WEBVTT - Week 10 NFL Best Bets (Ep. 64)

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Hey, everybody, welcome back to another episode of the Betting

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 1>Pros NFL Podcast. I'm your host, Dan Harris. With me,

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.079
<v Speaker 1>of course, is Matt Parral. You can find us on

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Dan Harris Adian at Sports Talk. Matt, Matt,

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>how are you on this fine Thursday evening.

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm rolling up my sleeves as we speak. Let's get

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:34.720
<v Speaker 2>to work here. We need to go, all right, I

0:00:35.000 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>I this week sucks. That means we're gonna have a

0:00:37.920 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 2>great week.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god. I was legitimately thinking the same thing.

0:00:41.240 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I felt pretty good about the last couple of weeks,

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and we have just kind of been treading water and

0:00:45.800 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit under treading water where we need to go,

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:50.640
<v Speaker 1>and now I feel terrible about it. So I'm ready

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to just go.

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:51.600
<v Speaker 2>Fine O.

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:55.240
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do our usual PSAs before we recap

0:00:55.320 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>last week, can get into this week's games discord? Of course,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt on how many we're like pushing a thousand.

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 2>At this point one thousand. We're about nine to fifty

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:05.520
<v Speaker 2>right now for people who are on it. I mean

0:01:05.800 --> 0:01:08.120
<v Speaker 2>during football games, we're approaching you know, two fifty three

0:01:08.200 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 2>hundred people at a time that are on it. It's

0:01:10.560 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 2>really cool because I figured out a feature that when

0:01:13.120 --> 0:01:17.039
<v Speaker 2>I play prop bets, there's an at everyone features and

0:01:17.120 --> 0:01:19.679
<v Speaker 2>I can send it out to everyone so everyone sees

0:01:19.760 --> 0:01:21.720
<v Speaker 2>the ads that they make, which I found that to

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 2>be incredibly cool last night.

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.039
<v Speaker 1>So I'm aware because I've seen them them up and

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:28.039
<v Speaker 1>I've been like, wait, what's going on. Is Matt trying

0:01:28.040 --> 0:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>to talk to me?

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh?

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>No, He's just telling everyone in our Discord channel that

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:34.120
<v Speaker 1>he's got a prop bet, which is great. I actually

0:01:34.120 --> 0:01:37.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a great idea because as you know, sometimes I'm

0:01:37.040 --> 0:01:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the worst person ever. You guys know, I do a

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>ton of fantasy, especially on Sunday mornings. Sometimes I am

0:01:42.200 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>too late and I don't get my props into Matt.

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.080
<v Speaker 1>So worst comes to worse, I'll put on Discord now

0:01:46.240 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>at everyone, so everybody knows that if I don't get

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 1>it to Matt by the time he does his YouTube

0:01:50.760 --> 0:01:53.360
<v Speaker 1>stream at YouTube dot com slash Betting Pros but anyway,

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the best you can go to join our Discord Bettingpros

0:01:56.160 --> 0:01:57.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash chat. We are also giving away an

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>AJ Brown helmet so you can get assigned helmet team

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>get that as well. Again, Betting Pros dot com slash chat. Second,

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.560
<v Speaker 1>our prop bet cheat cheap bettingpros dot com slash props

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:12.679
<v Speaker 1>consider compare consensus projections to the available props in the market. Again,

0:02:12.680 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 1>we're still tweaking it. We're still getting it up to

0:02:14.360 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>day and everything like that. But you can go check

0:02:16.040 --> 0:02:18.399
<v Speaker 1>it out offer some good ones, all right. So let's

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:20.399
<v Speaker 1>get to every game on this weekend. First, the three cap.

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Last weeks, once again we have gone three and two.

0:02:23.520 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>We went three and two for like six weeks straight.

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Now we're two and three and back to back weeks.

0:02:26.960 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe we are now twenty what is it, twenty

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>three and twenty two. I believe overall we're one game up,

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever it is. Fifty one point one percent hit on

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.080
<v Speaker 1>the Ravens lank two and a half to the Culture,

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:40.400
<v Speaker 1>which is a game that I liked that we switched

0:02:40.440 --> 0:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>in thankfully for the Chiefs game that we had settled

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>on last week. And we also liked the Saints getting

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:48.600
<v Speaker 1>four and a half from the Bucks, which we hit on,

0:02:48.840 --> 0:02:50.679
<v Speaker 1>but we missed on the Seahawks getting two and a

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>half from the Bills. The Bills are like, you know,

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:55.600
<v Speaker 1>our kryptonite or Matts kryptonite, that's for sure.

0:02:56.000 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 2>The court trill, who I made good money on the

0:02:58.560 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 2>bills betting its bills this year.

0:02:59.840 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>That's fair, that's fair, I bet. I just mean you

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:06.120
<v Speaker 1>hate them. I bet cards, the cards laying four and

0:03:06.160 --> 0:03:08.919
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Dolphins and the pass lank seven

0:03:08.919 --> 0:03:10.840
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Jet's goodness, gracious, we're not even

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:13.200
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about that Monday night game. So wait, three

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>eighty fourth out of six eighty nine. We've got ways

0:03:16.160 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to go, but not in any way out of it

0:03:18.760 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 1>at all. At this point. We've got plenty of time

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 1>to catch up, but we've got to get going now.

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.919
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna take a big week or two or three.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:28.920
<v Speaker 1>So let's get started right now with a week that

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.119
<v Speaker 1>I hate, which you hate, which we're gonna go five

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and oh so start us off. What's your number one pick?

0:03:33.520 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 2>All right? So I'm going to I went through and

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I tried to kind of game theory based upon the

0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:44.800
<v Speaker 2>numbers for DraftKings. Okay, and so I have been getting

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:46.760
<v Speaker 2>caught because now that I'm in the West Gate and

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm in the DraftKings and I'm in the Circa, these

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 2>numbers matter right at this point in the year, there's

0:03:52.760 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 2>enough algorithms, there's enough information out there where the lines

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:58.040
<v Speaker 2>can be very very sharp. This is where it gets

0:03:58.120 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 2>very difficult. This is when the public loses their sh

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 2>shirt from this week, Week ten on the NFL's very hard.

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.480
<v Speaker 2>So when there's line discrepancies, I'm gonna be those are

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 2>going to raise red flags to me. So the bucks

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 2>are four and a half in our contest, yep, they

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.800
<v Speaker 2>are five and a half six in climbing as we

0:04:16.920 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 2>roll here. I'm not saying it's a bad idea if

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 2>you get to seven or six and a half to

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.640
<v Speaker 2>take the Panthers here plus the points. But in our

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 2>contest it's four and a half. It's below my hated five.

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a bounce back spot. And I believe the Panthers

0:04:32.480 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 2>decided that they wanted to beat the Chiefs so badly

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:37.800
<v Speaker 2>that they would go and do anything to have the

0:04:37.880 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 2>scalp that they could run around and say, Matt rule

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:42.719
<v Speaker 2>a year one beat the defending champs on the road

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 2>because Christian McCaffrey should have been on a pitch count

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:48.159
<v Speaker 2>last week. He wasn't. They forced in the ball so

0:04:48.279 --> 0:04:50.679
<v Speaker 2>much that they got him hurt. So now that after

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.359
<v Speaker 2>changing their offense to fit in McCaffrey, they got to

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 2>go back to having him not be there. I know

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 2>that Bridgewater is a cover machine, but that pathetic effort

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 2>by the They're gonna turn things around this week. I

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:05.839
<v Speaker 2>like the Bucks even on the road to lay it

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:07.720
<v Speaker 2>down on the Panthers. I'm gonna lay the four and

0:05:07.760 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 2>a half tampamize four and a half.

