WEBVTT - What Is A Quantum Computer?

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:10.119
<v Speaker 1>So you know how sometimes in physics there's a word,

0:00:10.440 --> 0:00:13.039
<v Speaker 1>and this word for people it's like magic. It means

0:00:13.080 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>like a big leap forward. It's like a huge transformation,

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:21.639
<v Speaker 1>you mean, like dimensions, dimension is the worst, absolutely, and

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:23.439
<v Speaker 1>stuff like that. And the one I'm thinking of in

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>particular is the word quantum. Quantum mechanics obviously a huge

0:00:27.240 --> 0:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>transformation the way we think about the world that it

0:00:29.560 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 1>also seems to be a transformation and everything like you

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.440
<v Speaker 1>can find like quantum massage, and you know, there's that

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>whole television show Quantum Leap, and like all this stuff

0:00:38.360 --> 0:00:40.879
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with quantum mechanics at all. It's

0:00:40.920 --> 0:00:43.919
<v Speaker 1>just the word quantum seems to represent some sort of

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>high tech, next generation high tech fanciness. You know, sometimes

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it really does represent a transformative leap. Sometimes there really

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>is an opportunity to convert a normal version of something

0:00:56.360 --> 0:00:59.560
<v Speaker 1>into the quantum version and then take a huge step forward.

0:00:59.840 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And so that's what we wanted to talk about today.

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:24.440
<v Speaker 1>After my quantum massage hold on him and I'm Daniel

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:27.520
<v Speaker 1>and this is our podcast. Daniel and Jorge explained the

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>universe in which we take the whole universe and chop

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>it up in the little pieces, turn each of them

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.959
<v Speaker 1>into a quantum of understanding and download it into your

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>brain and in which you feel like you understand and

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.679
<v Speaker 1>not understand at the same time. No, we're going for

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>a hundred understanding. We don't want to be one of

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:48.520
<v Speaker 1>those podcasts where you feel like, oh, I heard a

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of smart people talking about it, but I didn't

0:01:50.680 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>really get it right. Yeah. Yeah, because in this podcast

0:01:53.720 --> 0:01:58.400
<v Speaker 1>you only listen to one intelligent person, Joe and I

0:01:58.520 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>together making one intelligent person. We won't say which fraction

0:02:01.920 --> 0:02:04.360
<v Speaker 1>of each, but together we are one smart guy. We

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>are quantum entangled in our intelligence. That's right. That's right,

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 1>And this is just the latest in our projects together.

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>We also wrote a book called We Have No Idea,

0:02:14.160 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>A Guide the Unknown Universe, where we explore all the

0:02:16.760 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>big questions in the universe, what doesn't physics know yet

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.160
<v Speaker 1>and what could it mean for humanity? And if you

0:02:22.200 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>search online on YouTube, you can also find a couple

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 1>of the videos that we've made together about the Higgs boson,

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:31.720
<v Speaker 1>about dark matter, about gravitational waves. So check this out. Yeah,

0:02:32.040 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>so today we wanted to talk about quantum computers because

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>we feel like it's a word that's bandied around, and

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>we wanted to make sure everybody understood what it actually means.

0:02:44.520 --> 0:02:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Think about whether you know what a quantum computer is. So,

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>as usual, I went out and I asked ten random

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:52.720
<v Speaker 1>people on the u c I campus if they knew

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>what a quantum computer was and how it works. And remember,

0:02:55.400 --> 0:02:58.880
<v Speaker 1>some of these people are computer science undergraduates, so they

0:02:58.919 --> 0:03:02.720
<v Speaker 1>really should know. Here's what they had to say. Nope, nope,

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>you never heard of a quantum computer? All right, cool,

0:03:05.960 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I have no idea. Have you heard of the quantum computer?

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:11.119
<v Speaker 1>This is the first time that I'm hearing it right now.

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure about how does it work, but I

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 1>know that it has four men bits or alphabet and

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>it is said to revolutionalize the computer science. I don't

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.520
<v Speaker 1>know about a quantum computer, but you've heard of them. Um.

0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I've heard the term, but I don't know much else

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:33.440
<v Speaker 1>about it other than that. Alright, So not a not

0:03:33.480 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>an impressive performance here by uc I Underground. That's right. Well, hey,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>some of them understood it, right, at least most of

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>them have heard of it. The one guy like heard

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>about quantum computers. The moment I said the phrase, it

0:03:45.240 --> 0:03:48.760
<v Speaker 1>exploded in his brain. Like, what, I've never heard of

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>that until you mentioned it. I've never heard those two

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>words together. You've probably spend the next six hours googling

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>and reading about it. And maybe he's the next future

0:03:58.480 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>quantum computing genius. We have changed the course of human

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:03.960
<v Speaker 1>history through this podcast or oh my god, it's possible.

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>But most people seem to have very little understanding of

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.000
<v Speaker 1>what a quantum computer is. Um though, you know, somebody

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:12.320
<v Speaker 1>out there had had some idea at least, so we

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>feel like this is a good topic for a podcast.

0:04:15.280 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's clear out the weeds of everybody's understanding and make

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 1>sure everybody knows what we're talking about when we say

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:23.239
<v Speaker 1>quantum computer. I mean everyone has heard of a computer,

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>but a quantum computer. That just sounds interesting, Right, What

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:28.599
<v Speaker 1>do you what do you what did you think of

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the first time you heard quantum computer? Do you think

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.919
<v Speaker 1>like a tiny computer the size of an atom? What

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>did I think? I thought that it was? I think

0:04:35.360 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I just had that good reaction. Also, it's like a

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>like a super new magic computer, right, Like I want

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:46.760
<v Speaker 1>a quantum Ferrari. We just said for my quantum mortgage

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 1>to be paid first. I love how the word quantum

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>is just like taken on this magical mystical power, you know,

0:04:54.240 --> 0:04:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and it's not bad. There's like no nuance to quantum

0:04:57.279 --> 0:04:59.760
<v Speaker 1>that's bad. It's not like dark or dangerous. It's just

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:03.279
<v Speaker 1>like the new, fancy, glittery, shiny version of something. The

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.960
<v Speaker 1>weird thing is is that it's not a new word, right, Like,

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a word that's been around for a hundred years nearly, right, Well,

0:05:10.200 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>it's been around for a long time and it's been

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>applied to this kind of thing for about a hundred years. Yeah,

0:05:14.920 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics is almost a hundred years old. To the idea,

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>the very basic ideas of quantum mechanics, you know, that

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:24.559
<v Speaker 1>the universe is chopped into pieces and not continuous. That's

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>not a very new idea, right, Well, let's break it down.

