WEBVTT - Confession

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:06.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Kate Winkler Dawson. I'm a journalist who's spent the

0:00:06.800 --> 0:00:09.559
<v Speaker 1>last twenty five years writing about true crime.

0:00:09.800 --> 0:00:12.800
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Paul Hols, a retired cold case investigator who's

0:00:12.840 --> 0:00:16.400
<v Speaker 2>worked some of America's most complicated cases and solve them.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.799
<v Speaker 1>Each week, I present Paul with one of history's most

0:00:19.840 --> 0:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>compelling true crimes.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.239
<v Speaker 2>And I weigh in using modern forensic techniques to bring

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:26.040
<v Speaker 2>new insights to old mysteries.

0:00:26.440 --> 0:00:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Together, using our individual expertise, we're examining historical true crime

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:34.360
<v Speaker 1>cases through a twenty first century lens.

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.800
<v Speaker 2>Some are solved and some are cold, very cold.

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 1>This is buried Bones.

0:01:01.440 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 2>Hey Paul, Hey Kate, how are you.

0:01:03.560 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing well. We've got Easter coming up. What kind

0:01:07.920 --> 0:01:10.839
<v Speaker 1>of Easter traditions do you guys having Do you celebrate Easter?

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.840
<v Speaker 2>First of all, you know, we would do when the

0:01:14.880 --> 0:01:17.440
<v Speaker 2>kids were younger, we would do the Easter basket and

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.240
<v Speaker 2>hide the eggs type of thing. Even like when I

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 2>was a kid, you know, I was born and raised Catholic,

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 2>you know, so of course Easter was a big deal

0:01:26.080 --> 0:01:30.399
<v Speaker 2>and going to Mass and stuff. But now my kids

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 2>are older, I think my wife will get them some

0:01:33.760 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 2>basket with chocolates in it, and that's about it.

0:01:36.319 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh, they don't look for Easter eggs anymore, not even

0:01:40.400 --> 0:01:42.120
<v Speaker 1>like the plastic kind of Easter eggs.

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:43.479
<v Speaker 2>No, thank god.

0:01:44.000 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Do you know that My mom would do hard boiled

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>eggs and I wouldye them, and then she would hide them.

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>But she would hide them, I feel like, the night before,

0:01:52.800 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and then they were sitting out until noon or one

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>o'clock the next day, and then she would use them

0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>for deviled eggs. And I think, decades later, I said,

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is a good idea. I should

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:09.839
<v Speaker 1>boiled eggs sit out for that long? I mean, you

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:12.080
<v Speaker 1>know better than I do. That doesn't seem like a

0:02:12.120 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>good idea to me.

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, because one of the interesting things, you know,

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:18.200
<v Speaker 2>I eat a lot of eggs. You know, eggs are

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.720
<v Speaker 2>my staple for breakfast. But it's like here in the

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:27.760
<v Speaker 2>United States, we refrigerate our eggs. Over in Europe they don't. Yeah, true,

0:02:27.880 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 2>you know, so if you boil them, you know, maybe

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 2>there's no reason to have to keep them refrigerated. So

0:02:34.120 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>maybe they're fine up to a certain point. I'm guessing

0:02:37.240 --> 0:02:38.480
<v Speaker 2>that's all it is at this point.

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>So my mom is kind of exonerated from having any

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>bad poisoning me after you say that we could maybe

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>like keep them outside. Issue number two with leaving the

0:02:49.360 --> 0:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>eggs out all night is we have so many raccoons

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and deer that jump our f and bugs and dirt

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:02.679
<v Speaker 1>and snakes and everything. I still say it was bad parenting.

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:04.960
<v Speaker 1>I love my mom, but that was not a great idea.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I feel like because she would hide an egg and

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 1>then she didn't know where the egg went, and I said,

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that's because a raccoon probably took it, And now you

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>want me to eat it.

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:17.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, for sure, But man, you're harsh. Bad parenting.

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:21.400
<v Speaker 1>Huh oh, maybe not parenting, fit boy, I do. Parenting

0:03:21.400 --> 0:03:23.919
<v Speaker 1>fails pretty much constantly. I think every day. I think

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I just did about an hour and a half ago.

0:03:25.880 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Actually, I think we all do.

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Actually, so we hide plastic eggs and the kids, you know,

0:03:32.960 --> 0:03:34.960
<v Speaker 1>will hunt around for them and stuff, and they still

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>do it, and you know, we'll have sort of a

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:42.080
<v Speaker 1>traditional Easter afternoon dinner. We're not religious at all, so

0:03:42.280 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's mostly about the bunny rabbit. My grandfather, who was

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>my dad's father, lived in Missouri. He was a carpenter,

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and he was married to my granny for decades and

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 1>decades and decades, and they were the ones I feel

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>like I told you in another case, those were the

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>grandparents who slept in separate beds, which I found, even

0:04:00.920 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>at eight weird. I didn't understand it. And you know,

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>they had twin beds and they were on the other

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:08.560
<v Speaker 1>side of the room, which I don't know what that means.

0:04:08.600 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I would think they would be closer together,

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.280
<v Speaker 1>but they had twin beds. My papa had like a

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>massive it was like four acres garden, all vegetables. They

0:04:16.960 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>had a root cellar, all this stuff in Missouri, and

0:04:20.360 --> 0:04:21.920
<v Speaker 1>he used to tell me that he was going to

0:04:21.960 --> 0:04:25.880
<v Speaker 1>sit outside with a gun and chase off the Easter Bunny.

0:04:26.160 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 2>Of course, I just thought, you're so mean.

0:04:28.600 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I know he was kind of a farmer type,

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:32.279
<v Speaker 1>but I mean I get it. You know, nobody wants

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>their garden invaded, but the Easter bunny really Papa.

0:04:36.279 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, at least he wasn't out on the porch

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:41.240
<v Speaker 2>with a shotgun when Santa Claus was going to come. Now,

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.240
<v Speaker 2>we would have potentially a homicide.

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and absolutely, well, I mean, you know that strange

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>man creeping along your roof. Yes, he probably hadn't thought

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 1>about that. He just wanted to scare me a little bit,

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I think, And I just thought, it's a bunny rabbit.

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Let him have the lettuce. I mean, you know, I

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>know he chased off animals. So I had an interesting family.

0:05:00.920 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 2>Sounds like it.

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I am taking you to nineteen sixty three Arizona,

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:10.839
<v Speaker 1>and this is a case that, on the surface seems

0:05:10.880 --> 0:05:14.279
<v Speaker 1>I think fairly simple, but it was a landmark case.

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And you'll find out why. I try to find stories where,

0:05:18.839 --> 0:05:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we can say this is the reason why

0:05:21.279 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>we have X, Y and Z. Remember the story about

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:28.360
<v Speaker 1>the man who was accused of sexual assault sneaking into

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:31.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody's house and he left his fingerprints in fresh paint,

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>and that became the landmark case the first time that

0:05:34.600 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>fingerprinting was introduced in court. So this is sort of

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>that kind of case. So as we go along, you know,

0:05:41.360 --> 0:05:45.039
<v Speaker 1>this case changes quite a bit to reflect why it's

0:05:45.040 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>important today.

0:05:46.200 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, so relatively speaking, it's a more recent case.

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 1>It's like brand new, it's like yesterday for us.

0:05:52.200 --> 0:05:55.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no, for sure, it's just what five years before

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:56.159
<v Speaker 2>I was born.

0:05:56.279 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>So you keep dating yourself. I like a guy who

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:00.840
<v Speaker 1>does that though. I mean, you know, you're proud of

0:06:00.880 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>your age, and I'll lend me too.

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 2>It's better than the alternative, right, And you know.

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:07.200
<v Speaker 1>What, my mom says that. Now, I'm going to really

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.720
<v Speaker 1>give my mom some props. My mom says that every time,

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, she says, well, I have friends who don't

0:06:13.800 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>want to disclose their age, and I'm proud of it

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:18.040
<v Speaker 1>because you know, a lot of people don't make it

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.039
<v Speaker 1>to you know, my mom's age was about eighty. She's

0:06:21.080 --> 0:06:23.559
<v Speaker 1>going to be eighty two this year, so I would

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>be bragging about that too. Yeah, I'll brag about fifty fifty.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy to have made it this far.

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:34.280
<v Speaker 2>I've got you beat you, do I know? I know? Yeah.

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, let's go ahead and set the scene for the story.

0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 1>We are, as I said before, in nineteen sixty three, Arizona.

0:06:43.040 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>This is going to be a landmark case. A warning.

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.760
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot involving a sexual assault. You all

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>know that we try to handle this with a lot

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:56.040
<v Speaker 1>of sensitivity, and Paul does a great job talking about this.

0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:58.160
<v Speaker 1>So I just want to give you a warning straight

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:01.159
<v Speaker 1>off the top. So here is the crime. We're going

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to jump right into it before midnight, shortly before midnight,

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>March second, nineteen sixty three. We are in Phoenix. An

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.720
<v Speaker 1>eighteen year old woman is heading home from her job

0:07:12.800 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>at the concession counter at a local movie theater. She

0:07:16.440 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>takes a city bus to a stop that's about three

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>blocks away from her home, where she lives with her

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 1>mother and her sister and her sister's husband. The time

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>when this happened is a little murky because the woman

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:34.520
<v Speaker 1>says this happened before midnight on March second, but the

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>police filed the report on March third, so it gets

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a little confusing. But we're gonna go with March second.