0:05:09.800 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>Far and away, my number one pick, Far and away,

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.599
<v Speaker 1>like maybe the only game that I really was like, yep,

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>this is one I absolutely want. I mean, if I'm

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 1>if I'm poking a hole in it. It's just that

0:05:22.480 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Teddy Bridgewater covers. Teddy Bridgewater is the cover machine. It

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.359
<v Speaker 1>is what he does. But it just doesn't matter to me.

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>You buying low on the Bucks after that embarrassing performance.

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Tom Brady off a loss he usually covers. As you

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>mentioned about McCaffrey, he's out for this game. It's gonna

0:05:38.440 --> 0:05:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be Mike Davis, who again it played really well for

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>several games, but then he wore down. He played kind

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of poorly the last three games. So that this is

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>this is no brainer to me, absolutely at four and

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a half. And you're right that the spread is rising

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and that that that's a great point, Matt. When do

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the lines lock at the Circa and and the.

0:05:56.640 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Other one when they come out, I mean basically either

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Wednesday or third day. It's on COVID problems. So if

0:06:01.480 --> 0:06:04.599
<v Speaker 2>big COVID issues Circa and Westgate can they can hold

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 2>on to it. Sometimes I find out exactly who's playing,

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.320
<v Speaker 2>but mostly it's Wednesday or Wednesday afternoon Thursday, same time

0:06:11.360 --> 0:06:14.400
<v Speaker 2>as the DraftKings. There's just different. There's discrepancies in the

0:06:14.480 --> 0:06:17.359
<v Speaker 2>numbers that are quite glaring. Like in the circle of

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 2>this it's five and a half, so it's four and

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>a half. We're getting extra point here.

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, there's no brainer. On our bed analyzer, it's this

0:06:25.080 --> 0:06:27.560
<v Speaker 1>spread right now is the consensus sign is minus six,

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's still overwhelmingly on the bucks.

0:06:30.560 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 2>I think seven. You may talk me into the Panthers,

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:33.840
<v Speaker 2>but four and a half I'm taking tap.

0:06:33.920 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, four and a half without that, Okay, So maybe

0:06:36.720 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 1>we will agree. I'm coming in here, Matt, and I'm

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 1>expecting us not to really agree on all of these

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.600
<v Speaker 1>just because it's so ugly, but you might given the

0:06:44.640 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>way your preface to this entire week, which is where

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:52.120
<v Speaker 1>the public's gonna lose their shirt. Maybe you won't hate

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.039
<v Speaker 1>all of these. I really don't know. Let me see

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>which one I wanted to start with here. Okay, I'll

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 1>get one which think you'll like, but we'll see about it.

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>The forty nine Ers getting nine and a half from

0:07:02.839 --> 0:07:05.440
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. So here here's number one. I think the

0:07:05.480 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Saints are going to be a very public play, if

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 1>for no other reason, then of course, the very classic.

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:13.720
<v Speaker 1>They absolutely destroyed the Bucks and the forty nine Ers

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>look like perhaps the worst team in football on Thursday night. Now,

0:07:17.760 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I realize you don't have Jimmy Garoppolo. I realize you

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have George Kittle, But Kyle Shannan is a fantastic coach.

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>He is going to figure out a way to improve

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the offense. You're gonna get at least Brandon aiyuk back.

0:07:30.480 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Sounds like maybe Deebo Samuel will need another week. The

0:07:33.240 --> 0:07:35.080
<v Speaker 1>running backs are gonna need another week? Which are I mean?

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Kiinnon is fine if it gets to work. I think

0:07:37.320 --> 0:07:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Kendrick Bourne, who's currently on the COVID list, is probably

0:07:39.920 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to come off. And again, this just

0:07:42.160 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as a very huge overreaction to what happened

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:51.000
<v Speaker 1>last week, so I'd love it if it were a ten.

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Spreads actually down to nine in our consensus lines, and

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the people in our bed on liies are leaning towards

0:07:56.400 --> 0:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the Saints. But it's ugly, But I like forty nine

0:07:58.960 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>ers getting nine and a half. Here.

0:08:00.040 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 2>You could pick all the boards one game, but this

0:08:02.400 --> 0:08:03.360
<v Speaker 2>is the game you're choosing.

0:08:03.600 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's correct, right.

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 2>You want to bet on a backup quarterback, back up,

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:13.200
<v Speaker 2>running back, back up, backup, offensive line, backup, backup, defensive line, backup, secondary,

0:08:13.240 --> 0:08:15.120
<v Speaker 2>and this is the pick against a team that just

0:08:15.200 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 2>whipped and looked amazing against the Bucks.

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh do so? I'm sorry, Just to be clear, are

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we supposed to be like wow, that team just absolutely

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 1>destroyed the Bucks after, by the way, nearly losing to

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the Bears the Bears, Like, let I'm not overreacting to

0:08:31.440 --> 0:08:33.440
<v Speaker 1>a week. This is what I said. I knew you

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.160
<v Speaker 1>were going to hate this pack. I almost I tell

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>you said the public, I'm going to be the most

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>will the best line.

0:08:39.640 --> 0:08:41.959
<v Speaker 2>I'm willing. I'm willing to listen to it.

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead.

0:08:42.600 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I wouldn't listen to it and put it in

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 2>the maybe category. I'm just saying, of all that you

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 2>have the board to play with the board.

0:08:49.480 --> 0:08:52.280
<v Speaker 1>This is how every pick is ugly, Matt, every pick

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>is ugly this week. But yes, let me tell you,

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:56.400
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the public split is going to

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>be on this game? What do you think the public well,

0:08:58.320 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>how much.

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 2>I think it'll get to ten and then I mean,

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 2>I think it just depends on how high the line

0:09:02.720 --> 0:09:05.760
<v Speaker 2>will go. I think if we get over eleven or twelve,

0:09:05.760 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I think you'll see buy back.

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>But I think you're gonna see by I think I

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>think what you're gonna see. And I could be wrong.

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.400
<v Speaker 1>And you, you, frankly, you, because you've been out there

0:09:14.480 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 1>so much, you have so much great insight, you understand

0:09:17.080 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 1>it more. I think there's gonna be a ton of

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>public play on the Saints this week, and I don't

0:09:22.240 --> 0:09:23.120
<v Speaker 1>think that line's well.

0:09:23.120 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 2>I think on the East Coast. You gotta remember that

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.719
<v Speaker 2>in Vegas we have a lot of California people, So

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:30.800
<v Speaker 2>that tend that tends to keep the California team's lines

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:32.760
<v Speaker 2>to be a little bit in check. Yep, because if

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:34.679
<v Speaker 2>you go double digits, just people here in Vegas are

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:36.200
<v Speaker 2>smart enough and they're from California. A lot of them.

0:09:36.240 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 2>They're going, you know what, the Niners are gonna keep

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:39.920
<v Speaker 2>the game close. But my problem is they're gonna have

0:09:39.920 --> 0:09:42.160
<v Speaker 2>to run the football, and I think that's the one

0:09:42.200 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 2>thing the Saints actually do a good job of stopping.

