WEBVTT - NBA Draft, Winners & Losers, Rays To Montreal

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune and app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:20.960
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess did Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:32.560 --> 0:01:03.080
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network. Yeah, now

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that's welcome, bab. Your host Friday from Man five died

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:27.760
<v Speaker 1>from say Francis Frank, stand ball, ladies and tell me

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>in your ps and with that we will get you

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>inside Studio thirty four. This he's the BFFs year all

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy at Sports Network. I am Greg Susman. Frank

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:44.039
<v Speaker 1>Stamford too hungover from last night's NBA Draft coverage. He

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>has the day off, so joining me as he does

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>each and every Friday. BFF Mike Floria, what's happening to Florida?

0:01:51.320 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>What's up? Greggy? How was how was your NBA Draft

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:57.000
<v Speaker 1>coverage last night? And I have to ask it's Frank

0:01:57.080 --> 0:01:59.680
<v Speaker 1>actually too hungover because that would be two drafts that

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>he has worked the next day because he was too hungover.

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>To be fair, He's not. He was fine going home

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:08.080
<v Speaker 1>last night. It's King's birthday tomorrow, so he took the

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:09.959
<v Speaker 1>day off today. They're going to the Yankee game tonight,

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:11.920
<v Speaker 1>so Yester the day a while back before we even

0:02:11.960 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 1>knew we were doing the draft coverage. So he's actually

0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>good to go. Um And I don't know why you're

0:02:16.600 --> 0:02:19.080
<v Speaker 1>asking me. You you should have been watching our draft coverage.

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Not that you know, you just want to support your BFFs.

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:25.040
<v Speaker 1>It was the BF Draft show. It was pretty good. Well,

0:02:25.240 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I I will have to go back and check it out.

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I apologize I was watching the actual draft. I was

0:02:30.040 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty excited that Nick Scott the maple Mamba. I mean,

0:02:33.280 --> 0:02:35.600
<v Speaker 1>have you heard of a cooler nickname in sports, because

0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I have. The white Mambo really worked

0:02:37.880 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 1>for me. It's like James Paxson and Kobe and one

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the big maple Mamba are Jay Barrett. There you go.

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>It was good. It was a good job. We had

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a really fun time here at Versa. And you know,

0:02:53.680 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I'm excited that people watched It seems like

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 1>from the reaction that we've gotten, people have enjoyed it,

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:03.520
<v Speaker 1>which is really cool. Um, So you know, I'm really

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.639
<v Speaker 1>really happy with how the coverage went and Frank with

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a well deserved day off. It was a good show

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:10.680
<v Speaker 1>last night. That's awesome, man. And I'm I'm pretty I know,

0:03:10.840 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>like you could see I at the nixt head on

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Gregy you know him a nick time. I'm happy with

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the pick. Yeah, I wanted Zion, but r J. Barrett

0:03:16.960 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>is not a bad consolation price. He's not and I

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:25.920
<v Speaker 1>felt like it was ultimately wasn't meant to be with

0:03:26.040 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Zia Williamson. The had a fourteen percent chance of getting him. RJ.

0:03:28.400 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Barrett works out, and remember he's the number one player

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>coming in to college last year. Winds up at number three.

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>We'll take that. R J. Barrett very well could be

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the best player in that draft. We hope for Florio.

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>It is a waiver wire Friday, and over the last

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:45.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks, we haven't had major players on the

0:03:45.200 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>waiver wire to talk about right like, there was nobody

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 1>we're spending money on. I have a feeling that's going

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.120
<v Speaker 1>to change this week, specifically with Zach Gallan. You and

0:03:54.160 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Frankie haven't hyped about this dude for a while. Now

0:03:57.160 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>he gets called up. He makes his first MLB start

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 1>last night against St. Louis, and why it wasn't Jimmy

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Yamamoto stats. He was still pretty good in his five innings.

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>A word, do you throw nine and night pitches in

0:04:07.480 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 1>five innings? But overall pretty good? How desperate should people

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:13.360
<v Speaker 1>be to go add Jack Gallant all the way over wire?

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:16.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he's the big fish to pick up this week.

0:04:17.200 --> 0:04:20.000
<v Speaker 1>No pun intended, because he's in Marlin. Last night's outing,

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I know, we wish he would have went a little

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.200
<v Speaker 1>bit deeper into the game, but six k's ten swinging strikes. Uh,

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>he sat between like ninety two around ninety two miles

0:04:29.040 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 1>per hour. It was maxing out a little bit over

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you like to see that, although I will say I've

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.479
<v Speaker 1>been reading in recent days some stuff like there was

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a scout I wish I remembered who tweeted it out,

0:04:41.839 --> 0:04:43.679
<v Speaker 1>but it was a quote from a scout that said,

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>up until the start of this year, I was the

0:04:46.640 --> 0:04:49.320
<v Speaker 1>highest guy on Zack Gallen, and I was telling the

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.960
<v Speaker 1>rest of the world they need to catch up to me. Now.

0:04:52.000 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the world has surpassed me, he said.

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.360
<v Speaker 1>He was like the hype on Zack Gallen. He thinks

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>had even has climbed out of control and is is

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.479
<v Speaker 1>higher than what Allen can live up to. So maybe

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we are doing that. Maybe we are over hyping a

0:05:03.640 --> 0:05:06.159
<v Speaker 1>prospect too much. But he is the big arm right

0:05:06.200 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>now to pick up. There's not This is the arm

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>we've been waiting for. I'm not sure you know when

0:05:10.600 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see the forest wit leaves of the world

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and stuff. He is the big prospect to pick up

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>right now, and I would be picking him up, especially

0:05:16.920 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>because his spot in the rotation could be safer than

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>we had envisioned. A uh, Jose Urena had just been

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:25.760
<v Speaker 1>placed on the sixty d d L, so he's gonna

0:05:25.760 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>be out awhile it's gonna be coming down to him

0:05:28.240 --> 0:05:31.560
<v Speaker 1>and Jordan Yamamoto for who gets that spot. But if

0:05:31.560 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>you're the Marlins, what do you have to lose by

0:05:33.200 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>not giving Zach Gallen every opportunity the rest of the way?

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you know that? For like a week's I've been

0:05:37.839 --> 0:05:41.200
<v Speaker 1>calling Jordan Yallomoto Jimmy Yallomoto because jimm yakobonus my superstar

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:44.000
<v Speaker 1>pitcher on the Baltimore Orioles. No matter what I do,

0:05:44.040 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I keep saying Jimmy Yallamoto and every repeatedly, I cannot

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>like figure out the difference between Yallmamoona and Yakobonus and

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.520
<v Speaker 1>do it like one's one's terrible in your defense, I

0:05:54.560 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>mean they're like when do you get that names that

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>similar that are that like you know, not coming, but

0:06:00.920 --> 0:06:04.479
<v Speaker 1>like the difference is one of them are horrible, one

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:06.719
<v Speaker 1>of them like aren't good. The reason I like Jimmy

0:06:06.760 --> 0:06:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Yakobonas is I saw him pitch against the Yankees on

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:11.400
<v Speaker 1>an opening day of the day after and his and

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.640
<v Speaker 1>his um all speech stuff is like moving was like, Wow,

0:06:14.640 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>this guy is good. He's he's not spoiler alert, he's

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>he's very very bad. Jordan Yallmomoto not very bad. And

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>with Urania and Pablo Lopez out for a significant period

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of time, it looks like Yallomoto and Zach Gallen both

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>going to get opportunities I think long term in this rotation.

0:06:30.120 --> 0:06:32.960
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the case, who would you rather have

0:06:33.160 --> 0:06:36.040
<v Speaker 1>Gallant or Yallomoto And how much of their budget that

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 1>you have left are you spending on these guys, I'd

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:40.839
<v Speaker 1>rather go after Gallen. I think the upside is a

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 1>lot higher. Y'allmomota has been pitching well, but like he

0:06:44.120 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>got the Cardinals the other day, and I don't want

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:47.440
<v Speaker 1>to and that's who Gallant got to. I don't want

0:06:47.480 --> 0:06:49.359
<v Speaker 1>to discredit that, but the Cardinals have been one of

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>the worst offensive teams in June. I just think the

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>upside is a little bit higher with Gallen. I think

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 1>if you're trying to trade him, you'll be getting more

0:06:57.160 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>in return for Gallan, So I think I would be

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.600
<v Speaker 1>spending up on him. I wrote before his start yesterday

0:07:02.640 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>that I think I would be aggressive and try to

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.040
<v Speaker 1>spend fifteen if you're in need of pitching, uh in

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>a home league, if you're not his desperate for a pitch,

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>or maybe ten to fifteen percent. But I don't think

0:07:12.920 --> 0:07:15.240
<v Speaker 1>we should discredit Gallen. You know where just a month

0:07:15.320 --> 0:07:16.920
<v Speaker 1>ago we're telling you to blow it all on these

0:07:16.920 --> 0:07:19.720
<v Speaker 1>other top prospects. He's the top pitching prospect right now.

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:21.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you are in need of pitching, I think

0:07:21.680 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>you gotta, you know, break out the budget and spend

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>whatever you like, a percentage of whatever you got left

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying fifteen. Yeah, I think when it comes to

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:33.320
<v Speaker 1>some of these Marlins, guys were just like, oh, he's

0:07:33.320 --> 0:07:36.760
<v Speaker 1>a Marlin, he's never gonna win. But the Marlins in

0:07:36.760 --> 0:07:38.960
<v Speaker 1>our best best forever. I've been pounding them because they're

0:07:39.000 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>They're pitching staff all season long has been better than

0:07:41.000 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>people think. And it's gonna take a while. With this

0:07:44.000 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Jeter rebuild, I think ultimately will work because pitching is

0:07:46.120 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>there and Zach Gallen certainly seems to be for real.

0:07:49.120 --> 0:07:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Yellow Jimmy said, he what's it again? Jordan Yamamoto

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.200
<v Speaker 1>um has had two really good starts. I'm interested in

0:07:55.200 --> 0:07:58.600
<v Speaker 1>what he does Sunday against Philadelphia. But through these first

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>couple of starts, the Miami's talent that is getting called up,

0:08:02.280 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it's been very, very good. Let me read you the

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.240
<v Speaker 1>line from Zack gwen last night, as he would five innings,

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:09.600
<v Speaker 1>allowed five hits, one run, two walk, six strike, as

0:08:09.600 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>did throw uh those night and nine pitches, but he

0:08:12.440 --> 0:08:15.200
<v Speaker 1>fared well in his debut. The Marlins actually one seven

0:08:15.240 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>to six in extra innings. Is Andrew Miller allows the

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>game tying or the game winning to run home run

0:08:22.320 --> 0:08:25.280
<v Speaker 1>to J. T. Riddle in the eleventh the Cardinals and

0:08:25.360 --> 0:08:27.480
<v Speaker 1>everything they could to come back against Sergio Romo was

0:08:27.520 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 1>not to be, as Romo got his thirteen save this season.

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>You mentioned the Cardinals Mikey have been struggling. We talked

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about that on yesterday's show. Why are

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:41.240
<v Speaker 1>the Cardinals so bad right now? I wish I could

0:08:41.280 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you, man, they got a ton of talent in

0:08:43.080 --> 0:08:45.120
<v Speaker 1>that lineup. And I have a lot of these guys

0:08:45.120 --> 0:08:47.600
<v Speaker 1>for fantasy. I don't have any Goldie, believe it or not,

0:08:47.640 --> 0:08:49.240
<v Speaker 1>but I have a Zuna in a couple of leaks,

0:08:49.240 --> 0:08:51.560
<v Speaker 1>I have too young, I have some Matt carpent heres.

