Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Time for a culture
Speaker 1: war CounterPunch, defunding the police, consequences hit some major cities,
Speaker 1: mask wearing for years. And also who's gonna be Biden's VP,
Speaker 1: Rice or Harris? And will it matter? Buck Sextons coding
Speaker 1: the news and disseminating information with actionable intelligence, make no
Speaker 1: mistake Americans great, You're a great American again. This is
Speaker 1: the Buck Sexton Show. Former CIA analysts. I can speak
Speaker 1: to three hours without a phone call. Try doing that sometime. No,
Speaker 1: welcome everybody to the Buck Sexton Show. Always an a privilege,
Speaker 1: a pleasure to have you here with me. Thank you
Speaker 1: so much. I look at the news today and it
Speaker 1: feels a bit like there's a calm before the stom.
Speaker 1: I think that the media is in a little bit
Speaker 1: of a of a weight and c mode for what
Speaker 1: narratives can take hold that will be the most damaging
Speaker 1: to the administration. What can they do to put Trump
Speaker 1: on defense again? Because their response to this speech that
Speaker 1: I talked to you about yesterday, his Mount Rushmore's speech
Speaker 1: was so unhinged that it didn't work. And I do
Speaker 1: believe that now there's a creeping realization that the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party is gonna have to at least pretend that it's
Speaker 1: a little bit less crazy if it's going to win
Speaker 1: this election. You see, if you understand everything that's been
Speaker 1: going on from the start of this year, really the
Speaker 1: start of COVID, because that's put us into a whole
Speaker 1: new political cycle, political realm you've had when we would
Speaker 1: normally see base mobilization efforts by Democrats. That's been the
Speaker 1: absolute panic over COVID, and also this mobilization of the
Speaker 1: Black Lives Matter movement, ANTIFA, the protesters toppling statues. We
Speaker 1: got to come up with a name. Statue topplers doesn't
Speaker 1: really sound if we call them iconoclasss. That term, initially
Speaker 1: referred to people that destroyed statues, has a long standing
Speaker 1: historical significance destroyed statues and paintings and icons, and as
Speaker 1: it goes back to Christianity and the destruction of religious imagery.
Speaker 1: So we can't call them the iconoclass because in the
Speaker 1: contemporary context, that's like someone who you know, breaks down
Speaker 1: the sacred cows of a culture. No, no, no, we
Speaker 1: gotta come up with a name that shows they're a
Speaker 1: bunch of lunatics who don't know what they're doing. Who
Speaker 1: will topple of Frederick Douglas statue and columb His statues
Speaker 1: and Gandhi has come up for cancelation to Churchill, of course,
Speaker 1: I guess we shouldn't be surprised about that. The people
Speaker 1: who think they're fighting fascism today want to undermine the
Speaker 1: man who rallied the entire civilized world against fascism one
Speaker 1: hundred years plus ago or less than a hundred years ago.
Speaker 1: Rather so, now we're at this phase where they're trying
Speaker 1: to figure out what the division of labor is going
Speaker 1: to be between the various factions of the beat Trump
Speaker 1: Elect Biden effort. They've got some problems though. For one thing,
Speaker 1: they've told us so many times with COVID that we
Speaker 1: should all panic and this will be a discussion we
Speaker 1: have in greater detail later on the show. They've told
Speaker 1: us that the numbers are going to be X, and
Speaker 1: they're really why. They've told us that certain measures will
Speaker 1: work or shouldn't be done, and they don't work or
Speaker 1: they should be done. They keep changing, And anyone who's
Speaker 1: been paying attention and remembers also knows that you would
Speaker 1: be foolish. You would be foolish at this point to
Speaker 1: discount that there was a public health expert betrayal. It
Speaker 1: was a betrayal of the public trust where they were
Speaker 1: so scared of being called racist that they were all
Speaker 1: in favor of the BLM protests. And now magically, suddenly
Speaker 1: the gathering together in close quarters for long periods of
Speaker 1: time of tens of thousands, perhaps hundreds of thousands of
Speaker 1: young people. That's who's at these protests, people that are
Speaker 1: twenty to thirty five. We have spikes in caseloads and
Speaker 1: almost no stories whatsoever about maybe this was related to
Speaker 1: spreading the virus further. Now, I'm also not somebody who
Speaker 1: panics at younger, healthier people dealing with this virus, because
Speaker 1: I recognize the data that we have, and also historically,
Speaker 1: a virus that is going to eventually where we're going
Speaker 1: to eventually beat it through her community is going to
Speaker 1: have to infect a lot of people. And now there's
Speaker 1: there's even some talk about how the the vaccine against
Speaker 1: this may be more like a flu vaccine, which means
Speaker 1: you have to get it every year and it's only
Speaker 1: forty to fifty percent effective, and so you know what
Speaker 1: that means we're going to be dealing with this, so
Speaker 1: it's a question of how do we deal with it?
Speaker 1: But put aside for a moment that those facts and details.
Speaker 1: We'll get to that later on. I just I can
Speaker 1: see that the Democrat media apparatus right now is in
Speaker 1: a little bit of a reset because now they're going
Speaker 1: to have to start putting Biden forward more, and Biden
Speaker 1: can't afford to sound completely insane. Right, it was. It
Speaker 1: was great for the Democrats up to this point to
Speaker 1: have the stats full of protesting lunatics and taking down
Speaker 1: statues and throwing rocks and looting and burning, because they're saying, oh,
Speaker 1: look at Trump, look at your law and order president
Speaker 1: not getting it done. Look at look at how bad
Speaker 1: the country is. Like insurgents undermining a national government. All
Speaker 1: the Democrats had to do was create misery, despair, and
Speaker 1: perpetuate the conditions for a continued lockdown, and then they
Speaker 1: were winning. Right, Trump's approval rating is going down, down, down.
Speaker 1: They're going to continue this, but they're looking to strike
Speaker 1: some sort of balance between insanity that mobilizes the left
Speaker 1: wing base that gets the statue topplers, and the BLM
Speaker 1: protesters and all the rest of them out there. Remember,
Speaker 1: it's not just so that those groups and the Democrat
Speaker 1: Party that they represent feel emboldened empowered. It's also meant
Speaker 1: to cowers all the other people in society who are saying, WHOA,
Speaker 1: I don't want the protesters online or in person to
Speaker 1: come after me, so I guess I should go along
Speaker 1: with this. There's a massive cultural influence from these protests
Speaker 1: that spills over, not just onto social media, which is
Speaker 1: now our primary especially in the era of COVID nineteen.
Speaker 1: Digital and online communication is our communication now. Right, we're
Speaker 1: not seeing people in person the way we used to,
Speaker 1: but the protest movement has spilled over online but also
Speaker 1: into workplaces. Now it's a professional liability to be a Republican.
Speaker 1: We all know this. It's a professional liability to talk
Speaker 1: about facts and figures and data when it's sensitive. For
Speaker 1: the left, can't do that, find yourself in a whole
Speaker 1: lot of trouble. So we're right now, in this moment,
Speaker 1: in this momentary pause. Now when I say pause, I'm
Speaker 1: not saying they're not They're still trying all these things,
Speaker 1: the COVID panic, we'll talk about all that today, But
Speaker 1: you can tell that there's a reformulation of the all
Speaker 1: out assault on Trump asm that's going on right now.
Speaker 1: And that's why I think it is so important. Before
Speaker 1: the president gets put on defense again, this president has
Speaker 1: to go out on offense with his message. We need
Speaker 1: a CounterPunch against the fascist, looney left. That's what we
Speaker 1: have to do. That's what is needed. Messaging out there
Speaker 1: in public, and not just from the President and not
Speaker 1: just from a handful of surrogates in the White House,
Speaker 1: I mean from everybody who believes in this movement, has
Speaker 1: to start making it very clear what would four more
Speaker 1: years of Trump get you? What is the mission, what
Speaker 1: is the agenda, what are the stakes? The president before
Speaker 1: was able to turn some of the media, this was
Speaker 1: in twenty sixteen, turn some of the media's biases and
Speaker 1: weaknesses against it. CNN and these other massive media entities,
Speaker 1: not massive audience, but massive legacy institutions that make most
Speaker 1: of their money by telling, in the case of CNN,
Speaker 1: the rest of the world how terrible America is, CNN International,
Speaker 1: CNN dot Com. That's how they make their money. Just
Speaker 1: so you know. But when you look at what was
Speaker 1: different then from now, the president was able to was
Speaker 1: able to get them his opponents to put him on
Speaker 1: TV all the time, because look at the spectacle, Look
Speaker 1: at this ridiculous fellow. Yeah, every one of those rallies.
Speaker 1: People were looking at that saying, this is a real movement.
Speaker 1: This guy's got something, he's tapped into something. But the
Speaker 1: media executives, the liberal hacks that might as well get
Speaker 1: a check from the d n C. They were thinking, oh, well,
Speaker 1: what a buffoon he is, and haha, Hillary is going
Speaker 1: to win. They all thought Hillary was going to win.
Speaker 1: They're not going to do that this time around. Now
Speaker 1: they understand that it's not like putting putting up this
Speaker 1: Trump carnival for everybody to mock and make fun of.
Speaker 1: They're going to try to suppress the message in as
Speaker 1: many places as they can. That's why you're seeing this
Speaker 1: boycott against Facebook taking effect right now, companies saying we
Speaker 1: will not advertise anymore on Facebook until they do more
Speaker 1: to stamp out hate. Really, what qualifies us hate these days?
Speaker 1: Secure boarders believing that immigration law should be enforced is
Speaker 1: that hate? Because I'm pretty sure there are a lot
Speaker 1: of people in the Democrat Party, like almost all of it,
Speaker 1: would say yeah, that's hateful. So now they're going to
Speaker 1: try to suppress the message they were that was. And
Speaker 1: they're still bitter about this, they're still angry. They thought
Speaker 1: they were ridiculing Trump by exposing him to all of
Speaker 1: America and promoting and showing these rallies on TV. And no,
Speaker 1: they were just giving promotion for his message. They're not
Speaker 1: going to make that mistake again. We can't rely on
Speaker 1: the same playbook because in twenty sixteen, the Libs thought
Speaker 1: that Hillary had it in the bag, and they thought
Speaker 1: that Trump was just so outlandish and ridiculous, and they
Speaker 1: believed all the polls that they could cash in on
Speaker 1: the absurdity of the Republican, the absurdity of the Republican
Speaker 1: front runner or the candidate, rather both frontrunner and then candidate,
Speaker 1: and then it would be useful for the Democrat Party
Speaker 1: to come in and say, see we have a Hillary.
Speaker 1: Look at how sophisticated and brilliant we are. So that's
Speaker 1: not going to happen this time. They got surprised. That
Speaker 1: was a sucker punch. Now we need a CounterPunch right now,
Speaker 1: we need Okay, we understand they're trying to make the
Speaker 1: country miserable, push lockdowns, push racial division, the attacks on
Speaker 1: our history, the attacks on our civilization. They're trying to
Speaker 1: do all of that. What do we do to respond
Speaker 1: to it? What can President Trump do to lead the movement?
Speaker 1: And I think that speech that he gave was the beginning,
Speaker 1: the beginning of that counter narrative of that response that
Speaker 1: is necessary now to show us that there is a choice,
Speaker 1: there is an alternative to the absurdity, the dysfunction, the
Speaker 1: hypocrisy of the socialist Democrat Party. And well, that's what
Speaker 1: it is. It is a party of socialists. Now they
Speaker 1: will pretend they're not because that's a word that still
Speaker 1: rightly offends the American political sensibility. And that's why they
Speaker 1: didn't go with Bernie Sanders. Not because Bernie Sanders was
Speaker 1: too far left. It's because Bernie Sanders brand of Democrat
Speaker 1: socialism was too honest. The Democrat Party cannot be honest.
Speaker 1: You see this over and over. The Democrat Party cannot
Speaker 1: tell you what it's really all about, what it's really
Speaker 1: going to do, not when elections are happening. No, they're
Speaker 1: going they're going to deploy every resource, every platform they
Speaker 1: have to convince you know, suburban moms in Ohio and
Speaker 1: convince steel workers in Michigan. Hey, okay, maybe Hillary wasn't
Speaker 1: so great and like a ball and she's corrupt and
Speaker 1: dishonest and horrible. Fine, fine, but you know Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: We wouldn't elect Joe Biden if we were socialists. He's
Speaker 1: in he was in the Senate for almost forty years.
Speaker 1: You can trust us blue collar Joe, and we all
Speaker 1: know what happens when he's if he's elected. All of
Speaker 1: a sudden, the people writing the legislation are the same
Speaker 1: activists and think tanks and organizations and media outlets that
Speaker 1: are excusing the cancel George Washington movement, the cancel Hamilton,
Speaker 1: the beloved by libs Broadway play movement that doesn't go away,
Speaker 1: but they're going to try to hide it. Look, we
Speaker 1: can have discussions here about the nuances and complexities of
Speaker 1: what their messages are going to be. They will hold
Speaker 1: two beliefs at the same time. They will flood the
Speaker 1: airwaves with contradictory messages. Right one day, Joe Biden will
Speaker 1: be the law and order candidate. The next day him
Speaker 1: or his VP will be here. His VP will be
Speaker 1: out there talking about how we need more police reform
Speaker 1: and defund police might be too far, but you know
Speaker 1: they're gonna just say whatever they have to say in
Speaker 1: the moment to get the numbers moving in the right direction.
Speaker 1: And don't even get me started on what happens with
Speaker 1: mail and voting. As we know, Democrats don't want any
Speaker 1: rules in the election process because they would feel morally
Speaker 1: justified in cheating to win. There's no problem. It's just
Speaker 1: a question of can they cheat and get away with
Speaker 1: it and win? But if cheating means that Donald Trump
Speaker 1: doesn't get to be president for four more years, they
Speaker 1: say he's a threat to the Republic. They think that
Speaker 1: he's going to start a war with North Korea, that
Speaker 1: he's a Russian asset, that he's a sexual predator. They'll
Speaker 1: say anything about Trump, and many of them, unfortunately, believe it.
