Speaker 1: You are entering the freedom hunt. Jeffrey Epstein is dead.
Speaker 1: We will look at what the various conspiracies out there
Speaker 1: are and focused in on the fact that there was
Speaker 1: a conspiracy here. It's just a question of how far
Speaker 1: it goes and how up the chain we can get
Speaker 1: to figure it out. This is the buck Sexton Show
Speaker 1: where the mission where mission is to decode what really
Speaker 1: matters with actionable intelligence. Make no mistake American, You're a
Speaker 1: great American. Again the buck Sexton Show begins. He's a
Speaker 1: great guy now. Sex trafficking case was very important to
Speaker 1: the Department of Justice, to me personally, it was important
Speaker 1: to the dedicated prosecutors in the Southern District of New York,
Speaker 1: and to our FBI agents who investigated the case and
Speaker 1: were preparing it for trial. Most importantly, this case was
Speaker 1: important to the victims who had the courage to come
Speaker 1: forward and deserve the opportunity to confront the accused in
Speaker 1: the courtroom. I was appalled, and indeed the whole Department
Speaker 1: was and frankly angry to learn of the MCC's failure
Speaker 1: to adequately secure this prisoner. We are now learning of
Speaker 1: serious irregularities at this facility. That are deeply concerning and
Speaker 1: demand a thorough investigation. The FBI in the Office of
Speaker 1: Inspector General are doing us that we will get to
Speaker 1: the bottom of what happened and there will be accountability.
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show. By now, you have
Speaker 1: likely heard many times over that the single most high
Speaker 1: profile inmate in federal custody in the United States right now,
Speaker 1: the one who has the eyeballs on him, the one
Speaker 1: that had the most conspiracies surrounding conspiracy theories, the possibility
Speaker 1: that he was going to name names, the information that
Speaker 1: had just come out last week. Everybody wanted to know
Speaker 1: what was going to happen with Jeffrey Epstein. And now
Speaker 1: we may never really know because Jeffrey Epstein allegedly committed
Speaker 1: suicide in his cell at the Manhattan Correctional Facility where
Speaker 1: he was being held in New York City. How is
Speaker 1: this possible? How could anyone think that this would not
Speaker 1: raise so much in terms of suspicions. And you know,
Speaker 1: the problem that I have now is I'm reading all
Speaker 1: these different conspiracy theories because I do believe, I know
Speaker 1: that there was a conspiracy. I don't know if there
Speaker 1: was a conspiracy to off Epstein necessarily, but he was
Speaker 1: a part of a massive international conspiracy involving hundreds of
Speaker 1: millions of dollars changing hands, involving the global elite, names
Speaker 1: like the Clintons and many others coming up. I know
Speaker 1: they keep trying to tie Trump to this, And what
Speaker 1: you say is that Trump is the only person who
Speaker 1: was ever named in the Jeffrey Epstein debacle who stood
Speaker 1: up to Epstein and said that he was a dirt
Speaker 1: bag and a bad guy and banned him from his
Speaker 1: So the media can keep throwing Trump's there was the
Speaker 1: Trump and Clinton, Trump and Clinton. Well, Clinton is the
Speaker 1: one who was flying on his jet all the time.
Speaker 1: Clinton's the one who seemed to have much more, shall
Speaker 1: we say, worthy of further scrutiny ties. But the global
Speaker 1: elite befriended a billionaire who made his money in ways
Speaker 1: that we still don't understand, and it wasn't just picking
Speaker 1: really good stocks, folks, while he was trafficking in underaged girls,
Speaker 1: having sexual relations with underaged girls, and engaged in the
Speaker 1: kinds of crimes that would send a normal person to
Speaker 1: prison for decades, if not for life, without question on
Speaker 1: a regular basis, and yet he had some quasi immunity
Speaker 1: from the Department of Justice and certainly from the Florida
Speaker 1: State Attorney in Palm Beach County while he was doing this.
Speaker 1: One cannot help but remember the words of Alex Asar,
Speaker 1: the now resigned Secretary of Labor and the Trump administration,
Speaker 1: who was the US Attorney for the Southern District of Miami,
Speaker 1: who cut the deal that allowed for not just a
Speaker 1: sweetheart situation for him in Palm Beach with Palm Beach County,
Speaker 1: but prevented follow on federal prosecution. I mean, it was
Speaker 1: almost like he got immunity. Why would he get immunity? Well,
Speaker 1: Azar said something if you were calling and during testimony
Speaker 1: about quote he belonged to intelligence end quote. What does
Speaker 1: that mean? I don't know, but I want to know.
Speaker 1: And that's where I am on so much of this.
Speaker 1: Some of you will, no doubt point out that I
Speaker 1: have been giving you regular Epstein updates on this show,
Speaker 1: more so than I think you would see in the
Speaker 1: mainstream media, because I have been concerned along that this
Speaker 1: that we would never get answers and go back and
Speaker 1: listen to some of the shows, you know what I'm
Speaker 1: talking about. I've been saying, I think that they're gonna
Speaker 1: make this whole thing go away, that they're gonna someone's
Speaker 1: gonna get to Epstein, or they're just gonna they're going
Speaker 1: to you know, he's gonna be either on an island
Speaker 1: in a non extradition country all of a sudden, or
Speaker 1: or either going to offer him or this is this
Speaker 1: is why I've been talking about this, because it's so
Speaker 1: clear that he was tied in with the most some
Speaker 1: of the most powerful people in the world. And does
Speaker 1: anyone really think that he was the only individual involved
Speaker 1: with underage girls? Does anyone really think that. I have
Speaker 1: a very hard time believing that people referred to pedophile Island.
Speaker 1: They talk about these trips and the young girls and
Speaker 1: the planes, and he's entertaining all these global celebrities and
Speaker 1: political figures and scientists, and he had quite a rolodex.
Speaker 1: Some of them admitted to getting massages at his property.
Speaker 1: Of course, the massages, they say, nothing bad happened, Okay,
Speaker 1: But people spend a lot of time with this individual.
Speaker 1: And I can tell you this, if anyone is socially
Speaker 1: associating with someone who is constantly surrounded by girls who
Speaker 1: seem to be under the legal age of consent, anyone
Speaker 1: in their forties and fifties was what we're talking about here.
Speaker 1: You would think that they would understand the red flags
Speaker 1: that they're seeing a bit more. A lot of people
Speaker 1: turning a blind eye to this, a lot of people
Speaker 1: acting like, Oh, it was just Jeffrey being Jeffrey, and
Speaker 1: I didn't know anything. No one knew anything. Even after
Speaker 1: we did know things. There were names that we're going
Speaker 1: to come out. I'm very confident of that, and now
Speaker 1: they probably won't come out. There were stories that we
Speaker 1: were going to hear, and now I think we won't
Speaker 1: ever hear those stories. At some level, they have managed
Speaker 1: to snuff out the truth here. They've managed to eliminate
Speaker 1: some of the justice that could have been achieved after
Speaker 1: this whole sordid tail unfolded. But now let's just turn
Speaker 1: our minds for a moment to the actual death of
Speaker 1: Epstein in prison, because so I still want to know,
Speaker 1: there's this overall conspiracy. How did this guy make his money?
Speaker 1: We don't have answers to that. We should know that
Speaker 1: right away. Oh, two of his lawyers this is broke today,
Speaker 1: who are very involved in his finances. They've already hired
Speaker 1: criminal defense attorneys for themselves, so get ready for that.
Speaker 1: We know that he was involved with Wexner, the founder
Speaker 1: of L brands, but in a way that you don't
Speaker 1: he had power of attorney's This is something that you
Speaker 1: know you maybe would trust in an immediate relative with.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is very unusual, moving around eighty billion here,
Speaker 1: forty billion there, all offshore accounts, all that being hidden.
Speaker 1: Why so much secrecy around what he's doing with his
Speaker 1: money unless it really wasn't about investments, There's something else
Speaker 1: going on. So that's the part of the conspiracy. And
Speaker 1: also who knew and who was doing stuff with Epstein
Speaker 1: that was illegal. I refused to believe that he was
Speaker 1: the only one. I refused to believe that there weren't
Speaker 1: very powerful people who were going to be implicated by Epstein.
Speaker 1: That's the only card that he had left the trade.
Speaker 1: And now we get to, oh, but he's dead. You
Speaker 1: go down the list and the most sober and serious
Speaker 1: minded people I know, who are real legal experts and
Speaker 1: criminal justice experts are all completely appalled by this. So
Speaker 1: this is not there's no conspiracy here. When it comes
Speaker 1: to thinking that what happened is in outright debacle for
Speaker 1: our criminal justice, a system, for public faith in the
Speaker 1: institution of the Bureau of Prisons, our ability to keep
Speaker 1: prisoners alive. Epstein was somebody who tried to commit suicide.
Speaker 1: They just took him off suicide watch a few days ago.
Speaker 1: They were supposed to have somebody monitoring his cell every
Speaker 1: and walk by his cell every thirty minutes. It didn't
Speaker 1: happen for two hours. He shouldn't have been taken off
Speaker 1: of suicide watch, but they did. His cell mate was
Speaker 1: suspiciously transferred out of his cell hours before this happened.
Speaker 1: The people who were assigned to watch him were running
Speaker 1: crazy long overtime shifts. Now, is it possible that all
Speaker 1: of this is just the federal incompetence that we see
Speaker 1: in the bureaucracy time and again, there are really no
Speaker 1: limits to federal incompetence. That's a fair thing to say. Yes, absolutely,
Speaker 1: it's possible. I think it's likely. But how would you
Speaker 1: prove that someone got to someone inside this system and
Speaker 1: didn't I'm I don't think it's I don't think it's
Speaker 1: the case, And we have to see. We haven't even
Speaker 1: gotten a full report from the corner yet. But I
Speaker 1: don't think it's the case that he was oft in prison,
Speaker 1: that Epstein was killed by someone, actively killed by someone.
Speaker 1: Do I think that someone got to his lawyers? I
Speaker 1: saw today on Fox Andy McCarthy saying he had read
Speaker 1: that the lawyer's request that he'd be taken off suicide watch.
Speaker 1: So that's interesting when your client has already apparently tried
Speaker 1: to commit suicide. So that's putting a lot of faith
Speaker 1: in your lawyer's discretion. Do I think that they got
Speaker 1: they got him. No. Do I think that they maybe
Speaker 1: let him take care of it himself, because that was
Speaker 1: always what the plan was supposed to be, because maybe
Speaker 1: somebody on the outside had lever John Epstein. Yeah, that
Speaker 1: I could buy that, I can believe. I'm not saying
Speaker 1: I know it. I'm not saying it is. I'm saying
Speaker 1: I could see that realistically having happened here. I've seen
Speaker 1: that there's almost no suicides in this very high profile
Speaker 1: correctional facility in Manhattan for federal courts down at the
Speaker 1: southern tip of Manhattan. I've I've seen people who work
Speaker 1: there saying that they're not aware of any suicides before this.
Speaker 1: Under these circumstances, in this facility. So the one guy
Speaker 1: who manages to suicide himself, which I know is a repetitive,
Speaker 1: but the one guy manages to take himself out inside
Speaker 1: this facility is the one who, more than any other
Speaker 1: criminal defendant I can think of in my lifetime, may
Speaker 1: have been in a position to bring down people who
Speaker 1: are literally part of political dynasties on a globe. Will
Speaker 1: Scale the only one that you can think of who
Speaker 1: might have had information that could have taken down and
Speaker 1: one of the few areas of public life. And I've
Speaker 1: been saying this where if you're caught, you're pretty much done.
Speaker 1: Is this kind of sexual predatory behavior involving underage girls
Speaker 1: You're no matter who you are, We had been led
Speaker 1: to believe at least you would be punished for this,
Speaker 1: and you certainly would not have your reputation intact in
Speaker 1: public if you're involved in this and you're a politician.
Speaker 1: That Epstein was able to escape serious consequences for this
Speaker 1: as long as he did is simply inexplicable. You cannot
Speaker 1: come up with a real explanation unless you understand who
Speaker 1: brought pressure on the prosecutors, on the officials that were involved,
Speaker 1: or who tried to exert leverage on Epstein's behalf. That's
Speaker 1: what I mean by the conspiracy that we have to
Speaker 1: on earth, because it's there. Nobody gets the deal that
Speaker 1: he got. Even Dershowitz admitted that it was the deal
Speaker 1: of a lifetime, the deal of his whole career. Nobody
Speaker 1: would get that deal. You're running essentially an underage prostitution
Speaker 1: ring out of your mansion in Palm Beach, and you
Speaker 1: get six months of house arrest that allows you to
Speaker 1: go work in your office and check in at a
Speaker 1: county jail once a week. Nobody gets that deal. Who
Speaker 1: would get that deal? Somebody who has a lot of
Speaker 1: leverage on some other very powerful people. Somebody perhaps who
Speaker 1: has blackmail of a level and degree that could completely
Speaker 1: destroy very powerful people. Somebody who I don't know belongs
Speaker 1: to intelligence. There's a whole bunch of things that we
Speaker 1: need to track down here. Now. I know the Attorney
Speaker 1: General has said that we shouldn't think that this will
Speaker 1: just go now without punishment for those who are co conspirators.
