WEBVTT - Surveillance: JPM's Kelly Sees Rough Road Ahead

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Term Keene Jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg Let's

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>bring it. David Kelly Showery, JP Morgan, Asset Management, Chief

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Global Strategists. So, David, help us understand two things. Near

0:00:33.560 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>term outlook darkening, long term out look, medium turn out

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>look getting brighter. How do you navigate those two things

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. One of the advantages of being a

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>bear is you can always hybridate. I think a lot

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people would like to hibernate through the

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>next few months because it is going to be pretty rough. Um.

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's you can look at those case cans.

0:00:52.280 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 1>You know how this is going to play out. It's

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be difficult for the economy, it's gonna be

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>very difficult for people's lives, and I could we think

0:00:58.880 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>that growth in the US has to show down to

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>about three growth if that, over the next quarter or two.

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But beyond that, you know, the vaccine news is good news, um,

0:01:08.880 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>And we do if we're passed. I think the election,

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty in reality or whatever, you know, maybe going on

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>to Washington right now. Um, And I do think the

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:18.480
<v Speaker 1>vaccine is going to make a big difference, because the

0:01:18.520 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 1>difference between a you know, a vaccine that six effective

0:01:21.200 --> 0:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>and nine percent effective is is it's a big difference

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:26.040
<v Speaker 1>because a meaning revenge you would be able to squash

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>this thing. Um. So we do think the growth will

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>pick up a lot in the second half of the

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:33.559
<v Speaker 1>next year as people get back to normal and people

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>start doing all the things they haven't been able to

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:36.679
<v Speaker 1>do for a year and a half. So we do

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>see a certain today, but we do have to go

0:01:38.959 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 1>through a pretty rough time for the economy and for

0:01:40.720 --> 0:01:43.800
<v Speaker 1>society between now and then. David, David help us with

0:01:43.920 --> 0:01:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the application of when strategies shift and go bullish. We

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:50.840
<v Speaker 1>saw there some Golden Sex David, you may be familiar

0:01:50.880 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>with them as a small bank downtown. And also JP

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Morgan again shifting to a or more bullish tact as well.

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>How does your world change when it's team at JP

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>Morgan gets quote unquote more bullish? Likely, sa Bramo wits, well,

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.760
<v Speaker 1>we obviously we're trying to do the research ourselves. We're

0:02:09.800 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>trying not to be influenced by by other teams. But

0:02:12.360 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a there is a logic to this thing. I mean,

0:02:14.600 --> 0:02:17.919
<v Speaker 1>if you know stocks, you know even long term bonds

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:20.799
<v Speaker 1>are very long term investments. So you've got to look

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>past the next six months, and very often the best

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>way to make money in the long run is to

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 1>basically to fade whatever emotion is in the market at

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the time. So, yes, we've got this rising case content.

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>It's it's dreadful from from many perspectives, but you've just

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:36.600
<v Speaker 1>got to look beyond that. I think the other thing

0:02:36.639 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that that's very important for for world markets in general

0:02:40.160 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is with the new administration, I think you're gonna have

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:44.920
<v Speaker 1>more certainty on trade. I think that's one of the

0:02:44.919 --> 0:02:48.320
<v Speaker 1>reasons the dollar is going down um. But also a

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>folding dollar is advantageous for a lot of reasons. I

0:02:51.400 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>think it will help out emerging markets. I think it

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>will help US investors with UM with you foreign investments,

0:02:57.840 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it will, it should help SMP pipeund that, and then

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a divided government means you don't necessarily get an increase

0:03:03.440 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>in corporate taxes. To put all this together, there's plenty

0:03:06.400 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>of reasons to be optimistic once you can get past

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic. David, you said fade the emotion in markets,

0:03:12.800 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>A fascinating turn of phrase at a time when the

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>motion that we have seen, at least so far this

0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:21.240
<v Speaker 1>week until today has been borderline euphoric. So are you

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>fading the hope that they are having next year or

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.880
<v Speaker 1>do you think that we still have some pessimists and

0:03:26.919 --> 0:03:30.239
<v Speaker 1>baked into markets where they are now. I don't. I

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>don't mean that. I mean they fade the emotion that

0:03:32.160 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>that's bubbling up in society and will bubble up over

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the next week ahead. I you know, these case cants

0:03:37.160 --> 0:03:41.000
<v Speaker 1>are rising very very rapidly. So you know, if if

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 1>if it keeps on the same trajectory, within a week,

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>people are going to be talking about nothing but the

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the misery that COVID is inflicting upon us,

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and talking about shutdowns and lockdowns and businesses in trouble.

