern day. We expanded it

0:19:36.840 --> 0:19:39.719
<v Speaker 4>to cover some topics that were uncovered. It certainly has

0:19:39.840 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 4>more international investing, which wasn't really focused on by Graham.

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 4>It talks about some other private investments. It talks about

0:19:48.200 --> 0:19:52.159
<v Speaker 4>some of the changes in financial markets, the latest manias

0:19:52.200 --> 0:19:54.920
<v Speaker 4>and fads and all of that, but also the changes

0:19:54.960 --> 0:19:59.280
<v Speaker 4>in market structure, the changes in asset classes that have

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.000
<v Speaker 4>come into exac distance and all of that. I think

0:20:02.080 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 4>is a valuable updating of the literature and helps keep

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 4>something relevant that deserves to be relevant while updated because

0:20:11.080 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 4>in its original Graham and Dodd nineteen thirty four form

0:20:15.359 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 4>wouldn't be very useful to people.

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 2>Coming up, we continue our conversation with Seth Clarman, CEO

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:25.439
<v Speaker 2>and portfolio manager at the bow Post Group, discussing the

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:30.280
<v Speaker 2>firms evolution and philosophy. I'm Barry Ridults. You're listening to

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. I'm Barry Riddults. You're

0:20:44.080 --> 0:20:47.720
<v Speaker 2>listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio. Our extra

0:20:47.800 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 2>special guest this week is Seth Klarman. He's CEO and

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:55.880
<v Speaker 2>portfolio manager at the bow Post Group, a legendary value

0:20:55.960 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 2>and distressed investment shop out of Boston, running over twenty

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:05.240
<v Speaker 2>two billion dollars in assets. So let's talk a little

0:21:05.280 --> 0:21:10.480
<v Speaker 2>bit about the way you think of opportunities and risks.

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 2>During the eight or nine financial crisis, you raised about

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:21.280
<v Speaker 2>four billion dollars and the research I read you're deploying

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:24.919
<v Speaker 2>one hundred million dollars a day into distress assets. That

0:21:25.160 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 2>seems like a big chunk of money. First of all,

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 2>are those numbers remotely accurate? Is that ballpark?

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:33.440
<v Speaker 3>It's ballpark?

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 4>What I would tell you first of all is we

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:39.120
<v Speaker 4>had been closed for new clients much of our history,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 4>but we kept a list in case. And so when

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:45.399
<v Speaker 4>the market started to fall apart after bear Stearns and

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:49.439
<v Speaker 4>then after Liman, there were all kinds of things going on,

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:54.680
<v Speaker 4>and people were in great stress as we entered the

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:59.720
<v Speaker 4>uncertainty of an economic decline that could have pretty epic proportions.

0:21:59.760 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 4>As it turned out, it probably was. It certainly was

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 4>the worst decline since the Great Depression, and it stands

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 4>out as kind of the mother of all bear markets

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 4>for anybody in the last hundred years. So the challenge was,

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:19.280
<v Speaker 4>maybe it's time to take some capital, and the odds

0:22:19.280 --> 0:22:21.120
<v Speaker 4>are increasing every day that we're going to be able

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:22.200
<v Speaker 4>to deploy it fruitfully.

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 3>So what you said is about right.

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:29.440
<v Speaker 2>So bear Stearns, if I'm remembering correctly, was spring of

0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 2>two thousand and seven. Lehman was September of eight. That's

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 2>not a lot of time from there until March on nine,

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 2>when everything really bottoms. I have three questions about this.

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 2>The first is how quickly were you able to raise capital,

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:52.159
<v Speaker 2>get the docks signed, and be prepared to deploy that

0:22:52.480 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 2>as opportunities arose. Doesn't seem like there's a lot of time.

0:22:56.359 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 4>The team worked heroically and we were able to raise

0:22:59.359 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 4>about We were able to raise very significant capital within

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 4>a quarter.

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:07.840
<v Speaker 2>Wow, that's really quickly. Now you mentioned the team, I

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 2>have heard some really interesting rumors and legends. How did

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:16.439
<v Speaker 2>you put this team together? What was their marching orders?

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 2>How did everybody operate in that period of absolute turmoil

0:23:21.160 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 2>in Mayhew.

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 4>So we already were an established firm. We've been up

0:23:26.520 --> 0:23:30.000
<v Speaker 4>and running for a couple of decades by then. So

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 4>I had a team in place, and they were deeply knowledgeable, experienced.

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 2>Distressed asset expertise in the group.

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:43.920
<v Speaker 4>Not everybody on the team has that, but a very

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 4>high percentage of the team has that. And people at

0:23:46.640 --> 0:23:50.520
<v Speaker 4>balpos like being versatile athletes. So we're nimble, we're agile,

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 4>and we cross train just kind of like baseball teams

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 4>are doing now in the minor leagues. They don't want

0:23:56.200 --> 0:23:58.560
<v Speaker 4>you to just be a third basement. They also want

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:01.480
<v Speaker 4>you to play out field and maybe second if need be,

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 4>And so the same with us that we have people

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:07.159
<v Speaker 4>that sit in four different groups, as you mentioned, but

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:11.080
<v Speaker 4>all of them can work on distressed situations. And people

0:24:11.359 --> 0:24:14.600
<v Speaker 4>in the private investments especially love when we're super busy

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:16.560
<v Speaker 4>in the public markets and we call them in to

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 4>work on a distress credit.

0:24:18.520 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 2>So big chunk of capital, very aggressively deployed in a

0:24:24.560 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 2>moment in time when so many people seem to be

0:24:26.840 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 2>just paralyzed and frozen with fear. Was it just the

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 2>value analytical framework or was it a little broader and

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 2>deeper than that.

0:24:36.560 --> 0:24:39.399
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think Barry that the way you're conveying it

0:24:39.480 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 4>probably comes across as we come in with giant satchels

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.639
<v Speaker 4>of money and handover fists deploy it. It wasn't like

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 4>that at all. It was the same cerebral, methodical, painstaking

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:54.920
<v Speaker 4>environment that we do every day. So we see things

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 4>trading at lower prices, and we notice that, and we

0:24:58.160 --> 0:25:00.600
<v Speaker 4>look at the fundamentals, and every thing we do at

0:25:00.600 --> 0:25:03.639
<v Speaker 4>Bawtpost is bottom up. Nothing's top down. We're not saying

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 4>probably a good time to be a contray and none

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 4>of that. We're saying, oh, I can buy this bond

0:25:09.080 --> 0:25:11.679
<v Speaker 4>at seventy that I think is covered at par. I

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:14.600
<v Speaker 4>think people are worried maybe it could have a blip

0:25:14.720 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 4>or have a problem for a while, but people aren't

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 4>really doubting that there's something there. I think as the

0:25:21.320 --> 0:25:24.320
<v Speaker 4>economy got worse, people may have started to doubt more

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 4>and more. Prices come in more and more, and so

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:32.920
<v Speaker 4>we're literally able to buy mortgage securities, residential mortgage securities.

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 4>We're able to buy corporate debt, especially of the auto fincos,

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 4>the financial arm of General Motors and Chrysler and Ford,

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:47.840
<v Speaker 4>and that Lehman goes broke, and that had pieces within

0:25:47.880 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 4>its capital structure that got very interesting. So we're seeing

0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:53.920
<v Speaker 4>all kinds of things and we're kind of kids in

0:25:53.960 --> 0:25:58.400
<v Speaker 4>a candy store. Sadly, right, it's a tough time. People

0:25:58.440 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 4>are hurting. But also so as an investor, you're fiduciary

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 4>and you've got to put money to work where you're

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 4>going to benefit your clients. So we're in every case

0:26:07.760 --> 0:26:10.480
<v Speaker 4>stress testing, Hey, if the world got even worse, Hey

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:13.920
<v Speaker 4>if this turned out to be nineteen thirty three, will

0:26:13.920 --> 0:26:15.199
<v Speaker 4>this investment be okay?

0:26:15.680 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 3>And that's the.

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 4>Only place where we're where we're making decisions is if

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.200
<v Speaker 4>the downside is protected, and if we can see lots

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:26.520
<v Speaker 4>of paths to winning, then we're very interested. So we

0:26:26.720 --> 0:26:30.000
<v Speaker 4>found a lot to do in distressed. We also owned equities.

0:26:30.040 --> 0:26:32.960
<v Speaker 4>We also found private investments, and there were just all

0:26:33.040 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 4>kinds of things worth doing in that era. The challenge

0:26:36.560 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 4>in investing, I think for everybody is you want to

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.080
<v Speaker 4>make sure that you know those environments are going to

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:44.040
<v Speaker 4>happen once in a while, and you need to make

0:26:44.040 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 4>sure you don't blow up during them. And if possible,

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:50.000
<v Speaker 4>you need to make sure that you'll have capacity to

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 4>buy when the best opportunities become available and maybe your

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 4>competitors are sidelined. And so that's the moment that I

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.919
<v Speaker 4>think investors need to at least have in their heads,

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:03.840
<v Speaker 4>how are you going to handle that environment? Because if

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 4>you're too exposed, if you're getting margin calls, if you're

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 4>getting massively redeemed because you took the wrong clients and

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 4>they're short term oriented, then you're going to be out

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 4>of commission on that day. So to be around on

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 4>that day and be able to do what we do,

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:18.920
<v Speaker 4>we just did the same thing we do every day.

0:27:19.040 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 4>We did a little bigger size.

