WEBVTT - Surveillance: Slow Recovery With Fed's Harker

0:00:09.840 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane. Daily

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberg And

0:00:27.120 --> 0:00:30.160
<v Speaker 1>we start with sometime the economic data. The July report

0:00:30.200 --> 0:00:33.600
<v Speaker 1>on Empire manufacturing from New York turns positive for the

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:38.320
<v Speaker 1>first time since February seventeen, point to a significant increase there.

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>And we see new orders, production and even employment turns

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.479
<v Speaker 1>slightly positive. So that is New York. What is happening

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in Pennsylvania and the second district of the Federal Reserve

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:51.559
<v Speaker 1>joining us now is Patrick Harker. He is the president

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Philadelphia Fed. Good morning to you, Pat, and

0:00:54.520 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us. Uh. I want to ask you

0:00:57.320 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 1>off the top, how things are going in the Pennsylvania area.

0:01:00.160 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I know that the COVID case rate has risen a

0:01:02.360 --> 0:01:05.160
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Are you concerned that you fall back into

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>the same situation that we're seeing in the Sunbelt states?

0:01:09.200 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>So in the Try state region Pennsylvania, New Jersey and

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Delaware that we cover, we have seen a little bit

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>of an uptick in the COVID cases, but the governors

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 1>have taken action to slow the uh the opening a

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit, so I'm not that concerned right now. I

0:01:25.240 --> 0:01:29.040
<v Speaker 1>think the generally the virus is pretty well controlled here.

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 1>It's still a tragedy and there's still a lot of

0:01:31.560 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>work to be done, but I'm not very worried at

0:01:33.880 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this point for this region. What's your view of the

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:40.039
<v Speaker 1>economics of the region. How hard have you been hit?

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:43.920
<v Speaker 1>How hard are you going to be So the region

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>is defacturing sector has bounced back. We saw our last

0:01:47.800 --> 0:01:52.200
<v Speaker 1>report last month. We are seeing some good news there.

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 1>We are particularly the city of Philadelphia itself is predominantly

0:01:56.360 --> 0:02:00.360
<v Speaker 1>edge and meds, and I'm concerned about those. Are not

0:02:00.440 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 1>just about the large medical institutions which have lost a

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:08.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of revenue because of elective procedures being curtailed or delayed,

0:02:08.800 --> 0:02:11.520
<v Speaker 1>but also in the royal communities here. Those royal health

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:15.799
<v Speaker 1>systems have been hurt quite badly through this process. What

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>about the overall US economy Now that we've seen this

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.359
<v Speaker 1>flare up across much of the country, are you revising

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:27.000
<v Speaker 1>your economic forecast or your outlook? So prior to this,

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.839
<v Speaker 1>we saw a pretty big hit and queue first half

0:02:29.880 --> 0:02:32.839
<v Speaker 1>of this year, probably about in GDP in the first half.

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>We thought it would bounce back around in the second half,

0:02:35.960 --> 0:02:40.720
<v Speaker 1>ending around six down in GDP for the year and

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:43.880
<v Speaker 1>unemployment around ten percent. We are revising it right now

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:49.240
<v Speaker 1>because with the virus surging in the south and southwest

0:02:49.280 --> 0:02:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of the country, we are concerned about that. I'm very

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>concerned about that. So this is going to be a

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>slow recovery. Until we get the virus under control, we

0:02:57.320 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>can't get the economy back to full throttle. You mentioned

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:02.840
<v Speaker 1>EDS and meds. The EDS part of it is your specialty.

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>You came up as an educator. How important is it

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:09.920
<v Speaker 1>to get the schools open? How important to the economy

0:03:09.960 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>this fault. It's very important, but we have to do

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:17.280
<v Speaker 1>it carefully because we don't want to put people at risk.

0:03:17.600 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 1>You start, for example, we know that in a child

0:03:20.600 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 1>care business, about half the child care institutions, many of

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:29.320
<v Speaker 1>them are small uh companies that are taking care of children,

0:03:29.760 --> 0:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>about half of them closed, and the remaining ones they

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>lost about at least fifty capacity in remaining open. So

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just simply if people can't find care for their

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:43.560
<v Speaker 1>children or be able to get their children to school,

0:03:43.920 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna have a hard time working. And particularly in

0:03:46.160 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>a knowledge economy where people's productivity is really their knowledge,

0:03:50.760 --> 0:03:54.080
<v Speaker 1>if they're concerned about their children and that's weighing on

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>their mind, it's human nature, they're going to be less productive.

