WEBVTT - THE AI BUBBLE IS BURSTING? ⚠️ 4 Tech Stocks I’d Hold No Matter What

0:00:00.120 --> 0:00:03.320
<v Speaker 1>AI bubble warning. There's been a recent AI bubble warning issued,

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>a new one. What's your thoughts on this.

0:00:08.680 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if bubble is the right term, but

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.960
<v Speaker 2>a few institutions have issued this warning. We'll get to

0:00:15.000 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 2>Alex in a second. I do think that the AI

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:23.680
<v Speaker 2>promise has not been delivered. Like I asked a question

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 2>last week and it was slightly controversial for whatever reason

0:00:27.320 --> 0:00:31.000
<v Speaker 2>after but shot to everyone of Microsoft, love you guys,

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:32.360
<v Speaker 2>seal it from bottle of my heart, one of my

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 2>favorite companies of all time, sat to one of my

0:00:34.159 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>favorite CEOs ever better than Tim Cook, et.

0:00:37.400 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 3>Cetera, et cetera.

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 2>You can't run your business off co pilot like for

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:47.520
<v Speaker 2>all the automations that we have and shot to perplexity

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 2>and everything's tied done, Shot to leash you little still

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:55.600
<v Speaker 2>to this day, I can't set up all these agents

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 2>and then just go off to Mexico and do no

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 2>work for two week and come back and the agents

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:06.039
<v Speaker 2>have everything done. The first company that provides that kind

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:09.080
<v Speaker 2>of premise and return they're going to And as a result,

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.840
<v Speaker 2>with even AI not delivering is as well as it should.

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:17.760
<v Speaker 2>It's obliterated the software category. So bubble no, I think

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:20.240
<v Speaker 2>people forget Even in the dot com era, it took

0:01:20.280 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 2>a while for things to be calibrated. I don't think

0:01:22.319 --> 0:01:24.479
<v Speaker 2>it will take that long. But I think we may

0:01:24.480 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 2>be three or four years off from having systems of

0:01:28.760 --> 0:01:32.679
<v Speaker 2>scale and tech at scale that it really allows you

0:01:32.720 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 2>to offload your workforce and the cost isn't so high

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:38.760
<v Speaker 2>to be able to do so. So I wouldn't say bubble,

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:41.880
<v Speaker 2>but it hasn't delivered on the return that it was

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.080
<v Speaker 2>initially promised. If you can lay off your workforce and

0:01:45.160 --> 0:01:47.640
<v Speaker 2>enjoy more of your life and be off grid and

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.200
<v Speaker 2>just to let the lllms run in the background, like

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:52.280
<v Speaker 2>that premise, isn't there, Like, I don't, do you guys

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 2>know of anyone. I've asked this question to probably two

0:01:55.840 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred people over the last year. No one is just

0:02:00.520 --> 0:02:04.400
<v Speaker 2>leaving their business to be run solely by lol.

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, yeah, the idea.

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I think one of the greatest minds that

0:02:11.200 --> 0:02:15.000
<v Speaker 5>has lived through both and his business has been benefited

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 5>tremendously because of it, spoke on this recently. Jeff Bezos

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 5>was asked about the bubble, and he said, I want

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 5>you to think of it like this. Right now, businesses

0:02:25.360 --> 0:02:29.400
<v Speaker 5>are being done in terms of picks and shovels, right

0:02:29.400 --> 0:02:32.560
<v Speaker 5>like people are manually doing the work. He said, think

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 5>of AI as a bulldozer. So if you were digging

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:39.800
<v Speaker 5>with a pick and the shovel, well, bulldozer is about

0:02:39.840 --> 0:02:44.760
<v Speaker 5>to come and make everything happen a lot faster, more efficiently,

0:02:45.320 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 5>and have more skill and so the actual tax won't

0:02:49.440 --> 0:02:53.079
<v Speaker 5>be replaced. How we get the task done will be altered.