Speaker 1: So we need two things to happen right now. The
Speaker 1: President to begin that discourse with all Americans who will listen,
Speaker 1: not just as supporters, but the people that are going
Speaker 1: to make the difference in those swing states. What will
Speaker 1: it get you if you vote for Trump? The New
Speaker 1: Hampshire rally this weekend certainly a good step in that direction,
Speaker 1: but we need a lot more of that and we
Speaker 1: need to not have people on our side afraid. Right now,
Speaker 1: a lot of people, Oh they want to you know,
Speaker 1: they want to hold on to there. They're tiny little
Speaker 1: slice of the cable news pie somewhere. Oh I got
Speaker 1: to stay with that, or they want to hold on
Speaker 1: to you know, whatever stations or platform or whatever they have.
Speaker 1: Pretend that they're a big warrior for the cause. But
Speaker 1: play it safe. See which way the battle's going. Stay
Speaker 1: on the edges of it. Don't get right in the
Speaker 1: middle of it where people are swinging battle axes. Right.
Speaker 1: That's that's going to be a huge problem for us
Speaker 1: if we don't have the people who can afford in
Speaker 1: every sense professionally financially, to take some risks. God bless
Speaker 1: Tucker Carlson for being someone leading the large on this one.
Speaker 1: His show has taken a hit with advertisers, and he
Speaker 1: still keeps pushing the truth. It's also why he had
Speaker 1: the biggest quarter of cable news ratings ever any show ever.
Speaker 1: What was the magic sauce speaking the truth and doing
Speaker 1: it like you don't know what your status, what your
Speaker 1: job will be tomorrow, but it doesn't matter. You use
Speaker 1: the platform. You have to speak the most truth and
Speaker 1: to do the most good for the country while you can.
Speaker 1: If that becomes the ethos of the conservative media, the
Speaker 1: Republican Party, at least some of it, the Trump White House,
Speaker 1: and the President himself, speak the truth, don't worry about tomorrow,
Speaker 1: do what you can today to tell as many people
Speaker 1: what is real and what is necessary, defend this republic
Speaker 1: while with a civil republic. If that becomes our rallying cry,
Speaker 1: we will win. That in and of itself becomes the
Speaker 1: tactical genius, that the CounterPunch that deals with all this
Speaker 1: other stuff. It starts with a willingness to speak truth
Speaker 1: and to face consequences in the near term in order
Speaker 1: to save this country in the long term. Do we
Speaker 1: have it. We'll see. But those are the stakes, and
Speaker 1: that's where we are right now, and I think we
Speaker 1: should understand that right now. You're in the freedom hunt.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. Govern just asked
Speaker 1: this question, point blank, President Trump, essentially embracing the Confederate flag, right,
Speaker 1: why else would you tweet out flag decision as in
Speaker 1: the decision to remove it has caused lowest ratings ever
Speaker 1: all caps exclamation point. Why why is he doing this?
Speaker 1: He's flailing, Aaron, he's in a meltdown, and he looks
Speaker 1: at his poles and he doesn't know who to blame.
Speaker 1: He blames his advisors, even he's even blaming Fox News now,
Speaker 1: and he's flailing and he doesn't know how to how
Speaker 1: to start things. So I think he's just throwing everything
Speaker 1: out over the period of the last three days, hoping
Speaker 1: he's going to strike a chord. And what he doesn't
Speaker 1: realize is that basse he has, the edges at base
Speaker 1: are beginning to fray. That base is getting smaller and smaller.
Speaker 1: And at the same time, of course, because he's a Republican,
Speaker 1: he's causing a brand problem for Republicans. And mark my words,
Speaker 1: there's going to be a point in time where these
Speaker 1: folks are going to leave, you know, and then many
Speaker 1: of them will say, well, I was never part of this,
Speaker 1: you know, I never supported him. But at the meantime,
Speaker 1: because they had gone along, they've enabled him to do
Speaker 1: these kinds of what I think are just totally outrageous things.
Speaker 1: Mark my words, Kasik is a moron and he's wrong.
Speaker 1: And if we listen to people who are quote Republicans
Speaker 1: like him, we will definitely have President Biden for eight years.
Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the bus Sess and Show podcasts.
Speaker 1: Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. You know that the left
Speaker 1: is having a moment of pause here where they're not
Speaker 1: really sure exactly what the best method of attack is.
Speaker 1: They've had weeks now going on the last really month
Speaker 1: or two, all feeling like they're just in this blitzkrieg
Speaker 1: against Trump. Right, They're just they're mowing down all the opposition.
Speaker 1: They're destroying anybody who gets in their way. Republicans are
Speaker 1: running scared. Trump gave the speech this weekend that was useful.
Speaker 1: But there's another place, another area of national politics right
Speaker 1: now where Democrats don't really have a good answer for
Speaker 1: what they're going to tell people as they get closer
Speaker 1: to voting. Right, it's one thing to have the BLM
Speaker 1: activists all chanting about how they want to defund police
Speaker 1: and all these protesters running around pulling down statues and
Speaker 1: antifacting like lunatics months and months before the election. But
Speaker 1: as we get closer here, Democrats have got a problem,
Speaker 1: and it is that the violence spikes in some of
Speaker 1: the major US cities that have occurred that you could
Speaker 1: say this is a return of what Heather McDonald had
Speaker 1: had termed the Ferguson effect. And we've had Heather on
Speaker 1: the show many times to talk about it. It's very
Speaker 1: it's a straightforward idea. When cops are not supported, they
Speaker 1: do less. They are less aggressive, less willing to take
Speaker 1: risks to themselves, to their careers because they don't have
Speaker 1: the political backing to do their jobs. And that's true
Speaker 1: in some cities. Can you imagine being in Atlanta where
Speaker 1: they're threatening to execute a cop for defending himself against
Speaker 1: a convicted criminal who tried to use a weapon on
Speaker 1: the police officer after resisting arrest. Not fire the cop.
Speaker 1: Not Maybe he spends a couple of years in prison,
Speaker 1: no death penalty, and yet Atlanta turns around. Now the
Speaker 1: Atlanta Air turns around and says, well, it's a perfect
Speaker 1: storm of a lot of things, COVID and all this
Speaker 1: other stuff, and really it's Trump's fault. There are limits
Speaker 1: to this stupidity of Democrat arguments when it comes to
Speaker 1: their effectiveness. I'm not saying that there's no limits to
Speaker 1: how stupid Democrat arguments will be, but there are limits
Speaker 1: to what is effective. It is possible even for the
Speaker 1: socialists and the leftists among us to make an argument
Speaker 1: that is so dumb that it does not serve their
Speaker 1: purposes and saying that Trump is responsible for violence surging,
Speaker 1: and it is clearly surging. That data is in no
Speaker 1: question about it surging in Atlanta, surging in New York.
Speaker 1: The Georgia governors had to call in a thousand National
Speaker 1: Guard troops because things are so bad there. Wait, I
Speaker 1: thought that Black Lives Matter was going to make cities
Speaker 1: safer for predominantly minority areas. Right, we're most of the
Speaker 1: violence as concentrated. I thought they're going to make things
Speaker 1: better in police community relation. No, I didn't think any
Speaker 1: of that. You know why, because we've already been through
Speaker 1: this and things got worse. The police are not the problem.
Speaker 1: The police are the centerpiece of the solution to the problem.
Speaker 1: Democrats don't have a good a good answer for this.
Speaker 1: They don't have a way of explaining to anybody who
Speaker 1: you know, has two brain cells to rub together. Hold
Speaker 1: on a second, you've been making the police the enemy here,
Speaker 1: and you've been trying to pull funds and you've been
Speaker 1: supporting this narrative and comps. Remember, COMPS may be defunded
Speaker 1: only in a handful of cities so far, but comps
Speaker 1: everywhere across the country. No one misstep one thing that
Speaker 1: could be misrepresented that's captured by a nearby cell phone video.
Speaker 1: And not only could your career be ruined, you could
Speaker 1: face the ruination of your life, and you could even
Speaker 1: face your own state government threatening to put a needle
Speaker 1: in your arm and a bag over your head as
Speaker 1: a murderer. We all know what the impact of that
Speaker 1: is on police psyche across the country. I know from
Speaker 1: talking to cops here where I am in New York
Speaker 1: and across the country. It's obvious what do Democrats have
Speaker 1: to say about this right now? Oh, I mean, they're
Speaker 1: gonna lie, They're gonna say, oh no, it was always
Speaker 1: you know, it was always just it. But people are
Speaker 1: gonna get tired of the obvious ploy here of do
Speaker 1: you support Black Lives Matter? Well? Are they asking me
Speaker 1: if I support the movement or the concept? Everyone supports
Speaker 1: the concept, the statement do I support the movement that
Speaker 1: it represents? I've said this before. It really is true,
Speaker 1: And I know this seems like a digression, but in
Speaker 1: the fantastic comedy Parks and Recreation, which you should skip
Speaker 1: to season three really, not even season two and start
Speaker 1: it there because the first season's bad. But in that
Speaker 1: fantastic show, there was a group of people that every
Speaker 1: year gather in the park. This is it's all. It's
Speaker 1: a joke. It's a comedy. They gather in a park
Speaker 1: and they want they claim the world is going to end,
Speaker 1: and every year it doesn't end. But every year they
Speaker 1: say they've received another sign from their you know, their
Speaker 1: profit and the spaceship or whatever, who's saying, oh, no,
Speaker 1: it's going to be next year. But they're called the
Speaker 1: reasonable Lists. And the whole point is, well, how can
Speaker 1: you disagree with the reasonable lists? Are you going to
Speaker 1: say the reasonable lists are unreasonable? I know it seems silly,
Speaker 1: but that's effectively what the tactic is. It's the same
Speaker 1: thing as do you believe in climate change? What does
Speaker 1: that mean? Yeah? I think the climate is changing, the
Speaker 1: climate has always been changing. Well do you believe yes
Speaker 1: or no? They make it seem like a religious article
Speaker 1: of f because for many of them it is. And
Speaker 1: if you disagree, you're a bad person, or if you
Speaker 1: don't answer in the affirmative. But answering in the affirmative
Speaker 1: then means that they will attach to you. They will
Speaker 1: claim that you have agreed with a whole series of
Speaker 1: decisions and policies and beliefs. Same thing is true of
Speaker 1: Black Lives Matter. People are going to get tired of
Speaker 1: this as they see this play out again. We all
Speaker 1: understand there is zero disagreement about Black lives mattering in
Speaker 1: American society. It's a statement of the most obvious moral
Speaker 1: truth imaginable. But the reason that that's the name of
Speaker 1: the group founded by a bunch of Marxists is specifically
Speaker 1: so that they can have a political entity that is
Speaker 1: difficult to criticize without sounding like what you don't care
Speaker 1: about black lives right, sounding like you're actually a racist,
Speaker 1: and that they can shoehorn whatever policies and ideas they
Speaker 1: want into under this umbrella, and it has a degree
Speaker 1: of not just protection but built in acceptance. People will
Speaker 1: go around and the perception as well, everyone agrees black
Speaker 1: Lives matter, Does everyone agree with everything that what Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matter is doing is a correct policy or the
Speaker 1: elimination of the nuclear family, As has been pointed out,
Speaker 1: a classic Marxist idea. People say, oh, how is it
Speaker 1: a Marxist group. Eliminating the nuclear family allows for the
Speaker 1: disintegration of the one bond that we all have and
Speaker 1: should have that is more important than the state, and
Speaker 1: that any of us in a free and moral society
Speaker 1: would place above the mandates of the state. You know,
Speaker 1: if the government decides that, you know, one of my
Speaker 1: siblings was an enemy of the state for political reasons
Speaker 1: and it had gone tyrannical, I would take up arms
Speaker 1: against the government, no question about it, no no question.
Speaker 1: I'd go down fighting right there. The true statists, the
Speaker 1: true Marxist leftist radicals, I mean really all Marxist radicals.
Speaker 1: So some of this is going to be a little
Speaker 1: bit redundant. They understand that to make people truly servants
Speaker 1: of the state, you have to destroy that bond with
Speaker 1: the family, which is why famously, in the Soviet Union
Speaker 1: they elevated, they elevated a boy who turned in his
Speaker 1: own parents for being counter revolutionaries. This propaganda existed for
Speaker 1: a very specific reason. It's why the secret police loved
Speaker 1: and used in the most widespread fashion informants in families
Speaker 1: against families, break down the family structure and there's nothing
Speaker 1: you can trust more than the state. The state becomes
Speaker 1: your family. Now, isn't that twisted, especially when as we know,
Speaker 1: all of the social science, the real data in social science,
Speaker 1: I don't even like it really as a term. All
Speaker 1: of the data and all of human experience for the
Speaker 1: last let's call it fifty years or so, has shown,
Speaker 1: because that's when we've had the disintegration of the family,
Speaker 1: has shown that family structure is the single most important
Speaker 1: determinant of an individual's future prospects. By all the percentages
Speaker 1: and by all the numbers, how likely are you to
Speaker 1: go to prison, How likely are you to die young?
Speaker 1: How likely are you to have out of wedlock births?
Speaker 1: How likely all of you? How likely are you to
Speaker 1: either be abused or be an abuser? Family structure. If
Speaker 1: you could have one thing, one advantage that you could
Speaker 1: give people of all races, all backgrounds, all religious groups.
Speaker 1: It's in fact, to maintain the nuclear family as they
Speaker 1: refer to it. I just like to call it the family.
Speaker 1: If you maintain that, you are doing enormous good for
Speaker 1: the people involved. And there's no counter argument to this really,
Speaker 1: except the Left wants to destroy it all. They always
Speaker 1: try to elevate and and celebrate the destruction of the
Speaker 1: family in different ways. Oh, this is all great, Oh
Speaker 1: you know big you know, single parenthood. Look, life is imperfect.