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 1>They do so they do they do. I agree, but

0:09:47.000 --> 0:09:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna give this team off a nationally

0:09:51.480 --> 0:09:56.440
<v Speaker 1>televised just absolute chi lacking where they didn't have any man.

0:09:56.480 --> 0:10:00.440
<v Speaker 1>I do fantasy football for a living and I barely

0:10:00.960 --> 0:10:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I could pick Richie James out of a lineup who

0:10:03.360 --> 0:10:05.760
<v Speaker 1>had one hundred and seventy yards right and the TOUCHDOWN'M like,

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that's what they were looking at. I uk is a

0:10:08.040 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>huge get to have back, as is I expect Kendrick Bourne,

0:10:13.280 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>who I know people look here, but it's fine. Look,

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>there was one game this week that I was going

0:10:18.240 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>to push and it was the Bucks. That's the only

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>one I was going to basically lie in the mat for.

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>There are no other games. So trust me. The fact

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 1>that I chose this game next, it was only because

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>I was like, with this, maybe fits into Matt's narrative,

0:10:29.040 --> 0:10:30.880
<v Speaker 1>maybe he'll go for it, So go ahead to your

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>next one.

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 2>Just it's just ugly, Okay, so my next one is

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.199
<v Speaker 2>a number that I would prefer to go down to three,

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 2>But it's three and a half for our contest, and

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:43.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't I don't hate it at three and a half. Again,

0:10:43.840 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 2>I would preferred to three. But I think the Houston

0:10:46.360 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 2>Texans are done. And I think if you look at

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:52.720
<v Speaker 2>the weather, okay, so this is what it's gonna be bad,

0:10:53.120 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 2>windy again, nasty and cold, okay, which is not Houston

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 2>Texans weather. Ye not. You can't fill the ball deep again, Okay.

0:10:59.679 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 2>So the same logic that we took this took the

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 2>Raiders to beat the Browns is the same logic. I'm

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 2>taking the Browns to win here because you're gonna get

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 2>Nick Chubb back, looks like. So you have two running

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 2>backs that are decent, and I don't think David Johnson's

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 2>questionable for this game for the Texans, I don't think

0:11:15.040 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 2>they can run the football all that well, I don't.

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Deshaun Watson might be their best running back

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 2>in this game.

0:11:20.280 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>I just think give Duke Johnson some credit. Matt Duke

0:11:23.640 --> 0:11:25.760
<v Speaker 1>Johnson is fine, okay, perfectly.

0:11:25.760 --> 0:11:28.960
<v Speaker 2>He's not gonna beat the brown by himself on the road, Okay,

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:32.439
<v Speaker 2>three out of that rather the three. But Cleveland minus

0:11:32.480 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 2>three and a half, I think from a pick play

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 2>I don't know if I'll bet it. I might bet it,

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 2>But from a pick play perspective, I like Cleveland to

0:11:38.679 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 2>cover that three and a half point line.

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm on the other side. I'm on the other side.

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I'm not gonna be The Texans play a two

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 2>and six football team.

0:11:45.960 --> 0:11:49.719
<v Speaker 1>Explain this to me, Okay, we like I mean, DVOA

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is not the be all and all right of teams,

0:11:53.559 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 1>of course, but it's Aguell. The Texans are a better

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>team by DVOA than the Browns. I don't think the

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Browns are really that good of a football team here, Matt,

0:12:02.640 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>especially when you're without Odell Beckham junior. Now, I get

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna get Chubb back, They're gonna be able to

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>run the ball. Absolutely, But again, if this were.

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 2>You believe in DVOA, then then you know that the

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:14.640
<v Speaker 2>rushing defense for the Texans is one of the worst

0:12:14.679 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 2>in the whole.

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Fact that the Browns can run on anybody. But I

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:19.200
<v Speaker 1>agree they're gonna run the Raiders.

0:12:19.240 --> 0:12:21.000
<v Speaker 2>That's why I put the Raiders. They couldn't run on

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:21.360
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders.

0:12:21.400 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>All right, that's fair. But with Chubb, who I do

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:25.840
<v Speaker 1>expect to be back here, they're gonna be able to

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>run with him and hunt. No Beckham, I think is

0:12:28.840 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a bigger loss than kind of weird, fully.

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 2>Right, But in this weather condition, he wouldn't be a

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 2>factor anyway.

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I I first of all, as far as I

0:12:37.760 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>can tell, Matt, and you tell me what's the exact forecast,

0:12:40.520 --> 0:12:41.160
<v Speaker 1>because this is.

0:12:41.080 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Not wins okay, which is the biggest issue of anything

0:12:44.800 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to Yeah, it's gonna be cold, it's

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.520
<v Speaker 2>gonna be windy, it's gonna be like the same weather

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 2>conditions as the last time the rate we talked about

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 2>the Browns with the Raiders, and we were all over

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:56.600
<v Speaker 2>the Raiders and we won that game out right, sixteen

0:12:56.640 --> 0:12:59.080
<v Speaker 2>to six. So I think the under is in play

0:12:59.120 --> 0:13:01.080
<v Speaker 2>in this game major But and I think with the

0:13:01.120 --> 0:13:03.280
<v Speaker 2>under in play, that favors the Browns.

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I just don't. I don't know, man. And you

0:13:07.679 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 1>know what's funny. You know what's funny, Matt, And it's

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>if people listening to this, I don't know if they

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:14.080
<v Speaker 1>listen to our fantasy podcast. We did a DFS show

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>today with Chris Rabahn of the Action Network. Do you know, Chris, Yeah,

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:20.559
<v Speaker 1>of course this is great. Legitimately, Matt, this was both

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>of our like one of our better picks on the board.

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>It randomly came up because we were talking about fantasy

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and he was like, I like the Texans getting three

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:28.679
<v Speaker 1>and a half. And I was like, yes, I'm gonna

0:13:28.760 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>use this when I talk about it with Matt Barral

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.079
<v Speaker 1>on our show today. The fact that Chris also likes

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:36.160
<v Speaker 1>them against them, I don't know, man. I think this

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>is just gonna be a close game. I agree that

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the wind is gonna be bad. Deshaun Watson, though, can

0:13:40.280 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 1>run certainly. And I also I think Duke Johnson is

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:44.920
<v Speaker 1>just as good as David Johnson at this point in

0:13:44.960 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 1>his career. I realized that he's never been given the

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>rock to sort of do what he can do. But

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.360
<v Speaker 1>I do not I do not view this as a downgrad.

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>I think they can jump off the ball a lot.

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you're, you know, maybe, yeah, it's gonna hamper

0:13:56.400 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the constant deep shots, but you know, the Browns can't

0:13:59.200 --> 0:14:02.160
<v Speaker 1>stop the pass, you know, between Will Fuller and Brandon Cooks.

0:14:02.240 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I just view this as a very close game. If

0:14:04.040 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>it was under a field goal, I might go for it,

0:14:05.840 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>but with the hook. No, don't like it. I don't

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 1>like it. So we're off. We're off. This is an

0:14:09.960 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>ugly week, we know. Oh boy, you're gonna hate this one. Ready,

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>let's got your first one.

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I might read hit your second one.