0:02:53.160 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 5>So companies will survive, some some will falter, but that's business,

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 5>and that's what happens inside of revolutions, especially in the

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 5>technology space. And he has a great vantage point because

0:03:07.000 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 5>in nineteen ninety seven, yeah, look at what his company

0:03:10.800 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 5>was and in twenty twenty six, obviously he's not the

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 5>CEO anymore, but look at what that company has grown to,

0:03:17.919 --> 0:03:20.000
<v Speaker 5>right because he was able to adapt, he was able

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 5>to use the technology to his advantage, and he was

0:03:22.800 --> 0:03:24.760
<v Speaker 5>able to scale it. So that's how we got to

0:03:24.840 --> 0:03:27.240
<v Speaker 5>have to look at it. The AI bubble. We've been

0:03:27.280 --> 0:03:28.359
<v Speaker 5>talking about this thing for.

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:31.040
<v Speaker 4>At least eighteen months now.

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 5>Man, I'm like, okay, okay, if there's gonna be a bubble,

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:35.760
<v Speaker 5>let's find the companies that are going to be here

0:03:36.560 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 5>when this.

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 4>So caught bubble burst, who will be the standing companies?

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:43.000
<v Speaker 5>I think we were spot on with the ones that

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.960
<v Speaker 5>we've been saying for sure, the time will tell, and

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 5>I think we're going to be on the right side

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 5>of it.

0:03:49.200 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 4>The thoughts.

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>Bubble is relative, I feel like, yeah, there's a lot

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 1>of companies that well, it just actually leads to an

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>als car Cliff. Actually, look, let's play this. Let's let's

0:04:02.320 --> 0:04:04.280
<v Speaker 1>play the clip from Atlas because that this kind of

0:04:04.320 --> 0:04:06.000
<v Speaker 1>just leads into this conversation.

0:04:07.640 --> 0:04:10.320
<v Speaker 6>The Alex carb going CNBC last week and torch the

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 6>entire AI business model, like Becky Quick had to stop

0:04:12.960 --> 0:04:16.000
<v Speaker 6>a mid rant like you sound pretty angry, and his response,

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.680
<v Speaker 6>this is the voice of American Business Channel through me.

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 6>I mean his rants, they're usually pretty epic, but I

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 6>think he hit on two sticking points that a really

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 6>decide how AI diffuses through the economy. Number one is

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.440
<v Speaker 6>that enterprises are losing trust in a lot of these

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:31.039
<v Speaker 6>AI model companies. He's saying because they're not safe, and

0:04:31.080 --> 0:04:32.600
<v Speaker 6>safe is a little bit different than you think. So

0:04:32.680 --> 0:04:33.400
<v Speaker 6>let's hear him out.

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.359
<v Speaker 7>Safe because it doesn't touch your unlearning data. Safe because

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 7>it prevents a large language model from caching your data

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:41.840
<v Speaker 7>and replicating your business safe because it doesn't transfer your

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.560
<v Speaker 7>ip of how to fight secret data, top secret data

0:04:44.640 --> 0:04:46.160
<v Speaker 7>or in a clinical context.

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:47.880
<v Speaker 6>And the second is that a lot of these large

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 6>enterprise customers are now wanting to own the entire AI stack,

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:54.440
<v Speaker 6>compute models, their data, all of it. Again, take it away, Alex.

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:57.120
<v Speaker 6>Here's the structural problem that he's calling out. Your edge

0:04:57.160 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 6>as a company depends on that proprietary data. Your AI

0:05:00.160 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 6>vendor depends on their models getting smarter, and how do

0:05:03.000 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 6>you think they do that? So there's a collision course

0:05:05.000 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 6>because the labs aren't just selling tokens anymore.

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>They're Okay, So Alex Carr, he went on a whole

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>rant on CNBC about AI, his frustration with a lot

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of AI companies.

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Mm hm.

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:25.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know he's been known to go on rants

0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.359
<v Speaker 1>from Tom to tom on a variety of different things. Okay,

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>so back to the AI bubble thing. AI bubble, yeah

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:34.960
<v Speaker 1>for sure, because a lot of the companies are not

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:39.239
<v Speaker 1>built on anything found fund foundationally strong to just putting

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:41.040
<v Speaker 1>AI in front of their name and just saying we're

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 1>going to do this, We're gonna do that. Like you said,

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:47.799
<v Speaker 1>I personally have yet to see AI do a variety

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of different things that people think it can do. Like

0:05:51.960 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>even if you look at our world, like AI cannot

0:05:55.320 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>create content. If it did, If it did, everybody would

0:05:59.360 --> 0:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>be content creator. Yeah, I know, I know this first hand.