0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's very important, but we can't do

0:03:59.640 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it in a way that puts the children or the

0:04:02.240 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>communities at risk. Obviously a lot of risks for the

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:08.440
<v Speaker 1>economy that don't seem to be reflected in equity prices.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Are you concerned about the level of stocks at this

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:14.119
<v Speaker 1>point and whether or not it's sustainable or we might

0:04:14.160 --> 0:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>be seeing a bubble that could pop and take the

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 1>economy with it. So the equity market, the stock market

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:22.720
<v Speaker 1>is a measure we look at, but I often remind

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>myself it's not the real economy. So for me as

0:04:25.200 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a policy maker, I'm looking at the signals coming from

0:04:28.640 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 1>the real economy, employment data, inflation data, and so forth.

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:36.039
<v Speaker 1>That is my main concern right now. Well, do you

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:37.880
<v Speaker 1>think there is any role for the FED though, in

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 1>perhaps controlling the rise of equities at this point? At

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.599
<v Speaker 1>this point we had the FED had that we had

0:04:45.680 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to act early and aggressively to help stem the damage

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:53.200
<v Speaker 1>from this unprecedented pandemic. And we did that, and so

0:04:53.440 --> 0:04:56.239
<v Speaker 1>that was job one. Now as we start to climb

0:04:56.279 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 1>out of this, hopefully sooner rather than later, we will

0:04:59.480 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>address other issues. But we had to act to secure

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the economy and helps save as much of the economic

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure in the country as we could. What more can

0:05:10.080 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the Fed do? Lele Brainerd suggested yesterday that you let

0:05:14.160 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the economy run hot for a while and explicitly say

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:21.279
<v Speaker 1>you're going to let it inflation rise. Is that a

0:05:21.320 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>strategy on the table for you? So we've been saying

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for a long time that the two percent inflation goal

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:29.599
<v Speaker 1>is symmetric, which means we should overshoot it. We're having

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>a difficult time doing that. Like all developed economies, UM

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:37.320
<v Speaker 1>supported the idea of letting inflation get above two before

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.039
<v Speaker 1>we take any action with respect to the FED fund try.

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that at this point the FED can

0:05:42.839 --> 0:05:44.800
<v Speaker 1>do a lot to stimulate the economy or is it

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 1>really up to washing it In the fiscal side, I

0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 1>think there are things we can do. Our tool can

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>we continue to lend and we have that authority, But yeah,

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the main issues that we're facing right now

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:58.599
<v Speaker 1>tend to be on the fiscal side of the House.

0:05:58.640 --> 0:06:01.160
<v Speaker 1>I would agree with that. What would you like to

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>see what's the most important thing to come out of

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>watching them? What kind of aid? I know you don't

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>want to mention a specific program, but what kind of thing?

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Where's the economy weakest that needs help? So I think

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:12.919
<v Speaker 1>a couple of things I worry about, And again I

0:06:12.920 --> 0:06:14.920
<v Speaker 1>don't want to tell Congress what to do, but there

0:06:14.960 --> 0:06:17.320
<v Speaker 1>are things I worry about. One is a cliff effect

0:06:17.320 --> 0:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>of unemployment insurance. Yes, there is a need to get

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>people back to work, and people want to go back

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>to work, but we can't just cut it off because

0:06:25.360 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>if we cut it off, people stop spending and that

0:06:27.640 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>will be a hit on the economy. Second, we're seeing

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:33.480
<v Speaker 1>the same kind of cliff effect with state and local

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>governments if they start laying off lots of people. We

0:06:36.440 --> 0:06:39.440
<v Speaker 1>talk a lot about anchor institutions. Well, one of the

0:06:39.480 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>big anchor institutions in our economy are state and local governments,

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.440
<v Speaker 1>so they need some help. So those are two that

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I think are really important, and the third that I

0:06:49.960 --> 0:06:52.160
<v Speaker 1>worry about, and we're doing a lot of work to

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:57.000
<v Speaker 1>defed on is small businesses. How to maintain the strength

0:06:57.000 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>of small businesses, particularly for a minority can. The National

0:07:00.760 --> 0:07:03.599
<v Speaker 1>Bureau of Economic Research recently put out a report saying

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 1>it's about of black owned small businesses have closed during

0:07:08.960 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>this pandemic. This is not only decimating to those businesses,

0:07:13.360 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>but to the communities they serve. Well, what can the

0:07:15.960 --> 0:07:18.679
<v Speaker 1>FED do? Are you are banking supervisors? Yesterday in his speech,

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 1>you were critical of the paycheck Protection program for we

0:07:22.360 --> 0:07:26.320
<v Speaker 1>focused more on bank relationships rather than need How how

0:07:26.320 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 1>do you redesign that or where can the FED act? Well?