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 1>She will be the victim of a sexual assault, and

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>I am not going to identify her because it's nineteen

0:07:48.920 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>sixty three and I would hope she's still around, so

0:07:53.320 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>we're going to leave out her name. But I don't

0:07:55.600 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's difficult to find. In the nineteen sixties. Phoenix

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is in the middle of it's a huge building boom,

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>and she lives in a development that's still under construction,

0:08:06.040 --> 0:08:08.240
<v Speaker 1>so the sidewalks are dark, they don't seem to have

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.600
<v Speaker 1>street lights. She's coming home very late by herself. She

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 1>can hear a car pulling up behind her. She kind

0:08:15.920 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of ignores it and keeps walking. The driver gets out

0:08:18.320 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of the car and he runs up behind her and

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 1>grabs her by the waist. She says that he presses

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.920
<v Speaker 1>something sharp up against the back of her neck. He says,

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>if you don't scream, I won't hurt you, and she

0:08:32.440 --> 0:08:35.160
<v Speaker 1>goes with him and he puts her in the car's

0:08:35.200 --> 0:08:39.359
<v Speaker 1>back seat. And before I kind of get to what happens,

0:08:39.720 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to ask a question because I feel like

0:08:42.559 --> 0:08:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the current guidance is. If you

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:50.480
<v Speaker 1>are approached by a stranger and he says get into

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>the car and he does have a weapon or doesn't

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:57.319
<v Speaker 1>have a weapon. I feel like growing up I heard comply,

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.720
<v Speaker 1>that's how you stay alive, because otherwise she you right there,

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.520
<v Speaker 1>or he'll force you in and it'll be a really

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.960
<v Speaker 1>bad situation, even worse situation. But I feel also like

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:09.840
<v Speaker 1>I've heard quite a bit about no matter what you do,

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:11.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think this is what they teach in schools

0:09:11.960 --> 0:09:13.600
<v Speaker 1>to kids. No matter what you do, don't get in

0:09:13.600 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>a car with somebody, fight, scream whatever it is, even

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:18.480
<v Speaker 1>if they have a gun pointed out, you don't do it.

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>So what's your understanding of what the guidance would be

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>from safety experts with this, Well.

0:09:25.800 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 2>It's not my understanding. I will tell you from my

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.560
<v Speaker 2>casework experience, you never ever let yourself be taken to

0:09:32.600 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 2>a secondary location. I don't care if they've got a gun,

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:38.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't care if they've got a knife. What they're

0:09:38.559 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 2>going to do to you at that secondary location is

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.439
<v Speaker 2>going to be far worse and being shot or stabbed

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 2>or killed at that contact spot. With my other podcast,

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:53.000
<v Speaker 2>small Town Dicks with Yardley, Dan and Dave, Dan, Dave

0:09:53.000 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and I are coming out law enforcement. We all tell

0:09:56.240 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 2>our listeners don't go to a secondary location. Don't let

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 2>let yourself get bound. You know, if you are having

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:08.040
<v Speaker 2>somebody who is trying to force you into a vehicle,

0:10:08.520 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 2>you fight, you kick, you go dead weight, You make

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 2>it as hard as possible, and you want to draw

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:22.360
<v Speaker 2>as much attention as possible so somebody else can either

0:10:22.760 --> 0:10:25.840
<v Speaker 2>come to your aid or at least get law enforcement rolling.

0:10:26.000 --> 0:10:29.800
<v Speaker 2>And oftentimes the offender is not expecting that. He's thinking

0:10:29.800 --> 0:10:32.160
<v Speaker 2>you're going to comply with the gun or the knife,

0:10:32.200 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 2>and now all of a sudden. He's got a fight

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:36.280
<v Speaker 2>on his hands. He's got a lot of noise being made.

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 2>There's a good chance at that offender will run off

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:43.559
<v Speaker 2>some won't you know. But that is you know, straight up,

0:10:43.800 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 2>because I've just seen what happens to victims when they

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:48.760
<v Speaker 2>go to a secondary location.

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:54.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, luckily this woman survives, but her ordeal is awful.

0:10:55.080 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>He has something sharp up against the back of her neck.

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:00.280
<v Speaker 1>He says, if you don't scream, I won't hurt you.

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>He puts her in the back seat of his car,

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>binds her ankles together with rope. He also ties her

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 1>hands behind her back. He drives about twenty minutes into

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 1>the desert, remember in Arizona, and he rapes her and

0:11:14.000 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>then he says something odd. He says, pray for me,

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>and drops her back off in her neighborhood. You know.

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:23.520
<v Speaker 1>She of course goes home, tells her family what happened.

0:11:23.520 --> 0:11:26.640
<v Speaker 1>They call the police, doing all the right things. When

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the investigators come, she can give a description of the car,

0:11:29.200 --> 0:11:32.120
<v Speaker 1>but not the make and model, and she says that

0:11:32.160 --> 0:11:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the car was either gray or a light green sedan

0:11:34.720 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>with a dark upholstered interior that has stripes, which is

0:11:38.960 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>great that she sounds so specific there, but she can't

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.199
<v Speaker 1>give a description of the offender. I don't know if

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>it's because of trauma or he's masked, but you know,

0:11:50.480 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 1>this is what ends up happening. So what do you

0:11:53.400 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 1>think so far based on all of this.

0:11:56.040 --> 0:12:01.600
<v Speaker 2>Well, there's plenty of examples where these sexually motivated offenders

0:12:01.880 --> 0:12:07.080
<v Speaker 2>abduct their victims, sexually assault them, and then take them back,

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 2>either to the abduction location or to some other location

0:12:10.880 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>and drop them off. At least within this offender's mind

0:12:16.240 --> 0:12:20.079
<v Speaker 2>right now, he doesn't have the homicidal ideations, at least

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 2>not yet. If he is unmasked and is letting this

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 2>victim go, you know, that's that's interesting because he's not

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 2>taking you know, in nineteen sixty three, most certainly would

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 2>be aware that this victim is going to be talking

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 2>to law enforcement and likely would be able to provide

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:42.320
<v Speaker 2>a pretty accurate description of him. So it kind of

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 2>tells me a little bit about this offender that he's

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 2>not being as as careful as he should if he

0:12:49.160 --> 0:12:51.360
<v Speaker 2>wants to continue to get away, either get away with

0:12:51.400 --> 0:12:54.599
<v Speaker 2>this particular crime or to continue to offend. You know,

0:12:54.640 --> 0:12:57.839
<v Speaker 2>because this type of offender, you know, abducting strangers and

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:02.080
<v Speaker 2>sexually assaulting them. That general is considered a predatory type crime,

0:13:02.160 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 2>and they do that over and over and over again.

0:13:04.800 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 2>In some ways, he's kind of almost rolling the dice

0:13:08.600 --> 0:13:13.280
<v Speaker 2>and willingly so to where maybe, you know, especially with

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 2>the statement pray for me, you know, he knows that

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 2>he has a fantasy life that society does not agree with,

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:24.280
<v Speaker 2>that he's committing a crime. He wants to be caught,

0:13:24.360 --> 0:13:26.440
<v Speaker 2>but he's not willing to give himself up.

0:13:29.880 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, what happens next disturbs me, of course, you know,

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:35.880
<v Speaker 1>anything involving is a sexual assault disturbs me. But what

0:13:35.960 --> 0:13:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the police do next I had not heard, and maybe

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:43.560
<v Speaker 1>you have. The survivor goes to the station to be

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>interviewed and they make her take a polygraph test. Have

0:13:48.080 --> 0:13:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you heard that before?

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 2>I hate to say it, but this is this is

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 2>an era in which law enforcement did a lot of

0:13:54.520 --> 0:13:58.079
<v Speaker 2>victim blaming. I saw it over and over again from

0:13:58.160 --> 0:14:02.360
<v Speaker 2>cases out of the nineteen six nineteen seventies, and here,

0:14:03.000 --> 0:14:05.600
<v Speaker 2>right off the bat, they are telling this victim, well,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:08.920
<v Speaker 2>you got to prove yourself that you're telling the truth. Right.

0:14:09.760 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 2>It very much was this misogynistic type of mentality that

0:14:15.360 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 2>law enforcement had back in the day. And remember nineteen

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 2>sixty three, law enforcement's all male, very few females are working.

0:14:23.160 --> 0:14:27.480
<v Speaker 2>There almost was a you know, mindset, well, you shouldn't

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 2>have dressed that way, and that is what's happening to

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:31.600
<v Speaker 2>this victim here.

0:14:31.960 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, first of all, let's go back and talk about

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>polygraph tests in general, which we know are unreliable from

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>American sherlock. You know, I can't remember what year it was,

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.440
<v Speaker 1>but it was like nineteen twenty five. I think that

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in that time period where even the Supreme Court said

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 1>these should not be admitted in court. You know, this

0:14:50.440 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is not reliable enough because so much can change your

0:14:53.280 --> 0:14:56.360
<v Speaker 1>heart rate, your pulse, everything can change based on medication,

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:58.560
<v Speaker 1>how you're feeling that. I mean, you know, a host

0:14:58.600 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>of things that can't be attributed to lying. I think

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:04.640
<v Speaker 1>you and I have talked about that. It's an effective

0:15:05.120 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>interrogation technique, but certainly not something that can point definitively

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>to someone's guilt.

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 2>It's a tool, Yeah, that's all it is, you know,

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 2>and you know, poligraphers will you know, pretty much defend

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:21.920
<v Speaker 2>their results, but also they recognize the variables that can

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:26.640
<v Speaker 2>skew the results. Oftentimes what we get an investigation from

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.880
<v Speaker 2>a polygraph because the person that's being hooked up to

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:35.760
<v Speaker 2>the instrument, they now are in a position to where,

0:15:36.280 --> 0:15:38.640
<v Speaker 2>oh shit, they're going to know if I'm lying. And

0:15:38.720 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 2>so sometimes certain individuals will now tell the truth. Other

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 2>individuals will just straight up continue to lie. But it

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 2>locks them into statements, and some of the most valuable

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 2>investigative statements come out of the polygraph interview. You get

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.360
<v Speaker 2>questioned while you're hooked up to the instrument. Polygrapher goes off,

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:04.560
<v Speaker 2>he comes back, he's got instrument readouts, and he says, okay, Paul,

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:07.520
<v Speaker 2>you answered these questions right, but I have concern about

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 2>this question. The next thing, you know, somebody is just like, well,

0:16:11.200 --> 0:16:13.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, trying to make something up in order to

0:16:13.040 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 2>say why the instrument is thrown off. And then a

0:16:15.640 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>discussion follows, and next thing you know, they're making admissions,

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:24.200
<v Speaker 2>which now the homicide investigators or sexual assault investigators go, okay,

0:16:24.320 --> 0:16:26.320
<v Speaker 2>we got the right guy. Now we need to do

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 2>we need to do some follow up. It's a tool,

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, There's no way you can you know, affect

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 2>an arrest based off of failing a polygraph.