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I had to think about it, Matt. My other one

0:14:18.360 --> 0:14:20.560
<v Speaker 1>that I was going to bring up instead of my

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>first one was the Texans getting three and four. So

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>you you see where we're all them. Let's actually see

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>where a bed analyzer has this one. I just want

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to know exactly where it is because it strikes me. Oh,

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>it is basically split. It's basically split at three and

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a half. It's fifty six percent in favor of Houston.

0:14:36.040 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I am one of that fifty six percent because I've

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>already put in my picker. Okay, you know what really

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:45.120
<v Speaker 1>feels like a great idea this week? Matt betting a

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 1>team that doesn't know how to win and cannot win

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:52.000
<v Speaker 1>a single game no matter what they do against the

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>team that's riding super super high after two giant wins.

0:14:56.480 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>And that is the charge where you're taking the charges

0:14:58.400 --> 0:14:59.400
<v Speaker 2>of the road to get the charger.

0:14:59.520 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>There is no, two and a half. There is no

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:03.560
<v Speaker 1>way from the Dolphins.

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 2>That it's not even worth having having this conversation right now.

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:12.560
<v Speaker 2>This is such a big problem for the Chargers when

0:15:12.600 --> 0:15:14.520
<v Speaker 2>it comes to going on the road on the East Coast.

0:15:14.600 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 2>And you could say, well, it's Anthony Lynn getting away

0:15:16.480 --> 0:15:18.000
<v Speaker 2>from the public, getting away from the media, and they

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 2>might be able to go and win a game like this,

0:15:19.840 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 2>But against that defense, I forget too, But forget against

0:15:23.800 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 2>that defense. Uh uh, that's a scary that's a scary game.

0:15:27.560 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 2>To go ahead. I love the Herbert you know, he

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:32.120
<v Speaker 2>wants to prove his draft pick against tu a Angle.

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.840
<v Speaker 2>I love all that. But that defense for the Dolphins

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:35.560
<v Speaker 2>is legitimate.

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:37.720
<v Speaker 1>The defense for the Dolphins is good. The defense for

0:15:37.760 --> 0:15:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the Dolphins is good, I agree, and you know, because

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>they're basically scoring defensive touch on stuff like that. But

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>they're not. I mean, first of all, Arizona should have

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.320
<v Speaker 1>won that game, you know, for many reasons, but they

0:15:48.360 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>outgained them significantly in yardage. I think the Dolphins have

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>defense scores.

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.480
<v Speaker 2>When you when you get a defensive score and back

0:15:55.520 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 2>to back weeks, you win most weeks like that's okay,

0:15:57.680 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 2>that's huge.

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Time are you are you thinking on a defensive score

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in the game.

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it I'm just saying it's possible. That's what. That's

0:16:06.240 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 2>why I'm scared of the game, because it's like, oh,

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:10.840
<v Speaker 2>I mean Herbert gets hit a lot. I mean he's

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:12.840
<v Speaker 2>under pressure. I think the number. I think he's like

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:14.760
<v Speaker 2>number three in the NFL right now in terms of

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.360
<v Speaker 2>passing under pressure. I mean, the dude is great, but

0:16:17.760 --> 0:16:20.320
<v Speaker 2>he gets pressure because his offensive line doesn't block anybody.

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, I understand. We to look without Preston Williams. Okay,

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 1>they've got DeVante Parker. I mean, Toua looked good to

0:16:28.680 --> 0:16:31.400
<v Speaker 1>be To be fair, he looked good. They rolled him

0:16:31.400 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 1>out of the pocket, they let him use his legs

0:16:33.080 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. That was good. I just don't think.

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:36.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they have no running backs. I don't know

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>which one of their fifty, you know, guy off the

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:41.600
<v Speaker 1>street running backs is gonna be running the ball. I

0:16:41.680 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>just don't trust them to be able to put up

0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.240
<v Speaker 1>a ton of points. And look, I'm not gonna I'm

0:16:45.240 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 1>not gonna stand up there again.

0:16:46.840 --> 0:16:48.640
<v Speaker 2>One. Dolphins are on my list, by the way, I

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:50.600
<v Speaker 2>have Dolphins myst two and a half on my line.

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Right Well, where we're off to a rocky start and

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>go to your next go to your next one. Hopefully

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>we find some games that were at least on the

0:16:55.880 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 1>same side.

0:16:56.400 --> 0:16:59.080
<v Speaker 2>Of Okay, I don't like this number, but I'm gonna

0:16:59.120 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 2>play it anyway. But because I think there's a chance

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.520
<v Speaker 2>they win the game outright, Big Ben's on schedule to

0:17:03.520 --> 0:17:05.919
<v Speaker 2>play for the Pittsburgh Steelers. That's great news for me.

0:17:06.080 --> 0:17:07.960
<v Speaker 2>I like the Bengals plus six and a half to

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:10.719
<v Speaker 2>potentially win this game outright. I think this is an

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 2>interesting matchup with the Bengals match up better.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And it's good news for you that Ben is gonna play.

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 2>Yes, Ben Roethlisberger is not playing well at all. His

0:17:18.760 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 2>number rat.

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>You think it's better for the Bengals if Ben plays

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 1>than Mason Rudolph.

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:24.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because I think in terms of the way that

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.120
<v Speaker 2>they'll approach the game, I think without with Rudolph, they'll

0:17:27.160 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 2>be more conservative, they'll run the football more, the defense

0:17:29.560 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 2>will know they have to play better. I just think

0:17:31.680 --> 0:17:34.160
<v Speaker 2>that this is a chance here for this. I think

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:36.680
<v Speaker 2>they could win the game outright, but if not, they'll

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.880
<v Speaker 2>keep the game close. I would prefer seven, but I'll

0:17:39.880 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 2>take the six and a half points and I'll take

0:17:41.560 --> 0:17:43.440
<v Speaker 2>the Bengals all right.

0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So I guess what I will say is, I don't

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:49.080
<v Speaker 1>despise this pick, like I'm not gonna I'm gonna put

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>on the maybe list for sure, and especially given where

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we are, it's probably getting in there. I would agree

0:17:55.600 --> 0:17:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that I would prefer it at seven. I do like

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:00.480
<v Speaker 1>faiting the Steelers because I don't think that the Steelers

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>are nearly as good as you know what they've shown now,

0:18:03.800 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>especially without Devin Bush. I don't think the defense like it.

0:18:06.080 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Although are they gonna have Williamson from the Jets. If

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:11.920
<v Speaker 1>he is, he's gonna help the defense. But yep, doesn't

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>matter to you if Mixing plays here, because it sounds

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:15.160
<v Speaker 1>like maybe he won't even off.

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:16.840
<v Speaker 2>The doesn't because I'm betting on Joe Burrow.

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, I mean it's I would like it at seven.

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I'd like it at seven, but I think I'm on

0:18:22.960 --> 0:18:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the right side.

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 2>I think that it's seven and every of the contest.

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:27.239
<v Speaker 2>That's why I pissed me off. I got back. I

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:28.960
<v Speaker 2>was like, it's seven in both the Circa and in

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.880
<v Speaker 2>the Westgates seven, six and a half an hours. I'm

0:18:31.880 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 2>gonna I'm gonna take it anyway, But I really I

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.520
<v Speaker 2>don't like the six and a half with seven defense.

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:37.960
<v Speaker 2>It would be it was seven, it would be my

0:18:38.040 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 2>number one plack pick.

