WEBVTT - Grace Shao on What the World Should Know About Chinese AI

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. Hello and welcome to

0:00:19.680 --> 0:00:21.960
<v Speaker 1>another episode of The Odd Lots Podcast.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:24.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Joe Wasental and I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Tracy, I love being in Hong Kong. I love I

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 1>hear so much. I love it here so much. I

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>would like come here a few times a year if

0:00:30.840 --> 0:00:31.160
<v Speaker 1>we could.

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure you would.

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 3>I've lived here for like, I guess, almost four years,

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:40.640
<v Speaker 3>so it's kind of weird coming back. But Hong Kong

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:43.880
<v Speaker 3>has a lot of pluses, like great food, great weather

0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.200
<v Speaker 3>for most of the year, beaches. I once heard someone

0:00:47.240 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 3>describe it as Manhattan meets Maui, which I think is

0:00:50.240 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 3>like pretty accurate.

0:00:51.760 --> 0:00:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh it's so nice.

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.200
<v Speaker 3>The weather's shade, nugget, it's not great right now.

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Like this week, we've come during a I guess it's

0:00:58.520 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>a monsoon season, right.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's the rainy season. But oh well, I like thunderstorms,

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 3>so I'm enjoying it.

0:01:04.040 --> 0:01:07.039
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm enjoying it too. Anyway. One thing that has

0:01:07.160 --> 0:01:09.680
<v Speaker 1>changed since the last time you were in Hong Kong

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you loved in twenty twenty two, Yeah, we weren't doing

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:14.240
<v Speaker 1>as many AI episodes.

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 3>No, we definitely weren't. In fact, So I remember one

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 3>of the big stories when I was here in Hong

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.399
<v Speaker 3>Kong in twenty twenty was China's tech crackdown, right.

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:26.360
<v Speaker 1>That's right, that's right, right, And like there.

0:01:26.280 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Was all this concern about whether or not the crackdown

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:32.720
<v Speaker 3>was going to destroy China's entrepreneurial spirit. I'm doing air

0:01:32.840 --> 0:01:35.800
<v Speaker 3>quotes on a podcast. I don't know why, but fast

0:01:35.840 --> 0:01:42.360
<v Speaker 3>forward six years and there's entrepreneurism basically everywhere, and we

0:01:42.440 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 3>talk a lot about how China is producing all these

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:47.440
<v Speaker 3>new AI models.

0:01:47.640 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay, can I like say, like, I know very little.

0:01:51.680 --> 0:01:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know very little about AI, but I

0:01:53.760 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>know even less about Chinese AI. But here are some

0:01:56.720 --> 0:02:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of my general impressions, which is, it seems like there's

0:02:01.200 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>so many open source Okay, so I know they're largely

0:02:04.360 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 1>open source. It seems like every random company you see,

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.160
<v Speaker 1>like some toothpaste company, and they'll have produced an LLM.

0:02:11.240 --> 0:02:14.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'm very curious, like how they're making money on it.

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I also get the impression and like, do you know

0:02:17.000 --> 0:02:19.720
<v Speaker 1>the heads of American AI labs speak in these like

0:02:19.760 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>sort of quasi mystical terms, et cetera. It doesn't feel

0:02:23.840 --> 0:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>quite the same here where it feels like a bit

0:02:26.120 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 1>more of like yet another technology. But I'm glad you

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.360
<v Speaker 1>brought up the point about the tech crackdown because at

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the time, the whole story was like, oh, there needs

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>to be less focus on sort of digital tech and

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:39.280
<v Speaker 1>more focused on card tech, which has been done extremely

0:02:39.680 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>that's been an extraordinarily successful endeavor. And then my last

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.320
<v Speaker 1>impression though, is that since the release of JADGPT in

0:02:46.400 --> 0:02:49.440
<v Speaker 1>late twenty twenty two, that was the moment it's like, no,

0:02:49.520 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>we really have to also compete on sort of this

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:57.720
<v Speaker 1>next era of software and sort of consumer facing tech

0:02:57.880 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>tech breakthroughs. Yeah.

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh, for all that AI scene in China feels much

0:03:02.360 --> 0:03:06.639
<v Speaker 3>more utilitarian to me. It's more about like the big companies,

0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 3>the ten cents, the Ali Baba is sort of using

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 3>AI for their existing business models rather than this existential thing,

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 3>which it is in the US, where like AI is

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:19.720
<v Speaker 3>the business that's just.

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 1>It, right, Yeah, that's exactly. AI is sort of weird,

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>like it sort of sits in the middle of what

0:03:24.919 --> 0:03:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you would call like software and hard tech because we

0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.919
<v Speaker 1>consume it through the browser, right, sort of the same way,

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>or in many cases through the browser the same way

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>that we would go to an Amazon or online gaming

0:03:35.960 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. But it's clearly, you know, it's

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>a scientific endeavor, and so it's sort of is this

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 1>blend And then you have to figure China's so far

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>ahead of the US when it comes to things like

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>robotics and evs and batteries, and one thing I don't

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>know anything about is the degree to which that melding

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>of hardware capabilities with AI capabilities, how that influences the

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>direction of the developments of the AI.

0:04:00.440 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm also very interested in, like the capital stack

0:04:03.800 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 3>for Chinese companies, because over in the US, we all

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.160
<v Speaker 3>know that people are flinging money at anything with the

0:04:09.200 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 3>word AI in it, but in China it's very different.

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 3>I get the impression that it's like much harder to

0:04:16.040 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 3>raise enormous sums of capital, and so I'm very curious

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 3>how that limited capital actually influences the development of these

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:25.280
<v Speaker 3>models and the tech.

0:04:25.600 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>I think it's safe to say that both of us

0:04:27.720 --> 0:04:31.960
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of impressions. Yes, right, impression Manytimes that

0:04:32.000 --> 0:04:33.760
<v Speaker 1>its intro is like, I get the impression, but I

0:04:33.760 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>actually have no idea. So that is a good reason

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to actually bring in our guest, someone who is more

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.600
<v Speaker 1>than quote impressions unquote about the AI tech scene. We're

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>going to be speaking to someone whose newsletter I'm a

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>big fan of and everyone should read. Are going to

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:51.039
<v Speaker 1>be speaking to the perfect guest, Grace Shao. She's an independent,

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>a researcher, and she has a great substack called AI Prome,

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:57.760
<v Speaker 1>and she joined us here in our Hong Kong office.

0:04:57.760 --> 0:05:00.120
<v Speaker 1>So Grace, thank you so much for coming on od Lave.

0:05:00.360 --> 0:05:02.040
<v Speaker 2>Thank you so much for having me, Joe and Tracy.

0:05:02.200 --> 0:05:05.159
<v Speaker 1>How did we do on our impression? Quote?

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:07.320
<v Speaker 2>Those are pretty accurate impressions? I think?

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.560
<v Speaker 3>Okay, good, that was the episode. Like, let's start at

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 3>a basic level. So the big impression, the one that

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:17.919
<v Speaker 3>everyone knows is Chinese models are open source versus the

0:05:18.000 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 3>closed frontier models of the US. Why did it develop

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 3>that way?

0:05:24.720 --> 0:05:28.640
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think people like to think of these myscal reasons,

0:05:29.080 --> 0:05:31.480
<v Speaker 4>but really it was a very pragmatic business reason to

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:34.160
<v Speaker 4>start with. To start with, a lot of the labs

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 4>have cited that, you know, for Western companies or Western

0:05:38.560 --> 0:05:41.680
<v Speaker 4>developers to trust them, they needed to open source their

0:05:41.720 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 4>models to build that trust and credibility. So in many ways,

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 4>it's a branding decision. Then on top of that, I

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 4>think you can see it as a philosophical drive. You know,

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.680
<v Speaker 4>the founder of deep Seagalmen Fung, has openly said he

0:05:53.720 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 4>wants open source his most frontier research to really help

0:05:56.400 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 4>propel the whole industry as a whole, and that kind

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.039
<v Speaker 4>of R and D sharing has now formed a layer

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 4>for the whole ecosystem where each of the labs kind

0:06:05.040 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 4>of integrate each other's kind of breakthroughs. You know, you

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 4>see them congratulate each other even on X when they

0:06:10.880 --> 0:06:13.600
<v Speaker 4>have new models announced, so you can say it's a

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:17.000
<v Speaker 4>bit more collegial. I wouldn't say they're not competing though, however,

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.239
<v Speaker 4>because of the compute constraint, they're faced with, talent constraint

0:06:20.279 --> 0:06:23.040
<v Speaker 4>and the capital constraint even mentioned, they are a lot

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 4>more conscious with where they want to put their money,

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:27.279
<v Speaker 4>where they want to put their time in R and

0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 4>D and all of that forms the basis of a

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 4>strong open source ecosystem.

0:06:32.760 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Is the culture as pro sharing and pro open source

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.600
<v Speaker 1>as it was even two years ago now. The Deep

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Seek moment was right around Trump's inauguration in early twenty

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty five, so about a year and a half ago.