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it yet or just well until until it's done it,

0:06:07.680 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>we can't.

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:12.719
<v Speaker 3>We can't. It can help you make content, Yeah, it

0:06:12.760 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 3>can't make it. It can't future for it can go off

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 3>the past.

0:06:16.640 --> 0:06:20.040
<v Speaker 1>It can make content. It's not it's not it's not good.

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not good enough, not great. It's not great. It's

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:24.159
<v Speaker 1>not great.

0:06:25.839 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 3>But I can't.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.479
<v Speaker 1>You would say, okay, I could just make I don't

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>think I do no work. I could just make a video.

0:06:31.800 --> 0:06:33.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have AI cut up and then it's gonna

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>get a million views, and that's gonna be my pathway

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 1>to become the next Logan Paul.

0:06:38.920 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 3>It has not happened mm hmm. I like up clip,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:43.599
<v Speaker 3>but but it does.

0:06:43.600 --> 0:06:47.520
<v Speaker 5>Happen for I Just what's happening for I just watched

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 5>AI travel channel that has like ten million followers completely

0:06:54.360 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 5>made up. She goes in history and takes you through

0:06:57.600 --> 0:07:01.039
<v Speaker 5>history and it feels like off all.

0:07:02.279 --> 0:07:05.159
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, but even that that's different, that's utilizing AI to

0:07:05.200 --> 0:07:07.480
<v Speaker 1>give you, Like we have French Martinis. What we do

0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>for the content. We can say that we because we

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>use AI for our content. So we have French Martana episode.

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>A few of those clips. One clip went viral, had

0:07:14.640 --> 0:07:17.760
<v Speaker 1>a million views. We used AI in it because it's

0:07:17.800 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>nar we're telling the story. That's different. That's still an

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>editor that's actually knows what they're doing, that's placing AI

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.640
<v Speaker 1>in it, utilizing that's still work involved. I'm saying as

0:07:28.640 --> 0:07:33.640
<v Speaker 1>far as the hands free pilot, I don't got autonomous

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:35.920
<v Speaker 1>AI is doing everything for me. That's not that hasn't

0:07:35.920 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>happened yet.

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 4>So that's.

0:07:39.120 --> 0:07:41.920
<v Speaker 1>The idea of AI, I think is ahead of the

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>reality of AI. The idea of AI is ahead of

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the reality of AI, and a lot of different in

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:51.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of different places. We still have We still

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>don't have the Jetson's car that we're supposed to have

0:07:54.120 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty five years ago, still waiting for that to happen.

0:07:57.080 --> 0:08:00.400
<v Speaker 1>Like there's still pilots in the sky, the supposed to

0:08:00.400 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>have autonomous planes by now, like commercial I mean, that's

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>what that's what you would think would happen at this

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>point in time in twenty twenty six, like, that's that's,

0:08:10.120 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that's what the promise is.

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 3>In ninety we were promm the justice came out on

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 3>what seventy.

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 5>Exactly, I'm saying AI, the current state of AI, the

0:08:19.920 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 5>revolution that has happened over the past three years. What like,

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.680
<v Speaker 5>we're just doing large language models right now, so like

0:08:27.080 --> 0:08:28.120
<v Speaker 5>what are you basing that off?

0:08:28.360 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>Even the large language models is still being prompted. So

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:32.560
<v Speaker 1>what I'm saying, like what Ian said, there's still a

0:08:32.600 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 1>person attached to it, this idea that humans are going

0:08:36.160 --> 0:08:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to be not needed anymore. That's the narrative that's been

0:08:39.600 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>pushed a lot. Humans will be no longer needed. I

0:08:42.840 --> 0:08:46.439
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen that. I haven't seen that the idea, the

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>idea of AI has gotten ahead of the practicality of AI.

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, AI is going to be here. AI is

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 1>going to change the world. AI has changing the world

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:58.160
<v Speaker 1>every single day. But there's a lot of companies that's

0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 1>just coming up with random ideas for AI and it's

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:03.720
<v Speaker 1>not gonna it's not gonna work. And when that, when

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that happens, a lot of these companies are gonna fall

0:09:06.640 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>by the way side.

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 4>And I'm not sure you.

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:12.280
<v Speaker 3>Tell me what.

0:09:14.320 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think we're so early inside.

