WEBVTT - Big Tech in Wait-and-See Mode

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news from Mahard.

0:00:09.160 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>We're Innovation of Money and power Collie in Silicon Valley, NBN.

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde and Ed Ludlow.

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 3>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 3>Technology Coming up. Tech leads us lower as we end

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 3>the week in the red. All eyes on in video

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.160
<v Speaker 3>earnings as the Trump trade it fades plus.

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 4>Ali Barber reports solid growth in international and cloud units,

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 4>offsetting week sales in its China e commerce.

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.800
<v Speaker 3>Business, and SpaceX gets ready to launch a tender offer

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 3>in December, which would value it at more than two

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:59.600
<v Speaker 3>hundred and fifty billion dollars according to reports. But first

0:01:00.000 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>from private markets to public markets. We're having a pretty

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 3>lower end to the week. Look, the risk off focus

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:09.840
<v Speaker 3>has come. Whether it's Trump Trade, the euphoria dying, or

0:01:09.840 --> 0:01:12.759
<v Speaker 3>whether it's Federal reserve. Reality is we cut our bets

0:01:12.840 --> 0:01:16.360
<v Speaker 3>for a FED rate cut in December to as low

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:18.920
<v Speaker 3>as a fifty percent chance. Now we're off by three percent.

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 3>This is the worst week since the beginning of September

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.839
<v Speaker 3>for the NASDAC. Just bear that in mind. Four straight

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:26.200
<v Speaker 3>days of losses. We thank one of our producers for

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 3>that particular key fat. That is the worst set of

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 3>losses that we've seen going back to April. On a

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 3>back to back basis. We're looking at bitcoin though managers

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 3>to continue to power higher on the week but not

0:01:36.240 --> 0:01:36.720
<v Speaker 3>on the day.

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:38.199
<v Speaker 5>Bitcoin up some fifteen percent.

0:01:38.200 --> 0:01:40.640
<v Speaker 3>It's a seven day version of this end because trades

0:01:40.680 --> 0:01:41.320
<v Speaker 3>over the weekend.

0:01:41.560 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 5>What are you looking at on a micro basis, Yeah, I.

0:01:43.760 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 4>Think part of the reason that the overall euphoria's faded

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 4>post election is the hearing now is about technology earnings.

0:01:50.120 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Applied Materials is the biggest US maker of chip making equipment.

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 4>It's like the US version of ASML. It's given us

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 4>a week outlook. We're going to dig into that later

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.160
<v Speaker 4>in the show. Bloombergsin and King. Clearly the stock is

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:04.000
<v Speaker 4>down a lot. Then you have Ali Barber. These are

0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 4>the US listed shares or ADRs, and we kind.

0:02:07.000 --> 0:02:08.079
<v Speaker 6>Of summer it at the top.

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:12.120
<v Speaker 4>They're seeing really weak or anemic growth in e commerce

0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 4>in China, which is their domestic core business, even if

0:02:15.320 --> 0:02:17.399
<v Speaker 4>they're doing well in other areas. Again, we will dig

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:18.919
<v Speaker 4>into that a little bit more in just a moment,

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:21.480
<v Speaker 4>but don't forget earnings is a story from here. Are

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.560
<v Speaker 4>in because the big one next week in Vidia. All

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 4>relevant and we'll get to it later in the program.

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:29.359
<v Speaker 3>Karen re member the twentieth after the market, All eyes

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:31.480
<v Speaker 3>on Nvidia, all eyes on what's moving the markets right here,

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.399
<v Speaker 3>right now. Bloomberg of course as well. Lee is over

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 3>in Boston today. Just tell us what you're looking at

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:37.760
<v Speaker 3>in the market.

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 7>I'm looking at tech and it's really interesting because it's

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 7>a weight and see for all these tech companies, they're

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.240
<v Speaker 7>really struggling to parse out what a second Trump administration will.

0:02:46.600 --> 0:02:47.120
<v Speaker 5>We'll do it.

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.520
<v Speaker 7>It doesn't help the Trump personally. This likes meta and alphabet.

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 7>And if you look at the stocks, they're reflecting that.

0:02:52.639 --> 0:02:55.560
<v Speaker 7>While we have Tesla up at about twenty percent for

0:02:55.600 --> 0:02:58.160
<v Speaker 7>a good reason, which is Elon Musk, the rest are

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:00.560
<v Speaker 7>really trading flat. And then as that, as you pointed out,

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 7>is down for a four straight day, so that's really

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:05.760
<v Speaker 7>a really long stretch of losing streak. If you want

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 7>to see the where we're seeing action, of course, it's Bitcoin.

0:03:08.480 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 7>It's up thirty percent ever since Trump has declared victory.

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.600
<v Speaker 7>And we're looking actually at the sailor buffet ratio so

0:03:15.720 --> 0:03:20.520
<v Speaker 7>as we know, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hasaway is an established company,

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:23.360
<v Speaker 7>it tracks more in names so to speak, and micro

0:03:23.440 --> 0:03:27.080
<v Speaker 7>Strategy tracks Bitcoin well. That ratio, which measures the relative

0:03:27.120 --> 0:03:30.600
<v Speaker 7>stock performance of both so its highest level since two

0:03:30.680 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 7>thousand and it's not really a surprise because micro Strategy

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 7>is up over four hundred percent while Berkshire Hathaway is

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 7>up just around thirty one percent. And for more conviction,

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:43.880
<v Speaker 7>we saw six billion flowing through crypto funds. That's a record, Caroline,

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 7>So it's really interesting to see the two spaces as

0:03:46.760 --> 0:03:48.560
<v Speaker 7>this administration plays out.

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:51.680
<v Speaker 4>Okay, bloombergs Isabelle Lee, thank you very much. We mentioned

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 4>it a moment ago, Ali Barber reporting some solid growth

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:59.160
<v Speaker 4>in its businesses outside of China international cloud divisions and

0:03:59.200 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 4>that kind of helped set some of the drag from

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 4>an anemic Chinese e commerce business.

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 6>Going back to.

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 4>Henry Wren out of London's been tracking this print and

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 4>that sums up the story.

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:11.320
<v Speaker 6>But what's going on, particularly.

0:04:10.800 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 4>In mainland China with the Chinese consumer that has at

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.040
<v Speaker 4>least the US listed shares moving downwards.

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:22.120
<v Speaker 8>And as you said, this is certainly a result that

0:04:22.200 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 8>has some good and bad But the bad part is

0:04:24.760 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 8>of course the local e commerce business, because this is

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 8>the two thirds of ali Baba's revenue generation, and what

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 8>we've been seeing for this quarter is still anemic because

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 8>the revenue that ali Baba generates from third party merchants

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 8>that grew only two percent during the quarter, So that's

0:04:42.920 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 8>not a sort of rebound that investors have been hoping for.

0:04:46.800 --> 0:04:50.679
<v Speaker 8>And a direct cell from Ali Baba's platform also stuck

0:04:50.720 --> 0:04:53.520
<v Speaker 8>in the decline as well. That really shows that consumer

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 8>sentiment in China is still weak, although this morning that

0:04:57.320 --> 0:05:00.920
<v Speaker 8>we have some more positive retail sales state data in

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:05.080
<v Speaker 8>October showing that the retail sales actually expanded by four

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:08.800
<v Speaker 8>point eight percent, which is the fastest pace in eight months. However,

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 8>we have to take in an account that these results

0:05:11.640 --> 0:05:15.560
<v Speaker 8>came between June and September, and during that period we

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 8>can say that the consumer sentiment.

0:05:17.560 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 6>Is really not on amend just yet.

0:05:20.520 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 3>International growth, how resilient is that going to be in

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 3>the face of geopolitical headwinds, most dominantly here in the

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:31.880
<v Speaker 3>United States we're anticipating in new administration which isn't very

0:05:31.960 --> 0:05:32.600
<v Speaker 3>China friendly.

0:05:33.960 --> 0:05:38.359
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So, as we discussed the domestic e commerce business

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 8>has been weak for quarters and quarters, so they have

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.160
<v Speaker 8>to find a new growth engine. It used to be Cloud,

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 8>but Cloud that growth engine has been sputtering for several

0:05:48.839 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 8>quarters in a row. Now it has showed some signs

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 8>of recovery, but still a long way to go. So

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 8>another way to expand is through overseas business. What we

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 8>see from pdd door as well, which we've been seeing

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 8>from team.

0:06:03.040 --> 0:06:04.520
<v Speaker 6>Explosive growth in the US.

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:08.800
<v Speaker 8>For Ali Baba, the focus has been in other Asian markets.

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 8>We're talking about Malaysia, Indonesia, those markets, and they've been

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:15.840
<v Speaker 8>doing quite well, although we would have to point out

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 8>that Ali Baba is still burning.

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 6>Cash in those markets.

0:06:19.320 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 8>What we've been seeing in the past quarter is they

0:06:22.080 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 8>are narrowing losses and we see the margins has been improving,

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:28.800
<v Speaker 8>although it's still some distance away from break even.

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.479
<v Speaker 3>Henry Wren has been across all of these Chinese e

0:06:32.520 --> 0:06:33.240
<v Speaker 3>commerce players.

0:06:33.240 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 5>We thank you.

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 3>Now and we're going to turn our attention a minute

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.279
<v Speaker 3>to SpaceX. It's preparing a tender offer in December. The

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 3>two hundred and fifty billion dollar valuation. We're going to

0:06:42.240 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 3>get to those reports. That's next.

0:06:43.880 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 5>This is bloe Meg.

0:06:44.520 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 4>Technology SpaceX is preparing to launch a tender offer in

0:06:58.160 --> 0:07:01.440
<v Speaker 4>December that will sell existing shares in the business at

0:07:01.480 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 4>about one hundred and thirty five dollars each. That's according

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 4>to a report in the Financial Times, where they cited sources.

0:07:08.480 --> 0:07:11.000
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg's Bris ein Horn is here with us and Bruce

0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 4>just for a Bloomberg technology audience. The basics a tender

0:07:14.120 --> 0:07:18.960
<v Speaker 4>is where employees or some early investors sell shares. There's

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 4>no new capital raise. The main point, I think is

0:07:22.440 --> 0:07:24.920
<v Speaker 4>a valuation of two hundred and fifty billion dollars or

0:07:24.920 --> 0:07:28.280
<v Speaker 4>more is quite eye watering. Put SpaceX up there. What

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:29.000
<v Speaker 4>else do we know?

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:30.240
<v Speaker 9>That's right?

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 10>And so typically SpaceX does these offerings twice a year.

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:39.119
<v Speaker 10>The previous valuation, which was in mid year, was around

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 10>two hundred and ten billion dollars, So two hundred and

0:07:42.360 --> 0:07:44.800
<v Speaker 10>fifty billion dollars of course a big jump up. It

0:07:44.840 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 10>would be a record for a US company. It's not

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:48.840
<v Speaker 10>a record for a startup. The record for a startup

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:51.880
<v Speaker 10>is two hundred and sixty eight billion dollars for Byte

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 10>downs to the Chinese parent of TikTok. Just to give

0:07:56.480 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 10>you a sense of just how much SpaceX's valuation has increased.

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.840
<v Speaker 10>A year ago, when there was a similar offer, the

0:08:02.960 --> 0:08:05.920
<v Speaker 10>valuation was one hundred and eighty billion dollars.

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 3>It feels for some as though the valuation goes higher,

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe it gets a Trump Elon Musk bump. Maybe everyone's

0:08:14.720 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 3>just trying to plow in money to associate themselves with

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 3>the success of Elon Musk and the considerable perhaps ease

0:08:21.360 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 3>with which he'll get better regulatory approvals when he's associated

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.800
<v Speaker 3>with the next administration. Is that something you eyeing, Bruce, certainly,

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.760
<v Speaker 3>gwinnshot while the president of SpaceX is talking about that

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 3>very thing this morning.

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.720
<v Speaker 10>It's a good point that, of course Elon Musk does

0:08:36.800 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 10>have the ear of President elect Trump. That said, though

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 10>this is a lot more than just a politics story.

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:48.679
<v Speaker 10>Starlink has more than six thousand satellites in operation. Gwinshot

0:08:48.679 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 10>well this morning, speaking at a conference in New York,

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 10>said that the company has launched more than seven thousand satellites.

0:08:57.400 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 10>This puts Starlink far ahead of any competitor. So they

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 10>are really the dominant player for now, at least in

0:09:04.280 --> 0:09:09.719
<v Speaker 10>lower th orbit. The satellite communication, which the valuation partly reflects.

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:13.800
<v Speaker 4>You know, Bruce, the focus on SpaceX is about reusability.

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.640
<v Speaker 4>The Falcon generation of rocket can go up and then

0:09:16.679 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 4>come back down and be used again. But our attention

0:09:19.320 --> 0:09:22.199
<v Speaker 4>is going to turn to Starship. What did Shotwell say

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 4>about Starship? And I guess should the audience be looking

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:27.000
<v Speaker 4>out to see another test anytime soon?

0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 10>Yes, so there will be another test soon. This morning

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:35.320
<v Speaker 10>Gwinschotwell said that we should expect that on Tuesday next week.

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 10>This would be the latest test of Starship. Starship is

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:42.559
<v Speaker 10>just a level, a whole other level bigger than anything

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 10>that's existed up until now. And in her comments this morning,

0:09:48.160 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 10>she also did say that the company expects to launch

0:09:52.640 --> 0:09:56.040
<v Speaker 10>direct to sell service sometime before the end of the year,

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.559
<v Speaker 10>sometime in the next month or so. That would also

0:09:59.120 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 10>put SpaceX out front in another business that's really just

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.640
<v Speaker 10>getting started, offering satellite based communication that could go directly

0:10:07.679 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 10>to cell phones without having to have any sort of

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:12.800
<v Speaker 10>satellite dish or any other type of equipment.

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 3>More than four hundred Starship launches are possible in the

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:20.120
<v Speaker 3>next four years, according to Quench Shutwell, extraordinary numbers on

0:10:20.240 --> 0:10:23.720
<v Speaker 3>both evaluation and the amount of launches. Briseiinhorn, we thank

0:10:23.760 --> 0:10:27.680
<v Speaker 3>you Meanwhile, let's talk about Elon Masqu's Tesla seeing a

0:10:27.720 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 3>big reaction alongside other EV makers.

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.319
<v Speaker 5>Today we get a reprieve. It was yesterday that a.

0:10:32.280 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 3>Report hit from Reuter's saying that Donald Trump and his

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 3>administration is set to end some seven and a half

0:10:38.040 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 3>thousand dollars EV tax credits that are currently out there.

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.199
<v Speaker 3>Joining us is Terry o Day, in charge Energy COO Terry.

0:10:44.360 --> 0:10:46.200
<v Speaker 3>So the point here is that when you buy an

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 3>EV you can get a nice, juicy tax credits seven

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:50.520
<v Speaker 3>and a half thousand dollars and that would be wiped

0:10:50.520 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 3>out potentially by the next administration.

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.640
<v Speaker 5>How important, How integral is that tax credit to demand?

0:10:57.720 --> 0:11:00.160
<v Speaker 11>Well, it's not clear yet, but we do know that

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 11>it is important. It's very valuable to the industry, and

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:08.200
<v Speaker 11>it's important because of both consumers relying on it and

0:11:08.320 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 11>manufacturers relying on it. So it's really about EV jobs

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 11>when it comes down to it. And the current incentive

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:19.960
<v Speaker 11>is only available to American made vehicles, So what we're

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 11>really talking about is manufacturing in the US, and that's

0:11:24.160 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 11>why this comes as a bit of a surprise. And

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 11>the last time this personal tax credit was challenged, it

0:11:31.000 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 11>had a lot of support in Congress from states that

0:11:34.240 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 11>are manufacturing the components for electric vehicles, like states like

0:11:38.400 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 11>Tennessee and South Carolina and Michigan and Illinois. They wanted

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:44.959
<v Speaker 11>to protect jobs and that's why they protected this tax

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:47.840
<v Speaker 11>credit last time. So we'll see how this proposal goes

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:48.440
<v Speaker 11>in Congress.

0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Many of those states, not blue states per se, potentially

0:11:54.120 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 3>read and therefore affecting home territory to certain extent for

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 3>your business, when you think about the infrastructure play of this,

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 3>does this set back the adoption.

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 5>Of evs in the longer term?

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.000
<v Speaker 3>Do you think I know it's hypothesis here, but does

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 3>that make you think about readjusting your strategy?

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 12>It definitely has that potential.

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 11>I mean, for our business, we rely on demand from

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 11>consumers and from businesses, so this is a personal task

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.600
<v Speaker 11>credit for individuals. There are other incentives in the industry

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.359
<v Speaker 11>that are definitely on the shopping block from this administration.

0:12:27.920 --> 0:12:31.760
<v Speaker 11>So there's an important fight to protect a lot of

0:12:31.800 --> 0:12:32.720
<v Speaker 11>those incentives.

0:12:32.760 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 4>Now, Terry, you said this is a surprise, is it really?

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 4>Elon Musk has been talking about scrapping subsidies for years.

0:12:43.200 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 6>He has been close to.

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 4>Trump throughout the election process and now in an advisory

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 4>role because those will out act outside of government.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 6>He will have Trump's here.

0:12:54.480 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 4>But also we had decelerating EV sales growth anyway for

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:01.679
<v Speaker 4>the latter part of biden'sministration. Why is it a surprise to.

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 11>You, Well, I think decelerating sales growth was going to

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.840
<v Speaker 11>happen anyway, right, because when you're growing year over year

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.960
<v Speaker 11>double digits, you cannot continue that forever, just the law

0:13:11.120 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 11>numbers doesn't allow it. So deceleration was going to happen.

0:13:15.280 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 11>But this incentive has broad support, as I was saying,

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 11>So that's why it comes as a bit of a surprise.

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.079
<v Speaker 11>And to be saying this so early in the transition

0:13:23.640 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 11>is I think also kind of surprising. Look, this is

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:31.720
<v Speaker 11>not a significant tax credit and the range of new

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 11>tax policy we're going to be seeing coming out of

0:13:34.480 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 11>this administration, and it favors US manufacturing, which this new

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 11>administration has been saying is what they really want.

0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:47.840
<v Speaker 12>So they're looking for manufacturing. This is something that does that.

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:51.080
<v Speaker 4>Terry, Don't get me wrong, I've got a Tesla model

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:53.000
<v Speaker 4>why I think Carroy I'm right and saying, also has

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 4>an EV I leased it. It was a competitive lease

0:13:56.200 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 4>because of the seventy five hundred dollars tax credit. But

0:13:59.080 --> 0:14:02.200
<v Speaker 4>big picture, what is it that's going to put electric

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 4>vehicle sales in North America at least back on a

0:14:05.200 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 4>path to accelerating sales growth. What do you want to

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 4>see proactively the Trump administration do well?

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 11>The most important thing is that California has the right

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:18.520
<v Speaker 11>to regulate tailpipe emissions today, and about a dozen other

0:14:18.600 --> 0:14:19.640
<v Speaker 11>states have signed.

0:14:19.360 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 12>On to that.

0:14:20.320 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 11>They have regulations forthcoming that are affecting fleets, So fleets

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 11>would be required to buy evs when those fleets are

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 11>larger than fifty vehicles in their fleet, and manufacturers would

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 11>be required to sell to those fleets, so that dual

0:14:38.200 --> 0:14:43.640
<v Speaker 11>regulation is in jeopardy. And overall, California's right to regulate

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:47.440
<v Speaker 11>tailpipe emissions is what created the EV industry in the

0:14:47.440 --> 0:14:50.440
<v Speaker 11>first place. We think we can compete on an equal

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 11>footing with gas and diesel. Today, my customers like PEPSI

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 11>and FedEx and ups and school districts across the country

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 11>are already saving money by going to electric because it's

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:04.359
<v Speaker 11>cheaper than gas and diesel on a total operating cost.

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 12>So we think we can compete on an equal putting.

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 11>But it's important to have these regulations in place to

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:11.480
<v Speaker 11>just kind of get over the hump of these pilot

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:13.240
<v Speaker 11>programs and enable it.

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:14.120
<v Speaker 12>To go to scale.

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 3>In so saying that terry, it almost makes you think, well,

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 3>why have them if already you're able to compete. That's

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 3>sort of therein lies the argument, and going back to

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 3>the consumer right now, is it that you need to

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 3>compete by what you do. Many people are reticent to

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 3>commit fully to an EV. They've been going back to

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 3>a hybrid model because they're worried about infrastructure and alack thereof.

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, and that's the real trick here.

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 11>I think, you know, committing capital to build out an

0:15:41.560 --> 0:15:46.119
<v Speaker 11>industry like this is extremely risky. So those regulations provide

0:15:46.200 --> 0:15:52.280
<v Speaker 11>the guardrails for investment. It attracts private investment and creates jobs.

0:15:52.400 --> 0:15:55.240
<v Speaker 11>And so that's really what this is about, is not

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:59.360
<v Speaker 11>the you know, favoring one industry over another, but really

0:15:59.440 --> 0:16:03.240
<v Speaker 11>just giving enough certainty to investors that they can put

0:16:03.360 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 11>capital into the space to continue to grow that charging infrastructure,

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.480
<v Speaker 11>to continue to convert their fleets and do the things

0:16:10.480 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 11>that we want to do for this space.

0:16:13.160 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 4>President Elect Trump's point, i think is not that he's

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 4>antiev but that he's not fully all in ev he

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 4>wants choice. Terry O'Day in charge energy. Soah, great to

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:30.880
<v Speaker 4>have you on the program.

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 9>We're just getting started.

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.680
<v Speaker 13>And the thing I remember about last week is when

0:16:35.720 --> 0:16:38.200
<v Speaker 13>Donald Trump was in this room, everybody else was celebrating.

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 13>He was stone cold ready for the next step. But

0:16:41.920 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 13>I also want to thank him for making sure that

0:16:44.400 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 13>Elon Musk and I own a position to start the

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:51.440
<v Speaker 13>mass deportations of millions of unelected federal bureaucrats out of

0:16:51.480 --> 0:16:54.760
<v Speaker 13>the DC bureaucracy. That too, is how we're going to

0:16:54.840 --> 0:16:58.920
<v Speaker 13>save this country. And I don't know if you've got

0:16:58.920 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 13>to know Elon yet, but he doesn't bring a chisel.

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 13>He brings a chainsaw, and we're going to be taking

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 13>it to that bureaucracy.

0:17:05.200 --> 0:17:06.160
<v Speaker 9>It's gonna be a lot of fun.

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswami, who has recently chosen by President elect

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.520
<v Speaker 3>Donald Trump to co lead the new Department of Government

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 3>Efficiency along with Elon Musk, to cut excess regulation, it says,

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:23.760
<v Speaker 3>and expenses. Let's discuss this with Jennifer Pallack Pulker.

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:25.159
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, it's a Friday.

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer Pulker, Senior Fellow at Niscannon Center and former President

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.560
<v Speaker 3>Barack Obama's deputy Chief Technology offers a boy, you have

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.400
<v Speaker 3>got inside knowledge about how easy or hard it is

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:40.280
<v Speaker 3>to affect policy change within a civil service that already exists.

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Look Vivek Ramaswami saying it will be fun to take

0:17:43.359 --> 0:17:45.959
<v Speaker 3>a chainsaw to it. For many who work there, this

0:17:46.000 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 3>won't be fun.

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 5>But what's the reality.

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 3>Do you agree that, in principle efficiency needs to be found?

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 14>I agree that government has to get better at doing

0:17:55.520 --> 0:17:57.879
<v Speaker 14>what we say we're going to do, and I think

0:17:58.000 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 14>our inability to do that has I've created the opening

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 14>for this DOGE and sort of other initiatives that you

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.440
<v Speaker 14>see coming out of the Trump White House. Now there's

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 14>so many questions about this. You have significant confluence of interest,

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:18.560
<v Speaker 14>especially for Elon Musk. They have established this thing outside

0:18:18.600 --> 0:18:21.199
<v Speaker 14>of government, so it's unclear if they really intend to

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:25.040
<v Speaker 14>just rely on executive action or really get.

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:25.800
<v Speaker 5>Involved with Congress.

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 14>So there's some questions about the whether they can be effective.

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.080
<v Speaker 14>But I do think that there is a real problem

0:18:32.119 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 14>behind all of this rhetoric that needs to be handled

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 14>with probably more care than the way that Musk and

0:18:41.800 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 14>Ramaswami are talking about it.

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 3>Jediv I do want to be naive to the fact

0:18:45.520 --> 0:18:48.800
<v Speaker 3>that people have been probably trying to make government more

0:18:48.840 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 3>efficient for a little while.

0:18:50.359 --> 0:18:52.359
<v Speaker 5>So what is it that hasn't been done? Oh, we

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 5>at the level now.

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:58.439
<v Speaker 3>That this sort of decision not to care, not to

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:01.199
<v Speaker 3>be precise, but actually to just go at it with

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:05.200
<v Speaker 3>the chainsaw. Just every other Social Security number is out.

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 3>Is that the place that we've got ourselves to.

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 14>I don't think it has to be. I think a

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 14>good analogy might be brush fires. So I live part

0:19:17.200 --> 0:19:21.040
<v Speaker 14>time in California in a very very high fire risk area,

0:19:21.600 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 14>and I was told when we moved there, you know,

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 14>backwen natives all in the land, there were fifteen trees

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:31.399
<v Speaker 14>per acre, sorry, yes, per acre, and now there's fifteen

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 14>hundred and so the fires now are bigger, and we

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:39.080
<v Speaker 14>can do fire management. Now, we've learned a lot, and

0:19:39.119 --> 0:19:41.959
<v Speaker 14>we can mitigate the worst damage.

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 5>But when you haven't cleared out.

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 14>The craft for many years, and I think that is

0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 14>unfortunately what has happened in our government is that we haven't,

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 14>then we get these conflagrations.

0:19:51.880 --> 0:19:53.440
<v Speaker 5>That burn out of control.

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 14>I hope we can stop that, but we are going

0:19:56.119 --> 0:19:58.239
<v Speaker 14>to have some burning, and some of it will end

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:01.159
<v Speaker 14>up being healthy over the long run. It's in a

0:20:01.359 --> 0:20:04.200
<v Speaker 14>difficult situation to be in, and I think that public

0:20:04.280 --> 0:20:06.640
<v Speaker 14>servants to Jennifer feel nervous about this, have.

0:20:06.600 --> 0:20:10.679
<v Speaker 4>A road to be We heard from Vivek Ramaswami in

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 4>that SoundBite, but I had an exchange with him on

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 4>x the social media platform yesterday, and as part of

0:20:16.800 --> 0:20:21.040
<v Speaker 4>that exchange, I flagged the idea that investors are basically

0:20:21.200 --> 0:20:26.439
<v Speaker 4>selling out of companies that are historically main contractors to

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 4>the government.

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 6>For a reason.

0:20:28.400 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 4>They think that you know that mister Ramaswami, who calls

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 4>Uncle Sam not supposed.

0:20:33.600 --> 0:20:37.040
<v Speaker 6>To be Uncle Sucker. They think he'll be successful. I

0:20:37.119 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 6>guess that I would just like you.

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:42.760
<v Speaker 4>To outline the reality of doing that, canceling long term contracts,

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 4>looking at automate vendors, and ultimately reducing headcamp at government

0:20:46.920 --> 0:20:50.320
<v Speaker 4>agencies based on your experience having worked within it.

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:54.160
<v Speaker 5>If we do that, there.

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 14>Will be damage in all sorts of ways. There's going

0:20:57.800 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 14>to be damage to.

0:21:00.760 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 5>Our ability to protect our nuclear arsenal.

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 14>For instance, Michael Lewis writes about this in the fifth Risk.

0:21:06.400 --> 0:21:08.280
<v Speaker 5>It will chill your bones. We do not want that.

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 14>On the other hand, we do need some changes, and

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 14>we need when we do those changes to be thoughtful

0:21:16.640 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 14>about preserving the foundations that this country is built on. Now,

0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:23.479
<v Speaker 14>this isn't a Doge proposal, but if you look at

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:27.520
<v Speaker 14>the schedule F proposal, for instance, it's not actually addressing

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 14>the real problems of being difficult to fire under performers,

0:21:31.960 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 14>for instance. It's going at the core principles of a

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 14>independent civil service that's able to tell the truth, that

0:21:40.200 --> 0:21:44.040
<v Speaker 14>is hired and fired on the basis of merit. We

0:21:44.080 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 14>need real civil service reform, not schedule F.

0:21:47.119 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 4>Jennifer Palker, Senior fellow at NISCAN and sent I really

0:21:50.119 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 4>appreciate your time here on Bloomberg Technology.

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Blue Meg Technology. I'm Caroline Hyde in

0:22:02.800 --> 0:22:04.080
<v Speaker 3>New York and I met.

0:22:04.000 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 6>Love Low in San Francisco. What's going on in the market, Scarret,

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:07.960
<v Speaker 6>I've risk off.

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:08.400
<v Speaker 5>Kind of a day.

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.199
<v Speaker 3>Look, we're back to fundamentals yourfuria. The highs of the

0:22:11.240 --> 0:22:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Trump trade just ease a little bit, and we've refocused

0:22:13.880 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 3>on the other guy, that is, of course, the head

0:22:15.920 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 3>of monetary policy. We think about what Jay Power is

0:22:18.320 --> 0:22:20.399
<v Speaker 3>saying in in terms of the FED and rate cuts,

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.959
<v Speaker 3>in the market really pairing back how likely that cut

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 3>is for December.

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:26.160
<v Speaker 5>We're off by almost three percent.

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 3>You can see the sudden jarring move that we've got

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 3>on this last day of trade. It is the worst

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:32.840
<v Speaker 3>week for the Nasdaq, the main benchmark now's that one

0:22:32.960 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 3>hundred at least since going back to the beginning of September.

0:22:35.560 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 3>So we have got a sort of a bit of

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 3>a pain trade to end the week. Move on and

0:22:38.480 --> 0:22:40.360
<v Speaker 3>have a look at what's happening on the individual movers

0:22:40.640 --> 0:22:42.680
<v Speaker 3>because we're actually back to fundamentals when it comes to

0:22:42.760 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 3>earnings as well. Ed I China, like what's happening with

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 3>some of the chip makers.

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 5>Firstly, Tesla is up four percent.

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 3>It's like the only Magnificent seven company that is on

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.920
<v Speaker 3>the higher side from the benchmark today it pulls up,

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:55.800
<v Speaker 3>but the rest of the Mags seven are pulling down

0:22:56.000 --> 0:22:58.960
<v Speaker 3>on a points perspective, and really that's a relief rally

0:22:59.000 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 3>after yesterday's sell off from the back of that ev news.

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.560
<v Speaker 3>Applying Materials down eight percent, we're seeing it trade at

0:23:04.560 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 3>the lowest level since February of this year. This is

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 3>a chip equipment maker like asml over in Europe. This

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 3>is the US version, and look, it's signaling that perhaps

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.000
<v Speaker 3>everything in Chipland isn't all that rosy if you strip

0:23:15.000 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 3>out AI again, we're thinking industrial or thinking autos, and

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:19.879
<v Speaker 3>we're thinking China. And I'm looking at in video what

0:23:19.920 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 3>does this reader cross mean for in video? When we

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:25.520
<v Speaker 3>get its earnings on November the twentieth ed key for

0:23:25.520 --> 0:23:27.160
<v Speaker 3>there were down by two and a half percent. Of course,

0:23:27.200 --> 0:23:28.960
<v Speaker 3>the key points drag on the day. What are you

0:23:28.960 --> 0:23:29.840
<v Speaker 3>looking at?

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, let's go back to the chips and do a

0:23:31.600 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 4>deep dive bloomberg z and King is here with us

0:23:33.520 --> 0:23:37.280
<v Speaker 4>in San Francisco on Applied Materials. It's interesting because part

0:23:37.320 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 4>of kind of the bigger tech markets discussion is we've

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 4>got over the election.

0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 6>Now and earnings are with US.

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:47.479
<v Speaker 4>Applied Materials is America's biggest chip equipment maker. Was there

0:23:47.520 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 4>anything in it that was kind of consistent with what

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 4>we've heard from ASML the big themes about AI investment

0:23:53.280 --> 0:23:56.359
<v Speaker 4>and those cutting edge machines or China or anything else.

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 15>Yeah, No, that's one hundred percent consistent with what we've

0:23:59.240 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 15>heard from others. Spoke with the CEO yesterday after the

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:05.919
<v Speaker 15>release and he was like, look, everything's Okay, well, you know,

0:24:05.960 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 15>there's nothing to worry about. The long term picture for

0:24:08.240 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 15>this industry is fantastic. I'm not going to worry about,

0:24:11.400 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 15>you know, the odd fluctuation here and there on a

0:24:13.760 --> 0:24:18.520
<v Speaker 15>quarterly basis. Unfortunately for him, investors are because you know,

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:20.840
<v Speaker 15>you have to be perfect with the amount of money

0:24:20.880 --> 0:24:24.119
<v Speaker 15>that's been put into these stocks, with the expectations that

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 15>exist around AI. Our performance is the only performance.

0:24:29.400 --> 0:24:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Well said, I think a prior to this on the year,

0:24:31.760 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 3>they had actually been up to the tune of about

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:34.600
<v Speaker 3>fifteen percent.

0:24:34.640 --> 0:24:37.439
<v Speaker 5>Now were only up about five percent. In the reader

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.760
<v Speaker 5>cross is important because we're all.

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 3>Going to be obsessing about in video next week, and

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:45.040
<v Speaker 3>this is your main company that you focus on.

0:24:45.160 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 5>What does it mean for in video?

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.280
<v Speaker 15>I mean again, the word AIAIAI keeps cropping up over

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.920
<v Speaker 15>and over again. What we've heard with regards to in

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:56.240
<v Speaker 15>video has been very positive.

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:56.479
<v Speaker 11>Right.

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 15>The only thing that's going to hold them back will

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:02.639
<v Speaker 15>be availability of supply. Can they get enough chips to

0:25:02.680 --> 0:25:06.440
<v Speaker 15>meet demand. Everything that we're hearing in terms of the fundamentals,

0:25:06.480 --> 0:25:08.280
<v Speaker 15>in terms of the sell through, in terms of the

0:25:08.320 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 15>capex's planned is absolutely positive.

0:25:11.240 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 4>You've reported overnight that TSMC, the world's largest contract manufacturer

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.919
<v Speaker 4>of chips, is finalizing its awards from the US government

0:25:19.920 --> 0:25:23.719
<v Speaker 4>through the Chips Act. What's new and why is that significant?

0:25:23.920 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 15>Oh, it's now a legally binding contract between the United

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 15>States government and TSMC. So not I won't say there's

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:34.399
<v Speaker 15>no going back, but it makes going back a lot harder.

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:38.120
<v Speaker 15>It shows that they've already achieved some of the things

0:25:38.119 --> 0:25:39.800
<v Speaker 15>that they were supposed to do. They're going to get

0:25:39.840 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 15>a billion dollars of federal money this year, we were

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 15>told yesterday. So in general it's a positive sign. It's

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:50.920
<v Speaker 15>moving that whole bill forward, obviously ahead of the administration handover.

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.879
<v Speaker 6>Blimbozy and King and all things chips. Thank you very much, Carol.

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:56.800
<v Speaker 3>Sticking with chips a little bit, it's time for talking

0:25:56.880 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 3>tech ed and first up shares of Samsung. They'd been

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 3>up in South Korean trade today because the tech giant

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:07.159
<v Speaker 3>is surprising investors with a mammoth buyback of seven billion

0:26:07.200 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 3>dollars worth of its own stock over the next year.

0:26:09.520 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 3>The move comes, of course, the mid investor concerns that

0:26:12.640 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 3>the growth in the firm's memory chip business has been lackluster,

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.359
<v Speaker 3>Struggling to keep up with rival sk Heinex, for example. Meanwhile,

0:26:19.359 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 3>Elon Musk was ramping up his feud with Sam Altman.

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:25.199
<v Speaker 3>In a revised court filing must highlighted and trust concerns

0:26:25.200 --> 0:26:27.919
<v Speaker 3>by OpenAI, alleging that the company is trying to corner

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 3>the Generator AI market and sacrificing safety.

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 5>OpenAI didn't immediately respond to.

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 3>A request for comment, and the Ultimate Fighting Championship will

0:26:37.200 --> 0:26:40.000
<v Speaker 3>be looking for a decade long partnership when it shops

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 3>around its media rights next year. This is all according

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.560
<v Speaker 3>to the company CEO Dana White, who sat down with

0:26:44.600 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 3>Boomberg TV yesterday. He also spoke about his relationship with

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 3>the President elect Trump.

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 5>Just take a listen.

0:26:50.080 --> 0:26:52.640
<v Speaker 16>He's the one that when we first bought the company

0:26:52.880 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 16>and venues didn't love the UFC. Back then, he opened

0:26:57.840 --> 0:27:00.400
<v Speaker 16>up the TAJ and New Jersey and said, we did

0:27:00.400 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 16>our first couple of events there at the TAJ and

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 16>he showed up for the first one and stayed till

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.080
<v Speaker 16>the last fight. That was when he became a fan.

0:27:07.200 --> 0:27:08.880
<v Speaker 12>I know you've been friends with him for a long time.

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 12>Any plans to actually work for him in his new administration.

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 16>I want nothing to do with politics.

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 9>No I do not I know.

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:20.400
<v Speaker 4>Let's stay in the realm of fighting and competitive sports.

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 4>Netflix shares actually down two percent. Remember tonight is the

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 4>big fight. It is streamed exclusively on Netflix. Jake Paul

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.399
<v Speaker 4>versus Mike Tyson. Don't know about you, Carrot. It's been

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 4>all over my social media feeds and it's an interesting

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 4>moment for Netflix whether they can pull off There he

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.160
<v Speaker 4>is and there he Is. We'll be tuning in one

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 4>to watch. You can discuss it on the show on Monday.

0:27:42.640 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 4>Coming up on this edition of Bloombog Technology. Business leaders

0:27:45.400 --> 0:27:48.679
<v Speaker 4>from around the world are gathered in Lima for apex

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:52.680
<v Speaker 4>CEO summit. That includes Google's VP of Government Affairs Corumbatia,

0:27:52.800 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 4>and we're going to hear from him next Stay with us.

0:27:55.200 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 6>This has Boombog Technology.

0:28:06.000 --> 0:28:09.320
<v Speaker 3>Apex CEO Summit. It's been underway for the last few days.

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 5>In Lima, Peru.

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 3>Global business leaders gathered to discuss the latest in the

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.920
<v Speaker 3>space sector, in AI policy, and much more.

0:28:15.400 --> 0:28:16.480
<v Speaker 5>Most Lisa Bromo, it's.

0:28:16.359 --> 0:28:19.959
<v Speaker 3>Actually sat down with Google's VP of Government Affairs, Kuran Batia.

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 5>Take a listen.

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:25.479
<v Speaker 17>In all honesty, I've been here today. The conversation actually

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 17>has mostly been and I've been meeting with foreign ministries

0:28:29.600 --> 0:28:34.879
<v Speaker 17>government officials has really mostly been about how can they

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:39.040
<v Speaker 17>get the benefits of this amazing new technological revolution that's

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 17>happening around artificial intelligence. So they want to hear about

0:28:43.920 --> 0:28:46.560
<v Speaker 17>what can they be doing in terms of building infrastructure,

0:28:46.600 --> 0:28:49.160
<v Speaker 17>what can they be doing in terms of skilling their people.

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 17>There are you know, there's an awareness that there is

0:28:52.040 --> 0:28:57.200
<v Speaker 17>geopolitics that impacts the technology sector as well as everything else.

0:28:57.440 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 17>But frankly, it's been interesting to me to see how

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:04.800
<v Speaker 17>much interest and appetite there is around getting that technological edge.

0:29:05.120 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 18>So how much have you been surprised or why is

0:29:07.920 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 18>it important for Google to be so heavily invested in

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 18>areas like Latin America, like zact East Asia.

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 17>Well, first of all, it kind of starts with our

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:20.320
<v Speaker 17>mission as a company, which is to organize the world's

0:29:20.360 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 17>information and make it universally accessible and useful.

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 9>And that universal part.

0:29:25.560 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 5>Is really core to our being.

0:29:27.520 --> 0:29:31.479
<v Speaker 17>It's a recognition that Google's not fulfilling its mission if

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 17>we're not operating in places like Latin America, like Southeast Asia,

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 17>East Asia. So I think part of it literally has

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.640
<v Speaker 17>to do with what it is we do every day,

0:29:43.840 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 17>and as the technology expands and as our business expands,

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:48.360
<v Speaker 17>these regions.

0:29:48.040 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 12>Become more and more important.

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 17>Obviously, you can't look at the growth that's happening in

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:57.600
<v Speaker 17>places in East Asia. Latin American markets are doing very

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 17>well and not being encouraged by sort of we're seeing.

0:30:03.000 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 4>That was Corumbatia, Google VP of Global Public Policy and

0:30:06.160 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Government Relations. Let's get out to Lima, Peru and bring

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 4>in Bloombergs Lisa Rumvitz, who's been there for a few days.

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 4>And what's notable is the presence of big tech, right,

0:30:15.240 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 4>not just Google, Microsoft as well. What is it that

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:20.520
<v Speaker 4>they were actually doing there, like give us a bit

0:30:20.560 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 4>more of a sense of the role that those tech

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:24.080
<v Speaker 4>names played in the discussion.

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 18>It's a good question, And first I just want to

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 18>say it is notable that the big tech firms were

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:34.360
<v Speaker 18>here because there were so many US companies that were absent.

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 5>We saw big.

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:38.959
<v Speaker 18>Tech, we saw energy companies, we saw JP Morgan, but

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 18>other than that, US companies were kind of more on

0:30:41.800 --> 0:30:44.880
<v Speaker 18>the sidelines and Chinese companies much more present. Now when

0:30:44.920 --> 0:30:47.040
<v Speaker 18>you talk about some of the big tech names, they

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 18>want to make sure that they get their footprint as

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.360
<v Speaker 18>everybody clamorous for the artificial intelligence bedrock that a lot

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 18>of people think will establish the next generation of business.

0:30:55.680 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 18>But here's the question, how can they do that when

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.880
<v Speaker 18>regulatory regimes are not set? And that was sort of

0:31:01.920 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 18>the big existential aggs hanging over all of this. How

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.840
<v Speaker 18>do you deal with the fact that President Trump, president

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:11.200
<v Speaker 18>elect Trump will have different policies than President Biden, and

0:31:11.240 --> 0:31:13.360
<v Speaker 18>that even now we don't have a real sense of

0:31:13.400 --> 0:31:15.920
<v Speaker 18>what counts as national security when some of these companies

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:17.680
<v Speaker 18>are expanding and what does.

0:31:17.520 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 3>It so true? Lisa, and we heard from Xijingping at

0:31:21.800 --> 0:31:24.680
<v Speaker 3>the event, the Chinese narrative coming and saying, look, let's

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 3>not backtrack, let's stick to a global economy here. But

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:31.800
<v Speaker 3>how much do you take that at face value at

0:31:31.800 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 3>the moment? How all companies able to invest?

0:31:37.080 --> 0:31:39.719
<v Speaker 18>Well, this is a good question, and the answer is

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 18>they look at where they can and what they do know.

0:31:42.560 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 18>And I think that a lot of these companies have

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 18>made inroads when it comes to, for example, big tech.

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 18>They're looking for countries that have some energy infrastructure. So

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 18>a place like this which has a copper and lithium

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:57.720
<v Speaker 18>and a whole host of other natural renewable energy sources

0:31:58.280 --> 0:32:01.200
<v Speaker 18>that is appealing on the large your scale, though, there

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 18>is a hesitance in certain sectors to really invest, and

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 18>you are seeing that, which is maybe why you're not

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 18>seeing some of the more consumer facing sectors like retail

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 18>really coming down here. But you're right, there is this

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:16.440
<v Speaker 18>question of how do you invest in a time of change.

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:18.960
<v Speaker 18>The answer is carefully, and that's what people are saying.

0:32:19.000 --> 0:32:21.560
<v Speaker 18>You are seeing on the margins, but it's select industries

0:32:21.760 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 18>and otherwise there is a bit of a paralysis as

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:27.040
<v Speaker 18>people try to figure out what exactly comes next.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 3>Lisa so busy, great conversations, key among them, Jamie Dimond.

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.160
<v Speaker 3>We appreciate it, Lisa Bramowitz. On the ground there in Peru.

0:32:34.640 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 3>There's so much to unpack from the US election in

0:32:37.560 --> 0:32:41.280
<v Speaker 3>terms of geopolitics as well from a venture capital standpoint too,

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:43.160
<v Speaker 3>from AI policies, tax implications.

0:32:43.360 --> 0:32:45.480
<v Speaker 5>Let's just get to it with a race between US

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:45.960
<v Speaker 5>and China.

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 3>Let's discuss it with a venture investing on today's VC Spotlight.

0:32:49.000 --> 0:32:52.760
<v Speaker 3>Alfred Chuang Founer, General partner at Race Capital. Someone who

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:56.040
<v Speaker 3>has built businesses yourself, be a systems for example, And

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm really interested Alfred at this moment of how much

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 3>you are putting your mind to the future of US

0:33:03.920 --> 0:33:07.520
<v Speaker 3>China relations, the US global relations at this point.

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>Apparently, good morning, thank you for having me back by.

0:33:10.800 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Good to CEEO.

0:33:12.960 --> 0:33:15.640
<v Speaker 9>This is a very interesting time. But I think just.

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:18.880
<v Speaker 1>If you look at where all the activities are in

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>tech and inventure at this point, pretty much everything is

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>AI driven, whether they are like what we do, which

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is straight in the plumbing. So I'm like the plumber

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 1>of Silicon Valley. Try to ment all the infrastructure, which

0:33:31.800 --> 0:33:35.240
<v Speaker 1>is all the critical pieces to enable the enterprise application.

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Do now have a new network inside and be able

0:33:38.640 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to be very smart and be very efficient and be

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:45.880
<v Speaker 1>extraordinarily efficient. The China and the US part of it

0:33:45.920 --> 0:33:48.520
<v Speaker 1>is because the way that we train the data for

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the large model itself, we're not completely separated.

0:33:51.840 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 9>So there's a model for China, there's.

0:33:53.720 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>A completely different model what we've been doing actual multiple

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:58.360
<v Speaker 1>models in the United States.

0:33:58.840 --> 0:34:00.360
<v Speaker 9>Because I think a lot of it has to do

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 9>with history.

0:34:01.560 --> 0:34:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Our data are just so much more organized, and we

0:34:04.080 --> 0:34:07.000
<v Speaker 1>have systems that we've been preparing for the past decade,

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, like all the things that we're put into

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Spark data breaks, for example, we're all grape preparation for

0:34:13.239 --> 0:34:16.320
<v Speaker 1>organizing this data to make the computer thing like human.

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So US has a huge advantage at this point in

0:34:18.920 --> 0:34:22.480
<v Speaker 1>time and time and getting ahead of this program.

0:34:23.160 --> 0:34:26.799
<v Speaker 3>I'm interested in just the supply chains fact a bit

0:34:26.840 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 3>there out for you talk about the efficiency, the clear

0:34:30.040 --> 0:34:33.200
<v Speaker 3>efficiency that's been built in the US, but we're about

0:34:33.200 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 3>to pledge you see, tariffs, so that we can't be

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 3>unaware of the fact that a lot of things are important,

0:34:37.800 --> 0:34:41.840
<v Speaker 3>even at the most high end technological element. Will that

0:34:42.480 --> 0:34:45.800
<v Speaker 3>put pains to efficiency here in the US.

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's already pain. I think obviously there's more

0:34:48.560 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>pain to the people that are not now allowed to

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>be importing the eight one hundred and one hundred form

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:56.640
<v Speaker 1>En video. They're equivalently Obviously, supply chain is not like

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>what it used to be before COVID, so we have that

0:34:58.640 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>slowdown already at this point in time. There's never back

0:35:01.719 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>to non one. By the way, we are still very

0:35:04.239 --> 0:35:06.960
<v Speaker 1>behind in this country. So we're you know, we don't

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:10.319
<v Speaker 1>have any babs right well, pfares have limited availability. We

0:35:10.360 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 1>are dependent on loot of fabs in Taiwan. Some of

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>these lower trips are building China still, so there's call

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:18.920
<v Speaker 1>dependency between these countries in order to continue to advance.

0:35:18.960 --> 0:35:20.240
<v Speaker 9>At Ai and.

0:35:20.080 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm you know, have great Hopdad, or the great reasons

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>of continuing to progress mankind, we don't start this trade

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and which I don't think that will be the case,

0:35:28.920 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 1>because it just will be dysfunction.

0:35:33.160 --> 0:35:35.440
<v Speaker 4>I want to think about the environment a bit, Alfred.

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 4>This week, for example, my colleagues and I reported that

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:42.799
<v Speaker 4>Data Breaks is doing a tender largely for employee liquidity.

0:35:43.400 --> 0:35:45.400
<v Speaker 4>And that's a name that Data Breaks. That that's in

0:35:45.440 --> 0:35:48.799
<v Speaker 4>your portfolio. But there are signed things are happening right,

0:35:49.040 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 4>whether it's the IPO market, whether it's.

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 6>Different kinds of exits through M and A.

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to ask you what you think kind of

0:35:55.040 --> 0:36:00.000
<v Speaker 4>happens next, particularly under a Trump administration, for your portfolio

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.880
<v Speaker 4>companies and vcs that are looking for an exit.

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:03.879
<v Speaker 9>Yeah.

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:06.919
<v Speaker 1>At Berger to CEO, thank you for having me back.

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:11.759
<v Speaker 1>Database is in the unique case Database perhaps, which I

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:16.560
<v Speaker 1>believe is probably the best, the most exciting, the fastest

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>growing large enterprise tech company and run by probably the

0:36:21.800 --> 0:36:23.000
<v Speaker 1>best CEO ever.

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:26.359
<v Speaker 9>In enterprise tech. So they're in a unique place. I think.

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Whatever they're going to do in fundraising is their choice

0:36:29.880 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>that they decided not to go to the proper marketplace

0:36:32.680 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 1>they might have qualified to do so. And I think

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>that's just by choice. And I think that choice come

0:36:37.440 --> 0:36:40.560
<v Speaker 1>from which I believe in the past ten days is

0:36:40.640 --> 0:36:43.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of how we feel with all the founders in

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>the valley, which is we're going through a rebook process.

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:49.640
<v Speaker 1>Does rebook process will likely have a chance pose to

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 1>relook at how the SEC, the FDC, the CTPB, how

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be conducting business, on their policies, how

0:36:59.120 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>they're going to regulate, how to get regularly AI, how

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>they're going to regulate other webprear technology, cryptos and other things.

0:37:05.640 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think we kind of were stuck for the

0:37:07.440 --> 0:37:10.000
<v Speaker 1>last two three years, you know, in a place where

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to get anything. Then from that perspective,

0:37:13.280 --> 0:37:16.400
<v Speaker 1>very little company, one IPO, very m and A happened.

0:37:16.719 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 9>So I think there's a.

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 1>Lot of new hook you know, we don't know, Yeah,

0:37:20.280 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the new admonstration won't start until the twentyeth

0:37:23.320 --> 0:37:26.080
<v Speaker 1>of January. How are they going to do to do

0:37:26.120 --> 0:37:29.840
<v Speaker 1>things differently to kind of re enable this ability to

0:37:29.880 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>do some.

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:30.800
<v Speaker 9>Of these things.

0:37:30.960 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think I'm very optimistic I think next year

0:37:34.200 --> 0:37:37.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to be an unreal great year for innovation

0:37:37.239 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>and for our venture deployment.

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 6>Capital out for it very quickly.

0:37:46.080 --> 0:37:50.160
<v Speaker 4>The next area of growth for you, the fair the

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:53.600
<v Speaker 4>next area of growth. Where are you looking right now?

0:37:53.640 --> 0:37:54.920
<v Speaker 4>We just have ten seconds?

0:37:55.200 --> 0:37:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Okay, ten seconds without a doubt, AI enabled enterprise applications.

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's gette hundred percent efficiency on every individual they're using

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>enterprice computing.

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:06.080
<v Speaker 9>That's where the growth would be.

0:38:06.320 --> 0:38:07.240
<v Speaker 6>That was ten seconds.

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 4>Alfred Trunk, founder and Race General Partner at Race Capital,

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 4>Thank you very much. Plantable Foods has already harnessed the

0:38:22.080 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 4>power of plants to manufacture the Ruby protein, which comes

0:38:26.040 --> 0:38:28.680
<v Speaker 4>from duck weed. Now the company's looking to grow the

0:38:28.719 --> 0:38:32.120
<v Speaker 4>popularity of the nutrient rich products with a new thirty

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:35.320
<v Speaker 4>million dollars Series B funding. Round here with more Plantable

0:38:35.360 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 4>co founder Tony Martin's bacchini and welcome to the program.

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 9>Thank you.

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:42.960
<v Speaker 4>Also known as water lentils. If you're not familiar with

0:38:43.040 --> 0:38:46.200
<v Speaker 4>duck weed, I don't really know where to start other

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:50.000
<v Speaker 4>than you have some specific technology that has made something

0:38:50.080 --> 0:38:52.440
<v Speaker 4>others have tried a success.

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:54.279
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well we really tried to do it.

0:38:54.360 --> 0:38:57.360
<v Speaker 19>Plantable is to work backwards from what the food industry needs, right.

0:38:57.440 --> 0:38:59.480
<v Speaker 19>I think over the past couple of years, we've seen

0:38:59.600 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 19>the food industry being overwhelmed with synthetic, unhealthy or elecgenic ingredients,

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 19>and we started to look for a natural successor to

0:39:07.920 --> 0:39:11.400
<v Speaker 19>these unhealthy ingredients that they're using today. We found that

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.000
<v Speaker 19>in an enzyme known as ribisco, which is funnily enough,

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 19>one of the most abundant proteins on the planet and

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:19.440
<v Speaker 19>millions of people are consuming it on a daily basis

0:39:19.440 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 19>because it's present in every leafy green. Now, then we

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:25.160
<v Speaker 19>started to look for the most cost efficient and environmentally

0:39:25.160 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 19>friendly way of scaling ribisco, and we found that in

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:31.879
<v Speaker 19>this aquatic plant known as lemna or some other people

0:39:31.920 --> 0:39:33.080
<v Speaker 19>might call it water lentils.

0:39:33.280 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 4>And so, why do you need the thirty million dollars

0:39:35.400 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 4>of what's the process from here?

0:39:36.600 --> 0:39:38.399
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, So over the past couple of years, we've built

0:39:38.400 --> 0:39:42.359
<v Speaker 19>out our first commercial manufacturing module in West Texas, and

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:45.239
<v Speaker 19>since then we've been able to start to fulfill some

0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 19>of the commercial demand that's out there in the market.

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:49.399
<v Speaker 19>But we're seeing that we aren't really able to keep

0:39:49.480 --> 0:39:51.640
<v Speaker 19>up with the demand that's out there, and so we

0:39:51.680 --> 0:39:53.759
<v Speaker 19>need to thirty million dollars in order to continue to

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:57.240
<v Speaker 19>expand our manufacturing operations in Texas to fulfill the commercial

0:39:57.239 --> 0:39:58.160
<v Speaker 19>demand that's out there.

0:39:58.760 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 5>So Tony, am I eating this now? Is it available?

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 6>It is available?

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:05.840
<v Speaker 19>You can Actually there are some products on the market

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:09.640
<v Speaker 19>that contain our product at the moment, so absolutely you

0:40:09.680 --> 0:40:10.560
<v Speaker 19>can eat it right now.

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:13.480
<v Speaker 3>Where are you in sort of the general approvals when

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:16.240
<v Speaker 3>it comes to FDA, when it comes to Food Science

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:17.360
<v Speaker 3>Authority as well.

0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 19>Yeah, great question. So at the moment we're self affirmed Grass.

0:40:20.600 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 19>We're working with the FDA to get the final letter

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:27.000
<v Speaker 19>of no questions from their site. In the meantime, we're

0:40:27.000 --> 0:40:29.920
<v Speaker 19>also working on a formal approval from the European Food

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:32.279
<v Speaker 19>Safety Authority, which we hope to get by the end

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:34.279
<v Speaker 19>of twenty twenty five early twenty twenty six.

0:40:34.640 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 3>What's it like in the world of raising capital for

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 3>food tech ad tech right now? Because it's been through

0:40:40.680 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 3>to some peaks and troughs, shall we.

0:40:42.040 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 19>Say, yeah, it's misogonistic as maybe the right word. But

0:40:47.840 --> 0:40:50.560
<v Speaker 19>I think we've been working incredibly hard as a team

0:40:50.640 --> 0:40:54.040
<v Speaker 19>to hit milestone after milestone and that has really allowed

0:40:54.120 --> 0:40:56.879
<v Speaker 19>us to propel the company forward show that we can

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 19>scale up, but also scale out our technology and prove

0:40:59.719 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 19>that they're true product market fit for our ingredient while

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:05.840
<v Speaker 19>actually discovering new and new market opportunities every day of

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:06.240
<v Speaker 19>the week.

0:41:06.640 --> 0:41:09.640
<v Speaker 4>Let's talk about the investors why they're interested in you?

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 4>Are they traditional texts? And how did you go about

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:16.040
<v Speaker 4>doing this? It's a pretty tough environment. Actually, yeah, it

0:41:16.080 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 4>is a pretty tough environment.

0:41:17.600 --> 0:41:20.080
<v Speaker 19>I think like, why are these Why are the investors,

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 19>both the financial and the strategic investors interested? Is for

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.319
<v Speaker 19>a couple of reasons, right, I think on the on

0:41:25.360 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 19>the financial side, we've obviously been able to show the

0:41:28.200 --> 0:41:30.759
<v Speaker 19>de risking of the technology, the de risking of the

0:41:30.840 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 19>market risk, and it's now a matter of solving the

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 19>operational risk as we move from being an R and

0:41:35.440 --> 0:41:38.160
<v Speaker 19>D company to a full fledged manufacturing company very quickly.

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:39.239
<v Speaker 6>Chipotle is on there.

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:41.480
<v Speaker 4>What's the kind of go to market I'm assuming that's

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.359
<v Speaker 4>more a strategic partner, sure, and just financial Yeah.

0:41:44.360 --> 0:41:46.680
<v Speaker 19>I think about Chipotle as a company that's really whose

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:50.520
<v Speaker 19>mission it is to produce food with integrity and basically

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 19>create delicious, clean label and healthy foods for the consumers

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 19>out there.

0:41:54.800 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 9>And what we're able to do is We're able.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:41:59.080
<v Speaker 19>To allow them to unlock new recipes or improve their

0:41:59.120 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 19>current recipes without having to introduce new allergence or food

0:42:02.560 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 19>safety risk containing ingredients.

0:42:04.760 --> 0:42:06.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm going to look at the ponds near me in

0:42:06.360 --> 0:42:08.640
<v Speaker 3>a whole new way water Lentils.

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 5>That's their name.

0:42:09.360 --> 0:42:11.880
<v Speaker 3>Plantable co founder Tony Martin's bikini.

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:14.600
<v Speaker 5>Great to have some time with you. Congratulations on the rais.

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:15.439
<v Speaker 19>Well.

0:42:15.640 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 5>That does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 4>What a week, ed, Yeah, another astonishing week, a historic

0:42:21.719 --> 0:42:23.520
<v Speaker 4>week in many ways in the context of the election,

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:26.279
<v Speaker 4>but also tech. Check out the podcast It's Worth the

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:30.319
<v Speaker 4>recap online on Apple, Spotify and also on iHeart. Big

0:42:30.360 --> 0:42:32.279
<v Speaker 4>thank you to the team in New York and here

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:33.280
<v Speaker 4>in San Francisco.

0:42:33.760 --> 0:42:35.319
<v Speaker 6>This is Bloomberg Technology.