0:18:39.320 --> 0:18:42.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean yeah. This strikes me as as the

0:18:42.080 --> 0:18:45.040
<v Speaker 1>Bengals finding a way to cover at the end of

0:18:45.080 --> 0:18:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the game. I don't think they're gonna do Yeah, yeah,

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'll put in the maybe. But given where

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>we are the most likely, yes, because I do think

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>that's the right side at fifty eight percent. By the way,

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>people on the Bengals and our bet analyzer for the Dolphins,

0:18:58.520 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>by the way, since I didn't say it sixty are

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:03.159
<v Speaker 1>on the wrong side. And on the Dolphins, I'll just

0:19:03.200 --> 0:19:06.160
<v Speaker 1>get all right, let's keep getting ugly, then, Matt, Let's

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>get really ugly. This is actually an interesting one because

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you make a lot of money off the Bills. How

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.680
<v Speaker 1>do you feel about the Cardinals laying the two and

0:19:16.720 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Bills.

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 2>I think it's the right side. I'm just petrified of it.

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:24.159
<v Speaker 2>You know, I don't like Josh Allen. I had a

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 2>long I had a long conversation with somebody from Pro

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 2>Football Focus on my radio show today. Who's arguing the

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 2>other side, Who was arguing the Bills. Yeah, and I

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:35.080
<v Speaker 2>was arguing I was arguing the Cardinals, and just match

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 2>up wise, he thinks that because of the Manda Man

0:19:37.600 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 2>defense of the Cardinals play in their secondary, they're gonna

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:42.720
<v Speaker 2>have a real tough time stopping the wide receivers with

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 2>pristine conditions for Buffalo, and this factor is in better

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 2>for the Bills because they play you know, they play

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:51.880
<v Speaker 2>a warm weather style of football more than a more

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 2>than a cold weather style of football they do. Yeah,

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 2>so they're in Arizona, they're in the Dome, and they're

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 2>against that defense that does give up big yards in

0:19:58.520 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 2>the past play. So I'm with you on the Cardinals.

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 2>So if you want to hit the Cardinals, I'm okay

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 2>with it. I just have some people who are telling

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 2>me that we're on the wrong side.

0:20:06.560 --> 0:20:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, okay, I'm gonna put in the maybe category. I look,

0:20:09.640 --> 0:20:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't love I don't love any games anymore, but

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's the right side here. I think again,

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit of a you know, just kind

0:20:18.400 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>of the very basic Bilo Sell high. I think the

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>public is probably gonna like the Bills here after they

0:20:24.080 --> 0:20:26.639
<v Speaker 1>destroyed the Seahawks in that game. The Cardinals had that

0:20:26.800 --> 0:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>horrible loss to the Dolphins, which again they could have

0:20:29.720 --> 0:20:32.359
<v Speaker 1>very easily won. I think the Bills traveling cross country

0:20:32.400 --> 0:20:34.920
<v Speaker 1>a homefield advantage doesn't mean anything really anymore, but I

0:20:34.960 --> 0:20:36.600
<v Speaker 1>do think cross country trips, and you brought up the

0:20:36.640 --> 0:20:38.880
<v Speaker 1>fair point about the Chargers coming cross country and again

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 1>harder west to go east. But still it is something

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:45.159
<v Speaker 1>where I think, you know off that win. It's just

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a decent time to sell the Bills. But I

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>don't feel great about it, so we'll put it in

0:20:50.440 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the maybe category on the Cardinals. All Right, you got

0:20:53.280 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>anything else that you're remotely feeling?

0:20:55.800 --> 0:20:59.840
<v Speaker 2>One more game? Okay, this is horrible. Yes, just gonna

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:01.480
<v Speaker 2>tell you this. This is my last on my list.

0:21:02.080 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 2>It's it's a play that even I don't like. But

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 2>it's a numbers play. Patriots in primetime catching seven and

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:11.400
<v Speaker 2>a half points against the Ravens.

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh goodness.

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 2>Here's the here's the thought. Okay, the thought is this,

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Lamar Jackson against Bill Belichick. Defense has done pretty much nothing. Okay,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 2>he has, Belichick has his number figured out. Even if

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:26.919
<v Speaker 2>Gilmour doesn't play. He didn't practice today. But even if

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Gimour doesn't play. I'm not really all that worried about it.

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:31.439
<v Speaker 2>The biggest question I've got is whether or not the

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 2>Patriots can move the football against the Ravens defense. But

0:21:34.359 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 2>if that's my question, getting seven and a half means

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a chance the Patriots are in this game, and

0:21:39.440 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 2>there's a chance that they have an opportunity to maybe have,

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:45.239
<v Speaker 2>you know, a six point loss. It's a you know,

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:49.000
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven to twenty one type of loss here at

0:21:49.000 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 2>home to the Ravens. The Ravens don't blow out anybody,

0:21:52.840 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>and Lamar Jackson, I'm gonna trust Belichick to have a

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 2>defensive scheme enough that they don't give up big plays

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.080
<v Speaker 2>in the run game and they make him throw, and

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 2>as we know, when he has to throw, he's not

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 2>done very well this season. So it's a bet on Belichick.

0:22:06.280 --> 0:22:08.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a bet on their defense, not really their offense.

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 2>But give me the seven and a half, I'll take

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots in primetime.

0:22:11.560 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Was that the same defense that let Joe Flacco throw

0:22:14.160 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>three touchdown passes?

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.479
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but Stefan Gilmour wasn't there, And arguably you can

0:22:17.520 --> 0:22:19.359
<v Speaker 2>make a case that Flacco is a much better passer

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 2>than Lamar Jackson. Yeah, okay, I mean what would you

0:22:24.560 --> 0:22:26.199
<v Speaker 2>argue that point? Would you if you had to throw

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 2>a pass for your life if you had Lamar Jackson

0:22:27.920 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 2>throwing or Joe Flacco throwing? Who would you take?

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>I think I just you know, right, make sure my

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 1>will was there.

0:22:35.160 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Joe Flacco any day of the week. And you know

0:22:36.880 --> 0:22:39.199
<v Speaker 2>it's okay, Joe Flacco maybe not mister elite, but Joe

0:22:39.240 --> 0:22:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Flacco can throw the football a heck a lot better

0:22:40.880 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 2>than mar Jackson.

0:22:41.640 --> 0:22:45.359
<v Speaker 1>Can regardless, regardless, And again, we don't know if Gilmore

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>is gonna play here anyway, because I was one of

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.119
<v Speaker 1>your points. But even if it doesn't really matter because

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:50.880
<v Speaker 1>what you know, it's not as if you're like, oh god,

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:52.920
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna what are they gonna take away? Hollywood Brown.

0:22:52.960 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood Brown hasn't been involved in you know, anything games

0:22:55.800 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. I get. I get sort of the theory

0:22:59.680 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of it, but man, Matt, watching that team on Monday

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>night just look absolutely ridiculous. Like, if you're the Ravens

0:23:09.880 --> 0:23:12.600
<v Speaker 1>and you're defending this team, what are you? What are

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you worried about? You see, maybe you double team Jacobe

0:23:15.520 --> 0:23:17.800
<v Speaker 1>Myers if you absolutely have to, and you just guard

0:23:17.800 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>against the run. What what in the world? How are

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:21.879
<v Speaker 1>they going to move the ball? How are they going

0:23:21.920 --> 0:23:23.560
<v Speaker 1>to camp any points camp?