0:27:20.960 --> 0:27:24.760
<v Speaker 2>So I'm kind of fascinated by the dynamic tension between

0:27:25.840 --> 0:27:30.320
<v Speaker 2>fundamental bottoms up research on a credit or equity by

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 2>credit or equity basis versus the top down. I know

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:38.879
<v Speaker 2>you've said that you really don't think about markets or

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:42.199
<v Speaker 2>investing from a top down perspective. But it seems that

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:47.960
<v Speaker 2>everybody who panicked, everybody who helped create those distressed assets,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 2>were either responding or overresponding to the top down environment.

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 2>How do you look at that sort of environment.

0:27:56.960 --> 0:27:59.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, there are several layers to that. First of all,

0:27:59.760 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 4>I think I think people were responding to all kinds

0:28:02.080 --> 0:28:05.679
<v Speaker 4>of things. They were responding to redemption requests by their

0:28:05.760 --> 0:28:10.639
<v Speaker 4>mutual fund shareholders, they were responding to credit downgrades, so

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 4>that it wasn't just I'm nervous that things are going

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:16.600
<v Speaker 4>to be bad. This bond is no longer investment grade,

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 4>and maybe my mandate is I can only own investment

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.240
<v Speaker 4>grade bonds, or this bond has defaulted and I can

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:25.399
<v Speaker 4>no longer hold this bond. So you have for selling

0:28:25.640 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 4>all over the place and force selling. You never want

0:28:29.400 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 4>to be a foreseller, and you especially want to be

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:34.959
<v Speaker 4>able to buy from force sellers in any asset class

0:28:35.320 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 4>if that comes along. What I would say is I

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 4>think that, like, I'm not a mountain climber or big hiker,

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 4>but if you're going to climb a mountain, you want

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:48.520
<v Speaker 4>to look bottom up.

0:28:48.560 --> 0:28:50.960
<v Speaker 3>You want to understand is this the right trail?

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:55.240
<v Speaker 4>Is this safe? Do I have my equipment? Am I prepared?

0:28:55.480 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 4>And then you also want to have the top down view.

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 4>What's the weather and what if it suddenly gets snowy

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 4>up there? If the winds sixty miles an hour, how

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.760
<v Speaker 4>am I going to handle that? And so you kind

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 4>of want to have in your head the weather forecast,

0:29:10.960 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 4>and I think I know that I'm always thinking about

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 4>is this environment safe? In today's market, it feels stretched,

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 4>but it also feels like we're on the brink of

0:29:21.760 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 4>an incredibly an unprecedented technology and an era that might

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 4>be one of very substantial prosperity, but also one of

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:37.480
<v Speaker 4>risk to society and great change. So bottom up still

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:40.240
<v Speaker 4>feels like the right way to invest, but it feels

0:29:40.360 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 4>like you still need your eye on the weather.

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 3>In the financial.

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:47.200
<v Speaker 4>Markets, that means where it's the GDP going, and what's

0:29:47.280 --> 0:29:50.280
<v Speaker 4>the national debt and where's inflation going to take us?

0:29:50.480 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 4>So I always have an eye on that stuff, but

0:29:52.560 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 4>we're not We're not investing our portfolio based on that,

0:29:55.360 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 4>the same way we don't invest based on a macro

0:29:57.640 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 4>view that this country would be a good place to invest.

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:04.640
<v Speaker 4>In rather, we notice a security bottom up and say, wow,

0:30:04.680 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 4>that seems egregiously mispriced. I wonder if there are more mispricings.

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 4>Maybe we should look at that market a little bit closer.

0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.960
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk a little bit about cash. I think

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of investors look at cash as a drag

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 2>on their performance. The net return is usually zero or

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:26.920
<v Speaker 2>close to zero relative to inflation. How do you think

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:30.440
<v Speaker 2>of cash? It's always been such a historically important part

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:35.600
<v Speaker 2>of your toolkit. What sort of optionality does it create

0:30:36.200 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 2>versus the career pressure of staying fully invested at all times.

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 4>So you're nailing it with your question. You've covered all

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 4>the parts of holding cash. I think that cash can

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 4>be valuable optionality, especially just imagine you have a reasonably

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:55.959
<v Speaker 4>concentrated portfolio. A large position or two comes off the books.

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 4>Should you put it to work in a nanosecond or

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:02.000
<v Speaker 4>can you wait till something really interesting comes along. So

0:31:02.040 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 4>that's the origin of us holding cash. Positions would come

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 4>off and we'd hold some cash until something great came along, but.

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 2>Not just a couple of percent you've hold out history.

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.680
<v Speaker 4>But with concentrated positions, we have five and ten percent

0:31:14.720 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 4>positions in the portfolio. When two or three of them

0:31:17.240 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 4>come off, cash goes from next to nothing to fifteen

0:31:20.600 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 4>or twenty percent. So that's the origin. That's how we

0:31:23.400 --> 0:31:25.880
<v Speaker 4>got started with the idea that we would hold some

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:29.520
<v Speaker 4>cash from time to time. I think, though I would

0:31:29.520 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 4>accept that I almost certainly made a mistake in that

0:31:33.520 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 4>holding cash to that extent. There were times when we

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:40.680
<v Speaker 4>thirty percent cash and even higher, and I viewed it

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:45.040
<v Speaker 4>as valuable optionality. The problem is the optionality didn't pay

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:49.040
<v Speaker 4>off very well for big swaths of time, especially since

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.320
<v Speaker 4>so eight that with suppression of interest rates and the

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 4>FED printing a lot of money in the US running

0:31:54.240 --> 0:31:57.800
<v Speaker 4>large deficits that we really haven't had a serious downturn

0:31:57.840 --> 0:32:02.000
<v Speaker 4>in almost two decades, and that amount of cash became painful.

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:06.680
<v Speaker 4>I think that the argument for holding cash. When a

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:09.240
<v Speaker 4>client says, I'm not paying you to hold cash, my

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.560
<v Speaker 4>answer would be, I'm not getting paid to hold cash.

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm getting paid to use my judgment on when to

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 4>deploy the money and in what to deploy it.

0:32:17.640 --> 0:32:20.960
<v Speaker 3>So I feel like that's right, But I felt like

0:32:21.200 --> 0:32:21.720
<v Speaker 3>I was.

0:32:21.680 --> 0:32:25.400
<v Speaker 4>Not optimizing for our clients in an environment that stopped

0:32:25.440 --> 0:32:27.680
<v Speaker 4>being as volatile as the one I had grown up in.

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 4>So we changed our strategies somewhat. We made our liquid

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.440
<v Speaker 4>books more liquid, especially our public equity book, where we

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 4>used to own companies with five hundred million or billion

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:40.320
<v Speaker 4>dollar market cap. Now we own much bigger market cap

0:32:40.640 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 4>holdings on average. That liquidity in the public equity book

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 4>has made us feel better that we can pivot on

0:32:47.800 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 4>a dime with a large percentage of our book, so

0:32:50.880 --> 0:32:52.640
<v Speaker 4>we don't need as much cash to be able to

0:32:52.680 --> 0:32:55.800
<v Speaker 4>take advantage of a sudden opportunity that shows up.

0:32:56.600 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 2>A lot of larger equity font when they're sitting in cash,

0:33:02.600 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 2>they use the spiderydfs, they'll roll into spy so they're

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:11.120
<v Speaker 2>not falling behind a benchmark, and then it's deep and

0:33:11.160 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 2>liquid if they want to deploy that in a momentum market.

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 2>Is that a bad strategy or are you just adding

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:21.440
<v Speaker 2>risk to avoid the cash risk.

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:25.280
<v Speaker 4>We think about our benchmark as an absolute return, not

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:28.320
<v Speaker 4>a relative return, So we're not very interested in keeping

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 4>up with the market. Market's going to do what it does,

0:33:31.440 --> 0:33:34.800
<v Speaker 4>and especially a market this concentrated and a handful of names,

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 4>and it's really been that way for a number of

0:33:36.720 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 4>years with the fang stocks and the handful of names

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.040
<v Speaker 4>that carry the market often not always, but often or

0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 4>expensive overpriced. So we just think that's not the right

0:33:47.760 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 4>way to think about it. We want our an absolute return.

0:33:50.400 --> 0:33:53.080
<v Speaker 4>We want to beat inflation by hundreds of basis points,

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 4>and if we're doing that, we're not going to worry

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 4>about whether that's ahead of the market or behind. I think,

0:33:58.200 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 4>over the fullness of time, a good absolute return strategy

0:34:02.240 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 4>is going to beat the market to.

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:07.160
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about some of the opportunity sets that

0:34:07.240 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 2>you look at. You mentioned equities, We talked about distress debt.

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 2>You also make real estate investments, other private investments. How

0:34:16.120 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 2>do you think about capital alocreation across these buckets? Are

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:24.960
<v Speaker 2>you using percentage terms or are you just purely opportunistic.

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 4>So we came about these through our experiences. We didn't

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 4>just wake up one day and said let's be in

0:34:32.040 --> 0:34:36.520
<v Speaker 4>four different areas. Rather, we noticed that over the transom,

0:34:36.800 --> 0:34:40.200
<v Speaker 4>interesting private investments were coming into the portfolio. We're getting

0:34:40.200 --> 0:34:43.600
<v Speaker 4>phone calls, Hey, would you ever would you inject capital

0:34:43.600 --> 0:34:46.239
<v Speaker 4>into this business? Or would you buy this portfolio of

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:52.640
<v Speaker 4>venture investments from a failed company that needed to sell them,

0:34:52.840 --> 0:34:55.480
<v Speaker 4>or would you buy twenty two percent of a company

0:34:55.880 --> 0:35:00.399
<v Speaker 4>owned by largely seventy eight percent by a large Middle

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 4>Eastern company, and twenty two percent up for sale. Would

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:07.640
<v Speaker 4>you buy that well at three times ebitdah, maybe you would.