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say I was critical. What I was saying

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>is that a lot of these micro enterprises, that is,

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.000
<v Speaker 1>enterprises with less than five employees, and we have lots

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of those in Phildelphia all around the country, they don't

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:43.280
<v Speaker 1>have banking relationships because for a lot of reasons, they

0:07:43.280 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily trust the institutions. That's the root problem. We

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:51.520
<v Speaker 1>have to solve that problem to get I don't accept

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that people don't have a banking relationship as

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the status quad and we should just accept We should

0:07:56.800 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>work on that. We should bring people into the system

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:02.480
<v Speaker 1>so that they can have access to things like PPP

0:08:02.680 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>programs and just have lower fees and better service to

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>build their businesses. Before I let you go, I want

0:08:09.160 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to ask you how you're following the economy these days.

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>We've had two better than expected jobs reports. Do you

0:08:14.080 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 1>think we get the same thing for the month of July?

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And doesn't really matter. It will depend because of what's

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:25.360
<v Speaker 1>happening with resurgence of the virus. I'm a little skeptical

0:08:25.400 --> 0:08:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that we're going to see as good a job's report,

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>but we'll see. But it all comes down to right now,

0:08:31.240 --> 0:08:35.040
<v Speaker 1>controlling the virus. The health of the economy is dependent

0:08:35.160 --> 0:08:37.400
<v Speaker 1>on the health of all of us, and until we

0:08:37.440 --> 0:08:39.640
<v Speaker 1>get the virus under control, we're not going to get

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:41.720
<v Speaker 1>the economy back to where we all wanted to be.

0:08:42.040 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the fact that we're coming up on this

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>fiscal cliff in July. In the end of September, we're

0:08:47.760 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 1>going to have a lot of your lending programs expired.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>You anticipate at this point they continue. Potentially, it will

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:56.520
<v Speaker 1>depend on what the state of the economy is at

0:08:56.559 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>that time. Right Thanks very much to Patrick Harker, the

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>president of the Philadelphia Fed. Thanks for joining us today.

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It is about Ireland and the bomb show announcement this

0:09:10.280 --> 0:09:14.080
<v Speaker 1>morning on Apple Computer was wonderful about this, as we

0:09:14.120 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>have with us the Finance Minister of Ireland, Pascal Donahoe.

0:09:18.160 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>And what is so interesting of Mr Donahoe is his

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>truck from Trinity College in Dublin to real corporate, multinational

0:09:26.320 --> 0:09:29.920
<v Speaker 1>work in the United Kingdom for Procter and Gamble years ago.

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:34.920
<v Speaker 1>He has lived the multinational nous of the United Kingdom,

0:09:35.000 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>of the Republic of Ireland, indeed of Luxembourg in Europe.

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Finance Minister, we are thrilled to have you with us.

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Bloomberg surveillance. Were you surprised by this huge,

0:09:46.520 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>huge win for your nation and for Tim Cook and Cupertino? Well,

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:55.400
<v Speaker 1>I always believe such an outcome was possible. And Ireland

0:09:55.520 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 1>has been very clear now over many many years that

0:09:59.400 --> 0:10:03.559
<v Speaker 1>we do not make special tax agreements with any company

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>big small here in our country, and all taxpayers are

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:11.360
<v Speaker 1>treated equally. We really value the relationship that we have

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:14.240
<v Speaker 1>with an employers such as Apple, like we value the

0:10:14.280 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>relationship that we have with all employers in Ireland and

0:10:17.520 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 1>we do not do special deals for them. And this

0:10:20.920 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>ruling here today is a recognition of US Minister, you

0:10:24.920 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>have lived this with p and years ago. I want

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you to explain to those of continental Europe and frankly

0:10:31.960 --> 0:10:36.680
<v Speaker 1>those of you worldwide, that appropriate tax policy for multi

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:43.520
<v Speaker 1>nationals is not theft from the general taxpayer. Well, I

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 1>believe it's absolutely imperrasive that big companies are taxed effectively

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:52.760
<v Speaker 1>and they are taxed fairly. And I also believe that

0:10:52.840 --> 0:10:55.839
<v Speaker 1>for very big and very big digital companies, how we

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>are going to tax them in the future is also

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>going to change. But what was so important about this

0:11:02.559 --> 0:11:07.400
<v Speaker 1>particular issue is an allegation was made that we were

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:11.840
<v Speaker 1>in some way treating Apple differently to other taxpayers that

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>will be here in Ireland. This matter ultimately ended up

0:11:15.720 --> 0:11:18.320
<v Speaker 1>in the General Court of the European Union and it's

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>been settled in the way that you've now described. So

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:25.199
<v Speaker 1>the message from me, it's a finance minister here in Europe,

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:30.079
<v Speaker 1>is that companies, whether they're from Europe, America already well

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.319
<v Speaker 1>or else in the world, have to be taxed effectively

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.719
<v Speaker 1>and fairly. And this was a really important issue for

0:11:36.760 --> 0:11:40.280
<v Speaker 1>our tax code here in Irelands, moving from taxing to spending.