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>What does it mean when you say the word quantum,

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>like quantum physics or quantum particles? You know, what does

0:05:37.000 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>it mean? Well, the word basically just means portion or

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>packet or unit, you know, it's like a quantity, like, yeah,

0:05:44.600 --> 0:05:47.600
<v Speaker 1>quant quantity, quantum is that where it comes from? Yeah,

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 1>it's connected. Why I think Jorge just had a realization

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and live right there on the podcast. Um, Yes, it's

0:05:54.400 --> 0:05:57.240
<v Speaker 1>related to quantities, right. It says things that are are

0:05:57.360 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>quantized are things that are made out of little atomic pieces,

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>things that can't be broken into smaller pieces. Right, So

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>like our money is quantized. We don't have money less

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:09.919
<v Speaker 1>than a penny, right, you can't spend less than a penny.

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:12.560
<v Speaker 1>That's the basic unit. Everything is built out of that.

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's relevant to physics because it turns out the

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:19.600
<v Speaker 1>universe is quantized, like particles are made out of smaller particles.

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>You can't have like half a particle or three quarter

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.240
<v Speaker 1>of a particle. And energy levels are quantized, you know,

0:06:25.320 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the way electrons move around in nucleus. They can't just

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>have like any arbitrary amount of energy, just like a

0:06:30.720 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 1>ladder of energy levels. They can be on and they

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 1>can't be in between those steps. But it kind of

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>means more than just the idea of chopping things up

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>into a little bit. It's really more about what the

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.119
<v Speaker 1>world is like when you get down to those little

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 1>little little bits. Quantum physics means the physics of those

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>little little little particles, which is very different than the

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:55.160
<v Speaker 1>physics of like, you know, a basketball or a baseball

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Quantum. That's what quantum means. It's a little

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>bit bits and quantum mechanics or quantum physics that deals

0:07:01.040 --> 0:07:03.640
<v Speaker 1>with how those things interact with each other. And it

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.279
<v Speaker 1>turns out that those little tiny bits of the universe

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>interact in ways that are very unfamiliar to us. There's

0:07:09.600 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>very little intuitive understanding we can grasp the way those

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.480
<v Speaker 1>things work because they follow very different rules than the

0:07:16.520 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>things than baseballs and basketballs follow. They follow more probabilistic rules,

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and and your intuition that you developed through observing the

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>way baseballs and basketballs moved through the air doesn't work

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about electrons or other little quantum particles

0:07:30.720 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>because they follow different rules. Yeah, and those different rules

0:07:34.200 --> 0:07:36.560
<v Speaker 1>lead to a very different kind of logic. You see,

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>in normal logic, you can say something like a switch

0:07:39.480 --> 0:07:42.680
<v Speaker 1>is either on or off, but not both, right, But

0:07:42.760 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in quantum logic it's different, which is why quantum computing

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>turns out to also be different. Yeah, they don't behave

0:07:49.640 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 1>like they do the big things behave, right, Like if

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you had a baseball the size of a quantum particle,

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>you can just bounce it off of a wall, That's right.

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.720
<v Speaker 1>And the most important feature of these little quantum bits,

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and the one that's gonna be relevant for quantum mechanics,

0:08:03.480 --> 0:08:07.120
<v Speaker 1>is that we don't know everything about them. Like a baseball,

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you know everything you need to know. You know it's

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>direction and you know it's velocity. From that, you can

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>predict its future. If you know where it is and

0:08:13.800 --> 0:08:16.240
<v Speaker 1>where it's going, you know where it's going to be. Right.

0:08:16.680 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>For a quantum particle, like an electron, you can't observe

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>it directly, and so there's some uncertainty about where it is,

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:25.760
<v Speaker 1>which means that it can be like here or it

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>can be there. But the crucial thing about a quantum

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>particle is it's not actually in one place or the other,

0:08:31.960 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and you just don't know it. It has a probability

0:08:35.080 --> 0:08:37.680
<v Speaker 1>to be in both places. Our lack of knowledge about

0:08:37.720 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>it reflects the fact that it's location is not actually determined.

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:44.719
<v Speaker 1>It's like it could be over here and it could

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>be over there, which means it's a little bit of both.

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's what I mean when I say the act

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in ways that are different from the ways that are

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 1>normal things interact. You know, a baseball is either here

0:08:54.280 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>or it's there, right, But when you get down to

0:08:56.320 --> 0:08:59.319
<v Speaker 1>that size, it doesn't look like like an electron doesn't

0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:02.520
<v Speaker 1>look like a little tiny baseball. Nobody knows what an

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.440
<v Speaker 1>electron looks like. Yeah, like when you try to zoom

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:08.400
<v Speaker 1>in and you zoom in, it just becomes fuzzy, right,

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:11.440
<v Speaker 1>like you see this little fuzziness right. Well, that's a

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.679
<v Speaker 1>whole other funny question, like what would an electron look like?

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Because an electron is has zero size, right, zero volume,

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.960
<v Speaker 1>and so it doesn't really look like anything. But about

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the electrons fuzziness, we say the electron has a probability

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to be in a few different places. That's the fuzziness.

0:09:27.920 --> 0:09:31.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's not determined before you ask. But when you

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 1>want to interact with the electron, like if you want

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.240
<v Speaker 1>to measure where it is, then those probabilities collapse into

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>a specific outcome. We call that collapsing the wave function

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>because remember electrons are particles, but they're controlled by wave equations,

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:50.439
<v Speaker 1>which determine the probability of being in various places, kind

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>of like if you're not looking at it, it's sort

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:54.360
<v Speaker 1>of like a cloud almost, and then when you look

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>at it, then boom, it's a little point. That's right,

0:09:56.920 --> 0:09:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And this is the deep question of quantum mechanics that

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:01.559
<v Speaker 1>that a lot of people do and understand. Most people

0:10:01.679 --> 0:10:04.959
<v Speaker 1>don't understand. I think maybe everybody doesn't understand. How does

0:10:05.000 --> 0:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that make any sense? Right? How does it make sense

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:10.160
<v Speaker 1>that something can be in both places at once until

0:10:10.200 --> 0:10:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you ask look at it? How does it make sense

0:10:12.320 --> 0:10:16.040
<v Speaker 1>that you asking changes where it's going to be? Right?