0:06:48.480 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Since then, has the culture stayed the same or has

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that sort of competition bug, that intense competition bug that

0:06:56.680 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we know among American AI labs, has it spread to

0:07:01.320 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese labs at all.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:07.520
<v Speaker 4>I think the sharing is an unintentional result rather than

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, an intentional effort in the beginning to even

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.680
<v Speaker 4>start with. They are for sure extremely competitive, and you know,

0:07:13.720 --> 0:07:17.200
<v Speaker 4>we all know the word involution, so like China Ai

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 4>is do adding as well, that means like there's evolution

0:07:20.360 --> 0:07:23.640
<v Speaker 4>in this ecosystem as well. However, I think bringing up

0:07:23.640 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 4>deep sea deep sea plays a very interesting role in

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 4>the whole ecosystem. Like you mentioned, V three, propel the

0:07:30.040 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 4>whole industry forward. Everyone kind of start taking China Ai

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 4>more seriously. You know, it brought a lot of interests

0:07:36.200 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 4>from investors globally back into the internet companies that Tracy mentioned,

0:07:39.560 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, project that there was a bit of a

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 4>slump for three to five years. However, you know, Jiarpoolzai

0:07:45.640 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 4>is now public listed in Hong Kong, Mini Max is

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 4>pubably listed in Hong Kong. Moonshot is you know, in

0:07:50.600 --> 0:07:54.840
<v Speaker 4>preparation to go public next year. They are competing with

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 4>each other to capture market share, to capture developer mind share.

0:07:59.200 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 4>But deep Sea plays an interesting role. I want to

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 4>bring it back to DEEPCV four, so V four, you know,

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:07.800
<v Speaker 4>on the surface, you know, people said, Okay, it wasn't

0:08:07.840 --> 0:08:11.240
<v Speaker 4>as maybe impressive on evails and performance, They didn't catch

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 4>up with the most front of your labs in the

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 4>US whatnot, Right, But it was a very interesting move

0:08:16.920 --> 0:08:19.600
<v Speaker 4>because what I heard from researchers on the ground in

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:24.160
<v Speaker 4>Beijing was that the lab actually delayed their release for

0:08:24.200 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 4>about three to four months because they wanted to re

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:30.120
<v Speaker 4>engineer a lot of the inference onto Huawei. So I'm

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 4>not saying this completely replaces in video or Kuda, not

0:08:34.760 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 4>at all, because if you ask any developers, they still

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 4>want to use Kuda if they can. However, it was

0:08:40.440 --> 0:08:43.800
<v Speaker 4>the first effort to really I kind of like did

0:08:43.840 --> 0:08:46.200
<v Speaker 4>one for the team, like they kind of like hunt them.

0:08:46.480 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 3>It's supposed to be like a signal basically, yeah, we're

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 3>doing this all on like a Chinese stack. Yeah.

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:54.520
<v Speaker 4>They were like, look, guys, like you can actually do this,

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 4>and they became a shared foundation layer for China's model ecosystem. So,

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:02.160
<v Speaker 4>because again everything is open source and open weight, other

0:09:02.320 --> 0:09:05.120
<v Speaker 4>labs were able to study what they did to actually

0:09:05.280 --> 0:09:09.120
<v Speaker 4>start inferencing on Huawei stack, and I think that was

0:09:09.160 --> 0:09:12.200
<v Speaker 4>the first step, whether it's signaling or actually you know,

0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:17.440
<v Speaker 4>very pragmatic reason to start shifting some reliance on you know,

0:09:17.520 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 4>the China AI.

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.600
<v Speaker 2>Stack aside from deep Sea.

0:09:20.679 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 3>Can you kind of describe the differences or what China

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 3>is trying to do on the actual frontier side, because

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.480
<v Speaker 3>there are there are some I.

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:31.520
<v Speaker 4>Think if you really have to have to look at

0:09:31.559 --> 0:09:34.840
<v Speaker 4>the ecosystem, we can kind of put side the big

0:09:34.880 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 4>tech for now, but looking at the maybe the foremost

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 4>relevant startup labs Deep Seak, Moonshot, who has Kimmi, Zia

0:09:42.280 --> 0:09:46.319
<v Speaker 4>who has GLM, and then Mini Max. They are still

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:50.720
<v Speaker 4>probably the most committed to frontier research. However, because the

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 4>constraint we mentioned that they face, whether it's compete when

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 4>it is capital or even friendly talent, they have decided

0:09:57.280 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 4>out of necessity to basically each focus on a different

0:10:00.240 --> 0:10:03.640
<v Speaker 4>vertical in capturing a different kind of business share. So

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 4>Zi is very focused on coding capabilities. So if anything,

0:10:08.120 --> 0:10:10.440
<v Speaker 4>their gl AND plan is much more similar to maybe

0:10:10.440 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 4>what you think of Claude cloud co wor cloud code

0:10:12.840 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 4>et cetera, a codex that kind of product. And then

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:20.679
<v Speaker 4>you look at Minimax, they're really focused on the multimodality capabilities, Moonshot,

0:10:20.720 --> 0:10:23.560
<v Speaker 4>they're really focused on agents and deep sea.

0:10:23.679 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 2>Again.

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Really is just focused on pushing the frontier and trying

0:10:27.240 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 4>to play catch up and push the Chinese ecosystem as

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 4>fast as possible.

0:10:32.160 --> 0:10:34.960
<v Speaker 1>It's really crazy to look at some of the ones

0:10:35.080 --> 0:10:38.040
<v Speaker 1>that they have already gone public here and just put

0:10:38.080 --> 0:10:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in So Minimax is public and in US dollar terms,

0:10:42.800 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>it's a twenty billion dollar company. I mean there are

0:10:46.160 --> 0:10:49.319
<v Speaker 1>people in the US who have done nothing but publish

0:10:49.360 --> 0:10:52.520
<v Speaker 1>a paper on archive dot org, who do not even

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 1>have a product yet, who have probably VC backed applied

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 1>valuations of our twenty billion dollars. How do they make money?

0:10:59.480 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 1>You know again and open source? Okay? Like in these

0:11:02.520 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>four models that you name, do they have different thoughts

0:11:05.720 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>on how they plan to make money or different business models?

0:11:09.480 --> 0:11:09.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah?

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:14.160
<v Speaker 4>So China's VC space in general has not been that vibrant,

0:11:14.200 --> 0:11:17.080
<v Speaker 4>frankly since Internet crackdown and a lot of USD funds

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 4>did exit you know, three to five years ago, with

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 4>Saquoia being maybe the most like high profile, right, like

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:25.800
<v Speaker 4>we all remember that. Now, people forget even in twenty

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:27.640
<v Speaker 4>twenty two, a lot of these labs that we just

0:11:27.679 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 4>talked about, they were struggling to even raise money, you know,

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 4>raise capital, and a lot of them spun out of

0:11:33.320 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 4>academic institutions. You know, you mentioned their value anywhere roughly

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 4>between twenty to thirty billion right now, but they went

0:11:39.160 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 4>public between like six to eight billion. That's like kind

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 4>of tiny compared to American valuations. Right now, however, they

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 4>are actually making money, you know, the publicly disclosed information

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:52.320
<v Speaker 4>I think from mini max and DRUP who indicates that

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.200
<v Speaker 4>they were making just as much like in their last month.

0:11:56.280 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 4>They've made the same amount of money last month as

0:11:58.559 --> 0:12:01.679
<v Speaker 4>they did last year essentially, and their end of your

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:04.719
<v Speaker 4>AR projection is anywhere between one to one point two

0:12:04.760 --> 0:12:05.560
<v Speaker 4>billion right now.

0:12:05.960 --> 0:12:07.240
<v Speaker 2>So they are making money.

0:12:07.240 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 4>And how well, just because their open source doesn't mean

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 4>they don't make money. I think people forget. You know,

0:12:12.920 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 4>we had open source softwares before as well. People are

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:19.880
<v Speaker 4>paying for managed services, and when you're paying for an

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:24.240
<v Speaker 4>API through that AI or minimax whatnot, you basically don't

0:12:24.240 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 4>have to self host, you don't have to get your

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 4>own GPU. You don't have to get you figure out

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:29.160
<v Speaker 4>your gown compute. You don't have to figure out your

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:31.960
<v Speaker 4>own guardrails or deployment, your security or monitoring whatnot.

0:12:32.040 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>Right, So, just to be clear, you can self host

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:40.360
<v Speaker 1>all of these models, but for the most part, they

0:12:40.400 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>do offer the inference part of the stack, and that

0:12:43.440 --> 0:12:44.960
<v Speaker 1>is a profit center for them.

0:12:45.280 --> 0:13:02.679
<v Speaker 2>Yes, exactly, got it all right.

0:13:02.720 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 3>So there seem to be two major constraints on Chinese AI.

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:09.720
<v Speaker 3>Maybe energy is a constraint as well, we should talk

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:14.679
<v Speaker 3>about that. But there's the capital issue, so not as

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 3>much capital available or people aren't flinging it at AI

0:13:18.600 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 3>companies the way they are in the US. And then secondly,

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:23.760
<v Speaker 3>there are the export controls on chips and we talked

0:13:23.760 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 3>about that a little bit, but can you describe how

0:13:26.360 --> 0:13:31.120
<v Speaker 3>those controls are actually I guess influencing the development of

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:34.439
<v Speaker 3>the models themselves and like I guess optimization.

