WEBVTT - Democratic Party Needs to Focus on Economic Growth, General Clark Says

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keen with

0:00:13.560 --> 0:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>David Gura. Daily we bring you insight from the best

0:00:16.560 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>of economics, finance, investment, and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, Bloomberg dot com, and of course,

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg. Let's go first to Edward Alden, who

0:00:34.280 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>joins us now from our Bloomberg nine nine one studios

0:00:36.240 --> 0:00:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, d C. He's a Senior Fellow at the

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:41.639
<v Speaker 1>Council on Formulations, author of Failure to Adjust, How Americans

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.320
<v Speaker 1>got left behind in the global economy, and expert on

0:00:44.400 --> 0:00:48.200
<v Speaker 1>trade policies. We approached the beginning of renegotiation talks on NAFTA,

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>and Ted, let me ask you first of all about

0:00:50.720 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the use of trade as a weapon and offensive or

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.639
<v Speaker 1>a defensive weapon. Bloomberg News reporting yesterday that the the

0:00:56.640 --> 0:01:00.279
<v Speaker 1>the administration is elected to wait awhile here on an

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:03.319
<v Speaker 1>investigation into intellectual property violations that may right occurred with

0:01:03.320 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 1>with China because of China's willingness to vote with the

0:01:06.120 --> 0:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>U S and the U N Security Council. Over the

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>weekend fIF zero was the vote there on new sanctions

0:01:10.880 --> 0:01:14.039
<v Speaker 1>on North Korea. Have we seen this before, that being

0:01:14.040 --> 0:01:17.880
<v Speaker 1>trade policy used as as advice of foreign policy, Oh, yeah,

0:01:17.959 --> 0:01:20.320
<v Speaker 1>very much, David. And and in fact, it was one

0:01:20.360 --> 0:01:24.119
<v Speaker 1>of the things that President Trump criticized as a candidate,

0:01:24.240 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 1>which which is that the United States does have a

0:01:27.280 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>long record of sometimes putting its trade in economic concerns

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:35.560
<v Speaker 1>on the back burner because it has bigger diplomatic fish

0:01:35.600 --> 0:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>to fry. If you look at our trade relations with

0:01:38.120 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Japan over many years, there's no question that that that

0:01:41.640 --> 0:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Japan got advantages from the United States because it was

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>such an important ally in Asia. So so this kind

0:01:47.680 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of thing happens all the time. What's a bit different

0:01:50.360 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 1>is the President being quite so explicit about it, having

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.160
<v Speaker 1>said to China, look, if you help us out on

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>North Korea, we might go easier with you on trade.

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>You rarely hear presidents be be quite that forthright about

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 1>what it is they're doing. Tetle and help us understand

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:10.320
<v Speaker 1>the importance of the trade relationship between China and North Korea.

0:02:10.360 --> 0:02:14.239
<v Speaker 1>These sanctions amounted about a billion dollars in total. Uh,

0:02:14.280 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>this is not a that's very sizeable for North Korea.

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>Here explain the importance of that particular trade relationship and

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and the role that China is playing here. Well, I

0:02:24.040 --> 0:02:26.840
<v Speaker 1>mean China and to a lesser extent, Russia. Those are

0:02:26.880 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>North Korea's primary markets for UH, for the country's exports. UM.

0:02:32.800 --> 0:02:35.960
<v Speaker 1>What was significant about the U N sanctions is that

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is that they're going to bite on major raw materials

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:42.799
<v Speaker 1>exports coming out of North Korea, and if fully implemented,

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>will squeeze the North Korean economy to a degree we

0:02:46.440 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>have not seen in the past. That said, there's a

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:54.639
<v Speaker 1>long history of China looking the other way and allowing

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this trade to continue despite formal sanctions

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:01.839
<v Speaker 1>being in play. So I think the real question here

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>will be whether China is worried enough about the current

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:11.480
<v Speaker 1>situation and believes that sanctions might actually UH put North

0:03:11.560 --> 0:03:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Korea on a on a slightly less volatile path. And

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>we're just gonna have to to watch how that plays out.

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Tad Alton with the Council on formulations here with us

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.679
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg surveillance. Tad, I know you're looking ahead to

0:03:20.720 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 1>August the sixteenth, that's when negotiations over and AFTA are

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:25.720
<v Speaker 1>set to begin. What do we know about what's on

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the table? We got this I think eighteen page report

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>from the U S. Trade Representative outlining what the the

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the the the the ideal agenda items would be, what's

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 1>the what's the administration said about what they hope to

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>accomplish during these talks. Yeah, well, we know quite a

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.600
<v Speaker 1>lot now actually from all three countries. So I would

0:03:40.600 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>put the U S asks into kind of three buckets. Um.

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.720
<v Speaker 1>One is things that we're already done in the Transpacific Partnership,

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:49.160
<v Speaker 1>which is the deal with Asia that President Trump walked

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 1>away from. Uh Digital trade is a good example, new

0:03:51.760 --> 0:03:54.880
<v Speaker 1>rules for digital trade which are very important, restricting state

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 1>owned enterprises, looking at the issue of currency manipulation, labor,

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>environmental standards. A lot of that was on the table

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.960
<v Speaker 1>at tpp UM. There's a kind of second bucket, which

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>is hard issues within NAFT. A lot of those have

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to do with dispute settlement. The Trump administration believes that

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.080
<v Speaker 1>American sovereignty has been compromised in various ways by these

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:19.279
<v Speaker 1>arrangements government procurement. Trump administration wants to expand by America.

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>And then there's a third basket, which I think nobody's

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of paying attention to, which is all the industries

0:04:24.080 --> 0:04:26.039
<v Speaker 1>that didn't get as good a deal as they wanted

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>out of NAFTA are now going to come out of

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the woodwork and say this is our opportunity to make

0:04:29.640 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 1>it better. You mentioned the t p P. How much

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of that is is a framework for this administration's trade

0:04:35.200 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>policy and going forward they electing not to to sign

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>on to that deal. Um, but is it's still the

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.080
<v Speaker 1>framework for for word things you're heading? Yeah, if you,

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you look at that the proposal from

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:48.279
<v Speaker 1>USTR and the negotiating objectives an awful lot of the

0:04:48.360 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>languages straight out of TPP and and and does make

0:04:51.880 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the president's action on TPP look much more questionable. I mean,

0:04:54.960 --> 0:04:57.039
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about China earlier as well. TPP would

0:04:57.040 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>have been a great way to pressure China on on

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:02.760
<v Speaker 1>eight issues. So I think the reality is that there

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>are things that the United States wants for its own

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:10.080
<v Speaker 1>economic interests, particularly helping our advanced industries of one sort

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:12.720
<v Speaker 1>or another in the technology and digital space, and a

0:05:12.720 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of that was done in TPP, and now the

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 1>administration is going to have to redo it on a

0:05:16.800 --> 0:05:20.400
<v Speaker 1>smaller scale and then after renegotiations. Good morning everyone, Bloomberg

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:23.400
<v Speaker 1>surveillance David Gurha and Tom Kane with Brooklyn Meyer of

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>BNP Perry futures deteriorate negative eight down futures a negative

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, and the vicks, which oh was nine out

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:35.039
<v Speaker 1>to a ten, jumped up to eleven point five. Eleven

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>point six is now out to twelve point one. Seven

0:05:38.279 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>That vis moved through the morning is a big one

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>point to one vix points. That's a big move given

0:05:46.320 --> 0:05:49.640
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen through August and July and the quiet

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>of the markets. I guess what else I'm looking at?

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:57.119
<v Speaker 1>David on on yen strong yen uh this morning? Point

0:05:57.160 --> 0:06:02.159
<v Speaker 1>four seven figures on yen as well, Brooklyn. How open

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>is the US economy? How much is our export and

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:10.359
<v Speaker 1>our import economy getting ahead of ourselves? You're ted Aldon first?

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>His next next, That's what happens when I walk in

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>lake David, continue, Please, I just let's let's let's before

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:24.240
<v Speaker 1>we before we get into that question, let me let

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>me ask you just about the digital e commy. You've

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned that here talking about NAFTA renegotiations, and it's something

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:32.279
<v Speaker 1>that I talked about with your now colleague, Ambassador Michael Frohman,

0:06:32.320 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>at the Council on Foreign Relations. A lot has changed

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>here in the twenty three years that have intervened here

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>between when when NAFTA was ratified and where we are today.

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:42.600
<v Speaker 1>How how desperate is is the need to change trade

0:06:42.640 --> 0:06:46.320
<v Speaker 1>policy because of innovations in the information space? Oh, I mean,

0:06:46.360 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's pretty desperate, right, I mean NAFTA was

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.599
<v Speaker 1>was ratified, and you know, back in the mid nineteen nineties,

0:06:52.640 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>that was before the Internet, you know, long before smartphones

0:06:56.200 --> 0:06:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and all the other things we take for granted. If

0:06:58.080 --> 0:07:01.880
<v Speaker 1>you look at at at the most successful dynamic companies

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, you know, the Google's, the Facebook's,

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the Amazon's, you know, these companies didn't exist when when

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>NAFTA was negotiated. So I think even if it weren't

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in this this political context of Trump having won the

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>election in part on promising to renegotiate NAFTA, I think

0:07:18.600 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>there clearly is a need to update the NAFTA. Mexico

0:07:22.320 --> 0:07:25.000
<v Speaker 1>and Canada are, you know, our our first and third

0:07:25.080 --> 0:07:27.640
<v Speaker 1>largest trading partners. So there's a lot of work that

0:07:27.640 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>that should have been done under any circumstances, to make

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.560
<v Speaker 1>this a better and more modern deal. Help us understand

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>who the principles are here, who's going to be at

0:07:34.240 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the negotiating table. I read that the the chief negotiator

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>here on NAFTA is somebody who's been with the US

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Trade Representative Office for for well over a decade. He's

0:07:42.520 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>a he's a career member the US Trade Representative Office. Uh,

0:07:47.080 --> 0:07:49.760
<v Speaker 1>what difference does that make and and what do you expect?

0:07:49.760 --> 0:07:52.240
<v Speaker 1>How politically do you expect these negotiations to be ten Well,

0:07:52.320 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I think they will probably, at least at the outset,

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>be less political than people think because these negotiations are

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:01.320
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily complicated. You know, Canada, the United States, and Mexico

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>have all appointed experienced expert negotiators who understand the ins

0:08:06.280 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>and outs of everything from you know, digital trade to

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:11.840
<v Speaker 1>textiles to autos to agriculture. Um, a lot of these

0:08:11.880 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are are hard grinding sort of issues. That's that's why

0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I think this notion that we're going to do a

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.400
<v Speaker 1>quicker negotiation is just a fantasy. This is going to

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 1>be an extremely complex and difficult negotiation and I think

0:08:22.560 --> 0:08:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna take a lot longer than than people think.

0:08:26.000 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 1>And the fact that you've got professionals and in each

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>of the three countries running it. Uh is evidence of

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 1>of of how serious all three countries are taking it. Ted,

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>thank you for stopping by today. Good to be with

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>chill them. It's very importantly folks. His book Failure to

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Justice fabulous on the United States trade and with a

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>paperback coming out here in a bit with an update.

0:08:49.320 --> 0:08:53.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm President of the United States. His name is Ted Alden.

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 1>David Gura got there right, I did not. That's what

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.040
<v Speaker 1>happens when you stay up late last night watch in

0:09:00.160 --> 0:09:04.520
<v Speaker 1>Yankee baseball torture that I had to goes from anyway,

0:09:04.600 --> 0:09:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Ted Alden with the Council and Foreign Relations. MafA Nathanson

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>is a phrase and media of great respect. Michael Nathanson

0:09:24.679 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>out of brandeis legendary at Sanford Bernstein. In a week

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:31.400
<v Speaker 1>moment decided to join Craig MafA or MafA joined naked

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and no one knows. But anyways, we are honored in

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:38.400
<v Speaker 1>our studios today. Michael Nathanson. I think we covered today

0:09:38.440 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot, Michael, the news on Disney and Netflix. I

0:09:42.320 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>want to bring up the name Jeffrey Immelt, you Bill

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Ge and things happen and all of a sudden they're

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:51.839
<v Speaker 1>going Jeff, maybe we need a new pair of eyes.

0:09:52.559 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Is Iger getting out in front of margin reduction? Is

0:09:57.000 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Mr Iger getting out in front of a board that's

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna go Wait a minute, what's going on here? Yeah,

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that's a good question. I think he's getting out in

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:07.959
<v Speaker 1>front of the changes that you and I are observing

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:10.760
<v Speaker 1>in the marketplace, which you're gonna lead to more investment

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>spending in the near term. So taking that question is yeah,

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>Bob is saying we cannot stay in the path we're

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>on now. It's gonna it's not going to the optimal solution,

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:22.199
<v Speaker 1>so we have to spend. He did this when he

0:10:22.240 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 1>got there. He bought Picks Are his first his almost

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>first month on the job. That was an admission that

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 1>Disney needed to change the entire culture. So Bob has

0:10:29.840 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>done this before, and I think this is the right

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.880
<v Speaker 1>path for Disney. It may not be pretty the near

0:10:33.960 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>term verse what we expected, but it's the right thing

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to do for the long term healthful. They have the

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 1>luxury of a timeline to eighteen nineteen when I see

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:45.440
<v Speaker 1>margin erosion and two of three businesses is the truth here.

0:10:45.480 --> 0:10:49.400
<v Speaker 1>They really got to get this done faster. It's it's

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>really It's funny you asked that. In eighteen and nineteen,

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Disney actually sets up well because of their content slate.

0:10:55.679 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>In twenty you know, last one, there's a new NFL

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 1>deal that comes in for the this new negotiation, and

0:11:01.520 --> 0:11:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the question is what's going to happen to that NFL deal.

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's really about twenty one and beyond the next

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of years of Disney have has enough engine kicking

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 1>at the parks and and the movie you know movies.

0:11:12.720 --> 0:11:15.520
<v Speaker 1>I know the movies are the David Kurtt help us here,

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>because you're the only one watching Disney movies exactly. I mean,

0:11:19.080 --> 0:11:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I get the idea of the movies are predictable. I'm

0:11:21.800 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at margin erosion that at any other company in

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 1>America would stop traffic. But Tom, this was a bad

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>This was a bad year. Here's why this was a

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.080
<v Speaker 1>bad year. There was a new NBA contract. It cost

0:11:32.080 --> 0:11:34.400
<v Speaker 1>six hundred million dollars more this year than last year.

0:11:34.920 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>That's a one time hit to this year's numbers. Acting

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that hit. Disney's ESPN growth is modestly zero plus minus one.

0:11:43.880 --> 0:11:46.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's so that's the outlook the next one

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>or two years. The problem is when the step ups

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 1>come again on the NFL. What is your base of revenues? Right?

0:11:52.320 --> 0:11:54.200
<v Speaker 1>What are you gonna do to your base? And if

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:56.160
<v Speaker 1>he stays on the panthes on now, he's gonna have

0:11:56.160 --> 0:11:59.319
<v Speaker 1>a much smaller base of revenues to bid for the contract. Right,

0:11:59.360 --> 0:12:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that's his problem. Help us understand the timing here. Visit

0:12:01.640 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>v Mr Igor. He just had his contract with Nude.

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Seems like everybody loves Bob Iger within the Disney world.

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.880
<v Speaker 1>Why do this now? Why why respond, as he said,

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to what's happening in the marketplace? Why didn't this happen earlier?

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Why not wait to see how how another company fair

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do what he's trying to do, because

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the Walt Disney Company, and Bob feels like, you

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:21.679
<v Speaker 1>know that that company is going to be a survivor,

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:23.199
<v Speaker 1>and you could do one or two things. You could

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>sell the way that scripts are sold, Time Warner sold,

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>You could stay in fight. And so Walt Disney Company,

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 1>they look at this is We've got a hundred of

0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>year history, We've got brands, we have consumer connections. Why

0:12:32.600 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>can't we do this? And Bob has never been a

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>short term quarter to quarter guy, and he has to

0:12:37.920 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>do this now. It's the right thing to do for

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>the company and probably gonna be tested by it's a

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>three or four year question whether or not it's gonna work,

0:12:46.440 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>But it's the right thing to do. What's going to

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>happen with with sports rights? I look at the ever

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:54.960
<v Speaker 1>escalating cost of getting the NBA contract, of the NFL contract,

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you look at what's been happening with the ESPN. There's uh,

0:12:57.400 --> 0:12:58.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess not not a whole lot of

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.599
<v Speaker 1>grounds for optimism. There are the price of all that

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.520
<v Speaker 1>is going to continue to go up, and how is Disney,

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>how are the companies going to deal with that? Now,

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>that's something that we always talked about the value of

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:10.360
<v Speaker 1>sports and how the companies and owned sports right now

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.040
<v Speaker 1>or the place you want to invest in the Achilles

0:13:13.120 --> 0:13:16.600
<v Speaker 1>hell that that thesis is well in one beyond, there's

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.880
<v Speaker 1>another cycle that's gonna be a problem. Right, what's gonna

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 1>stop on Amazon, maybe Netflix one day, YouTube from bidding

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:26.120
<v Speaker 1>on the next set of rights? Right, that is going

0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 1>to be a problem. Um, it's really the NFL and

0:13:29.320 --> 0:13:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the NFL. It's interesting that Disney pays a billion nine

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:34.440
<v Speaker 1>for seventeen Monday night football games that I would say

0:13:34.440 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 1>to you should not be reextended at that price. Those

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>games are lower rated than they ever have been. Well,

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:43.439
<v Speaker 1>Disney walk away from the NFL, will the move to

0:13:43.480 --> 0:13:46.160
<v Speaker 1>a Sunday and night package, right, so that is going

0:13:46.240 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>to be in two three years. The biggest questions of

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the sector is like, what's going to be the next

0:13:51.280 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>cycle of cost? And it's the glue we have on

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>our sector. And I think you're gonna have massive inflation

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the next time you go around, which will lead to

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>more margin pressure and more need to find other ways

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to grow revenues. It's just there's there's only around it.

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 1>How does Cable TV respond to this? How does Mr

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Roberts over his morning cup of coffee looking at the

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.400
<v Speaker 1>collapse of the Philadelphia Phillies. How does Mr Roberts at

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>depth and adjust to what I grew up? Okay, so

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 1>that's that's Craig's world. But I think he lam an

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>answer exactly exactly exactly Okay, So basically I think what

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Brian Roberts and Contact Cable do will say, Look, we

0:14:29.640 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 1>own the broadband pipe to the home, the best broadband pipe.

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>As more content goes over the internet, we've got broadband pricing,

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>we have a unique offering on the video front. They

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.920
<v Speaker 1>may start becoming indifferent as to how you and David

0:14:42.960 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 1>and I get our content right. They may let these

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>companies go over the top and get integrated at your

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.920
<v Speaker 1>TV set, so they may trade the property making TV

0:14:52.560 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for property making broadband and allow the media companies to

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>work their way around what's been a set top box,

0:14:58.560 --> 0:15:01.640
<v Speaker 1>closed end system for many years. Do you have confidence

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.920
<v Speaker 1>that cable TVs we know it will exist in ten

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>years thirty second adds? Maybe we go to fifteen second adds.

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.520
<v Speaker 1>How will we get the CBS News? How will we

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:15.800
<v Speaker 1>get PBS and c Span. Well, it's gonna look a

0:15:15.800 --> 0:15:17.880
<v Speaker 1>lot like the paper business, where we have some people

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>who prefer the printed copy like you have in your

0:15:20.880 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>desk right now, and the majority of people may not.

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're gonna have to have two models, right,

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>One milet's direct consumer and one that's going to be

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the big bundle deliver the old fashioned way. Where is

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the creativity and content today? You look at what's successful

0:15:34.560 --> 0:15:38.320
<v Speaker 1>for Disney, Uh, it's the Marvel franchise. It's these these

0:15:38.360 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>big sequels and beyond sequels, triquels. What do you know, right,

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.360
<v Speaker 1>right right, where do you see creativity in content today?

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>Where's that coming from as a company like Disney equipped

0:15:47.440 --> 0:15:50.920
<v Speaker 1>to do things that are capital creative. Well, let's divide

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:54.640
<v Speaker 1>that question into television and film. It's clear that television

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:57.360
<v Speaker 1>has never had a better cycle of content creation, and

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.440
<v Speaker 1>that TV has replaced movies for play for develop helpers

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>of great content. On a film side, we are really worried.

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Disney is the exclusion to the rule, but we're very

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 1>worried about the health of the film business because it's

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:11.640
<v Speaker 1>all been about sequels and global ten poles and just

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>redundant copies of of kind the same script. So I

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>think on the film side, everyone but Disney has real

0:16:18.280 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>challenges to find unique content. TV has replaced film, right,

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>So in HBO, Showtime, Netflix, they've got those developers, but

0:16:27.320 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>films are a big problem. What's TV gonna look like?

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you must be thinking about this day in

0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:32.920
<v Speaker 1>a day appen light of the news that we got

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 1>yesterday from Disney the way they intend to do this.

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:38.400
<v Speaker 1>If you get every other h film studio, entertainment company

0:16:38.440 --> 0:16:40.880
<v Speaker 1>pursuing this kind of approach, what is the device? What

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.560
<v Speaker 1>is our engagement with that device. Look like in five

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:47.080
<v Speaker 1>ten years, Okay, so we see the device being there'll

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>be a connected boxing your house for lives live content,

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're not gonna trust the internet to deliver ninety

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.720
<v Speaker 1>million homes streaming Eagles games. Right, We're gonna get we

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna need to pay for live TV, and the

0:16:59.240 --> 0:17:01.840
<v Speaker 1>companies that have live assets will benefit live. But for

0:17:01.840 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>the vast majority of the rest of the networks out there,

0:17:04.359 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>we're living on kind of channel surfing. They're gonna have

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>a problem because we're gonna also go to on demand. Right,

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:11.879
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna basically bifrect into an on demand world, live world,

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 1>and that middle will just drop away, right, And that's

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>what's gonna happens. Free cash flow drop away for some

0:17:18.880 --> 0:17:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of these companies out For the people in the middle,

0:17:20.520 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna drop away. Well, look, we we have cells

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:25.439
<v Speaker 1>and AMC networks, we have cells on Discovery and up

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:28.080
<v Speaker 1>until that deal last week, we have silent scripts. So

0:17:28.119 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>we thought the cable network universe are pure play, the

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:34.679
<v Speaker 1>CBS world, the BUCAS world, Well, CBS CBS will be

0:17:34.680 --> 0:17:36.919
<v Speaker 1>fine because CBS is going to collect a higher toll

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 1>from the distributors. Right, they're gonna say the value of

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>our content is underpriced. Right, But it's time. It's the middle,

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the dial that basically was was just

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>filling time as we channel. This has been wonderful Michael

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Nathans and making a huge effort really off of this

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>seismic announcement by Dizzie. Mr Nathanson is with Moffatt Nathanson

0:17:59.240 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>again we protect copyright of all of I guess no,

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:05.119
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to send out the Black Book from

0:18:05.200 --> 0:18:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Michael Nathan Sinny how much to talk about this one, David,

0:18:19.760 --> 0:18:22.320
<v Speaker 1>what are your thoughts as we're looking at taking the

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 1>official surveillance nap that we both every afternoon for you

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.679
<v Speaker 1>maybe two Mondays ago, and that was when the Anthony

0:18:30.720 --> 0:18:33.000
<v Speaker 1>Scaramucci news broke. So I had a taste of what

0:18:33.040 --> 0:18:35.119
<v Speaker 1>you must experience every day you're getting up so early

0:18:35.160 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>and trying to sleep as you can. But you know,

0:18:37.800 --> 0:18:40.640
<v Speaker 1>I obviously continuing to watch what's happening in the Asia

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.399
<v Speaker 1>Pacific region light of the tweets we've seen this morning

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>and the hot rhetoric conveyed the official statements from the

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 1>president here and from the leader of North Korea as well,

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.400
<v Speaker 1>it's making a diplomatic option returned to the negotiating table.

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Looked like a farther off and farther off thing. David,

0:18:55.000 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you do the politics here. But I want to say

0:18:57.160 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>that we have made every effort to speak to our mility, Harry,

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:04.280
<v Speaker 1>including the great services of James Travitis, A Fletcher School

0:19:04.320 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Tufts for Admiral Navy. Uh, and much can be saved

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:11.080
<v Speaker 1>with Wesley Clark has been much more visible. But what

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I think is so important in introduction is General Clark,

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you were first in your class at West Point. How

0:19:16.800 --> 0:19:19.239
<v Speaker 1>did you do that? How did you go into the

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln Building overlooking the Hudson and defeat the rest of

0:19:23.119 --> 0:19:26.879
<v Speaker 1>the troops or was it really defeat? I mean I was.

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:30.399
<v Speaker 1>I really enjoyed. I love being there. I love the

0:19:30.680 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>officers that mentored me and helped me. And Uh, it

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:39.600
<v Speaker 1>was privileged to be my class. It was been had

0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a great inundication school of arts on its being stare

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:46.679
<v Speaker 1>General Clark, let me ask you how much this situation

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.359
<v Speaker 1>has changed the situation with regard to to North Korea

0:19:50.160 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>since you were serving General. Of course, we've had to

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:56.479
<v Speaker 1>test these two tests at these Intercontinental Ballistic missiles UH

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and a new round of sanctions, I think the eighth

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 1>round of sanctions from the U N. Security Council. How

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:02.719
<v Speaker 1>much has this story changed as you've watched it unfold?

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>So In I was in the Joint Staff and I

0:20:07.840 --> 0:20:12.440
<v Speaker 1>was part of the team that helped do the response

0:20:12.560 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to the North Korean nuclear crisis at that time, and

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 1>we came out of it with negotiated settlement to provide

0:20:21.080 --> 0:20:25.159
<v Speaker 1>two nuclear reactors. At that time, North Korea didn't have

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:28.879
<v Speaker 1>nuclear weapons, but they did have a very very powerful

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>conventional artillery system that at rockets that could have devastated

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 1>South Korea and could have struck Japan. And they did

0:20:38.119 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>have biological and chemical weapons. So we wanted to hint

0:20:43.080 --> 0:20:47.120
<v Speaker 1>off their nuclear challenge. We did it by promising them

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:50.400
<v Speaker 1>two nuclear reactors for electric power, that's what they said

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 1>they really wanted, and fuel oil to sustain their electricity

0:20:54.680 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 1>grid until the reactors came online. Um, there was a

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:02.639
<v Speaker 1>lot of fumbling around. One agree it was shaded. People

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 1>had money at the South LANs Japanese. We had to

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:08.080
<v Speaker 1>put some money up and had to go through Congress.

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Congress had to appropriate money for the fuel oil. People

0:21:11.640 --> 0:21:15.160
<v Speaker 1>didn't like the North Koreans. They didn't like USA blah blah,

0:21:15.680 --> 0:21:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and they probably didn't trust it, and then we didn't

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:23.200
<v Speaker 1>trust them and art and we knew about two thousand

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:27.440
<v Speaker 1>two that North Korea was the highest risk for nuclear proliferation,

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>but instead we invaded Iraq on the theory that what

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.080
<v Speaker 1>if we woke up and they had a nuclear weapon,

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.040
<v Speaker 1>but we knew Korea was high risk for developing it.

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.920
<v Speaker 1>So we've lived for decades with the problem that there's

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>no good military option for Korea. Even in the early

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:51.199
<v Speaker 1>nine nineties, if you'd attacked North Korea, they would have

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>had ten thousand pieces of artillery. They could have brained

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:58.520
<v Speaker 1>thousands of rounds of chemical web warheads and other things

0:21:58.520 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>into South Korea. Million man army, a hundred thousand special

0:22:02.320 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>courses troops, insurted by many subs and uh and and

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 1>and small aircraft, guerrilla operations all over the country. And

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it's still the same, all the worse because they have

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>nuclear warriage. General Clark, we we've had a couple of

0:22:20.800 --> 0:22:23.120
<v Speaker 1>moments here in recent history. In the present has tweeted

0:22:23.160 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 1>something that could have potentially huge ramifications. I think just

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago when he tweeted about whether

0:22:28.920 --> 0:22:31.240
<v Speaker 1>or not to allow transgender individuals to serve in the

0:22:31.240 --> 0:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in the U. S. Military. Uh, there was a lot

0:22:33.280 --> 0:22:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of questioning about the nuance or the lack thereof in

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 1>those tweets. Today there are some more tweets about North

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Korea and our nuclear arsenal. Go back to when you

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>were serving, when you were a general, how would you

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>have reacted to to the tweets like the ones you've

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:48.920
<v Speaker 1>seen today. You've got to imagine that Secretary Mattis, that

0:22:49.040 --> 0:22:52.760
<v Speaker 1>John Kelly, others in that upperrational and of the administration

0:22:52.800 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 1>can't be happy with with what's being communicated via social

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>media today. We'll probably not, but you're not going to

0:22:58.400 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 1>react to tweets. The America public might react on guts

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:05.679
<v Speaker 1>might react, but the military chain fan bax or orders

0:23:05.680 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 1>that come down the chain command, so they're coming through

0:23:08.880 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>General or through Secretary demanding, so they're not tying directly

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>for the tweets. General, you have been balanced in your

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>support of the legacy of and also of Harry Truman.

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>You are identified, I would believe my most Americans as

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:29.000
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat, what is the Wesley cart Clark prescription for

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:34.520
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party forward? Well, you're asking something that's beyond

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>North Korea. But we've got to focus on The Democratic

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:42.919
<v Speaker 1>Party had to focus on economic growth. We've got to

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>have infrastructure. We've got to use our oil industry and

0:23:48.520 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>maximize our production of energy now and then transition through

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a some form of incentive. It could be a carbon

0:23:57.080 --> 0:24:03.159
<v Speaker 1>tax and move us into a non hypercarbon economy in

0:24:03.240 --> 0:24:08.120
<v Speaker 1>the thirty year time frame, among like the renewable fuel standard,

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:12.720
<v Speaker 1>and it would be a tremendous job creating exercise to

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:18.600
<v Speaker 1>do that. So it's it's pulled us economic strength. That's

0:24:18.680 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing we could do to strength in American

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>General Clark thought about our military forces. General Clark right

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to speak to you this morning, to speak to you

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the hope we can talk again soon. That's at General

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:29.920
<v Speaker 1>Wesley Clark, retire. General Wesley Clark from a NATO Supremalli

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>commander joining us on our phone lines. He's from the

0:24:42.760 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>fourth District of Oklahoma. The Congressman for Oklahoma, Tom Cole.

0:24:47.920 --> 0:24:50.199
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say anybody that listens to

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the show knows how what a joy it is to

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:56.439
<v Speaker 1>have the historian in the academic Congressman Cole on the

0:24:56.480 --> 0:24:59.119
<v Speaker 1>phone Uh, Tom, I'm gonna go to you as a

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:03.919
<v Speaker 1>card carryman publican of what I see today and the

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:06.239
<v Speaker 1>cover of the New York Times, the headline is they

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:09.159
<v Speaker 1>will be met with fire and fury. I paid a

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 1>lot more attention to the follow on statement like the

0:25:12.680 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 1>world has never seen. How can you in Republican leadership

0:25:16.760 --> 0:25:19.640
<v Speaker 1>give a history lesson to the President of the United States.

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 1>What do we need to do to get scope and

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.399
<v Speaker 1>scales so we don't see a phrase like the world

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:28.480
<v Speaker 1>has never seen? Well, I think, look, I think the

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 1>President is trying to be very direct in his communication

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:35.040
<v Speaker 1>to North Korea. Uh it's a you know, impenetrable regime,

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>and uh, I think he just wanted to be crystal clear.

0:25:37.800 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>But I don't find the phrase that's disturbing as some

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:44.480
<v Speaker 1>because I look at the people that are around the president.

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I look at a pievous staff like John Kelly, I

0:25:47.760 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 1>look at Secretary Maddis, I look at uh, you know,

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.520
<v Speaker 1>Ceptry Tillerson. I look at him and the Master and

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:57.240
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got probably the best foreign policy uh

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.880
<v Speaker 1>slash defense team of any more president. And so I think,

0:26:02.200 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, he's not going to take precipitous

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>or rash action James Travitas in Bloomerview Today. The admiral

0:26:09.320 --> 0:26:13.520
<v Speaker 1>from tough school, Fletcher Fletcher School, a tough university, makes

0:26:13.560 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>it very clear that we need a military presence, but

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>bluster won't do it. What will matters? What will Kelly?

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>What will McMaster message to the president? I think very

0:26:25.920 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>much the same thing. I mean, frankly, Uh, Admiral Stravais

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>I met when he was actually commander in NATO. He's

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a he's a brilliant soldier, but he's also a contemporary

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:38.680
<v Speaker 1>of Maddis, McMaster and Kelly. So these are people that

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>have served together that no one another to think highly

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.240
<v Speaker 1>of one another. And I think, you know, the Admiral's

0:26:44.280 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>expressing and perfectly appropriate points at Uh. Look, we're gonna,

0:26:48.400 --> 0:26:51.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, back up what we say, but we're not

0:26:51.280 --> 0:26:54.200
<v Speaker 1>trying to be provocative. But we do want the North

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Koreans to understand that we're serious, and frankly, we want

0:26:56.720 --> 0:26:59.640
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese to understand we're serious. And I think that's

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>something lost in all this. Uh. This may be as

0:27:02.920 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>much about pressuring the Chinese and reminding them to keep

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.639
<v Speaker 1>the commitments that they made when they voted for you

0:27:08.720 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>in sanctions as anything else. We know we need them

0:27:12.359 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>as a pressure point on North Korea. And frankly, they've

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:18.240
<v Speaker 1>responded to President Trump more than they have to any

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>previous American president on this doesn't make a difference to

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you being outside of Washington and all as all this

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>is happening, of course, Congress on recess to send it

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.360
<v Speaker 1>on recess as well. It seems like things are are

0:27:28.400 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>heating up here. The Secretary State and disputing that today

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>on his plane as he arrived in Guam, Uh, he

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>said that Americans just sleep soundly at night. He said,

0:27:36.880 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>things that have have not measurably changed to him. Is

0:27:39.280 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>it harder to keep track of this for you and

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.399
<v Speaker 1>your colleagues when you're not all in Washington? Is there

0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a disadvantage to not being there at this point? Well, obviously,

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.160
<v Speaker 1>if you're there, you've got immediate access to briefing from

0:27:50.160 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 1>the Pentagon, of the State Department, whoever you need to

0:27:52.359 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>talk to. But actually, I said on Defense Appropriation Subcommittee,

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:58.719
<v Speaker 1>and so this none of this really has come as

0:27:58.720 --> 0:28:03.840
<v Speaker 1>a surprise, uh, including the quote updated intelligence you know,

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>estimate of North Korea's nuclear capability. Frankly, We've been being

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:12.000
<v Speaker 1>told for over a year in Congress that the North

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Koreans would develop this kind of capability within President Trump's

0:28:16.200 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>first term. So I think our Defense Department, State Department

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:22.600
<v Speaker 1>been thinking about this for quite a long time, and

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>to be fair to them, they've kept Congress well informed.

0:28:25.400 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>So I see no particular disadvantage other than you get

0:28:30.280 --> 0:28:33.480
<v Speaker 1>much more immediate information. But throughouty is we've been warned

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:35.240
<v Speaker 1>this was coming for quite a while. You're on the

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:36.960
<v Speaker 1>Budget Committee as well. I think a lot of our

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>listeners care a great deal about whether or not we

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.520
<v Speaker 1>meet our funding obligations. What's going to happen with the

0:28:41.640 --> 0:28:43.920
<v Speaker 1>with the debt ceiling. What's your sense of how all

0:28:43.960 --> 0:28:45.600
<v Speaker 1>of that is going to perceive when you get back

0:28:45.600 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to Washington in early September. Do you have a clear

0:28:48.440 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>path forward from the White House? Uh? Do you have

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:53.160
<v Speaker 1>a sense here that we're gonna we're gonna avoid a

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>government shutdown. I think we're going to see that debt

0:28:55.160 --> 0:28:59.040
<v Speaker 1>limit raised. I think we will avoid a government shutdown.

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll probably past the budget pretty quickly after

0:29:02.280 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>we get back in. It's out of the Budget Committee.

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>It came out with the unanimous Republican vote. So that's

0:29:07.160 --> 0:29:09.560
<v Speaker 1>a sign that things won't be too rough on the floor.

0:29:10.120 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>All the appropriations committees are out of our appropriations bills

0:29:13.400 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 1>are out of the Appropriations committee for um across the floor,

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I expect the other eight, the death sits, will be trickier.

0:29:19.920 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 1>It always is, uh, simply because every administration, including this one,

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>wants a clean debt ceiling. Every Republican Congress it says, right,

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:30.520
<v Speaker 1>we'll give it you a debt ceiling, but we want

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.959
<v Speaker 1>some sort of uh uh, you know, change on the

0:29:34.000 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 1>trajectory of the debt. We don't expect you to solve

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 1>it a single pleasure, but we don't want to be

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in a situation where, effectively, you know, it's like having

0:29:42.120 --> 0:29:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a credit card and you hit the limit and you

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>just raise the limit, but you keep spending at the

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>same rate. So I think that will be a point

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.840
<v Speaker 1>of some negotiation. But you'll have plenty of Democratic votes. Uh,

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>they always are for a clean debt ceiling increase. So

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>I always say, this is a little bit like the

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:00.560
<v Speaker 1>Perils of Pauline. You know, always, look, the train has

0:30:00.560 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna run over Pauline. But sooner or later, Pauline somehow

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 1>magic who slips out of it? And I think that's

0:30:06.200 --> 0:30:11.360
<v Speaker 1>what will happen again in September. Does he realize that

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:15.719
<v Speaker 1>of the audience doesn't know the perils of Pauline is?

0:30:16.720 --> 0:30:19.600
<v Speaker 1>We got the allusion, we got the illusion. Uh, taxi

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>form is also going to be on your agenda. We've

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:23.200
<v Speaker 1>we've heard from the Big Six. I wonder if you

0:30:23.240 --> 0:30:26.320
<v Speaker 1>think the process has been inclusive enough thus far. I'm

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna be talking to your colleague, congress Been Brady tomorrow

0:30:28.640 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Television about where things stand when it comes

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>to taxi form. What's the what's the lesson that you've

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>learned on the heels of the conversation about healthcare that

0:30:37.320 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 1>you can apply to the conversation about tax reform. Well,

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the first lesson is that recofciliation is a

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:46.959
<v Speaker 1>very difficult process, and running the House by Senate rules,

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 1>tribute in the Senate couldn't follow through on his own,

0:30:49.640 --> 0:30:52.680
<v Speaker 1>which it didn't on healthcare as a little tricky. On

0:30:52.720 --> 0:30:54.480
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, I do think this has been a

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:58.720
<v Speaker 1>much more transparent process. Chairman Brady's kept us all inform

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that we've had a lease of common principles by the administration.

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Of the House and the Senate. So my instinct is, again,

0:31:05.520 --> 0:31:08.320
<v Speaker 1>we've got to see the bill. I mean uh, and

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:09.840
<v Speaker 1>we don't have some of the pay for us we

0:31:09.880 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 1>thought we would have in healthcare reform. Obviously the moorderjustment

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>tax is no longer an option here. So the real

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:19.240
<v Speaker 1>question is if they're going to proceed under reconciliation, which

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.720
<v Speaker 1>has to be budget neutral, you know, what are the

0:31:21.760 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>pay for is going to be. I think we were

0:31:23.440 --> 0:31:25.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty much a pretty clear understanding where they're going to

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 1>go in terms of lowering rates and you know, consolidating

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:34.200
<v Speaker 1>brackets and lower corporate income tax and territory reality. But

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>tell me how you're gonna pay for it all. That's

0:31:36.680 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the piece that we need to know. But again, they're

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:41.440
<v Speaker 1>working it, they've been transparent, so I think we have

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a good chance of getting there before the end of

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 1>the year. And practically having failed on healthcare, it's absolutely

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.160
<v Speaker 1>essential that we succeed on tax reform, and I think

0:31:49.160 --> 0:31:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that will focus a lot of Republican minds and maybe

0:31:52.240 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>make the conference a little more compliant than it was

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:57.680
<v Speaker 1>over the healthcare issue. Jackson, thank you so much. Thomas

0:31:57.720 --> 0:32:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Cole is with the fourth District of Oklahoma, and we

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 1>look forward to speaking to them again in our studios

0:32:02.240 --> 0:32:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance podcast.

0:32:15.400 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Subscribe and listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or

0:32:20.720 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>whichever podcast platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene,

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>David Gura is at David Gura. Before the podcast, you

0:32:29.480 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>could always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg Radio