0:03:52.800 --> 0:03:55.760
<v Speaker 1>So the I'm not necessarily talking about the emotion of

0:03:55.760 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>the last week and sort of the weirdness after the election.

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about what's just ahead of us here. I

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.240
<v Speaker 1>think people should not overplay that. I think they should

0:04:03.240 --> 0:04:05.040
<v Speaker 1>recognize that there is light at the end of the tunnel,

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.600
<v Speaker 1>even though the tunnel itself right now is getting darker. Whatever.

0:04:08.680 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>It keeps coming back to the same question we've asked

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>repeatedly in the last couple of days about this how

0:04:12.760 --> 0:04:16.039
<v Speaker 1>much bad news is this market willing to ignore? Just

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>how much? Well? The problem? The problem is it's it's

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 1>we've got this, this market which is being supported by

0:04:23.160 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>these very easy central banks. Um, there is nowhere else

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to go. There's a lot of liquidity, and that's really

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:30.160
<v Speaker 1>what's supporting this market. I think the market can probably

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.640
<v Speaker 1>look through a fair amount of that. I mean, it's

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.240
<v Speaker 1>it's until there's something that's going to pull money away

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:40.279
<v Speaker 1>from upper income individuals and institutions that can that can

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.120
<v Speaker 1>put this money to work. There's money that needs to

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>go to work. Where is it going to go to work? Um?

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say that, you know, longer term, as uncertainty fades,

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>you want to really look at valuations more than momentum.

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.680
<v Speaker 1>So we've got a lot of momentum and megacap growth stocks.

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:56.760
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of been the continuing trade of But I

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>think as uncertainty diminishes, as you get back to more

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.760
<v Speaker 1>normal economy and particularly if you get a correction at

0:05:01.800 --> 0:05:04.800
<v Speaker 1>some stage, then people are going to focus more on valuations,

0:05:04.960 --> 0:05:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and valuations look a lot better in US value stocks

0:05:07.720 --> 0:05:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and in e M and developed country international stocks than

0:05:10.520 --> 0:05:12.359
<v Speaker 1>they do in the S and P five handed overall,

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and particularly in megacap growth stocks, Mega Camp growth. Right

0:05:17.120 --> 0:05:19.400
<v Speaker 1>now bit NaSTA film at David Grants to catch up

0:05:19.440 --> 0:05:21.960
<v Speaker 1>with you, David Kelly, that of JP Mulgan Asset Management,

0:05:21.960 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 1>thank you, And right now Albert co of Yale University

0:05:29.680 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>to say he is a professor of epidemiology barely describes

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.240
<v Speaker 1>his focus on the heart of the matter right now,

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.719
<v Speaker 1>which is transmission dynamics. He is world class in this

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're thrilled he could join us this morning. Dr Co,

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:48.039
<v Speaker 1>Are you smarter about the transmission dynamics of this virus

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:51.680
<v Speaker 1>than you were in April? So so, Tom, thank you

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.040
<v Speaker 1>very much for the invitation. And uh and with respect

0:05:55.080 --> 0:05:57.919
<v Speaker 1>with whether we're smarter, I'm not sure if that's the

0:05:57.960 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>best way to describe it. Were we learned more much

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.680
<v Speaker 1>more about how this virus transmits, who it transmits, and

0:06:05.720 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 1>where it transmits. I think what we're not necessarily smarter

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>is is learning the lessons and translating that that knowledge

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>of evidence to policy. Well, okay, in the policy, but

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 1>we have a policy void. Can we wait until January

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>or please call it from the urgency of policy right

0:06:24.760 --> 0:06:29.800
<v Speaker 1>now in the final days of the Trump administration. Yeah. So,

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>so Tom, we're at a critical moment right now. Uh,

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.760
<v Speaker 1>and we can't wait until the January for effective action.