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.480
<v Speaker 4>So some of these big tech are actually even buying

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 4>out the contracts that data centers have with some of

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.600
<v Speaker 4>these labs, and you know they are taking over compute.

0:13:42.600 --> 0:13:47.720
<v Speaker 4>So these labs essentially are now optimizing for the highest

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.319
<v Speaker 4>quality inference amount, if that makes sense. They don't actually

0:13:50.400 --> 0:13:53.400
<v Speaker 4>have enough even supply, they don't have enough compute power

0:13:53.400 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 4>to even like meet the demand that's coming through. So

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 4>that's on like how they're servicing clients, how they're changing

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 4>I guess, or how they're optimizing O their training is

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.680
<v Speaker 4>that a lot of them are really focused on the

0:14:04.720 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 4>post training. And this goes back to so you know

0:14:08.440 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 4>how open ai has like three buckets where they check

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 4>money at there's like the R and D, there's pre training,

0:14:12.800 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 4>this post training R and D. A lot of times

0:14:15.280 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 4>a lot of money is spent, but say like one

0:14:17.520 --> 0:14:19.680
<v Speaker 4>out of ten things stick, but you need a lot

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 4>of compute and resource some people to be figuring out

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:25.520
<v Speaker 4>where to go. For a lot of these labs in China,

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.840
<v Speaker 4>they frankly don't have that luxury. So they've even given

0:14:28.840 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 4>me a metaphor and said it's kind of like knowing

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 4>what the answer to the homeworks and working backwards. So

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.320
<v Speaker 4>they will wait till the frontier labs to come out

0:14:37.360 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 4>with where the right direction is for the next frontier model,

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.240
<v Speaker 4>and they will work backwards and actually focus all their

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 4>resources on post training. So with post training, they will

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:49.880
<v Speaker 4>optimize a lot of times the data they collect. For example,

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.720
<v Speaker 4>if a data provider like Mercore provides a very very

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.560
<v Speaker 4>niche set of data set for like an open AI whatnot,

0:14:58.240 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 4>Maybe they will charge them ten twenty mille dollars. The

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 4>Chinese lab will weigh out that exclusivity contract three to

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 4>six months time, let's say, and then pay a fraction

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 4>if not like a tenth of that price the same

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 4>data set, and that kind of plays into that like

0:15:11.960 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 4>six to nine month leg that we hear about as well.

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 3>That's really interesting. Let's talk about energy then, because the

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 3>story in the US is that electricity is really the

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:24.280
<v Speaker 3>big constraint on AI use, and you know, you got

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 3>to find a data center that has an electricity hookup,

0:15:27.440 --> 0:15:29.480
<v Speaker 3>and it has to be reliant and all of that.

0:15:30.000 --> 0:15:32.560
<v Speaker 3>It seems to be in short supply. Is it a

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 3>similar story in China?

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 4>Honestly, energy is probably not the biggest bottleneck right now

0:15:38.280 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 4>in China. And I think people like to say, well,

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 4>some people like to say, oh, somehow the Chinese government

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 4>had foresight on the AI boom, driving like the energy consumption,

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 4>but definitely not. I think people forget that China's economic

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 4>growth over the last three to four decades also meant

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 4>a rise of urbanization and a lot of the cities

0:15:56.240 --> 0:15:58.080
<v Speaker 4>that you know, we are visiting these days, like at

0:15:58.120 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 4>least westerns are visiting, like Beijing, China High Engine with

0:16:00.760 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 4>all these robots and evs or whatnot. These were all

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:08.240
<v Speaker 4>really urbanized within the last two three decades. And because

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:10.720
<v Speaker 4>of that, the grid is very new, and because of that,

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 4>the government already foresaw that there was going to be

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 4>a increase in energy demand, and you know, so a

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.880
<v Speaker 4>lot of the energy plants, you know, the solar plants,

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 4>hydro plants, whatnot, were actually built out in you know,

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 4>anticipation for that. Now obviously this has coincided with now

0:16:28.040 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 4>the AI boom, and it's really helped out beyond that.

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:33.920
<v Speaker 4>You know, China has an advantage in the fact that

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 4>they can actually drive top down mandates and provincial governments

0:16:37.880 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 4>will follow suit. This is something quite unique to China

0:16:40.920 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 4>because it's not like decided about each state. So when

0:16:43.680 --> 0:16:46.160
<v Speaker 4>they pushed out the East State to West compute where

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.240
<v Speaker 4>it's basically a top down initiative where they built a

0:16:49.360 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 4>ton of renewable energy for cheap in rural mountainous areas

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:59.280
<v Speaker 4>in guat Zo Province like even Sinzong, Inner Mongolia Suchwan

0:16:59.360 --> 0:17:03.720
<v Speaker 4>you know, those were like very easily executed, frankly, and

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:06.840
<v Speaker 4>then ninety percent of the population actually sit on the

0:17:06.880 --> 0:17:10.760
<v Speaker 4>eastern coastal lines, like we think about Beijing, Tianjing, Shanghai,

0:17:10.760 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 4>sh Engine, that's all on east, so that's where the

0:17:13.160 --> 0:17:17.240
<v Speaker 4>data comes from. So that kind of optimization has also

0:17:17.320 --> 0:17:20.000
<v Speaker 4>really helped them, you know, with the low that is

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 4>the demand right now, I want to.

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Get back to something you said. So first of all,

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>just to clarify, you mentioned companies like Mercore that sell

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:33.360
<v Speaker 1>proprietary data that they are able to collect and manufacture

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 1>in various ways. Then they sell it to an open

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:38.720
<v Speaker 1>aira So a company like Merkcore will hire a bunch

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of people to say, build power points, and then they'll

0:17:41.640 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>collect the data on how they do that, and that

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>is fresh data that they can sell. So those have

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:50.679
<v Speaker 1>exclusivity windows, after which they can then sell them to anyone.

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:54.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm not saying Marcos specifically, but supposedly there are these

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 4>data providers that do the cell and they have exclusivity windows,

0:17:57.119 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 4>and then the Chinese labs kind of weigh that out

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 4>so they can pay like maybe a million dollars versus

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:04.399
<v Speaker 4>like time and folk same data side.

0:18:04.480 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 1>So This gives to something generally speaking, which is that

0:18:08.080 --> 0:18:12.640
<v Speaker 1>people are around the world correctly like quite impressed by

0:18:12.960 --> 0:18:16.200
<v Speaker 1>how high quality the Chinese models are, even if they're behind.

0:18:16.680 --> 0:18:18.359
<v Speaker 1>But then you have things like that, and then you

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 1>also have accusations from the likes of Anthropic that they're

0:18:21.720 --> 0:18:25.640
<v Speaker 1>distilling models and that they're finding ways to collect the

0:18:25.680 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>outputs of American models for training. So then you could say, well, yeah, sure,

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:34.040
<v Speaker 1>that's like, it's great this open source model and it

0:18:34.040 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>can stay close to the edge. But then the encounter

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:40.359
<v Speaker 1>is that they can only be so advanced because there's

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:44.399
<v Speaker 1>this extremely capital intensive closed source model in the US

0:18:44.880 --> 0:18:49.359
<v Speaker 1>that's really establishing the frontier, and that these Chinese companies

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:52.160
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be anywhere near where they were if they weren't

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of I guess you would say drafting off the

0:18:54.640 --> 0:18:55.479
<v Speaker 1>American labs.

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think the compute constraint on the capital constraint

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Israel and frankly, like no one's hiding that or pretending

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 4>that that's not an issue for them right now, like

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 4>deep Sea has openly said they even were struggling right

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.919
<v Speaker 4>like they needed more compute. I think on the distillation

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 4>allegations or accusation it is quite interesting. Like recently, I've

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 4>been thinking about this a lot and thinking about what

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:19.000
<v Speaker 4>it means for distillation and what it means for the

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 4>models to catch up. Right. So, there was this one

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 4>quote from y'all showing you who is a Google Deep

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Mind researcher. He said, there're smart distillation and dumb disolation.

0:19:29.880 --> 0:19:32.840
<v Speaker 4>Dumb distillation is something I think most of us were

0:19:32.880 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 4>frankly non technical think about. It's like, okay, you take

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 4>like a thousand queries, you take the answers of whatever

0:19:38.200 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 4>claud gives you, right, and then you kind of force

0:19:40.160 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 4>copy that into your said model, and then you forcefully

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 4>make them basically like get the exact same answer. Smart

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 4>distillation is like you using the frontier model almost as

0:19:50.000 --> 0:19:52.720
<v Speaker 4>a partner to help you with the judgment, for the

0:19:52.800 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 4>valuation and even the data labeling itself. So you're using

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 4>it as almost a teacher for your own model. It

0:19:59.480 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 4>guides it little bit versus really copy pasting the answer,

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 4>if that makes sense, And that part of it is

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 4>frankly not that unethical or like you know that frown

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.399
<v Speaker 4>upon right now, because that is what enterprises do when

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:14.879
<v Speaker 4>they're fine to me, So it's all kind of a

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 4>bit of a mercury area.

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 2>To be honest.