Speaker 1: And if the point here was trying to silence Epstein
Speaker 1: before he was able to bring down the whole house
Speaker 1: of cards and to send an earthquake through some corridors
Speaker 1: of the global elite. That purpose has been met, They've
Speaker 1: achieved that. Are we really going to have enough faith
Speaker 1: in the institutions of government right now that weren't able
Speaker 1: to stop the nonsense of the Russia collusion delusion for
Speaker 1: two years, in fact instigated it, ran with it. We
Speaker 1: trust their judgment, we trust their honesty and their integrity
Speaker 1: to pursue a case at this level implicating the kind
Speaker 1: of people that we know have already been implicated and
Speaker 1: chasing it down. I don't think I have that faith,
Speaker 1: and I don't think many of you do either. More
Speaker 1: in Epstein and then also the worst lie that a
Speaker 1: Democrat presidential candidate has told them a long time. We'll
Speaker 1: get to that in the second hour today. It was
Speaker 1: told by both Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris, who should
Speaker 1: be ashamed. They are not. But we'll break down what
Speaker 1: that is. And then we're finally getting some distance from
Speaker 1: O Trump is a racist week last week, which what
Speaker 1: the whole week was about in the media. We'll talk
Speaker 1: about how that factors into the Democrats strategy to win
Speaker 1: twenty twenty. They're not giving up on that, and much
Speaker 1: more coming up, team, So stay with me. President Trump
Speaker 1: facing backlash after tweeting a conspiracy theory linking the Clintons
Speaker 1: to Jeffrey Epstein's death. What do you think the President
Speaker 1: was thinking here? What was behind us? I think the
Speaker 1: President was basically asking some of the questions that we
Speaker 1: saw millions of Americans probably asking themselves, whether it be
Speaker 1: on social media or just even in their own private conversations,
Speaker 1: about the very strange circumstances around around this person's death.
Speaker 1: You even had the Attorney General of the United States
Speaker 1: today say that there are some serious irregularities with this
Speaker 1: case that need to be investigated. The President his entire
Speaker 1: administration are very firm in the fact we need to
Speaker 1: investigate not only the circumstances around his death, but continue
Speaker 1: the investigation into the horrible actions he was accused of
Speaker 1: and those who may have helped him. I will note
Speaker 1: that the this is an incredibly serious issue, and we're
Speaker 1: going to continue to drill down into into those aspects
Speaker 1: of it. And I do want answers. And there is
Speaker 1: a conspiracy here, we just need to figure out how
Speaker 1: far it goes and who's involved. I mean an Epstein conspiracy,
Speaker 1: not just what happened in prison conspiracy that could be
Speaker 1: a part of it. Two, we have to find out
Speaker 1: what the answers are. As latter was just saying. But
Speaker 1: the Clintion memes over the weekend, I have to say
Speaker 1: some of them were pretty we're pretty funding him. And
Speaker 1: I saw it because look, there's a weird association here
Speaker 1: with people that are in the Clinton orbit who just
Speaker 1: have an untimely demise. That's maybe you could say it's
Speaker 1: all coincidence, fine, But my favorite was there was a
Speaker 1: Chuck Norris meme where Chuck Norris says that even he
Speaker 1: checks in his closets and under his bed before he
Speaker 1: goes to sleep at night, making sure that there aren't
Speaker 1: Clinton's waiting for him. You know, there's a lot of
Speaker 1: that going on. And look what Trump did, He retweet it.
Speaker 1: This is at some level, this is just trolling to
Speaker 1: Clinton's obviously by a lot of people that are enjoying
Speaker 1: the did they just like to get under the Clinton
Speaker 1: supporter's skin. But then there's also the whole Bill Clinton
Speaker 1: Epstein connection that I want more answers there. I'll just
Speaker 1: say that I want more answers. I'm not going to
Speaker 1: show you between but the spokesman for former President Bill
Speaker 1: Clinton responded to the president, retweeting it saying, quote ridiculous
Speaker 1: and of course not true. And Donald Trump knows it.
Speaker 1: Has he triggered the twenty fifth Amendment? Yet? President Trump
Speaker 1: could use his megaphone for anything, but the President often
Speaker 1: uses it to amplify that which is the worst of
Speaker 1: US personal attacks, bigotry, and insane conspiracy theories. Officials say
Speaker 1: Epstein died by apparent suicide while in the custody of
Speaker 1: the federal government. The Attorney General Will bar released a
Speaker 1: statement opening an investigation into how this happened, saying he
Speaker 1: was quote appalled and saying, mister Epstein's death raises serious
Speaker 1: questions that must be answered unquote. This is, of course,
Speaker 1: not the first time the President Trump has chosen to
Speaker 1: use his amplified voice to spread conspiracies. He lied about
Speaker 1: President's Let's not hear Jake Tapper's whiny and annoying voice
Speaker 1: anymore than we have to. I I'm out in the
Speaker 1: worth time. Okay, that's great, let's just get into this
Speaker 1: Trump notice is the enemy here, right? Epstein dies in
Speaker 1: Bureau of Prison custody. There's all kinds of very real
Speaker 1: unanswered questions. This guy was able. Epstein was able to
Speaker 1: get away with terrible crimes for many, many, many years,
Speaker 1: and now we have to focus on Trump's tweet. That's
Speaker 1: the real that that's where the real outrage is. Good
Speaker 1: job Tapper really leaning into it, really shown us what
Speaker 1: matters here. But Tapper's very indicuou of one of the
Speaker 1: lessons that we have from all of this as somebody
Speaker 1: who is very much part of the establishment, the elite
Speaker 1: establishment media, which really has no business considering itself to
Speaker 1: be elite in the first place. CNN is a mockery
Speaker 1: of what it once pretended to be, and the people
Speaker 1: who work there have become a mockery of the mission
Speaker 1: that they claim to fulfill, which is speaking truth to power.
Speaker 1: They do the bidding of powerful people all the time,
Speaker 1: most notably Jeff Zucker, but many others. They are fighting
Speaker 1: for the Democrat Party and for the left and for
Speaker 1: the socialists in this country while pretending to just be
Speaker 1: objective journals. But this is all part of what we
Speaker 1: have been learning in recent years, and there's a lot
Speaker 1: that factors into this. I think that Trump's elevation is
Speaker 1: a big part of it. I think that quite honestly,
Speaker 1: technology and the Internet are a part of it. But
Speaker 1: we have learned some very important things as I think
Speaker 1: Americans now are broadly much more aware of at least
Speaker 1: two observations. One is the very powerful and connected in
Speaker 1: this country, if they have the right politics, meaning democrat,
Speaker 1: can get away with almost anything. That the elite live
Speaker 1: by a different set of laws. That's real. That's a
Speaker 1: real thing, the truth, the the financial and political elite.
Speaker 1: I don't just mean, you know, they always say this, oh,
Speaker 1: there's different justice for if you're you know, if you're
Speaker 1: a white male that in the justice system who is
Speaker 1: has some financial means you are, you have totally different
Speaker 1: justice than No. I mean, there's not a lot of
Speaker 1: guys who you know, are are are making one hundred
Speaker 1: grand working as you know, a car salesman somewhere, who
Speaker 1: get away with murder. Okay, yeah, if you're somebody who's
Speaker 1: incredibly famous, connected, powerful and rich, then maybe you get
Speaker 1: away with things. But the global elite, and as evidence
Speaker 1: in this country specifically, they do live by a different
Speaker 1: set of laws. They live by a different set of rules.
Speaker 1: That's a real thing. Not all the time, but enough
Speaker 1: that it should be bothers into all of us, and
Speaker 1: then there's just the elite. Is not what we have
Speaker 1: been led to believe. They are our institutions, something that
Speaker 1: Democrats constantly complain about. They say that Trump is eroding
Speaker 1: our institutions. I think a big part of the public's
Speaker 1: trust declining when it comes to these institutions is that
Speaker 1: we're just finding out the truth about them and who
Speaker 1: runs them. Just go down the list. Do you think
Speaker 1: that the FBI and the Department of Justice are more
Speaker 1: or less trustworthy and competent? Now that you know the
Speaker 1: truth about people like James Comey and Eric Holder and
Speaker 1: Loretta Lynch and many, many, many others, does it inspire confidence?
Speaker 1: This is the chief law enforce and some of the
Speaker 1: chief law enforcement figures in the country for years. Do
Speaker 1: you do that makes you feel better or worse about
Speaker 1: the situation in this country? Look at the DNI, look
Speaker 1: at the CIA. Look at what do we learn about
Speaker 1: the biggest Wall Street banks in two thousand and eight.
Speaker 1: They weren't so smart. They were just connected and greedy
Speaker 1: use political connections to avoid what should have happened, which
Speaker 1: is they should have been allowed to go under at
Speaker 1: least in a fair system. People say all would have
Speaker 1: destroyed the whole banking system, would have freeze, frozen up
Speaker 1: all credit and everything else. Okay, but you know if
Speaker 1: it was, if it was a real free market, guess
Speaker 1: what you would have had more than just leaving brothers fail.
Speaker 1: The banks weren't so smart, they didn't foresee the future.
Speaker 1: They were just greedy, and then they use their political
Speaker 1: connections to save their butts. The media, as evidence by
Speaker 1: Tapper and many others, you trust the media? I mean,
Speaker 1: there are trustworthy people in the media. I hope you
Speaker 1: think you're listening to one. Now. I'm not perfect, b
Speaker 1: I am trustworthy. I do approach what I do, and
Speaker 1: more importantly, in many ways, I think I approach who
Speaker 1: I am every day with an aspiration of honor, if
Speaker 1: not the achievement of it. But do you trust the
Speaker 1: mainstream media? Do you trust the major institutions of journalism
Speaker 1: out there? And that declining trust is the result of
Speaker 1: more information than ever before, more access to what's really
Speaker 1: going on, to what their journalists think, to what they're
Speaker 1: reporting is really based on, to what's going on behind
Speaker 1: the scenes. This is a recurring theme. The more you
Speaker 1: know about these elites and their institutions, the less you
Speaker 1: tend to trust them. And you think back to the Founding,
Speaker 1: the genius of the Founders was largely rooted in distrust
Speaker 1: of human being who acquire power. Full stop. They understood,
Speaker 1: you give people too much power, bad things happen. That's
Speaker 1: why you have to have checks and balances, you disperse it,
Speaker 1: you have oppositional government, You have all these different components
Speaker 1: put together so that you limit the scope of what
Speaker 1: power can do, and you limit how much any one
Speaker 1: individual can have or any group can have. So this
Speaker 1: is this for me, at least, what we've started. We
Speaker 1: see with a Bureau of Prisons and their inability to
Speaker 1: keep Epstein alive in custody. Yeah, we need to make
Speaker 1: sure that this isn't the result of a specific conspiracy.
Speaker 1: But there's also a reminder for all of us that
Speaker 1: the government couldn't keep this guy alive. How much incompetence
Speaker 1: are we really supposed to stomach? I mean, the government
Speaker 1: couldn't prevent him from committing suicide. If they can't prevent
Speaker 1: him from committing suicide and custody, how can they prevent anybody.
Speaker 1: The Attorney General is rightly embarrassed because technically he is
Speaker 1: at the top of this command chain, and this was
Speaker 1: a big mess up. Some of your saying bucket wasn't
Speaker 1: a mess up. I know we will find out. We gotta.
Speaker 1: We shouldn't jump to conclusions, but I'm leaving open a
Speaker 1: lot of stuff here because it's all just too convenient,
Speaker 1: too coincidental. How many coincidences pile up before you start
Speaker 1: to say that you're not going to accept the official
Speaker 1: narrative anymore. But I do feel like we are entering
Speaker 1: a period where being told, oh, this is the way
Speaker 1: it is because the right people are in charge, the
Speaker 1: smart people are in charge, just shut up and listen
Speaker 1: to them. That's getting to be a harder sell. And
Speaker 1: I think that's a good thing. I think that we
Speaker 1: should demand accountability. We should hope for excellence, but we
Speaker 1: should always demand accountability, and we should not accept the
Speaker 1: narratives of those in power that are meant to keep
Speaker 1: I'm in power and keep them from being accountable. In
Speaker 1: every respect. Elite institutions have not had a good few
Speaker 1: years here, folks in the government, across the board, you
Speaker 1: name it. There's there's a lot of necessary skepticism that
Speaker 1: we should all have in our day to day lives,
Speaker 1: and for me, this whole Epstein situation, it just goes
Speaker 1: to show you where are the limits? You know, when
Speaker 1: is it just too much? When is the abuse too
Speaker 1: egregious for those who have power, who have influence to
Speaker 1: be able to just make it all go away. They knew,
Speaker 1: people knew what this guy was doing, and they didn't care.
Speaker 1: They weren't necessarily complicit. I'm not saying they weren't necessarily
Speaker 1: legally liable for assisting him, but they were turning a
Speaker 1: blind eye because this guy was moving around a lot
Speaker 1: of cash to the right people in politics, and who
Speaker 1: knows where else he was buying them off. Will we
Speaker 1: ever find out really what the full extent of it was,
Speaker 1: I don't know. I'm you know that I was skeptical
Speaker 1: that we would get answers before he died, because I
Speaker 1: thought something was going to happen, And now something has happened,
Speaker 1: So it would be strange if I didn't think that
Speaker 1: it was likely much of what we were going to
Speaker 1: find out has now been forever lost. Doesn't mean we
Speaker 1: should give up, but I mean, this was the biggest
Speaker 1: and just one more thing about the media and how
Speaker 1: they're always, they're always, Oh, they're so great at pulling
Speaker 1: apart Trump's tweets and calling them a racist. That's like
Speaker 1: their only job. It's so lazy, it's so worthless. But
Speaker 1: they've deluded themselves. I mean, they've created a cult of
Speaker 1: anti trump Ism that they cannot escape now, and their
Speaker 1: audiences have been brainwashed into thinking that anything that's anti
Speaker 1: Trump is worth hearing. But where are all these masses
Speaker 1: of multi billion dollars media conglomerates on this case about
Speaker 1: Jeffrey Epstein? How was this not? You know, look at
Speaker 1: the flood the zone coverage that they created in what
Speaker 1: twenty four hours on the Covington kids based on a lie.