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.000
<v Speaker 1>So like I would like these guys to get going.

0:08:54.120 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>I think there's too much talent there for them not to.

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>But when it comes to like a player like Paul

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.000
<v Speaker 1>gold Smith, like someone the other day asked me if

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>they should be buying gold Schmidt or not, and I said,

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.720
<v Speaker 1>in a redraft, yes, because he's still hitting the ball hard,

0:09:07.760 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>he's still lifting the ball. I would expect the home

0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>runs too to come in bunches, and I think he'll

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 1>be okay. But in like a redraft or I'm sorry,

0:09:15.600 --> 0:09:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in a keeper or a dynasty I'm not. He is

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>starting to show the signs of decline. In my opinion,

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the strikeout rate is up, swinging strikeout rate is up.

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe the chase rate is up. And to me though,

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:27.680
<v Speaker 1>and he's not stealing at all. He does not have

0:09:27.720 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>his stolen base this year. So like with with gold Schmidt,

0:09:31.640 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a little bit of unlucky plus a

0:09:33.760 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit of declining. With the other guys, I'm not

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>as shure. I think, like Paul de Young, was just

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>playing over his head those first couple of months, and

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>now we're seeing the natural regression. I know think he's

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>as good as he was early on. I don't think

0:09:44.120 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>he's as bad as he is now, and I think

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that happened with a lot of these players. But I

0:09:48.080 --> 0:09:50.199
<v Speaker 1>expect much better results out of them, as I think

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.599
<v Speaker 1>everyone does. We talked about Goldie yesterday and whether this

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>is like the decline phase for gold Schmidt or ultimately

0:09:56.960 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>he'll turn it around, and Frank seems to be more

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:00.320
<v Speaker 1>on the side of he'll turn it around, be honest

0:10:00.360 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>with you, kind of looking at some of the stats

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>from last year and what he was able to do.

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll see the Cardinals don't have a single hitter right now.

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>Adding over. The thing about Goldie though, is what always

0:10:10.559 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>like not saying he was a stolen base player, like

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:15.760
<v Speaker 1>that's why you drafted him, But the thing that always

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>differentiated him from those other top first basement and the

0:10:19.520 --> 0:10:21.280
<v Speaker 1>reason why he was always the number one for so

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.560
<v Speaker 1>long was the stolen basis because you don't get any

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>out of most first basement. And that went from thirty

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:31.160
<v Speaker 1>two and sixteen to eighteen and seventeen to seven last

0:10:31.200 --> 0:10:34.360
<v Speaker 1>year to zero so far this year. This is not

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the same Paul Goldschman. I agree with Frank where I

0:10:36.440 --> 0:10:38.920
<v Speaker 1>think he ultimately will turn it around, But I also

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 1>think at what is he? I believe he's thirty. He's

0:10:41.400 --> 0:10:44.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty one years old right now, soon to be thirty two.

0:10:44.120 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I do think we are starting to see the decline

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>of Paul Goldschman. All Right, I've waited about thirteen minutes here.

0:10:49.720 --> 0:10:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Mike Mr Quality Greater signed quantity Rich Hill as a

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>strained flexor muscle in his elbow. He's going to miss

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:04.040
<v Speaker 1>like the next two months in hopes to return this season.

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.280
<v Speaker 1>As Frank would say if he were here, Rich Hill

0:11:07.280 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna Rich Hill, Yeah, and I could say rich Hill

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna Rich Hill when he's healthy. Man, do you, Nelly,

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>have you seen how great rich Hill has been since

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>when he's been pitching, But he's never healthy to First

0:11:21.960 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>of all, this injury is unlike anything we've ever seen

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:26.680
<v Speaker 1>out of rich Hill the last few years. It's always

0:11:26.679 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a blister. It's always a two or three weeks shelf thing.

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.640
<v Speaker 1>And I'm perfectly fine living with those. And I've been

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>fine living with those for the last few years. I

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:37.559
<v Speaker 1>always say, he's gonna give me a hundred and thirty innings,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'm getting him outside the top ten rounds. So

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>if he gives me a hundred and thirty innings of

0:11:42.880 --> 0:11:45.200
<v Speaker 1>ace like ball and that's what he was doing. I

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:47.480
<v Speaker 1>know it was only fifty three innings this year, but

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>two point five five r RA over ten case per nine.

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the guy had just been tremendous and using

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 1>this strategy, Greggy, I have shares of the best picture

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 1>on the planet hingin Ryou, who everyone said coming into

0:12:01.240 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 1>this year couldn't stay healthy. Well, he has stayed healthy

0:12:03.800 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>and he is the n l C A young right now, sure,

0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but we're not talking about read at the moment. We're

0:12:09.400 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about. You can't. You can't pinpoint one specific player

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in the strategy is my whole thing? Like Rich Hill

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>is like your poster boy dude, Like, oh, we got

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and thirty innings from Rich Hill. I'm fine quality,

0:12:20.440 --> 0:12:23.120
<v Speaker 1>greater sign quantity. Dude, pitch fifty innings this year and

0:12:23.160 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>he could be done for the year. I don't. I

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>read as of yesterday, three to four weeks and then

0:12:28.440 --> 0:12:31.400
<v Speaker 1>he's beginning a throwing program. I hope to be able

0:12:31.440 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>to pitch again this season. Definitely don't have an answer when,

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:40.000
<v Speaker 1>but I expect to be back great. Greggy. I'm telling me, man,

0:12:40.040 --> 0:12:42.199
<v Speaker 1>I've had Rich Hill. He's going on my DL spot.

0:12:42.200 --> 0:12:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not dropping him. He's oh my god, yeah, I

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.800
<v Speaker 1>have to. I have my I have I L spots

0:12:48.880 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot like so I just lost him and Pablo

0:12:51.360 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>Lopez this week. That's an easy decision as to which

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>one I'm gonna keep and which one I'm gonna cut.

0:12:56.920 --> 0:13:00.040
<v Speaker 1>Rich Hill. It's amazing. He probably still own Alice would do,

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:04.080
<v Speaker 1>don't you. I don't think I do. But he's throwing again, Greggy,

0:13:04.080 --> 0:13:05.839
<v Speaker 1>I own him in my draft and holds because I

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:08.640
<v Speaker 1>can't drop him there. Would you pick up Alex Wood

0:13:08.679 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 1>this week? No, he's not. I would wait until he

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 1>gets closer, because who knows he could suffer a setback.

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, but let me be serious with rich Hill

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:19.600
<v Speaker 1>going on the I l a major question that Dodgers

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:22.240
<v Speaker 1>fans and fantasy fans have a like is who who

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 1>is replacing him in the rotation? And Julio, you asked

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 1>at the start last night was great. Pitched three innings

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>and look brilliantly against the San Francisco Giants. I get

0:13:31.800 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it was the Giants, but he looked really, really good.

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Ross Stripling also came in and he did his thing

0:13:37.200 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 1>as well last night for the Los Angeles Dodgers. Um

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Stripling loud, three runs, all unearned, pitched a couple of innings.

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna have to find a way to replace rich

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:50.440
<v Speaker 1>Hill over the next month or two at least. If

0:13:50.480 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>you're picking up somebody off the waiver wire, Stripling Urias neither.

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.439
<v Speaker 1>What's the plan here? I think if you're in a

0:13:59.520 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>league where if you miss out, I would go with

0:14:01.760 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Urius first. I think his upside is higher. I think

0:14:04.440 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the fact that they let him start the game yesterday

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and and while the UH runs to Strippling were unearned.

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Urius did pitch better than Strippling. UH. I think his

0:14:13.320 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>upside is just higher. But I'm telling people I've been

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.360
<v Speaker 1>putting on my Patreon page. I'm gonna talk about on

0:14:18.400 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>my podcast today. If you missed out on Urius, I'm

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.360
<v Speaker 1>taking the shot on Strippling. This has been something I've

0:14:23.360 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>been preaching all year with these Dodgers pictures, UH, mostly

0:14:26.800 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 1>in draft season because they've surprisingly stayed healthy this year.

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 1>But I kept saying at a hill Reu, my Ada, Strippling, Urius.

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't sure when exactly they were going to get

0:14:38.040 --> 0:14:40.200
<v Speaker 1>their starts, but I was confident at some point in

0:14:40.240 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the year each one would be healthy and have a

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.320
<v Speaker 1>turn through the rotation, a little bit of a stay

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:48.000
<v Speaker 1>in the rotation, because this is just what the Dodges do, Like,

0:14:48.040 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I would not be surprised if we see a Ryou

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:52.840
<v Speaker 1>Phantom I L Stints at some point, or Mayata or

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:55.720
<v Speaker 1>even a Kershaw like. I don't think there's any of

0:14:55.720 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>their pictures that they wouldn't put on the I L.

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>And if that's gonna be the case Eurius and Stripling,

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we saw last year when these guys start, they have

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a ton of upside and in the leagues where I

0:15:04.440 --> 0:15:06.880
<v Speaker 1>lost rich Hill, like in one of them the other day, Greggy,

0:15:06.960 --> 0:15:09.320
<v Speaker 1>I just I picked up Curious and if he doesn't

0:15:09.320 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>get the start a bit on stripling and hope that

0:15:11.360 --> 0:15:13.760
<v Speaker 1>he's the one who gets it. But that's my plan.

0:15:13.840 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Like whever I lost rich Hill, I'm just trying to

0:15:15.560 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>pick up Curious and just keep it moving, keep kicking

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>the can down the curb with these arms that I

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 1>can trust to to not hurt my ratios and to

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:25.240
<v Speaker 1>get me a ton of strikeouts. And on the Dodgers,

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:27.040
<v Speaker 1>they're also going to be getting a lot of wins.

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It's the reason why I love all the Dodgers pictures

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>so much, because they won't give you the quantity of

0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>innings that that I know you love, Greggy. But when

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:38.000
<v Speaker 1>they go out there, man, they are always. They're all

0:15:38.080 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>all seven of them are worthy of being in your

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.800
<v Speaker 1>your rotation anytime they take them ount. Yeah, Hulu, you

0:15:44.240 --> 0:15:47.800
<v Speaker 1>definitely somebody that for all the reasons you mentioned, being

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>with the Dodgers getting the winds, how he pitches, somebody

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>want to pick up three innings forty five pitches last night?

0:15:54.040 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>If we could get up to let's say sixty pitches

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.240
<v Speaker 1>next time out throughout the summer, he could be valuable.

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.320
<v Speaker 1>The Dodgers wanted to limited his innings anyway. Getting him now,

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>we get him for a lot of the summer where

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>he has the potential to extend himself. It could be good.

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:11.320
<v Speaker 1>So Curious over stripling, that's correct. I think so, just

0:16:11.320 --> 0:16:13.360
<v Speaker 1>because I think the upside is a little higher. But

0:16:13.640 --> 0:16:15.960
<v Speaker 1>to put it in perspective, I think Curious could be

0:16:16.040 --> 0:16:19.400
<v Speaker 1>like a Chris Paddock type picture, like he's that good,

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:22.440
<v Speaker 1>but he's just there's the pitch limit, the inning limit

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and everything. It's gonna make it a little bit frustrating

0:16:24.600 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>at times. And hopefully the frustrating period is already over.

