WEBVTT - Content or Commercial: Inside Content Studios

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm off my game today. No, you're not. People are

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>going to have to start making better content. I think

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be talking about this for a long time.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>When you program for everyone, you program for no one.

0:00:10.200 --> 0:00:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a word purpose driven platform. Like we're

0:00:12.280 --> 0:00:15.640
<v Speaker 1>trying to get to substance? How was that? Are you

0:00:15.680 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>happy with that? This is marketing therapy right now? And

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:23.760
<v Speaker 1>it really is? What's up? I'm Laura Coarnti and I'm

0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Alexa Christen. Welcome back to Atlantia. We are in March,

0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>or in March. It's March madness. March is coming in

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:34.919
<v Speaker 1>like a lion, so march. On to the topic of

0:00:34.960 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>this episode, the content studio. The content studio. So we

0:00:38.440 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>have Auto Bell, who's the chief creative officer of Courageous,

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a Turner Media content studio, and they've been around for

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years and kind of burning things up.

0:00:48.240 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 1>So in the spirit of it being our first creative

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>lead episode, we are going to make this a podcast

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:59.080
<v Speaker 1>short and welcome Auto Bell to the show. Welcome to

0:00:59.160 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>the show. Auto, Hello, Otto and you ladies. Nice to

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>see you both. Yes, thank you are so happy you're here.

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>We are very happy you're here, So I haven't seen

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you since we were both at Ogilvie. You were leading

0:01:09.800 --> 0:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>Ogilvy Entertainment. So tell us now you're at Creatius. What

0:01:13.760 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>was the path from agency into media company? UM? I

0:01:21.959 --> 0:01:26.680
<v Speaker 1>arrived at CNN because I had UM just like sounds

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>like you just went to the doors and you're like,

0:01:28.520 --> 0:01:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm it wasn't it was? It was. It was a fun,

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:34.560
<v Speaker 1>fun origin. So I don't know if you know this one, Laura,

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:39.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's um. We haven't talked about it. So I

0:01:39.200 --> 0:01:47.319
<v Speaker 1>got really friendly with um cat's head of sales at CNN, Kakugach,

0:01:47.400 --> 0:01:50.040
<v Speaker 1>that's right, and we became good friends over the years.

0:01:50.040 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Because I was at Ogilvy, we were carving out all

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>of these interesting deals with like BBC World News and

0:01:58.960 --> 0:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>CNBC in Times Now of India, all of these these

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:10.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of multi platform TV lead deals for content, and

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.960
<v Speaker 1>I was always trying to work with CNN with my

0:02:15.040 --> 0:02:16.799
<v Speaker 1>then boss Dog Scott. We were trying to we was

0:02:16.840 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>trying to get something away at CNN, but they were

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.560
<v Speaker 1>so strict about their church and state they just wouldn't

0:02:22.880 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>do anything exotic in terms of hybrid deals or anything

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:31.440
<v Speaker 1>like that. So it could but then a couple of

0:02:31.520 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>years later, UM cat gave me cool and she said, oh,

0:02:34.919 --> 0:02:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I want you to come in and let's chat about

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a marketing job. And she introduced me to some of

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 1>her colleagues, McAll and we got to talking and it

0:02:42.800 --> 0:02:47.520
<v Speaker 1>became clear pretty quickly that they needed helping in brand

0:02:47.560 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>with branded content. And by that time Jeff Zuccerd arrived

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:54.840
<v Speaker 1>and and he had really um he'd become a lot

0:02:54.919 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>more thoughtful about about the network, about adding entertainment properties

0:03:00.520 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>to the network. That kind of broadened the definition of journalism,

0:03:03.360 --> 0:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, stuff like Bourdaine and Lisa Laying and w

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Kamal Bell and so the company was ready to do

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>to do more and to um but in but obviously

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>in a very careful way. So we struck on the

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.400
<v Speaker 1>idea of setting up a brand of content studio. How

0:03:19.440 --> 0:03:22.160
<v Speaker 1>many years ago was that two and a half two

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half years ago, So right in the prime

0:03:24.400 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of everybody started Russia, there was like t brand existed. Yeah, yeah,

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.120
<v Speaker 1>there was one or two. Um but that's the thing.

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:33.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you swing a cat now on this town,

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.960
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna hit somebody who's opening a content studio right Well,

0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>about that, let's go right there. Well, they're everywhere. I mean,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>we very when we set up Courageous Um we named

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>after Ted Turners, America's cup winning yacht actually, but it

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>also speaks to the mindset um that we want our

0:03:50.440 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>clients to be in, right, We want them to be

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>brave and bold and and and and open minded and

0:03:56.200 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>generally courageous. But the but yeah, with everybody opening a

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>brand studio, I mean, the trick is you've got to

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>really look very carefully at what sits behind that. It's

0:04:07.360 --> 0:04:11.680
<v Speaker 1>very easy to hang a shingle. But to my experience,

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you guys probably know no better, but everything

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that I see that seems to be a lot of

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:21.680
<v Speaker 1>hollow studios out there. So a lot of um account

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>handlers or folks who will kind of take your order

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:28.240
<v Speaker 1>and then they'll turn around and they'll produce something. Yeah,

0:04:28.279 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and they'll hire a bunch of freelancers to actually execute

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the work. Or it's maybe a rebadged marketing department right

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:39.839
<v Speaker 1>going by another name in a cool new corner of

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the office. We we built this, We built Courageous from

0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.279
<v Speaker 1>the ground up. We took a very different and that

0:04:45.360 --> 0:04:47.000
<v Speaker 1>was part of the part of the deal. When I

0:04:47.080 --> 0:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>joined is that we're going to need to do things

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:51.520
<v Speaker 1>a certain way. Had a lot of a lot of

0:04:51.520 --> 0:04:54.760
<v Speaker 1>scars and a lot of lessons from from Ogilvie and

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:58.839
<v Speaker 1>wanted to build something quite, quite deliberate and quite self sufficient.