Speaker 1: I'm not I'm not judging anyone. And it's it's not
Speaker 1: about that. It's about what do we try to promote,
Speaker 1: you know, it's it's about what do we try to
Speaker 1: replicate as a society. But the elevation, for example, of
Speaker 1: single parenthood, particularly single motherhood by liberals as desirable as
Speaker 1: opposed to something that happens and people do their best
Speaker 1: under the circumstances. This is all deeply counterproductive. But you
Speaker 1: see that's we're not even talking about any of this.
Speaker 1: Are we as a society right now? Now we're talking
Speaker 1: about pulling down statues because they make you afraid. With
Speaker 1: all of this talk about systemic racism and the Confederate
Speaker 1: flag and all these issues, were you go, well, I
Speaker 1: don't you know, yeah, I'm against that, or I don't
Speaker 1: like that, and hold on. You know that they put
Speaker 1: you on the defensive, they make you fearful. And then
Speaker 1: while we're all silent, well we're all quiet, these other
Speaker 1: things start coming up. Oh, we're also going to eliminate
Speaker 1: you know, we're going to eliminate the family structure. We're
Speaker 1: going to make sure that the welfare state is even
Speaker 1: has even more lax regulations, is even larger than in
Speaker 1: previously been. They'll they'll try to just increase the role
Speaker 1: of society as a mechanism for redistribution and social justice
Speaker 1: in every way possible. While we're all sitting there saying,
Speaker 1: hold on a second, I just don't want to get
Speaker 1: called racist. They're pushing transformational and by their own words
Speaker 1: they say Biden has even said transformational national policies. That's
Speaker 1: what they're trying to do. One thing that they don't
Speaker 1: address is who gets lost in the meantime, who suffers?
Speaker 1: Oh that's right, minority communities where violence is spiking and
Speaker 1: the media is shockingly or no, I should I should
Speaker 1: retract that's name in the media is of course, as expected,
Speaker 1: completely uninterested in that story. You're in the Freedom Eye.
Speaker 1: This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast. I think the
Speaker 1: world is looking at us as a leader in COVID
Speaker 1: nineteen because the chart I showed you where you have
Speaker 1: mortality rate in Italy and UK up here and across Europe,
Speaker 1: and you have the United States at a low mort
Speaker 1: case mortality rate. It's because of the extraordinary work that
Speaker 1: we've done on therapeutics, getting PPE and leading on ventilators
Speaker 1: and having excess of ventilators that we were able to
Speaker 1: deploy around the world and help other countries. So that's
Speaker 1: what I would have to say on COVID. And finally
Speaker 1: I did with this. You know, I was asked probably
Speaker 1: twelve questions about the Confederate flag. This President's focused on action,
Speaker 1: and I'm a little dismayed that I didn't receive one
Speaker 1: question on the deaths that we got in this country
Speaker 1: this weekend. I didn't receive one question about New York
Speaker 1: City shootings doubling for the third straight week and over
Speaker 1: the last seven days, shooting skyrocket by one hundred forty
Speaker 1: two percent. Not one question. I hadn't received one question
Speaker 1: about five children who were killed. And I'll leave you
Speaker 1: with this remark by a dad. It broke my heart.
Speaker 1: A dad of an eight year old lost in Atlanta
Speaker 1: this weekend. They say black lives matters. You killed a child,
Speaker 1: she didn't do nothing to nobody, was his quote. We
Speaker 1: need to be focused on securing our streets, making sure
Speaker 1: no lives are lost because all black lives matter, that
Speaker 1: of David Dorn and that of this eight year old girl.
Speaker 1: And yet there won't be any marches or protests about
Speaker 1: any of that. Will there Here in New York. It
Speaker 1: has become pretty standard to share latest, the latest videos
Speaker 1: of just the brazenness, the viciousness of crimes that are
Speaker 1: occurring now, in some cases in broad daylight. I'm sure
Speaker 1: you've seen the video the elderly woman getting shoved and
Speaker 1: falling down and hitting her head on a hydrant by
Speaker 1: a guy who's been arrested over a hundred times. But
Speaker 1: criminal justice reform. President Trump was told by certain advisors
Speaker 1: that was the way to respond to this Marxist uprising.
Speaker 1: Oh boy, oh my. And then you had a video
Speaker 1: that is there's actually several Now there's a video of
Speaker 1: someone executing two people in the stairwell of a building
Speaker 1: here in New York, where they're frantically trying to get
Speaker 1: into a door. They see the gunman coming up the steps,
Speaker 1: and it's just it's just it's just gut wrenching. It's
Speaker 1: horrible that any human being could be so so heartless
Speaker 1: and vicious. And and there's a video of a guy
Speaker 1: driving and broad daylight out in Brooklyn, New York, and
Speaker 1: he with a guy, the victim walking with his six
Speaker 1: year old daughter and broad daylight and the driver, I'm sorry.
Speaker 1: The passenger of a car sticks a handgun out and
Speaker 1: just shoots him a few times, kills him dead right
Speaker 1: there on the street while he's holding his six year
Speaker 1: old daughter's hand. This is what's happening every day across
Speaker 1: this country. But if you bring any of this up,
Speaker 1: you will be met with people chanting, you know, justice
Speaker 1: for Mike Brown. Say what what does Mike Brown? What
Speaker 1: does that have to do with with any of this stuff.
Speaker 1: Mike Brown tried to attack a cop and take his
Speaker 1: gun and got killed, according to Black Eye witnesses, and
Speaker 1: according to the Obama Administration's Department of Justice, we're still
Speaker 1: talking about this like he didn't get shot because he
Speaker 1: was trying to kill a cop. Justice for George Floyd,
Speaker 1: they chant, Okay, the cop who killed George Floyd is
Speaker 1: facing the rest of his life in prison. We're a
Speaker 1: country at three hundred and thirty million people. There's gonna
Speaker 1: be a couple of bad cops every year. That's gonna happen.
Speaker 1: A dozen, two dozen that's gonna happen no matter what
Speaker 1: kind of society we think we're living in, right, no
Speaker 1: matter how good police community relations are. So what about
Speaker 1: what happens every day? What about the criminality that is
Speaker 1: just considered to be a fact of life in so
Speaker 1: many communities? Now in Chicago it's completely out of control.
Speaker 1: In New York, it's trending toward what it was in
Speaker 1: the past, big spike. Even the moron in chief, Deblasio
Speaker 1: more On Chief for New York City, even he says
Speaker 1: things are looking pretty bad right now. Where is the concerned,
Speaker 1: the outrage about this? Where's the desire to save thousands
Speaker 1: of black lives that are lost every year? In fact,
Speaker 1: I think last year it was almost eight thousand African
Speaker 1: Americans killed by other African Americans in cities across the country.
Speaker 1: That's the number, that's the statistic. Where is the focus
Speaker 1: on saving those lives? Thousands? And think of the families
Speaker 1: that are shattered when one of these individuals, these are
Speaker 1: these are people's sons that are dying in the street.
Speaker 1: And you never hear the kind of outrage rhetoric from
Speaker 1: the media about this. You never have the same focus
Speaker 1: on the children who are being shot on the streets
Speaker 1: of Chicago, not once in a while, every day, every day.
Speaker 1: But Democrats think they have the moral high ground here
Speaker 1: because they'll focus on one bad cop here, one bad
Speaker 1: cop a couple of years ago. And in some cases
Speaker 1: they're focusing on cops who didn't do anything wrong, like
Speaker 1: Mike Brown and that situation with Officer Darryl Darren Wilson.
Speaker 1: There we go. I to remember his name. They don't care.
Speaker 1: This is all about politics. It's not actually about making
Speaker 1: people safer. It's not about making our society better. This
Speaker 1: is about power, and it's about mobilizing emotions for their
Speaker 1: own side and fear in the other side to put
Speaker 1: forward policies that, as we're already seen, will result in
Speaker 1: more people attacked, raped, murdered, violated in every criminal way
Speaker 1: imaginable from all races and backgrounds, but disproportionately the victims
Speaker 1: will in fact be minorities, people of color, young black
Speaker 1: men in this country because of the policies that the
Speaker 1: Democrats are pushing forward. That's just where we are. Thanks
Speaker 1: for listening to the bus Ess and Show podcasts. Remember
Speaker 1: to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the iHeartRadio app, or wherever
Speaker 1: you get your podcasts. There was a pretty interesting discussion
Speaker 1: about this dynamic that I've been talking to you about,
Speaker 1: about the reality of what Black Lives Matter movement stands
Speaker 1: for and what it does, what it accomplishes. Right, those
Speaker 1: are two things. What does it want and what is
Speaker 1: it done so far? But if you're going to talk
Speaker 1: about so far, you also have to look at what
Speaker 1: has happened in the past. We've been through all of this, alright,
Speaker 1: We've had these same arguments, the same discussions. Now they've
Speaker 1: kind of combined the statue toppling, and there's the COVID anxiety, fear,
Speaker 1: and anger that's out there that's also being piled atop
Speaker 1: all of this and being used. People are frustrated because
Speaker 1: they've been lied to you by their government. They keep thinking,
Speaker 1: the Democrats keep thinking, if I just listen to the
Speaker 1: government everything, But no, the government has been wrong about
Speaker 1: this over and over, federal level, state level, a lot
Speaker 1: of wrong, a lot of wrong. But there has been
Speaker 1: some interesting discussion of this. You have to just look
Speaker 1: for it. And here on Don Lemon Show, which is
Speaker 1: a show at CNN that I have to say, back
Speaker 1: of the day, I appeared on a fair amount talking
Speaker 1: about terrorism, not talking really very much about politics. As
Speaker 1: soon as they found out that I was really conservative,
Speaker 1: all of a sudden, the invitations to be on that
Speaker 1: show pretty much stopped. But here you have Don Lemon
Speaker 1: and Terry Creuz having a conversation about BLM and Terry Crews.
Speaker 1: I think he deserves a lot of credit. He is
Speaker 1: a black man in America who's willing to speak out
Speaker 1: on this issue knowing that I can't even imagine. Well
Speaker 1: maybe I can imagine it, but I certainly I'm never
Speaker 1: someone who's going to experience the kind of hatefulness that
Speaker 1: will be thrown at him from the left for being
Speaker 1: a famous black man in America who does not speak
Speaker 1: about BLM and does not view BLM the way that
Speaker 1: the left says you have to right. The left dictates
Speaker 1: ideological positions. They believe it is a betrayal for people
Speaker 1: of certain skin color not to hold certain political views
Speaker 1: and to be a member of a prescribed party, the
Speaker 1: Democrat Party. They're open about this. This ha all the time.
Speaker 1: We see this all the time. And if you're looking
Speaker 1: for examples, why is it that a lot of historically
Speaker 1: black institutions for example, do not elevate Revere and celebrate
Speaker 1: justice Clarence Thomas the way they do a lot of
Speaker 1: other members of the black To me, why oh, because
Speaker 1: he's a conservative. We all know this. This is this
Speaker 1: is law. It has been obvious for decades and decades now.
Speaker 1: But Terry Cruz has opinions on this that he thinks
Speaker 1: need to be heard. And I think he's right. Let's
Speaker 1: start with the way that he thinks BLM leaders see themselves.
Speaker 1: Play clip for you know, it's one of those things
Speaker 1: where I've been a part of different groups. I've been
Speaker 1: a part of different things, and you see how extremes
Speaker 1: can really get. You can't go far and can't go wild.
Speaker 1: And then when you issue a warning, and when a
Speaker 1: warning is seen as detrimental to the movement, how can
Speaker 1: you ever ever have checks and balances? Um. You know,
Speaker 1: in the sixties and seventies, airplanes went down all the time,
Speaker 1: and the reason they found out why they did was
Speaker 1: because the pilots could never be questioned. And when you
Speaker 1: have the leaders of the Black Lives Movement who are
Speaker 1: now talking about, you know, if we don't get our demands,
Speaker 1: we're gonna burn it down. Other black people who are
Speaker 1: talking about working with other whites and other other races
Speaker 1: that are being viewed a sellouts are called Uncle Tom's.
Speaker 1: It starts to start you you start to understand that
Speaker 1: you are now you know, being controlled. You're not being
Speaker 1: treated as loved, You're actually being controlled. Someone wants to
Speaker 1: control the narrative. And I viewed it as a very
Speaker 1: very dangerous self righteousness that was developing. That you know
Speaker 1: that that really viewed themselves as better. It was almost
Speaker 1: a supremacist move. Let me jump their black lives mattered
Speaker 1: a lot more than mine. That is incredibly astute, excellent analysis.
Speaker 1: Have you heard anyone really talking about that? And look
Speaker 1: at did I We're playing it from Don Don Lemons
Speaker 1: show Monsieur Don Lemon. I don't know, it's not actually French,
Speaker 1: but it sounds like they'll be fun if it were French.
Speaker 1: Don Lemon Show put it on the air. But you
Speaker 1: can tell Don Lemon is like not really happy with
Speaker 1: the way that this has gone with Terry Crews. Why
Speaker 1: he starts interrupting him. You always know I've told you this,
Speaker 1: CNN anchors. All you have to do is see how
Speaker 1: much they let a certain person speak and how much
Speaker 1: they interrupt them, and that is that tells you what
Speaker 1: they think of that person or guest, and it's also
Speaker 1: what they're trying to tell the audience they think about
Speaker 1: that person or guest. It's true every time I used
Speaker 1: to go on seeing and I would text friends of mine.