0:09:17.360 --> 0:09:21.320
<v Speaker 5>I think the argument that's fair to make, uh, is

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:25.160
<v Speaker 5>that we haven't seen the revenue generated from the spend

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:29.040
<v Speaker 5>in AI and that takes time right now, Right, so

0:09:29.280 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 5>we're still we still have infrastructure, yet, we stilln't have

0:09:33.040 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 5>energy yet, the applications are still trying to get. Software

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.000
<v Speaker 5>hasn't even been put out. Yeah, you have a few

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 5>models platforms that you use, you have five now, but

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:45.560
<v Speaker 5>like that's drastically gonna change in the next five years, right,

0:09:45.600 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 5>So I think we're so early that that argument, I

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 5>think still needs time to come to fruition. Right, Like

0:09:53.480 --> 0:09:57.199
<v Speaker 5>obviously Argentic will be here at some point in their

0:09:57.240 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 5>future autonomous that's it's going to happen.

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 4>It's going to take time for it to happen.

0:10:03.080 --> 0:10:05.800
<v Speaker 5>I think that the fair argument from my standpoint would

0:10:05.840 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 5>be and I could agree and kind of what Alex

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 5>is saying here is, yes, the spend and the cap X,

0:10:14.160 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 5>where's the return the other return for a lot of

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 5>companies yet, right, you can't.

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 4>You wouldn't say that for Micron there's been a return.

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I said they were the smart them SK and video.

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 2>But the premise of the adel. But for open A

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:34.959
<v Speaker 2>like I've been using chat since twenty into twenty one

0:10:35.040 --> 0:10:39.680
<v Speaker 2>or twenty two. Even the premister on the business side

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 2>or consumer side, a lot of the stuff that they

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.160
<v Speaker 2>said that could do it hasn't been able to do.

0:10:44.200 --> 0:10:46.080
<v Speaker 2>Even like when Charlotte Mae makee that post like Ian

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.200
<v Speaker 2>you're in trouble, open aie out and choles like no

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 2>you need human intuition like it can. And even for

0:10:52.120 --> 0:10:57.240
<v Speaker 2>investing open AI, when you prompted it last and best

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 2>fast for what the next stocks were going to be,

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 2>it got all of the wrong. So I think there's

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.360
<v Speaker 2>a way to go. But I think the initial premise

0:11:05.760 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 2>and promise for what is being spent in terms of

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 2>like uh, he talked about tooking pricing and then the

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.440
<v Speaker 2>thing I've been always asking, how do you get five

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:17.360
<v Speaker 2>extra I said it with open a eye, okay, going

0:11:17.440 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 2>to okay, why you need to sell five percent of

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.080
<v Speaker 2>opening off to the government if you got a machine

0:11:22.080 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>that could replicate.

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 3>God, you're bullshitting on one side or another.

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's just it's just even I must you change

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.480
<v Speaker 1>a company from a car company to a robotic company.

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:34.560
<v Speaker 1>There's no need to have one hundred million humanoid robot.

0:11:34.559 --> 0:11:37.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not going to happen. It's a fairy tale. That's

0:11:37.200 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>a fairy tale. It's not going to happen. It's never

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna it's not gonna happen.

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.840
<v Speaker 2>Because that's the case, they would have just traded the

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.679
<v Speaker 2>arbitrage on if the model was that fucking great to

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:47.440
<v Speaker 2>open the shot, to open the eye. But if the

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 2>model was that great, you would have traded arbitrage every

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 2>day to not raise capital. That was the first sign

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:54.400
<v Speaker 2>to me, this ship with work. That's what the topic

0:11:54.520 --> 0:11:55.720
<v Speaker 2>does not have that issue.

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.000
<v Speaker 5>That's why I think the keyword is yet right, because

0:11:59.000 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 5>the one thing that we do know about the models

0:12:00.760 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 5>is that even as we're talking, they're getting better.

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:12:04.200 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 5>And so three years ago we sat here to a

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 5>t like you said, open a iur lead, You said,

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:11.079
<v Speaker 5>open a I wourl lead.

0:12:11.640 --> 0:12:12.559
<v Speaker 4>Is it our leader today?

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:16.400
<v Speaker 3>No? It adjusted adjustment model.