0:04:59.080 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>So we set out and we we we hired a

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>full time team. I think we're up to about thirty

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:08.240
<v Speaker 1>five full time staff. Now. UM, well, everybody makes and

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:11.240
<v Speaker 1>does so with it is a lot when you consider

0:05:11.279 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 1>that everybody is either a cinematographer or a craft editor,

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>or a filmmaker director, or a graphic designer or a

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:20.880
<v Speaker 1>web developer. You don't have account people running around. No,

0:05:21.040 --> 0:05:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that's handled by other parts of business UM, which is great.

0:05:24.600 --> 0:05:28.159
<v Speaker 1>So we just focus on actually making the stuff. What

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 1>differentiates Courageous from everything else that that is in the market.

0:05:32.560 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>What sort of the elevator pitch um when you walk

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:39.240
<v Speaker 1>in and are going up against UM bids for commercial

0:05:39.279 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 1>spots to full live production, uh, cinematography, What does that

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.320
<v Speaker 1>look like UM to you? Because there are skills I

0:05:47.360 --> 0:05:50.760
<v Speaker 1>think that you have within the walls of Courageous UM

0:05:50.800 --> 0:05:56.039
<v Speaker 1>that many folks don't. Yeah, thank you. I mean in

0:05:56.160 --> 0:06:00.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of differentiation, it is it's self sufficiency with that ability,

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean we're doing things that at one five the

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>cost of a of a creative agency or a glossy

0:06:07.600 --> 0:06:11.280
<v Speaker 1>production company because we've taken the two biggest costs out

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>of production. So we don't have day rates for freelancers

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and we don't when we own our own gears, So

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>that is one big differentiator. But then we're also pretty particular.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Snobby is another word about the folks who we've brought

0:06:29.640 --> 0:06:33.320
<v Speaker 1>on board, because in a world where everybody wants good,

0:06:33.360 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 1>fast and affordable, the good part, the quality part can

0:06:37.640 --> 0:06:42.799
<v Speaker 1>often suffer. And deliberately tried to hire the same caliber

0:06:42.839 --> 0:06:46.479
<v Speaker 1>of people that you'd find kicking around and see an

0:06:46.520 --> 0:06:50.320
<v Speaker 1>n newsroom. We have them courageous working in the dedicated

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>way for brands. So I'm talking about Emmy and Morrow

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>winning filmmakers. Um. I mean, we've only been going just

0:06:56.720 --> 0:07:00.200
<v Speaker 1>over a couple of years and I would hasten say

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.680
<v Speaker 1>we're probably the most awarded brand studio of in America

0:07:03.880 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>this year already, you know, everything from the can lines

0:07:07.040 --> 0:07:11.120
<v Speaker 1>to to Digit Day naming as the best publisher for video.

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>So we are We're very focused on the people that

0:07:15.800 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>we bring in to make sure that they can um

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.560
<v Speaker 1>deliver at at a at a high quality, you know,

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the kind of commercial production standards which brands expect. You know,

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 1>just because they're moving, they're moving maybe from an AD

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>from an agency of record model to an AD more

0:07:30.800 --> 0:07:34.559
<v Speaker 1>project by project basis, they're not given up that that

0:07:35.280 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>polish that they have spent years and billions of dollars honing,

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, like they still very they still care a

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>great deal about that. So you know, we're very conscious

0:07:46.960 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of that, and I try to make sure that the

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>work is um certainly looks looks good enough. But then

0:07:53.080 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>also the big the big difference, and we can talk

0:07:57.200 --> 0:08:00.520
<v Speaker 1>more about agency versus publisher, but we're going to go there.

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.720
<v Speaker 1>But I mean that that idea of having a value exchange. Now,

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>now there's so you ask, you know, making commercials and

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that sort of stuff. Our commercial will be a secondary

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>output of what it is that we do. You know,

0:08:15.600 --> 0:08:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm not really in the business of making thirty second

0:08:17.800 --> 0:08:20.760
<v Speaker 1>spots of trying to replace a traditional creative agency. You

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>even want to make them do CNN or just sorry,

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:25.080
<v Speaker 1>just Turner want you to do it? Well, No, I

0:08:25.120 --> 0:08:27.360
<v Speaker 1>mean what we're seeing is a lot of clients asking

0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>for it. You know, they'll startup. Yeah, they'll they'll well,

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.679
<v Speaker 1>what what happens is we'll start off making something too three,

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:37.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe an event something like that. They'll see it online

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:39.880
<v Speaker 1>or they'll see it on TV. You know. We have

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>these pod takeovers where were Native plus, where we just

0:08:44.040 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>run a piece of content instead upon a bunch of thirties.