0:20:16.560 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so you mentioned data, just then talk to us

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:22.440
<v Speaker 3>about what the Chinese data set actually looks like, because

0:20:22.480 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 3>I imagine, if you're a ten cent I mean you've

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:28.160
<v Speaker 3>got we chat, right, that must be a whole load

0:20:28.200 --> 0:20:31.479
<v Speaker 3>of data on which to actually like build your AI.

0:20:32.119 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 3>But on the other hand, I imagine, like there are

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:38.359
<v Speaker 3>some restrictions around the Internet. Obviously, what does it actually

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:39.000
<v Speaker 3>look like here?

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.280
<v Speaker 2>So I actually split that into two parts.

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 4>On the data itself, people often think China is so

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 4>data intensive and you just have mass amount of data

0:20:47.840 --> 0:20:51.080
<v Speaker 4>to use for AI training. However, actually people forget again

0:20:51.280 --> 0:20:55.640
<v Speaker 4>China's enterprise build out or you know whatever. The knowledge

0:20:55.640 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 4>work economy is very new and not as sophisticated frankly

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 4>as American ecosystem or the Western ecosystem, if you have

0:21:02.840 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 4>to put it that way. So data is often unstructured,

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 4>and data thus a lot of the specific needs for

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, the kind of training we're seeing today is

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:14.320
<v Speaker 4>not as vibrant, or the data ecosystem is not as

0:21:14.359 --> 0:21:18.359
<v Speaker 4>sophisticated as what American data providers kind of can provide,

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:21.320
<v Speaker 4>such as mercre like we just mentioned now on the

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 4>big tech side, it's bit interesting. So I'm glad you

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 4>brought up Tencent, because Tencent actually just announced last week

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:30.439
<v Speaker 4>that they are working in the works of creating an

0:21:30.480 --> 0:21:32.880
<v Speaker 4>agent that can be plugged into we Chat. This has

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 4>been very controversial and it has actually had a lot

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:40.760
<v Speaker 4>of pushback even internally, because WeChat's product manager, Alan Jung

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 4>has been famously or notoriously known to be kind of

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:46.840
<v Speaker 4>hard to work with if you want to push something

0:21:46.840 --> 0:21:49.720
<v Speaker 4>with a WeChat because he's so protective of that user experience.

0:21:50.000 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 4>It's his baby, right, And Tencent, like you said, has

0:21:53.600 --> 0:21:56.959
<v Speaker 4>we Chat, which is a super app, has more than

0:21:57.000 --> 0:22:00.720
<v Speaker 4>one point four billion MAU globally, like mostly one point

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:02.840
<v Speaker 4>three million people in China and the Chinese ask for

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 4>globally or people who work with China. That is immense value.

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:11.919
<v Speaker 4>But the risk and compliance risk of potentially of agent

0:22:12.000 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 4>going rogue within that chatbot, or that of agent going

0:22:16.200 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 4>rogue in executing you know, whether it's a purchase whatnot,

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:22.120
<v Speaker 4>is that risk is very high. So they've been working

0:22:22.200 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 4>on that. And on top of that, Tencent itself has

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.119
<v Speaker 4>been lagging behind compared to other big tech in their

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 4>own proprietary models, and they've really been trying to really

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:31.959
<v Speaker 4>play catch up.

0:22:32.240 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 2>They actually last.

0:22:33.200 --> 0:22:36.480
<v Speaker 4>Year poached someone from open Ai who is a researcher

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 4>called y'all shoam U as well has the same name

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:40.800
<v Speaker 4>as the other researcher we just mentioned, to lead this

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 4>whole initiative, and their whole goal is to basically build

0:22:43.840 --> 0:22:47.560
<v Speaker 4>a ten cent agent native model, and that is their

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 4>biggest goal because end of the day, like you said

0:22:49.600 --> 0:22:52.719
<v Speaker 4>in the very beginning, their goal is to optimize their

0:22:52.760 --> 0:22:56.600
<v Speaker 4>existing businesses already and bring AI to the mass consumer

0:22:56.720 --> 0:22:57.520
<v Speaker 4>as fast as they can.

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:01.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, you mentioned poaching a research from open Ai,

0:23:01.800 --> 0:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's like the way I see it, AR will

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 1>definitely be built by the Chinese. The question is whether

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it be built by the Chinese working the American labs

0:23:10.160 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 1>or whether it will be built by Chinese working and

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Chinese labs. Has there been a gathering of steam of

0:23:15.880 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 1>researchers from that had been working at American labs going

0:23:20.920 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 1>to Chinese labs or are they still sort of one

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>off and somewhat rare.

0:23:24.920 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 4>I think even during the Internet era, we saw a

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.920
<v Speaker 4>lot of Chinese nationals or Chinese I think people returning

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:32.919
<v Speaker 4>to China right. I think this it's easy to blanket

0:23:32.960 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 4>statement as geopolitical headwinds. People are scared, but realistically, I

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 4>think most people are just trying to take care of

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 4>their families and live a good life, right, yea. I

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:44.800
<v Speaker 4>hate to sound so crass about it, but you know,

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:49.200
<v Speaker 4>sometimes it's what your package look like and over generalize.

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:52.359
<v Speaker 4>I've heard from many researchers say, look, if my wife

0:23:52.400 --> 0:23:54.320
<v Speaker 4>is a lawyer in China, my wife is a nurse

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:56.840
<v Speaker 4>in China, my wife is a teacher in China, that

0:23:56.960 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 4>kind of employment opportunity is very, very hard to actually

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:01.000
<v Speaker 4>you transfer to.

0:24:00.960 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 2>A new market.

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:03.800
<v Speaker 4>They're like, if I can get a similar package and

0:24:03.840 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 4>a growth opportunity in one of the big labs in China,

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:09.399
<v Speaker 4>I would pick that over living in the US. And

0:24:09.440 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 4>on top of that, I think that something is lost

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 4>in the nuance is my parents immigrated to North America

0:24:14.440 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 4>thirty plus years ago. It was a very clean cut,

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:21.080
<v Speaker 4>like quality of life. It's just like objectively better in

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:23.920
<v Speaker 4>any city in North America compared to any city in China.

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 4>Now that's kind of a personal debate, right, because it

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 4>depends on what you really value. If you want to

0:24:29.840 --> 0:24:32.240
<v Speaker 4>be close to the city center. You want that fast paced,

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 4>like techno evy futuristic lifestyle, China actually gives that to you.

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:38.960
<v Speaker 4>And then on top of that, if you want to

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 4>be close to your family, it's a very personal reason.

0:24:41.520 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 4>So I've met a lot of research I actually decided

0:24:44.160 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 4>to come back to China or this part of the

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 4>world simply because they wanted to do it for personal

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 4>family reasons.

0:24:50.920 --> 0:24:53.119
<v Speaker 3>Are they paid as much as they are in the US?

0:24:53.240 --> 0:24:55.479
<v Speaker 3>Because we get headlines all the time about you know,

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:59.480
<v Speaker 3>so and so is joining whatever company, and people treat

0:24:59.560 --> 0:25:04.320
<v Speaker 3>that new whose like sports stars, right, like teams trading

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.160
<v Speaker 3>their best players. Is it a similar thing here?

0:25:07.680 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 4>I think you definitely get less of that sports star

0:25:10.400 --> 0:25:14.960
<v Speaker 4>vibe or mentality. Here. They're still getting paid like hafty amounts.

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 4>How much they don't usually disclose, but at least even

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.159
<v Speaker 4>in the Internet era, like a byte dance product manager

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 4>can make just as much as a meta product manager. Similarly,

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:27.360
<v Speaker 4>if you're like an average AI researcher, you're probably making

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 4>a similar amount. Although the star star players, like the

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:33.800
<v Speaker 4>ones that are signing one hundred million bonuses, I don't

0:25:33.840 --> 0:25:37.080
<v Speaker 4>know if we had anything like that big like in China,

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 4>but look, they made their money with the IPOs, they

0:25:40.480 --> 0:25:44.280
<v Speaker 4>made the money recently with all this AI boom. It's

0:25:44.320 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 4>just on a maybe slightly smaller scale. Doesn't mean that

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 4>they're not making much more than the frankly average person.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Tracy, Can I say something that might be sort of

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:56.280
<v Speaker 1>a sacrilege for a podcast host to say? Uh, Okay,

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm only speaking for myself here, not necessarily speaking for

0:26:01.280 --> 0:26:04.399
<v Speaker 1>the team, But it occurred to me like, I'm not

0:26:04.560 --> 0:26:08.240
<v Speaker 1>really sure if I'd be that interested in, say, getting

0:26:08.280 --> 0:26:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the CEO of like an American AI lab on the

0:26:11.280 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>podcast as a guest. I don't know what I would

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>ask them, because like, like do I really want to

0:26:15.880 --> 0:26:20.280
<v Speaker 1>hear like Sam Altman or Dabi Sasabi's or whatever like

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the future of work and all this stuff or like

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 1>these all the big you know, I love doing AI episodes.

0:26:27.160 --> 0:26:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I just feel like at that level I would rather

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:32.919
<v Speaker 1>talk to us or like someone in actually the engine

0:26:33.000 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>room rather than this sort of big picture a person

0:26:35.720 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>who may have some degree of AI psychosis and just

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.760
<v Speaker 1>like as on a speaks in like the biggest generalities.