0:12:16.880 --> 0:12:18.840
<v Speaker 5>That that goes to the case that that models are

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:21.439
<v Speaker 5>getting better. Right, in a year, we might not even

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.240
<v Speaker 5>say open AI is our leader. It might be something

0:12:23.280 --> 0:12:26.079
<v Speaker 5>different because something would have surpassed it. So we're still

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:26.720
<v Speaker 5>early in this.

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 2>I think they've already been surpassed, and I brought up

0:12:29.679 --> 0:12:32.240
<v Speaker 2>to and also to the Elon.

0:12:32.440 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 3>This will always be telling y'all that beef. It doesn't help.

0:12:35.920 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 2>The Elon battle destroyed the company because the Lenz he

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 2>was willing to go. And then here comes anthrop pick.

0:12:43.480 --> 0:12:46.200
<v Speaker 2>They take the lead. The model is but anytime you

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:46.839
<v Speaker 2>get to asking for.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 3>That two hundred cool.

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 4>So I'm happy with it.

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 5>And that kind of ties back into the invented Nvidia piece. Right,

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 5>I'm going to put the capital, I'm going to give

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.000
<v Speaker 5>the compute. Un let's see who comes back with the

0:12:58.000 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 5>thing that is going to lead. I think that the Alice.

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 5>I watched that thing live, so it's just if you

0:13:02.800 --> 0:13:05.959
<v Speaker 5>haven't seen it. It's a seven minute segment. But I'm

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 5>glad we cut this piece because he keeps bringing the

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 5>word up safe, safe, safe, and if you think about safe,

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 5>I keep hearing him talking about In my mind, he's

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 5>talking about his own company.

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 4>Why are we shitting?

0:13:17.720 --> 0:13:20.360
<v Speaker 5>Why are we getting beat when these people aren't inching

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.400
<v Speaker 5>money and we have the idea and the platform and

0:13:23.440 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 5>the technology to keep he was talking his own book

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 5>for sure, we want to keep you safe. Right, we

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.920
<v Speaker 5>have the government contracts. Our platform is the place those

0:13:32.000 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 5>applications aren't ready yet.

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:35.600
<v Speaker 4>These people are trying to spend and spend.

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 5>Now, the AI model is, hey, we're going to build

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 5>inside of our in house, which again two things can

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 5>be true, because we just I just read the report

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:46.240
<v Speaker 5>that Broadcom and Google Google might say, hey, you know what,

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 5>We're going to use our own silicone to build our

0:13:48.440 --> 0:13:49.079
<v Speaker 5>own TVU.

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:50.679
<v Speaker 4>We may not need you anymore.

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 5>At the same time, Apple says, okay, cool, broad Coom,

0:13:53.600 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 5>you're going to be our partner into twenty thirty one. Right,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.400
<v Speaker 5>So people are saying, how can we keep the stack inside?

0:13:59.480 --> 0:14:02.400
<v Speaker 5>The problem with that theory is that how many companies

0:14:02.400 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 5>can afford to keep the entire stack? Not many three three,

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:11.960
<v Speaker 5>maybe not even Google Amazon.

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 3>Maybe they put up some money, but they won't.

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.520
<v Speaker 4>But they won't, So that that's such a limited space.

0:14:20.040 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 5>How many people can actually do that, right, So it

0:14:22.400 --> 0:14:24.640
<v Speaker 5>becomes not a monopoly, But I mean it is a

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 5>monopoly in the sense if I'm doing everything in house.

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 5>So he's saying the right thing, but he's also promoting

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.080
<v Speaker 5>what they do, right, because why is the software space

0:14:34.080 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 5>getting beat down?

0:14:37.600 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Right?

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 3>AI is software?

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.720
<v Speaker 2>That's the other funny part of that is what I'm

0:14:41.760 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 2>saying for those who don't know AI is software. But

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 2>going back to depictions and shovels Micron AMD until when

0:14:49.560 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 2>they got selected they made a great return on capital. Conversation,

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 2>put this in check. Every business is in the hedge

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 2>front business? How much more? And can I make you?

0:15:01.280 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 2>How much can I save you? How reliable can I

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 2>be if I made you money? Please put yes and jet.

0:15:07.240 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 2>What open AI has not done. They haven't done a

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:14.160
<v Speaker 2>great job of letting the consumer base know how much

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.640
<v Speaker 2>easier your life can be. Even like when open claw

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:22.280
<v Speaker 2>came out, that was an issue. Deep sequeens an issue.