Speaker 1: I think I used to tweet this out sometimes. Oh no,
Speaker 1: I couldn't because I was on contract the time, but
Speaker 1: I used to text friends of mine. Watch this. I'm
Speaker 1: gonna get the first question. I'm gonna it's gonna be
Speaker 1: a very pointed question to put me on defense. This
Speaker 1: ill CN I call the CNN ambush and from the
Speaker 1: anchor who's pretending to just be an unchurgils asking questions,
Speaker 1: I said, I'm gonna get interrupted before I can get
Speaker 1: fifteen seconds of response out to kind of throw me
Speaker 1: off a little bit, to pretend it's a clarification, but
Speaker 1: it interrupts my answer. I don't get it. And then
Speaker 1: they'll go to the other the democrat. They're both Democrats,
Speaker 1: and they'll say no, no no, no, buck buck, let the
Speaker 1: let the other person. Let the Democrats speak and trash
Speaker 1: the fifteen seconds of what you were trying to say,
Speaker 1: and and then maybe they go to commercial. That's the
Speaker 1: way the CNN ambush usually works. And I don't care
Speaker 1: who you are, you have you have no way of
Speaker 1: fighting through this. It's a little bit like being on
Speaker 1: the Bill Mars Show. You have no way of fighting
Speaker 1: through it because if you try to talk over or
Speaker 1: if you try to establish fair speaking time, then you're
Speaker 1: like aggressive and you're being so so it's it's effectively
Speaker 1: it's a totally rigged game, right, Producer Mark would be
Speaker 1: like saying, let's go play hockey, but you don't get
Speaker 1: to have a stick. Well, what can you use your hands?
Speaker 1: Because he can't. That wouldn't work, right, That would be bad, Yes,
Speaker 1: it would be it would be bad. Yeah, yeah, bad exactly. So,
Speaker 1: Uh now we have Terry Crews making the essential point
Speaker 1: of the absolutism that is at the heart of the movement,
Speaker 1: the BLM movement. You're not allowed to question. There's not
Speaker 1: a discussion about whether different policies are wise, whether this
Speaker 1: is even a folks. You know. The one thing that
Speaker 1: comes up is they'll say, well, where is the focus
Speaker 1: of the movement versus where should it be? And they'll
Speaker 1: say no, no, no, no, that's not that's not allowable.
Speaker 1: This is very similar to the way that media organizations
Speaker 1: engage in bias and propaganda. They'll say, oh, we we're
Speaker 1: covering this issue now, not that issue. So and you'll say, well,
Speaker 1: hold on. If you cover this issue, let's say Russia
Speaker 1: collusion a hundred times in thirty days, and you cover
Speaker 1: that other issue, the strong economy under Trump, two times
Speaker 1: in thirty days, that's a very profound decision. That decision
Speaker 1: alone is one that should be debated, discussed, and criticize
Speaker 1: where necessary. What Black Lives Matter does is say, okay, yeah, yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: there's all this other stuff about violence in the black
Speaker 1: community that comes from gang violence and the drug war
Speaker 1: and all, and it's black on black person violence that's occurring. Yeah, yeah,
Speaker 1: that's all out there. But we're talking about this now,
Speaker 1: cops police violence against black We're talking about this. And
Speaker 1: you say, yeah, well, you talk about that about a
Speaker 1: thousand times as much as you talk about the other thing.
Speaker 1: That's a decision, that's a that's an editorial focus decision
Speaker 1: that should be up for discussion debate too. You have
Speaker 1: limited time, limited resources, limited energy, and all things in life.
Speaker 1: So what you spend your time on, you know, There's
Speaker 1: a reason why when I do this show, I don't
Speaker 1: come up every day and say, you know, took a
Speaker 1: dog for a walk this morning, and I'm gonna make
Speaker 1: myself some bacon and gonna hang out and maybe we'll
Speaker 1: get to some news stories later. No, because I value
Speaker 1: your time that you give to me, and I understand
Speaker 1: that every decision I make on this show is a
Speaker 1: decision about how we are using our time together. Right.
Speaker 1: You know, maybe we'll do another show our producer Mark
Speaker 1: and I talk about our favorite breakfast foods. But for now,
Speaker 1: we focus on things that really matter. And that's why
Speaker 1: I start at the top of the show with what
Speaker 1: I think are the most important things. Of course, this
Speaker 1: is the way the whole news business information exchange. This
Speaker 1: is how it works. But if you try to question
Speaker 1: the decision of focus on this by the numbers, very
Speaker 1: small issue within the black community, of unarmed black man
Speaker 1: killed by cops, a very specific, very uncommon aberrant, you
Speaker 1: could even say, statistically event, and to ignore. And at
Speaker 1: the heart of this, of course, is that the life
Speaker 1: of every black American, the life of every American, is
Speaker 1: precious and is deserving of dignity and rights and care
Speaker 1: and love. That is true. But if that is the
Speaker 1: premise they are using as the core of why, and
Speaker 1: it is the premise of the core of why this
Speaker 1: police violence against black men is so abhorrent to all
Speaker 1: of us, why isn't that same premise then the cause
Speaker 1: of much greater focus on violence within minority urban particularly
Speaker 1: in urban communities across the country. Can't get an answer.
Speaker 1: We're talking about this thing, not that thing. We're talking
Speaker 1: about A, not B. That's what they say. Here's Don Lemon,
Speaker 1: not letting Terry Crews speak with Terry Cruise is trying
Speaker 1: to say that Black Lives Matter isn't even really about
Speaker 1: police brutality. It's already moved on clip three, then start
Speaker 1: that movement with that name. But that's not what Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matter is about. It's not an all encompassing So
Speaker 1: if you're talking about if someone started moving that said
Speaker 1: cancer matters, and then someone comes in and said, why
Speaker 1: aren't you talking about HIV, it's not the same thing.
Speaker 1: We're talking about cancer. So the Black Lives Matter movement
Speaker 1: is about police brutality and injustice in that manner, not
Speaker 1: about what's happening in black neighborhoods. If there are people
Speaker 1: who are working on that issue, and if you want
Speaker 1: to start that issue, why don't you start it? Do
Speaker 1: you understand what I'm saying. Well, when you look at
Speaker 1: the organization, police brutality is not the only thing they're
Speaker 1: talking about. I know that that. I agree, But that's
Speaker 1: not what the Black Lives Matter movement is about. Terry
Speaker 1: Black lives matters about police brutality and about and about
Speaker 1: criminal justice. It's not about what happens in communities when
Speaker 1: it comes to crime, black on black crime. People who
Speaker 1: live near each other, black people kill each other, same
Speaker 1: as whites. Eighty some percent of white people are killed
Speaker 1: by white people because of proximity. It's the same thing
Speaker 1: with black people that happens in every single neighborhood that
Speaker 1: doesn't Again, I'm not saying that's not important that those
Speaker 1: those kids die, but it's a different movement. See, oh no,
Speaker 1: we're talking about this, not talking about that. That's okay. Well,
Speaker 1: let's let's take mister Lemon at his word here, and
Speaker 1: let's let's look at his analogy because I think it
Speaker 1: really is instructive in ways that he's not prepared for.
Speaker 1: You know, he says it would be like saying I've
Speaker 1: got a society about cancer, and you're saying, why aren't
Speaker 1: you talking about heart disease? Well, isn't that very interesting,
Speaker 1: because that's a ridiculous analogy because cancer kills a whole
Speaker 1: lot of people every year in America, and so does
Speaker 1: heart disease. These are both statistically very significant public health
Speaker 1: risks that take far too many of our loved ones
Speaker 1: away from us every year. You know, millions of people
Speaker 1: getting cancer diagnoses and dying, millions of people getting heart
Speaker 1: disease and dying. So these are very similar things. When
Speaker 1: you're talking about police violence against police killing of unarmed
Speaker 1: black men, and then you're talking about murders that are
Speaker 1: occurring within the black community overall, this would be like
Speaker 1: comparing deaths in terms of the numbers each year from
Speaker 1: hunt of virus which kill which they're about twenty to
Speaker 1: forty cases a year in the United States obscure disease,
Speaker 1: but it's a high lethality, about thirty percent lethality deaths
Speaker 1: from which is you're terrible. People people do die from this,
Speaker 1: right serious. But if you if you had if you
Speaker 1: were devoting all of your media attention, billions and billions
Speaker 1: of dollars of research to anti virus and spending basically
Speaker 1: no money on heart disease. People would ask questions, so
Speaker 1: the don lemon thing here of it would be like
Speaker 1: this and like no, no, no no, no. That's a sloppy analogy,
Speaker 1: because when you're talking about twelve to thirty people a
Speaker 1: year killed by cops when they're unarmed, under suspicious although
Speaker 1: not necessarily illegal, but under suspicious circumstances, versus seven to
Speaker 1: eight thousand murders of overwhelming the young black metal though
Speaker 1: also children and women and older people. One of these
Speaker 1: is statistically a very uncommon problem. The other is incredibly,
Speaker 1: unfortunately tragically common. And the energy and resources and attention
Speaker 1: put on the first dwarfs from the media and from
Speaker 1: the Democrat Party the one put on the second. That's
Speaker 1: the point. And he helped us accidentally illuminate this right
Speaker 1: heart disease in cancer major problems. Both need big foundations,
Speaker 1: a lot of research, a lot of dollars. Right, there
Speaker 1: are other diseases, you know, occasionally you'll have these. I
Speaker 1: think I just saw this in Florida. Right, there's the
Speaker 1: brain eating amiba that has shown up horrible but very
Speaker 1: very very rare. If you if every day we had
Speaker 1: updates on brain eating amiba cases, which is not to
Speaker 1: say it's not terrible for that family. It is terrifying.
Speaker 1: That's why we click on it, and that's why we
Speaker 1: see it. But if every day you were talking about
Speaker 1: the brain eating amibas and not talking about heart disease
Speaker 1: and not talking about cancer, people would say, is this
Speaker 1: really about public health or is it about something else? Boom,
Speaker 1: that's the point you're in those hud This is the
Speaker 1: Buck Sexton Show podcast. Compared to last year, shootings up,
Speaker 1: homicides up more than thirty percent. So just blank, what
Speaker 1: is happening right now? All of these forces are coming
Speaker 1: together at the same time and making it very difficult
Speaker 1: the ecosystem of public safety that isn't just law enforcement,
Speaker 1: but as local community base. They too have really been
Speaker 1: hit hard by COVID and are now just kind of
Speaker 1: coming back online and getting their footing. Oh okay, this
Speaker 1: is the mayor of Chicago, which has a gun violence problem.
Speaker 1: Member Chicago effectively outlaws gun ownership. It's really really hard
Speaker 1: to get a gun if you're a resident of Chicago,
Speaker 1: just like it as in New York City. But there's
Speaker 1: plenty of guns, plenty of shootings, tragically, far too many.
Speaker 1: New York City shootings up one hundred and thirty percent,
Speaker 1: murders up thirty percent for the month of June. Okay,
Speaker 1: that's just a statistic that I saw, tod I keep
Speaker 1: that one in mind. Chicago also has a very it
Speaker 1: has a very high murder murder number overall for a
Speaker 1: city of its size, a lot of a lot of shootings.
Speaker 1: And here you have the mayor at a time when
Speaker 1: police are being demoralized, defunded, and debased by shameless, reckless
Speaker 1: Democrat politicians. You're the mayor of Chicago, does exactly what
Speaker 1: we all can expect here, which is to say, oh,
Speaker 1: it's about it's a lot of things. It's a lot
Speaker 1: of things, it's and it's that that means it's really
Speaker 1: nothing right because it could be anything, and who really knows,
Speaker 1: And it's COVID, and it's it's outrageous, it's outrageous, it's
Speaker 1: completely unacceptable. But Democrats accept no accountability for this whatsoever.
Speaker 1: They want power without the accountability of being unable to
Speaker 1: use that power to provide the single most essential and
Speaker 1: important part of the social contract, protecting people's lives. Your citizens,
Speaker 1: as the sovereign, you protect their lives. That's number one,
Speaker 1: even ahead of property, right, that's number one. In Chicago
Speaker 1: and now increasingly in New York are failing in that mission.
Speaker 1: The Democrat Party is flailing when asked to come up
Speaker 1: with any real explanations for this. But what do they do?
Speaker 1: They just start chanting black lives matter, as if that's
Speaker 1: an answer to what we're talking about here, which is, okay,
Speaker 1: why is crime spiking in these cities and how can
Speaker 1: we stop it so we can save more lives, in
Speaker 1: particular more black lives. Thanks for listening to The bus
Speaker 1: Esson Show podcasts. Remember to subscribe on Apple podcasts, the
Speaker 1: iHeartRadio app, or wherever you get your podcasts. You won't
Speaker 1: wear a mask because he doesn't want to admit that
Speaker 1: there's a code a virus why. I have no idea,
Speaker 1: but his denial of the problem and hiss making statements
Speaker 1: like that ninety nine point nine don't have to worry
Speaker 1: about it, Okay, then there's no issue. What he saying
Speaker 1: the American people is there's no problem. And then they
Speaker 1: don't wear a mask, and they don't socially distanced and
Speaker 1: they don't take any precautionary behavior and then the virus
Speaker 1: goes like this. He is he is facilitating the virus.
Speaker 1: He is enabling the virus by statements like that, and
Speaker 1: you're seeing the infection rate go up and you're seeing
Speaker 1: the economy suffer. He is a neighbling the virus. He's
Speaker 1: like a best friend of the COVID. He's doing the
Speaker 1: bad thing so that people will get it and they
Speaker 1: will die. Quoo is the worst. I think I could
Speaker 1: just end the sentence there. The Governor of New York,
Speaker 1: at least, Gavin Newsom is a little slick, you know,
Speaker 1: he's a little bit the guys. The guy's kind of smooth.
Speaker 1: Cuomo is just like a bit of a thug. You know. Well,
Speaker 1: we're gonna do it my way because that's what the
Speaker 1: data says. Oh and what a surprise to no one.
Speaker 1: Cuomo has put out there a producer mark out to
Speaker 1: remind me we needed we needed to bring back the
Speaker 1: buck slap for people like Cuomo. So remind me, I'll
Speaker 1: find this. I'll find this one later because someone that is,
Speaker 1: you know, we got to bring back some of the
Speaker 1: old school, especially in this election season, so we all
Speaker 1: find the buck slap but Cuomo had his Health Department
Speaker 1: for the State of New York do this whole report
Speaker 1: on putting thousands of people who were COVID patients, who
Speaker 1: were seniors into nursing homes where then they had an
Speaker 1: explosion of COVID. You know what they found. Who wants
Speaker 1: to guess what Cuomo's New York Health Department New York
Speaker 1: State Health Department found about what would seem to be
Speaker 1: the single dumbest, most reckless policy see that anybody had
Speaker 1: even had done during the entirety of the COVID operak.