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:08.239
<v Speaker 3>So.

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:13.600
<v Speaker 4>Literally, by seeing examples one at a time, bottom up,

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.320
<v Speaker 4>we started to figure out that there were more things

0:35:16.320 --> 0:35:19.359
<v Speaker 4>to focus on than just the public equity markets, and

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:22.399
<v Speaker 4>so we got drawn. One of our specialties I think

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 4>is distressed credit, and we became really good at it.

0:35:25.560 --> 0:35:29.279
<v Speaker 4>We've got smart people, We're very patient. Sometimes there's nothing

0:35:29.280 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 4>to do, there's nothing distressed. Other times there's an avalanche

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:36.920
<v Speaker 4>of opportunity, and so we wait patiently. In all of

0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 4>our areas, we built teams of versatile people, so that

0:35:41.320 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 4>a team is basically a generalist team, and the same

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:46.880
<v Speaker 4>person can work on a private investment, can work on

0:35:46.880 --> 0:35:51.040
<v Speaker 4>a credit investment, can work on an equity investment. Real

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:53.719
<v Speaker 4>estate is a bit more specialized than that, but even

0:35:53.760 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 4>within real estate, many people have a land person and

0:35:56.600 --> 0:35:57.440
<v Speaker 4>a hotel person.

0:35:57.680 --> 0:35:59.640
<v Speaker 3>We don't do that. Everybody works on everything.

0:36:00.280 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 4>So we have the team in place and we're able

0:36:04.280 --> 0:36:08.279
<v Speaker 4>to respond bottom up. That the bottom up approach to

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:12.319
<v Speaker 4>opportunity I think lets us allocate capital better than if

0:36:12.360 --> 0:36:14.279
<v Speaker 4>we were doing a top down that. I think a

0:36:14.360 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 4>lot of people will look at historic returns will say

0:36:17.719 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 4>the expected return from owning private equity will be mid

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:25.200
<v Speaker 4>teens or upper teens. The expected return from venture capital

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 4>will be better than that. And we don't do that.

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:30.279
<v Speaker 4>We really don't know what an asset class is going

0:36:30.280 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 4>to do because we think that's very time specific and

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 4>very valuation dependent. Rather, we see what's available right this second,

0:36:39.000 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 4>and by looking bottom up opportunity after opportunity, I think

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 4>we can paint a really clear picture. So right the second,

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:49.440
<v Speaker 4>real estate has been in tough shape since COVID, especially

0:36:49.440 --> 0:36:54.319
<v Speaker 4>commercial office and people started working from home, and that

0:36:54.360 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 4>hasn't fully returned. And in certain markets especially there's too

0:36:58.719 --> 0:37:01.600
<v Speaker 4>much space and a lot of people that have been

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:03.960
<v Speaker 4>in real estate have not done that well. A lot

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 4>of people got into the wrong vintage and a lot

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 4>of properties have become structurally obsolete. So that sounds like

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:14.200
<v Speaker 4>a mess, why would you touch it? But it also

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:17.640
<v Speaker 4>means that competition is hardly looking and so we think

0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 4>they're opportunities right now. For example, in assisted living, which

0:37:22.080 --> 0:37:24.720
<v Speaker 4>is population is aging, you can make a very strong

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:27.920
<v Speaker 4>case for fundamentals. Rents haven't moved up in years, and

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:31.080
<v Speaker 4>I think there's probably pent up growth in reds to come.

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:37.239
<v Speaker 4>And COVID was obviously a giant problem because any facility

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:40.560
<v Speaker 4>tended to empty out as people pulled their relatives out

0:37:40.719 --> 0:37:43.759
<v Speaker 4>to save their lives during COVID understandably, and a lot

0:37:43.760 --> 0:37:46.880
<v Speaker 4>of newly built facilities from that era from twenty twenty

0:37:47.160 --> 0:37:49.840
<v Speaker 4>one to twenty twenty two never got filled and a

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:52.800
<v Speaker 4>lot of them have run into bankruptcy or financial distress.

0:37:53.120 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 4>So it's been an opportunity to build a position an

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:59.360
<v Speaker 4>area with strong fundamentals. The past is the past, but

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:02.399
<v Speaker 4>moving forward, it looks like they're going to have real

0:38:02.719 --> 0:38:07.359
<v Speaker 4>ramp for rents and for occupancy, and we're seeing opportunity

0:38:07.400 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 4>here and there to add to a portfolio of assisted living. Similarly,

0:38:11.719 --> 0:38:14.880
<v Speaker 4>we like certain parts of the real estate office market,

0:38:15.000 --> 0:38:19.400
<v Speaker 4>especially some outside the major cities in a few select

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:22.760
<v Speaker 4>markets though, and we're seeing more in other sub markets

0:38:22.760 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 4>within real estate. It's a real estate, as you know,

0:38:25.840 --> 0:38:28.200
<v Speaker 4>is a giant market. It's probably got a market cap

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 4>around as big as a public equity market and so,

0:38:32.239 --> 0:38:36.279
<v Speaker 4>but it has a very different capital structure in terms

0:38:36.360 --> 0:38:38.960
<v Speaker 4>of who are the players and how much capital can

0:38:39.000 --> 0:38:43.120
<v Speaker 4>they tap and the opportunity set. So real estate's interesting.

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 4>We like looking at it, and we have a team

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 4>that's agile and could deploy capital quickly when something comes along.

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 4>In private investments, it's opportunistic, and there have been some

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.560
<v Speaker 4>things to do lately as capitals pulled back from private investments,

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:03.359
<v Speaker 4>for example and energy and midstream. That's led to some

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 4>things that have trickled down to us that we've been

0:39:05.560 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 4>very excited, very high return and well hedged, so downside protected.

0:39:11.920 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 4>So we're just opportunistic investors. I would say, though, using

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:20.960
<v Speaker 4>my top down lens that you mentioned, we are certainly nervous.

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:25.600
<v Speaker 4>We're in a bit of an economic boom, possibly an

0:39:25.640 --> 0:39:29.160
<v Speaker 4>inflationary boom. Who knows what's going to happen with the

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:32.239
<v Speaker 4>Strait of Hormuz and the end result of that, and

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:36.719
<v Speaker 4>the demand for AI is an AI related investments is

0:39:36.760 --> 0:39:39.879
<v Speaker 4>so all encompassing. It's almost as if the market has

0:39:39.920 --> 0:39:42.520
<v Speaker 4>said we want the AI winners. We're going to dump

0:39:42.560 --> 0:39:44.759
<v Speaker 4>anything that looks like an AI loser, and maybe we'll

0:39:44.760 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 4>throw out some babies with the bathwater, and we don't care.

0:39:47.600 --> 0:39:50.680
<v Speaker 4>And AI agnostic, we're not looking at that either. So

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:54.640
<v Speaker 4>we think there's opportunity even in some larger cap high

0:39:54.719 --> 0:39:58.680
<v Speaker 4>quality equities that are being thrown out as people want

0:39:58.719 --> 0:40:01.480
<v Speaker 4>to make the high returns from speculating an AI.

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 3>Right now, we're going to.

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:06.640
<v Speaker 2>Talk a little bit about the current environment in greater details. Shortly,

0:40:07.600 --> 0:40:11.440
<v Speaker 2>I just have to ask one more question about contrarian

0:40:11.520 --> 0:40:16.440
<v Speaker 2>approach as an opportunity for value investors. The risk is

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:21.839
<v Speaker 2>always a value trap. Sometimes the market's negative judgment is

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 2>actually right. How do you prevent something that's cheap from

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:31.920
<v Speaker 2>suckering you into something that's on the way to becoming

0:40:32.120 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 2>much much cheaper.

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you're asking something that we've had a bit of

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 4>a painful lesson in over time, which is cheap is

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:43.680
<v Speaker 4>not really a strategy. We tend to look at our

0:40:43.760 --> 0:40:46.839
<v Speaker 4>investments not as are they at a discount from what

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 4>we think they could be worth, but rather what is

0:40:49.360 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 4>our expected go forward return from here? And we tend

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:55.759
<v Speaker 4>to also ask that our investments have catalysts, and that

0:40:55.880 --> 0:40:58.799
<v Speaker 4>when we lay out a thesis in an investment conversation,

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 4>it's very clear not just how undervalued is it, but

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:05.680
<v Speaker 4>why is this going to work? What's going to drive it?

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:08.560
<v Speaker 4>And if we can't make an argument for why it's

0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 4>turn around in the next year or two. It might

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 4>be nice that it's trading at a five year low,

0:41:15.600 --> 0:41:17.000
<v Speaker 4>but that doesn't mean it's not going to be at

0:41:17.040 --> 0:41:19.120
<v Speaker 4>a seven year low and a ten year low. And

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:22.320
<v Speaker 4>so our time horizon is not that long. We can't

0:41:22.680 --> 0:41:25.880
<v Speaker 4>just hold things that don't perform for five or ten years.

0:41:26.000 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 4>I think very very few people can do it today,

0:41:28.719 --> 0:41:31.399
<v Speaker 4>and we think that's not holding our feet to the fire.

0:41:31.800 --> 0:41:36.520
<v Speaker 4>All organizations need to demand accountability from their teams, so

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:40.200
<v Speaker 4>we always are asking ourselves and really I think changed

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:44.280
<v Speaker 4>our approach a little bit, where we're asking a different

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:48.319
<v Speaker 4>question about what is going to drive the success of

0:41:48.360 --> 0:41:51.839
<v Speaker 4>this investment rather than just letting it cheap being enough,

0:41:51.920 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 4>it's not enough.