0:15:22.560 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 2>And then also too, we haven't had an American company

0:15:26.200 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 2>that is open sourcing yet. That's the real trojan forest

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 2>in threats. Yes, that could lead to enterprise growth kind

0:15:36.320 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 2>of like, but now we get into the Microsoft, we're

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:43.480
<v Speaker 2>going to open source it and let you be in

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:44.359
<v Speaker 2>our ecosystem.

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 3>But what open sourcing? There's gonna come some ip and

0:15:48.000 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 3>idea theft.

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 2>It happened with words for those who don't know, Like,

0:15:52.120 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 2>even though Microsoft my biggest favorite company of all time.

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 3>The origins are still nefarious.

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 4>So even if they open source, what platform will they

0:16:01.320 --> 0:16:03.600
<v Speaker 4>build on? What's the first place Whe's the first place

0:16:03.640 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 4>they're going on we try to go home.

0:16:05.040 --> 0:16:08.200
<v Speaker 3>Ya gotta go to the mothership mh.

0:16:09.000 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 5>So that so even an open source right, you can

0:16:10.880 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 5>see KOA still being the software that they're gonna build.

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 3>You got you gotta go to the maltorship.

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 2>And that's why like the suppression of Nvidia, because if

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 2>we argue motes, they literally have.

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Governmental motes on both sides.

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 2>They have the spend, they have the hardware, they have

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 2>the platform, the partnership and likability. I don't get the compression,

0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.040
<v Speaker 2>I really don't, but it's going back to people are

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 2>just chasing in return and I were chasing quality.

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 5>I saw somebody in the chat said three hundred by

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:48.680
<v Speaker 5>the end of the year. I'm not mad at I'm

0:16:48.680 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 5>not mad at the video at Like in the two seventies,

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:52.360
<v Speaker 5>by the NDA, I can I can see the path

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:53.600
<v Speaker 5>forward the consolidation now.

0:16:54.120 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 4>Is it frustrating?

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, what's also frustrating is that people telling me like, yo,

0:16:58.080 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 5>video doesn't move.

0:16:59.160 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm like, what what are we talking about?

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 3>Like yeah, because.

0:17:02.280 --> 0:17:05.159
<v Speaker 2>Everybody everybody's looking to trade, they're not looking to and

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.240
<v Speaker 2>that shit breaks my heart because it's going you're gonna

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:11.240
<v Speaker 2>see me and like in one of them other countries,

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 2>what another place? But no, I should have listened. You

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 2>should have, you should have. It doesn't move for the

0:17:17.800 --> 0:17:20.959
<v Speaker 2>gambler in you. If you have some capital in it.

0:17:21.359 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 2>Fifty grand, one hundred grand, two hundred grand.

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 3>It is a beacon of safety for sure. What's the

0:17:28.240 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 3>outlook for TSM?

0:17:31.280 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 5>TSM is, for those not to know, the number one

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 5>UH manufacturer and packaging company for semiconductors in the world.

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 5>I think at this point did they produce eighty to

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.320
<v Speaker 5>ninety percent of the world semi conductors? And so when

0:17:48.359 --> 0:17:50.159
<v Speaker 5>I talk about my favorite companies, this is at the

0:17:50.160 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 5>top of the list when we talk about the most

0:17:51.640 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 5>important companies, obviously at.

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 4>The top of the list.

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:57.680
<v Speaker 5>They report on the sixteenth, which I believe is next Wednesday,

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 5>earlier expectations. Right now they're looking at a fifty percent

0:18:01.400 --> 0:18:06.399
<v Speaker 5>jump in revenue, which is absolutely ridiculous. The future guidance

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 5>looks like they're going to increase it as well. I

0:18:08.520 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 5>think TSM and I like that it reports early. It

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 5>reports before everybody, because it will tell us are they

0:18:16.560 --> 0:18:20.960
<v Speaker 5>getting orders from in Video? How high last quarter? They

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.600
<v Speaker 5>said in Video's orders were in such high demand that

0:18:23.600 --> 0:18:26.760
<v Speaker 5>they passed Apple as their number one client, right, so

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:30.680
<v Speaker 5>much so that TSM said, Okay, we've got so much

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.239
<v Speaker 5>demand that we might have to offshoot some of our