0:10:16.240 --> 0:10:18.920
<v Speaker 1>It's it's it's a situation, and that's all. There's a

0:10:19.000 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 1>huge philosophical debate about that. You know, is it the

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.120
<v Speaker 1>asking that makes a decide where it's it going to be?

0:10:24.400 --> 0:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>Or does the universe split into two options where you know,

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:28.719
<v Speaker 1>on one hand it's on the left and then the

0:10:29.120 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>other universe it's on the right. And different people argue

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 1>about this stuff for for decades and decades. So it's

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>certainly not something we can address in twenty minutes on

0:10:37.280 --> 0:10:39.280
<v Speaker 1>a podcast. But the thing you need to know to

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.560
<v Speaker 1>understand quantum mechanics is that there's a probability for it

0:10:42.600 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to be in one place or the other, and that

0:10:44.760 --> 0:10:48.400
<v Speaker 1>both probabilities exist simultaneously. So if I'm not if I'm

0:10:48.440 --> 0:10:50.120
<v Speaker 1>not looking at the electron, it looks like a little

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 1>fuzzy cloud and you're saying that cloud is it's it's

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of like it's in all those places at the

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>same time with a certain probability. Yeah, I think the

0:10:58.080 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>most correct statement would say it has a probability to

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:03.520
<v Speaker 1>be in all of those places. To say it actually

0:11:03.679 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is in all those places, I mean you don't. It's

0:11:06.080 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>not actually anywhere. It just has a probability to be

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.720
<v Speaker 1>those things. It's like the answer is not determined or known.

0:11:11.800 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>It's not like God has it written down on a

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:17.679
<v Speaker 1>golden tablet somewhere. We just don't know. It's not actually anywhere.

0:11:17.720 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>It just has a probability to be this or that.

0:11:19.840 --> 0:11:22.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like it's like a die you haven't ruled yet.

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>It's not like it already is a four and you

0:11:23.960 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 1>just haven't looked yet. You haven't rolled the die, so

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't There isn't an answer. The same way the

0:11:28.520 --> 0:11:32.400
<v Speaker 1>electron has a probability distribution to be in various situations,

0:11:32.600 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 1>but until you measure it, it's not in all of

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>those at the same time. It just has a probability

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to be in those things. Man, So you're saying all

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:43.880
<v Speaker 1>of us, all of our particles are if you get

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:49.199
<v Speaker 1>down to that level, they're all unthrown die, yes, exactly,

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>until you interact with them and forces the universe to

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>throw the die. And that's one of the deep questions

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.199
<v Speaker 1>about about econom mechanics, is like where's that die? Who's

0:11:57.240 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>doing those random number process you know? So when Einstein

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.319
<v Speaker 1>famously said God doesn't play dice, it's kind of true.

0:12:04.400 --> 0:12:07.920
<v Speaker 1>It's like, really, things are all just unthrown dice. Yeah,

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>he didn't like that description of it at all. He

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:13.560
<v Speaker 1>really believed that the dice was already thrown. We just

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>didn't know the answer, right, That's a big difference. That's

0:12:17.280 --> 0:12:20.319
<v Speaker 1>a big difference. And then eventually they proved that actually

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>the dice is not yet thrown until you ask the question.

0:12:24.080 --> 0:12:26.040
<v Speaker 1>And that's a whole other podcast. We can talk about

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.400
<v Speaker 1>how they proved that. It's called the bell inequality, and

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a whole other topic we can get into. But

0:12:31.760 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I think for today's episode, people just need to understand

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that a quantum particle can be different from a classical particle,

0:12:37.320 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>from like a thing you're you're understand because it can

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>be kind of a probability to be in two different

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:46.240
<v Speaker 1>situations at the same time. Okay, So that's that's what

0:12:46.400 --> 0:12:49.880
<v Speaker 1>quantum means. And now let's get into quantum computers. But

0:12:50.000 --> 0:13:04.960
<v Speaker 1>first let's take a break, all right. So that's what

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>quantum means. It's like the how the world behaves when

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you get down to those little tiny pits of the universe,

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>which is totally different and kind of fuzzy and probabilistic. Um.

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.360
<v Speaker 1>So now let's combined it with the word everyone knows,

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>which is a computer. So what does it mean to

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>like have a quantum computer. Yeah, so the idea there is,

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>let's build a computer. Let's build out of pieces that

0:13:25.880 --> 0:13:28.920
<v Speaker 1>can do these weird things, because then maybe you can

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:32.000
<v Speaker 1>solve problems that are otherwise hard. I mean, I think

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.880
<v Speaker 1>it's also important to think about how a normal computer works,

0:13:34.920 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and like what does it mean to say a computer

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 1>before we think about what is a quantum computer um?

0:13:39.960 --> 0:13:42.040
<v Speaker 1>And for those of you out there listening, you probably

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>know what a computer is. You have one in your

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 1>in your office or whatever. You're banging on it right

0:13:45.760 --> 0:13:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you download stuff and play Mario card or whatever. But

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:51.840
<v Speaker 1>what it's doing on the inside is really is that

0:13:51.880 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>it's doing calculations. Right, a program on your computer or

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.040
<v Speaker 1>something that does a calculation, Maybe that calculation is how

0:13:58.040 --> 0:14:00.600
<v Speaker 1>do I draw Mario card on the screen? Or you know,

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>how do I predict this the trajectory of this cannonball

0:14:03.920 --> 0:14:05.920
<v Speaker 1>that I want to fire at my opponent's castle or whatever.