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Very very interesting. Coming up, we continue our conversation with

0:41:57.160 --> 0:42:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Seth Klarman's CEO and portfolio manager at the Bowpost Group,

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:07.240
<v Speaker 2>discussing the state of investing in today's environment. I'm Barry Results.

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Masters of Business on Bloomberg Radio. I'm

0:42:24.320 --> 0:42:27.680
<v Speaker 2>very Results. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

0:42:28.280 --> 0:42:31.799
<v Speaker 2>My extra special guest today is Seth Klarman. He is

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:40.160
<v Speaker 2>the CEO and portfolio manager of Value Investing, really legend

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:43.840
<v Speaker 2>the Bowpost Group. The firm managers about twenty two billion

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:49.800
<v Speaker 2>dollars in client assets. We've touched briefly on things affecting

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:53.799
<v Speaker 2>today's environment, price of oil, inflation, we have a Middle

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:57.240
<v Speaker 2>East war, We're still dealing with a new set of tariffs.

0:42:57.280 --> 0:43:01.919
<v Speaker 2>It seems like every week there's a different mac grow headache.

0:43:02.400 --> 0:43:06.400
<v Speaker 2>How do you think about the current environment. Is it

0:43:06.560 --> 0:43:12.239
<v Speaker 2>something that has to be dealt with but sort of compartmentalized.

0:43:12.920 --> 0:43:15.520
<v Speaker 2>Is something that have to be dealt with and compartmentalized

0:43:15.680 --> 0:43:19.400
<v Speaker 2>or do you just look at it as yet another

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 2>input into fundamental values?

0:43:23.640 --> 0:43:29.200
<v Speaker 4>So I think AI is a sea change, and that

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a tech guy, and I'm not a personal

0:43:34.680 --> 0:43:38.280
<v Speaker 4>user at the cutting edge of technology, but I've spent

0:43:38.320 --> 0:43:40.840
<v Speaker 4>a huge amount of time. I think that the advent

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:45.719
<v Speaker 4>of AI has forced me and probably everyone to just

0:43:45.880 --> 0:43:49.359
<v Speaker 4>add more time to their day to stay current. That

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:52.719
<v Speaker 4>I've never seen a technology with this kind of importance

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 4>and potential game changing magnitude. So I read everything I

0:43:58.239 --> 0:43:59.840
<v Speaker 4>get my hands on. I listen to a lot of

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 4>podcast as well. I read a lot of books and

0:44:02.440 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 4>magazine articles as well. I'm consumed because even though I

0:44:07.200 --> 0:44:10.120
<v Speaker 4>don't think Baopost as a value firm is going to

0:44:10.160 --> 0:44:14.160
<v Speaker 4>find too many ways to get long AI exposure, I

0:44:14.239 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 4>think that we don't want to. We don't want to

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:19.200
<v Speaker 4>be behind the curve. We don't want to not know

0:44:19.280 --> 0:44:23.280
<v Speaker 4>what we don't know, and so the team is doing

0:44:23.280 --> 0:44:26.680
<v Speaker 4>a fabulous job thinking about AI, thinking about ways to

0:44:26.719 --> 0:44:30.640
<v Speaker 4>incorporate it into our processes, but also especially thinking about

0:44:30.640 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 4>the implications of AI on our portfolio companies. So I

0:44:34.080 --> 0:44:36.440
<v Speaker 4>think we have found ways to have a little bit

0:44:36.440 --> 0:44:40.360
<v Speaker 4>of long exposure in things, for example, like data centers,

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:43.880
<v Speaker 4>where we own a few private investments at what we

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:47.240
<v Speaker 4>think is a very considerable discount to where data centers

0:44:47.239 --> 0:44:50.480
<v Speaker 4>tend to trade. We're not sure what the right discount is,

0:44:50.560 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 4>or we're not really sure what the right long term

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:55.239
<v Speaker 4>cap rate is, but we think owning it a significant

0:44:55.280 --> 0:44:56.359
<v Speaker 4>discount is a good thing.

0:44:56.480 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 3>So we have some exposure.

0:44:58.080 --> 0:45:01.920
<v Speaker 4>But mostly we're trying to own a portfoli where we

0:45:02.239 --> 0:45:06.680
<v Speaker 4>have avoided AI losers and maybe occasionally we've found something

0:45:06.719 --> 0:45:08.960
<v Speaker 4>that market thinks is an AI loser that we think

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:13.719
<v Speaker 4>isn't and to otherwise have things with ancillary exposure to

0:45:13.800 --> 0:45:16.840
<v Speaker 4>AI where we can turn into AI winners but not

0:45:16.920 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 4>pay much for the privilege. So it's it's a piece

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:23.520
<v Speaker 4>of what we do in the meantime. Obviously you refer

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:26.840
<v Speaker 4>to tariffs and the president, the volatility of the president

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:30.200
<v Speaker 4>and this administration. There are things coming out of left

0:45:30.200 --> 0:45:32.960
<v Speaker 4>field all the time. Some of it is policy, some

0:45:33.000 --> 0:45:36.680
<v Speaker 4>of it is distraction, I think, maybe deliberate distraction, and

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:39.960
<v Speaker 4>it's very hard to deal with that. I think most

0:45:40.200 --> 0:45:43.839
<v Speaker 4>investors and I too have said I need to make

0:45:43.880 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 4>a mental note of it. I need to think about

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:48.480
<v Speaker 4>who I want to vote for next time there's an election.

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:52.000
<v Speaker 4>But I also need to not get distracted by this.

0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:55.280
<v Speaker 4>And most of it doesn't end up mattering on an

0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 4>investment by investment basis. So it is a time of

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 4>tremendous change, high degrees of volatility, and you see the volatility.

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 4>The stock by stock volatility is unbelievable that when they

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:09.640
<v Speaker 4>love a stock, they can't get enough of it and

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:11.759
<v Speaker 4>it goes through the roof, and when they turn on

0:46:11.840 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 4>a stock, it gets clobbered, and so the individual stock

0:46:15.160 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 4>dispersion is very high. Well, the overall market volatility is

0:46:18.760 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 4>actually quite low.

0:46:20.160 --> 0:46:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Huh, really interesting. Let's talk about another distraction and what

0:46:25.239 --> 0:46:30.920
<v Speaker 2>it might might mean. We're recording this a couple of

0:46:31.040 --> 0:46:35.080
<v Speaker 2>days before the SpaceX ipo, it'll broadcast a couple of

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 2>days after the SpaceX ipo. This is not only a

0:46:39.800 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 2>giant trillion dollar valuation, but it's got a lot of

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 2>hair on the deal with this tiny float and the

0:46:48.680 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Nasdaq waving the rules to put an end to the cues.

0:46:53.360 --> 0:46:56.520
<v Speaker 2>How do you look at an event like this in

0:46:56.640 --> 0:47:01.200
<v Speaker 2>terms of the overall gestalt of the market is I

0:47:01.239 --> 0:47:03.799
<v Speaker 2>know the old line is they don't ring a bell

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 2>at the top, But at a certain point, how do

0:47:06.120 --> 0:47:08.920
<v Speaker 2>you perceive something like this? Does it trouble you?

0:47:09.960 --> 0:47:12.279
<v Speaker 4>So my compliance team is very clear that I can't

0:47:12.280 --> 0:47:15.400
<v Speaker 4>talk about individual securities and we own We own no

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:19.600
<v Speaker 4>SpaceX privately or in any other form. What I would

0:47:19.600 --> 0:47:22.719
<v Speaker 4>say to you is I share your sense that this

0:47:22.920 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 4>is the kind of bell that might ring at the top.

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:31.000
<v Speaker 4>It is an unprofitable company, and aggregate it is an

0:47:31.120 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 4>enormous valuation. I think we all we both read in

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:37.080
<v Speaker 4>the paper this morning the Goldman estimates of what growth

0:47:37.080 --> 0:47:39.440
<v Speaker 4>would have to be in some parts of their business,

0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:42.240
<v Speaker 4>like one hundred x in order to justify the current

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:46.440
<v Speaker 4>price a long period of time, and those projections have

0:47:46.480 --> 0:47:50.560
<v Speaker 4>a way of not happening. Is it's not impossible, but

0:47:50.640 --> 0:48:00.799
<v Speaker 4>it's hard. I think that that it is. I think

0:48:00.840 --> 0:48:04.800
<v Speaker 4>investors might be missing just how much money is being

0:48:04.840 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 4>sucked out of the system between large IPOs. This won't

0:48:08.560 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 4>be the last one. Open AI Onanthropic are coming, and

0:48:11.600 --> 0:48:14.799
<v Speaker 4>there's a ton of other IPOs that are stuck in

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:18.680
<v Speaker 4>institutional investors' portfolios that also they'd love if they could

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 4>get them off at any point. Then the float might

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:24.839
<v Speaker 4>be tiny today, but you have a large number of

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:28.399
<v Speaker 4>shareholders private investments. We write again this morning that ten

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:33.000
<v Speaker 4>or fifteen percent of some endowments entire endowment is in

0:48:33.040 --> 0:48:34.319
<v Speaker 4>the one name SpaceX.

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:36.360
<v Speaker 3>So they're going to want to sell.

0:48:36.880 --> 0:48:39.399
<v Speaker 4>Employees are going to want to monetize and go from

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 4>being wealthy on paper to wealthy in a bank deposit.