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:29.320
<v Speaker 1>I know the reason I was able to get Curious

0:16:29.360 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>is because the people who drafted him ended up cutting him.

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>So this is now the time, I think, where you

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.200
<v Speaker 1>want to get back into Urius and hopefully he can

0:16:37.240 --> 0:16:39.200
<v Speaker 1>give you some Chris Paddock production. And by what I

0:16:39.240 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 1>mean by that is when they do allow him to pitch,

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna be very very good for your fantasy team. Alright,

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:48.240
<v Speaker 1>So Lulo Urius worth the pickup, Go out and get

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:51.960
<v Speaker 1>him Chris Paddock like upside. Speaking of Chris Paddock, he's

0:16:52.000 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>returning to the Mound this weekend for San Diego. Things

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:59.960
<v Speaker 1>look good for Paddock. Things looking up Hulu Urius as well.

0:17:00.360 --> 0:17:02.600
<v Speaker 1>We are going to take a break when we come back,

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:05.200
<v Speaker 1>Michael Florio. We're gonna discuss some of these other guys

0:17:05.240 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>that you don't want to pick up the waiver wire,

0:17:06.560 --> 0:17:08.720
<v Speaker 1>some of the lesser known guys at the higher price prospects.

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:10.439
<v Speaker 1>We also have to talk about who did drop right.

0:17:10.440 --> 0:17:12.359
<v Speaker 1>You're picking up Curious and you're picking up Zac Gallant,

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 1>You're picking up Jordan's Yamamoto. You gotta drop people. Were

0:17:16.200 --> 0:17:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you most comfortable dropping? We're gonna let you know. This

0:17:19.359 --> 0:17:22.840
<v Speaker 1>is the VFS here on a Friday, a fantasy sports network.

0:17:31.640 --> 0:17:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Daily Rodo dot Com learned from the game's best DFS players.

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you advice. We play every day,

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stopped industry

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:49.240
<v Speaker 1>leading DFS tools and custom projections, and now the Daily

0:17:49.280 --> 0:17:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Rodo dot Com Optimizer in minutes, build an optimized line

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>up for cash games and tourneys. Learned from the game's

0:17:56.320 --> 0:18:03.879
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players. Join Daily rodot Com. The morning after

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:06.679
<v Speaker 1>my fall was potentially they could go Barrett Dezig and

0:18:06.680 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 1>pair them together. Yet if I'm the Pelicans, I actually wouldn't.

0:18:10.440 --> 0:18:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Yes they get along, and yes they played together, but

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I think they're both too big for the same court

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>here at the NBA, I think you're almost better off

0:18:19.240 --> 0:18:22.440
<v Speaker 1>getting a player that will really compliments sign better than

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:24.760
<v Speaker 1>having two sort of future stars on the court getting

0:18:24.760 --> 0:18:27.639
<v Speaker 1>in each other's way. Week days nine am, Star on

0:18:27.840 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>F and T s Y Radio and on your popular

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:33.040
<v Speaker 1>podcast providers. Money Now one hundred is not a lender, broker,

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.280
<v Speaker 1>or agent of any lender or financial advisor. We do

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:37.520
<v Speaker 1>not make loans or credit decisions. He must be eighteen

0:18:37.560 --> 0:18:39.840
<v Speaker 1>years or older and the US resident to qualified. This

0:18:39.920 --> 0:18:42.239
<v Speaker 1>is not an offer or solicitation to lend. I want

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>the money Now one hundred dot com and got the

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:48.439
<v Speaker 1>five thousand dollars I needed deposited in my account the

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.479
<v Speaker 1>next business day. If you need money for any reason,

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:54.520
<v Speaker 1>help is here. Got to money now one hundred dot

0:18:54.520 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>com and get the money you need. Need to pay

0:18:56.800 --> 0:18:59.600
<v Speaker 1>off credit card debt, go to money now one hundred

0:18:59.640 --> 0:19:03.000
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Need your car repaired, need home improvement money?

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>Visit money now one hundred dot com. If you need

0:19:06.359 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 1>fast cash for any reason, go to money Now one

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>hundred dot com. Good, bad, or no credit at all.

0:19:12.960 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Go to money now one hundred dot com. You could

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:18.320
<v Speaker 1>get up to five thousand dollars as soon as the

0:19:18.400 --> 0:19:21.560
<v Speaker 1>next business day. Go to money now one hundred dot com.

0:19:21.560 --> 0:19:24.480
<v Speaker 1>On your phone, tablet, or computer. Type in the address

0:19:24.520 --> 0:19:28.680
<v Speaker 1>bar money now one hundred dot com. That's money now

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the number one hundred dot com. Lets it back with

0:19:49.200 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you here on the v f F S Drag Sausman

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:56.119
<v Speaker 1>Michael Florio on a Florial Friday. Frankly, Mike, it's it's

0:19:56.320 --> 0:19:57.840
<v Speaker 1>in the kind of nice just having it and me

0:19:57.920 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>for once like a throwback. Is it was like what

0:20:01.200 --> 0:20:02.600
<v Speaker 1>frank would always a wave you away, you and I

0:20:02.640 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>would just hang out in mad fun of him back.

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:08.919
<v Speaker 1>I know it reminds me. I know I mentioned it earlier,

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>but it reminds me of the day after the NFL

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Draft that year and we just kind of the two

0:20:12.680 --> 0:20:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of us hung overly, just made fun of frank for

0:20:14.880 --> 0:20:18.200
<v Speaker 1>most of the hour. Yeah, that was a disaster. That

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:23.240
<v Speaker 1>was a straight up disaster. Um, you know, Frankie doing

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>his thing, taking the day off. He'll be back here

0:20:25.280 --> 0:20:29.159
<v Speaker 1>on Monday. Now, Mike, I mentioned before that if you're

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>figuring out these guys, you have to be able to

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>drop some players. So I want to throw some names

0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 1>out at you. This is what people are asking about

0:20:34.840 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 1>insenter YouTube chat, on Twitter, so on and so forth.

0:20:37.440 --> 0:20:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Let me start out with Clint Fraser of the Yankees,

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>Aaron Judge officially being activated today, Cameron Mayban staying in

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.720
<v Speaker 1>the majors, and I spoke to me about spoke to

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:49.160
<v Speaker 1>Frank about this off the air. And if you read

0:20:49.160 --> 0:20:51.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of quotes regarding Clint Frasier being sent down

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>this past weekend and Karen Mayban winding up staying in

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the majors, now this week, there's no love lost Clint

0:20:59.720 --> 0:21:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Fraser and he sent down. There's no one coming to

0:21:01.200 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>his defense. Nobody's saying he's a great teammate, he helps

0:21:03.840 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>on us. We love him, he'll be back. We can't wait.

0:21:06.040 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>We'll miss him, Cameron. Maybe it's like, oh, Mane the

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:10.200
<v Speaker 1>stud was born of a pinch stripes. He's the heart

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of our team, he's the soul. And I'm like, they

0:21:12.400 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 1>hate Cliff Fraser like these he has no friends on

0:21:15.440 --> 0:21:17.199
<v Speaker 1>this team. And when he said, it's been hard for

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>me to Josh, it's been hard for me to fit in.

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.680
<v Speaker 1>I think he's a douche. I think that's what it is.

0:21:22.840 --> 0:21:26.399
<v Speaker 1>And there's zero love laws by his teammates, and I wonder,

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>not wonder, like the Yankees are going to trade this

0:21:28.600 --> 0:21:31.320
<v Speaker 1>guy at the right opportunity presents itself. But as a

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owner, do you wait for that to happen? I

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:37.520
<v Speaker 1>think you try your best, I really do. I mean

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:39.800
<v Speaker 1>this guy like, I agree with you, Greggy. I don't

0:21:39.800 --> 0:21:42.159
<v Speaker 1>think he deserves to get sent down. It was nothing

0:21:42.280 --> 0:21:45.240
<v Speaker 1>he did. It's just the Yankees are too stacked offensively,

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 1>and I totally understand why he would not be cool

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>with that, and and he'd have an issue with that.

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.919
<v Speaker 1>It's costing him money. It's costing him a large portion

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of his career being on the Yankees, because if he

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:57.720
<v Speaker 1>was on another team, he'd probably be up for a

0:21:57.760 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>couple of years by now already. But I just I

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.119
<v Speaker 1>do feel for him a little bit. But I agree

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 1>with you. Everything about this kid says that he's immature,

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 1>and he kind of does seem like a douche. But

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.679
<v Speaker 1>as for fantasy purposes, he was very effective when he

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:15.240
<v Speaker 1>was healthy, so I would try my best. The trading

0:22:15.320 --> 0:22:17.360
<v Speaker 1>deadline is just a month away. We know a lot

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of traits happened earlier in July than that, so I

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>would try my best to hold onto him because I

0:22:22.840 --> 0:22:25.359
<v Speaker 1>do think the Yankees he's going to be a big

0:22:25.400 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>piece in the trade for his starting pitcher, and whenever

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:31.040
<v Speaker 1>he gets traded, I think he will play right away

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:33.360
<v Speaker 1>like he has nothing left to prove in the minor leagues. Yeah.

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:36.120
<v Speaker 1>He hit a moonshot last night in trivle A also

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:39.720
<v Speaker 1>hit a long double as well. He showed up finally

0:22:39.840 --> 0:22:42.920
<v Speaker 1>he did. He wounded up showing up. Yes, So the

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Fraser can hit. That's not the issue. It's personality, um,

0:22:46.480 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's his fielding. The worst fielder in the majors

0:22:48.920 --> 0:22:50.760
<v Speaker 1>this year. They're playing a lot in center field as

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a way to showcase him. We'll see what happens. You're

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:56.120
<v Speaker 1>holding on a Clint Fraser if possible. I'm trying my best, Yeah,

0:22:56.160 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>because the upside we know is is and especially since

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:01.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you agree, Greggy, I feel like

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 1>this is more of a starting pitcher waiver wire week,

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>and typically I don't wanna I mean, I get it.

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>If you need the pitching, you sometimes have to drop

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.360
<v Speaker 1>a hitter. But there's no hitter right now. I think

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:14.640
<v Speaker 1>on the waiver wire that has higher upside than Clint

0:23:14.680 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 1>Frasier as I look at the waiver wire. So the

0:23:16.960 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>other names I wrote down here, Chris Taylor, who's gonna

0:23:19.760 --> 0:23:22.560
<v Speaker 1>be play? Who's playing for Corey Seeger, Brendan Rodgers go

0:23:22.600 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to play? Given Trevor's story being out for the next

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:29.200
<v Speaker 1>month or so, um Ray Solaire owned about leagues? Any

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:33.399
<v Speaker 1>of those names interesting or Solaire is under criminally under owned.

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:35.439
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I think people are too quick to

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>write this guy off as a bust. He he was

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 1>once a former top prospect. Then he's matching the ball,

0:23:40.520 --> 0:23:42.639
<v Speaker 1>hitting for power at the very least this year, so

0:23:42.680 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he is very under own. Brendan Rodgers is interesting, man,

0:23:46.000 --> 0:23:48.239
<v Speaker 1>because I want Brendan Rodgers to be a thing. If

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>you remember, I was very high on him. I believe

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>in his skill set, I believe in that corpse lineup,

0:23:52.880 --> 0:23:54.959
<v Speaker 1>and obviously I want to exposure to course field. But

0:23:55.640 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, like they're so inconsistent with how

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>they use a young players. I understand that now it's

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:04.720
<v Speaker 1>a shortstop. It's different. Ryan McMahon can't play short and

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Hampson hasn't done anything this year to win back time.