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>In the end, it's doing a calculation. And the way

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it does that calculation is that it represents the problem

0:14:11.280 --> 0:14:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that needs to be solved in terms of a bunch

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of numbers, because all the computer really, in the end

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.200
<v Speaker 1>is doing is manipulating numbers. I mean the memory and

0:14:19.240 --> 0:14:22.040
<v Speaker 1>your computer is a bunch of ones and zeros. That's

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>what we call bits, and those represent a number. And

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.600
<v Speaker 1>a computer is useful when you can take a problem

0:14:27.640 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you want to solve and represent it in a way

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that the computer knows how to solve it right. Right, So,

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, how do I hit my baseball in a

0:14:35.680 --> 0:14:37.640
<v Speaker 1>way that goes over the fence? What angle is the

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:39.440
<v Speaker 1>best angle to do that? Right? Do? You want to

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.360
<v Speaker 1>solve that problem? But you first have to break it

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>down into math and then have your computer basically act

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 1>as a calculator and crunch those math equations. And the

0:14:49.200 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of math you use to break it down depends

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>on the kind of computer you have and the kind

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of calculations that computer can do. So the kind of

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.560
<v Speaker 1>computers we use, classical computers have ones in zeros, and

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:03.680
<v Speaker 1>all they can do are a few basic logical operations

0:15:03.680 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>on those ones and zeros they can do and they

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:08.960
<v Speaker 1>can do or they can do x or or nand

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and you can build those up to do all sorts

0:15:11.200 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 1>of more complicated things like addition or subtraction or Mario

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Kard and other video games. Right, And the way it

0:15:17.320 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>does that you're saying, is that it takes the problem,

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:24.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, whereas Mario and Mario card or how much

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>is tu plus two and then breaks it down into bits,

0:15:28.040 --> 0:15:30.760
<v Speaker 1>which is are which are ones and zeros. So everything that,

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>like most of our language, all the math that we

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>know about, all that can be essentially eventually breaking down

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>into ones and zeros. That's right, and we'll see later.

0:15:41.800 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>The quantum computers don't use ones and zeros, and they

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>have a different kind of logic, so they can solve

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of problems. And in the end, it's all

0:15:50.600 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>about efficiency. Which kind of computer is faster at which

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of problem running Mario cards or breaking into the

0:15:57.320 --> 0:15:59.400
<v Speaker 1>n s A does it take one second or does

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>it take a build in years? Well, let's talk a

0:16:01.480 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>bit about why you want to break it down into

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.400
<v Speaker 1>ones and zeros, right, Like, why is why is that important?

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Because once you break it down to ones and zeros,

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:11.680
<v Speaker 1>then even like a simple computer can then add and

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>subtract those, Right Like, if you can break the whole

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>world into ones and zeros and everything into simple operations

0:16:18.200 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 1>like plus or minus, then you can have a machine

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>basically do it. Yeah, you can do simple logic operations

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>on ones and zeros, and there's a theorem that shows

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that you can combine those to do any logical operation.

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 1>So if you combine enough of those together, you can

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:37.680
<v Speaker 1>have any operation on your inputs. That doesn't mean necessarily

0:16:37.720 --> 0:16:40.960
<v Speaker 1>the best way to do any problem. Like you might say, hey,

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I want to know where this baseball is going to go.

0:16:43.200 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>So one way to do that is build a computer,

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.400
<v Speaker 1>have inside the computer a perfect model of how the

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 1>baseball works, and do the calculation. Another way to do

0:16:51.520 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that is just hit the baseball. Right from that perspective,

0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>like a baseball is a computer that calculates one thing,

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:02.680
<v Speaker 1>how far does this base ball go? Right. It's very powerful,

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>it's very fast, but it only does that one thing.

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>The advantage of a classical computer with ones and zeros

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is that it can solve lots of different kinds of problems.

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:12.879
<v Speaker 1>They can do your baseball problem, and they can do

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Mario Kart right, Okay, So that's the basis of regular computers,

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Like even the computer and the phone that people are

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.879
<v Speaker 1>listening to this podcast on. It's taking our voices, breaking

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>them down to one and zeros, chopping those up, mixing

0:17:26.800 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 1>them up, and then basically recreating our voices and flappy bird. Right,

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 1>that's right exactly. And so what is a quantum computer. Well,

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.600
<v Speaker 1>a quantum computer is a computer built out of different

0:17:38.640 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>little pieces. Right. Whereas the normal computer uses ones and zeros,

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a quantum computer uses quantum mechanical objects that have different properties.

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:48.960
<v Speaker 1>They can be zero, they can be one, or they

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.840
<v Speaker 1>can be some combination of zero and one. The way

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.640
<v Speaker 1>a quantum particle is like, maybe it's here, maybe it's there.

0:17:55.920 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>A quantum bit, what we call a cube bit, is

0:17:59.119 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe zero, maybe one, has a probability be zero and

0:18:02.359 --> 0:18:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a probability to be one. And again it's not secretly

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 1>zero and secretly one. Like a dice you've already rolled

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and you just haven't looked at. It's not determined. It's

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:15.040
<v Speaker 1>some combination of zero and some combination of Wow. I see,

0:18:15.040 --> 0:18:18.160
<v Speaker 1>what if he had a computer that was fundamental little

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>processing unit is not just black and white, but maybe

0:18:21.600 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>like some something in between the shades of gray, shades

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>of great, Like what would happen if you add and

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:29.760
<v Speaker 1>mix those up and try to make calculations with things

0:18:29.800 --> 0:18:32.919
<v Speaker 1>that can be not just ones and zeros. Yeah, And

0:18:32.920 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>so what happens is you get a very different kind

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of computer, one that's much better at things that classical

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>computers find difficult, but also is worse at some things

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>that classical computers find very easy. Like what, Yeah, just

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.199
<v Speaker 1>the way, like a baseball is a good computer for

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:51.760
<v Speaker 1>calculating what a baseball does, it's not very good at

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:55.600
<v Speaker 1>organizing your recipes or doing Mario Kart, right. A quantum

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>computer is built differently, it's but it still runs in

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the physical universe, you know all the things. These computers

0:19:00.880 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>are just ways to manipulate physical objects to represent calculations

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that we want done. That's what a computer is, right,

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:10.359
<v Speaker 1>And sometimes the classical computer is really good at that.

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.600
<v Speaker 1>A quantum computer, because it's made out of different things,

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>is good at at different kind of calculations. It's like

0:19:16.359 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 1>do you want to build your house out of wood

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>or out of brick? Well, you know wood is good

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:22.399
<v Speaker 1>for some things and brick is good for other things.