0:48:43.719 --> 0:48:46.239
<v Speaker 4>And so that's a lot of stock for sale and

0:48:46.280 --> 0:48:50.440
<v Speaker 4>we have to sell that stock. While apparently Google and

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:54.320
<v Speaker 4>Facebook need more money, and where open AI and Anthropic

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 4>need more money, and utilities need more money to power

0:48:57.640 --> 0:49:00.279
<v Speaker 4>and chip companies need to build new factories. In America,

0:49:00.840 --> 0:49:04.400
<v Speaker 4>there's so much demand for money. And I think we're

0:49:04.440 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 4>in a vulnerable place where ultimately supply and demand for

0:49:08.480 --> 0:49:12.040
<v Speaker 4>money determines the cost of capital. And that's true in

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:13.960
<v Speaker 4>a bond market, and it's in effect true in the

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:19.240
<v Speaker 4>stock market. So we might be looking some supply demand

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:25.320
<v Speaker 4>excess where prices soften just because there's so much supplier

0:49:25.920 --> 0:49:30.840
<v Speaker 4>of securities and the need to monetize is so great

0:49:31.120 --> 0:49:32.360
<v Speaker 4>by these private companies.

0:49:32.480 --> 0:49:38.080
<v Speaker 2>So let's talk about another imbalance between supply and demands

0:49:38.239 --> 0:49:42.719
<v Speaker 2>through history. Because Bowpost has been around for over four decades,

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:48.560
<v Speaker 2>You've traded and invested through and survived all sorts of

0:49:48.600 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 2>different market regimes, inflation, disinflation, the dot com bubble, the

0:49:54.520 --> 0:50:01.280
<v Speaker 2>financial crisis, QE and ZUP, COVID, and and more recently

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:05.400
<v Speaker 2>the return to let's just call it normalized interest rates.

0:50:06.640 --> 0:50:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Has anything changed since nineteen eighty two? Is it just

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the same careening from one crisis to another or do

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 2>things eventually sort of moderate? Sort of do we learn

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 2>from these experiences, what's the same, what's different.

0:50:24.760 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 4>I think that all investors should be students of history,

0:50:27.960 --> 0:50:30.560
<v Speaker 4>as we talked about, and I think we know that

0:50:30.680 --> 0:50:33.799
<v Speaker 4>over the course of history, they're cycles that you're going

0:50:33.840 --> 0:50:37.520
<v Speaker 4>to have a cycle where you're at war, and then

0:50:37.560 --> 0:50:39.719
<v Speaker 4>another cycle where people are tired of war and you

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:42.040
<v Speaker 4>have peace for a while. At some point you have

0:50:42.120 --> 0:50:44.560
<v Speaker 4>peace long enough that people forget how bad war is,

0:50:44.640 --> 0:50:46.920
<v Speaker 4>and you end up in another war, and you have

0:50:47.000 --> 0:50:52.320
<v Speaker 4>those similar cycles. Whether it's the government spending and inflation

0:50:52.440 --> 0:50:55.479
<v Speaker 4>and deflation, that sort of thing. Even the nature of debt.

0:50:55.920 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 4>That debt feels great when nobody's asking you to pay

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:00.880
<v Speaker 4>it back and an interest rates are low. At some

0:51:00.960 --> 0:51:04.759
<v Speaker 4>point that becomes pernicious and a giant problem. So I

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:07.520
<v Speaker 4>think we're likely to always see those cycles, at least

0:51:07.520 --> 0:51:11.399
<v Speaker 4>as long as humans are in charge of markets. How

0:51:11.400 --> 0:51:14.080
<v Speaker 4>do you navigate it? I think you navigate it by

0:51:14.200 --> 0:51:17.240
<v Speaker 4>realizing that you may not see the cycle with clarity

0:51:17.239 --> 0:51:19.680
<v Speaker 4>while you're in it, but you know there are cycles.

0:51:20.120 --> 0:51:22.520
<v Speaker 4>You know that what seems to be true today for

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:25.279
<v Speaker 4>all time probably won't be true for all time, and

0:51:25.360 --> 0:51:27.840
<v Speaker 4>hold on to that. So again it goes to the

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:30.239
<v Speaker 4>idea of holding inconsistent ideas in your head. At the

0:51:30.239 --> 0:51:33.360
<v Speaker 4>same time. This is both true and likely at some

0:51:33.440 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 4>point to become less true or untrue, and you don't

0:51:37.040 --> 0:51:40.879
<v Speaker 4>know exactly how So how do you hold the portfolio,

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:44.640
<v Speaker 4>you diversify. When things are up a lot and become

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:47.279
<v Speaker 4>more expensive and the go forward return is low, you

0:51:47.320 --> 0:51:49.799
<v Speaker 4>take profits. You trade out when things are out of

0:51:49.800 --> 0:51:54.719
<v Speaker 4>favor so badly that the returns look high. Maybe there's

0:51:54.760 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 4>a time to step in and buy during a period

0:51:57.040 --> 0:52:00.359
<v Speaker 4>when others are dumping. So I think it's that stay

0:52:00.360 --> 0:52:03.960
<v Speaker 4>focused on the bottom up. Remember broadly the weather, so

0:52:04.000 --> 0:52:07.040
<v Speaker 4>when you go camping, you don't not prepare appropriately for

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:10.360
<v Speaker 4>stormy days, not just in the mountains but in the

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:14.759
<v Speaker 4>financial markets. And look, Bowpost protects on the downside as

0:52:14.840 --> 0:52:18.840
<v Speaker 4>best we can by doing deep fundamental analysis, by knowing

0:52:18.840 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 4>our names unbelievably well, by not being afraid to sell

0:52:22.080 --> 0:52:24.600
<v Speaker 4>them when the price is up and the same as

0:52:24.600 --> 0:52:27.400
<v Speaker 4>we buy more when the price is down. By finding

0:52:27.440 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 4>securities that are maybe more senior in nature, whether in

0:52:31.080 --> 0:52:34.919
<v Speaker 4>public or private markets, and by macro hedging the portfolio

0:52:34.960 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 4>to an extent, because we know that those rainy days

0:52:37.640 --> 0:52:40.920
<v Speaker 4>are going to happen, and so we're buying macro protection

0:52:41.080 --> 0:52:43.560
<v Speaker 4>when volves are low and people think nothing bad is

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:46.000
<v Speaker 4>going to happen, so we can sell that at a gain,

0:52:46.520 --> 0:52:48.799
<v Speaker 4>both because the price moved in bec has val moved

0:52:48.880 --> 0:52:51.720
<v Speaker 4>up during a stormier moment in the markets.

0:52:52.320 --> 0:52:55.279
<v Speaker 2>So we now have a new FED chair and that's

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:59.520
<v Speaker 2>a great leaping off point to talk about a lot

0:52:59.600 --> 0:53:03.760
<v Speaker 2>of skillicism broadly. But you've been pretty skeptical about FED

0:53:03.840 --> 0:53:08.440
<v Speaker 2>policy since the financial crisis. How do you think rates

0:53:08.480 --> 0:53:13.759
<v Speaker 2>have affected investors? What's been the impact on behavior and

0:53:14.239 --> 0:53:16.680
<v Speaker 2>are we at a point now where rates have more

0:53:16.800 --> 0:53:19.520
<v Speaker 2>or less normalized. How do you look at the present environment.

0:53:21.200 --> 0:53:25.839
<v Speaker 4>You know, I believe in people taking responsibility for their actions.

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:29.799
<v Speaker 4>I believe that we are a healthier system when there's

0:53:29.840 --> 0:53:33.839
<v Speaker 4>a reckoning for excess and for you know, egregious speculation

0:53:34.160 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 4>and for over leverage. So I kind of hated that

0:53:37.600 --> 0:53:41.279
<v Speaker 4>the FED took rate I totally understood why the FED

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:44.200
<v Speaker 4>took rates down to zero after the Great Financial Crisis,

0:53:44.640 --> 0:53:46.520
<v Speaker 4>and that it was really the only way to hold

0:53:46.520 --> 0:53:49.800
<v Speaker 4>things together give time to heal. But by leaving rates

0:53:49.800 --> 0:53:53.080
<v Speaker 4>there for an extra decade after there was no crisis,

0:53:53.160 --> 0:53:57.000
<v Speaker 4>I think we stoked a problem. We sort of incented

0:53:57.040 --> 0:54:02.879
<v Speaker 4>speculation and maybe dis incentivized responsibility, and so we got

0:54:02.880 --> 0:54:06.960
<v Speaker 4>some of that. We saw that firsthand in twenty twenty two,

0:54:07.320 --> 0:54:10.200
<v Speaker 4>when the market had gone higher and higher and higher.

0:54:10.200 --> 0:54:13.439
<v Speaker 4>You had those SPACs and all kinds of garbage heet

0:54:13.440 --> 0:54:16.800
<v Speaker 4>companies training at very high prices the MEME stocks, and

0:54:16.840 --> 0:54:18.600
<v Speaker 4>then it blew up in twenty twenty two, a lot

0:54:18.640 --> 0:54:22.040
<v Speaker 4>of stocks down, you know, fifty seventy eighty ninety ninety

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:26.360
<v Speaker 4>five percent. And that's what happens when you get that

0:54:26.440 --> 0:54:34.800
<v Speaker 4>kind of unregulated speculation. I think today we are back speculating.