Speaker 1: Oh turns out they don't think that it was Cuomo's fault.
Speaker 1: That's right. They're saying it was a lot of things.
Speaker 1: There was a lot of factors, and also healthcare professionals
Speaker 1: who may have been positive or sorry, employees of the
Speaker 1: nursing homes, some of whom maybe were healthcare professionals who
Speaker 1: were positive went back into work. That's what they're saying. Now.
Speaker 1: That may be true too. But the justification for taking
Speaker 1: people who are positive or likely positive with COVID who
Speaker 1: are already at high risk, which means that they have
Speaker 1: an immune system that might not be able to fight
Speaker 1: off the virus themselves and also might make them very
Speaker 1: susceptible because of the virus replicates at a very high
Speaker 1: viral load make other people around them more susceptible to infection.
Speaker 1: That decision is inexplicably stupid, that cuomo mate. And there's
Speaker 1: no way you could believe that putting thousands of COVID
Speaker 1: positive seniors into nursing homes, given how infectious this disease is,
Speaker 1: There's no way that you could think that that did
Speaker 1: not result in people dying who would not have otherwise died.
Speaker 1: But account if you're looking for accountability from the government,
Speaker 1: I got a I got some beachfront property to sell
Speaker 1: you in Missouri, although actually technically wouldn't there be a
Speaker 1: lot of I mean lakefront, right if you think that's
Speaker 1: a beach. So, but you know what I mean, You
Speaker 1: know what I mean. I've been watching that show, Ozark's
Speaker 1: Too Much good show, producer Mark, you've seen it. I
Speaker 1: saw the first two seasons, haven't seen the third yet. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's very good, very good, very well done. So now
Speaker 1: we look at what they're saying about COVID, and I
Speaker 1: just there's something that I want to present to you,
Speaker 1: and that is that there's so many theories out there
Speaker 1: right now, and we're being told to make all these
Speaker 1: decisions about theories really while discounting the theories that are
Speaker 1: saying things like and again, none of this has proven yet.
Speaker 1: These are I'm just giving you the thing. These are
Speaker 1: not conspiracy theories. These are doctors and other experts such
Speaker 1: as they are, who are putting forward ideas about this. Okay,
Speaker 1: one is the virus might be easier to spread now
Speaker 1: but much less lethal now. Is this true? No one
Speaker 1: really knows. But that's a theory that's out there that's
Speaker 1: gaining traction. Does that seem to make sense. Well, there's
Speaker 1: a part of the debate over this where you have
Speaker 1: people who want to explain why there's all these all
Speaker 1: these infections, big numbers of infections in record numbers in
Speaker 1: Texas and Florida and nationwide really though centered in these
Speaker 1: these states, these big states, and yet the death toll,
Speaker 1: as I keep telling you, is under three hundred, which
Speaker 1: is down eighty eighty five maybe ninety percent from what
Speaker 1: the death toll was a few months ago. So we
Speaker 1: have record case and then it say, oh, buck two weeks,
Speaker 1: two weeks, two weeks. Yeah, but they also don't tell
Speaker 1: you that hospital stays on average for people who do
Speaker 1: get hospitalized with COVID or about half what they were.
Speaker 1: What I really want to know is what is the
Speaker 1: for hospitalized patients. This is data that I haven't been
Speaker 1: able to find yet, for hospitalized patients with COVID. What
Speaker 1: is the survival and go home rate? Right the release
Speaker 1: from the hospital rate versus what it was three or
Speaker 1: four months ago, because then we'd have a pretty good
Speaker 1: sense is this just a less lethal virus or are
Speaker 1: just younger people getting it because older, more at risk
Speaker 1: people know to be particularly cautious. And that also social distancing.
Speaker 1: I've never argued with social distancing as Yeah, if you're
Speaker 1: not close to somebody who has the virus, you're not
Speaker 1: going to get the virus. That's obvious. We also can't
Speaker 1: run a society where everyone is engaged in social distance.
Speaker 1: It's just not possible. So that's not really a silver
Speaker 1: bullet for dealing with this thing. It's just masking and
Speaker 1: when to mask and how to mask and what kind
Speaker 1: of mask that I have a lot more questions about,
Speaker 1: but I won't focus on that one all right now,
Speaker 1: although actually no, I will. I take that back because
Speaker 1: I saw this expert that had that's gotten all of
Speaker 1: this attention for saying that, here you go, this is
Speaker 1: the World Health organ Sorry, Eric Choner, this was a
Speaker 1: story about this guy. Eric Toner has been planning for
Speaker 1: a pandemic for years. He's brief world leaders on outbreaks
Speaker 1: and how to best prepared entire nations for mass casualties. Yaha,
Speaker 1: yah yah. Nothing could have prepared for COVID nineteen. Choner
Speaker 1: is a senior scholar at Johns Hopkins Center for Health
Speaker 1: Security and a world leader in pandemic preparedness. And he's
Speaker 1: saying that we could be dealing with this and have
Speaker 1: to wear masks for years. I've been saying this all along,
Speaker 1: my friends. If you're anything, masks are that effective and
Speaker 1: no big deal, We're going to be told to wear
Speaker 1: masks for the foreseeable. If masks are no big deal,
Speaker 1: why don't we wear them every year during influenza season? Oh,
Speaker 1: I'm sorry that the twenty to fifty to eighty thousand
Speaker 1: people that die from the flu every year don't count.
Speaker 1: Oh those are all loved ones too. Those are our
Speaker 1: fellow Americans or fellow human beings. So why don't we
Speaker 1: wear a mask. Then they always just pretend like there's that,
Speaker 1: that's all, that's irrelevant. Oh you know why, Oh, because
Speaker 1: you know they don't want to run this is something
Speaker 1: that I want to be very cleared. They don't want
Speaker 1: there to be clear tests of their mandates, of the
Speaker 1: experts and the government mandates on these things. They look
Speaker 1: at you like you're crazy when you say there is
Speaker 1: no evidence in a peer reviewed, conclusive study that masks
Speaker 1: prevent errorsolis virus spread from COVID nine team. They will
Speaker 1: look at you like you are crazy when that is
Speaker 1: a fact, that is a true statement that I just said.
Speaker 1: But they look at you like you're crazy because they
Speaker 1: want you to just do it anyway. Just just just
Speaker 1: do it, Just do it. Why why? I would like
Speaker 1: to know. And they'd say, well, a mask is somewhat effective. Okay,
Speaker 1: so is holding my breath for you know, thirty seconds
Speaker 1: out of every minute, probably, But telling me to do
Speaker 1: that all the time would be really annoying. And I'm
Speaker 1: not going to do it everything or even fifteen seconds
Speaker 1: of every minute, right, not breathing in any air, Yeah,
Speaker 1: that probably would have an effect too, And I'm around people,
Speaker 1: but I'm not going to do that, and this sense
Speaker 1: of will not comply. This grates against a certain mentality
Speaker 1: in this country from people that like to think they're
Speaker 1: right and like to tell other people what to do.
Speaker 1: This is not going to go away. This is why
Speaker 1: you have. You have masks shaming. You have people that
Speaker 1: have gotten into physical altercations, fights have broken out, firearms
Speaker 1: have been drawn because of a lack of social distancing
Speaker 1: in public venues and people get all you get all
Speaker 1: angry at each other and crazier. Someone's not wearing a
Speaker 1: mask and someone freaks out about it. Cuomo here, Why
Speaker 1: ulding the president wear a mask? The president is having
Speaker 1: the people around him tested every day he is in
Speaker 1: a Why does the president have an army of Secret
Speaker 1: Service protection with him all the time. He's not just
Speaker 1: a normal dude, Okay. The President of the United States
Speaker 1: has a special role that he has to fulfill and
Speaker 1: going ruined mask on all the time is not going
Speaker 1: to get it done. Joe Biden's he's in the basement's
Speaker 1: ear a mask all the time. I'm just gonna be
Speaker 1: in the basement, yeah, man, I'm just telling him. And
Speaker 1: I saw on a Tucker Show last look. The only
Speaker 1: thing on cable news that I watch is a Tucker monologue.
Speaker 1: That's it. That's the only thing on cable news that
Speaker 1: I watched. I can't, you know, I look, that's the
Speaker 1: only thing I have time for. I won't say any
Speaker 1: more than that, but that's the only thing I watched.
Speaker 1: And he had two great insights last night. One of
Speaker 1: them was that our news media is full of I'm
Speaker 1: sorry three insights. That our news media is full of
Speaker 1: people who are objectively vicious, insecure, bad human beings. I mean,
Speaker 1: the news media is full of a lot of really
Speaker 1: bad people. I mean, I mean that more so than
Speaker 1: on the other industries. A lot of malignant, narcissists and delusional,
Speaker 1: intellectually insecure but also incredibly egotistical people male female. That's
Speaker 1: what the news media is full of. So that was
Speaker 1: one inside. The second is that WHOOPI Goldberg's just not
Speaker 1: very funny, which I kind of thought. I was, like
Speaker 1: the only person that I noticed this. I've never heard
Speaker 1: say anything funny. Supposed to be a comedian or she
Speaker 1: was a comedian. Now I guess she's a talk show
Speaker 1: host or something, but I just don't think she's funny.
Speaker 1: To reach his own people, think she's funny. But I mean,
Speaker 1: I'm not the only one is now that that was nice.
Speaker 1: I was like, oh, he agrees, Whoopy Goldberg not funny?
Speaker 1: Can't ever think of it. And I've I've seen movies
Speaker 1: she's been in not funny, Remember sister act I think
Speaker 1: she was funny. I don't know. Um. And then the
Speaker 1: third one was that Biden and the people around him
Speaker 1: trash this country and yet it's a country that's so
Speaker 1: remarkable that you can be an intense mediocrity like Joe
Speaker 1: Biden and be elevated to this position of the most
Speaker 1: powerful job in the world. That's that's stunning. I mean,
Speaker 1: you might say it's in some ways a rebuke of
Speaker 1: our system, but Joe Biden, you be President United States. Wow,
Speaker 1: There's there's nothing about Joe Biden that is not absolutely mediocre.
Speaker 1: I mean, he is a guy that just sort of
Speaker 1: was a part of the system, and it's just he's
Speaker 1: just been showing up, showing up, not doing very much,
Speaker 1: and messing up a lot for however many decades now,
Speaker 1: you know, five decades in American politics. So the mask
Speaker 1: issue that Joe Biden goes around wearing a mask all
Speaker 1: the time, We all know that there's a lot of
Speaker 1: politics involved in this. And I was talking to you
Speaker 1: about theories, and as I said, if you're if you're
Speaker 1: a senior, by the way, and you wear a mask,
Speaker 1: I wear a mask when I go to a store
Speaker 1: because I have to. I got no choice. Would I
Speaker 1: if I didn't know, I would not. If I had
Speaker 1: the option to go into a store now without a
Speaker 1: mask on, I would not wear. But you know it's
Speaker 1: a private establishment, and I got to wear masks. Now
Speaker 1: they're being told they have to do that by the government,
Speaker 1: so it's not really this is really a government mandate
Speaker 1: through private mechanism. But masks outside dumb And he even
Speaker 1: tells you otherwise, I doesn't know what they're talking about.
Speaker 1: It's just doesn't make any sense. If you're so close
Speaker 1: to somebody outdoors that they're at risk of transmission, masks
Speaker 1: is not going to do anything, So mask outside. The
Speaker 1: evidence shows ridiculous transmission from children to adults, almost impossible.
Speaker 1: Risk to people under the age of twenty almost zero.
Speaker 1: These are things that we know that don't get nearly
Speaker 1: enough attention and focus in this herd immunity. How do
Speaker 1: we get there? Are we getting there. Now, I'm hearing
Speaker 1: people say that if we get a vaccine, it might
Speaker 1: be as I mentioned the top of the show, it
Speaker 1: might be only forty or fifty percent effective, and you
Speaker 1: might have to get it every year like you do
Speaker 1: with the flu. Given what we know about coronaviruses, that
Speaker 1: may be true. Coronaviruses effectively gives you a cold, usually
Speaker 1: other coronaviruses. Common cold is a coronavirus. They're two hundred
Speaker 1: known two hundred plus, I'm sure's known strains of a
Speaker 1: virus to give you what you think of as a cold.
Speaker 1: So why do we think that we're going to be
Speaker 1: able to it's this one strain that we get her
Speaker 1: immunity too, and then we don't have to worry going forward.
Speaker 1: You know, these are the answers that nobody seems to
Speaker 1: have yet. But we're making all these policy decisions as
Speaker 1: though we know. And there's an enormous incentive to shutting
Speaker 1: down the country for the Democrats so that they can
Speaker 1: be in power, and then they figure they'll make all
Speaker 1: this stuff better or not. Whatever. Shut up, peasant, do
Speaker 1: what they tell you. That's the point. You're in the
Speaker 1: freedom hunt. This is the buck Sexton Show podcast. We
Speaker 1: have a phase and re engagement of our economy, and
Speaker 1: I hope to take the rest of the sea into
Speaker 1: Phase five. But we dialed it back right before Fourth
Speaker 1: Live because we see these numbers increasing. So not having
Speaker 1: bars that are serving indoors, that's one thing. But you know,
Speaker 1: we're going to continue to monitor the numbers. If they
Speaker 1: keep moving up, we're going to dial back if we
Speaker 1: have to. And it's the last thing any of us wants.