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:49.920
<v Speaker 1>They'll see it, they like it, and then they'll want

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to graduate it to a full campaign. So they want

0:08:52.679 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to take it off of our network and play it everywhere,

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:57.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, on the side of a building in Austin,

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:02.040
<v Speaker 1>or in cinemas or around the Super Bowl. I mean,

0:09:02.080 --> 0:09:04.680
<v Speaker 1>these are all real examples. That's a good question. Is

0:09:05.080 --> 0:09:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you said campaign, but then you were talking about a

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>specific execution. I mean, are you seeing the work that

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>you're doing informing larger kind of campaign or campaign strategy.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm seeing them being picked up and used as a campaign. Okay,

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:21.240
<v Speaker 1>what's the best brief you've gotten? Um? The one that

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:29.000
<v Speaker 1>can change, you know, the one where I can do

0:09:29.040 --> 0:09:33.600
<v Speaker 1>what I want? Can you still pay me? I got

0:09:33.640 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>far better people than than I'll give you an example, um,

0:09:38.400 --> 0:09:45.800
<v Speaker 1>video game company Square Nicks. They they do Hitman and

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.199
<v Speaker 1>Lara Croft and stuff. They have another franchise, d s

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:52.679
<v Speaker 1>x UM. It's set like fifteen years in the future

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and mankind is divided between people who have changed their

0:09:56.760 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 1>bodies with technology and people who haven't. It's like this

0:09:59.679 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>war going on sounds like my kind of game. It's

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>mine kind of divided day sex mine kind of. So

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 1>they came to us and they're looking to go beyond

0:10:10.240 --> 0:10:15.080
<v Speaker 1>average gamers. Um. The initial brief that came in was

0:10:15.160 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>for like some homepage takeovers the day the game released,

0:10:18.920 --> 0:10:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Like why you know why because people don't even think

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>about media, right, so how can they go on brief

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you on something that they came and they said, we

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>want some because impact. Well, yeah, I mean company who's

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>creating cinematic content that people interact with. What was it

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>good about the brief was they listened. So they started

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.560
<v Speaker 1>to look at the brief and because they're journalists, they

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>can't help themselves. These are a lot of my my filmmakers.

0:10:49.320 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>They these are the people on your journalism. Yeah, and

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:57.080
<v Speaker 1>they start looking they're like whatever, They start scratching away

0:10:57.120 --> 0:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>at it and they're like, well, you realize that this

0:11:00.760 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>isn't science fiction. Like a lot of what your game

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>deals with that's actually happening now, and they found, you know,

0:11:06.240 --> 0:11:10.079
<v Speaker 1>the first cyber hate crime in France like six months earlier,

0:11:10.080 --> 0:11:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and and then the and then what they pointed out

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:14.199
<v Speaker 1>though in the case that we made back to the

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.280
<v Speaker 1>client is yet there is no bill on the floor

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>of Congress. There's no one body who's thinking about this

0:11:20.840 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>subject matter. This is all you know. The science is

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>galloping ahead, but nobody's nobody's tackling it in a thoughtful way.

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>So what we ended up doing was we ended up

0:11:30.559 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 1>having the first UM summit on human augmentation, like the

0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>first conference for cyborgs in the history of the world.

0:11:39.320 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>So we'll be back after this quick break. So we're

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:48.480
<v Speaker 1>back in the studio with maybe first creative on the show,

0:11:48.559 --> 0:11:51.440
<v Speaker 1>officially our first creative on the show, Atto Bell, chief

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.360
<v Speaker 1>creative officer of Courageous. Can you explain to our listeners

0:11:55.880 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>how do you push back or redirect the conversation. So

0:11:59.400 --> 0:12:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you said you came to the table with insights, you

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>were looking at weight, deeper contacts, differ context. What what

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.200
<v Speaker 1>it was that process like for your team to sort

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of pivot the client to get to from hoping to

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:16.360
<v Speaker 1>take over to a cyborg conference. If you didn't even blink,

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:21.320
<v Speaker 1>it's um. It's the first word. Well, there's a couple

0:12:21.320 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>of things. There's UM, a lot of communication and then yeah,

0:12:25.960 --> 0:12:28.400
<v Speaker 1>backing it up with insights and research. You're not going

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to get past go without a counter argument, you know,

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a big media insight backed up with statistics, UM and

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>some kind of concrete research. Before you go on any

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of flight of fancy or creative meandering there there

0:12:46.360 --> 0:12:49.719
<v Speaker 1>has to be the counterpoint, like we heard you on this,

0:12:50.360 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but did you know that x um so they wanted

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 1>to go beyond a hardcore gaming office audience and we

0:12:57.480 --> 0:12:59.280
<v Speaker 1>did that. You know, it's it's public knowledge. We we

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.920
<v Speaker 1>boost the sales by on Amazon during the during the campaign,

0:13:02.960 --> 0:13:07.400
<v Speaker 1>like we have real results on how we affected the numbers.

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>You've got to have the client who's open to it.

0:13:10.320 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean the amount of time that we'll spend and

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:14.959
<v Speaker 1>we've worked together, you know, the amount of time will

0:13:15.000 --> 0:13:18.520
<v Speaker 1>spend talking about things in pre production. It saves you

0:13:18.720 --> 0:13:22.480
<v Speaker 1>so much time later write. One of my pet pees

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:27.200
<v Speaker 1>with publishers is like trust us. You know, hey, we've

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:35.920
<v Speaker 1>got this from here on out time. What I haven't

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:38.720
<v Speaker 1>done right is dumped something on your desk after two

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:42.320
<v Speaker 1>months of radio silence and said like, hey, review this

0:13:42.480 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>rough cut, and it's a million miles away from anybody

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 1>who works with Alex, and I know that we don't

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.360
<v Speaker 1>live in silence. So um, it's interesting. Alex and I

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.480
<v Speaker 1>go back and forth a lot. And you were getting

0:13:52.520 --> 0:13:55.400
<v Speaker 1>to this earlier on the conversation around talent and the

0:13:55.440 --> 0:13:58.640
<v Speaker 1>types of backgrounds or skill sets that you're pulling from.

0:13:59.040 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>What you were just described riving would be research and

0:14:01.880 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 1>strategy in a way in which you're pulling from different departments.