Speaker 1: I look at the other times that they've manufactured stories
Speaker 1: out of effectively nothing because they wanted to tell a
Speaker 1: certain tale to the American public. Here's a guy who
Speaker 1: was all of the things that the journalist class and
Speaker 1: the elites in this country pretend they are there to
Speaker 1: protect us from a super wealthy, connected white male predator
Speaker 1: of underage girls, all these things, who was. There's political
Speaker 1: corruption involved here, there's financial crimes going on, their crimes
Speaker 1: against underaged girls, abusing women, all these things that they're
Speaker 1: they're supposed to be protecting us from. And when it
Speaker 1: all came together in this one case, where were they, Oh,
Speaker 1: the elites were m I A what a shock. It
Speaker 1: wasn't until a lawsuit brought by lawyers representing one of
Speaker 1: the Bolts that gots on the documents out the Miami
Speaker 1: Harold said, Okay, I guess we have to actually look
Speaker 1: into this thing again. And all of a sudden, uh,
Speaker 1: but this case had been We'd known about this for
Speaker 1: years in the background. No, no investigative journalists assigned to this,
Speaker 1: no people looking into what really happened here. That The
Speaker 1: New York Times did a whole piece today on how
Speaker 1: they can't tell you the reader, how Epstein made his money,
Speaker 1: or even where his money is, or even how much
Speaker 1: he's really worth. Folks, just because what he listed for
Speaker 1: the courts is what it is doesn't mean that's really
Speaker 1: the full I'm sure he's hiding money overseas. Will never
Speaker 1: find There are Epstein accounts we will never even find
Speaker 1: out about, and who knows how much money has been
Speaker 1: hidden away in them. But that places like the New
Speaker 1: York Times, in CNN and these others, they've got all
Speaker 1: these people, these big fat salaries that they're reporting at
Speaker 1: this stage of the game, they don't even know how
Speaker 1: this guy made his money. They don't even know where
Speaker 1: he got. He lives in the biggest, most expensive single
Speaker 1: family home in the largest and richest city in the
Speaker 1: United States, and they don't know how he made his money.
Speaker 1: At this stage of the game, they should be embarrassed.
Speaker 1: How can they not know me the first right, Everything
Speaker 1: that you're ever told about chasing down leads all. They
Speaker 1: got to follow the money trail. They haven't followed the
Speaker 1: money trail because they didn't care. Oh, but they're really
Speaker 1: good at telling you that Trump's tweets are mean and
Speaker 1: then lying to you about him being a neo Nazi
Speaker 1: supporter from a press conference at the Charlottesville years ago.
Speaker 1: We'll talk more about that. I dug into that again
Speaker 1: over the weekend. It's shocking. I mean, the media really
Speaker 1: does just need to be scrapped and rebuilt from the
Speaker 1: ground up. Nine at ninety five percent of this country
Speaker 1: just need to be scrapped. All the journalism schools are
Speaker 1: a joke. It's completely out of control. So, yeah, the
Speaker 1: Epstein case says a lot more than just oh, this
Speaker 1: super connected rich weird Peto managed to offer himself in prison.
Speaker 1: You know, let's just move on to the next thing. No,
Speaker 1: there was a lot going on here, a lot of
Speaker 1: people who didn't want the truth to come out, a
Speaker 1: lot of people who didn't do their jobs, who at
Speaker 1: best were wildly incompetent and at worst were corrupt complicit.
Speaker 1: We need answers, folks. I'll try to get them to
Speaker 1: you on this show as much as I can well
Speaker 1: bear it back. This is somebody who not only is
Speaker 1: high profile, who not only knew a lot of high
Speaker 1: profile people, whose papers just came out of court just
Speaker 1: to let out some of the documents related to his
Speaker 1: cases that name high profile people, who was friends with
Speaker 1: the current president of the United States, who flew a
Speaker 1: previous president of the United States around on his plane,
Speaker 1: who was alleged to have trafficked girls to a member
Speaker 1: of the Royal fan Emily of Britain. Okay, this is
Speaker 1: not a this is this is you know, on the
Speaker 1: same level like a Bill COSI. This is a famous
Speaker 1: person now who's now in prison. He knows a lot
Speaker 1: about a lot of people, and as you said earlier,
Speaker 1: his only out at this point would be to talk
Speaker 1: about those people. So he's in this very vulnerable situation.
Speaker 1: And then you throw in the fact which I did
Speaker 1: not know until thank god, Stephanie Goska is sitting here
Speaker 1: and told me this that this is now a facility
Speaker 1: under the control of the Department of Justice. And this
Speaker 1: Department of Justice does not exactly inspire confidence. Let's just
Speaker 1: be blunt. William Barr's Justice Department is not one that
Speaker 1: you can readily simply rely upon and feel confident in.
Speaker 1: And so what do we make of all this? Now
Speaker 1: that in this federal facility, this person was allowed to
Speaker 1: be alone long enough to either harm himself or be
Speaker 1: killed by something. We don't know what happened, right, We
Speaker 1: just don't know. But okay, can we just can I
Speaker 1: jump in here? That was That was Joy Reid, who
Speaker 1: you may remember from MSNBC. She's still there. She's the
Speaker 1: one who wrote the homophobic stuff ten years ago on
Speaker 1: her blog and then claimed publicly that she was hiring
Speaker 1: the FBI. Look at who hacked in and changed her
Speaker 1: blog from ten years ago and f and by the
Speaker 1: way m SMEs he kept her, didn't fire her. So
Speaker 1: wokeness has its limits. Apparently, so does reasonable and common sense.
Speaker 1: I like how she lays out this whole thing, and
Speaker 1: then it's the real problem. You see, this is this
Speaker 1: is a trumped derangement syndrome symptom, is that all things
Speaker 1: go back to Trump or one of his cabinet officials.
Speaker 1: The real the real problem here is that you can't
Speaker 1: trust Bar at the top of the ooh, Bar is
Speaker 1: such a badman. Does anyone think that Bill Barr wanted
Speaker 1: anything other than this guy too? I mean, now some
Speaker 1: of you might say, Buck, you don't know where the
Speaker 1: conspiracy goes, all right, But I mean, realistically, I don't
Speaker 1: think Bar is involved in any of the conspiracy folks.
Speaker 1: Doesn't mean he does deserve some share of the blame,
Speaker 1: as it's the buck stops with him, so to speak.
Speaker 1: But this whole oh, we can't trust Bar. That doesn't
Speaker 1: inspire confidence. See, this is what they do. And I'm
Speaker 1: asked and CNN, they always find a way to bring
Speaker 1: it back to Trump bad. I mean, they could be
Speaker 1: talking about how it's raining right now, and you know
Speaker 1: it really is about how Trump bad because climate change
Speaker 1: or something. They'll always find a way this overshadowed. Something
Speaker 1: could happen over the weekend. You had the anniversary of
Speaker 1: the five year anniversary of Mike Brown being shot, and
Speaker 1: you have some Democrats weighing in on this. It's really
Speaker 1: one of the most dare I say, pernicious, most mendacious
Speaker 1: things that have come out of a Democrat's mouth at
Speaker 1: a long time. I'm going to tell you what they said,
Speaker 1: but you have to stay through this break. Everyone's looking
Speaker 1: for a new guiding light. I personally think we should
Speaker 1: use science and so have a hypothesis like is what
Speaker 1: the President said true? And then give the reader some
Speaker 1: analysis about that. But there are lots of different ways
Speaker 1: we could try to approach hypothesis, as in this assertion
Speaker 1: we believe and then see if the facts back it up,
Speaker 1: because that would be an inversion of what's true usually
Speaker 1: journalism was supposed to do, which is to follow the
Speaker 1: facts and then come to a conclusion based on that. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I mean, it's sort of two different ways of looking
Speaker 1: at it. Right. You can look at all these facts,
Speaker 1: and I think a really good example of it is
Speaker 1: actually the New York Times when they put a list
Speaker 1: together of every lie that Trump had done, had said
Speaker 1: for two years that in twenty seventeen, and they showed
Speaker 1: the facts that back that up. And then after that,
Speaker 1: I think they felt comfortable, and anyone would feel comfortable saying,
Speaker 1: this is a man who's repeatedly and unabashably lies all
Speaker 1: the time, right, and so then that hypothesis is fully proven. Yeah,
Speaker 1: they're telling you exactly what they're doing here. That was
Speaker 1: on CNN, a bunch of smug lib journals doing what
Speaker 1: they do. Why did I play that whole thing for you?
Speaker 1: Because that was giving you a peak into what they
Speaker 1: really think, which is that they first they start with
Speaker 1: the position, They start with the hypothesis Trump as a racist,
Speaker 1: Trump is evil. They go from there and then they
Speaker 1: find out it insta suit whatever they like, once they've
Speaker 1: already established what the main claim is going to be.
Speaker 1: That's the game, that's what they're doing. This is advocacy journalism.
Speaker 1: This is what they don't understand. They pretend to be neutral.
Speaker 1: This is CNN. They pretend to be neutral. They're not neutral.
Speaker 1: And who says they're neutrals a joke to this day,
Speaker 1: I would love to have a debate with Oh, I
Speaker 1: don't know, let's say Jake Tapper, mister super journal over
Speaker 1: at CNN. Other CNN is a left wing propaganda organ
Speaker 1: and effectively taking orders from the DNC. Would I would
Speaker 1: smoke anyone at CNN in a debate on that issue.
Speaker 1: There's not a stent because I'm right and it's obvious.
Speaker 1: They also they never let their pampered and overpaid anchors
Speaker 1: wander out of friendly venues because they would be shown
Speaker 1: to be the intellectual lightweights that they are. But they
Speaker 1: talk so much about fats, right, they think that this
Speaker 1: is oh, and I also like that, let's approach this
Speaker 1: like science. Just as an aside. We all know libs
Speaker 1: say this. You know that they're the people that don't
Speaker 1: think that men and women are biologically distinct. But hashtag
Speaker 1: science man, you know, sure, thanks, that's good. Just call
Speaker 1: it science, and then you're obviously right. But the unwillingness
Speaker 1: to stare at the rejection of fact on major issues
Speaker 1: national news stories on their side is one of the
Speaker 1: reasons why a lot of us give Trump some leeway
Speaker 1: when he's kind of you spouting off about stuff, We're like,
Speaker 1: all right, I mean, maybe he's playing a little fast
Speaker 1: and loose with some of his assessments or some of
Speaker 1: his analysis, but he doesn't lie the way Kamala Harris
Speaker 1: and Elizabeth Warren have just lied. This is an appalling,
Speaker 1: appalling thing for two prominent Democrats to have done. But
Speaker 1: they're pandering their demagogues and they are deeply dishonest. On Friday,
Speaker 1: you had people commemorating the five year anniversary of Ferguson, Missouri,
Speaker 1: the Ferguson Zuri's shooting involving app officer Darren Wilson and
Speaker 1: Mike Brown. This led up to this led to hands Up,
Speaker 1: Don't Shoot, which became a rallying cry for leftist anti
Speaker 1: police movements across the country. But there was a very
Speaker 1: thorough Obama Justice Department investigation of this that showed that
Speaker 1: Officer Wilson was defending himself, that Mike Brown was a thug,
Speaker 1: was involved in assaulting a police officer, and was not
Speaker 1: holding his hands up. This was according to African American eyewitnesses,
Speaker 1: by the way, cited in this DJ report. And yet
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren tweeted the following in commemoration
Speaker 1: on August nine of the shooting of Michael Brown. The lawful,
Speaker 1: thoroughly investigated, lawful, and just defied shooting. That's right, according
Speaker 1: to Obama's DJ, let's just go over that one more time.
Speaker 1: A lawful and justified shooting of a person who has
Speaker 1: engaged in felony assault of a police officer, Mike Brown.
Speaker 1: It's not a martyr, he's not a hero. Ah, but
Speaker 1: the narratives he useful. He was useful for the movement,
Speaker 1: So they created this whole storyline around him. That was
Speaker 1: just all a lie. Kamala Harris, though tweeted this out,
Speaker 1: remembers the former prosecutor Elizabeth Warren, a law professor. They're
Speaker 1: supposed to know the law. Harris wrote, Michael Brown's murder
Speaker 1: Forever change Ferguson and America. His tragic death sparked a
Speaker 1: desperately needed conversation and a nationwide movement. We must fight
Speaker 1: for stronger accountability and racial equity in our justice system. Well,
Speaker 1: equity means that if you attack a cop and try
Speaker 1: to get his he's going to shoot you. That is
Speaker 1: equity in the justice system. I don't care who you are,
Speaker 1: what race you are, If you do that, you are
Speaker 1: likely to get shot and deserve to be shot. This
Speaker 1: is what we had a throw investigation here. Mike Brown.
Speaker 1: It's not some terrible tragedy. Mike Brown deserved to be
Speaker 1: shot by that officer in self defense. That is what
Speaker 1: the law says. But you might have to explain that.
Speaker 1: To Elizabeth Warren. Five years ago, Michael Brown was murdered
Speaker 1: by a white police officer in Ferguson. She wrote, Michael
Speaker 1: was unarmed, yet he was shot six times. I stand
Speaker 1: with activists and organizers who continue to fight for justice
Speaker 1: for Michael. We must confront systemic racism and violence from
Speaker 1: the police head on. But just just all blabber, all propaganda,
Speaker 1: all lies. Michael Brown was not murdered. Elizabeth Warren is
Speaker 1: not a moron, Neither is Kamala Harris. They know he
Speaker 1: was not murdered. Why are they saying it? I would
Speaker 1: offer to you. I think this should be legally actionable.
Speaker 1: I think Officer Wilson should sue them. Is this is libel.
Speaker 1: They are writing malicious lies about a private citizen who
Speaker 1: has been cleared by the Justice Department for any wrongdoing.