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>You get a pretty different kind of house. Um, so

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.880
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty different, but you know they're related, but they

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:30.640
<v Speaker 1>have different strengths, and those strengths and weaknesses come from

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the essential differences in how those bits work. Okay, so

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.119
<v Speaker 1>let's get into some of these differences from where they

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>come from. So, like, what's happening now instead of when

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm mixing these cube bits that's what they're called, right,

0:19:42.240 --> 0:19:45.359
<v Speaker 1>the quantum bits, they're called cube bids. Yeah, Um, so

0:19:45.359 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>what's happened? What's happening when I mix them? Like if

0:19:47.440 --> 0:19:50.760
<v Speaker 1>I do a calculation with these fuzzy bits. Right, So

0:19:50.800 --> 0:19:52.639
<v Speaker 1>there's really two things you have to understand about how

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:56.840
<v Speaker 1>quantum calculations work. First of all, is that you when

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>you have two cube bits, they're not independent. It't Okay,

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you have two bits and a computer, then they can

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>have four different states zero zero, zero, one, one zero

0:20:07.119 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 1>or one one. Right, So two bits means two to

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the end different states. But you really just need two

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.399
<v Speaker 1>numbers to specify that, right, you need the first number

0:20:15.400 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>in the second number totally specifies the configuration. So it's

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 1>really just two bits means two pieces of information for

0:20:21.400 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>a classical computer. That's because those two bits are totally independent.

0:20:25.040 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>For a quantum computer, the cubits are not independent. They're entangled, okay,

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so they're connected to each other. And so you can

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>have different states. You can have zero zero, you can

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.560
<v Speaker 1>have one one. You can have some mixture of one

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:41.360
<v Speaker 1>zero and zero one. You can have other mixtures of zero, zero,

0:20:41.480 --> 0:20:46.320
<v Speaker 1>zero one. There's four combinations there, and what you get

0:20:46.320 --> 0:20:49.840
<v Speaker 1>are you need four piece of information to specify which

0:20:49.880 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 1>state you're in. You have simultaneously some probability to being

0:20:53.560 --> 0:20:56.879
<v Speaker 1>zero zero, some probability to being zero one, some probability

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 1>being one zero, and some probability being one one. So

0:21:00.280 --> 0:21:04.760
<v Speaker 1>two cubits means four pieces of information needed to store

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>the configuration. So two to the end pieces of information

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>from two cubits, right, Whereas in a classical computer, if

0:21:12.280 --> 0:21:14.959
<v Speaker 1>there are end bits, there are two to the end

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 1>different states, but you only need end pieces of information

0:21:18.480 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>to specify the state. So if there are two bits, right,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>then there are four different states that can be in,

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>but you only need two pieces of information to tell

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:31.240
<v Speaker 1>you exactly which state it's in, and a quantum computer

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>with two cubits you need to specify the probability of

0:21:34.640 --> 0:21:37.080
<v Speaker 1>each of the two to the end different states it

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:39.399
<v Speaker 1>can be in at the same time, which means you

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.919
<v Speaker 1>need four pieces of information to totally kneel down the

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.240
<v Speaker 1>state of a two cubit quantum computer, right, because you're

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 1>mixing two things that are that could be a wide

0:21:49.080 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>range of things, right, that's right, because you not just

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>have the things, you have the relationships between them. Right,

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.760
<v Speaker 1>So as the number of things grows you have like

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>thirty cubits, then you not just have is the state

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.159
<v Speaker 1>of this bit? You have the state what is the

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:05.320
<v Speaker 1>relative state of these two things? How closely connected are they?

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.720
<v Speaker 1>So if you have, for example, thirty cubits, you need

0:22:08.800 --> 0:22:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to to the thirty numbers to specify the state of

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.919
<v Speaker 1>that quantum system. And that that's very powerful because you

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.400
<v Speaker 1>know how many particles are there in the universe. There's

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>like two to the three hundred particles in the universe.

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>So a quantum computer that had three hundred cubits in it, right,

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>it has as much information as like all the numbers

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:38.439
<v Speaker 1>of the particles in the entire universe. Boomation. Wait, that

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:42.360
<v Speaker 1>just means that a simple operation in the quantum computer

0:22:42.640 --> 0:22:47.679
<v Speaker 1>can represent a much bigger, sort of richer result. Is

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.560
<v Speaker 1>that kind of what it means? Like, there's two different

0:22:50.680 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>there's two pieces to a computer. There's the information in it,

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>on the operations you can do right right now, we're

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>just talking about the information in it. But yes, a

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.840
<v Speaker 1>smaller quantum computer can represent much more information with a

0:23:01.880 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>smaller number of bits. I see. So like three hundred

0:23:04.760 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>regular bids from a regular computer can maybe store the

0:23:09.280 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>yes or no voting information from three hundred people, right, yeah,

0:23:13.480 --> 0:23:18.000
<v Speaker 1>whereas three hundred quantum bids can store the information from

0:23:18.080 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>basically the entire universe. Now, let's be careful not to

0:23:21.640 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 1>oversell it. It takes two to the three hundred numbers

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:28.360
<v Speaker 1>to specify the state of three d cubits, that's right,

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:32.280
<v Speaker 1>But that doesn't mean that a three hundred cubic computer

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>can usefully store two to the three hundred pieces of information, because,

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>as we will talk about later, cubits have a very

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.880
<v Speaker 1>rich internal state, but the information is not as accessible

0:23:43.920 --> 0:23:47.359
<v Speaker 1>as it is with classical bits. Okay, like with the

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>electron that has lots of different probabilities. You only measure

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:53.240
<v Speaker 1>it in one of them. So if all the particles

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.560
<v Speaker 1>in the universe got together to vote on something, you'd

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:58.680
<v Speaker 1>still need a pretty big computer. Who wants to exist

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>crazy he thinks Jorge should have another banana. Yes or no,

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that's just the state of the system. Right. Then there's

0:24:09.280 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>the operation, and there's a there's another sort of magical

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.879
<v Speaker 1>thing that happens. Oh, I shouldn't say magic, because none

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of it's magical. It seems like magic because it's so weird,

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's actually physics, right, um, And that's what

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:23.520
<v Speaker 1>happens when you do in operation. You know, in a

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>normal computer, your operations like math. I'm gonna add one

0:24:27.000 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and one and see what it happens when I get

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>to what happens when you do a quantum calculation. Remember

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>that the states can be in the superposition of different states, right,

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like in state zero and sixty percent in state one.