0:11:40.320 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>There's a big question. You are the president you're the

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>head of a group of nineteen finance ministers. They will

0:11:45.280 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>all get together this weekend for that European Commission meeting

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>where they're gonna be speaking about that key trillion dollar

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>trillion euro budget as well as the seven dred and

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:57.839
<v Speaker 1>fifty euro billion euro plan that has been proposed. How

0:11:57.880 --> 0:12:00.800
<v Speaker 1>much pushback are you hearing from the frugal for and

0:12:00.840 --> 0:12:04.920
<v Speaker 1>what has been proposed and bringing that fiscal stimulus down. Yes,

0:12:05.000 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>there is a diversity of debate in relation to this

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>particular project within Europe and inside the European Union, But

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:14.760
<v Speaker 1>very broadly, the point I would make to you and

0:12:14.880 --> 0:12:18.079
<v Speaker 1>to all your viewers across the world if this is

0:12:18.120 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a really signature example of Europe deepening its economic architecture

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and deepening and making stronger the foundations of the Euro

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and we are doing us to strengthen the ability of

0:12:33.600 --> 0:12:37.120
<v Speaker 1>our own economies here in Europe to respond back to

0:12:37.360 --> 0:12:40.880
<v Speaker 1>the economic shock of COVID and because this is such

0:12:40.920 --> 0:12:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a big project, of course of our different views in

0:12:43.160 --> 0:12:46.600
<v Speaker 1>relation to us, but I do believe that within the

0:12:46.640 --> 0:12:49.640
<v Speaker 1>European Union will reach agreement on the matter and the

0:12:49.679 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>concerns that my colleagues and friends have amongst some countries

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.439
<v Speaker 1>for God, in the scale of the fond and how

0:12:56.520 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>this money can be used effectively and transparently. I believe

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>what creativity and imagination in the coming days are maybe weaker,

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:08.400
<v Speaker 1>so we'll find a way of reaching agreement. Mr Dannio,

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to go back to Apple. I think the

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>sovereignty issue here and frankly as to do with the

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.440
<v Speaker 1>weekend meetings, but the sovereigny issue here is absolutely critical.

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Frankly going back to Trinity College and Elizabeth the First

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.439
<v Speaker 1>and the formation of liberty in Ireland. What this decision

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.200
<v Speaker 1>is really about, folding into all the different meetings that

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:31.040
<v Speaker 1>are you howners, is about sovereignty of nations to make

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>their own laws. What does it mean for Brussels to

0:13:34.840 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 1>see this victory by you today. Well, actually, I believe

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>in the puding of sovereignty and I believe in the

0:13:43.040 --> 0:13:47.199
<v Speaker 1>sharing of sovereignty. I'm a passionate supporter of the European project.

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm a deep believer in the process of European integration

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that we have and they need to look at how

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.320
<v Speaker 1>we can strengthen it in the future. So I would

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.679
<v Speaker 1>actually regularly make the case here in Ireland and to

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>crawl us Europe and indeed across the world that the

0:14:02.520 --> 0:14:07.600
<v Speaker 1>European project about economically and politically, it's an extraordinary achievement

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:11.080
<v Speaker 1>that from my point of view personally and politically, I

0:14:11.160 --> 0:14:13.760
<v Speaker 1>want to protect and want to secure us and I

0:14:13.800 --> 0:14:17.440
<v Speaker 1>want to grow within the future. And Commissioner Vestigure is

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>a commissioner that I have huge respect for who I

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 1>look forward to working with again in the future. Um

0:14:24.080 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>that said, there are always a number of particular areas

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how decisions are made and then how

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:34.400
<v Speaker 1>they're implemented that are always going to matter to individual

0:14:34.520 --> 0:14:37.840
<v Speaker 1>nation states. And from our point of view, the reason

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>this was so important is that it create the inference

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that we used our national sovereignty in some way to

0:14:45.000 --> 0:14:48.120
<v Speaker 1>get favorable treatment to a company. That wasn't the case.