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Well it is inconclusive. And in two thousand and five,

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought this was interesting. In two thousand and five, right,

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:46.600
<v Speaker 1>so twenty years ago, the Violence Against Women Act withdrew

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 1>some federal funding from states that still required rape survivors

0:16:51.760 --> 0:16:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to take polygraph tests. So this is what's stunning to me.

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>As it stands, at least twenty five states have since

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>banned this practice. This leaves the other states who still

0:17:02.840 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>do it, And that's incredible to me. I just had

0:17:05.400 --> 0:17:08.160
<v Speaker 1>never heard that before, so that it's good to know,

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, that this is something that gives me a

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of context, that this is something you know that

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:13.200
<v Speaker 1>happened in the past.

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.640
<v Speaker 2>You know. And I do just want to say, you know, obviously,

0:17:16.680 --> 0:17:20.280
<v Speaker 2>when you have a victim come in, you have to

0:17:20.320 --> 0:17:24.160
<v Speaker 2>listen to that victim and take what they are saying

0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 2>as being fact. Right, this is what they experienced. However,

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.800
<v Speaker 2>we do have victims lie. They make up things, you know,

0:17:32.920 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 2>and so as you investigate, if you do find out

0:17:36.960 --> 0:17:39.959
<v Speaker 2>this victim is likely lying, then of course you have

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:42.639
<v Speaker 2>to figure out, well, what is going on here, but

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:46.640
<v Speaker 2>to treat like in this case, this victim straight off

0:17:46.680 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 2>the bat to hook somebody up to a polygraph before

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:54.280
<v Speaker 2>even hearing what happened and starting the investigation is just

0:17:54.320 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 2>straight up wrong, right, And she's.

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Not accusing anybody yet. I mean, it's not like there's

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 1>some wealthy, you know, young man whose life is on

0:18:02.320 --> 0:18:05.399
<v Speaker 1>the line because this woman is accusing him of something.

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>There isn't even an investigation yet. This is her, you know,

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:12.840
<v Speaker 1>a contention, So okay, let's move on. So there was

0:18:12.880 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 1>a detailed interior description of the car, but not the exterior.

0:18:16.760 --> 0:18:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But the description of the car matches descriptions that have

0:18:21.080 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>been given to the police in reports of other assaults.

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>She says it was a gray or a light green

0:18:27.040 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>sedan with dark upholstered interior that had stripes. I mean,

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:35.960
<v Speaker 1>that still seems kind of vague, But people who have

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>been survivors of other similar attacks are coming back with

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:42.560
<v Speaker 1>the same description of the car. So does that seem

0:18:42.720 --> 0:18:44.880
<v Speaker 1>reliable to you? I mean, police are going to really

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>lean into this too well.

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 2>I think in terms of, you know, is it reliable

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 2>necessarily to be able to link these crimes together conclusively? No,

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, what is the prevalence of this style interior

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 2>at this point in time? But in terms of this

0:19:03.680 --> 0:19:06.639
<v Speaker 2>is a detail of if these if these crimes are

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 2>similar enough to where these all these victims are saying

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I was inside the offender's vehicle and this is what

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the interior of the vehicle look like, then it is

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 2>a characteristic where you have to consider this may be

0:19:19.440 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 2>the same offender. Now if you have other behaviors, how

0:19:22.560 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 2>these women are abducted, you know, how he is sexually

0:19:25.400 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 2>assaulting them, what his appearance is like, and all these

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 2>seem to be within sort of a you'd say it's

0:19:31.880 --> 0:19:35.000
<v Speaker 2>a bracket, you know, in terms of each characteristic falls

0:19:35.000 --> 0:19:38.640
<v Speaker 2>within a bracket where it doesn't deviate too much from

0:19:38.720 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 2>each other. Then you go, okay, there's a good likelihood

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:44.400
<v Speaker 2>that we have a serial rapist on the loose here.

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>So the police cannot find this car. And about a

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>week later after this woman's attack, this woman's brother in

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>law has been escorting her to and from the bus

0:19:58.800 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>ever since the rape happened. At some point, he spots

0:20:03.080 --> 0:20:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a car that matches his sister in law's description. The

0:20:06.640 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>car leaves before the woman's bus arrives, but comes back.

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Once the woman and the brother in law are there together,

0:20:14.840 --> 0:20:17.080
<v Speaker 1>she confirms that it looks like the right car, and

0:20:17.320 --> 0:20:20.040
<v Speaker 1>he runs after it, but the car speeds away once

0:20:20.040 --> 0:20:23.400
<v Speaker 1>he sees somebody as chasing him, and the brother in law,

0:20:23.520 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>thank goodness, jots down a partial plate number. This car

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:30.119
<v Speaker 1>turns out to be a nineteen fifty three Packard and

0:20:30.320 --> 0:20:33.359
<v Speaker 1>it's registered to a woman. But she lives with a

0:20:33.400 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>man who is twenty three and his name is Arnisto.

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:39.639
<v Speaker 1>I can tell you about Arnisto. I can talk about

0:20:39.720 --> 0:20:42.879
<v Speaker 1>what ends up happening when police locate him. And remember

0:20:42.920 --> 0:20:44.920
<v Speaker 1>this is a very significant case and you're going to

0:20:44.960 --> 0:20:45.880
<v Speaker 1>find out in just a bit.

0:20:46.240 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think, you know. I think the first comment

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 2>is is that you know, the victim being able to say, hey,

0:20:51.840 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 2>that looks like the car. It's basically okay, this looks

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:58.440
<v Speaker 2>like the make and model car that the offender used

0:20:58.440 --> 0:21:00.879
<v Speaker 2>that she was put into. And I'm assuming that they

0:21:00.960 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 2>must have been close enough to the vehicle possibly to

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:05.920
<v Speaker 2>be able to see, oh, it's got the striped upholstery

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 2>on the inside. So she's not saying that guy looks

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:12.639
<v Speaker 2>like the guy that's actually assaulted me. She's saying, that

0:21:12.680 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 2>looks like the car. Okay, So it's most certainly something

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.120
<v Speaker 2>where it's okay, that's good. Now we have an understanding

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:23.000
<v Speaker 2>of the making model that the offender was using, potentially

0:21:23.800 --> 0:21:26.479
<v Speaker 2>and a nineteen fifty three packard you know, I'm I

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:31.600
<v Speaker 2>know of the packard vehicles. I don't think they were

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:34.840
<v Speaker 2>exceptionally common, but that would be something that I would

0:21:34.880 --> 0:21:38.199
<v Speaker 2>be kind of wanting to know as an investigator. Is okay,

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.280
<v Speaker 2>So is this just a you know, we have a

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 2>ton of these, you know, driving around the city, or

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 2>is this something that is relatively rare that I don't know,

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:48.440
<v Speaker 2>but I would want I would be wanting to dig

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 2>into that before I put a lot of weight on.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 2>You know, the person that has access to this vehicle

0:21:54.040 --> 0:21:58.359
<v Speaker 2>is possibly her attacker. So that's probably the first observation

0:21:58.440 --> 0:22:01.440
<v Speaker 2>that I have. And then you know, the registered owner

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 2>being a woman, Well, we know a woman isn't the

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 2>one that is attacking the victim. But we have a

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 2>twenty three year old male, you know, our nesto. So, now,

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.560
<v Speaker 2>based off of what the victim could recount about her offender,

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:18.439
<v Speaker 2>does this our nesto seem to match? I know you

0:22:18.520 --> 0:22:21.480
<v Speaker 2>said that she could not remember much about the physical

0:22:21.560 --> 0:22:23.040
<v Speaker 2>characteristics of this offender.

0:22:23.520 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, not at all. I mean she did at the

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:29.800
<v Speaker 1>time that she couldn't recall anything specific, but for.

0:22:29.840 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 2>Law enforcements, there seems to be other cases that are

0:22:32.840 --> 0:22:38.120
<v Speaker 2>matching this victim's case in terms of the vehicle. So

0:22:38.280 --> 0:22:41.080
<v Speaker 2>what are these other victims saying about the you know,

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:44.959
<v Speaker 2>the physical characteristics of their offender, and does our Nesto

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 2>match that. That's kind of what I would be looking

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 2>at if I'm considering these cases as being related.

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you because I do have descriptions of what

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>happens in these other cases too, and we can kind

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>of see that. On March thirteenth, nineteen sixty three, the

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:03.240
<v Speaker 1>police come to his house where he lives, or Nesta's house,

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>and ask him to come down for questioning. According to

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the police, or Nesto is friendly and helpful, unbothered, and

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>he talks freely with the police. This seems unusual to me,

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if he is the person. I

0:23:16.000 --> 0:23:17.720
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this is someone who thinks he can

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 1>out smart the police and you know, just sort of

0:23:20.560 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of skate through this, but you know he is

0:23:23.200 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 1>he is someone who does not seem alarmed by the

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 1>fact that he's being brought in for questioning. For it

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>sounds like at least one sexual assault, and I'm assuming

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:32.879
<v Speaker 1>they're going to try to tie him to the others.

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 2>Sure, but there are plenty of people that respond that way. Okay,

0:23:36.440 --> 0:23:39.480
<v Speaker 2>you really can't draw conclusions. You're just noting that he

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 2>seems cooperative. You know, he does not seem nervous, so

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, maybe he doesn't have anything to do with this.

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 2>But then there are offenders that when they've been pulled in,

0:23:50.359 --> 0:23:51.400
<v Speaker 2>that's the way they are.

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, before I get to the interrogation, let me just

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.240
<v Speaker 1>tell you a little bit about him. He was born

0:23:56.480 --> 0:24:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona to a very poverty stricken family. His mother

0:24:00.560 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>died when he was young, and he had a lot

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of brushes with the law when he was a kid.