0:24:07.720 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 1>So I expect Brendan Rodgers to get a lot of opportunity,

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:12.280
<v Speaker 1>and I would be wanting to pick him up. But

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a close one him and Clint Fraser, I think

0:24:14.960 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>right now. Actually though, I lean Rodgers because he should

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:21.359
<v Speaker 1>get the opportunity for the next month or so, Brendan

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Rodgers is going to have a chance here to be

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:27.960
<v Speaker 1>successful with the Rockies playing in Colorado. Daniel Murphy, David Donald,

0:24:28.119 --> 0:24:30.800
<v Speaker 1>do you guys have turned it around after early season struggles?

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Whether Rogers struggle in his first taste of the Major

0:24:32.680 --> 0:24:35.439
<v Speaker 1>but didn't necessarily get the playing time consistently prove what

0:24:35.480 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>he could do. If he was dropping your league's I

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>would rather have him than Clint Frasier. Maybe it's because

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he's in the majors, but yeah, I would okay with that. Yeah,

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm okay with that. Okay, other players that I gotta

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>ask you about dropping Hunter Pence has been fantastic this year,

0:24:51.080 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>and I know he says leave that quickly from the IL,

0:24:53.520 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>but as a guy that's pretty old in his leap thirties.

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:57.919
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that you can trust that. Are you

0:24:57.920 --> 0:25:00.280
<v Speaker 1>holding on a Hunter Pens are dropping him? I think

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you could drop him. Willie Calhoun is back and still

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:05.440
<v Speaker 1>playing well. Remember when Calhoun came up, we thought Pence

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>would be the one that would lose out on playing time,

0:25:08.160 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 1>and and I kept waiting for the other shoe to

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:12.600
<v Speaker 1>fall with Pence. Maybe I was doing it wrong, but

0:25:12.640 --> 0:25:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like you said, this guy is very old.

0:25:14.240 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>He had never played like this. He hasn't been good

0:25:16.000 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 1>in years. I love the career resurgence for him going

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to Texas, but ultimately, this is a team still competing

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>right now. But I still think they're gonna try to

0:25:25.200 --> 0:25:27.520
<v Speaker 1>get Willy Calhoun in there as much as possible, and

0:25:27.560 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it will come at the expense of Hunter Pence. Alright,

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>So Willie Calhoun Joey Yallow both going to play for Texas. Ultimately,

0:25:34.640 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>that means Hunter Pence could wind up being the odd

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:40.040
<v Speaker 1>band out for the Rangers. Floria says, you can drop

0:25:40.119 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>him if necessary. Here you talk about wanting you to

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 1>drop pictures for pictures, Yamamoto gallon the two top pictures

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:50.080
<v Speaker 1>out there also Abert as Alai. I want to throw

0:25:50.119 --> 0:25:52.399
<v Speaker 1>that out there before we continue. What should fantasy owners

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.560
<v Speaker 1>know about him? So last night he did pitch well.

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Granted it was against the Mets, and I mean anyone

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:01.040
<v Speaker 1>could probably pitch well against the Mets right now. But

0:26:01.080 --> 0:26:03.320
<v Speaker 1>he went four plus innings, started to get into a

0:26:03.359 --> 0:26:04.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit of trouble when he They tried to stretch

0:26:05.000 --> 0:26:07.280
<v Speaker 1>him to let him go the ninth yesterday, but he

0:26:07.320 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>only left one run. He had five k's but only

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>six swinging strikes. That don't love that. And I don't

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:15.800
<v Speaker 1>know if maybe I'm reading into this a little too much.

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.119
<v Speaker 1>This worried me a little bit. He was sitting at

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety four point six miles per hour and maxed out

0:26:20.800 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 1>at ninety five point nine. And I remember, I think

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>it was last year, maybe the year before. You know,

0:26:26.520 --> 0:26:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Sarah's did like a study on pictures who throw close

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:32.480
<v Speaker 1>to their max velocity and how it usually leads to

0:26:32.520 --> 0:26:34.640
<v Speaker 1>them getting injured. More So, maybe I'm just reading into

0:26:34.680 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit too much, But that worried me.

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 1>It's tad. I am excited about advert but to put

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 1>him into perspective with these other young pictures, I would

0:26:43.240 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>have Gallan one, I'd have Logan Allen ahead of him.

0:26:46.200 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I'd also have Julio Erias ahead of him. We haven't

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.360
<v Speaker 1>mentioned Logan Alan yet. And it's worth mentioning the hashtag

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:55.479
<v Speaker 1>one that dollar bet Logan Allan, John Cena making that

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:58.600
<v Speaker 1>bet and Logan Allen pitched well in his MLB debut

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for San Diego. Did not have a good season thus

0:27:00.480 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>far in the PCL, but Alan came up pitched very

0:27:03.480 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 1>well in his first start. He's number two for you

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:10.680
<v Speaker 1>after Zach Gallen. Hell come, I just think Zach Gallan's

0:27:10.720 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>upside what we've seen him through throughout the minor leagues.

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I I think there's more upside there than with a

0:27:16.160 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>Logan Alan. And but great story with Alan. What you

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>said with the John Cena bed, I mean that was

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>that was awesome to see Sena there watching him pitch,

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and Alan pitch very well. And I picked him up

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 1>in a home league for four bucks out of a hundred.

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Also picked up Urius for three bucks out of a

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred there, so that puts it into perspective. I did

0:27:33.800 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>have a backup bid on I'm gonna I'm gonna butcher

0:27:37.040 --> 0:27:40.440
<v Speaker 1>his name probably, but I'll call him advert because also

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.280
<v Speaker 1>is a little a little bit of a tongue tie.

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.040
<v Speaker 1>But I had a two dollar bid in on him

0:27:44.040 --> 0:27:45.840
<v Speaker 1>as a backup to those other guys to put it

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.159
<v Speaker 1>into perspective. All right, So that's kind of the idea.

0:27:48.320 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>But Florio, you said that when you're picking up pictures,

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>you ideally want to drop pictures. Potentially the top picture

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.679
<v Speaker 1>that I've gotten asked about dropping here this week was

0:27:58.359 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that strong, and that's drom him off the I L

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a good spun. Colorado Uh predictively didn't go well.

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about dropping match strom Uh? For

0:28:10.720 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>for Gallen or Curious or Logan Allen, I'm okay doing it,

0:28:15.920 --> 0:28:18.920
<v Speaker 1>but I think after that I would hold match strom Uh.

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:22.399
<v Speaker 1>He he's a solid picture, like I. I get it.

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>It was Colorado in Milwaukee that really did blow up

0:28:25.359 --> 0:28:29.439
<v Speaker 1>his last two outings, But in between the before getting

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>hurt and before and in between that first really terrible

0:28:33.240 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>start he made, he was pitching well for a significant

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>stretch of the season. So for any of those other

0:28:38.840 --> 0:28:40.920
<v Speaker 1>guys who I think I've higher upside, I'm okay with it.

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, I'm probably sitting tight and holding

0:28:43.000 --> 0:28:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Match drom alright, match Drom a solid, spectacular member of

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:51.680
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy rotation, so consider keeping strong obviously if you can.

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:55.280
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned last week I dropped Chris Archer. That felt great.

0:28:55.440 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't regret that. So if you still own him,

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you're the same cool. Yeah, I'm I wrote a couple

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>of weeks ago, like, yeah, I'm cutting it with Chris

0:29:05.040 --> 0:29:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Archer feels like it feels awesome. I didn't have him anywhere, luckily,

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.720
<v Speaker 1>but this was the first year in a few years

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.080
<v Speaker 1>where I was on board taking a shot on him.

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>But the only thing was greggy. I was getting, you know,

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:19.080
<v Speaker 1>my my quality arms over him, like guys like Rich

0:29:19.160 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>Hill prevented me from getting a Chris Archer. Yeah, so

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Chris Archer belongs on the waiver wire, But who does

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:27.680
<v Speaker 1>he belong there with. Let me give you a couple

0:29:27.720 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>of other pictures that we liked a lot this season,

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.160
<v Speaker 1>and we have gone back and forth on that's the

0:29:33.200 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>bull Specier turn Ball. We'll start there with Detroit. We

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>still own him in a league, Mike, Uh, is it

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.160
<v Speaker 1>time to take about it? The ball? Uh? To me,

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>this is a very format dependent picture, like I mean,

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:49.720
<v Speaker 1>league size dependent picture, like us we own him in

0:29:49.720 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a fifteen team league, and I think that's worth noting.

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>But in like a twelve team league, I I understand

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:57.640
<v Speaker 1>if you want to drop him. He hasn't been pitching

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>great as of late, and I believe it is the

0:29:59.440 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland in and that he always struggles against, which is

0:30:01.800 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit strange. But I would still be trying

0:30:05.000 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to hold onto the bowl if you can. I mean,

0:30:07.360 --> 0:30:10.040
<v Speaker 1>his ear raight right now is three to seven, which

0:30:10.160 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 1>is significantly like that's almost that's over a full run

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:16.080
<v Speaker 1>below league average. Last I looked, and the expit at

0:30:16.080 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>four point five three. That's not great, but that's just

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit a bubble average. As of the other day,

0:30:20.920 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>league average was four point four one, So he's a

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>league average picture giving you eight case per nine, and

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>right now the results have been better. So I think, yeah,

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:33.880
<v Speaker 1>like Zach Gallen is out there and Turnbull is your

0:30:33.880 --> 0:30:37.080
<v Speaker 1>most jobable picture. I'm okay taking the upside shot on Gallen.

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know, other than like hammer Urea is these

0:30:40.400 --> 0:30:43.000
<v Speaker 1>top high upside arms, he's a lot like strong, like

0:30:43.000 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna hold turn Bull would really have that strong

0:30:45.720 --> 0:30:49.960
<v Speaker 1>special Turnbull Spencer Turnbull. Okay, next name on my list.

0:30:50.040 --> 0:30:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Martin Perege, who was really really good at the joining

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota's rotation early in April. He hasn't been good. He's

0:30:56.880 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>last few starts, though, has the magic run out from

0:31:00.080 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Team Perez. I'm afraid of that, but I still don't

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>want to drop him. I own him in a draft

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>in whole league, so I don't have this problem. That's

0:31:08.840 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>the only league I have him in. Unfortunately, I dropped

0:31:11.960 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>him those first two weeks. If you remember the Twins

0:31:14.360 --> 0:31:16.440
<v Speaker 1>went four man rotation, I had to drop him in

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>those leagues. I'm still kicking myself a little bit. He's

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.800
<v Speaker 1>been good, man. He's been a lot like Spencer turnable

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.320
<v Speaker 1>in the sense of almost a strikeout per inning, but

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>not quite there yet. Uh. The ear a is a

0:31:27.840 --> 0:31:30.560
<v Speaker 1>little over four and the xpit is four point three two.

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I know in a normal year those marks might not

0:31:32.720 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>look good, but I think we need to reevaluate the

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>way we look at pictures. Like Mark Martine Perez right

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:41.080
<v Speaker 1>now is pitching as a little bit above average league pictures,

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:43.040
<v Speaker 1>So I do think there is a spot for him

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:46.000
<v Speaker 1>in in fantasy. More of a deeper league guy if

0:31:46.000 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>you're in a ten team league. Yeah, he shouldn't be

0:31:47.800 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 1>owned twelve team he's very fringey, but like fourteen fifteen

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 1>team leagues, I think that is the sweet spot. That's

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.040
<v Speaker 1>where he's useful. So here's my issue in Martine Perez.