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:51.560
<v Speaker 1>It's been recognized by the routing here this morning. But

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, I make all these this case, and I

0:14:53.840 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>make that argument though in the context of somebody who

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>is a European politician believes in the europe Union and

0:15:00.800 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the sharing of sovereignty. But inside that architecture, countries still

0:15:04.920 --> 0:15:09.040
<v Speaker 1>have roles, their duties and their responsibilities. And that's why

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:12.320
<v Speaker 1>this hearing was so important. Finance minister, thank you so

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:14.680
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us this morning. Pasco Donajo is the

0:15:14.720 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Irish Finance Minister. Off of this extraordinary ruling out of

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>Luxembourg on Apple computer. Daniel Tannebaum is expert hit what

0:15:29.040 --> 0:15:35.480
<v Speaker 1>financial companies do given sanction rules and law changes. He's

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>with Oliver Wyman after a distinguished career. He's got a

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.920
<v Speaker 1>fancy title of America's and a financial crime leader. But

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 1>mostly what he does is going to rooms and say, okay,

0:15:45.320 --> 0:15:48.360
<v Speaker 1>here your options. Dan Tannebaum, what are the options for

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 1>American banking is they sit two blocks from the Mandarin

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Hotel in Hong Kong. Thanks Tom. It's it's gonna be

0:15:56.560 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a tough morning or day for for US banks opera

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 1>rating in Hong Kong as they really think about what

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.080
<v Speaker 1>this could mean. I think it's really important to note, though,

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>that sanctions weren't actually levied yesterday, but a framework was

0:16:09.880 --> 0:16:13.320
<v Speaker 1>essentially established through the signing of the Hong Kong Autonomy Act.

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>But if these sanctions are put forth um like many

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>think they could be, and these were very much a

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.880
<v Speaker 1>blunt instrument rather than a surgical use of sanctions in

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a very sensitive market. Um it would be nearly impossible

0:16:27.720 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for a US bank to be able to comply with

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>U S sanctions and Chinese law simultaneously. Well down, this

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 1>is the issue. I'm trying to understand the scale, the

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>magnitude of the issue before us right now. And let's

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 1>just think this out. I don't want to get you

0:16:39.960 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>in trouble with any clients. Let's say there's a bank

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that starts with an H and to the C. They

0:16:43.840 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 1>have a headquarters in London and a huge presence. I'm

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:50.840
<v Speaker 1>thinking banks, nay, many banks. We're trying to keep down

0:16:50.880 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>out of trouble. Down. Let's say that bank services a

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:58.280
<v Speaker 1>particular client that comes under these sanctions. What did they do?

0:17:00.120 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we've talked about this on the show before.

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:05.639
<v Speaker 1>I mean, realistically, they're going to have to pick which

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>regulatory regime can end up hurting them the most. Now,

0:17:10.080 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I do think there's some cause for caution on all

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 1>of this, because I mean we're potentially a year away

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>from actually seeing any real designations under this program. If

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>you get into the nuts and bolts of what was

0:17:22.640 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>signed yesterday, the administration have ninety days to identify targets

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>where designating then they have to inform Congress if any

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 1>foreign banks carried out business with the aforementioned targets um

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and they have a year to do that. So you're

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:40.359
<v Speaker 1>talking potentially October one before you may begin to see

0:17:40.440 --> 0:17:44.240
<v Speaker 1>any banking related restrictions or more serious sanctions that get

0:17:44.320 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>rolled out. Potentially, Dan, the sanctions haven't been levied yet.

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You made a point of that, and clearly, uh, this

0:17:50.760 --> 0:17:54.320
<v Speaker 1>is just amping up the arsenal the President Trump potentially

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>could have. Can you give a sense of why now,

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.760
<v Speaker 1>because initially a President Trump didn't have that strong of

0:17:59.760 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a action publicly to the incursions in Hong Kong's autonomy.