0:24:39.560 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>Like it can be white in seventy percent black. That's

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.320
<v Speaker 1>like one cuban right, right. And it's not that it

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>has the shade of gray which is white and black.

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:53.000
<v Speaker 1>It's has a probability to be white. And a probability

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:54.680
<v Speaker 1>to be black. If you look at it, you can

0:24:54.720 --> 0:24:57.359
<v Speaker 1>only see white or black. You'll never see gray. Oh

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 1>I see. But seventy of the time you'll see it

0:25:00.119 --> 0:25:03.720
<v Speaker 1>black and you'll see it as white exactly. Oh I see.

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:06.040
<v Speaker 1>So it's not gray, it's just as a probability of

0:25:06.080 --> 0:25:09.439
<v Speaker 1>being black or white. That's right. When you do an operation,

0:25:09.840 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 1>you don't it doesn't collapse to black or white and

0:25:12.080 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 1>then do the operation. It does the operations on the

0:25:15.160 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>probabilities themselves. Okay, so it have you have the thirty

0:25:20.119 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>percent of zero and thirty percent of one, or thirty

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>percent of white and black or whatever, and you do

0:25:26.119 --> 0:25:28.639
<v Speaker 1>the operation. It does the operation on the zero and

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>it does the operation on the one at the same time.

0:25:32.040 --> 0:25:35.439
<v Speaker 1>So it keeps both probabilities and it evolves them forward

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in time using quantum mechanics. So it's like doing two

0:25:38.600 --> 0:25:41.040
<v Speaker 1>operations at once. Is it kind of like as we

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:43.480
<v Speaker 1>were saying earlier, a quantum bid is kind of like

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:47.480
<v Speaker 1>an unthrown dice, right, So if you it's like, what

0:25:47.520 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>happens if I multiply this die that I haven't thrown

0:25:50.480 --> 0:25:53.040
<v Speaker 1>times this died that I also haven't thrown what's the

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 1>result exactly, And it needs to consider, well, you know

0:25:56.960 --> 0:25:58.959
<v Speaker 1>it might be too and so what would happen if

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>it were too okay? And what would happen if it

0:26:00.640 --> 0:26:02.200
<v Speaker 1>was four? And what would happen if it were six?

0:26:02.480 --> 0:26:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And it propagates all those forward simultaneously because the quantum

0:26:05.760 --> 0:26:10.040
<v Speaker 1>state reflects all those probabilities, and the quantum operation moves

0:26:10.119 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>all those operations, all those probabilities forward in time and

0:26:13.119 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>effect doing all of those in parallel. So you have

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>a massive amount of information density, plus you have massive

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>parallelism to do these conversations. It keeps all of those

0:26:24.040 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>possibilities inside of this new combination of information, like it's

0:26:29.359 --> 0:26:32.520
<v Speaker 1>like it has all the possibilities thwart into this little

0:26:32.560 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>imaginary multiplication. That's right. And then the new state is

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:38.880
<v Speaker 1>some different arrangement of those possibilities, right, but it reflects

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.639
<v Speaker 1>all the probabilities in the previous state. Now here's an

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>important place that a lot of people misunderstanding quantum computers.

0:26:45.560 --> 0:26:47.920
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people say, oh, quantum computers are super

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:51.000
<v Speaker 1>powerful because they're basically infinitely parallel. You can do like

0:26:51.040 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>a million calculations in parallel because of quantum mechanics. Meaning

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it keeps all these probabilities sort of in its head. Yeah,

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>and it sort of seems like magic, like you know,

0:27:01.560 --> 0:27:04.320
<v Speaker 1>I can try um, I can break passwords, because I

0:27:04.320 --> 0:27:07.200
<v Speaker 1>can try millions of things all at the same time. Well,

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>that's not exactly true. I mean there's some truth to it,

0:27:10.040 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 1>because there is parallelism in the quantum world because you're

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>keeping all these probabilities intact and you're operating on them,

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and you're moving them all fullward simultaneously. The problem is

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>when you get the answer. Okay, you want to say, okay,

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I have my quantum state, I did my calculation. Now

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I want the answer, right, how do you measure that?

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>When when you measure it, you're gonna get your black

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>or your white. You're gonna get your zero or one.

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>You don't get all the information. You don't get all

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 1>the probabilities. You just get one answer. You roll the dice,

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:39.919
<v Speaker 1>you get your four or you get your six, and

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 1>you look at it. You just get a number. You

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>just get a number. Yeah, And so a lot of

0:27:44.240 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>that information is lost, right, huge amounts of that information

0:27:47.160 --> 0:27:49.360
<v Speaker 1>is lost when you want to get the output from

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the quantum computer. And so that's why it's not really

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:55.399
<v Speaker 1>fair to say that it's like this huge massive parallelism.

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:57.840
<v Speaker 1>There is some parallelism there, and you can't exploit it

0:27:57.880 --> 0:28:00.479
<v Speaker 1>to do certain kinds of calculations, but in the end,

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:02.680
<v Speaker 1>most of the information is thrown away when you get

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the answer. I see, it's a much harder problem than

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.720
<v Speaker 1>you think. Kind of yeah, exactly, And so we've built

0:28:08.760 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>this new thing. It's a bunch of um, you know,

0:28:11.280 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>states that can be black or white, and they're all

0:28:13.280 --> 0:28:15.240
<v Speaker 1>entangled or whatever. And then you can ask, can I

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:19.480
<v Speaker 1>use this to do anything? Can I represents some calculation

0:28:19.560 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I have in a way that this physical thing I built,

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>this entangled combination of quantum states, can effectively solve my problem,

0:28:28.160 --> 0:28:31.120
<v Speaker 1>right the way classical computer can by representing in terms

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of math and zeros and ones or baseball, can solve

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that one single problem. Right, Can a quantum computer solve

0:28:38.240 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>useful problems? Um? That's the next question. I see. Well,