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.600
<v Speaker 3>Okay, well, now Sam Altman needs to like invite himself

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.280
<v Speaker 3>on the show just to test your your commitment to

0:26:49.400 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 3>not having AI CEOs.

0:26:51.359 --> 0:26:53.199
<v Speaker 1>No, I would, I would do it, But I like,

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>let's just agree here that if we ever get one

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.200
<v Speaker 1>of the really big like lab CEOs, let's just ask

0:26:59.240 --> 0:27:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the very like sort of mundane questions about operations and now,

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>like what are we all going to do? And you know,

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:07.959
<v Speaker 1>is what is the meaning of life going to be

0:27:08.040 --> 0:27:09.800
<v Speaker 1>when we don't have jobs? Because I'm so sick of

0:27:09.840 --> 0:27:13.439
<v Speaker 1>those conversations. They may be important at some point, but Grace,

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of curious from your perception, like it does

0:27:18.040 --> 0:27:20.639
<v Speaker 1>feel like the heads of the American AI labs have

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>some degree of AI psychosis themselves. Either they talk about

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>all white color employment is going to disappear, or that

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>they're going to build a monster that if done wrong,

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:33.800
<v Speaker 1>is going to be out of control and that they're

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 1>not you know, it'll escape, that it'll escape the sandbox.

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:41.679
<v Speaker 1>Is there the same sort of existential discourse in the

0:27:41.760 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Chinese AI community?

0:27:43.600 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah? I think to start with in the AI community themselves,

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.600
<v Speaker 4>I would say people are a lot more pragmatic and

0:27:50.640 --> 0:27:52.760
<v Speaker 4>I think recently I was talking to Nathan Lambert, who

0:27:52.760 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 4>is open source researcher who just came to China visited

0:27:55.160 --> 0:27:57.520
<v Speaker 4>all the labs. He said, Look, I was shocked to

0:27:57.560 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 4>see majority of labs are so as in like a

0:28:00.880 --> 0:28:04.399
<v Speaker 4>lot of the researchers are still students, a lot of

0:28:04.400 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 4>them are interns, and the core research teams are maybe

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.720
<v Speaker 4>led by a handful of people. And then these people

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:13.360
<v Speaker 4>are academics by training. So maybe they're a bit less commercial.

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:14.160
<v Speaker 2>Maybe you can.

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:17.720
<v Speaker 4>Say they're less like sophisticated to make manimally the market,

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:20.560
<v Speaker 4>whatever you want to call them. So I definitely feel

0:28:20.600 --> 0:28:23.120
<v Speaker 4>like there's less of that kind of psychosis or high

0:28:23.280 --> 0:28:24.679
<v Speaker 4>level narrative going around.

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:26.480
<v Speaker 2>However, I would.

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 4>Say that there is obviously anxiety from the public in

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:34.399
<v Speaker 4>some degree, not as much of a back pushback. But

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 4>recently there was a very interesting court case in Hongjo,

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 4>which is you know, home to Ali Baba and a

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 4>lot of these al abs. Basically, a company try to

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 4>like lay off a person saying you are being replaced

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 4>with AI, and the court literally rules say that is

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 4>not allowed and no company can use AI as an

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.000
<v Speaker 4>excuse to lay off or replace or even cut short

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:00.440
<v Speaker 4>their contract time. So that was a really swift reaction

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 4>from regulators, and I think it really did serve as a.

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 2>Calming factor for the public.

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 4>Obviously, I also think I want to preface the fact

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 4>that the knowledge worker economy makes.

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Up less of the whoverall.

0:29:12.280 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 4>Economy in China as well, so that kind of fear

0:29:15.560 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 4>maybe doesn't feel as imminent, but that conversation is being had.

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:21.800
<v Speaker 4>But I do think in Asia in general, not only

0:29:21.800 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 4>in China. You look at South Korea, Singapore, all these

0:29:24.880 --> 0:29:28.560
<v Speaker 4>countries are approaching AI in a very pragmatic way, and

0:29:28.680 --> 0:29:30.959
<v Speaker 4>the tire moms are trying to train up the kids

0:29:31.000 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 4>to be AI native, the students are trying to train

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.480
<v Speaker 4>themselves up to be AA native. People are preparing for

0:29:36.520 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 4>the future versus pushing back on the future.

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:43.280
<v Speaker 1>That's interesting. You know, in the US, obviously, companies announced

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that they're laying people off, and they cite AI even

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.360
<v Speaker 1>frequently when there's no evidence that AI had anything to

0:29:49.400 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>do with it. So it's interesting they're not allowed to

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.239
<v Speaker 1>do it. In defense of American AI labs, most of

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:58.040
<v Speaker 1>them lose a lot of money, and yet they actually

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>do spend, at least the one spend there quite a

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:06.440
<v Speaker 1>decent amount on so called like alignment research, safety research,

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>making sure the AIS don't go rogue et cetera. How

0:30:10.080 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 1>big of a part of the Chinese labs, how much

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.080
<v Speaker 1>did they spend on I guess what they would you

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 1>would put but the American labors would put into the

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:18.160
<v Speaker 1>safety bucket.

0:30:18.360 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 4>I do have to say, I'm not a policy expert,

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.080
<v Speaker 4>so I don't work with a lot of the safety

0:30:22.120 --> 0:30:25.880
<v Speaker 4>people as much. But there are organizations in China that

0:30:26.000 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 4>are definitely working, like the regulators as well as the

0:30:29.680 --> 0:30:33.959
<v Speaker 4>private sector working together. And for some context, in China,

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:37.040
<v Speaker 4>there are various moving parts in the government. There's MIT,

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:41.640
<v Speaker 4>the CAC, et cetera. These agencies basically some are to

0:30:41.680 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 4>propel economic development. So in this case AI diffusion, the

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:49.280
<v Speaker 4>whole idea of AI plus AI plus every single sector

0:30:49.320 --> 0:30:52.640
<v Speaker 4>you can think of, some act more like a guardrail

0:30:53.000 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 4>as a protector, so they are working.

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:55.920
<v Speaker 2>Hand in hand.

0:30:56.000 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 4>And on top of that, every single AI jen AI

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 4>application as well as LM company have to go through

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 4>the National Registry in China, so they actually disclose what

0:31:07.520 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 4>is being trained, what is you know, the potential risk

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:13.560
<v Speaker 4>that said, I think right now, you know, no one

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:17.120
<v Speaker 4>really knows what the real impact of AI will be

0:31:17.160 --> 0:31:20.560
<v Speaker 4>on economy, but you know definitely that fear mongering narrative

0:31:20.720 --> 0:31:36.040
<v Speaker 4>is not mainstream in China.

0:31:37.960 --> 0:31:41.000
<v Speaker 3>How would you describe I guess the approach of the

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 3>Chinese government to AI in general, because it feels like

0:31:44.800 --> 0:31:47.640
<v Speaker 3>the trade off for maybe not being on the cutting

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:51.200
<v Speaker 3>edge with frontier models is well, you're further along with

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:54.560
<v Speaker 3>sovereign AI and the government maybe has like a better

0:31:54.640 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 3>handle on what the labs are actually doing.

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.520
<v Speaker 4>The Chinese government probably sees this in a much more

0:32:01.600 --> 0:32:05.959
<v Speaker 4>pragmatic way. You know, just like how there was an

0:32:05.960 --> 0:32:10.040
<v Speaker 4>Internet plus policy fifteen years ago, there's now an AI

0:32:10.080 --> 0:32:13.200
<v Speaker 4>plus policy. When deep seak moment took off, you know,

0:32:13.240 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 4>there was a frenzy of private companies even in home appliances,

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 4>trying to embed deep seat, integrate deep sea. I'm just like,

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.520
<v Speaker 4>what is a AI vacuum going to do for you?

0:32:22.640 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 4>Or AI like electric truth rush for you? It was wild, right,

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:28.520
<v Speaker 4>but the government picked that up. And I think what

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 4>the Chinese government, going back to what we talked about earlier,

0:32:30.960 --> 0:32:33.920
<v Speaker 4>is that they have the advantage of having the ability

0:32:33.920 --> 0:32:36.640
<v Speaker 4>to push things down from top down and at the

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:40.200
<v Speaker 4>very high level, they're seeing AI as an economic driver

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:45.600
<v Speaker 4>to propel maybe efficiency, to address some of the labor

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 4>shortage that is coming as the population could continues to

0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 4>age and decline. It also addresses a lot of issues

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:53.520
<v Speaker 4>where a lot of the young people don't want to

0:32:53.560 --> 0:32:56.760
<v Speaker 4>work in manufacturing roles. They want to be automated actually,

0:32:56.920 --> 0:32:59.000
<v Speaker 4>and they want to work in urban areas. So they

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 4>have that now, and then each of the provincial governments

0:33:02.880 --> 0:33:05.760
<v Speaker 4>will take that as kind of like a KPI. They're like,

0:33:05.760 --> 0:33:08.880
<v Speaker 4>all right, let's go ask like vcs essentially and go

0:33:09.560 --> 0:33:13.240
<v Speaker 4>find you know, future deep seeks and fund them. However,

0:33:13.320 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 4>how much these companies want to take government money is

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:18.560
<v Speaker 4>a different discussion. A lot of them will then even

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 4>support them by providing you know, infrastructure like buildings, offices,

0:33:23.000 --> 0:33:25.720
<v Speaker 4>even like some of them heard like dormitory for these

0:33:25.760 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 4>young entrepreneurs, and then give them money and capital try

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.840
<v Speaker 4>things out. There's also these AI pilot zones being rolled

0:33:31.840 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 4>out across the country. I think now about eleven or

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.640
<v Speaker 4>twelve of them, where you know, people can try out

0:33:36.680 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 4>new AI products. I met with the largest AI developer

0:33:40.520 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 4>community founder in China a couple of weeks ago, and

0:33:43.000 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 4>she was saying, there's more than a couple hundred thousand

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 4>developers in this ecosystem and they are working with.