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I know you read the stats, but when five in

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a loud to is over six hits, okay, fine after that.

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So all of June and two and two thirds six

0:32:06.720 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>runs allowed, four and two thirds five runs allowed. June eleven,

0:32:10.320 --> 0:32:13.640
<v Speaker 1>five innings, four runs allowed. Last week against Kansas City

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>six and two thirds five runs allowed. That's a really

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>bad month. And Martine Perez, to me, isn't it good

0:32:19.640 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 1>enough picture that you suffer through this terrible nous to

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:26.280
<v Speaker 1>see what comes down on the other side. That's just

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.640
<v Speaker 1>me though. Yeah. No, if this recent stretch has turned

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you off, like again, I'm okay dropping him for Gallon

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 1>for yours and Logan Allen as well. Like I think

0:32:35.600 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 1>those guys have higher upside. I think they're pitching better

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:40.480
<v Speaker 1>right now, so I'm okay with doing that. But it's

0:32:40.480 --> 0:32:42.240
<v Speaker 1>when we get to the fringe of your arms after

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>like these higher upside young pictures where there's a lot

0:32:45.120 --> 0:32:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of guys who you're probably been recycled on multiple teams

0:32:48.360 --> 0:32:50.960
<v Speaker 1>this year. At that point in time, after seeing as

0:32:51.000 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>a whole what we've seen from Martine Perez this year,

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:55.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd probably be more inclined to hold him. Holding on

0:32:56.160 --> 0:32:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to Martine Perez rightly gets some of the hitters that

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought would be worth driving. And name a couple

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in Clint Fraser and Hunter Pence. Here. Uh, there's two

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:05.600
<v Speaker 1>more that I have on my lesson. I'll go out

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>to you, Mike Gregory Polanco. I know Florida Frank has

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>been vehemently against dropping him because he remember woul happened

0:33:12.200 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>last year where he dropped him and he went on

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>the second half tear. How do you feel about dropping

0:33:15.760 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>him now? Gregory Polanco is this guy that I feel

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:21.960
<v Speaker 1>like every year we have this discussion he can be

0:33:22.040 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 1>dropped or not, like literally every year. And right now

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at what he's doing, Like the k rate

0:33:27.000 --> 0:33:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is up, the walks aren't great at seven point two.

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>There's just there's not a whole lot to love with

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Polanco and what he's doing right now. And the hard

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.240
<v Speaker 1>hit rate thirty eight point five on fan Graphs, it's

0:33:40.240 --> 0:33:43.280
<v Speaker 1>not bad. That's about league average fly ball rate. Is

0:33:43.360 --> 0:33:45.320
<v Speaker 1>up a little bit. It's down from last year, but

0:33:45.400 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>still a little bit higher than league average, so you'd

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:49.960
<v Speaker 1>like to see that. But Gregory Polanco is one of

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>these fringy roster guys. To me, if you are holding him,

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason is what Frank said, because of

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen from him in the past. But there's

0:33:56.760 --> 0:33:58.880
<v Speaker 1>really nothing he has done this year that warrants you

0:33:59.200 --> 0:34:02.240
<v Speaker 1>giving him a longer leash. Okay, so accordin to you, Florio,

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:08.399
<v Speaker 1>Gregory polancod you go man, a very very fringy rostery guy,

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.240
<v Speaker 1>like you don't have to hold him. I don't think. Okay,

0:34:11.239 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, you don't have to hold Gregory Polanco. What

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 1>about some of it was hot, very very hot about

0:34:16.280 --> 0:34:18.000
<v Speaker 1>a month ago. And that's Derek Dietrich. What do you

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>think about him? I would not want to drop Derek

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>scot Is coming back, but I'm a sucker for Derrek Dietrich.

0:34:25.760 --> 0:34:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I bought in earlier this year and it's been a

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.759
<v Speaker 1>fun ride. But my thing is, like you look at

0:34:30.760 --> 0:34:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the Red's lineup right, and like a guy like Jose

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:38.160
<v Speaker 1>Peraza is giving them nothing, absolutely nothing this year. So

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we've seen Dietrich play some first some second, some corner

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>out field. I have a feeling when Scooter Jannette comes back,

0:34:45.000 --> 0:34:47.640
<v Speaker 1>he's going to become a super utility man. I'm hoping

0:34:47.680 --> 0:34:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they get creative. Maybe try to throw like Nick Senzel

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>or Suarez, guys who have a little bit of a

0:34:53.320 --> 0:34:56.120
<v Speaker 1>background playing shortstop. Maybe throw them at shortstop and just

0:34:56.120 --> 0:34:59.560
<v Speaker 1>say forget about defense. We're just gonna try and outmash opponents.

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And it's something thing that more and more teams in

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the MLB are doing like today. I don't know if

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>you've seen the Mets line up yet, Greggy, it's probably

0:35:06.200 --> 0:35:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the worst defensive outfield in baseball. It's Dominic Smith and left,

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Michael CONFORDO and center, and Jeff mcneillen right. But it's

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:16.160
<v Speaker 1>their three best offensive bats right now. And they're doing that.

0:35:16.239 --> 0:35:19.560
<v Speaker 1>And the Dodgers are talking about having Jack Peterson played

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>first base, something he has never done in his professional

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>career in the minors or in the majors. But if

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:26.879
<v Speaker 1>they do that, it allows them to put Munthsy at

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.960
<v Speaker 1>second and keep verdo Go in the lineup when Pollock returns.

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.439
<v Speaker 1>So more and more teams are are doing this where

0:35:32.440 --> 0:35:35.239
<v Speaker 1>they're playing people out of position just to get their

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.600
<v Speaker 1>best bats in the lineup, and I'm I'm hoping the

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.279
<v Speaker 1>Reds do that, and if they don't, I also think

0:35:40.320 --> 0:35:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Derek Dietrich is a prime trade candidate, and if they

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 1>trade him, I think there's a good chance he goes

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:47.040
<v Speaker 1>to a team when he gets to play every day.

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:49.240
<v Speaker 1>All Right, A couple of deep league players I wanted

0:35:49.280 --> 0:35:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about here, Um Florio, and that is

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:56.600
<v Speaker 1>two old veterans that don't exactly especially excitement. These are

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:01.840
<v Speaker 1>frank type of guys, Mike Leak and Tommy Malone and interested. Yeah.

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I talked about them on my podcast last week. They're

0:36:04.560 --> 0:36:07.640
<v Speaker 1>more deeper league options. Tommy Malone has been pitching well,

0:36:07.719 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>but Tommy Malone is who we think he is. A

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.719
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Malone, Yeah, yeah, Like Tommy Malone is capable of

0:36:13.760 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>going on stretches where you think Tommy Malone is like

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:20.600
<v Speaker 1>he once upon a time had hype and you think like, oh,

0:36:20.680 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 1>maybe he could finally be a post hype sleeper living

0:36:23.440 --> 0:36:25.560
<v Speaker 1>up to it, and then Tommy Malone reminds the world

0:36:25.560 --> 0:36:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of who he is. The same thing with Mike Leak.

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:29.839
<v Speaker 1>I think these are hot stretches. I'm using Mike leak

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.000
<v Speaker 1>in my tout war Straft and hold this week because

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I have some starting pitcher injuries that I needed to replace.

0:36:35.200 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 1>But I ultimately think they're more deeper league options. I

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:40.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think in a twelve team league you want to

0:36:40.520 --> 0:36:42.480
<v Speaker 1>be starting either one of those guys. I agree. I

0:36:42.480 --> 0:36:44.279
<v Speaker 1>don't feel safe Flora. By the way, and to say

0:36:44.360 --> 0:36:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is that loud? Joe the Mustache just said, if Chris

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:48.879
<v Speaker 1>Ventro we're an offensive major league I feel like I'd

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:53.879
<v Speaker 1>be Derek Teacher. What is that like like when every

0:36:53.920 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 1>once in a while is going to hit a home

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 1>run for you? You know what? I don't even know

0:36:57.400 --> 0:36:59.360
<v Speaker 1>what it means. I don't want to know, but I

0:36:59.440 --> 0:37:03.680
<v Speaker 1>just me laugh. Joe and a Mustache is gonna be

0:37:03.760 --> 0:37:06.880
<v Speaker 1>my podcast yesterday. Greggy, that's awesome, so we'll plug that.

0:37:07.400 --> 0:37:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Flores's podcast guest, Joe Mustache have a good show. I'll

0:37:10.040 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>check it out. Florio, we're gonna take our final break.

0:37:13.239 --> 0:37:14.359
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into some of the two star

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:16.280
<v Speaker 1>pitchers for next week, go over some of the stuff

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 1>that stood out to both of us last night, and

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:19.560
<v Speaker 1>we'll get to the Jason Stark should be a question

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of the week. All that and more the final twenty

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:32.959
<v Speaker 1>minutes the f S I had great results. I lost

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>seventy pounds by way to sixty five and went down

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>to my doctor told me, if it works for you,

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>then do it. But a lot of people say to me,

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>how would you lose the weight? I said, I take

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Andrew four hundred every day, and I'm gonna take it forever.

0:37:45.520 --> 0:37:48.319
<v Speaker 1>That was Walt talking about Andrew four hundred. Now listen

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to what Bob has to say. When you listen to

0:37:50.680 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>your radio commercials, you say that's not possible. But since

0:37:53.760 --> 0:37:57.279
<v Speaker 1>I've experienced it, your commercials aren't strong enough. I am

0:37:57.520 --> 0:37:59.960
<v Speaker 1>seventy and I've had a belly for way too long.

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:03.239
<v Speaker 1>My whole body is shrinking. My energy level has gone up,

0:38:03.239 --> 0:38:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and don't think differences. And it's great stuff. But I

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:09.120
<v Speaker 1>tried other products and nothing happen. Guys, if you'd like

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:13.280
<v Speaker 1>to lose stubborn belly fat, gain energy, and feel years younger,

0:38:13.440 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>try Androw four hundred, the safe, natural and affordable way

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:21.439
<v Speaker 1>to boost your testosterone. Go to Androw four hundred dot

0:38:21.440 --> 0:38:24.879
<v Speaker 1>com or call eight eight eight four hundred zero four

0:38:25.000 --> 0:38:28.359
<v Speaker 1>three five eight eight eight four hundred zero four three

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>five Androw four hundred dot com. Look Daily Rodo dot

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:34.600
<v Speaker 1>Com guide you to victory as you swing for the

0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:38.320
<v Speaker 1>fences playing daily Fantasy Baseball. Become the eighth Daily Rodo lineup.

0:38:38.320 --> 0:38:40.719
<v Speaker 1>Optimize it will win one million dollars in a fan

0:38:40.800 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Duela Draft Kings tournament, or become part of the growing

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:45.840
<v Speaker 1>community who have won thousands of dollars. If you're playing

0:38:45.920 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 1>MLB dfs and not using Daily Rodo dot com, you're

0:38:48.719 --> 0:38:51.520
<v Speaker 1>doing it wrong. Enter promo code f n t s

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Y for a ten percent discount the two thousand, nineteen

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>MLB Daily Rodo Premium package at Daily rodo dot com.