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you. I wanted to reengage this economy
Speaker 1: more than anyone, but I'm not going to do it
Speaker 1: if it is too risky to do so. And that's
Speaker 1: why we're staying focused on the epidemiology. I'm not going
Speaker 1: to be bullied into moving before it's safe. And if
Speaker 1: we have to move back, we're gonna. Yeah, I'm just
Speaker 1: not going to be bullied into it. Not you know,
Speaker 1: the tiring of Michigan. He's like, excuse me, sir, Yeah,
Speaker 1: I'm not going to do it. Govin you whitmer Ah,
Speaker 1: when is it safe? I would like to know when
Speaker 1: is it? When is it safe? You know, Australia supposedly
Speaker 1: beat the virus and now they're worried about an outbreak
Speaker 1: of it, So when is it safe? We were not told,
Speaker 1: nor did we agree as a society when we initially
Speaker 1: had this open debate about policy. The Trump administration fouci
Speaker 1: the whole thing. We were told it was about hospital
Speaker 1: capacity and that set. Now it's just about aggregate numbers
Speaker 1: based on cases, high number of cases shut down. That's
Speaker 1: not what we were told. That's not what we signed
Speaker 1: up for. That does not make sense. This is the
Speaker 1: most disastrous series of public health and public policy decisions
Speaker 1: in my lifetime. And I wonder how many lifetimes back
Speaker 1: you'd have to go. The public health authorities, the people
Speaker 1: in charge have been wrong at every stage of this.
Speaker 1: They keep doing maximum damage with minimum benefit to the
Speaker 1: public health. Fourteen days to stop the spread or fifteen
Speaker 1: days whatever it was. I always going to confuse. Fifteen
Speaker 1: days to stop the spread turned into you know, one
Speaker 1: hundred and fifty days to stop the spread. That's where
Speaker 1: we are. We are still on lockdown. We have not
Speaker 1: reopened the country. We still have restrictions of all kinds
Speaker 1: all over the place, masks and all the stuff, and
Speaker 1: we still have a surgeon cases another want to lock
Speaker 1: us down even more we are just we are giving
Speaker 1: up our freedom in a country. Or we all wave
Speaker 1: flags around and say yeah America and all this stuff.
Speaker 1: People just take it. They just say, Okay, whatever you want.
Speaker 1: You know, government overlords will do even even when you've
Speaker 1: been wrong. We'll do whatever you say. That's what That's
Speaker 1: what American character right now seems to mean when dealing
Speaker 1: with this virus. Thanks for listening to the Bus Sesson
Speaker 1: Show podcast. Remember to subscribe on Apple Podcasts, the iHeartRadio app,
Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts. All right back by
Speaker 1: popular demand. Our buddy John Cardillo in the mix. He
Speaker 1: is a TV host, podcaster, radio host, conservative commentator, former
Speaker 1: law enforcement officer for the n y p D, and
Speaker 1: he's down in Florida. John, Great to have you back, man,
Speaker 1: luck always good to be with you, by friend. And
Speaker 1: I think that annoying alarm that was buzzing a little
Speaker 1: while ago, the fire department turned it off. So okay,
Speaker 1: we're gonna have a quiet as long as you're safe.
Speaker 1: Spreading freedom is important, but we care about John Cardillo's
Speaker 1: safety first and foremost as our guest here. So all right,
Speaker 1: I got we got a lot of ground, a lot
Speaker 1: of things going on right now. I want to start
Speaker 1: with I am maybe and this might be me being hopeful,
Speaker 1: because you know, the President, I thought, gave a very
Speaker 1: good speech over the weekend, and it feels like he's
Speaker 1: starting to turn the cruise ship around from the rocks
Speaker 1: to that beautiful island we're trying to get to, right like.
Speaker 1: It feels as though this was the first real move
Speaker 1: for the president we've had in a while. And I
Speaker 1: also think, and I want to get your take on that,
Speaker 1: but I also want to know if you feel like
Speaker 1: the Democrat insanity about police and cops. There's a little
Speaker 1: at least trepidation among the smarter Democrats at the national
Speaker 1: level that this anti cop frenzy might become a liability
Speaker 1: for them if this continues. I want you give me
Speaker 1: your sense on both of those. Yeah, absolutely so down
Speaker 1: here in Florida. And I was very vocal about this
Speaker 1: on Twitter. You were our friend ed Ryan was, you know,
Speaker 1: people that really keep the hear to the ground. We
Speaker 1: were very concerned about what looked like a lack of
Speaker 1: proactivity in the Trump campaign. I'm so energized. I feel
Speaker 1: so much better after that Mount Rushmore a speech buck
Speaker 1: on the fourth. The President looks like he's doing what
Speaker 1: he needed to do. He's trusting his instincts again. He's
Speaker 1: not listening to the moderates, those people advising him to
Speaker 1: tone it down. He's become himself. He's the twenty fifteen,
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen Donald Trump who wanted to see back. So
Speaker 1: I'm encouragingly and I'm being very cautiously up the minister.
Speaker 1: I don't want to take anything for granted. The Democrats
Speaker 1: have done a very good job with their ground game.
Speaker 1: They're mail in ballot strategy here in Florida. But I'm
Speaker 1: encouraged by some moves made in the campaign. Susie Wile's
Speaker 1: back running Florida she wanted in twenty sixteen for the president.
Speaker 1: The really fortunate byproduct of bringing her back is that
Speaker 1: all of those ground troops are about three thousand very
Speaker 1: energized volunteers in Florida for the Trump campaign in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: Those were all her people, her team Karen Journau, who
Speaker 1: ran the state in the primary. Well, all those people
Speaker 1: are now back in the mix, and they're fired up,
Speaker 1: and that makes a tremendous difference. That moves the needle
Speaker 1: for the president. So like you, Yeah, I'm feeling a
Speaker 1: lot better than I was two weeks ago, so it's
Speaker 1: a good thing. With regards the policing, I'm with you.
Speaker 1: I think that the Democrats really missed the mark here
Speaker 1: because when I drive through even the most blue areas
Speaker 1: of Broward County, your blue county on the west side
Speaker 1: of the county have believe them, cratic stronghold. But in
Speaker 1: all of those HLAs you see one thing at night,
Speaker 1: a marked police car and an officer in uniform working
Speaker 1: the off duty details. So even these Democrats, they sleep
Speaker 1: very soundly in their beds because the old rough rough
Speaker 1: men with guns then watch ready to get up. And
Speaker 1: so they want those police officers there. They're law and
Speaker 1: orders centric people, and now they'll they'll be liberal to
Speaker 1: a point, and they'll sympathize with suspects who are roughed
Speaker 1: up by the police, etc. We get that, but they're
Speaker 1: not going to buy in to abolish the police, defund
Speaker 1: the police. They might vote Democrat, but if anyway HLA meeting,
Speaker 1: they also vote to pay for those off duty police officers.
Speaker 1: And I do think that's what the President needs to
Speaker 1: step up now. He needs the message to those suburban moms,
Speaker 1: those independents, that law and order will reign supreme in
Speaker 1: the US. Because if he reassures those voters, though those women,
Speaker 1: those moms, though those wives, I think he'll he'll have
Speaker 1: a tremendous showing in November. Speaking of John Cardillo, conservative commentator,
Speaker 1: former law enforcement officer with the NYPD, and John, since
Speaker 1: you are down in Florida. This is this is a
Speaker 1: place that gets so much media attention for a lot
Speaker 1: of reasons. And I'm not talking about the Florida man
Speaker 1: stuff where somebody with roller skates and an alligator over
Speaker 1: their shoulder on top of a semi You know that's
Speaker 1: other stuff, right, but baby short, Yeah, exactly like the
Speaker 1: Florida man stuff is a different reason for media attention.
Speaker 1: But they they have gone after Florida and almost seem
Speaker 1: to be rooting and Paul Krugman is rooting, was rooting
Speaker 1: openly for Florida seniors to get COVID just so there'd
Speaker 1: be a political narrative that he likes, which is truly
Speaker 1: insane and evil. But now we have the city of
Speaker 1: Miami in a state of what retreat from COVID from
Speaker 1: the reopened what's happening. Is the whole state panicking? Is
Speaker 1: it just Miami and Broward and some of the surrounding areas,
Speaker 1: And how bad is? I mean? I look at the
Speaker 1: national COVID death stats and no, this is not this
Speaker 1: is not what they're saying it is. But in my
Speaker 1: in Florida, does it look like it's actually trending that way?
Speaker 1: We're gonna see different numbers in two weeks. What's going
Speaker 1: on now? Listen? I lived, like I said, I lived
Speaker 1: down here in Broward County, and I don't I think.
Speaker 1: I got one person that had COVID and I said,
Speaker 1: how was it? And he said it felt like a flu.
Speaker 1: I went to bed, I woke up and I had
Speaker 1: a fever. I woke up, sweated it out overnight. I
Speaker 1: washed my sheets and felt fine the next day. And
Speaker 1: so I'm not seeing anecdotally anyway this mass ester area.
Speaker 1: And I'm not seeing the problem. The bigger, the bigger
Speaker 1: problem for me, Buck And I've been calling out Florida's governor,
Speaker 1: and I'm very upset with Republicans in Florida. And let
Speaker 1: me tell you why You've got Carla's Humanez. The mayor
Speaker 1: of Miami Dade County a Republican. But this is a
Speaker 1: Republican who proudly voted for Hillary Clinton in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: condemned the president and again those moderate advisors to Donald Trump.
Speaker 1: When Humanez jumped into the race He's going to run
Speaker 1: for the Florida's twenty six congressional district against w musk
Speaker 1: Roll Powell, somebody advised Donald Trump to endorse him within minutes.
Speaker 1: I thought that was a ridiculous movie. Because human say Trump,
Speaker 1: he hates them. He voted for Hillary in twenty sixteen.
Speaker 1: He mocks Trump behind closed doors to anybody that'll listen.
Speaker 1: So human as to me is a dem He's a
Speaker 1: dam with an R behind his name because they needed
Speaker 1: to be in that part of Miami Dad County to
Speaker 1: win the maoralty. You also got these Democrats up here
Speaker 1: in Brower that are just doing something because they're statuss.
Speaker 1: But I blame the Republicans in Florida because we have
Speaker 1: a Republican governor or Republican Attorney general or Republican CFO
Speaker 1: that's the executive committee of the state. There's one dem
Speaker 1: on that committee. Nikki Freed, the Agriculture secretary who's wrapped
Speaker 1: up in a major scandal because her fiance allegedly physically
Speaker 1: abused or the Ortidelle police had to come and millions
Speaker 1: went to his medical marijuana company from her agency that
Speaker 1: she oversees. The conflict of interest is glaring. There should
Speaker 1: be an investigation, but Ron de Santis's office won't touch it. Furthermore,
Speaker 1: and here's my bigger problem. Where Republicans in Florida could
Speaker 1: save this economy in this state, the biggest wing state.
Speaker 1: We have a red legislature, we have a Republican governor.
Speaker 1: Florida has preemption statutes. Legislature could move an emergency bill
Speaker 1: to night Buck, basically banning cities from shutting down without
Speaker 1: the permission of the governor. The governor can sign it,
Speaker 1: those cities will be banned legislatively by the Florida Constitution
Speaker 1: from preempting state law. And the Republicans here will not
Speaker 1: do it. They're still playing defense to minority, the minority
Speaker 1: party Democrats, even though the entire state is read. I
Speaker 1: am so sick of this Republican party. They're absolutely godless. John,
Speaker 1: There's no way, based on any map, but I've seen
Speaker 1: that the Republican that well the president can win re
Speaker 1: election without Florida. I've never seen a realistic map where
Speaker 1: pinned to it. So so Florida is the is the
Speaker 1: lynchpin of the of the whole strategy, which is again
Speaker 1: why the focus on COVID there and on mail and balance.
Speaker 1: As you brought up all the things Florida are going
Speaker 1: to get magnified and magnified in the weeks and months ahead.
Speaker 1: How are we looking there? I mean, I know there
Speaker 1: was all this talk about a surge of US citizens
Speaker 1: from Puerto Rico coming to Florida after all the damage
Speaker 1: of Puerto Rico sustained, and that that might swing the election.
Speaker 1: That there's this change in the law about former felons
Speaker 1: getting to vote and how that might change the outcome.
Speaker 1: How is the Republican Party looking for this upcoming and
Speaker 1: it's going to be here fast election, which means basically,
Speaker 1: can Donald Trump win? I mean if he can't win Florida,
Speaker 1: can't win. Can he win Florida? That is the question?
Speaker 1: Right with a capital thha I think so, I think
Speaker 1: yeah he can. I mean never the last time he
Speaker 1: only won the state, but like a point and a half,
Speaker 1: one point six, it will probably be closer to a
Speaker 1: point this time around. Wouldn't surprise me if we had
Speaker 1: a Florida two thousand situation here at the Bushcore recount.
Speaker 1: Do I think Trump can win? I do, because it's
Speaker 1: now his home state. He has a really solid, like
Speaker 1: I said a bit earlier, restroots infrastructure here again, now
Speaker 1: that they've done some campaign team shuffling, but man, they've
Speaker 1: got to get on the ball buck. I mean, they
Speaker 1: have got to start working on absentee ballots mailing today.
Speaker 1: It's perilous razor thin close here. But look, think about
Speaker 1: this for a second. Why isn't anyone in them You are,
Speaker 1: and I am, but the mainstream media, even the conservative media,
Speaker 1: why aren't they talking about something that's glaringly obvious if
Speaker 1: you're paying attention. All of a sudden, all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: these democrats and these rhinos want to shut down states
Speaker 1: and cities a week after Job's numbers beat expectations and
Speaker 1: Trump's numbers start to rise, and now all of a sudden,
Speaker 1: COVID is back and no one is talking about it.
Speaker 1: And the White House needs to get some messaging discipline
Speaker 1: and start pushing back on this because they're going to
Speaker 1: try to shut this state down for exactly that reason
Speaker 1: to thrush the economy to put people out of work,
Speaker 1: and they're gonna blame it on the Republicans in Tallahassee
Speaker 1: and in White House, and we're letting them do it
Speaker 1: and it's infuring it. John Cardilla, everybody check them out.