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>We're on the ex meddential curve of growth of cases,

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:44.679
<v Speaker 1>not only in new places where the viruses has spread

0:06:44.839 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, but also old places. For example

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>here in the northeast of Connecticut, northeast of the country.

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.839
<v Speaker 1>We were hit hard in the early part of the epidemic,

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and now we're having a resurgence at this moment, I

0:06:59.440 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>felt that to find exponential for us if you can

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.200
<v Speaker 1>with the numbers that you're sink currently, and whether what

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you're saying is once you reach that kind of right

0:07:07.120 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>of change, the inevitably the only way to handle this

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>is to lock back down. Again, is that what you're implying.

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 1>So so I'll take the first part and what we

0:07:16.560 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>were doing in by expensional curve. So, this is a

0:07:19.400 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>virus that propagates by person or person in contact. So

0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:26.880
<v Speaker 1>if you have one person in it it um transmits

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:30.119
<v Speaker 1>to two people, those two people transmit to four people,

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:34.080
<v Speaker 1>those four people up to sixteen people. And that's that

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:37.800
<v Speaker 1>what we call the exponential curve. When there's that uncontrolled

0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>transmission and people are are we're undergoing doubling rates um

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the whether what the response to that is is actually

0:07:47.840 --> 0:07:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to do several things, and we know the evidence and

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we've learned this in the last ten months of this epidemic.

0:07:53.600 --> 0:07:56.640
<v Speaker 1>What is face matchs, you know, what we call barrier

0:07:56.720 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>reduction or barrier interventions to prevent people from from being

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>exposed to the virus. The other is to decrease the

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>social contact rate. Now that doesn't necessarily need lockdown, but

0:08:09.720 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>when the cats out of the bag or when we

0:08:12.120 --> 0:08:16.360
<v Speaker 1>have a wildfire, this extensional growth lockdown as we've seen

0:08:16.400 --> 0:08:19.320
<v Speaker 1>back in the early stages of the epidemic is a

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>is one, you know, one of the effective interventions dr CO.

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>When we talk about what types of interventions are necessary,

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we have to revisit how contagious the

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 1>disease is and the main methods of transmission. There are

0:08:32.920 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>some questions about whether it's effective to close bars and

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>restaurants at ten pm whether that actually does anything, whether

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:43.439
<v Speaker 1>the surface transmission mechanism is a substantial one or not.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 1>What do we know so far about the main modes

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:48.559
<v Speaker 1>of transmission other than people looking at each other for

0:08:48.640 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>more than fifteen minutes and speaking and singing at each other. Right,

0:08:52.160 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>so we know that person or person contact is essential

0:08:55.800 --> 0:08:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and it drives this uh, drives transmission. I think you

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>can break it down into three parts. One is the

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:06.040
<v Speaker 1>transmission through respiratory droplets. These are larger droplets that travel

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:10.680
<v Speaker 1>roughly six ft um uh and and really that type

0:09:10.720 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of transmissions fueled by close contact physical contact. The second

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.719
<v Speaker 1>is through what we call famites or person coughing or

0:09:19.720 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 1>sneezing onto our surface. Uh. And then the third is

0:09:22.880 --> 0:09:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the aerosols. Uh. These are smaller droplets that travel much further.

0:09:28.920 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 1>But but what we know now we don't actually have

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the exact figures, but the large majority of transmission is

0:09:34.640 --> 0:09:39.360
<v Speaker 1>actually fueled by the kind of close contact through through

0:09:39.400 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>respiratory droplets within six ft. And that's good news in

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>the sense that we know how to kind of we

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:48.200
<v Speaker 1>know how to address that. It's use of face masks

0:09:48.600 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 1>and to maintaining physical physical distance distancing in that scenario.

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Dr Coe solid Or Brazil is a thousand miles or

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:01.120
<v Speaker 1>so north of Rio. You've had a huge commitment there

0:10:01.200 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>to their medicine, their micro biology. I say this with

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:08.560
<v Speaker 1>great respect and nothing to demean the Brazilian government. Do

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you trust the statistics out of Brazil, out of South

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>America and out of Mexico. Yeah, so, I think you know.