0:23:23.760 --> 0:23:25.879
<v Speaker 2>That's the only that you have to let Cam go

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:27.760
<v Speaker 2>off and you and you have to let Cam run

0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 2>the football. And I just I think that this team

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.399
<v Speaker 2>is going to have a game plan like they do

0:23:34.560 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 2>every week where everyone goes, how are the Patriots going

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 2>to do it? And then they do it, and then

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.280
<v Speaker 2>and then Belichick is like, oh, that's right, it's Belichick. Yeah,

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know in the game. I'm just saying this

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:45.879
<v Speaker 2>that the hook theres is a big deal to me.

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:47.520
<v Speaker 2>Seven and a half is a big deal to me.

0:23:48.200 --> 0:23:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, man, I don't know. Let me check the bed

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.439
<v Speaker 1>out of all. Let me see where everybody's at, just

0:23:52.480 --> 0:23:54.960
<v Speaker 1>to know where we are. Sixty eight percent on the

0:23:55.040 --> 0:23:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Ravens seven without the hook, without the hook, So.

0:23:58.800 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 2>See, the hook matters to me, and a half matters

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 2>to me.

0:24:01.359 --> 0:24:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I would just like it on the record that you

0:24:02.760 --> 0:24:05.360
<v Speaker 1>crushed me for going after the forty nine ers and

0:24:05.480 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you're willing to go with the Patriots.

0:24:07.800 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because I know, Wait, how many rings does Shanahan have? Oh?

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.560
<v Speaker 1>Man, are we have a Belichick? Are we gonna have

0:24:13.560 --> 0:24:15.720
<v Speaker 1>to debate. Look, Belichick is what happened.

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 2>What happened is the biggest game of his life last year.

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 2>What happened? Belichick has right got he lost that game.

0:24:21.680 --> 0:24:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Valichack has the same number of rings that he

0:24:24.320 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>had on Monday night when he nearly let the one

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>of the historically bad Teamsall do.

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 2>You know what to just do against the Patriots? You

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:35.960
<v Speaker 2>know that, you know what the rivalry is like between

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 2>those two.

0:24:36.880 --> 0:24:39.719
<v Speaker 1>Just stop. You need to stop making excuses.

0:24:40.800 --> 0:24:42.280
<v Speaker 2>To a team. I'm not debating that point. I'm just

0:24:42.280 --> 0:24:44.400
<v Speaker 2>talking about this from a point spread perspective. I'm talking

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:46.520
<v Speaker 2>about winning and losing here, I'm talking about keeping it

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 2>within seven points. It's a big.

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Difference to be as fair as But I don't have

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:52.919
<v Speaker 1>a lean at all on this game. I guess you know,

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to be very because you're not wrong. We talked we

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, switched to the Ravens last week, and for

0:24:58.680 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a while that looked like the wrong side. And maybe

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:03.800
<v Speaker 1>if Johnthan Taylor doesn't fumble early like that and kind

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of change the entire tenor of the game. Although Gus

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Edward's fumbled on the goal line as well, so maybe

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>not but yeah, that game didn't look good and the Ravens.

0:25:11.000 --> 0:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>Did you tweet out that the Ravens offense is broken

0:25:13.560 --> 0:25:15.080
<v Speaker 1>or something? Somebody tweeted out.

0:25:14.960 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 2>I feel I think it is broken.

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Person, Yeah, I think you might have tweeted that out somebody.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:18.800
<v Speaker 2>Game it looked broken.

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Now, that's what I mean.

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 2>During the game, they just can't do anything. I mean,

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, look the Colts defense. We'll see it, We'll

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.159
<v Speaker 2>see it tonight. Colt's defense is good. It's on paper,

0:25:27.240 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 2>it's paper good. And and Lamar Jackson made them look like,

0:25:30.440 --> 0:25:31.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, the Steel Curtain.

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, all right, let's keep talking about every other game

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:36.600
<v Speaker 1>here and just see whether or not we get to

0:25:36.640 --> 0:25:39.200
<v Speaker 1>anywhere that we like, because right now we're legitimately looking

0:25:39.240 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 1>at one game that we like, maybe two games that

0:25:41.640 --> 0:25:44.159
<v Speaker 1>we don't absolutely despise, and then everything else is kind

0:25:44.160 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of up in the air. So let's let's just talk

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:47.600
<v Speaker 1>through each of the games. I'm not giving you a

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>side when I list, I'm just gonna list the favorite first,

0:25:51.119 --> 0:25:54.320
<v Speaker 1>so don't take from it that I'm I'm asking for

0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>a side. How do you feel about the Rams laying

0:25:56.880 --> 0:25:59.480
<v Speaker 1>one and a half points to the Seahawks in Los Angeles.

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 2>It's just a tough bounce back spot because I think

0:26:02.240 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Seattle they turned the ball over so many times last week.

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I think they're angry about it. I'm just concerned if that,

0:26:09.240 --> 0:26:12.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, four leaf clover is gonna wilt there for Seattle,

0:26:12.160 --> 0:26:14.159
<v Speaker 2>with how many games they've won on the last second

0:26:14.280 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 2>and you know, getting getting to all the breaks, is

0:26:17.280 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 2>it now going to go against them and they're going

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 2>to start to cough the football up and turn the

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 2>football over and come back down to Earth. So I mean,

0:26:23.160 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 2>I like Seattle. I think Seal's the right side in

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 2>that game, but I'm concerned about it.

0:26:28.160 --> 0:26:30.159
<v Speaker 1>I actually think the Rams might be the right side here.

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think, really what it is that I'm no

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:38.640
<v Speaker 1>longer scared to go against the Seahawks because that defense

0:26:38.720 --> 0:26:42.600
<v Speaker 1>is historically bad, Yeah, historically bad. And you know, Cooper

0:26:42.600 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 1>Cups will banged up in this game, and you know

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the Rams are but you know, I don't I don't

0:26:47.600 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 1>think Jalen Ramsey can necessarily shut down DK Metcalf. But

0:26:50.560 --> 0:26:52.440
<v Speaker 1>they did know the Rams are really good defense, and

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.120
<v Speaker 1>they're they're underrated a bit, and you're giving you're giving

0:26:55.160 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>McVeigh two weeks to prepare for this act.

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:00.840
<v Speaker 2>Look, the Rams are might picked to win the division.

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:02.240
<v Speaker 2>So if you wanted to, if you wanted to have

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 2>this be one of our picks, I wouldn't fight you

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 2>on it because I think I just I'm concerned about

0:27:07.400 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 2>the I'm concerned about what happened last week. Yeah, if

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Seattle doesn't turn the football over, it turns into a shootout,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.000
<v Speaker 2>and then I'm trusting Jared Goff to be a shootout,

0:27:16.000 --> 0:27:18.520
<v Speaker 2>which is like true, Oh, but you're right. The Rams

0:27:18.520 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 2>defense is tremendous. It's the strength of their defense. It

0:27:20.800 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 2>was a circular team and if they could get a

0:27:22.359 --> 0:27:25.480
<v Speaker 2>lead and then keep the ball away from Ross, then yeah,

0:27:25.520 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean the recipe is there for a Rams victory.

0:27:27.680 --> 0:27:30.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's put it on the maybe gross list.