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:08.000
<v Speaker 1>And this came, according to some people, sort of suddenly, Well,

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean it didn't. It didn't. Let's let's remember what

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:14.439
<v Speaker 1>he signed yesterday. It was a very very bipartisan piece

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.359
<v Speaker 1>of legislation passed in both the House and Senate that

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.159
<v Speaker 1>forced the president's hand. He was essentially given no choice

0:18:21.160 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>in a veto proof majority to sign the legislation that

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>came across his desk. So Congress is the one that

0:18:27.720 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>acted and forced the administration to do something. They signed something,

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:35.399
<v Speaker 1>but haven't necessarily done anything yet. And I think the

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.320
<v Speaker 1>next step where the administration have to identify targets. That's

0:18:39.359 --> 0:18:41.919
<v Speaker 1>the real sensitive piece here. But I don't think it

0:18:42.000 --> 0:18:45.439
<v Speaker 1>was necessarily suddenly. Um. He definitely was delayed for a

0:18:45.440 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 1>few weeks, and I think the timing was the UK

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>announcement yesterday of of excluding a certain tech company from

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.840
<v Speaker 1>from involvement in their five G market. UM was you know,

0:18:54.880 --> 0:18:57.280
<v Speaker 1>this has been a bad week in terms of Western

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>China relation to John's correct delicate questioning of what a

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>given bank would do. Look at the margin, this stops

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.040
<v Speaker 1>marginal Hong Kong growths for the financial system of the West.

0:19:08.640 --> 0:19:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Where do they go when they move from stopping the

0:19:11.520 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 1>marginal growth of headcount over to we've got to adjust

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:20.160
<v Speaker 1>at the margin or completely an exit Hong Kong. Where

0:19:20.160 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>would you just suggest they go to? I mean there's

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:25.919
<v Speaker 1>no I mean this is still somewhat fresh, so I

0:19:25.960 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 1>don't think there is a clear answer of where you'd

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:29.720
<v Speaker 1>go to. I know there's a lot of people in

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Singapore that are excited of what this could potentially mean

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for the further growth of Singapore as a financial services

0:19:35.640 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>hub UM, which is a potentially a logical move from

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a regulatory standpoint In otherwise, UM there's no clear answer.

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone is evacuating the Hong Kong market yet,

0:19:46.200 --> 0:19:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think any moves and doing so could be

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>viewed as premature depending on the business. But this is

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.160
<v Speaker 1>what a lot of banks, similar to those that we're

0:19:54.200 --> 0:19:58.120
<v Speaker 1>looking at Bregg's post Brexit locations had to do, may

0:19:58.160 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>need to begin spinning up our plan if this escalates.

0:20:02.040 --> 0:20:04.199
<v Speaker 1>Do we stay in Hong Kong or do we actually

0:20:04.240 --> 0:20:06.840
<v Speaker 1>have to potentially move? I would point out, folks, a

0:20:06.880 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>trip from Song Kong to Singapore is almost four hours.

0:20:10.320 --> 0:20:12.760
<v Speaker 1>You're on the plane and you're like, really, it's like

0:20:12.880 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>literally New York. It's a lot farther away than anybody imagines. There,

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Dan give us an update than on what your council

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:24.920
<v Speaker 1>would be to banks right now. I mean, I think

0:20:24.920 --> 0:20:29.360
<v Speaker 1>it's keeping aware of what's happening. The one missed opportunity

0:20:29.359 --> 0:20:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in all of this was the US again went and

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 1>alone set forth the unilateral sanctions package that there weren't

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:40.080
<v Speaker 1>other countries latching onto, which does make it harder, um

0:20:40.119 --> 0:20:43.840
<v Speaker 1>have you as you have these more significant business decisions

0:20:43.840 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 1>that have to be made. I think trying to establish

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>what this could potentially mean looking at the China response,

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.159
<v Speaker 1>which thus far has been focused similar to what it

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was last week with the designation of Marco Rubio and

0:20:56.640 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz for in response to weaker sanctions. UH. The

0:21:00.320 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>Chinese response has been at least relatively measured, given I

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 1>think they're aware that nothing has really happened yet, but

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>companies need to begin to prepare to understand how they

0:21:10.880 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 1>can operate in both markets UM without you know, completely

0:21:14.480 --> 0:21:18.159
<v Speaker 1>running a foul of the other side. And there aren't

0:21:18.200 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>any clear answers yet given you know, everyone's still decomposing

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>this Executive Order and the Autonomy Act and what it

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>could potentially mean. Well, Dan, you've now, dear. I think

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the era of sitting on the fence for many of

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>these companies who won their hand in both regions without

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>really coming out and saying what they think about the situation,

0:21:37.080 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 1>that's over, isn't it. It does seem like that's over.

0:21:41.160 --> 0:21:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I think the relations between US and China have only

0:21:44.040 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 1>continued to worsen over the last few months. UM. And

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>for banks that have grown their business in the APAC region,

0:21:51.640 --> 0:21:54.960
<v Speaker 1>those that are have significant business in the US, UM,

0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if they necessarily need to make any

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:00.639
<v Speaker 1>choices in the near term, but obviously this does pose

0:22:00.680 --> 0:22:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a threat to the growth of the business UM going forward.