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I know that you have Launchpad, for example, which is

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous social insights tool that your team uses to

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.640
<v Speaker 1>field editorial. Can you talk about some of the inputs

0:14:15.679 --> 0:14:17.840
<v Speaker 1>and what the skill sets look like in this sort

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>of modern version of content creation. Well, in my case

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:26.320
<v Speaker 1>where I've sort of netted out is it's weighted in

0:14:26.400 --> 0:14:31.040
<v Speaker 1>favor of folks with editorial backgrounds, with a healthy mix

0:14:31.080 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of advertising professionals, and then just the dash a data

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.320
<v Speaker 1>science that would be that that would be the recipe

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>that I'm cooking with. So those editorial guys, Um, those

0:14:44.160 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>people are worth their weight in gold. It's a hell

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of a lot easier to teach marketing to a journalist

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>than it is to teach a marketer how to be

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 1>a journalist, like their instincts to kind of source report,

0:14:57.160 --> 0:15:00.200
<v Speaker 1>to get on the phone and track down a right

0:15:00.320 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>story and not stop until they've got to an under

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>explored angle or an interesting narrative hook like that. That tenacity,

0:15:11.120 --> 0:15:15.000
<v Speaker 1>it has been a revelation for me coming from advertising. Um.

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, UM, it is good to have.

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you talked about that enough, by the way, Yeah,

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that when you kind of go into these meetings.

0:15:24.520 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, for anybody who has a studio, everybody talks

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about we have the pipes, we have the scale, we're

0:15:29.160 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>built into X, Y and Z network. But actually coming

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.040
<v Speaker 1>at it, that's a point of differentiation in comparison to

0:15:36.080 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>a creative agency. Right, you're selling this is a commercial

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>but this is a commercial company you've got And and

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:43.880
<v Speaker 1>to that point though, that's one of the promises that

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.400
<v Speaker 1>I make to the journalists who do come over and

0:15:47.400 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and work with me and concentrate on brands, is you know,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>you give me a few years of your time and

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>I will in turn make you kind of fluent, commercially

0:15:59.360 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>fluent right, like tell you how to market and how

0:16:02.120 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 1>to market yourself, and which in today's business isn't essential,

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it's absolutely crucial. I mean, if you've got a passion

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>project you want to extract money from somebody in order

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:15.200
<v Speaker 1>to realize you'll create a vision, chances are you're gonna

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 1>have to walk into a room and present and and

0:16:18.560 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>know how to lay out an argument and and explain

0:16:20.920 --> 0:16:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to a financier or somebody who's commissioning a project, why,

0:16:24.360 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>why you deserve it. I always thought it was fascinating

0:16:26.480 --> 0:16:29.960
<v Speaker 1>that j school and business school were separate tracks. Yeah,

0:16:30.040 --> 0:16:31.600
<v Speaker 1>because at the end of the day, there's really a

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 1>need for at least the business school angle to live

0:16:34.000 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>within journalism. It was interesting in yeah, the Oscars this weekend,

0:16:38.600 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Francis McDorman is saying, finance our films. Yeah,

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you've got to go out, you know, you need to

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>go out and know how to sell your work. What

0:16:46.240 --> 0:16:51.680
<v Speaker 1>is the difference between advertising and branded content anymore? Or

0:16:51.720 --> 0:16:54.480
<v Speaker 1>how are you actually are you putting a line in

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the sand? Do we need to anymore? Is that funny?

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 1>There's that good two thousand one wasn't at Seth Godin

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 1>said Content Marketing is all the marketing that's left. I

0:17:06.320 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think we're there yet. I think

0:17:09.080 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>TV is still pretty powerful. I would say that, though,

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't I work at and then look, I think the

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 1>idea of of a value exchange, but to me, that's

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:23.640
<v Speaker 1>always informed good marketing as well. So you know how

0:17:23.720 --> 0:17:28.000
<v Speaker 1>much of this is new? I don't know. Theoretically not much,

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but in practice, in the articulation, in the expression of it,

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>we are definitely living in a different time than we

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.679
<v Speaker 1>were even five years ago. The output, when you think

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 1>about the traditional thirty and sixty, is focused on the brand. Correct,

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.919
<v Speaker 1>When you think about the output of branded content in

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 1>the sense in which the three of us are talking

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:46.879
<v Speaker 1>about it, the value and the focus is on the

0:17:46.880 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>consumer and protecting that experience and making it hopefully a

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:54.560
<v Speaker 1>symbiotic relationship in the context of what they are watching.

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>And that's the fundamental difference. It's not a break in

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the content. It's additive to the content, but it's also

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>about the context of the brand. The context of how

0:18:03.760 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a brand shows up is so important and probably more

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.680
<v Speaker 1>important now to brands than it ever has been before. Right,

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And at the end, I go back to trumping your values.

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Our first episode just so you know, auto, you should

0:18:17.160 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>listen to it if you haven't already. Um, we talk

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:25.000
<v Speaker 1>about brands and and expressing their core values. I think

0:18:25.040 --> 0:18:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that content gives the ability. Good content gives the ability

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 1>for brands to both express their core values in context

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>of the consumer, and the consumer actually to interact with

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the brand in their own context. Right, So it's this

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:44.160
<v Speaker 1>two way. And and I think it was really interesting

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>as well, is that in what you say, oh, brands

0:18:47.480 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 1>expressing that cool values, that there a lot that scares

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people and like, oh, you're you're expecting

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.119
<v Speaker 1>me as a brand to take a stand and to

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.520
<v Speaker 1>wait into these That is not. No, you don't have

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to be divid iceive in order to take a stand,

0:19:01.480 --> 0:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and that's one of the great misconceptions, like what we

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>did on New Politics and purpose. And there's also a

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:10.360
<v Speaker 1>difference between taking a stand and having a perspective. It's

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 1>like having a pulse and being a corpse there. I mean, right,

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I didn't hear either one or the other. But there

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of moments out there, like like New Year's

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.679
<v Speaker 1>Like what I did that our first live ad was

0:19:23.680 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>around the eclipse. Yeah, that's great. But what was nice

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>about that is, alright, the country's and uproar, a lot

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.919
<v Speaker 1>of people taking sides, but on that day, everybody looking

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:38.240
<v Speaker 1>at the same moon, everybody united in this fabulous moment.