0:38:57.360 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Use a promo code f n T s Y and

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>get your ten percent discount Today. You can't get enough

0:39:02.680 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football. Rhoto Experts has launched their NFL three Fantasy

0:39:06.760 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Football package, which includes the best math based seasonal projections

0:39:10.160 --> 0:39:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and rankings available anywhere on the Internet and Davis Madigan,

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>The Rhoto Experts are providing dynasty, season long betting, best ball,

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:19.279
<v Speaker 1>and NFL Draft content every day of the year to

0:39:19.320 --> 0:39:21.520
<v Speaker 1>give you an edge regardless of what type of fantasy

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:24.480
<v Speaker 1>football you play. Save temper cent at roto experts dot

0:39:24.480 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>com with the promo code V and T s y.

0:39:26.520 --> 0:39:30.640
<v Speaker 1>It's the NFL three Fantasy football package only at Rhoto

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Experts dot com. How much Friday editions happen not to

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>all the game Rentsard hold on, this is under songs.

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>It will not be at my wedding, which for the record,

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:54.200
<v Speaker 1>playing out glory, what's up? Look what songs are going

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:56.319
<v Speaker 1>to be played at your wedding? I would say they

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:58.880
<v Speaker 1>were ideally popular music, but I'll get a fight with

0:39:58.920 --> 0:40:02.719
<v Speaker 1>all parents about this. So I'm guessing there's gonna be

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.040
<v Speaker 1>a ton of Dave Matthews. There will not be a

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:07.240
<v Speaker 1>ton of Dave Matthews. You can't really dance to Dave Matthews.

0:40:07.400 --> 0:40:10.439
<v Speaker 1>You could, you could. Sway, I'm playing music, you can't

0:40:10.520 --> 0:40:12.839
<v Speaker 1>dance to it my wedding. I don't care. You think that,

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>and then you're not. Me and Nicolete have already said, like,

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:18.719
<v Speaker 1>there's a few songs were definitely playing that most people

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:20.759
<v Speaker 1>aren't going to get and we don't care. But that's fine.

0:40:20.800 --> 0:40:22.520
<v Speaker 1>That's a few songs. I don't want any songs that

0:40:22.560 --> 0:40:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't want and that's the that's the issue that

0:40:24.120 --> 0:40:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I have a fight with my future in laws. Okay, yeah,

0:40:28.800 --> 0:40:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I have I haven't barely scratched the surface when it

0:40:31.440 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>comes to wedding planning. I've just thought about music that

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>will be playing and like still like I thought about

0:40:36.680 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 1>like music and food. Kind of sure those are the

0:40:38.640 --> 0:40:42.439
<v Speaker 1>most important things. Yeah, that's it. I believe me. That's

0:40:42.440 --> 0:40:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree. All right, you're ready for the Jayson Stark

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 1>tip A question of the week? I am. I feel

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.800
<v Speaker 1>like it's gonna be harder though with just me guessing,

0:40:48.840 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 1>unless you're gonna play. I don't know the I don't

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:53.359
<v Speaker 1>know the answer, Okay, cool, I don't actually know if

0:40:53.360 --> 0:40:55.680
<v Speaker 1>he's revealed the answer yet, so you might be just

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 1>doing this and I'll find the answer out later. Here

0:40:57.600 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>we go, and when in Chronosi, you know my guy

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 1>has hit three hundred and two home runs the start

0:41:03.640 --> 0:41:06.800
<v Speaker 1>of eleven. That makes him one of five active players

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:10.240
<v Speaker 1>with hit at least three hundred home runs over any

0:41:10.360 --> 0:41:13.960
<v Speaker 1>nine years span in their career. Can you name the

0:41:14.000 --> 0:41:17.279
<v Speaker 1>other four? Can I start off by saying, I don't

0:41:17.320 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 1>like this question already? Why I don't? It's it's I

0:41:21.120 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 1>thought it was gonna be like since two th that's

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:26.799
<v Speaker 1>obviously not with this. Yeah, and any nine years spent

0:41:26.840 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 1>woman against MIGGI. Yeah, maybe he's the first one obviously

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:33.440
<v Speaker 1>comes to mind. Who holds? Does Joji Batista count as

0:41:33.440 --> 0:41:38.719
<v Speaker 1>being active? No, Trouts probably done it, right, Yeah, I

0:41:38.719 --> 0:41:42.080
<v Speaker 1>would imagine so. And Trud's done in like seven years?

0:41:42.080 --> 0:41:45.319
<v Speaker 1>Well its Trump been around for nine years though, was

0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.360
<v Speaker 1>over any nine years span? I mean, I don't know.

0:41:47.400 --> 0:41:49.120
<v Speaker 1>He has been around nine years. It probably doesn't count.

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:53.720
<v Speaker 1>He debuted in twenty twelve, right, yeah, so it probably

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:58.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't count. Okay, but we got we got two of them.

0:41:58.080 --> 0:42:01.720
<v Speaker 1>How many is their total? Four? I would guess Ryan Braun.

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>Ryan Broun is a good one. Ryan is a very

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 1>good one. Fail you're on fire right now? And then

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:10.480
<v Speaker 1>I would also guess Chris Davis. I don't know that Chris.

0:42:10.760 --> 0:42:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Has he done it? Has he done it long enough? Carloston,

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:16.879
<v Speaker 1>you've done right for nine years? Yeah? I think so?

0:42:19.200 --> 0:42:23.719
<v Speaker 1>When when was he Mike Staining? I don't know. I

0:42:23.719 --> 0:42:26.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Yeah, I don't. I don't think he's tweeted

0:42:26.440 --> 0:42:34.279
<v Speaker 1>out the answer yet. Uh he has not. That's frestrating

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:37.000
<v Speaker 1>all you all. I'm trying to think of is old

0:42:37.040 --> 0:42:39.799
<v Speaker 1>guys who used to be good. It makes sense that

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of the it's not a great question this week. Yeah,

0:42:42.719 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't love this week. And also anytime you go

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>with stuff like this like Pooh, Hols and Migie are

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:51.880
<v Speaker 1>automatically two of the answers. Yes, definitely. By the way,

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:53.919
<v Speaker 1>I just saw this on Twitter. A couple of notes

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:58.759
<v Speaker 1>for you. Your boy Tires Battle signed a undraut the

0:42:58.760 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>free agent contract Minnesota. He's not gonna make it in

0:43:03.080 --> 0:43:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the league. He's gonna be Do you remember c J. Fair?

0:43:06.920 --> 0:43:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Of course, I think that's who tis Battle kind of

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:15.320
<v Speaker 1>is what about you know that he's Johnny Flynn. Johnny

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Flynn man. I had such high hopes for Johnny Flynn.

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:21.759
<v Speaker 1>Did I should have looked this up myself. But did

0:43:21.800 --> 0:43:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Brissette from Cus get drafted? YEA? Who who Brissette? I

0:43:27.400 --> 0:43:31.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'm not sure. Probably not. He was like projected,

0:43:36.080 --> 0:43:38.920
<v Speaker 1>but these guys still go out early, man like Shamori Ponds.

0:43:38.920 --> 0:43:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I know Frank loves him for some reason. He texted

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:45.480
<v Speaker 1>me the other day like, all like they should draft him,

0:43:45.480 --> 0:43:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and I said to him, I said, this guy is

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>very undersized. He wasn't projected to get drafted last year

0:43:50.640 --> 0:43:53.319
<v Speaker 1>and heard his stock coming back. But Frank I saw

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:55.319
<v Speaker 1>him today saying they should sign him like he very

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 1>much still it wants Ponds and I get it, he's

0:43:56.960 --> 0:43:59.560
<v Speaker 1>a New York guy. But a lot of these guys, man,

0:43:59.600 --> 0:44:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know they hurt their value by leaving early

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:04.440
<v Speaker 1>or if like they just would be delaying the inevitable

0:44:04.440 --> 0:44:06.399
<v Speaker 1>of not getting drafted. But you always hate to see

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>a guy leave early and then not get drafted. And

0:44:08.480 --> 0:44:11.840
<v Speaker 1>then the other piece of information shams Terry Harris, the

0:44:11.960 --> 0:44:15.360
<v Speaker 1>brother of Toby Harris, who finished his college career in

0:44:15.440 --> 0:44:18.759
<v Speaker 1>North Carolina A and t playing Smarly for the six years.

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:23.239
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that's a coincidence, Floria, Toby being Tobias

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Toby being Tobias. Yes, okay, no, not a coincidence at all.

0:44:27.440 --> 0:44:29.840
<v Speaker 1>It's like when a baseball team drafts their stars like

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:32.759
<v Speaker 1>younger brother in like the twentieth round, or when the

0:44:32.800 --> 0:44:35.319
<v Speaker 1>Knick signed Chris Harris because they wanted to resign. Yeah,

0:44:35.320 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I was like Chris Smith when they wanted to resign Jr. Smith.

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:40.640
<v Speaker 1>That was the most fun Nick summer ever. The Smith

0:44:40.680 --> 0:44:45.600
<v Speaker 1>brothers is doing whatever they wanted. It's great summer. Mike Greggy,

0:44:45.680 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Greggy Greggy, can I just like I have the Knicks

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:53.600
<v Speaker 1>head on. But everything has gone wrong. Man, everything it sucks.

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I was, you know, I was so boon in that

0:44:56.120 --> 0:44:58.319
<v Speaker 1>this was gonna be the year that changes things. That's

0:44:58.360 --> 0:45:01.279
<v Speaker 1>what happens, Floria. We always buy and it never changes. Ever,

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 1>this is what we deal with or Nick fans like,

0:45:04.560 --> 0:45:06.520
<v Speaker 1>if this was any other team where Kevin Durant was

0:45:06.560 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 1>going to he doesn't get hurt, the Warriors probably win

0:45:08.920 --> 0:45:11.319
<v Speaker 1>the championship, and then he rides off into that team

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:15.279
<v Speaker 1>in the sunsetting. But it's the Knicks, right. I'm glad

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 1>you're finally understanding that this works. The Knicks probably cost

0:45:18.320 --> 0:45:24.719
<v Speaker 1>the Warriors to three Nicks. Oh man, all right, let's

0:45:24.760 --> 0:45:27.120
<v Speaker 1>go back to baseball here. Let's go to the two

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:30.160
<v Speaker 1>start pitchers for next week. There are four guys that

0:45:30.239 --> 0:45:32.520
<v Speaker 1>are out there in most nays I have written down

0:45:32.640 --> 0:45:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that I wanted to ask you about. Let me start

0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 1>with Cleveland's Adam Pluco facing Kansas City at home, and

0:45:37.280 --> 0:45:39.840
<v Speaker 1>then he's in Baltimore. The matchups, all right, is the

0:45:39.840 --> 0:45:43.560
<v Speaker 1>picture right. I'm a little bit scared by that in

0:45:43.640 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore start because in Baltimore we know balls could leave

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 1>the yard quickly. But I like these two matchups. I

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:53.439
<v Speaker 1>think there's a lot of strikeout upside here. I'm okay

0:45:53.560 --> 0:45:56.719
<v Speaker 1>riding him out, alright, So Adam Pluco you're okay with

0:45:56.840 --> 0:45:59.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna tell you I'm gonna drop on Saturday or

0:45:59.160 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Sunday whenever Bred at his next start is, I'm gonna

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 1>drop him for Adam Plutka. I don't love Pluco the

0:46:05.320 --> 0:46:07.560
<v Speaker 1>most of the pictures you wrote down, though you do not.