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>He was sent to a reform school when he was

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 1>a teenager. He had some prior rest in California, though

0:24:09.840 --> 0:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't convicted. It doesn't sound like anything violent. He

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.760
<v Speaker 1>lived sort of an itinerant lifestyle in his late teens

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and early twenties, which means he hopped around from place

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>to place and job to job, so he didn't have

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>roots anywhere. He was convicted in Tennacy for driving a

0:24:25.920 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 1>stolen car. When he is being questioned for this sexual

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>assault by the Phoenix Police. He's working nights on a

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.119
<v Speaker 1>loading dock for a produce company and that's what we

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:41.280
<v Speaker 1>know about Ernesto. So, you know, the brushes with the law.

0:24:41.320 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about that before, that certain rushes with the

0:24:45.680 --> 0:24:47.600
<v Speaker 1>law are alarming to you, at least when we talk

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:51.239
<v Speaker 1>about psychopathy and the potential for violence of somebody later on.

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>But these things, you know, he's twenty three, stolen car,

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>nothing violent. Is this anything that would alarm you as

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 1>an investigator when you're looking at this case, because right now,

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.679
<v Speaker 1>all it is is he's got a car that people

0:25:03.680 --> 0:25:06.360
<v Speaker 1>are saying might have been involved in, you know, the

0:25:06.400 --> 0:25:08.240
<v Speaker 1>offender being a rapist.

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 2>No, you know, all of it seems to be minor.

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:16.119
<v Speaker 2>You know, many people have this level of criminality, you know,

0:25:16.240 --> 0:25:18.960
<v Speaker 2>so it doesn't mean doesn't point to anything that would

0:25:19.000 --> 0:25:22.360
<v Speaker 2>indicate that, you know, he potentially is a serial rapist

0:25:22.440 --> 0:25:26.159
<v Speaker 2>or a capable of sexual assault. If he has priors

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:28.199
<v Speaker 2>as as I think I've talked about before, If he

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:34.080
<v Speaker 2>has prior sexual assault, particularly sexual assaults on strangers, you know,

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 2>predatory type crime, then that is more of a red

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:40.960
<v Speaker 2>flag in terms of his past criminality indicating Okay, he's

0:25:41.000 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 2>capable of this type of crime. And we know these

0:25:43.160 --> 0:25:46.880
<v Speaker 2>types of fenders have a tendency to be recidivous, they

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 2>have a tendency to continue committing these types of crimes.

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, now I'm going to have questions about police conduct

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.200
<v Speaker 1>just in general, when you're interrogating somebody, whether this is

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of commonplace or not. Here's point number one, and

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:02.719
<v Speaker 1>you tell me what you think. They take er Nesto

0:26:03.080 --> 0:26:06.600
<v Speaker 1>to a very small interrogation room. You know, they want

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:08.680
<v Speaker 1>to try to figure out if he's even the right guy,

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.880
<v Speaker 1>because he does not seem bothered at all that he's there.

0:26:13.200 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>So it's described this interrogation room is described more like

0:26:16.400 --> 0:26:20.439
<v Speaker 1>a cubicle twelve feet squared cubicle, and they refer to

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:23.879
<v Speaker 1>it as the sweat room. Are you allowed water? Can

0:26:23.920 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>you go to the bathroom? Is that one call? Still?

0:26:26.560 --> 0:26:27.880
<v Speaker 1>One phone call? Still a thing?

0:26:28.560 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 2>You know? There's when when somebody's brought in to be interviewed,

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:40.360
<v Speaker 2>there is a level of expected treatment. You know, you're

0:26:40.359 --> 0:26:43.879
<v Speaker 2>not bringing somebody in to you know, put them in

0:26:44.400 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 2>essentially a jail cell. Typically, yes, he had a part

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:54.159
<v Speaker 2>of a proper interview is where you're ensuring that the

0:26:54.240 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 2>subject is reasonably comfortable. Today, law enforcement needs to be

0:26:59.440 --> 0:27:06.120
<v Speaker 2>mindful of the suspects perception. Now under this circumstance, at

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:08.840
<v Speaker 2>this point in time, I don't think you said he

0:27:08.920 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 2>was arrested. He was asked to come down to the station.

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 2>He is voluntarily there in this day and age, under

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:21.320
<v Speaker 2>this set of circumstances. You know, at any point, he

0:27:21.359 --> 0:27:24.600
<v Speaker 2>can decide to get up and leave, and he has

0:27:24.680 --> 0:27:29.919
<v Speaker 2>to have that perception of the capability to get up

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:31.920
<v Speaker 2>and leave when he is there voluntarily.

0:27:32.880 --> 0:27:39.440
<v Speaker 1>So Smarty, tell me what Ernesto's last name is, Miranda. Yep,

0:27:40.720 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>this is the Miranda Rights case, nineteen sixty three. Yes,

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe it took till nineteen sixty three to

0:27:46.080 --> 0:27:48.640
<v Speaker 1>sort all this out. But it's an interesting case.

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:52.320
<v Speaker 2>No, for sure, you know, but this there is a reason,

0:27:52.720 --> 0:27:57.040
<v Speaker 2>because of this case, why people that are in a

0:27:57.119 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 2>custodial situation, whether they've been told that they are in custody,

0:28:04.480 --> 0:28:08.280
<v Speaker 2>or they perceive that they are in custody, that they

0:28:08.480 --> 0:28:11.919
<v Speaker 2>need to be told their rights. And it's because of

0:28:11.960 --> 0:28:12.440
<v Speaker 2>this case.

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Well, now we're going to find out why. So he

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:19.679
<v Speaker 1>is questioned for two hours and he denies the rape

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:22.760
<v Speaker 1>and several other crimes that police are trying to pin

0:28:22.840 --> 0:28:26.600
<v Speaker 1>him on basically just based on the description of his car,

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:28.760
<v Speaker 1>which does not seem like a wild description, but I

0:28:28.760 --> 0:28:31.360
<v Speaker 1>guess it is. So they're trying to pin him on

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of different things. So police put him in

0:28:34.520 --> 0:28:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a lineup. Now we need to talk about lineups. Police

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 1>put him in a lineup, and the young woman eighteen

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>year old who was raped, as well as another woman

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>identify him out of four men, but they say they're

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>not positive. I mean, my notes say that the young

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>woman really couldn't give him a description, so I don't

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.680
<v Speaker 1>know what would have changed. And then talk about how

0:28:56.880 --> 0:29:01.080
<v Speaker 1>lineups work. Are they the same as in the sixties, we'll.

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 2>See well, and this is where whether you're dealing with

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 2>a photo lineup or you're doing this in person type

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 2>of lineup is Nowadays there are criteria that these lineups

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 2>have to meet in order for them to be to

0:29:17.680 --> 0:29:22.880
<v Speaker 2>have any level of veracity. In terms of if the victim,

0:29:23.240 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 2>like in this case, is able to pick somebody out

0:29:26.240 --> 0:29:31.360
<v Speaker 2>of the lineup. There isn't anything that would have swayed

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 2>the victim to point at the person that law enforcement

0:29:34.560 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 2>is considering the suspect. But let's say Ernesto is you know,

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 2>I don't know his size. Let's say he's five six,

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and fifty pounds, clean shaven, and the other

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 2>three men in this lineup are all above six foot

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 2>and they have facial hair. You know, it's that type

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:53.680
<v Speaker 2>of thing. And those were some of the things that

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.920
<v Speaker 2>was happening, you know, back in the day, in order

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 2>to get that witness or that victim to point at

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 2>the person that law enforcement has kind of keyed in on,

0:30:04.520 --> 0:30:06.800
<v Speaker 2>in order for law enforcement to write up a report

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:09.959
<v Speaker 2>saying suspect was picked out of a photo lineup, and

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 2>now they're putting that in a probable cause affidavit for

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:15.479
<v Speaker 2>arrest for that crime.

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:18.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the other case. There was another

0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>woman who identified him in this lineup, but said, you know,

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm not one hundred percent sure. The circumstances from her

0:30:25.000 --> 0:30:28.200
<v Speaker 1>case were that she was grabbed at knife point while

0:30:28.240 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>she was going to her car at night from her

0:30:31.440 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 1>job as a bank teller. He put her in the

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 1>front bench of her own car, drove a short distance,

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and she was assaulted but not raped, and robbed of

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:43.920
<v Speaker 1>eight dollars. This seems different.

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 2>It is tough when you have disparate crimes like this.

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Now you have an abduction of females. In both instances,

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 2>you have these females being kidnapped, they're being moved to

0:30:57.720 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 2>a different location. Okay, there's similarities there, just because one

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 2>case doesn't end in sexual assault and it turns out

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:09.680
<v Speaker 2>to be essentially a robbery of eight dollars. You know,

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 2>eight dollars is taken by force or fear by this offender.

0:31:13.040 --> 0:31:15.360
<v Speaker 2>Serial rapists will also commit this type of crime and

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 2>not sexually assault somebody, So you can't eliminate them as

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 2>not being related. But I think to your point, yes,

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 2>you can't necessarily say they are related because there isn't

0:31:26.880 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 2>enough circumstances, behaviors, et cetera that are unique enough to say, yes,

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:36.600
<v Speaker 2>this appears to be the same individual, the same offender.

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 2>It's just something you have to consider. You know, offenders

0:31:39.640 --> 0:31:43.160
<v Speaker 2>commit multiple types of crimes, so that's just what happens.

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:47.080
<v Speaker 2>And you know, you take a look at Ernesto's criminal pass,

0:31:47.600 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 2>this robbery of eight dollars seems to be more in

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.400
<v Speaker 2>line with the types of petty crimes that he's committing

0:31:53.440 --> 0:31:57.240
<v Speaker 2>even though the kidnapp is serious. That's that's a massive,

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.640
<v Speaker 2>major felony that's going on there. But to take the

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 2>eight dollars seems inline, like with maybe some of these

0:32:03.800 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 2>petty theft arrests that he possibly had in his criminal past.

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. So remember it was a lineup of Ernesto and

0:32:11.960 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>three other men, and they said it looks like him,

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>but we're not one hundred percent sure. That's not what

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the police tell Ernesto and they say that he has

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 1>been positively identified by these two women, and he immediately confesses.

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.000
<v Speaker 1>Now two hours of interrogation. We don't know what that

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 1>involved in. I don't know if about Phoenix, Arizona in

0:32:32.120 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>the sixties, if this was the third degree or what happened.

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>But he didn't break until these two women positively identified him.