Speaker 1: Follow them on Twitter if you're not already, John, it's
Speaker 1: probably a nice day in Florida. Can get some raisin,
Speaker 1: enjoy some of that Kenny g music we could hear background,
Speaker 1: you could, Yeah, that was a little weird that. Sorry.
Speaker 1: You know, if you like to chill out to some
Speaker 1: some groovy clarinet tunes or flute or whatever that's in
Speaker 1: the background, go ahead, man, Thanks so much, John, I'm
Speaker 1: a big chuck, big chuck. Mai guy. There we go.
Speaker 1: He celebrates his whole catalog. Thanks. Thanks, take care, you're
Speaker 1: in the Freedom Heart. This is the Buck Sexton Show
Speaker 1: podcast his career. This president wants to draw a line
Speaker 1: in the sand because he's taking a day that we
Speaker 1: will all it now as we're challenging statues coming down
Speaker 1: of Confederates and outright slave owners and racists and say no,
Speaker 1: I'm going to even put it in your face. I'm
Speaker 1: going to land that Native Americans were old it was
Speaker 1: there as it was a treaty violated. I'm going to
Speaker 1: celebrate presidents some who advocated slavery and who in fact
Speaker 1: our own slaves themselves, and I'm going to do it
Speaker 1: at the risk of the help of those that are
Speaker 1: supporting me. So I'm joining the line in the sand.
Speaker 1: This is going to be a cultural war election, and
Speaker 1: I'm on the side of white supremacy. I'm on the
Speaker 1: side I'm holding up the statues and relats of those
Speaker 1: that represented dehumanization of people of color, particularly black people,
Speaker 1: and either you're on my side or the other side.
Speaker 1: I play this, and I thought maybe we wouldn't share
Speaker 1: the Reverend audio here. Remember this guy has a show,
Speaker 1: I think he stole a show at MSNBC and is
Speaker 1: treated as really an elder statesman within the Democrat Party.
Speaker 1: Here he's saying that the Trump is on the side
Speaker 1: of white supremacy, which is a vile smear. But you
Speaker 1: know that's yeah, that's not I mean, I'll sharpened to
Speaker 1: Wanna Brawley, go back in time, learn the stories. You
Speaker 1: find out that Al Sharpton has gotten away with defamation
Speaker 1: that led to a man's suicide, a rape hoax that
Speaker 1: he helped perpetuate. The woman lost a judgment, that's how
Speaker 1: much of a lie. It was a defamation judgment and
Speaker 1: was owed money to the people who and they were
Speaker 1: all they were all white males that she alleged raped
Speaker 1: her to want a brawl. That was all a lie.
Speaker 1: As we know, he has said truly vile, anti Semitic
Speaker 1: things in the past, that's a matter of record. And
Speaker 1: he is just a decades long com man, and yet
Speaker 1: he has listened to yet democrats, I love hated. He's
Speaker 1: considered a community leader, a national voice, ran for president.
Speaker 1: Why does anyone listen to Al Sharpton. I There's a
Speaker 1: lot of ways that I could try to answer this,
Speaker 1: or there's a lot of things you could throw into
Speaker 1: the mix here, But I just think that asking the
Speaker 1: question the sense is enough. Remember, this is the party
Speaker 1: that believes it is a moral force, that it is
Speaker 1: going to achieve justice. And one of the really the
Speaker 1: longest standing social justice grifters out there is the Reverend
Speaker 1: Al Sharpen. Right, this is this guy's been He's been
Speaker 1: doing it longer than anybody else. You see on the
Speaker 1: scene he was doing it was out there before Black
Speaker 1: Lives Matter, using social justice and really division and exacerbating
Speaker 1: divide and hatred between people and distrust, and and he'd
Speaker 1: been benefiting himself from that and he's never held to account.
Speaker 1: It's remarkable. Never you know, the media is still all
Speaker 1: he's got it. He's celebrated in the media. It's stunning
Speaker 1: what this guy has gotten away with as long as
Speaker 1: he has. But that's the Democrat. And if you want
Speaker 1: to run for president for years and years, you had
Speaker 1: to go and kind of get like the sharp and
Speaker 1: endor anyway, I just it just maybe come from New
Speaker 1: York and New Yorkers tend to know the Reverend owl
Speaker 1: More sort of up close and personal from his past
Speaker 1: here and everything else. But it's Democrat. Democrats. What a Democrats?
Speaker 1: Just a shameful bunch of frauds. They really are. Um,
Speaker 1: now we have something else I want to talk to about,
Speaker 1: which is usually I avoid the royal family stuff because
Speaker 1: who cares, right, But I just thought this was kind
Speaker 1: of funny. So now we have what is it Prince
Speaker 1: Producer Mark? Which one is it? Prince Harry? Right? Yes,
Speaker 1: I believe so, not the other one, but the younger one,
Speaker 1: the one married to Megan Markle. Right, yeah, Megan Markle.
Speaker 1: And you know I in the UK, they're still fascinated
Speaker 1: by all this. I find the whole Royal family thing
Speaker 1: to be kind of a you know, a who care situation.
Speaker 1: But he's that they've left the royal family, there's still
Speaker 1: somehow really rich, even though wuldn't those all be public
Speaker 1: funds when they have to give back all of that money.
Speaker 1: I mean what, I don't get it at all. Be
Speaker 1: thankful at least we don't have a royal family, thank
Speaker 1: you seventeen seventy six, boot yah, thankful we don't have
Speaker 1: royal family at least technically in America. But now they're
Speaker 1: living in mansion in Hollywood, living in a mansion in Hollywood,
Speaker 1: and he has to make these videos where it's like
Speaker 1: the royal family of the prince or whatever. He is
Speaker 1: the Prince of Wales or is he the other one?
Speaker 1: He's like the Prince probably the Archduke of Suffolk. I
Speaker 1: don't know whatever. I hate all that stuff. It's all
Speaker 1: such nonsense, but it is funny because he has to
Speaker 1: make videos now. Megan Markle is apparently pushing him to
Speaker 1: do this. He married an American actress is all about
Speaker 1: social justice, where he has to say things like oh
Speaker 1: play clip two, stay when you look across the Commonwealth,
Speaker 1: there's no way that we can move forward unless we
Speaker 1: acknowledge the post. And I think so many people they
Speaker 1: have done such an amazing, incredible job of acknowledging the post.
Speaker 1: I'm trying and right go as wrongs, but I think
Speaker 1: we all acknowledge on here. There is so much more
Speaker 1: still to do. It's not going to be easy and
Speaker 1: in some cases it's not going to be comfortable, but
Speaker 1: it needs to be done because guess what, everybody benefits.
Speaker 1: So I think there's a hell of a lot that
Speaker 1: we together need to acknowledge. But I only see I
Speaker 1: only see hope and optimistly in the fact that we
Speaker 1: could only do this together. We have to, in this
Speaker 1: moment in time to say we're going to have to
Speaker 1: be a little uncomfortable right now, because it's only in
Speaker 1: pushing through that discomfort that we get to the other
Speaker 1: side of this and find the place. As you're pointing out,
Speaker 1: we're a high tide raises all ships. Is that enough? Honey?
Speaker 1: Was enough? Was saying enough about our confronting our past
Speaker 1: so we can all move together and forward and honey,
Speaker 1: do I get to do? I get to stop sleeping
Speaker 1: on the couch now? It was like this guy's making
Speaker 1: a hostage video. So that is that enough, darling. I
Speaker 1: really think we need to confront our past. And yeah,
Speaker 1: we may be we may be here in a ten
Speaker 1: million dollar home in Beverly Hills and we are living
Speaker 1: off of money that we only have because we're essentially
Speaker 1: a family that he's an economic parasite on the UK.
Speaker 1: But I think we should all confront our past and
Speaker 1: be much more, much more brave from our mansions in
Speaker 1: Hollywood about what the British Commonwealth did. It's amazing. I
Speaker 1: love this guy. Look I've been there, man, I've been there.
Speaker 1: You know, sometimes a pretty lady wants you to apologize,
Speaker 1: even needing anything wrong. And you know what, the guys
Speaker 1: the audience know, you're gonna apologize, right, You're gonna apologize.
Speaker 1: It's just the way that it is. You know, Hey,
Speaker 1: a smart man knows, well, the pretty lady says, you're
Speaker 1: gonna have to say sorry for something, even if you're like, what,
Speaker 1: I didn't even do it yet? You want to sleep
Speaker 1: on the couch? No, then you apologize. So I'm sure
Speaker 1: he's got a very fancy couch, but he's making the
Speaker 1: making the necessary. I'm just I'm gonna be a big
Speaker 1: advocate for confronting our past and making sure that sure
Speaker 1: you are, buddy. Yeah, it's gonna be uncomfortable, really uncomfortable
Speaker 1: for you to get all those likes and thumbs up
Speaker 1: on social media. Man, after Independence Day, it's worth thinking
Speaker 1: about how lucky we are. We don't have a royal family.
Speaker 1: You're in the freedom Hunt. This is the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show podcast, rock and roll. Fellow patriots, we made ours
Speaker 1: go up to eleven. It's time for roll call alrighty,
Speaker 1: let us get to it. Let us do all of
Speaker 1: the things. Producer, Mark, what's going on with you, man?
Speaker 1: How are you feeling it? It feeling all right. Got
Speaker 1: a nice amount of sleep last night, so that's good.
Speaker 1: There we go. Yeah, he was kind of he was
Speaker 1: kind of a happy Mark today. I gotta tell you
Speaker 1: he's not not a would you like media elliot for
Speaker 1: some of them? No, no, no, you like a happy Mark.
Speaker 1: We don't want to mess with that at all. So
Speaker 1: that's that's a good thing. Um. But yeah, man, thank
Speaker 1: you for pulling all the role calls together. Make sure
Speaker 1: that you give producer Mark enough to do this week
Speaker 1: by calling in and leading voicemails eight four four nine
Speaker 1: hundred two eight two five eight four four nine hundred Buck.
Speaker 1: This has now become a fan favorite, and it's a
Speaker 1: favorite of nobodies as much as it is Marks. He'd
Speaker 1: like staying up late at night listening to all your voicemails.
Speaker 1: So yeah, if you could like make them coherent, that
Speaker 1: would be nice too. There co they're excellent, Producer Mark,
Speaker 1: We've had excellent voicemails. Although I guess you hear all
Speaker 1: of them out you hear like two percent of them. Well,
Speaker 1: please do leave messages, folks. We do enjoy it. Also
Speaker 1: right to his team Buck at iHeartMedia dot com, or
Speaker 1: if you want to send us a Facebook message and
Speaker 1: also check out the Buckbrief on Facebook, go to Facebook
Speaker 1: dot com slash buck Sexton. Please share the Buckbrief to
Speaker 1: your page. Sharing it is the most important thing you
Speaker 1: can do for any of our Facebook post because then
Speaker 1: other people in your Facebook network we'll see it, So
Speaker 1: please share. That's the like is nice. Share is the best.
Speaker 1: Share it on your Facebook pages and remember Bucksexton dot
Speaker 1: com is your one stop shop for the podcast stories
Speaker 1: throughout the day, all kinds of good stuff like that.
Speaker 1: So with that we have Tim all right. You know, Buck,
Speaker 1: remember when the Project Veradas posted the Bernie Brothers and
Speaker 1: said that we're going to burn down the country if
Speaker 1: Bernie was the nominee. Maybe the next time we don't
Speaker 1: dismiss the radical nut jobs in the Marine Corps. They
Speaker 1: told us we need to destroy the will of the
Speaker 1: people to conquer a country. I feel the radicals are
Speaker 1: conquering our country. Well, Tim, uh, yeah, that's that's true.
Speaker 1: If you want to subdue nation, you have to subdue
Speaker 1: the will of the people to resist. And right now, gosh,
Speaker 1: that word resists and resistance has been polluted by the
Speaker 1: left and by the Democrats. It certainly feels like it's
Speaker 1: very difficult to push back on the insanity being shoved
Speaker 1: down our throats by Democrats all the time. Is there
Speaker 1: is no equivalent situation where democrats can say something about,
Speaker 1: you know, how they disagree with conservatives on a matter
Speaker 1: of policy, and they have to worry about getting fired
Speaker 1: and having their lives ruined. We have to worry about
Speaker 1: this all the time, you know, we have to have
Speaker 1: a constant sense of anxiety from not being in a position,
Speaker 1: not being in a position to say what we think
Speaker 1: and say what we mean. So yeah, that's where we are.
Speaker 1: That's the real and that is influencing so much, not
Speaker 1: just in politics and everything, in everything now, our entertainment,
Speaker 1: sports culture, convert stations with friends. I mean, I'm always
Speaker 1: amazed at how often I still come across people who
Speaker 1: just speak as though that that the assumption they should
Speaker 1: have is like anybody in New York City hates Trump,
Speaker 1: and so they'll just launch into how terrible Trump is,
Speaker 1: and I'm sitting there, I'm like, clearly, you do not
Speaker 1: know who you're talking to. So that happens sometimes, I
Speaker 1: mean strangers, you know, I'll be sitting at over He's
Speaker 1: sitting at an in line at the grocery stores. Trump's
Speaker 1: the worst, Um No, I think I think Biden's a
Speaker 1: lot worse, actually, But I won't get into that with strangers.
Speaker 1: To try not to Sheldon Bucking, producer mark this see
Speaker 1: below will be inked on me next month. I hope
Speaker 1: it's not trademark. I'll send a picture of the tattoo
Speaker 1: when it's completed. Shield's high. That's actually a badass insignia.
Speaker 1: I gotta say that's pretty cool, producer, Mark, what are
Speaker 1: you going to get a shield's high tattoo? Well, I
Speaker 1: don't know if you know this or not, Buck, but
Speaker 1: I'm Jewish and Jews do not get tattoos. I did
Speaker 1: know you were Jewish. I did not know that that
Speaker 1: was a thing though, that you cannot be buried in
Speaker 1: a Jewish cemetery if you have a tattoo. Really. Yes,
Speaker 1: In fact, there's a whole episode of Curb your enthusiasm
Speaker 1: about it. This is okay, this is why I should
Speaker 1: know this. His mother had to be put in the
Speaker 1: special section, and he had no idea his mother had
Speaker 1: a tattoo until she passed away. Wow, what is this? Just?