0:46:08.040 --> 0:46:11.839
<v Speaker 1>That's exciting. Who knew you like the best? I think

0:46:11.920 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Brad Keller this week at Cleveland and at Toronto, like

0:46:18.880 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't fear being neither of those ballparks as much

0:46:21.960 --> 0:46:24.719
<v Speaker 1>as I do fear being in Baltimore. Plus, those are

0:46:24.719 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>two teams that I know the Indians have kind of

0:46:27.040 --> 0:46:29.200
<v Speaker 1>been hot as of late, but there's still not the

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:31.160
<v Speaker 1>most fearful lineup in the world. And then the Blue

0:46:31.200 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 1>Jays just strike out a ton. So I would ride

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:38.080
<v Speaker 1>with Brad Keller the highest of the four on this list, alright.

0:46:38.080 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 1>So Keller's the highest. I don't love Brad Keller because

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:43.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's very good. So Brad Keller not

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:45.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna make my top list. I like Pluco a little

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 1>bit more. The other names of the list, Trevor Richards

0:46:48.000 --> 0:46:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and Chris Bassett. Richards has the toughest matchup, that's probably

0:46:50.920 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the best picture out of these guys. He's home for

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:57.520
<v Speaker 1>both of his starts Division matchups, Washington and Philadelphia. Bassett

0:46:57.560 --> 0:46:59.840
<v Speaker 1>on the road for both starts in St. Louis in

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:02.560
<v Speaker 1>L A l A. Playing a lot better as of late,

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Bassett not exactly pitching great as of late. What do

0:47:05.239 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 1>you think of those two guys? Bassett is basically you

0:47:08.440 --> 0:47:10.600
<v Speaker 1>could I think you could write him down five and

0:47:10.600 --> 0:47:13.840
<v Speaker 1>two thirds three in runs like that's what he's done

0:47:13.880 --> 0:47:17.840
<v Speaker 1>extra out place that my I didn't realize this until yesterday.

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:19.479
<v Speaker 1>A buddy of mine text me and was like, why

0:47:19.480 --> 0:47:21.880
<v Speaker 1>can Chris Bassett never get the last out in the

0:47:21.920 --> 0:47:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sixth innings? And then I looked and I was like, Wow,

0:47:24.280 --> 0:47:26.120
<v Speaker 1>this guy really like I used to call it the

0:47:26.200 --> 0:47:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Jake oder Rizzi five and two thirds, I think we

0:47:28.080 --> 0:47:30.719
<v Speaker 1>should start calling it the Chris Bassett. But he I

0:47:30.800 --> 0:47:32.480
<v Speaker 1>did look at his game looks today when I saw

0:47:32.480 --> 0:47:34.399
<v Speaker 1>you wrote him down, Greggy, and I noticed, my god,

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 1>he's just crazy. If yeah right, and if I remember correctly,

0:47:37.920 --> 0:47:39.760
<v Speaker 1>if you have in front of you. It's one start

0:47:39.760 --> 0:47:41.720
<v Speaker 1>all year where he's allowed more than three AR runs.

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:45.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't you know, because I only have the E

0:47:45.320 --> 0:47:47.919
<v Speaker 1>R A. I don't have got it. I'll just gonna

0:47:48.000 --> 0:47:51.919
<v Speaker 1>get your game one second. Um, So we're talking about

0:47:51.960 --> 0:47:55.799
<v Speaker 1>three earned runs one start all year he's allowed more

0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:58.440
<v Speaker 1>than three earned run that's correct. His last week starts

0:47:58.800 --> 0:48:01.560
<v Speaker 1>five and two thirds all three of them, Oh my god,

0:48:01.719 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>a ton of them or three year in runs Like

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this guy is not he does not have a high ceiling.

0:48:06.200 --> 0:48:09.320
<v Speaker 1>But you if you pick him up six starts exactly

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:11.960
<v Speaker 1>three yearned runs. Yeah, like you're picking him up for

0:48:12.120 --> 0:48:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that floor, hoping you get five and two thirds of

0:48:14.680 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>three yearned runs against the car way, that you get

0:48:17.680 --> 0:48:21.560
<v Speaker 1>that extra out this time is what you're playing for. Um, Mike,

0:48:21.719 --> 0:48:23.720
<v Speaker 1>is there any other two star pictures that I didn't

0:48:23.719 --> 0:48:28.520
<v Speaker 1>necessarily see that you want to grab? Uh? No, so one,

0:48:28.680 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 1>it's not one that you can grab Greggy, but it's

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:34.080
<v Speaker 1>one that I'm debating trusting. It's more about can you

0:48:34.120 --> 0:48:36.279
<v Speaker 1>if you have this guy, can you trust him? And

0:48:36.280 --> 0:48:41.279
<v Speaker 1>it's Marco Gonzalez. I want to ask your opinion. At Milwaukee,

0:48:41.600 --> 0:48:43.799
<v Speaker 1>at Houston, there's no way I could use this got

0:48:43.800 --> 0:48:47.319
<v Speaker 1>a chance in health Floria a chance. And so my

0:48:47.480 --> 0:48:50.080
<v Speaker 1>next question, because I've been debating this in the league,

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:53.799
<v Speaker 1>should I drop him then or is this a case

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of it's just two of the hardest matchups it could

0:48:56.040 --> 0:49:01.160
<v Speaker 1>be you can have. Yeah, some of those younger pictures

0:49:01.200 --> 0:49:02.919
<v Speaker 1>are still out there, the guys we were talking about

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>earlier on. I have no problem dropping Marco Gonzalez. I'm

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:08.840
<v Speaker 1>not like fearful the mark of Gonzalez gonna go on

0:49:08.880 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>some tear, like he's gonna be an average starting pitcher,

0:49:11.200 --> 0:49:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, I like, he's never gonna strike anybody out.

0:49:13.560 --> 0:49:16.840
<v Speaker 1>So does it does it change? So does the league scoring?

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>In this if you get it's a points league, but

0:49:18.760 --> 0:49:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you get five points for quality, like we flipped the

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 1>quality to be worth more than wins. So that's the

0:49:24.760 --> 0:49:27.880
<v Speaker 1>reason I've been holding onto him because six innings at

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:31.040
<v Speaker 1>three and runs is kind of like the Marco Gonzalez Special.

0:49:31.600 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 1>But he's been struggling lately and I'm kind of getting

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>close to dropping him and Mark Gonzalez. I'm fine with that.

0:49:40.160 --> 0:49:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm certainly not starting this week. You need to drop

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:44.200
<v Speaker 1>if you need the dropping for one of the guys

0:49:44.239 --> 0:49:47.480
<v Speaker 1>that we named. That's fine. Yeah, I think that's what

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do. Like, I almost pulled the trigger the

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 1>other day, and I said, let me, let me think

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:52.960
<v Speaker 1>about it, but no one picked up any of the

0:49:53.040 --> 0:49:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Like Logan Allen is Zach Gallant's own, but Logan Allen

0:49:56.160 --> 0:49:59.399
<v Speaker 1>is out there. I believe Julio Eureus is out there,

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:02.440
<v Speaker 1>and I'm like, I should probably take an upside just

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:05.440
<v Speaker 1>there for those guys. You know, That's what I'm thinking too.

0:50:05.520 --> 0:50:07.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm gonna end up pulling that trigger. Okay,

0:50:07.920 --> 0:50:10.359
<v Speaker 1>a couple of notes before we wrap up and get

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:11.880
<v Speaker 1>to our best Best Forever, which you're gonna be a

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:15.160
<v Speaker 1>part of today. Floria Carlos Correa not expected to be

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:18.000
<v Speaker 1>back until after the All Star Rak for Houston, so

0:50:18.040 --> 0:50:20.439
<v Speaker 1>that's a rough go for his fantasy owners. We mentioned

0:50:20.520 --> 0:50:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Rich Hill Aaron Judge, make sure you activate him. He

0:50:23.239 --> 0:50:25.600
<v Speaker 1>is back tonight for the New York Yankees. He has

0:50:25.640 --> 0:50:29.760
<v Speaker 1>been activated. That's super excited. Uh. In last night's awesome

0:50:29.800 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 1>A's Raise game between Charlie Morton and Frankie Mantas, it

0:50:32.800 --> 0:50:37.120
<v Speaker 1>lived off to the expectations, so both closures blew it. Yeah,

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm Blake Charlon hasn't been pitching well, but I think

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he'll be okay. Uh, Diego Castillo, Man, the Rays have

0:50:45.120 --> 0:50:47.160
<v Speaker 1>to be one of these teams shopping for a closer

0:50:47.239 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 1>right now, right I soon they are. They were on Kimber,

0:50:50.960 --> 0:50:54.359
<v Speaker 1>We know that. Yeah, Like I imagine they're gonna there's

0:50:54.360 --> 0:50:56.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a number of closers trade Like Luke Jackson's

0:50:56.760 --> 0:50:58.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna lose his job. I've I own him, and I've

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>already accepted that. Diego Castio, I think if I owned him,

0:51:01.640 --> 0:51:04.719
<v Speaker 1>I'm probably accepting that he's at one soon going to

0:51:04.800 --> 0:51:07.360
<v Speaker 1>lose his job. I didn't want to ask you a question, Greggy.

0:51:07.400 --> 0:51:10.720
<v Speaker 1>You've mentioned having Judge. Have you you followed the Yankees

0:51:10.719 --> 0:51:13.359
<v Speaker 1>obviously a lot closer than most like have. Have they

0:51:13.560 --> 0:51:16.920
<v Speaker 1>said what their everyday lineup is gonna be once Judges back? Yeah,

0:51:17.000 --> 0:51:20.759
<v Speaker 1>the thought the the order of the lineup. Yeah, no,

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they have not. But the kind of assumption is that

0:51:23.520 --> 0:51:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Judges fit right back into the two hole. But and

0:51:26.600 --> 0:51:28.759
<v Speaker 1>then where does Void job? Because I know Void's been

0:51:28.840 --> 0:51:31.799
<v Speaker 1>hitting second and I X because the hitter I own

0:51:31.880 --> 0:51:35.520
<v Speaker 1>more than anyone this year's Edwin and Carnacion. Yeah. So Um,

0:51:35.520 --> 0:51:37.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't want him to hit seven. That's my fear.