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:42.880
<v Speaker 1>I know police can lie, right, I mean how much

0:32:42.920 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>can they lie? When you're interrogating somebody, you're trying to

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:46.080
<v Speaker 1>trap them.

0:32:46.480 --> 0:32:49.520
<v Speaker 2>You can lie to the person you're talking to, you know,

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.040
<v Speaker 2>with the expectation that if the person's innocent, they will

0:32:53.520 --> 0:32:58.320
<v Speaker 2>stand their ground and in essence tell the interviewer you're wrong.

0:32:58.800 --> 0:33:01.360
<v Speaker 2>You know that wasn't me. I did not you know,

0:33:01.560 --> 0:33:04.480
<v Speaker 2>attack those women or whatever. But we do see with

0:33:04.800 --> 0:33:11.040
<v Speaker 2>select types of suspects that will cave in to an

0:33:11.080 --> 0:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>interrogation when they are told lies. You know, So it

0:33:15.440 --> 0:33:18.400
<v Speaker 2>is a balance. You know that. This is where you

0:33:18.480 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 2>have you have an offender, Hey, we've got your DNA.

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 2>In this case, in this sexual assault, the innocent person

0:33:25.600 --> 0:33:28.480
<v Speaker 2>is expected to say, I don't know how that got there. Now,

0:33:28.680 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 2>guilty guys say the same thing, right, but you expect

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 2>that person, the innocent person, to stand their ground. But

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 2>then you have to evaluate the individual you're talking to.

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 2>And we know individuals that are intellectually challenged, that have

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:47.440
<v Speaker 2>certain personalities, that are of a certain age, et cetera,

0:33:47.840 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 2>are more susceptible to caving in, either to being under

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the influence of the interrogator or to caving into the circumstances.

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 2>If I just tell them what they want to hear,

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 2>maybe I'll be let go.

0:34:00.840 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I've heard circumstances where people say they were interrogated for

0:34:05.120 --> 0:34:08.440
<v Speaker 1>so long, almost days, where they start questioning whether they

0:34:08.440 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>were involved or not. I don't remember the stat from

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.760
<v Speaker 1>the Innocence Project, but it's something like twenty five percent.

0:34:13.920 --> 0:34:18.440
<v Speaker 1>I think wrongful convictions come from false confessions.

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:22.600
<v Speaker 2>No, for sure, you know. And it's interesting in California

0:34:22.680 --> 0:34:26.960
<v Speaker 2>so that the read interview technique, which has been taught

0:34:27.000 --> 0:34:31.040
<v Speaker 2>forever and it originated out of the Chicago area, has

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:36.000
<v Speaker 2>been shown to generate false confessions. And so in California,

0:34:36.560 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I know there's one DA. I think it's Elderiddle County DA.

0:34:39.680 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 2>I was listening to him at a conference talk about

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 2>how he was championing banning the use of this read

0:34:45.560 --> 0:34:48.760
<v Speaker 2>interrogation technique in California, and I think he was successful.

0:34:48.800 --> 0:34:51.839
<v Speaker 2>I'm not entirely sure I know where that's at, in

0:34:51.920 --> 0:34:56.760
<v Speaker 2>part because it does cause susceptible individuals to falsely confess

0:34:56.800 --> 0:35:00.359
<v Speaker 2>to something they didn't do. You know. It's just way

0:35:00.440 --> 0:35:05.719
<v Speaker 2>that these individuals are manipulated, you know. So it's a balance,

0:35:05.880 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 2>you know, you want to get the truth out of

0:35:07.840 --> 0:35:11.400
<v Speaker 2>the person, and we know people will lie to protect

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 2>themselves from the crimes that they've committed. So you have

0:35:14.040 --> 0:35:17.760
<v Speaker 2>to somehow figure out a way in order to get

0:35:17.800 --> 0:35:20.359
<v Speaker 2>those facts out or at least get them to make

0:35:20.440 --> 0:35:24.319
<v Speaker 2>statements that are incriminating that a prosecutor can use. But

0:35:24.440 --> 0:35:27.600
<v Speaker 2>at what point do you draw the line in terms

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:29.759
<v Speaker 2>of what you're willing to do in order to get

0:35:29.800 --> 0:35:32.759
<v Speaker 2>those statements out of that particular suspect.

0:35:33.120 --> 0:35:36.319
<v Speaker 1>Well, this prosecutor you were talking about, can you draw

0:35:36.480 --> 0:35:40.400
<v Speaker 1>briefly a contrast between the read interrogation technique and what

0:35:40.600 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 1>should be done if you have somebody who's intellectually challenged.

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what's the different, what's the right and the wrong?

0:35:47.040 --> 0:35:50.319
<v Speaker 1>What does the read technique do that's so manipulative that

0:35:50.360 --> 0:35:51.920
<v Speaker 1>gets these wrongful.

0:35:51.520 --> 0:35:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Convictions fundamentally sort of like what you're hearing here in

0:35:56.000 --> 0:35:59.920
<v Speaker 2>the Miranda case in terms of you know, very confrontation,

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:04.080
<v Speaker 2>making up these these lies, you know, really trying to

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 2>persuade the individual down a certain tract. You know, back

0:36:09.200 --> 0:36:13.360
<v Speaker 2>in the day before this case, law enforcement was really

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:16.759
<v Speaker 2>heavy handed in terms of how they would interrogate individuals.

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:19.880
<v Speaker 2>She's talk about, you know, being you know, kept awake

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 2>for long hours while you are being questioned over and

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:27.520
<v Speaker 2>over again. And part of the questioning with this tactic

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:31.680
<v Speaker 2>is just re asking the questions over and over again

0:36:31.840 --> 0:36:34.200
<v Speaker 2>over the course of many hours to where now the

0:36:34.239 --> 0:36:38.120
<v Speaker 2>person's getting frustrated and so now they're going to go, well,

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 2>my cooperation up to this point isn't working, So now

0:36:41.000 --> 0:36:43.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to give them what they want, you know,

0:36:43.120 --> 0:36:46.279
<v Speaker 2>and now they've just confessed to a crime. And then

0:36:46.640 --> 0:36:49.720
<v Speaker 2>what I've seen, in fact, I consulted on an innocence

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 2>project case and I won't go into the details, but

0:36:53.200 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally what law enforcement was doing back in the day,

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:58.840
<v Speaker 2>and this was not back in nineteen sixty three. This

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:03.200
<v Speaker 2>is back in the nineteen nineties. But this particular agency,

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:07.279
<v Speaker 2>with this particular couple of interviewers, what they do is

0:37:07.320 --> 0:37:12.480
<v Speaker 2>they in essence, tell the suspect the details and make

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.560
<v Speaker 2>the suspect tell those details about the crime back. And

0:37:15.640 --> 0:37:18.480
<v Speaker 2>then the investigator is the one that's typing up this

0:37:18.560 --> 0:37:22.080
<v Speaker 2>is what the suspect said, and there's no recording, and

0:37:22.120 --> 0:37:27.239
<v Speaker 2>then they make the suspect sign that you told us this, right, yes,

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:30.520
<v Speaker 2>I told you that, and that suspect just now has

0:37:30.680 --> 0:37:35.800
<v Speaker 2>confessed to a crime, and it is so inappropriate.

0:37:35.960 --> 0:37:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Well, what's hard about this case of Ernesto Miranda is

0:37:39.560 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>he is guilty. He's about to give a full confession.

0:37:43.120 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 1>Not only that he's going to identify the woman that

0:37:45.760 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>he attacked, but you know the way that the police

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>handle it and what they have him sign. We have

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to get a little technical here. That's why this case

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 1>was so important. So he signs a form. He says

0:37:57.920 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in the forum, he's twenty three. His highest level of

0:38:00.520 --> 0:38:03.680
<v Speaker 1>education is eighth grade. And this is his written statement.

0:38:03.880 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>He said, seeing a girl walking up the street, stopped

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a little head of her, got out of the car,

0:38:08.520 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 1>walked toward her, grabbed her by the arm and asked

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>her to get in car. Got in car without force,

0:38:14.719 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>tight her hands at ankles, drove away for a few miles, stopped,

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>asked to take clothes off, did not asked me to

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:26.120
<v Speaker 1>take her home. I started to take clothes off without

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:29.120
<v Speaker 1>any force, and with cooperation, asked her to lay down,

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:32.080
<v Speaker 1>and she did. Could not get penis into vagina, got

0:38:32.160 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>about half an inch in, told her to get closed

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>back on, drove her home, and I couldn't say I

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:40.760
<v Speaker 1>was sorry for what I had done, but I asked

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:44.720
<v Speaker 1>for her to pray for me. So that's what he said,

0:38:45.000 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and on the form he wrote this statement. On it

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:51.239
<v Speaker 1>said with full knowledge of my rights, even though he

0:38:51.320 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>was never informed of any rights. And that's where this

0:38:54.480 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>case is. So what do you think about that? First

0:38:57.080 --> 0:38:59.359
<v Speaker 1>his confession? What do you think about the confession? Did

0:38:59.360 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 1>he write the well here's the thing, Paul, I mean,

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:05.520
<v Speaker 1>we have a verbatim. There's no punctuation, almost no punctuation

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:08.120
<v Speaker 1>in here, you know, And I don't know if he

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:10.439
<v Speaker 1>actually wrote it, wrote it in eighth grade. You would

0:39:10.440 --> 0:39:13.359
<v Speaker 1>think he would be able to, but it's I don't know.

0:39:13.560 --> 0:39:14.720
<v Speaker 1>You're right, it's hard to tell.

0:39:15.160 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 2>Well, well, this is sort of like that Innocence project.

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.600
<v Speaker 2>Is you know, what had he been told about the crime?

0:39:22.000 --> 0:39:24.080
<v Speaker 2>When I'm assessing statements, and I do this all the

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.399
<v Speaker 2>time in cold cases, is I'm assessing, okay, what what

0:39:27.440 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 2>did law enforcement know? How did they know it? Is

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:34.960
<v Speaker 2>this something that during the interviews law enforcement, during their

0:39:35.000 --> 0:39:39.920
<v Speaker 2>interrogator phase, they're now confronting him with facts and you

0:39:39.960 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 2>know this fact you tried to raper but you only

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 2>could get in so far. Well, now he's fed that detail.