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:50.680
<v Speaker 2>Regulators and the private sector.

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 4>So if say bitdowns have a new product, they might

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:54.680
<v Speaker 4>go to them first and say can you try this out?

0:33:55.040 --> 0:33:58.320
<v Speaker 4>And then they will report and debug and see what's happening,

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.600
<v Speaker 4>and then tell the whoever low government that's funding them

0:34:01.600 --> 0:34:04.560
<v Speaker 4>with providing with the infrastructure, say, hey, this product might

0:34:04.600 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 4>come out. Do you want to be part of it?

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:08.160
<v Speaker 4>Do you want to give it money? Do you want

0:34:08.200 --> 0:34:10.920
<v Speaker 4>to provide it with whatever resource you want to? So

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 4>there is kind of this like cohesive ecosystem where they

0:34:14.480 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 4>kind of all dance together. How much these companies actually

0:34:18.440 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 4>want to take state money, I think that's debatable. However,

0:34:23.000 --> 0:34:26.000
<v Speaker 4>as AI and robot has become morem when sensitive and

0:34:26.040 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 4>being recognized as not only an economic driver but potentially

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 4>a military use or geopolitical I guess talking point. At

0:34:34.160 --> 0:34:36.920
<v Speaker 4>this point, it is becoming more and more nationalized, not

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 4>only in China but globally in the US and so on.

0:34:40.440 --> 0:34:44.240
<v Speaker 1>Robotics is obviously an area where China is just straight

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 1>up ahead of the United States, or at least according

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:49.720
<v Speaker 1>to all the videos on my Twitter and Instagram feed

0:34:49.880 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of humanoid robots and so forth. How much does you

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>know when we were all kids when we thought of

0:34:56.800 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>like AI, I think we thought of robots, right, we

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>thought about fifteen one thousand or some version of it.

0:35:02.760 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And now when we think of AI, most people think

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of chatbots. But that's just one aspect of AI. For

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the advanced labage, whether we're talking about the deep sea

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:14.040
<v Speaker 1>so then Mini Max's or GLM and so forth, like,

0:35:14.800 --> 0:35:18.200
<v Speaker 1>are they actively working hand in hand with some of

0:35:18.239 --> 0:35:21.919
<v Speaker 1>the unit trees and advanced robotics companies to figure out

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:25.320
<v Speaker 1>how you can actually have that the true AI robot

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:26.000
<v Speaker 1>of the future.

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:30.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I think China, having been the manufacturing hub of

0:35:30.560 --> 0:35:33.200
<v Speaker 4>like literally everything in the sun over the last like

0:35:33.239 --> 0:35:37.480
<v Speaker 4>three decades, has definitely an advantage of owning all the

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.040
<v Speaker 4>supply chain, right. And it's like not only just owning

0:35:40.080 --> 0:35:42.520
<v Speaker 4>the supply chain, but you know, there are literally regions

0:35:42.560 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 4>where that whole supply from raw material to like the

0:35:46.280 --> 0:35:49.359
<v Speaker 4>result end product from OEM is all within like say,

0:35:49.400 --> 0:35:53.120
<v Speaker 4>fifty kilometers of each other. So what we're seeing is

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 4>a lot of American investors and entrepreneurs coming into China

0:35:56.960 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 4>to kind of get a sense of that. And like

0:35:58.880 --> 0:36:01.759
<v Speaker 4>you mentioned, because we've been so fixed in software, I

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:05.520
<v Speaker 4>think China having a very strong hardware background is now

0:36:05.600 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 4>thinking about how can we actually integrate the software into

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 4>the hardware. How ready that is to the mass market.

0:36:12.320 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 4>I frankly don't think it's really there yet. So recently

0:36:15.040 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 4>I just met with some robotic companies. They actually can't

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:20.560
<v Speaker 4>just plug in a Mini Max. You know, that's like

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 4>for them, they need to actually get physical data. They

0:36:24.360 --> 0:36:26.400
<v Speaker 4>This is where like you know, now all the hype

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 4>is on world models physical AI. You know, that is

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.960
<v Speaker 4>a complete different set of kind of technology essentially, where

0:36:33.560 --> 0:36:37.800
<v Speaker 4>without the three D data that these models need right now,

0:36:38.120 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 4>the bottomneck right now is that you know, these hardware

0:36:41.200 --> 0:36:44.560
<v Speaker 4>is these humanoids, quadrupids, dogs, whatever you want to call them,

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:46.800
<v Speaker 4>they cannot be powered by lms.

0:36:47.040 --> 0:36:47.880
<v Speaker 2>That's number one.

0:36:48.080 --> 0:36:51.520
<v Speaker 4>Number two is despite that China being very strong on hardware,

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:54.200
<v Speaker 4>the bottleneck is actually a lot of times in the

0:36:54.280 --> 0:36:57.880
<v Speaker 4>integration as well as the battery solutions. You know, you

0:36:57.920 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 4>think of China having very strong battery solutions, but most

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 4>of these gadgets can't last more than like say two hours,

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 4>and there's no one that's really come out with a

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.840
<v Speaker 4>better solution so far. What I've seen the most creative

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:11.879
<v Speaker 4>things so far is like you know, those glasses you wear,

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:14.600
<v Speaker 4>like the metaglasses, they kind of die within two hours.

0:37:14.840 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 4>But China, like I Fly Tech or Rocket that's kind

0:37:18.040 --> 0:37:22.840
<v Speaker 4>of a newer player startup, they created these battery capsules

0:37:22.840 --> 0:37:25.960
<v Speaker 4>where you can just like stick on to your glasses.

0:37:26.239 --> 0:37:29.359
<v Speaker 4>It's very lightweight, doesn't really affect your user experience, and

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:31.600
<v Speaker 4>that's actually able to kind of extend it by a

0:37:31.640 --> 0:37:34.719
<v Speaker 4>few hours. So to go back to your question, is

0:37:34.800 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 4>China trying to do physical AI?

0:37:36.840 --> 0:37:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Definitely?

0:37:37.680 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 4>What is their edge? I think it's still in manufacturing.

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:42.359
<v Speaker 4>Is their software good enough? I don't think anyone really

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 4>has good enough software right now as of now.

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Wait, I'm just going to press you on this.

0:37:46.200 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 3>So if we fast forward ten years, like, what would

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:53.279
<v Speaker 3>you say is most likely to be China's comparative advantage.

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:57.600
<v Speaker 3>Is it like the cheap, open source super optimized models.

0:37:57.880 --> 0:38:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Is it software AI software that's like integrated with like

0:38:02.040 --> 0:38:05.680
<v Speaker 3>industry and existing business or is it robotics and the

0:38:05.719 --> 0:38:07.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of hardware side of AI.

0:38:07.840 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 2>I think any.

0:38:11.360 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 3>But we want to challenge here.

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 2>A lot of these companies that exist ten years ago

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:16.960
<v Speaker 2>or not even five years.

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.800
<v Speaker 3>That's fair, okay, I can shorten the timeframe in three years.

0:38:20.880 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 4>All right, So don't chase me down if I'm wrong

0:38:24.239 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 4>in three years. But I think, you know, there's two parts.

0:38:27.520 --> 0:38:29.480
<v Speaker 4>One is I think I agree with the hardware side.

0:38:29.560 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 4>China is definitely going to have I think, more breakthroughs

0:38:32.680 --> 0:38:35.000
<v Speaker 4>and have a lot of edge. Not only is the

0:38:35.040 --> 0:38:38.719
<v Speaker 4>supply chain all domestically there, I think something overlooked by

0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 4>people is the fact that a lot of the know

0:38:41.200 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 4>how is also there, and that's not easy to transfer overnight.

0:38:45.239 --> 0:38:47.879
<v Speaker 4>You know Patrick McGee's book recently in his Apple book

0:38:47.960 --> 0:38:50.399
<v Speaker 4>saying how Apple tried to move this whole supply chain

0:38:50.440 --> 0:38:53.040
<v Speaker 4>to India. The biggest bottom neck is actually these like

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:58.080
<v Speaker 4>highly skilled laborist jobs that actually are so technical that

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:01.880
<v Speaker 4>cannot be even trained in one generation. It took decades

0:39:01.920 --> 0:39:04.960
<v Speaker 4>to really train up the local community labor force whatnot.

0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 4>So that's still there now because of that ecosystem.

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 2>A lot of these.

