WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - September 16, 2022

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:12.600
<v Speaker 1>global business, finance and tech news as it happened. S

0:00:12.600 --> 0:00:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messier and Bloomberg Quick Takes.

0:00:16.520 --> 0:00:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Hi, everyone, Welcome to the

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week. The big news in

0:00:24.200 --> 0:00:27.040
<v Speaker 1>financial market says week here in the United States, as

0:00:27.080 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's been for much of the year, inflation. The latest

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.160
<v Speaker 1>print released on Tuesday showed consumer prices once again coming

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.600
<v Speaker 1>in hotter than expected. Well, stocks tumbled following that report,

0:00:36.640 --> 0:00:40.280
<v Speaker 1>the most since we're likely to see another big interest

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>rate high two from the Federal Reserve this coming week.

0:00:43.080 --> 0:00:45.400
<v Speaker 1>So all of that Tim on investor's mind. Yeah, Well,

0:00:45.440 --> 0:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I've ahead We've got the perfect guest to help us

0:00:47.800 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>understand the data. Legendary investor David Rubinstein gives us tips

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>for tough times and a lesson or two from his

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 1>new book. He's seen a few cycles in any time. Yeah,

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.400
<v Speaker 1>he knows a thing or two about investing. Absolutely. Plus,

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>we've got a be in Beth's chief marketing officer on

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>how the Brewing Giant is staying connected with consumers amid

0:01:05.560 --> 0:01:08.440
<v Speaker 1>an uncertain market outlook. And our Business Week cover story

0:01:08.560 --> 0:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>on a Chinese spy and some not so encrypted evidence

0:01:11.800 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>on his phone. It's amazing story. First up this hour, though,

0:01:14.720 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>look at how surging borrowing costs are rippling through a

0:01:17.200 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>critical economics sector, the housing market, both here at home

0:01:21.360 --> 0:01:23.720
<v Speaker 1>and abroad. It was the subject of a Bloomberg Big

0:01:23.760 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Take from this past week. Major cities around the globe

0:01:26.640 --> 0:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>that had been seeing real estate boom are now facing

0:01:29.160 --> 0:01:32.000
<v Speaker 1>a painful reset. To find out just how grim the

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.960
<v Speaker 1>picture looks, Bloomberg Market Senior editor Mike Reagan and I

0:01:35.000 --> 0:01:37.840
<v Speaker 1>caught up with our San Francisco bureau chief, Carol Wetzel.

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>The markets that were really in focus on are the

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>ones that have been hugely bubbly black of the bettle

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:45.279
<v Speaker 1>word over the past few years of the pandemic boom.

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Australia, New Zealand, Canada, where investing in real

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:52.520
<v Speaker 1>estate just became a huge phenomenon. You know, you've seen

0:01:52.560 --> 0:01:56.280
<v Speaker 1>price gains of plus per year. Not apparently, those are

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the ones that suddenly are rapidly cooling because now that

0:02:00.040 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>we have this synchronized interest rates from central banks around

0:02:03.360 --> 0:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>the world. Borrowing costs are going up everywhere, and you

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>have this combination of now prices were at record levels

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>and borrowing costs are now just way out of people's reach,

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 1>so they're having the quickest come down now, you know, Kara,

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>when I read about potential double digit home price declines,

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I kind of have a nasty flashback to, uh, you

0:02:20.800 --> 0:02:24.000
<v Speaker 1>know about twelve thirteen years ago and the financial crisis.

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you covered that, right, and if you're like,

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:28.880
<v Speaker 1>get get chills up the spot a little bit. But

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering. I mean, there's so much has been done

0:02:31.480 --> 0:02:35.080
<v Speaker 1>in the US to safeguard the financial system, and we've

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>really moved away from those adjustable rate mortgages in the

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>US that we're part of the problem back then. But

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I get the impression the rest of the world is

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>still more exposed to adjustable rate mortgages than we are

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in the US. Is that true? And are there concerns

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:53.679
<v Speaker 1>out there about some sort of ripple effects from a

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:58.119
<v Speaker 1>drop in property values into the global financial system. Yes,

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that's absolutely true. So the US has vastly come away

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.880
<v Speaker 1>from addressable rate mortgages in the aftermath of the financial crisis.

0:03:04.960 --> 0:03:08.200
<v Speaker 1>It's it's been about um seven percent is average of

0:03:08.280 --> 0:03:09.959
<v Speaker 1>loans are in the past five years. And it makes

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:12.680
<v Speaker 1>sense because rates have been so low, why would you

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.480
<v Speaker 1>not just lock in those rates. But the US is

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>actually something I've just found and working on this story,

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is pretty unique in terms of having thirty year fixed

0:03:20.520 --> 0:03:24.639
<v Speaker 1>mortgages or even fixed here that a lot of these

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.280
<v Speaker 1>countries they are just the mortgage system works by they

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:30.120
<v Speaker 1>have mortgages that may reset every year depending on you know,

0:03:30.120 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>what central banks do, or they may even reset just

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 1>based monthly or just you know, just be directly tied.

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>So that is definitely sort of what some of the

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 1>concern is in some of these markets, like in New

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 1>Zealand for instance, more than fifty of mortgages are going

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>to reset to a higher rate UM by next June.

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.960
<v Speaker 1>So yes, so these are it's not just you know,

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 1>home buyers that are affected by the rising rates UM

0:03:53.480 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>as it largely is here in the U S. It's

0:03:54.920 --> 0:03:57.240
<v Speaker 1>also homeowners who now are going to be facing higher

0:03:57.280 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>monthly payments on loans in some cases if they bought

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, at very high levels. Probably we're already stretching

0:04:03.440 --> 0:04:05.440
<v Speaker 1>to make, you know, to pay for these things. And

0:04:05.480 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>so yes, ripple effects of consumer spending and other other

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:12.680
<v Speaker 1>types of things for these economies. So that's something you know,

0:04:12.720 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>again as a central banker's way, how much to race

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>rates and the effects on the broader economy. That's something

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I think those bankers have to keep in mind there, Kara,

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is there any silver lining here with with with this

0:04:25.040 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>sort of coming down from from these sky high prices?

0:04:27.800 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>And I asked this question fully realizing that we're in

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>an environment where interest rates are higher. So you know,

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:35.440
<v Speaker 1>even if houses become more quote unquote affordable, that monthly

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>payment could be even higher than it was for a

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>more expensive house because of interest rates. Yes it could.

0:04:42.680 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>But yes, this liver lining is that I think you know,

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 1>we've all been witnessed to this real estate frenzy. I

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>mean in the US as well, where you know, you're

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 1>bidding wars and you have to fight you know, fifteen

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>other offers to get at home and that's not healthy either,

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>and so slowing that down and that's um, you know,

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.000
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a problem, and it kind of puts us

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>back toward normalization. And yes, if home prices do come

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>down a bit, you know, if you're a homeowner, you're

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:09.760
<v Speaker 1>still sitting on a fair amount of equity. Prices have

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 1>gone so much it's hard to cry too many tears

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.719
<v Speaker 1>for like, oh, um, you know my house gained twenty

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:17.600
<v Speaker 1>percent a year, is now only up ten percent from

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:20.119
<v Speaker 1>that figure. You're still you know, you're still doing okay.

0:05:20.120 --> 0:05:22.719
<v Speaker 1>So maybe this provides an opportunity for you know, a

0:05:22.720 --> 0:05:25.320
<v Speaker 1>bit of a cool down in the market in the stabilization.

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm fascinating in the story Care that it says New

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Zealand was really the poster child of the pandemic housing boom.

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 1>What's going on there? Is it just a matter of

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 1>the lowest interest rates? We're people flocking to New Zealand

0:05:40.800 --> 0:05:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in the pandemic? Have you seen those pictures? The rest

0:05:43.600 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 1>of my life, I'm willing to flock there personally, it's

0:05:45.880 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>part of it. I think it's just becomes a cultural

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>thing that this is where people see they can build

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:55.320
<v Speaker 1>their wealth and um, it's it's a big investment play,

0:05:55.400 --> 0:05:57.279
<v Speaker 1>and like it's just the culture of you know, you

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.919
<v Speaker 1>need to be a homeowner, and so everybody, um flock

0:06:00.960 --> 0:06:02.479
<v Speaker 1>to it and it it kind of builds on itself. I

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.120
<v Speaker 1>think a similar thing happened in Canada. It's just um,

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, where people see the ability to build wealth

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>that you need to buy a house and and so

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that extreme and and again and yes, and then this

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.799
<v Speaker 1>colliding at a time of low rates. Obviously the pandemic

0:06:17.200 --> 0:06:19.400
<v Speaker 1>caused a lot of people to rethink how they're living

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>and they need a bigger house, to work from home,

0:06:22.720 --> 0:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and that type of thing. It was a bit of

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:26.839
<v Speaker 1>a you know, all these issues colliding. That was Bloomberg

0:06:26.839 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>News San Francisco Bureau Chief Carol Wetzel with Mike Reagan

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:32.239
<v Speaker 1>and me coming up the origin story of the world's

0:06:32.240 --> 0:06:35.159
<v Speaker 1>biggest video platform, how it came to be, its impact

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.640
<v Speaker 1>also on the concept of free speech on the internet.

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:41.120
<v Speaker 1>We are talking YouTube. Are in Mark Bergen details YouTube's

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.080
<v Speaker 1>rise to world domination and its plans to hold down

0:06:44.080 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the top spot in streaming for years to count. And

0:06:46.680 --> 0:06:48.520
<v Speaker 1>he's got a brand new book on it. You're listening

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg. It's not just

0:06:51.480 --> 0:07:05.680
<v Speaker 1>about cat videos, you know, it isn't. This is Bloomberg

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Stenovik from Bloomberg Radio YouTube. It's ubiquitous. We all check

0:07:14.880 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>it out regularly. Tim and I and our Bloomberg Business

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.080
<v Speaker 1>Week show We're on it every day. And a new

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.800
<v Speaker 1>book tells the inside story of YouTube and how it

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>up ended media, culture, industry and democracy. Bloomberg News technology

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>reporter Mark Bergen is out with a new book on

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the world's premier video platform. The book is called Like

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 1>Comments Subscribe, Inside YouTube's chaotic rise to world domination, and

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Mark says it's unparalleled success is about much more than

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>being at the right place at the right time. They

0:07:43.200 --> 0:07:46.679
<v Speaker 1>made some really important decisions early on, and as a startup,

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they only existed for about eighteen months before Google swept

0:07:49.160 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in and pay them for for cool one point six billion.

0:07:52.160 --> 0:07:54.720
<v Speaker 1>The basic feature set of YouTube is pretty much the

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>same as it was seventeen years ago. It is simple

0:07:57.160 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>as intuitive. The founders talked about building something that their

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:02.960
<v Speaker 1>mom could use, and they certainly succeeded. They were one

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>of the first digital video sites to building a feature

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>where they could embed in other websites and players, which

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:11.440
<v Speaker 1>was pretty revolutionary at the time. They also took some

0:08:11.600 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>risks that bigger companies including Google and Microsoft wouldn't take.

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Around copyright which ended up paying off for them that

0:08:18.560 --> 0:08:22.080
<v Speaker 1>got them into like big messy legal challenges. So I

0:08:22.120 --> 0:08:24.119
<v Speaker 1>think there was a lot of key decisions they made,

0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and then it was like this this moment where there

0:08:26.960 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>was just an explosion in interest and homemade video, and

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:33.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly video was just moving to the Internet. I think

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 1>what's what's so interesting about this is, you know, in

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the early days of YouTube, there was this reluctance coming

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:40.240
<v Speaker 1>from media companies to work with it. It was kind

0:08:40.240 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>of seen as like this disruptor that they were really

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.080
<v Speaker 1>scared of. And now what you have is you have

0:08:45.240 --> 0:08:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the large established media organizations using YouTube as a channel

0:08:48.800 --> 0:08:51.160
<v Speaker 1>for for distribution. Mark, can you talk a little bit

0:08:51.160 --> 0:08:53.560
<v Speaker 1>about how they sort of turned from enemies to I

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:56.000
<v Speaker 1>guess for enemies and now kind of like everybody needs

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:58.640
<v Speaker 1>to be on YouTube. It was a long battle. I mean,

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:02.080
<v Speaker 1>they're early These teams at YouTube were very focused on

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>getting traditional media to come onto the platform, and part

0:09:06.000 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>of that was a concern that this was the only

0:09:07.800 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>way they were going to have commercial success. That they

0:09:09.600 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 1>went out and they tried to cut deals with CBS

0:09:12.320 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and ABC and got pretty close with both of them,

0:09:14.760 --> 0:09:17.240
<v Speaker 1>like to run lost wast like the biggest show and

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest shows in America at the time

0:09:19.120 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube. A lot of those companies instead went and

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:25.840
<v Speaker 1>they formed Hulu or they eventually built their own streaming services.

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Disney is a good example, was reluctant to put its

0:09:29.080 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>prized I p onto YouTube. Still to this day, you're

0:09:32.040 --> 0:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>not going to find like they're they're going on Disney,

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:37.000
<v Speaker 1>plus they're going in movie theaters. To your point, audience

0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>was there sort of since day one, and it's been sustainable.

0:09:40.480 --> 0:09:43.679
<v Speaker 1>YouTube put in place rights management system that's basically if,

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>if you know, even if someone else uploads a piece

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:49.280
<v Speaker 1>of Disney content, Disney gets the money from the ad revenue,

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.679
<v Speaker 1>and that was a pretty key decision that they made,

0:09:51.720 --> 0:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and that helped persuade the record labels and traditional media

0:09:55.320 --> 0:09:58.400
<v Speaker 1>to come on. YouTube was at one point competing with

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:01.480
<v Speaker 1>them like they started a few years go, and originals

0:10:01.720 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>building and subscriber only shows. They've dropped that. They're like,

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>we're content to be the sort of video advertising platform

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>and let Disney, Netflix, Amazon battle it out for subscribers.

0:10:12.760 --> 0:10:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And you've seen media companies being more comfortable with them since.

0:10:15.520 --> 0:10:16.959
<v Speaker 1>But this is what's so weird. I remember a few

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 1>years ago when YouTube did this, I forget what it

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.360
<v Speaker 1>was called. It started off as YouTube Read, which is

0:10:21.440 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a very clumsy name. But Cobra Kai was was like

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:26.679
<v Speaker 1>one of the shows that they talked about a lot,

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and nobody watched it when it was on YouTube, but

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 1>then it went to another platform and now everybody talks

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>about it. You know, YouTube part of Google. They have

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>gobs of money, they're alphabet But at the same time,

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>like more recently we reported on this a lot for Bloomberg,

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:40.560
<v Speaker 1>like they have been cutting back on spending and I

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.280
<v Speaker 1>think the originals program that launched Cobra Kai was sometimes

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in tension with the other goals of the platform, which

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 1>is just scale will get a lot of people out

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of watch hours. You can make an argument that had

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>they invested more resources into original content, they could be

0:10:55.559 --> 0:10:58.560
<v Speaker 1>cranking out more of the cobra kais. Google as a

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.600
<v Speaker 1>company just doesn't do media programming, and they went out

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 1>with the original plan was we're going to not just

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 1>have Cobra Kai, but we're gonna have our biggest YouTube

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.280
<v Speaker 1>stars and these shows and then they're some of their

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>biggest YouTube stars went out and did like deeply irresponsible

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.640
<v Speaker 1>things that got them in trouble with advertisers and politicians,

0:11:15.679 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think that was a contributing factor to maybe

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe we can't take these risks. For years, YouTube had

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>been scolded for giving a platform to radical Islamists, and

0:11:25.240 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 1>I do think about the political side of this and

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the controversy, and this gets to what is YouTube Visit

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>a media company, you know, a media arm of Google.

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>But but talk to us about some of the controversy

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:40.600
<v Speaker 1>that has erupted over the years, especially as YouTube has become,

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, so ubiquitous. Yeah, it's at the Macaca moment

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>is what it was called. And it was a Senate

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:50.800
<v Speaker 1>race in Virginia. Yeah, candidate was said something deeply racist

0:11:50.960 --> 0:11:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on camera that spread. It was one of the early

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>first YouTube political viral hits, and it changed the race.

0:11:57.760 --> 0:11:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I think leaning in you know, I talked the book

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:01.520
<v Speaker 1>talks about the Arab Spring, which was a very different

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 1>time for social media companies when they were seen as

0:12:04.840 --> 0:12:08.319
<v Speaker 1>toppling dictators. Right. YouTube did at the time invest in

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 1>a partnership around verifying footage coming out of the Middle

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>East in the Arab world. For a variety of reasons

0:12:14.800 --> 0:12:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that the company's d n A their risk averse. They

0:12:17.960 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to get into legal trouble. They were more

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 1>hands off on taking editorial approach, especially on politics. And

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 1>then fast forward to the Trump era, they've been extremely

0:12:27.000 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>cautious this politics. It is effectively radioactive for YouTube. Um,

0:12:31.160 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 1>you know they they answer that Susan Wiski, the CEO IS,

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 1>has talked about is that news and politics is a

0:12:36.679 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>relatively small percentage of platform, which in some ways it

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is true. Right, you go look at YouTube, it is gaming,

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:46.120
<v Speaker 1>it is beauty, kids content, write music videos. You know,

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you've reported on this company, you know for a long time.

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:53.040
<v Speaker 1>What surprised your what came to light that you were like, wow,

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that I was Well, some of the

0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:59.200
<v Speaker 1>early success was actually, um, the YouTube their early success

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:01.200
<v Speaker 1>was based on myces, which is really funny now if

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>we think about my space is the tom That was

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>kind of surprising to me. Yeah, the you know, YouTube

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is they built the world's biggest kids entertainment platform and

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a multimillion billion dollar business now right, and they're

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>like huge conglomerate companies coming out of Hollywood that are

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 1>just around YouTube kids content. What surprised me was the

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:23.319
<v Speaker 1>extent to which the company had turned a blind eye

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of that and really didn't expect that to happen, and

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 1>for a long time didn't know how to deal with that.

0:13:28.120 --> 0:13:30.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think just in the past recent years, after

0:13:30.360 --> 0:13:33.320
<v Speaker 1>they've been regulated and and a lot of attention to

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>focus on that, they're finally turning to, Wow, we we

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>have some responsibility here with where we're raising the entire

0:13:38.760 --> 0:13:41.319
<v Speaker 1>generation of kids. Hey, Mark, what is the future of

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 1>of YouTube look like? What do we expect them to

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.480
<v Speaker 1>do to try to compete with TikTok, certainly leading in

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>on shorts, they have plans to I believe by the

0:13:49.720 --> 0:13:53.959
<v Speaker 1>end of the year turn on modernization and commercials for

0:13:54.120 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube shorts. And I think you know, you talked to

0:13:56.120 --> 0:13:59.600
<v Speaker 1>creators and they're really jazzed about TikTok. TikTok is a

0:13:59.640 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>is a play where they can break through to an audience.

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.599
<v Speaker 1>YouTube is very crowded. Now that being said almost consistently,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.760
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, I can I can have fun, that

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 1>can experiment on TikTok, I can preach a big audience.

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:12.400
<v Speaker 1>I really make money on YouTube. And so I think

0:14:12.440 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>once YouTube is able to turn on that flip that switch,

0:14:15.480 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>it's it's going to have a bigger competitive advantage against

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 1>TikTok and against Facebook, which has never really figured out

0:14:21.640 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 1>how to monetize Um creators in that way. YouTube is

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>also they're They're big focus is still like eating into

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the television market. We will see them increasingly try to

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 1>take more capture more time on on big screens. That

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.840
<v Speaker 1>was Bloomberg News technology reporter Mark Bergen. Pick up a

0:14:36.880 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>copy of his new book, Like Comments Subscribe Inside YouTube's

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:44.119
<v Speaker 1>chaotic rise to world domination still ahead on Bloomberg Business Week. Ethereum,

0:14:44.120 --> 0:14:47.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the world's most popular crypto networks and its makeover.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>A breakdown of the so called Ethereum merge and why

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:53.479
<v Speaker 1>it could shake up the crypto universe. This is Bloomberg

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Front nesting from the financial capital of the world Bloomberg

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>eleven Frio in New York to Washington, d C. Bloomberg

0:15:07.640 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>to Boston, Bloomberg one oh six one to San Francisco,

0:15:10.920 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg nine sixty to the country Sirius XM Chado one

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.400
<v Speaker 1>nine team and around the globe the Bloomberg Business app

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business Week.

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:25.600
<v Speaker 1>This week, the Ethereum network finalized a shift known as

0:15:25.640 --> 0:15:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the merge, adopting a new mechanism for creating tokens and

0:15:28.720 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 1>ordering transactions. The network runs Ether, the world's second most

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:36.480
<v Speaker 1>valuable digital currency. The merge drastically lowers Ethereum's energy use

0:15:36.520 --> 0:15:39.520
<v Speaker 1>and could silence the critics who doubt the sustainability of

0:15:39.560 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>blockchain technology due to its environmental impact. It will also

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>make Ether look more like a traditional financial asset that

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>pays interest, which could be more lucrative, at least for

0:15:49.480 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 1>some mainstream investors. In the finance section of the magazine

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.680
<v Speaker 1>this week, crypto reporter Ogakreif breaks down the overhaul, what

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 1>it means for crypto minors, and why the rest of

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 1>us should care. She spoke with Tim Mike Regan and

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business wee getitor Joe Weber before the merge took place.

0:16:06.040 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>This kind of a change has never been attempted in

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain world before, and what it does is essentially

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:19.040
<v Speaker 1>until now and for the next day or so, miners,

0:16:19.120 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>basically very powerful computers are the ones ordering transactions on

0:16:23.400 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 1>the Ethereum blockchain, and then after that there will be

0:16:26.760 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a switch to proof of stake essentially stakes of coins.

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Will be used to do the same to order transactions.

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>And of course what this means for miners is that

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they will be out of the job. And miners have

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:43.360
<v Speaker 1>been looking around to see which other changes they could

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>potentially move their equipment to or what other options they have.

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>And for Ethereum, what this will mean is that um

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>power consumption of the blockchain will drop by about which

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is really good news for invest stars and and developers

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>who have been deterred from participating in the theorym ecosystem

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>because of its high energy consumption. You know, companies and

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 1>investors who have s G requirements can now perhaps give

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:21.359
<v Speaker 1>ethereum a second look. But what I'm fascinated with is

0:17:21.400 --> 0:17:24.439
<v Speaker 1>the other innovation that this sort of unlocks, which is

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.679
<v Speaker 1>staking coins in return for your yield. You know, you

0:17:27.760 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>lock up your ether uh in a staking protocol and

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you get, say, I don't know, three or four or

0:17:33.240 --> 0:17:37.120
<v Speaker 1>five percent whatever the yield is. Obviously, that makes Ether

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>look a lot more like a security than just a

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:44.520
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrency like bitcoin. I wonder, how are you thinking about

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 1>the regulators? Is there the potential for a backlash? Absolutely,

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>this is an issue that a lot of people are

0:17:51.240 --> 0:17:57.560
<v Speaker 1>thinking about and worrying about. Because so about twenty eighteen,

0:17:58.080 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>high up executive at the SEC essentially said, you know,

0:18:03.040 --> 0:18:06.080
<v Speaker 1>ethereum does not look like a security to us, and

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:10.159
<v Speaker 1>so that was the assumption to everybody ever since. But

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>now Etherium is undergoing some very dramatic changes. Right now

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:18.119
<v Speaker 1>people are going to be essentially putting in money to

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:23.120
<v Speaker 1>earn yield. That brings ethereum just a little bit closer

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 1>to appearing to at least one point of about four

0:18:28.520 --> 0:18:32.720
<v Speaker 1>that regulators look at the determine if something is a

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.159
<v Speaker 1>security or not. There are also questions about does the

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>theem become more or less decentralized after this change, which

0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:44.320
<v Speaker 1>also impacts whether it will be defined as a security

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>or not. So there could be some moves from regulators

0:18:48.000 --> 0:18:51.200
<v Speaker 1>on this front, and in fact, in August, coin Base,

0:18:51.640 --> 0:18:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the US's biggest scripto exchange, did disclose that the SEC

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:02.160
<v Speaker 1>has asked for some information from it on it's taking services.

0:19:02.160 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 1>Someone out that things, okay, so this has never happened before,

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>it's going to happen. If it doesn't go, well, can

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 1>you just put it in reverse and back up and

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>like go back to the way it was before. Well,

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:16.879
<v Speaker 1>there are some people who are creating an alternative chain

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.560
<v Speaker 1>in hopes that the merge does not go well, and

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 1>then people will be like, wait a minute, we want

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the previous block chains. There are

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:31.640
<v Speaker 1>people who are creating a copy of Etherium that will

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>still use minors, but the majority of the Ethereum community

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>is going ahead with this new proof of state blockchain.

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>It's been tested and retested for years. Okay, and what

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:46.680
<v Speaker 1>does this all mean for bitcoin? And there's this thing

0:19:46.720 --> 0:19:51.200
<v Speaker 1>called the flippening right, so some people believe that this

0:19:51.440 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 1>puts Etherium more head to head in competition with Bitcoin, which,

0:19:56.160 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of course crypto fans have long cold digital gold. With

0:20:01.720 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Ethereum undergoing this transition, perhaps it's going to become more

0:20:06.840 --> 0:20:12.880
<v Speaker 1>more attractive for corporate treasuries and for hedge funds and

0:20:13.000 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>for other investors that have only invested in bitcoins. There

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:21.080
<v Speaker 1>is a potential for something that crypto fans called the flippenine,

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>which is basically the Etherium market cap exceeding bitcoins. Likely

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.359
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit of time before that occurs. This is

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:31.240
<v Speaker 1>a story that we're going to continue to follow really

0:20:31.280 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>closely in our big Thanks to Bloomberg News crypto reporter

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Olga Karif, Joe Weber and Mike Reagan. We'll be back

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a little later in the program. You're listening to Bloomberg

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Up next, Carlisle Group co founder David Rubinstein

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>breaks down his new book on stock trading, Tips from

0:20:44.560 --> 0:20:46.679
<v Speaker 1>the best in the business and what to make of

0:20:46.680 --> 0:20:49.320
<v Speaker 1>global markets right now. Good luck with that one. I mean,

0:20:49.480 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>he's got to talk to about this. Yeah, exactly, Stick around.

0:20:52.359 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. Well,

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:14.440
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, US docks posted their biggest drop in two

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>years after that latest CPI reports, surprise to the up

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 1>side the silver lining, though, maybe it is a good

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.600
<v Speaker 1>time for savvy investors to buy the dip. At least

0:21:23.640 --> 0:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>that's what David Rubens died told our Bloomberg TV colleagues

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:28.959
<v Speaker 1>the day after that massive sell off. His comments got

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:31.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of play online, because, well, after all, who

0:21:31.119 --> 0:21:33.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want investing tips from some of the best in

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>the biz. Luckily for us, he's back with more. The

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Carlisle Group co founder, he's well known to our audience.

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 1>He's the host of Bloomberg Wealth and the author of

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.440
<v Speaker 1>numerous books. His latest one is just out. It's called

0:21:44.480 --> 0:21:47.439
<v Speaker 1>How to Invest Masters on the Craft and Tim. We

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>spoke with David about a lot of things, including that

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 1>new book. We began though, with his thoughts on how

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to navigate a volatile market environment. Clearly the markets are

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.400
<v Speaker 1>not happy with the higher inflation numbers, and I think

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.800
<v Speaker 1>that's a big actor. When you have higher inflation, you

0:22:01.880 --> 0:22:04.960
<v Speaker 1>can expect higher interest rates, and the Fed is next

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.120
<v Speaker 1>week like the increase interest rates by seventy five basis points.

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 1>There's some who think it could be a hundred basis points,

0:22:10.520 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 1>but I doubt that that that that would happen. That

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>would probably really hurt the markets much more because that

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>would show the FT is much more nervous about inflation

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>than it has said it is, although it has said

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:23.680
<v Speaker 1>it's it's worried. But I think a hundred basis points

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 1>will be much more than their guidance has been. So

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:27.440
<v Speaker 1>if they were to do a hundred basis points and

0:22:27.480 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>market will really sell off. In my view, seventy five

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:32.320
<v Speaker 1>basis points and markets already assuming that's going to happen,

0:22:32.359 --> 0:22:35.199
<v Speaker 1>so probably not a big surprise of the markets. So

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I think markets are gonna be choppy for a while,

0:22:36.920 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>There's no doubt about it. Shoppy, but you still think

0:22:39.680 --> 0:22:42.280
<v Speaker 1>there are opportunities, especially when we see the equity side

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>of the markets. David sell Off that that is a

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:48.120
<v Speaker 1>time to enter you You stand by that the greatest

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.160
<v Speaker 1>more fortunes in the stock market are generally not made

0:22:51.160 --> 0:22:53.080
<v Speaker 1>when people see a top of the market and they say,

0:22:53.080 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>now I'm going to get in. Generally markets are down,

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and then what happens is people say, I think it

0:23:02.280 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>could go down further, and they try to look for

0:23:04.040 --> 0:23:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the bottom of the market. Anybody that's looking for the

0:23:06.560 --> 0:23:08.240
<v Speaker 1>top of the market or the bottom of the market

0:23:08.280 --> 0:23:11.320
<v Speaker 1>generally is on a fool's Errand so markets are shares

0:23:11.400 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>her off now what more than from the peak, and

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty good downside. It could go down a

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:18.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more, but I don't see another twenty percent down.

0:23:18.920 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the markets are pretty much near the bottom.

0:23:21.320 --> 0:23:23.600
<v Speaker 1>They might be five percent more to go, or maybe

0:23:23.600 --> 0:23:25.359
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more. But I think we know a

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>lot of what's going on in the markets now and

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:30.600
<v Speaker 1>not likely to see big changes now. The Ukraine Russia

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>situation has had some positive news, maybe that war could

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 1>be over sooner than we once thought. Now. Um, generally

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.600
<v Speaker 1>the inflation situation not under control, but the FED seems

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>to be on top of the situation, maybe more than

0:23:42.440 --> 0:23:44.879
<v Speaker 1>it was before. So I'm not expecting we're going to

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>see another decline in stock prices. But would you con

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.000
<v Speaker 1>see that it's safe to say that we really don't

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>know kind of how things go on the other side

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:56.680
<v Speaker 1>of it. Considering the pandemic that we're coming out of,

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>the amount of stimulus that was pumped in to the

0:23:59.440 --> 0:24:02.240
<v Speaker 1>globally economy, is it safe to say we don't quite

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>really know how this all plays out. Um. This is

0:24:04.720 --> 0:24:07.400
<v Speaker 1>what lawyers often call a case of first impression, which

0:24:07.400 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>is to say, we have something that's relatively unique in

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the sense that we haven't had five trillion dollars injected

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:16.120
<v Speaker 1>into an economy quite the way the federal government did,

0:24:16.160 --> 0:24:17.919
<v Speaker 1>and then know what the impact is going to be

0:24:17.920 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>an inflation in the markets a year or two later.

0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:22.719
<v Speaker 1>We did prevent it recession, but we also gave us

0:24:22.720 --> 0:24:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of inflation. Um. If you go back at

0:24:25.320 --> 0:24:28.680
<v Speaker 1>any time in market history, you'll always fullfind that there

0:24:28.600 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>are problems. There's never a case where people say, you know,

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.280
<v Speaker 1>everything is looking great and actually turns out to be great.

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:35.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, the challenges of getting people back to work,

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the challenges of avoiding another COVID type pandemic, the challenge

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:42.440
<v Speaker 1>of the U. S. China relationship, the challenge of the

0:24:42.480 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Russian situation, the energy situation, money challenges. But that's what

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 1>makes great investors great. They can see through the challenges

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>and get in when they going is good. Is there

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>any concern Do you have any concern that the FED

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>could overdo it? Well? Of course the FED didn't make

0:24:57.080 --> 0:24:59.679
<v Speaker 1>a mistake that it admitted it thought the inflation was

0:24:59.680 --> 0:25:02.520
<v Speaker 1>was going to transitory. Obviously was not j Pal who

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>used to work at my firm, and I've known him

0:25:04.240 --> 0:25:06.280
<v Speaker 1>for a long time, though I'm obviously not getting inside

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>information from him now. I think he's a very cautious person.

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>He likes to tell you what he's going to do,

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and they'd like to then do it. Um He's pretty

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.240
<v Speaker 1>much said, I'm gonna go the Fed's gonna FOMC is

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna go up by seventy five basis points. I think

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>if they were going to go a hundred basis points

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:23.360
<v Speaker 1>or more, I think they would have tipped the markets

0:25:23.359 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a bit. A hundred basis points or more now would

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 1>shock the markets, and I think it would be uh,

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:30.920
<v Speaker 1>something that would see a big sell off in stock.

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So I don't see that being tipped from the FED.

0:25:34.040 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 1>And obviously he doesn't control what the FMC does, but

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:39.160
<v Speaker 1>he has an enormous amount of influence. So I suspect

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 1>um will be something around seventy five basis points. The

0:25:41.840 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>real change is whether we will have another fifty basis

0:25:44.520 --> 0:25:46.240
<v Speaker 1>points increase the remainder of the year, which is what

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 1>the markets have assumed, or could it be the case

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:51.159
<v Speaker 1>that we get more than fifty basis points or the

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:53.000
<v Speaker 1>remainder of the year. And then, of course, right now

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the markets are generally assuming probably not any real increases

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>early next year, and who knows that could change? All right,

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the book How to invest Masters

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:04.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Craft Uh, And I do wonder, you know, David,

0:26:04.960 --> 0:26:08.359
<v Speaker 1>generally successful investors it's because of their differences they find

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.320
<v Speaker 1>opportunities where others do not. So at the same time,

0:26:11.359 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I wonder, is there's something that successful investors all have

0:26:14.040 --> 0:26:17.639
<v Speaker 1>in common. Yes, they have these things in common. They

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:21.320
<v Speaker 1>tend to come from blue collar and middle class families.

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:23.639
<v Speaker 1>They don't come from very wealthy families. They tend to

0:26:23.640 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 1>be pretty good students. These are not typically college dropouts

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>or high school dropouts. As a general rule of thumb,

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they tend to be pretty good in math. They tend

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to like to make decisions. They tend not like to delegate.

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 1>They tend to be people who will defy conventional wisdom.

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.040
<v Speaker 1>The conventional wisdom say now is not the time to

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:44.639
<v Speaker 1>to invest. That's when they invest. They also tend to

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:47.040
<v Speaker 1>be relatively humble because they've made a lot of mistakes

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>over the years. Every investor does. They also tend to

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>get rid of their mistakes pretty quickly. A really good

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>investor when they when he or she makes a mistake,

0:26:54.800 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>they don't labor over it for months and months and

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>months and still about it. They get out of the

0:26:58.760 --> 0:27:01.160
<v Speaker 1>position and they go into the next thing. They also

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:04.640
<v Speaker 1>tend to be i'd say relatively philanthropic. Clearly, if you're

0:27:04.760 --> 0:27:06.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're in the business world and you're an investor,

0:27:06.680 --> 0:27:09.639
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to be in the endowment world or nonprofit world,

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:11.640
<v Speaker 1>you tend to make a lot of money as investors,

0:27:11.640 --> 0:27:14.199
<v Speaker 1>and they tend to give away a large percentage of it. Generally,

0:27:14.240 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>these are people who are quite articulate, quite smart, and

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>quite hard working. We're hard work is not a problem

0:27:20.320 --> 0:27:22.760
<v Speaker 1>for them because what they do is what they love.

0:27:23.240 --> 0:27:26.199
<v Speaker 1>Investing is not for them work, It's it's pleasure. And

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:28.840
<v Speaker 1>once they've made whatever they need to make a billion dollars,

0:27:28.840 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>two billion, ten billions, twenty billion dollars, they don't stop working.

0:27:31.880 --> 0:27:34.399
<v Speaker 1>They work until they just can't do it anymore. They

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>don't tend to retire at fifty five or sixty. Some

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:38.080
<v Speaker 1>of the names on here, I mean this is a

0:27:38.119 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>who's who of the of the Wall Street world and

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:42.959
<v Speaker 1>also Silicon Value. When it comes to alternatives, I mean

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>we're talking people like Larry Fink, John Gray, Sam Zell

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:47.919
<v Speaker 1>are featured in here, rate Dahio. When it comes to

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:52.159
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds, we got John Poulson on hedge funds, Mark Injuries.

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>And when it comes to venture capital, I want to

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:56.439
<v Speaker 1>go back to what you said about mistakes though, What

0:27:56.520 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>are some prominent mistakes that you learned about when you

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>were doing reporting for this book. Well, of course, um,

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.000
<v Speaker 1>every investor has his or her stories of their mistakes,

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>and I wouldn't put myself in the great investor category,

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:13.480
<v Speaker 1>but I turned down Facebook when Mark Zuckerberg was in college. UM,

0:28:13.520 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I basically didn't. I told Jeff Bezos his company wasn't

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna get anywhere, and I sold his stock relatively early,

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:21.719
<v Speaker 1>right at the I P O. When Mark Andreeson came

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>to my firm to try to raise money at the

0:28:23.880 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>beginning for Netscape, I told him it would never get anywhere.

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 1>I think every investor UM makes mistakes, and that's what

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.080
<v Speaker 1>life is all about. I'm trying to think of the

0:28:33.200 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>average investor out there, David, and I'm wondering what lessons

0:28:36.240 --> 0:28:38.760
<v Speaker 1>they can take away from listening to the pros. The

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>most common mistake that investors make, the pros would say,

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think I'm talking about average investors. If the

0:28:46.000 --> 0:28:48.120
<v Speaker 1>book is not designed to make you into sam's Ow

0:28:48.280 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>or John Gray, that's unrealistic. On the book is going

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to do that, but it's designed for people who are

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:57.480
<v Speaker 1>average investors who dabble in the market, or they buy

0:28:57.600 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>funds and they have other people dabbling for them. And

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:02.360
<v Speaker 1>if back, I would say that the cost common mistake

0:29:02.440 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that people point out to me is that people when

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the markets are going up, they rush in and they

0:29:07.480 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>want to catch it at the top, and then when

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>the markets are going down, they want to sell. So

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you got to be very careful and I think know

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing. Also, one of the advantages of of

0:29:17.240 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of being a value investor in a long term investor's

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Warren Buffett is they tend not to sell a lot.

0:29:23.080 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And when you sell a lot or you buy a lot,

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of transaction costs and you have

0:29:26.880 --> 0:29:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to pay taxes, and that's an important thing. People should

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>hold on the things for quite a bit longer than

0:29:31.680 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>than they tend to. David. The people you spoke with,

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:38.040
<v Speaker 1>um again really interesting names. But can I just says

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of men. There's a lot of men. Well, um,

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:44.920
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of women too. I would say.

0:29:44.920 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Obviously it's easy to do a book like that and

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>fill up with old white men. I tried hard not

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to do that. Um. I have in there, for example,

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:55.959
<v Speaker 1>Kim lou who is the woman that runs the endownment

0:29:56.000 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 1>for Columbia University. Are really impressive investor. Also was in

0:30:00.240 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>there Paula Blin, who runs the endownment for Rockefeller University.

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>But I tried to show is that there are women

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>and minorities who are moving up into the pantheon of

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 1>great investors. But let's be honest, today there are more

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:14.720
<v Speaker 1>white male people who are considered great investors than women,

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:16.600
<v Speaker 1>rightly or wrong, and it may change in time. And

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>in part what I wanted to do is inspire people

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:22.120
<v Speaker 1>who are not white males to go into this business

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>and see that you can become Paula Balin or Kimlu.

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask David about crypto because you know,

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in the alternative section Mike nova Gradson, who's the name

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>very familiar to our audience, UM, but also somebody who

0:30:32.640 --> 0:30:35.479
<v Speaker 1>has you know, dabbled just in traditional finance trad FI

0:30:35.520 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>as it's known, and also in defy with when it

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>comes to crypto, your thoughts after interviewing him for this

0:30:40.360 --> 0:30:42.520
<v Speaker 1>book and about whether or not the crypto actually has

0:30:42.560 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 1>staying power because he did make a lot of money

0:30:44.480 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 1>and also recently lost a lot of money when it

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>comes to crypto. Yes, well, overall, he's ahead my own

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 1>view on crypto, and I don't own crypto currencies myself,

0:30:53.520 --> 0:30:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Like I have invested in companies that service the industry

0:30:56.480 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>because I think the industry is gonna be around for

0:30:58.040 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>quite a while. The people that buy crypto tend to

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>be younger people, and I think they like it in

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>part because they can trade it frequently, of course, but

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it has fluctuations which makes them think they're going to

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>make money and they're willing to take the risk about

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:14.080
<v Speaker 1>it going down. But also they the privacy associated with it.

0:31:14.240 --> 0:31:17.200
<v Speaker 1>You don't dependent on nobody else knows what you really own.

0:31:17.680 --> 0:31:19.600
<v Speaker 1>The government can't take it away from you. And I

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:21.680
<v Speaker 1>also think that people that are buying it to a

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:24.160
<v Speaker 1>large extent are they tend to be very libertarian in

0:31:24.200 --> 0:31:26.160
<v Speaker 1>many ways. They want to be countered to the government,

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 1>and they've lobbied Congress and I've had a lot of uh,

0:31:28.920 --> 0:31:30.360
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of members of Congress who are

0:31:30.360 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Republicans who are listening to what they're saying, and I

0:31:32.480 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>think it's unlikely you're gonna see a lot of over regulation.

0:31:35.600 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 1>That's Carlisle Group co founder David Rubinstein. Check out his

0:31:38.360 --> 0:31:41.120
<v Speaker 1>new book. It is entitled How to Invest Masters on

0:31:41.160 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>the Craft. It is out now. And that wraps up

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the first hour of the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Week from Bloomberg Radio. I'm Carol Masser and I'm Tim

0:31:47.880 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Stentivic ahead in our next hour. Our Business Week cover

0:31:50.560 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 1>story how the FBI built its case against the Chinese

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.160
<v Speaker 1>spy using evidence from his iPhone. It all happens off

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>of her phone, doesn't it? Oh my gosh. Plus how

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>China is finding a way around slee tariffs with a

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>little help from Mexico, and a look at the post

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 1>COVID marketing strategy at the world's largest brewer. We sit

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:09.000
<v Speaker 1>down with the CMO of A B and BEV. This

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week inside from the

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.880
<v Speaker 1>reporters and editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine.

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Plus global business finance and tech news as it happened

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Sloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Blay ahead in our second

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 1>hour of the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week, including Yeah,

0:32:39.160 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 1>We're doing some food and beer if. We've got the

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.120
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Upside Foods on how the company is growing

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 1>real meat directly from animal cells. We've also got the

0:32:47.520 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 1>CMO of A B and BEV opening up a key

0:32:49.800 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 1>strategic shift at the global brewer. Plus our Business Week

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>team looks at how Chinese manufacturers are skirting U S

0:32:56.040 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 1>tariffs by setting up south of the border. First up

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:02.479
<v Speaker 1>This Hour, this week's cover story, a Chinese intelligence officer

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>targeted US industrial giants for a living and then left

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>a heap of evidence on his phone, his iPhone, along

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.400
<v Speaker 1>with his own personal secrets. Drake Bennett and Jordan Robertson

0:33:12.440 --> 0:33:14.880
<v Speaker 1>co wrote that story Drake and Business we getitor Joe

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Webber taking us inside a spy's diary. Whenever you talk

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:22.920
<v Speaker 1>about China in US and in intellectual property and what

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 1>companies have you know, there's always been this assumption and

0:33:26.760 --> 0:33:30.800
<v Speaker 1>reporting has suggested that Chinese are really good at at spying,

0:33:31.160 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>but we never really get a sense of what that

0:33:33.120 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>actually looks like. And so when Jordan and Drake came

0:33:37.000 --> 0:33:38.959
<v Speaker 1>to just us with this story, the thing that just

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>jumped out at us was it's all there in part

0:33:43.280 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>because of this cotton mouse game that evolved that I'm

0:33:46.000 --> 0:33:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sure Drake's gonna tell us about, and it ended up

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in court because the US was able to not only

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 1>nab this Chinese spy and his phone, we got it all.

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>We got all the info, and so Drake I mean, like,

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:03.480
<v Speaker 1>this is raster that you ran across, and I'm curious,

0:34:03.520 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 1>just like when you saw it and Jordan's saw, how

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:09.959
<v Speaker 1>did it pop to you guys? I mean, like you said,

0:34:09.960 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just an extraordinary opportunity because this is normally just

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>a black box. You just see kind of the outgoing

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>stuff where it's the companies that are being targeted or

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the people that are being targeted as potential sources,

0:34:23.080 --> 0:34:25.239
<v Speaker 1>and you never get to see what goes on back

0:34:25.320 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 1>in China. And what happened with this guy is he

0:34:27.920 --> 0:34:31.440
<v Speaker 1>was the first ever MSS officer to be lured out

0:34:31.440 --> 0:34:35.240
<v Speaker 1>of China the Ministry of State Security, so it's basically

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:39.280
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government Chinese yeah intelligence, which is responsible not only

0:34:39.320 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>for military and government intelligence, but you know economic and

0:34:43.840 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not exactly a secret. No, not a secret, not

0:34:47.000 --> 0:34:50.680
<v Speaker 1>a secret. Um, we know what happens, we know a

0:34:50.680 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 1>lot less about what it looks like. So when this

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:58.440
<v Speaker 1>guy gets lured out through this very painstaking FBI investigation,

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:01.239
<v Speaker 1>he's arrested and he has his phone on him and

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>he his iPhone on him and he has backed up

0:35:03.760 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>everything not I mean just everything to the cloud. Um,

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:11.520
<v Speaker 1>so there's all this like sensitive MSS documents, correspondence between

0:35:11.600 --> 0:35:14.360
<v Speaker 1>him and his colleagues, between him and his sources, and

0:35:14.360 --> 0:35:16.560
<v Speaker 1>there's also just a lot of like really intimate personal

0:35:16.600 --> 0:35:20.440
<v Speaker 1>detail about himself. You know, he's he's someone I mean,

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of like his name is

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Juan John, you know, a lot there's some cloak and

0:35:25.960 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>dagger stuff in the story, but a lot of it

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:31.640
<v Speaker 1>is also just the he's this espionage bureaucrat and he's

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of like you watch him get sort of like

0:35:33.840 --> 0:35:36.480
<v Speaker 1>ground down by his job, and he gets more and

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>more unhinged, and he's just spending all this time and

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>like massage parlors and drunken card games, and I think

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:45.080
<v Speaker 1>that may have you know, affected his decision making. Tell

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:47.400
<v Speaker 1>us about the expense account, right, So a lot of

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:49.400
<v Speaker 1>what they do is they're just handing people money, you know,

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.400
<v Speaker 1>three thousand dollars, six thousand dollars for your travel expenses

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 1>or for whatever. But he one of his sort of

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>gripes over time, and it gnaws at him more and more,

0:35:58.239 --> 0:36:01.520
<v Speaker 1>is that his boss just keeps rejecting these expense accounts

0:36:01.560 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 1>for these dinners he has to like recruit people, and

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 1>it just really drives him nuts, and you because we

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:09.400
<v Speaker 1>have his diary. He treated his eye calendar like a diary,

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>so there's stuff about, you know, meeting with this person

0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.200
<v Speaker 1>or doing this hack. And then it's just like my

0:36:14.239 --> 0:36:17.200
<v Speaker 1>boss rejected the expenses again and he just like it

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.480
<v Speaker 1>clearly just burns him, which are just epic, you know.

0:36:20.719 --> 0:36:22.800
<v Speaker 1>So I just you just assume, like we take on

0:36:22.840 --> 0:36:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the us anything you need, and it's like, actually it's yeah,

0:36:30.360 --> 0:36:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the target that ends up being so much of the

0:36:33.520 --> 0:36:36.880
<v Speaker 1>story is actually g E. Right, what was the spy

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:39.719
<v Speaker 1>going for and and tell us about how that played out.

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's g E jet engines and it's in particular

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:48.319
<v Speaker 1>it's these uh composite fan blade and casings for the

0:36:48.360 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>fan blades. So uh G Aviation is is still basically

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the only company that has these super lightweight fan blades

0:36:56.920 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 1>and casings so their their engines can be lighter, UM,

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:05.160
<v Speaker 1>more fuel efficient, UM, safer uh and every and so

0:37:05.200 --> 0:37:09.560
<v Speaker 1>basically this is a key technology UM that Drew had

0:37:09.719 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of focused on, and he sort of rise at

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>this through these conversations with folks in the Chinese government,

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>with folks at Stayed owned aircraft aeronautics companies um in China,

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.839
<v Speaker 1>and so that's what. So he, through this intermediary, through

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 1>this academic basically a university official, reaches out to this

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:31.480
<v Speaker 1>engineer at the aviation, you know, through LinkedIn, invites him

0:37:31.520 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to come give this talk, and then it sort of begins.

0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Um What he doesn't realize is that midway through this process,

0:37:38.880 --> 0:37:44.440
<v Speaker 1>the FBI sort of intervenes um and starts investigating um

0:37:44.480 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>his his potential source at the aviation, who then not

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to spoil the end of the story, but who ends

0:37:51.640 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 1>up being instrumental in in the investigation to then turn

0:37:55.360 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>around and and trap um U himself. Our producer said,

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:03.279
<v Speaker 1>one of the stupidest or dumbest spies ever just got stop.

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that was one of the most interesting takeaways

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:10.480
<v Speaker 1>from this is like the idea that people have in

0:38:10.520 --> 0:38:14.160
<v Speaker 1>their heads of a James Bond type figure. What is

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the life of a spy? Yeah, I mean he's a bureaucrat.

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>He's an espionage bureaucrat. You know, he's a cog in

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:21.480
<v Speaker 1>this big machine. You know, in certain ways, I think

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:23.720
<v Speaker 1>he he you know, he has a lot of power

0:38:23.760 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 1>back home and he sort of seems to abuse it

0:38:26.120 --> 0:38:28.439
<v Speaker 1>in certain ways. But he also has this boss that's

0:38:28.480 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 1>on him all the time, you know, who's like constantly

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.760
<v Speaker 1>demanding these things that he feels like a really unreasonable

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 1>um And so it's a bit of a grim existence

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in certain ways, and I think it sort of drives

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>him a little around the bend. Now, Martinis, no, Aston,

0:38:42.040 --> 0:38:46.719
<v Speaker 1>Martin's no, definitely not. Oh my goodness, we're saying, where

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:49.320
<v Speaker 1>is he now in jail? Oh, he's in jail in Ohio.

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:52.240
<v Speaker 1>He's a winning sounding. That was Bloomberg News Technology reporter

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Drake Bennett, along with Business Week editor Joe Weber on

0:38:55.040 --> 0:38:57.880
<v Speaker 1>this week's cover story. Check out the full story online

0:38:58.000 --> 0:39:01.239
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg or on newsstands. Coming up, Jiell Webber

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>joins us again for another story in this week's magazine.

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 1>It's about the haven for Chinese companies very close to

0:39:07.400 --> 0:39:20.840
<v Speaker 1>the United States. This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovik

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. Well, this is one of those stories

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>that we've come to love business Week four, one that

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:33.319
<v Speaker 1>taps into the big themes of our time, but may

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:36.040
<v Speaker 1>not be on your radar, but definitely should be. It's

0:39:36.040 --> 0:39:39.000
<v Speaker 1>about a prime spot between Mexico's industrial capital and the

0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:42.839
<v Speaker 1>US border that's become a haven for Chinese manufacturers looking

0:39:42.880 --> 0:39:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to sidestep US tariffs and shortened supply chains. The story

0:39:46.440 --> 0:39:49.280
<v Speaker 1>was also a Bloomberg Big Take. This week, Bloomberg business

0:39:49.280 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Week editor Joel Webber is back with more, along with

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:55.800
<v Speaker 1>Business Week Global Economics editor Christina lynd Lad. China became

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:59.759
<v Speaker 1>very interested in sort of a side door to the

0:39:59.840 --> 0:40:01.839
<v Speaker 1>U U S there and so we have seen an

0:40:01.840 --> 0:40:07.719
<v Speaker 1>explosion of factories there and uh it is effectively a

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 1>workaround of Trump's tariff policy, which the Biden administration is

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 1>basically kept in place. Um. And so it's interesting about

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>that is that you know, you basically have gained the system. Uh.

0:40:21.719 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>And so things going forward may not be manufactured in

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:29.000
<v Speaker 1>China as before you find some cheap real estate in

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:31.600
<v Speaker 1>other countries. Mexico is not the only version of this,

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.200
<v Speaker 1>but certainly the closest to the U S. UM. So

0:40:34.239 --> 0:40:37.040
<v Speaker 1>how's this, how's this working out? As uh as a

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:40.600
<v Speaker 1>little bit of arbitrage, Christina, Well, that's the globalization is

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:45.160
<v Speaker 1>always arbitrage, right, So I think when we interviewed companies

0:40:45.200 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>that are based in one particular industrial park that we

0:40:48.000 --> 0:40:50.840
<v Speaker 1>focused on. They most of the Chinese firms preferred to

0:40:51.200 --> 0:40:54.759
<v Speaker 1>emphasize the you know, proximity to the US market and

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:58.200
<v Speaker 1>this and this savings on shipping, but when pressed they

0:40:58.360 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>admitted that, you know, for example, one furniture maker was

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:05.320
<v Speaker 1>facing taffs of twenty when they were shipping from China

0:41:05.440 --> 0:41:09.520
<v Speaker 1>and now uh qualified for duty free shipments into the US.

0:41:10.320 --> 0:41:12.279
<v Speaker 1>What blew me away is how quickly they were able

0:41:12.320 --> 0:41:14.040
<v Speaker 1>to do that, right, Like I always feel like when

0:41:14.080 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to CEOs and like, well the shift, you know,

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 1>if we have to shift our production elsewhere, it's going

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.040
<v Speaker 1>to take a long time. I mean, they move pretty quickly,

0:41:20.040 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and it reminds us that they are still the manufacturer

0:41:22.640 --> 0:41:24.399
<v Speaker 1>to the world. Yes, and I think some of these

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:27.360
<v Speaker 1>companies are pretty I mean they're not all big. I

0:41:27.360 --> 0:41:30.360
<v Speaker 1>mean one of the manufacturers is a really big manufactor

0:41:30.440 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 1>in China, but like so they are nimble and they

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you know um. As a policy, China has been basically

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 1>willing to shed kind of low margin manufacturing businesses as

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>it you know, as it focuses on high end stuff

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>like you know, new new fuel vehicles and biotechnology and semiconductors.

0:41:51.960 --> 0:41:55.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think the first wave went to places like Vietnam.

0:41:56.080 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>But now you know, you can see, like, you know,

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 1>businesses are moving for they're away, you know, from those

0:42:01.560 --> 0:42:07.839
<v Speaker 1>comfort kind of locales where they first landed. And um, yeah,

0:42:07.960 --> 0:42:09.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think what I thought it was kind

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>of funny was that. Do you remember when Trump tweeted

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>basically ordering American companies home, and I said, what came

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:24.000
<v Speaker 1>floating across like the Pacific or Chinese Chinese plants didn't

0:42:24.000 --> 0:42:25.719
<v Speaker 1>exactly work that way. I don't know. It seems like

0:42:25.800 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>there could be like a way for the US to

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:30.320
<v Speaker 1>close this loophole. I mean, they know what these Chinese

0:42:30.320 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>companies produce, and isn't there a way that they can say, Okay,

0:42:34.440 --> 0:42:37.319
<v Speaker 1>well we know that it comes from a subsidiary of

0:42:37.360 --> 0:42:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a Chinese company, and you're not sticking to the spirit

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of the rule. Um, we're going to attack on that tariff?

0:42:43.120 --> 0:42:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Do they want to? Oh? I don't know. I mean

0:42:45.320 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 1>that might cause issues with the U. S m c

0:42:47.440 --> 0:42:50.080
<v Speaker 1>A right like the successor to NAFTA. I mean, I

0:42:50.120 --> 0:42:53.600
<v Speaker 1>think Mexico would have legitimate reason to say what are

0:42:53.600 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 1>you doing? You know, as long as they meet the

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:58.719
<v Speaker 1>content requirements, which they are and to do that. I mean,

0:42:59.200 --> 0:43:01.800
<v Speaker 1>we should be clear that this implies a certain amount

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.279
<v Speaker 1>of effort on the part of these Chinese companies because

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:07.919
<v Speaker 1>they're having to source products from Mexico, could be even

0:43:07.960 --> 0:43:11.560
<v Speaker 1>North America. There they can't just import assemble everything from

0:43:11.640 --> 0:43:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Chinese parts and shipping across. Yeah. The other thing to

0:43:14.719 --> 0:43:16.560
<v Speaker 1>keep in mind here, you know, Belton Road is a

0:43:16.680 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 1>very top down initiative in China. This is not that

0:43:19.880 --> 0:43:25.400
<v Speaker 1>this is just grassroots, grassroots effort by Chinese exporters to

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>be like, how do we It's kind of simple, but

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:31.280
<v Speaker 1>it makes so much sense also, I mean, we talked

0:43:31.280 --> 0:43:34.799
<v Speaker 1>to some companies that off the record explicitly said part

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of the reason we're doing this isn't just cost savings,

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>is that there's political risk, I mean policy risk. Rather

0:43:40.880 --> 0:43:44.239
<v Speaker 1>in China in recent years we've seen like crackdowns in

0:43:44.280 --> 0:43:48.120
<v Speaker 1>tech and other sectors, and so, you know, so we

0:43:48.239 --> 0:43:52.400
<v Speaker 1>talked about the Mexico side of this too. Amlo being obviously,

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:56.799
<v Speaker 1>um the president of Mexico has been you know, very

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:00.400
<v Speaker 1>eager to try and get employment whatever there can be employment.

0:44:00.440 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>How is this shaping out domestically for him? Well? The

0:44:03.640 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing is at the federal level, Mexico has never

0:44:06.680 --> 0:44:11.359
<v Speaker 1>really actively courted Chinese investment because they see Chinese exporters

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:15.240
<v Speaker 1>as rivals in third markets, right. So, but the state,

0:44:15.360 --> 0:44:19.240
<v Speaker 1>at the state level, they like states have so Nueo Leon,

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:22.520
<v Speaker 1>which is where you know, this particular industrial park, and

0:44:22.560 --> 0:44:24.279
<v Speaker 1>these are a lot of these companies are setting up shop.

0:44:24.920 --> 0:44:27.879
<v Speaker 1>UM has has done and they're building a special road

0:44:27.920 --> 0:44:31.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, from like you know, the from the industrial

0:44:31.200 --> 0:44:36.359
<v Speaker 1>park to the border. Uh. And so yeah, but I

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:38.880
<v Speaker 1>think that some people have said that Mexico might have

0:44:38.920 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 1>actually seen even a bigger windfall of this kind of

0:44:42.239 --> 0:44:47.360
<v Speaker 1>investment if am Low was being less nationalistic on topics

0:44:47.360 --> 0:44:49.960
<v Speaker 1>like energy and you know and things like that. But

0:44:50.000 --> 0:44:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is great for Mexico, right, Like the

0:44:53.440 --> 0:44:55.799
<v Speaker 1>number that really jumped out at me here is UH

0:44:56.080 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>near shoring UH could boost Mexico's exports by three five

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:02.600
<v Speaker 1>billion year, a bit over seven percent. I mean, that's

0:45:02.600 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>like the real that's reformative. Yeah. Also, I mean while

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese investment, like like the most recent figures five

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>million dollars a year is not huge, there is there

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:16.399
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of deals that could happen this year

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:20.240
<v Speaker 1>that would be transformative that that we're talking about billion

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:23.200
<v Speaker 1>dollar factories. One of them is there an e V

0:45:23.400 --> 0:45:26.719
<v Speaker 1>engine maker that's looking at two different sites in Mexico.

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:31.120
<v Speaker 1>And those kinds of investments pulls supply chains you know,

0:45:31.719 --> 0:45:34.919
<v Speaker 1>around them, you know, So that kind of that kind

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:36.479
<v Speaker 1>of thing I think would take it to the next level.

0:45:36.920 --> 0:45:39.359
<v Speaker 1>The suppliers that play into it. Hey, um, you guys

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:41.800
<v Speaker 1>point out in the story, though Chinese companies aren't the

0:45:41.800 --> 0:45:44.560
<v Speaker 1>first to seek shelter from US terris right, Japan did.

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:47.720
<v Speaker 1>It went back in the similar playbook when Reagan started

0:45:47.800 --> 0:45:51.399
<v Speaker 1>layering all these different restrictions on Japanese cars, and then

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:54.120
<v Speaker 1>when NAFTA took effect, they saw, well, this is a

0:45:54.120 --> 0:45:57.319
<v Speaker 1>great export platform now. But I think it's interesting, right

0:45:57.320 --> 0:45:59.839
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the globalization conversations that we're having about

0:45:59.840 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>what is going on. What I forgot about that we

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:04.239
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about that forever. Well, I mean the way

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>I think, well, we didn't use the word French shor freh. Yes,

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:16.440
<v Speaker 1>that's when you go to friendly countries. That was Bloomberg

0:46:16.440 --> 0:46:19.160
<v Speaker 1>business Week editor Joel Webber, along with Business Week Global

0:46:19.200 --> 0:46:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Economics editor Christina Lyndblad still to come on Bloomberg Business Week,

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Beyond Meat and Impossible Foods are the key players in

0:46:25.840 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 1>the race to market plant based meat alternatives, often with

0:46:29.040 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 1>ingredients like p protein and soy. Going up next, you'll

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:34.840
<v Speaker 1>meet Upside. That's the company that's got a different approach.

0:46:35.080 --> 0:46:38.759
<v Speaker 1>They're actually growing meat. We take real animals, take themselves

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>from those animals. We essentially select the ones that are

0:46:42.040 --> 0:46:44.480
<v Speaker 1>going to taste the best and grow the best. When

0:46:44.520 --> 0:46:46.799
<v Speaker 1>I first had my bite of cultivated meat, I can

0:46:46.840 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>tell you that's the moment when I really believe. Upsides

0:46:49.480 --> 0:46:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Chief operating Officer Amy Chan explains on the other side,

0:46:52.960 --> 0:47:03.280
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg broadcasting from the financial capital of the world,

0:47:03.360 --> 0:47:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg eleven Frio in New York to Washington, d C.

0:47:07.040 --> 0:47:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg one oh six one to San Francisco,

0:47:11.800 --> 0:47:15.279
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg nine sixty to the country Sirius XM Chado one

0:47:15.320 --> 0:47:18.279
<v Speaker 1>nine team, and around the globe the Bloomberg Business app

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business Week.

0:47:23.760 --> 0:47:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Eating meat takes a toll on the environment. You know

0:47:26.000 --> 0:47:28.479
<v Speaker 1>that We've talked about it on our broadcast. We've also

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:31.960
<v Speaker 1>talked about several plant based food startups that manufactured meat

0:47:32.000 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>alternatives beyond meat and impossible foods, commonly using ingredients such

0:47:36.480 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 1>as soy and p protein. Turning now to a company

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that's got quite a different solution for sustainable consumption. Check

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:46.240
<v Speaker 1>out Upside Foods. It's a startup that grows meat directly

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:49.800
<v Speaker 1>from animal cells. The company recently announced a four million

0:47:49.800 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars seriously funding round. It put its valuation at over

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a billion dollars. Investments came from Bill Gates, Tyson Foods,

0:47:56.040 --> 0:47:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and soft Bank, to name just a few. Upsides products

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:01.960
<v Speaker 1>are still pending reulatory review, but the company hopes it's

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:04.920
<v Speaker 1>lab grown chicken, breasts, steaks, and more will be market

0:48:04.920 --> 0:48:07.480
<v Speaker 1>ready by the end of this year. Tim and Mike

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Reagan recently spoke with Amy Chen. She is the company's

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:14.600
<v Speaker 1>chief operating officer. We take real animals, take themselves from

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:17.239
<v Speaker 1>those animals. We essentially select the ones that are going

0:48:17.280 --> 0:48:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to taste the best and grow the best, and then

0:48:19.960 --> 0:48:22.680
<v Speaker 1>we feed them something that we call self feed or media.

0:48:23.080 --> 0:48:26.560
<v Speaker 1>It's essentially the same kind of nutrients they would normally

0:48:26.560 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>get inside of an animal's body. We just do it

0:48:28.480 --> 0:48:30.360
<v Speaker 1>in a what we call cultivator, which is like a

0:48:30.400 --> 0:48:32.719
<v Speaker 1>stainless steel tank that you might see in a brewery

0:48:32.960 --> 0:48:35.719
<v Speaker 1>or in a yogurt factory. We allow them to grow,

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.520
<v Speaker 1>continue feeding them, and then ultimately are able to harvest

0:48:38.560 --> 0:48:40.799
<v Speaker 1>meat that is as close to the real thing as

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 1>you can possibly get because it's grown from real animals.

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Amy the timing of this segment is perfect because Tim

0:48:45.760 --> 0:48:49.160
<v Speaker 1>and I were both starving. So I'm curious when will

0:48:49.200 --> 0:48:50.960
<v Speaker 1>we be able to see this on the market. I

0:48:51.040 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>understand it has to get regulatory approval first, right, That's

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:56.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, and so we are currently pending regulatory approval.

0:48:57.239 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>But as soon as it happens, we will be excited

0:48:59.080 --> 0:49:00.640
<v Speaker 1>to start being able to share are it more broadly

0:49:00.680 --> 0:49:03.840
<v Speaker 1>with consumers. One of the things that really convinced me

0:49:04.200 --> 0:49:06.680
<v Speaker 1>about the potential and the promise of cultivated meat was

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:08.640
<v Speaker 1>actually the taste of it, and growing up in the

0:49:08.680 --> 0:49:11.359
<v Speaker 1>food world, taste of King and Queen. When I first

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:13.560
<v Speaker 1>had my bite of cultivated meat, I can tell you

0:49:13.640 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that's the moment when I really believe, and when you

0:49:16.000 --> 0:49:17.839
<v Speaker 1>think about plant based and a lot of these other

0:49:17.920 --> 0:49:20.440
<v Speaker 1>things that require people to make changes in their habits.

0:49:20.640 --> 0:49:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm from Texas, and I love my meat and so

0:49:23.640 --> 0:49:25.799
<v Speaker 1>I have always just wanted to be able to think

0:49:25.800 --> 0:49:28.040
<v Speaker 1>about a way to change the world without requiring people

0:49:28.040 --> 0:49:29.799
<v Speaker 1>to really change their habits. And I think does this

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in a really compelling way. What okay, if you were

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:33.399
<v Speaker 1>to be able to buy this in this store when

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at the ingredients, but on the box, what

0:49:35.560 --> 0:49:38.719
<v Speaker 1>would it say? And also are their antibiotics? Are their

0:49:38.760 --> 0:49:41.239
<v Speaker 1>their chemicals in it, etcetera. Now, one of the things

0:49:41.280 --> 0:49:43.960
<v Speaker 1>that's amazing is that it doesn't have antibiotics or hormones

0:49:44.080 --> 0:49:45.279
<v Speaker 1>or some of the things that you think about with

0:49:45.320 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 1>respect to conventional meat. We're still working on exactly what

0:49:48.120 --> 0:49:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the label would say, but would essentially say chickens grown

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:53.520
<v Speaker 1>from animal cells are cultivated from high quality animal cells.

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>There's a whole range of products is you can imagine

0:49:55.600 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 1>everything from a chicken breast or a chicken file at

0:49:58.360 --> 0:50:00.800
<v Speaker 1>through to a sausage or a hot dog. Um. Different

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:03.399
<v Speaker 1>products of conventional meat would have different labels, and so

0:50:03.680 --> 0:50:06.400
<v Speaker 1>you'd see that same kind of thing reflected here. But

0:50:06.520 --> 0:50:09.120
<v Speaker 1>ultimately the promise is that the real cell can be

0:50:09.239 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 1>the meat that we all love. You know, Amy, I'm

0:50:11.520 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 1>wondering if there's the potential down the roads even sort

0:50:14.680 --> 0:50:16.680
<v Speaker 1>of improve on mother nature, you know, and make a

0:50:17.239 --> 0:50:20.480
<v Speaker 1>steak with less cholesterol, or chicken that I don't know

0:50:20.560 --> 0:50:24.040
<v Speaker 1>comes pre flavored with buffalo sauce or something like that.

0:50:24.440 --> 0:50:29.239
<v Speaker 1>But you're you're just playing with God there, alright. But

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:32.319
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, is there yeah? Is there is there the

0:50:32.360 --> 0:50:35.280
<v Speaker 1>potential to actually enhance foods and make them even healthier,

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 1>more nutritious than than what we're used to. Long term? Absolutely, um,

0:50:39.719 --> 0:50:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's something on our roadmap in the horizon.

0:50:42.360 --> 0:50:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I think in the near term we're focused on delivering

0:50:44.440 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>amazing delicious meat um that is safe enough, high quality,

0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:51.480
<v Speaker 1>and that fits into people's diets and into their habits

0:50:51.480 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 1>in a way that makes a lot of sense. But absolutely,

0:50:53.719 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 1>longer term, I mean exactly what you say, you could

0:50:55.760 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>have a steak with the intritional profile of samins um

0:50:59.080 --> 0:51:01.839
<v Speaker 1>or anything else you could imagine in terms of allergies

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:04.360
<v Speaker 1>or other issues that are currently part of the conventional

0:51:04.360 --> 0:51:06.920
<v Speaker 1>meat system. Well, Amy, speaking of the conventional meat system,

0:51:06.920 --> 0:51:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who are vegetarians, they don't they

0:51:09.719 --> 0:51:11.840
<v Speaker 1>don't eat meat, you know, for a few reasons, and

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:15.400
<v Speaker 1>among those reasons include treatment of animals, or they're just

0:51:15.640 --> 0:51:19.880
<v Speaker 1>against killing animals for food. UM, what is this type

0:51:19.880 --> 0:51:25.040
<v Speaker 1>of thing vegetarian friendly? You know, it's a great question. UM.

0:51:25.080 --> 0:51:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I would say absolutely, but it probably depends on what

0:51:27.840 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of vegetarians are UM. We have a company that

0:51:31.120 --> 0:51:34.839
<v Speaker 1>is a mix of passionate meat eaters UM and carnivores

0:51:34.920 --> 0:51:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and folks that are passionate vegans and vegetarians. And what

0:51:37.560 --> 0:51:40.120
<v Speaker 1>we've generally found is that people who are vegetarian or

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:44.400
<v Speaker 1>vegan for ethical reasons or environmental reasons UM will embrace

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:47.480
<v Speaker 1>cultivated meat. Folks who are maybe vegetarian or vegan for

0:51:47.680 --> 0:51:50.279
<v Speaker 1>religious reasons or other ones may want to take a

0:51:50.280 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 1>second look. I was going to say, the the environmental

0:51:52.600 --> 0:51:57.000
<v Speaker 1>footprint of cultivated meat sounds like it must be way

0:51:57.120 --> 0:52:01.120
<v Speaker 1>less than the farm grown version. Is that is that safe?

0:52:01.160 --> 0:52:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Is that a selling point of this product? Absolutely? I

0:52:04.280 --> 0:52:06.279
<v Speaker 1>think one of the pieces when you think about what's

0:52:06.280 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>happening in the future is people predict that demand for

0:52:09.200 --> 0:52:12.160
<v Speaker 1>meat is going to almost double by And when you

0:52:12.200 --> 0:52:14.600
<v Speaker 1>think about the amount of land and water, it's about

0:52:14.600 --> 0:52:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a third that's currently used for agriculture, you know, one fifth,

0:52:17.400 --> 0:52:20.760
<v Speaker 1>one six of all greenhouse gases, and the world simply

0:52:20.800 --> 0:52:23.920
<v Speaker 1>cannot sustain the kind of demand increases that we're expecting

0:52:23.920 --> 0:52:26.040
<v Speaker 1>on meat UM and so one of the things that's

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:28.840
<v Speaker 1>really exciting about cultivated meat is because it happens in

0:52:28.840 --> 0:52:32.239
<v Speaker 1>a controlled environment similar to a manufacturing plant. UM, it

0:52:32.320 --> 0:52:35.040
<v Speaker 1>had the potential to have a substantially lower footprint. That

0:52:35.120 --> 0:52:37.640
<v Speaker 1>was a me chen chief operating officer of Upside Foods

0:52:37.680 --> 0:52:40.680
<v Speaker 1>with Tim and fellow Bloomberg carnivore Mike Crea again, and

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a big shout out to Mike for filling in while

0:52:42.719 --> 0:52:44.160
<v Speaker 1>I was out of the office. Maybe I'll send a

0:52:44.160 --> 0:52:47.040
<v Speaker 1>mistake or something. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week coming up.

0:52:47.239 --> 0:52:50.000
<v Speaker 1>You've had your food, now, how about a beer. I mean,

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it has been quite a week. The chief marketing officer

0:52:53.120 --> 0:52:55.719
<v Speaker 1>at a Bienbev joins us right after the break. This

0:52:55.880 --> 0:53:08.720
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:53:08.760 --> 0:53:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Masser and Bloomberg Quick takes Tim Steinovik from Bloomberg Radio.

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:17.880
<v Speaker 1>This company, it is the world's biggest brewer maker, Budweiser, Stella,

0:53:17.920 --> 0:53:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Artois and Corona. And our next guest to spent nearly

0:53:20.840 --> 0:53:23.520
<v Speaker 1>twenty years at the company, and he's got some thoughts

0:53:23.520 --> 0:53:26.360
<v Speaker 1>for us. On today's marketplace for adult beverages and really

0:53:26.480 --> 0:53:30.320
<v Speaker 1>what consumers want most. Marsin Marcondez is the chief marketing

0:53:30.320 --> 0:53:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Officer at a b Nbev. He's also the former global

0:53:32.960 --> 0:53:36.200
<v Speaker 1>president of a b nbev's Beyond Beer division. He joined

0:53:36.239 --> 0:53:38.720
<v Speaker 1>us in studio this past week and express his hope

0:53:38.800 --> 0:53:42.719
<v Speaker 1>that the world is finally hopefully putting COVID nineteen in

0:53:42.760 --> 0:53:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the rear view mirror your business. It's very meaningful to

0:53:44.880 --> 0:53:48.319
<v Speaker 1>see the people that people are really willing to go

0:53:48.400 --> 0:53:51.560
<v Speaker 1>back to life to enjoy, to be outside, to enjoy

0:53:51.719 --> 0:53:54.880
<v Speaker 1>concerts too, to be with friends, to be with family,

0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to have a good time, to feel like they can

0:53:57.080 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 1>enjoy time together one more time. This has an impact

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:03.880
<v Speaker 1>on on the economy. This this has a significant impact

0:54:03.960 --> 0:54:06.239
<v Speaker 1>in our business as well. You can imagine all the

0:54:06.280 --> 0:54:10.160
<v Speaker 1>frequency on the restaurants, bars, events are all those things

0:54:10.160 --> 0:54:13.280
<v Speaker 1>that were not happening anymore. So there's a balance points

0:54:13.320 --> 0:54:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of concern as as it's always the case in life,

0:54:16.320 --> 0:54:19.480
<v Speaker 1>but a lot of points for optimism as well. Do

0:54:19.480 --> 0:54:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you feel like you have a lot of clarity and

0:54:21.280 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and in terms of the outlook, And it's interesting that

0:54:23.600 --> 0:54:25.959
<v Speaker 1>you talk about events tib and I did a couple

0:54:25.960 --> 0:54:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of shows from the U S Open here in New

0:54:28.480 --> 0:54:32.080
<v Speaker 1>York City and it was so packed compared to where

0:54:32.080 --> 0:54:34.560
<v Speaker 1>it was pretty pandemic. So, having said that, do you

0:54:34.640 --> 0:54:38.759
<v Speaker 1>feel like the economy is stronger versus like all of

0:54:38.800 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 1>the recessionary talk that seems to be going on globally. Yes,

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:47.080
<v Speaker 1>And I am optimistic. That's exactly how I feel, especially

0:54:47.120 --> 0:54:49.480
<v Speaker 1>for our industry. I am optimistic. There's a lot of

0:54:49.600 --> 0:54:51.840
<v Speaker 1>bright side, a lot of bright angles for us to observe,

0:54:51.920 --> 0:54:55.560
<v Speaker 1>like the ones you just described. People are out there.

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:59.520
<v Speaker 1>There's always a key concern about inflation, recession here and there,

0:54:59.560 --> 0:55:05.239
<v Speaker 1>but there's a bigger inner voice and energy saying go live. Well,

0:55:05.280 --> 0:55:07.720
<v Speaker 1>it's it's interesting here you speak this way because obviously

0:55:07.760 --> 0:55:09.680
<v Speaker 1>your job is to tappen to what people are feeling,

0:55:09.719 --> 0:55:11.839
<v Speaker 1>because you need to know how to communicate to them.

0:55:11.960 --> 0:55:14.400
<v Speaker 1>You need to know how to express your brands to

0:55:14.480 --> 0:55:16.480
<v Speaker 1>them in a way that they will be receptive to.

0:55:17.080 --> 0:55:20.440
<v Speaker 1>How have you community? How is your communication A B

0:55:20.560 --> 0:55:23.920
<v Speaker 1>N beats communication changed over the last couple of years.

0:55:24.160 --> 0:55:26.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's a very good question. And actually I should

0:55:26.120 --> 0:55:28.719
<v Speaker 1>take one or two steps back before I get really

0:55:28.760 --> 0:55:31.720
<v Speaker 1>straight into your into your question, because I think we

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:34.320
<v Speaker 1>we as a company, we're going through a meaningful process

0:55:34.320 --> 0:55:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of evolution. We're known for our financial discipline and for

0:55:37.880 --> 0:55:40.560
<v Speaker 1>growing inorganically. But then in the last couple of years,

0:55:40.560 --> 0:55:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to your question, we became the indisputable number one brewery

0:55:43.880 --> 0:55:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in the world. And by the time you become the

0:55:45.680 --> 0:55:49.200
<v Speaker 1>number one, you lead the category. So your growth model

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:52.400
<v Speaker 1>needs to adjust because it's not about acquiring other companies

0:55:52.440 --> 0:55:55.320
<v Speaker 1>anymore and just fighting for share. You need to work

0:55:55.680 --> 0:55:58.759
<v Speaker 1>to enlarge and to grow the whole category so that

0:55:58.840 --> 0:56:02.440
<v Speaker 1>everybody wins and win together. Meaning we need to move

0:56:02.480 --> 0:56:05.360
<v Speaker 1>from a growth model that is focused on inorganic growth

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:07.920
<v Speaker 1>to a growth model that is focused on organic growth.

0:56:08.600 --> 0:56:11.080
<v Speaker 1>And by the time any company makes that decision, brands

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:14.920
<v Speaker 1>become inevitably one of the most important assets of the organization,

0:56:14.920 --> 0:56:17.520
<v Speaker 1>if not the most important ones. And this is when

0:56:17.680 --> 0:56:20.080
<v Speaker 1>we really talk about our messaging and all that. So

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:23.600
<v Speaker 1>we are intentionally becoming much more consumer centric. And this

0:56:23.680 --> 0:56:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is for real, it's not just a nice thing a

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:29.840
<v Speaker 1>nice thing to say. So we became obsessed about talking

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:33.879
<v Speaker 1>to people, understanding people, understanding what's going on with them,

0:56:34.120 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 1>what's impacting their behaviors, which are their needs so that

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:40.719
<v Speaker 1>we can identify relevant opportunities to make our brands relevant

0:56:41.040 --> 0:56:43.600
<v Speaker 1>in their lives. The key thing is that when you

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:46.279
<v Speaker 1>do marketing, when you build brands, there's a trap or

0:56:46.320 --> 0:56:49.760
<v Speaker 1>a tendency for people to be okay just if they're visible,

0:56:50.040 --> 0:56:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and then you can spend a lot of money just

0:56:51.560 --> 0:56:54.680
<v Speaker 1>on visibility. The key thing to really drive growth and

0:56:54.719 --> 0:56:57.000
<v Speaker 1>to be meaningful to people is when you find the

0:56:57.160 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 1>right spots to be relevant to them. How do you

0:56:59.680 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 1>figure relevancy? It all comes. It all comes as a

0:57:02.640 --> 0:57:05.400
<v Speaker 1>consequence of being closed to them. So we talked to

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:11.759
<v Speaker 1>literally millions of people every year. We have survey we

0:57:11.840 --> 0:57:15.200
<v Speaker 1>have online panels and fixed online panels. We we talked

0:57:15.239 --> 0:57:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to thousands of consumers every week because we're obsessed about

0:57:19.680 --> 0:57:23.040
<v Speaker 1>understanding their behavior. We learn a lot of that coming

0:57:23.080 --> 0:57:25.600
<v Speaker 1>after COVID right, because when the big thing happens that

0:57:25.640 --> 0:57:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it significantly changes the way people live. We need to

0:57:28.560 --> 0:57:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to have a much tighter post on how they're living

0:57:31.080 --> 0:57:33.240
<v Speaker 1>so you can identify the opportunities to be meaningful and

0:57:33.320 --> 0:57:36.160
<v Speaker 1>relevant in their lives. And that's a big change that

0:57:36.200 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 1>we've been going through as an organization. Because there's so

0:57:38.680 --> 0:57:42.000
<v Speaker 1>many brands today b and some five brands. How does

0:57:42.000 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 1>is structured internally because you can't personally oversee five hundred brands.

0:57:45.880 --> 0:57:48.080
<v Speaker 1>So take us inside the company a little bit. I

0:57:48.160 --> 0:57:49.760
<v Speaker 1>was about to say welcome to the kitchen, but i'd

0:57:49.800 --> 0:57:53.920
<v Speaker 1>right say welcome to the bar, to the brewery, all right.

0:57:54.400 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I have heads of marketing responsible for the different regions

0:57:57.080 --> 0:57:59.960
<v Speaker 1>of the world, and I also have people reportents directly

0:58:00.040 --> 0:58:03.160
<v Speaker 1>to me to lead from those five brands. With the

0:58:03.200 --> 0:58:09.360
<v Speaker 1>four global brands, and they are Budweiser, Stellartoa, Corona, and Miklobota,

0:58:09.760 --> 0:58:12.520
<v Speaker 1>So there's a special focus their plus the long tail

0:58:12.600 --> 0:58:15.960
<v Speaker 1>of brands because this is still an industry where fifty

0:58:16.320 --> 0:58:19.720
<v Speaker 1>percent of the industry is focused still in local brands,

0:58:19.840 --> 0:58:22.800
<v Speaker 1>they usually carry the local pride. Right, that makes a

0:58:22.800 --> 0:58:25.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense. I mean, do you anticipate that those

0:58:25.080 --> 0:58:28.760
<v Speaker 1>four brands continue to be really the engine for the

0:58:28.800 --> 0:58:32.840
<v Speaker 1>company going forward? Definitely yes, because these four brands there

0:58:32.840 --> 0:58:36.520
<v Speaker 1>are premium brands, and the premiumization is a gigantic trend

0:58:36.600 --> 0:58:39.520
<v Speaker 1>that we see having a huge impact in multiple industries,

0:58:39.520 --> 0:58:41.920
<v Speaker 1>including hours and it's here to stay. What are the

0:58:41.960 --> 0:58:45.480
<v Speaker 1>top brands that's sell in the United States. I'll give

0:58:45.520 --> 0:58:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you the top two. Okay, so number one, it is

0:58:47.600 --> 0:58:49.680
<v Speaker 1>not going to be hard to to guess. It's bud

0:58:49.760 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Light and it's been the case for decades. But number

0:58:52.880 --> 0:58:55.000
<v Speaker 1>two might be in new news for you. Number two

0:58:55.040 --> 0:58:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is michelob Ultra low carbs, locale, great taste for twenty years.

0:58:59.600 --> 0:59:02.200
<v Speaker 1>That's been around for twenty years, and since last year

0:59:02.240 --> 0:59:05.919
<v Speaker 1>it's the number two brand in volumes in the United States. Timmy,

0:59:05.920 --> 0:59:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you were shocked by that. Yeah, I was really surprised

0:59:07.600 --> 0:59:09.560
<v Speaker 1>because to me, it's still a new brand even though

0:59:09.560 --> 0:59:11.360
<v Speaker 1>it is twenty years old. That's one of those brands

0:59:11.400 --> 0:59:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that I think I remember when it was introduced, like

0:59:14.160 --> 0:59:16.080
<v Speaker 1>how has it been so successful and why, especially in

0:59:16.080 --> 0:59:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the last year, has it seen a real uptick Again,

0:59:18.520 --> 0:59:22.080
<v Speaker 1>It's all about getting extremely well connected with consumer behavior

0:59:22.240 --> 0:59:25.280
<v Speaker 1>and with big consumer trends and industry trends. In this case,

0:59:25.640 --> 0:59:28.360
<v Speaker 1>we see that health and wellness is a big trend.

0:59:28.440 --> 0:59:31.680
<v Speaker 1>We see this in every industry for sure. COVID has

0:59:31.720 --> 0:59:34.680
<v Speaker 1>accelerated that as well, so we see a clear impact

0:59:34.680 --> 0:59:37.000
<v Speaker 1>of this in our industry too, and this has definitely

0:59:37.040 --> 0:59:40.080
<v Speaker 1>accelerated the performance of Mikolo Boltra more so. That's what

0:59:40.120 --> 0:59:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask you, like Tim and I for

0:59:41.800 --> 0:59:44.080
<v Speaker 1>so many of our conversations for a long time, and

0:59:44.120 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>I do feel like we're getting increasingly away of thinking

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:49.560
<v Speaker 1>about the COVID impact. But what happened to you guys

0:59:49.720 --> 0:59:52.160
<v Speaker 1>during COVID that has stayed with you in terms of

0:59:52.200 --> 0:59:55.960
<v Speaker 1>corporate strategy and how you relate with consumers. So when

0:59:55.960 --> 1:00:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you think about brands and commercial trends in the indust

1:00:00.040 --> 1:00:02.400
<v Speaker 1>three I could name three. So the first one, as

1:00:02.400 --> 1:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>we just spoke about, is health and wellness. Second point

1:00:04.960 --> 1:00:09.400
<v Speaker 1>is premiumization. Because beer is affordable luxury, right, so when

1:00:09.400 --> 1:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>people say, like Okay, things are complicated, I want to

1:00:11.520 --> 1:00:14.960
<v Speaker 1>give myself some treat, they can't afford great beers. So

1:00:15.000 --> 1:00:17.280
<v Speaker 1>we see premiumization. Again. This is a trend that we

1:00:17.320 --> 1:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>see happening in multiple industries, but in our case in

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:22.440
<v Speaker 1>the beer industry, it's a very evident and strong trend.

1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>So back to your previous question on the global brands,

1:00:25.080 --> 1:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they're all premium and they continue to be the big

1:00:27.200 --> 1:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>growth engine of the company because they're sitting over a

1:00:29.920 --> 1:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>gigantic trend. The third thing that I think we all

1:00:32.920 --> 1:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>feel it e commerce. Because of the lockdown lives people

1:00:36.040 --> 1:00:38.800
<v Speaker 1>started getting used to buying things online. So we've been

1:00:38.840 --> 1:00:43.880
<v Speaker 1>investing significantly significant amounts of money on technology, on building

1:00:43.920 --> 1:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>those platforms. And for example, more than fifty percent of

1:00:48.000 --> 1:00:52.720
<v Speaker 1>our net revenues they are already sold worldwide via digital channels.

1:00:52.840 --> 1:00:56.080
<v Speaker 1>How does that work for beer? Right? How does that work?

1:00:56.160 --> 1:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>So this is because but this is sold from us

1:01:01.200 --> 1:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>to the clients, to the retailers right, so to the entrade.

1:01:04.800 --> 1:01:07.480
<v Speaker 1>These are business to business platform called bees. It's already

1:01:07.520 --> 1:01:09.840
<v Speaker 1>one of the top ten e commerce platforms in the world.

1:01:10.400 --> 1:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>But imagine a company our size, more than fifty percent

1:01:13.880 --> 1:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>of our natural revenues are already sold via digital channels.

1:01:16.680 --> 1:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>What about director consumer? Direct to consumers? This is our

1:01:20.000 --> 1:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>next endeavor. So we have already in a few countries.

1:01:23.760 --> 1:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So in the US specifically, we have strong partnerships with

1:01:27.040 --> 1:01:29.720
<v Speaker 1>the big retailers that are that also have online versions

1:01:29.760 --> 1:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>like Walmart and so and so forth and easily and

1:01:32.160 --> 1:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the ones you mentioned. We cannot operate in the US

1:01:35.560 --> 1:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>doing direct two consumers operations, but in multiple countries of

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:43.080
<v Speaker 1>the world we can. In Brazil, it's uh, it already

1:01:43.120 --> 1:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>represents more than five percent of our total sales. We

1:01:46.320 --> 1:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>sell direct to consumers. And that we're just about to launch,

1:01:49.320 --> 1:01:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Like fIF World Cup will be a big opportunity for us,

1:01:51.480 --> 1:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>especially in Latin American markets because imagine how many people

1:01:55.160 --> 1:01:57.520
<v Speaker 1>will be watching the games at home. I feel like, oh,

1:01:57.560 --> 1:02:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I should have ordered more beers. So we're launching Tada

1:02:01.200 --> 1:02:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Tada right, which is our our new global brand for

1:02:05.000 --> 1:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>for director consumers in more than ten countries in the

1:02:07.400 --> 1:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>second semester of this year. And this has become this

1:02:10.920 --> 1:02:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is growing very fast. Are beer trends among consumers? I mean,

1:02:15.000 --> 1:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's probably stupid question, but I mean, are they the same? Like?

1:02:19.520 --> 1:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>How different are some some things they hit the tren

1:02:23.960 --> 1:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>the different markets, uh, and with different intensities, But they're

1:02:27.400 --> 1:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>the same, Like the mega trends as we say, like primalization,

1:02:30.560 --> 1:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>health and well in the e commerce these are mega trends.

1:02:32.480 --> 1:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>But for example, beyond beer is something that is not

1:02:37.000 --> 1:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>equally split yet. So you see like the US, for example,

1:02:40.840 --> 1:02:43.960
<v Speaker 1>having a very meaningful market already for beyond beer, I

1:02:44.000 --> 1:02:48.640
<v Speaker 1>mean selters, ready to drink, cocktails, hearties and these kinds

1:02:48.640 --> 1:02:52.760
<v Speaker 1>of products. It's already tennish percent of the total industry

1:02:52.800 --> 1:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>in the US. It's very sizeable in other markets, it's

1:02:55.800 --> 1:02:59.880
<v Speaker 1>still more at the early stages. So this is one trend.

1:03:00.200 --> 1:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>It is a trend everywhere, but it's still uneven lead

1:03:05.720 --> 1:03:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the street any thanks to Marsel Marcone days he's the

1:03:07.800 --> 1:03:10.560
<v Speaker 1>chief marketing officer at A B and BEV. And speaking

1:03:10.600 --> 1:03:12.600
<v Speaker 1>of thanking someone, a big shout out to our Carley

1:03:12.680 --> 1:03:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Wanna of Bloomberg News. She has been with us doing

1:03:15.120 --> 1:03:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a rotation three months with the Bloomberg Radio Group and

1:03:18.400 --> 1:03:20.800
<v Speaker 1>she's been such an important member of our team, including

1:03:20.920 --> 1:03:23.360
<v Speaker 1>helping us produce this weekend broadcast on a regular basis.

1:03:23.400 --> 1:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>And she's not going too far, so maybe she'll actually

1:03:25.200 --> 1:03:26.680
<v Speaker 1>get to join us back on air in a bit

1:03:26.720 --> 1:03:29.400
<v Speaker 1>when she's got some new stories potentially about Crypto. We

1:03:29.480 --> 1:03:31.520
<v Speaker 1>totally want her back. And that wraps up the weekend

1:03:31.640 --> 1:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Thank you

1:03:34.080 --> 1:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. I'm Carol Masser and I'm

1:03:36.240 --> 1:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Tim Stanovk. Be sure to tune into Bloomberg Business Week

1:03:38.680 --> 1:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Monday through Friday. It starts at two pm Wall Street

1:03:40.800 --> 1:03:43.160
<v Speaker 1>time on Bloomberg Radio. You can also watch our daily

1:03:43.200 --> 1:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>broadcast on YouTube. Just search Bloomberg Global News and check

1:03:46.360 --> 1:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>out our Bloomberg Business Week podcast. You can find that

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com, Apple, or wherever you get your podcast.

1:03:51.760 --> 1:03:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week is available on newsstands, now, at Bloomberg

1:03:54.680 --> 1:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>dot com and always on the Bloomberg terminal. You can

1:03:57.040 --> 1:03:59.720
<v Speaker 1>also see me on Bloomberg Quick Take, available at Bloomberg

1:03:59.720 --> 1:04:03.280
<v Speaker 1>dot im, slash qt, and streaming platforms like Roku, Apple TV,

1:04:03.440 --> 1:04:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Samsung TV and more. Have a great weekend everyone, take

1:04:06.600 --> 1:04:08.400
<v Speaker 1>care of stay safe. This is Bloomberg