0:39:47.000 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 2>At what point during the interview is the the person

0:39:51.560 --> 0:39:57.359
<v Speaker 2>being interviewed bringing up this level of detail. And I know,

0:39:57.400 --> 0:40:00.600
<v Speaker 2>when I evaluate a case, I'm off and taking a

0:40:00.719 --> 0:40:03.960
<v Speaker 2>look at the crime scene and the physical evidence and

0:40:04.040 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 2>interpreting that. And many investigators don't know how to interpret,

0:40:09.920 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, do like a crime scene reconstruction, so they

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:14.840
<v Speaker 2>never bring those types of details up to the suspect

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 2>that they're talking to. But when I see a suspect

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.879
<v Speaker 2>say something during that interview that matches up with what

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:23.439
<v Speaker 2>I am seeing in the physical evidence, I'm going, oh,

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 2>he literally knows something that even the investigators don't know.

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:32.280
<v Speaker 2>Now I'm putting a ton of veracity on that type

0:40:32.440 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 2>of detail. So, you know, statement analysis in terms of

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:40.400
<v Speaker 2>assessing you know, like what Arnesto is saying, you know,

0:40:40.480 --> 0:40:43.920
<v Speaker 2>that's where Okay, who's writing this? At what stage is

0:40:43.920 --> 0:40:46.600
<v Speaker 2>he writing? This? Is towards the end of the interrogation?

0:40:47.200 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 2>Was this recorded? Was this? Were these details that he

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 2>was fed by the detectives during an interrogation, and now

0:40:53.960 --> 0:40:57.279
<v Speaker 2>he's just regurgitating them because he just wants to be done.

0:40:57.680 --> 0:41:00.640
<v Speaker 2>Remember what I said. You know, they're selecting individuals in

0:41:00.680 --> 0:41:03.239
<v Speaker 2>our society that are more susceptible to these types of

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:07.040
<v Speaker 2>interrogative tactics and will falsely confess. One of those is

0:41:07.120 --> 0:41:10.880
<v Speaker 2>going to be that kind of that limited intellectual aspect.

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:14.440
<v Speaker 2>Ernesto has an eighth grade education and he's twenty three

0:41:14.520 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 2>years old. He's satisfying one of those characteristics of yea,

0:41:18.320 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 2>he might be susceptible. Now I'm not saying, you know

0:41:20.960 --> 0:41:24.319
<v Speaker 2>that he's innocent of these crimes. But what I am

0:41:24.360 --> 0:41:26.760
<v Speaker 2>saying is is that there's a reason why this became

0:41:26.800 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 2>a landmark case.

0:41:28.760 --> 0:41:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me tell you how we keep going here.

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:34.400
<v Speaker 1>He identifies the eighteen year old woman that we started

0:41:34.400 --> 0:41:38.919
<v Speaker 1>the story with who he sexually assaulted, and then he said,

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 1>I also did a robbery and an attempted robbery. He said,

0:41:42.760 --> 0:41:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in both of those cases, the women have been assaulted

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:51.600
<v Speaker 1>but escaped before being raped. The robbery was eight dollars

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and he took it from a survivor who is a

0:41:53.360 --> 0:41:57.279
<v Speaker 1>bank teller. After this statement, he's arrested and booked in

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:01.800
<v Speaker 1>the Maricopa County jail. The prosecutor ends up filing charges

0:42:02.080 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 1>on the rape and the robbery, not like the attempted robbery.

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So there were three cases that they were interested in

0:42:10.239 --> 0:42:14.399
<v Speaker 1>with him. Again the detail about the bank teller, and

0:42:14.800 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 1>you know a couple of other details. But right because

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>of this is a Miranda case. The Miranda case, we

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 1>have to think about what investigators did to get this information,

0:42:24.920 --> 0:42:26.920
<v Speaker 1>so they're untrustworthy unfortunately.

0:42:27.680 --> 0:42:29.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, you know, and part of what I want to

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:33.480
<v Speaker 2>hear from Miranda, you know, as he's giving his statements

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:36.799
<v Speaker 2>is I want to hear his perspective on how the

0:42:36.880 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 2>crime was committed. Not what I'm hearing you telling me

0:42:41.320 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 2>is well, these are the types of statements that the

0:42:44.239 --> 0:42:47.560
<v Speaker 2>victim would be saying. I want to hear his perspective.

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I initially saw this victim at this location. I followed

0:42:51.239 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 2>her until we got to this particular location. I got out,

0:42:55.760 --> 0:42:58.399
<v Speaker 2>I went around this corner of the front of my car.

0:42:58.520 --> 0:43:01.840
<v Speaker 2>You know something where he's walking through committing the crime

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:07.280
<v Speaker 2>versus regurgitating. She was a bank teller. Well, law enforcement

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 2>knows she's a bank teller, right, you know, I need

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 2>to hear something sort of outside of what I've heard

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:17.400
<v Speaker 2>so far. I you know, of course I'm familiar with

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 2>you know why Miranda exists. I'm not real familiar with

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:26.879
<v Speaker 2>the crimes that Miranda committed. To get to the point

0:43:26.920 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 2>to where now we have this landmark case.

0:43:29.280 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, I'll tell you more about these trials. There's two trials,

0:43:32.520 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 1>because remember there is a robbery and then there's the rape.

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:39.560
<v Speaker 1>So he goes on trial for the robbery first in

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:42.759
<v Speaker 1>June of nineteen sixty three. It takes a day. He

0:43:42.840 --> 0:43:46.919
<v Speaker 1>has a court appointed attorney who follows emotion indicating that

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:50.759
<v Speaker 1>he intends to plead insanity, and the court has two

0:43:50.880 --> 0:43:54.640
<v Speaker 1>psychiatrists examine him. One of the psychiatrists says that he

0:43:54.800 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 1>has an emotional illness that the psychiatrist classifies as a

0:43:59.719 --> 0:44:04.520
<v Speaker 1>quote schizophrenic reaction of the chronic undifferentiated type. At the

0:44:04.520 --> 0:44:08.120
<v Speaker 1>same time, he concludes that Miranda was unaware of his

0:44:08.200 --> 0:44:11.719
<v Speaker 1>actions but aware that he did something wrong. Meantime, the

0:44:11.760 --> 0:44:14.920
<v Speaker 1>other psychiatrist says he's just immature and unstable and he

0:44:14.960 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't see any evidence of psychosis. So we have the

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:24.120
<v Speaker 1>arresting officer and the woman who was robbed testify and

0:44:24.160 --> 0:44:27.320
<v Speaker 1>the jury comes back with the unanimous guilty verdict. That afternoon.

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 1>They're waiting on what happens with the rape trial to

0:44:30.760 --> 0:44:33.359
<v Speaker 1>deal with sentencing, and the rape trial is the next day.

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:36.759
<v Speaker 1>I want to definitely talk about the diagnosis from one

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:40.759
<v Speaker 1>of the psychiatrists about schizophrenia, because you know, you are

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about vulnerable people and being subjected to unethical interrogation techniques,

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:51.560
<v Speaker 1>so so far, what are you hearing in this because

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:53.960
<v Speaker 1>he confessed to the robbery as well as you know,

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>these other crimes too.

0:44:55.680 --> 0:44:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you know, it's it's really tough, you know, to

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:04.319
<v Speaker 2>assess kind of the mental health aspect and how that

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:10.200
<v Speaker 2>plays into this case. Most certainly, I'm familiar with schizophrenia,

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:15.480
<v Speaker 2>but in terms of wherever he's at a long sort

0:45:15.520 --> 0:45:21.280
<v Speaker 2>of this spectrum a schizophrenia. He's twenty three, we know generally,

0:45:21.520 --> 0:45:23.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, in the early twenties. Oftentimes this is when

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:28.040
<v Speaker 2>schizophrenia starts to manifest itself and then it progresses from

0:45:28.040 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 2>that point. I can only right now speculate from my

0:45:32.360 --> 0:45:36.560
<v Speaker 2>dvantage point that, yeah, schizophrenia may be something that would

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:42.719
<v Speaker 2>influence Miranda in terms of how he interacts under an

0:45:42.760 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 2>interrogator setting. I mean that is way outside my level

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 2>of expertise. You know, for me, what I'm assessing a

0:45:50.800 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 2>let's say prime and we start talking psychosis. You know,

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:59.959
<v Speaker 2>a psychotic offender, a true disorganized offender that has mental

0:46:00.200 --> 0:46:03.560
<v Speaker 2>health issue that is so extreme they're unaware that they

0:46:03.600 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 2>are committing a crime that is wrong. This is your

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:10.320
<v Speaker 2>true insanity. I can't form any type of opinion. Does

0:46:10.480 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 2>you know Miranda fall within that type of vendor. You

0:46:13.840 --> 0:46:17.319
<v Speaker 2>have one of the psychiatrists saying he's not at the

0:46:17.400 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 2>level of a psychosis, right, I think that's what you said. However,

0:46:21.800 --> 0:46:25.920
<v Speaker 2>both psychiatrists, though somewhat different in their opinions, are saying

0:46:26.000 --> 0:46:30.440
<v Speaker 2>he does have some sort of mental health aspect to him,

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:34.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, and so that kind of underscores from my perspective. Okay,

0:46:34.120 --> 0:46:37.920
<v Speaker 2>he is a vulnerable suspect, and so the interview of

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 2>somebody like that needs to be handled in a different

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:45.279
<v Speaker 2>way than likely it was handled in terms of a

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:47.080
<v Speaker 2>hardcore interrogation.