0:19:38.640 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Same thing with New Year's. Show me somebody who's not

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>hopeful for the New year on December one, you know,

0:19:46.119 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So there's plenty of it's talk to them January. Different purposes,

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>a very different thing of politics. Yeah. At a upfront

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years back, I remember Donna Special up

0:19:57.280 --> 0:20:01.639
<v Speaker 1>on stage talking about Turner moving away from frequency in

0:20:01.680 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the number of spots that they were putting in their

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>prime time programming and focusing on building longer pods to

0:20:06.720 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>allow for this narrative, this longer narrative which you call

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>natas plus within prout programs on T and G, TBS, etcetera.

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Interestingly enough, NBC came out just a few days ago

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:20.199
<v Speaker 1>and he said, we are going to be moving to

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:26.240
<v Speaker 1>fewer of them to protect our programming as well. Is

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:29.920
<v Speaker 1>there a trend to sort of protect the consumer experience

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>and does that change the difference between content versus commercial. Yeah,

0:20:35.040 --> 0:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of experimentation happening, and for

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>good reason, right. You know, the problem or one of

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the side effects of the rise in subscription models is

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:52.760
<v Speaker 1>that it accentuates the adverts that remain, the commercials that

0:20:52.840 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>remain in your life. When you have a a newspaper subscription,

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:59.959
<v Speaker 1>when you have a Spotify subscription, when you have Netflix subscription,

0:21:00.440 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 1>all of these things they exacerbate the commercials that are left.

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 1>They feel even more painful, they feel even more interruptive.

0:21:08.960 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, so you're right. The traditional broadcasters and cable nets,

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they are you are seeing them cut their their adload.

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:21.560
<v Speaker 1>NBC is is ten, you know, that's that's two cable

0:21:21.640 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>promos a sorry, two network promos per commercial break. We'll

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>get them to that target. So I think, honestly, I

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 1>think they I don't know if that's enough. You know,

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:36.720
<v Speaker 1>we did fourteen hours of commercial replacement last year, which

0:21:36.760 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>is where we put content like mine made by Courageous

0:21:40.040 --> 0:21:45.040
<v Speaker 1>into commercial pods and kicked out all those thirties and

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.320
<v Speaker 1>we did fourteen hours of that. So it's it's what

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 1>was the reaction for that. Some of them are holding

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the rating, which, as you know is is very depressive incredible,

0:21:55.200 --> 0:22:00.159
<v Speaker 1>so um, which, yeah, so more of that please, But

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that takes to take you know, we turned around an

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 1>oil tank. It it takes time. Is there a future

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>where brands start taking over and producing content themselves and

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe even more with editorial lens like what to you

0:22:12.160 --> 0:22:15.000
<v Speaker 1>is going to want sustain your business and grow it?

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:18.360
<v Speaker 1>And then what do you think we're like some interesting

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 1>pops or turns or swerves that you think may be

0:22:20.760 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>coming in the industry, Well, it's already happening. I mean,

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, did you guys see the Lego movie brought

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:31.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we brought it. We've brought this up. We

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:34.720
<v Speaker 1>brought them in in the documentary space, you know you

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>had that. But not every brand is going to make

0:22:36.800 --> 0:22:39.359
<v Speaker 1>a Lego movie like a full feature film, right, Yeah,

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 1>I agreed, But I think in the short term there's

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:46.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be a reckoning. Quite I agree, quite honestly. Well,

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.479
<v Speaker 1>I think you know a lot of these magazines with

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>websites are in trouble because because that the brand studio is,

0:22:55.040 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the cost of production is not commensurate with the ad

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>revenue that it generates. Right, they can't chuck. So you've

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.240
<v Speaker 1>got to there is a certain point where you've got

0:23:06.240 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>to have either an incredibly valuable audience or critical mass

0:23:11.600 --> 0:23:15.119
<v Speaker 1>in terms of distribution to sustain these kind of custom

0:23:15.160 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>content deals, right like if you know, so for some

0:23:21.359 --> 0:23:23.280
<v Speaker 1>what you're seeing is it's kind of like a death

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:26.960
<v Speaker 1>rattle of of print. And you know Facebook's algorithm change,

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:30.639
<v Speaker 1>They're only going to accelerate that as well. So I

0:23:30.640 --> 0:23:32.320
<v Speaker 1>think in the short term there'll be a reckoning. But

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.159
<v Speaker 1>long term, I think the future looks very bright for

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.480
<v Speaker 1>what we do. I think all the trade winds are,

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, pushing in our favor, and I think you

0:23:42.800 --> 0:23:45.360
<v Speaker 1>will see more and more commercial replacement. I think you'll

0:23:45.359 --> 0:23:51.119
<v Speaker 1>see more and more addressable UM custom content UM. And

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 1>I think it will be at the vanguard of a

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:56.400
<v Speaker 1>lot of these changes that we've been promised for so