0:28:42.600 --> 0:28:45.000
<v Speaker 1>let's um, let's get into that. But let's take a

0:28:45.080 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>quick break. Okay, So let's say that I build a

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.120
<v Speaker 1>quantum computer, and you're saying it's not gonna be great

0:29:03.160 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>for playing Mario Kart unless you're playing quantum Mario card

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.960
<v Speaker 1>quantum Marit card is awesome, Yeah, because you're both like

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:12.640
<v Speaker 1>a dead and alive at the same time. Right, But

0:29:12.680 --> 0:29:15.120
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be useful for like, you know, playing flabby

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Bird on your phone or surfing Facebook. So what what

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:20.840
<v Speaker 1>would it be good of? What are people excited about

0:29:20.880 --> 0:29:23.360
<v Speaker 1>making quantum computers? Yeah, well, it took a while for

0:29:23.400 --> 0:29:25.440
<v Speaker 1>people to figure this out. You know, people thought about

0:29:25.480 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>the idea of quantum computers a few decades ago, like, okay, um,

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the world is built in a quantum way,

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>maybe our computer should be quantum. And then it took

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 1>a few decades for people to come up with ideas

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>for how to actually use them. Like, let me take

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a problem I have mapping into something that can be

0:29:41.440 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>represented with a quantum state, so that when I do

0:29:44.560 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 1>this experiment on it, do these operations on it, the

0:29:47.760 --> 0:29:50.760
<v Speaker 1>output of that experiment is basically answered to my question.

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Remember that's sort of what we're thinking of as it

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>as a computer, right, because you can't just pretend to

0:29:56.080 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>be making a quantum computer. You actually have to build

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:01.960
<v Speaker 1>it out of quantum things, things that are quantum, like

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:03.280
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Like I can I can't

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:05.840
<v Speaker 1>just like add all these probabilities in my on my

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:09.400
<v Speaker 1>regular computer, Like the computer itself has to be made

0:30:09.400 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>out of quantum things, right, Well, you know everything in

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe is made out of quantum things, right, so

0:30:13.920 --> 0:30:16.120
<v Speaker 1>in that sense, you are a quantum computer. Or hey,

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that's right, Yeah, I am stacular um. And so one

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.000
<v Speaker 1>of the first things that people figured out was that

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:28.840
<v Speaker 1>there's an algorithm you can write down for factorizing big

0:30:28.880 --> 0:30:32.360
<v Speaker 1>integers that says, take an integer and break it into

0:30:32.480 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>its factors. You know, like fifteen is five times three.

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>That's obvious, but what if you had a really big number.

0:30:38.200 --> 0:30:40.520
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to necessarily know how to break down you know,

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>one to four, seven, eight, ten into all of its factors.

0:30:44.240 --> 0:30:47.160
<v Speaker 1>It's a hard, hard thing. It takes a while to do.

0:30:47.200 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>You mean, like thirty can be five times six, where

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>it can be three times ten, right, yeah, Well you

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:54.920
<v Speaker 1>want to break it down to all of its fundamental factors,

0:30:54.920 --> 0:30:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and so thirty is two times three times five. Right,

0:30:57.920 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 1>there's one unique set of factors for every integer um

0:31:02.640 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's not easy to do, right for big numbers,

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>it could take a while because you basically just have

0:31:06.640 --> 0:31:09.040
<v Speaker 1>to check them. And this some slightly more clever algorithms

0:31:09.120 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>using normal computers. But normal computers it takes a long

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:13.920
<v Speaker 1>time for them to do this because they have to

0:31:13.960 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>cycle through all the different possible You mean, like if

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:20.880
<v Speaker 1>I told you, like million, three hundred four thousand, seven

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:23.200
<v Speaker 1>dred and ninety nine, tell me all the numbers that

0:31:23.240 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>can multiply into that number exactly, that would be a

0:31:25.440 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>hard problem. May be a hard problem for me, and

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.479
<v Speaker 1>uh a slow problem for a classical computer. But there

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.040
<v Speaker 1>was a guy who figured out how to write an

0:31:33.080 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>algorithm to use these quantum states how to represent that

0:31:35.720 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>problem on a quantum computer, right, so that you can

0:31:39.080 --> 0:31:42.960
<v Speaker 1>manipulate that computer and out out get the answer. And

0:31:43.000 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 1>the way he did it, the algorithm that he came

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 1>up with is much much faster on a quantum computer

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:50.960
<v Speaker 1>than on a normal computer, because in a sense, it's

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>using the parallelism. It's like, let me represent all this number,

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:56.640
<v Speaker 1>how to build this number in lots of different ways

0:31:56.960 --> 0:32:00.080
<v Speaker 1>and then push all those forwards simultaneously, right, And so

0:32:00.120 --> 0:32:02.360
<v Speaker 1>he came up with an algorithm to do this. And

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>this is a big deal because the fact that this

0:32:05.440 --> 0:32:08.560
<v Speaker 1>is really hard for normal computers is the basis of

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of modern cryptography, meaning like how passwords are encoded,

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.360
<v Speaker 1>that they use this idea of factoring large numbers. That's right.

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>If you can instantly factorize a large number, then you

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 1>can break a lot of modern cryptography. You can get

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:27.880
<v Speaker 1>into the Department of Defense and the I R. S

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and all that stuff, because all of those things, their cryptography,

0:32:31.440 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>their their protection, their their cyber protection, assumes that it

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>would take a long time to factorize a large number.

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Cryptography is based on the idea that let's find problems

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that are hard to solve but easy to check, right, Like,

0:32:44.800 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 1>if you give me a big number and you asked

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>me to find the factors, it might be take me

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a long time to find them, but once I had them,

0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>I could verify very quickly that they were correct. It

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.280
<v Speaker 1>just had to together, do I get the right answer,

0:32:55.400 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Like it's hard to get two times three times five

0:32:57.680 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 1>from thirty, but it's easy to verify that two times

0:33:00.080 --> 0:33:04.680
<v Speaker 1>street terms five is equal to yeah, exactly. And so

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>if you can find a faster way to do these things,

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>then you break this assumption that's in most modern cryptography.

0:33:10.480 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 1>Not all, but most modern cryptography is based on the

0:33:12.840 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 1>idea that these things are hard to find but easy

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:19.000
<v Speaker 1>to check. So quantum computers in theory can do this

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.280
<v Speaker 1>much much faster because of the way they're constructed. So again,

0:33:22.280 --> 0:33:25.680
<v Speaker 1>they're better at some problems, like specialized problems, not necessarily

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:27.680
<v Speaker 1>better at everything though, right, not that I would ever

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:29.520
<v Speaker 1>have any need to break into the I R S

0:33:29.600 --> 0:33:34.240
<v Speaker 1>or anything like that. Not it's clear in case there's

0:33:34.280 --> 0:33:42.640
<v Speaker 1>any auditors listening here. But so how far away are

0:33:42.680 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we from getting there? Like, what's the current state of

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:49.520
<v Speaker 1>the art in terms of making quantum computers. We have

0:33:49.600 --> 0:33:53.120
<v Speaker 1>quantum computers. People have built cubits, individual ones, and they

0:33:53.240 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 1>built sets of cubits together. Um, you know, they're up

0:33:56.560 --> 0:34:00.040
<v Speaker 1>to probably by the time this podcast comes out, of

0:34:00.040 --> 0:34:02.200
<v Speaker 1>the numbers will be irrelevant, but you know, they're ten

0:34:02.280 --> 0:34:05.800
<v Speaker 1>cubic computers out there, fifteen cubic computers. There are even

0:34:05.840 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>ones you can access online. IBM has one that's connected

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to the web, meaning you can talk to that. This

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:14.439
<v Speaker 1>quantum com computerly have you can ask it questions. Yeah,

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 1>but it's hard because you have to get these cubits

0:34:16.920 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 1>built and then you have to get them to be stable,

0:34:19.920 --> 0:34:22.880
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes these things fall apart. I mean, the basic

0:34:22.920 --> 0:34:25.759
<v Speaker 1>principle of a quantum computer works if it's in isolation,

0:34:26.080 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>but no computer is really in isolation. Interacts with the

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>environment and so it gets messed up. And so these

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>things are really finicky. There's not they're not easy to build,

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and so we're still getting good at building the bits.

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:39.279
<v Speaker 1>Like if you look at it will collapse into black

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 1>or white, so you have to really protect it from

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.439
<v Speaker 1>anyone looking at your quantum computer until you actually want

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the answer exactly. Yeah, So technically these things are really tricky,

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.040
<v Speaker 1>but you know, technical problems get solved, and when there's

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:52.439
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money, it's stakes a lot of people

0:34:52.480 --> 0:34:54.759
<v Speaker 1>work on them. And so I think quantum computers are

0:34:54.800 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 1>going to come pretty rapidly and get larger and larger

0:34:57.840 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>and more complicated. And so you know, we're at the

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>point where we have ten fifteen cubic computers. They don't

0:35:03.560 --> 0:35:06.520
<v Speaker 1>last for very long, so you can't do long complicated calculations,

0:35:06.680 --> 0:35:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're huge, right, Like they take up the space

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>of our room the way classical computers used to. You know,

0:35:11.120 --> 0:35:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you have a little picture a classical computer from nineteen

0:35:13.440 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 1>sixty It could like do less than your iPhone and

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:18.799
<v Speaker 1>it filled up a whole room. Right, Well, you might

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:22.360
<v Speaker 1>want to have a quantum computer in your phone, but

0:35:22.480 --> 0:35:25.000
<v Speaker 1>like maybe right in fifty years, Yeah, perhaps if you

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 1>needed to do that kind of stuff. Um, you know,

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:29.760
<v Speaker 1>if I if I pooh pooh the applications of quantum computers,

0:35:29.760 --> 0:35:31.440
<v Speaker 1>then I risk going down in history. Is like one

0:35:31.480 --> 0:35:34.520
<v Speaker 1>of those guys who said computers have a very specialized use.

0:35:34.600 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>You might sell five or six worldwide. Nobody can ever

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:40.200
<v Speaker 1>predict how these things are going to change the side

0:35:40.280 --> 0:35:42.319
<v Speaker 1>and how people will think to use them. Nobody wants

0:35:42.320 --> 0:35:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to be that guy. No one wants to be that guy, right,

0:35:45.840 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, I think the future holds a big promise

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:50.480
<v Speaker 1>for quantum computers, and I think they'll crack open new

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>kinds of problems that were hard before um. So far,

0:35:53.360 --> 0:35:55.800
<v Speaker 1>there's sort of limited set of problems and quantum computers

0:35:55.800 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>can solve. It's like it's as a new toy and

0:35:57.560 --> 0:35:59.520
<v Speaker 1>we're trying to figure out exactly how to use it

0:35:59.560 --> 0:36:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to definitely, you fun kind of thing. This is are

0:36:02.080 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>having fun putting together. But it's not like it's can

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>speed up every problem. Some people think, oh, quantum computers

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>make everything faster. That's not the case. So it's not

0:36:10.560 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna be like a quantum lead. It will be more

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>like a quantum skill. Are you saying it would be

0:36:15.440 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>more like a quantum massage whatever that means? Oh my gosh. Well,

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I hope you guys enjoyed this deep dive into quantum computers. Yeah.

0:36:25.920 --> 0:36:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And if you have questions about what we said and

0:36:27.440 --> 0:36:30.920
<v Speaker 1>you didn't understand it, please send us feedback to feedback

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 1>at Daniel and Jorge dot com. And if you have

0:36:33.400 --> 0:36:36.040
<v Speaker 1>another question you think we we would take a part

0:36:36.120 --> 0:36:37.880
<v Speaker 1>nicely you'd like to hear us talk about, send that

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to us as well. Or if you just want Daniel

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:43.480
<v Speaker 1>to give you a massage, just write at quantum Massage

0:36:43.719 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>at Daniel Jorge dot com. That's right, I'll give you

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:51.839
<v Speaker 1>one bit of a massage, one quantum bit. All right.

0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Thanks everyone for listening and tune in next time. See

0:36:54.480 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you next time. If you still have a question after

0:37:04.640 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>listening to all these explanations, please drop us a line.

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:09.920
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can find us

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:13.759
<v Speaker 1>at Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at Daniel and Jorge that's

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>one word, or email us at feedback at Daniel and

0:37:17.280 --> 0:37:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Jorge dot com.