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Here's the rape trial. It happens the next day. The

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:54.719
<v Speaker 1>defense tries to shake the survivor's story. She is very

0:46:54.760 --> 0:46:58.880
<v Speaker 1>consistent and believable. The lawyer, for lack of a better phrase,

0:46:58.920 --> 0:47:04.040
<v Speaker 1>completely fucks up his attorney so states Exhibit one is

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Miranda's signed statement which admitted to the rape. But his

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 1>own attorney calls it a confession. No one else in

0:47:11.920 --> 0:47:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the court has called it a confession. They say it's

0:47:13.600 --> 0:47:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a statement. So the prosecutor, at the very end in

0:47:17.680 --> 0:47:21.040
<v Speaker 1>his closing statement set even his own attorney, says he's confessed,

0:47:21.440 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and this is that. So I mean, this will of

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:27.480
<v Speaker 1>course set up a pretty decent appeal from Miranda. But

0:47:28.239 --> 0:47:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the defense doesn't dispute the validity of this confession statement thing,

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:36.480
<v Speaker 1>And within minutes the jury comes back with a guilty

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>verdict and he sentenced to twenty to thirty years for

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:42.920
<v Speaker 1>each count the kidnapping and the rape, and he's also

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:46.399
<v Speaker 1>sentenced to twenty five years for the robbery. If this

0:47:46.560 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 1>man's last name were not Miranda, this would be the

0:47:48.920 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 1>end of our story. But in the sixties, lawyers and

0:47:52.040 --> 0:47:55.719
<v Speaker 1>activists had already started being critical of you know, what

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:59.839
<v Speaker 1>the constitutional rights are when you are being interrogated by

0:47:59.840 --> 0:48:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the police. And that's why this case turns into a

0:48:02.360 --> 0:48:07.000
<v Speaker 1>big case. So in sixty three, the original lawyer who

0:48:07.120 --> 0:48:10.080
<v Speaker 1>defended Miranda is a guy named Alvin Moore. He files

0:48:10.080 --> 0:48:13.920
<v Speaker 1>an appeal. And there are other cases involving coerced or

0:48:13.960 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 1>improperly attained confessions that have drawn a lot of national

0:48:17.440 --> 0:48:22.360
<v Speaker 1>attention and established the right for an attorney during interrogations

0:48:22.440 --> 0:48:26.719
<v Speaker 1>under the sixth Amendment. So Moore's basis for this appeal

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to the Arizona Supreme Court is that his confession was

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:33.439
<v Speaker 1>improperly received as evidence. The state Supreme Court disagrees and

0:48:33.600 --> 0:48:37.359
<v Speaker 1>they uphold the conviction. But there is a lot more

0:48:37.440 --> 0:48:40.840
<v Speaker 1>happening here where eventually, I mean, just to kind of

0:48:40.840 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 1>shorthand this you know, this takes a very windy road

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:49.359
<v Speaker 1>and the ACLU gets involved. There's another case in California

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 1>with the California Supreme Court, and that court ruled that

0:48:53.400 --> 0:48:57.759
<v Speaker 1>before a suspect is interrogated, he has to be expressly

0:48:57.800 --> 0:49:00.959
<v Speaker 1>informed of his right to an attorney, and Miranda wasn't.

0:49:01.719 --> 0:49:04.560
<v Speaker 1>So Arizona and California were contradicting each other as a

0:49:04.560 --> 0:49:07.760
<v Speaker 1>matter of constitutional law. And this is where Robert Corkran,

0:49:07.800 --> 0:49:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the retired attorney, decides to step in and he takes

0:49:11.400 --> 0:49:13.520
<v Speaker 1>over the case. Now do you want to do a

0:49:13.560 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 1>shorthand of what happens or what do you I mean,

0:49:16.080 --> 0:49:19.400
<v Speaker 1>this is such a massive case. We don't know if

0:49:19.440 --> 0:49:21.680
<v Speaker 1>he's guilty, but it sure sounds like it to me.

0:49:22.160 --> 0:49:24.680
<v Speaker 1>But that's not the point, you know. The point is

0:49:25.239 --> 0:49:28.680
<v Speaker 1>establishing your rights, you know, and everybody, even guilty people,

0:49:28.760 --> 0:49:29.360
<v Speaker 1>need rights.

0:49:30.200 --> 0:49:33.440
<v Speaker 2>I know of the Miranda case, but in terms of

0:49:33.480 --> 0:49:36.920
<v Speaker 2>the legal path up to the Supreme Court, not familiar

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:40.640
<v Speaker 2>with that at all. You know, fundamentally, my training when

0:49:40.640 --> 0:49:44.120
<v Speaker 2>I was with law enforcement, you know, was with Miranda.

0:49:44.760 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Of course, you're informing the person that you're interviewing of

0:49:48.080 --> 0:49:51.160
<v Speaker 2>their rights, you know, the right to remain silent the

0:49:51.239 --> 0:49:55.359
<v Speaker 2>right to have an attorney. But the primary criteria that

0:49:55.520 --> 0:50:00.439
<v Speaker 2>impacts law enforcement needing to inform this person of their

0:50:00.560 --> 0:50:05.200
<v Speaker 2>rights is the custodial status. Is this person in custody

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:08.960
<v Speaker 2>which means they are not free to leave? Or does

0:50:09.040 --> 0:50:12.799
<v Speaker 2>a person have perception of custody? And I believe this

0:50:12.880 --> 0:50:17.120
<v Speaker 2>isn't necessarily addressed under the miranda case. There's other case

0:50:17.200 --> 0:50:21.040
<v Speaker 2>law related to perception of custody. So as an example,

0:50:21.120 --> 0:50:24.400
<v Speaker 2>the way you set, let's say a suspect up in

0:50:24.480 --> 0:50:28.520
<v Speaker 2>an interview room and now you have two big burly

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:32.839
<v Speaker 2>detectives that are between that suspect and the door, and

0:50:32.880 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 2>that suspect has just been told you can leave any time,

0:50:36.880 --> 0:50:40.640
<v Speaker 2>but he has to push through these two cops. Maybe

0:50:40.640 --> 0:50:43.000
<v Speaker 2>one of the cops is in uniform. That person has

0:50:43.000 --> 0:50:46.319
<v Speaker 2>a perception I'm not free to leave. So under that

0:50:46.360 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 2>set of circumstances, this is where now law enforcement is going, Okay,

0:50:50.320 --> 0:50:53.719
<v Speaker 2>generally good, you know, and there's a balance. You know,

0:50:53.760 --> 0:50:56.480
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to mirandize somebody if you don't have to,

0:50:56.840 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 2>or now you just have told this person shut up.

0:50:59.239 --> 0:51:03.440
<v Speaker 2>You want this person to cooperate, But if you recognize, okay,

0:51:03.480 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 2>this person is talking to me voluntarily, and they're free

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:09.799
<v Speaker 2>to leave, but there might be a perception that on

0:51:09.880 --> 0:51:12.160
<v Speaker 2>their part that they're not free to leave because maybe

0:51:12.239 --> 0:51:14.759
<v Speaker 2>the way our station house is set up. You know,

0:51:15.280 --> 0:51:18.560
<v Speaker 2>you air on the side of caution, and you mirandize

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:22.200
<v Speaker 2>them right and hope that that person is still going

0:51:22.239 --> 0:51:25.000
<v Speaker 2>to want to be able to cooperate and provide statements

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:29.360
<v Speaker 2>so you can further your investigation. There's almost a tactical

0:51:29.400 --> 0:51:32.080
<v Speaker 2>way of having to approach. You have to assess your suspect,

0:51:32.120 --> 0:51:34.399
<v Speaker 2>the situation that you're talking to the suspect, and whether

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:39.480
<v Speaker 2>or not it truly does require to mirandize them or not,

0:51:39.920 --> 0:51:41.920
<v Speaker 2>or is it in the gray area yep? And then

0:51:42.000 --> 0:51:44.320
<v Speaker 2>generally it's sort of like, oh, you better err on

0:51:44.360 --> 0:51:46.839
<v Speaker 2>the side of caution, because if you don't, pretty much

0:51:46.880 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 2>you have just killed the case. If they find out

0:51:49.080 --> 0:51:50.880
<v Speaker 2>that you should have mirandized them.

0:51:51.040 --> 0:51:52.840
<v Speaker 1>This goes all the way to the Supreme Court. And

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:55.279
<v Speaker 1>there has to be clarity because there are a lot

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:57.920
<v Speaker 1>of cases that are now coming forward where people are saying,

0:51:58.120 --> 0:52:00.880
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about intimidation with the police. A lot of

0:52:00.880 --> 0:52:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the arguments are I'm not educated enough to know, you know,

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Paul holds the banker probably knows his rights, but Miranda didn't.

0:52:10.520 --> 0:52:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And so what the Supreme Court eventually votes five to four,

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:17.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, in favor of They essentially say that if

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution only protects Americans who are educated enough to

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:24.799
<v Speaker 1>know their rights, then not all Americans are protected. So

0:52:25.200 --> 0:52:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is, like I said, a five to

0:52:27.160 --> 0:52:31.080
<v Speaker 1>four decision, and in response, police departments across the country

0:52:31.239 --> 0:52:34.600
<v Speaker 1>give out those cards to their personnel with language to

0:52:34.680 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>inform suspects of their rights. You know, the Supreme Court

0:52:38.120 --> 0:52:41.520
<v Speaker 1>didn't prescribe any specific language, but this is where the

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:43.640
<v Speaker 1>little speech that the police will give you if you're

0:52:43.680 --> 0:52:49.280
<v Speaker 1>under arrest. Miranda's conviction is overturned and that drives me crazy.

0:52:49.719 --> 0:52:53.360
<v Speaker 1>But he goes on trial again in Arizona in nineteen

0:52:53.360 --> 0:52:56.359
<v Speaker 1>sixty seven. This is only for the rape and the kidnapping,

0:52:56.760 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>since the robbery didn't go to the Supreme Court and

0:53:00.280 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>his original confession is not admitted as evidence. He has

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:07.480
<v Speaker 1>tried under a false name because Miranda is very famous

0:53:07.520 --> 0:53:11.239
<v Speaker 1>now and his estranged girlfriend, the woman who had been

0:53:11.280 --> 0:53:14.120
<v Speaker 1>living with him, testifies against him, and he has found

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:17.240
<v Speaker 1>guilty in sentenced to twenty to thirty years in prison.