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:01.640
<v Speaker 1>long UM, in terms of attribution models and and addressable

0:24:02.160 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 1>I think custom content will increasingly be bound up in

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>those discussions as the primary vehicle to get us to

0:24:09.880 --> 0:24:12.399
<v Speaker 1>that nirvana that you know, that future we've been promised

0:24:12.400 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>for so long. Do you see Courageous becoming the agency

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>of record for blue chip brands? UM? Yeah, yeah, I do,

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.080
<v Speaker 1>certainly entertainment agency of record UM. But then I also

0:24:24.119 --> 0:24:29.119
<v Speaker 1>think the ao R model is somewhat outdated you know,

0:24:29.359 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm quite happy. Like, look, I mean, I really pride

0:24:32.720 --> 0:24:36.760
<v Speaker 1>ourselves on our annuities. I think it's it's the way

0:24:36.760 --> 0:24:39.720
<v Speaker 1>that you build a sustainable business. I want Courageous to

0:24:39.720 --> 0:24:42.520
<v Speaker 1>be around twenty years from now, and I want people

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to look at it in the same way that they

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>look at Ogilviana resume and like that place is a

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:50.159
<v Speaker 1>great quality. Yeah, that's a great university for for what

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's a badge of come on in the

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:54.879
<v Speaker 1>water's warm kind of thing. But right now, would you

0:24:54.960 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>say that most brands are discovering you because they're coming

0:24:57.520 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in through the front door of CNN from a media

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>perspect to have our people coming in from the side

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 1>door looking for creative solutions. Now, the majority is it's

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:10.200
<v Speaker 1>coming through the UH, through the through the traditional media

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:14.480
<v Speaker 1>sells absolutely, I would say that, yeah, a slim majority.

0:25:14.840 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>What's it going to take for that to become a

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>standalone service? I'm not looking. I'm fine servicing media deals

0:25:24.280 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>at the moment. I don't have a um a big

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 1>interest in a white label production operation. There are plenty

0:25:31.160 --> 0:25:34.600
<v Speaker 1>of people. In fact, that's kind of a tough business

0:25:34.680 --> 0:25:37.160
<v Speaker 1>and increasingly is and I think it is going to

0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:40.240
<v Speaker 1>see its own degree of contraction as well. I mean,

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I feel very good about the production model today. That said,

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.199
<v Speaker 1>this whole thing is changing. Like if you don't if

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you don't like standing on a burning platform, you probably

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:54.919
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't be in marketing and advertising right now because it

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.719
<v Speaker 1>is changing day by day. But as of today, do

0:25:58.720 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you see courageous in And Tom, you kind of said

0:26:01.040 --> 0:26:02.720
<v Speaker 1>no to this, but I'm going to ask anyway, do

0:26:02.720 --> 0:26:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you see courageous inventing any new forms of media that

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:12.240
<v Speaker 1>are um, you know, based on specific content or I

0:26:12.400 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>P uniqueness. Yeah, I think one of the great revenue

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:24.080
<v Speaker 1>areas for us in the future is in some way

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.560
<v Speaker 1>or another. And we've had lots of conversations about it.

0:26:26.600 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>We haven't we haven't landed on exactly how best to

0:26:29.520 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>do this, but it is unignorable the fact that we

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>are generating so much I P on a daily basis.

0:26:37.920 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was in conversations like full stats, CNN,

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Great Big Story. These guys are churning out stories, headlines,

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:48.879
<v Speaker 1>investigative stories, feature reports. I mean, I was in a

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:54.480
<v Speaker 1>conversation recently with a competitor from a development team on

0:26:54.520 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>a cable company and he goes Oh yeah, My my

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.880
<v Speaker 1>staff might runs a development apart because they love Great

0:27:00.920 --> 0:27:03.159
<v Speaker 1>Big Story. Because they wake up every morning and the

0:27:03.200 --> 0:27:05.120
<v Speaker 1>first thing they do they check out Great Big Story

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>for ideas well, for ideas for them exactly. And I

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:11.560
<v Speaker 1>think that we should be doing a better job of

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:13.879
<v Speaker 1>harnessing that. And we've got a lot of people who've

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.520
<v Speaker 1>got great commercial instincts. You know, that's what we do

0:27:16.600 --> 0:27:19.879
<v Speaker 1>all day for our advertisers. So UM, I think we

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:22.960
<v Speaker 1>should um, you know that that that's that's one potential

0:27:23.000 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 1>area I think in which we can grow. Do you

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>see a brand ever buying courageous? Oh, I don't know,

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know. Again, let's see what

0:27:34.080 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>happens to the landscape in the marketplace. But right now

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's um, it's settled nicely, um where

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>it should be incided to turn a servicing, you know,

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:49.280
<v Speaker 1>working outwards. So it's time. It's time. We're going to

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 1>play our favorite games. You know this game she never

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:55.880
<v Speaker 1>told you No, I didn't tell him. I was creative.

0:27:55.920 --> 0:27:58.439
<v Speaker 1>He can come up with something on the spot. So

0:27:58.480 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we play our version of kill Fuck Mary, which is

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 1>called killed by d I, Y killed by d I y,

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 1>and it's what would you kill in the market? What

0:28:06.960 --> 0:28:10.840
<v Speaker 1>would you buy? And what would you do yourself? So

0:28:10.920 --> 0:28:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what would you kill? What would you kill?

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:20.639
<v Speaker 1>I would kill um lazy p s A s All right,

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:22.679
<v Speaker 1>don't you give us an example? Well, you know, you

0:28:22.720 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of them. Taxi TV is like a

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:28.879
<v Speaker 1>nest of bad p s A. You know, it's always

0:28:28.920 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>like or a brilliant revenue stream strategy. Oh yeah, no,

0:28:32.760 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 1>don't get me wrong. The business model is fantastic. I

0:28:34.800 --> 0:28:37.919
<v Speaker 1>just mean the content. You know, whenever you see it's

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 1>always a celeb holding a sign in front of like

0:28:40.520 --> 0:28:44.880
<v Speaker 1>a white psych and then it's like written signs exactly

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and then they prayed twenty of them out and that's

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>supposed to have a real impact on you. I think

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 1>there's just that whole industry can be so much more powerful,

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and they, I don't know, they just let themselves down sometimes.

0:28:56.840 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I would really want to improve the state of p

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>s as generally Like that, What was the next one?

0:29:03.600 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>What would you buy? What I buy? It would have

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to be some kind of proprietary technology, because you know,

0:29:13.360 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 1>buying like a VR company or an influencer network. I

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>mean those are all things. You can hire somebody to

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:22.680
<v Speaker 1>do that and you don't have to pay a premium.

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>So what tech like would change your life? Embedded branchips.

0:29:26.200 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's got to be something like that. It's

0:29:28.560 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>got to be something. It's gotta be, you know, maybe

0:29:32.080 --> 0:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>something voice driven right now, but something is something really like,

0:29:39.000 --> 0:29:43.600
<v Speaker 1>something that is proprietary where you're not just buying It

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>would be three small people who I don't know, something

0:29:46.680 --> 0:29:50.680
<v Speaker 1>like that, something like some kind of next um, some

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of frightening delivery system. Right like, so you're still

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.560
<v Speaker 1>black mirror, like you really want to be black mire

0:29:58.520 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 1>And what would you do yourself? Something you've seen in

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:02.280
<v Speaker 1>the market that you're like, I could have done this better,

0:30:02.640 --> 0:30:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the auto bell way um experiential I we've we've dipped

0:30:08.640 --> 0:30:12.240
<v Speaker 1>our toe into a few, you know, tad like events.

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Everything a tadlike event because it's the easiest shorthand like

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the monika for it. It's just it's just a way

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:23.280
<v Speaker 1>for people to But even that, I think that format

0:30:23.880 --> 0:30:28.040
<v Speaker 1>is right for overhaul as well. I just think blending.

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I think well, I think events are a really efficient

0:30:30.760 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>way to harvest a great deal of reusable content. Generally,

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I think they're fantastic for that. And you know, in

0:30:37.720 --> 0:30:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a day you can get eight hours of content which

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you can dice up and and and put out into

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:48.240
<v Speaker 1>the world. But the actual occasion itself, properly scheduling that,

0:30:48.560 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>properly um curating it so that you've got everything from

0:30:54.400 --> 0:31:00.640
<v Speaker 1>music to food to insightful human stories. You know, no, please, really,

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I think we've all been to those conferences held by banks,

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>held by management consultancies, held by our agencies, and they

0:31:10.520 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>they they're not that interactive, they're not that varied. You know,

0:31:14.760 --> 0:31:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot to you guys do that at the

0:31:17.640 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>upfront this year. Maybe that's uh, yeah, yeah, have an idea, Yeah,

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a little a little bit close maybe maybe nineteen Yeah, okay, wait,

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.800
<v Speaker 1>one more question. Sorry, what thing? Whether it's some kind

0:31:34.800 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of physical art piece, um, audio things some band er into,

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Like what are you jamming on right now? I got

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I got my new new film project coming out. We

0:31:45.000 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 1>just got financing for that. I can't talk about the

0:31:47.280 --> 0:31:52.160
<v Speaker 1>subject matter, but it's um, it's it's gonna be uh,

0:31:52.280 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a doozy. It's going to be a

0:31:53.920 --> 0:31:55.959
<v Speaker 1>hell of a film. So I'm very excited about that.

0:31:56.200 --> 0:31:59.560
<v Speaker 1>And and you know the full feature film. Yeah, yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:31:59.560 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>that's what going for a cinematic feature documentary. All right,

0:32:02.960 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Otto Bell, always a pleasure. People want to get ahold

0:32:05.560 --> 0:32:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of you? How do they do it? Also Dot Bell

0:32:08.560 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>at Turner dot com. Thank you Auto again. I don't

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:18.520
<v Speaker 1>think I've seen Auto for a few years now, so

0:32:18.560 --> 0:32:20.360
<v Speaker 1>it's nice for me to see Auto. You've been working

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>with him, Yeah, he's He's tremendous, and it's really fun

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>to watch them sort of differentiate themselves in the market,

0:32:26.400 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and which is a very competitive space right now, super competitive.

0:32:29.240 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And I liked, Actually, I liked the honest answer. Everyone

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>says this part of it. Everyone says, like, Okay, we

0:32:35.080 --> 0:32:37.280
<v Speaker 1>all know there's a little bit of a doomsday coming

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for like content studios and branded content in media companies.

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>And he said that. But what I liked was a

0:32:45.040 --> 0:32:47.480
<v Speaker 1>very honest response of like, this is a tough game,

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>right and so I'm going to get the best people,

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:54.560
<v Speaker 1>and I'm very comfortable being a part of the media

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:58.520
<v Speaker 1>company that I have, and right now they're good with that. Right.

0:32:58.560 --> 0:33:00.760
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't looking to white label his Lucian. He wasn't

0:33:00.760 --> 0:33:03.920
<v Speaker 1>looking to spin off and become a standalone creative shop.

0:33:03.960 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>He was very comfortable playing in the space knowing what

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>a network like Turner brings the space, and that's quality content,

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that's global pipes, that's differentiated. You know, I p in

0:33:16.000 --> 0:33:18.480
<v Speaker 1>the market UM, and it's interesting. I think that they're

0:33:18.520 --> 0:33:21.480
<v Speaker 1>just getting started and I'm really excited to see where

0:33:21.520 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>they had next. One thing that I think that Turner

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>has that a lot of people don't have. A lot

0:33:25.800 --> 0:33:28.240
<v Speaker 1>of media companies don't have is the ability to be

0:33:28.480 --> 0:33:32.240
<v Speaker 1>live anywhere, kind of in a minute, in a second.

0:33:33.200 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>And you guys prove that out with some of the

0:33:34.800 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it took work, but and and pre planning,

0:33:38.600 --> 0:33:40.560
<v Speaker 1>but you proved that out with a live ad you

0:33:40.560 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 1>guys did with Mass Mutual. I would love to see

0:33:43.760 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 1>programming where brands come in and actually do programming with

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 1>them like that, but it's it's commercial, and I think

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>people would watch it if it was great programming. Totally.

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.719
<v Speaker 1>The biggest takeaway I took was um the idea of

0:33:56.200 --> 0:34:00.840
<v Speaker 1>interspersing journalists and people with strict editorial background owns in

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 1>the branded content space, and that's something I'll take away

0:34:03.120 --> 0:34:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and start thinking about how we incorporate that in the

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.480
<v Speaker 1>agency model because it's not a skill set I think

0:34:08.520 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 1>many people are looking for. And until he said it,

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I didn't really kind of connect the dots around the

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>rigor and fact checking and um looking for what he

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:22.400
<v Speaker 1>said a different way in and an angle that And

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's one of those things that has been

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>um un merchandised as when it comes to branded studios.

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that like to that point, and one of

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the big things on the marketer side that's like boggles

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>my mind is like, do we actually expect our creatives,

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:41.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's at a branded studio or content studio, an agency,

0:34:41.760 --> 0:34:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a media company, to actually give us really rich and

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>phenomenal stories, right, and content and ideas when we're doing

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:53.200
<v Speaker 1>it in a fucking one page briefright. So with that,

0:34:53.520 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you, Cameron Drews. Are all our friends and family

0:34:56.000 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>at Panoply, met turk Andy Bowers, Jacob Weisberg. We will

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:01.919
<v Speaker 1>be back in two weeks after south By coming back

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>at your atland. Yeah see out there y'all. Mm full disclosure.

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Our opinions are our own. Who do you think outside

0:35:19.080 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of courageous because you of course they're going to say courageous, Like,

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:24.240
<v Speaker 1>who do you think is actually producing the best content

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the Bronze studios or just in general. I mean you're

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>going to say, like the BBC because you're British. What

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>am I enjoying right now? I think the New Times

0:35:38.560 --> 0:35:44.680
<v Speaker 1>do a great job, you know, I think, UM, I

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:49.480
<v Speaker 1>think Anonymous is the kind of company that Anonymous and

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:52.759
<v Speaker 1>what Patrick milling Smith is doing with Smuggler, those are

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of companies that I you know, that I

0:35:56.520 --> 0:36:01.880
<v Speaker 1>would aspire to to. I mean, with Courageous, those are

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:05.000
<v Speaker 1>like but those are like production companies. Well they well

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.720
<v Speaker 1>they're diversified, you know, like like they have a bedrock

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of a commercial business. Radicals another great example of this.

0:36:12.400 --> 0:36:15.439
<v Speaker 1>Um they've got a bedrock of commercial business which does

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:19.279
<v Speaker 1>very well, world class work. But then you look at

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.360
<v Speaker 1>them and they're diversified, and they have been from diversified

0:36:22.440 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>into like editorial Broadway. Yeah, yeah, I mean Anonymous, You've

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 1>got an Oscar winning studio, UM, Patrick's got VR and

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:35.759
<v Speaker 1>and Broadway going very nicely. Radical or obviously you know

0:36:35.800 --> 0:36:37.920
<v Speaker 1>it must be one of the top five producers for

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Netflix at this point, Like UM, there are great opportunities,

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 1>and I think my point is this, like I would

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like to grow a business where it is totally format agnostic,

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>right like where the medium or the story dictates the

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:59.440
<v Speaker 1>medium and the channel. We're getting there. One of the

0:36:59.480 --> 0:37:01.239
<v Speaker 1>nice things of out being at CNN is I can

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>play this game a little bit. I've got two TV stations,

0:37:04.080 --> 0:37:07.360
<v Speaker 1>we've got an international network, we've got the airport network,

0:37:07.360 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we've got a Snapchat channel, weve got V O D,

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:11.600
<v Speaker 1>we've got O T T, we've got biggest social handle

0:37:11.640 --> 0:37:16.359
<v Speaker 1>and us. What that equates to is a channel agnostic

0:37:16.920 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of approach whereby you tell me your problem as

0:37:20.520 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a brand channel challenge exactly, and I'll build you an event,

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 1>or I'll build you a TV show, or I'll build

0:37:26.800 --> 0:37:28.839
<v Speaker 1>you a short form film series, or I'll put all

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of those things together working in concert. So I'd love

0:37:32.520 --> 0:37:36.320
<v Speaker 1>to get to that, um, you know, even outside the

0:37:36.360 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>commercial realm marketing. Yeah, and STELLF financing marketing and financing

0:37:42.560 --> 0:37:45.279
<v Speaker 1>and that that's that's the that's the utopia. You know.

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:48.200
<v Speaker 1>I've done it a couple of times in my career.

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Literally