0:39:09.320 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 4>Robots home appliance is whatnot. These tech gadgets are produced

0:39:13.520 --> 0:39:16.239
<v Speaker 4>at less than fifty percent of the costs of where

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:18.279
<v Speaker 4>you could produce that anywhere else in the world. They

0:39:18.320 --> 0:39:22.399
<v Speaker 4>are also extremely innovative. I've talked to people at ev

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 4>companies just for example, to ship out a new model

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:31.279
<v Speaker 4>from ideation to production to hitting the floors that takes

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:34.640
<v Speaker 4>maybe less than fifteen months. Wow, But for traditional OEM

0:39:34.680 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 4>like way for at least three to five years. Right,

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:41.360
<v Speaker 4>So there's the hardware side. I think another very underappreciated

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:43.920
<v Speaker 4>fact on the Chinese open source model is that people

0:39:44.000 --> 0:39:46.920
<v Speaker 4>don't realize. So a year ago when I spoke to

0:39:47.120 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 4>startups as semlic Valley, they were the most cost conscious,

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 4>frankly less compliance conscious and gives very little the care

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:59.120
<v Speaker 4>about geopolitics. They were building on top of QUID. Now

0:39:59.200 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 4>it's actually all a lot of Ai Native American enterprises

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:05.239
<v Speaker 4>building on Chinese open source because we're seeing headlines on

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.960
<v Speaker 4>the ROI is not like showing it's extremely expensive for

0:40:10.000 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 4>these token maxing projects whatnot. So Harvey Cursor, they've talked

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.759
<v Speaker 4>about using a hybrid model where they will build majority

0:40:19.760 --> 0:40:22.440
<v Speaker 4>on GLM or KIMMI, but kind of like what we

0:40:22.440 --> 0:40:26.399
<v Speaker 4>talked about earlier where they use like Opus to act

0:40:26.440 --> 0:40:29.120
<v Speaker 4>as a judge or a guidance. So I think that's

0:40:29.160 --> 0:40:32.759
<v Speaker 4>something where we're continue to see and these companies are

0:40:32.840 --> 0:40:35.560
<v Speaker 4>generating a lot of revenue, and going back to the

0:40:35.600 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 4>fact that like a lot of them don't even have

0:40:37.640 --> 0:40:40.279
<v Speaker 4>enough capability to support the demand that's coming through.

0:40:40.600 --> 0:40:42.879
<v Speaker 1>That's such a fascinating idea, and it makes a lot

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of sense that at the application layer that probably a

0:40:46.560 --> 0:40:48.799
<v Speaker 1>lot of different models can go into it.

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:49.040
<v Speaker 4>You know.

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:50.480
<v Speaker 1>By the way, I was talking to someone out a

0:40:50.520 --> 0:40:53.560
<v Speaker 1>dinner recently and he said he thinks that AI writing

0:40:53.600 --> 0:40:56.799
<v Speaker 1>will get a lot better when AI is embedded in

0:40:56.920 --> 0:41:00.799
<v Speaker 1>humanoid robots, because then the will have this sort of

0:41:00.920 --> 0:41:03.560
<v Speaker 1>groundedness in the real world where I have no idea

0:41:03.680 --> 0:41:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this is true, he said. The reason his theory was

0:41:06.000 --> 0:41:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that the reason why AI writing is still so weird

0:41:08.120 --> 0:41:11.759
<v Speaker 1>is because it's in this disembodied data centers, and that is,

0:41:12.080 --> 0:41:14.759
<v Speaker 1>as soon as they're really in robots, then they'll have

0:41:15.040 --> 0:41:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a sort of real world groundedness. A right, have one

0:41:17.239 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>last question, you know, after open Claw came out, I

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:24.879
<v Speaker 1>started seeing again my entire Twitter feed and answergram feed.

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I have done this to myself, but all I do

0:41:27.440 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 1>all day is consume Chinese propaganada. But I started seeing

0:41:31.040 --> 0:41:33.520
<v Speaker 1>all these videos, like all these grandmothers and stuff like

0:41:33.840 --> 0:41:36.279
<v Speaker 1>setting up their claws and stuff like that. And I

0:41:36.320 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 1>saw these videos and I said to myself, I just

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:40.719
<v Speaker 1>don't believe this. I think this is fake news. I

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:43.759
<v Speaker 1>do not actually believe that there's all these eighty year

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>old Grammas or whatever really excited about setting up their

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:49.800
<v Speaker 1>open claw or whatever. Are those real? Like, what's the

0:41:49.880 --> 0:41:50.399
<v Speaker 1>deal with that?

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:51.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah?

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I think that was definitely a bit of a hype.

0:41:53.320 --> 0:41:53.839
<v Speaker 1>I knew it.

0:41:54.040 --> 0:41:56.799
<v Speaker 4>No, No, but I will say there were Grammas lining

0:41:56.920 --> 0:41:57.680
<v Speaker 4>up to get it done.

0:41:57.800 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'll answer this twofold on the kind of the

0:42:01.600 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 2>surface is.

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:08.120
<v Speaker 4>I think Chinese aunties, uncles whatnot. They are just much

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:11.440
<v Speaker 4>more open to technology because you know, you go around,

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:14.160
<v Speaker 4>whether it's by force or by nature. You know, you

0:42:14.200 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 4>can't really navigate modern Chinese life without being on alipay.

0:42:18.040 --> 0:42:18.799
<v Speaker 1>No, you really can't.

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:22.080
<v Speaker 3>You can't like buy Starbucks in Beijing without like having

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:22.720
<v Speaker 3>we paid.

0:42:22.800 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 4>After COVID, I went back to I think Shanghai for

0:42:25.680 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 4>the first time, and I was sitting at a restaurant

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 4>just like waiting for someone to help me order food.

0:42:30.840 --> 0:42:33.200
<v Speaker 4>No one came because they're just like, why are you

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:35.480
<v Speaker 4>so Like, why are you a caveman? Don't you know

0:42:35.520 --> 0:42:38.680
<v Speaker 4>how to like scan the QR code on your table? Okay,

0:42:38.680 --> 0:42:43.160
<v Speaker 4>So that Tangent's side, I think the overall optimism around.

0:42:43.239 --> 0:42:47.799
<v Speaker 4>Technology is very different from the West because in the

0:42:47.880 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 4>last twenty thirty years, a lot of rural eras in

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:56.080
<v Speaker 4>China literally could not access resources, information, goods, whatever that,

0:42:56.480 --> 0:42:59.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, like big cities could not until these super

0:42:59.719 --> 0:43:02.319
<v Speaker 4>apps came about. So a lot of people don't have

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:04.280
<v Speaker 4>TVs in their homes and they live in a village

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 4>and there may be annual household income is like one

0:43:06.800 --> 0:43:09.480
<v Speaker 4>thousand dollars, but they will have a smartphone and that

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 4>smartphone will be able to actually enable them to get

0:43:12.680 --> 0:43:16.200
<v Speaker 4>micro loans to purchase goods, you know, to help their

0:43:16.280 --> 0:43:20.279
<v Speaker 4>kids access information online whatever that is. So technology is

0:43:20.480 --> 0:43:24.440
<v Speaker 4>very much kind of accepted and respected and actually like

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 4>big tech is loved, like if you work for one

0:43:26.800 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 4>of big tech, you are like a pride of the family.

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:33.279
<v Speaker 4>So there's that very culture aspect of it. Then is

0:43:33.360 --> 0:43:36.080
<v Speaker 4>like going back to the super apps. So I think

0:43:36.120 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 4>the open Claw frenzy was interesting because some people say

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 4>it was the first agent that you know, Chinese people

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:44.320
<v Speaker 4>could get their hands on, like a Western agent that

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 4>they can get their hands on because you know, anthropic

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 4>and open it doesn't actually operated in China. You can't

0:43:49.280 --> 0:43:53.520
<v Speaker 4>access that. So when Tensan and Ali Baba try to

0:43:53.960 --> 0:43:58.719
<v Speaker 4>embed open claw products into their own like series of

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:02.560
<v Speaker 4>products or business whatever offerings. It got people really excited,

0:44:02.960 --> 0:44:06.239
<v Speaker 4>and because of these super app models that they have,

0:44:06.719 --> 0:44:10.000
<v Speaker 4>it was a very natural way for people to access them.

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 4>There's a functional adjacency to you know, the search bar

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:15.560
<v Speaker 4>and then opening up an open claw and then trying

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:18.320
<v Speaker 4>to like run like you know, manage your mini programs

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:21.200
<v Speaker 4>within ten cent we chat and then try to order something.

0:44:21.239 --> 0:44:23.600
<v Speaker 4>So all of that kind of took off. But that said,

0:44:24.080 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 4>actually the Chinese government again regulators acted very swiftly in

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:31.680
<v Speaker 4>the beginning. I think local government, like we see try

0:44:31.719 --> 0:44:36.040
<v Speaker 4>to even encourage local businesses to embrace open claw. But

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:39.839
<v Speaker 4>the Beijing government immediately said, guys, actually be very very

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 4>careful of your data privacy. Your security banks didn't do

0:44:43.120 --> 0:44:45.560
<v Speaker 4>this as so you shouldn't do this. Be mindful of

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:48.600
<v Speaker 4>what you're doing with this technology. And then the big

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:50.719
<v Speaker 4>tech kind of rolled back a bit of their marketing

0:44:51.000 --> 0:44:54.880
<v Speaker 4>and you can see, actually hilariously there were advertisements for

0:44:55.080 --> 0:44:58.840
<v Speaker 4>helping these aunties and uncles how to uninstall these open claw.