0:22:04.880 --> 0:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Dan Tannebaum, great to catch up with you. Out of

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a woman, Partner in America's Anti financial crimes head, joining

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>us on the latest out of Hong Kong. Bank of

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:20.359
<v Speaker 1>America has a franchise in research of trying to figure

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>out the pulse of the by side, John, at any time,

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this is an important conversation, and I would say in

0:22:27.119 --> 0:22:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the history of Bank of America's research, there's never been

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.359
<v Speaker 1>a more important time in this a pandemic than to

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>figure out what the people scared stiff about the actual

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 1>assumption or thinking happy to say we can bring Jack

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:40.879
<v Speaker 1>Wood it in now. Bank of America Securities head of

0:22:40.960 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a research investment committee, Jared, always great to catch up

0:22:43.800 --> 0:22:46.360
<v Speaker 1>with you, sir. Just how under round is that cyclical

0:22:46.359 --> 0:22:48.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the market and what will it take to

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>get a durable rotation, one that lasts longer than twenty

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:58.000
<v Speaker 1>four hours? Yeah, no, it's look the big cyclical assets

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the Europe the you know, the the value stocks, the

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>financials either are some of the most hated assets in

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the world. You have um, everyone crowded into essentially just

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:11.600
<v Speaker 1>one trade, which is which is tech. And our contention

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is that on the one hand, it's not quite as

0:23:13.640 --> 0:23:17.440
<v Speaker 1>dangerous at this moment to own tech is as it

0:23:17.560 --> 0:23:20.199
<v Speaker 1>might might seem. For one thing, a lot of these

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>stocks turned out to be quite more defensive than than

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>history would suggest. But at the same time, we do

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:30.199
<v Speaker 1>see one big risk to the very crowded positioning that

0:23:30.200 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that everyone has in place, and that's the risk of

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 1>a genuine um economic rebound, not just a return to

0:23:35.480 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 1>form of the kind of secular stagnations low growth, low inflation,

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 1>but in the in the instance of a genuine economic

0:23:42.400 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>uplift cause maybe maybe a huge surge and research and development,

0:23:45.760 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 1>hu surgeon, corporate capex, the kind of things that can

0:23:48.080 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>really boost productivity. If you get that kind of macro environment,

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>something we've been writing about in recent months, then that

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 1>would be a big risk to the crowded trade that

0:23:55.400 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>everyone has in place. Did you You've got a wonderful

0:23:57.880 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>double degree philosophy and theology. I want you to go

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 1>all Voltaire on me right now and explain to me

0:24:03.680 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the panic and the institutional buy side over where the

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:12.959
<v Speaker 1>actual assumption is going. The math doesn't work, It doesn't.

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:14.800
<v Speaker 1>It is a you know, it is an existential risk.

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we talk about you know, Heideger and side for

0:24:17.040 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>a minute, but you know, the math doesn't work in

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the long term. I think that's why people are increasingly pushing,

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, out of treasuries, out of out of observation,

0:24:27.280 --> 0:24:30.320
<v Speaker 1>into more equity like investments, into parts of the credit

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.480
<v Speaker 1>market that have a little more risk in them because

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:35.000
<v Speaker 1>the bottling. They have to get some yield somewhere. That's

0:24:35.000 --> 0:24:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a big theme for us lately where you can go

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 1>when yields are low. And I think the good news

0:24:39.040 --> 0:24:40.879
<v Speaker 1>is that that the support from the FED, the support

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.399
<v Speaker 1>from fiscal authorities has made some of those act that

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 1>classes a little bit safer than they work and uh

0:24:45.880 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and you can buy alongside. We can talk about moral hazard,

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:51.240
<v Speaker 1>we can talk about long term solvency issues out on

0:24:51.280 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the horizon, but I think for the moment, what we're

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 1>seeing from a lot of investors, both in terms of

0:24:56.119 --> 0:25:01.520
<v Speaker 1>um you know, uh, households institutions every when really are

0:25:01.520 --> 0:25:04.680
<v Speaker 1>looking increasingly as in these alternative asset classes and risk

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>your parts of the credit market because they do have

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>to get a yield pick up somewhere. Yeah, Jared, you

0:25:08.760 --> 0:25:10.760
<v Speaker 1>could look at philosophy, or you could look at there

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.119
<v Speaker 1>is no alternative and the bottom line. And the bottom

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.720
<v Speaker 1>line is, as you pointed out in your research, sent

0:25:16.880 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>of SMP five hundred stocks are paying dividends that are

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 1>higher than treasury yields. How long it can this subsist?