Speaker 1: If you can call Officer Wilson a murderer based on this,
Speaker 1: you could call somebody a child molester just because you
Speaker 1: feel like it running for public office. You could call
Speaker 1: somebody a rapist just because you know you feel like
Speaker 1: it a private citizen without consequence. These should be actionable accusations,
Speaker 1: but more to the point, because that wouldn't stop them.
Speaker 1: And this is the left that you're really dealing with.
Speaker 1: They pretend to care about facts, They pretend to be
Speaker 1: the ones that are so focused in on the truth.
Speaker 1: Do you think that any CNN journalists are going to
Speaker 1: ask Elizabeth Warren or Kamala Harris about saying that Mike
Speaker 1: Brown was murdered? I mean, challenge them on this point.
Speaker 1: What is it about the facts that we know that
Speaker 1: justifies saying that that officer Wilson, who was doing his job,
Speaker 1: doing a tough job in a tough neighborhood of an
Speaker 1: American city with far too much violent crime. As we know,
Speaker 1: libs don't talk about us very much. Vast majority of
Speaker 1: urban violent crime is not from cops to African American men.
Speaker 1: It is black men shooting black men in numbers that
Speaker 1: are tragic and we need to address as a country,
Speaker 1: but it's not part of the narrative. So we always
Speaker 1: focus on the cop violence. We always focus on the
Speaker 1: cop violence, even though it's in the low hundreds as
Speaker 1: opposed to the thousands and thousands, and by the way
Speaker 1: those low hundreds. Most of it is exactly what happened
Speaker 1: with Mike Brown. Somebody's running out a police officer with
Speaker 1: a knife. Police officer has a gun for a reason,
Speaker 1: shoots the person. Black, white, any other color, doesn't matter.
Speaker 1: You come at a cop. There's a lethal threat against
Speaker 1: that all officer. The officer believes his life or her
Speaker 1: life is in danger. Officer has to be able to
Speaker 1: draw down and defend himself or herself. That's it, or
Speaker 1: else we have anarchy, I mean, or else we have
Speaker 1: no rule of law in this country. If police can't
Speaker 1: use force even to defend themselves, what do we have left.
Speaker 1: Michael Brown was not murdered. Michael Brown was killed assaulting
Speaker 1: a police officer that he may have murdered had he
Speaker 1: not been stopped. He's not a martyr, He's not a hero.
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren no better. The Obama Justice
Speaker 1: Department certainly knows better, and Democrats should hold each other
Speaker 1: to account on this, but they won't. Why because hands up,
Speaker 1: don't shoot is such a catchy slogan. That's why. Welcome
Speaker 1: back to the Buck Sexton Show. One of the more
Speaker 1: frustrating I was gonna say most, and then I turned
Speaker 1: it into more but more speak the English book. Something
Speaker 1: that bothers me about the Trump administration from the beginning
Speaker 1: it always has is that as much as he's a
Speaker 1: fighter and I appreciate his ability, his sheer endurance for
Speaker 1: the all outlib assault means that I give Trump a
Speaker 1: tremendous amount of respect and a lot of leeway to
Speaker 1: be imperfect, because I'm not the one who's on that battlefield,
Speaker 1: so to speak, with every LIB with a with a following,
Speaker 1: with a microphone, with money, with access, with power, trying
Speaker 1: to just tear you down all the time, I don't
Speaker 1: know how he does it. It's and I get my
Speaker 1: fair share of hate. I mean I got people wrote
Speaker 1: me really mean things after the Bill maher appearance of libs.
Speaker 1: Of course, all of the conservatives were like, you crushed it,
Speaker 1: You're amazing, I love you. Not all of you wrote that,
Speaker 1: but some of you wrote that, And those were the
Speaker 1: night those were the nice, slash astute observations. But I mean,
Speaker 1: I see what Trump does, and it is remarkable what
Speaker 1: he puts up with. That said, what am I What
Speaker 1: was I starting to lead into there? I just don't
Speaker 1: understand well, I mean, I guess it's loyalty based, and
Speaker 1: he people who around him that he thinks are loyal
Speaker 1: to him. That's that's priority number one. But some of
Speaker 1: the people that he has put around him, and we
Speaker 1: know this, it's admitted now. I mean, I don't think
Speaker 1: anybody disagrees. We're just the worst. They're just just losers.
Speaker 1: And they have had really important roles in his administration.
Speaker 1: And you know, I will never Jeff Sessions is a
Speaker 1: good man and he's I feel badly for Jeff because
Speaker 1: he was put in a spot that he was not
Speaker 1: you know, he was not meant for Andy. And so
Speaker 1: he's on the same category as the mooch who we're
Speaker 1: about to talk to you who's I mean, there are grifters.
Speaker 1: They're just people that are Trump grifters. Uh, what's what's
Speaker 1: prouiser Mark? What's the name of the lady from the
Speaker 1: show who? Uh? You know what I'm talking it's African
Speaker 1: American lady was on The Apprentice? Who was you know,
Speaker 1: she's the Cruella de Ville? Yeah, Samarosa Amarosa. You know
Speaker 1: she's the bad the bad person from the show amar Rosa.
Speaker 1: I mean, she was in the White House. She was
Speaker 1: had access to the White House, into the Oval Office,
Speaker 1: and this is like, come on, folks, and you know
Speaker 1: I have nothing anyway. The Jeff Sessions thing, though, that
Speaker 1: would be like if you if you put me on
Speaker 1: a golf course and said, hey, buck, you gotta let's
Speaker 1: see what you got, I would be bad. It doesn't
Speaker 1: mean that I'm a bad person or a bad athlete.
Speaker 1: I just don't play golf. Right then this is not
Speaker 1: a great example, but you know, you know, Jeff Sessions
Speaker 1: was put on a golf course and it's like he'd
Speaker 1: never held a club before. He was not meant to
Speaker 1: be the Attorney General, not under an administration, not with
Speaker 1: an administration that was under complete siege by the deep state,
Speaker 1: by the Lib media, all the rest of it. But
Speaker 1: then you got the other people like I'm talking about
Speaker 1: with the Mooch, would just come across as grifters. I mean,
Speaker 1: what the Mooch is doing now is to me class
Speaker 1: A one grifting, which is, you know, when when Trump
Speaker 1: was and this is what you see with Joe Scarborough,
Speaker 1: you know a lot of prenny. I know he wasn't
Speaker 1: working for Trump, although he kind of wanted to it
Speaker 1: seemed like at one point, a lot of people when
Speaker 1: they have the Trump access, they love him. He's amazing
Speaker 1: to defend anything. But then if they fall out with him,
Speaker 1: then they run over and become best friends with CNN
Speaker 1: and MSNBC and the anti Trump resistance. So here's the mooch.
Speaker 1: Who was I think this was on the Bill Marshaw. Actually, uh,
Speaker 1: this was the former White House Communications director Scaramoucci, Anthony Scaramucci,
Speaker 1: who had one of the dumbest blunders of anybody in
Speaker 1: a senior White House role I've ever seen. I mean
Speaker 1: to call up a journalist and go on some tirade
Speaker 1: about and say the kind of stuff that he said.
Speaker 1: It's just it's like he was begging to be fired,
Speaker 1: and he did get fired, as he should have. But
Speaker 1: here's now he's supposed to be the voice of wisdom,
Speaker 1: but all things trump here he is playclip three. You know,
Speaker 1: I got fire or two years ago and have tried
Speaker 1: to stay very loyal to him and very loyal to
Speaker 1: the agenda because I think the policies are very very
Speaker 1: good for the American people. But the rhetoric is so
Speaker 1: charged and so divisive that we have to all just
Speaker 1: take a step back now and say what are we doing? Actually,
Speaker 1: so one thing that I find reprehensible and the President
Speaker 1: continues to do this, and I think we'll end up
Speaker 1: happening is sound and reasonably minded men and women in
Speaker 1: the Republican Party will say, wait a minute, we can't
Speaker 1: do this. He is giving people a license to hate,
Speaker 1: to provide a source of finger to go after each other.
Speaker 1: And he does it on his Twitter account. So let's
Speaker 1: just stop for a second and think about this. We
Speaker 1: ignore it. But he goes after people personally, going after
Speaker 1: me personally, no problem. I'm a big boy. I can
Speaker 1: take it. Donnie Deutsch can take it. But he goes
Speaker 1: after individuals as the president of the United States on
Speaker 1: his Twitter account, okay, which incites hate, which incites death threats,
Speaker 1: incites hate, incites death threats. I get hate and death threats.
Speaker 1: And I'm not the president, nor is the president coming
Speaker 1: after me. So that's I mean. Libs love to do
Speaker 1: this thing of oh insights. There's hate all over the
Speaker 1: If you're on the internet, if you have any public
Speaker 1: persona whatsoever, you're getting hate. I don't care if your
Speaker 1: life's work is just making the perfect grilled cheese and
Speaker 1: your Twitter account is grilled cheese lover. People are telling
Speaker 1: you that you use greair instead of American. So you're
Speaker 1: an evil commie and you know you should be destroyed
Speaker 1: or whatever you know that you're using. You're using cheddar
Speaker 1: cheese because you're a racist. Why is cheddar cheese rate? Ah,
Speaker 1: because you're a racist. You know, if people write crazy
Speaker 1: stuff all the time, makes no sense. But you know
Speaker 1: the thing about the mooch trying to be the conscience
Speaker 1: of America right now, at least the conscience of the
Speaker 1: Trump administration that he was ejected from it. Look, I
Speaker 1: still remember I met this guy backstage at Fox once
Speaker 1: and I could not believe that he was running the
Speaker 1: Trump transition. It was I was like, this is this
Speaker 1: is a clown show, and I was worried. I was
Speaker 1: worried for how Trump would do just based on the
Speaker 1: fact that this guy was running things. I was like,
Speaker 1: I was like, do want Do I want to work
Speaker 1: for the Trump administration in some capacity? I remember thinking
Speaker 1: about this. I was like, well, this is the kind
Speaker 1: of decision making they've got. I am concerned. To her
Speaker 1: credit MSNBC, Stephanie Rule decided that she was going to
Speaker 1: ask the obvious question here, which anytime journos asked the
Speaker 1: obvious question, I do give them credit because so few
Speaker 1: of them do. Which is that, Okay, mooch, you seem
Speaker 1: like somebody who's just desperate to be on TV. Desperate
Speaker 1: to be on television because for a lot of people,
Speaker 1: it's just an ego driven thing. There's a hole in
Speaker 1: their soul and that's why they want to be on TV.
Speaker 1: She asked him, you're going out for Trump? Now? Is
Speaker 1: this the Scarborough when you love Trump when he's on
Speaker 1: your when he's on your personal side, but then you're
Speaker 1: all against him the moment that it's not that that
Speaker 1: way anymore. Blake let two, I can't think of anything
Speaker 1: less American, Stephanie than bullying people and being the American president.
Speaker 1: And you were using your Twitter feed to call out
Speaker 1: your fellow citizens on Twitter. But different today may that
Speaker 1: he's going after you on Twitter. He started running for
Speaker 1: president calling Mexicans rapists and drug dealers and criminals, and
Speaker 1: he was crushing he was crushing other people running for
Speaker 1: president on the debate stage. So what is different today? Well, again,
Speaker 1: like I said, you may not like my arrival to
Speaker 1: this moment and you may disagree with my arrival. I
Speaker 1: think I should have gotten there sooner. You may not
Speaker 1: like my arrival. I like that. This is gonna be
Speaker 1: another line that I have. Hey Buck, are you are
Speaker 1: you telling me that you you don't like so and
Speaker 1: so because you know she she doesn't want to go
Speaker 1: out on a date with you? Or do you really
Speaker 1: just not like her? And I'm like, well, let's not
Speaker 1: get into how I arrived at this moment, shall we. Oh? Man,
Speaker 1: that's great, that's up there with That's not in my purview.
Speaker 1: Hey Buck, did you did you leave the milk out
Speaker 1: on the table so that it's now gone bad? Up?
Speaker 1: That's not in my purview. Sorry, can't answer that. If
Speaker 1: it works for Muller works for me. The grifters the
Speaker 1: one thing that I've never really been able to stomach
Speaker 1: with this administration, some of the people that Trump has
Speaker 1: put in power. Look, he knows he's made mistakes. Giuliani
Speaker 1: told me once. I can't remember the word he used,
Speaker 1: but he said that they're something along the lines of
Speaker 1: their losers. I forget what the word was that he used.
Speaker 1: But it's true, folks, Trump does not pick the best people.
Speaker 1: Who is supposed to be the great savior of the country,
Speaker 1: save us from Trump. Oh my gosh, Trump, what are
Speaker 1: we gonna do? What are we gonna do? How are
Speaker 1: we gonna save us all? Some Trump actually kind of
Speaker 1: sounded like a little bit of Remember when Hans Gruber
Speaker 1: switches out of his it's actually an English accent, it's
Speaker 1: supposed to be German. But he goes, oh my gosh,
Speaker 1: Oh my gosh, you're or one of them, You're one
Speaker 1: of them, And the rooftop scene where John McClean stumbles
Speaker 1: upon him and he convinces him that he's one of
Speaker 1: the hostages instead of the hostage taker. That's kind of
Speaker 1: what Democrats have done with America. They're really the hostage takers,
Speaker 1: and that they're ruining this country in as many ways
Speaker 1: as they can. But then when we actually have them
Speaker 1: cornered on ourn issue with those oh my gosh, you're
Speaker 1: one of them, please please please, you know, they freak
Speaker 1: out and hide their accents, although they don't, you know,
Speaker 1: hide what they really want. That's what the metaphor is
Speaker 1: supposed to be here. But they tell us that there's
Speaker 1: going to be a Savior's gonna protect us from Trump's
Speaker 1: destruction of America. You know that savior is supposed to
Speaker 1: be keep in mind that Trump's racism is one of
Speaker 1: the big problems we're supposed to do with. Here, the
Speaker 1: primary savior corner of the polls right now is Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: We just wanted to just do a little reminder here,
Speaker 1: the guy who says, you know, we want truthover facts,
Speaker 1: and who just is constantly having what and I don't
Speaker 1: mean this to be agist and disrespectful in general, but
Speaker 1: he's having senior moments, folks. That's what The guy's seventy
Speaker 1: four years old. He's going to be president into his
Speaker 1: eighties if he were to win two terms. Really, here's
Speaker 1: just a little a little flavor of what Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: The media always explained this is, Oh, it's just Joe
Speaker 1: being Joe, and they've created this the same way that
Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders is the cudlely mad scientist Kami from Vermont,
Speaker 1: which he's not cudly. He's going to destroy the economy
Speaker 1: and his ideas are horrific, and he's actually kind of
Speaker 1: comes across as kind of a nasty, get off my
Speaker 1: lawn figure these days. But Biden is always the uncle
Speaker 1: that just says the thing that's you're not supposed to say,
Speaker 1: but he just lets it. No, he's actually just a clown.