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:38.719
<v Speaker 4>We're speculating in an era that in an area that

0:54:38.800 --> 0:54:42.600
<v Speaker 4>feels more legitimate. It's hard to say exactly what's going

0:54:42.640 --> 0:54:48.600
<v Speaker 4>to happen with the continued development of AI, with the

0:54:48.640 --> 0:54:53.400
<v Speaker 4>possibility of AGI coming and what that will mean. We

0:54:53.480 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 4>don't know whether it's going to lead to massive unemployment,

0:54:56.520 --> 0:54:59.799
<v Speaker 4>when it's going to lead to incredible prosperity, or whether

0:54:59.800 --> 0:55:02.440
<v Speaker 4>it's going to create even more dispersion in the economy

0:55:02.480 --> 0:55:04.799
<v Speaker 4>between the people are doing well and the people are

0:55:04.840 --> 0:55:08.680
<v Speaker 4>not doing well the case shaped economy, and that's a

0:55:08.719 --> 0:55:11.640
<v Speaker 4>real source of concern. So there's always going to be

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:15.000
<v Speaker 4>that kind of uncertainty. I think what we should agree

0:55:15.160 --> 0:55:17.960
<v Speaker 4>is that there's going to be a path that nobody

0:55:18.000 --> 0:55:21.360
<v Speaker 4>today in twenty twenty six could say with any precision

0:55:21.680 --> 0:55:23.440
<v Speaker 4>what things are going to look like in two or

0:55:23.520 --> 0:55:26.600
<v Speaker 4>four or ten years. And the dilemma with that is

0:55:26.800 --> 0:55:29.799
<v Speaker 4>people are paying very high prices, so the future is

0:55:29.840 --> 0:55:33.680
<v Speaker 4>extremely predictable and clear when obviously, given what's going on,

0:55:33.840 --> 0:55:35.040
<v Speaker 4>it is anything but that.

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:38.839
<v Speaker 2>So you're a big Boston guy, and you mentioned you

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:42.080
<v Speaker 2>were a big fan of the sports pages and all

0:55:42.120 --> 0:55:46.000
<v Speaker 2>the statistics. What do you think of what's going on

0:55:46.160 --> 0:55:50.759
<v Speaker 2>in sports these days? The Celtics didn't go as far

0:55:50.840 --> 0:55:54.120
<v Speaker 2>as some people thought. We're now Knicks are up to

0:55:54.120 --> 0:55:57.280
<v Speaker 2>one in the finals. How are you looking at basketball?

0:55:57.280 --> 0:55:58.840
<v Speaker 2>What do you like in sports these days?

0:56:00.560 --> 0:56:05.560
<v Speaker 4>So, my two biggest sports passions are baseball and I'm

0:56:05.600 --> 0:56:08.600
<v Speaker 4>a small owner in the Red Sox and horse racing,

0:56:08.800 --> 0:56:11.920
<v Speaker 4>and I've been fortunate to have some really high quality

0:56:12.280 --> 0:56:16.520
<v Speaker 4>thoroughbreds over the years, and we want a few races

0:56:16.920 --> 0:56:19.520
<v Speaker 4>Belmont Steakes weekend, not the Belmont, but a few other

0:56:19.840 --> 0:56:23.160
<v Speaker 4>stakes races this past weekend. So those are my favorite sports.

0:56:23.440 --> 0:56:27.000
<v Speaker 4>I thought the Celtics season was disappointing. They played so

0:56:27.200 --> 0:56:30.320
<v Speaker 4>well the first three quarters of the season, and sadly,

0:56:30.400 --> 0:56:33.759
<v Speaker 4>when their superstar Jason Tatum came back, I think it

0:56:33.880 --> 0:56:36.520
<v Speaker 4>got them out of their game where they were introducing

0:56:36.600 --> 0:56:39.200
<v Speaker 4>younger players into the mix, they were passing the ball

0:56:39.239 --> 0:56:42.640
<v Speaker 4>a lot and really winning in an exciting way. So

0:56:42.719 --> 0:56:46.080
<v Speaker 4>maybe the chemistry just didn't go as well as they

0:56:46.080 --> 0:56:48.319
<v Speaker 4>had hoped, and then when Tatum got hurt right at

0:56:48.320 --> 0:56:50.439
<v Speaker 4>the end of the playoffs, we bowed out.

0:56:51.719 --> 0:56:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I think sports is great.

0:56:53.520 --> 0:56:57.600
<v Speaker 4>It's a place where Americans of Blue Americans and independent

0:56:57.640 --> 0:57:00.200
<v Speaker 4>Americans and Red Americans kind all root for the same

0:57:00.239 --> 0:57:03.080
<v Speaker 4>team and can be excited about a sport and could

0:57:03.080 --> 0:57:06.840
<v Speaker 4>do it in a way that's gracious and accept winning

0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:10.719
<v Speaker 4>but also except losing. Sports is a great equalizer and

0:57:10.800 --> 0:57:13.680
<v Speaker 4>a great unifier. So I love sports. It serves a

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:17.360
<v Speaker 4>lot of positive purposes in a society. It's a little

0:57:17.440 --> 0:57:21.439
<v Speaker 4>crazy because we're rooting for strangers we've never met who

0:57:21.480 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 4>represent our city, but it is a powerful way that

0:57:25.080 --> 0:57:26.680
<v Speaker 4>I think also can unite a city.

0:57:26.920 --> 0:57:30.320
<v Speaker 2>So baseball this year just seems to be so odd

0:57:30.400 --> 0:57:34.960
<v Speaker 2>that the Mets are having a hard time the Red Sox.

0:57:36.120 --> 0:57:37.960
<v Speaker 2>I don't have no idea what's going to happen with

0:57:38.000 --> 0:57:40.560
<v Speaker 2>them this year. What do you think about what's happening

0:57:40.560 --> 0:57:42.320
<v Speaker 2>in baseball in twenty twenty six.

0:57:43.720 --> 0:57:47.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think that it is partly as small numbers

0:57:47.840 --> 0:57:50.880
<v Speaker 4>that we've only played sixty or sixty five or seventy games,

0:57:51.200 --> 0:57:52.800
<v Speaker 4>so there's still a lot of season to go.

0:57:53.000 --> 0:57:54.600
<v Speaker 2>But that's a third of a season.

0:57:54.720 --> 0:57:58.160
<v Speaker 3>It's a third of a season. But statistics, you know, things.

0:57:57.920 --> 0:58:00.120
<v Speaker 2>Can mean reversional eventually cast.

0:58:01.800 --> 0:58:03.760
<v Speaker 4>In the same way that I mean, all of us

0:58:03.760 --> 0:58:06.480
<v Speaker 4>have to decide whether we believe on hot streaks or not. Right,

0:58:06.520 --> 0:58:09.520
<v Speaker 4>it looks like a thing, but in fact, is there

0:58:09.560 --> 0:58:13.400
<v Speaker 4>really a shooting streak or is it simply And and

0:58:14.040 --> 0:58:17.480
<v Speaker 4>to every good shooter, you you get a little overconfident,

0:58:17.560 --> 0:58:18.640
<v Speaker 4>start taking worse shots.

0:58:18.680 --> 0:58:20.720
<v Speaker 2>It's when you when you.

0:58:20.640 --> 0:58:24.320
<v Speaker 4>Take high percentage shots and you take them consistently. So

0:58:24.960 --> 0:58:29.840
<v Speaker 4>I think that that baseball will always surprise you. It's

0:58:29.880 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 4>a perplexing game that what you draw up on paper

0:58:32.920 --> 0:58:36.680
<v Speaker 4>doesn't happen. But it's also doesn't happen in the locker room.

0:58:36.800 --> 0:58:40.080
<v Speaker 4>That the players can't understand. I could hit last year

0:58:40.280 --> 0:58:42.600
<v Speaker 4>and now I can't hit. And part of it is

0:58:42.680 --> 0:58:46.800
<v Speaker 4>that the opponents adjust that if you're a rookie and

0:58:46.840 --> 0:58:48.600
<v Speaker 4>you know Roman Anthony and you come up and you

0:58:48.680 --> 0:58:52.800
<v Speaker 4>hit three hundred for two months, he's hurt. But the

0:58:52.880 --> 0:58:56.080
<v Speaker 4>pitching figures out your weak spots and they make you

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:58.600
<v Speaker 4>look bad. And then you were you adjust and you

0:58:58.640 --> 0:59:01.000
<v Speaker 4>make the pitchers look bad. So I think there's that

0:59:01.160 --> 0:59:07.720
<v Speaker 4>perpetual back and forth between defense adjusting and then offense adjusting,

0:59:08.240 --> 0:59:10.440
<v Speaker 4>and where it ends up determines who goes in the

0:59:10.440 --> 0:59:10.959
<v Speaker 4>Hall of Fame.

0:59:11.320 --> 0:59:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Huh really interesting. You very famously kept a low profile

0:59:17.320 --> 0:59:23.280
<v Speaker 2>in a business that has historically rewarded publicity. Was that

0:59:23.360 --> 0:59:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a conscious decision? Was that a strategic approach? And why

0:59:30.720 --> 0:59:35.720
<v Speaker 2>be a little more public these days?

0:59:36.880 --> 0:59:40.240
<v Speaker 4>So I'm probably a little bit more introvert than extrovert,

0:59:40.360 --> 0:59:43.640
<v Speaker 4>so I'm not looking to be on TV or in

0:59:43.680 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 4>the papers. I also think a lot of the work

0:59:46.320 --> 0:59:49.280
<v Speaker 4>we do is better off when everybody isn't looking to

0:59:49.400 --> 0:59:52.840
<v Speaker 4>copy our investments. That if you want to accumulate a stock,

0:59:53.240 --> 0:59:55.880
<v Speaker 4>you're better off. If everybody doesn't know that you're trying

0:59:55.920 --> 0:59:57.640
<v Speaker 4>to do that, you're going to get a better price,

0:59:58.040 --> 1:00:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Like in any business transaction that said, We've never been

1:00:02.080 --> 1:00:04.800
<v Speaker 4>We're not a recluse. You know, everybody knows where we are,

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:08.720
<v Speaker 4>Everybody knows members of our team. We're very very well

1:00:08.760 --> 1:00:11.680
<v Speaker 4>known on the street. You just don't see me on TV.