0:25:23.760 --> 0:25:27.440
<v Speaker 1>How long can these companies keep such high dividends relative

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to benchmark borrowing costs without at least something giving and

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:35.679
<v Speaker 1>that gap compressing one way or another. Well, historically that

0:25:35.720 --> 0:25:38.840
<v Speaker 1>gap has fallen when an economic conditions recover. And I

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>think that's a function actually more of of treasure yields

0:25:42.640 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>rising than of you know, dividends falling. Um, that's that's

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:48.679
<v Speaker 1>certainly happened in the last three or four you know,

0:25:48.680 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>big economic cycles. You saw that that ratio decline. But um,

0:25:52.280 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>we think that you know, one wrinkle in the in

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>the in the in the story today is that it

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.200
<v Speaker 1>does seem really difficult to imagine how treasury yields could

0:26:00.280 --> 0:26:02.840
<v Speaker 1>could rise sharply, if for no other reason than because

0:26:03.200 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone expects the said to join other central banks in

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.400
<v Speaker 1>yield curve control. Um. You know, maybe a little bit

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:13.239
<v Speaker 1>later rather than sooner. But um, if it's not you know,

0:26:14.560 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>if it's not that you know, yield rising, UM, it's

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:23.159
<v Speaker 1>the other thing. It's the prospect of increasing central UH

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>infuence to fund you know, expansive new investments, which would

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:29.560
<v Speaker 1>be really bullish for growth who would also be painful

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:32.240
<v Speaker 1>for for treasury owners. And for that reason, that's why

0:26:32.240 --> 0:26:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we say that, you know, it's all essentially one big

0:26:34.240 --> 0:26:37.080
<v Speaker 1>trade either your long duration, your long technology, your long

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:40.840
<v Speaker 1>defensives in various ways, or you're starting to look for

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.480
<v Speaker 1>avenues to bet on a men equal you know, economic

0:26:43.520 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>rebound Jared. There's also the other thing of companies cutting

0:26:46.840 --> 0:26:49.600
<v Speaker 1>their dividends. How concerned are you about the fact that

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:52.199
<v Speaker 1>we've seen companies cut their dividends the fastest pace on

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>records so far this year, with a likelihood that that's

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>going to continue in some shape or form going forward.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>It's it's possible. We're not We're not overly concerned about that,

0:27:02.040 --> 0:27:04.359
<v Speaker 1>I think at this moment um if for another reason,

0:27:04.560 --> 0:27:08.000
<v Speaker 1>because the the amount of policy support that's come online

0:27:08.000 --> 0:27:10.679
<v Speaker 1>has UM made you know, some of those cuts I

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:15.240
<v Speaker 1>think unnecessary. There's there's certainly pressure political pressure UM, maybe

0:27:15.240 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>some pressure from shareholders UH to shore balance sheets um

0:27:18.880 --> 0:27:20.959
<v Speaker 1>in our in our Fundanager survey this month, you know,

0:27:21.440 --> 0:27:24.639
<v Speaker 1>a lot of institutional investors continue to say, you know,

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:27.359
<v Speaker 1>increasing buybacks, increasing dividends was at the very bottom of

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>our list of priorities, which is very understandable at this

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>moment in the business cycle. But um as as a

0:27:32.560 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>medium term question and longer, we don't expect a lot

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of cuts on that account. In fact,

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>one reason we're suggesting investors start to take a look

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:43.320
<v Speaker 1>just take a peek at European banks, for example, maybe

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>add to your watch lists because there is a prospect

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 1>of of of dividends coming. Lack of conviction here, take

0:27:50.080 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a look take pay. Now, let's pretend McClure and you

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.440
<v Speaker 1>called me up and you say, take a look, take

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:59.359
<v Speaker 1>a peek. What is that main Jared, Well, I know

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm being caged because they are. They are, you know,

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:03.320
<v Speaker 1>some of the least owned assets in the world. Our

0:28:03.359 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>contention is that there's a really great value opportunity there

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.520
<v Speaker 1>if things continue to go well in Europe with regards

0:28:08.520 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 1>to you know, fiscal policy, and and then you know,

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:13.960
<v Speaker 1>as as maybe they get permission to pay dividends. Again,

0:28:14.720 --> 0:28:18.239
<v Speaker 1>that's a really profound opportunity. Okay, John, we're gonna leave

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:19.680
<v Speaker 1>it there. Always grid to catch out with you. My

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>best set of say job, what of that banks American?

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:26.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe and

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:31.840
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:36.119
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Radio