Speaker 1: But Biden's racial insensitivity is always constantly covered up, Right,
Speaker 1: Biden's racial gaffs or something that we're supposed to say, Oh, well,
Speaker 1: he didn't mean it. They don't give that leeway to Trump. Ever,
Speaker 1: here's just a little little taste of a playlif nine.
Speaker 1: In Delaware, the largest growth of population is Indian Americans.
Speaker 1: Movie from India. You cannot go to a seven eleven
Speaker 1: or Duncan Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent.
Speaker 1: We have this notion that somehow, if you're poor, you
Speaker 1: cannot do it. Poor kids are just as bright and
Speaker 1: just as tall as white kids, wealthy kids, Black kids.
Speaker 1: What kind of a chance with a Northeastern liberal like
Speaker 1: Joe Biden stand in the South, if you were running
Speaker 1: in Democratic primaries against Southerners like Mark Warner and John Edwards,
Speaker 1: and you don't know my state, My state was a
Speaker 1: slave state, My state is a border state. They're gonna
Speaker 1: put you all back in chains. When you've got the
Speaker 1: first sort of made American who is articulate and bright
Speaker 1: and clean who most foreign policy experts around the world
Speaker 1: say is the most the wisest man in the Orient,
Speaker 1: a large, very identifiable Somali community. I might add, if
Speaker 1: you ever come to the train station with me, you'll
Speaker 1: notice that I have great relationship because there's an awful
Speaker 1: lot of driving cabs. Apologize for what former Vice President
Speaker 1: Biden Wednesday night stood by comments he made this week
Speaker 1: about his work with two segregationist senators. I was in
Speaker 1: a caucus with James O. Eastland. He never called me boy,
Speaker 1: he always called me son. At least there was some civility.
Speaker 1: We got things done. There's not a racist bone in
Speaker 1: my body. I've been involved in civil rights my whole
Speaker 1: career period. But all the things that Biden says, those
Speaker 1: are not a big deal because he's Biden, He's a Democrat.
Speaker 1: Anything that Trump ever said. In fact, that they're willing
Speaker 1: to change what Trump says to make it sound worse
Speaker 1: or to make it sound bad when it wasn't bad
Speaker 1: at all. And this is what we should expect because
Speaker 1: of the media now sometimes slips it admits that objectivity
Speaker 1: in the era of Trump is just not acceptable anymore,
Speaker 1: which is hilarious because they've never been objective, and no
Speaker 1: one who pays attention thinks they're objective. My friends, I
Speaker 1: ask you if you're not already there, and I think
Speaker 1: you are, because if you listen to the show, then
Speaker 1: you're you know what the real deal is. And I
Speaker 1: mean that if you listen to me, if you're listening
Speaker 1: to this radio show, you understand that the mainstream media
Speaker 1: is full of hacks and propagandists and people that are
Speaker 1: not honest what they're doing. And we are in the
Speaker 1: midst of a propaganda fight constantly between left and right
Speaker 1: in the media. People are and there are those of
Speaker 1: us who say what side we're generally on, but at
Speaker 1: least are honest about where we come from and what
Speaker 1: our philosophy is and why we think what we think.
Speaker 1: And then the people that pretend to be neutral, objective observers,
Speaker 1: and they're not. You know, even when I was traveling
Speaker 1: with the Pompeo and the press corps that was with him,
Speaker 1: you know, they're from all the big publications that you
Speaker 1: would expect. They're all liberals, the whole bunk. I mean,
Speaker 1: I'll was sitting there talking to them. I didn't look
Speaker 1: that stuff was I'm not somebody that would ever speak
Speaker 1: about social conversations, and you know with that, I don't
Speaker 1: do that. Some people will do that. They'll say I
Speaker 1: heard so and so say this, and they thought that
Speaker 1: they were just hanging out after work. I would never
Speaker 1: do that. But they're all lives obviously. I mean, it
Speaker 1: was very clear from spending time with them that they
Speaker 1: do not like President Trump, and they're the ones that
Speaker 1: are reporting on stuff, and so, you know, not none
Speaker 1: of this should really be a surprised But Biden is
Speaker 1: the great Savior or Bernie Sanders. Speaking of Bernie the
Speaker 1: guy who honeymooned in Moscow during the worst times of
Speaker 1: the Soviet Union or one of the worst times, I
Speaker 1: should say this, I mean the Soviet Union a lot
Speaker 1: of bad time, but you know, really the high I
Speaker 1: think he went in the nineteen sixty so it's when
Speaker 1: things were real bad. Here's Bernie Sanders, the other savior.
Speaker 1: To save us from Trump, they offer us this guy play.
Speaker 1: Ten four years ago, I came here in Iowa and
Speaker 1: I was asked, what is the major national security issue
Speaker 1: we faced? And people thought I'd say, isis or alkater
Speaker 1: and those hall big issues. The answer that I gave
Speaker 1: in terms of national security? Is climate change? Climate change?
Speaker 1: What's the most frightening thing on the way I started
Speaker 1: to get into Cuomo. There, you know what's the most
Speaker 1: frightening thing? Climate change is? We could do Bernie arguing
Speaker 1: with Cuomo. Cuomobil like, you don't understand climate change will
Speaker 1: kill all of us, that will destroy the world, And
Speaker 1: Bernie's like, no, you can't understand. If we don't take
Speaker 1: care of the next ten years, we're all gonna melt.
Speaker 1: It's gonna be super hot, Nomo, Ben and Jerry's ice cream.
Speaker 1: We're not gonna be a who wins that fight? I
Speaker 1: don't know between Cuomo and Bernie. You put in your
Speaker 1: queer girl, yes, you put it in. Yes, I'm white
Speaker 1: and old. They call me all kinds of names, and
Speaker 1: so you think I would vote for Come on, you're smarter.
Speaker 1: You fill in the blank. Ye. No, I don't have
Speaker 1: to fill in the blank. Everybody knows we're the bad people.
Speaker 1: What do they call you? I'm a racist. I went
Speaker 1: to school. I shared my guard or the colored guy.
Speaker 1: I have nothing again for him. I grew up in
Speaker 1: the East, we grew up with people. Do you think
Speaker 1: the president is a racist? Though? Now I don't. I
Speaker 1: really don't. When you's here, send them back. When you
Speaker 1: hear him talk about communities of color, do you see
Speaker 1: white people, do call him a racist? Yes and no,
Speaker 1: because some of those people he's talking about has said
Speaker 1: just as bad things about him that you can't say
Speaker 1: on TV. So that was an MSNBC reporter at the
Speaker 1: Iowa Fair. And now we're going to get through all
Speaker 1: these the usual and unexpected campaign events, you know, the
Speaker 1: Iowa Fair, and you got up, all these different candidates
Speaker 1: show up there, do all the stuff that they do.
Speaker 1: This Iowa voter, you could tell, is a little defensive
Speaker 1: about what's going on because he knows. First of all,
Speaker 1: I don't know why he would. I don't know if
Speaker 1: he could tell that. The guy he probably had an
Speaker 1: MSNBC microphone out there. But you know, just here's rule
Speaker 1: number one. Just don't talk to MSNBC, all right, unless
Speaker 1: unless you're a woke left wing bot and you're going
Speaker 1: to say exactly what they want you to say. I
Speaker 1: think it's a bad idea that you're you're not going
Speaker 1: to be You're not gonna make any friends speaking to
Speaker 1: MSNBC if you're a Trump voter. That's one thing. I mean, they,
Speaker 1: as we've been discussing continuously on the show, they put
Speaker 1: insane people on air on a regular basis who just
Speaker 1: bashed Trump. That's all they do. They just bashed Trump.
Speaker 1: But he says, I'm old, I'm white. They call me
Speaker 1: all kinds of names. Who do you think I vote for?
Speaker 1: When are we allowed to have a conversation in this
Speaker 1: country about all this bashing of old white males all
Speaker 1: the time is getting really old and it's unfair, and
Speaker 1: everyone's kind of sick of it. Who's been on the
Speaker 1: receiving end of it? You know, people who have been
Speaker 1: good members of their of their communities, who have been
Speaker 1: good fathers, who have been good earners and productive and
Speaker 1: law abiding and patriotic, and you know, many of them serve,
Speaker 1: but even you know, people serve in different ways, not
Speaker 1: just in the military. You know, many ways to be
Speaker 1: a patriot, in many ways to support your country. But
Speaker 1: they've been they've been good, honorable people, and they just
Speaker 1: want certain economic policies. They support more conservative social policies,
Speaker 1: although Trump is not is not very socially conservative. And
Speaker 1: they made their pick and the guy won, Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: And now they're always being told that they're racist for that.
Speaker 1: I mean, we'll get into it. We got we had
Speaker 1: betto coming up here, He explicitly says it. I mean,
Speaker 1: if you vote for Trump now, you're a racist. This
Speaker 1: is what Democrats are saying instead of trying to win
Speaker 1: people over. They've given up on that. You know why
Speaker 1: they've given up on trying to win people over to
Speaker 1: vote for Democrats because the numbers speak for themselves. Look
Speaker 1: at the economy. Who if you were just trying to
Speaker 1: have a more prosperous America financially, when it comes to freedom,
Speaker 1: when it comes to entrepreneurship, growth, prosperity, would you rather
Speaker 1: have the policies of Obama or the policies of Trump
Speaker 1: on those kitchen table issues that we're all supposed to
Speaker 1: care about the most in politics? At least, that's what
Speaker 1: all the political pundits of nothing else to say will
Speaker 1: be saying in this election cycle. Who does a better job?
Speaker 1: Who has done a better job? Obama or Trump? And
Speaker 1: yet if somebody assesses that and makes a determination about
Speaker 1: who they're going to vote for based upon it, and
Speaker 1: the person that they assess as being better is Trump,
Speaker 1: they are being told now or the you're you must
Speaker 1: be a racist. You must be a racist because you're
Speaker 1: voting for Trump, you see, instead of whoever, instead of
Speaker 1: whatever total lunatic Democrats are putting forward. I mean this,
Speaker 1: this propping up of Biden. You know, if this starts
Speaker 1: to remind me a little bit of of the ending
Speaker 1: of the movie El Sid, where you know, El Sid
Speaker 1: has passed away, but they put him up on the
Speaker 1: horse and they and they have him like lead the
Speaker 1: charge to get the Moors out of Spain. You know,
Speaker 1: that's in fourteen ninety two. I think it was, Uh
Speaker 1: that's you know, they're they're propping up a very old
Speaker 1: and weak and not particularly with it, Biden, and they're
Speaker 1: wondering why people aren't flocking who would We're not just
Speaker 1: look there Democrats who are baked into the cake. They're
Speaker 1: always going to vote Democrat because it's part of their identity.
Speaker 1: They believe this stuff about oh, you're a better person
Speaker 1: if you vote Democrat, you care more about the poor,
Speaker 1: you care more about minorities if you vote Democrat. Name
Speaker 1: I'll look at the elites of the the Democratic Party. It's
Speaker 1: all hypocritical, self indulgent billionaires, Hollywood celebrities, the people that
Speaker 1: really call the shots. The Democratic Party are not people
Speaker 1: that care about the poor. They're not people that spend
Speaker 1: any time dealing with the problems of minority communities. They
Speaker 1: just talk about it because it makes them feel like
Speaker 1: they're so strong and brave and you know, virtuous. But
Speaker 1: the Democratic Party has done a good job of creating
Speaker 1: a certain brand for itself, right. The brand is the good, smart,
Speaker 1: nice people vote Democrat. We do break down why that's
Speaker 1: just not accurate on the merits every day on this show.
Speaker 1: I think that's part of what I do here. But
Speaker 1: you see, the Democrats are already, at least a number
Speaker 1: of them, are abandoning any hope of offering up a
Speaker 1: more competent, governing alternative to Trump. That's now just that's gone.
Speaker 1: Now it's going to be vote against Trump or you're
Speaker 1: a racist. And they know that all the Democrats will
Speaker 1: already vote. You know, the people that are already on board,
Speaker 1: they're just going to come out to cast a vote
Speaker 1: against Trump as part of their virtue signaling experience. But
Speaker 1: for those who are in those states that are up
Speaker 1: for grabs, right, the states that matter, we all know
Speaker 1: what they are. And for the undecided voters, and the
Speaker 1: enthusiasm component of this in those states where you need
Speaker 1: to see which side is able to do a better
Speaker 1: vote voter turnout operation. What are they offering up, Well,
Speaker 1: if you vote for Trump, you're a racist. So don't
Speaker 1: be a racist. Vote against Trump. That's that's all they've got,
Speaker 1: because what's the other case they're going to make. Hey,
Speaker 1: we're going to raise your taxes and destroy healthcare even more.