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Eventually he applies and has denied parole four times. He

0:53:22.320 --> 0:53:26.840
<v Speaker 1>is granted in nineteen seventy two parole, So he serves

0:53:26.840 --> 0:53:29.840
<v Speaker 1>about nine years in prison, and he violates this parole

0:53:29.880 --> 0:53:32.440
<v Speaker 1>with a lot of misdemeanors, goes back to prison for

0:53:32.440 --> 0:53:36.440
<v Speaker 1>another five years. He's released in seventy five, and he

0:53:36.920 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 1>is stabbed to death at a bar in nineteen seventy

0:53:40.200 --> 0:53:41.440
<v Speaker 1>five after he's released.

0:53:41.719 --> 0:53:43.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that sounds vaguely familiar. I think I may have

0:53:43.880 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 2>heard that at some point, but most certainly most of

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:49.959
<v Speaker 2>what you just told me about, you know, Miranda's back

0:53:50.000 --> 0:53:53.799
<v Speaker 2>and forth with prison and parole, I did not know.

0:53:54.320 --> 0:53:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you know, he ends up at this bar

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:59.080
<v Speaker 1>and he gets into an argument and he's stabbed in

0:53:59.120 --> 0:54:01.640
<v Speaker 1>the chest in the net can. He dies within minutes,

0:54:02.200 --> 0:54:04.560
<v Speaker 1>you know. I mean a little side note, They find

0:54:04.560 --> 0:54:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the guy who did it. They inform them of his

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:08.960
<v Speaker 1>rights in Spanish because he doesn't speak English. So that's

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:11.360
<v Speaker 1>how evolved they became. So they inform aim of his

0:54:11.480 --> 0:54:14.719
<v Speaker 1>rights in Spanish, and he waves his rights and he

0:54:14.760 --> 0:54:17.719
<v Speaker 1>tells Billie, you know that he didn't do it, and

0:54:17.760 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't arrest him. So, I mean, the irony here

0:54:20.120 --> 0:54:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is is he waves his rights, he denies that he

0:54:21.920 --> 0:54:26.080
<v Speaker 1>did this, he had some injuries, and the police let

0:54:26.120 --> 0:54:28.760
<v Speaker 1>him go. And when they go back to find him again,

0:54:28.800 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 1>when employees say we can identify him, he's gone. He's

0:54:31.760 --> 0:54:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico.

0:54:32.920 --> 0:54:35.600
<v Speaker 2>And this is the suspect in Miranda's homicide.

0:54:35.760 --> 0:54:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, so he's gone where his family lives. He's in

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:43.520
<v Speaker 1>the wind. So the murder of Ernesto Miranda. You know,

0:54:43.880 --> 0:54:47.600
<v Speaker 1>no one was ever arrested for the murder of Ernesto Miranda.

0:54:47.840 --> 0:54:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And I mean this story. Of course, I'm familiar with

0:54:51.040 --> 0:54:54.120
<v Speaker 1>miranda rights, but I did not know the backstory of it.

0:54:54.160 --> 0:54:56.759
<v Speaker 1>I know this is not our traditional true crime, But

0:54:56.880 --> 0:55:00.919
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I'm always interested in why cases are.

0:55:01.040 --> 0:55:03.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, case law is established and you know where

0:55:03.320 --> 0:55:06.120
<v Speaker 1>different things come from in our history, and this was

0:55:06.160 --> 0:55:07.040
<v Speaker 1>an interesting case.

0:55:07.600 --> 0:55:11.240
<v Speaker 2>Well yeah, no, for sure, it's a landmark case. It's

0:55:11.560 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's one of those things you know there's

0:55:14.320 --> 0:55:18.279
<v Speaker 2>for law enforcement, there are select individuals, you know, just

0:55:18.480 --> 0:55:22.840
<v Speaker 2>whether they're patrol guys or investigators. They love staying on

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:25.000
<v Speaker 2>top of the case law and they often I can

0:55:25.000 --> 0:55:27.279
<v Speaker 2>think of one guy who is a DA investigator. He

0:55:27.320 --> 0:55:30.000
<v Speaker 2>would give training to the other investigators, Hey, this is

0:55:30.040 --> 0:55:32.560
<v Speaker 2>the curt this was just a Supreme Court decision, or

0:55:32.560 --> 0:55:36.560
<v Speaker 2>here's a California appellate decision, because you need to know,

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:41.080
<v Speaker 2>you know what changes. You go through the police academy

0:55:41.120 --> 0:55:43.799
<v Speaker 2>and you're told about Miranda, but then there's other case

0:55:43.880 --> 0:55:48.160
<v Speaker 2>law that have modified Miranda, right, so you have to

0:55:48.200 --> 0:55:50.160
<v Speaker 2>stay on top of that. And there are people that

0:55:50.239 --> 0:55:52.640
<v Speaker 2>fortunately that do that and that of course, you know,

0:55:52.760 --> 0:55:56.320
<v Speaker 2>the prosecutors, your attorneys are the ones that are really

0:55:56.360 --> 0:55:59.680
<v Speaker 2>the experts. You know. So if law enforcement, if an

0:55:59.719 --> 0:56:03.759
<v Speaker 2>invest stigator ever has a question about the legality of

0:56:03.840 --> 0:56:06.799
<v Speaker 2>let's say a certain type of search, you know, you

0:56:06.920 --> 0:56:09.560
<v Speaker 2>ring up your local prosecutor and you run the facts

0:56:09.600 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 2>by them and say, hey does this work?

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:15.640
<v Speaker 1>You know before you do it and you screw something up.

0:56:15.719 --> 0:56:19.319
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, you know, And and that's where, you know, one

0:56:19.400 --> 0:56:22.640
<v Speaker 2>of the reasons I enjoy the cold case side is

0:56:22.680 --> 0:56:27.000
<v Speaker 2>things are slow. They're slow moving, right, they're decades old.

0:56:27.160 --> 0:56:29.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't have that public pressure, right.

0:56:29.560 --> 0:56:32.400
<v Speaker 2>You don't have you know. I don't think people truly

0:56:32.480 --> 0:56:35.799
<v Speaker 2>appreciate whether it's a patrol officer that's responding to an

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:39.440
<v Speaker 2>active crime or an investigator investigating an after crime. How

0:56:39.480 --> 0:56:43.960
<v Speaker 2>many decisions they have to make on the fly, and

0:56:44.040 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 2>they have to make those decisions based on what the

0:56:46.560 --> 0:56:50.480
<v Speaker 2>current case law is. It's not something that they necessarily

0:56:50.680 --> 0:56:53.520
<v Speaker 2>have received a bunch of training on, you know. So

0:56:53.640 --> 0:56:57.200
<v Speaker 2>this is part of the evolution as you go through

0:56:57.239 --> 0:57:01.279
<v Speaker 2>your career of seeing how laws change over time. And

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:04.319
<v Speaker 2>it's not necessarily in the penal code. It's something that

0:57:04.480 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 2>is now. You know, the attorney for the sheriff's office sed, hey,

0:57:08.280 --> 0:57:11.879
<v Speaker 2>there's new California Supreme Court has just come out with this,

0:57:12.200 --> 0:57:13.920
<v Speaker 2>and so even though you've been doing it this way

0:57:14.000 --> 0:57:16.120
<v Speaker 2>up until today, tomorrow, you need it to do it

0:57:16.120 --> 0:57:18.160
<v Speaker 2>this way, you know, and you have to make that

0:57:18.240 --> 0:57:21.040
<v Speaker 2>adjustment or you potentially could have a case thrown out.

0:57:21.480 --> 0:57:25.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Well, like I said, not our normal type of story,

0:57:25.560 --> 0:57:29.280
<v Speaker 1>but important and I love learning about where things come from.

0:57:29.600 --> 0:57:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Next week, I can almost guarantee we're not going to

0:57:32.880 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 1>be talking about Miranda rights, probably because from the eighteen

0:57:36.520 --> 0:57:41.680
<v Speaker 1>hundreds and they ain't have any rights, so itus you'd

0:57:41.680 --> 0:57:46.080
<v Speaker 1>be lucky to survive interrogation. But you know, we will

0:57:46.080 --> 0:57:49.480
<v Speaker 1>have a case that definitely has some deep history. So

0:57:49.480 --> 0:57:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I hope you look forward to it.

0:57:50.680 --> 0:57:54.480
<v Speaker 2>Paul I always do and another great job today, Kate.

0:57:54.480 --> 0:57:55.320
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much.

0:57:55.480 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Paul, I see you next week.

0:57:57.200 --> 0:57:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Sounds good.

0:58:01.840 --> 0:58:04.320
<v Speaker 1>This has been an exactly right production.

0:58:04.360 --> 0:58:07.560
<v Speaker 2>For our sources and show notes go to Exactlyrightmedia dot

0:58:07.600 --> 0:58:09.760
<v Speaker 2>com slash Buried Bones sources.

0:58:09.960 --> 0:58:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Our senior producer is Alexis Mrosi.

0:58:12.600 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 2>Research by Maren mcclashan, Ali Elkin and Kate Winkler Dawson.

0:58:17.120 --> 0:58:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Our mixing engineer is Ben Tolliday.

0:58:19.680 --> 0:58:21.960
<v Speaker 2>Our theme song is by Tom Bryfogel.

0:58:22.200 --> 0:58:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Our artwork is by Vanessa Lilac.

0:58:24.520 --> 0:58:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Executive produced by Karen Kilgarriff, Georgia hard Stark, and Danielle Kramer.

0:58:28.920 --> 0:58:32.280
<v Speaker 1>You can follow Buried Bones on Instagram and Facebook at

0:58:32.400 --> 0:58:33.560
<v Speaker 1>buried Bones pod.

0:58:34.000 --> 0:58:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Kate's most recent book, All That Is Wicked, a Gilded

0:58:36.560 --> 0:58:38.600
<v Speaker 2>Age story of murder and the race to decode the

0:58:38.600 --> 0:58:40.680
<v Speaker 2>criminal mind, is available now.

0:58:40.720 --> 0:58:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And Paul's best selling memoir Unmasked, My life Solving America's

0:58:45.000 --> 0:58:47.080
<v Speaker 1>Cold Cases is also available now.

0:58:47.400 --> 0:58:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Listen to Baried Bones on the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:58:51.200 --> 0:59:04.600
<v Speaker 2>or wherever you get your podcasts.