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:34.879
<v Speaker 5>demand to some of these companies, which is why we

0:18:34.920 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 5>talked about AMCRE as a company that's going to be

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:39.520
<v Speaker 5>a beneficiary of that. There's another company, but South Korean

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:43.400
<v Speaker 5>one ACI that we can't directly invest in, So we'll

0:18:43.400 --> 0:18:46.520
<v Speaker 5>go with AMCRE for now. But that demand story will

0:18:46.560 --> 0:18:49.960
<v Speaker 5>be on the forefront. Is in Vidio still having that

0:18:50.000 --> 0:18:53.120
<v Speaker 5>same level demand as Apple's demand, is the appetite still

0:18:53.160 --> 0:18:56.960
<v Speaker 5>there is AMD's demand. So there AMD is, like I mean,

0:18:57.040 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 5>we was up twenty dollars today over I think it

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 5>was at five to seventy today.

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:04.719
<v Speaker 4>What does that demand story look like?

0:19:05.560 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 5>You're going to see the AI hyperscalers come to the

0:19:08.400 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 5>forefront and if TSM is able to say, hey, demand

0:19:13.280 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 5>has peaked again, now we're going to see another start

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:21.199
<v Speaker 5>of ticking up of that semi conductor space in the

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:25.359
<v Speaker 5>technology space because capax hasn't slowed down, In fact, it's

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 5>getting increased. The demand hasn't slowed down. Have companies pulled back, yeah,

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 5>have people taken profits?

0:19:31.119 --> 0:19:35.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? You know, my favorite question, has a story changed.

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 2>No, TSM should be at six hundred and eighteen months,

0:19:41.560 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 2>and we can argue if it was an American born

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:46.800
<v Speaker 2>and bred, it probably.

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 3>Be number one.

0:19:47.840 --> 0:19:51.040
<v Speaker 4>We're getting closer for real like.

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:55.879
<v Speaker 2>Hole for the long term and before we grap I

0:19:55.880 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 2>don't know for close wrapping.

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 3>Please put in chat. I only need four stocks to

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 3>hold on two lifetime.

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:06.000
<v Speaker 2>I had an interest in conversation with a brother in

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:11.760
<v Speaker 2>stock Club his granddad in nineteen eighty stock club put

0:20:11.800 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 2>yes and chat. If you saw it in telegram, eighty shares.

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:18.679
<v Speaker 2>If you would have held it through all the splits,

0:20:18.720 --> 0:20:22.520
<v Speaker 2>would have turned into seventeen thousand shares. So even in

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:25.919
<v Speaker 2>the desire to want to sell off early, some of

0:20:25.960 --> 0:20:28.600
<v Speaker 2>these companies are going to have to split, and then

0:20:28.600 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 2>you go from having one hundred shares to one thousand

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 2>shares or one hundred to five hundred. There's only upside

0:20:34.680 --> 0:20:37.520
<v Speaker 2>potential if you're holding equities for a long period of time.

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.439
<v Speaker 2>You only need four that you're going to marry. Like

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 2>even Rashat talked about it earlier. Even with Q you

0:20:44.640 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 2>can't go wrong. I know something, But what about TQQ

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 2>and what about TUCO? Yeah, you can add exotics on

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:53.560
<v Speaker 2>top of it. But your core four have to be

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:57.159
<v Speaker 2>ones that you never like. You never wake up in

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.160
<v Speaker 2>the middle of the night worried about v'all or VT

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 2>or vu G or Q.

0:21:02.240 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 3>You only need four.

0:21:03.960 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 2>My question for you is why you're not executed Because

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.959
<v Speaker 2>you want to gamble mm hmm, and if you gamble,

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.240
<v Speaker 2>you deserve to be broke. I think you deserve to

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.480
<v Speaker 2>be rich and wealthy hole for.

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 3>The long term.

0:21:16.200 --> 0:21:17.919
<v Speaker 2>But at this point I've been really do what you

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 2>want to do. If you want to blow through your

0:21:19.640 --> 0:21:22.840
<v Speaker 2>money and mess up your money, I'm not. If you

0:21:22.880 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 2>want to, I love that for you.

0:21:25.520 --> 0:21:29.199
<v Speaker 4>You're right, Well, you're right, you're right. How about your

0:21:29.240 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 4>way