Speaker 1: You know, there's a there's a really interesting stat out
Speaker 1: today actually, as I saw Axio shared at some study
Speaker 1: that looks at what's going on in healthcare. There's bad
Speaker 1: stuff happening in healthcare in this country. I mean there's
Speaker 1: and it's because of government intervention. But you've had an
Speaker 1: increase in a whole slew of really common hospital practices,
Speaker 1: hospital procedures, I should say, you've had in the last
Speaker 1: four or five years a twenty percent increase in the
Speaker 1: cost of these procedures. Meanwhile, the doctors are not the
Speaker 1: ones that are they're getting more. This is all hospitals
Speaker 1: now have consolidated. They have brought doctors practices indoors, so
Speaker 1: to speak, inside their walls, so they now control it.
Speaker 1: And the hospitals are just charging whatever prices they want
Speaker 1: on this stuff. They fight like mad against price transparent. See,
Speaker 1: and you've got the government telling them to take money
Speaker 1: for Medicaid procedures that don't even begin to cover the
Speaker 1: actual cost of the procedures. So they're operating a loss
Speaker 1: on that Medicare procedures don't cover the actual cost of
Speaker 1: most important procedures that hospitals do on a regular basis.
Speaker 1: So I'm trying to hear. I've actually hospital prices for
Speaker 1: inpatient services increased more than the prices paid to doctors
Speaker 1: between twenty thirteen and twenty seventeen. This was on axios today.
Speaker 1: I mean this is real, folks. Yeah, nineteen percent over
Speaker 1: this period, where the increase in these services for things
Speaker 1: like childbirth, appendex to me hypertension, there's been no great
Speaker 1: improvement in these services. Why are they charging them? Was
Speaker 1: twenty percent more? Twenty percent more on average? That's a lot.
Speaker 1: Is there already expensive procedures? Ah, because the government is
Speaker 1: very involved in determining who can do these procedures and
Speaker 1: what they can charge arge and what insurers can charge water,
Speaker 1: and there's all kinds of market intrusion. Those are real conversations.
Speaker 1: How do we make this better? I mean, the answer
Speaker 1: really is the free market and the stop with all
Speaker 1: the socialism. But instead of having conversations about how we
Speaker 1: can make things better that will affect you and me,
Speaker 1: what do we have from the Democrats. What's the primary
Speaker 1: push for why you should vote against Trump? He's a racist?
Speaker 1: We'll talk. I mean, Betto takes this line, who's he's
Speaker 1: become among the most annoying of all the candidates by
Speaker 1: that he's not charming, He's not used to be like
Speaker 1: I was, like kind of nice and everything. But now
Speaker 1: that no one votes, Miriam getting really mean. We'll hear
Speaker 1: from Betto in a second. I think it's really hard
Speaker 1: after everything that we've seen from his time as a
Speaker 1: candidate in twenty sixteen, to his repeated warnings of invasions,
Speaker 1: to his repeated calls to send them back, sending back
Speaker 1: people who are US citizens, sending back people who are
Speaker 1: born in this country. His description of white nationalists and
Speaker 1: klansmen and neo Nazi as very fine people. Stop right there,
Speaker 1: Stop right there for a second. I can't. I just
Speaker 1: can't have this anymore. That's a lie. What Beto just
Speaker 1: said about the white nationalists is very fine people on
Speaker 1: both sides, or good people on both sides, that that
Speaker 1: that that infamous now statement that President Trump made after Charlotte'sville.
Speaker 1: He's trying to give up, He's trying to talk about
Speaker 1: jobs in New York City. I went back and read
Speaker 1: that transcript five times through this past weekend because I thought,
Speaker 1: you know, I'm really sick of hearing about this. And
Speaker 1: I just remember at the time I was shouted down
Speaker 1: on Twitter at least by some other right wingers or
Speaker 1: at least former GOP people, for saying that that's not
Speaker 1: what Trump said. Oh, yes it is, Yes it is.
Speaker 1: It just turned into what always happens here, which is
Speaker 1: that the propaganda overwhelms the truth right, or as Biden
Speaker 1: would say, the truth over the facts, which as a
Speaker 1: classic bidenism, but it became a narrative that you could
Speaker 1: not pierce with reality. Donald Trump did not say that
Speaker 1: there were good neo Nazis in Charlottesville. That did not happen.
Speaker 1: I read the transcript over many, many times and not mean.
Speaker 1: What ends up happening when you look at it is
Speaker 1: that they're being First of all, the journalists are being
Speaker 1: incredibly disrespectful to President in a way where if they
Speaker 1: had peppered Obama with questions the way they were just
Speaker 1: going after going after Trump, we would have been told
Speaker 1: that it was so racist, and then it was terrible,
Speaker 1: and then it was off on all this other stuff. Okay,
Speaker 1: so start start with that. But they were going after
Speaker 1: Trump with everything that they had. And in that same
Speaker 1: press conference where he talked about the good people on
Speaker 1: both sides, Trump said, quote, you had people and I'm
Speaker 1: not talking about the neo Nazis and the white nationalists
Speaker 1: because they should be condemned totally. You had many people
Speaker 1: in that group other than neo Nazis and white nationalists, Okay,
Speaker 1: and the press has treated them absolutely unfairly. Now when
Speaker 1: he says this is this is where they kind of,
Speaker 1: you know, burrow under the walls of reality. I mean,
Speaker 1: this is their their entry point. When he's talking about
Speaker 1: that group, he's referring to a group that was there
Speaker 1: before the Tiki Tiki torch, neo Nazi marcher, people who
Speaker 1: were opposed to taking down the statue of Robert E. Lee.
Speaker 1: And that's how this whole thing got started. There was
Speaker 1: a pro and there was a con And I would
Speaker 1: say to those who want to tell us that Robert E.
Speaker 1: Lee statues have to come down. I do need to
Speaker 1: understand if that's the standard, why we aren't taking down
Speaker 1: the Washington Monument, why we aren't tearing down the Jefferson
Speaker 1: Jefferson memorial, Why we aren't renaming Washington, DC? You know,
Speaker 1: where does it stop? And Trump was making that point
Speaker 1: at his press conference. Where and that I think it's
Speaker 1: a completely fair question to ask. But the most important
Speaker 1: thing here is that Betto and these others in the media,
Speaker 1: they're just lying. They're lying about what Trump said, and
Speaker 1: it's now become a lie that is so frequently repeated
Speaker 1: by so many people that they believe that it's the truth.
Speaker 1: I mean, I remember once or twice I was and
Speaker 1: you know, I'll tell you this in all honestly, I
Speaker 1: was on The Rising Show and somebody said, oh, Donald Trump,
Speaker 1: blah blah blah, good people on both sides, referring to
Speaker 1: neo Nazis. That became a talking point that I heard
Speaker 1: once or twice, and I knew that it wasn't true,
Speaker 1: but I hadn't looked at the transcript recently enough that
Speaker 1: I wanted to really dig down into it. And now
Speaker 1: in retrospect. Of course I should have thrown down on
Speaker 1: that point, but it's hard because everyone around you look,
Speaker 1: so he goes, what are your Merian? You know, that's
Speaker 1: what he said. It is not what he said. Donald
Speaker 1: Trump did not say that they were good people on
Speaker 1: both sides. Referring to neo Nazis in that same press conference,
Speaker 1: he said, I just read it to you that they
Speaker 1: should be con d totally. He was not referring to
Speaker 1: the neo Nazis. He was referring to the people who
Speaker 1: the night before or the day before this whole remember
Speaker 1: Antifa was there and it was a mess. I mean,
Speaker 1: there was all this protests and counter protest going on
Speaker 1: in the streets of Charlottesville, otherwise a pretty quiet town usually.
Speaker 1: But he was referring to the people that didn't want
Speaker 1: the statue of Roberty Lee to come down out of
Speaker 1: this park and the park to be renamed. That's what
Speaker 1: he's referring to. And when you read when you read
Speaker 1: what he was saying the press, it's very clear. But
Speaker 1: he's going back between the group that group. Trump is
Speaker 1: not that precise always in his language, but I'll say
Speaker 1: that in that circumstance, it was confusing because there were
Speaker 1: multiple groups and multiple incidents. But that's why you have
Speaker 1: to read it in context. And when you read it
Speaker 1: in context, it is very clear. But because it was
Speaker 1: open ended enough for the media, they just decided to infer. Oh,
Speaker 1: he's talking about Neo Nazis and this, this is one
Speaker 1: of the great talking points to left us is about
Speaker 1: how you can't support Trump. This is how Beto O'Rourke,
Speaker 1: who's just it just a real empty suit. Oh, it
Speaker 1: doesn't wear suits. It was just got a shirt on.
Speaker 1: I'm just wearing a shirt because I'm like one of you.
Speaker 1: I'm married a super rich lady and like her family
Speaker 1: is like paying all of our bills. But I'm also
Speaker 1: like totally the working ban to keep playing this clip though,
Speaker 1: this is what he says now that people who want
Speaker 1: to vote for Trump after everything that we've seen from
Speaker 1: his time as a candidate in twenty sixteen, to his
Speaker 1: repeated warnings of invasions, to his repeated calls to send
Speaker 1: them back, sending back people who are US citizens, sending
Speaker 1: back people who are born in this country, his description
Speaker 1: of white nationalists and klansmen and neo Nazis as very
Speaker 1: fine people, his warnings of Muslims as being somehow inherently
Speaker 1: defective or dangerous and attempting to ban them from entry
Speaker 1: into thestry, his transgender troop band, and his attack on
Speaker 1: any one who does not look like, or pray like,
Speaker 1: or love like the majority of this country. Yes, Donald
Speaker 1: Trump is dangerous to the future of America and will
Speaker 1: destroy what makes us so unique and so special and
Speaker 1: the genius that we represent to ourselves. And I can't take.
Speaker 1: I can't take anymore. I don't want you guys to
Speaker 1: turn off. I can't take it anymore. I'm sorry. I
Speaker 1: know this guy's running for president because it moron lies, lies, lies,
Speaker 1: completely and utterly, either misrepresenting what Trump has said. I mean,
Speaker 1: it just heres a perfet example of the Muslim band.
Speaker 1: It's not a Muslim ban. It used countries at the
Speaker 1: Obama administration singled out as being threats for Jehanna's terrorism
Speaker 1: and said that we're going to have more stringent measures
Speaker 1: put in place. It did not limit Muslims coming from
Speaker 1: India or Indonesia, the two largest Muslim populations of the world.
Speaker 1: Didn't limit people coming from Muslim countries that are allied
Speaker 1: with us. The only exception of that was Iraq, and
Speaker 1: then they change that very quickly there after. So he's
Speaker 1: just it's just lies. They're just lying. If Trump is
Speaker 1: so bad, and this is what I really want to
Speaker 1: get to, I mean, Betto goes on to say in
Speaker 1: that clip, and we want him to get to. He says,
Speaker 1: it's really hard to see people voting for Trump if
Speaker 1: they aren't racist. That's his that's his crescendo. I mean,
Speaker 1: that's his real what he's really going for, And it's
Speaker 1: just such a horrible smear. It's really hard to see
Speaker 1: people voting for Trump if they aren't racist. If Trump
Speaker 1: is so racist, Betto, he was really just a He's
Speaker 1: really just a himbo. You know, this guy is a
Speaker 1: complete lightweight. Why why do we have to hear democrats
Speaker 1: lie about what Trump has said so many times or
Speaker 1: lie about his policies, If he's so bad, why do
Speaker 1: they have to make it up all the time. It's
Speaker 1: just so easy, isn't it. You hear this from I'm
Speaker 1: sure a lot of your lib friends or Lib colleagues,
Speaker 1: co workers, whatever, Oh Trump is racist, and oh the
Speaker 1: person saying this, they always assume, well, of course, you
Speaker 1: know they're they're not racist because they say Trump is racist.
Speaker 1: This is the cheapest virtue you can acquire anywhere in
Speaker 1: American society now, denouncing someone on the right for being
Speaker 1: a racist. Oh, it's a racist. Oh you don't have
Speaker 1: to do anything to advance racial justice when you say this.
Speaker 1: You don't have to actually tackle the problems of inner
Speaker 1: city communities, or do anything to help our failing public schools,
Speaker 1: or limit violence in places like Chicago or Baltimore. You
Speaker 1: don't have to do anything. You are a good person
Speaker 1: who's promoting racial healing in this country. If you just
Speaker 1: say that Trump is a racist, that's that's the Left's
Speaker 1: promised you. And I think it's grotesque. I think it's
Speaker 1: it's deeply intellectually dishonest. It's really unfair to the people
Speaker 1: who vote for Trump. And I think that they recognize
Speaker 1: that there's not going to be a a forgiveness for
Speaker 1: those who voted for Trump in the past, at least socially.
Speaker 1: We're going to be told if Libs win this next election,
Speaker 1: if you have some Democrat kuk who ends up being
Speaker 1: the next the United States, because they're all pretty kooky,
Speaker 1: I mean, the whole Democrat crew that they've got running
Speaker 1: is really a bunch of jokesters. But trust me, they're
Speaker 1: going to rub it in your face and we're going
Speaker 1: to be hearing about Trump's racism for the rest of
Speaker 1: our lives. If Trump doesn't win reelection, well, I would
Speaker 1: say we can chalk a victory up for the outrage mob.
Speaker 1: This time on the right. They won in this case.