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:14.360
<v Speaker 4>Talking about it all the time. I don't know why

1:00:14.400 --> 1:00:16.160
<v Speaker 4>that's a bad thing. It feels to me like a

1:00:16.200 --> 1:00:16.640
<v Speaker 4>good thing.

1:00:17.560 --> 1:00:20.240
<v Speaker 2>And beyond investing, you and your wife have been very

1:00:20.280 --> 1:00:25.920
<v Speaker 2>active philanthropists the Clarman Cell Observatory. There's been just a

1:00:26.000 --> 1:00:29.720
<v Speaker 2>run of different things. How do you think about philanthropy,

1:00:29.760 --> 1:00:32.760
<v Speaker 2>how do you think about capital allocation? And how do

1:00:32.800 --> 1:00:35.480
<v Speaker 2>you make sure that the money that are going to

1:00:35.560 --> 1:00:38.000
<v Speaker 2>these causes is being well spent.

1:00:39.600 --> 1:00:42.160
<v Speaker 4>On our third date, my wife and I were taking

1:00:42.160 --> 1:00:45.240
<v Speaker 4>a walk on Cape Cod on the beach and she said,

1:00:46.520 --> 1:00:48.840
<v Speaker 4>and we're just getting to know each other obviously, third date,

1:00:49.360 --> 1:00:51.840
<v Speaker 4>she said, what do you hope for in your life?

1:00:52.000 --> 1:00:54.720
<v Speaker 4>I said, I hope that if I'm able to provide

1:00:54.760 --> 1:00:58.120
<v Speaker 4>for my family and there's still resources beyond that, I

1:00:58.120 --> 1:01:00.360
<v Speaker 4>want to get back. And that just comes from my

1:01:00.440 --> 1:01:03.480
<v Speaker 4>fundamental view. I guess it's how I was raised, that

1:01:04.040 --> 1:01:05.880
<v Speaker 4>some of us are going to be fortunate and be

1:01:05.960 --> 1:01:08.120
<v Speaker 4>in that position at a time when not everybody is.

1:01:08.760 --> 1:01:12.600
<v Speaker 4>And it's both it's both a privilege and a responsibility

1:01:12.640 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 4>to give backs. You can't take it with you, and

1:01:18.640 --> 1:01:21.800
<v Speaker 4>you probably don't want to. I mean, it's not a

1:01:21.840 --> 1:01:25.600
<v Speaker 4>good look to spend it all ostentatiously in your lifetime.

1:01:25.640 --> 1:01:26.600
<v Speaker 3>That's not my nature.

1:01:27.200 --> 1:01:30.080
<v Speaker 4>So I've always, i think, been working to make money

1:01:30.160 --> 1:01:32.840
<v Speaker 4>to give away, and it's what keeps me focused today

1:01:32.960 --> 1:01:36.040
<v Speaker 4>that I love investing as a puzzle, but I love

1:01:36.120 --> 1:01:39.280
<v Speaker 4>knowing that if we do it well, we serve our clients,

1:01:39.440 --> 1:01:40.840
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to have money that I'm going to be

1:01:40.880 --> 1:01:43.920
<v Speaker 4>able to add to what we give to charity. Charity

1:01:44.520 --> 1:01:49.440
<v Speaker 4>is a calling. It feels very very important to me personally.

1:01:49.920 --> 1:01:53.040
<v Speaker 4>I think this is a broken world. There are all

1:01:53.160 --> 1:02:02.160
<v Speaker 4>kinds of problems, from climate change to a poor education system,

1:02:03.240 --> 1:02:08.680
<v Speaker 4>to challenges to democracy that threaten America the way you

1:02:08.720 --> 1:02:10.840
<v Speaker 4>and I have known it our whole lives, and the

1:02:10.880 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 4>country that I want You probably want future generations to

1:02:14.640 --> 1:02:17.480
<v Speaker 4>grow up. And America has been amazing for me. I

1:02:17.520 --> 1:02:20.400
<v Speaker 4>have been such a beneficiary of growing up in this

1:02:20.440 --> 1:02:24.120
<v Speaker 4>country and having unprecedented opportunities that if I was in

1:02:24.160 --> 1:02:27.200
<v Speaker 4>another country I wouldn't have had. So I'm grateful for that.

1:02:27.280 --> 1:02:29.320
<v Speaker 4>I want to make sure everybody has the same chance,

1:02:29.640 --> 1:02:32.040
<v Speaker 4>but we also have to be realistic. The America dream

1:02:32.120 --> 1:02:34.480
<v Speaker 4>is broken for a lot of people. People are less

1:02:34.560 --> 1:02:37.840
<v Speaker 4>likely today to be able to say that their kids

1:02:37.880 --> 1:02:41.360
<v Speaker 4>and grandkids will be able to eclipse them, and I

1:02:41.360 --> 1:02:43.040
<v Speaker 4>think we need to restore that, and we have a

1:02:43.080 --> 1:02:44.120
<v Speaker 4>lot of hard work to do.

1:02:44.520 --> 1:02:44.640
<v Speaker 3>So.

1:02:44.680 --> 1:02:48.280
<v Speaker 4>Our philanthropy goes into many different areas, some as you said,

1:02:48.280 --> 1:02:51.760
<v Speaker 4>in science, some in terms of thinking about democracy and

1:02:52.160 --> 1:02:56.960
<v Speaker 4>making sure that the system holds, some in terms of healthcare,

1:02:57.720 --> 1:03:00.800
<v Speaker 4>some to the universities that we're going to. Me and

1:03:00.840 --> 1:03:05.200
<v Speaker 4>my wife. We spread it pretty well because we believe

1:03:05.280 --> 1:03:10.200
<v Speaker 4>that a lot of causes will come together to be

1:03:10.280 --> 1:03:13.080
<v Speaker 4>able to lift up people throughout the country. One of

1:03:13.080 --> 1:03:16.640
<v Speaker 4>the things we do is a music instrument fund because

1:03:16.720 --> 1:03:19.440
<v Speaker 4>our son is extremely musical and it reminded us that

1:03:19.800 --> 1:03:22.640
<v Speaker 4>every kid that is passionate about music should have a

1:03:22.720 --> 1:03:27.480
<v Speaker 4>chance to have an instrument. We also do capital gifts

1:03:27.880 --> 1:03:32.800
<v Speaker 4>in institutions throughout Massachusetts. In some of the harder hit

1:03:32.880 --> 1:03:38.000
<v Speaker 4>towns during COVID or just economically depressed areas, there's just

1:03:38.040 --> 1:03:40.440
<v Speaker 4>not a lot of money there, so kind of as

1:03:40.480 --> 1:03:44.480
<v Speaker 4>a value investor, I'm seeing an opportunity to refurbish the

1:03:44.520 --> 1:03:48.480
<v Speaker 4>civic center or this library in a small town in Massachusetts,

1:03:48.840 --> 1:03:52.200
<v Speaker 4>and it just feels great to know that the people

1:03:52.200 --> 1:03:54.680
<v Speaker 4>in Pittsfield will have as good a library as the

1:03:54.680 --> 1:03:57.360
<v Speaker 4>people in Boston really interesting.

1:03:57.520 --> 1:04:00.600
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's jump to our favorite questions ask all

1:04:00.640 --> 1:04:04.600
<v Speaker 2>our guests, starting with who were your mentors who helped

1:04:04.960 --> 1:04:05.960
<v Speaker 2>shape your career?

1:04:07.520 --> 1:04:07.640
<v Speaker 3>So?

1:04:08.280 --> 1:04:11.000
<v Speaker 4>I worked for Max Heine and Michael Price at Mutual

1:04:11.040 --> 1:04:14.360
<v Speaker 4>Shares right out of college, and that was an incredible

1:04:14.360 --> 1:04:18.360
<v Speaker 4>couple of years they and I stayed in close relationship

1:04:18.400 --> 1:04:20.440
<v Speaker 4>with them over the years. They've been great friends and

1:04:20.520 --> 1:04:23.640
<v Speaker 4>mentors to me. I think Warren Buffett, who I didn't

1:04:23.680 --> 1:04:27.040
<v Speaker 4>know until later in my career, but reading about Warren,

1:04:27.120 --> 1:04:30.440
<v Speaker 4>reading his annual reports and reading his old shareholder letters

1:04:30.880 --> 1:04:35.560
<v Speaker 4>was very inspiring and also reminded me of the idea

1:04:35.560 --> 1:04:38.520
<v Speaker 4>of quality companies, which was not something that Graham and

1:04:38.560 --> 1:04:41.320
<v Speaker 4>Dodd talked that much about, but was something that Warren

1:04:41.480 --> 1:04:44.840
<v Speaker 4>taught us all about. I think, so they were the

1:04:44.840 --> 1:04:47.000
<v Speaker 4>people I would list as mentors. And then I also

1:04:47.040 --> 1:04:50.440
<v Speaker 4>developed mentors who were kind of peers that I had

1:04:50.440 --> 1:04:53.200
<v Speaker 4>a tiny firm. I didn't get trained officially at any

1:04:53.240 --> 1:04:56.000
<v Speaker 4>big Wall Street firm, but I was able to form

1:04:56.040 --> 1:04:59.640
<v Speaker 4>friendships with people that ran other funds. And some of

1:04:59.680 --> 1:05:02.600
<v Speaker 4>those people probably you know all of them, but somebody

1:05:02.640 --> 1:05:05.840
<v Speaker 4>like Richard Perry or somebody like Frank Rosen's or somebody

1:05:05.920 --> 1:05:10.440
<v Speaker 4>like Paul Singer have all been mentors in various ways

1:05:10.480 --> 1:05:13.560
<v Speaker 4>over the years, in a way that you know, hopefully

1:05:13.600 --> 1:05:16.400
<v Speaker 4>I've provided something to them as well. But I think

1:05:16.760 --> 1:05:20.560
<v Speaker 4>finding kindred spirits out there makes all of us both

1:05:20.760 --> 1:05:23.760
<v Speaker 4>enriched by the experience but also wiser along the way.