0:44:58.640 --> 0:45:01.719
<v Speaker 2>On their gadget. So anyway, that's a bit of a

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:02.839
<v Speaker 2>kind of background on that.

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:05.880
<v Speaker 1>All right, Graceha, thank you so much for coming on

0:45:05.920 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>odd lot. It's great to connect with you here in

0:45:08.000 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 1>Hong Kong. And we'll have you back in three years, no,

0:45:11.280 --> 0:45:14.720
<v Speaker 1>hopefully before then. We'll have you back at least certainly

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:17.080
<v Speaker 1>in three years to see how your predictions held up.

0:45:17.320 --> 0:45:30.880
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much, Tracy.

0:45:30.920 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>That was fun. There was a lot of interesting ideas

0:45:33.719 --> 0:45:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in a fairly short conversation. But one thing specifically and

0:45:36.840 --> 0:45:39.920
<v Speaker 1>then that like sort of stands out to me is

0:45:40.000 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 1>thinking about some of these application companies, how much it

0:45:44.360 --> 0:45:46.959
<v Speaker 1>makes sense for them to sort of Yeah, they'll use

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:49.759
<v Speaker 1>like a state of the art American closed model for

0:45:49.840 --> 0:45:53.319
<v Speaker 1>like some of the work, but then other just you know,

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:56.960
<v Speaker 1>almost as capable models underneath, so you have like a

0:45:57.200 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 1>legal AI app like a Harvey or something. Sure, some

0:46:00.640 --> 0:46:03.680
<v Speaker 1>of these open source models work well for some tasks

0:46:03.719 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 1>within that context, And how much it makes sense to

0:46:06.719 --> 0:46:10.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of combine them under one app layer.

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:14.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Well, you don't need the cutting edge model for everything, right,

0:46:14.840 --> 0:46:17.960
<v Speaker 3>but like if you can get some of the cutting

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:22.000
<v Speaker 3>edge model combined with like the cheapness of the open

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:24.959
<v Speaker 3>source thing, like that seems like a pretty good deal

0:46:25.200 --> 0:46:26.200
<v Speaker 3>for a lot of companies.

0:46:26.440 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, definitely. I also think like, how is the massive

0:46:30.320 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing edge that China has not going to just keep

0:46:34.320 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 1>compounding itself. I mean, this is like the multi trillion

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:42.279
<v Speaker 1>dollar question of the entire world. But it really does.

0:46:42.400 --> 0:46:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when you think about, Okay, there's a sort

0:46:44.680 --> 0:46:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of presumably natural synergy, there's all this real world physical

0:46:49.280 --> 0:46:54.439
<v Speaker 1>data that Chinese manufacturing companies can theoretically get from their

0:46:54.560 --> 0:46:58.480
<v Speaker 1>various robotic vacuum cleaners and so forth, and then feed

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 1>those into certain model then we call AI. That really

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:05.400
<v Speaker 1>does seem like a potential leg up that you know,

0:47:05.520 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 1>just done the data collection alone from all those physical things,

0:47:09.560 --> 0:47:12.040
<v Speaker 1>like a huge potential edge over the next several years.

0:47:12.120 --> 0:47:14.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, although it was very interesting, Grace was saying that

0:47:14.840 --> 0:47:17.600
<v Speaker 3>it's not as developed or as structured as it is

0:47:17.640 --> 0:47:20.520
<v Speaker 3>in the US, because I had thought the same thing, like,

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 3>if everyone's talking over we chat, if everyone's paying over

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:27.280
<v Speaker 3>we pay, you must have oodles and oodles of data.

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:31.239
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, that was interesting. The ecosystem thing, I think

0:47:31.360 --> 0:47:33.960
<v Speaker 3>is really important, and it just seems like really hard

0:47:34.040 --> 0:47:37.640
<v Speaker 3>to get an ecosystem kind of going from scratch. And

0:47:37.719 --> 0:47:41.000
<v Speaker 3>I remember maybe it was with Dan Wong, but someone

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:44.000
<v Speaker 3>describing how like, if you go to shen Zen, you

0:47:44.040 --> 0:47:48.920
<v Speaker 3>can basically start like an entire company manufacturing a physical

0:47:49.040 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 3>thing because every single supplier is there. You just go

0:47:52.719 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 3>from like one storefront to another storefront to another storefront.

0:47:57.600 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 3>I don't think that can be replicated anywhere in the US.

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is a bit of a tangent. But

0:48:02.719 --> 0:48:06.279
<v Speaker 1>you know this is economists talk about quote agglomeration all

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the time. The advantage is exactly that of having everything

0:48:09.960 --> 0:48:12.600
<v Speaker 1>there and then you build these deep networks. One thing

0:48:12.600 --> 0:48:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I find to be a little strange, and again this

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:19.279
<v Speaker 1>is a tangent, is how San Francisco concentrated AI is,

0:48:19.760 --> 0:48:22.120
<v Speaker 1>even though at the American level it is sort of

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:25.600
<v Speaker 1>pure like desk work right Like, it's not the sort

0:48:25.600 --> 0:48:29.959
<v Speaker 1>of we need the bolts manufacturer, we need the servos manufacturer,

0:48:30.040 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we need robovision manufacturer, and yet it's still so agglomerated.

0:48:34.760 --> 0:48:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Or the fact that finance is so agglomerated in New

0:48:37.120 --> 0:48:40.279
<v Speaker 1>York City. I find that or conglomerated. I find that

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:43.440
<v Speaker 1>to be a little odd. So, but yeah, I don't

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:47.720
<v Speaker 1>conglomerated is a conglomerated I don't know whether it's conglomerated

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:50.799
<v Speaker 1>or agglomerated. I'm just gonna say glomerated. We know that

0:48:50.880 --> 0:48:53.359
<v Speaker 1>we are certain industries in the US that are quote

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 1>conglomerated one way or another. But yeah, I did find

0:48:57.120 --> 0:49:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that to be And man, these like Mini Mac billion

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:03.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar company that's like nothing compared to the valuations that

0:49:03.680 --> 0:49:06.719
<v Speaker 1>we see with American companies. Pretty wild stuff. Also, the

0:49:06.719 --> 0:49:09.440
<v Speaker 1>point we should do more, I mean, there's a million

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:11.960
<v Speaker 1>we gotta do we have and there are plenty of

0:49:12.000 --> 0:49:14.160
<v Speaker 1>non a I things to do, so you can't just

0:49:14.239 --> 0:49:16.880
<v Speaker 1>keep saying we should do an episode on X or Y.

0:49:17.360 --> 0:49:20.880
<v Speaker 1>But data markets and like the idea of like, okay,

0:49:20.920 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>these Chinese companies can buy very pricey proprietary data after

0:49:26.760 --> 0:49:29.839
<v Speaker 1>some exclusivity window. There's some interesting stuffing to down there.

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:32.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, the monetization was really interesting to hear.

0:49:32.800 --> 0:49:34.319
<v Speaker 2>Okay, shall we leave it there for now?

0:49:34.360 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there.

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:37.920
<v Speaker 3>This has been another episode of the All Thoughts podcast.

0:49:38.040 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:49:39.160 --> 0:49:41.560
<v Speaker 3>You can follow me at Tracy Alloway.

0:49:41.320 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm sure wasn't Thal. You can follow me at

0:49:43.680 --> 0:49:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the Stalwart. Follow our guest Grace Show. She's at Grace

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:51.120
<v Speaker 1>MZ show and check out her subtck ai prom Follow

0:49:51.160 --> 0:49:55.080
<v Speaker 1>our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman armand Dashel Bennett at Dashbot,

0:49:55.160 --> 0:49:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Calebrooks at Cale Brooks and Kevin Lozano at Kevin Lloyd

0:49:58.920 --> 0:50:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Lozano and from our Oddlots content. Go to Bloomberg dot

0:50:02.040 --> 0:50:04.600
<v Speaker 1>com slash odd loss for the daily newsletter and all

0:50:04.640 --> 0:50:06.839
<v Speaker 1>of our episodes, and you can chat about all these

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>topics twenty four seven in our discord Discord dot gg

0:50:10.680 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 1>slash odlines.

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:13.920
<v Speaker 3>And if you like odd Lots, if you want us

0:50:13.960 --> 0:50:16.440
<v Speaker 3>to do an episode on data markets, then please leave

0:50:16.520 --> 0:50:20.240
<v Speaker 3>us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform. And remember,

0:50:20.280 --> 0:50:22.920
<v Speaker 3>if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can listen to

0:50:23.040 --> 0:50:26.359
<v Speaker 3>all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All you need

0:50:26.400 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 3>to do is find the Bloomberg channel on Apple Podcasts

0:50:29.280 --> 0:50:32.120
<v Speaker 3>and follow the instructions there. Thanks for listening.