Speaker 1: I think it's ridiculous. I was on America's newsroom last
Speaker 1: week and I said, pausing the promotions for the movie
Speaker 1: in the immediate aftermath of the mass shootings I thought
Speaker 1: made sense. But yanking the entire film because people got
Speaker 1: angry and the president tweeted about it. I'm not someone
Speaker 1: who believes that we should go the direction of censorship. Also,
Speaker 1: to my Trump's supporting friends, if you watch the trailer,
Speaker 1: it is very obvious that the good guys are the
Speaker 1: deplorables who have been drugged and kidnapped and are being
Speaker 1: hunted by left wing elitists Like I feel like they
Speaker 1: like that totally misplaced outrage. And even if it was
Speaker 1: well placed outrage, I don't think we should be canceling. No,
Speaker 1: just don't see it, don't go see gotta say, I
Speaker 1: agree with my buddy Guy Benson, Guy and I go
Speaker 1: way back. I think he's right across the board on
Speaker 1: this one. Why are they pulling the movie now? I look,
Speaker 1: I didn't I saw the trailer, and in the heat
Speaker 1: of a gun control discussion, after two mass shootings and
Speaker 1: all the you know, sometimes you might want to tone
Speaker 1: it down a little bit with your ad campaign that
Speaker 1: shows people of one political persuasion hunting another. And I
Speaker 1: also think it goes to show the in general, the
Speaker 1: double standard. Here's the real double standard. Conservatives aren't a
Speaker 1: bunch of cry babies. Conservatives aren't running around yelling about
Speaker 1: boycotts all the time and saying that, you know, people
Speaker 1: need to be nicer to our our art or our
Speaker 1: stuff or else. I mean, we would like them to
Speaker 1: be more open minded, do creative conservative objects. But I'm
Speaker 1: talking about trying to use economic force to get your way.
Speaker 1: That's not how we roll. And in this instance, I've
Speaker 1: got to tell you, I'm I'm a little disappointed that
Speaker 1: they pulled the movie. I kind of wanted to see
Speaker 1: this movie. I mean, it seemed like it might be
Speaker 1: reasonably interesting, and it is true that if you look
Speaker 1: deeper into it and I didn't see this the first
Speaker 1: day or two this is being talked about. You had
Speaker 1: to look at one of the there there were several
Speaker 1: versions of the trailer. The good guys or the people
Speaker 1: you're rooting for, well, I guess that's the same thing.
Speaker 1: Are are, in fact the red state Trump supporter types,
Speaker 1: and the bad people are the elitist evil Libs who
Speaker 1: are trying to hunt them. So now is it sensible
Speaker 1: to pull that campaign after we've had mass shootings that
Speaker 1: are very politically facile. Yes, I think so, but just
Speaker 1: for a few that's just the ad campaign. And now
Speaker 1: I'll say, you know, that's a question of taste. It's
Speaker 1: not entirely necessary. I don't want the political climate as
Speaker 1: a general rule. I don't want the political climate to
Speaker 1: be determining what we can see and what we can
Speaker 1: watch and what we can hear. I would like the
Speaker 1: market to determine these things. My problem with libs is
Speaker 1: that in this woke culture we all have to live in,
Speaker 1: they give no leeway to our side whatsoever. And in fact,
Speaker 1: they're so drunk with power all the time because they
Speaker 1: can shut down whatever they want, they can boycott whomever
Speaker 1: they want, that they will do it to their own side,
Speaker 1: because that's now who they are, that's what they have become.
Speaker 1: They can't even just keep it against us. So I
Speaker 1: would just note that this was not this was not
Speaker 1: the outcome that I was looking for in this. In
Speaker 1: this circumstance, they should not pull the movie. I'm sure
Speaker 1: it will get released by someone else or by a
Speaker 1: different studio at some point. Probably maybe they're just maybe
Speaker 1: they say they've pulled it right now and have no
Speaker 1: intend to release it just because of what happened last week,
Speaker 1: and they're going to realize that that's that's excessive. But
Speaker 1: our side can our side can handle stuff. If they
Speaker 1: want to be a bunch of whiny little babies, that's
Speaker 1: all on the left. But I do not walk conservative
Speaker 1: to start you the home. We can't. That's not where
Speaker 1: that's not the way we should go. Speaking of what
Speaker 1: we can watch, I was told over the weekend by
Speaker 1: some of my conservative media friends, and this was a
Speaker 1: discussion that occurred via Twitter as you can see it
Speaker 1: as public, that there's a movie that is a very
Speaker 1: good Western, but it is so disturbing that they more
Speaker 1: or less told me that I can't I cannot watch it.
Speaker 1: Because it will haunt me. And it has Kurt Russell,
Speaker 1: who you know, I'm a Kurt Russell person because of
Speaker 1: Tombstone and Big Trouble in Little China. But they say
Speaker 1: that there's a scene toward the end of the movie
Speaker 1: that is so disturbing that you cannot watch it, and
Speaker 1: not to me, this is like telling a kid, whatever
Speaker 1: you do, don't go into that room. That room is
Speaker 1: the secret room when you can't know what's in there
Speaker 1: and you can't go in there. Right when you're a kid,
Speaker 1: someone says that what do you want to do? You
Speaker 1: want to go into that room? Obviously this was Jesse
Speaker 1: Kelly and Matt Walsh to two great guys, and they
Speaker 1: were telling me about Bone Tomahawk, this movie from twenty fifteen.
Speaker 1: I don't know if any of you have seen it.
Speaker 1: They claim it is an excellent movie, but then it
Speaker 1: gets really like messed up at the very end in
Speaker 1: a way that it reminds me. I still haven't been
Speaker 1: able to live down some scenes. Look, I know that
Speaker 1: I'm probably a whimp when it comes to the stuff,
Speaker 1: but The Witch really haunted me for a few days.
Speaker 1: That movie, The Witch about the New England possession and
Speaker 1: everything else. That movie scared the you know what out
Speaker 1: of me. And I'm not somebody that usually gets two
Speaker 1: into these things, but that movie released scared me. But
Speaker 1: but the Hills Have Eyes the uncut version of that movie.
Speaker 1: I don't know why it was on HBO one night.
Speaker 1: I don't know why I decided, Oh, watch this movie.
Speaker 1: It kind of it's a pretty fast moving plot, like
Speaker 1: it pulls you in and then it's it's like a
Speaker 1: car wreck. You know, you don't, you don't want to look,
Speaker 1: but you find yourself in a situation where you know
Speaker 1: you don't, you don't turn away. So Bone producer Mark,
Speaker 1: have you seen Bone? Tomahawk? I have not? All right?
Speaker 1: So what is the one movie? This was how this
Speaker 1: whole thread got started? This was from Matt Walsh. What
Speaker 1: is the one movie that you wish you could if
Speaker 1: you could unsee it? You wish you could unsee it
Speaker 1: because it was so traumatizing or you know, freaked you
Speaker 1: out so much, or just grossed you out? Whatever? What
Speaker 1: is it that I have to think about that one?
Speaker 1: The one movie I wish I never saw was the
Speaker 1: X Files movie because it was terrible, but for different
Speaker 1: reasons than disturbing me, if you know what I mean? Well,
Speaker 1: because the show was great? Right with this? You know,
Speaker 1: I didn't really watch the show. I saw a few episodes.
Speaker 1: Do you think it holds up? Like if I went
Speaker 1: back to watch The X Files, now would that be?
Speaker 1: I never watched this, watch the show. One of my
Speaker 1: friends dragged me in the movie and I hated it.
Speaker 1: So now why would I watch the show? Oh? I
Speaker 1: thought you were because usually people who love the show
Speaker 1: said the movie was just like ruined the show in
Speaker 1: a sense for them, because you know, it's like when
Speaker 1: you watch the Indiana Jones and The King of the
Speaker 1: Crystal Skull ruined my childhood because I love the three
Speaker 1: Indiana Jones movies. I love them. I saw them with
Speaker 1: my parents, I saw them with my siblings. You know,
Speaker 1: dozens and dozens of times each one of those movies,
Speaker 1: you know we had it on VHS. And the Indiana
Speaker 1: Jones movie with Shia lebuff or whatever just total trash.
Speaker 1: But really, you've never watched a movie or like, I
Speaker 1: wish I hadn't seen. I mean I could name a
Speaker 1: I mean that that's definitely the case for me. With
Speaker 1: the Hills Have Eyes, I actually thought that pulp fiction
Speaker 1: was a little And I'm anti Tarantino, which I know
Speaker 1: some of you right now are like, Buck, how can you?
Speaker 1: But I'm anti Tarantino. I think his movies are overrated
Speaker 1: and they suck, I really do. The new one is
Speaker 1: disturbing at the end. Which one's the new one? The
Speaker 1: one that just came out Once upon a time in Hollywood. Oh,
Speaker 1: I don't even know. I didn't even know that that's
Speaker 1: a Tarantino movie. I think he's one of the most
Speaker 1: overrated Hollywood people of any kind of of our generation.
Speaker 1: I think he's really weak sauce. But anyway, Bone Tomahawk,
Speaker 1: will I watch? Will I not? I do not recommend
Speaker 1: any of you watch it, because if Matt Walsh says
Speaker 1: that it freaks, it'll freak you out. Matt Walsh is
Speaker 1: no joke man. That guy's intense. So I'm just saying,
Speaker 1: I'm I don't know, Am I gonna watch it this weekend?
Speaker 1: We'll see a team. I'll let you know. We've got
Speaker 1: more to stay with me. Farrell hog Man is now
Speaker 1: a thing. I don't know how many of you saw this.
Speaker 1: If you're not a person that spends a lot of
Speaker 1: time on social media. You may not have caught this,
Speaker 1: but Farrell Hawkman became a meme over the weekend. This
Speaker 1: was one of these earnest and unexpectedly funny moments that
Speaker 1: can happen in the midst of incredibly nasty back and
Speaker 1: forth over politics and gun control. There was a person
Speaker 1: named Jason Isabel, who I don't even know. Let let
Speaker 1: me see if I can find out who Jason Isabel is.
Speaker 1: I absolutely no idea. Is a musician. Okay, he's with
Speaker 1: a band, the Ryman, I guess, yeah, the singer, songwriter,
Speaker 1: guitarist from Greenhill, Alabama. Anyway, Okay, so this guy's from
Speaker 1: Alabama and he put this out on Twitter. If you're
Speaker 1: on here arguing the definition of assault weapon today, you're
Speaker 1: part of the problem. You know when an assault weapon
Speaker 1: is and you know you don't need one. And then
Speaker 1: William McNabb responded on Twitter and this then became a
Speaker 1: huge sensation legit question for rural Americans. How do I
Speaker 1: kill the thirty to fifty feral hogs that run into
Speaker 1: my yard within three to five minutes while my small
Speaker 1: kids play? And everybody was just completely take it in
Speaker 1: by this. That's a very good question. What would you
Speaker 1: do if you had a few dozen Farrell hogs invade
Speaker 1: your property and you have kids there, I mean Farrell hogs.
Speaker 1: I gotta tell you. I saw photos, and some of
Speaker 1: you live in parts of the country where these things
Speaker 1: actually exist. I remember years ago I had someone on
Speaker 1: team back who invited me to do one of these,
Speaker 1: and it was very nice of him. I just could
Speaker 1: never make it happen. And if he's listening, I'd still
Speaker 1: be interested to come check out what they do. But
Speaker 1: they have these former military little bird pilots that more
Speaker 1: or less get you up in a helicopter and you
Speaker 1: go Farrell hog hunting with an aar. I think you're
Speaker 1: allowed to. I think you're allowed in some states to
Speaker 1: hunt from the air and at night, like you're going
Speaker 1: after bitten laden or something, which sounds a little crazy maybe,
Speaker 1: although some of you're like, actually, bucket sounds awesome, true,
Speaker 1: fair point, but it sounds like maybe it's overkill until
Speaker 1: you see photos of these things and what they can do,
Speaker 1: these Ferrell hogs, and they're terrifying. Turns out they're also
Speaker 1: not even native to the US. They are an invasive species.
Speaker 1: They're considered a public nuisance they carry all kinds of
Speaker 1: really nasty diseases. In fact, they're generally so diseased. I'm
Speaker 1: told that you don't eat them. They're not even really
Speaker 1: good for eating because they have all kinds of stuff
Speaker 1: that you don't want to get anywhere near. They will
Speaker 1: destroy habitats of other animals. They will eat ground nesting birds,
Speaker 1: they'll eat fawns and even the young of domestic livestock.
Speaker 1: So that's you know, this is what you're dealing with
Speaker 1: with these guys. And they're very, very scary looking. So
Speaker 1: they're very scary looking. There's also that, So do you
Speaker 1: need an aar to kill your farreal hogs? I mean
Speaker 1: maybe you definitely don't want, like just an overunder shotgun.
Speaker 1: If there's twenty of those Farrell hogs, I don't care
Speaker 1: how good a shot you are, that's not going to
Speaker 1: get it done. And there's a photois on the Internet
Speaker 1: of one of these things holding a baby deer in
Speaker 1: its mouth like it had just grabbed one it was
Speaker 1: gonna eat it. I mean, they're scary looking. So Farrell
Speaker 1: hog Man became a sensation over the weekend, and William
Speaker 1: McNabb it's good to hear good to hear from you
Speaker 1: out there. And now we've got more of the story. Folks.
Speaker 1: You need your aar to kill all the Farrell hogs
Speaker 1: in your backyard. Keep your kids safe. We got roll
Speaker 1: call coming up. Hey, team Buck, it's time for roll
Speaker 1: call all right, I did his roll call time Facebook
Speaker 1: dot com slash Buck Sexton to get in on the
Speaker 1: latest roll call action. Please do send me your thoughts,
Speaker 1: tell me your your I was gonna see your deebas
Speaker 1: darkst secrets. Don't do that, but you can tell me
Speaker 1: things like about the show or something I got wrong
Speaker 1: or right it went in doubt. You could also say Buck,
Speaker 1: your radio show keeps me safe and warm at night.