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.280
<v Speaker 1>How about the Bears laying two and a half points

0:27:32.280 --> 0:27:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to the Vikings in Chicago on Monday night football?

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 2>And so the stat is this going into tonight, which

0:27:38.600 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 2>it factors in teams who are playing at home against

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.919
<v Speaker 2>divisional opponents that are catching points are twelve and one

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 2>against the spread. Yep, so the Bears factor into this.

0:27:49.440 --> 0:27:50.920
<v Speaker 2>So if I was going to take a play, not

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.000
<v Speaker 2>that I'm going to go strictly on just on a trend,

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 2>but I think it's a decent trend to look at.

0:27:55.800 --> 0:27:57.760
<v Speaker 2>I would take the Bears at home against the Vikings

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 2>because I don't think the Vikings can do much else

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 2>besides doubt and Cook and the Bears probably gonna take

0:28:01.600 --> 0:28:02.000
<v Speaker 2>him away.

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:04.280
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I said that wrong. I apologize the

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Bears are getting to an a half points, not laying

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:06.919
<v Speaker 1>to an a half points.

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I said it.

0:28:09.200 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just saying for the listeners. You knew it correctly,

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.640
<v Speaker 1>You knew it correctly. Yeah. I kind of don't mind

0:28:14.680 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the Bears here, Matt. I mean, I'm a little I'd

0:28:19.040 --> 0:28:21.280
<v Speaker 1>like Dave Montgomery to play. We don't know, because he's

0:28:21.320 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>got the concussion. But Kirk Cousins especially, you know, in

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:30.679
<v Speaker 1>primetime in Chicago. I don't know. I kind of like

0:28:30.800 --> 0:28:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it's gross because I don't want to really back and

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:35.880
<v Speaker 1>I've been fading the Bears quite a bit. But I

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>do think that they're going to be able to keep

0:28:38.040 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>this close and probably win it in the end. The

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Vikings just are not a good team. Their secondary is

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>not good. You know, Nick Foles is willing to take shots.

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, Mooney's kind of coming into his own a

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit. I would I'd be willing to take the

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Bears here if you came in and said I like

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:56.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bears, I'd be willing to do it.

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 2>But in primetime I don't mind it.

0:28:59.360 --> 0:29:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I I yeah, all right, let's put it on the

0:29:02.920 --> 0:29:05.680
<v Speaker 1>maybe list. Then we've got NonStop Maybes going on.

0:29:05.720 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 2>I love it.

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, hold on, what have we talked about yet?

0:29:10.040 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Philly and New York and Jacksonville and Green.

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Bay Fit and the Lions. Let's let's get to Let's

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:17.600
<v Speaker 1>get to Philly and New York. The Eagles are laying

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>nine and three and a half. Pardon me, three and

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Giants in New York. By the way,

0:29:21.680 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>with the with the Bills and the Bears and Vikings,

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:26.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent our bet analyzer are on the Vikings, just

0:29:26.280 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>so everybody knows. Okay, So yeah, what do you think

0:29:28.720 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles laying three and a half to the Giants in.

0:29:30.720 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 2>New York's same conversation. In the last time, it's a

0:29:33.040 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 2>home dog in division. Give me the Giants post three

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 2>and a half. If I bet the game, it's Giants

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:40.280
<v Speaker 2>post three and a half all day over the Eagles.

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>That's how I feel, too like, and I don't love

0:29:42.720 --> 0:29:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it by any means, right, but that's how I feel.

0:29:45.360 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>If you're giving me if if I had any confidence

0:29:47.640 --> 0:29:51.040
<v Speaker 1>in Daniel Jones at all to just not bungle it

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>up completely and blow the game at like the last minute,

0:29:54.160 --> 0:29:55.600
<v Speaker 1>I would take them to keep it closed. I think

0:29:55.640 --> 0:29:58.400
<v Speaker 1>people are gonna be like Eagles off bye, here they come,

0:29:58.600 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah, And I think you're just gonna still

0:30:00.680 --> 0:30:03.080
<v Speaker 1>be like, why is Carson Wentz holding the ball for

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>eight seconds and throwing it off his back foot into

0:30:05.560 --> 0:30:08.960
<v Speaker 1>triple coverage? So another game where I'll put in the

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe list. I mean, the Giants getting three and a

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 1>half whatever, I mean, give us some fun here.

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 2>This is what matters there to me.

0:30:15.640 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the hook matters exactly. Okay, let's go to the

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>next game. The Lions laying four and a half to Washington.

0:30:23.960 --> 0:30:27.160
<v Speaker 2>I hate this game so much. Yes, there's nothing in

0:30:27.200 --> 0:30:29.240
<v Speaker 2>this game. I like, there is no way you can

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 2>convince me to take a slide in this game besides

0:30:32.120 --> 0:30:34.240
<v Speaker 2>just taking the points because both teams are horrible. So

0:30:34.280 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 2>if I had to bet, it'll take the Washington team.

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.720
<v Speaker 2>But I hate I mean, I just absolutely hate this game.

0:30:38.920 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>You couldn't force me to take this game legitimately under

0:30:42.360 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>any circumstances. There's not I don't have a single feeling

0:30:45.440 --> 0:30:48.760
<v Speaker 1>about this game other than runaway Packers laying three and

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 1>a half thirteen and a half. Goodness, I'm so sorry

0:30:51.360 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Packer's laying thirteen and a half to the Jaguars. Before

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you do, hold on, I do want to see if

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:58.920
<v Speaker 1>our bet Atalyzer is where it looks at right now

0:30:59.000 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>in that game. No, that is legitimately the most even

0:31:03.040 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>split game on everybody. I bet you it's also going

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:07.440
<v Speaker 1>to be the least bet game of the weekend because

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>nobody wants to go there. But it's fifty four percent

0:31:09.480 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>if anybody cares is backing the Washington football team Lange

0:31:13.080 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>four and a half. Anyway, the Packers laying thirteen and

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Jaguars in Green Bay, I.

0:31:18.360 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Mean, how do you? I mean, this is the ultimate

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 2>professional bet. Okay, professionals are going to lay thirteen and

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:28.960
<v Speaker 2>a half just blindly, right, just blindly because it's thirteen

0:31:28.960 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 2>and a half points in the NFL, and they pay

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 2>their players too. But I don't know how in the

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:38.080
<v Speaker 2>world you could take Jacksonville on the same level. I

0:31:38.080 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 2>don't know how you lay nearly two touchdowns at home

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.840
<v Speaker 2>for this Packers team. I just don't trust either one

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 2>of these teams to cover. So if I had to

0:31:46.320 --> 0:31:48.840
<v Speaker 2>bet it, I would say Green Bay based on quarterback play,

0:31:49.280 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 2>but no way would I ever take it.

0:31:51.280 --> 0:31:53.479
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, if there's wind in this game as well, I

0:31:53.480 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>believe this is the other wind game. I think there

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:57.160
<v Speaker 1>were two. I believe this was the other one. I

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>could be wrong, but yeah, like I can't, I don't know.

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I did not learn anything about Jake Luton last week,

0:32:05.480 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>like I was.

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.880
<v Speaker 2>He played throw. Yeah, I don't know how much you

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 2>saw him in college, but that kid can throw a football.