0:51:37.880 --> 0:51:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's possible, which is crazy because I

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:42.200
<v Speaker 1>think I don't think Void josh a little bit of seven,

0:51:42.200 --> 0:51:44.239
<v Speaker 1>given that he's been hitting too. Like to me, you'll

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:47.239
<v Speaker 1>probably have Avoid hit three or four and Gary, uh,

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:49.480
<v Speaker 1>we'll hit five. You're gonna have to have Hicks in

0:51:49.520 --> 0:51:53.040
<v Speaker 1>there as a lefty or a switch hitter. So unless

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 1>they really snack those righties, I think you're gonna see

0:51:55.080 --> 0:51:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Eddie hit six or seven. But I think it's gonna be,

0:51:57.440 --> 0:51:59.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, honestly a few and our days between when

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:03.400
<v Speaker 1>you get that Yankees death lineup if you will, with Stanton, Judge,

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Sanchez and Carnassion and Void like I don't I don't

0:52:06.000 --> 0:52:08.239
<v Speaker 1>know if they all play together all the time, so

0:52:08.280 --> 0:52:12.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. It's I'm also very worried as and

0:52:12.440 --> 0:52:14.400
<v Speaker 1>I think you should be worried as an Incarnacion or

0:52:14.520 --> 0:52:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Luke Void owner that they are going to lose some

0:52:16.680 --> 0:52:19.040
<v Speaker 1>playing time based on what you said, Like they're gonna

0:52:19.080 --> 0:52:21.040
<v Speaker 1>give days where Stantons the d H. You're gonna have

0:52:21.080 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 1>days where Judges the d H, I think, and one

0:52:24.280 --> 0:52:27.040
<v Speaker 1>Avoid and Incarnacion is gonna have to sit and I've

0:52:27.080 --> 0:52:29.640
<v Speaker 1>accepted that as an Incarnacion owner. I do think though

0:52:30.000 --> 0:52:31.759
<v Speaker 1>for him, he makes up for it. Now he's in

0:52:31.760 --> 0:52:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a better ball park, a much better line up, he'll

0:52:33.520 --> 0:52:36.319
<v Speaker 1>make up for it. But don't get frustrated if you see,

0:52:36.440 --> 0:52:38.520
<v Speaker 1>like I, I worry about that. So I think it's

0:52:38.560 --> 0:52:41.359
<v Speaker 1>a legitimate concern. I don't know if you agree or not.

0:52:41.560 --> 0:52:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Well runs back to back days for Cardassion. I'm not

0:52:44.000 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>super concerned about it because he is a huge, huge threat.

0:52:47.120 --> 0:52:48.840
<v Speaker 1>I think they're gonna want him in the lineup and

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and relatively high up on most days we'll see EDDI.

0:52:52.880 --> 0:52:55.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm very happy I'm an Edwin Incarnacion owner with this

0:52:55.960 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>deal to New York. We're gonna sign off a YouTube

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 1>for now coming up next the Window with Sean Gassimakia.

0:53:02.760 --> 0:53:05.600
<v Speaker 1>You know how his bedstaid with the NBA drafts already

0:53:05.680 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of course for the weekend at the Window is next

0:53:08.920 --> 0:53:11.000
<v Speaker 1>by Floria. Just a couple of minutes left to go

0:53:11.480 --> 0:53:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in our program. Is there anything else you want to

0:53:13.880 --> 0:53:15.919
<v Speaker 1>talk about before we get to our best best forever? Actually,

0:53:15.960 --> 0:53:17.520
<v Speaker 1>actually there's one more thing I want to ask you about.

0:53:17.520 --> 0:53:21.399
<v Speaker 1>One more thing. Can you drop Jimmy Nelson? I knew

0:53:21.400 --> 0:53:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you were gonna ask me that, and I think if

0:53:24.360 --> 0:53:26.799
<v Speaker 1>any of those high upside starting pictures are out there,

0:53:26.800 --> 0:53:29.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you can It sucks what's happening with Jimmy

0:53:29.360 --> 0:53:31.800
<v Speaker 1>Nelson right now. He's working his way back from injury.

0:53:32.080 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 1>There's no way you could start him anytime soon. So

0:53:35.680 --> 0:53:38.480
<v Speaker 1>ideally and a deeper league, I wanna stash him a

0:53:38.520 --> 0:53:41.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit longer. But if you know a Gallon is

0:53:41.920 --> 0:53:44.480
<v Speaker 1>out there or or Urius is out there, yeah, I'm

0:53:44.520 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>okay making that swap to pick up those higher Logan Allen,

0:53:47.239 --> 0:53:49.239
<v Speaker 1>any of those higher upside arms. This would be one

0:53:49.239 --> 0:53:51.359
<v Speaker 1>of those where I have myself on the back because

0:53:51.400 --> 0:53:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I try to tell you that Jimmy Nelson hasn't pitched

0:53:53.040 --> 0:53:55.120
<v Speaker 1>in two years and he's not gonna be Jimmy Nelson

0:53:55.160 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 1>of Olden. Why not he yaws him? And I'm like,

0:53:59.360 --> 0:54:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the belief isn't that he'd instantly be Jimmy Nelson Vold

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:04.160
<v Speaker 1>And I told everyone you cannot start in right away.

0:54:04.200 --> 0:54:06.359
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna be really rusty. I didn't think it would

0:54:06.360 --> 0:54:07.960
<v Speaker 1>be this bad though. All right, let's get to the

0:54:08.000 --> 0:54:12.920
<v Speaker 1>best bets forever. Florio, I'm very hot just saying we

0:54:13.000 --> 0:54:17.080
<v Speaker 1>do this every day. I am I believe for I'm

0:54:17.120 --> 0:54:21.319
<v Speaker 1>like six and one this week. Yeah, so I had

0:54:21.360 --> 0:54:23.359
<v Speaker 1>a nice run last night. My pick was the over

0:54:23.480 --> 0:54:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Dodgers and the Giants that went way over

0:54:26.280 --> 0:54:29.520
<v Speaker 1>late night. Um, so tonight, I'll go first. I'd like

0:54:29.560 --> 0:54:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to go second because that's where my hotness has been,

0:54:31.800 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>but I'll I'll go first here because I don't know

0:54:34.239 --> 0:54:35.960
<v Speaker 1>if you were prepared for this part of the program,

0:54:37.000 --> 0:54:39.200
<v Speaker 1>you were not saying that's why. That's why I'm going first. Okay,

0:54:39.280 --> 0:54:41.560
<v Speaker 1>So there's a couple of that that stand out to me.

0:54:42.680 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 1>But what I'm gonna do, I just like the number

0:54:45.080 --> 0:54:47.360
<v Speaker 1>here and I get caught doing this a lot. But

0:54:47.440 --> 0:54:50.840
<v Speaker 1>it's Tigers and Indians. Matthew boy has been good. You

0:54:50.880 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 1>get Maddie Boyd at plus one seventy four tonight, I'll

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:57.560
<v Speaker 1>take the Tigers a plus one seventy four. You're gonna

0:54:57.600 --> 0:55:02.399
<v Speaker 1>go against Trevor Bauer yea, all right. I mean he's

0:55:02.440 --> 0:55:05.399
<v Speaker 1>been pitching better as of late, but definitely before that. Yeah,

0:55:05.480 --> 0:55:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Like so Greggy, when I was scrolling through this right,

0:55:09.280 --> 0:55:11.799
<v Speaker 1>there was one game that it was an over under

0:55:13.640 --> 0:55:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the Marlins Phillies over it's Sandy all Katara against Aaron

0:55:17.600 --> 0:55:21.600
<v Speaker 1>Nola and a half is the number. Yeah, Nola hasn't

0:55:21.600 --> 0:55:23.840
<v Speaker 1>been great at all, and al Katara can blow up

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:25.439
<v Speaker 1>at any point. He could blow up with the best

0:55:25.480 --> 0:55:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of them. So I seen that briefly scrolling through, and

0:55:28.280 --> 0:55:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I think I would pick the over there.

0:55:29.960 --> 0:55:32.080
<v Speaker 1>And it saddens me to say that because I have

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:34.920
<v Speaker 1>Aaronola in the league where I've been hoping he can

0:55:34.920 --> 0:55:37.239
<v Speaker 1>turn it around, but he just hasn't. Actually like that

0:55:37.320 --> 0:55:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot. The over eight and a half no versus

0:55:40.160 --> 0:55:42.200
<v Speaker 1>Al Kazara, Nola has not been able to figure out

0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:44.120
<v Speaker 1>in now Kazara, as you mentioned, he can get blown

0:55:44.200 --> 0:55:46.120
<v Speaker 1>up with the best of them. I really like that one.

0:55:46.160 --> 0:55:47.719
<v Speaker 1>To Florida, that's a that's a good one. I'm looking

0:55:47.719 --> 0:55:52.160
<v Speaker 1>for an over under um myself. Yeah, the White Sox

0:55:52.239 --> 0:55:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Rangers over under is eleven and a half. We've we've

0:55:55.160 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>seen twelve and a half over the last week. It's crazy.

0:55:57.560 --> 0:56:03.600
<v Speaker 1>That's insane. Um. This Colorado Dodgers over unders that seven

0:56:03.640 --> 0:56:06.160
<v Speaker 1>and a half with Bueller and Marquez, and I don't

0:56:06.160 --> 0:56:08.799
<v Speaker 1>know what to do about that. I feel like they're

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:11.160
<v Speaker 1>trying to get everyone to take the under there, and

0:56:11.200 --> 0:56:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm tempted to take the over. I just don't think

0:56:13.480 --> 0:56:15.200
<v Speaker 1>I touch it. I don't know what to think. Walker

0:56:15.239 --> 0:56:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Vieler has been so so good. Harald Marquez is great

0:56:19.040 --> 0:56:22.400
<v Speaker 1>when he's away from Colorado. I just don't think I

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:25.000
<v Speaker 1>touch it. I think I just stick uh to Matthew

0:56:25.040 --> 0:56:27.759
<v Speaker 1>Boyd and the Tigers. That's my pick. Floria is going

0:56:27.880 --> 0:56:29.680
<v Speaker 1>over when it comes to the Marlins and the Phillies.

0:56:29.760 --> 0:56:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Under a minute remaining, Mike, what do you playing for

0:56:31.400 --> 0:56:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the weekend? I Am going to San Francisco tomorrow morning,

0:56:34.800 --> 0:56:36.880
<v Speaker 1>early flight, gonna go there. I'm gonna see a Giant's

0:56:36.880 --> 0:56:39.600
<v Speaker 1>game while I'm there, and then I'm gonna next week

0:56:39.680 --> 0:56:42.200
<v Speaker 1>fly back and we're going to Disney and Universal in

0:56:42.320 --> 0:56:44.719
<v Speaker 1>l A. Because Nicolet's sister is coming out for the week.

0:56:44.840 --> 0:56:47.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's gonna be a fun week. And then after

0:56:47.000 --> 0:56:48.799
<v Speaker 1>that I go to Mexico, Greggy, so I might not

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:50.399
<v Speaker 1>be seeing you for a little bit. All right. That's

0:56:50.440 --> 0:56:53.400
<v Speaker 1>that's fantastic. Floria aheaded to San Francisco, aheaded to Mexico.

0:56:53.880 --> 0:56:57.080
<v Speaker 1>That's amazing. Have fun, man, Thank you. I hope you

0:56:57.080 --> 0:56:58.640
<v Speaker 1>have a good weekend. Two. I didn't get to ask you,

0:56:58.680 --> 0:57:01.359
<v Speaker 1>but I hear the music. We're out of time. It's fine,

0:57:01.400 --> 0:57:03.680
<v Speaker 1>I have a wedding to go. Do. What's new? All right,

0:57:04.200 --> 0:57:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael Floria, I'll grey. We appreciate everybody's help, everybody's time watching,

0:57:08.840 --> 0:57:11.440
<v Speaker 1>and Frank for Frank Staffle will be back here on Monday.

0:57:11.560 --> 0:57:13.719
<v Speaker 1>But until that, had a great weekend. We'll do it

0:57:13.719 --> 0:57:21.880
<v Speaker 1>all again on Monday. We hope, we hope. The Fantasy

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network gets ready to take you out to the

0:57:24.160 --> 0:57:26.760
<v Speaker 1>ball game. Our experts and analysts are following the Boys

0:57:26.800 --> 0:57:29.240
<v Speaker 1>of Summer through all one, dred and sixty two games.

0:57:29.280 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Talk the two thousand nineteen MLB season with