Speaker 1: It's amazing. Thank you. That's that's always a welcome message.
Speaker 1: You could send that along. Now let's see we have
Speaker 1: Sam who writes almost finished reading The Strange Death of Europe.
Speaker 1: Thanks for recommending it. Everyone should read it before deciding
Speaker 1: on the immigration issue. Yeah, I didn't even remember that.
Speaker 1: I did recommend that. I think I did a while ago.
Speaker 1: Is that by Bruce Bauer I think his name was. Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's very interesting about the changes going on in Europe
Speaker 1: right now. So yes, indeed, see what we have next here,
Speaker 1: my man, TJ. Buck, I don't get it. Everyone is
Speaker 1: two hundred percent certain that Epstein did not commit suicide,
Speaker 1: and now there's going to be this Boden guy who
Speaker 1: is a connected to three controversial conspiracy filled murders, the JFK, MLK,
Speaker 1: and OJ cases. He's going to oversee Epstein's autopsy. Can
Speaker 1: we believe these results when they come out? Why wouldn't
Speaker 1: they choose someone with a little less controversy connected to them.
Speaker 1: It's kind of like they're trying to pull the wool
Speaker 1: over our eyes in real time. TJ. I don't know
Speaker 1: much about this doctor Boden guy. I can't speak to
Speaker 1: that very effectively. I just know that they need to
Speaker 1: do everything they can to try and re establish public
Speaker 1: faith in some of these things that have been going
Speaker 1: on here. That would that would be a big help.
Speaker 1: Institutions are not doing particularly well right now. I think
Speaker 1: that's for sure. Let's seem Daniel, right, a big fan
Speaker 1: of the show. Listen to the podcast every day to
Speaker 1: start the morning. Well, the good news, Daniel is that
Speaker 1: you'll be able to listen to it in the afternoon.
Speaker 1: Very soon. We're gonna have the podcast out. I guess
Speaker 1: maybe this is something of a big announcement. Starting after
Speaker 1: Labor Day, you'll be able to hear the Buck Sexton
Speaker 1: Show via podcast by three Eastern every day, So all
Speaker 1: of you who listen, I want you to know that
Speaker 1: you can listen still obviously live on your station, or
Speaker 1: you'll be able to listen to a podcast of the
Speaker 1: show even earlier, because we're going to be moving up
Speaker 1: the taping of the show so that you can watch
Speaker 1: a stream of it on a platform that is to
Speaker 1: be announced. So we've got some fun stuff going on
Speaker 1: for sure. But Daniel writes, with all the recent mass shootings,
Speaker 1: I've seen people throw all sort of solutions out there.
Speaker 1: We all know it'll absolutely go nowhere. I feel I
Speaker 1: have a great idea for how we could solve this
Speaker 1: and in turn maybe make the big tech companies look good.
Speaker 1: For Once we know all these companies, especially Google, Facebook,
Speaker 1: and YouTube, know everything about us, why not do this?
Speaker 1: Have these companies work on new algorithms that will spot
Speaker 1: certain makers of people that are going markers of people
Speaker 1: that are going down a bad spiral. They could work
Speaker 1: with FBI profiles, type psychologists and sociologists who identify them.
Speaker 1: I know this is not minority report. We don't send
Speaker 1: their info to a government agency. What we do is
Speaker 1: we have them put in an ad for the Jordan
Speaker 1: Peterson video and add about getting involved in the community.
Speaker 1: We can make sure they get recommendations and suggestions to
Speaker 1: videos that encourage people to reach and speak to family,
Speaker 1: friends or faith leaders to help guide you. I think
Speaker 1: with these techniques we could put an end to shootings
Speaker 1: and maybe even people get mentally and emotionally better. What
Speaker 1: do you think maybe you can get my idea up
Speaker 1: on something. Keep up the great work, Shields Hide Dan,
Speaker 1: I give you points for creativity. I don't know how
Speaker 1: this would really work in real life and how we
Speaker 1: could even implement it. But the more that we embrace
Speaker 1: using all of these different digital means to try and
Speaker 1: engage in pre crime prevention, we get further and further
Speaker 1: down what is the path to a full scale surveillance state?
Speaker 1: And we're not that far from it right now. So
Speaker 1: that's a reality that we have to be very aware of.
Speaker 1: John John has had to start off a message Buck
Speaker 1: absolutely love your show. I was listening to your show
Speaker 1: from Friday in the Apple podcast apps. Sunday morning. You
Speaker 1: had a clip from the President to start the show.
Speaker 1: It was the President saying he doesn't like to be
Speaker 1: called a racist and saying the Dems call everyone racist
Speaker 1: when they run out of cards, which is true. Gave
Speaker 1: me an idea. Trump should tell the Dems that he
Speaker 1: will pass background checks. Not that I support further background checks,
Speaker 1: because I don't. If they stop calling him a racist,
Speaker 1: it won't stop them forever, maybe temporarily. I just think
Speaker 1: it would be funny to see what they react. Would
Speaker 1: be well, John, I know that you're being tongue in
Speaker 1: cheek here, but they wouldn't be able to take that
Speaker 1: deal because they absolutely insist on calling Trump a racist,
Speaker 1: and they insist on lying about what he has said
Speaker 1: in the past. As I've told you, he did not
Speaker 1: say that there were good neo Nazis. That is not
Speaker 1: what he said. I read through the transcript about five
Speaker 1: times over the weekend of the press conference in question.
Speaker 1: I watched the clip of it. He absolutely did not.
Speaker 1: And it's not malpractice, it's malicious, meaning it's intentional. It
Speaker 1: wasn't a mistake to say that Trump called neo Nazis
Speaker 1: good people that the media made by accident. They knew
Speaker 1: that this was a very important part of their narrative,
Speaker 1: and so they went with it. But yeah, they will
Speaker 1: not stop calling him racist. That's really the primary. That's
Speaker 1: their main reason that they give for Trump to for
Speaker 1: you to vote against Trump, that's the main thing. Todd,
Speaker 1: Right's hey, bucket Sunday morning, I just that Epstein died
Speaker 1: in jail. I was out doing things Saturday, no news,
Speaker 1: so I just learned it this morning. Buck You called
Speaker 1: this spot on back on July twenty fifth. I drive
Speaker 1: a lot for work, and I remember exactly where I
Speaker 1: was driving, by Nebraska's Lake McConaughey, listening to you when
Speaker 1: you said you would not be surprised if he died
Speaker 1: in jail. You said it might be suicide or it
Speaker 1: might be a hit, but there were too many high
Speaker 1: profile people connected with him that this would not go
Speaker 1: to trial. This is a disgusting story all around. But
Speaker 1: I appreciate your analysis and education on this topic and
Speaker 1: all the others you talk about. Shields high Todd in Nebraska. Well, Todd,
Speaker 1: thank you so much. I do appreciate getting the high
Speaker 1: five from somebody who listens to the show so intently
Speaker 1: that they realized that, yes, I was very much calling
Speaker 1: out the possibility, the likelihood even of this Epstein case
Speaker 1: getting buried in Epstein dying under mysterious circumstances. Look, I
Speaker 1: don't have to tell you about the prediction really, because
Speaker 1: you can go and listen. I mean, Todd even gave
Speaker 1: the date of the show back on July twenty fifth,
Speaker 1: so it's all out there. It's it's a matter of record.
Speaker 1: I've been worried about this. The reasons are pretty clear
Speaker 1: that I've been worried about this. I know many of
Speaker 1: you are worried too, so this is where it is.
Speaker 1: Thank you so much though, for writing in my friend
Speaker 1: Let's see here Chris Rights, Hey Buck, I love Mike
Speaker 1: Pence's VP, but do you think we could nominate Ron
Speaker 1: Swanson for twenty twenty Trump Swanson twenty twenty has a
Speaker 1: nice ring to it. Secondly, I'm hoping to become a
Speaker 1: proud gun owner soon, both for sport and home protection.
Speaker 1: Do you know of any class one can take that
Speaker 1: teaches basic home protection and defense tactics like yourself. I
Speaker 1: love to learn and would love to have a plan
Speaker 1: to protect myself and my family and drill of what
Speaker 1: to do if an intruder breaks in. Thanks for all
Speaker 1: you do for your podcast. They keep me company during
Speaker 1: long drives for work. Well, Chris, first of all, it's
Speaker 1: an honor to keep you company. And as for you know,
Speaker 1: the class, it's funny. I've been looking recently for a
Speaker 1: class myself like this, and it turns out that Tim Kennedy,
Speaker 1: who is a former Special Forces Guy MMA fighter, he
Speaker 1: has a a group called I believe it's called Sheep
Speaker 1: Dog Response. I'm pretty sure that's what it is. So, yeah,
Speaker 1: you know what, we should have Tim all the show.
Speaker 1: I'll do that all because I'm thinking about taking his class.
Speaker 1: I've been talking to my two brothers about it and
Speaker 1: we're thinking about going down to to do Sheepdog Response class.
Speaker 1: I believe it's in Austin, Texas. So for those of
Speaker 1: you who are kl BJ listeners in Austin, I know
Speaker 1: you can go check this out. Just if you go
Speaker 1: check out the class, you know, make sure you like
Speaker 1: tweet at Tim Kennedy let him know you've heard about
Speaker 1: it on the Buck Sexton Show. Yeah he's not, he's
Speaker 1: not a sponsor or anything, but I just, you know,
Speaker 1: like to get the credit for a tell it everybody,
Speaker 1: because I think I'm gonna go down myself hopefully this
Speaker 1: fall and do Sheepdog Response with Tim Kennedy and his
Speaker 1: whole crew down there, because it looks like a really
Speaker 1: excellent course and it runs you through some hand to hand,
Speaker 1: different firearms, just different training scenarios so you are as
Speaker 1: safe as can be in your home and you don't
Speaker 1: rely on anybody else to defend you. That's the whole idea. Yeah,
Speaker 1: Sheepdog Response dot Com. So look at that. Maybe I'll
Speaker 1: see you with the class. Maybe. Hey, if I'm gonna go,
Speaker 1: you know, maybe I'll tell you guys and those of
Speaker 1: you who want to also sign up for a class
Speaker 1: that weekend, we can have like a whole team Buck
Speaker 1: extravaganza shooting guns and hanging out together. Now that sounds
Speaker 1: like fun. And those of you who listen on kobj Austen,
Speaker 1: come on, why not, right, you're right in the neighborhood.
Speaker 1: I've got all kinds of fun plans, Nicole, Hey Buck,
Speaker 1: I'm a podcast listener. I love your show. I've been
Speaker 1: thinking a lot about the red flag laws, and at
Speaker 1: first I was pretty supportive of it. The more I
Speaker 1: thought about it, the more creating a mental illness database
Speaker 1: bothered me? Wouldn't it violate hippo laws about federal privacy
Speaker 1: and doctor's therapists are already required by law to report
Speaker 1: a patient that poses a threat to themselves or others.
Speaker 1: Would love to hear thoughts on this. Yeah, Nicole, I'm
Speaker 1: with you. I mean, I think I admitted I felt
Speaker 1: a little bit of just the psychological impact of a
Speaker 1: two shootings like this. You think, well, maybe there's something,
Speaker 1: Maybe there's something that we need to do here, Maybe
Speaker 1: there's some action not just oh, grab guns and everything else.
Speaker 1: But let's try to be reasonable. Let's try to put
Speaker 1: in place something that is actually common sense that might
Speaker 1: be helpful. And keep in mind that we've already done
Speaker 1: a lot of that. That's why we have so many
Speaker 1: of the laws, Like we already have background checks, and
Speaker 1: we already have, you know, restrictions on fully automatic weapons,
Speaker 1: and we already have you know, you can't buy a
Speaker 1: gun if you're a domestic abuser or if you're a
Speaker 1: convicted falon or all these different there's so many rules.
Speaker 1: Those are all common sense rules. Those are things that
Speaker 1: we can agree or common sense. So it's not that
Speaker 1: there's no such thing as a common sense law that
Speaker 1: may be helpful in reducing gun violence. It's let's make
Speaker 1: sure it's actually in sense and not just some left
Speaker 1: wing gun grabb or excuse thing. But yeah, no, Nicole,
Speaker 1: I'm with you. The more I thought about it, and
Speaker 1: also some of my OG team Buck from back in
Speaker 1: the day, we're like, hey, hey, we know you and
Speaker 1: we know you know red flag laws will get abused.
Speaker 1: And I was like, all right, I think you guys
Speaker 1: are onto something here, So I'm with you. I thought
Speaker 1: more about it, and I think it's probably too like
Speaker 1: I think the upside is outweighed by the downside. It
Speaker 1: would be abused, especially in blue states, and it's an
Speaker 1: infringement on a constitutional right and it's a bad precedent
Speaker 1: to set that kind of infringement. All right, team, it's
Speaker 1: been a fantastic Monday show. I hope you agree. Like
Speaker 1: I said, the podcast is going to start coming out
Speaker 1: in a few weeks by three pm Eastern, if not
Speaker 1: even maybe a little sooner, but definitely by three pm Eastern.
Speaker 1: So what that means is, I'd like all of you
Speaker 1: to please subscribe on iTunes to The Buck Sexton Show,
Speaker 1: And once you've subscribed, it's totally free. Of course, even
Speaker 1: if you're a radio listener, subscribe just in case you
Speaker 1: miss it on radio. You can always listen to the
Speaker 1: downloadable podcast version at your leisure. And then if every
Speaker 1: person listening to this got one person to start listening
Speaker 1: who was new, put one new member of Team Buck
Speaker 1: on the squad, we would be an unstoppable national level force.
Speaker 1: And we're already getting there, but it would make it
Speaker 1: really fast. All right, Team More tomorrow, Shield Hie