0:32:11.400 --> 0:32:13.360
<v Speaker 1>He can throw. He can throw and if you you know,

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:15.240
<v Speaker 1>although he doesn't move all that well, that was a

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>nifty spin move to get to the ends on there

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 1>against the Texans, But it was the Texans defense. I

0:32:20.080 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what he's going to look like in

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Lambeau against a wrested Packers defense. So really not a

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.000
<v Speaker 1>game I want to trust on either side. I think

0:32:28.040 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>the only game that we haven't talked about is the

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Broncos getting five and a half from the Raiders in

0:32:34.080 --> 0:32:36.280
<v Speaker 1>Las Vegas. It's five and a half. So yeah, I

0:32:36.320 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>know you hate the Raiders.

0:32:37.400 --> 0:32:39.040
<v Speaker 2>This is one of my bets of the week for

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:42.160
<v Speaker 2>the Daily Juice. I've already bet it. The over in

0:32:42.200 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 2>this game is gonna hit. Ah. Okay, the over is fifty.

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 2>This is I have no idea why the number is fifty.

0:32:47.480 --> 0:32:50.480
<v Speaker 2>It is bizarre to me why this number is so low.

0:32:50.520 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Denver is not going to get any I mean, the

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.520
<v Speaker 2>Raiders are going to get any pressure on Drew Locke

0:32:55.640 --> 0:32:57.280
<v Speaker 2>and the one thing that Drew Lot can do is

0:32:57.360 --> 0:33:00.360
<v Speaker 2>throw with a clean pocket like most quarterbacks can. The Raers,

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:01.840
<v Speaker 2>on the other hand, are gonna run the ball and

0:33:01.840 --> 0:33:04.000
<v Speaker 2>throw the ball deep. I think Ruggs is a monster game.

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 2>I think you see Waller have a monster game. I

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 2>just think points points points in this game. I hate

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 2>the five and a half point numbers, so I won't

0:33:11.200 --> 0:33:13.160
<v Speaker 2>go near it. But if I had to lay it,

0:33:13.200 --> 0:33:14.320
<v Speaker 2>I would lay it with Vegas.

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I don't have a great feel for it, to

0:33:17.680 --> 0:33:20.640
<v Speaker 1>be fair, I don't. I think I agree with the over,

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.480
<v Speaker 1>but I don't love it. Meanwhile, the consensus spread is

0:33:23.520 --> 0:33:26.719
<v Speaker 1>down to four, which is interesting. I think if I

0:33:26.840 --> 0:33:28.640
<v Speaker 1>had to go on one side. I might go with

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the Broncos just to cover, you know, do like a

0:33:30.600 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>backdoor cover, because that's all I mean. Right, if the

0:33:32.880 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>Raiders get up ahead, you know, Drew Locks is gonna

0:33:34.720 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 1>go absolutely insane and just start throwing not.

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a thirty twenty seven type of game,

0:33:39.040 --> 0:33:42.160
<v Speaker 2>one way or the other. So I think there's fifty.

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:44.080
<v Speaker 2>I think it gets through fifty pretty easily. So that's

0:33:44.080 --> 0:33:45.960
<v Speaker 2>all I prefer the over in this game. Then the side.

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:49.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's get really gross and talk about where

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we are. So here's what I'm gonna do. We know

0:33:51.160 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 1>we're taking the Bucks laying four and a half to

0:33:53.640 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>the Panthers. Yeah, I'm going to add in the Bengals

0:33:57.800 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>getting six and a half from Pittsburgh because that was

0:34:00.400 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>like the least yuck I could get to and we

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:04.680
<v Speaker 1>were on the right side. Okay, hold on, let me

0:34:04.720 --> 0:34:09.440
<v Speaker 1>just ride it in. Okay. So these are the other games, Matt,

0:34:09.440 --> 0:34:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and you can let me know if I've missed one.

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:14.640
<v Speaker 1>These were the other games where we weren't, like essentially

0:34:14.680 --> 0:34:17.760
<v Speaker 1>on different sides, which means we'd have to pick three

0:34:17.920 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>of these gross four games. The Cardinals laying two and

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Bills, the Rams laying one and

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Seahawks, the Bears getting two and

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.399
<v Speaker 1>a half from the Vikings, and the Giants getting three

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:30.440
<v Speaker 1>and a half from the Eagles.

0:34:31.840 --> 0:34:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Rams Bears, Giants.

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 1>Rams Bears, Giants. I am okay with that, actually, and

0:34:38.160 --> 0:34:41.160
<v Speaker 1>if I am going to be as transparent as possible,

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.960
<v Speaker 1>all three of those were in my list of h

0:34:45.520 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 1>I can live with this. That's where they were. They

0:34:47.719 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>were all in my list. The Rams laying one and

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a half to the Seahawks, the Bears getting two and

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:54.160
<v Speaker 1>a half points from the Vikings, and the Giants getting

0:34:54.160 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>three and a half points from the Eagles. I like

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the Giants with the hook. I think the Bears are

0:34:57.600 --> 0:34:58.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna win out right, and I think the Rams are

0:34:58.920 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna win out right. So that's where we are. I

0:35:01.840 --> 0:35:03.800
<v Speaker 1>feel pretty gross about it, which means it's probably a

0:35:03.840 --> 0:35:04.640
<v Speaker 1>five and oh week.

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 2>But I like points. I mean, at this point in

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:10.360
<v Speaker 2>the year, I start to like points because the public

0:35:10.400 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 2>starts getting all wacky with favorites of the dark past

0:35:13.880 --> 0:35:16.240
<v Speaker 2>lay in points and I'll do it. I like taking points,

0:35:16.360 --> 0:35:20.280
<v Speaker 2>but week ten on I like taking short favorites and points.

0:35:20.360 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Yep, all right, well, those of you who are listening

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>can understand that I am taking the Texans getting three

0:35:25.680 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>and at myself, I haven't already bet this the Texans

0:35:27.960 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>getting three and a half and the forty nine ers

0:35:30.680 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 1>getting nine and a half. So that is how gross

0:35:33.680 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be right now for this weekend. Okay,

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>good enough, good enough for me. Everybody, make sure you

0:35:39.040 --> 0:35:41.960
<v Speaker 1>are listening to the Daily Juice podcast, which is Matt's

0:35:42.080 --> 0:35:46.000
<v Speaker 1>daily podcast. It is, I dare say it the greatest

0:35:46.040 --> 0:35:48.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast in the world. I really love it. It's every day,

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:50.479
<v Speaker 1>It's fantastic. Matt does a great job breaking down pretty

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:54.120
<v Speaker 1>much every single sport. Again Betting Pros like comp slash chat,

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 1>join our discord channel and there are our workspace or

0:35:57.440 --> 0:35:59.239
<v Speaker 1>whatever you call it at this point, and again you

0:35:59.239 --> 0:36:02.320
<v Speaker 1>can win a sign a J Brown Titan's helmet hopefully

0:36:02.760 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is a big game tonight because I need him. And

0:36:05.160 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>also don't forget that you can check out our cheat

0:36:08.760 --> 0:36:10.520
<v Speaker 1>sheet creators what we call it?

0:36:10.520 --> 0:36:12.320
<v Speaker 2>What do we call our pret cheat sheet.

0:36:12.280 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>Prop bet cheat sheet, I'm still learning the name over

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>at Bettingpros dot com slash props. And we'll be back

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:22.680
<v Speaker 1>next week bringing down the week eleven straight, hopefully after

0:36:22.680 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a big week. We'll talk to you then