Speaker 1: Is this like a verse in Leviticus or something. I'm
Speaker 1: not really sure the origins. It's somewhere in the Torah,
Speaker 1: I'm sure. How good is your Hebrew? Awful? Yeah? I
Speaker 1: was bar mitzvod like I used to be able to
Speaker 1: read it and whatnot? Now fair point, I can give
Speaker 1: you the prayer for the honoky candles. That's about it.
Speaker 1: What does because I sang it at your wedding? What
Speaker 1: does have a Neguila meet. It's just a celebratory song.
Speaker 1: I have no idea. Why are you putting you're putting
Speaker 1: me on the bass? Yeah, I don't know, I have
Speaker 1: no way. It's just a but it is the best
Speaker 1: part of a Jewish wedding. Yeah, good, good call okay um, Jacqueline.
Speaker 1: Next up, by the way, that tattoo this guy is
Speaker 1: gonna get is actually really cool and that's an amazing
Speaker 1: homage to the show Sheldon, And please do send it's
Speaker 1: a photo of your shield's high tattoo when you get it.
Speaker 1: It's just a badass. It's a badass emblem you've got
Speaker 1: going here anyway, So I'm all, I'm all about it. Man,
Speaker 1: good for you. That's a really does he make this?
Speaker 1: That's impressive. It looks like just a regular guy in
Speaker 1: a you know, a shield, but like a Roman fighter.
Speaker 1: Is that how it looks like? It looks like the
Speaker 1: headpiece of either a Roman gladiator or a Greek in
Speaker 1: the phalanx, although in the phalanx they would have also
Speaker 1: usually had a large plume from the top of the helmet.
Speaker 1: But that's that would have looked weird. And you know,
Speaker 1: you don't want to, you know, the plume might mess
Speaker 1: up the design for the tattoos. So I like this.
Speaker 1: This is more of a standard, a standard helmet. It's
Speaker 1: pretty cool. We'll have to get a definitely better to
Speaker 1: get a Shield's High tattoo that people just think is
Speaker 1: badass than a buck Sexton swooped tattoo of the hair.
Speaker 1: They'll be like, what's going on there? You know? So
Speaker 1: I support this Shield's High decision. I don't have any tattoos,
Speaker 1: but if I were to get one, I would get
Speaker 1: this one. This one's pretty cool. You're not gonna get
Speaker 1: one er like your face somewhere. A guy who has
Speaker 1: a tattoo of himself on his body probably has issues.
Speaker 1: If there's anyone I know who would do it, Wow, Wow.
Speaker 1: The view from under the bus is sad and rough.
Speaker 1: All right, Jacqueline hey Buck talking to my liberal friends.
Speaker 1: They don't expect Biden to last long. They're really going
Speaker 1: to be voting for him in the hopes his vice
Speaker 1: president will be someone of worth. Oh, I almost forgot
Speaker 1: we at the top of the show. I gotta to
Speaker 1: a whole a little breather here for a second. Let
Speaker 1: me finish Jaquelin's thing. Nervous for the official announcement. Who's
Speaker 1: been running with him. They're hoping the backdoor and really
Speaker 1: wanted to be Joe probably not making it through his
Speaker 1: term if elected. That's my theory, Okay, Jacqueline, I mentioned
Speaker 1: this top of the show. I meant to get to
Speaker 1: and so you got right now. It seems Stacy Abrams
Speaker 1: has faded from the conversation and a lot of this
Speaker 1: is just driven by people trying to get clicks and
Speaker 1: media and journalists covering things. Stacy Abrams has faded a
Speaker 1: little bit, and it looks like Kamala Harris and Susan
Speaker 1: Rice are the two front runners this. Susan Rice has
Speaker 1: never won any elected office, so her electability and her
Speaker 1: political skills, I think that's an obvious question mark no
Speaker 1: one really knows. But she was Obama's Usmbassador the Nations
Speaker 1: and National Security Advisor, and so you know, okay, maybe
Speaker 1: maybe that's a pick that would work for the Democrats.
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris, the media, you know, if Biden pixer, you know,
Speaker 1: the media love loved and loves uh. Kamala Harris absolutely
Speaker 1: loves her and are still a little bit upset and
Speaker 1: be fuddled about why she didn't catch on more with
Speaker 1: Democrat voters, including African American Democrat voters who in the
Speaker 1: primary were Biden voters. Right, not excited about Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: And I mean not like Pete Buddha Judge not excited
Speaker 1: because that whoa Buddha Judge. Uh, you know all of
Speaker 1: the the Wellesley class of twenty eighteen that was thinking, yes,
Speaker 1: Buddha Judge, it's gotta nope, not gonna happen. You gotta
Speaker 1: actually have you gotta have a candidate for dem the
Speaker 1: Democrat office that has some support in the minority community.
Speaker 1: That turns out you need that Buddha Judge was at
Speaker 1: pretty much zero the whole time. But yeah, the answer,
Speaker 1: I have no idea who the Democrats are gonna pick
Speaker 1: because I don't think Democrats, I don't think that Bionden
Speaker 1: campaign knows. They're still figuring it out right now. I
Speaker 1: guess they'll have to decide in the next month or so.
Speaker 1: And everyone always makes a much bigger deal of this
Speaker 1: than it probably really they probably really should be. You know,
Speaker 1: who really knows whether it's going to move the needle
Speaker 1: one way or the other. But yes, the theory that
Speaker 1: Jacqueline's talking about here that Democrats care a lot more
Speaker 1: about this vice president than they normally would about a
Speaker 1: vice president because they know that Biden may not be
Speaker 1: able to make it to a second term, just healthwise.
Speaker 1: The guy's always seventy eight years old. And I know
Speaker 1: there are seventy eight year old to listen to the
Speaker 1: show who could bench press me and run faster than
Speaker 1: me and respect. But a lot of people at seventy
Speaker 1: eight being the president and signing up for what really
Speaker 1: should be an expected eight years commitment, Biden would be
Speaker 1: finishing the presidency when he's eighty five. He hasn't committed
Speaker 1: to being a one term president. Eighty five, eighty six,
Speaker 1: I don't know. It depends on Wait, he would be
Speaker 1: eight years. He's seventy eight, so yeah, eighty five or
Speaker 1: eighty six, depending on what his birthday is. I guess.
Speaker 1: I mean, why do not have a president who's one hundred? Right?
Speaker 1: I mean, are we allowed to say at some point
Speaker 1: it's just too much, you're too old? Eye? I don't
Speaker 1: think so. I would think so. But it's all right,
Speaker 1: we'll see what We'll see what happens. Jacqueline, you're in
Speaker 1: the freedom hunt. This is the Buck Sexton Show podcast
Speaker 1: all right more roll called Chris Rights hey bucking producer
Speaker 1: Mark So. I live in Portsmouth, New Hampshire, and Trump
Speaker 1: has a rally here at the Peas Trade Port, the
Speaker 1: old Air Force Base on Saturday. To say the local
Speaker 1: Libs are melting down is an understatement. They called an
Speaker 1: emergency city council meeting to try and make masks mandatory
Speaker 1: before the weekend comes. However, it's being healed on government.
Speaker 1: I think he means held on government property, so the
Speaker 1: mandate won't even matter. Everyone is posting all over Facebook
Speaker 1: to buy all the tickets as well, so people can't attend.
Speaker 1: Except that's not how it works. This city is out
Speaker 1: of control right now. Thanks for all you do, Shields high, yeah, Chris.
Speaker 1: Remember Democrats think that the way to win debate is
Speaker 1: not have a debate, to shut it down before it
Speaker 1: can happen, and to force people to do what you
Speaker 1: want without hearing what they have to say about any
Speaker 1: of it. That is the plan. That is how they roll.
Speaker 1: I'm sure it'll be a very lively atmosphere outside and
Speaker 1: inside the Trump rally on Saturday in Portsmouth, New Hampshire.
Speaker 1: I was in New Hampshire for the gosh, what was that. No,
Speaker 1: it wasn't in Portsmouth. I was in in twenty six.
Speaker 1: I went up and I interviewed Rubio and k Sick
Speaker 1: and uh, what's his name? Rand Paul and I think
Speaker 1: Carly Fiorina who now is a Democrat, and there I fell.
Speaker 1: I can't remember all. I think there were so many
Speaker 1: candidate I can't remember them all. The only candidate I
Speaker 1: think it was in Manchester, New Hampshire, not Portsmouth, New Hampshire.
Speaker 1: I think that's right. The only candidate that I did
Speaker 1: not I knew I wasn't gonna get to interview was
Speaker 1: Donald Trump. He was the only one he did. He
Speaker 1: didn't show producer Mark Tyronic looking back at it, you
Speaker 1: know what I mean. I mean there, I am, I'm here.
Speaker 1: I got all these candidates, and everyone's like, oh, you know, Ted,
Speaker 1: I've interviewed Ted Cruise a bunch of time, Ted Cruise,
Speaker 1: Everyone's gonna be there, but now you're not gonna. I'm
Speaker 1: not gonna get to actually interview the guy who ended
Speaker 1: up the coming president. It's pretty funny. He wasn't even there.
Speaker 1: It wasn't even my fault. He didn't even decide to
Speaker 1: show up pretty uh, pretty funny in retros. Back to
Speaker 1: how all that stuff goes? All right? The next step
Speaker 1: here we have Eric hey buck love the show. Haven't
Speaker 1: mister Wort since Quarantine started thanks to all my free
Speaker 1: time due to King Cuomo and Jester to Blasio. A
Speaker 1: few weeks back, I ran into an old friend when
Speaker 1: I was on the run on the West Side Highway.
Speaker 1: I knew he was a LIB because of his post
Speaker 1: on Facebook. I also wasn't in the mood, so I
Speaker 1: enacted my play dumb mode with lib. Not proud of it,
Speaker 1: but sometimes I just want to get going and there's
Speaker 1: no point in dealing with them. However, this was around
Speaker 1: the time the media was slamming hydroxy chloroquin, so I
Speaker 1: asked him what he thought of it. He said, oh,
Speaker 1: that doesn't work. Trump is only pushing that to get votes.
Speaker 1: Obviously this answer is dumb on many levels, but mostly
Speaker 1: very concerning. Side note, you helped me convert a few
Speaker 1: people into full supporters. Second side note, early this year
Speaker 1: you said you might get into stand up comedy. Still
Speaker 1: a chance? Thanks? Well, Eric, let's take those in reverse order.
Speaker 1: I do not recall I'll saying I was ever gonna
Speaker 1: do stand up, that would be I think I said
Speaker 1: that that's the only thing I won't do, right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: you definitely have spoken about doing stand up and how hard,
Speaker 1: about about how hard it is. Yeah, I don't I
Speaker 1: don't think that's I don't think I got that. I
Speaker 1: think it'd be great, Like you could do stand up
Speaker 1: and I would just stand there with a microphone mocking you. Now,
Speaker 1: you'd have to be in the audience heckling exactly. Otherwise
Speaker 1: it seems like you're part of the act and you
Speaker 1: might actually funny. So we'd have to have you the
Speaker 1: audience be like you're the worst. You know. You have
Speaker 1: to tell the staff though, so I don't get kicked out. Hey,
Speaker 1: you know, my scoop just flew in from Omaha and
Speaker 1: man or my arms tired. You know you're ugly, right, bad? Bad?
Speaker 1: So did you see how ugly? Yeah? I just named
Speaker 1: a random insult. Wow forster Mark. I was heckling you.
Speaker 1: I was joking around with the heckling it's first, Well,
Speaker 1: because you said hair first, So I was like, all right,
Speaker 1: your hair is ugly. Oh dude, I gotta please. I
Speaker 1: get told about libs. The libs the first two, the
Speaker 1: first two things I hear from libs on social media
Speaker 1: or when you know, whenever, whenever that is your name
Speaker 1: is stupid and you're ugly. Those are the two. Those
Speaker 1: are the two go to. It's every time your name
Speaker 1: is dumb and you're ugly, and I'm always like, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: you're ugly. Is actually nice compared to some of the
Speaker 1: things I hear about you sometimes. Thanks Mark, I appreciate you.
Speaker 1: You're the one who makes me breather. Listen to the
Speaker 1: voicemails every week? Wow, who calls it and says mean
Speaker 1: things on voicemails? Problem Breaco? Yeah, I guess people do.
Speaker 1: Brian bucking Mark, Hope you guys had a good Independence Day.
Speaker 1: I made sure too. Oh. I wanted to first let
Speaker 1: me thank Eric for converting people, for passing the buck.
Speaker 1: That's a single, most helpful, most important, most wonderful thing
Speaker 1: you can do. Just get them to go to buckseex
Speaker 1: and dot com so the podcast is there or iHeart
Speaker 1: or Spotify. Get them to listen. Please. Brian bucking Mark,
Speaker 1: hope you guys had a good Independence Day. I made
Speaker 1: sure to passive agrest. They call it that to my
Speaker 1: liberal friends in group text messages. Because I have an iPhone,
Speaker 1: I get Apple News Daily. My liberal friends plus families
Speaker 1: send me links to educate me from Apple News Daily.
Speaker 1: It is a hodgepodge of liberal talking points strawn from
Speaker 1: mainstream media. Apple News Daily is pure communist propaganda and
Speaker 1: a disinformation campaign. We need to start calling it out
Speaker 1: as such. How are people falling for this crap o? Brian?
Speaker 1: I agree with you. I'll take your word for it.
Speaker 1: Thank you for writing in, Thank you for standing tall
Speaker 1: for freedom America, the freedom hunt, all those good things.
Speaker 1: All right, everybody has the show. It'll be awesome tomorrow
Speaker 1: and the next day. Speak to you. Then she'll tie