1:05:24.240 --> 1:05:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Good, good answer. Let's talk about books. You mentioned you're

1:05:27.280 --> 1:05:29.160
<v Speaker 2>a big reader. What are you reading now? What are

1:05:29.200 --> 1:05:30.600
<v Speaker 2>some of your favorites.

1:05:32.080 --> 1:05:36.920
<v Speaker 4>So right now, I'm finishing Lloyd Blankfind's memoir. I'm also

1:05:36.960 --> 1:05:41.040
<v Speaker 4>reading Michael Poland's latest book about Consciousness, which is really interesting.

1:05:42.320 --> 1:05:47.080
<v Speaker 4>It's combined some things I'm intrigued by, including the idea

1:05:47.120 --> 1:05:50.480
<v Speaker 4>of what plants are up to. Plants turn out to

1:05:50.480 --> 1:05:53.040
<v Speaker 4>be a lot more conscious and a lot more aware

1:05:53.080 --> 1:05:56.080
<v Speaker 4>of their environment than you might think when you just

1:05:56.120 --> 1:05:58.919
<v Speaker 4>walk by them and think of it as lawn. There's

1:05:58.920 --> 1:06:02.360
<v Speaker 4>a lot more going on with plants. I love history.

1:06:03.160 --> 1:06:05.680
<v Speaker 4>My favorite is probably Battle Cry of Freedom about the

1:06:05.720 --> 1:06:10.960
<v Speaker 4>Civil War. I read a fair amount of everything. I

1:06:11.000 --> 1:06:15.360
<v Speaker 4>love The Red Queen and evolutionary biology. I'm a pretty

1:06:15.360 --> 1:06:19.760
<v Speaker 4>good reader of fiction as well, biography, memoir across the board.

1:06:20.920 --> 1:06:23.480
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned podcasts. What are you listening to or what

1:06:23.520 --> 1:06:25.560
<v Speaker 2>are you watching and streaming these days?

1:06:26.200 --> 1:06:28.680
<v Speaker 4>My favorite streaming I think this was this is maybe

1:06:28.720 --> 1:06:34.200
<v Speaker 4>a golden age of TV streaming. We loved pitt on

1:06:34.840 --> 1:06:38.960
<v Speaker 4>the Pittsburgh General Hospital Emergency Room and it's just a

1:06:39.000 --> 1:06:43.560
<v Speaker 4>remarkable series. Noah Wiley but also a great surrounding cast

1:06:44.240 --> 1:06:48.360
<v Speaker 4>is just off the charts. We also loved Shrinking.

1:06:48.880 --> 1:06:52.480
<v Speaker 2>Yep, that was a lot of fun. Final two questions,

1:06:52.640 --> 1:06:54.880
<v Speaker 2>what sort of advice would you give to a recent

1:06:54.920 --> 1:06:58.840
<v Speaker 2>college grad interested in a career in investing?

1:06:59.760 --> 1:07:02.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, first of all, go somewhere that you would want

1:07:02.800 --> 1:07:05.400
<v Speaker 4>your capital invested. If you wouldn't put your money there,

1:07:05.720 --> 1:07:08.200
<v Speaker 4>don't go there, and don't be afraid to go somewhere

1:07:08.240 --> 1:07:11.240
<v Speaker 4>out of favor. You know, if two years ago you

1:07:11.240 --> 1:07:13.680
<v Speaker 4>would ask me, I would have said, well, biotech is

1:07:13.680 --> 1:07:17.520
<v Speaker 4>on it, you know, is hitting lows every day as

1:07:17.600 --> 1:07:20.240
<v Speaker 4>though there's never going to be any new drugs discovered

1:07:20.320 --> 1:07:23.280
<v Speaker 4>or anything good happening in that sector. I would have said,

1:07:23.360 --> 1:07:25.600
<v Speaker 4>I'm not sure. I'm not an expert on that stuff,

1:07:25.800 --> 1:07:29.120
<v Speaker 4>but take a close look. Now it's on fire, a

1:07:29.120 --> 1:07:31.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of takeovers, a lot of people are doing really well.

1:07:32.120 --> 1:07:34.880
<v Speaker 4>I think that it pays to be a little contrarian

1:07:35.280 --> 1:07:38.120
<v Speaker 4>and go somewhere where they're going to be mentors to you,

1:07:38.360 --> 1:07:40.080
<v Speaker 4>where they're willing to be patient with you, where they're

1:07:40.120 --> 1:07:41.760
<v Speaker 4>not going to just expect you to make money the

1:07:41.800 --> 1:07:44.200
<v Speaker 4>first six months you're there. That's where you're going to

1:07:44.200 --> 1:07:45.960
<v Speaker 4>be able to build a career and learn a lot.

1:07:46.960 --> 1:07:50.080
<v Speaker 2>Final question, what do you know about the world of

1:07:50.200 --> 1:07:54.960
<v Speaker 2>markets risk investing today? Would have been useful to know

1:07:55.320 --> 1:07:58.720
<v Speaker 2>forty plus years ago when you were first getting started.

1:07:58.960 --> 1:08:01.440
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I've thought of that. It's a really good and

1:08:01.560 --> 1:08:05.280
<v Speaker 4>hard question. And what I think is I wish I

1:08:05.360 --> 1:08:10.240
<v Speaker 4>knew the importance of the economic engine that Silicon Valley

1:08:10.360 --> 1:08:14.040
<v Speaker 4>is that American creativity and ingenuity is. It's why I

1:08:14.080 --> 1:08:16.760
<v Speaker 4>worry so much about the bad things happening in our

1:08:16.760 --> 1:08:20.960
<v Speaker 4>country like that are threatening our democracy. The ability to

1:08:21.120 --> 1:08:25.080
<v Speaker 4>try and fail, the ability to innovate, the desire to innovate.

1:08:26.960 --> 1:08:31.439
<v Speaker 4>These startups unleash the passion of brilliant, hard working people

1:08:31.760 --> 1:08:34.519
<v Speaker 4>who want to cause their dream to happen, and that

1:08:35.840 --> 1:08:40.120
<v Speaker 4>is the driver of this economic engine that keeps not

1:08:40.160 --> 1:08:43.360
<v Speaker 4>only winning, but keeps outpacing everywhere else in the world.

1:08:43.800 --> 1:08:46.760
<v Speaker 4>Israel has maybe a mini version of that, but it

1:08:46.840 --> 1:08:49.200
<v Speaker 4>hardly exists in the rest of the world, certainly doesn't

1:08:49.200 --> 1:08:52.559
<v Speaker 4>exist in Europe much. And it's really sad because the

1:08:52.640 --> 1:08:57.280
<v Speaker 4>opportunity that is present for young Americans to help to

1:08:58.200 --> 1:09:01.960
<v Speaker 4>stream and to start something is just an amazing engine

1:09:02.080 --> 1:09:06.920
<v Speaker 4>for their lives, for their communities, for future philanthropy, for

1:09:07.080 --> 1:09:10.920
<v Speaker 4>tax receipts. It's across the board, and I wish I'd

1:09:11.000 --> 1:09:13.639
<v Speaker 4>understood it better. I would have owned some venture capital

1:09:13.680 --> 1:09:19.680
<v Speaker 4>in my foundation. I would have been recommending that institutional

1:09:19.720 --> 1:09:22.439
<v Speaker 4>portfolios diversify into at least a piece.

1:09:22.640 --> 1:09:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Now, venture capital is the.

1:09:23.920 --> 1:09:26.320
<v Speaker 4>Last thing a value person is going to say, it's

1:09:26.320 --> 1:09:29.240
<v Speaker 4>a bargain, you should go long. But I do think

1:09:29.360 --> 1:09:32.639
<v Speaker 4>that as a value investor, maybe too much paint by numbers.

1:09:33.040 --> 1:09:36.160
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't focused enough on the engine that is venture capital.

1:09:37.000 --> 1:09:40.639
<v Speaker 2>Fascinating. Seth, thank you for being so generous with your time.

1:09:41.240 --> 1:09:44.840
<v Speaker 2>We have been speaking with Seth Klarman. If you enjoy

1:09:44.920 --> 1:09:47.600
<v Speaker 2>this conversation, well, be sure and check out any of

1:09:47.680 --> 1:09:50.559
<v Speaker 2>the six hundred and fifty one we've done over the

1:09:50.600 --> 1:09:55.240
<v Speaker 2>previous twelve years. You can find those at Apple, iTunes, Spotify,

1:09:55.400 --> 1:10:00.760
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg YouTube, wherever you get your favorite podcasts. I would

1:10:00.800 --> 1:10:03.000
<v Speaker 2>be remiss if I didn't thank the correct team that

1:10:03.080 --> 1:10:07.120
<v Speaker 2>helps me put these conversations together each and every week.

1:10:07.600 --> 1:10:13.520
<v Speaker 2>Alexis Noriega is my video producer. Sean Russo is my researcher.

1:10:14.240 --> 1:10:18.920
<v Speaker 2>Anna Luke is my podcast producer. I'm Barry Rdults. You've

1:10:18.960 --> 1:10:22.719
<v Speaker 2>been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio