1
00:00:03,480 --> 00:00:07,560
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Law Podcast. I'm June Grosso. Every

2
00:00:07,640 --> 00:00:10,440
Speaker 1: day we bring you insight and analysis into the most

3
00:00:10,480 --> 00:00:13,399
Speaker 1: important legal news of the day. You can find more

4
00:00:13,440 --> 00:00:18,040
Speaker 1: episodes of the Bloomberg Law Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud

5
00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:22,560
Speaker 1: and on Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts. The Supreme Court

6
00:00:22,600 --> 00:00:26,040
Speaker 1: is back in session today with Apple and iPhone apps.

7
00:00:26,120 --> 00:00:28,240
Speaker 1: The first order of business this morning. Here to tell

8
00:00:28,320 --> 00:00:32,080
Speaker 1: us about it is Greg Store, Bloomberg, new Supreme Court reporter. So, Greg,

9
00:00:32,120 --> 00:00:35,560
Speaker 1: consumers want to sue Apple, saying it's using its dominance

10
00:00:35,640 --> 00:00:39,000
Speaker 1: in the market to jack up the prices for iPhone apps.

11
00:00:39,040 --> 00:00:42,640
Speaker 1: What's the issue with that lawsuit, Julie. The issue is

12
00:00:42,680 --> 00:00:45,879
Speaker 1: that the Supreme Court has said in previous cases that

13
00:00:45,960 --> 00:00:48,319
Speaker 1: the only one who can sue under federal antrust law

14
00:00:48,720 --> 00:00:53,000
Speaker 1: is the direct purchaser of something. And this lawsuit focuses,

15
00:00:53,080 --> 00:00:57,080
Speaker 1: at least in part on the commissions that Apple charges

16
00:00:57,160 --> 00:01:02,200
Speaker 1: to the developers. Those are UM and UH. The consumers

17
00:01:02,200 --> 00:01:05,160
Speaker 1: say those are higher than they should be if there

18
00:01:05,160 --> 00:01:09,000
Speaker 1: were a true competition here, and so Apple's argument is

19
00:01:09,280 --> 00:01:13,320
Speaker 1: that the consumers are not the direct purchasers of UH.

20
00:01:13,800 --> 00:01:18,480
Speaker 1: These the distribution services that the commissions pay for. They say,

21
00:01:18,520 --> 00:01:21,959
Speaker 1: the only one who can sue us for having allegedly

22
00:01:22,000 --> 00:01:25,919
Speaker 1: too high commissions are the app developers, not the consumers.

23
00:01:26,319 --> 00:01:30,360
Speaker 1: And what does what does the consumer groups say? Well,

24
00:01:30,440 --> 00:01:33,400
Speaker 1: the consumers say that we ultimately end up paying the

25
00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:38,080
Speaker 1: cost of the commissions through higher app prices. And they

26
00:01:38,080 --> 00:01:40,959
Speaker 1: also say that the case is not just about the commissions,

27
00:01:41,040 --> 00:01:44,880
Speaker 1: It's about Apple's total control of the system for buying apps.

28
00:01:44,880 --> 00:01:46,839
Speaker 1: They say, Look, if you're gonna, if you have an iPhone,

29
00:01:46,840 --> 00:01:48,360
Speaker 1: you want to buy an app, the only place you

30
00:01:48,360 --> 00:01:51,360
Speaker 1: can go is the app store, and Apple at the

31
00:01:51,400 --> 00:01:55,000
Speaker 1: app Store has some control over the prices that that

32
00:01:55,200 --> 00:02:00,320
Speaker 1: developers can charge. They are charged in UH amounts ending

33
00:02:00,320 --> 00:02:03,440
Speaker 1: in ninety nine or a dollar ninety nine or two

34
00:02:04,760 --> 00:02:10,720
Speaker 1: UM and uh. The consumers say that that overall control

35
00:02:11,520 --> 00:02:14,480
Speaker 1: is enough that that uh it feels like you are

36
00:02:14,520 --> 00:02:18,000
Speaker 1: buying the app from app directly from Apple uh and

37
00:02:18,040 --> 00:02:21,200
Speaker 1: therefore we should be allowed to sue Apple for inflated prices.

38
00:02:21,560 --> 00:02:25,560
Speaker 1: So antitrust cases sometimes not always, but sometimes divide the

39
00:02:25,600 --> 00:02:29,480
Speaker 1: Supreme Court along ideological lines. What can you glean from

40
00:02:29,560 --> 00:02:33,400
Speaker 1: the justices questions this morning? So this one sort of

41
00:02:33,400 --> 00:02:37,000
Speaker 1: divided them along ideological lines. If the four liberal justices

42
00:02:37,040 --> 00:02:39,040
Speaker 1: all seemed like they were varying kind to let this

43
00:02:39,160 --> 00:02:43,120
Speaker 1: lawsuit go forward, uh, Justice Kavana, the newest judge, justice,

44
00:02:43,200 --> 00:02:45,679
Speaker 1: might join them in that. And then you had two

45
00:02:45,680 --> 00:02:49,959
Speaker 1: of the more conservative justices, Gorsu and Alito, and they

46
00:02:49,960 --> 00:02:53,000
Speaker 1: were asking a much bigger question. Uh. Justice Corsue in

47
00:02:53,040 --> 00:02:56,120
Speaker 1: particular was suggesting that he doesn't like this direct purchase

48
00:02:56,200 --> 00:02:59,799
Speaker 1: or requirement at all, and he would consider throwing out

49
00:02:59,840 --> 00:03:03,519
Speaker 1: the ninety seven Supreme Court ruling that that imposed the

50
00:03:03,560 --> 00:03:06,720
Speaker 1: direct purchaser requirement. If the court were to go that route,

51
00:03:07,440 --> 00:03:10,200
Speaker 1: the consumers would be allowed to to move forward with

52
00:03:10,280 --> 00:03:12,160
Speaker 1: their suits. So you could end up with kind of

53
00:03:12,200 --> 00:03:15,800
Speaker 1: a combination of rationales for letting this lawsuit go forward.

54
00:03:16,200 --> 00:03:19,240
Speaker 1: So we're the justices up to date on the tech

55
00:03:19,320 --> 00:03:22,239
Speaker 1: aspects of this, because sometimes in these arguments they're a

56
00:03:22,280 --> 00:03:25,920
Speaker 1: little behind the curve. Yeah, there weren't any any of

57
00:03:25,919 --> 00:03:28,640
Speaker 1: those moments where you're like, Wow, they really don't understand

58
00:03:28,720 --> 00:03:31,120
Speaker 1: what's going on here. One justice who tends to be

59
00:03:31,120 --> 00:03:33,840
Speaker 1: one of the more tech savvy justices, Justice Kagan uh

60
00:03:33,960 --> 00:03:36,920
Speaker 1: did talk about the process of buying an app on

61
00:03:36,960 --> 00:03:40,200
Speaker 1: her iPhone as She talked about when I, you know,

62
00:03:40,240 --> 00:03:42,480
Speaker 1: buy something, I'm paying you know, I go to the

63
00:03:42,480 --> 00:03:45,280
Speaker 1: app store, I'm paying for it using my Apple I

64
00:03:45,360 --> 00:03:47,720
Speaker 1: D and the credit card information stored there. So she

65
00:03:48,040 --> 00:03:51,480
Speaker 1: seemed to be speaking from personal experience in doing that. UH.

66
00:03:51,680 --> 00:03:54,640
Speaker 1: For the most part, the other questions didn't get too

67
00:03:54,680 --> 00:03:59,040
Speaker 1: deeply into the actual operation of smartphones. Tell us the

68
00:03:59,160 --> 00:04:02,840
Speaker 1: effect of a broad ruling in this case versus a

69
00:04:02,880 --> 00:04:07,440
Speaker 1: limited ruling, how many companies might it affect? So there

70
00:04:07,440 --> 00:04:10,880
Speaker 1: are a lot of companies in this uh, this internet

71
00:04:10,920 --> 00:04:14,960
Speaker 1: economy um uh, an awful lot of companies like eBay,

72
00:04:15,080 --> 00:04:19,240
Speaker 1: like et Sea, like Amazon serve as kind of the middleman.

73
00:04:19,720 --> 00:04:24,599
Speaker 1: They have a marketplace. UM. The consumers suing Apple say,

74
00:04:24,839 --> 00:04:27,599
Speaker 1: you don't have to get into the way those companies work,

75
00:04:27,600 --> 00:04:29,919
Speaker 1: because Apple is so different in the amount of control

76
00:04:30,360 --> 00:04:33,760
Speaker 1: it exercises over the app store. But it's at least

77
00:04:33,760 --> 00:04:38,080
Speaker 1: possible that a decision letting this lawsuit go forward could

78
00:04:38,200 --> 00:04:41,440
Speaker 1: make it easier for consumers trying to sue at least

79
00:04:41,480 --> 00:04:43,839
Speaker 1: some of those other companies, especially the ones that do

80
00:04:43,960 --> 00:04:47,200
Speaker 1: exercise a lot of control over the marketplaces they run.

81
00:04:47,480 --> 00:04:51,440
Speaker 1: Let's turn to certain requests the Justice Department is once

82
00:04:51,480 --> 00:04:54,560
Speaker 1: again trying to jump over the Circuit Court of Appeals

83
00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:58,280
Speaker 1: and asking the court to review President's Trump's ban on

84
00:04:58,480 --> 00:05:03,120
Speaker 1: military service by transgender people. Tell us about that. Yeah,

85
00:05:03,160 --> 00:05:06,200
Speaker 1: so this is a policy that the Trump administration has

86
00:05:06,240 --> 00:05:09,320
Speaker 1: tried to put in place, but several federal district judges

87
00:05:09,360 --> 00:05:14,080
Speaker 1: have blocked them from barring service by transgender people. And

88
00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:17,760
Speaker 1: the Trump administration has said, we need to get this

89
00:05:17,800 --> 00:05:23,160
Speaker 1: issue resolved very quickly, so they filed uh petitions here

90
00:05:23,160 --> 00:05:26,840
Speaker 1: at the Supreme Court on Friday, uh saying, don't even

91
00:05:26,839 --> 00:05:29,880
Speaker 1: bother waiting for the appeals court to rule. We think

92
00:05:30,200 --> 00:05:31,920
Speaker 1: you should take it up now so that you can

93
00:05:32,000 --> 00:05:35,200
Speaker 1: rule this term and and tell us by by June

94
00:05:35,240 --> 00:05:38,360
Speaker 1: of next year whether we can indeed bar transgender people

95
00:05:38,400 --> 00:05:41,279
Speaker 1: from serving in the military. How likely is it that

96
00:05:41,360 --> 00:05:44,680
Speaker 1: the Court would grant certain that case and and avoid

97
00:05:44,680 --> 00:05:47,919
Speaker 1: the Circuit Court. Well, I mean, we're speculating here, but

98
00:05:48,000 --> 00:05:50,520
Speaker 1: that's a highly, highly unusual thing for the Supreme Court

99
00:05:50,560 --> 00:05:54,359
Speaker 1: to do. It almost always wants the lower courts to

100
00:05:54,640 --> 00:05:58,160
Speaker 1: fully vet an issue and certainly having the federal appeals

101
00:05:58,160 --> 00:06:02,000
Speaker 1: courts rule on it for they take it up. On occasion,

102
00:06:02,040 --> 00:06:04,279
Speaker 1: the Court will do that if there's a special urgency

103
00:06:04,360 --> 00:06:09,200
Speaker 1: for something, or if maybe they're already considering related to

104
00:06:09,279 --> 00:06:11,039
Speaker 1: in a separate case and they and they just want

105
00:06:11,040 --> 00:06:15,159
Speaker 1: to broaden what they're thinking about. UM. You know, it

106
00:06:15,160 --> 00:06:17,280
Speaker 1: would be an extraordinary thing for the Supreme Court to do,

107
00:06:17,400 --> 00:06:21,320
Speaker 1: especially given that so far the Court has suggested it

108
00:06:21,320 --> 00:06:24,719
Speaker 1: wants to step carefully and move slowly when it comes

109
00:06:24,720 --> 00:06:28,640
Speaker 1: to some of these centerpiece issues, uh, pushed by the

110
00:06:28,680 --> 00:06:32,719
Speaker 1: Trump administration. Speaking of extraordinary things at the Supreme Court,

111
00:06:32,800 --> 00:06:35,919
Speaker 1: I have to ask you about the Chief Justice pushing

112
00:06:35,960 --> 00:06:40,320
Speaker 1: back on the President's criticisms of judges appointed by former

113
00:06:40,360 --> 00:06:44,359
Speaker 1: President Barack Obama. How out of character was that for

114
00:06:44,400 --> 00:06:47,280
Speaker 1: the Chief It is extremely out of character. He has

115
00:06:47,320 --> 00:06:50,800
Speaker 1: talked about, uh, the importance of an independent judiciary. He

116
00:06:50,800 --> 00:06:53,200
Speaker 1: has said that repeatedly. He has said that he doesn't

117
00:06:53,279 --> 00:06:57,080
Speaker 1: view judges as being partisan actors. They're not Republican judges

118
00:06:57,160 --> 00:07:00,240
Speaker 1: or democratic judges. He said that all before. But this

119
00:07:00,320 --> 00:07:03,719
Speaker 1: came in response to a question from an Associated Press

120
00:07:03,760 --> 00:07:06,640
Speaker 1: reporter asking whether the Chief Justice want to respond to

121
00:07:07,400 --> 00:07:11,000
Speaker 1: the President's criticism of the Federal District Judge and the

122
00:07:11,040 --> 00:07:13,720
Speaker 1: Federal Appeals Court. And so the Chief Justice put out

123
00:07:13,720 --> 00:07:17,160
Speaker 1: a statement, and that is something that he has never done.

124
00:07:17,320 --> 00:07:21,000
Speaker 1: It is uh, it is John Roberts standing up to

125
00:07:21,240 --> 00:07:24,560
Speaker 1: Donald Trump in a way that he hasn't before. And

126
00:07:24,600 --> 00:07:27,640
Speaker 1: it is certainly a fascinating dynamic that we're going to

127
00:07:27,720 --> 00:07:30,280
Speaker 1: be watching while the Supreme Court considers all these hot

128
00:07:30,280 --> 00:07:33,640
Speaker 1: button Trump administration appeals. Only that a minute here, Greg,

129
00:07:34,840 --> 00:07:37,559
Speaker 1: what do you think it was that led him to

130
00:07:37,640 --> 00:07:40,840
Speaker 1: make that statement? You know it again, we're getting a

131
00:07:40,880 --> 00:07:44,280
Speaker 1: little bit in the speculation. But the President uses the

132
00:07:44,360 --> 00:07:48,360
Speaker 1: phrase Obama judge to describe this, this federal district judge

133
00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:53,680
Speaker 1: who who ruled against the administration on an asylum issue.

134
00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:58,440
Speaker 1: That is a characterization that John Roberts really resists. Um uh.

135
00:07:58,480 --> 00:08:01,280
Speaker 1: He certainly understands that that. You know, judges come to

136
00:08:01,280 --> 00:08:04,360
Speaker 1: the court with different views. But this is a guy who,

137
00:08:04,400 --> 00:08:07,520
Speaker 1: in his confirmation hearing said judges should be like umpires.

138
00:08:07,680 --> 00:08:10,400
Speaker 1: He does not believe they should be affiliated with the

139
00:08:10,400 --> 00:08:12,880
Speaker 1: president who appointed them in the way the President suggested.

140
00:08:13,160 --> 00:08:15,480
Speaker 1: All right, thanks so much, Greg for your insights. That's

141
00:08:15,480 --> 00:08:19,000
Speaker 1: Greg stores Bloomberg, new Supreme Court reporter. Thanks for listening

142
00:08:19,040 --> 00:08:22,320
Speaker 1: to the Bloomberg Law podcast. You can subscribe and listen

143
00:08:22,360 --> 00:08:25,920
Speaker 1: to the show on Apple podcast, SoundCloud, and on bloomberg

144
00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:33,360
Speaker 1: dot com slash podcast. I'm June Brasso, this is Bloomberg. Yeah,