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:22.240
<v Speaker 1>The key issue with surveillance and the numbers and getting

0:10:22.520 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>reliable numbers. And this is an issue here in the

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>United States is round powder round public testing. Being able

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to test people who are symptomatic with the disease and

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:36.240
<v Speaker 1>to test the vulnerable populations and those UH in those settings.

0:10:36.480 --> 0:10:38.760
<v Speaker 1>This is purely a challenge here in the United States,

0:10:38.920 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 1>even in our own vulnerable communities, but this is a

0:10:42.720 --> 0:10:47.079
<v Speaker 1>challenge throughout poorer countries and developing countries and even richer

0:10:47.080 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 1>countries among that group, such as such as Brazil. UH.

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Certainly there are two key issues. One is you know,

0:10:53.880 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>which is key, and is the government uh investment in

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the response. And we've seen the of the foiables and

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the problems that Brazil that had due to political concerns

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>in the last uh you know, last ten eight to

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:11.360
<v Speaker 1>ten months. Uh. The other is is that you know,

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.439
<v Speaker 1>there are places in Brazil which we're doing extensive testing,

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.400
<v Speaker 1>places like some polo in uh In, many of the

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>state's buildings, Auch City, or build Auch in the city

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.199
<v Speaker 1>that I work in Salvador. They're doing quite a bit

0:11:23.240 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>of testing. So numbers are going to change based on

0:11:27.080 --> 0:11:30.200
<v Speaker 1>where you are within a country. But the numbers, actually,

0:11:30.400 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>I think what's more important than the absolute number is

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the trends and where they're going through. Many of these

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.160
<v Speaker 1>places are either going up or they're staying the same.

0:11:40.080 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Don't to appreciate your time this morning, Thanks for being

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 1>with us, Come back soon. Why don't you don't to

0:11:43.520 --> 0:11:49.960
<v Speaker 1>wrap a cord that of university right, albeit a kur

0:11:50.080 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>joints us to Bernstein maybe Bernstein Co. Ahead of investment strategies.

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>Do we sort of laid out the present land here?

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>How do you write for March of two thousand twenty

0:11:59.240 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 1>one or investment out all through two thousand twenty one. Well,

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>we think about a continuation of the same forces that

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the market has been reckoning with this calendar year, which

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is of course the challenge of COVID, which is ongoing

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>and escalating. As you've been discussing. But the offsetting force

0:12:19.200 --> 0:12:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is the fiscal support and monetary support that's providing tremendous

0:12:23.720 --> 0:12:27.080
<v Speaker 1>momentum and liquidity to the market. And I think what

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 1>you've seen over the course of the last week is

0:12:30.040 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>really a recognition that so many people were waiting for

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:37.800
<v Speaker 1>event risk around the election and have re engaged with

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the market as there is more clarity around that policy.

0:12:41.440 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So I think we have to wrestle with those two forces, Peter.

0:12:45.480 --> 0:12:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people also thinking about whether

0:12:47.280 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>we would have some regime change on the policy side,

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:53.440
<v Speaker 1>away from a monthy policy regime towards a fiscal policy regime.

0:12:53.480 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>And understand we've had a mix of both, but I

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>do wonder for you WHI you're sitting right now what

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.000
<v Speaker 1>regime are we in at the moment on the policy

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>from We're in a regime that's been coordinated, and what

0:13:04.679 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>we saw in the first quarter was an incredible response,

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.360
<v Speaker 1>both in terms of speed and magnitude, and that is

0:13:11.400 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately what gave markets the comfort to start that steady

0:13:14.640 --> 0:13:17.760
<v Speaker 1>march upward and then over the summer. It's been frustrating

0:13:17.800 --> 0:13:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to not see that second round of fiscal stimulus be passed,

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 1>we really think the economy and ultimately the markets will

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.600
<v Speaker 1>be looking for direction around fiscal stimulus, a much smaller

0:13:28.640 --> 0:13:32.520
<v Speaker 1>stimulus package than what would have occurred under the consensus

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:36.120
<v Speaker 1>views going into the election of a blue wave. But nonetheless,

0:13:36.520 --> 0:13:39.319
<v Speaker 1>we do think you'll see in the numbers today that

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:42.720
<v Speaker 1>there's still a tremendous number of people looking for work

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 1>out of work that need help, and especially as COVID

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:51.520
<v Speaker 1>nineteen ramps up pretty relentlessly, we think that fiscal stimulus

0:13:51.559 --> 0:13:55.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to be critical. While the numbers are ugally

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and the prospect of they see

0:13:57.720 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>doing more as diminished considerably out of the aus compliments

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 1>as you've described, What are the capital aizication consequences of

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:06.959
<v Speaker 1>that for you right now as you look into your

0:14:06.960 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 1>rend Yeah, well, I'm coming to you here from Chicago, Illinois,

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.679
<v Speaker 1>where we're the one state in the Union right now

0:14:13.720 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't even allow indoor dining, to give you a

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>sense of the escalation and the potential for ongoing shutdowns

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and lockdowns. So we do see the vulnerability of the

0:14:23.440 --> 0:14:28.760
<v Speaker 1>economy to ongoing stress from lockdowns. That being said, we

0:14:28.880 --> 0:14:32.200
<v Speaker 1>are long term bullish, and in fact, we went into

0:14:32.280 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 1>September and the election, slightly overweight equities. That has been

0:14:36.440 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the right call, and we have trimmed that back of

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but ultimately maintaining that position because we

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:48.560
<v Speaker 1>see vaccine optimism and earnings recoveries that are substantial in

0:14:48.600 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and twenty one, so be able let's build

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.440
<v Speaker 1>on that. Is there an idea then that the virus

0:14:53.520 --> 0:14:56.080
<v Speaker 1>counts and all of the high frequency data that people

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>were pouring over earlier this year, but none of that

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>matters right now. If you've got a longer term you well,

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't think none of it matters. If you think

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.720
<v Speaker 1>about what happened in the spring, the market was really

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.920
<v Speaker 1>focused on a national healthcare crisis and the inability of

0:15:10.960 --> 0:15:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the system to manage the virus. And what we've learned

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 1>today and you've had a prior guests this morning actually

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:22.480
<v Speaker 1>addressing this is better treatment, ultimately lower fatality rates, and

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>more targeted economic impact from more localized shutdowns. And I

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 1>think that's what the market is effectively expecting. But again

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>we come back to the fact that we do think

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>fiscal stimulus is necessary in some form. The sooner the better,

0:15:38.560 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>but the odds of it happening this year are being

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>reduced as we speak. He always fought a lot of

0:15:44.040 --> 0:15:46.840
<v Speaker 1>math into this, and I love your phrase, the mathiness

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>of the phrase. The idiosyncretic drivers discussed that what's the

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>new idiosyncratic driver. Well, in our opinion, as active investment

0:15:57.920 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>managers for over fifty years, it burns. What it means

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>is that being an index investor or simply investing in

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.440
<v Speaker 1>sectors today is not enough. There are a lot of

0:16:07.600 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>underlying company fundamentals that you have to look at very specifically.

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>We know that we're in a year where growth has

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>led in an extraordinary way, but even within the growth

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.400
<v Speaker 1>style um there's growth at a reasonable price, and then

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>there's simply momentum growth. And the valuation differences are huge.

0:16:26.720 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 1>And you could say the same thing about value in

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>terms of cyclicals and financials versus energy. So you have

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:37.720
<v Speaker 1>to look at the company, it's balance sheet, it's management team. Ultimately,

0:16:37.760 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we're focused on buying enduring businesses and in the end

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we think that focus on stock selection will prevail. Well,

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.160
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about that and let's finish there. Just give

0:16:49.240 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 1>us an idea of how you do that. Early this week,

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>when the positive news around the vaccine came out the

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 1>likes of AMC get bits up aggressively. I want to

0:16:57.200 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>understand the difference between a company that just places the

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>catch up write on a bit of opium on a

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>Monday morning into Tuesday, and something more durable through the

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>recovery that you anticipate. Well, I leave that hard work

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to our research analysts and our portfolio managers, who are

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 1>responsible for ultimately kicking the tires with the management teams.

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:17.919
<v Speaker 1>But I can tell you that what our pms have

0:17:18.000 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>been doing over the last couple of weeks is picking

0:17:21.040 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit more in the cyclical space. But

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to give you an example, even within technology, for example,

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:31.200
<v Speaker 1>focused on semiconductors, an area that we think will continue

0:17:31.200 --> 0:17:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to benefit from the stay at home economy, but ultimately

0:17:34.280 --> 0:17:39.239
<v Speaker 1>support that reversal to going back to normal, picking up

0:17:39.240 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more in the transportation sector, as well

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:44.800
<v Speaker 1>as some of the most beaten down names in consumer

0:17:44.880 --> 0:17:49.040
<v Speaker 1>discretionary and travel and leisure. So uh, that is how

0:17:49.080 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we're thinking about positioning today. A bit of case. Thank

0:17:52.880 --> 0:17:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you always, great to catch up. Thank you very much.

0:17:54.800 --> 0:18:01.720
<v Speaker 1>If I b Bernstein there on this market. I have

0:18:01.760 --> 0:18:05.200
<v Speaker 1>anticipated this interview since I spoke to James Travitas a

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>number of days ago. General Mark Kimmitt is the rarest

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.959
<v Speaker 1>of rare, someone with a distinguished military career who's dovetailed

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 1>it was State Department experience. We're thrilled at General Mark

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Kimmitt could join us right now. General Kimmitt, the name

0:18:20.160 --> 0:18:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Bler right now is off the chart. We have a

0:18:22.640 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>general here, We've got a colonel there. We've got a

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>list of slot can out of Michigan with their Defense

0:18:28.720 --> 0:18:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Department experience and all of its name in this cacophony

0:18:32.600 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>comes down to one thing. How is the Pentagon doing?

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 1>What is your feeling of how the Pentagon is doing

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:44.360
<v Speaker 1>in this immediate turmoil. Look, I think the uniform services

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>are doing just fine. As Admiral Steverta said, you can

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:50.520
<v Speaker 1>be sure that Mark Milly has got the rudder in

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:54.360
<v Speaker 1>the boat, moving them straight, uh and in the right direction.

0:18:55.080 --> 0:18:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I am all concerned about what's going on in my

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>old policy shop in the Pentagon and the intel shop

0:19:01.560 --> 0:19:06.679
<v Speaker 1>and the Secretary Defense. Something doesn't click here. What is

0:19:06.720 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the price or the good or the negative of an

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>Afghanistan exit? Clearly the zeitgeist, as the President desires that

0:19:16.240 --> 0:19:19.399
<v Speaker 1>we hear a silence from the military. Give us the

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:24.800
<v Speaker 1>calculus if we were to exit Afghanistan. Well, on that

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>particular itch with Afghanistan, Zal Holizade is doing some great negotiations,

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.719
<v Speaker 1>but he's negotiated with the Taliban. The fact remains, as

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 1>we are coming to an agreement where the Taliban say

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 1>you leave, will take care of al Qaeda. We know

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not going to happen in the United States of

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:44.920
<v Speaker 1>saying if you take care of al Qaeda, will leave,

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's not going to happen. I mean, if there

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is an al Qaeda threat or any other isis thread

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 1>inside of Afghanistan, we will come back in. It may

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>be from the air, it maybe with like special operations units.

0:19:58.119 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>But the fact remains is we are not going to

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:04.320
<v Speaker 1>allow Afghanistan to remain and become again a safe haven

0:20:04.320 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>for terrorists. So this kabuki about pulling all the American

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:11.440
<v Speaker 1>troops out, We'll pull the ones that are sitting around

0:20:11.440 --> 0:20:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the base is not doing much. But the ones that

0:20:13.720 --> 0:20:15.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to have there to work with the Afghan

0:20:15.920 --> 0:20:20.240
<v Speaker 1>national security forces and in counter terrorist operations. I'm not

0:20:20.320 --> 0:20:25.480
<v Speaker 1>worried about that. Under the revolution that was Goldwater Nickels

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>really the last act of Senator Goldwater to create a

0:20:28.920 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>real structure and separation of our military. How confident are

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.280
<v Speaker 1>you that the military can operate over the next sixty

0:20:37.320 --> 0:20:42.040
<v Speaker 1>nine days. I'm not the slightest that worried about that.

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Goldwater Nichols was a result of the clown

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.800
<v Speaker 1>college that we called Grenada, where you had every service

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.399
<v Speaker 1>doing their own thing. Since then, since eighties six and

0:20:52.440 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Goldwater Nickels, it's a very smooth running military set up,

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>going from the President to the Secretary Defense down to

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the combatant commanders. Uh, that's not where I'm worried about

0:21:03.920 --> 0:21:06.920
<v Speaker 1>right now. It's from the combatant commanders through the Secretary

0:21:06.960 --> 0:21:10.239
<v Speaker 1>Defense and up where I have some concerns. All right,

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>can you elaborate, General on your concerns with the practical

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:17.879
<v Speaker 1>implications of some of the turnover. Maybe, well, I'm not

0:21:17.920 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>concerned about the practical implications. I'm concerned about the people.

0:21:22.320 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>I think. You take a look at the record of

0:21:24.680 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Tony Tayta, Doug McGregor, Ezra Cohen Watkins, Stephen Miller. I

0:21:30.680 --> 0:21:34.560
<v Speaker 1>don't know the Secretary Defense, but these are guys that

0:21:34.840 --> 0:21:38.439
<v Speaker 1>have a great military background, but it seems their greatest

0:21:38.520 --> 0:21:41.919
<v Speaker 1>qualification for joining the policy shop is that they appeared

0:21:41.920 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>on Fox News on a repeated basis, probably echoing back

0:21:45.200 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to President Trump what he wanted to hear. Does this

0:21:48.160 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 1>have I media implications or long term implications in terms

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:57.119
<v Speaker 1>of a greater politicist as its politicization of the entire

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:01.240
<v Speaker 1>military forces. That's not going to happen. I mean, Mark

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Milly and the team will resign before they have become

0:22:04.200 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>political bozos. What I am concerned is I have and

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:11.280
<v Speaker 1>this is purely speculative. I've got this sneaking suspicion that

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:15.960
<v Speaker 1>something's going on here in terms of why these people

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:17.920
<v Speaker 1>were brought in, and I think it's far more than

0:22:17.960 --> 0:22:21.359
<v Speaker 1>just Afghanistan. These are people with a deep loyalty to

0:22:21.440 --> 0:22:24.440
<v Speaker 1>a president, a president who has sixty days left in

0:22:24.600 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>unfinished business, and I'm just hoping that the Secretary of

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Defense is not going to give actions in orders to

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the military in the next sixty days that are going

0:22:34.240 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to haunt us for a while. You have a great

0:22:37.000 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 1>experience with Colonel McGregor. If you mentioned Fox TV, he

0:22:40.720 --> 0:22:43.560
<v Speaker 1>has of course been a contributor there as well. Can

0:22:43.600 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>you describe if Colonel McGregor enters the Pentagon is a citizen.

0:22:48.560 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>How he will relate to the Joint Jesus staff. Again,

0:22:54.920 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>what I'm concerned about with Doug is not relating to

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the staff as a and I mean there's a great

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:06.000
<v Speaker 1>respect for X military among the Joint staff. Uh, it's

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:09.080
<v Speaker 1>what is being planned and why he was brought in.

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Doug McGregor is brilliant, but he's got some very strong views.

0:23:14.000 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 1>I worked side by side with him over the years.

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:19.960
<v Speaker 1>I worked for him in one job. He is creative,

0:23:20.840 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 1>He thinks outside the box, and I just wonder what

0:23:24.359 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>he's thinking outside the box right now for the next

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>see General Kimmon, thank you so much for joining us

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:32.800
<v Speaker 1>today under sum drest. We're thrilled we could find the

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.119
<v Speaker 1>time to speak to market Kimmon. Thanks for listening to

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast. Subscribe and listen to interviews on

0:23:40.760 --> 0:23:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Tom Keane before the podcast. You can

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.160
<v Speaker 1>always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio